⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩

III. ཎᏊ᰾≀⌮◊✲㒊㛛࣓ࣥࣂ࣮  ᩍᤵ୰ົ Ꮥࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈ㸦㔞Ꮚ≀ᛶ㒊㛛වົ㸧

ㅮᖌ

ᶫᮏᖾ⏨

ຓᩍ

᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕

◊✲ဨ㮖ᒣᗈᖹ㸦2018.9 ㌿ฟ㸧ࠊGuillaume Scamps㸦2018.12 ㌿ฟ㸧ࠊ ถ㸦2019.2 ╔௵㸧Ꮫ⏕኱Ꮫ㝔⏕ 4 ྡ㸦࠺ࡕ≉ู◊✲Ꮫ⏕ 1 ྡ㸧ᴫせᮏ㒊㛛࡛ࡣࠊ᰾Ꮚ㸦㝧Ꮚ࣭୰ᛶᏊ㸧ࡢከయ⣔࡛࠶ࡿཎᏊ᰾ࡸ୰ᛶᏊᫍࡢᵓ㐀࣭཯ᛂ࣭ᛂ⟅࡞࡝ࡢከ᰾Ꮚ㔞Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࡢ◊✲ࢆ᥎㐍ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᏳᐃ⥺㸦ࣁ࢖ࢮࣥ࣋ࣝࢢࡢ㇂㸧࠿ࡽ㞳ࢀࡓᨺᑕᛶ࢔࢖ࢯࢺ࣮ࣉࡢཎᏊ᰾ࡢᵓ㐀࡜཯ᛂࠊ࢚࢟ࢰࢳࢵࢡ࡞ບ㉳≧ែࡢᛶ㉁ࠊᵝࠎ࡞㞟ᅋ㐠ືࡢⓎ⌧ᶵᵓ࡞࡝ࠊᮍゎỴࡢㅦࡢゎ᫂࡟ྲྀࡾ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࠋཎᏊ᰾ࡢ◊✲ࡣࠊࣇ࢙࣑ࣝ⢏Ꮚࡢ㔞Ꮚከయ⣔ィ⟬࡜࠸࠺ほⅬ࡛ࠊ≀㉁⛉Ꮫࡸග⛉Ꮫࠊ෭༷ཎᏊ⣔ࡢ≀⌮࡜ᐦ᥋࡞ࡘ࡞ࡀࡾ
ࢆࡶࡘࠋࡲࡓࠊࢡ࢛࣮ࢡ࣭ࢢ࣮ࣝ࢜ࣥࡢࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࢆグ㏙ࡍࡿ᱁Ꮚ QCD ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ᰾ຊࡢィ⟬ࠊ㍍࠸ཎᏊ᰾ࡢ┤᥋ィ⟬࡞࡝ࡀ㐍ᒎࡍࡿ୰ࠊ⣲⢏Ꮚ≀⌮Ꮫ࡜ࡢ㐃ᦠࡶ㔜せᛶࡀቑࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
ࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀࡢゎ᫂࡟ྥࡅࡓࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀࣞࢫ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯࡢほᐇ㦂ࡸࠊ⣲⢏Ꮚᶆ‽ᶍᆺࡢࢸࢫࢺ࡟㛵ࢃࡿᐇ㦂࡞࡝࡟ࡶཎᏊ᰾⌮ㄽࡢ⢭ᐦィ⟬ࡀ୙ྍḞ࡜ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊඖ⣲ࡢ㉳※ࡸᫍࡢᵓ㐀ࠊ୰ᛶᏊᫍࡢㄌ⏕࡟ࡶ㛵ࢃࡿ⇿Ⓨⓗኳయ⌧㇟࡟ࡶཎᏊ᰾ࡢᛶ㉁ࡣ῝ࡃ㛵ࢃࡾࠊᏱᐂ≀⌮Ꮫ࡜ࡶᐦ᥋࡟㛵ಀࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡉࡽ࡟ࠊཎᏊຊᕤᏛศ㔝ࡸᛂ⏝ศ㔝࡜ࡢ㐃ᦠࡀ㔜せ࡟࡞ࡗ࡚ࡁ࡚࠾ࡾࠊᮏ㒊㛛࡛ࡶ 2014 ᖺ࠿ࡽࠊཎᏊ⅔ࡢ㧗ࣞ࣋ࣝᗫᲠ≀ࡢ㈨※໬࣭పῶ໬ࢆ
᭱⤊┠ⓗ࡜ࡍࡿ ImPACT ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛ࡟ཧຍࡋࠊᇶ♏ࢹ࣮ࢱ࡬ࡢ⌮ㄽⓗࢧ࣏࣮ࢺࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚ࡁ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᮏ㒊㛛ࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡣࠊࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ᖜᗈ࠸ㄢ㢟࡟ྲྀࡾ⤌ࡳࠊศ㔝ࡢᯟࢆ㉸࠼ࡓ◊✲ࢆ᥎㐍ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ◊✲ᡂᯝ⌮ㄽィ⟬᰾ࢹ࣮ࢱ࡜ InPACS 㸦୰ົࠊỤᖭ㸦ᮾᕤ኱㸧ࠊ㮖ᒣ㸧ᖹᡂ 29 ᖺᗘࠊཎᏊ᰾ࡢᙧࢆ⣔⤫ⓗ࡟ㄪᰝࡍࡿࡓࡵࠊ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ࡟ BCS ⌮ㄽࢆ⤌ࡳྜࢃࡏࡓ⌮ㄽࢆ㸱ḟඖ✵㛫⾲♧࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ィ⟬ࡋࠊᇶᗏ≧ែ࡟⌧ࢀࡿᙧ≧ࢆணゝࡋࡓࠋ᏶඲⮬ᕫ↓᧐╔࣭㠀ไ㝈ࡢィ⟬࡛࠶ࡾࠊ඲࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ࢆ᭱ᑠ໬ࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ᮲௳࡜ࡋ࡚ㄢࡋࡓኚ
ศ࡟ࡼࡾࠊ⌫ᙧࠊ㍈ᑐ⛠ᛶࢆᣢࡗࡓࣉ࣮ࣟࣞࢺᆺ࣭࢜ࣈ࣮ࣞࢺᆺኚᙧࠊ㍈ᑐ⛠ᛶࢆ◚ࡗࡓ୕- 65 -

─ 65 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩㍈㠀ᑐ⛠ኚᙧ࡞࡝ࠊᵝࠎ࡞ᙧ≧ࡀᇶᗏ≧ែ࡟ฟ⌧ࡋࡓࠋ௒ᖺᗘࠊࡇࢀ࡟ຍ࠼࡚ࠊഅ᰾࣭ወ᰾࣭
ወࠎ᰾࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ࠊ⌫ᑐ⛠ᛶࢆ௬ᐃࡋࡓ㸯ḟඖ HFB ィ⟬࡟ࡼࡿ᰾Ꮚᐦᗘศᕸࢆィ⟬ࡋࠊ࠾ࡼࡑ
4,000 ᰾✀ࡢࢹ࣮ࢱࢆᩚഛࡋࡓࠋ
⌮ㄽィ⟬ࢹ࣮ࢱ࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊࡇࢀࡽ࡟ຍ࠼࡚ࠊ㉁㔞ࡸ༙ᚄࠊ㝧Ꮚࡸ୰ᛶᏊࢆ๤ࡂྲྀࡗู࡚ࡢཎᏊ

᰾࡟ኚ᥮㸦᰾ኚ᥮㸧ࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡟ᚲせ࡞࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮࡞࡝ࠊཎᏊ᰾≀⌮Ꮫࡔࡅ࡛࡞ࡃᵝࠎ࡞ᛂ⏝ࡢࡓࡵ࡟᭷┈࡞᝟ሗࢆ࢚࢘ࣈୖ࡟බ㛤ࡋࡓ㸦ᅗ 1㸧ࠋࡇࡢබ㛤ࡋࡓࢧ࢖ࢺࢆࠊInPACS㸦Interactive
Plot for Atomic nuclei and Computed Shapes㸧࡜ྡ௜ࡅࠊᖹᡂ 31 ᖺ 1 ᭶࡟ࠊ⟃Ἴ኱࡟࠾࠸࡚㛵㐃ࡍࡿࣉࣞࢫ࣮ࣜࣜࢫࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋᅗ 1: බ㛤ࡋࡓ࢙࢘ࣈࢧ࢖ࢺ InPACS ࡢࢫࢼࢵࣉࢩࣙࢵࢺࠋཎᏊ᰾ࡢᅄ㔜ᴟኚᙧࡢᗘ
ྜ࠸ࢆ⾲ࡍࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱߚଶ ࡢ኱ࡁࡉ࡛ࠊ᰾ᅗ⾲ࢆⰍศࡅ࡛ᅗ♧ࡋࡓࡶࡢࠋ㟷ࡀ⌫ᙧࢆ⾲ࡋࠊ㉥ࡣ኱ࡁࡃኚᙧࡋࡓཎᏊ᰾ࢆ⾲ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ᰾✀ࡢ࣐ࢫࢆࢡࣜࢵࢡࡍࡿࡇ࡜
࡛ࠊࡑࡢཎᏊ᰾ࡢᙧࡢᴫ␎ᅗࠊヲ⣽࡞ィ⟬ࢹ࣮ࢱࢆࢲ࣮࢘ࣥࣟࢻ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᖹᆒሙࡢ᪂ࡓ࡞㔞Ꮚ໬ᡭἲ࡜ᑐ᣺ື㞟ᅋࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫ㸦೓㸦D3㸧ࠊ୰ົࠊ᪥㔝ཎ㸧᫬㛫౫Ꮡᖹᆒሙ⌮ㄽࡣࠊཎᏊ᰾ࡢࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࢆ㠀⤒㦂ⓗ࡟グ㏙ࡍࡿ⌮ㄽ࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊከࡃࡢ
ᡂຌࢆ࠾ࡉࡵ࡚ࡁࡓࡀࠊ୍᪉࡛ࠊ㞟ᅋⓗ㔞Ꮚࢺࣥࢿࣝ⌧㇟ࡀグ㏙࡛ࡁ࡞࠸࡞࡝ࠊၥ㢟Ⅼࡶ▱ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ࠊ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᖹᆒሙࡢ෌㔞Ꮚ໬࡜࠸࠺ᡭἲࡀᥦၐࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡀࠊ࿘
ᮇ㌶㐨ࢆồࡵࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡾࠊࡇࢀࡀᅔ㞴࡛࠶ࡿࡓࡵ࡟ࠊᐇ㝿࡟ࡣ࡯࡜ࢇ࡝⾜ࢃࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋ

- 66 -

─ 66 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩ࡲࡓࠊᖹᆒሙࢆ㉸࠼ࡓ┦㛵ࢆྲྀࡾධࢀࡿ⌮ㄽ࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊ㸦୍⯡໬㸧ࢫ࣮ࣞࢱ࣮⾜ิᘧࢆ㔜ࡡྜࢃࡏࡿ⏕ᡂᗙᶆἲ㸦GCM㸧ࡀ᭷ྡ࡛࠶ࡿࡀࠊᐦᗘ౫Ꮡ┦஫స⏝࡬ࡢ㐺⏝࡞࡝࡟኱ࡁ࡞ၥ㢟ࡀ࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟࡞ࡾࠊ㏆ᖺ኱ࡁ࡞㐍ᒎࡀぢࡽࢀ࡞࠸ࠋ
ࡑࡇ࡛ᡃࠎࡣࠊࡇࢀࡽࡢၥ㢟ࢆゎỴࡍࡿ᪂ࡓ࡞㔞Ꮚ໬ࡢฎ᪉ࢆᥦၐࡋࡓࠋከḟඖ✵㛫୰ࡢ࿘ᮇ㌶㐨ࢆồࡵࡿ௦ࢃࡾ࡟ࠊࡣࡌࡵ࡟ྍ✚ศ⣔࡜࡞ࡿ㞟ᅋ㒊ศ✵㛫ࢆᢳฟࡋࠊࡑࡢ㒊ศ✵㛫ୖ࡛㔞Ꮚ໬ࢆ⾜࠺㸦ᅗ2㸧ࠋྍ✚ศ⣔ࡢ㔞Ꮚ໬ࡣẚ㍑ⓗᐜ࡛᫆࠶ࡾࠊ⤒㊰✚ศࡢ೵␃఩┦㏆ఝࢆ⏝࠸࡚ࠊ㸦୍⯡໬㸧ࢫ࣮ࣞࢱ࣮⾜ิᘧࡢ㔜ࡡྜࢃࡏ࡜ࡋ࡚࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ᅛ᭷≧ែࢆグ㏙ࡍࡿࠋࡇࡢ᪂ࡓ࡞ᡭἲࢆཎᏊ᰾ࡢࢫࣆ࣭ࣥࣃࣜࢸ࢕ 0+ ≧ែࡢၥ㢟࡟ᛂ⏝ࡋࠊ㖄࢔࢖ࢯࢺ࣮ࣉࡢບ
㉳≧ែ࡞࡝࡟㛵ࡍࡿィ⟬ࢆᐇ⾜ࡋࠊᡭἲࡢ᭷⏝ᛶࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ            ‫ܥ‬௞ᅗ2: 㞟ᅋ㒊ศ✵㛫ࢆᢤࡁฟࡍࡇ࡜࡛ࠊᅗࡢࡼ࠺࡞ࢺ࣮ࣛࢫୖࡢ⊂❧࡞࣮ࣝࣉୖ࡛㔞Ꮚ໬ࡀྍ⬟࡜࡞ࡿࠋ ᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘἲ࡟ࡼࡿᅄ㔜ᴟ㞟ᅋࣁ࣑ࣝࢺࢽ࢔ࣥࡢᵓ⠏࡟ྥࡅ࡚㸦㮖ᒣࠊ୰ົ㸧㑄⛣㡿ᇦࡢཎᏊ᰾ࡢ୰࡛ࠊపບ㉳≧ែ࡟」ᩘࡢኚᙧ≧ែࡀᏑᅾࡋࡓࡾኚᙧ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ࢯࣇࢺ
࡞ᛶ㉁ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࡾࡍࡿࡶࡢࡀ࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ཎᏊ᰾ࢆ኱᣺ᖜ㞟ᅋ㐠ືࡢほⅬ࠿ࡽグ㏙ࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡟ࠊཎᏊ᰾ᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘἲ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ㸳ḟඖᅄ㔜ᴟ㞟ᅋࣁ࣑ࣝࢺࢽ࢔ࣥࡢᵓ⠏࡜ཎᏊ᰾పບ
㉳≧ែ࡬ࡢᛂ⏝ࢆ┠ᣦࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ᫖ᖺᗘࠊ㸳ḟඖᅄ㔜ᴟ㞟ᅋࣁ࣑ࣝࢺࢽ࢔ࣥࡢᅇ㌿㐠ື㡯ࡢ័ᛶ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࡢホ౯ࢆ⾜࡞ࡗࡓࡢ࡛ࠊ௒ᖺᗘࡣࠊ᣺ື㐠ື㡯ࡢ㞟ᅋ័ᛶ㉁㔞ࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡟ᒁᡤ஘㞧఩┦㏆ఝἲ /RFDOTXDVLSDUWLFOHUDQGRPSKDVHDSSUR[LPDWLRQ/453$  ࡢᛂ⏝ࢆ⾜࡞ࡗࡓࠋ㸳ḟඖᅄ㔜ᴟ㞟ᅋࣁ࣑ࣝࢺࢽ࢔ࣥࡢ᣺ື័ᛶ㉁㔞ࢆィ⟬ࡍࡿ࡟ࡣ㸦㸯㸧ྛኚᙧᗘ࡛ࡢᣊ᮰᮲௳௜ࡁᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘィ⟬ࢆ⾜࡞࠸ࠊ㸦㸰㸧ᚓࡽࢀࡓ≧ែࢆᇶ࡟ /453$ ᪉⛬ᘧࢆゎ࠸࡚㞟ᅋⓗ࡞ᅄ㔜ᴟపບ㉳࣮ࣔࢻࡢᅛ᭷ゎࢆồࡵࠊ㸦㸱㸧ᚓࡽࢀࡓపບ㉳࣮ࣔࢻࡢゎ࠿ࡽ᣺ື័ᛶ㉁㔞ࢆᵓᡂࡍࡿࠋᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣࠊᕧ኱ḟඖࡢ /453$ ᪉⛬ᘧࢆ┤᥋ゎࡃ௦ࢃࡾ࡟ᩘ
್ⓗ࡟⡆౽࡛࠿ࡘྠ➼࡞⤖ᯝࢆ୚࠼ࡿ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲࢆ⏝࠸ࡓࠋࡲࡎࠊ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲࡢᯟ⤌ࡳ࡛㞳ᩓⓗ࡞పບ㉳࣮ࣔࢻゎࢆᚓࡿࡓࡵ࡟ࠊ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲ࡜」⣲࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ᖹ㠃࡛ࡢ࿘ᅇ✚ศἲࢆ⤌ࡳྜࢃࡏࡓᡭἲࡢᐇ⿦ࢆ⾜࡞ࡗࡓࠋ࠸ࡃࡘ࠿ࡢኚᙧ᰾ࡢ㞳ᩓⓗ࡞పບ㉳ᅄ㔜ᴟ࣮ࣔࢻゎ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚࣋ࣥࢳ࣐࣮ࢡィ⟬ࢆ⾜࡞࠸ࠊඛ⾜◊✲࡜ྠᵝࡢపບ㉳≧ែࡢศගᏛⓗᛶ㉁㸦᥮⟬㑄⛣☜⋡ࠊບ㉳࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㸧ࢆᚓࡓࠋ
- 67 -

─ 67 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩ḟ࡟ࠊࡇࡢ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲ㸩࿘ᅇ✚ศἲࢆᅄ㔜ᴟኚᙧᗘșࡢࡳࡢ୍ḟඖ᣺ື័ᛶ㉁㔞࡛࠶ࡿ᰾ศ⿣⤒㊰ࡢ㞟ᅋ័ᛶ㉁㔞ィ⟬࡟ᛂ⏝ࡋࡓࠋ240Pu ࡢ㉁㔞ᑐ⛠᰾ศ⿣⤒㊰ࢆᅄ㔜ᴟኚᙧᗘșࡢᣊ᮰᮲௳௜ࡁᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘἲ࡛ィ⟬ࡋࠊྛኚᙧᗘ࡛ᒁᡤ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲ㸩࿘ᅇ✚ศἲ࡟ࡼࡾ㞟ᅋ័ᛶ㉁㔞ࢆᅄ㔜ᴟኚᙧᗘșࡢ㛵ᩘ࡜ࡋ࡚ồࡵࡓࠋᚓࡽࢀࡓ㞟ᅋ័ᛶ㉁㔞ࡣᇶᗏ≧ែཬࡧ᰾ศ⿣࢔
࢖ࢯ࣐࣮≧ែ࡛ࡣ௚ࡢኚᙧᗘ࡟ẚ࡭࡚኱ࡁ࡞್ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊኚᙧᗘࡀኚ໬ࡍࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚
㞟ᅋ័ᛶ㉁㔞ࡀ኱ࡁࡃኚ໬ࡍࡿኚᙧ㡿ᇦࡀᏑᅾࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋࡇࢀࡣࡇࡢኚᙧ㡿ᇦ࡛
240

Pu ࡢ୍⢏Ꮚᵓ㐀ࡀ๻ⓗ࡟ኚ໬ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ♧၀ࡍࡿ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ

㸱ḟඖᐇ✵㛫ᗙᶆࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ HFB ィ⟬ࢥ࣮ࢻࡢ㛤Ⓨ㸦᯽ⴥ㸦D2㸧ࠊ୰ົ㸧ᚑ᮶ࡢ᪉ἲ࡛ࡣࠊHFB ⌮ㄽ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ⮬ᕫ↓᧐╔࡞ᐦᗘ㛵ᩘィ⟬ࡣᇶᗏࡢᩘࡢ୕஌㸦N3㸧࡟
ẚ౛ࡍࡿィ⟬ࢥࢫࢺࡀ࠿࠿ࡿࡓࡵࠊㄪ࿴᣺ືᏊᇶᗏࢆ⏝࠸࡚ᇶᗏࡢᩘࢆῶࡽࡍ࡞࡝ࡢᕤኵࢆ
ࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ⌧ᐇⓗ࡞ィ⟬᫬㛫ෆ࡛ࡢィ⟬ࡀᅔ㞴࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋࡋ࠿ࡋࠊ㏆ᖺ Krylov 㒊ศ✵㛫ἲࢆ⏝࠸ࡓᡭἲࡀᥦ᱌ࡉࢀ࡚࠾ࡾࠊࡇࢀࢆ౑࠺ࡇ࡜࡛ィ⟬ࢥࢫࢺࢆ N2 ࡟ᢚ࠼ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀྍ⬟࡜࡞ࡿࠋᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣࠊKrylov 㒊ศ✵㛫ἲ࡟ࡼࡿ㸱ḟඖᐇ✵㛫ᗙᶆࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ HFB ィ⟬ࢥ࣮ࢻࡢ㛤Ⓨࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋᩘ್ィ⟬ࢥ࣮ࢻࡣ࡯ࡰ᏶ᡂࡋࠊጇᙜ࡞ィ⟬᫬㛫࡛ᐇ⾜ࡀྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋࡲ
ࡓࠊOakforest-PACS ୖ࡛㧗࠸୪ิᛶ⬟ࢆᐇ⌧ࡋࡓࠋ㸱ḟඖᐇ✵㛫ᗙᶆࢆ᥇⏝ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛ࠊᚑ
᮶ࡢ᪉ἲࡀⱞᡭ࡜ࡍࡿ኱ࡁ࡞ኚᙧࡸ㠀ᑐ⛠ኚᙧࢆྵࡴཎᏊ᰾ࡢゎᯒࡀྍ⬟࡟࡞ࡿࠋ௒ᚋࡣࠊ
୰ᛶᏊᫍෆẆ࡟Ꮡᅾࡍࡿ࡜ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࣃࢫࢱཎᏊ᰾࡞࡝ࠊ≉␗࡞ᙧ≧ࢆࡋࡓཎᏊ᰾ࡢᵓ㐀ࡢィ⟬࡟ᛂ⏝ࡍࡿࠋ
 ୰ᛶᏊ㐣๫ Mo ྠ఩యࡢపບ㉳≧ែࡢศᯒ 㸦Ha㸦ࢯ࢘ࣝᅜ❧኱㸧ࠊⅣ❟㸦⌮◊㸧ࠊ᪥㔝ཎ㸧୰ᛶᏊ㐣๫ Mo ྠ఩య࡛ࡣ୕㍈㠀ᑐ⛠㸦Ț㸧ኚᙧࡀᇶᗏ≧ែ࡛⌧ࢀࡿྍ⬟ᛶࡸࢯࣇࢺ࡞ Ț᣺ືࡀணゝࡉࢀ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ⌮໬Ꮫ◊✲ᡤࡢ RIBF ࡟࠾࠸࡚ 106,108,110Mo ཎᏊ᰾ࡢపບ㉳≧ែࡀᐃࡉࢀࡓࠋࡇࢀࡽࡢཎᏊ᰾࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ࠊ㸳ḟඖᅄ㔜ᴟ㞟ᅋ Hamiltonian ࢆ CHFB+LQRPA ἲࢆ⏝࠸࡚ᵓ⠏ࡋࠊᅄ㔜ᴟపບ㉳≧ែࡢศᯒࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ᭷ຠ┦஫స⏝ࡣ SLy4, SkM*, SLy5+T ࡟ࡼࡿ
Skyrme-HFB ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆ෌⌧ࡍࡿࡼ࠺࡟ Pairing-plus-quadrupole ┦஫స⏝ࡢࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱࢆỴᐃࡋ࡚ࡇࢀࢆ⏝࠸ࡓࠋSLy4 ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ⌮ㄽィ⟬࡛ࡣ࢜ࣈ࣮ࣞࢺኚᙧ࡟࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ᴟᑠⅬࡀ⌧ࢀࠊࢫ࣌ࢡࢺࣝ࡟ࡣȚࢯࣇࢺ࡞ᛶ㉁ࡀᙉࡃぢࡽࢀࡓ㸦ᅗ 3㸧ࠋ୍᪉ SLy5+T ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓィ⟬࡛ࡣࣉࣟࣞ
࣮ࢺኚᙧࡀ⌧ࢀࠊ106,108Mo ࡛ࡣȚ᣺ືⓗ࡞ࢫ࣌ࢡࢺࣝࡀᚓࡽࢀࠊᐇ㦂࡜ࡢࡼ࠸୍⮴ࡀぢࡽࢀࡓࠋ- 68 -

─ 68 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ
筑波大学 計算科学研究センター 平成 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩
年度 年次報告書

108

Excitation Energy (MeV)

2.5
2

6

+

6

1.5
1

Mo

+

4+
6+

0.5

4+

0

2+
+

2+
+

0

(6+)

5+
+
4
+

3
+
2

6

+

4+

5+
+

4
+
3
+
2

2+
0+

0

CHB+LQRPA(SLy5+T)

EXPᅗࡢᅄ㔜ᴟኚᙧ࣏ࢸࣥࢩࣕࣝ᭤㠃㸦ᕥᅗ㸧࡜ CHFB+LQRPA ࡟ࡼࡿపບ㉳≧ែ
図 3: 108Mo の四重極変形ポテンシャル曲面（左図）とによる低励起状態
ࡢࢫ࣌ࢡࢺࣝ㸦ྑᅗ㸧ࠋ
のスペクトル（右図）。

 ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲ࡟ࡼࡿ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ࡢィ⟬
有限振幅法による二重ベータ崩壊原子核行列要素の計算 㸦᪥㔝ཎࠊEngel㸦ࣀ࣮ࢫ࢝（日野原、Engel（ノースカࣟࣛ࢖ࢼ኱㸧㸧
ロライナ大））
ࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀࣞࢫ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯࡢ༙ῶᮇ࠿ࡽ㟁Ꮚࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀࡢ᭷ຠ㉁㔞ࢆỴᐃࡍࡿࡓ
ニュートリノレス二重ベータ崩壊の半減期から電子ニュートリノの有効質量を決定するたࡵ࡟ࡣᔂቯࡢཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ࢆ⢭ᐦ࡟ィ⟬ࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࡀࠊཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ࡣ୰ᛶᏊ̿㝧
めには崩壊の原子核行列要素を精密に計算する必要があるが、原子核行列要素は中性子―陽Ꮚᑐ┦㛵࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ᢚไࡉࢀࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ▱ࡽࢀ࡚࠾ࡾࠊᑐ┦஫స⏝ࡢ⤖ྜᐃᩘࢆỴᐃࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ
子対相関によって抑制されることが知られており、対相互作用の結合定数を決定することが⾜ิせ⣲ࡢ⢭ᐦィ⟬ࡢࡓࡵ࡟㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀࢆ㸰ࡘᨺฟࡍࡿ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯ࡟ࡣ
行列要素の精密計算のために重要である。ニュートリノを２つ放出する二重ベータ崩壊には㇏ᐩ࡞ᐇ㦂ࢹ࣮ࢱࡀᏑᅾࡋࠊࡇࢀࢆ⏝࠸࡚୰ᛶᏊ̿㝧Ꮚᑐ┦㛵ࡢ⤖ྜᐃᩘࢆỴᐃࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ
豊富な実験データが存在し、これを用いて中性子―陽子対相関の結合定数を決定することがྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿࠋ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯࡢཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ࢆ‽⢏Ꮚ஘㞧఩┦㏆ఝ࡛ィ⟬ࡍࡿሙྜࠊ኱ḟ可能である。二重ベータ崩壊の原子核行列要素を準粒子乱雑位相近似で計算する場合、大次ඖࡢ⾜ิᑐゅ໬ࢆ⾜࠺ᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࡀࠊ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ᛂ⟅㛵ᩘࢆ཯᚟ἲ࡛ຠ⋡ⓗ࡟ィ⟬元の行列対角化を行う必要があるが、有限振幅法によって応答関数を反復法で効率的に計算ࡋࠊᛂ⟅㛵ᩘࡢ஧㔜」⣲✚ศ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ࡢᑟฟࡀྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿᐃᘧ໬ࢆࡇࢀࡲ࡛
し、応答関数の二重複素積分によって原子核行列要素の導出が可能である定式化をこれまで
࡟⾜ࡗࡓࠋ⡿ᅜࣀ࣮ࢫ࢝ࣟࣛ࢖ࢼ኱Ꮫ࡛㛤Ⓨࡉࢀࡓ୰ᛶᏊ̿㝧Ꮚࢳࣕࢿࣝࡢ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲࡢࢥ
に行った。米国ノースカロライナ大学で開発された中性子―陽子チャネルの有限振幅法のコ࣮ࢻࢆᣑᙇࡋࠊ஧㔜㑄⛣ᙉᗘ࠾ࡼࡧࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀࢆ㸰ࡘᨺฟࡍࡿ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂードを拡張し、二重 Gamow-Teller 遷移強度およびニュートリノを２つ放出する二重ベータ崩
ቯཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ィ⟬ࡢᐇ⿦ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋpf
壊原子核行列要素計算の実装を行った。pf Ẇ㡿ᇦࡢཎᏊ᰾࡟ᑐࡋ࡚⣔⤫ⓗ࡞ィ⟬ࢆ⾜࠸ࠊཎ
殻領域の原子核に対して系統的な計算を行い、原Ꮚ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ࡢ୰ᛶᏊ̿㝧Ꮚᑐ┦㛵౫Ꮡᛶࡢศᯒࢆ⾜ࡗࡓ㸦ᅗ
子核行列要素の中性子―陽子対相関依存性の分析を行った（図 4㸧ࠋ4）。

ᅗ 4: 48Ca の二重ࡢ஧㔜 Gamow-Teller 遷移（左図）とニュートリノを２つ放出する二重ベー㑄⛣㸦ᕥᅗ㸧࡜ࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀࢆ㸰ࡘᨺฟࡍࡿ஧㔜࣮࣋図タ崩壊（右図）の原子核行列要素のアイソスカラー対相関結合定数依存性。
ࢱᔂቯ㸦ྑᅗ㸧ࡢཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ࡢ࢔࢖ࢯࢫ࣮࢝ࣛᑐ┦㛵⤖ྜᐃᩘ౫Ꮡᛶࠋ
-- 69 -─ 69 ─⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩㉸ὶືཎᏊ᰾ࡢ⼥ྜ㐣⛬࡟࠾ࡅࡿᑐ┦㛵ࡢຠᯝ㸦ᶫᮏࠊG. Scampsʥ௒ᖺᗘࡣࠊᣊ᮰᮲௳௜ࡁࣁ࣮ࢺ࣮ࣞࣇ࢛ࢵࢡ࣭࣎ࢦࣜࣗ࣎ࣇ㸦CHFB㸧ἲ࡟ࡼࡾ◲㯤 40S ࢆ஧ࡘࡢ㓟⣲ 20O ࡟ศ㞳ࡍࡿ㐣⛬ࡢ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㠃࡜୍⢏ᏊἼື㛵ᩘࡢࢭࢵࢺࢆᚓࡓࠋࡇࢀࡣࠊ
஧ࡘࡢ㓟⣲ 20O ࡢṇ㠃⾪✺࡟ࡼࡿ⼥ྜ㐣⛬ࡢ࣏ࢸࣥࢩ࢚ࣕࣝࢿࣝࢠ࣮ࢆồࡵࡿࡇ࡜࡟ᙜࡓࡿࠋ
ࡇࡢ CHFB ἲ࡟ࡼࡿ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㠃ୖࡢⅬࢆึᮇ᮲௳࡜ࡋ࡚ TDHFB ㌶㐨ࢆィ⟬ࡋࠊ஧ࡘࡢ㓟⣲ 20O ࡢ⼥ྜ㐣⛬ࡢ TDHFB ㌶㐨࡜ẚ㍑ࡋࡓࠋࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊi) ஧ࡘࡢ㓟⣲ 20O ࡢ᥋ゐ࠿ࡽ㔜࡞ࡾࢆ⤒࡚ῶ⾶᣺ື࡟⮳ࡿ㐣⛬࡟࠾ࡅࡿᑐ┦㛵࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ࡢኚ໬ࡣࠊCHFB ἲ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ồࡵࡓ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㠃ୖࡢⅬࢆึᮇ್࡜ࡍࡿ TDHFB ㌶㐨ࡢࡶࡢ࡜ࡼࡃఝࡓ᣺ࡿ⯙࠸ࢆࡍࡿ㸦ᅗ 5 ᕥ㸧ࠊii) ࡲࡓࠊi) ࡢᑐ┦㛵࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ࡣ CHFB ἲ࡟ࡼࡿ㟼ⓗ࡞ᑐ┦㛵࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ࡢ┦ᑐ㊥㞳౫Ꮡᛶ࡟ἢࡗࡓኚ໬ࢆࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛ࠊࡇࡢ㡿ᇦ࡛ࡣ⣔ࡢኚ໬ࡣ᩿⇕ⓗ࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ♧၀ࡉࢀࡿࠊiii)
CHFB ἲ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ồࡵࡓ୍⢏Ꮚ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ࡢศᕸࡣࠊ┦ᑐ㊥㞳ࡢῶᑡ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚஧ࡘࡢ㓟⣲ 20O
ࡢࡶࡢ࠿ࡽ⦰㏥ࡀゎࡅࡿࠋ≉࡟ࣇ࢙࣑ࣝ㠃㏆ഐࡢ f5/2 ㌶㐨ࡢศᕸࡢᩓ㛤ࡀᑐ┦㛵࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮
ࡢ⁥ࡽ࠿࡞ῶᑡࢆࡶࡓࡽࡍࠊiv) ⼥ྜᚋࡢῶ⾶᣺ືࡣࠊTDHFB ㌶㐨ࡢṇ‽㌶㐨༨᭷ᩘࡀ CHFB
㌶㐨ࡢ㌶㐨༨᭷ᩘศᕸ㸦ᅗ 5 ྑ㸧࠿ࡽ᫬㛫ⓗ࡟ኚ໬ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡟ࡼࡾෆ㒊㐠ືࡢບ㉳࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ࡢቑ኱ࢆࡶࡓࡽࡍࡇ࡜ࠊ࡞࡝ࡀ⌮ゎࡉࢀࡓࠋ

 

 

ᅗ 5㸦ᕥ㸧CHFB ࡟ࡼࡿ㓟⣲ 20O -㓟⣲ 20O 㛫ࡢ┦ᑐ㊥㞳㸦Rz㸧࡜࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㸦㉥㸧ࠊᑐ┦㛵࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㸦㝧Ꮚ㸦⥳㸧ࠊ୰ᛶᏊ㸦㟷㸧㸧ࠋ⾪✺࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮11.4 MeVࡢṇ㠃⾪✺ TDHFB ィ⟬ࡢ୰ᛶᏊᑐ┦㛵࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㸦⣸㸧ࠊ㯮୸㸦‫ە‬㸧ࢆึᮇ᮲௳࡜ࡍࡿ TDHFBィ⟬ࡢ୰ᛶᏊᑐ┦㛵࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㸦㯮㸧ࠋ㸦ྑ㸧ᕥᅗ㯮⥺ࡢ TDHFB ㌶㐨ࡢṇ‽༨᭷ᩘ㸦ኴ⥺㸧࡜ CHFB ࡢṇ‽༨᭷ᩘ㸦⣽⥺㸧ࡢ┦ᑐ㊥㞳࡟ࡼࡿኚ໬ࠋ

- 70 -

─ 70 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩ Effect of octupole deformation on the fission of actinides (G. Scamps and C. Simenel)ᅗ 6㸸 Evolution of the fission of 240Pu nuclei.
Nuclear fission is a process in which a heavy nucleus split into two. Most of the actinides nuclei(Plutonium, Uranium, Curium…) fission asymmetrically with one big fragment and one small.
Empirically, the heavy fragment presents on average a Xenon element (with charge number Z=54)
independently from the initial fissioning nucleus. To understand the mechanism that determines thenumber of protons and neutrons in each of the two fragments has been a longstanding puzzle. It was
expected that the deformation of the fragments could play a role. Indeed, the atomic nuclei can havedifferent shapes depending on their internal structure. Some of them are spherical, most of them aredeformed like a rugby ball and a few have a pear-shaped deformation. The internal structure of the nuclei
varies as a function of the number of protons and neutrons composing the nuclei. The state of the art ofnuclear theory has been used to describe dynamically the fission process. This simulation of the nuclear
fission uses the quantum-mechanics to take into account the motion of the nucleons in the nuclei anduses adequate simplifications to solve the many-body problem. Using that model, in the case of the 240Pu,
it has been found that the fission fragments are preferably formed with a pear-shaped deformation (seefigure 6). This pear-shaped deformation is due to the strong Coulomb repulsion of the two fragments.
This initial deformation favours nuclei which are pear-shaped in their ground state. This is the case of
the Xenon due to some internal structure effects associated with a number of proton Z=54. Thismechanism is strong enough to strongly influence the partition of nucleons in several fissioning systems.
This mechanism has been found in simulations of the fission of 230Th, 234U, 236U, 246Cm and 250Cf inagreement with the experimental observations. These findings may explain in future, surprising recent
observations of asymmetric fission of lighter than lead nuclei, and improve predictions of fission- 71 -

─ 71 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩
properties of exotic nuclei which impact the abundance of elements produced in the astrophysicalprocesses.
 Density-constraint Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (G. Scamps and Y. Hashimoto)
A new method is developed in order to determine the Nucleus-Nucleus potential for fusion reactions
for which pairing play an important role, the Density-constraint Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov theory. Using
this method, we investigate the splitting of the Nucleus-Nucleus potential with respect to different
relative gauge angles (figure 7).

ᅗ 7: Nucleus-Nucleus potential for the 20O+ 20O reaction for 3 gauge-angle.
Self-consistent random phase approximation based on the relativistic Hartree-Fock

WKHRU\5ROHRIȡ-tensor coupling (Wang 㸦≉ู◊✲⏕㸧 ࠊNaitoʤᮾ኱ʥǃLiangʤ⌮◊ʥࠊLong (Lanzhou Univ.))  
The framework of the random phase approximation (RPA) based on the relativistic Hartree-Fock(RHF) theory is extended to achieve a self-FRQVLVWHQWFDOFXODWLRQZLWKWKHȡ-meson tensor coupling. The
model self-consistency is verified by the check of the isobaric DQDORJVWDWHDQGLWLVIRXQGWKDWWKHȡWHQVRUDQGȡ-vector-tensor couplings play significant roles in maintaining the self-consistency. Using
the RHF Lagrangian PKA1, the properties of the Gamow-Teller resonances (GTR) are investigated(figure 8), in which the roles played by the particle-hole residual interaction of various meson-nucleon
couplings are clarified in details. Furthermore, the effects of the tensor force, which is introduced
naturally via the Fock terms, are analyzed by comparing the calculations with full Lagrangians and theones artificially dropping the tensor force components. It is found that for the RHF Lagrangians PKOi
(i = 1,2,3) and PKA1, the tensor forces play the role mainly via the RHF mean-field rather than via the
RPA residual interaction in determining the GTR. Moreover, the tensor-force effects are not as strongas those indicated by the Skyrme Hartree-Fock calculations.
- 72 -

─ 72 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩ᅗ 8: Transition strength distributions of GTR in 208Pb. The calculations are performed by the RHF+ RPA approach with the effective interaction PKA1. The unperturbed results (short-dotted line,
GHQRWHGDV+) DQGWKHUHVXOWVRIWKHFDOFXODWLRQZLWKı-6Ȧ-V (short-GDVKHGOLQH ı-6Ȧ-9ȡ-V(dash-GRWWHGOLQH ı-6Ȧ-9ȡ-9ʌ-PV (short-dot-dotted line) in the ph residual interactions, as well
DVWKHUHVXOWVRIWKHIXOOFDOFXODWLRQ VROLGOLQH DUHVKRZQ$/RUHQW]LDQVPHDULQJSDUDPHWHUī 
MeV is used. The horizontal position of the arrow corresponds to the experimental peak energy.

ᩍ⫱
 Ꮫ఩
1㸬೓ ᨺ㸦Ni Fang㸧ࠊ༤ኈ㸦⌮Ꮫ㸧Requantization of time-dependent mean field for pairing collective motion in superfluid
nuclei 㸦㉸ὶື᰾࡟࠾ࡅࡿᑐບ㉳㞟ᅋ㐠ື࡟ᑐࡍࡿ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᖹᆒሙ෌㔞Ꮚ໬㸧 2㸬ᇼᕝ ೺ࠊಟኈ㸦⌮Ꮫ㸧㛗ࡉࢤ࣮ࢪࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ࿘ᮇ⣔ࡢ㟁Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫィ⟬

㞟୰ㅮ⩏
୰ົ

Ꮥ

ࠕཎᏊ᰾ࡢᵓ㐀࣭཯ᛂ࡜ィ⟬᰾≀⌮Ꮫࠖࠊ༓ⴥ኱Ꮫࠊ2018 ᖺ 6 ᭶ í ᪥.
- 73 -

─ 73 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩

ཷ㈹ࠊእ㒊㈨㔠ࠊ▱ⓗ㈈⏘ᶒ➼እ㒊㈨㔠1㸬 ᪥ᮏᏛ⾡᣺⯆఍⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝࣭ᇶ┙◊✲(B)ࠊ୰ົ Ꮥࠊ௦⾲ࠊí21 ᖺࠊ4,000,000෇㸦H30 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧ࠊࠕᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ㉸୪ิࢯࣝࣂࡢ㛤Ⓨ࡜ཎᏊ᰾࠿ࡽ୰ᛶᏊᫍࡲ࡛
ࡢ⤫୍ⓗ㧗⢭ᗘィ⟬ࠖ
2㸬 JST ImPACTࠕ᰾ኚ᥮࡟ࡼࡿ㧗ࣞ࣋ࣝᨺᑕᛶᗫᲠ≀ࡢ኱ᖜ࡞పῶ࣭㈨※໬ࠖࠊ୰ົ Ꮥࠊㄢ㢟㈐௵⪅ࠊ2014 – 2018 ᖺࠊ4,646,000 ෇㸦H30 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧ࠊࠕ᰾ᵓ㐀ィ⟬࡟ࡼࡿ᰾཯ᛂࣔࢹࣝࡢ㧗⢭ᗘ໬ࠖ3㸬 ᪥ᮏᏛ⾡᣺⯆఍஧ᅜ㛫༠ຊ஦ᴗ㸦JSPS-NSFC㸧ࠊ୰ົ Ꮥࠊ᪥ᮏഃ௦⾲ࠊ2017 – 2019 ᖺࠊ
1,470,000 ෇㸦H30 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧ࠊࠕr ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢㅦゎ᫂࡟ྥࡅࡓ᰾㉁㔞࡜ᑑ࿨ࡢ◊✲ࠖ
4㸬 ᪥ᮏᏛ⾡᣺⯆఍⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝࣭ⱝᡭ◊✲(B)ࠊ᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ௦⾲ࠊ2016 – 2019 ᖺࠊ700,000෇㸦H30 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧ࠊࠕ୰ᛶᏊ–㝧Ꮚᑐ┦㛵࣭ᑐจ⦰ࡢゎ᫂ࠖ
5㸬 ᪥ᮏᏛ⾡᣺⯆఍⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝࣭᪂Ꮫ⾡㡿ᇦ◊✲(◊✲㡿ᇦᥦ᱌ᆺ㸸◊✲㡿ᇦࠕᏱᐂࡢṔྐࢆࡦࡶ࡜ࡃᆅୗ⣲⢏ᏊཎᏊ᰾◊✲ࠖ)(බເ◊✲) ᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ௦⾲ࠊ2017 – 2018 ᖺࠊ
1,000,000 ෇㸦H30 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧ࠊࠕ⏕ᡂᗙᶆἲ࡟ࡼࡿ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ
⣲ࡢホ౯ࠖ

◊✲ᴗ⦼
(1) ◊✲ㄽᩥA) ᰝㄞ௜ࡁㄽᩥ
1.

K. Wen and T. Nakatsukasa, “Nuclear reaction path and requantization of TDDFT”, JPS Conf.
Proc. 23, 012024 (2018).

2.

K. Washiyama and T. Nakatsukasa, “Multipole modes for triaxially deformed superfluid
nuclei”, JPS Conf. Proc. 23, 013012 (2018).

3.

F. Ni, N. Hinohara, and T. Nakatsukasa, “Low-lying collective excited states in non-integrable
pairing models based on the stationary-phase approximation to the path integral”, Phys. Rev.
C 98, 064327 (2018).

4.

F. Ni and T. Nakatsukasa, “Comparative study of the requantization of the time-dependent
mean field for the dynamics of nuclear pairing”, Phys. Rev. C 97, 044310 (2018).

5.

G. Scamps and C. Simenel, “Impact of pear-shaped fission fragments on mass-asymmetricfission in actinides”, Nature 564, 382 (2018).
- 74 -

─ 74 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩6.

H. Zheng, S. Burrello, M. Colonna, D. Lacroix, and G. Scamps, “Connecting the nuclear EoS
to the interplay between fusion and quasifission processes in low-energy nuclear reactions”,
Phys. Rev. C 98, 024622 (2018).

7.

Z. H. Wang, Q. Zhao, H. Z. Liang, and W. H. Long, “Quantitative analysis of tensor effects
in the relativistic Hartree-Fock theory”, Phys. Rev. C, 98, 034313 (2018).

8.

S. Burrello, M. Colonna, D. Lacroix, X. Roca-Maza, G. Scamps, and H. Zheng, “Collective
aspects of the dipole response in nuclei: an analysis from semi-classical and quantal
approaches”, Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. C (2019), arXiv:1807.10118.

9.

Y. Kashiwaba and T. Nakatsukasa, “Self-consistent band calculation of slab phase in neutronstar crust”, submitted to Phys. Rev. C; Preprint arXiv:1904.10712.

10. N. Hinohara, “Energy-weighted sum rule for nuclear density functional theory”, Submitted toPhys. Rev. C, arXiv:1902.11105.
B) ᰝㄞ↓ࡋㄽᩥ1.

K. Wen and T. Nakatsukasa, “Self-consistent collective motion path for nuclear fusion/fission
reactions”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Theory in the
Supercomputing Era - 2016 (NTSE-2016) (Pacific National University, 2018), pp. 115 – 123.

(2) ᅜ㝿఍㆟Ⓨ⾲A) ᣍᚅㅮ₇
1.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Dipole response in exotic nuclei”, ECT* workshop on Probing exotic
structure of short-lived nuclei by electron scattering, Trento, Italy, Jul. 16 – 20, 2018.

2.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Theories of nuclear large amplitude collective motion”, 1st APCTPTRIUMF joint workshop on understanding nuclei from different theoretical approaches,
Pohang, Korea, Sep. 14 – 19, 2018.

3.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Self-consistent determination of nuclear reaction path and clustering”, ECT*
workshop on indirect methods in nuclear astrophysics, Trento, Italy, Nov. 5 – 9, 2018.

4.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Nuclear structure and reaction with quantum shape fluctuation”, 13th
International Conference on nucleus-nucleus collisions (NN2018), Saitama, Japan, Dec. 4 – 8,
2018.

5.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Self-consistent band calculation for 1D neutron-star crust”, Workshop on
Nonequilibrium phenomena in superfluid systems, Warsaw, Poland, Mar. 1 – 3, 2019.

- 75 -

─ 75 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩
6.

N. Hinohara, “Nuclear density functional theory for description of collective excitation”, 10th
China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium (CJNP2018), Huizhou, China, Nov. 18 – 23,
2018.

7.

N. Hinohara, “Nuclear density functional theory for collective excitation”, Fifth Joint Meetingof the Nuclear Physics Divisions of the APS and the JPS (HAWAII2018), Waikoloa Village,
HI, USA, Oct. 23 – 27, 2018.

8.

N. Hinohara, “Application of finite-amplitude method for nuclear collective motion”, 2018
PKU-CUSTIPEN workshop on “Low-Energy Nuclear Dynamics and Effective Nuclear
Interactions”, Beijing, China, Sep. 17 – 19, 2018.

9.

N. Hinohara, “Collective motion in stable and unstable nuclei within nuclear density
functional theory”, IX International Symposium on Exotic Nuclei (EXON-2018),
Petrozavodsk, Russia, Sep. 10 – 15, 2018.

10. K. Washiyama, “Shape fluctuation and large amplitude collective motion in transitional
nuclei”, New Frontiers in Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics-1, Antalya, Turkey, May 28 –Jun. 1, 2018.
11. K. Yoshida, “Analog pygmy-dipole resonance and low-lying charge-exchange dipole state inneutron-rich nuclei”, The 6th International Conference on Collective Motion in Nuclei under
Extreme Conditions, Cape Town, South Africa, Oct. 29 – Nov. 2, 2018.
B) ୍⯡ㅮ₇
1.

T. Nakatsukasa, “New scheme of MCRP-2019”, 10th symposium on Discovery, Fusion,
Creation of New Knowledge by Multidisciplinary Computational Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan,
Oct. 15 – 16, 2018.

2.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Collective coordinate for pairing dynamics and requantization of TDHFB”,
Fifth joint meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of the APS and the JPS (HAWAII2018),
Waikoloa Village, HI, USA, Oct. 23 – 27, 2018.

3.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Multi-reference EDF theory alternative to GCM: Application to the pairingmodel”, Tsukuba-CCS workshop on “microscopic theories of nuclear structure and dynamics”,
Tsukuba, Japan, Dec. 10 – 12, 2018.

4.

N. Hinohara, “Finite-amplitude method for double-beta decay nuclear matrix elements”(poster presentation), International Symposium on Revealing the history of the universe with
underground particle and nuclear research 2019, Sendai, Japan, Mar. 7 – 9, 2019.

5.

N. Hinohara, “Finite-amplitude method for double-beta decay”, Tsukuba-CCS workshop on“microscopic theories of nuclear structure and dynamics”, Tsukuba, Japan, Dec. 10 – 12, 2018.
- 76 -

─ 76 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩
6.

N. Hinohara, “Binding-energy differences of even-even nuclei and pairing correlation”, 13th
International Conference on Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (NN2018), Saitama, Japan, Dec. 4 –8, 2018.

7.

N. Hinohara, “Energy-weighted sum rule for nuclear density functional theory” (poster
presentation), 13th International Conference on Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (NN2018),
Saitama, Japan, Dec. 4 – 8, 2018.

8.

N. Hinohara and J. Engel, “Double-beta decay nuclear matrix element using finite-amplitude
method”, Fifth Joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of the APS and the JPS(HAWAII2018), Waikoloa Village, HI, USA, Oct. 23 – 27, 2018.

9.

N. Hinohara, “Double-beta decay nuclear matrix elements with linear and non-linear dynamics
of neutron-proton pairing” (poster presentation), 10th symposium on Discovery, Fusion,
Creation of New Knowledge by Multidisciplinary Computational Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan,
Oct. 15 – 16, 2018.

10. N. Hinohara, “Neutron-proton DFT”, The 4th workshop on many-body correlations in
microscopic nuclear model (SADO2018), Sado, Japan, Aug. 18 – 20, 2018.
11. N. Hinohara, “Nuclear collective excitation within finite-amplitude method” (poster
presentation), 10th international conference on Direct Reactions with Exotic Beams(DREB2018), Matsue, Japan, Jun. 4 – 8, 2018.
12. Y. Hashimoto, “Study of structure changes in 406ĺ20O+20O by Gogny TDHFB method”, The
4th workshop on many-body correlations in microscopic nuclear model (SADO2018), Sado,
Japan, Aug. 18 – 20, 2018.
13. Y. Hashimoto, “Study of 40S by Gogny-TDHFB method”, Tsukuba-CCS workshop on“microscopic theories of nuclear structure and dynamics”, Tsukuba, Japan, Dec. 10 – 12, 2018.
14. K. Washiyama, “Collective Hamiltonian from Skyrme EDF”, The 4th workshop on manybody correlations in microscopic nuclear model (SADO2018), Sado, Japan, Aug. 18 – 20,
2018.
15. G. Scamps, “Dynamical effects of superfluidity on multi-nucleon transfer, fusion and fission”,“ECT* workshop on Probing exotic structure of short-lived nuclei by electron scattering”,
Trento, Italy, Apr. 9 – 13, 2018.
16. G. Scamps, “Role of octupole deformed shell effects on the fission of actinides”, 2018 PKUCUSTIPEN workshop on “Low-Energy Nuclear Dynamics and Effective Interactions”,
Beijing, China, Sep. 17 – 19, 2018.

- 77 -

─ 77 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩
17. G. Scamps, “Role of octupole deformed shell effects on fission” (poster presentation), 13th
International Conference on Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (NN2018), Saitama, Japan, Dec. 4 –8, 2018.
18. G. Scamps, “Impact of pear-shaped fission fragments on mass-asymmetric fission”, TsukubaCCS workshop on “microscopic theories of nuclear structure and dynamics”, Tsukuba, Japan,
Dec. 10 – 12, 2018.
19. Z. H. Wang, “Quantitative analysis of tensor effects in relativistic Hartree-Fock theory”, The
17th CNS International Summer School, Wako, Japan, Aug. 22 – 28, 2018.
20. K. Yoshida, “First-Forbidden Beta-decay near the Drip Line”, The 4th workshop on manybody correlations in microscopic nuclear model, Sado (SADO2018), Niigata, Aug. 18 – 20,
2018.
21. K. Yoshida, “Beta-decay around 78Ni: N=50 magic number and shell structure”, YITP
workshop on `Recent advances in nuclear structure physics 2018', Kyoto, Japan, Nov. 29 –Dec. 3, 2018.
(3) ᅜෆᏛ఍࣭◊✲఍Ⓨ⾲A) ᣍᚅㅮ₇
1.

୰ົ Ꮥࠊ“ཎᏊ᰾㉁㔞࡜᰾ᵓ㐀࣭᰾ຊ”ࠊ◊✲఍ࠕ㔜ຊἼほ᫬௦ࡢ r ࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡜୙

Ᏻᐃ᰾ࠖࠊ⌮໬Ꮫ◊✲ᡤࠊ࿴ගࠊ2018 ᖺ 6 ᭶ 20 – 22 ᪥
2.

୰ົ Ꮥࠊ“Nuclear deformation and radii in heavy nuclei”ࠊ ELPH ◊✲఍ࠕ㟁Ꮚᩓ஘࡟ࡼࡿཎᏊ᰾◊✲ࠖࠊELPHࠊᮾ໭኱Ꮫࠊ௝ྎࠊ2019 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 20 – 21 ᪥3.

᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ“ཎᏊ᰾ᑐ┦㛵࡜ほ 㔞”ࠊNITEP ◊✲఍ࠕᚤどⓗ⌮ㄽ࡛ࡘ࡞ࡄᩓ஘ほ㔞࡜᰾ᵓ㐀ࠖࠊ኱㜰ᕷ❧኱Ꮫᱵ⏣ࢧࢸࣛ࢖ࢺࠊ኱㜰ࠊ2019 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 28 ᪥4.

᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ“஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ィ⟬ࡢ⌧≧”ࠊࠕᏱᐂࡢṔྐࢆࡦࡶ࡜ࡃ
ᆅୗ⣲⢏ᏊཎᏊ᰾◊✲ࠖி኱࣭A ⌜ඹദ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯⱝᡭ◊✲఍ࠊி㒔኱Ꮫࠊி㒔ࠊ2018 ᖺ 11 ᭶ 8 – 9 ᪥

5.

᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ“ཎᏊ᰾㞟ᅋ⌧㇟࡬ࡢᖹᆒሙ࢔ࣉ࣮ࣟࢳ”ࠊ➨ 64 ᅇཎᏊ᰾୕⪅ⱝᡭኟࡢᏛᰯࠊ࣍ࢸࣝࢽ࣮ࣗ࢝ࢿ࢖ࠊ㛗⏕㒆ⓑᏊ⏫ࠊ2018 ᖺ 8 ᭶ 6 – 11 ᪥

6.

㮖ᒣᗈᖹࠊ“ᚤどⓗᶍᆺ࡛ࡢ㉸㔜ඖ⣲ྜᡂ཯ᛂ࣭ᵓ㐀◊✲”ࠊ஑኱◊✲఍ࠕ㉸㔜ඖ⣲◊✲ࡢ᪂ᒎ㛤ࠖࠊ஑ᕞ኱Ꮫࠊ⚟ᒸࠊ2018 ᖺ 7 ᭶ 30 – 31 ᪥.

7.

ྜྷ⏣㈼ᕷࠊ”Nuclear density-functional theory for weak matrix elements”ࠊKEK ◊✲఍ࠕࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀཎᏊ᰾཯ᛂ࡜ࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀ┦஫స⏝ࠖࠊᮾᾏࠊ2019 ᖺ 2 ᭶ 22 ᪥㸬

- 78 -

─ 78 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩8.

ྜྷ⏣㈼ᕷࠊ”Magic numbers, shell structures and collective phenomena”ࠊࢩ࣏ࣥࢪ࣒࢘
`Nuclear structure studies through the magic numbers'ࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍➨ 74 ᅇᖺḟ኱఍ࠊ஑኱ఀ㒔࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ㸪⚟ᒸࠊ2019 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 14 – 17 ᪥.
B) ࡑࡢ௚ࡢⓎ⾲
1.

୰ົ Ꮥࠊ㮖ᒣᗈᖹࠊ“ᚤどⓗ㞟ᅋᶍᆺ࡟ࡼࡿ LLFP ࡢ᰾ᵓ㐀◊✲”ࠊ᪥ᮏཎᏊຊᏛ఍
2018 ⛅ࡢ኱఍ࠊᒸᒣ኱Ꮫࠊᒸᒣࠊ2018 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 5 – 7 ᪥.

2.

୰ົ ᏕࠊỤᖭಟ୍㑻ࠊ㮖ᒣᗈᖹࠊ”᰾ኚ᥮࡟ࡼࡿ㧗ࣞ࣋ࣝᨺᑕᛶᗫᲠ≀ࡢ኱ᖜ࡞ప
ῶ࣭㈨※໬ (5-5) ᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘィ⟬࡟ࡼࡿ᰾ᵓ㐀ࢹ࣮ࢱ”ࠊ᪥ᮏཎᏊຊᏛ఍ 2019 ᫓ࡢᖺ఍ࠊⲈᇛ኱ᏛࠊỈᡞࠊ2019 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 20 – 22 ᪥.

3.

୰ົ Ꮥࠊ“ప࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮᰾཯ᛂ࡜㔞Ꮚࢡࣛࢫࢱ࣮࡬ࡢ㠀⤒㦂ⓗ࢔ࣉ࣮ࣟࢳ”ࠊࠕ㔞Ꮚࢡࣛࢫࢱ࣮࡛ㄞࡳゎࡃ≀㉁ࡢ㝵ᒙᵓ㐀ࠖ ࢟ࢵࢡ࢜ࣇࢩ࣏ࣥࢪ࣒࢘ࠊᮾᕤ኱ࠊᮾிࠊ
2018 ᖺ 11 ᭶ 19 – 20 ᪥.

4.

୰ົ Ꮥࠊ”PJ3- 3: ᰾ᵓ㐀ィ⟬࡟ࡼࡿ᰾཯ᛂࣔࢹࣝࡢ㧗⢭ᗘ໬”㸦࣏ࢫࢱ࣮㸧ࠊImPACT
ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࠕ᰾ኚ᥮࡟ࡼࡿ㧗ࣞ࣋ࣝᨺᑕᛶᗫᲠ≀ࡢ኱ᖜ࡞పῶ࣭㈨※໬ࠖබ㛤ᡂᯝሗ࿌఍ ʊ᪂ࡓ࡞㑅ᢥ⫥ࡢᥦ᱌ࠊᮍ᮶࡟ྥࡅ࡚ʊࠊရᕝ࢖ࣥࢱ࣮ࢩࢸ࢕࣮࣍ࣝࠊᮾிࠊ
2019 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 9 ᪥.

5.

᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ“ཎᏊ᰾ᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ࿴๎࡟㛵ࡍࡿ Thouless ࡢᐃ⌮”ࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍➨ 74 ᅇᖺḟ኱఍ࠊ஑ᕞ኱Ꮫఀ㒔࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠊ⚟ᒸࠊ2019 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 14 – 17 ᪥.

6.

᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ“ཎᏊ᰾ᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘࡢỴᐃ࡜㛵㐃ࡍࡿᐇ㦂ࢹ࣮ࢱ”ࠊRIBF ⱝᡭᨺㄯ఍㸸࢚࢟ࢰࢳࢵࢡ᰾≀⌮ࡢᑗ᮶ࠊ⌮໬Ꮫ◊✲ᡤ⚄ᡞ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠊ⚄ᡞࠊ2019 ᖺ 2 ᭶ 18 –
20 ᪥.

7.

᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ“஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯ࡜୰ᛶᏊ̿㝧Ꮚᑐࡢ㠀⥺ᙧࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫ”㸦࣏ࢫࢱ࣮㸧ࠊ➨ 5 ᅇࠕிࠖࢆ୰᰾࡜ࡍࡿ HPCI ࢩࢫࢸ࣒฼⏝◊✲ㄢ㢟ᡂᯝሗ࿌఍ࠊTHE GRAND
HALLࠊᮾிࠊ2018 ᖺ 11 ᭶ 2 ᪥.

8.

ᶫᮏᖾ⏨ࠊ“Gogny-TDHFB ࡟ࡼࡿ 40S ࡢᑐ⛠ᆺ኱᣺ᖜ᣺ື㐠ືࡢグ㏙”ࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍➨ 74 ᅇᖺḟ኱఍ࠊ஑ᕞ኱Ꮫఀ㒔࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠊ⚟ᒸࠊ2019 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 14 – 17 ᪥.

9.

ᶫᮏᖾ⏨ࠊ“᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ㉸ὶືཎᏊ᰾ࡢ཯ᛂᶵᵓࡢ◊✲”㸦࣏ࢫࢱ࣮㸧ࠊ➨ 5 ᅇࠕிࠖࢆ୰᰾࡜ࡍࡿ HPCI ࢩࢫࢸ࣒฼⏝◊✲ㄢ㢟ᡂᯝሗ࿌఍ࠊTHE
GRAND HALLࠊᮾிࠊ2018 ᖺ 11 ᭶ 2 ᪥.

10. ೓ ᨺࠊ“᩿⇕ⓗ⮬ᕫ↓᧐╔㞟ᅋᗙᶆࡢ᪉ἲ࡛᥈ࡿཎᏊ᰾ࡢ᪂ࡋ࠸㞟ᅋ㐠ື”ࠊRIBF
ⱝᡭᨺㄯ఍㸸࢚࢟ࢰࢳࢵࢡ᰾≀⌮ࡢᑗ᮶ࠊ⌮໬Ꮫ◊✲ᡤ⚄ᡞ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠊ⚄ᡞࠊ2019ᖺ 2 ᭶ 18 – 20 ᪥.

- 79 -

─ 79 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩
11. ྜྷ⏣㈼ᕷࠊ”Toward a systematic and microscopic calculation of beta-decay rates”ࠊ㔜ຊἼほ᫬௦ࡢ r ࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡜୙Ᏻᐃ᰾ࠊ⌮◊ࠊ࿴ගࠊ2018 ᖺ 6 ᭶ 20 – 22 ᪥.

12. ྜྷ⏣㈼ᕷࠊ”࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯ⋡࠿ࡽ᥈ࡿ᰾ᵓ㐀: 78Ni ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ N=50 ࡢ㨱ἲᩘ࡜Ẇᵓ㐀”ࠊᏱᐂ᰾≀⌮㐃⤡༠㆟఍◊✲఍ࠕ᰾ࢹ࣮ࢱ࡜㔜ඖ⣲ྜᡂࢆ୰ᚰ࡜ࡍࡿᏱᐂ᰾≀⌮◊✲఍ࠖࠊ໭ᾏ㐨኱Ꮫࠊᮐᖠࠊ2019 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 6 – 8 ᪥.
(4) ⴭ᭩ࠊゎㄝグ஦➼
1.

M. Bender, A. Bulgac, T. Duguet, J.-P. Ebran, J. Engel, M. M. Forbes, M. Kortelainen, T.
Nakatsukasa, N. Schunck, “Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei”, (IOP
Publishing, Bristol, UK) 2019.

␗ศ㔝㛫㐃ᦠ࣭ᅜ㝿㐃ᦠ࣭ᅜ㝿άື➼࠙ᅜ㝿㐃ᦠࠚ
1.

࣏࣮ࣛࣥࢻ࣭࣡ࣝࢩࣕ࣡ᕤ⛉኱ᏛࡢཎᏊ᰾⌮ㄽࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࡜ඹྠ࡛ࠊᐇ✵㛫 TDHFBィ⟬㸦୰ົ㸧.

2.

⡿ᅜ࣭ࣀ࣮ࢫ࢝ࣟࣛ࢖ࢼ኱Ꮫࡢ Engel ᩍᤵ࡜஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯࡢཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲࡟㛵ࡍࡿඹྠ◊✲ 㸦᪥㔝ཎ㸧.

3.

⡿ᅜ࣭࣑ࢩ࢞ࣥᕞ❧኱Ꮫ Nazarewicz ᩍᤵ࠾ࡼࡧࣇ࢕ࣥࣛࣥࢻ࣭ࣘࣂࢫ࢟ࣗࣛ኱Ꮫࡢ
Kortelainen ◊✲ဨ࡜ཎᏊ᰾ᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘࡢㅖၥ㢟࡟㛵ࡍࡿඹྠ◊✲㸦᪥㔝ཎ㸧.

4.

㡑ᅜ࣭ࢯ࢘ࣝᅜ❧኱Ꮫࡢ኱Ꮫ㝔⏕ Ha Ặ࡜⌮໬Ꮫ◊✲ᡤ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ୰ᛶᏊ㐣๫ Mo ཎᏊ᰾ࡢ ȕ-Ȗ ᰾ศගᐇ㦂࡟㛵ࡍࡿඹྠ◊✲㸦᪥㔝ཎ㸧.

5.

㡑ᅜ࣭Hoseo ኱Ꮫ Moon ᩍᤵ࡜ Te ཎᏊ᰾ࡢపບ㉳≧ែ࡟㛵ࡍࡿඹྠ◊✲㸦᪥㔝ཎ㸧.

6.

⡿ᅜ࣭࣑ࢩ࢞ࣥᕞ❧኱Ꮫ Wang ẶࠊNazarewicz ᩍᤵࡽ࡜୰ᛶᏊ㐣๫ Mg ཎᏊ᰾ࡢᇶ
ᗏ≧ែ࠾ࡼࡧపບ㉳≧ែ࡟㛵ࡍࡿඹྠ◊✲㸦᪥㔝ཎ㸧.

ࢩ࣏ࣥࢪ࣒࢘ࠊ◊✲఍ࠊࢫࢡ࣮ࣝ➼ࡢ㛤ദᐇ⦼1.

ᅜ 㝿 ࢩ ࣥ ࣏ ࢪ ࢘ ࣒ 10th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium (CJNP2018),(Huizhou, China, Nov. 18 - 23, 2018)ࡢ⤌⧊ጤဨࢆົࡵࡓ ୰ົ .

2.

ᅜ㝿఍㆟ Nuclear Theory in the Supercomputing Era – 2018 (NTSE-2018) (Daejeon, Korea,
Oct. 29 - Nov. 2, 2018) ࡢ⛉Ꮫㅎၥጤဨࢆົࡵࡓ ୰ົ .

3.

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮୺ദࢩ࣏ࣥࢪ࣒࢘㸸10th symposium on Discovery,
Fusion, Creation of New Knowledge by Multidisciplinary Computational Sciences (Tsukuba,
Japan, Oct. 15 - 16, 2018) ࡢ⤌⧊ጤဨ㛗ࢆົࡵࡓ ୰ົ .
- 80 -

─ 80 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩4.

ᅜ㝿࣮࣡ࢡࢩࣙࢵࣉ Recent advances in nuclear structure physics 2018 (RANSP2018)(Kyoto, Japan, Nov. 29-Dec. 3, 2018) ࡢ⤌⧊ጤဨࢆົࡵࡓ㸦᪥㔝ཎ㸧.

5.

ᅜ㝿࣮࣡ࢡࢩࣙࢵࣉ Microscopic theories of nuclear structure and dynamics (Tsukuba,
Japan, Dec. 10-12, 2018) ࡢ⤌⧊ጤဨ㛗(᪥㔝ཎ)࠾ࡼࡧ⤌⧊ጤဨ㸦୰ົࠊᶫᮏ㸧ࢆົࡵ
ࡓ.

⟶⌮࣭㐠Ⴀ
⤌⧊㐠Ⴀࡸᨭ᥼ᴗົࡢጤဨ࣭ᙺဨࡢᐇ⦼୰ົ Ꮥ
ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ཎᏊ᰾≀⌮◊✲㒊㛛 㒊㛛୺௵ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ 㐠Ⴀጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ே஦ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ 㐠Ⴀ༠㆟఍ጤဨィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ඹྠ◊✲ᢸᙜ୺ᖿ
ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ඹྠ◊✲ጤဨ఍࠾ࡼࡧඹྠ◊✲㐠⏝ጤဨ఍ ጤဨ㛗ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ Ꮫ㝿ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ㐃ᦠᐊဨィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ᝟ሗࢭ࢟ࣗࣜࢸ࢕ጤဨ
ᩘ⌮≀㉁⣔≀⌮Ꮫᇦ 㐠Ⴀጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ᩘ⌮≀㉁⣔≀⌮Ꮫᇦ ཎᏊ᰾⌮ㄽࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ㛗ᩘ⌮≀㉁⣔≀⌮Ꮫᇦ⌮ㄽࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ๪㆟㛗᭱ඛ➃ඹྠ HPC ᇶ┙᪋タ ኱つᶍ HPC ࢳࣕࣞࣥࢪᑂᰝጤဨ఍ ๪ጤဨ㛗
HPCI ࢥࣥࢯ࣮ࢩ࢔࣒ᶵ㛵௦⾲᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ඛ➃ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ᥎㐍ᐊဨィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ᝟ሗࢭ࢟ࣗࣜࢸ࢕ጤဨ

♫఍㈉⊩࣭ᅜ㝿㈉⊩୰ົ Ꮥ
Editor for Journal of Physical Society of Japan
Editor for International Journal of Modern Physics E
JAEA ࢱࣥࢹ࣒ᑓ㛛ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
JAEA 㯪᫂◊✲ホ౯ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
኱㜰኱Ꮫ᰾≀⌮◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮࣭㐠Ⴀጤဨ఍ጤဨ
- 81 -

─ 81 ─

⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ᖹᡂ 30 ᖺᗘᖺḟሗ࿌᭩㧗࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ຍ㏿ჾ◊✲ᶵᵓ࣭⣲⢏ᏊཎᏊ᰾◊✲ᡤ࣭㐠Ⴀ఍㆟㆟ဨ㧗࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ຍ㏿ჾ◊✲ᶵᵓ࣭⣲⢏ᏊཎᏊ᰾◊✲ᡤ࣭ᖖ⨨ே஦ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
㧗࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ຍ㏿ჾ◊✲ᶵᵓ࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
㧗࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ຍ㏿ჾ◊✲ᶵᵓ኱ᆺࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥ◊✲᥎㐍ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ィ⟬ᇶ♏⛉Ꮫ㐃ᦠᣐⅬ㐠Ⴀጤဨ㸦࣏ࢫࢺி㔜Ⅼㄢ㢟㸷㸧୰ᮧㄔኴ㑻㈹㑅⪃ጤဨ᰾⌮ㄽጤဨ఍ጤဨ

ࡑࡢ௚- 82 -

─ 82 ─