© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Alchemist
Page 2 of 8Alchemist
Jacob Toorenvliet(Leiden 1640 – 1719 Leiden)

1684
oil on copper
31.6 x 25.3 cm
inscribed and dated in light-colored paintcentered along reverse: “Jacob Toorenvliet.
fec 1684.”
JT-107

How to cite
Aono, Junko. “Alchemist” (2017). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 2nd ed. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock
Jr. New York, 2017–20. https://theleidencollection.com/artwork/the-alchemist/ (archived May 2020).
A PDF of every version of this entry is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive ismanaged by a permanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrativeoccurs.

© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Alchemist
Page 3 of 8

Originating in ancient philosophy, alchemy in early modern Europe wasComparative Figuresconsidered a pseudoscience of transmutation, in which a base metal (forexample, lead) was to be transformed into a noble metal, such as gold orsilver. Reflecting contemporary perception of the mystic as well as thescientific nature of this tradition, two rather contradictory ways of portraying
the alchemist exist in the visual tradition of the northern and southern
Netherlands. One depicts the alchemist as a charlatan in search of themagical ability to create gold, and the other depicts him as a scientificscholar, laying the foundation for the early development of modern
chemistry.[1]The first approach, employed throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries, characterized the alchemist as the object of satire and a symbol ofFig 1. After Pieter Bruegel theElder (ca. 1525–69), possibly
workshop or immediatesurroundings of Pieter Brueghel
the Younger (ca.
1564–1637/38), Alchemist, ca.
1600–25, 46.7 x 62.3 cm, © The
Leiden Collection, New York,
PB-100human folly. His futile experiments in changing base metals into gold wererepresented as sinful quests for personal gain. In this view of alchemy,alchemists inevitably ended up wasting precious time and money, thereby
sacrificing the welfare of their families.(fig 1) Pieter Brueghel the Elder’s (ca.
1525–69) drawing Alchemist, ca. 1658, depicting the alchemist as aprofligate, served as an important source of inspiration for later generationsof artists, including David III Rijckaert (1612–61), Jan Steen (1626–79), andAdriaen van Ostade (1610–85).[2] In Jan Steen’s Village Alchemist, forexample, the artist depicts an elderly alchemist as being oblivious to thepoverty of his surroundings, especially that of his own family. His young wife
holds their infant in her arms and casts a discouraged glance up at an empty
moneybag hanging from the ceiling (fig 2).[3]David Teniers the Younger (1610–90) introduced the second common
portrayal of the alchemist in the 1640s, and his example was followed by,among others, Thomas Wijck (1616–77), Frans van Mieris the ElderFig 2. Jan Steen, The Village
Alchemist, early 1660s, oil onpanel, 41.7 x 29.8 cm (16 2/5 x 113/4 in.), The Wallace Collection,
London(1635–81), and Cornelis Bega (1631–64).[4] Despite the often skeptical viewof the profession, alchemy was, in fact, a precursor to modern chemistry andpharmacology. In the course of their experiments, alchemists developedchemical processes like distillation and dissolution, and increased theknowledge of the physical world, which was of great practical use in, forinstance, the chemistry of medicine, which distilled herbs to make elixirs.[5] In
Teniers’s Alchemist in the Mauritshuis, the alchemist is portrayed as a wiseand humble scientist diligently absorbed in his research and surrounded by avariety of instruments, such as distillation equipment (fig 3).[6] Teniers’sFig 3. David Teniers theYounger, Alchemist, ca. 1650, oil
on panel, 26.6 x 37 cm.,
Mauritshuis, The Hague, no. 261

alchemists are often accompanied by one or two assistants who take chargeof the execution of the experiment. His laboratories do not include motifs that© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Alchemist
Page 4 of 8

suggest the self-deception and resultant misery often associated withalchemy, such as empty moneybags or weeping families.
Jacob Toorenvliet’s interest in the alchemist as a scientist developed overmany years. In the late 1660s, undoubtedly when he was living in Vienna,
Toorenvliet first painted an image of a scholarly alchemist devoted to hisexperiment; he then repeated the subject in 1679 after he had returned
briefly to his native Leiden (fig 4).[7] In the latter picture the alchemist isdepicted as an intellectual deeply engrossed in his experiment, evinced by
the books and notes on the table.[8] The depiction of an alchemist as amaster instructing his assistant is first seen in Toorenvliet’s Alchemist and[9]His Two Assistants, which he executed in the late 1660s.

The Leiden

Collection painting is dated 1684 and was executed during the artist’s

Fig 4. Jacob Toorenvliet, An
Alchemist, 1679, oil on copper, 22x 17 cm, Nationalmuseum,Stockholm, NM 661

Amsterdam years. Nevertheless, the painting’s composition and style, with
two half-length figures placed close to each other and against a shaded
background, are comparable to works that the artist made during hisViennese period.
The inspiration for Toorenvliet’s positive depictions of alchemists wasundoubtedly David Teniers the Younger, whose paintings were highly
regarded by Archduke Leopold Wilhelm and his successors in Vienna.
Teniers’s pictures of alchemists would have been familiar to Toorenvliet
while he was in that city. As in Teniers’s pictures, there is no allusion tomisery or deception in Toorenvliet’s paintings of alchemists.[10] In the Leiden
Collection painting, Toorenvliet’s alchemist has one hand on the crumpledpages of a manuscript resting on a work table filled with vessels and awooden bellows. He interacts easily with his assistant, who has come toshow him a piece of metal he has been heating in the fire partially visible
behind them. It is a moment of intellectual exchange, where the two men
respond to the results of the experiment they are conducting. With a surety oftouch and command of his subject, Toorenvliet creates an engaging
scenario, where the men’s active gesture and counter-gesture reflect theexcitement of the moment and the expectation of discovery.

- Junko Aono, 2017

© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Alchemist
Page 5 of 8Endnotes

1. Görel Cavalli-Björkman, Dutch and Flemish Paintings II. Dutch Paintings c. 1600–c. 1800,(Stockholm, 2005), 457; Carolyn Rose Rebbert, Alchemy: Magic, Myth or Science? (Exh. cat.
Greenwich, Conn., Bruce Museum) (Greenwich, 2009), 3, 11–16.
2. For Brueghel’s drawing and Philip Galle’s print after it, see Friedrich Wilhelm Hollstein,Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts ca. 1450–1700 (Amsterdam,1949–2010), 3: 296; Nadine M. Orenstein, Pieter Bruegel the Elder: Drawings and Prints(Exh. cat. New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art; Rotterdam, Museum Boijmans vanBeuningen) (New York, 2001), 170–73, no. 61; cf. Matthias Winner, “Zu Bruegels‘Alchimist,’” in Pieter Bruegel und Seine Welt, ed. Otto von Simson and Matthias Winner(Berlin, 1979), 193–202. For David III Rijckaert, see Bernadette van Haute, David III
Ryckaert: A Seventeenth-Century Flemish Painter of Peasant Scenes (Turnhout, 1999), nos.
79–82, 84; for Jan Steen, see The Alchemist, Städel Museum, Frankfurt (inv. no. 898); for
Van Ostade, see The Alchemist, National Gallery, London (inv. no. 846) and another work ina private collection in the United States (photograph at the RKD (Rijksbureau voor
Kunsthistorische Documentatie/Netherlands Institute for Art History), artwork no. 120536).
3. The moneybag is joined by a bloated bladder, which was considered a variation of the themeof blowing bubbles, symbolizing transience and vanity of life. For this motif, see Eddy deJongh, Tot lering en vermaak: betekenissen van Hollandse genrevoorstellingen in dezeventiende eeuw (Exh. cat. Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum) (Amsterdam, 1976), 117–18. The
two figures behind the alchemist could be common theatrical stooges, namely the hunchback
and the boor, emphasizing the folly of the alchemist’s quest. John Ingamells, The Wallace
Collection: Catalogue of Pictures: IV Dutch and Flemish (London, 1992), 359–60, no. P209.
4. For Teniers, see, for example, the picture in the Herzog Anton Ulrich-Museum, Braunschweig(inv. no. 140) and the one in Wasserburg Anholt, Fürst zu Salm-Salm, Isselburg (inv. no.
389): Margret Klinge, David Teniers de Jonge: Schilderijen/tekeningen (Exh. cat. Antwerp,Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten) (Antwerp, 1991), 136–37, no. 42; and Rüdiger
Klessmann, Die flämischen Gemälde des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts (Braunschweig, 2003),
102–3, no. 140. For Van Mieris, see Otto Naumann, Frans van Mieris (1635–1681) the Elder(Doornspijk, 1981), 15, no. 11; and Quentin Buvelot, Otto Naumann, and Eddy de Jongh,
Frans van Mieris 1635–1681, ed. Quentin Buvelot (Exh. cat. The Hague, Mauritshuis;
Washington D.C., National Gallery of Art) (Zwolle, 2005), 85–87, no. 6. Bega seems to haveput more emphasis on the representation of still life motifs; see Peter van den Brink, andBernd Wolfgang Lindeman, Cornelis Bega: Eleganz und raue Sitten (Exh. cat. Aachen,Suermondt-Ludwig-Museum; Berlin, Gemäldegalerie der Staatliche Museen zu Berlin)(Aachen, 2012), nos. 69, 70. Thomas Wijck made a series of paintings in which the© 2020 The Leiden Collection

AlchemistPage 6 of 8alchemist’s family sometimes appears but is not impoverished: The Alchemist, Rijksmuseum,Amsterdam (inv. no. SK489) and The Alchemist, The State Hermitage Museum, St.
Petersburg.
5. See, for example, the sixteenth-century alchemist Paracelsus, who was the founder ofmodern pharmacology: Carolyn Rose Rebbert, Alchemy: Magic, Myth or Science? (Exh. cat.
Greenwich, Conn., Bruce Museum) (Greenwich, 2009), 15–16.
6. Quentin Buvelot, Royal Picture Gallery Mauritshuis: A Summary Catalogue (Zwolle, 2004),302–3, no. 261.
7. Susanne Henriette Karau, “Leben und Werk des Leidener Malers Jacob Toorenvliet(1640–1719)” (PhD diss. Universität Berlin, 2002), nos. A 94, 102; and Görel CavalliBjörkman, Dutch and Flemish Paintings, vol. 2, Dutch Paintings c. 1600–ca. 1800
(Stockholm, 2005), 475, no. NM661. Toorenvliet made another alchemist in 1676, seeSusanne Henriette Karau, “Leben und Werk des Leidener Malers Jacob Toorenvliet(1640–1719)” (PhD diss., Universität Berlin, 2002), no. A61.
8. This type of scholar can also be found in another group of pictures dated 1679, which
represent men of learning, such as a Jewish scholar or an old man holding a book. SusanneHenriette Karau, “Leben und Werk des Leidener Malers Jacob Toorenvliet (1640–1719)”(PhD diss. Universität Berlin, 2002), nos. A91, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, 103–4, 105.
9. Susanne Henriette Karau, “Leben und Werk des Leidener Malers Jacob Toorenvliet(1640–1719)” (PhD diss. Universität Berlin, 2002), no. B26. This picture was probably
inspired by An Alchemist and His Assistant in a Workshop (ca. 1655) by Frans van Mieris theElder, alongside whom Toorenvliet apprenticed with his father, Abraham Toorenvliet. See
Quentin Buvelot, Otto Naumann, and Eddy de Jongh, Frans van Mieris 1635–1681, ed.
Quentin Buvelot (Exh. cat. The Hague, Mauritshuis; Washington D.C., National Gallery of Art)
(Zwolle, 2005), 85–87, no. 6.
10. Toorenvliet’s alchemist is even dressed in a fur vest and fur-trimmed hat similar to thoseworn by the alchemist in Teniers’s painting in The Hague.

Provenance(Sale, Al. Helfert, Dorotheum, Vienna, 1910).
(Possibly Sotheby’s, London, 16 November 1960, no. 103 [£200 to Moss]; sale, Galliera,Paris, 29 November 1965, no. 133).
(Sale, Christie’s, Paris, 23 June 2009, no. 38 [Salomon Lilian B. V., Amsterdam, 2009]).
From whom purchased by the present owner.
© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Alchemist
Page 7 of 8

Exhibition History
Greenwich, Conn., Bruce Museum, “Alchemy: Magic, Myth or Science?” 26 September
2009–3 January 2010 [no number, lent by the present owner].
Williamstown, The Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, “An Inner World: SeventeenthCentury Dutch Genre Painting,” 5 March–17 September 2017 [lent by the present owner].

References
Frimmel, Theodor. “Jacob Toorenvliet als Wiener Maler und die Verteilung seiner Arbeiten inösterreichischen Galerien.” In Von alter und neuer Kunst. Edited by Theodor Frimmel, 75.
Vienna, 1923.
Karau, Susanne Henriette. “Leben und Werk des Leidener Malers Jacob Toorenvliet(1640–1719).” PhD diss. Universität Berlin, 2002, 103–4, no. A105.

Versions
Versions and Copies

1. After Jacob Toorenvliet, Alchemist with His Assistant, oil on panel, 34.3 x 25.9 cm,
Nationalgalerie, Prague.

Technical Summary
The support, a relatively thin, rectangular copper sheet, has been hammered then rolled and has
raised burrs along the reverse of all four edges. The panel does not flex when handled. There arethree brown oxidation products, two inscriptions, and a light-colored wax dot, but no wax
collection seals, stencils, labels or maker’s mark.
A dark ground or underlayer has a gritty, sandy texture with pin-sized raised dots. The paint has
been applied smoothly with glazes wet-into-wet through the flesh tones with no areas of impasto
or low rounded brushwork. Fine brushstrokes define the figure’s hair, beard, and fur collar of hisjacket. The paint has flaked off the tops of the pin-sized raised dots and a fine network ofcraquelure has formed along most of the composition. Together with the panel’s hammeredsurface, the raised dots and craquelure give the painting a textured appearance even though it© 2020 The Leiden CollectionPowered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Alchemist
Page 8 of 8

has been smoothly painted.
The painting is unsigned and undated on the front, but is inscribed and dated twice on thereverse.
No underdrawing is readily apparent in infrared images captured at 780–1000 nanometers.
Compositional changes visible in the images and as pentimenti include shifts in the position of thealchemist’s proper left profile and to the fingers of the assistant’s proper right hand, which restson the alchemist’s shoulder. Pentimenti along the lower left corner indicate that the horizontallyoriented, folded, white paper was added after the bellows were painted, and the pot with lid wasapplied after the alchemist’s proper right forearm was painted.
The painting was cleaned and restored in 2009 and remains in a good state of preservation.

© 2020 The Leiden Collection