ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
2 November 2010
CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITYCONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE
CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Tenth meeting
Nagoya, Japan, 18-29 October 2010
Agenda item 5.2
MARINE AND COASTAL BIODIVERSITY
Decision as adopted (Advance unedited version)*
The Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity
In-depth review of the progress made in the implementation of the elaborated programme of work on
marine and coastal biological diversity, as contained in annex I to decision VII/5
1.
Expresses its appreciation to Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations for
submitting relevant information, such as third and fourth national reports, voluntary reports and otherrelevant reports;
2.
Takes note of progress made in the implementation of the elaborated programme of workon marine and coastal biological diversity, as contained in the annex I to decision VII/5, at national,
regional and global levels and that implementation has been facilitated by the Executive Secretary as well
as relevant United Nations agencies and international organizations, but notes with concern that these
efforts have not been able to prevent the serious decline in marine and coastal biodiversity and ecosystemservices;
3.
Recognizes and supports the establishment, under the United Nations and accountable to
the General Assembly, of the Regular Process for Global Reporting and Assessment of the State of the
Marine Environment including Socioeconomic Aspects and the work of United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) and the United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs
and the Law of the Sea (UNDOALOS);
4.
Notes with concern the slow progress towards achieving the 2012 target of establishmentof marine protected areas, consistent with international law and based on the best scientific information
available, including representative networks, and that despite efforts in the last few years, just over 1 percent of the ocean surface is designated as protected areas, compared to nearly 15 per cent of protectedarea coverage on land;
5.
Emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to all elements of the programme of workon marine and coastal biodiversity, as contained in annex I to decision VII/5;* This is an advanced unedited text reflecting the decision as adopted on the basis of
document UNEP/CBD/COP/10/L.42 and any amendments made during the closing Plenary
session. It has not been formally edited. The final official version of the decision will be
issued as part of the report of the meeting in due course .

/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 2
6.
Requests Parties to implement actions at the national level and collaborate with activities
related to the Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from LandBased Activities (GPA), taking into account national capacity and circumstances;
7.
Notes with concern the adverse impact of climate change on marine and coastal
biodiversity (e.g., sea level rise, ocean acidification, coral bleaching) and recognizing that the ocean is
one of the largest natural reservoirs of carbon, which can significantly affect the rate and scale of global
climate change, invites Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations to further integrate climatechange-related aspects of marine and coastal biodiversity into relevant national strategies, action plansand programmes, including, inter alia, national biodiversity strategies and action plans (NBSAPs),
national adaptation programmes of action (NAPAs), national integrated marine and coastal management
programmes, the design and management of marine and coastal protected areas, including the selection ofareas in need of protection to ensure maximum adaptive capacity of biodiversity, and other marine
environment and resource management-related strategies;
8.
Stressing the importance of marine and coastal biodiversity to the mitigation of andadaptation to climate change, invites Parties, other Governments, relevant organizations, and indigenous
and local communities, to address climate-change adaptation and mitigation issues, in line with thedecisions on the in-depth review of work on biodiversity and climate change (see decision X/xx on
biodiversity and climate change) by:(a)
Highlighting the role and potential of marine and coastal ecosystems, such as coral reefs
and estuaries, and habitats such as tidal salt marshes, mangroves and seagrasses;(b)Extending their efforts in identifying current scientific and policy gaps in order topromote sustainable management, conservation and enhancement of natural carbon sequestration services
of marine and coastal biodiversity;(c)
Identifying and addressing the underlying drivers of marine and coastal ecosystem loss
and destruction, and improving the sustainable management of coastal and marine areas; and(d)Enhancing their efforts to increase the resilience of coastal and marine ecosystems,
through, inter alia, improved implementation, towards achieving the 2012 target of establishing marine
protected areas, consistent with international law and based on best scientific information available,
including representative networks;
9.
In accordance with decision X/xx on biodiversity and climate change, requests the
Executive Secretary to include the interaction between oceans and climate change and alternatives for
mitigation and adaptation strategies when conveying the proposal to develop joint activities to thesecretariats of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the United Nations
Convention on Combating Desertification;
10.
Emphasizing that the world's oceans host most of the known phyla on Earth and containbetween 500,000 and 10 million species, and that new oceanic species are continuously being discovered,particularly in the deep sea, encourages Parties, other Governments and organizations to further enhance
globally networked scientific efforts, such as the Census of Marine Life (CoML) and the Ocean
Biogeographic Information System (OBIS), to continue to update a comprehensive and accessible global
database of all forms of life in the sea, and further assess and map the distribution and abundance ofspecies in the sea, and encourages Parties and other Governments to foster further research activities, inaccordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, toexplore marine communities where the current level of knowledge is scarce or inexistent;/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 3
11.
Takes note of the importance of collaboration and working jointly with relevant regional
initiatives, organizations, and agreements in identifying ecologically or biologically significant marine
areas (EBSAs), in accordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the
Law of the Sea, in particular in enclosed or semi-enclosed seas, among riparian countries, such as the
Caspian and Black Seas, the Regional Organization for the Protection of the Marine Environment(ROPME) region, Baltic Sea, Wider Caribbean Region, Mediterranean Sea, and other similar sea areas
and to promote conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in those areas;
12.
Understanding that regional progress has been made in analysing the impacts ofunderwater noise on marine and coastal biodiversity, such as under the Convention on Migratory Species,
the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR
Convention), the Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans in the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea andcontiguous Atlantic area (ACCOBAMS), the International Whaling Commission (IWC), andInternational Maritime Organization (IMO), and recognizing the role of the Convention on Biological
Diversity in supporting global cooperation, requests the Executive Secretary, in collaboration with
Parties, other Governments, and relevant organizations, to compile and synthesize available scientificinformation on anthropogenic underwater noise and its impacts on marine and coastal biodiversity andhabitats, subject to availability of financial resources, and make such information available forconsideration at a future meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological
Advice (SBSTTA) as well as other relevant organizations prior to the eleventh meeting of the Conferenceof the Parties;
13.
Reaffirming that the programme of work still corresponds to global priorities, has beenfurther strengthened through decisions VIII/21, VIII/22, VIII/24, and IX/20, but is not fully implemented,
therefore encourages Parties to continue to implement these programme elements, and endorses thefollowing guidance, where applicable and in accordance with national capacity and circumstances, forenhanced implementation:(a)Further efforts on improving the coverage, representativity and other network properties,
as identified in annex II to decision IX/20, of the global system of marine and coastal protected areas, inparticular identifying ways to accelerate progress in establishing ecologically representative andeffectively managed marine and coastal protected areas under national jurisdiction or in areas subject tointernational regimes competent for the adoption of such measures, and achieving the commonly agreed
2012 target of establishing marine and coastal protected areas, in accordance with international law,
including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and based on the best scientific information
available, including representative networks;(b)
Further efforts on promoting full and effective participation of indigenous and local
communities, in line with programme element 2 of the programme of work on protected areas (decision
VII/28), ensuring that the establishment and management of marine and coastal protected areas aims to
make a direct contribution, where appropriate, to poverty alleviation (decision VII/5, annex I, paragraph
8);(c)
Cooperating with the United Nations General Assembly, in particular the Ad HocOpen-ended Informal Working Group, to expedite its work on approaches to promote international
cooperation and coordination for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity
beyond areas of national jurisdiction and the Regular Process for Global Reporting and Assessment of theState of Marine Environment including Socioeconomic Aspects, and supporting Parties as well ascompetent international organizations on scientific and technical issues relating to the identification of
ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs), in accordance with international law,
including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and based on the best scientific/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 4
information available, considering, where appropriate, the indicative list of activities contained in annex I
to this decision;(d)Addressing climate-change-related aspects of marine and coastal biodiversity, including
the potential adverse impacts on marine and coastal biodiversity of ocean acidification as a directconsequence of the increased concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere;(e)Ensuring that no ocean fertilization takes place unless in accordance withdecision IX/16 C and taking note of the report (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/7) and developments noted
paragraphs 57 – 62;(f)
Avoiding to the extent possible potential adverse impacts on marine and coastal
biodiversity of other human responses to climate change;(g)
Further efforts, in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations (FAO), and relevant international and regional organizations, including regional fisheries
management organizations (RFMOs), as appropriate, and in accordance with international law, including
the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, to ensure the sustainability of fisheries, by managing theimpacts of fisheries on species and the wider ecosystem to achieve the outcomes of Target 6 of the
Revised and Updated Strategic Plan 2011-2020, through implementing the ecosystem approach;eliminating illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing; minimizing the detrimental impacts offishing practices; mitigating and managing by-catches sustainably and reducing discards, in order to attaina sustainable exploitation level of marine fishery resources and thereby contributing to a goodenvironmental status in marine and coastal waters;(h)Further efforts to minimize the specific as well as cumulative detrimental impacts, where
they occur, of human activities on marine and coastal biodiversity, e.g. shipping, extraction of living andnon-living resources, biotechnology, scientific research, infrastructure, waste disposal, tourism and otherhuman activities, and further emphasis on the contribution of environmental impact assessments (EIAs)
and strategic environmental assessments (SEAs) to further strengthening sustainable use of living andnon-living resources both in areas within and beyond national jurisdiction;(i)
The valuation of marine and coastal biodiversity and ecosystem services and its
integration into national accounting systems in order to increase sectoral integration;(j)Further efforts on sea areas that are affected by multiple direct and indirect anthropogenic
influences originating from the watershed area, and where the biodiversity issues require an integrated
holistic approach aiming to improve the water quality and restore the health and functioning of the wholeecosystem;(k)Collaboration with the Regular Process for Global Reporting and Assessment of the Stateof the Marine Environment including Socioeconomic Aspects and the proposed new Intergovernmental
Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), to advance the CBD programme of work on
marine and coastal biodiversity (annex I to decision VII/5);(l)

The new Strategic Plan of the Convention 2011- 2020;(m)
Carrying out assessments on the status and trends of cold-water coral reef ecosystems,
seamounts, and hydrothermal vents;/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 5
14.
Requests the Executive Secretary to work together with other relevant bodies in order tobetter understand the management of invasive alien species in the marine and coastal environment and to
make the results of the collaboration available to Parties;
15.
Urges Parties and other Governments to achieve long-term conservation, management
and sustainable use of marine resources and coastal habitats, and to effectively manage marine protectedareas, in accordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of theSea, in order to safeguard marine and coastal biodiversity and marine ecosystem services, sustainable
livelihoods, and to adapt to climate change, through appropriate application of the precautionary approachand ecosystem approaches, including the use of available tools such as integrated river basin andintegrated coastal zone management, marine spatial planning, and impact assessments;
16.
Decides to align the targets of the programme of work on marine and coastal biodiversity
with specific indicators and timelines, included in the revised Strategic Plan 2011 – 2020 of theConvention on Biological Diversity and the agreed post-2010 targets;
17.
Invites Parties to link these indicators and timelines to national targets and indicators, anduse this framework to focus monitoring;
18.
Urges Parties and other Governments, as appropriate, to strengthen and establish, where
necessary, targets at the national level for the implementation of the programme of work on marine andcoastal biodiversity and to incorporate these into revised national biodiversity strategies and action plans
with specific timelines, responsibilities and budgets, and means for implementation, as a contribution to
the revised Strategic Plan of the Convention for the period 2011- 2020;
19.
Requests the Executive Secretary, in collaboration with the Ramsar Secretariat and theScientific and Technical Review Panel, to review opportunities for strengthening implementation of thecoastal components of the programme of the work on marine and coastal biodiversity, in relation to theactions requested in paragraph 16 of decision X/xx (UNEP/CBD/COP/10/WG.1/CRP.2);
20.
Invites the Global Environment Facility and other donors and funding agencies, as
appropriate, to consider extending support for capacity-building to developing countries, small island
developing States, least developed countries, and countries with economies in transition, in order toimplement the present decision, and in particular:(a)With respect to the invitation in paragraph 38 of this decision(b)
To facilitate the participation in targeted research schemes called for in paragraphs 10
and 48 of the present decision, and including those promoted by the International Seabed Authority; and(c)To support initiatives identified in paragraphs 74 and 76 of the present decision.

Identification of ecologically or biologically significant areas (EBSAs) and scientific and technicalaspects relevant to environmental impact assessment in marine areas
21.
Reiterating the United Nations General Assembly’s central role in addressing issues
relating to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in marine areas beyond national
jurisdiction;
22.
Recalling that General Assembly resolution 64/71 emphasized the universal and unified
character of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and reaffirmed that the United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea sets out the legal framework within which all activities in the oceans/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 6and seas must be carried out, and that its integrity needs to be maintained, as recognized also by theUnited Nations Conference on Environment and Development in chapter 17 of Agenda 21;
23.

Recalling the General Assembly resolution 64/71 on oceans and the law of the sea;

24.
Recognizes that the Convention on Biological Diversity has a key role in supporting thework of the General Assembly with regard to marine protected areas beyond national jurisdiction, by
focusing on provision of scientific and, as appropriate, technical information and advice relating to marine
biological diversity, the application of the ecosystem approach and the precautionary approach;
25.
Notes that the application of the scientific criteria in annex I of decision IX/20 for theidentification of ecologically and biologically significant areas presents a tool which Parties andcompetent intergovernmental organizations may choose to use to progress towards the implementationof ecosystem approaches in relation to areas both within and beyond national jurisdiction, through theidentification of areas and features of the marine environment that are important for conservation andsustainable use of marine and coastal biodiversity;
26.
Notes that the application of the ecologically or biologically significant areas (EBSAs)
criteria is a scientific and technical exercise, that areas found to meet the criteria may require enhanced
conservation and management measures, and that this can be achieved through a variety of means,including marine protected areas and impact assessments, and emphasizes that the identification of
ecologically or biologically significant areas and the selection of conservation and management measures
is a matter for States and competent intergovernmental organizations, in accordance with internationallaw, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea;
27.
Acknowledges the report on Global Open Oceans and Deep Seabed (GOODs)
Biogeographic Classification published by the United Nations Educational, Cultural and Scientific
Organization (UNESCO)-Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) and IUCN, which was
submitted pursuant to paragraph 6 of decision IX/20, as a source of scientific and technical informationthat may assist States and competent intergovernmental organizations with the identification ofrepresentative networks of marine protected areas (MPAs);
28.
Invites Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations to use the scientificguidance on the use and further development of biogeographic classification systems, contained inannex V to the report of the Ottawa Expert Workshop (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/4), in their efforts
to conserve and sustainably use marine and coastal biodiversity, and to enhance ocean management at alarge ecosystem scale, in particular to achieve the 2012 target of the World Summit on Sustainable
Development to establish marine protected areas, in accordance with international law and based on best
scientific information available, including representative networks;
29.
Expresses its gratitude to the Governments of Canada and Germany for co-funding, andCanada for hosting, the Expert Workshop on Scientific and Technical Guidance on the Use of
Biogeographic Classification Systems and Identification of Marine Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction in
Need of Protection, held in Ottawa, from 29 September to 2 October 2009, to other Governments andorganizations for sponsoring the participation of their representatives, and to the Global Ocean
Biodiversity Initiative (GOBI) for its technical assistance and support; and takes note of the report of thisExpert Workshop (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/4);30.
Recalling decision IX/20 and the outcome from the Ottawa Workshop, invites the Ad
Hoc Open-ended Informal Working Group of the United Nations General Assembly to study issues
relating to the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity beyond areas of national
jurisdiction, Parties, other Governments, and competent intergovernmental organizations to consider the/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 7use of, as appropriate, the scientific guidance on the identification of marine areas beyond national
jurisdiction, which meet the scientific criteria in annex I to decision IX/20, as contained in annex 6 to thisExpert Workshop Report (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/4) ;31.
Notes that the Ottawa workshop (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/4) identified a number ofopportunities for collaboration between the Convention on Biological Diversity, in its work on
ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs) (decision IX/20, annex I), and the Food andAgriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), in its work on vulnerable marine ecosystems(VMEs);
32.
Encourages Parties, other Governments and competent intergovernmental organizations
to cooperate, as appropriate, collectively or on a regional or subregional basis, to identify and adopt,according to their competence, appropriate measures for conservation and sustainable use in relation toecologically or biologically significant areas, and in accordance with international law, including theUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, including by establishing representative networks ofmarine protected areas in accordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on
the Law of the Sea, and based on best scientific information available, and to inform the relevant
processes within the United Nations General Assembly;
33.
Noting the slow progress in establishing MPAs in areas beyond national jurisdiction, andthe absence of a global process for designation of such areas, emphasizes the need to enhance efforts
towards achieving the 2012 target of establishment of representative network of MPAs, in accordancewith international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and, recalling
the role of United Nations General Assembly in this respect, invites the United Nations General Assembly
to request the Secretary-General to convene during 2011 a meeting of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Informal
Working Group to expedite its work on approaches to promote international cooperation and coordination
for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity beyond areas of national
jurisdiction, and consideration of issues of MPAs, and urges Parties to take action as necessary toadvance the work in that group;
34.
Recalling decision IX/20, identification of ecologically or biologically significant areas(EBSAs) should use the best available scientific and technical information and, as appropriate, integrate
the traditional scientific, technical, and technological knowledge of indigenous and local communities,
consistent with Article 8(j) of the Convention;
35.
Requests the Executive Secretary to work with Parties, other Governments, the Food andAgriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, UNESCO/IOC, in particular the Ocean
Biogeographic Information System, the Central Data Repository run by International Seabed Authority(ISA), and other relevant international scientific partnerships producing credible, quality-controlledscientific information (OBIS), such as the World Conservation Monitoring Centre of the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP-WCMC), the Global Ocean Biodiversity Initiative (GOBI), to facilitate
availability and inter-operability of the best available marine and coastal biodiversity data sets andinformation across global, regional and national scales;
36.
Requests the Executive Secretary to work with Parties and other Governments as well ascompetent organizations and regional initiatives, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of theUnited Nations (FAO), regional seas conventions and action plans, and, where appropriate, regional
fisheries management organizations, with regards to fisheries management, to organize, including thesetting of terms of references, subject to the availability of financial resources, a series of regional
workshops, before a future meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological
Advice (SBSTTA) prior to the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention, with/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 8a primary objective to facilitate the description of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas
through application of scientific criteria in annex I of decision IX/20 as well as other relevant compatible
and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, as well as the scientificguidance on the identification of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction, which meet the scientificcriteria in annex I to decision IX/20;
37.
Emphasizes that additional workshops are likely to be necessary for training andcapacity-building of developing country Parties, in particular the least developed countries and small
island developing States among them, as well as countries with economies in transition, as well as
through relevant regional initiatives, and that these workshops should contribute to sharing experiences
related to integrated management of marine resources and the implementation of marine and coastal
spatial planning instruments, facilitate the conservation and sustainable use of marine and coastal
biodiversity, and may address other regional priorities that are brought forward as these workshops areplanned;38.
Invites the Global Environment Facility and other donors and funding agencies, as
appropriate, to extend support for capacity-building to developing countries, small island developing
States, least developed countries, and countries with economies in transition, in order to identify
ecologically or biologically significant and/or vulnerable marine areas in need of protection, as called forin paragraph 18 of decision IX/20 and develop appropriate protection measures in these areas, within thecontext of paragraphs 36 and 37;
39.
Requests the Executive Secretary, in collaboration with Parties and other Governments,
the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), UNDOALOS, UNESCO/IOC, inparticular OBIS, and other competent organizations, the World Conservation Monitoring Centre of theUnited Nations Environment Programme (UNEP-WCMC) and the Global Ocean Biodiversity Initiative(GOBI), to establish a repository for scientific and technical information and experience related to theapplication of the scientific criteria on the identification of EBSAs in annex I of decision IX/20, as well asother relevant compatible and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientificcriteria that shares information and harmonizes with similar initiatives, and to develop an informationsharing mechanism with similar initiatives, such as FAO’s work on vulnerable marine ecosystems(VMEs);
40.
Requests the Executive Secretary to prepare, in collaboration with the relevantinternational organizations, a training manual and modules in UN working languages, subject to theavailability of financial resources, which can be used to meet the capacity-building needs for identifying
ecologically or biologically significant marine areas using the scientific criteria in annex I to decision
IX/20 having regard to other relevant compatible and complementary intergovernmentally agreed
scientific criteria as well as the scientific guidance on the identification of marine areas beyond national
jurisdiction, which meet the scientific criteria in annex I to decision IX/20, taking into account the resultsof the Ottawa workshop;
41.
Requests that the Executive Secretary make available the scientific and technical data andinformation and results collated through the workshops referred to in paragraph 36 to participating Parties,
other Governments, intergovernmental agencies and the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical andTechnological Advice (SBSTTA) for their use according to their competencies;
42.
Requests the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice(SBSTTA) to prepare reports based on scientific and technical evaluation of information from theworkshops, setting out details of areas that meet the criteria in annex I to decision IX/20 for considerationand endorsement in a transparent manner by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention, and requests
the Conference of the Parties to include the endorsed report in the repository referred to in paragraph 39/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 9and submit the endorsed report to UNGA, particularly the Ad Hoc Open-ended Informal Working Group,
as well as relevant international organizations, Parties and other Governments;
43.
Recalling paragraph 18 of decision IX/20, invites Parties and other Governments toprovide for inclusion in the repository, scientific and technical information and experience relating to theapplication of the criteria in annex I to decision IX/20 or other relevant compatible and complementary
nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria to areas within national jurisdiction before
the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties;
44.
Further requests the Executive Secretary to report on the status of this collaboration, as
referred to in paragraph 39, to a future meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical andTechnological Advice (SBSTTA) for consideration by the eleventh meeting of the Conference of theParties, and to inform the United Nations General Assembly as well as competent internationalorganizations, such as International Seabed Authority (ISA) and the International Maritime Organization(IMO), of progress in this regard;
45.
Decides to review the status and outcomes of application of the criteria for ecologicallyor biologically significant marine areas as part of its consideration of the work contributing to theimplementation of the 2012 target related to marine protected areas;
46.
Requests the Executive Secretary to explore, together with secretariats of regional
initiatives, regional seas organizations and agreements mandated to promote conservation and sustainable
use of biodiversity in enclosed or semi-enclosed seas, the possibility for cooperation, including theidentification, development and implementation of targeted joint activities to support biodiversity
conservation and sustainable use in those regions;147.
Recalling decision IX/20, paragraph 27, requests the Executive Secretary to undertake,subject to availability of financial resources, a study, within a context of Article 8(j) and related
provisions, to identify specific elements for integrating the traditional, scientific, technical andtechnological knowledge of indigenous and local communities, consistent with Article 8(j) of theConvention, and social and cultural criteria and other aspects for the application of scientific criteria inannex I to decision IX/20 for the identification of ecologically or biologically significant areas as well as
the establishment and management of marine protected areas, and make the report available at theeleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention and transmit the findings to therelevant United Nations General Assembly processes, including the Ad Hoc Open-ended Informal
Working Group to study issues relating to the conservation and sustainable use of marine biologicaldiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction;
48.
Invites Parties and other Governments to foster research and monitoring activities, inaccordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, toimprove information on key processes and influences on the marine and coastal ecosystems which are
critical for structure, function and productivity of biological diversity in areas where knowledge is scarceand to facilitate the systematic collection of relevant information in order to continue proper monitoringof these areas;
49.
Expresses its gratitude to the Government of the Philippines and the
GEF/UNDP/UNOPS Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA)
for co-hosting, and the European Commission for providing financial support for, the Expert Workshop
1

In this respect the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity has been encouraged to initiate collaboration with
regional initiatives, organizations and agreements, such as the Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), Caspian Environment
Programme (CEP) and Regional Organization on the Protection of the Marine Environment (ROPME).

/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 10
on Scientific and Technical Aspects relevant to Environmental Impact Assessment in Marine Areas
Beyond National Jurisdiction, held in Manila from 18 to 20 November 2009, and to other Governments
and organizations for sponsoring the participation of their representatives, and welcomes the report of thisExpert Workshop (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/5);
50.
Requests the Executive Secretary to facilitate the development of voluntary guidelines forthe consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and strategic environmental
assessments (SEAs) in marine and coastal areas using the guidance in annexes II, III and IV to the Manila
workshop report (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/5), provide for technical peer review of those guidelines,
and submit them for consideration to a future meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical andTechnological Advice (SBSTTA) prior to the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties,
recognizing that these guidelines would be most useful for activities that are currently unregulated withno process of assessing impacts;
51.
Takes note, with appreciation, of the adoption by International Seabed Authority of theRegulations on Prospecting and Exploration for Polymetallic Sulphides in the Area, which requires the
mandatory submission of an impact assessment of the potential effects on the marine environment, andurges Parties and invites other Governments and intergovernmental organizations to implement theseRegulations;
Impacts of unsustainable fishing such as destructive fishing practices, overfishing, and illegal,
unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing on marine and coastal biodiversity
52.
Expresses its appreciation to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations (FAO) and to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) for the financial andtechnical support, and the Fisheries Expert Group (FEG) of the Commission on Ecosystem Management(CEM) of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) for the technical support
provided for the FAO/UNEP Expert Meeting on Impacts of Destructive Fishing Practices, Unsustainable
Fishing and Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing on Marine Biodiversity and Habitats,which was organized in collaboration with the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity in
pursuance of paragraph 2 of decision IX/20, at FAO, Rome, from 23 to 25 September 2009, and takes
note of the report of this Expert Meeting, contained in document UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/6;
53.
In view of the identified information gaps and constraints in undertaking the scientificreview due to limited resources available for the initial collaboration efforts with the Food andAgriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the United Nations Environment Programme(UNEP), and noting an urgent need to further review, in accordance with international law, including theUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the impacts of unsustainable fishing, such as
destructive fishing practices, overfishing, and illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, on
marine and coastal biodiversity and habitats, building upon the initial efforts, requests the Executive
Secretary to collaborate with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), theUnited Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), regional fisheries management organizations(RFMOs), as appropriate, and in accordance with international law, including the UN Convention on the
Law of the Sea, IUCN-FEG (IUCN Fisheries Expert Group), and other relevant organizations, processes,
and scientific groups, subject to the availability of financial resources, on ad hoc organization of a joint
expert meeting, where possible through existing assessment mechanisms, to review the extent to which
biodiversity concerns, including the impacts on marine and coastal biodiversity of pelagic fisheries oflower trophic levels, are addressed in existing assessments and propose options to address biodiversity
concerns and report on the progress of such collaboration at a future meeting of the Subsidiary Body on
Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) prior to the eleventh meeting of theConference of the Parties;/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 1154.
Encourages Parties and other Governments to fully and effectively implement paragraphs
113 through 130 of the United Nations General Assembly resolution 64/72 on responsible fisheries in themarine ecosystem, addressing the impacts of bottom fishing on vulnerable marine ecosystems and thelong-term sustainability of deep-sea fish stocks, in areas beyond national jurisdiction, in particularparagraphs 119 and 120 of the resolution, calling on States and/or regional fisheries management
organizations (RFMOs), consistent with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries in the High Seas and consistent withthe precautionary approach, to conduct impact assessments, conduct further marine scientific research anduse the best scientific and technical information available to identify areas where vulnerable marine
ecosystems are known or likely to occur, either adopt conservation and management measures to prevent
significant adverse impacts on such ecosystems or close such areas to fishing, and adopt measures toensure the long-term sustainability of deep-sea fish stocks (both target- and non-target stocks), and not toauthorize bottom-fishing activities until such measures have been adopted and implemented;
55.
Urges Parties and other Governments to consider ratifying the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations agreement on Port States measures to prevent, deter and eliminate
illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing and to implement, where applicable, the United Nations
Fish Stocks Agreement, particularly in relation to the application of the ecosystem and precautionary
approaches and the elimination of overcapacity, as well as relevant FAO’s international plan of action(IPOAs) and develop national or regional plans of action or equivalent in order to mitigate the impacts ofovercapacity of fishing fleets, destructive fishing practices, unsustainable fishing and illegal, unreported
and unregulated (IUU) fishing, including through their participation in regional fisheries management
organizations (RFMOs), as appropriate;
56.
Encourages Parties and other Governments to take appropriate measures, where
necessary, to improve the sustainability of harvesting of coastal and inshore marine resources so that
overfishing is avoided; such measures should be undertaken together with coastal communities dependent
on these resources, and mindful of socio-economic constraints, with the aim to achieve Target 6 of the
Revised and Updated Strategic Plan for the period 2011-2020; and urges Parties, other Governments,
inter-governmental organizations and non-governmental organizations in a position to do so, to support
capacity-building in this area, for developing countries, in particular the least-developed coastal and small
island developing States;
Impacts of ocean fertilization on marine and coastal biodiversity
57.
Welcomes the report on compilation and synthesis of available scientific information on
potential impacts of direct human-induced ocean fertilization on marine biodiversity(UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/7), which was prepared in collaboration with United Nations Environment
Programme - World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) and the International Maritime
Organization in pursuance of paragraph 3 of decision IX/20;
58.
Recalling the important decision IX/16 C on ocean fertilization, reaffirming the
precautionary approach, recognizes that given the scientific uncertainty that exists, significant concern
surrounds the potential intended and unintended impacts of large-scale ocean fertilization on marine
ecosystem structure and function, including the sensitivity of species and habitats and the physiologicalchanges induced by micro-nutrient and macro-nutrient additions to surface waters as well as thepossibility of persistent alteration of an ecosystem, and requests Parties to implement decision IX/16 C;
59.
Notes that the governing bodies under the London Convention and Protocol adopted in2008 resolution LC-LP.1 (2008) on the regulation of ocean fertilization, in which Contracting Parties/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 12declared, inter alia, that given the present state of knowledge, ocean fertilization activities other thanlegitimate scientific research should not be allowed;
60.
Recognizes the work underway within the context of the London Convention and London
Protocol to contribute to the development of a regulatory mechanism referred to in decision IX/16 C, andinvites Parties and other Governments to act in accordance with the Resolution LC-LP.2(2010) of the
London Convention and Protocol;
61.
Notes that in order to provide reliable predictions on the potential adverse impacts on
marine biodiversity of activities involving ocean fertilization, further work to enhance our knowledge andmodelling of ocean biogeochemical processes is required, in accordance with decision IX/16 C and taking
into account decision IX/20 and LC-LP.2 (2010);
62.
Notes also that there is a pressing need for research to advance our understanding ofmarine ecosystem dynamics and the role of the ocean in the global carbon cycle;
Impacts of ocean acidification on marine and coastal biodiversity
63.
Welcomes the compilation and synthesis of available scientific information on ocean
acidification and its impacts on marine biodiversity and habitats (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/8), which
was prepared in collaboration with UNEP-WCMC in pursuance of paragraph 4 of decision IX/20;
64.
Expresses its serious concern that increasing ocean acidification, as a direct consequenceof increased carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere, reduces the availability of carbonate
minerals in seawater, important building blocks for marine plants and animals; for example by 2100 it has
been predicted that 70 per cent of cold-water corals, key refuges and feeding grounds for commercial fish
species, will be exposed to corrosive waters, noting that under a business-as-usual scenario, given current
emission rates, it is predicted that 10 per cent of the surface waters of the highly productive Arctic Ocean
will become under-saturated with respect to essential carbonate minerals by the year 2032, and theSouthern Ocean will begin to become under-saturated with respect to essential carbonate minerals by
2050, with potential disruptions to large components of the marine food web;65.
Takes note that many concerns exist regarding the biological and biogeochemicalconsequences of ocean acidification for marine and coastal biodiversity and ecosystems, and the impactsof these changes on oceanic ecosystems and the services they provide, for example, in fisheries, coastal
protection, tourism, carbon sequestration and climate regulation, and that the ecological effects of ocean
acidification must be considered in conjunction with the impacts of global climate change;
66.
Requests the Executive Secretary to develop, in collaboration with the Intergovernmental
Oceanographic Commission of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(IOC/UNESCO), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the Secretariat of
the United Nations Framework Convention of Climate Change (UNFCCC), the World Conservation
Monitoring Centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP-WCMC), the International
Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI), Ramsar Convention, Antarctic Treaty, the Arctic Council, and other relevantorganizations and scientific groups, subject to the availability of financial resources, a series of joint
expert review processes to monitor and assess the impacts of ocean acidification on marine and coastal
biodiversity and widely disseminate the results of this assessment in order to raise awareness of Parties,
other Governments and organizations, and also requests the Executive Secretary, given the relationshipbetween atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and ocean acidification, to transmit the results ofthese assessments to the Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC);/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 13
67.
Calls on Parties, other Governments and organizations to take into account emerging
knowledge on ocean acidification and to incorporate it into national biodiversity strategies and actionplans (NBSAPs), national and local plans on integrated marine and coastal area management, and thedesign and management plans for marine and coastal protected areas;
Impacts of human activities on marine and coastal biodiversity
68.
Further notes an urgent need to further assess and monitor the impacts and risks ofhuman activities on marine and coastal biodiversity, building upon the existing knowledge;
69.
Requests the Executive Secretary to work with competent organizations which conductmarine assessments, including the United Nations General Assembly Regular Process for Global
Reporting and Assessment of the State of Marine Environment including Socioeconomic Aspects, theFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the United Nations Environment Programme,
UNESCO/IOC, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and International Seabed Authority (ISA),
and other relevant organizations and scientific groups, to ensure their assessments adequately address
biodiversity concerns in marine and coastal commercial activities and management; and, as necessary,
where gaps are found, work with these agencies to improve the consideration of biodiversity inassessments; and report the progress of such collaboration at a future meeting of the Subsidiary Body on
Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) prior to the eleventh meeting of theConference of the Parties;
70.
Further requests Parties, other Governments, and other relevant organizations, tomitigate the negative impacts and risk of human activities to the marine and coastal biodiversity;
71.
Requests Parties, other Governments, and other relevant organizations to take into
account the special characteristics of enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, which are affected by multiple
direct and indirect anthropogenic influences originating from the watershed area, and where thebiodiversity issues require an integrated holistic approach aiming to improve the water quality and restore
the health and functioning of marine and coastal ecosystems to ensure the provision of ecosystem services
that are provided by these ecosystems;
72.
Urges Parties to stop the degradation and loss of ecologically important ecosystems andhabitats, such as estuaries, coastal sand dunes, mangroves forests, salt marshes, seagrass beds, andbiogenic reefs, due to coastal development and other factors in coastal area, to facilitate their recovery
through the management of human impacts and restoration, where appropriate;73.
Urges Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations to adopt, in accordancewith international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, complementarymeasures to prevent significant adverse effects by unsustainable human activities to marine and coastal
areas, especially those identified as ecologically or biologically significant;74.
Requests the Executive Secretary to prepare, subject to availability of financial resources,
a report on the progress made in the implementation of the specific work plan on coral bleaching, adopted
in decision VII/5 (appendix 1 of annex I), and make it available for consideration at a future meeting of
the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice prior to the eleventh meeting of
the Conference of the Parties. The report should also identify barriers to implementation and ways toovercome them as well as identify specific actions to mobilize financial resources and provide guidance
to relevant financial institutions, including the Global Environment Facility, to support theimplementation of the specific work plan on coral bleaching;/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 1475.
Requests the Executive Secretary, subject to availability of financial resources, tocompile and synthesize available information in collaboration with Parties, other Governments andrelevant organizations on their experiences and use of marine spatial planning, in particular on ecological,
economic, social, cultural and other principles used to guide such planning and the use of area-based
management tools, and to make such information available for consideration at a future meeting of theSubsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice prior to the eleventh meeting of theConference of the Parties;
76.
Requests the Executive Secretary to organize, subject to availability of financial resources,
an expert workshop to identify practical and innovative ways to accelerate progress on the establishment
and effective management of marine protected areas (MPAs) in under-represented areas of the marine
environment, particularly areas with highly important and irreplaceable biodiversity under national
jurisdiction, building on Parties’ experiences and information on impediments and success factors, andinvolving all relevant stakeholders. This workshop should provide a review of the various tools such as
marine spatial planning that might assist Parties in their efforts to establish and manage marine protectedareas (MPAs) and integrate these areas with other human uses allocations;
77.
Recalling the Manado Ocean Declaration adopted in Manado, Indonesia during theWorld Ocean Conference in May 2009, invites Parties, other Governments and donor agencies to promoteecosystem-based approaches to climate change mitigation and adaptation to improve resilience, resistanceand recovery of marine and coastal ecosystems, and incorporate climate change impacts and ecosystembased adaptation in development and disaster-reduction planning, particularly in coastal areas, andrequests the Executive Secretary to convene, subject to availability of financial resources and inviting
collaboration with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, an expert workshop on
the role of marine and coastal biodiversity and ecosystems in adaption to and mitigation of climate change
impacts, with a view to share experiences and provide guidance for planning and implementing
ecosystem-based approaches to climate change mitigation and adaptation, and their integration in broader
adaptation, mitigation and disaster risk reduction strategies, and in support of the development ofelements on the issues of marine biodiversity and climate change as inputs to the development of joint
activities between the three Rio conventions;
78.
Invites Parties and other Governments to increase efforts to apply marine spatial planning
tools, as appropriate, in accordance with Parties’ national planning and strategies, for better integration ofconservation objectives in marine and other sectoral development programmes, and in overall plans for
economic development;/…

ADVANCE UNEDITED TEXT
Page 15Annex
INDICATIVE LIST OF ACTIVITIES FOR OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE 2.4 OF
PROGRAMME ELEMENT 22 ON MARINE AND COASTAL LIVING RESOURCES(a)
To further compile, synthesize and analyse available information relevant to identifying areas of
ecological or biological significance in open-ocean waters and deep-sea habitats beyond national
jurisdiction, based on the CBD scientific criteria in annex I of decision IX/20 and other relevant
compatible and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, including
through the UNEP-WCMC Interactive Map (IMAP), as in paragraph 5 of decision IX/20;(b)
To further compile, synthesize and analyze available information relevant to the design ofrepresentative networks of marine protected areas (MPAs), building on annexes II and III of decision
IX/20;(c)
To identify and assess threats to biological diversity in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction,
including in areas identified as likely to meet the criteria for ecologically or biologically significant areas(annex I of decision IX/20) and other relevant compatible and complementary nationally andintergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, as appropriate;(d)
In order to avoid degradation or destruction of ecologically or biologically significant marine
areas (EBSAs), to encourage Parties and invite other Governments and intergovernmental organizations,
within their respective jurisdiction and competence, to take measures to ensure conservation andsustainable use by implementing relevant tools, including area-based management tools such MPAs,
environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and strategic environmental assessments (SEAs);(e)
To encourage the application of environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and strategic
environmental assessments (SEAs) in relation to activities that may cause substantial pollution orsignificant and harmful changes to the marine environment, as referred to in Article 206 of the United
Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, taking into account the special features of marine ecosystems,
as identified in the Manila workshop report (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/5);(f)

To further research and investigate the role of the ocean and its ecosystems in the carbon cycle.
-----

2

As contained in annex I to decision VII/5.

/…