ISO/IEC JTC/1 SC/2 WG/2 N2221R
2000-06-01

ISO/IEC JTC/1 SC/2 WG/2
Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS)
Secretariat: ANSI

Title:JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS (draft for ammendment-1) revised

Doc. Type:national body contribution

Source:Japan -SY/tks

Project:

02:18.01

Status:To be considered at #39 WG2 meeting in Greece (SEP2000)

Date:

2000-06-01

Distribution: ISO/IEC JTC/1 SC/2 WG2Reference:

WG2 N2197, N2222R, N2223R,

WG2-Resolution M38.11

Medium:The resolution M38.11 instructs project editor for ISO/IEC 10646-1 to include JIS X 0213
COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS into a list of characters accepted for processing beyond the 2nd editionof ISO/IEC 10646-1.
This document describes necessary information and proposal for the project editor to accommodate theinstruction defined in the resolution M38.11.
Japan requests the editor to include this requirement into the first amendment of the 2nd edition ofISO/IEC 10646-1 which is also instructed to the project editor per resolution M38.14.

Note for both part-1 and part-2 editors (Bruce Paterson and Michel Suignard): To make part-1 and part-2
consistent for the COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH, please open a discussion about accommodation of thisrequirement.

1. Code table, character name table and associated changes.
1-1.

Collection name:

Japan requests an independent collection name for these ideographs. The

recommended collection name is JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS.

1Remark: Japan believes that it is not necessary to state “ compatibility with which JIS” . Those
information should be described in the annex P along with other necessary information.

1-2.

Code table: Add following code table as table xxx (xxx to be defined by editor).

TABLE xxx – Row FA: JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHSFA3FA4FA5FA6

FA30

FA40

FA50

FA60

FA31

FA41

FA51

FA61

FA32

FA42

FA52

FA62

FA33

FA43

FA53

FA63

FA34

FA44FA54

FA64

FA35FA45

FA55

FA65

FA36

FA46

FA56

FA66

FA37

FA47

FA57

FA67

FA38

FA48

FA58

FA68

FA39

FA49

FA59

FA69

FA3A

FA4A

FA5A

FA6A

FA3B

FA4B

FA5B

FA6B

FA3C

FA4C

FA5C

0123456789A

BC2D
FA3D

FA4D

FA5D

FA3E

FA4E

FA5E

FA3F

FA4F

FA5F

EF

Remark: number of the characters is 60 while the n2197 requested 61. This is per final agreementwith the JIS development committee. As a result, the code range is FA30-FA6B.

1-3.

Character name: Japan proposes to use the same principle as CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPHS/CJKCOMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS for naming of the ANY COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH (use UCS
code position for the naming).

The resultant character name is JIS COMPATIBILITY

IDEOGRAPH-FA30 for example (for code point FA30).
Since Japan requests additional information at annex P for those characters, an ASTERISK to beadded to indicate the information at the annex P.

Table xxx – Row FA: JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHSHEXNAME

FA30
FA31
FA32
FA33FA34
FA35
FA36
FA37
FA38
FA39
FA3A
FA3B
FA3C
FA3D
FA3E
FA3F
FA40
FA41
FA42
FA43
FA44
FA45
FA46
FA47
FA48
FA49
FA4A
FA4B
FA4C
FA4D
FA4E
FA4F
FA50
FA51
FA52
FA53
FA54
FA55
FA56
FA57
FA58

JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA30 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA31 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA32 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA33 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA34 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA35 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA36 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA37 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA38 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA39 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA3A *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA3B *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA3C *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA3D *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA3E *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA3F *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA40 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA41 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA42 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA43 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA44 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA45 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA46 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA47 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA48 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA49 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA4A *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA4B *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA4C *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA4D *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA4E *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA4F *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA50 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA51 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA52 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA53 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA54 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA55 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA56 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA57 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA58 *HEX

3NAME

FA59
FA5A
FA5B
FA5C
FA5D
FA5E
FA5F
FA60
FA61FA62FA63FA64
FA65
FA66
FA67
FA68
FA69
FA6A
FA6B

JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA59 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA5A *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA5B *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA5C *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA5D *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA5E *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA5F *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA60 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA61 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA62 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA63 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA64 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA65 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA66 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA67 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA68 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA69 *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA6A *JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA6B *Group 00
1-4.

Plane 00

Row FA

Block name and table 3 and 4: It is up to editor, whether if new block name is necessary for
those or not. Also, up date of the table 3 and/or 4 or not is up to the editor.
Japan does not have any preference on this issue.

JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS(collection) may (and may not) be a part of the CJK COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS (block)
1-5.

Annex A clause A.1:

Add collection JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS in clause A.1.

1-6.

Annex L and clause 27: Try to add a text to explain the rule 13 of the annex L is applicable to the
COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH. (May be rule 13 itself is Okay as it is, However, clause 27 ismentioning CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPHS only)).

1-7.

Annex M: Add JIS X 0213: 2000 7-bit and 8-bit double byte coded extended KANJI sets forinformation interchange.

Remark: Since ISO/IEC 10646-1 does not use JIS X 0213 as a character naming reference, there
is no way to add the JIS into the clause 27. Therefore, the annex M is the best place to add theJIS as a reference standard. (Besides, the part-2 is referring the JIS. Thus, it is necessary to add
JIS X 0213: 2000 at clause 10.2.x of the part-2).

4

2. Compatibility information.
Both N2142 (IRG report regarding COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS) and N2196 (Japanesecontribution about the COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS) are requested to include following information
for the COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS.

••Corresponding CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH (code point at least)
Source standard (and code point)

Japan recommends including that information within annex P.

2-1. Issue:

The annex P is an informative annex, however, Japan believes that that information

regarding the COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS should be a normative. Japan likes to leave thisissue with the editor to resolve.
2-2. Annex P: Add following text to annex P

FA30-FA6A JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH FA30-FA6B Those characters are compatibility
ideographs with JIS X 0213: 2000.

Note: a mapping information form the JIS X 0213 to this international standard is available within
the JIS X 0213: 2000.

The corresponding CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH are as follow:

Code point: JIS COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH
FA30
FA31
FA32
FA33
FA34
FA35
FA36
FA37
FA38
FA39
FA3A
FA3B
FA3C
FA3D
FA3E
FA3F
FA40
FA41
FA42
FA43
FA44
FA45
FA465CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH (incl. Extensions)
4FAE
50E7514D
52C952E45351
559D5606
5668
5840
58A85C645C6E6094
6168
618E
61F2
654F
65E26691
6885
6982
6D77

FA47
FA48
FA49
FA4A
FA4B
FA4C
FA4DFA4E
FA4F
FA50
FA51
FA52
FA53
FA54
FA55
FA56
FA57
FA58
FA59
FA5A
FA5B
FA5C
FA5D
FA5E
FA5F
FA60
FA61
FA62
FA63
FA64
FA65
FA66
FA67
FA68
FA69
FA6A
FA6B

6E1A
6F22716E
722B
7422
7891
793E
7949
7948
7950
7956
795D
798D
798E
7A40
7A81
7BC0
7DF4
7E09
7E41
7F72
8005
81ED
FA5F, 8279, 4491
FA5E, 8279, 4491
8457
8910
8996
8B01
8B39
8CD3
8D08
8FB69038
96E3
97FF
983B

Remark: Japan does not want to add the code point information onto this international standard. Itshould be a part of the source standard. Reasons are.

•The source standard should have the information and has to keep the right to manage theinformation (such as up-dating).

•If this international standard also has the information, it may have a danger of the inconsist
referring. The reference should be one direction and never be a bi-directional.

3. Other concerns: Besides the above, Japan does believe that following to be considered.
3-1. Adding a definition of the COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS.

For better understanding of therelation between CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPHS and CJK COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPHS, it might
be better to include a explanatory text like in N21 96 as a part of the ISO/IEC 10646.
3-2. The text might be a part of the definition clause, an independent clause in main text or independent

6

annex which might include other information such as information described in para-2 of this draft(as a part of annex P).
3-3. There is a possibility to move the corresponding CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH information fromannex P (as proposed in pare-2) to the parenthesized information along with the character name.
This may (may not) soften the normative/informative discussion of the annex P.
3-4. By the way, some of the information in the annex P might have a nature of normative also (such asGlyph table for FA1F and FA23).

---end----7