OUTLINE OF THE HISTORY OF RUSSIAN CARTOGRAPHY
names would
not be obscene.”34 Asidefrom the Soviet
period, which
is not coveredin this chapter
and famous forFig. 29
drastic changesof place names,
the other major
wave in Russian history tochange place
names wascaused by theImperial govFigure 29. Map of Moscow Province (1774)
ernment decreein 1815, when Russia celebrated its victory over Napoleon. Thus, Alexander I
ordered changes of the names of many Ural villages to those of West Europeancities (especially French ones). As a result, now we have in the Ural mountains
places such as Paris, Brussels, Bouillon, and Marseilles, but it is impossible tofind these names on small-scale maps because all of them have become derelict,little, miserable villages lost in the Russian wilderness.
Gradually, and especially after the General Survey had been completed,the survey department began to be involved in detailed cartography of naturalresources. In the nineteenth century this tendency developed in the Ministry ofState Properties, which organized surveys aimed at amelioration of soil, forest
management, and other economic improvements.35
The Ministry of State Properties undertook intensive studies for the General Survey of Siberia conducted in the 1850s. Because of the specific conditionsof mostly unexplored Siberia, as well as the need to investigate its natural resources and possibilities for settling state-owned serfs and exiled criminals there,
special manuals on land surveying were required in addition to general survey
instructions. To draft these manuals, various scientists (geographers, ethnographers, statisticians, and geodesists) were invited by the ministry. Remarkably, the first version of the manual was sent to Siberia to be “tested by life,”
and it was only after the document was verified and revised in the field during
34 Cited by Postnikov, Razvitie krupnomasshtabnoi..., p. 60.
35 The results of studies by civilian topographers in forest cartography survived as a manuscript: “Map of Forests and the Timber Industry in Russia,” which was discovered by M.A.
Tsvetkov in 1949. Recently I found, in the Russian State Historical Archives (St. Petersburg), a file of the Ministry of State Properties which demonstrates that it took two years tocomplete this map and other similar maps since the ministry tried to compare the existingelements of forest map making, such as scales and legends.

29

ALEXEI V. POSTNIKOV
the following two years that the document was finally reviewed by the scientists and approved by the Ministry of State Properties. Undoubtedly, this instruction for surveying Siberia was the most detailed, scientifically sound guidance prepared in nineteenth century Russia to survey lesser known territories.36
In 1845, the Russian Imperial Geographic Society was organized, and oneof its first major projects was aimed at uniting the efforts of land surveyors andmilitary topographers. The main idea behind this was to “reinforce” land survey documents drawn up from the end of the eighteenth to the beginning of thenineteenth centuries with mathematical, astronomic, and geodetic elaboration.
The surveys that had been made since 1846 under the general leadership ofLieutenant-General Aleksandr Ivanovich Mende (who had been a graduate of
the aforementioned Gappaniemy Cadet School in Finland) laid the foundation
for a general approach to topographic map-making satisfying broad circles ofconsumers. Surveying and mapping instructions were drafted by a special commission representing various agencies, and were approved by the Russian Geographic Society. Mende intended to make topographic survey atlases for all theguberniyas of European Russia, but the program was interrupted in the 1860s
for financial reasons. Although topographical atlases for Tver, Ryazan, Tambov,Vladimir, Yroslavl, Simbirsk, Nizhnii Novgorod, and Penza Guberniyas had
been compiled, only those of Tver, Ryazan, and Tambov Guberniyas and a fewmaps based on Mende’s surveys were published. All other maps and geographic
descriptions produced by this program survived only in manuscript form andare stored in the Russian State Archives of Ancient Documents in Moscow.
The Russian Geographic Society continued to make efforts to create a united
topographic and geodetic service in Russia through the late nineteenth and earlytwentieth centuries. As a first step in this direction, A.A. Tillo, K.N. Pos’et, andV.I. Vernadskii suggested that a coordinating-consulting Geodetic Council beorganized. Although this proposal failed to be realized in pre-revolutionaryRussia, the basic formulas for the 1919 decree to organize the Supreme Geodetic Department (the present Central Geodetic and Cartographic Administration of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Protection of Environment of theRussian Federation) were thus prepared.

5. RUSSIA’S EXPANSION AND “FRONTIER CARTOGRAPHY”
The Baltic and Caspian Seas
One of Peter I’s main aims was to secure control over outlets to the sea in
the north-west, south, and east. Naturally he focused most on the Baltic Sea,
where he built his new capital, St. Petersburg. It is sufficient to say that twentyone of the twenty-nine navigational atlases published in eighteenth century
Russia were devoted to the Baltic. Another academic achievement of Peter I’s
reign was the precise charting of the Caspian Sea, which, until then, had been
36 Postnikov, Razvitie krupnomasshtabnoi..., pp. 192-199.

30

OUTLINE OF THE HISTORY OF RUSSIAN CARTOGRAPHY
depicted incorrectly on most maps.37 Peter I, in February 1721, sent a new Russian chart of the Caspian Sea to Paris to express his gratitude for being elected amember of the French Academy of Sciences (on December 22, 1717). It caused asensation among the men of letters in France. Panegyrizing on Peter I, B.
Fontenelle, secretary of the French Academy, exclaimed that “we are very grateful to You, Great Academic Victor. We at last know the true shape of this sea
which bears no resemblance to the former and more common one.”38
Via Eastern Siberia to Kamchatka and Alaska
The Russian hydrographic and cartographic works on the Caspian andBaltic Seas were entirely based on new, West European principles, and it isvirtually impossible to identify in them any link with earlier Russian cartographic
traditions. The situation was quite different, however, with regard to the cartography relating to the waterways of the Northern and Eastern boundaries of
the Russian Empire - another area in which Russian hydrographers and geographers achieved international fame in the eighteenth century.
As stated previously, during the long push eastwards, Russian explorers
relied upon local information accumulated over the centuries by Siberianpeoples. Such information is reflected, for example, in maps by S.U. Remezov.
The inhabitants of Chukotka spoke of a “Great Land” lying across the ocean,and this provided an important argument in favor of organizing a scientificexpedition to find this land, which educated circles in Petrine Russia assumed
to be America. This assumption was proved to be correct as a result of the First(1728) and Second (1741-42) Kamchatka Expeditions led by Vitus Bering andAleksei Il’ich Chirikov, and also of the voyages made by M.S. Gvozdev and I.
Fedorov to the islands in the Bering Straits and to the shores of North Alaska(1732).39
The initial stage of the First Kamchatka Expedition is well illustrated bythe manuscript Map of Eastern Siberia from the Lena to Kamchatka Inclusive stored
in the Russian State Military History Archives (Figure 30).40 Aleksei V. Yefimov
37 Only a few medieval maps gave a relatively accurate picture of the Caspian Sea. One ofthese was the round map of the world compiled by a Venetian monk, Fra Mauro, with thehelp of Andrea Bianco, a well-known engraver, for the King of Portugal in 1459. The map
had used sources lost to the later cartographers who outlined the sea incorrectly right up tothe Russian surveys in the early eighteenth century. For more on this mysterious map see:Postnikov, Razvitie kartografii..., pp. 93-94.
38 I.I. Golikov, Trudy Petra Pervogo, Chast’ 8 (Moscow, 1789), p. 36.
39 The materials of the Kamchatka Expeditions have recently appeared in a more complete
edition: Russkie ekspeditsii po izucheniyu severnoi chasti Tikhogo okeana v pervoi polovine XVIIIv. Sbornik dokumentov (Moscow, 1984).
40 “Karta Vostochnoi sibiri ot Leny do Kamchatki vklyuchitel’no”: RGVIA, f.349, op.45, No.
2422 [no. 60 in A.V. Yefimov (ed.), Atlas geograficheskikh otkrytii v Sibiri i Severo-Zapadnoi
Amerike v XVII-XVIII stoletiyakh (with the English title Atlas of Geographical Discoveries inSiberia and North-Western America, XVII-XVIII Centuries) (Moscow, 1964)]. Size: 45×52 cm.
Drawn on paper with ink and water colors.

31

ALEXEI V. POSTNIKOV[Efimov], who discovered and publishedthis map, 41 thoughtthat it had been compiled by Ivan Petrovich
Kozyrevskii. Kozyrevskii presented it to
Captain Vitus Bering
around 1726 as a mateFig. 30
rial contribution to theplanning of his voyage
from the mouth of theLena River down toChina and Japan. Thismap is closely connected with works ofRemezov (1700), Atlasov (1701), and L’vov(1710). I assume, however, that Kozyrevskii
Figure 30. Map of Eastern Siberia from the Lena toused materials even
Kamchatka Inclusive
older than those usedby L’vov, Atlasov, and Remezov. By its appearance the map is archaic to theextent that it can be taken as an example of traditional Old Russian maps. Actually, the First Kamchatka Expedition had no alternative but to use maps of thiskind. Remezov, Atlasov, L’vov, and Kozyrevskii represented the typical Old
Guards serving in the Siberian civilian and military administrations with traditional survey methods which, at least for them, remained unchallenged by the
influx of European survey methods. Their main sources were native data andcrude surveying - establishing distances mainly in days, and directions of streams
by compass, which was done only during river and sea sailings.
As was the case with the Remezov and L’vov maps, Kozyrevskii’s map
reflects the attention the Russian government paid to the northeast extremity ofSiberia. This attention was sharpened on the eve of the eighteenth century due
to a mysterious tale of an island or a “Great Land” off the Chukotskii Peninsula.
This information was provided by Vladimir Vasil’evich Atlasov, a “captain(pyatidesyatnik)” of the Yakut Cossacks, in 1701 after his trip to Kamchatka. In
the first decade of the eighteenth century, this tale was repeatedly confirmed bymany Cossacks from the Anadyr River region. I.P. Kozyrevskii was one of theseCossack officers with wide travel and military experience in Kamchatka, theKurile Islands, and the Chukotskii Peninsula. He was involved with the Cossacks who had revolted against V.V. Atlasov and murdered him (on April 1,41 Zbornik po istorii Dal’nego Vostoka (Moscow, 1959).

32

OUTLINE OF THE HISTORY OF RUSSIAN CARTOGRAPHY1711). To avoid the death penalty for this crime, Kozyrevskii, together withDanilo Yakovlevich Antsiferov (who was also connected with this grim affair),asked leave of the higher authorities to atone for their guilt by discovering newlands for Russia. They were permitted to go eastwards, and between 1712-14,
reached at least two of the Kurile Islands and obtained descriptions and drawings of approximately fifteen others. In addition, they explored the Kamchatkaand Chukotskii Peninsulas, raiding the native population to impose yasak [levyin fur] on them. Thus, in 1726, Kozyrevskii was “well-prepared” to report toVitus Bering about lands to the south and north of Kamchatka with the presentation of the Map of Eastern Siberia... and several crude maps of the Kurile andJapanese Islands.42According to Kozyrevskii’s report, he compiled these maps of the Kurile
Islands and Japan as a result of his voyage with D.Ya. Antsyferov to Shushmuand Paramushir Islands in 1711-13. A Japanese sailor saved from a shipwreck,
who was called “Sana,” accompanied Kozyrevskii in 1713 and told him about
Japan. On this basis, the Russians compiled the Drawing of Kamchadal’skii Nos[“Kamchatka Point”], up to Matmaiskii [Hokkaido - A.P.] and Nifonte [Japan /?/- A.P.] Islands...43 Some results of these works are reflected in Ancienne Carte deSiberia et Camchat, which was discovered in the Bibliothèque Nationale (Paris)(Figure 31).44
There is an obvious contrast between the previous, “half-native” maps
and the charts and maps produced by the Kamchatka Expeditions, drawn byeducated Navy officers and St. Petersburg academicians on the basis of astronomic and hydrographic surveys. An example of the latter is a manuscript
report by Captain Aleksei Chirikov: Map Compiled from a Russian Atlas for theWest of Tobol’sk, and for the East of It - from Various Descriptions and the Results ofthe Kamchatka Expeditions... May, 1746.45 At that time (1746), Captain Chirikov
served as the superintendent of the Navel Academy in St. Petersburg. After thedeath of Vitus Bering in 1741, he became the acting chief of the Second Kamchatka
Expedition and, therefore, was most qualified for summing up the results of theexpeditions. This map reflects the maximum scope of geographic knowledgeof the Arctic and Pacific Oceans attained by Russians by 1746, especially through42 For details see: A.I. Andreev, Russkie otkrytiya v Tikhom okeane i v Severnoi Amerike v pervoi
polovine 18 veka (Moscow, 1948), p. 13; D.M. Lebedev, Geografiya Rossii Petrovskogo vremeni(Moscow-Leningrad, 1950), pp. 49-57.
43 “Chertezh Kamchatskogo Nosa, do Matmaiskogo i Nifonte ostrovov”: RGADA, f.199b, no.
539, kniga 2, list 4.
44 Bibliothèque Nationale (Paris), Département des cartes et plans. Collection de 190 cartes deRussia de J.-N. Delisle. Call No.: Ge. BB. 124 (158).
45 RGVIA, f.846, op.16, no. 20227. Scale: 157 versts to 1 inch. Size: 234×85.5 cm. Drawn on
paper with ink and water colors. Original by: Aleksei I. Chirikov, “Karta do Tobol’ska sAtlasa Rossiiskogo, a ot Tobol’ska - s raznykh opisaniev i voyajei Kamchatskoi ekspeditsii...
Maya, 1746.” This map, unfortunately only its eastern part, was made public by A.V. Yefimov[no. 109 in: Yefimov, Atlas...]. In content, it is close to another summary map by A.I. Chirikov:RGVIA, f.846, op.16, No. 23466 [no. 110 in: Yefimov, Atlas...].

33

ALEXEI V. POSTNIKOVFig. 31

Figure 31. Ancienne Carte de Siberia et Camchat

34

OUTLINE OF THE HISTORY OF RUSSIAN CARTOGRAPHY
the two Kamchatka Expeditions. The areas that had not been investigated during the expeditions were left empty on the map.46
With regard to the Pacific Ocean, Chirikov’s map demonstrates the outstanding results of the voyage he and Bering made on board the “St. Peter” andthe “St. Paul” to Alaska’s coast. Nautical surveys routinely performed on bothexpedition vessels served to compile two main charts. These charts, however,convey two different notions about the space between Kamchatka and America.
One chart compiled by Ivan Yelagin, the pilot of the “St. Paul,” and checked byAleksei Chirikov, shows several lands between Kamchatka and America, which
Chirikov’s men correctly took to be islands. The other chart compiled by members of Bering’s crew, Sven Vaksel and Sofron Khitrovo, proposes a different
picture of the Pacific between Kamchatka and America. Instead of islands, itshows the continuous coast of the American mainland to the middle of theocean.47 In his summary map, Aleksei Chirikov faithfully represented all lands
sighted by himself and also by the members of Bering’s crew, but he did notcopy the wrong interpretation by Vaksel and Khitrovo of their discoveries, andrelied upon his own view of the Pacific Ocean between Kamchatka and America
which would be proved to be true.
Remarkably, during the Second Kamchatka Expedition, Lieutenant M.R.
Shpanberg and Lieutenant V. Valton in the “Archangel Gavriil” and the “St.
Mikhail” sailed to the coasts of Japan, landed twice and were well received by
the Japanese people.48
The discovery made by the Second Kamchatka Expedition that the islandsin the Pacific could provide a rich supply of fur, not surprisingly interested
Siberian fur traders and hunters, the so-called promyshlenniki. Over the next
four decades, a number of private companies sent ships and hunting teams tothe Pacific. In the course of these voyages the Aleutian Islands and the Alaskan
Peninsula were reached and partly explored.49 Although these voyages madeby the fur traders and hunters in the open sea were very different from their
Siberian predecessors’ trips along rivers and the Arctic coast in the sixteenthand seventeenth centuries, they made use of the earlier experience, particularly
with regard to the exploitation of local geographic knowledge. Moreover, the46 An explanation of the map gives all the sources used. As one of these sources Chirikov
refers to a chart compiled by Fedorov and Gvozdev, the original of which has not beenfound yet.
47 For more details, see: A.V. Postnikov, The Mapping of Russian America: A History of RussianAmerican Contacts in Cartography (Milwaukee, 1995), pp. 8-10.
48 RGADA, f.199, portfel’ 248, tetrad’ 8, listy 7-8; A.I. Alekseev, Syny otvazhnye Rossii (Magadan,1970), pp. 84-85.
49 For interesting details about these voyages, see: O.M. Medushevskaya, “Cartographic
Sources of the Russian Geographic Discoveries in the Pacific Ocean in the Second Half ofthe 18th Century,” The Canadian Cartographer 9 (1972); S.G. Fedorova, Russkoe naselenie Alyaskii Kalifornii. Konets 18 veka - 1867 g. (Moscow, 1971); R.V. Makarova, Russkie na Tikhomokeane. 1743-99 (Moscow, 1968).

35