Resolution Item 1
Approval on
FY2021 Business Report and
Financial Statements

1
世界最高水準の安全性の追求～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
Copyright © 2020 by Japan Nuclear Safety Institute. All Rights Reserved.

一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety Institute1. FY2021 Activity Status (Main Actions)
Main Actions

FY2021 Activity Status(Items with “●” are related to Highly Focused Activity)(1) Effective andefficient
implementation ofpeer reviews (PR)

●Ensure to implement power plant PR (4 NPPs: Onagawa, Ohi, Takahama, Genkai)●Continue to take measures to obtain WANO-PR equivalency (Meeting to promote assessment are held
twice a month with WANO London office).
●Effective and efficient implementation of PR (Hold workshops for the purpose of training/capacity
building of reviewers)〇Peer Review

 Conducted 25 times since the founding of JANSI (2012)<The Role of JANSI Peer Review>• Evaluate the safety improvement activities of the operators• Create a mechanism for the top management of theoperators to commit to improvement through peer reviews<Desired End States>•Based on the premise that there is a feeling of trust between
the power plant (interview content, reports, and otherinformation will not be disclosed)•Conduct “quality peer reviews” that will lead to improvements
in power plants•Continuous involvement through “evaluation and support”•Ensure “independence”•Seek “highest excellence” for JANSI itself tooPeer Review Track Record of the Past 3 Years
FY2018FY2019FY2020

Ikata
Kashiwazaki
Kariwa (5-7)
Sendai
TsurugaKashiwazaki
Kariwa (1-4)
Shika
Ohi
Hamaoka

Ikata
Tokai Daini(Onagawa andTomari were
postponed due
to COVID-19
pandemic)

FY2021
Track Record
Onagawa
Ohi
Takahama
GenkaiTeam Meeting

Pursue the World’s Highest Level of Safety and Reliability2 Now under assessment for WANO equivalency.
2

世界最高水準の安全性の追求 ～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～

一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会

Japan Nuclear Safety Institute

Main Actions

FY2021 Activity Status(Items with “●” are related to Highly Focused Activity)(2) Strengthen daily
monitoring of plant
performance●Implementation of Feasibility Study Phase 2 for performance monitoring system construction(PM&Cont.M). (Partial trial will be conducted at the same time as the full-scale operation of
WANO-enhanced PM (ePM) in the second half of FY2022.)○Utilization of PI (Provide WANO-PI quarterly, collect/evaluate voluntarily-set common PI)(3) Continuously
improve and conduct
Integrated
Assessment for
nuclear stations○Operation of plant integrated assessment (sharing of integrated assessment results based on
FY2020 results)○Operation of power plant commendation (no plant commendation for this time)○Maintenance of past PI data (including recommended voluntary-set PI data).
*Conducted Integrated Assessment from FY2016.
・Conducted assessment based on the previous FY’s results and shared information in
CEO Session
・Power plant special commendation(FY2018: 3 plants, FY2019: 1 plant, FY2020: 3 plants, FY2021: None)

世界最高水準の安全性の追求～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
Copyright © 2020 by Japan Nuclear Safety Institute. All Rights Reserved.

3
一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety InstituteFY2021 Activity Status

Main Actions(4) Upgrade OE
tasks and actively
provideinformation○Collect/analyze OE information internally/externally and release documents to operators
according to the significance (Issued information notices (2 cases))・"Information sharing related to fatal accidents caused by CO2 emission from CO2 fire extinguishing equipment that occurred in
the general industries“・"Information sharing related to troubles of the U.S. Callaway 1 Condenser Air Off Take System Radiation Monitor Drain Piping 4
Loop Seal Loss (PWR WH)”

○Study for improvement/upgrade of OE tasks
・Strengthening of OE information sharing(Enhancement of NICS registration function, continued full-scale operation of private database)・Strengthening the utilization of OE information(Deepening of analysis method (improvement of OE analytical ability and trend analysis))・Enhancement of OE information processing(Consideration of OE-PI index enhancement (strengthening index enhancement, system construction))〇Utilization of Operating Experience Information (OE) Collect and analyze domestic and overseas OE information, and present measures etc. to the operators as necessary Domestic OE information is registered in the public database (NUCIA), and if necessary, roll out will be required.
Overseas Information
INPO

NRC

IAEA

Domestic Information
WANO

Collect OE Information
FY2021 Activity Results
・Domestic information analysis: 181
Roll out
42・Overseas information analysis 4732
Reference information 54
・Documents of Significance sent: 0・Documents of Warning sent: 2

Screening (Extracting important info)
Examine the concept of roll out andcountermeasures

Issue recommendation documents, etc.
to the operators

世界最高水準の安全性の追求 ～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～

NUCIA

Press
Releases

Overseas: Approx. 47,000 cases
Domestic: Approx. 4,000 cases
NRC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
IAEA: International Atomic Energy Agency
NUCIA: Nuclear Information Archives

Since the founding of JANSI, sent:
・20 Documents of Significance・12 Documents of Warning4
一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety Institute

Main Actions(5) Strengthen the
support for theoperators to resolve
shared important
issues

FY2021 Activity Status(Items with “●” are related to Highly Focused Activity)○Support for resolving important issues identified in PR (Shift to regular support from FY2022)①Operations fundamental for shift-operators in accident response simulator training②Mitigation of fire risk
③Support for performance improvement④Comprehensive support for SAT：(Please refer to the Main Action (13))○Held Plant Performance Review Meeting (PPRM) (3 times) Report to the Board Meeting○Support through MA Review Meeting (Held MA Review Meeting (5 times) and mid-loop
operation information liaison meeting (1 time))○Regular contact and visit by Senior Representatives (SR) and support by the technical contact
point (TCP) for inquiries from power plants, etc. in each specialized area (Regular communication
was carried out from each SR to the relevant power plant in a timely manner, and the status of
JANSI's support activities, etc. was communicated).
○Updated Excellence Guideline (Ex-GL) (OP, FP, MA, RP, CY, ES, EP)(6) Provide support○Support for constructing/operating new fundamental programs of operators
for autonomous①CAP：Held ”CAP Working-level working group” (5 times)
safety activity②CM：Held ”CM-WG” (4 times)
programs③Common Voluntary PI：Held a “Common Voluntary PI Review Working Group“ (2 times)④RM：(Please refer to the Main Action (11))●Support for improving the risk sensitivity of station staffs (Education and training to increaserisk sensitivity of station staffs: 8 sites, 3 corporate offices)(7) Provide support○Provide support such as exchanging opinions with preceding plants in cooperation with WANO
for restarting plants(Restarting support for Mihama Unit 3 and conduct questionnaire survey after the support)(8) Provide support●Support for reprocessing facilities by 11 teams according to Highly Focused Improvement items
for reprocessing and (Held JANSI progress meeting (8 times), steering meeting (2 times), progress report of support
other facilities
activities for the Board of Directors, etc.)
5
世界最高水準の安全性の追求～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Copyright © 2020 by Japan Nuclear Safety Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Japan Nuclear Safety InstituteFY2021 Activity Status

Main Actions(9) Strengthen
oversight function
including corporate
offices(10) Upgrade safety
culture diagnosis
method○Support for improving the effectiveness of operators oversight (Please refer to Main Actions (10) and (11))○Participation in WANO CPR (Dispatched reviewers to CPR by Moscow Center)○Implementation of evaluation from the perspective of organizational effectiveness (Started consideration of
implementation of evaluation from the perspective of organizational effectiveness)○Conduct safety culture diagnosis: 6 places (Higashidori, Ohi, Shika, Onagawa, Toshiba, Fukushima Daiichi)○Support for operators’ safety culture fostering/improvement activities (evaluate the self-assessment process of
all operators and present the evaluation results. In addition, detailed explanations and opinion exchanges havebeen conducted with 10 companies so far).
○Review of safety culture diagnosis method (Conducted 10Traits based on-site diagnosis, the 7th Safety Culture
Questionnaire Survey)○Implementation of safety culture assessment based on PR results (in addition, provided information andevaluation advice for PR)〇Safety Culture Diagnosis

 On-Site Diagnosis: Based on the results of a questionnaire survey every 3 years, it is conducted every 3 to 4 years for
power plants, major plant manufacturers, and fuel processing manufacturers (Able to hear opinionsof the on-site staffs, and grasp the potential problems)
The interview has been expanded to the corporate offices from FY2020.
 Questionnaire Survey of Safety Culture: Conducted as a fixed-point observation every 3 years for Special Members
and Associate Special Members【On-Site Diagnosis】
On-site diagnosis observes and analyzes the target
organization from multiple perspectives of organizational
culture, and gives a diagnosis on how they are involved inmaintaining and improving performance including safety,
from an independent and objective standpoint.
Its purpose is to provide an opportunity for the target
organization itself to recognize its own situation in relation
to safety more correctly, and to improve its learning ability
as an organization pursuing excellence in safety.

Track
RecordClassification

NPPs
JNFL

On-Site Diagnosis Track Record of the Past 3 Years

FY2018
Fukushima
Daini,
Takahama,
Shimane,Genkai, Oma

Plant
Toshibamanufacturers
Fuel
世界最高水準の安全性の追求 ～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
manufacturers

FY2019FY2020Tokai/Tokai
Tsuruga, Ikata,
Daini, Hamaoka, Sendai
Tomari,
Kashiwazaki
Kariwa, JNFL

FY2021
Track Record
Higashidori,Ohi, Shika,
Onagawa,
Fukushima
Daiichi

Mitsubishi
Hitachi-GE
Toshiba
Heavy
Nuclear6
Industries
Energy一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety Institute

Main Actions

FY2021 Activity Status(11) Summarize
safety improvementtasks and enrich RM
support○RM system development support (Startup of RM effectiveness evaluation/self-evaluation TF, held RM
working-level meeting (3 times))○Trial of RM review (Held RM trial review at 2 stations (Hamaoka, Sendai))○Development of safety measures evaluation method (Conducted SA evaluation of Shika Unit 2 at therequest of Hokuriku EPCO, FY2020 proposal follow-up report, proposal (No.7) issuance, interim summary ofdefense in depth level 1-3 and external events review, etc.) *IAEA SRS-46: IAEA’s "Defense in Depth Evaluation of NPPs"○Development of foundation for evaluation of safety improvement measures (Participation in IAEA SRS-46*
revision CS meeting, etc.)○JSAR Guideline development (Completed JSAR guidelines creation)〇Safety improvement measures evaluation, recommendation and support

Pursue world’s excellence by investigating/collecting the latest findings of the world, and evaluate/support safety improvement
measures of each operator.
A)
B)

Develop evaluation methods (IAEA’s SRS-46 is applied as methods different from those of operators and NRA. Participating in revision of SRS-46)
Safety Improvement Measures evaluation and recommendation (1 Defense in Depth level 1-3 recommendation was issued in May 2021. Now
following up on the response status of 6 SA (Severe Accident) measures recommendations)C) Survey on Good Practices of Safety Improvement Measures (Now conducting an overseas survey of issues extracted from the gap with the
U.S./Europe. U.S. STS, mid-loop operation, etc.)
D) Future Activities (Evaluation using the SRS-46 will be completed in FY2022, overseas surveys and seminars & lectures will be continued)【Evaluation of safety improvement measures】
A) Development of
Evaluation Method
Adoption of IAEA SRS-46"Assessment of Defense in
Depth for Nuclear Power Plants"(1) Independence, (2)Uniqueness, (3) Originality, (4)(Exclusion of) Self-righteousness
Now participating in the revisionof IAEA SRS-46

B) Safety Improvement Measures
Evaluation and Recommendation• SA evaluation: Complete for FY2020• DB-related: Under consideration/FY2021 interim report• External events: Under consideration/FY2021 interim
report• Identify and consider issues related to safety measures• Issue recommendations (1 for DB in FY2021, 6 for SAs)
• Follow up on recommendations (follow up on response
status every year)C) Survey on Good
Practices of Safety
Improvement Measures
Now conducting anoverseas survey of issues
extracted from the gap with
the U.S./Europe.
U.S. STS, Mid-loop
operation,
Digital I&C, External event
measures, Source term
behavior during SA, etc.

D）Future Activities
 By FY2022, evaluate Defense in Depth level 1-3 and measures against external events, and give an overallsummary～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
 Operators support activities such as new世界最高水準の安全性の追求
findings surveys, effectiveness evaluations,and seminar & lectures
held by JANSI will be continued in and after FY2023

Quantitative Evaluation of Safety Improvement
Measures (SA evaluation example)
Improvement of safety measures before and after
compliance with new regulatory requirements
Identify areas for improvement of safetymeasures
Standard comparable to global standard
Clarify differences from plant to plant7
一般社団法人原子力安全推進協会
Example:Comparisonof sufficiency evaluation between
Japan
Nuclear
SafetyInstitutedomestic
PWR plant
A andforeign plant B

FY2021 Activity Status

Main Actions(12) Leadershiptraining for
emergency
preparedness[Leadership training]○Planned and rational implementation of training
・Systematic implementation of CEO training, CNO training, Senior Management training, Station
Manager training, etc.
・Held "Training Promotion Working Group" (June, November) and shared the training plan while
confirming the intentions of the operators such as the scale and timing of the training.
Training Track Record (Number of people)
FY2018Fy2019FY2020

FY2021266

203 (*1)

128 (*1)

610 (*2)*1：In FY2019/2020, a part of the training was canceled due to the COVID-19
pandemic*2：Recorded 389 non-technical skill training participants

Online implementation[Support for nuclear emergency training]○Activities based on the Nuclear Emergency Training Review Committee
・Held the emergency training presentation via the Web
・Held Nuclear Emergency Training Review Committee Meeting B (3 times) and Meeting A (1 time)・Seminars and lectures related to emergency response were held
・Implement JNFL support as an alternative to Nuclear Emergency Training Assistance Visit

世界最高水準の安全性の追求～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
Copyright © 2020 by Japan Nuclear Safety Institute. All Rights Reserved.

一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety Institute8

Main Actions

FY2021 Activity Status(13) Educate
operators aboutsystematic
approach totraining (SAT)○Implementation of practical training and power plant caravan
・For SAT support, there were applications from 19 sites of 11 companies, and provided support for each power plant while
confirming the needs of each company (confirmed that the support status will be shared by the "Training Promotion
Working Group"). (SAT: Systematic Approach to Training)○E-learning attendance and promotion of guideline utilization
・Promote e-learning attendance and utilization of guidelines (145 people attended the e-learning (the cumulative total:
1592 people))[Prevention of Fukushima accident from fading]・Explain and share the utilization results and good practices of “maintaining conscience of Fukushima Daiichi accident video”
in the "Training Promotion Working Group" (November).
[Confirmation of Incorporating the lessons from the Fukushima Accident]・Lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi accident was posted on the member website, and held an online information
session for the operators.

(14) Incorporate
Fukushima
Daiichi lessons
learned〇Annual Conference

・JANSI holds the “JANSI Annual Conference” to report on the results of its activities, and to receive opinions from domestic/overseas
nuclear community in order to make future activities more effective.
Track Record of the Past 3 Years
Event Date

2020.3.18 (Cancelled)2021.3.17

2022.3.23

Number ofParticipants－

Approx. 600 (Held Online)

Approx. 600 (Held Online)

Panel
Discussion

The event was cancelled in response to the
spread of COVID-19 infection and the "Basic
Policy for Countermeasures against COVID19 Infections" announced by thegovernment.
A tripartite talk was held on the Denki
Shimbun, related to the theme"improvement of risk sensitivity" scheduled
for the day.

Establishment and Progress of Voluntary Continuous
Safety Improvement Initiative(Chairman) Professor Akira YAMAGUCHI, Nuclear Professional
School, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo
Fumihito OGATA: Executive Vice President, West Japan Railway
Company
Jeffrey B. Archie: Former CNO, South Carolina Electric & Gas
Company (SCE&G)
Yutaka FUJII: President & Director, Hokkaido Electric Power
Company
Kazuhiro IKEBE, President & CEO, Kyushu Electric Power
Company(Tripartite Talk)
Hiromi YAMAZAKI: President & CEO, JANSI
Risk Management from the perspective of
Hayabusa2 and Nuclear Power
Yuichi TSUDA: Hayabusa2 Project Leader,
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
Professor Akira YAMAGUCHI: Nuclear
Professional School, School of Engineering,
The University of Tokyo～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
Hiromi YAMAZAKI: President &世界最高水準の安全性の追求
CEO, JANSI

Enhancement of Resilience in Nuclear Safety -New
Perspective for Plant Operation-(Chair) Kyoko OBA: Deputy Chief Engineer, Japan Atomic Energy
Agency (JAEA)/Associate Professor, Nagaoka University ofTechnology
Dr. Erik HOLLNAGEL: Professor Emeritus, Linköping University
Jacques REGALDO: Senior Vice President, EDF
Dr. Kazue NAKAJIMA: Executive Director, Japan Organization of
Occupational Health and Safety
Keisuke NAGAI: Director and President, Shikoku Electric Power
Company
Hiromi YAMAZAKI: President & CEO, JANSI

9
一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会

Japan Nuclear Safety Institute

Main Actions

FY2021 Activity Status(15) Foster operators’
awareness as owner ofself-regulation byhaving discussion
among executives○Activities for understanding corporate office top management and station executives
・Held Board Meeting (5 times), CEO Session and CNO Session (4 times each)・Held interviews between the President&CEO and the newly appointed CEO/CNO (6 times)
・Conducted leadership training for corporate office top management and station executives
・Conducted web interviews between the Planning Department GM and the newly appointed station managers(Oma, Ohi, Genkai, Shika)
・Conducted interviews with the station manager and other executives during the joint assessment
・Dissemination of various contents to the station working-level (issued "JANSI ACTIVITIES" (6 times), issued"JANSI Annual Report 2020," published articles in Denki Shimbun, etc.)(16) Operator support
in emergency, e.g.
issue of significant
event notice○Cooperating with the operators and WANO-TC, participation in the operator-WANO training
・Incorporated areas of improvement for training in line with organizational reform in "JANSI Power Plant
Emergency Preparedness Guidelines" (4th revised edition)・Based on the above guidelines, participated in the operators nuclear emergency preparedness drill together
with the operators and WANO-TC.

(17) Secure
medium/long-term
human resources anddevelopment of humanresource development
program○Securing medium- to long-term personnel (Human resources request through "Staffing Planning
Meeting”)○Appropriate staffing (newly establish competence evaluation system)○Maintenance and improvement of staff competence (Maintenance of staff training system)○Sharing awareness and values within JANSI through knowledge management (KM) (Enhancement of
information held by those who left the company, training textbooks, etc.)

世界最高水準の安全性の追求～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
Copyright © 2020 by Japan Nuclear Safety Institute. All Rights Reserved.

一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety Institute10

FY2021 Activity Status

Main Actions(18) Raise awarenessas self-regulatoryorganization by the
executives○Small-group dialogue
・Conduct dialogue with the President&CEO (targets are transferees and all GLs: 40 people), and send amessage from the President&CEO at each dialogue
・Individual dialogue between the Chairman and GMs○Employee awareness survey
・Follow-up on the improvement status for proposals issued based on the results of FY2020 awarenesssurvey(19) Strengthen○Gathering information on the conclusion of a memorandum of understanding with NRA at WANO, etc.
collaboration with NRA (There is no progress in concluding MOU with NRA at WANO and JANSI)○Held "OE Regular Information Exchange Meeting" with NRA (4 times)(20) Build peer
relationships with
WANO, INPO and otherinternationalorganizations○WANO-related (World Governing Board Meeting (3 times), Tokyo Center Board Meeting (3 times), WIO
Conference (2 times) participation)○INPO-related (Held US-Japan CNO Leadership (LS) Meeting, participated in CEO Conference, held
INPO-JANSI Meeting)○Electricity of France (EDF) related (renewal of cooperation agreement with EDF)
○International organizations related such as IAEA, OECD/NEA, etc. (participate in ISRSC, etc.)○International Advisory Committee related (conducting web conferences with committee members andholding International Advisory Committee Meeting)

世界最高水準の安全性の追求～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
Copyright © 2020 by Japan Nuclear Safety Institute. All Rights Reserved.

一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety Institute112. FY2021 Activity Status (Technology Basis)
Technology
Basis

FY2021 Activity Status(A) Support throughautonomous
guideline
development○Development of Vessel Internals Inspection & Evaluation Guidelines: Held Review Meetings (3 times)○Development of EQ Management Guidelines: Held Review Meetings (2 times), EQ Management
Seminar○Development of guideline for Quality Improvement of Analysis work: Held Review Meetings (2 times),
published the third edition of revised guidelines, held information session, completed hand-off to FEPCat the end of March 2022.
○Industry-wide platform for maintenance engineering, dissemination of technical basis information(B) Development of(improved the maintenance information library, maintenance/enhancement of database, enhancement
maintenanceof on-site engineer network activities, maintenance of deterioration mechanism, etc.)
technology basis○Revision support for maintenance management rules, etc. (revision support for maintenancemanagement rules (JEAC4209))○Support through QMS committee: Committee held (3 times)(C) Organizational
effectiveness support ○Support through Internal Audit Committee: Committee held (3 times)○Training for improvement of quality assurance activities: QA new manager training, auditor training(QMS)(once each)○Support for revision of JEAC4111: At the "special lecture" (The Japan Electric Association), was incharge of the lecturer○Held Human Performance Improvement (HPI) Training: Basic, Advanced, RCA, Technical (4 times in(D) Organizational
effectiveness support total)○Continuous study of training for HF specialist education: Study through QMS Task Review Meeting (3(Humantimes), held “HF Specialist Meeting”
Performance)○Create safety awareness materials (posters): 3 times○Provide results of HF analysis to PR personnel as reference information: 4PR (Ohi, Genkai, Takahama,
Mihama)○Ensure to conduct manufacturer PR: 3 places(E) Manufacturer
12

support

世界最高水準の安全性の追求～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
Copyright © 2020 by Japan Nuclear Safety Institute. All Rights Reserved.

一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety InstituteTechnology
Basis

FY2021 Activity Status(F) Operation
Supervisors
Certification tasks○Operation Supervisors Certification: 4 times○Support for the operator experience training: Continued long-term acceptance (No new shorttime acceptance)○Enrich certifications：Explanation on knowledge and skills (KSA) catalog for emergency
personnel, maintenance of standard KSA catalog for BWR operators, explanation of revision of
JEAC4804 (Operation Supervisors Certification Regulations), etc.
(G) Maintenance Skill ○Granting certification and issuing certificates as per operators’ request: Written exam: 23
Certification tasks
people passed, Practical exam: 28 people passed, Exam certification: 28 people, Renewal: 893
people, Skills training (renewal pending): 170 people○Consideration of transferring tasks to other organizations: Completed transfer of duties to
JAPEIC(H) Support○Promotion of codes/standards maintenance:development of・Participation in codes/standards formulation meetings (committee, expert committee,
codes and standards subcommittee, review meeting, etc.) of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Japan Electric
Association, and Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers using the WEB system.
・Actively plan, participate, and present in academic conferences, domestic external seminars,
lectures, and training sessions held on the Web.
○Smooth transfer to FEPC:・Technical support for relevant utilities, cooperation in technical studies related to codes andstandards, etc.

13
世界最高水準の安全性の追求～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
Copyright © 2020 by Japan Nuclear Safety Institute. All Rights Reserved.

一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety Institute3. Corporate Overview(1) Change of members
March 31, 2021
Number ofmembers

Increase/Decrease
No increase or
decrease due toadmission andwithdrawal frommembership

March 31, 2022

March 31, 2021

Increase/Decrease

March 31, 2022

204

Decrease of 26178

129 companies

129 companies(2) Staff
Number of staff (*)(*) : including Directors (full-time), Executive Officers

14
世界最高水準の安全性の追求～たゆまぬエクセレンスの追求～
Copyright © 2020 by Japan Nuclear Safety Institute. All Rights Reserved.

一般社団法人 原子力安全推進協会
Japan Nuclear Safety Institute