UNODC’S ANTI-CORRUPTION WORK OVER THE LAST DECADE
Candice Welsch*

Until the 1990s, corruption was seen as a narrow national issue with limited impact.
Since then, however, it has been increasingly recognized as a transnational problem. Corrupt
officials hide their illicit proceeds of crime offshore; corrupt networks and organized crimegroups operate together to lower the effectiveness of law enforcement and to facilitate illicit
trade and contraband. In addition, corruption is always associated with inefficiency: it grows
where institutions are not effective and exacerbates ineffectiveness, thus hampering theimplementation of government policies, undermining sustainable development and weakening
security and law enforcement bodies.
In the last decade of the 20th century and beginning of the 21st century, an unprecedented
interest was developed in relation to good governance, effective government and public trust
in institutions. Corruption as both a cause and consequence of weak public institutions and thedeclining trust in government became the focus of this international discourse. The concernsof the international community brought to life the United Nations Convention against
Corruption: the sole global anti-corruption legal instrument to prevent and fight corruption.
Since that time, there has been increasing recognition that corruption hampers sustainable
development and can have serious consequences on the security of a country. This is reflectedin the adoption of Goal 16 of the Sustainable Development Goals which requires States to“promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access tojustice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels”, throughreducing illicit financial flows, strengthening the recovery and return of stolen assets,
substantially reducing bribery and corruption, and developing effective, accountable andtransparent institutions at all levels.
I. UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTIONA.

UNCAC: The Global Anti-Corruption Legal Instrument
The importance of harmonizing the international efforts to prevent and fight corruption
was recognized more than a decade before the actual adoption of the Convention. The road to
the Convention was paved by the efforts of the United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal
Justice Programme alongside the Centre for International Crime Prevention from 1989.
Important milestones in this process include the adoption of resolution 7 on action against
corruption by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and theTreatment of Offenders; the development of the International Code of Conduct for Public
Officials, adopted by the General Assembly by its resolution 51/59 of 12 December 1996; andthe adoption of the United Nations Declaration against Corruption and Bribery in International
Commercial Transactions on 16 December 1996 by General Assembly resolution 51/191. A
key milestone in this process was the development and adoption of the Convention against
Transnational Organized Crime, which was adopted by the General Assembly in resolution
55/25 of 15 November 2000. The process of negotiation on UNTOC saw extensive debate on

Chief, Implementation Support Section, Corruption and Economic Crime Branch, United Nations Office on
Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
*－ 30 －

whether and how corruption should be included in the provisions of the Convention. Whilecertain elements of corruption (including the criminalization of active and passive bribery of
public officials, international public officials and foreign public officials) were included in the
Organized Crime Convention, the complexity and importance of the challenges associated withcorruption were seen as requiring the development and adoption of a new, comprehensive legal
instrument.
This international consensus was formalized in the General Assembly resolution 55/61,
which established the Ad Hoc Committee for Negotiation of a Convention against Corruption
and provided for a process to be followed ensuring widest possible participation andinvolvement of Governments.
The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime provided input in and facilitated thework of the Ad Hoc Committee in negotiating the Convention. The UN Convention against
Corruption was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in its resolution 58/4 of 31
October 2003. It was opened for signature on 9 December 2003 in Merida, Mexico (which was
subsequently declared as International Anti-Corruption Day) and entered into force on 14
December 2005, 90 days after the date of deposit of the thirtieth instrument of ratification.
At the present time, UNCAC has 182 States parties and is close to becoming a universal
instrument.
B.

UNCAC Structure and Contents
The United Nations Convention against Corruption has 71 articles, structured in eightchapters. The “substantive corpus” of the Convention consists of four chapters－Chapter II(Preventive measures), Chapter III (Criminalization and law enforcement), Chapter IV(International cooperation) and Chapter V (Asset recovery).
It is often said that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Indeed, relying
only on ex post facto prosecution of corruption would be insufficient in environments where
corruption is prevalent and where engaging in corrupt practices may be seen as an undesirable
but unavoidable manner of conducting one’s business affairs. Even in societies with relatively
low levels of corruption, neglecting prevention would mean that corruption is only stopped
after it has already occurred－when the money has been stolen, the bribe has been given andaccepted or when the damage to the treasury, public trust and society has already occurred.
Recognizing this, UNCAC devotes the entirety of chapter II to the prevention ofcorruption. The Convention requires States parties to introduce effective and coordinated anticorruption policies and practices (art. 5); to designate or establish anti-corruption bodies withpreventive functions (art. 6); to strengthen the integrity of the public administration bypromoting measures such as merit-based career development (art. 7); and to adopt and enforce
codes of conduct and systems requiring public officials to disclose their assets and interests(art. 8).
The Convention pays special attention to the risks of corruption in public procurement
and management of public finances (art. 9). It recognizes that judicial and prosecutorial
integrity is indispensable for the fight against corruption (art. 11). It also recognizes theimportance of addressing corruption in the private sector (art. 12), promoting participation ofsociety (art.13) and preventing money-laundering (art. 14).

－ 31 －

In addition to prevention, UNCAC also pays due attention to the criminalization of
specific corruption offences and to effective law enforcement. The Convention recognizes that
corruption as a phenomenon has multiple societal and cultural dimensions which made itdifficult for State parties to agree on a single definition of corruption. Instead, Chapter III
formulates a number of specific offences which are to be criminalized, either on a mandatory
or optional basis, by States parties. The harmonization of the international anti-corruption
regime and of national criminal law definitions enables the Convention to act as a true legal
instrument, making international cooperation predictable and reliable.
Under the Convention, States parties are obliged to criminalize the active and passive
bribery of national public officials (art. 15); active bribery of foreign public officials andofficials of public international organizations (art. 16, para. 1); embezzlement,
misappropriation or other diversion by a public official (art. 17); laundering of proceeds ofcrime (art. 23); obstruction of justice (art. 25); and the participation in any capacity such as anaccomplice, assistant or instigator of an offence established in accordance with the Convention(art. 27, para. 1).
Optional offences, i.e. offences which the States parties shall consider criminalizing,
but are not obliged to actually to do so, include the passive bribery of foreign public officials
and officials of public international organizations (art. 16, para. 2); active and passive trading
in influence (art. 18); abuse of functions (art. 19); illicit enrichment (art. 20); active and passive
bribery in the private sector (art. 21); embezzlement of property in the private sector (art. 22);concealment (art. 24); and attempts to commit, or preparation for, an offence established inaccordance with the Convention (art. 27, paras. 2 and 3).
The Convention includes an array of criminal justice and law enforcement measures in
its Chapter III, which enable or facilitate the detection, investigation and prosecution ofcorruption, international cooperation in corruption cases, and recovery of stolen assets. These
provisions relate to the statute of limitations (art. 29), provisions relating to sanctions,prosecutions and adjudications (art. 30), freezing, seizing and confiscating assets (art. 31), andthe protection of witnesses (art. 32) and reporting persons (art. 33). Article 36 requires Statesto have specialized law enforcement bodies with the necessary independence, training andresources to carry out their functions. Provisions address the need for offenders (art. 37),
national authorities (art. 38) and the private sector (art. 39) to cooperate with law enforcement.
UNCAC contains, in its Chapter IV, extensive provisions on international cooperation,
including formal cooperation such as mutual legal assistance (art. 46) and extradition (art. 44),
as well as informal cooperation between law enforcement bodies (art. 48). In this, UNCAC iscompletely compatible with and follows the tradition of the Organized Crime Convention, witha couple of improvements. Under the detailed provisions of this Chapter, UNCAC may serveas the legal basis for mutual legal assistance and extradition even between countries which are
not a part of a bilateral or multilateral international cooperation or extradition agreement.
A new and truly ground-breaking feature of UNCAC is found in Chapter V which isdevoted to the recovery of stolen assets. UNCAC states that the return of assets is a“fundamental principle” of the Convention and that States Parties shall afford one another thewidest measure of cooperation and assistance in that regard (art. 51). The Convention includes
specific provisions on the measures and mechanisms for facilitating the repatriation of stolen
assets derived to their country of origin. Chapter V also provides for mechanisms for direct
recovery of property (art. 53) and a comprehensive framework for international cooperation(arts. 54-55) in confiscation matters.

－ 32 －

II. UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIMEThe United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime is an office of the United Nations anda part of the UN Secretariat. The office was established in 1997 through the merger of the UN
Drug Control Programme and the Centre for International Crime Prevention and just celebrated
its 20th anniversary. Throughout its operation, UNODC has been on the forefront ofinternational efforts to address transnational crime, including drug trafficking, corruption,organized crime, and terrorism. Its headquarters is in Vienna but the UNODC also maintains a
network of field offices around the world including regional and country offices and two liaison
offices.
UNODC is the custodian of the United Nations Convention against Corruption and acts
as the Secretariat to the Conference of the States Parties to the Convention and to its Mechanism
for the Review of the Implementation of the Convention. UNODC also provides significant
technical assistance to States parties to support the effective implementation of the Convention.
UNODC anti-corruption activities focus on three main areas: research, normative work andtechnical assistance.
A.

Research Work
Research is a key element of the anti-corruption work. To be effective, policymaking
should be based on facts and extensive research is needed in order to accurately obtain thosefacts. It is of utmost importance to understand and resolve a problem to study its causes in
depth and suggest meaningful responses. In addition, evaluating and monitoring theimplementation of anti-corruption policies is only possible in the presence of clear baseline
data and information on the changes introduced by the government policies that have been
implemented.
Recognizing the importance of research, UNODC has developed, over the years, stateof-the-art methodologies for measuring bribery and corruption both in the general populationand in the business sector. This methodology has been applied in a number of countries by
national research institutions with active support by UNODC. UNODC works with otherinternational organizations to constantly update and improve its research methodology.
UNODC is currently working with UNDP to develop a guide on anti-corruption surveys. This
work becomes especially important in the context of the 2030 Sustainable Development
Agenda and in particular to measure the progress towards implementation of Goal 16 and its
targets.
B.
1.

Normative Work: UNODC as a Secretariat
Conference of the States Parties
The Conference of the States Parties to UNCAC was established, pursuant to article 63of the Convention, to improve the capacity of, and cooperation between, States Parties toachieve the objectives of the Convention, and to promote and review its implementation. It
meets every two years. Its first session was held in Amman, Jordan in December 2006; thesecond in Bali, Indonesia, in January 2008; the third in Doha, Qatar, in November 2009; andthe fourth session in Marrakech, Morocco, in October 2011. The fifth and the sixth sessions of
the Conference took place in Panama in 2013 and in the Russian Federation in 2015,
respectively. The seventh session of the Conference is scheduled for November 2017 in the
UN Headquarters in Vienna.

－ 33 －

2.

Working Group on Prevention
The Conference of the States Parties to the Convention decided, in its resolution 3/2, toestablish an open-ended intergovernmental working group to advise and assist it in theimplementation of its mandate on the prevention of corruption. The Conference also decided
that the Working Group should: (a) assist the Conference in developing and accumulatingknowledge in the area of prevention of corruption; (b) facilitate the exchange of informationand experience among States on preventive measures and practices; (c) facilitate the collection,dissemination and promotion of best practices in preventing corruption; and (d) assist theConference in encouraging cooperation among all stakeholders and sectors of society in orderto prevent corruption. In its resolution 4/3, entitled “Marrakech declaration on the preventionof corruption”, the Conference of the States Parties decided that the Working Group should
continue its work to advise and assist the Conference in the implementation of its mandate on
the prevention of corruption; and should further continue to perform the functions of aninternational observatory gathering existing information on good practices in preventing
corruption, as well as provide information on lessons learned, the adaptability of good practices
and related technical assistance activities.
Since its establishment in 2009, the Working Group on Prevention has held eight
meetings during which its participants exchanged information and experiences, presented
national actions against corruption, discussed specific substantive topics as well as theimplementation of resolutions dealing with the prevention of corruption, and formulated
recommendations to be presented to the Conference.
Through its workplans, the Working Group has sought to examine different topics
under chapter II of the Convention. In recent years, topics discussed include education inschools and universities on anti-corruption efforts, the integrity in criminal justice institutions(8th session), the use of information and communications technologies to implement UNCAC,
integrity in sports (7th session), measures to prevent money-laundering, integrity in public
procurement processes and transparency and accountability in the management of publicfinances (6th session), mandates of anti-corruption bodies and public sector legislative andadministrative measures － including measures to engage transparency in the funding ofcandidatures for elected public office and, where applicable, the funding of political parties (5thsession).
All of the submissions received by States, the reports prepared by the secretariat andpresentations made during the meeting are available online on the website of the meeting andin the thematic compilation1 of the Working Group.
3.

Working Group on Asset Recovery
In its resolution 1/4, the Conference of the States Parties established the Open-ended
Intergovernmental Working Group on Asset Recovery. The objective of the Working Group is
to advise and assist the Conference in the implementation of its mandate on the return ofproceeds of corruption. In the same resolution, the Conference defined the functions of theWorking Group, such as assisting the Conference in developing cumulative knowledge in thearea of asset recovery, particularly on the implementation of articles 52-58 of the United
Nations Convention against Corruption, through mechanisms for locating, freezing, seizing,
confiscating and returning the instruments and proceeds of corruption; identifying capacitybuilding needs and encouraging cooperation among relevant existing bilateral and multilateral1

http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/WG-Prevention/thematic-compilation-prevention.html－ 34 －

initiatives; facilitating the exchange of information, good practices and ideas among States;and building confidence and encouraging cooperation between requesting and requested States.
The Working Group has held 11 meetings since it was established.
4.

Expert Meeting on International Cooperation
In resolution 4/2, entitled “Convening of open-ended intergovernmental expert
meetings to enhance international cooperation”, the Conference established the open-ended
intergovernmental expert meetings on international cooperation to advise and assist it withextradition and mutual legal assistance. In the same resolution, the Conference decided that theexpert meetings shall: (a) assist it in developing cumulative knowledge in the area ofinternational cooperation; (b) assist it in encouraging cooperation among relevant existing
bilateral, regional and multilateral initiatives and contribute to the implementation of the related
provisions of the Convention under the guidance of the Conference; (c) facilitate the exchangeof experiences among States by identifying challenges and disseminating information on goodpractices to be followed in order to strengthen capacities at the national level; (d) build
confidence and encourage cooperation between requesting and requested States by bringing
together relevant competent authorities, anti-corruption bodies and practitioners involved inmutual legal assistance and extradition; and (e) assist the Conference in identifying thecapacity-building needs of States. The sixth meeting will be held during the Conference of theStates Parties in November 2017.
5.

Implementation Review Group (IRG)
At its third session in Doha in November 2009, the Conference adopted resolution 3/1
on the review of the implementation of the Convention. In that resolution, the Conference also
adopted the terms of reference of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of theUnited Nations Convention against Corruption and established the Implementation Review
Group – a special body which monitors the review process, identifies challenges and goodpractices, and considers technical assistance requirements in order to ensure effective
implementation of the Convention.
The Implementation Review Mechanism (IRM) is a peer review process that assists
States parties to effectively implement the Convention. In accordance with the terms ofreference, each State party is reviewed by two randomly selected peers.
The Mechanism provides the Conference of the States Parties with information on
measures taken by States parties in implementing the Convention and the difficulties
encountered by them in doing so, thus promoting international cooperation, and helps States
parties identify the needs for technical assistance and promote and facilitate the provision ofsuch assistance.
Since its establishment, 162 States parties have completed their implementation review－
60 States Parties have completed their reviews under the first Implementation Review Cycle(on the implementation of Chapters III and IV of the Convention) and two States havecompleted their reviews under the second cycle of the Implementation Review. 162 executive
summaries were published on the UNODC’s IRG country profile website2 and 75 States parties
have agreed to also publish their full country reports.

2

http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/country-profile/index.html－ 35 －

6.

Technical Assistance
Assisting States parties to effectively implement the Convention is a priority for
UNODC. The provision of technical assistance is based on the principles of national ownershipand builds on the outcomes of the UNCAC Implementation Review Mechanism. Technicalassistance is provided to enable countries to accede to the Convention; to prepare them toeffectively carry out their functions in the context of the implementation review; to support
them in implementing the recommendations stemming from the review and; to help them build
legislative and institutional capacity to address, prevent, detect, investigate and prosecutecorruption, as well as engage in international cooperation and in asset recovery.
In line with Conference resolutions 3/4 and 4/1, technical assistance delivered by
UNODC for the implementation of the Convention takes into account the importance ofcountry-based and country-led, integrated and coordinated technical assistance delivery, andfollows a three-tiered approach (global, regional and national) to ensure synergy and efficiency.
In its resolution 6/1, the Conference underscored the importance of addressing the technicalassistance priorities identified in the country reviews, and invited other technical assistanceproviders to consider those priorities when designing and implementing new technicalassistance programmes or to incorporate them into ongoing programmes.
In the last years, UNODC has continued to follow up with technical assistance needs
arising from the first review cycle covering chapters III (Criminalization and law enforcement)
and IV (International cooperation) of the Convention. Since the start of the second cycle ofreviews, a number of technical assistance needs have also been identified in relation to chapters
II (Preventive measures) and V (Asset recovery). UNODC has often been requested to provide
technical assistance before and during the review process in relation to both completing thereview and addressing the substantive gaps or needs that have become apparent during thereview process. In addition, UNODC responds to direct requests for technical assistance fromcountries.
UNODC strives to ensure a global presence that is able to effectively respond totechnical assistance requests. UNODC’s network of field-based anti-corruption advisers
provides technical assistance at the regional and country levels. The advisers provide rapidly
deployable professional expertise to States parties as well as at regional levels and aresupported in their work by the UNODC Headquarters staff. Anti-corruption advisers play animportant role in strengthening regional coordination, encouraging South-South cooperation,and facilitating the exchange of good practices.
Currently, regional advisers are based in Fiji (for the Pacific), Thailand (one advisor forSouth-East Asia and a second one for South Asia), Senegal (for West and Central Africa) andPanama (for Central America and the Caribbean). A senior global adviser is based in Vienna
and national advisers are based in El Salvador, Guyana and Qatar.
UNODC field offices, with support from headquarters, implement national anticorruption projects in Bolivia, Colombia, El Salvador, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kenya,
Panama, Paraguay and Timor-Leste.
UNODC supports countries which offer targeted awareness-raising and advocacy atboth the political and legislative levels through detailed briefings, workshops, sample
documentation and advice on the process of depositing the instruments of accession to theConvention as well as pre-ratification workshops to help with the process of UNCAC accession.

－ 36 －

Of the nine countries that ratified or acceded to the Convention since September 2013, fivewere assisted by UNODC with the pre-ratification process and/or immediately after
ratification3. Sample documentation and advice on the process of depositing their instrumentsof accession to the Convention were provided to Oman, Somalia, South Sudan and the Sudan.
The demand for technical assistance from states parties is increasing. UNODC has adopted aprioritized and strategic approach to address the different requests, seeking to coordinate andcooperate with other assistance providers and international organizations.
Assistance is provided to develop or amend national anti-corruption policies or
strategies, to develop new or amend legislation, to establish new anti-corruption bodies and tobuild the capacity for prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of corruption. Issuesof particular interest for States parties include development of anti-corruption strategies,
development of laws which protect witnesses and reporting persons, capacity development of
law enforcement bodies and corruption risk assessment.
UNODC provided assistance to national institutions to strengthen their capacities totrace, seize, freeze, confiscate and return the proceeds of corruption, mainly through the joint
UNODC-World Bank Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Initiative. StAR supports asset recovery
efforts through a number of different measures including; country engagements, policy advice,
partnerships with States and other stakeholders, knowledge and innovation initiatives, andadvocacy. In an African country for example, StAR worked to support a strategy session forjudges and prosecutors on the effective application of non-conviction based forfeiturelegislation. Furthermore, over the past two years, StAR has provided a number of countries
with legal assistance in the development or amendment of asset forfeiture laws, including
several countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia.
Overall, from January 2016 to June 2017, UNODC provided assistance to 83 States
parties and trained over 6,000 practitioners.

Grenada, Kiribati, Oman, South Sudan and the State of Palestine. In the case of Kiribati, detailed briefings were
provided to a range of government stakeholders, and workshops were delivered for senior government officials
and for members of parliament.

3－ 37 －

UNODC supported a variety of different types of beneficiaries:

Number of activities

200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Government officials
AC authorities
Judiciary
Prosecution
Civil Society
Law enforcement
AC experts/practitioners
Investigation
Policy makers
Private sector
Academia
Financial intelligence
Parliamentarians
Wildlife/Environment
Customs
Sport integrity
Media
International…
Youth
Banking sector
Audit
UNCTs
Military
Human…
Counter Terrorism
Drug Trafficking

Beneficiaries

The types of activities carried out by UNODC are reflected here:

III. EMERGING TOPICS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION WORKA.

Education
UNODC continues to support anti-corruption education initiatives and theimplementation of article 13 (1) (c) of the Convention through two major education initiatives:
the Anti-Corruption Academic (ACAD) initiative and the Education for Justice (E4J) initiative.
ACAD is a UNODC-led collaborative academic initiative, which brings together academics,
international organizations and Governments to promote anti-corruption education in
universities worldwide. To date, ACAD has actively involved over 400 universities in its
activities and has produced a comprehensive anti-corruption educational tool, the ACAD Menu

－ 38 －

of Resources, containing over 1,800 articles, publications and research papers related tocorruption that can be used by universities in their existing programmes. A key resource
associated with ACAD is the model university course on the Convention which UNODC hasdeveloped and made available online for free in Arabic, Chinese, English, French and Spanish.4
The Russian language version will soon become available.
The second major education project launched by UNODC is the Education for Justice(E4J) initiative which is part of the Global Programme to Promote the Implementation of the
Doha Declaration. The E4J initiative is aimed at building a culture of lawfulness amongchildren and youth through the provision of age-appropriate educational materials on topics
related to criminal justice and crime prevention, including anti-corruption, and the integrationof those materials into the curricula of primary, secondary and tertiary education levels.
At the primary level, E4J focuses on promoting and teaching values such as acceptance,
integrity, respect and fairness. As part of activities at the secondary level, E4J is currently
supporting the upgrading of a mobile phone applications and works with civil society
organizations and research or academic institutes to develop non-electronic educational games,
including in the area of anti-corruption.
E4J addresses tertiary education by developing modules and materials that would
support academics in their teaching and research activities related to UNODC mandate areas,
including corruption, integrity and ethics.
B.

Corruption in the Private Sector
Since 2008 UNODC has been building the capacity of the private sector to engage inanti-corruption activities at both national and global level. UNODC is working to reduce
opportunities for corruption by enhancing public-private sector dialogue, improving
governmental anti-corruption frameworks and legislation, and creating a culture of integrity inthe private sector. UNODC worked closely with a number of private sector organizations andentities, including the Business-20 (B20), the G20’s dialogue with the private sector, and theWorld Economic ForumThe interactive e-learning tool for the private sector, entitled “The fight against
corruption” is now available in 24 languages. The tool was developed jointly by UNODC andthe United Nations Global Compact to enhance the understanding by the private sector of theConvention and the Global Compact’s tenth principle against corruption. To date, more than
225,000 users have taken the course and more than 40,000 users have successfully passed theend-of-course assessment and obtained the course certificate
C.

Wildlife
Wildlife and forest crime is a serious and growing problem, posing a significant threat
to the environment and negatively impacting economic and social development, security andgovernance. Illicit trade in poached wildlife enriches the organized crime groups and increases
the threat associated with them. Corruption is often used to facilitate poaching, smuggling andtrafficking and there are clear links between wildlife crime and fraud and money laundering.
This has stimulated governments and international organizations to seek ways to strengthen the
integrity in the wildlife law enforcement agencies, border guards, customs and all relevant

4

http://www.track.unodc.org/Education/Pages/ACAD.aspx－ 39 －

stakeholders and to ensure that, where corruption has been used to facilitate wildlife crime, it
is detected, investigated and prosecuted.
UNODC provides assistance to a number of countries in Latin America, Africa andSouth East Asia to identify and address corruption risks in wildlife agencies and in bordersecurity and to build capacity to investigate and prosecution corrupt acts linked to wildlife
crime.
This issue has also been addressed in a number of internal fora. The Conference of theParties to the Conference on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna andFlora adopted resolution 17/6 on “Prohibiting, preventing, detecting and countering corruption,
which facilitates activities conducted in violation of the Convention”. The G20 under theGerman presidency adopted the G20 High Level Principles on Combatting Corruption Related
to Illegal Trade in Wildlife and Wildlife Products in June 2017. The General Assembly recently
adopted a resolution in its 71st session entitled “Tackling illicit trafficking in wildlife” whichcalls for specific action to be taken to prevent and counter corruption linked to wildlife
trafficking.
D.

Customs/Borders
Corruption in customs is a threat to both the economic development and for the securityof the affected countries. Inefficient and corrupt customs services are unable to ensure the equal
treatment of importers and exporters in paying excise and customs duties and are likely to failin stopping illicit contraband and trafficking in drugs, firearms and wildlife.
UNODC actively supports specific anti-corruption initiatives in customs and promotes
the use of targeted corruption risk assessments, by assisting States parties to identify actual
corruption risks and scenarios, develop plans for addressing these risks and consequently
implement these plans.
UNODC actively cooperates to promote integrity in customs also through programmessuch as the Container Control Programme, a joint initiative of UNODC and the World Customs
Organization. Some of these measures include the development, introduction andimplementation of conflict of interest regulations, measures to increase transparency of
customs services, strengthening whistle-blower protection, as well as developing andintroducing strong control environment with proper oversight and accountability measures.
E.

Sports
The world of sports has gone through dramatic evolution resulting in many challenges
and opportunities. Factors such as increasing professionalization and expansion of scope of the
sports industry, to include extensive development of online betting markets combined with adiverse and multifaceted approach to regulation and governance of sports organizations, hasresulted in many benefits and opportunities.
However, a major downside is that some of the associated risks of this evolution for
sports organizations and associated stakeholders have not been adequately assessed or
mitigated. As has been pointed out in the past and borne out by recent scandals, at a broader
institutional level, sports organizations are responding in a reactive manner to threats such as
corruption and involvement of complex international criminal activity. Added to this have been
concerns about the legacy of major sport events.

－ 40 －

Competition manipulation in particular has become an increasing area of concern given
the links with organized crime and illegal betting and the illicit profits that can be generated
for those engaged in this activity. The scale of illegal betting is estimated at being $500 billion
and is a growing international problem associated with the rise of online betting sites. The
attraction for organized crime is obvious, with one study in 2014 estimating that $140 billion
had been laundered via sports betting.
Corruption is a facilitator for those looking to organize and benefit from competition
manipulation in sport. However, many countries and sports organizations are generally illequipped to understand and adequately respond to these threats.
By combatting corruption in sport and competition manipulation, in particular by
supporting agencies tasked with overseeing and enforcing rules in sports, opportunities for
those seeking to benefit from corruption and manipulate sport competitions are reduced andresources are better used for the purposes intended.
Against this backdrop, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) andthe International Olympic Committee (IOC) signed a memorandum of understanding in 2011and has since developed an excellent working relationship. This productive partnership has led
to the development of two publications related to the manipulation of sports competitions,
namely the UNODC-IOC booklet and study on Model Criminal Law Provisions for theProsecution of Competition. UNODC and IOC further cooperated during the development of
the Resource Guide on Good Practices for the Investigation of Match-Fixing, the UK’s AntiCorruption Summit in April 2016 and the INTERPOL-IOC workshop on combatting crimes in
sport, held in Rio de Janeiro in June 2016. Further to this, UNODC and IOC helped to establish
and launch the International Partnership against Corruption in Sport in June 2017.
F.

Cities and Local Government
The rise in urbanization throughout the world brings unprecedented challenges
associated with corruption. The growth of the large cities, the provision of services, thebooming construction and associated issuance of permits and licenses, the insecurity andorganized crime often result in a rise of corruption.
Trust in local government is in decline, reflecting the overall trend of declining trust in
government in large parts of the world.
To address corruption in local government and in urban settings, UNODC actively
engages with partners such as UN Habitat to promote the anti-corruption work in sub-national
level. UNODC country offices are also paying close attention to the issue; a recent publication
on Municipal Transparency by the UNODC Office in Bolivia focuses on the corruption risks
and transparency and integrity frameworks in local government.
G.

Violent Extremism and Corruption
Just like corruption, radicalization is not any more a narrow national problem. Extremistgroups use anti-corruption rhetoric in their recruiting material; and extremists are increasingly
quoting their frustration with corruption as a driving force for radicalization. Terrorist groups
also employ corruption in order to facilitate their activities and to avoid detection. UNODC has
begun research and on the ground work to explore whether strengthened state responses toactual or perceived corruption at the community level can reduce the propensity of youth toradicalize and is also looking at corruption in the security sector.

－ 41 －

H.

Corruption Risk Assessments
Effective prevention of corruption is only possible where the organizations correctly
identify the relevant corruption risks and design and implement proper mitigation plans toaddress the risks identified. However, most corruption risk management methodologies
developed in the recent years require a level of sophistication which is often lacking in the
public administration of a country with systemic corruption problems.
To assist the States parties in identifying, prioritizing and addressing corruption risks
at the organizational level, UNODC has developed a methodology, which is simple, quick andinexpensive. This methodology has already been applied in a number of different governmental
institutions and countries and has brought about measurable results, identifying existingcorruption schemes and helping to reduce the annual procurement budget of organizations by
up to 50 per cent.
The last 10 years saw a dramatic increase in the interest of UN Member States towards
the prevention and fight against corruption. This unprecedented attention to the issue brought
the number of the UNCAC States parties to 182. The impact of corruption on sustainable
development has also been explicitly recognized in goal 16 of the Sustainable Development
Goals and one can further argue that preventing and fighting corruption is key to theachievement of the entire 2030 Agenda.
UNODC, in its normative, research and technical assistance work, actively supported
this process. The Office continues to assist States parties to effectively implement theConvention – and the ever growing number of technical assistance requests underscore thevalue that States parties assign to this support.
The second cycle of the Implementation Review Mechanism, focusing on the issues of
prevention of corruption and recovery of stolen assets will present both a challenge andopportunity. Technical assistance providers, donors and anti-corruption practitioners should
be prepared to meet the growing demand for practical, measurable responses to corruption atcountry and organizational level. In this, UNODC remains at the forefront of the anticorruption work worldwide.

－ 42 －