“Mysteries of the Deep” a temporary exhibit ofdeepwater animals of Monterey Canyon.
Charles Farwell
Monterey Bay Aquarium 866 Cannery Row Monterey, Ca 93940
e-mail : cfarwell@mbayag.org

Introduction
David packard’s fascination with the deep canyons located in Monterey Bay led the Monterey Bay
Aquarium to start early investigations into the animals living in this unique environment. Our goal was tostudy the possibility of collecting and displaying these deep-sea animals to the public. Early work startedin 1987 with mid-water tows on research vessels from Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Moss Landing
Marine Laboratories and finally utilizing research vessels of the Monterey Bay Aquarium ResearchInstitute, MBARI. Their unique remotely controlled underwater vehicle was key to the success of theaquariums goals in making both observations and collections of deep sea creatures.

The “Mysteries” team began with a list of 80 potential animals for possible consideration for thetemporary exhibit; the final number was about 60. These 60 animals were robust and long-lived as well as
being new and of unusual appearance making them suitable for aquarium exhibit.
Early efforts of keeping animals from the deep taught the collectors and aquarists that special
equipment and techniques would be needed to keep these animals in good health for long periods of time.
Specialized holding and display tank designs, water temperature and light control as well as maintaining
correct oxygen levels,very low dissolved oxygen in some cases for certain animals. Correctly thought-out
collection techniques and ship-board care were shown to be critical to long-term survival.

The final exhibit featured a wide range of diverse animals collected from sheer canyon walls,
mid-water and from the sea-floor, pom-pom anemones, predatory tunicates, sponges, mid-water eel pouts,
ratfishes and catsharks represent a selection of the exhibit. The Mysteries of the Deep was open to thepublic in March of 1999 and remained popular to 2003 when it was closed. Collection, care, modifiedCollection locations and methods
Early work began offshore of San Diego collaborating with Scripps Institution of Oceanography,(SIO). We collaborated with researchers at SIO and in retum were given ship time to make mid waterCharles Farwell

exhibit life support systems and the species displayed will be discussed Hamilton et al., 2001.

144

collections. We later utilized ship time from Moss Landing Marine Laboratory which is located next to theMonterey Canyon. These collections utilized a modified mid-water trawl with an insulated cod-end(collection container that holds the specimens) that could be chilled to avoid temperature shock to thecollected specimens. These mid-water collections ranged in depth from 300 to 350 meters. All surviving
specimens were transferred to refrigerated, coldwater aquaria designed for supporting deep-sea fishes andinvertebrates.
Collections evolved to utilizing remotely operated deep-sea vehicles (ROV) belonging to theMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute. The majority of the collections utilizing the ROV were madeat depths to about 1000 meters, and the collections focused mainly on invertebrates found on the canyon
walls and the canyon seafloor. The ROV utilized grabber claws for picking up rocks with attached animals,suction hoses for swimming or floating specimens and sediment traps. All of the collected specimens weretransferred to refrigerated trays designed to hold the newly collected animals. Collections made by theROV were placed in chilled or refrigerated tanks for trarisfer back to the Monterey Bay Aquarium (MBA).

Experimental holding facilities
Dedicated laboratory space with controlled lighting, red filtered lights with low luminosity, cold
air-conditioning and specialized aquaria were utilized where temperature and oxygen content could bemodified and controlled to meet the specialized biological requirements of the collection. Low oxygen
content, 1.5mg O2/1 at 6°C was found to be essential to survival for predatory tunicates and droopy sea
pens. A system was devised where oxygen could be removed by bubbling nitrogen through the aquarium
water which drove off the dissolved oxygen. This process was controlled through the use of oxygen sensing
electrodes which regulated the release of nitrogen enabling the aquarists to maintain oxygen content at adesired level or range.
Specially designed tanks, circular or Kreisel types were used for maintaining and displaying
mid-water animals such as eel pouts and mysid shrimp.
All of the display exhibits were maintained at 5-6°C, and each had its own dedicated life support
system for maintaining proper water quality.

Exhibits
The special exhibit for the deep sea marine life of Monterey Canyon featured displays that focusedon the Mid-water, Canyon Walls and the Canyon Seafloor. Mid-water animals represented by eel pouts,(Melanostigma pammelas, Fig. 1a) red mysid shrimp, (Gnathophausia ingens, Fig. 1b), Black Prince
copepod, (Guassia princes, Fig. 1c) and various species of copepods proofed to be difficult to keep forCharles Farwell

145

longer periods of time and required frequent collections.
The Canyon Wall collections lent themselves to community species exhibits and featured a widearry of species that if collected with care were long lived in an aquarium situation. A representative list
would include: Red sea fans, (Swiftia kofoida, Fig. 1d), Mushroom soft corals, (Anthomastus ritteri, Fig.

1e), Predatory tunicates, (Megalodicopia hians, Fig. 1f), and a variety of sponges (Fig. 1g) frequently foundwith catshark eggs attached.
Canyon seafloor species were displayed as single species and as community exhibits depending on
compatibility and the delicate nature of the species to be displayed. Squat lobsters, (Munida sp, Fig. 1h) andSpiny king crabs, (Paralithoides rathbuni, Fig. 1i) File tail catsharks, (Paramaturus xaniurus, Fig. 1j), Ratfishes, (Hydrolagus colliei, Fig. 1k), Longspined thorney head rockfish (Sebastolobus altivelis, Fig. 1l) andApple anemones (Stomphia didemon, Fig. 1m) are found together and were compatible together in acommunity exhibit format. Pom-pom anenomes (Liponema brevicornis, Fig. 1n), Fragile pink sea urchin,(Allocentrotus fragilis, Fig. 1o) and Pacific hagfish (Eptatretrus stoutii, Fig. 1p) being more delicate or
sensitive needed to be displayed with other animals that would not disturb them such as Droopy sea pens
(Umbellula lindahli, Fig. 1p) and Johnson’s sea cucumbers, (Parastichopus johnsoni, Fig. 1q).

a. Eel pouts (Melanostigma pammelas)b. Red mysid shrimp (Gnathophausia ingens)ingensc. Black Prince copepod (Guassia princes)d. Red sea fans
(Swiftia kofoida)

Charles Farwell

Fig 1. Display deep-sea species in the Monterey Bay Aquarium.

146

Charles Farwelle. Mushroom soft corals(Anthomastus ritteri)f. Predatory tunicates (Megalodicopia hians)g. Sponges (species?)

h. Squat lobsters (Munida sp.)i. Spiny king crabs (Paralithoides rathbuni)

j. File tail catsharks (Paramaturus xaniurus)k. Rat fishes (Hydrolagus colliei)

l. Longspined thorney head rockfish(Sebastolobus altivelis)Fig 1. Continued.

147

m. Apple anemones(Stomphia didemon)n. Pom-pom anemones (Liponema brevicornis)

o. Fragile pink sea urchin (Allocentrotus fragilis)

p. Pacific hagfish (Eptatretrus stoutii)

q. Droopy sea pens
(Umbellula lindahli)r. Johnson’s sea cucumber (Parastichopus johnsoni)

Fig 1. Continued.

Care and feeding
Many of these animals are filter feeders and are fed by directing a weak current of water across thefeeding apparatus of the animals. This was accomplished by using a rubber squeeze bulb attached to a smallpacifica) were the most common food type. These items were used for most filter feeders including Red sea
fans, Mushroom soft corals, Predatory tunicates, Apple anemones, Pom-pom anemones and Droopy sea
pens. Active feeders such as, File tail catsharks, Rat fishes, Squat lobsters, Spiny king crabs and Pacifichagfish were presented with pieces of fish or squid. Other active feeders; Fragile pink urchins andCharles Farwell

diameter plastic tube, food (brine shrimp naupuli, adult brine shrimp (Artemia sp.) and krill, (Euphausia148

Johnson’s sea cucumber remove organic matter from the sandy bottom through the use of sticky feeding
appendages.

Future deep sea exhibits
A major remodeling of MBA’s Outer Bay Exhibits is now under process and the new exhibit themewill focus on seamounts and the ecological significance that they play in maintaining species biodiversity,
adding to primary productivity through ocean current modifications by diverting nutrient rich deep water tothe surface and the contribution of broad-cast spawn from large species-assemblages to the zooplankton
community, which then become available as food to other species.
Two deep sea community exhibits are planned: one representing the Davidson Seamount located120 km southwest of Monterey County. The other planned exhibit is to be a tropical seamount modeled
after Espirtu Santo Seamount in Baja California, Mexico, The species lists for these two exhibits are:Davidson Seamount; Mushroom Soft Coral, Red Sea Fan, Peppermint Gorgonian (Paragorgia arborea),
Red Licorice Gorgonian (Euplexaura marki), Apple Anemone, Scarlet King Crab (Lithodes couesi), RedVermillon Crab (Paralomis verrillis) and Thornyhead Rockfish.
Espirtu Santo Seamount; Elegant Coral (Pocillopora elegans), Orange Cup Coral (Tubastraea
coccinea), Yellow-polyp Black Coral (Antipathes galapagensis), Red Gorgonian (Eugorgia daniana),Longnose Hawkfish (Oxycirrhites typus) and Coral Hawkfish (Cirrhitichthys oxycephalus),Deep sea communities as a food source for epipelagic fishes
Documentation of deep dives presumably directed at foraging have been made for various membersof the Billfishes, Tunas and Lamnid sharks, dives exceeding 1000 meters have been recorded for tunas anddives of 300-600 meters for swordfish, marlin and white sharks (Boustany et. al., 2002; Block et al., 2001;
Milliman et al., 1967). Recent investigations utilizing retrieved data from surgically implanted archival tags
document feeding events with the associated peritoneal temperature rise in Pacific bluefin tuna.
Feeding events recorded at 300 meter depths are illustrated in figure 2; the temperature rise andduration are considered to be proportional to the energy content of the ingested prey item(Walli et al.,2007).

Charles Farwell149

Figure 2. Temperature signal for two feeding events in deep-diving Pacific bluefin tuna. Blue-dotted line is therecorded basal body temperature; the solid red line represents core temperature changes associated withingestion and digestive processes. All temperatures were recorded by an implanted archival tag which
was recovered after the fish was commercially landed. The solid blue line represents daily diving
record. Arrows 1A & 1B illustrate the core temperature drop resulting from ingesting an ectothermic
prey item that is at ambient water temperature. Arrows 2A & 2B point to the rise in core temperature
resulting from the metabolic processes associated with digestion. This is referred to as Specific
Dynamic Action (SDA).

Literature Cited
Block, B.A. et al., 2001. Migratory Movements, Depth Preferences, and Thermal Biology of Atlantic
Bluefin Tuna. Science, 293: 1310-1314.
Boustany, A.M., S.f. Davis, P. Pyle, S.D. Anderson, B.J. Le Boeuf and B.A. Block. 2002. Expanded niche
for white sharks. Nature, 415: 35-36.
Carey, F.G. and B.H. Robison. 1981. Daily Patterns in the Activities of Swordfish, Xiphias gladius,Observed by Acoustic Telemetry. Fishery Bulletin, 79: 277-291.
Hamilton, R., G. Van Dykhuizen and E. Seidel. 2001. New technologies, new species, and a new deep sea
exhibit at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, Bulletin de l’Institute oceanographic Monaco n. special 20fascicule 1.
Kitagawa, T., H Nakata, S. Kimura, T. Itoh, S. Tsuji, A. Nitta. 2000. Effect of ambient temperature on thevertical distribution and movement of pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

Milliman, J.D., F.T. Mayheim, R.M. Pratt and E.F.K. Zarudzki. 1967. Alvin Dives on the Continental
margin off the Southeastern United States July 2-13, 1967. In: U.S. Geological Survey TechnicalReport Vol. 27-29, 67-80. Woods Hole Oceanographic Instituiion, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.

Charles Farwell

206: 254-260.

150

Schaefer, K.M. and D.W. Fuller. 2002. Movements, behavior and habitat selection of bigeye tuna (Thunnusobesus) in the eastern tropical Pacific, ascertained through archival tags. Fisheries Bulletin 100:765-788.
Walli, A., D.P. Costa and B.A. Block. 2007. Estimating feeding from visceral warming in Pacific bluefin
tuna: Lab and field measurements. In Wexler, J.B and Margnlies, D. eds. The 58th Tuna Conference
58th ec. Vol. Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 46. Lake Arrowhead, San Bernardino County.
Weng, K., C. J. O’sullivan, C.G. Lowe, C. Winkler, H. Dewar and B.A. Block. 2007. Movements, behavior
and habitat selection of white sharks Carcharodon carcharias. Marine ecology Progress Series 338,
211-224.

Charles Farwell151