Open Access Original
Article

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45080

The Effect of Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy(EAT) on the Baroreceptor Reflex (BR)Ito Hirobumi 1

Review began 08/24/2023
Review ended 09/05/2023

1. Otolaryngology, Ito ENT Clinic, Funabashi, JPN

Published 09/12/2023© Copyright 2023
Hirobumi. This is an open access article

Corresponding author: Ito Hirobumi, hirobu@poppy.ocn.ne.jp

distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0.,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original author and source are credited.

Abstract
Introduction
Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) has been used as a treatment for chronic epipharyngitis, andalthough autonomic nerve stimulation has been pointed out as one of the mechanisms by which EAT
produces therapeutic effects, there have been few reports examining this mechanism of action. This study
investigated the effects of repeated EAT on autonomic nervous system activity in chronic epipharyngitis
patients over time, using heart rate variability analysis. In addition, we conducted a loading test using theactive standing test (AS test) to examine the effects of EAT on the baroreceptor reflex (BR).

Subjects and methods
A retrospective study was conducted on 39 patients who visited our clinic between July 2017 and November
2019 and underwent autonomic function tests with a diagnosis of chronic nasopharyngeal inflammation.
The subjects were divided into two groups: the improvement group and the invariant group forcomparison. Electrocardiographic recordings and blood pressure measurements were made under the stressof the AS test. Heart rate, high-frequency (HF) component, low-frequency (LF) component, and Coefficientof Variation on R-R interval were evaluated as indices of autonomic function. Component coefficient ofvariance high frequency was used as an index of parasympathetic function. ccvLF/ccvHF ratio was calculatedby dividing the component coefficient of variance low frequency by ccvHF. The AS test was conducted inphase 1 in the initial resting sitting position, in phase 2 in the standing position, in phase 3 in the standing
and holding the standing position, and in phase 4 in the seated and holding the sitting position. Systolicblood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were obtained in each phase. A paired ttest was used to compare the improved and invariant groups before and after treatment. The post-treatmentcomparison between the improved group and the invariant group was performed by unpaired t-test.
Variation of the evaluation index over time was evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA. Multiple
comparisons were corrected by the Bonferroni method.

Results
The EAT showed that parasympathetic activity was significantly suppressed in the improvement group,
while the AS test showed significant fluctuations over time for the improvement and invariant groups. Theinteraction between the time course and the two factors in the improvement and invariant groups was notstatistically evident. Although no significant difference was found, the improvement group showed atendency to suppress parasympathetic activity and a tendency to stimulate sympathetic activity compared tothe invariant group. Blood pressure in the improvement group showed a tendency to decrease.

Conclusions
EAT was found to suppress parasympathetic activity over time, and the AS test did not reveal an interaction
effect of EAT on BR. However, there was a trend toward suppression of parasympathetic activity andstimulation of sympathetic activity in the improved group compared to the invariant group. Blood pressurein the improved group tended to decrease. It is possible that EAT may have a positive effect on autonomic
neuropathy symptoms such as orthostatic dysregulation (OD), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome(POTS), etc. by stimulating the BRs. It is thought that the autonomic nervous system stimulating action andthe immune system stimulating action act synergistically to express the therapeutic effect of EAT.

Categories: Internal Medicine, Neurology, Otolaryngology
Keywords: inhibition of blood pressure variability, baroreceptor reflex (br), inhibition of parasympathetic nerve
activity, active standing test (as test), heart rate variability analysis, temporal effects, cardiocirculatory autonomic
activity, epipharyngeal abrasive therapy (eat), autonomic nervous system dysfunction, chronic epipharyngitis

Introduction
Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) is used as a treatment for chronic epipharyngitis [1], and thefollowing mechanisms of therapeutic effects of EAT have been pointed out: (1) astringent and bactericidal

How to cite this article
Hirobumi I (September 12, 2023) The Effect of Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) on the Baroreceptor Reflex (BR). Cureus 15(9): e45080.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

effects of zinc chloride, (2) purgative effects, and (3) vagus nerve stimulation effects [2]. The mechanism ofaction on the autonomic nervous system is thought to be stimulation of the autonomic nervous system bystimulating the vagus nerve projecting to the epipharynx and anti-inflammatory action via the inflammatoryreflex caused by vagus nerve stimulation [3].
EAT has been reported to have therapeutic effects on autonomic dysfunction (AD), including orthostatic
dysregulation (OD) [3], postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) [3], myalgic
encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) [4,5], long COVID (LC) [6-8], and other autonomic
dysfunction. From these reports, it can be inferred that EAT influences cardiocirculatory autonomic nervous
system activity. To date, however, few reports have examined the effects of EAT on cardiocirculatory
autonomic nervous system activity.
Harada S reported the effect of epipharyngeal stimulation on the vasomotor reflex. He reported that EAT
normalizes the vasomotor reflex [9]. Katori S performed the Mecholyl Test and analyzed the ear lobe vascularvolume pulses. He reported that autonomic symptoms caused by chronic epipharyngitis are due to latentpersistent stimulation and that EAT improved autonomic symptoms [10]. The author performed heart ratevariability analysis of EAT autonomic reflexes and found that sympathetic and parasympathetic activities
were alternately stimulated, and reported that the opposing excitatory and inhibitory stimulus inputs to thesympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems by EAT may activate the autonomic reflex function [11].
However, the mechanism of action by which EAT affects cardiocirculatory autonomic nervous system activity
is still largely unexplored.
This study used heart rate variability analysis to analyze the effects of repeated EAT on cardiocirculatory
autonomic nervous system activity over time in patients with chronic epipharyngitis. The effects of EAT on
baroreceptor reflex (BR) were also examined using an active standing test (AS test) [12]. We hypothesizedthat EAT improves AD in chronic epipharyngitis by activating the BR and that clarifying the effects of EAT on
autonomic nervous activity in the cardiocirculatory system will be useful in clarifying the mechanism oftherapeutic effects of EAT. The results of this study are presented in this report.

Materials And Methods
From July 2017 to November 2019, 1173 patients were diagnosed with chronic epipharyngeal inflammationaccording to Tanaka's diagnostic criteria [13] by visiting our clinic for EAT with the main complaints ofposterior rhinorrhea, hoarseness, abnormal feeling, chronic fatigue, and so on. Among them, 39 patients
underwent autonomic function testing using the AS test before and after the start of treatment. The medical
records of these 39 patients were examined for gender, age, duration of illness, duration of treatment,
number of treatments, changes in subjective symptoms, changes in objective findings, and changes inlaboratory records. The total number of subjects was 39, with an average age of 42.8 years; eight males, withan average age of 44.5 years; and 31 females, with an average age of 42.4 years. Based on the results of thetreatment efficacy evaluation, the patients whose symptoms improved were classified as the improvement
group (target group), and the patients whose symptoms remained invariant were classified as the invariant
group (control group), and the two groups were compared.
This study was a retrospective observational study based on existing medical records without obtaining new
samples or information. This study was conducted in compliance with the "Declaration of Helsinki" and the"Ethical Guidelines for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects" (partially amended on March 10, 2022).
Oral and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. When handling data and other materials
related to the study, I made sure to protect the confidentiality of the subjects and not to include any
information that could identify them in the publication of the study results. This study was conducted withthe approval of the Ethics Review Committee of the Chiba Prefecture Health Physicians Association(approval No. 20210601008).
Diagnosis and treatment of chronic epipharyngitis and evaluation of other findings were performed using aband-limited optical endoscopy system (Pentax EPK-i7000 video processor, VNL11-J10 videoscope with a 3.5
mm dia. tip outer diameter; manufactured by PENTAX Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The standard EAT
procedure performed in this study was as follows. First, the patient was anesthetized with 1% Xylocaine toprevent pain in the nasal cavity before EAT, and hyperemia and swelling of the nasal mucosa were removed
with a 0.01% adrenaline solution. Next, an endoscope was inserted nasally for endoscopic diagnosis. Next,
while observing the nasopharynx, a Rouze swab soaked in 1% zinc chloride solution was used to perform
EAT nasally. EAT was then performed orally using a Zermach pharyngeal crimp cotton swab impregnatedwith 1% zinc chloride solution. After observing the bleeding, the endoscope was removed, and the procedure
was terminated.
Electrocardiograms (ECG) were derived using II induction with electrodes attached to the chest. ECG
recordings were made using a heart rate monitor (Memory Heart Rate Monitor LRR-03 manufactured by
ARM Electronics, Tokyo, Japan). The blood pressure monitor was a biometric monitor (Circlemates, A&D
Corporation, Tokyo). The ECG detected the R-wave peak interval at a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz, andheart rate-linked continuous analysis was performed using the maximum entropy method [14]. Heart ratevariability analysis was performed using heart rate variability analysis software (Crosswell Kitsu Meijin,

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

2 of 18

Yokohama, Japan).
Heart rate (HR), high frequency (HF), low frequency (LF), and autonomic nervous activity (Coefficient of
Variation on R-R interval; CVRR) were calculated as indices to evaluate autonomic nervous function. HF
ranged from 0.15 to 0.40 Hz, and LF ranged from 0.04 to 0.15 Hz. CVRR is an aggregate of HF, LF, etc., andwas used as a measure of the sum of autonomic nervous activity. The component coefficient of variance highfrequency (ccvHF) is a fluctuation coefficient defined by Hayano and colleagues [15]. The ccvHF was used as
an index of parasympathetic function; the HF and LF components reflect sympathetic and parasympathetic
functions. The ccvLF/ccvHF ratio (ccvL/H), which is the component coefficient of variance low frequency(ccvLF) divided by ccvHF, was used as an index of sympathetic function [16].
For the AS test [17], the patient was first held in a resting sitting position for two minutes and then actively
stood up. After standing up, the standing position was held for two minutes. Next, the patient was seatedand held in the sitting position for one minute during the AS period, and ECG and blood pressure variability
were continuously recorded [16]. The recording interval was divided into four phases: phase 1 for the restingsitting position, phase 2 for the standing position, phase 3 for the standing position, and phase 4 for theseated sitting position. The mean values of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H in phase 1, HR in phase 2, andccvHF in phase 4 were calculated. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and diastolicblood pressure (DBP) were determined in each phase.
The first AS test was performed and measured before the first EAT, and the second AS test was measured
before the EAT after about 10 or more EAT treatments over a period of about 1 month. The results of the firstand second AS test measurements were compared to examine the effect of EAT on BR. 39 patients who
performed the first AS test were subjected to the Smirnov-Grubbs test, and one case was excluded as an
outlier. Thirty-eight patients were subjected to the phase 1 measurements, The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
was used to confirm that the measures of autonomic function were normally distributed.
The degree of improvement of subjective symptoms at the second AS test evaluation was evaluated on a 3point scale (improved, unchanged, or worsened), and the degree of improvement of objective findings at thesecond AS test evaluation was evaluated on a 3-point scale (improved, unchanged, or worsened). Based on
the results of the medical record survey, patients in whom both subjective symptoms and objective findings
improved were designated as the improvement group (target group). Cases in which subjective symptoms or
objective findings remained unchanged or worsened were designated as the invariant group (control group).
A comparison of the two groups was performed.
For the statistical study, the basic attributes of sex, age, and disease duration of the subjects were first
determined; the mean duration of treatment and the mean number of treatments before the second AS test
were determined.
Next, the effect of EAT on the AS test was compared between the two groups of patients: the improved groupand the invariant group for pre- and post-treatment measures of HR, CVRR, ccv HF, and ccv L/H in phase 1,
HR in phase 2, and ccv HF in phase 4, with statistical analysis using a The statistical analysis was performedby paired t-test.
Next, the effect of EAT on the AS test was compared between the two groups of post-treatment
measurements: HR, CVRR, ccv HF, and ccv L/H in phase 1, HR in phase 2, and ccv HF in phase 4, withstatistical analysis performed by unpaired t-test. unpaired t-test.
Two AS tests were performed, and 35 cases were able to record changes over time in all four phases. These
35 cases were analyzed. Within-group comparisons of pre- and posttreatment HR, CVRR, ccv HF, ccv L/H,
SBP, MAP, and DBP measurements were made for the improved and invariant groups by repeated measures
ANOVA (repeated measures (rm) ANOVA). Multiple comparisons were corrected by the Bonferroni method.
The effect of EAT on measurements during the AS test was also examined.
The statistical software EZR version 2.6-2 (www.jichi.ac.jp/saitama-sct/SaitamaHP.files/statmed.html) wasused for statistical analysis. A difference of less than 5% risk rate was considered statistically significant. No
statistical sample size calculation was performed. With a sample size of 15 cases in the improvement groupand 20 cases in the invariant group, the post hoc power was 41%, assuming a common standard deviation of
40% to detect a 20% difference in mean change from phase 1 to phase 2 in ccv HF between the improvement
and invariant groups.

Results
As a result of the evaluation, there were 16 cases in the improved group and 22 cases in the unchanged
group. Table 1 shows the basic attributes of the subjects. Most of the subjects with chronic epipharyngitis
were women in their 40s. The male-to-female ratio in the improved group was 1:2.2. The male-to-female
ratio in the invariant group was 1 to 6.3. The average duration of treatment for both groups was about 2
months, and the average number of treatments was about 10. Subjective symptoms improved in 26 patients

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

3 of 18

and remained invariant in 12 patients, for an improvement rate of 68.4%. The rate of improvement in otherfindings was 60.5%: 23 patients improved, 14 patients remained invariant, and one patient experienced an
exacerbation of symptoms. Both subjective symptoms and objective findings improved in 16 patients, for an
improvement rate of 42.1%.

Basic Attributes of the Subject

Improvement group

Invariant group

Number of patients (Male)

16 (5)

22 (3)

Age ( year)

47.6 (14.9)

40.1 (13.6)

During the disease (month)12.1 (13.1)

15.2 (24.1)

Length of treatment (month)

2.3 (1.1)

2.0 (0.8)

Number of treatments (times)

10.7 (5.0)

9.9 (6.2)

TABLE 1: Basic statistics of 38 cases
There were 16 cases in the improved group and 22 cases in the unchanged group. The numbers shown in the table indicate mean values. Numbers inparentheses indicate standard deviation values.

Figure 1 shows the results of within-group comparison of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H before and after
treatment in phase 1, HR in phase 2, and ccvHF in phase 4 in the improvement group. Figure 2 shows theresults for the invariant group. The results of the within-group comparison show that EAT treatment
significantly reduced ccvHF in phase 4 of the improvement group. No significant changes were observed in
the other parameters. HR and ccvL/H in the improvement group showed an increasing trend, while CVRR
and ccvHF showed a decreasing trend, although there were no significant differences. The trend of variationin each measure in the invariant group was not clear.

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

4 of 18

FIGURE 1: Within-group comparison of autonomic function indices
before and after EAT treatment in the improvement group
The results of the within-group comparison of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H before and after treatment in phase
1, HR in phase 2, and ccvHF in phase 4 of the improvement group are shown. Data distribution is shown in boxand-whisker plots. The bottom of the whiskers indicate the minimum value, the bottom box indicates the firstquartile (25th percentile), the middle line indicates the second quartile (median), the top box indicates the third
quartile (75th percentile), and the top of the whiskers indicates the maximum value. The horizontal line in the box
indicates the median and the mean is indicated by x. ccvHF showed a significant decrease after EAT treatment inphase 4. No significant differences were observed for the other evaluated indices. The median and mean of HR
and ccvL/H both showed an increasing trend after EAT treatment. CVRR and ccvHF both showed a decreasing
trend after EAT treatment.

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

5 of 18

FIGURE 2: Within-group comparison of autonomic function indices
before and after EAT treatment in the invariant group
The results of the within-group comparison of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H before and after treatment in phase
1, HR in phase 2, and ccvHF in phase 4 in the invariant group are shown. The indexes did not change
significantly. Median and mean ccvL/H tended to increase after EAT treatment; median and mean HR and ccvHF
tended to decrease after EAT treatment; median and mean CCVR did not change.

Figure 3 shows the results of the post-treatment comparison of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H in phase 1, HR
in phase 2, and ccvHF in phase 4 for the improvement group and the invariant group. The post-treatmentcomparison between groups showed no significant differences in any of the measures.

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

6 of 18

FIGURE 3: Comparison of autonomic function indices after EAT
treatment between the improvement group and invariant group
The comparison of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H in phase 1, HR in phase 2, and ccvHF in phase 4 after EAT
treatment is shown in white and gray box whiskers, respectively.
There were no significant differences in autonomic indexes; median and mean HR tended to increase after EAT
treatment; median and mean CVRR and ccvHF tended to decrease after EAT treatment; no change in ccvL/H wasevident; and median and mean ccvL/H tended to increase after EAT treatment.

The rm ANOVA results showed that the pre-and post-treatment HR, CVRR, ccvHF, ccvL/H, SBP, MAP, CVRR,
ccvHF, ccvL/H and analysis of variance of the mean values of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, ccvL/H, SBP, MAP, and DBP
before and after treatment in the four phases of the improvement group are shown in Table 2. The results ofmultiple comparisons of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H in the improvement group are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 5 shows the results of multiple comparisons of SBP, MAP, and DBP in the improvement group.

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

7 of 18

improvement groupphase 1phase 2phase 3Main Effects

Interaction

F value

P value

F value

P value

33.36

0.00**

0.67

0.97

15.13

0.00**

0.34

0.79

9.81

0.00**

0.11

0.95

4.27

0.01*

0.93

0.43

5.60

0.00**

0.53

0.66

6.13

0.00**

0.22

0.88

8.11

0.00**

0.25

0.86

phase 4

before77.09 (11.83)

81.52 (11.62)

81.95 (11.98)

80.19 (11.47)

after

79.52 (12.78)

84.26 (12.80)

84.42 (12.64)

82.45 (12.58)

before3.58 (1.21)

4.26 (1.78)

3.26 (1.52)

4.21 (1.57)

after

3.02 (1.35)

3.83 (1.90)

2.43 (1.09)

3.69 (1.46)

before1.23 (0.53)

1.53 (0.45)

0.97 (0.41)

1.20 (0.46)

after

0.98 (0.48)

0.89 (0.42)

0.75 (0.41)

0.99 (0.40)

before0.16 (0.08)

0.23 (0.13)

0.22 (0.15)

0.25 (0.14)

after

0.22 (0.18)

0.27 (0.12)

0.24 (0.12)

0.25 (0.14)

before125.26 (18.50)

120.80 (18.04)

127.47 (17.72)

119.13 (14.06)

after

119.40 (16.32)

118.00 (16.32)

120.13 (18.31)

114.47 (14.75)

before101.53 (16.88)

103.27 (17.05)

102.13 (17.06)

97.53 (14.14)

after

96.67 (15.70)

98.47 (19.44)

96.13 (16.12)

93.60 (12.63)

before78.00 (10.65)

78.13 (10.43)

77.47 (11.80)

73.33 (10.41)

after

75.00 (10.79)

74.73 (12.04)

73.20 (12.07)

70.80 (13.66)

HR

CVRR

ccvHF

ccvL/H

SBP

MAP

DBP

TABLE 2: Changes over time and results of analysis of variance of mean values of HR, CVRR,
ccvHF, ccvL/H, SBP, MAP, and DBP before and after treatment in the four phases of the
improvement group
The numbers shown in the table indicate mean values. Numbers in parentheses indicate standard deviation values.
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
HR: Heart rate; CVRR: Coefficient of Variation on R-R interval; ccvHF: Component coefficient of variance high frequency; ccvLF: Component coefficient ofvariance low frequency; ccvL/H: ccvLF/ccvHF ratio; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

8 of 18

FIGURE 4: Results of multiple comparisons of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, andccvL/H in the improvement group
Changes over time in HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and L/H measurements in the four phases are shown. A comparison ofchanges over time before and after EAT treatment in 15 patients was performed by rm ANOVA (Bonferroni
correction). However, the interaction effect of EAT treatment was not clear. There was a trend toward suppressionof each index in each phase after EAT treatment compared to pre-treatment.
HR: Heart rate; CVRR: Coefficient of Variation on R-R interval; ccvHF: Component coefficient of variance highfrequency; ccvLF: Component coefficient of variance low frequency; ccvL/H: ccvLF/ccvHF ratio* P <0.05, ** P<0.01

FIGURE 5: Results of multiple comparisons of SBP, MAP, and DBP in
the improvement group
Changes in SBP, MAP, and DBP over time in the four phases are shown. The white box whiskers before EAT
treatment and the gray box whiskers after EAT treatment show significant changes in SBP, MAP, and DBP,
respectively, but the interaction effect of EAT treatment was not evident. There was a trend toward suppression ofeach index in each phase after EAT treatment compared to before treatment.
* P<0.05, ** P<0.01
SBP: Systolic blood pressure; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; EAT: Epipharyngeal
abrasive therapy

The results of rm ANOVA and analysis of variance for the mean changes over time of HR, CVRR, ccvHF,
ccvL/H, SBP, MAP, and DBP before and after treatment in the four phases of the invariant group are shown in
Table 3. The results of multiple comparisons of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H for the unchanged group areshown in Figure 6. Figure 7 shows the results of multiple comparisons of SBP, MAP, and DBP in the
improvement group.

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

9 of 18

invariant groupphase 1phase 2phase 3Main Effects

Interaction

F value

P value

F value

P value

39.63

0.00**

0.12

0.95

18.22

0.00**

1.23

0.30

13.38

0.00**

0.10

0.96

7.97

0.00**

0.48

0.68

3.32

0.02*

0.13

0.94

2.91

0.04*

1.15

0.33

6.80

0.00**

0.44

0.73

phase 4

before78.69 (12.96)

84.35 (13.96)

85.20 (13.98)

80.95 (11.96)

after

76.88 (12.27)

81.84 (13.46)

83.21 (13.49)

79.07 (12.37)

before3.85 (1.36)

4.55 (1.77)

3.15 (1.33)

4.44 (1.63)

after

3.96 (1.49)

4.20 (1.29)

3.17 (1.19)

3.98 (1.29)

before1.32 (0.60)

1.16 (0.62)

0.97 (0.54)

1.22 (0.54)

after

1.22 (0.60)

1.08 (0.48)

0.92 (0.46)

1.14 (0.44)

before0.20 (0.11)

0.31 (0.18)

0.27 (0.15)

0.27 (0.10)

after

0.20 (0.10)

0.28 (0.15)

0.27 (0.14)

0.23 (0.06)

before116.05 (16.17)

115.45 (16.45)

111.70 (15.43)

112.55 (14.18)

after

115.00 (18.68)

116.10 (19.60)

111.50 (17.62)

113.20 (15.20)

before94.20 (14.64)

95.80 (15.67)

94.20 (13.80)

91.30 (10.71)

after

95.95 (15.03)

93.60 (16.68)

93.35 (14.42)

92.40 (12.45)

before73.35 (8.84)

71.95 (9.45)

72.00 (9.95)

70.25 (7.12)

after

74.10 (10.48)

72.80 (10.89)

71.30 (10.67)

70.55 (9.07)

HR

CVRR

ccvHF

ccvL/H

SBP

MAP

DBP

TABLE 3: Changes over time in the mean values of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, ccvL/H, SBP, MAP, and DBP
before and after treatment in the four phases of the invariant group and results of analysis ofvariance
The numbers shown in the table indicate mean values. Numbers in parentheses indicate standard deviation values.
* P<0.05, ** P<0.01
HR: Heart rate; CVRR: Coefficient of Variation on R-R interval; ccvHF: Component coefficient of variance high frequency; ccvLF: Component coefficient ofvariance low frequency; ccvL/H: ccvLF/ccvHF ratio; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

10 of 18

FIGURE 6: Results of multiple comparisons of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, andccvL/H in the invariant group
Changes over time in HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H measurements in the four phases are shown. The changes
in HR, CVRR, ccvHF, and ccvL/H before and after EAT treatment are shown in white box whiskers before EAT
treatment and gray box whiskers after EAT treatment. rm ANOVA ( Bonferroni correction ) was used to compare
the changes over time before and after EAT treatment in 20 patients. The interaction effect of EAT treatment was
not clear. The change in each index after EAT treatment was not evident compared to that before treatment. **P<0.01
HR: Heart rate; CVRR: Coefficient of Variation on R-R interval; ccvHF: Component coefficient of variance highfrequency; ccvLF: Component coefficient of variance low frequency; ccvL/H: ccvLF/ccvHF ratio;
EAT: Epipharyngeal abrasive therapy

FIGURE 7: Results of multiple comparisons of SBP, MAP, and DBP in
the invariant group
Changes in SBP, MAP, and DBP over time in the four phases are shown. The interaction effect of EAT treatment
was not evident. Changes in each of the assessed indices after EAT treatment were not evident. * P<0.05, **P<0.01
SBP: Systolic blood pressure; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; EAT: Epipharyngeal
abrasive therapy

The mean values of each autonomic evaluation index in the improvement group and the invariant groupfluctuated significantly over time. In other words, a main effect of time course was observed. The interaction
between time course and the two factors in the improvement and invariant groups was not statisticallysignificant. In other words, there was no clear difference in the effect of EAT on the improvement andinvariance groups.
The results of multiple comparisons showed that both the improvement group and the invariant group
showed significant fluctuations in each of the assessment indices over time. HR in the improvement groupand the invariant group increased in phases 2 and 3, and then returned to the same state as in phase 1 inphase 4. ccvHF showed an opposite trend to HR. ccvHF decreased in phases 2 and 3, and then returned to thesame state as in phase 1 in phase 4. ccvHF increased in phase 2, and then decreased in phase 3, and returnedto the same state as in phase 1 in phase 4. CVRR increased in phase 2, decreased in phase 3, and increased

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

11 of 18

again in phase 4. ccvL/H showed a tendency to increase in phase 2, and remained at the same value in phase
3 and phase 4. The mean and median fluctuations of the second measurement in the improvement groupwere larger than those in the invariant group. In the improvement group, CVRR and ccvHF decreased, while
HR and ccvL/H increased. The second SBP, MAP, and DBP measurements of the improvement group werelower than the first. The second blood pressure fluctuations in the improvement group tended to be
suppressed. In the invariant group, the variation between the first and second measurements was notevident. The effect of EAT on blood pressure variability was not statistically clear, but the improvement
group showed a greater effect of EAT on blood pressure variability than the invariant group.
Table 4 shows the results of the analysis of variance and change in mean values over time for the
improvement group and the invariant group after treatment. Compared to the invariant group, theimprovement group showed a decreasing trend in CVRR and ccvHF over time, and an increasing trend in HR
and ccvL/H. The improvement group showed a significant change in MAP and DBP over time, and theinvariant group showed a significant change in SBP over time. MAP and DBP showed significant changes
over time, but SBP did not show significant changes. The interaction between the time course and the two
factors in the improvement and invariant groups was not clear. In other words, the post-treatment groupcomparisons were not clear regarding the effect of EAT on each of the measures.

Group Comparison

phase 1phase 2phase 3Main Effects

Interaction

F value P value

F value P value

27.83

0.00**

0.89

0.45

17.00

0.00**

1.43

0.24

9.20

0.00**

0.22

0.86

3.46

0.02*

0.78

0.51

1.62

0.19

1.87

0.14

2.91

0.04*

1.11

0.35

6.15

0.00**

0.35

0.79

phase 4

improvement group

79.52 (12.78)

84.26 (12.80)

84.42 (12.64)

82.45 (12.58)

invariant group76.88 (12.27)

81.84 (13.46)

83.21 (13.49)

79.07 (12.37)

improvement group3.02 (1.35)

3.83 (1.90)

2.43 (1.09)

3.69 (1.46)

invariant group3.96 (1.49)

4.20 (1.29)

3.17 (1.19)

3.98 (1.29)

improvement group0.98 (0.48)

0.89 (0.42)

0.75 (0.41)

0.99 (0.40)

invariant group1.22 (0.60)

1.08 (0.48)

0.92 (0.46)

1.14 (0.44)

improvement group0.22 (0.18)

0.27 (0.12)

0.24 (0.12)

0.25 (0.14)

invariant group0.20 (0.10)

0.28 (0.15)

0.27 (0.14)

0.23 (0.06)

improvement group

119.40 (16.32) 118.00 (16.32) 120.13 (18.31)

114.47 (14.75)

invariant group115.00 (18.68) 116.10 (19.60) 111.50 (17.62)

113.20 (15.20)

improvement group96.67 (15.70)

98.47 (19.44)

96.13 (16.12)

93.60 (12.63)

invariant group95.95 (15.03)

93.60 (16.68)

93.35 (14.42)

92.40 (12.45)

improvement group75.00 (10.79)

74.73 (12.04)

73.20 (12.07)

70.80 (13.66)

invariant group74.10 (10.48)

72.80 (10.89)

71.30 (10.67)

70.55 (9.07)

HR

CVRR

ccvHF

ccvL/H

SBP

MAP

DBP

TABLE 4: Changes over time in mean values of HR, CVRR, ccvHF, ccvL/H, SBP, MAP, and DBP
and results of analysis of variance by group comparison between improvement group andinvariant group after treatment
The numbers shown in the table indicate mean values. Numbers in parentheses indicate standard deviation values.
* P<0.05, ** P<0.01
HR: Heart rate; CVRR: Coefficient of Variation on R-R interval; ccvHF: Component coefficient of variance high frequency; ccvLF: Component coefficient ofvariance low frequency; ccvL/H: ccvLF/ccvHF ratio; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure

Discussion
The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of EAT on the autonomic nervous system activity of the
cardiocirculatory system over time using heart rate variability analysis, and statistical analysis was
performed on the changes in autonomic function assessment indices in the improvement group and theinvariant group. The novelty of this study was the evaluation of changes in autonomic activity in chronic
epipharyngitis before and after treatment, separately for parasympathetic and sympathetic activity. The

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

12 of 18

possibility of EAT influencing changes in autonomic activity over time was evaluated. The subjects weredivided into two groups, an improvement group, and an invariant group, and a comparative evaluation of
the changes in autonomic nervous system activity in the two groups was conducted after the AS test wasadministered. Within-group comparisons between the improvement group and the invariant group showedsignificant changes in autonomic function as a result of AS test loading, respectively. Post-treatmentcomparison between the improvement and invariant groups showed no significant difference between the
improvement and invariant groups. However, the post-treatment improvement group showed greaterfluctuations in autonomic evaluation indices than the invariant group, Parasympathetic activity was
suppressed, sympathetic activity was stimulated, and blood pressure tended to decrease. The post-treatmentchanges in the improvement group were thought to be due to changes in BR, suggesting that EAT treatment
may have an effect on BR.
This study rated the rate of improvement on a three-point scale. The improvement rate of subjective
symptoms was 68.4%, and the improvement rate of objective findings was 60.5%. The cure rate for the
improvement group, which showed improvement in both subjective symptoms and objective findings, was42.1%. Ohno Y evaluated a group of patients who had undergone EAT approximately the same number oftimes and for the same length of time, using a 4-point scale. Ohno Y reported an improvement rate of 79.5%
for the chief complaint and 87.7% for the local findings [18]. Compared to Ohno's paper, the improvement
rate in this study was lower. This may be due to the more stringent criteria used in the evaluation methods ofthis study. It has been reported that chronic epipharyngitis tends to be more common in women [19]. The
male-to-female ratio in the improvement group in this study was 1 to 2.2, while the male-to-female ratio in
the unchanged group was 1 to 6.3, suggesting that women tend to have a harder time being cured than men.
The average duration of treatment tended to be longer, and the average number of treatments tended to behigher in the improvement group, suggesting that increasing the duration and number of treatments may
increase the cure rate.
The vasomotor reflex is influenced by the stiffness and elasticity of the vascular wall and consists of thevasoconstrictor reflex and the vasodilator reflex [20]. Harada analyzed the finger vasomotor reflex during asingle EAT stimulation and reported that the immediate effect of EAT was to initially elicit thevasoconstrictor reflex and then the vasodilator reflex [21]. In the same paper, it was also reported that when
symptoms are improved by EAT, the vasomotor reflex becomes smooth [21]. In the Harada paper,
sympathetic activity was first stimulated and then parasympathetic activity was stimulated; when symptoms
were improved by EAT, the vasomotor reflex became smooth, suggesting that EAT has the function of
normalizing reflex activity. This study found that EAT suppressed parasympathetic activity over time in the
improvement group. Relatively speaking, sympathetic activity is thought to be stimulated. The author
reported that EAT has a stimulating effect on sympathetic nerve activity [22]. In this study, EAT seemed tofacilitate autonomic reflex activity in the improvement group, suggesting that EAT improves autonomic
reflex activity and expresses a therapeutic effect.
When sympathetic nerve activity is stimulated by anxiety, fear, or pain stimuli, blood pressure rises.
Parasympathetic activity is increased to decrease this elevated blood pressure, triggering the vasovagal
reflex (VV reflex), resulting in hypotension and bradycardia. Excessive vasovagal reflexes may result in lossof consciousness or cardiac arrest [23]. Pathological vagal reflexes are more likely to be elicited in ME/CFS
because vagal homeostasis is impaired [5]. EAT is often painful, but empirically, vasovagal reflex syncope israrely associated. The inhibitory effect of EAT on parasympathetic activity may suppress the development of
the pathological vasovagal reflex. Based on the results of this study, the suppression of parasympathetic
activity by EAT may result in an improvement in sympathetic reflex activity, thereby ameliorating
cardiocirculatory autonomic symptoms.
In this study, a comparison between groups was made for the improvement group and the invariant group
after treatment, but no significant difference was found in the autonomic evaluation indices. The fact that
there was no difference between the improvement group and the invariant group in the autonomic
evaluation index by the second AS test suggests that the invariant group may have experienced the sameautonomic stimulating effect of EAT as the improvement group. In this study, the improvement group was
defined as those with improvement in both subjective symptoms and objective findings, while those withimprovement in either subjective symptoms or objective findings were classified as the invariant group. A
time lag has been reported to exist between improvement of subjective symptoms and objective findings[19], and the EAT effect on LC has been reported to be preceded by improvement of objective findings rather
than subjective symptoms [8]. It is possible that the method used in this study to classify patients into
improved and invariant groups based on subjective symptoms and objective findings was not appropriate. In
the future, it will be necessary to develop an evaluation index that can more easily and accurately evaluate
subjective symptoms and objective findings.
It is also possible that the classification of the improvement group and the invariant group in this study did
not significantly differ in the effectiveness of EAT treatment because the severity of chronic epipharyngitis
and the severity of autonomic symptoms before the start of treatment were not evaluated. Kawada analyzed
and reported on the static and dynamic characteristics of the arterial baroreceptor reflex. He pointed out thepossibility that the autonomic regulatory system responds differently in normal and pathological conditions[24]. Future comparative evaluation based on classification by symptom and severity of illness may be

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

13 of 18

necessary.
In this study, the effect of EAT over time was analyzed using rm ANOVA. Results showed that HR, CVRR,
ccvHF, and ccvL/H in both improvement and invariant groups showed fluctuations over time in phase 2 andphase 3 compared to phase 1 and stabilized in phase 4. Blood pressure also showed fluctuations in phases 2
and 3 and stabilized in phase 4. The subject patients responded normally to BR, and the homeostasis thatmaintains blood pressure was considered to be preserved.
The results of this study showed a trend toward greater variability in autonomic assessment indices after
EAT treatment in the improvement group compared to the invariant group. CVRR and ccvHF decreased ineach phase; HR and L/H increased. The improvement group showed a tendency to suppress parasympathetic
activity and stimulate sympathetic activity compared to the invariant group; SBP, MAP, and DBP decreased,
and blood pressure variability showed a decreasing trend. This may be due to the activation of BR bystimulating autonomic reflex activity and maintaining blood pressure homeostasis.
When a normal subject is subjected to a standing test, the BR acts to regulate blood pressure fluctuations
and maintain blood pressure The mechanism of action of the BR is that the initial active attempt to stand up
stimulates the sympathetic nervous system by information from the central command of the cerebral cortex.
On the other hand, the gravitational effect of the standing load causes a retention of blood in the veins of
the lower extremities and trunk. Cardiac output is reduced and blood pressure is lowered because blood
returning to the heart from the lower extremity veins is reduced. In the normal state, the BRs act quickly tostimulate sympathetic activity and inhibit parasympathetic activity, thereby increasing heart rate andcardiac contractility, and blood pressure is maintained by vasoconstriction. Further standing increases
circulating blood volume through activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and secretion ofantidiuretic hormone. Sympathetic activity is then suppressed and parasympathetic activity is stimulated,which stabilizes heart rate, cardiac contractility, and vasoconstriction to maintain blood pressure
appropriate for standing [16]. CFS, and LC, autonomic neuropathy symptoms such as dizziness and dizziness
may develop. In the improvement group in this study, the BR was activated by EAT, and blood pressure
fluctuation was reduced, suggesting that homeostasis was working to maintain blood pressure and that theactivation of the BR by EAT may have improved the cardiocirculatory autonomic neuropathy symptoms
caused by chronic epipharyngitis.
Katori performed a methacholine chloride muscle injection (Mecholyl BAPG test) and pharmacologicalautonomic function tests while recording the auricular vascular volume pulse wave in patients with chronic
epipharyngitis. A symptom classification of chronic epipharyngitis was performed and autonomic function
was evaluated for each symptom. The dizziness type showing autonomic dysfunction symptoms wasobserved in most cases with decreased parasympathetic function and increased sympathetic function, butthere were also cases with increased parasympathetic function and decreased sympathetic function. The
study revealed that autonomic dysfunction due to chronic epipharyngitis is not uniform. Katori reported
that when autonomic neuropathy symptoms are improved by EAT, autonomic function is also normalized[10]. In Katori's paper, the parasympathetic predominant cases may induce neurally mediated syncope [16],and EAT may suppress the pathological vasovagal reflex and normalize the parasympathetic function.
Sympathetic function predominant cases may also induce POTS and other symptoms [16]. Excessive
sympathetic hyperactivity induces the Reilly phenomenon [25], and EAT is thought to suppress excessive
sympathetic reflexes and normalize sympathetic function. Since chronic epipharyngitis is characterized by a
mixture of parasympathetic and sympathetic predominant cases, it is important to evaluate autonomic
function prior to the start of treatment.
When afferent signals increase with chronic persistent stimulation due to chronic epipharyngitis,
sympathetic nerve activity increases, and autonomic nerve activity, blood pressure, and other parameters
also change. In such conditions, the regulatory system for autonomic nerve activity is also thought to beabnormal. Yamamoto reported that the correlation between heart rate and blood pressure is different indiseases such as acute cerebral infarction and myasthenic sclerosis, because the central autonomic nervous
system is impaired differently in each disease [26]. EAT may have the function of regulating autonomic
nervous system activity. Although the evaluation of autonomic function by heart rate variability analysis isconsidered to have limitations, this study suggests that EAT suppresses parasympathetic activity andstimulates sympathetic activity to produce therapeutic effects on cardiocirculatory autonomic dysfunction
symptoms.
Next, a review of the literature on the mechanism of therapeutic effects of autonomic nerve stimulation of
EAT is in order. Parasympathetic and sympathetic nerves are distributed from the posterior wall of thenasopharynx to the canal, and both parasympathetic and sympathetic fibers flow into the pterygopalatine
ganglion (SPG). Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) [27] include cluster headache, SPG or vidian
nerve irritation [28] and inflammatory reflex pain. These disorders are thought to stimulate the trigeminal
nerve in the SPG region, inducing parasympathetic reflexes [29].
Parasympathetic reflex symptoms of TACs include mydriasis, eyelid drooping, lacrimal secretion, facial
cutaneous vasodilation, and trunk arterial blood pressure fluctuations. Trigeminal nerve stimulation

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

14 of 18

produces a hypotensive or elevated effect by input to the trigeminal spinal tract nucleus. Input to the middle
subnucleus of the trigeminal spinal tract is involved in the vasodilatory response, and input to the caudal
subnucleus of the trigeminal spinal tract is involved in the vasoconstrictor response. The conflicting
cardiovascular responses show differences among stimulus conditions, animal species, and individuals [30].
Although much remains unexplored regarding the reflex pathways of the baroreflex, given the effects of EAT
on cardiocirculatory autonomic activity, it is likely that EAT induces trigeminal sympathetic and trigeminal
parasympathetic reflexes that influence vasomotor and supraventricular centers.
Christine reported that blocking SPG (Sphenopalatine Ganglion block: SPG-block) improves symptoms of
TACs [31]. Hosseini et al. reported that SPG stimulation (Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation: SPG-Stim)(1) enhances collateral blood circulation, (2) stabilizes the blood-brain barrier, (3) provides direct
neuroprotection, and (4) enhances brain plasticity [32]. Cheyuo et al. reported that vagal afferents project tothe nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) and from the NTS to the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries
and basilar artery to modulate cerebral blood flow in a NO-activated manner [33]. Since vagus nerve
stimulation suppresses trigeminal parasympathetic reflexes [34], SPG electrical stimulation therapy (SPGStim), in which an electrical device is implanted in the SPG for symptomatic relief of cluster headaches, hasbeen clinically applied [35]. SPG-Stim is thought to improve cerebral blood flow by stimulating vagal nerve
activity, thereby expressing the effect of restoring brain function [36]. Tanaka reported Intranasal
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation (INSPGS) [6]. INSPGS stimulates both sympathetic andparasympathetic nerves. INSPGS is thought to improve cerebral blood flow and exert its effects.
Vagus nerve stimulation enhances cranial plasticity (neural plasticity enhancement) and improvesautonomic nervous system function [37]. when the mucosa near the epipharyngeal mucosa is abraded with
EAT, afferent nerves in the SPG-dominated area are stimulated, and both sympathetic and parasympathetic
nerves are stimulated to produce the effect The EAT is thought to stimulate both sympathetic andparasympathetic nerves. Although EAT expresses prompting and inhibitory effects by alternately stimulating
both sympathetic and parasympathetic activities, it is possible that the effects produced may differ
depending on the stimulus intensity, the site of stimulation, and the timing of stimulation.
Next, the interaction of EAT with the immune system and the autonomic nervous system will be discussed in
the literature. Nishi et al. conducted an immunohistological study and reported that EAT suppresses
interleukin (IL)-6 and TNFα production in the epipharyngeal mucosa [38]. EAT has an anti-inflammatory
effect on the local epipharyngeal mucosa. Overproduction of IL-6, an inflammatory cytokine, is involved in
the development of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases [39]. IL-6 has been reported to attenuate
arterial baroreceptor reflex function in the medullary solitary bundle nucleus [40]. Therefore, it is likely that
BR is attenuated in cases of chronic epipharyngitis, and EAT may improve BR by suppressing inflammatory
cytokines.
Mogidate reported that EAT decreased fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels [41,42], and the decreasein FeNO may be due to the suppression of type 2 inflammation, which is regulated by type 2 innate
lymphocytes. lymphocytes express β2 adrenergic receptors, and sympathetic stimulation of β2 adrenergic
receptors suppresses type 2 inflammation [43]; sympathetic stimulation by EAT may suppress type 2
inflammation.
Tracey KJ reported an inflammatory reflex in which the immune system is regulated by stimulation of thenervous system. He found that vagus nerve stimulation suppressed the production of inflammatory
cytokines [44]. Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS), an electrical stimulation of the afferent vagus nerve toenhance the function of inhibitory systems such as GABA, has been clinically applied to treat intractableepilepsy [45]. Transcutaneous VNS also enhances brain plasticity and has been clinically applied in stroke
rehabilitation [46]. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation has also been reported to be useful for POTS [47].
Afferent vagus nerve stimulation may affect both the nervous system and the immune system; EAT may
stimulate the vagus nerve to produce VNS-like effects.
Murakami reported that inflammation is induced in non-immune cells by IL-6 signals and named thismechanism of inflammation formation centered on non-immune cells the inflammation amplifier [48]. He
found Gateway Reflex, in which sympathetic nerve stimulation activates β1 adrenergic receptors to induce
inflammation and open the blood-brain barrier at specific vascular sites [49]. Murakami investigated themolecular mechanisms of the effects of pain stress, mental stress, electrical stimulation, and sleep
disturbance on chronic inflammatory pathology, and found that activation of sensory and sympathetic
nerves is an important factor in inflammatory activation in the central nervous system [50]. Adrenergic
receptor-mediated responses are thought to vary depending on the receptor and the cells expressing it.
Autonomic stimulation of the immune system may regulate the inflammatory response positively or
negatively, depending on the receptor that receives the input. Based on the above, it is possible that chronic
epipharyngitis induces inflammation in specific areas of the autonomic nerve center, and that EAT may
regulate inflammation in specific areas of the autonomic nerve center.
Various symptoms such as fatigue, dyspnea, brain fog, and autonomic neuropathy develop in LC [51], and it
has been reported that these may be due to vagus nerve damage [52]. Chronic irritation of the vagus nerve is2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

15 of 18

thought to induce encephalitis, resulting in the development of autonomic neuropathy symptoms; The
usefulness of INSPGS as a treatment for LC has been reported [6]. It has been reported that EAT for LC withchronic epipharyngitis tends to suppress parasympathetic function [8]. This study also revealed asuppressive effect of EAT on parasympathetic activity, suggesting that EAT may exert its therapeutic effectby suppressing the increase in parasympathetic activity caused by vagus nerve inflammation.
Kobori analyzed the reflex waves induced by trigeminal nerve stimulation and reported that trigeminal
nerve stimulation stimulates the vagus nerve reflex [53]. Conditioning stimulation of the superior laryngeal
nerve (vagus nerve) stimulates the laryngeal reflex (strangulation reflex) [54]. The preceding trigeminal andvagus nerve stimulation serves as the conditioning stimulus and controls the reflex [55]. In the standard EAT
procedure, in which nasal stimulation is followed by oral stimulation, it is possible that the initial insertionof the fiberscope into the nasal cavity and swabbing may serve as the conditioned stimulus, prompting andcontrolling the following nasopharyngeal posterior wall rub stimulus. The standard EAT with nasal
stimulation followed by oral stimulation is experienced to be more therapeutic than EAT with nasal
stimulation alone or EAT with oral stimulation alone. This may be due not only to differences in the size ofthe area to be rubbed but also to differences in autonomic nerve stimulation effects; trigeminal and vagus
nerve stimulation by EAT may interact to produce the effect.
Airway reflexes are a general term for various reflexes that are triggered by stimuli applied to the airways andoccur in the respiratory and circulatory systems. In addition to airway defense reflexes, there are otherimportant reflex mechanisms involved in respiratory control, swallowing control, and vocal control [56]. EAT
is thought to exert its therapeutic effect by inducing various autonomic reflexes. The immune system andthe autonomic nervous system interact with each other [57]. EAT is thought to exert its therapeutic effects
not only through its anti-inflammatory effects on the local epipharyngeal mucosa but also by stimulating
autonomic reflexes and the immune system through its sympathomimetic and parasympathomimetic
effects. Even after local inflammatory findings have improved with EAT, continued EAT may improveautonomic symptoms in patients with residual subjective symptoms. It is possible that autonomic nerve
stimulation by EAT activates the autonomic nerve center and enhances cranial nerve plasticity (neuralplasticity enhancement)[37], improving autonomic nerve function and symptoms.
This paper examined the effects of EAT on autonomic nervous system stimulation on cardiocirculatory
autonomic activity. It was found that parasympathetic activity was suppressed in the improvement group.
The mechanism by which this effect is mediated by the therapeutic effect is discussed. The results of thisstudy and the literature review indicate that the EAT affects the BRs and that the EAT regulates
cardiocirculatory autonomic nervous system activity by influencing the BRs. Normalization ofcardiocirculatory autonomic activity may improve AD in chronic epipharyngitis. The evaluation by AS test
load in this study showed no significant difference between the improvement group and the invariant group.
It is possible that there was a problem in the classification method of the improvement group and theinvariant group. Problems in classification by type of subjective symptoms, classification by severity ofsubjective symptoms, and how to evaluate the degree of improvement were considered. In the future, it will
be necessary to improve the problems in this study and to collect more cases for further investigation.
The abstract of this paper was presented at the 122nd Annual Meeting of the Japanese
Otorhinolaryngological Society (May 12-15, 2021, Kyoto, Japan).

Conclusions
As a temporal effect of EAT stimulation, the improvement group showed significant suppression ofparasympathetic activity. Evaluation by the AS test load showed no significant difference between the
improvement group and the invariant group, and the interaction effect of EAT on BR was not clear. Althoughno significant difference was found, the improvement group showed a suppression of parasympathetic
activity and a stimulation of sympathetic activity compared to the invariant group. Blood pressure in the
improvement group was found to decrease, suggesting that EAT may exert its therapeutic effect on
cardiocirculatory autonomic symptoms through a temporal effect on BR.

Additional Information
Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Ethics Committee of
the Chiba Prefecture Health Physicians Association issued approval 20210601008. Animal subjects: All
authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In
compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services
info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for thesubmitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial
relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have aninterest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no otherrelationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

16 of 18

Acknowledgements
The author would like to appreciate Dr. Manabu Mogitate, Director of Mogitate Otorhinolaryngology Clinic,
for his guidance on EAT.

References
1.
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.

14.

15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.

22.
23.
24.
25.
26.

27.
28.
29.
30.
31.

Horiguchi S: Epipharyngitis and its relationship to general diseases (Article in Japanese) . Journal of theJapanese Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 1966, 69:1-78. 10.3950/jibiinkoka.69.4_1
Hotta O, Tanaka A, Tani S: The importance of nasopharyngeal procedures in internal medicine: now,
another breakthrough is on the horizon (Article in Japanese). Stomatopharyngology. 2016, 29:99-106.
10.14821/stomatopharyngology.29.99
Hotta O, Nagano C: Consideration of various pathological conditions suggested to be related to chronic
nasopharyngitis and nasopharyngeal scraping therapy (Artile in Japanese). Stomatopharyngology. 2018,31:69-75. 10.14821/stomatopharyngology.31.69
Tanaka A: Efficacy of epipharyngeal abrasive therapy (EAT) in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue
syndrome (MC/CFS) and hypothesis of action mechanism. Journal of the Japanese Fatigue Society. 2021,
15:18-26.
Hirobumi I: Autonomic nervous system regulation effects of epipharyngeal abrasive therapy for myalgic
encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome associated with chronic epipharyngitis. Cureus. 2023,
15:e33777. 10.7759/cureus.33777
Tanaka A, Hotta O: The efficacy of intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation (INSPGS) in long COVID,
and its possible mechanisms. Scholarly Journal of Otolaryngology. 2022, 8:860-4.
Imai K, Yamano T, Nishi S, et al.: Epipharyngeal abrasive therapy(EAT) has potential as a novel method forLong COVID treatment. Viruses. 2022, 14:10.3390/v14050907
Hirobumi I: Effect of epipharyngeal abrasive therapy on long COVID with chronic epipharyngitis . Scholarly
Journal of Otolaryngology. 2022, 8:860-4.
Harada S: Relation between autonomic nerve symptoms and finger vasomotor reflex in epipharyngitis(Article in Japanese). Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1967, 70:841-56. 10.3950/jibiinkoka.70.841
Sanae Katori: Autonomic research on nasopharyngitis. Journal of the Japanese Society of Otolaryngology,
Head and Neck Surgery (Article in Japanese). 1969, 72:1728-58. 10.3950/jibiinkoka.72.9_1728
Hirobumi I: Heart rate variability analysis of autonomic nerve reflex in epipharyngeal abrasive therapy(EAT) (Article in Japanese). Autonomic Nervous System. 2022, 59:320-6. 10.32272/ans.59.3_320
Yamamoto T: Evaluation of autonomic nervous function by assessing baroreceptor reflex (Article inJapanese). Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2014, 54:1034-7. 10.5692/clinicalneurol.54.1034
Tanaka A: Band-limited optical endoscopic diagnosis and endoscopic nasopharyngeal abrasion in chronic
epipharyngitis (Article in Japanese). Stomatopharyngology. 2018, 31:57-67.
10.14821/stomatopharyngology.31.57
Kohara K, Nishida W, Maguchi M, Hiwada K: Autonomic nervous function in non-dipper essential
hypertensive subjects. Evaluation by power spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Hypertension. 1995,
26:808-14. 10.1161/01.hyp.26.5.808
Hayano J, Okada A, Amma F: Fluctuation of heartbeat - mechanism (Article in Japanese) . Artificial Organs.
1996, 25:870-80. 10.11392/jsao1972.25.870
Autonomic Nervous System Test (5th ed.). Japanese Society of Autonomic Neurology (ed): Tokyo; 2015.
Mitsuhiro A: Orthostatic test (Article in Japanese) . Equilibrium Res. 2021, 80:159-66. 10.3757/jser.80.159
Ohno Y: Classification of severity of chronic epipharyngitis and efficacy of epipharyngeal abrasive therapy(Article in Japanese). Stomatopharyngology. 2021, 34:163-72. 10.14821/stomatopharyngology.34.163
Hirobumi I: Statistical study of the effectiveness of EAT treatment for chronic epipharyngitis . Scholarly
Journal of Otolaryngology. 2022, 7:1014-25.
Kumada M, Terui N, Kuwaki T: Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Serves as Medullary Vasomotor Center (Article
in Japanese). Journal of Tokyo Women's Medical University. 1993, 63:17-25.
Harada S: Autonomic neuropathy associated with nasopharyngitis and its relationship to the phalangeal
vasomotor reflex. Journal of the Japanese Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 1967, 70:13752.
Hirobumi I: Effect of nasopharyngeal abrasion treatment on salivary amylase activity .
Stomatopharyngology. 2023, 36:33-41.
Mizumaki K: Neuromodulated syncope: vasovagal syncope. Journal of the Showa Medical Association. 2011,
71:530-41.
Kawada T, Sugimachi M: Open-loop system analysis of baroreceptor reflection . Measurement and Control.
2018, 57:557-62.
Reilly J: Heorrhagie, lesion vasculaires et lymphatiques dutube digestif determinecs par l' injection
penisplanchiquc de substances diverses. CRSoc Biol. 1934, 116:24.
Yamamoto T, Tamura N, Naito K, et al.: Usefulness of correlated heart rate and blood pressure
measurements in the evaluation of central autonomic fiber network function: a study in amyotrophic lateralsclerosis, acute stroke and Guillain-Barre syndrome. Autonomic Neurology. 2005, 42:283-7.
The Japanese Headache Society and International Headache Classification Committee: International
Classification of Headache. Igaku Shoin, Tokyo; 2018.
Sluder G: The role of the sphenopalatine ganglion in nasal headaches . N Y State J Med. 1908, 27:8-13.
Kumada M, Dampney RA, Reis DJ: The trigeminal depressor response: a novel vasodepressor response
originating from the trigeminal system. Brain Res. 1977, 119:305-26. 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90313-4
Silva AQ, Schreihofer AM: Altered sympathetic reflexes and vascular reactivity in rats after exposure tochronic intermittent hypoxia. J Physiol. 2011, 589:1463-76. 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.200691
Puig CM, Driscoll CL, Kern EB: Sluder's sphenopalatine ganglion neuralgia--treatment with 88% phenol . Am
J Rhinol. 1998, 12:113-8. 10.2500/105065898781390253

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

17 of 18

32.
33.
34.

35.
36.
37.
38.

39.
40.

41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.

47.
48.
49.
50.

51.
52.
53.
54.

55.

56.
57.

Bahr-Hosseini M, Saver JL: Mechanisms of action of acute and subacute sphenopalatine ganglion
stimulation for ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2020, 15:839-48. 10.1177/1747493020920739
Cheyuo C, Jacob A, Wu R, Zhou M, Coppa GF, Wang P: The parasympathetic nervous system in the quest forstroke therapeutics. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011, 31:1187-95. 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.24
Yoneda H, Kubo S, Hasegawa H, Tominaga S: Efficacy of nasal endoscopic pterygopalatine ganglion blockusing 4% lidocaine for cluster headache (Article in Japanese). Journal of the Japan Headache Society . 2010,36:255-9.
Nesbitt AD, Marin JC, Tompkins E, Ruttledge MH, Goadsby PJ: Initial use of a novel noninvasive vagus nerve
stimulator for cluster headache treatment. Neurology. 2015, 84:1249-53. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001394
Bornstein NM, Saver JL, Diener HC, et al.: Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation to augment cerebral blood
flow: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Stroke. 2019, 50:2108-17. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024582
Ikoma H, Matsui H: Control of the central brain environment by vagus nerve stimulation (Article inJapanese). The Autonomic Nervous System. 2022, 59:366-70. 10.32272/ans.59.4_366
Nishi K, Yoshimoto S, Nishi S, et al.: Epipharyngeal abrasive therapy (EAT) reduces the mRNA expression ofmajor proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 in chronic epipharyngitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022,
23:10.3390/ijms23169205
Nakane S, Mukaino A, Ando Y: The interface between the immune system and autonomic nervous system(Article in Japanese). Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi. 2017, 40:352-60. 10.2177/jsci.40.352
Takagishi M, Waki H, Bhuiyan ME, et al.: IL-6 microinjected in the nucleus tractus solitarii attenuates
cardiac baroreceptor reflex function in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010, 298:R183-90.
10.1152/ajpregu.00176.2009
Mogitate M: Effectiveness of epipharyngeal abrasive therapy on chronic epipharyngitis and the exhalednitric oxide levels. Intern Med. 2023, 62:1139-44. 10.2169/internalmedicine.9761-22
Mogitate M: Exhaled nitric oxide levels are associated with the severity of chronic epipharyngitis anddecreased via epipharyngeal abrasion. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2023, 50:534-9. 10.1016/j.anl.2022.11.003
Moriyama S, Brestoff JR, Flamar AL, et al.: β(2)-adrenergic receptor-mediated negative regulation of group
2 innate lymphoid cell responses. Science. 2018, 359:1056-61. 10.1126/science.aan4829
Tracey KJ: Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway . J Clin Invest. 2007,
117:289-96. 10.1172/JCI30555
Kawamura H: Neuromonitoring and neuromodulation (Article in Japanese) . Journal of Tojo Medical
University . 2008, 78:35-46.
Toffa DH, Touma L, El Meskine T, Bouthillier A, Nguyen DK: Learnings from 30 years of reported efficacy
and safety of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for epilepsy treatment: a critical review. Seizure. 2020, 83:10423. 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.09.027
Diedrich A, Urechie V, Shiffer D, et al.: Transdermal auricular vagus stimulation for the treatment of
postural tachycardia syndrome. Auton Neurosci. 2021, 236:102886. 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102886
Atsumi T, Singh R, Sabharwal L, et al.: Inflammation amplifier, a new paradigm in cancer biology . Cancer
Res. 2014, 74:8-14. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2322
Sabharwal L, Kamimura D, Meng J, et al.: The Gateway Reflex, which is mediated by the inflammation
amplifier, directs pathogenic immune cells into the CNS. J Biochem. 2014, 156:299-304. 10.1093/jb/mvu057
Nakagawa I, Murakami M: Inflammation amplifier and gateway reflex: The regulation of inflammation byneuroimmune interaction (Article in Japanese). Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi. 2017, 40:160-8.
10.2177/jsci.40.160
Lladós G, Massanella M, Coll-Fernández R, et al.: Vagus nerve dysfunction in the post-COVID-19 condition .
Preprints with The Lancet. 2023,
Logue JK, Franko NM, McCulloch DJ, McDonald D, Magedson A, Wolf CR, Chu HY: Sequelae in adults at 6
months after COVID-19 infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021, 4:e210830. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0830
Kobori T: Electrophysiological study of trigeminal-autonomic reflexes (Article in Japanese) . Jpn J Oral Biol.
1981, 23:186-96.
Hirobumi I: Reﬂex control of laryngeal functions in the cat: the effect of vibratory stimuli of the laryngeal
mucosa on the evoked laryngeal reflexes (Article in Japanese). Journal of the Japanese Society ofOtolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 1992, 95:1164-73.
Suzuki M: Effects of cranial nerve stimulation, especially trigeminal nerve stimulation, on vago-vagal
reflexes (Article in Japanese). Journal of the Japanese Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery.
1966, 69:536-42.
Nishino T: Mechanism of airway reflex (Article in Japanese) . Artificial Respiration . 1991, 10:125-33.
Takum K: Pathology of chronic nasopharyngitis and related diseases (Article in Japanese) .
Stomatopharyngology. 2021, 34:157-61. 10.14821/stomatopharyngology.34.157

2023 Hirobumi et al. Cureus 15(9): e45080. DOI 10.7759/cureus.45080

18 of 18