COMBATING CORRUPTION THROUGH EFFECTIVE CRIMINALJUSTICE PRACTICES, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ANDENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY: THE ZIMBABWEANPERSPECTIVE
Charity Matumbi＊

I. INTRODUCTION
Zimbabwe is affected by corruption just like any other country in the world over. Corruption has
debilitating effects and affects the most vulnerable citizens, the women, the children and the elderly at most.
Zimbabwe signed the United Nation Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) on 20 February 2004 andratified it on 8 March 2007, the Convention entered into force for Zimbabwe on 7 April 2007. Zimbabwe is asignatory to the African Union on Preventing and Combating Corruption (AUCPCC) which was adopted at
the Second Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the Union, held in Maputo, Mozambique on 11 July 2003. It
entered into force for Zimbabwe on 5 August 2006. To date thirty-four countries are members and State
parties to the regional Convention including Zimbabwe.
In 2004, Zimbabwe signed the Southern Africa Development Community Protocol on Corruption(hereinafter the SADC Protocol) in response to a regional call for leaders to pledge their commitment in thefight against corruption. Thereafter, Zimbabwe amended its Constitution1 and a provision for theestablishment of an anti-corruption body was included. The Anti-Corruption Commission Act2 was enacted in
2004 and the Commission was established in 2005. The Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (ZACC) is anindependent body established by the Constitution and mandated to investigate and expose cases ofcorruption, combat corruption, theft, abuse of power and other improprieties in the public and private sectors3.
Since then Zimbabwe has not looked back on the fight against corruption as it continues to make efforts tostrengthen its capacity and legal framework on corruption.
For the past two decades the Zimbabwean economy has been on the meltdown and one of the major
causes has been corruption. Although the Government showed its political will by ensuring the establishmentof a national anti-corruption body there are so many challenges which came about. The Commission is a bodythat is funded solely by the Consolidated Revenue Fund and since its inception it has budgetary constraints
which hamper most of the efforts to capacitate the Commission to enhance the fight against corruption.
ZACC requires capacity-building to enhance and strengthen its capacity to investigate corruption at thenational level. There are positive developments which have been ushered by the new dispensation led by His
Excellency, E. D Mnangagwa which will see the decentralization of the ZACC to all provinces. This is in linewith the mantra “zero tolerance to corruption”.

II. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN ZIMBABWE
The Zimbabwean legal system is based on the concept of separation of powers. There are three arms
which are the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. The legislature is responsible for making the laws
in Zimbabwe and these laws are enforced and implemented by institutions that are part of the executive. The
judiciary is a separate arm that should ensure the rule of law is upheld and it should remain independent. The
law enforcement agents are seized with the powers of investigating crime. The Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption
Commission is one of the law enforcement agencies which is seized with investigating all forms of corruptionin Zimbabwe. The corruption offences are outlined in the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act4 andsome of the offences are bribery, criminal abuse of office as a public officer, fraud involving corruption, money
Acting General Manager, Legal Services Department, Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission, Zimbabwe.
Amendment No. 18.
2
Chapter 9:22.
3
Section 255 (1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20).
4Chapter 9:23.
＊
1

213

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 107

laundering among other offences. In terms of the Constitution of Zimbabwe5 the Commission is mandated toinvestigate corruption cases and recommend the arrest of suspected persons6. The interpretation of the law
in this instance has been that the Commission can only investigate and not arrest persons suspected ofcorruption, and it remains a grey area of the law to an extent where there has been a constitutional challenge
in the Constitutional Court whether or not the Commission has powers of arrest. This legal lacuna has posed
challenges in the execution of the Commissionʼs mandate.
The Commission after completing its investigations recommends the arrest of suspected persons to theCommissioner General of Police. The police should scrutinize the investigation and formulate a reasonablesuspicion in order to effect arrest on a person suspected of having committed an offence. Thereafter, that iswhen the matter can be referred to the National Prosecuting Authority (hereinafter the ʻNPAʼ). The NPA has
to prove beyond reasonable doubt in each and every case, that a particular suspect has committed an offence.
The NPA is supposed to prosecute its cases before the court which is adjudicated by the judiciary.
A. Structure of the Courts
There are three main criminal courts in Zimbabwe, namely, the Magistrates Court, the High Court andthe Supreme Court. The Magistrate Court is the lowest criminal court in Zimbabwe. Two pieces of legislation
govern its operations. These are the Magistrates Court Act7 and the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act8.
This is the court where all cases of corruption are initially prosecuted. A corruption case can be referred to
the High Court depending on the threshold of the financial misappropriation or the seriousness of the offence.
The High Court is the next court of first instance and appeal in terms of criminal offences and it is governedby the Constitution and the High Court Act9. The highest court which can adjudicate criminal cases is theSupreme Court which is governed by the Constitution and Supreme Court Act10.
B. Offences Relating to Corruption in Zimbabwe
The offences relating to corruption in Zimbabwe are stipulated in the Criminal Law Codification and
Reform Act11 from sections 170 to section 174. Bribery is the first offence outlined and involves the receipt orgiving of a bribe for any consideration, corruptly using a false document, corruptly concealing a documentfrom a principal, corruptly concealing a transaction from a principal and criminal abuse of duty as a public
officer are the principal offences.

III. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ON CORRUPTION
Zimbabwe boasts of a relatively good legislative framework with regard to corruption. There are a goodnumber of pieces of legislation which relate to corruption. The supreme law of the land which is theConstitution of Zimbabwe has in its Chapter 13 made provisions for institutions which are responsible forcombating corruption which are the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission and the National Prosecuting
Authority, respectively. However, these key institutions have been buffered by the enactment of various
legislation some of which are the Money-Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act12, Prevention of Corruption
Act13, Public Entities and Corporate Governance Act14, Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act, and this is not
an exhaustive list.
The latest response was the enactment of the Money- Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Amendment
Act where the legislature addressed shortcomings of the anti-money laundering regime in terms of therequirements of the Financial Action Task-Force15 recommendations and United Nations Convention against
Corruption. The legislature has also enacted the Public Entities Corporate Governance Act after realizing
Amendment No. 20 (2013).
Section 255(3).
7Chapter 7:10.
8Madhuku L An Introduction to Zimbabwean Law page 61.
9Chapter 7:06.
10
Chapter 7:13.
11
Chapter 9:23.
12
Chapter 9:24.
13
Chapter 9:16.
14
Chapter 10:31.
15
Hereinafter FATF.
5
6

214

21ST UNAFEI UNCAC TRAINING PROGRAMMEPARTICIPANTSʼ PAPERS

that corruption in the public sector has become rampant and needed to be abated.

IV. STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS
Undoubtedly, corruption remains the most daunting challenge to good governance, sustainable economic
growth, peace, stability and development in Zimbabwe. In many corruption perception surveys, Zimbabwe isperceived as one the countries with high levels of corruption in Africa. Hence, addressing the problem ofcorruption in a strategic and comprehensive way is of paramount importance as a development priority for
Zimbabwe.
Zimbabwe has joined the world in the latest trends on investigating illicit financial flows. The Mbeki
report on Illicit Financial Flows highlights how corruption and weak transparency mechanisms allow tax
avoidance, trade mis-invoicing, abusive transfer pricing, and many other ways used to deny Africa to reap its
resources dividend. The 50 billion dollars Africa loses annually through illicit financial flows are resourcesthat could be used to create jobs for the youth who are now forced into illegal migration seeking greener
pastures16.
Corruption can be combated more successfully if a multi-stakeholder, comprehensive approach is chosen.
This approach will be successful if a mechanism can be provided where the relevant stakeholders, namely the
FIUs and the specialized agencies which investigate corruption can exchange relevant data in a trusted way.
In Zimbabwe the multi-stakeholder approach has been used to fight corruption. In 2016, the relevant
stakeholders in the criminal justice system collaborated and launched a campaign named ʻAgainst Corruption
Togetherʼ (ACT). This noble initiative was spearheaded by the Judicial Service Commission and the otherstakeholders were the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission, the National Prosecuting Authority, theMinistry of Justice. The ACT campaign was launched to raise awareness on corruption in the justice delivery
system. It was necessitated by the public outcry that the level of corruption in justice delivery had risen toalarming levels. The objective of the ACT campaign was to create anti-corruption desks in all relevant
stakeholder institutions, where reports would be received. The major targets were corruption related to the
judicial system. This campaign strengthened the capacity of institutions in the criminal justice system and it
also allowed for more effective dissemination of information when dealing with cases involving corruption.
Civil society organizations play a key role in addressing the scourge of corruption particularly throughadvocacy and monitoring the efforts of the country and intergovernmental organizations, but there still is aneed for a more unified and strategic approach to anti-corruption in Zimbabwe. The integration of
information between the public institutions mandated to combat crime and the civic organizations is still amajor challenge. There is an element of mistrust which eventually results in some very important corruption
cases not receiving due attention. The civil societyʼs role in formulating and implementing anti-corruption
policies is important for the success of institutions mandated to curb corruption. Zimbabwe has multiple anticorruption initiatives which have achieved limited success in alleviating corruption.

V. ZIMBABWEʼS EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION
In light of the rampant levels of corruption, the Zimbabwean Government continues to make efforts tocurb it. In the wake of 2018, the legislature enacted the Public Entities Corporate Governance Act17, whose
objective is to provide for the governance of public entities in compliance with Chapter 9 of the Constitution
and to provide a uniform mechanism for regulating the conditions of service of members of public entities andtheir senior employees.
A. Establishment of Anti-Corruption Courts
Against this backdrop, the Judicial Service Commission established and launched specialized AntiCorruption courts to tackle cases of corruption and will deal with all forms of corruption. The specialized
courts have been buttressed by the enactment of the amended Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime
Act whose provisions place reliance on a combination of civil and criminal procedures to combat financial
M. Begoto African Union Advisory Board on Corruption Concept Note 2017 “Winning the Fight Against Corruption: A
Sustainable Path to Africaʼs Transformation” page 3.
17
Chapter 10:31.
16

215

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 107

crimes though targeting the seizure and forfeiture of all tainted and illicit proceeds of crime. The judicial
officers and prosecutors are currently undergoing training on corruption matters. The establishment of thespecialized courts has seen the prosecution of five former Ministers and two of them have been successfully
convicted and are currently serving their terms of imprisonment.
B. Repatriation of Externalized Funds
Since the new dispensation of Government in 2017, the Zimbabwean government made an amnesty callfor the repatriation of externalized funds by Zimbabwean citizens and local and foreign companies whichwere operating in the country. This strategy was part of the initiatives of a massive anti-corruption campaign
by the new President, His Excellency E. D Mnangagwa. A list of individuals and companies who are alleged tohave ignored the directive to return all externalized funds amounting to billions of dollars has been madepublic and investigations have been launched in an effort to recover any proceeds which were externalized
illegally. This move was to curb rampant corruption, in order to register significant growth in the economy.
With the view to advancing the work on strengthening the recovery and return of stolen assets and in orderto develop good practices on asset recovery in line with the United Nations Conventions against Corruption,
Zimbabwe has implemented the good practice of asset forfeiture/parallel financial investigations through the
Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act. This initiative supports international efforts to end “SafeHavens for Corrupt Funds”. The anti-corruption exercise saw the return of $300 million dollars to thecountry, and there are 1166 cases of externalization of funds which are under investigation.
C. Corporate Governance Framework in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe enacted the developed and launched a Corporate Governance Code and which signified a new
dawn in the corporate culture of Zimbabwe, given the background of company failures mainly due tocorporate governance deficiencies, mechanisms for creating trust between shareholders, boards of directors
and management performance measurement standard, accountability, sustainability and ethical conduct of
directors. These areas which are extensively covered in the code are expected to result in corporate cultureof the highest standard which ensures the sustainability of business and ultimately will benefit Zimbabwe asa whole. In addition, Zimbabwe has introduced the Public Entities Corporate Governance Bill, which will
provide for corporate governance of public entities. Zimbabwe is also developing the National Integrity Plan
and the National Anti-Corruption Policy for use by public and private institutions as tools of corruption
prevention so as to enhance principles of effective public administration and corporate governance.
D. Legislation on Unexplained Wealth Orders
Zimbabwe recently passed legislation on unexplained wealth orders or illicit enrichment. The law now
requires that an enforcement authority can make a civil application to the High Court citing that they havereasonable suspicion that any person, natural or juristic, has unexplained wealth. The court if satisfied withthe application can grant an unexplained wealth order restraining or freezing the property and requiring the
Respondent to provide evidence to the contrary. This piece of legislation has enhanced the fight against
corruption where many persons have acquired wealth illicitly and are laundering the funds into thelegitimate system.

VI. CHALLENGES IN THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION
Zimbabwe is faced with the many challenges in fighting the scourge of corruption which are similar toother jurisdictions.
A. Gaps in Legislation to Fight Corruption
Although the Constitution of Zimbabwe, which is the supreme law of the land, had dedicated Chapter 13
to establish institutions to combat corruption, there are pieces of legislation which need to be enacted tostrengthen the anti-corruption corruption legislation. Zimbabwe is yet to enact legislation in line with theprovisions of Article 32 of the UNCAC which provides for witness protection for witnesses, experts andvictims of corruption. The absence of such legislation hampers investigations and prosecution of corruption.
In most instances the identity of witnesses is known and eventually they fear to come and testify in court
because there is a risk of intimidation, loss of employment and harassment afterwards. The relevant
institutions like the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission and civic organisations continue to lobby andadvocate the law-makers to consider the enactment of such important pieces of legislation.

216

21ST UNAFEI UNCAC TRAINING PROGRAMMEPARTICIPANTSʼ PAPERS

B. International Cooperation
The challenges faced when it comes to cross-border investigations cannot be overemphasized.
International cooperation is a major challenge for corruption investigations. Although, information sharing
platforms have been established through organizations like the Asset Recovery Inter-Agency of Southern
Africa (ARINSA) and International Police (INTERPOL) challenges occur in other jurisdictions where there isdelay or no response to enquiries on criminal offenders in extradition matters or enquiries on financial
investigations. This problem is not only peculiar to Zimbabwe but the world at large. Proceeds of crime are
kept in certain jurisdictions and efforts between countries to repatriate such proceeds are often frustrated bydifferent legal systems across borders. However, Zimbabwe continues to engage its counterparts and equallyassists when requests are received across borders for mutual legal assistance and extradition of offenders.
C. Strengthening Capacity of Institutions in the Criminal Justice System
In the 2012 UNODC executive summary of the Zimbabwe report it was observed that the lack ofresources to raise awareness and provide adequate training to enhance staff capacity contributed to aperception of mistrust in some criminal justice institutions. Continuous awareness campaigns on corruption
are centralized in major cities leaving the populace in small towns and rural areas unaware of the dangers ofcorruption. There has been intensive technical training for prosecutors which has been facilitated by the
UNODC and ARINSA. Prosecutors are posted to South Africa on an exchange programme in order for themto grasp the skills required when prosecuting corruption cases with substantial financial crime. It is, however,important for these skills to be attained by all the officers in the value chain of the criminal justice system.

VII. CONCLUSION
Zimbabwe, being a developing country, is making headway in its anti-corruption efforts, although thechallenges faced sometimes outweigh the progress. In its attempt to continue being relevant in the anticorruption regime, Zimbabwe continues to strengthen its collaborations with national, regional andinternational partners. Zimbabwe has undergone a National Risk Assessment under the Eastern andSouthern Anti-Money Laundering Group, and it is continuously making progress on the deficiencies noted in
its anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime. Currently, Zimbabwe isundergoing review by the UNODC on its compliance with Chapter II of UNCAC on preventive measures.
Ultimately, the Government is desirous of improving the integrity of the countryʼs financial system andreducing the scope of illicit transactions in the economy through an adequate and effective implementation of
the AML/CFT system. It is Zimbabweʼs hope to continue to have its institutions strengthened throughcapacity-building and strong partnerships.

217