Situating the Banna: An Ethnographic Descriptionof Ethnic Identification

KEN MASUDA
Nagasaki University

Studies of interethnic warfare in the Lower Omo Valley have explored relationships between
ethnic identity and culture and between society and ecology. This paper is the first to add ethnographic information about myth, clan classification, and interethnic warfare among the Banna
to academic discourse. It also clarifies how Banna people construct their "ethnic" identity: they
identify themselves as members of the Banna through a various forms of recognitipn and narratives, but these everyday activities do not guarantee a discrete Banna land, language, and culture.
Research has revealed that, contrary to the group's assertion, Banna identity has no discrete
unity. Appadurai (1996) theorized that locality is a "phenomenological property of social life,"
which might be discovered through description of neighborhoods as "the actually existing social
forms in which locality, as a dimension or value, is variably realized."
Keywords: Banna, clan distribution, identification, locality, warfare

1. INTRODUCTION
Since Fukui and Turton published "Warfare among East Mrican Herders" in 1979, many researchers
have focused on inter-ethnic warfare and relations among groups in the Lower Omo Valley. Thesestudies of southwest Ethiopia have clarified not only warfare, but also the dynamic processes of survival strategies and migration. Fukui conducted intensive research on the Bodi {1984, 1988, 1994)
and demonstrated that warfare, migration, and ethnic identity are strongly and profoundly indivisible.
Clearly, material-objective factors and conscious-subjective factors are related, and it remains to be
seen which of these is decisive for the process of ethnic identification. According to Fukui, "sharedcultural attributes cannot form an ethnic group, unless its members also share what Ri {1985) calls
the 'we consciousness.' It is quite natural that the consciousness of 'they' is a prerequisite for the
existence of 'we.' These two kinds of consciousness are not permanendy fixed in contradistinction"{Fukui 1994: 33).
The goal of this study is to provide an ethnographic description of ethnic identification among the
Banna. However, this will first require addressing other issues: Who are the Banna? What makes the
Banna an ethnic collective? And do the Banna have any substantial basis that guarantees their identity? Addressing these issues may involve questioning assumptions about fixation and naturalizationof ethnic discreteness. While the Banna appear to be a group defined as an aggregate of individuals,
this study approach them as an ethnic "group" by focusing on the identification process. When weview an "ethnic group" by focusing on each person's identity {rather than simply an "ethnic identity"),
we realize that the real feeling of"ethnic unity" that may appear in daily discourse is historically andNilo-Ethiopian Studies 13:47-62 (2009)
Copyright© 2009.Japan Association for Nilo-Ethiopian Studies

47

48

Nilo-Ethiopian Studies

socially constituted from a complex of plural identities, such as, clan, lineage, moiety, village, andage-grade. These plural identities have objective attributes that can be considered organizational; asa whole, these identities are phenomenological.
Appadurai {1996) claimed that, when discussing cultural dimensions of globalization, it is important to include the process of identification, specifically the relation between "locality" and "neighborhoods." According to Appadurai, locality is "a phenomenological property of social life" and "astructure of feeling that yields particular sorts of material effects" {Appadurai 1996: 182). In contrast,"neighborhoods" refer to "the actually existing social forms in which locality, as a dimension or value,
is variably realized" {Appdadurai 1996: 178-9). If this is correct, ethnic identity can be equated withlocality through use of neighborhoods such as lineage and clan name, myth, narrative, spatial recognition, and memory of warfare.
Banna people certainly refer to themselves as Banna, differentiating themselves from other surrounding groups, but the process of identification involves plural factors, which can even be situational. This study analyzed discursive aspects ofBanna myth, clan classification, and warfare because
the people have indicated that these represent the recognized and valued social order and neighborhoods. Although each person's narrative is basically subjective, it acquires objective attributes once
it is shared with society. Schlee {1989) studied pastoral peoples in Northern Kenya and found thatclan identity occupies a significant position in the process of ethnic identification. When examining "ethnic identity," an analysis of inter-ethnic warfare can provide important information for two
reasons: first, as demonstrated by Barth {1969), the process of self-identification functions in termsof other groups; second, considerable research is available about inter-ethnic conflicts in southwest
Ethiopia. When focusing on the narrative aspects of myths, information about clans and warfare canhelp situate Banna identity as a phenomenological property.

2.LANDOFTHEBANNA
2.1. Land ofthe Banna
The Banna, or BanyaO>, live in the savannah-woodland area between the Weito and Omo Rivers. The
language of the Banna, which is a dialect of Hamar, is classified as south Omotic (c£ Tsuge 1996).
Their subsistence economy is based on sorghum and maize cultivation and cattle herding. The Bannashare a common cultural background with the Hamar, their southern neighbor, and intermarry with
the South Ari and North Hamar.
Based on a census conducted in the early 1990s (Central Statistical Authority; CSA 1996), Banna
land is administratively included in the Hamer-Bena district (wereda) and divided into 15 administrative villages (kebeles), each of which consists of several traditional villages.
Banna people consider Banna land to be divided into two ritual regions:Ai/ama and Anno (or Arkor).
The western part of Banna land, Ailama, covers the area corresponding to three kebeles (Dizishi'sh,
Goldya, and Mokocha) and some southern Ari areas; it is said to be protected by the ritual power ofa bitta {ritual chief) ofDore<2> lineage. Therefore, this region is also called "Dore peino {land ofDore's
lineage). The eastern part, Anno or Arkor, covers a vast area and is said to be protected by the ritual
power of a bitta of Garsho zerl-3>. Both bitta lineages belong to the Gata clan.
2.2. Spatial Imagination in MythThe myth of bitta lineage in the west tells the origin and story of Ailama boundary fixing.
Bitta Wuloa came from Barka in Ari, where babi She'i Gundeis now rules.
Wuloa was the first son of his father's second wife, but after his father died, he succeeded his
father because the first wife had no son.
Some years later, his father's first wife became pregnant as a result of having relations withanother man and she bore a boy, who might be considered his father's legal "first born son." HeMASUDA: Situating the Banna

49

Map 1. Land of the Banna (Central Statistical Authority 1996).

would have been the babi rather than Wuloa by virtue of the mother's rank.
Wuloa resigned from the position of babi. Then he immigrated to Banna bringing a pair ofgoats, sheep, and cattle (a cow and a bull), and he was accompanied by his parko (ritual assistant).
They reached Mt. Molla, where they decided to settle. There were no people living in Bannaat that time. The parko let a red bull walk around the area, which included southern Ari and the
Tsamay lowlands. Wuloa proclaimed that it was all his territory.
Then he collected honey. People started coming from Ale (over the Weito River), Ari, and soon, since the time when Wuloa came to the Banna.< 4>This story reveals two characteristics of Banna spatial identity. First, the Ailama boundary was
fixed by a parko, a ritual assistant, who was led by a red bull. Second, the original area was larger
than the current Ail am a; the area over which the red bull walked extended farther than the current
domain. According to the Banna, the present Ailama area is very small because original Ailama land
was invaded by surrounding groups.
With regard to the tradition that Wuloa came from an Ari's babi lineage, the babi's kinsmen havea completely opposite story; they claim that their ancestor, named Denga, originated from the Banna(Gebre 1995: 13). Despite having different stories, the babi lineage and Wuloa's descendants share an

50

Nilo-Ethiopian Studies

awareness of their historical kinship with one another.
In the myth of Anno (Arkor) territory, the name of the first bitta was Wuloa, so two individuals of
bitta lineage shared the same name as the founders. However, the relationship between the Wuloas
has not been clarified.
Wuloa was a younger brother of the babi of Bako in southern Ari. One day he decided to go
down southwards to the present Banna area. Frrst, he took a rest at Kaisa along the GamaisoRiver, which is now supposed to be a boundary, then he reached Mt. Pinte. He took up his residence there because many bees gathered around him when he came. Wuloa put his metal spear(parko) and flag {labitsa) on a tree and put on a sheepskin cloth.
He asked people to give him land, but they were wary of how he could live alone without awife. They permitted him to live at Pinte if he would live with his wife. Wuloa went back to
Bako and took his wife and four sheep (yaati hayna) to Pinte. Wuloa made a fire with a fire-stickand set the grass alight. The fire spread rapidly. Wuloa dispatched several men to see how far
the fire had spread. He proclaimed that all the land that had been burnt and that extended fromthe current territory would be his own land.
People tried to persuade him to undergo the initiation ritual (atsa). Wuloa accepted a suggestion of his kinsmen in Bako. The suggestion was that Wuloa might try the initiation ritual
so long as he would not be circumcised, because Ari men never undergo circumcision. Wuloa
brought one cattle to leap over, then he finished the ritual.
One day people ofPinte brought a goat to Wuloa and asked him to call barjo and rain. Wuloa
said he couldn't call barjo by sacrificing a goat and that he required sheep, and then he killed oneof four sheep he took from Bako. Chyme (soko) from the stomach of the sacrificed sheep wasthrown around fields, and the fat of the tail was buried. Adult men (donza) took some chyme
on a karko plant to display in their houses. As a result of these procedures, the Banna land
became fertile, vegetation flourished, cattle multiplied, and many people came from every direc- ·tion (from Masuda 1997: 462, with minor revisions).
This story describes some traits of Ari culture. Circumcision is generally practiced by all Banna
men except for those of the Gata clan. Some people say this is because the Gata clan is still Ari. A
Hamar storyteller, Aike Berinas (Baldambe), told researchers that cutting the foreskin meant shifting
identity from Ari to Hamar (Lydall and Strecker 1979: 21). This case suggests that atsa initiation was
more important to being accepted as a Banna man than was circumcision. Here, ethnic distinction
amounts to a difference in cultural characteristics.

2.3. Virtual BorderAccording to these oral traditions, the ancestors of the Banna and surrounding groups fixed clearcut boundaries. However, there are no obvious visual borderlines. In addition, it is quite difficult todistinguish culturally between the two ethnic groups near the "boundary." In the northwest area of
Banna land, Mokocha and Chali, many people speak the Ari language, wear Ari clothing, have Ari
hair styles, and exhibit other material forms of Ari culture; half of the residents consider themselves
to be Ari.
The same challenge arises when the Banna and Hamar are treated as different ethnic groups.
Linguists consider the Banna language to be a dialect of the Hamar language, and Banna people
claim that they have only slight difficulties when communicating with Hamar and Bashada people.
The Banna used to be classified in the same ethnic group as the Hamar; the Ethiopian Central
Statistical Authority classifies the Banna and Bashada into one category: "Hamar." Urban dwellers,
most of whom are descendants of northern immigrants, consider the Banna to be part of the Hamar.
This equation of Banna with Hamar people was probably caused by various similarities between thetwo groups in cultural appearance. In fact, it is difficult to distinguish the Banna from the Hamar
using only their clothing, subsistence economy, and other cultural matters as criteria.

MASUDA: Situating the Banna

51

As discussed in the next chapter, Banna people specify clan locality in a particular way, for example,"Ba clan is not Banna; it's Hamar." Similarly, they can identify cultural differences in matters suchas cooking, clothing, hair styling, type of herds, and political and ritual customs. The rite of passage,atsa, is one example of how the Banna distinguish between the two groups.
One of the most characteristic aspects of the atsa rite of passage is when the boy leaps across theback of several cattle. This feature of atsa is still in use throughout Banna-Hamar land. According to
Banna elders, this ritual originated among the Hamar and was adopted by the Banna in the early 20th
century; they say that long ago, Banna men lifted and lowered their right thigh four times in front of
cattle or a row of granti (solanum) fruit instead ofjumping over the cattle.
These cases of Banna-Ari and Banna-Hamar relationships reveal no obvious spatial borderline
between groups, although people recognize local differences in language and cultural traits. This"locality" on which identity is based must not be understood simply in terms of physical proximity.

3.CLANS
3.1. Classification
Jensen carried out ethnographic research in the early 1950s and identified 18 clan names classified
into two categories: Binnas and Galabu (Jensen 1959: 321). Lydall and Strecker recorded 21 Hamarclans classified into Binnas and Galabu moieties, and one clan classified as "both moiety." Manygroups in addition to the Hamar and Banna have a similar duality in clan classification<5>. The next
section describes the Binnas/Galabu division among the Banna as an example of clan classificationand exogamous categorization.
The word "Binnas" is derived from bitta naasi (bitta's descendant). This implies that all clans
included in the Binnas category are recognized as derived from the Gata clan, generally recognized as
bitta's clan, even thougp the two bitta lineages may not have any historical-genealogical connection,
as mentioned above.
The origin of the name of the other category, Galabu, is unknown. However, its alternative name,"Kaisi" is derived from kais, which means "prohibited" and the Kaisi people are "subject to ritual prohibitions with respect to the bitta" (Lydall and Strecker 1979: 173).
The Gasi clan is regarded as the core Galabu clan, and Gasi ancestors are said to have lived in
Banna land long before the first bitta came from Ari. This tradition sometimes inspires Galabu
people to claim that they are the true Banna and that not only the Gata clan, but all Binnas are
merely immigrants. Individuals who hold this belief consider the fact that male members of Gata
clan remain uncircumcised as support for their opinion; to them, this choice means that members of
the Gata clan are not Banna, but outsiders.
I have refrained from terming the Binnas/Galabu categorization a "moiety system" because manyclans cannot be absolutely classified into either category. For example, the Hamar includes the Rachclan. Lydall and Strecker classified this clan as "both moiety," but did not explain why.
Unclassifiable clans also appear among the Banna. Many of the individuals whom I interviewed
about clan classification were unable to classify these clans and chose to place them into a separate
category of "wul'ed." The term wul'ed is a compound of wul, full or all, and eedi, people or humanbeing, and indicates that members of these clans are permitted to marry any clan member, regardlessof the Binnas/Galabu duality. When someone says, "Rach clan is wul'ed," this assertion merely connotes marriage rules for clan combination. Therefore, the category of"wul'ed" is not similar to thatofBinnas or Galabu.
The Zare clan will help elucidate the complexity and inconsistencies in clan classification. Table 1
shows various forms by which the Zare clan is recognized and how Binnas/Galabu classification andwul'ed recognition are based on different criteria.
Importandy, Binnas/Galabu classification involves two criteria: the ideal scheme of attributing
each clan to one of the two categories; and the exogamous rule according to which marriages haveNilo-Ethiopian Studies

52

Table 1. Results of questions about Zare recognition among 14 interviewees, not including Zare members(1993)
Detailed classification and Supplementary explanation

Answer aboutclassification.

"Zare is Galabu" "Zare is just Galabu." without any supplementary comments.
Galabu and wul'ed.
"Zare is Galabu and wul'ed." Galabu and wul'ed. Another name of Gulet.

4
1

1

Galabu and wul'ed. Another name of Gulet and Bokka. 1"Zare is Galabu. Another name of Gulet."3"Zare is Galabu. Another name of Bokka."

1"Zare is neither
Galabu nor
Binnas.""But Zare is wu/'ed. Another name ofBokka."

1

No idea aboutclassification.

"But Zare is wul'ed. Another name ofBokka and Gulet."1

1{Confusing. No
record.)Total

14

Table 2. Clan classification among 14 men {1993)

BinnasGalabu

Gata

Gasi

Gola

Gal

Ora
Binka
Melez

100% Consensus.

A dar
Ganaz
Duma
Peren (Feren)
Benet

Rach

WolmokZubat

Garshima

Zare

Gudo

Gulet

Maiz, Bokka, Kurs, Kurtum} More than 80% Consensus.

Less than 60% Consensus.

been practiced. For instance, Rachis classified as Galabu (or as not Binnas), but many people also
consider Rach to be wuledby a criterion of exogamous rule.
Table 2 presents the results of interviews with 14 men in Bori and Dizishi'sh villages in 1993 and1994. Each man was asked to classify clans as either Binnas or Galabu<6>. All the men classified twoclans (Gata and Gola) as Binnas and nine clans (Gasi, Gal, Ora, Binka, Melez, Adar, Ganaz, Duma,and Peren) as Galabu. More than 80% of the men agreed that four clans (Benet, Wolmok, Garshima,
and Gudo) are Binnas and another four (Rach, Zubat, Zare, and Gulet) are Galabu.
In contrast, the men were inconsistent in their classification of four clans (Mais, Bokka, Kurs, and53

MASUDA: Situating the Banna

Kurtum). One explanation is the limited number of interviewees. If more interviews had been carried out at more villages, responses might have agreed more.

3.2. Clan Classification in PracticeClan classification is exogamous, as are Binnas/Galabu categories. This section examines 187 marriages (113 in Bori, 74 in Dizishi'sh) to clarifY practical aspects of clan classification. Both Boriand Dizishi'sh are Gata-dominant villages where majority of married men (82% in Bori, 51% in
Dizishi'sh) are members of the Gata clan. In addition, some men are engaged in polygamous marriage, so the number of married women equals the total marriage cases in the collected data (see Table
3).
Based on the categories shown in Table 2, clan classifications in practice can be identified by classifYing the husband's clan in one category and the wife's in another (Table 4). Couples are supposed
to belong to differing exogamous categories (e.g., a Gata husband and a Gasi wife). If another couple(e.g., a Gata husband and a Gal wife) is classified in the same way, then the clans of Gasi and Gal
will fall into the same category, corresponding to the ideal classification shown in Table 2. If a clan
must be categorized to a third category, this third category is probably"wul'ed." The hypothesis is thatthe third category, wul'ed, might include clans that were not successfully classified using the Binnas/
Galabu categorization in the analysis discussed in the previous section (Fig. 1).
The analysis revealed that only four clans (Gata, Gola, Benet, and Gudo) are highly likely to be rec-

Table 3. Clans of married men and women in two villages (1993)
Married Males' and Females' clan in Dizishi'sh (1993)

Married Males' and Females' clan in Bori (1993)

Married female

Married male

Married female

Married male

Gata

29

Gasi

13

Gata

48

Gasi

31

Garshima

Gal

10

Duma

3

Rach

12

Gasi

5
5

Gata

10

Gasi

2

Ora

12

Gal

3

A dar

10

Maiz

1

Gal

9

Gal

3

Adar

9

A dar

3

Zarc

6

Ora

3

Garshima

4

Binka

9

Zansa

2

Ora

3

Gata

6

Zare

2

Zan sa

2

Duma

6

Bokka

2

Zare

5

Binka

2

Gulet

3

Bokka

1

KurtumBinka

1

Wokmok2

Garshima

2

Zubat

1

Kurtum

1

Melcz

2

Sub-total

56

Zubat

1

Ganaz

1

Baya

1

Zubat

1

Duma

1

Lera

1

Berda

1

Gola

1

Gola

1

Gudo

1

Gudo

1

Am an

1

Alii

1

Wolmok

1

Kabur

1

Sub-total

113

Sub-total

74

Sub-total57

54

Nilo-Ethiopian Studies

Table4. Clan combinations between husbands and wives in two villages (1993)
Clan combination between husband and wife in Dizishi'sh(74 cases)
H(Binnas)-W

H(Galabu)-W

Gata-Gal

8 Gal-Gata

Gata-Gasi

8 Gasi-Gata

Gal-Garshima

H(other)-W

H(Binnas)-W

8 Gal-Gata

2

Gal-Aman

1

3

Gata-Binka

91Gasi-Garshima 2

Gata-Adar

9

Gasi-Kabur

1

Gata-Ora

12

Gasi-Kurtum

1

Gata-Rach12

Gata-Gasi

31 Gasi-Gata

Gata-Melez

2

Gata-Duma

9 Adar-Gata
Adar-Wolmok

H(other)-W

H(Galabu)-W

Gata-Gal

1

Gasi-Gudo
Gata-Adar

Clan combination between husband and wife in Bori(113 cases)

Gasi -Garshima
1

Gata-Wolmok 1

1

6 Duma-Gata

3

Gata-Zansa

2

Duma-Zare

1

Gata-Binka

2 Binka-Gata

Duma-Gola1

Gata-Duma1

Duma-Garshima 1

Gata-Zubat

1 Zubat-Gata

1

Gata-Zare

4

Gata-Ora

3 Ora-Gata

1

Gata-Gulet

3

Ora-Bokka

1Gata-Zubat

1

Gata-Ganaz

Gata-Bokka

1 Bokka-Gata
Ora-ZareGata-Zare

Gata-Wolmok

3Zare{Gulet)-Gata

Gata-Lera

Adar-Zare

Adar-Gola

1

Maiz-Gal
Zare-Garshima

1

Garshima-Gasi

4

Garshima-Zare

1

Garshima-Gal

1

1

1
Zansa-Gal
Zansa-Adar

1

Zansa-Ora
Kurtum-Gasi
Gata-Baya

1

Gata-Berda

1

Gata-Alli

1

ognized as Binnas; and many clans (Gasi, Ora, Binka, Gal, Melez, Zubat, Adar, Duma, and Ganaz)
are highly likely to be recognized as Galabu. Some clans (Bokka, Wolmok, Zansa, Garshima, Zare,
Rach, Kurtum, and Maiz) are not classified as Binnas or Galabu; these clans are discussed below.
1. Bokka, Zare, and Gulet: Based on interviews, these three clans may be identical. Members
might be classified into the third category or classified inconsistendy because Zare members
do not appear to have married Gata (Binnas) or Duma (Galabu) members.
2. Wolmok: Recognition of the Wolmok clan appears to be inconsistent. The fact that only

55

MASUDA: Situating the Banna-· Galabu ....
Gasi
Ora
Binka
Gal
Melez
Zubat

-· Binnas - ...
Gata
Gudo
Benet
Gola

Adar

,,

.... JCiassification Unstable) ....
Rach
Kurtum
Maiz

''

Duma
Ganaz
\

Bokka
WolmokZan saGarshima ~.... Zare( =Gulet)

Fig. 1. Clan combinations in 191 marriages
Note: Among these 191 marriages, three clans (Rach, Kurtum, and Maiz) are identified simply as "not Binnas."

three marriages involved a Wolmok member (one to a Gata member, one to an Adar member,and one to a Rach member) suggests that the Wolmok clan is neither Binnas nor Galabu.
3. Zansa: The name Zansa has never appeared in any publication. Four Zansa members in
Disishi'sh were originally from the Arkisha area of the Ari.
4. Garshima: The name Garshima has appeared in some publications about Ari (Jensen 1959b:49), Hamar (Lydall and Strecker 1979: 231), and Kara (Matsuda, personal communication).
Although many people classify this clan as Binnas, this case study revealed that it should beclassified into the third category. Two marriages including Garshima members were identified in Dizishi'sh (to Zare and Gasi members), and four were identified in Bori (to Gata, Gasi,
Duma, and Ganaz members).
5. Rach: In Bori, 12 Rach women from the southern Banna and the Hamar all married Gata
men. These cases demonstrate that the Rach clan cannot be classified as Binnas. Lydall andStrecker classified Rach as "both moiety" (Lydall and Strecker 1979: 231).
6. Kurtum: Only two cases of marriages involved Kurtum members; both had married Gasi
members in Dizishi'sh, so the Kurtum clan is not Galabu.
7. Maiz: One Maiz man in Bori had married a Gal woman, indicating that the Maiz clan is
not Galabu. However, many elders classify the Maiz clan as Galabu. This discrepancy might
indicate that the recognition ofMaiz is inconsistent.
3.3. Ethno-history through Clan Distribution
Local residents told two different stories about the origin of the Binnas and Galabu. In one, no one
lived in Banna land before the first bitta Wuloa came from Ari. The descendants ofWuloa became
Binnas and other people who later came from outside became Galabu. In the other story, the Galabu
lived in Banna land before the first bitta immigrated.
It is impossible to know which story is true and which group first came to Banna land. However,
the moiety-like structure in which one party has ritual-political authority is found in neighboringNilo-Ethiopian Studies

56

Aari

Maale
Bink
Binka

Zoba

Sibati

AderriHor(Arbore)Kara

Garshima

Hamar

Fig. 2. The distribution of clans beyond Banna landgroups. In Ari, all the babts clan belong to Ashenda (Gebre 1995: 26-28). In Maale, a man fromoutside taught the local people how to control fire and became their king. His descendants are Karazi
moiety and the autochthonous people become Raggi moiety (Donham 1986: 71).
Though access to batjo (fortune) seems to have been exclusively given to bitta, there are two otherritual leaders. One is the fire-sticker, gudul, who is also responsible for rain and harvest; the otheris the war-leader, arti. Both titles are given only to Galabu members<7) because, according to somepeople, the Galabu are indigenous to Banna land.
A gudul makes fire using a firedrill, kogo, ideally three times per year. The ritual, carried out in lateJuly, is particularly important for three reasons: (1) at this time, the gudul makes a new fire that must
replace the old ones in every household and field; (2) this fire distribution redefines the extent ofideal
space of the village; and (3) people are forbidden to reap sorghum before this ritual.
However, the certainty that Galabu are autochthonous people does not extend to clans beyond
Banna land.
Figure 2<8> shows the distribution of clans beyond Banna land. This is only a tentative representation based on previously-published material, but it clearly shows that the Banna area is a patchwork
consisting of migrants from various origins, assuming that clan names certify genealogical links. The
fact that many clan names appear in neighboring ethnic groups does not explain why one clan is classified as Binnas and another as Galabu or why some clans are considered by most people as Binnas
while others are ambiguous.

4. ENMITY AND AMITY
4.1. Intermarriage Relations to "Kin People"
Inter-ethnic conflict is an important consideration when analyzing how the Banna identify themselves in terms of neighboring groups. Relationships between the Banna and other groups vary. The
Banna do not see neighboring groups simply in terms of an enmity/amity dualism; instead, they
use a complex scheme based on various factors such as the history of warfare, clan distribution, andintermarriage.

MASUDA: Situating the Banna

57

The range of people that the Banna do not consider enemies roughly corresponds with the groups
with whom they intermarry, the "ideal availability of intermarriage.n They have no general word for
non-enemy. Of the five ethic groups described below, four speak the south Omotic language: Ari,
Hamar, Bachada, and Kara.
Ari: The Banna say they have never raided the Ari because the Ari are not cattle herders. They frequently intermarry, and in most cases, an Ari woman marries a Banna man.
However, amity does not entail overall reliance. Generally, the Banna consider the Ari to be cunning and greedy for money; they usually require cash rather than cattle as bride-wealth. However, theBanna also consider the Ari to be important allies, as they need kinship linkages through intermarriage to ensure a food supply from the Ari during the dry season.
Hamar: As mentioned above, the Banna consider the Hamar to be Banna. The only differences lie in
the name and location of the group and some cultural traits.
Bachada: The Bachada, or Bashada, are a small group living in the southern part of Banna land; they
speak the same language as the Banna and the Hamar. Because the southern Banna and the Bachada
have intermarried, raids and warfare have not occurred between the two groups.
Kara: The Kara are a small group that live along the Omo River; contact and intermarriage is far more
frequent in southern Banna than in the northern area. The Kara speak a dialect of the Banna-Hamar
language, and the Banna people are aware of the differences. The Kana have a poor reputation; theBanna consider the Kara to be thieves and murderers. However, personal relationships have occurred
between the groups, especially in southern Banna.
Muguji (Mugunya): The Muguji or Mugunya, generally known as Koegu or Kwegu, are a small
group that engages in cultivation, hunting, and gathering along the Omo River. The Muguji call the
Banna "Atula," which is the name of the land along the western edge of Banna land. The Muguji
are not enemies to the Banna, and some Banna and Muguji have engaged in personal relationships(Matsuda 1992: 44)
Generally speaking, many Banna men marry Ari women in northern Banna land, while in southern Banna land they are more likely to marry Bachada or Hamar women. Intermarriage forms alarger network among these groups. However, these linkages do not create alliances between ethnic
units; they are purely personal connections of marriages and kinship. The same applies to personal
relationships between the Banna and the Muguji.
4.2. Enemies (Gal)The Banna consider themselves to be surrounded by enemies (gal). The Banna's enemies have two
common characteristics. First, they speak a different language, making it impossible to communicate
verbally and less likely that they share cultural traits. Second, most enemies live in remote areas, so
the Banna do not have frequent personal contact in the form of cattle exchange, intermarriage, andother personal relationships. However, violent exchanges are also infrequent due to the spatial distance between the groups. The Banna's hostility toward enemies does not necessarily result in actual
fighting; some groups are "ideal enemiesn that have never attacked or been attacked by, the Banna.
Tsarnay (Tsarnako): The Tsamay, or Tsamako, are considered enemies, but in some villages in theeastern lowland, the Banna and the Tsamay live together with no actual hostility. Their two languages
differ, but the groups communicate in the Banna language.
Marie (Hor/Arbore): The Marie, generally known as the Hor or Arbore, are considered enemies,
but the Banna do not know much about the Marie. The eastern end of Banna land has a huge ridgethat has prevented the Banna from approaching the Hor directly. Miyawaki (2006) reported that thehistory between the Hor and the Hamar is convoluted, and it is not clear whether the Hor consider
the Hamar to be Banna.
Korre (Sarnburu): A raid by the Korre is the oldest warfare that the Banna people remember, but
no Banna people currently know who the Korre were. They say the Korre raid happened when bitta
Doyo was in office. Doyo was killed, and many people fled the land. According to Strecker (n.d.), all
Hamar land was occupied by the Korre, probably in the mid-19th century, and the Turkana came up

Nilo-Ethiopian Studies

58

to the Hamar mountain from the south to fight the Korre.
Geleb (Dasanetch): The Banna consider the Geleb, or Galeba, to be enemies, but while relationships
are not particularly strong, neither is hostility. According to elders, the Banna frequently used Geleb
land as a refugee destination during their first contact with northern military expansion in the late
19th century.
Burne (Nyangatom): The Hamar and the Burne used to fight with each other and later carried out apeace-making ritual (Strecker 1979: 31-34). The Banna also consider the Burne to be strong enemies,
but did not talk about any cases of invasion or attack.
The Banna people often exhibit negative attitudes about Burne culture, saying things such as "Burne
do not cut their foreskin," or "They are supposed to marry their aunt." However, some traces of Burne
culture can be found among the Banna, especially in vocabulary about warfare, the age system, andsongs. One example is a "killer-name." Some Banna elders have their own "killer-name," which is
given in praise for killing an enemy during a previous war. It is said that the "killer-name" is from the
Burne language or borrows from Burne pronunciation.
The age system is also considered to have been imported from the Burne. Table 5<9> lists personal
knowledge among five individuals about names of age-grades. The names of past age-grades recalledby the five informants do not agree, and the names use a mixture ofBanna and Burne words. These
inconsistencies are probably due to the relative unimportance of this knowledge, the failure of its
function as a military system, and a lack of ritual. The functioning Banna age-system is the "donzasystem," in which the social system is managed by the authority of adult men (donza). This authority
Table 5. Knowledge about names of age-grades among five informants
Estimated Age

informant A

informant B

informant C

informant D

?

dalba

?

garzo

?
90'(?)

nymrpusinqaqoqe

inqaqoqe

inkakoke80'(?)
80'(?)

yiwairanyuwaira?

nyagamongnyagamonginnayamon?

nyemurBolenyakatakor

inkattakoel80'(?)

70'(?)

informant E

yuwaelayinkakoke

yinkakoke

yingagamong

yinyagamong

yiwairayiwairayinkatakol

yinkatakol

yemyerbol

nyammarpus
nyuwoiya60'(?)

nyumisiknyemesk50'(?)

plannaflanna50'(?)

logodo40'(?)

golbalcha

nyomesekplantiplanti(planna)logodo

logod

logod

golbalcha

golbalcha

golbalcha30'(?)

nyslkoy30'(?)

kofinnakofinna20'(?)

kantsalekontsalekoopinikoopini20'(?)

gepinikaza

gepinikaza

10'(?)

maqalatilcha

maqalatilcha

Note: Names in bold type are likely to be Burne word.

MASUDA: Situating the Banna

59

is personally acquired through several ritual steps, including the atsa rite of passage.
Murso (Mursi) and Bodi: The Banna consider the Mursi and the Bodi to be evil and are always
afraid they will attack. Above all, the Banna are supposed to kill the Mursi if they encounter any
while hunting, herding cattle, or raiding. Banna members who have experience fighting with andraiding the Mursi say that Banna-Mursi warfare occurred during the 1950s and 1960s.
The Banna do not know much about the land of the Mursi and the Bodi, probably due to thelarge forest and plain between the groups. Only a few young hunters now visit the Omo River.
Consequently, the Banna have a mainly imaginative idea of the Mursi. One Banna member compared the Mursi to ghosts, "Murso haunts everywhere like a ghost. They enter our village secretly
and drink coffee with us. We should beware." Another said, "Mursi sometimes watch us from themountaintop, and they know much about our pasturage. If a Banna notices a Mursi coming to raid
our cattle in the evening, he will be killed." They have contradictory images about the Mursi: on one
hand, they fear the Mursi as an actual violent enemy; on the other hand, they regard the Mursi as
malevolent supernatural beings like ghosts. The former belief is derived from experiences of actual
fighting, and the latter stems from the fact that most Banna members have not experienced raids by
the Mursi.
Maale: Maale land borders the Argo area in northern Banna. Banna elders remember raiding theMaale and warfare that continued until the 1960s. Some elders considered the Maale to be enemies
as late as the 1990s. However, in northern Banna land, some Banna people marry Maale members.
4.3. Imaginary Borders and Cultural Otherness

The short descriptions above illustrate that the Banna people are aware of clear distinctions between"people to kill" and those "not to kill." This distinction is not always based on historical fact, actual
warfare, or raiding history.
The groups that the Banna consider to be enemies tend to have common characteristics including
cultural and linguistic differences, and can be classified into three categories from a spatial point ofview. The first category includes Maale and Tsamay. Both groups are spatially near the Banna, andthey probably all share common resources such as water, land, and pastures around the border. The
second category includes Mursi and Bodi, who are considered to be potential attackers. The wide
plain lying between Banna and Mursi/Bodi land functions as buffer zone. The third category includes
Marie, Geleb, Burne, and Korre, groups who are so remote they are not considered to be an active
threat.
The previous discussion of clan identification revealed that the roles of bitta and arti are overlapping and complementary. While the role of a bitta includes calling barjo and ancestors' spirits tosecure peace and richness, an arti mainly involves securing the imaginary boundary between insideand outside, for example preventing evil (enemies, locust, illness) from entering the land. As discussed above, every time a war breaks out, an arti is chosen from among only Galabu members. Someinterviewees said that the reason for this is Galabu's autochthony.
When a war breaks out or the Banna decide to raid an enemy, they choose an arti by divination
using two pieces of goatskin. The chosen arti goes to war with a shoot of aloe00> as a talisman; thisis placed into the muzzle of cattle taken during the raid. The animal with the talisman in its muzzle
follows the arti and leads the entire herd, as described in the following example.
In about 1957 (EC), a huge number ofBanna men raided Grain the Bodi's territory. There wasa famous arti whose name was Belachew Aldi.
Belachew participated in the raiding party at that time, and he successfully took whole herds
from the Bodi. He rode on the biggest cattle and roared as cows do. Following him, wholeherds roared.
The Bodi followed them and arrived in Banna. The Bodi had an arti too. The Bodi arti burieda black goat with only its head left above the ground. Belachew, not knowing the meaning,approached the goat, and got shot. When Belachew died, the herd automatically went back toNilo-Ethiopian Studies

60

the Bodi.
This example illustrates two main points. First, an arti is expected to act as a kind of negotiator on
the front line of a raiding party, which represents the boundary between inside and outside. Second,
Belachew was unsuccessful in his negotiation and was shot dead, probably because of unfamiliarity
with the communication protocol.

5. CONCLUSIONSThe previous sections have described some aspects of neighborhood, such as Appadurai's terminology,
myth narrative, clan classification, and warfare.
The Banna define the locality of "Banna" by narrating the myth of bitta, which performatively
explains not only cultural differences between the Banna and the Ari, but also the dualistic structureof clan classification. An analysis of clan classification and distribution helps to clarify their historical background and how clans move beyond "ethnic" boundaries through communication with theouter world. War and inter-ethnic relations, which help to found and strengthen group identity, arealso based on spatial cognition and historical memory. These aspects of memory and recognition anddiscourse about them function to construct the Banna locality, or imagination.
Therefore, one important finding is the significance ofBinnas/Galabu duality. This can be used asa clue when examining historical and spatial consciousness among the Banna. Clarifying inter-ethnic
relations around southern Ethiopia will require more data about clan classification and distribution,although to date few ethnographers have focused on these issues.
From a subjective perspective, cultural differences, or cultural otherness, appears to be linked togeographical-spatial conditions such as remote distances or to obstacles to communication, such as
mountains. Still, human networks formed through practices such as intermarriage and immigration, which are reflected in clan distribution, carry great potential to move beyond spatial barriers,
cultural strangeness, and "ethnic" boundaries. The otherness of culture, either imagined or real, plays
an important role in Banna self-identification.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was partially funded by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology: "Anthropological Studies of theAcquisition and Inheritance of Culture: Traditional Knowledge and Modernization in Northeast
Mrica" (No. 07041055, 1995-1997); "Dynamic Relationships between Ethnic Groups and State,
Center and Periphery: Comparative Studies in Northeastern Mrica." (No.10041069, 1998-2000);and "Environmental Change and Subsistence Strategy of Ethnic Minorities in the National andDevelopment Policies: Comparative Studies in Northeastern Mrica." (No.13371008, 2001-2004);
and "Historical Studies of Inter-Ethnic Warfare in the Process ofNational Integration: Comparative
Studies in Northeastern Mrica" (17251014, 2005-2006). Masuda would like to thank Professor
Katsuyoshi Fukui of Kyoto University and colleagues for help during the study, and also Nagasaki
University for funding the study "Usage and Distribution of Water Resources in Savannah: An
Anthropological Study of Development with GIS and Participant Observation" (2005).

NOTES(1) The people who are called Banna (Bana, Bena) and live in southwest Ethiopia call themselves Banya in the
Banna language.

MASUDA: Situating the Banna

61(2) Dore Wangi, who was a bitta in western Banna around the end of the 19th century, acted as a mediator
between the Banna and the Ethiopian government when northern troops invaded the south. This lineage's
bitta geneaology is: Wuloa-Danga-Teso-Wulli-Laale-Garsho-Wangi-Dore-Bura-Bezabih (Masuda1997). It has had no bitta since Bezabih died in the early 1990s, but in early 2007 it was rumored that a
new bitta was about to succeed.
(3) This lineage is commonly known as Garsho zere after bitta Garsho who acted as bitta during the time of
the Ethiopian Imperial invasion in the late 19th century. This lineage's bitta genealogy is: Wuloa-BoqekaGarsho-Teso-Saara-Doyo-Kara-Garsho-Adeno (Masuda 1997).
(4) Narrated by Belachew Dore, 1993. This story was taken from my previous paper (Masuda 1997: 461) withminor revisions.
(5) In Ari, clans are divided into Ashenda and Endi; the former includes all nine chiefs (Gebre 1993: 29-30).
In Maale's case, "the autochthonous clans became the Raggi moiety while the king and his followers
became the Karazi moiety" (Donham 1986: 71).
(6) Interviews were conducted as a preliminary survey, and the very small sample does not allow a detailed
analysis. Both Bori and Dizishi'sh are considered to be bitta's villages.
(7) According to Jensen, the first gudel (gudul) was the younger brother of bitta Wlawada (Wuloa), and four
gudels were given land; also, all gudels are Gata (Jensen 1959: 318).Jensen's findings did not match myown data, possibly because Jensen collected data in western Banna and I studied eastern Banna.
(8) This figure is based on information from several publications. For Hamar: Lydall and Strecker 1979,
Jensen 1959b; for Ari: Gebre 1995,Jensen 1959c, 1959d; for Maale:Jensen 1959e; for Arbore: Miyawaki
1992.
(9) In Table 5, bolded text indicates words that are thought to have a Burne origin; the rest is in the Banna
language. Transcriptions for Burne words are inconsistent due to a lack of researcher ability and unfamiliar
pronunciation.
(10) The Banna distinguish between two kinds of aloe (walqo) based on color and shape: one kind is called
walqo binnas, while the other, which is used by the arti, is called walqo galabu.

REFERENCES
Appadurai, A.
1996 Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press.
Barth, F.
1969 Introduction, In: Barth (ed.) Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture
Difference. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget. pp. 9-38.
Central Statistical Authority
1996 The 1994 Population and Housing Census of Ethiopia Results for Southern Nations, Nationalities andPeoples' Region, VOlume 1, Part 1, Statistical Report on Population Size and Characteristics. Addis Ababa:Central Statistical Authority.
Donham, D. L.
1986 From Ritual King to Ethiopian Landlords in Maale. In: Donham, D. & W.James (eds.) The Southern
Marches of Imperial Ethiopia: Essays in History and Social Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
pp.69-95.
Fukui, K.
1984 Intertribal Relations through Conflict: The Pastoral Meken (Bodi) in South-West Ethiopia.
Minzokugaku Kenkyu (The Japanese Journal of Ethnology) vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 471-480 (in Japanese).
1988 Cultural Ideology and Ethnic Formation: Based upon Cases of Conflict in Bodi Society. In: Kawada,
J. and K. Fukui (eds.) What is an Ethnic Group? Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, pp. 187-12 (in Japanese).
1994 Conflict and Ethnic Interaction: The Mela and Their Neighbours. In: Fukui, K. and}. Markakis (eds.)
Ethnicity and Conflict in the Horn ofAfrica. London: James Currey, pp. 33-47.
Fukui, K. and D. Turton
1979 Waifare among East African Herders (Senri Ethnological Studies no. 3), Osaka: National Museum of
Ethnology.
Jensen, A. E.

62

Nilo-Ethiopian Studies

1959a Die Banna, In: A. Jensen (ed.) Altvolker Sud-Aihiopiens. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag. pp. 313336.
1959b Die Baka. In: A. Jensen (ed.) Altvolker SUd-Aihiopiens. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag. pp. 29-86.
1959c Die Shangama. In: A. Jensen (ed.) Altvolker Sud-Aihiopiens. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag.
pp. 107-165.
1959d Die Hammar. In: A. Jensen (ed.) Altvolker Sud-Aihiopiens. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag.
pp. 337-357.
1959e Die Male. In: A. Jensen (ed.) Altvolker Sud-Aihiopiens. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag. pp. 263301.
Lydall,J. and I. Strecker
1979 The Hamar of Southern Ethiopia: 2 Baldambe Explains. Hohenschaftlar: Klaus Renner Verlag.
Masuda, K.
1997 Histories and Ethnic Identities among the Banna: An Analysis of the Bittas' Oral Histories. Fukui,K., Kurimoto, E. and M. Shigeta (eds.) Ethiopia in Broader Perspective: Papers ofthe 13th International
Conference ofEthiopian Studies, Vol. 2, Shokado Booksellers. pp. 456-470.
Matsuda, H.
1992 The Dance among the Koegu of Ethiopia: Identity and Interethnic Relations of the Forager. Bulletinof the National Museum of Ethnology, 17 (1): 35-96. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology (inJapanese).
Miyawaki, Y.
1992 Interethnic Relationship in the Village of Tsamai Chief, Southwestern Ethiopia. Afrika-Kenkyu(Journal of Mrican Studies) 40: 49-68 (in Japanese).
2006 Imaginations in Periphery: State Rule and Resistance of the Hor in Southwestern Ethiopia. Kyoto:
Sekaisisousha (in Japanese).
Ri,K.
1985 Ethnicity and Modem Society: an Approach to Political Sociology. Shishou 4: 191-210 (inJapanese).
Schlee, G.
1989 Identities on the Move: Clanship and Pastoralism in Northern Kenya. London: Manchester University
Press.
Strecker, I.
n.dBerimba's Resistance: The Life and Times of a great Hamar Spokesman as told by his son Aike
(Baldambe).
Tsuge,Y.
1996 On the Consonant Correspondences of South Omotic Languages. In Sato, S. and E. Kurimoto (eds.)
Essays in Northeast African Studies. (Senri Ethnological Studies no. 43), Osaka: National Museum of
Ethnology, pp. 163-188.
Yntiso,G.
1995 The Ari of Southern Ethiopia: An Exploratory Study of Production Practices. Department of Sociology,
Anthropology and Social Administration, Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.

KEN MASUDA: Faculty ofEnvironmental Studies, Nagasaki University. Bunkyo 1-14, Nagasaki, 852-8521,
japan.