VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERSAN OVERVIEW OF THE UK DRUG STRATEGY WITH A FOCUS ON
TREATMENT AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF DRUG INTERVENTIONS IN THE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (ENGLAND AND WALES)

Shereen Sadiq*

I. INTRODUCTION
The overarching aim of the UK Government’s drug policy is to reduce the harm that drugs cause tosociety - communities, individuals and their families. The key to delivering this aim is to reduce the numberof people caught up in the chaotic lives of addiction and crime (problematic drug users) and to stop young
people from entering their ranks. Tackling the enormous challenge of drug misuse is not a matter for
Government or its agencies alone.
This paper reflects information provided in the Updated Drug Strategy’s, Executive Summary andincludes some of the current evidence, the progress so far and some of the next steps being undertaken to
tackle drug misuse particularly in relation to treatment and the development of drug intervention in the
Criminal Justice System in England and Wales.
II. TERMINOLOGY
To help set this work in context, this section of the paper will focus on some of the terms which will be
used. The ongoing debate about terminology means that a number of different terms are used to describe
drug taking behaviour. For the purposes of this paper the terms described below, have been adapted fromprevious definitions adopted by the Health Advisory Service (HAS), the Advisory Council on the Misuse ofDrugs (ACMD) and the National Treatment Agency (NTA).
• Drug Use – illegal and illicit drug taking that does not cause any perceived immediate harm- eventhough it may carry some risk of harm e.g. health problems.
• Drug Misuse – illegal and illicit drug taking which leads a person to experience social,
psychological, physical or legal problems related to intoxication and/or regular excessive
consumption and/or dependence.
• Treatment -describes a range of interventions which are intended to address an identified drug related
problem or condition relating to a person’s physical, psychological or social (including legal) wellbeing. Structured treatment (evidence based) follows assessment and is delivered according to a careplan with clear goals regularly reviewed with the client. It may comprise a number of concurrent orsequential treatment interventions. Drug treatment can encompass a wide range of interventions /treatment modalities (types).
• Problematic Drug User: describes those drug users who experience social psychological or legal
problems related to their drug use rather than those who use drugs casually or recreationally.

* Criminal Justice Policy Lead,
Criminal Justice Interventions Programme,
Drug Strategy Directorate,
Home Office,U.K

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author, not necessarily those of the Home Office (nor do theyreflect Government policy).

3

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64
III. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE ENGLISH LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ROLES OF CRIMINALJUSTICE AGENCIESTo set the work being undertaken with drug users in the criminal justice system in context, in Englandand Wales, a very brief overview of the legal framework and the role of criminal justice agencies has been
provided.
A. The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
The main legislation controlling the misuse of drugs in Britain is the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. It
incorporates the relatively new system of licensing doctors to prescribe heroin and crack cocaine to drug
users, the safe custody of drugs and national stop and search powers for the police. It also established thefirst statutory advisory body the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD).
The Act divides controlled drugs into three classes linked to maximum penalties in a descending order ofseverity from A to C. This three tier classification was designed to make it possible to control particular
drugs according to their comparative harmfulness either to individuals or to society as a whole. (SeeAppendix A which outlines more details, including the proposals relating to cannabis)
B. The English Judiciary Process
The English legal system has been built around two distinct court processes:• Civil Law and• Criminal Law.
The procedures within the court systems vary greatly; it is the judicial process around the criminal court
system which will need to be taken account of in delivery and planning of drug related criminal justiceprogrammes to be described later.
The British Court System is known as adversarial which means that both the Defence and Prosecution
try to persuade the bench or jury of either guilt or innocence.
The courts which deal with crime and related issues are the Magistrates Court and the Crown Court.
Offences within the criminal judicial system fall into one of three categories. The category determines thecourt’s power to deal with the offence. The categories are outlined in Appendix A.
C. The Magistrates Court
Magistrates Courts deal with Summary Offences and less serious Either-way offences. The Magistrates
only have the power to sentence individuals to up to one years’ imprisonment. There are two types ofMagistrates in England and Wales, Lay Magistrates and Stipendiary Magistrates.
Lay Magistrates sit on a bench with usually two others. They are members of the local community who
have been invited to sit on the ‘bench’. They are not qualified in law and their role is voluntary.
Stipendiary Magistrates on the other hand are qualified solicitors. They are paid to undertake their duties
and have the power to pass sentence by themselves.
Specialist Youth Courts form part of the Magistrates Court Structure. These courts deal with young
offenders less than 18 years. Lay Magistrates who have had training in youth matters sit at these courts.
D. The Crown Court
The Crown Court is the higher of the two courts. This means that the most serious of offences withsentences up to life imprisonment are conducted within it.
Proceedings in the Crown Court are overseen by a Judge and take place before a jury. The jury consistsof 12 members of the public who make a decision on the guilt of the defendant based upon the casepresented.

4

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS
The judge is qualified in law and will have experience through being a barrister in the higher courts. The
judge has the power to pass sentence on their own at the end of a trial.
E. Court Roles
1. The Clerk of the Court
The Clerk (Legal Advisor) is a qualified solicitor who is neutral in court proceedings. Their role is the
day-to-day running of the court. The Clerk advises the Magistrate on points of law and they sit below thebench.
2. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)The CPS has two roles: they prepare cases against defendants with information given by the police andalso prosecute the case against the defendants if there is enough evidence. The CPS solicitor is commonly
known or referred to as the Crown or Prosecution.
3. The Client’s Solicitor
The clients’ solicitor is also qualified in law like their CPS counterpart. Their role is to defend the client
against the charges put forward by the CPS. The clients’ solicitor is commonly known as their brief and isoften referred to as ‘The Defence’ in court. In the Crown Court the clients’ brief is known as the ‘barrister’.
F. The Probation Service
The National Probation Service for England & Wales is part of the Home Office. There are 42 probation
services across England & Wales matching police force geographical boundaries.
Their role is to supervise offenders in the community; in a court context they have two roles:• To assist the court in making decisions about bail.
• When asked by the court, to prepare written reports on those who are found guilty of offences, thereport known as a Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) is used.
G. The Prison Service
There are around 135 custodial institutions across England and Wales which comprise of a range of types
from high secure, through to establishments for women and young offenders: The role of the prison service
is to supervise offenders in custodial institutions.
The main aim of the Prison and Probation Services is to work together to deliver court sentences in orderto reduce re-offending and protect the public.
H. The Police Service
There are 43 Police Forces across England & Wales, covering specific geographical areas which arecoterminous with the Probation Service. The aim is to protect the public/community and prevent crime. For
policing purposes each police force area will be divided into smaller geographic areas, which could betermed/Divisions or Basic Command Units, comprised of one or more ‘police stations or custody suites.
Each division will: operate to meet both the national objectives and targets for all police forces and the needsof its own local community.
IV. THE CURRENT POSITION - THE EXTENT OF DRUG USE IN ENGLAND AND WALES
In order to focus on what will really make a difference, it is important to understand the scale and natureof drug misuse in England and Wales and its consequences. The associated evidence base shows that drug
misuse is a changing picture in England and Wales, which is difficult to assess and varies from area to area.
As drug taking is an illicit activity reliable data on prevalence is hard to obtain.
The British Crime Survey (BCS 2000) provides the best available guide to changing patterns of drug use
among the adult population in England and Wales. It is a large national survey and is designed to be
representative of the population of adults. In addition to asking about their experiences of crime the BCS

5

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64
also asks about a number of other crime related topics, since 1994 it has included a comparative module ofquestions on drug misuse.
The BCS indicates that in 2000, around one third of those aged 16 -59 yrs had taken illegal drugs at sometime in their lives, Using this information it can be estimated that around 4 million people use at least one
illicit drug each year, evidence suggests most of this drug use is cannabis.
Further information highlights around 1 million people use at least one of the most dangerous drugs(such as ecstasy, heroin and cocaine) classified as Class A. Many of these individuals will take drugs once,
evidence suggests that for many of these individuals, drug use is experimental and use is limited.
A. Estimating the ‘In-Need Population’
Estimating the number of people who experience serious problems or dependence because of their drug
misuse is in itself difficult and problematic.
Estimating the number of people who need drug treatment because of their problematic drug use is also
not easy. Research suggests that there are around 250,000 problematic Class A drug users in England andWales and the large majority of these individuals are engaged in criminal activity (whether or not it is related
to their drug use).It is estimated on the basis of the NEW ADAM (New English and Welsh Drug Abuse
Monitoring programme 2001) that there are around 180,000 problematic drug users who enter the criminal
justice system through police custody suites each year. Of these only a minority (around 15 percent) arealready in treatment, although a larger proportion has previously had a treatment episode.
Using the data from the National Drug Treatment Monitoring System (NDTMS) which reflects thoseseeking help, we can estimate that there are around 100,000 drug misusers in treatment.
These rough estimates highlight that the criminal justice system provides an important opportunity toidentify and engage in treatment, problematic drug users who have not previously engaged with treatment
services or for whom treatment has failed.
B. Evidence Base - Links between Drug Use and Crime
The evidence base has helped to inform and drive national policy and targeting work with problematic
drug users. Recent research indicates that many drug misusers are also offenders though the relationshipbetween drugs and crime is complex.
Research on offender populations in the UK suggests that acquisitive crimes such as shoplifting,burglary and fraud are the main methods to fund drug consumption (Bennett 2000).
A Home Office research study (New English and Welsh Drug Abuse Monitoring Programme Bennett
2001) involving the drug testing of arrestees irrespective of offence in 8 Police Custody suites found that:• 65% of arrestees test positive for at least one illegal drug
• 30 % tested positive for two or more such substances• 29% tested positive for heroin/cocaine• users of both heroin/cocaine/crack commit between 5-10 as many offences as arrestees who do notuse drugs• 78% saw a connection between drug use and acquisitive crime
The National Treatment Outcome Research Study (Gossop 2001) – Prospective cohort study amongst
1075 drug misusers admitted to specialist drug treatment, found that amongst the treated population over halfof those attending specialist treatment centres had some involvement in acquisitive crime (shoplifting was
the most common offence).
Strategies aimed at reducing the demand for illicit drugs by breaking the link between drugs and crime
have been an integral part of the UK Government’s anti-drug strategies since the mid-1990’s. The
importance of this connection can be demonstrated through the recent estimations of the economic and social
costs of Class A Drug use. These estimations were derived from a recent study undertaken by York6

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS
University (Godfrey et al 2002) the main focus of which was to estimate the economic and social costs ofClass A drug misuse. The study found that the total social and economic costs (including victim) of Class A
drug use in England and Wales, was estimated to be between £10 billion and £18 billion per annum. Problem
drug users account for almost all economic and social costs (99%) and drug related crime accounts foraround 88% of total economic and social costs.
C. Evidence that Treatment Works
The National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS) (Gossop et al, 2001) a 5 year prospective
study following a cohort of drug misusers through different treatment modalities, has shown clear reductionsin levels of drug use and acquisitive crime one year after treatment, which were maintained at five years. In
cost-effectiveness terms, NTORS estimates that for every £1 spent on drug treatment, a concomitant savingof £3 is made on criminal justice and victim costs.
In addition a number of pilot programmes in the criminal justice system targeted at drug misusers (to be
explained in a later paper) found that they could be effective in getting them into treatment. These
programmes can deliver crime reduction outcomes as evidenced by the early arrest referral pilots whichshowed that of those interviewed:• around 60% reported reductions in acquisitive crime• 75% reduced their spending on drugs• 31% said they had reduced their drug use• 28% said they had stopped using heroin or other illicit opiates.
Although there is strong evidence on the efficacy of drug treatment services, evidence (Audit
Commission, 2002; Hough, 1996) listed below points to a number of specific issues that need to beaddressed if treatment is to work effectively amongst problem drug-using offenders entering the Criminal
Justice System:• Drug using offenders should have quick access and entry into treatment;• They should be retained in continuous treatment for at least three months;• They should have the option of methadone maintenance (and not rely on detoxification alone) andshould be seen by high quality, committed staff;• Comprehensive care management techniques are needed to deal with an individual’s multiple needs;
and• There needs to be close co-ordination between specialist and generic services across a range ofinterventions.
V. OVERVIEW OF THE UK DRUG STRATEGY
The policy agenda in the UK for addressing drug misuse problems has been developing rapidly in recent
years and has led to a stronger emphasis on drug treatment services.
In 1995 the Government white paper Tackling Drugs Together set out plans to tackle drug misuse overthree years. Multi-agency Drug Action Teams were established at a local level with the remit of taking an
overview of drug related issues, co-ordinating service planning and delivery and developing local actionplans.
The publication of the Government’s strategy for tackling drugs, Tackling Drugs to Build a Better Britain
in 1998, was and still is a landmark: the UK’s first cross cutting strategy across government departments totackle drugs in an integrated way has four main strands:
Young People - to help young people resist drug misuse in order to achieve their full potential in society;
Communities - to protect our communities from drug-related anti-social and criminal behaviour;
Treatment - to enable people with drug problems to overcome them and live healthy and crime free lives;
and7

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64
Availability - to stifle the availability of illegal drugs on our streets.
A. Overview of the Updated Drug Strategy
Over the last year, the 10 year Drug Strategy, was reviewed to sharpen its focus and improve
effectiveness. The findings and recommendations of the Home Affairs Committee and the work of the Audit
Commission, the Advisory Council for the Misuse of Drugs, the Health Advisory Service, the Police
Foundation and others have also contributed to the review.
In December 2002 the updated Drug Strategy was published which built on the foundations laid before
and took account of lessons learnt so far. The strategy also included the additional availability of resources tobe made available and invested. Planned direct annual expenditure for tackling drugs will rise from £1026
million in this financial year 2003/04 to £1244 million in the next financial year; £1344 million in the year
starting April 2004 to a total annual expenditure of nearly £1.5 billion in the year starting April 2005.
The overall aim of the updated strategy is: Reducing the harm that drugs cause to society communities, individuals and their families
The updated strategy sets out a range of policies and interventions, which concentrate on the mostdangerous drugs, the most damaged communities and the individuals whose addiction and chaotic lifestyles
are most harmful, both to themselves and others.
The most effective way of reducing the harm drugs cause is to persuade all potential users, butparticularly the young, not to use drugs. Success will only be achieved if there are strategies which stopyoung people from developing drug problems, reduce the prevalence of drugs on the streets and reduce thenumbers of those with existing drug problems by getting them into effective treatment.
Preventing today’s young people from becoming tomorrow’s problematic drug users
The section relating to young people in the updated strategy highlights that all controlled drugs are
dangerous and no one should take them. Universal programmes of education and information will provide all
young people and their families the information and skills they need to protect themselves from the risks andharm of all drugs. The most vulnerable young people will get support before drug problems escalate.
Since 1998, universal programmes of education and information have been expanded. Substance misuseeducation is now part of the National Curriculum and 80% of primary and 96% of secondary schools haveadopted drug education policies.
Much has also been done to improve how to identify and support the most vulnerable young people:• 80% of England is covered by the new Connexions Service who identify young people with drug
problems and arrange for specialist help as a part of their wider role to support all young people.
• All Youth Offending Teams (YOTs) have named drug workers who assess and arrange for support
for young offenders with drug problems.
• Treatment services for young people, including detoxification and community prescribing are now
provided in 80% of Drug Action Team (DAT) areas.
• Positive Futures - using sport and arts to engage the most vulnerable young people by developing
skills to help them resist drugs and re-enter education and training - are available in 57 of our mostdisadvantaged communities.
16,000 young people currently receive support from local authority and health services, including
4,000 supported by drug treatment agencies and 3,000 by Positive Futures programmes.
By March 2006 young people will be discouraged from using drugs in the first place and support
parents and family members who are worried about drugs by:8

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS• Expanding the provision and improving the quality of drug education so that by March 2004 allprimary and secondary schools have drug education policies and further improve the quality so thatby March 2006, no drug education lessons will be described as ‘poor’ by OFSTED.
• Launching in Spring 2003, a major new Communications Campaign driving home the risks of ClassA drugs and encouraging young people and their parents to seek further advice and help. It is vitalthat the message to young people is open, honest and credible. The reclassification of cannabis will
support this.
• Clamping down on dealers who prey on the young by increasing the penalties for dealing Class C
drugs by July 2003 to match the already severe penalties for dealing Class A and B drugs.
• Expanding prevention programmes so that by March 2004 all young offenders and pupils attending
Pupil Referral Units participate.
• Improving services for parents and carers by setting clear standards for the support offered to parents
who are concerned about substance misuse or whose family members have a drug problem.
The provision of substance misuse treatment within the youth justice system will be expanded to:• Introduce drug testing and referral of young people for treatment following arrest• Give courts the power to include drugs treatment as part of community sentences• Pilot and roll out new programmes of treatment and wider support for young offenders• Provide drugs workers in all juvenile custodial establishments to organise programmes of
prevention, treatment and support on release by December 2003.
There will also be investment to help local authorities support young people with drug problems. This
will provide specialist support, outreach workers, training for professionals working with young people andan expansion of the Positive Futures programme. By March 2006 the number of young people with drug
problems receiving support will include:• 12,000 supported by YOTs and in juvenile custody• 28,000 supported by local authorities, health services and Connexions• 5,000 supported by Positive Futures programmes• 5,200 supported by drug treatment agencies
This means that by March 2006, there will be the capacity to support 40-50,000 young people with drug
problems every year. By 2008 this will have driven down the number of young people who go onto become
future problematic drug users.
B. Reducing the Supply of Illegal Drugs
Reducing the supply of illegal drugs and tackling the trafficking of all drugs is key. Progress since 1998
includes:• establishing the Concerted Inter-Agency Drugs Action Group (CIDA) to co-ordinate operational
activity across all intelligence and enforcement agencies;• increasing the number of drug seizures – the results for 2000 show a 53% rise in the number of
cocaine seizures and a 30% increase in heroin seizures compared with 1997; the amount of drugrelated assets recovered has also increased - £18.9 million from April 2001 to March 2002, almost
20% up on the previous year;• establishing the National Crime Squad and the National Criminal Intelligence Service in April 1998,
with key priorities of tackling hard drugs;

9

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64• more than 60 drug liaison officers are now in post in key drug producing and transit countries,
working to identify illicit drug movements, related financial activities, the structure of criminalorganisations involved and providing hard intelligence for use in investigations;• assisting EU candidate countries in their development of drug strategies and enforcement
capabilities. The UK is a lead partner in a law enforcement project across 10 candidate countries andalso involved in anti-drugs twinning projects in Bulgaria and the Czech Republic;• the Proceeds of Crime Bill received Royal Assent in July 2002, strengthening investigation andconfiscation powers, and the Recovered Assets Fund has been established;• following the fall of the Taliban, the UK has led in the co-ordination of international efforts to help
the Afghan Government counter narcotics production in Afghanistan.
There will be continuing focus on international trafficking, with a renewed focus on middle markets,
local policing and tackling crack. New initiatives include:• Increasing co-operation with countries on key supply routes so as to increase the quantities of heroin
and cocaine taken out en route, at the border and within the UK this includes: setting up a joint
investigation team with Spain to investigate organised crime networks associated with cocaine
trafficking; working closely with the Jamaican Government to disrupt the supply of cocaine via
Caribbean countries; in close touch with the Turkish authorities, both bilaterally and through the EU,
on problems associated with heroin trafficking; and hosting a conference to address organised crimein the Balkans – including drug-related organised crime.
• Working closely with the Afghan Government to reduce opium production with a view to eliminatingproduction by 70% by 2008 and in full by 2013. The initial focus will be the 2003 crop.
• Enhancing intelligence capability and working in co-operation with EU partners to tackle thesecondary distribution of heroin and cocaine from the EU and to prevent the diversion of precursor
chemicals used to make illicit drugs, such as Ecstasy.
• Reviewing the impact of interventions on the drug supply chain from international production to
distribution within the UK. The Government’s Strategy Unit working with the Home Office andother key departments will undertake a study.
• Increasing the recovery of drug-related criminal assets. The new Asset Recovery Agency will beestablished by February 2003.
• Targeting the middle markets. The police and other agencies are working together to tackle one of themost profitable parts of the supply chain – cross-regional markets. With close support from CIDA,
this capacity is being built at a regional level. In addition to the existing team in the West Midlands,
middle market capacity will be developed on Merseyside and in South and Mid Wales, before being
spread across the rest of England and Wales.
• Strengthening policing to better disrupt local supply markets. Police performance is being
strengthened through the work of the Home Office Drug Strategy Directorate and the PoliceStandards Unit. This involves guidance, sharing best practice, developing new targets andunderstanding drug markets. The Police Priority Area programme supports local policing strategies
to better tackle multiple problems like drugs, addressing all aspects of policing.
• Taking high profile action against suppliers in communities with particular problems. Recent
initiatives in Peterborough and Lambeth have shown how working closely with local partners andthe community we can successfully deliver specialist action to tackle local drug markets andassociated crime. For example, the Lambeth initiative saw over 100 crack house raids, 564 searches
and over 90 people arrested.

10

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS• Tackling crack. Policing to disrupt crack markets will be intensified in the areas most affected.
Specialist treatment for crack addiction will also be increased and action taken to deter usage.
Following a conference in June 2002, a National Crack Action Plan will be published before the endof December 2002.
• Heavily penalising those caught dealing or drug trafficking with maximum sentences ranging from
14 years (for Class B and C drugs) to life imprisonment (for Class A).
C. Reducing Drug Use and Drug Related Offending through Treatment and Support. Reducing Drug
Related Death through Harm Minimisation.
Evidence shows us that treatment works. It is the key to reducing the harm drugs cause to users, family
and communities and core to the delivery of the whole Drug Strategy. Problem drug misusers need a variety
of interventions, it is not a case of one size fits all.
It is not possible within the scope of this paper to describe the full range of treatment available to ‘treat’
drug misusers. It is however important to recognise that a holistic approach is needed and which seeks toaddress the range of assessed needs, related to the individual’s drug misuse and may include support withhousing, family and finance issues. For this paper the delivery of ‘specialist drug treatment’ will be
described across four main types/modalities these are:• Community prescribing• Care planned counselling including structured day programmes• Inpatient programmes• Residential rehabilitation
Specialist Drug Treatment is provided and delivered by a range of agencies which may include nongovernment organisations (known as the voluntary/independent sector), and statutory service providers, suchas health and social services.
The availability and effectiveness of drug treatment (delivered by a range of providers) is variable acrossEngland and Wales. The Department of Health and Home Office jointly funded the National Treatment
Agency (NTA), created in 2001 as a special Health Authority. The NTA’s remit, covers England and it’scurrent priorities are to ensure equality in drug treatment; increase the capacity and competence of the drug
treatment workforce; increase quality and accountability at all levels of the drug treatment system; improve
the availability and accessibility of drug treatment in all areas of the country; and increase the effectivenessof drug treatment.
The Department of Health commissioned the NTA to enhance planning, commissioning and provision of
drug treatment services. This resulted in the development of Models of Care, a national framework (SeeAppendix B). Services for drug misusers can be grouped into four broad bands or tiers. Local areas coveredby Drug Action Teams (see delivery section for explanation of DATs) will be expected to ensure that they
provide the right balance of local drug treatment services to fit the needs of their local population and canprovide access to the types of services outlined in the four tiers.
Models of Care is based on current evidence, quality standards and good practice in England andadvocates a systems approach to meeting the multiple needs of drug misusers. It recognises the need for
effective assessment which should be needs-led and seen as an on going process.
The three levels of assessment which should be available locally to provide access between the four tiersare:• Level 1 Screening and referral assessment• Level 2 Drug and alcohol misuse triage assessment• Level 3 Comprehensive drug and alcohol misuse assessment

11

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64
1. What is the Aim of Treatment?
For some years a range or hierarchy of goals of treatment have been identified in the UK (ACMD 1988
89, Task Force to Review Services for Drug Misusers 1996). These are• Reduction of health, social and other problems directly related to drug misuse• Reduction of harmful or risky behaviours associated with the misuse of drugs (e.g. sharing injecting
equipment)• Reduction of health, social or other problems not directly attributable to drug misuse• Attainment of controlled non-dependent or non-problematic use• Abstinence from main problem drugs• Abstinence from all drugs
This hierarchy of drug treatment goals endorses the principle of harm minimisation, which refers to the
reduction of the various forms of drug related harm until the drug misuser is both ready and able to come off
drugs (Department of Health 1999). Harm minimisation strategies in the UK have achieved considerable
success in preventing a more severe HIV epidemic (ACMD 1998).
2. Treatment – Overview from the Updated Strategy
The aim continues to be to increase the participation of problem drug users in the full range of treatment
services and increase the proportion of users successfully sustaining or completing treatment by 2008. There
has been good progress but much more needs to be done to ensure that treatment is readily available to those
who need it. Through national and local action, this will be achieved by:• Investing in additional and better quality treatment services. An expansion in treatment provision
will take time to build – there is no quick fix solution. However, by 2008, capacity will have doubled
so that 200,000 problematic drug users can be treated per year in the community or in a residential
setting, as appropriate.
• Filling the gaps in services. Drug users have different treatment needs, it’s not a case of one size
fitting all. DATs and the NTA are committed to ensuring that all areas have access to an adequate
range of services – including advice and harm reduction; GP and specialist prescribing;detoxification and rehabilitation, including residential services; and that new provision is evidencebased and effective.
Services for crack and cocaine users will be expanded from Spring 2003 with the development of
new fast-track agencies - first in areas of greatest need and later across the country - along with new
guidance, improved training and support for front line drugs workers.
All those who have a clinical need for heroin prescribing will have access to it under medical
supervision, safeguarding against the risk of seepage into the wider community.
• Reducing waiting times further. The growth in treatment capacity and improved efficiency ofservices means that by the end of March 2004, maximum waiting times from referral to receipt oftreatment should be no more than 2 weeks for in-patient detoxification and GP prescribing and 3
weeks for all other forms of treatment.
• Improving the health of drug takers through the greater involvement of GPs. We will increase thenumber of GPs / primary care professionals working with drug users and improve access tohealthcare services for all problematic drug users, irrespective of prescribing needs.
• More referrals from the Criminal Justice System. There will be a focus to develop better links totreatment for drug offenders in the areas with the highest levels of crime.
• Improving prison-based treatment provision. An additional 2,000 intensive treatment programmes
places will be created in prisons. New low intensity programmes will be introduced providing 17,000
places for those serving short sentences. The throughcare element of the system will be enhanced toensure better continuity of treatment once prisoners leave custody.

12

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS
D. Reducing Drug-Related Crime and its Impact on Communities
Nothing affects the well-being of local communities as much as drug misuse, drug-related crime and thefear of such crime. Where communities are strong, drugs do not take a hold. The highest incidences of drugrelated crime, supply and drug-related nuisance occur in the communities that suffer most from social
deprivation.
Since 1998 a number of criminal justice based drug initiatives have been introduced or piloted inEngland and Wales, designed to either facilitate the referral of drug misusing offenders into drug treatment
or deliver treatment within the context of a community or custodial sentence. These initiatives provide
access and engagement at key access points in the criminal justice system and have been listed in brief
below:
1. Police Custody Suites
Arrest referral schemes now cover all 43 police forces in England and Wales. Drug testing pilots operate
in one custody suite in nine police force areas and in additional custody suites covered by four police forces
within the street crime areas.
2. Courts
All courts in the drug testing pilot/street crime areas have access to the results (positive/negative) of drug
tests in police custody to inform bail/sentencing decisions: and power to order pre-sentence drug tests in thepilot areas. Arrest referral workers have a presence in some Magistrates Courts.
3. Community Sentence
Drug Treatment and Testing Orders were introduced to courts in all probation areas in England andWales from October 2000. Drug Abstinence Orders/Requirements are being piloted in 9 probation areas
since November 2001 (part of the Drug Test pilot programme).
4. Prison
Healthcare teams providing clinical services and detoxification for prisoners received into custody.
Counselling, assessment, referral, advice and throughcare (CARAT) teams have operated in all prisons from
September 1999. There are a range of structured drug treatment programmes and therapeutic communities
available in selected prisons. Mandatory drug testing has been available since 1997, a significant number ofprisons have chosen to give prisoners access to voluntary testing units.
5. Post-release
Currently there is no comprehensive aftercare provision for drug misusers returning to the communityfrom custody. Initiatives have developed in an ad hoc manner and prisoners serving less than 12 months are
not currently subject to statutory supervision and therefore particularly vulnerable following release. Drugtesting as a licence condition is being piloted in the 9 drug testing pilot areas.
E. The Updated Drug Strategy Highlights in this Area
• New programmes have been established to get drug misusers off drugs and out of crime througheffective treatment – the key to reducing offending. Each year, arrest referral schemes have picked up
around 50,000 drug misusers at the point of arrest and referred them into treatment or otherprogrammes of help. Drug treatment and testing orders have enabled around 6,000 offenders per year
to address their problems through intensive community based programmes, and drug testing pilots
have been introduced to test arrestees and better inform bail and sentencing decisions. Their drug
misuse and related crime rates have dropped significantly as a result;• The Jobcentre Plus initiative progress2work was launched in 2001 and the first participants started in
2002. It helps recovering drug users find and sustain jobs – a key way of returning to a more stable
and constructive life;• £100 million has already been made available through the new Communities Against Drugs fund tosupport targeted, locally determined measures designed to strengthen communities, disrupt the local
drugs markets and tackle drugs and drug-related crime;

13

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64• Guidance, training, information and support have been provided on housing management,neighbourhood renewal, homelessness and dance club management to enable agencies andorganisations to tackle drug misuse in the context of wider community problems.
To break the link between drugs and crime there will be investment in a major new programme ofinterventions for adults and young people, which will move offenders out of the criminal justice system andinto treatment. Using every opportunity from arrest, to court, sentence and on release, this programme will
include:• making arrest referral schemes more proactive and effective;• extending drug testing after charge to those local police force areas with the highest crime;• piloting the introduction of presumption against bail where offenders test positive for drugs but
refuse treatment;• doubling the number of Drug Treatment and Testing Orders by March 2005;• expanding treatment provision in prisons;• providing comprehensive programmes of throughcare and aftercare for treated drug misusers
returning to the community from prison, including post-release hostels, and for those leaving
treatment programmes who have not been in prison; and• a package of corresponding, but appropriate interventions for juveniles.
F. Delivery of the Updated Drug Strategy
The problems of drug misuse are complex and require integrated solutions and co-ordinated delivery ofservices involving education, intelligence and enforcement, social and economic policy, and health. Tackling
drugs requires effective joint working between Government Departments at national level and similar
partnership working between agencies at local level.
Delivering the Drug Strategy is a cross-government initiative. Following the 2001 General Election, theHome Secretary took over lead responsibility for driving forward delivery of the Drug Strategy, as Chair of
the Cabinet Ministerial Sub-Committee on Drugs Policy. The committee includes ministers from the
Department of Health, the Department for Education and Skills, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, theCabinet Office, the Treasury and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
The Drug Strategy targets are expressed in departments’ public service agreements listed below andsupporting service delivery agreements. These are embedded in delivery plans which are drawn up in
conjunction with the Prime Minister’s delivery unit and kept under regular review by ministers and officials.
The Public Service Agreements are to:• Reduce the use of class A drugs and the frequent use of any illicit drug among all young people
under the age of 25 especially by the most vulnerable young people;• Reduce the availability of illegal drugs by increasing: the proportion of heroin and cocaine targetedon the UK which is taken out; the disruption / dismantling of those criminal groups responsible forsupplying substantial quantities of Class A drugs to the UK market; and the recovery of drug-related
criminal assets;• Contribute to the reduction of opium production in Afghanistan, with poppy cultivation reduced by
70% within 5 years and elimination within 10 years;• Reduce drug related crime, including as measured by the proportion of offenders testing positive atarrest; and14

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS• Increase the participation of problem drug users in drug treatment programmes by 55% by 2004 andby 100% by 2008, and increase year by year the proportion of users successfully sustaining orcompleting treatment programmes.
The Government set up the National Treatment Agency (NTA) as a Special Health Authority on 1 April
2001, although staff were not in place until the autumn of that year. The NTA’s current priorities are to ensure
equality in drug treatment; increase the capacity and competence of the drug treatment workforce; increase
quality and accountability at all levels of the drug treatment system; improve the availability andaccessibility of drug treatment in all areas of the country; and increase the effectiveness of drug treatment.
G. Regional and Local Delivery Mechanisms
The following mainly reflects delivery in England.
At a local level, agencies working in partnership through 149 Drug Action Teams (DATs) deliver the
Drug Strategy. DATs were initially set up in 1995 and have been aligned with local authority boundaries
since April 2001. They bring together representatives of key local agencies, such as health (Primary Care
Trusts), social services, the police, probation, education, the Prison Service, and housing. Each DAT is
supported by a co-ordinator and is accountable to the Home Secretary. Some include alcohol and solvent
misuse within their remit. DATs are supported by one or more drug reference groups, whose membership
includes key local professionals involved in the delivery of drug services.
DATs are supported at a regional level by Home Office drug teams (Regional Government Office
Teams). There are nine in England. In recognition of the need to operate more effectively at regional level,
Home Office teams, including the nine regional teams are being integrated into the regional Government
Office structure. This will support closer links between those supporting regional activity on crime, drugs,
community cohesion, racial equality, active communities and other Home Office priorities such asneighbourhood renewal, and the wider Government Office agenda.
H. Performance Management and Monitoring
Delivery of the Drug Strategy depends on agencies working effectively in partnership to make a realdifference to local communities. Home Office teams support partnership working in a variety of ways,
including setting and monitoring standards of performance, and assessment of partnerships’ plans through aprocess which includes the NTA and other regional representatives (for example, the Youth Justice board,
the Connexions Service and the Social Service Inspectorate).
Recommendations for action are then agreed between the DAT and the Home Office team; and progress
is monitored and reported on a quarterly basis.
I. Annual Report
Each year DATs report on their work by providing statistical and qualitative data on young people,
treatment, communities and supply. From April 2001 DATs have provided this information electronically.
This in itself is a success story for the Government’s e-business strategy and has generated a database, which
includes the most comprehensive local information available to date on the delivery of the Drug Strategy andtracking of expenditure. The database allows comparison of DAT performance across “families” andregions, providing DATs with an opportunity to share good practice.
VI. WHAT NEXT FOR DEVELOPING DRUG INTERVENTIONS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICESYSTEM?
The updated Drug Strategy 2002 set out plans to break the link between drugs and crime by extending,enhancing and integrating a range of criminal justice interventions from arrest to court to sentence which are
aimed at getting drug misusing offenders in to drug treatment and provide appropriate aftercare.
A new criminal justice interventions programme – drugs, has been introduced to integrate new andexisting programmes. The aim of the new criminal justice intervention programme is to reduce drug related
offending by moving drug misusing offenders through criminal justice interventions into and through the

15

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64
drug treatment system. An integrated approach to delivering criminal justice based drug interventions is now
being developed.
A range of different initiatives highlighted previously currently deals with drug misusing offenders as
they are processed through the criminal justice system. such as Arrest Referral Schemes located in police
custody suites, Drug Treatment and Testing Orders managed by the probation service and prison based
CARAT schemes. In many instances, lack of co-ordination between these services has lead to inconsistencyof care, inefficient working practices and failure to effectively engage and retain offenders in treatment. Thisis particularly true of offenders who are released from prison without adequate aftercare arrangements.
The updated drug strategy highlights the aim to join up initiatives in the criminal justice system more
effectively and develop an ‘end to end approach from arrest through to sentence and beyond. Under this new
programme supported by the Home Office and NTA, 25 DATs covering areas with the highest levels ofacquisitive crime have been asked to adopt a model of working delivered by a ‘virtual or dedicated’community based criminal justice drug team for their area. This approach should where possible build on
work and arrangements already in place using a combination of existing and new resources from theadditional capacity building and aftercare funds.
In line with the Models of Care framework described in this paper, this approach adopts the principle ofidentifying an integrated care pathway which clearly maps the course of treatment for a drug misuser who isassessed and referred within the criminal justice system
This ‘community based team’ will accept referrals from police, courts, probation and prisons and theirrole will extend beyond assessment and referral. There is clear evidence from the arrest referral evaluation(July 2002) that delays between referral and accessing treatment are de-motivating and lead to a highproportion of offenders not engaging in treatment. This learning highlights the need for the community based
team to be able to provide and/or access the full range of Tier 2 interventions, including case management
and low threshold treatment interventions, to ensure that offenders are engaged and supported and to
maximise the prospects of retaining them in treatment.
The new teams will undertake the following tasks:• Drug and Alcohol triage assessment and referral into appropriate specialist treatment.
• Care planning and co-ordination function.
• Harm reduction advice and interventions.
• Immediate access to low threshold treatment – for instance, structured counselling/motivational
interviewing and methadone prescribing.
• Appropriate interventions for crack and cocaine users.
• Work in partnership with probation and police in contributing to the delivery of DTTO, pre-arrestand prolific offender programmes.
• Provide a dedicated aftercare service for prisoners being released into the relevant DAT area toaddress their drug treatment needs and facilitate access to other services like housing, mental health,employment etc. This will include liaising with CARAT teams and probation staff to prepare jointly
agreed release plans. Manage a team of volunteer mentors to provide practical support andencouragement for offenders.
There will also be similar initiatives aimed at young people in the youth justice system, starting withpiloting Arrest Referral for under 18s in 10 of the 25 DATs from September 2003.

16

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS
VII. CHANGES TO EXISTING LEGISLATION AND THE LEGAL FRAMEWORKThe Governments’ White paper ‘Justice for All’, published in the summer of 2002 outlined a range of
proposals to be taken forward subject to legislative changes. Some of these have been outlined in this paper.
The legislative process is under way and at the time of writing this paper these proposals amongst others
are being considered under the current Criminal Justice Bill. The proposals include:• extending drug testing provisions after charge with a ‘trigger offence’ under the Criminal Justice andCourt Services Act 2000 to those under 18;• piloting the introduction of presumption against bail where offenders 18 and over who test positive
after being charged must agree to be assessed and/or access treatment or be refused court bail;• introduction of a single generic community sentence made up of specific elements which will replace
all existing community sentences including the DTTO;• introduce a condition of treatment for young offenders as part of an Action Plan Order or Supervision
Order; and• under the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000 provisions to extend drug testing as acondition after release on licence to include non-trigger offences.
VIII. CONCLUSION
This paper has provided a brief overview of the UK Updated Drug Strategy’s, particularly in relation totreatment and the development of drug interventions in the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales.
The overarching aim of the UK Government’s drug policy is to reduce the harm that drugs cause to society communities, individuals and their families. The key to delivering this aim is to reduce the number of peoplecaught up in the chaotic lives of addiction and crime (problematic drug users) and to stop young people fromentering their ranks. Tackling the enormous challenge of drug misuse is not a matter for Government or its
agencies alone, partnership and collaborative approaches are needed from a national, regional and local levelto tackle the complex issues raised through use and misuse of drugs across all aspects of the four areas
outlined in the strategy. The development of drug interventions in the criminal justice system in conjunction
with effective treatment has demonstrated the potential for reducing drug related offending, drug misuse andimproving health can be achieved through moving drug misusing offenders through criminal justiceinterventions into and through the drug treatment system.

17

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64
APPENDIX A
THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK
I. THE MISUSE OF DRUGS ACT 1971
Drug misuse is a huge global problem which poses a threat to people in many countries worldwide. In
the early 1960s, the international community recognised that restricting the availability of drugs that are
liable to misuse would require co-ordinated and universal action and, with this aim in view, has subsequently
drawn up three United Nations Conventions on drugs.
The UN Conventions provide controls on several hundred narcotic drugs and psychotropic substancesthat are liable to misuse. They prohibit or restrict their use by means of a comprehensive range of control
measures. The Conventions also recognise that some narcotic and psychotropic drugs have valuable medical
and scientific uses. They make specific provision for the production and use of such drugs for legitimate
pharmaceutical, medical and scientific purposes, but otherwise prohibit their use.
The UK is a party to these Conventions and has implemented their provisions into UK law by means of
the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and its associated regulations. As a member state of the European Union(EU), the UK also works in close partnership with other member states to deliver the EU Drug Strategy(2000–2004). The strategy is wide-ranging, covering actions against supply and demand both within the EU
and internationally, as well as the development of comprehensive evaluation mechanisms. It is practically
implemented by means of the EU action plan on drugs (2000–2004). Subject to the scrutiny of Parliament, a
number of elements of the EU strategy will be incorporated into UK law.
The Misuse of Drugs Act and regulations made under the Act establish the controlled status of drugs
liable to be misused in the UK. They prohibit and make unlawful the importation, exportation, production,
supply and possession of such drugs without authority. The regulations also provide for the legal production
and distribution of controlled drugs for pharmaceutical and medicinal purposes.
The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 also established the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD),
an independent body of experts in the drugs field, to advise the Government on drug misuse issues. It is partof the ACMD's remit to consider and make recommendations on the classification of new drugs and forkeeping the classification of existing drugs under review.
The drugs which are controlled under the Act are listed in Schedule 2 and are separated into Class A,
Class B or Class C depending on their harmfulness. Class A drugs are the most harmful and Class C drugs
are the least harmful. The Act provides penalties for drug offences. The highest penalties relate to trafficking
offences, e.g. unlawfully supplying controlled drugs. Class A drugs attract the highest penalties and Class C
drugs the least strict penalties, as shown in the table below.
Table 1. Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
Class A
HeroinMorphine
Methadone
Cocaine
LSD
Ecstasy

18

Class B
Amphetamines
Barbiturates
CodeineCannabis

Class C
Amphetamine related drugs
Buprenorphine
Most Benzodiazepines
Anabolic Steroids(under certain circumstances)

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS
Table 2. Misuse of Drug Offences – Maximum Penalties
Offence

Class AClass B

Production of acontrolled drugLife or a fine or both

14 years or a fine orbothSupply of a controlled
drugLife or a fine or both

14 years or a fine orbothPossession of acontrolled drug

7 years or a fine or both

5 years or a fine or bothClass C
current - 5 years or afine or bothproposed - 14 years or afine or bothcurrent - 5 years or afine or bothproposed - 14 years or afine or both
2 years or a fine or both

A. Reclassification of Cannabis
It is important that the UK Government’s message to young people is open, honest and credible. Druglaws must accurately reflect the relative harms of different drugs if they are to be effective and credible intrying to persuade young people in particular of the dangers of misusing drugs. The police and otherenforcement agencies need to focus their resources effectively on tackling the drugs which do the most harm.
To ensure that these aims are met, the Government has decided to bring forward proposals to Parliament
to reclassify cannabis from Class B to Class C under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. Cannabis is illegal andwill remain illegal.
Hard drugs like heroin and powder and crack cocaine destroy lives. They cause harm and misery to those
who use them, their families and the communities they live in. The Drug Strategy will therefore concentrateon tackling these drugs. Efforts to reduce the supply of such drugs, and the approach to treatment andeducation, needs to reflect this priority.
The decision to reclassify cannabis is based on the advice of the Advisory Council on the Misuse ofDrugs (ACMD). The Council advised that the classification of cannabis as a Class B drug wasdisproportionate in relation both to its inherent toxicity, and to that of other substances (such asamphetamines) that are currently within Class B. In making its recommendation, however, the Council
made it clear that cannabis is unquestionably harmful.
The reclassification of cannabis will mean that the law is brought better into line with what actually
happens in practice. The maximum penalty for the possession of cannabis will go down to two years’
imprisonment. Most first offences of cannabis possession will be dealt with by the police by way of awarning and confiscation of the drug. The police will retain the power of arrest to be used where there areaggravating factors, such as flagrantly disregarding the law.
A new cannabis enforcement model being developed by the Association of Chief Police Officers(ACPO) will provide police with a clear and firm steer on dealing with cannabis possession, including any
aggravating circumstances. Police time saved as a result can then be redeployed, supporting the wider
strategy objective of refocusing efforts – including enforcement action – on the drugs that cause the mostharm.
1. Supply Offences
The Government takes the supply and dealing of cannabis very seriously. It therefore intends, subject toParliamentary approval, to increase the maximum penalty for supplying and dealing in Class C drugs from 5
to 14 years’ imprisonment. This will maintain the maximum penalty for dealing in cannabis at its level as aClass B drug and will enable the courts to continue to impose substantial sentences for serious dealing
offences involving cannabis.

19

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64
II. THE ENGLISH JUDICIARY PROCESS
A. Brief Summary and Roles of Agencies
To help set the work being undertaken with drug users in the criminal justice system in context, in
England and Wales a very brief overview of the legal system and the role of criminal justice agencies has
been provided.
The English legal system has been built around two distinct court processes• Civil Law and• Criminal Law.
The procedures within the court systems vary greatly; it is the judicial process around the criminal court
system which will need to be taken account of in delivery and planning of drug related criminal justiceprogrammes to be described later.
The British Court System is known as adversarial which means that both the Defence and Prosecution
try to persuade the bench or jury of either guilt or innocence.
The courts which deal with crime and related issues are the Magistrates Court and the Crown Court.
Offences within the criminal judicial system fall into one of three categories. The category determines thecourt’s power to deal with the offence. The categories are:
• Summary Offences (Magistrates Court)• Either-way offences (Magistrates or Crown Court)• Indictable offences ( Crown Court)
1. Summary Offences
Summary offences carry a maximum prison sentence of six months; these are dealt with by themagistrates’ court.
2. Either-Way Offences
Either-way offences can be tried in either the Magistrates Court or Crown Court. The transfer between
courts is known as a committal. The reason for the transfer between the courts can be: the magistrates electnot to deal with the matter and transfer it to the higher court due to the serious nature of the offence; or the
defendant elects for trial in the higher court.
3. Indictable offences
Indictable offences are the more serous and can only be tried in Crown Court. The procedure willcommence in the Magistrates court being committed to the Crown Court.
B. Brief Overview of the Courts
1. The Magistrates Court
Magistrates Court deals with Summary Offences and less serious Either-way offences. The Magistrates
only have the power to sentence individuals to up to one years’ imprisonment. There are two types ofMagistrates in England & Wales, Lay and Stipendiary Magistrates.
Lay Magistrates sit on a bench with usually two others. They are members of the local community who
have been invited to sit on the ‘bench’. They are not qualified in law and their role is voluntary.
Stipendiary Magistrates on the other hand are qualified solicitors. They are paid to undertake their duties
and have the power to pass sentence by themselves.
Specialist Youth Courts form part of the Magistrates Court Structure. These courts deal with young
offenders less than 18 years. Lay Magistrates who have had training in youth matters sit at these courts.

20

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS
2. The Crown Court
The Crown Court is the higher of the two courts. This means that the most serious of offences withsentences up to life imprisonment are conducted within it.
Proceedings in the Crown Court are overseen by a Judge and take the place before a jury. The jury
consists of 12 members of the public who make a decision on the guilt of the defendant based upon the casepresented.
The judge is qualified in law and will have experience through being a barrister in the higher court. The
judge has the power to pass sentence on their own at the end of a trial.
C. Court Roles
1. The Clerk of the Court
The Clerk (Legal Advisor) is a qualified solicitor who is neutral in court proceedings. Their role is the
day to day running of the court. The Clerk advises the Magistrate on points of law and they sit below thebench.
2. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)The CPS has two roles. They prepare cases against defendants with information given by the police andalso prosecute the case against the defendants if there is enough evidence. The CPS solicitor is commonly
known or referred to as the Crown or Prosecution.
3. The Client’s Solicitor
The clients’ solicitor is also qualified in law like their CPPS counterpart. Their role is to defend the client
against the charges put forward by CPS. The clients’ solicitor is commonly known as their brief and is often
referred to as ‘The Defence’ in court. In the Crown Court the clients’ brief is known as the ‘barrister’.
D. The Role of Criminal Justice Agencies
The Probation Service – Established in April 2001 the National Probation Service for England & Walesis part of the Home Office. There are 42 probation services across England & Wales matching police force
geographical boundaries.
The Prison Service – There are 135 custodial institutions across England & Wales comprised of a mix ofhigh secure, to establishments for young offenders. The role of the prison service is to supervise offenders incustodial institutions.
Prisons and probation services work together to execute court sentences to reduce re-offending andprotect the public.
1. Role of the Probation Service
Primary role is to supervise offenders in the community who have received a community sentence or are
released ‘on licence’ from prison (i.e. those adults who having received a sentence of more than a year, or ayoung person 18-21).
In a court context the probation service provides support in a number of ways.
The first of these is to:• Assist the court in making decisions about bail. The Probation Officer (PO) or Probation Service
Officer (PSO) may be asked to clarify bail addresses or employment circumstances of defendants. In
some cases they provide a bail hostel placement for defendants who have no bail address or need amore secure community address.
• When asked by the court, prepare written reports on those who are found guilty of offences. The
report known as a Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) is used by the Magistrate or Judge to assist in
sentencing. It gives information on the offender’s background and their view on their offence. The

21

RESOURCE MATERIAL SERIES No. 64
PSR also recommends a sentence to the court and if necessary outlines a plan of action that will be
used to rehabilitate the offender (as in the case of a Drug Treatment and Testing Order).
E. The Police Service
There are 43 Police Forces across England & Wales, covering specific geographical areas. The aim is toprotect the public and prevent crime. For policing purposes each area may be broken down into smaller areas
which could be termed / Divisions or Basic Command Units. Each division will operate to meet the needs of
its own local community this will also include involvement with partnership work. To assist in understanding
the arrest referral programme to be explained later, a brief explanation follows about the role of police
custody:
To assist in understanding how arrest referral works within the custody suite, a brief overview of the
management within the custody suite/office is given below:
The Custody Office is a secure restricted access area within a police station/custody suite which
comprises of a prisoner reception area custody desk interview room medical examination room and cell area.
Separate cell areas are provided for males and females. It is normally staffed by a sergeant and one or two
constables. The custody sergeant has responsibility for the custody office and all persons in police detention.
The constables provide support.
The position of the Custody Officer is unusual in that their role requirement is defined by statue and is alegislative requirement (Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984).
Upon arrival at a police station a detainee is brought back to the custody desk, where the arresting officer
will explain the circumstances leading to the arrest.
The custody sergeant will then consider whether they need to authorise detention. Once detention is
authorised the custody officer will open a custody record and the detainee will be given their rights andentitlements in accordance with PACE. (Human Rights etc) It is at this stage that the opportunity to see anarrest referral worker may first be offered.
The detainee will be searched and their property retained by the custody officer in accordance with
PACE. Custody offices in some force areas now have video camera systems installed which records all
activity within the custody cells.
III. POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 (PACE) AND CODES OF PRACTICE(NOTE: PACE WITH NEW CODES OF PRACTICE TO BE INTRODUCED)The Police must ensure that they act at all times in accordance with PACE and the codes of practice inrelation to arrest referral.
Particular relevance for arrest referral includes the following key codes which relate to interviewing andquestioning:• 11.1 A of PACE Code C (Code of Practice relevant to the detention, treatment and questioning of
persons by the police• 11.13 of PACE Code C (relating to keeping written record of any comments by a suspected person)• 3.4 of PACE Code C prohibits Custody Officer from engaging in conversation with the suspect
regarding anything to do with the offence• Section 40 (1) and (2) of PACE – periodic review of need to be in police detention.

22

124TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE
VISITING EXPERTS’ PAPERS
APPENDIX B
MODELS OF CARE - FOUR TIER FRAMEWORKTable 1. Drug Misuse Treatment Tiers and Commissioning Levels
Service Modality

Commissioning
Level

Tier No.

Tier Title

1

Non-substance misuse
specific services

For example:
Personal/general medical services (primary care)
Non-DM specific social services including children andfamily services; non-DM specific assessment and caremanagement
Housing and homelessness services
Non-SM specific probation services
Vaccination / communicable diseases
Sexual health / health promotion
Accident and emergency services
General psychiatric services
Vocational services

Local DAT*/ PCT/
PCG

2Open access drug
misuse services

Drug-related advice and information
Open access or drop-in services
Motivational interviewing/ brief interventions
Needle exchange (pharmacy/service/outreach)
Outreach services (detached/domiciliary/peripatetic)
Low-threshold prescribing
Liaison with drug misuse services for acute medical andpsychiatric sector
DM specific assessment and care management

Local DAT/ PCT/PCG

3

Structured communitybased specialist drug
misuse services

Drug specialist care planning and co-ordination
Structured care planned counselling and therapy options
Structured day programmes (urban and semi-urban)
Community-based detoxification services
Community-based prescribing stabilisation and maintenanceprescribing
Community-based drug treatment for offenders on DTTOs
Other structured community-based drug treatment services
targeting specific groups
Structured aftercare programmes
Liaison with drug treatment services

Local DAT*/ MultiDAT

4a

Residential substancemisuse specific services

Inpatient drug detoxification and stabilisation services
Drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation services
Residential drug and alcohol crisis centres
Residential co-morbidity services
Specialist drug and alcohol residential units targeting specificgroups, e.g. mother and child units services

Multi-DAT/ Regional/
National

4b

Highly specialist nonsubstance misuse
specific services

For example:
Specialist liver disease units
Forensic services
Specialist psychiatric units including: personality disorderunits; eating disorders units
Terminal care services
Young people’s hospital and residential services providing
drug and alcohol treatment services (16 to 21 years)
HIV specialist units

Regional/ National

Source : Models of Care for Treatment of Adult Drug Misusers - Part 1 NTA(Oct 2002)

23