Quantitative measurements of many-body exciton dynamics
in GaAs quantum-well structures
by
Ryan P. Smith
B.S. Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2004

A thesis submitted to the
Faculty of the Graduate School of the
University of Colorado in partial fulfillmentof the requirements for the degree ofDoctor of Philosophy
Department of Physics
2010This thesis entitled:
Quantitative measurements of many-body exciton dynamics in GaAs quantum-wellstructures
written by Ryan P. Smith
has been approved for the Department of Physics

Dr. Steven T. Cundiff

Dr. Chris H. Greene

Date

The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that boththe content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in theabove mentioned discipline.

iii
Smith, Ryan P. (Ph.D., Physics)
Quantitative measurements of many-body exciton dynamics in GaAs quantum-well structures
Thesis directed by Professor Dr. Steven T. Cundiff

Heterostructures in semiconductors, such as quantum wells, give rise to new optoelectronic properties compared to bulk materials by confining the motion of carriers. We study
quasiparticles in gallium arsenide (GaAs) quantum wells known as excitons. The absorption spectrum of these excitons exhibits changes at elevated carrier-excitation levels becauseof many-body interactions between particles. While the spectral absorption changes fromthese interactions have been studied, a connection between measurements and a microscopic
theory has been lacking.
The quantitative spectrally resolved transient absorption measurements described inthis thesis are combined with a microscopic theory. This combination relates observed spectral changes in the probe after ultrashort optical excitation to a unique mixture of electronhole plasma, exciton, and polarization effects. Through theory-experiment comparison, we
deduce the actual carrier-density levels, exciton populations, and other correlations in thesystem. We find that Coulomb scattering of polarization with free-carrier densities dominates the excitation-induced shifting and broadening of the exciton resonance and that
exciton populations do not significantly contribute to the excitation-induced effects. We
observe a strong transient gain and attribute this feature to a coherent transfer of energy
between the pump and probe.
Since the excitation-induced effects are strong, theory predicts that the system should
display light-statistic-dependent excitation-induced effects. To demonstrate that light statistics of optical fields have a meaningful effect on the many-body dynamics, we develop a measurement technique involving optical pulse shaping. Our measurements are consistent with

iv
theoretical predictions that light with incoherent statistics gives rise to weaker excitationinduced effects than does a coherent source that creates the same density of electron-holepairs. Preliminary results suggest that the observed effects are related to the increased temporal duration of the exciting light source. We explore the effects of different pulse shapes
to elucidate the primary underlying effects that give rise to the observed weaker excitationinduced effects.

Dedication

To my parents, who have nurtured me and encouraged me on my path.

vi

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my advisor, Steve Cundiff, for his thoughtful and patient guidanceas I explored uncharted territory. He has inspired me by his enthusiasm for exploring new
ideas and for developing helpful intuitive models.
Working with Mack Kira has been an incredible pleasure. He has been generous in
taking the time to discuss his theories to me, and he continues to challenge me and inspires
me to be curious about nature.
I am grateful to all the group members of the Cundiff lab. They have helped me enormously to find empowerment and confidence in my work, and have been an incredible team.
Pete Roos introduced me to the lab and helped me to develop my own system for successful
research. Jared Wahlstrand guided me through the early stages of this project and encouraged me to push forward even when I experienced uncertainties in the research. Andy Funk
has inspired me to be inquisitive and to produce quality work through practice. I would liketo thank Alan Bristow, Xingcan Dai, and Tianhao Zhang for helpful discussions, and Qing
Chao, Hebin Li, Galan Moody, Andy Funk, Haipeng Zhang, Andy Hunter, Mark Siemans,
Soobong Choi, and Martina Carsjens for their proof-reading help and encouragement withthis thesis.
My ‘chunch’ (|chessi ⊗ |lunchi) buddy, John Willits, frequently brought me fresh perspective and kept my brain charged.
A number of people have been generous and helpful to me while here at JILA. Jim
Faller mentored me and helped me to cultivate an enthusiasm about science even when I wasviiburied in technical challenges. Carl Sauer and Terry Brown assisted me and educated mein many electronics issues. Dave Erickson, Jeff Sauter, and Brian Lynch smoothed the roadwith their unrelenting dedication; it was always a pleasure talking with them – thank you forso many days in paradise. Loree Kaleth helped our group organization, and always broughtlight into the lab whenever she stepped foot inside. Mike Paige and J. R. Raith patiently
helped me with many computing difficulties. Ariel Paul inspires me to continue striving to
be a quality scientist, regardless of the path I take in life. Julie Phillips helped me to becomea better writer. Dave Alchenberger assisted with many technical issues. I thank Rich Mirin
of NIST for high quality quantum-well samples. Wayne Knox brings a smile to my face.
I thank Rich Muller (of UC Berkeley) and Mike Dubson for creating the opportunity
for me to teach “Physics for future presidents.” John Wood from Georgia Tech introduced
me to the joys of physics.
I thank my friends, who have been supportive and curious about my work and haveoffered insight and perspective on this long path; especially David Biagioni, Angela Janzen,
Adam Israel Cohen, Elizabeth Merchant, Charles Philbrick, Tara Lanich-LaBrie, Charles
Bloch, Stephanie Chasteen, Dana Müller-Hoeppe, Michael Barber, Janice Brahney, Ryan
Wilson, James McCutchan, Sherry Gillespie, Justin Kuzcynski, Aaron Donner, Joseph Britton, Ethan Townsend, Mark DeRespinis, Candace Gilet, Meghan Barritt, Michael Teves,
Caroline Mitchell, Pam and John Bowlan, Rachel Weitz, Tom Phillip.
I would lastly like to thank my incredible parents, and my three beautiful sisters: Mom,
Dad, Meaghan, Caitlin, and Cara, for being a joyful blessing my life.

Contents

Chapter
1 Introduction
1.1

1

Thesis organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 Background on excitons in semiconductors

3
5

2.1

Interest in semiconductors and GaAs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5

2.2

Semiconductors and direct band-gap picture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6

2.3

Excitons in bulk GaAs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8

2.4

Excitons in GaAs quantum wells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12

2.5

Polarization selection rules QW electronic transitions . . . . . . . . . . . . .

16

2.6

Optical Bloch Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20

2.7

Decoherence and relaxation dynamics of QW excitons . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24

2.8

Homogeneous vs. inhomogeneous broadening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27

2.9

Spectroscopy of semiconductors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

28

2.9.1

Driven oscillator model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

28

2.9.2

Linear spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29

2.9.3

Nonlinear spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33

2.10 Many-body effects in GaAs QWs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37

2.10.1 Excitation-induced dephasing and shifting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

38

2.10.2 Bleaching the exciton resonance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40

ix
2.10.3 Band-gap renormalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

41

2.10.4 Excitonic gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42

2.10.5 Biexcitons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43

3 Experimental techniques

45

3.1

Sample characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45

3.2

Linear absorption spectrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49

3.3

Transient absorption in the nonlinear regime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49

3.3.1

Experimental setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50

3.3.2

Choosing appropriate pump and probe spot sizes . . . . . . . . . . .

53

3.3.3

Estimation of excitation densities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55

3.3.4

Quantitative measurement of the probe and pump absorption . . . .

58

3.4

Extraction of line shape parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

60

3.5

Cross-correlation measurement of the pump . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62

3.6

Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63

4 Coulomb-induced nonlinearities in semiconductor quantum wells

64

4.1

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64

4.2

Theory development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64

4.3

Results and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

67

4.4

Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73

4.5

Transition to the study of QW system response to light statistics . . . . . . .

74

5 Background on light statistics and predicted interaction with matter
5.1

5.2

75

Coherence of a classical field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

75

5.1.1

First-order coherence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76

5.1.2

Second-order coherence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

79

Statistics of the quantized electromagnetic field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82

x
5.2.1

Quantum-mechanical representation of the field . . . . . . . . . . . .

82

5.2.2

Density matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

83

5.2.3

Coherence properties of light sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

83

5.2.4

Photon number distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86

5.2.5

Singlet quantities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

88

5.2.6

Coherent state is the classical field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

88

5.3

Phase-space representations of light fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

89

5.4

Theoretical predictions concerning many-body interactions excited by light

5.5

having incoherent statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91

5.4.1

Why excitons in GaAs quantum wells? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91

5.4.2

Semiconductor Bloch equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93

5.4.3

Coherent on-resonance excitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94

5.4.4

Radiative recombination of carriers and excitons . . . . . . . . . . . .

95

5.4.5

Impact of quantum light statistics on matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

96

5.4.6

Quantum-optical spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

97

5.4.7

Jaynes-Cummings model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

99

Summary: thermal vs. coherent light statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105

6 Toward a thermal source
6.1

6.2

106

Early efforts for a thermal light source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
6.1.1

Incandescent bulbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107

6.1.2

Light-emitting diodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

6.1.3

Below-threshold diode laser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110

6.1.4

Cavity dumping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111

Phase modulation of ultrashort pulses for incoherent light generation . . . . 115
6.2.1

Density-matrix ensemble averaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115

6.2.2

Ensemble averaging for phase-randomized fields . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

xi
6.3

Philosophical issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121

7 Pulse-shaping techniques

123

7.1

Concept of a pulse shaper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

7.2

Experimental setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

7.3

Shaper design considerations in the frequency domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
7.3.1

Spectral resolution constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125

7.3.2

Phase mask device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126

7.4

Physical limitations in pulse shaping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129

7.5

Relationship between time- and frequency-domains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

7.6

7.5.1

Time duration and bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

7.5.2

Effects of the spectral phase in the time domain . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

Alignment of the pulse shaper apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
7.6.1

7.7

Spatial mode filtering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139

Calibration and testing of phase masks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
7.7.1

Calibration procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141

7.7.2

Comparison of simulation with experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142

7.8

Comparison of chirp parameter range with material dispersion . . . . . . . . 144

7.9

Arbitrary pulse shape generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146

7.10 Prepared for density-matrix ensemble averaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
8 Phase-randomized pulse experiments

148

8.1

Characterization of average statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148

8.2

Qualitative predictions using the optical Bloch equations . . . . . . . . . . . 156

8.3

Experimental methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160

8.4

Results of phase-randomized experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161

xii
9 Quantum-well response to other pulse shapes

164

9.1

Three-pulse (zero-Φ) excitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165

9.2

Chirped pulses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173

10 Conclusion

178

10.1 Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179

Bibliography

181

Appendix
A Double chop method for probe measurements

189

B Calibration of the pump and probe powers

193

B.1 Correction for reflection losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
B.2 Calibration of probe powers in the presence of the pump . . . . . . . . . . . 197

xiii

FiguresFigure2.1

Absorption of a photon by a direct-gap semiconductor. When an electron is promoted tothe conduction band, it can move freely about the material and thus conduct electricity.

2.27(a) A Wannier-Mott exciton with a large spatial extent compared with the size of a unit
cell, typically found in semiconductors with large dielectric constant. (b) A tightly bound(Frenkel) exciton with smaller radius, more common to insulator crystals. Figure from [1].

2.39(a) Schematic diagram of exciton states and the continuum in the center of mass picture.
Excitons can form at discrete energies below Egap . Photons with energy exceeding Egap
can create unbound electron-hole pairs. (b) Cacluated absorbance spectrum of GaAs at 1.2
K including Sommerfeld enhancement, based on Ref. [2]. As the photon energy increases,
discrete peaks in the absorption correspond to the n = 1, 2, and higher bound states of theexciton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.4

12

Lowest-lying energy states, n = 1, for QW excitons. Growing a thin layer of GaAs between
two layers Al0.3 Ga0.7 As creates a quantum well (QW). The confinement pushes the electron(e) and hole energies away from each other and lifts the degeneracy between light-hole (LH)and heavy-hole (HH) states.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14

xiv
2.5

(a) Schematic of the hole sub-bands in GaAs, with the lifting in degeneracy at k = 0 due toconfinement in one dimension between the light-hole (LH) (J = 23 ,Jz = ± 12 ) and heavy-hole(HH) (J = 32 ,Jz = ± 23 ) sub-bands. The split-off band (J = 21 ) is shifted in energy becauseof spin-orbit coupling. (b) A diagram of selection rules for optical interband excitation withσ + and σ − polarized light. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.6Visualization of the Lorentz oscillator model [Eqn. 2.38]. (a) The real and imaginary partsof the induced polarization. (b) The magnitude of the polarization and the phase.

2.7

. . .

30

Linear absorption. An input field Ein induces a polarization in a sample which in turnradiates Esig in the same direction, producing a cancelation with the input field.

2.8

18

. . . .

30

Schematic for a two-pulse nonlinear experiment. The sample is tilted for clarity. Two
pulses are separated by a delay τ , and focused with a lens onto a sample with directions~k1 and ~k2 , respectively. For transient absorption (TA), the pump ~k1 and probe ~k2 generate
a signal (green dashed lines) in the reflected and transmitted probe beam directions. For
second-harmonic generation (SHG), the signal (blue dashed line) is detected in the ~k1 + ~k2
direction. A four-wave mixing (FWM) signal (black dashed line) may be detected in the
2~k2 − ~k1 direction.

2.9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35

Excitation-induced dephasing (EID) observed in the differential transmission of a probe
spectrum. The inset shows the probe absorbance in the absence of strong optical excitation.
Figure from [3].

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39

2.10 Blue shift in exciton absorption in a multiple QW structure. At positive delays (+2 and+15 ps), a blue-shift of the exciton resonance is observed compared to the unexcited (-5ps) delay. Figure from [4].

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39

2.11 Optical gain observed in a transient-absorption experiment according to [5]. The unexcitedtransmittance spectrum (solid line) is shown in comparison to the excited probe spectra at
two time delays. Cross-hatched regions correspond to optical gain. . . . . . . . . . . .

43

2.12 Exciton and biexciton features in a time-integrated luminescence spectrum. Figure from [6]. 44

xv
3.1

Schematic of the multiple quantum-well (QW) sample studied in this thesis. The 300 nm
GaAs layer is referred to as the bulk layer in the discussion. The direction of the incoming
laser beam is shown.

3.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46

Detailed geometry of cryostat optics. The light source enters from the left side. There
are losses due to reflection from the two surfaces of the sapphire disc (surf1 and surf2) inaddition to the cryostat windows.

3.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

47

Measured (red) and theoretical (black) sample reflection probabilities. The reflection andtransmission (not shown) spectra, recorded in absolute units, allow the fixing of a modelusing transfer-matrix theory. The bulk and QW exciton resonances are marked. The
spacing ∆E between fringes allows inference of the sample thickness. . . . . . . . . . .

3.4

47

Linear absorption (blue line) from the QWs in absolute units in the region of the 1s heavyhole (HH) exciton resonance. In arbitrary units, the probe spectrum before the sample isshown (green line) along with the narrowed pump spectrum used in transient-absorption
experiments (shaded area).

3.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50

Schematic setup for spectrally resolved transient absorption experiments. BS, beam splitter;
ND filter, neutral-density filter; τ delay, controls relative time delay between pump andprobe; POL, polarizer; QWP, quarter-wave plate; BB, computer-controlled beam blockers;
PD, photodetector.

3.6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Result of beam-sampling calculation. The error due to the probe sampling an inhomogeneous portion of the pump spatial intensity is shown.

3.7

51

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55

Setup for simultaneous measurement of the pump powers on photodetectors (PDs); BS, 1%
beam sampler.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59

xvi
3.8

Model-independent fit procedure. The black triangle is the first guess of the resonancepeak. The parabola fit (cyan line) results in a maximum (black diamond) that yields thepeak height and center resonance position. The two baselines (blue lines) at high andlow energy are used to estimate the half-widths (blue and red diamonds) on either side of
the resonance. Note that the low-energy baseline is used to estimate the bulk absorption(αBulk = 0.28).

4.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61

Probe QW absorption at large τ = 13 ps delay. (a) The measured CC-configuration αQW(shaded areas) are shown for pump-pulse photon densities np = 3.9, 16, and 27 × 1011 cm−2and compared to microscopically computed spectra (solid lines) for e-h densities neh = 0.14,
2.2, and 3.4 × 1010 cm−2 , from top to bottom. The spectra are vertically offset by 15 %.
The horizontal lines indicate the HWHM of the respective exciton resonances. (b) The
corresponding CL comparison with 3.9, 27, and 48 × 1011 cm−2 pump-photon densities(shaded areas) and calculations for the densities 0.21, 4.4, and 5.0 × 1010 cm−2 (solid lines).
(c) and (d): The deduced ML e-h densities (circles, left scale) and exciton fraction (squares,
right scale) as a function of photon density for CC and CL experiments, respectively. The
arrows indicate the spectra presented in the left-side panel; the dashed vertical lines marksaturation.

4.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

68

Internal decay rates γint (circles) and radiative-decay rates Γrad (squares) extracted from theexperimental measurements (squares and circles) along with theoretical predictions (lines).
The excitation saturates the probe response at intensity Isat .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

70

xvii
4.3

Probe QW absorption for the short τ = 3 ps delay. (a) CC conditions with pump photon
density np = 16 × 1011 cm−2 : the measured αQW (dark shaded), the computed αth (solidline), and the long-time delay αQW (light shaded). Inset: the measured (open circles) andcomputed (shaded area) absorption dip (gain maximum) as a function of pump-photon
density. The dashed vertical line marks saturation. (b) Same as (a), but for the CL
configuration with the photon density 27 × 1011 cm−2 . Inset: the absorption peak shift for
CL (squares) and CC (circles) measurements compared with theory (lines). . . . . . . .

4.4

72

Influence of exciton populations on nonlinear αQW . The long-delay measured αQW (shadedarea) for np = 16 × 1011 cm−2 pump is compared with the ML result (solid line) as wellas computations having 0% (dashed line) and 100% (dotted line) excitons. Inset: The
ML configuration (square) and the 5% confidence interval (shaded area) plotted in (neh , x)
space. The 0% (open circle) and 100% (filled circle) represent exciton configurations used
for the dashed and dotted lines, respectively.

5.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73

A Michelson interferometer with adjustable relative delay τ between the optical path lengthsof the two beams, split by a beam splitter (BS). As the delay is scanned, the beams constructively and destructively interfere on a photodetector (PD), producing ‘fringes.’ Thismeasurement yields information about the coherence properties of the light source.

5.2

. . .

77

(a) The signal IPD (τ ) read on a photodetector in a Michelson interferometer for varying
delay τ . The coherence time was chosen to be five times longer than the optical period.
(b) The power spectrum of the light source is the Fourier transform of IPD (τ ). The inverse
relationship between the widths of in the time and frequency domains are depicted witharrows.

5.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

78

A temporal coherence measurement based on the Hanbury-Brown and Twiss experiment.
The intensity of the light source is recorded on two separate photodetectors, and a variabledelay (typically digital) allows a computer to correlate the intensities at two times in thesame light source, yielding the second-order coherence function.

. . . . . . . . . . . .

80

xviii
5.4

Second-order coherence for classical chaotic and coherent light sources. . . . . . . . . .

5.5Comparison of photon number probability distributions for coherent and thermal lightsources, both with n̄ = 10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.6

81

87

Phase-space portraits in q̂-p̂ space. (a) The schematic for how amplitude n and phase θof a single measurement are plotted, resulting in a ‘fuzz-ball’ of uncertainty with widths∆q and ∆p. The distribution of measurements is shown for (b) a coherent state and (c) athermal state. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.7

90

Quantum wire (1D) calculation of on-resonance excitation dynamics. (a) A short pulse2

generates a carrier density and polarization |P | . (b) The polarization decays, generating
an exciton population. Most of the excitons are created in the ground 1s state. Figure
from [7].

5.8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94(a) Computed 1s exciton and (b) free carrier distributions in center-of-mass k-space for threetimes after coherent resonant excitation. The absence of excitons in the low-momentum
states is due to radiative recombination. Figure from [7].

5.9

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

95

Comparison of excitation dynamics resulting from a pulse with coherent vs. incoherent
statistics. (a) Coherent excitation; the optical excitation pulse (dashed line, scaled) isshown with the generated polarization (shaded area, scaled) and the bright 1s exciton
population (solid line). (b) Incoherent excitation; the incoherent optical pulse (dashed line,
scaled) is shown with the generated density of bright 1s exciton populations (solid line).
Note the dramatically different scale for the density compared with the coherent excitation,and that no polarization is generated. (c) The generated exciton population in momentum
space for coherent excitation (solid line, multiplied by 5) and incoherent excitation (shadedarea) 11 ps after optical pulse maximum. Figure from [7].

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98

xix
5.10 Theoretical prediction of the excitation-induced dephasing (EID) half-width at half maximum (HWHM) in addition to the linear 1s resonance width (≈ 0.75 meV) for coherent
vs. thermal excitation. Thermal excitation is predicted to suppress scattering comparedwith coherent excitation for similar carrier excitation levels. Suppressed scattering leads tolower dephasing rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1

Photon densities per second within a 1 meV bandwidth for blackbody radiation at a few
temperatures. The intensity at 1.55 eV increases with blackbody temperature.

6.2. . . . . 108

Diode laser output spectra for a range of carrier-injection currents. The peaks in the spectra
are evidence of lasing above a current threshold of 55 mA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.3

99

110

Schematic of setup used for cavity-dump experiment. OC, output coupler; AOM, acoustooptic modulators; Xtal, the Ti:sapphire gain crystal. A 5 watt Verdi laser pumps the gain
crystal. The dumped light is collected with a fiber.

6.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112“Pump and dump” technique. The pump AOM switches on at t1 to allow cavity build
up. The intracavity AOM switches on at t2 before the onset of lasing (at t3 ) to dump theincoherent photons out of the laser cavity.

6.5

The dumped spectra at t = t2 (blue), and for t > t3 (red), corresponding to ASE and lasing,respectively.

6.6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114

A spectrum from a mode-locked ti:sapphire laser with a random spectral phase function
with spectral bin sizes of ∆ωbin = 200 µeV. There are Nbins = 30 spectral bins across thisspectrum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.1

Layout for a 4f pulse-shaper apparatus. The spatial spread D corresponds to a spread in
optical wavelengths ∆λ.

7.2

118

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

Layout for a 4f pulse-shaper apparatus in reflective geometry. Reflected beam is verticallyoffset from the input beam, but shown at a slightly different horizontal angle here only forillustration purposes.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127

xx
7.3

Schematic of the Spatial Light Modulator (SLM) [8]. (a) A front-view drawing of the device.
(b) Detail of the pixel geometry. (c) Principle of operation using liquid crystals.

7.4. . . . 128(a) Illustration of the intensity distribution of overlapping single-color modes (A−E, bluelines) at the plane of the phase mask in a pulse shaper. The spectral phase function acrossthe mask (thick black line) is shown with arbitrary units. (b) The consequence of finite
spot size in a pulse shaper is amplitude modulation at phase discontinuities with widthcorresponding to Eqn.7.8.

7.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131

Pictorial relationship between the power spectrum (frequency domain) and temporal intensity (time domain) features. Figure from [9].

7.6

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133

Spectrograms for ultrashort pulses with varying chirp: (a) no chirp (b = 0, or transformlimited), (b) moderate chirp (b = 0.5 ps−2 ), and (c) strong chirp (b = 5 ps−2 ). Chirp‘rotates’ the spectrogram in this phase space.

7.7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137

Relationship between the temporal chirp parameter b̃ and the spectral chirp parameterb. Increasing the spectral chirp beyond |b| > 0.18 τp2 weakens the instantaneous frequency
dependence on time as the pulse spreads in time.

7.8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138

Spatial mode filtering using two lenses with a pinhole. The input distorted spatial mode is‘cleaned up’ into a TEM0,0 spatial mode by focusing the light through the pinhole.

7.9. . . 140

Transmission of the Hermite-Gaussian modes TEMm,0 through a spatial mode filter. A
series of diameters D and TEM0,0 spot sizes w0 (both in µm) allow choice of appropriate
mode-filtering geometry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

141

7.10 (a) A variety of power spectra, each with a single phase discontinuity that results in a dip
in the spectrum. (b) The center positions of the dips along with the recorded pixel number
on the SLM allow calibration of the SLM via a linear fitting procedure.

. . . . . . . . 142

7.11 Simulated and measured time shifts generated by a linear phase mask. . . . . . . . . . 144
7.12 Simulated and experimentally measured cross-correlation widths ∆τS for a range of chirpparameters. Cross-correlation width of ∆τS = 520 fs for a transform-limited pulse is shown
as a baseline.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145

xxi
7.13 Comparison of simulation and experiment for a randomized phase mask function applied
to a pulse spectrum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.1

147

Cross-correlation traces for six different scrambled realizations. All traces are normalized
so that the area is unity. For comparison, the normalized transform-limited pulse (flatspectral phase mask) is shown as a dashed red line.

8.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149(a) Cross-correlation values at time delay τ ′ = 0. (b) Probability distribution function for
the normalized cross-correlation values. (c) Cross-correlation values for serval τ values. (d)mth -order coherence values calculated by Eqn. 8.2.

8.3

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151

Convergence of the measured second-order coherence function values g (2) as the number ofrealizations is increased. The measured g (2) function (blue squares) is fit with an asymptotic function g̃ (green line) to determine the error in g (2) measuring a finite number ofrealizations. Asymptote of g̃ is shown for limN →∞ g̃. This example uses the data from∆ωbin = 0.3 meV, or the 20-bins case.

8.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153

Measured second-order coherence function values for several different bin spacings. Measured values correspond to the trend predicted in Eqn. 6.17. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.5

The average scrambled pump spectrum (shown for Nens = 1, 14, 50) converges to the flatmask spectrum as the number of realizations Nens is increased.

8.6

155

. . . . . . . . . . . . 156

Simulation using the optical Bloch equations (Eqn. 2.30) of the optical excitation of a
two-level system including phenomenological decay terms. The population term is offset
such that 0 means population is completely in the ground state.

8.7. . . . . . . . . . . . 158

Population-to-polarization ratios for three cases where the temporal duration is systematically varied. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.8

159

Nonlinear observables as a function of power. Peak heights of αQW are shown for varying
pump
pump
pump
(a) PQW
and (b) PQW. Center resonance positions are shown for varying (c) PQWandpump(d) PQW. Fits (solid lines) through each set of points clarify the trends for the observables. 162

xxii
8.9

The average spectrum from the scrambled realizations saturates the HH 1s-resonance lesspumpthan from coherent excitation with the same PIN. The spectra are shown with the linear

absorption (pump off) for comparison.

9.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163(a) Frequency and (b) time domain representations of a zero-Φ (or three-pulse) realization.
The simulation is shown to roughly match the experimental cross-correlation data. In (a),the parameters θ and Φ are labeled as described in the text. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9.2

165

pump
Nonlinear observables as a function of power. Peak heights are shown for varying (a) PQW
pump
pump
pump
and (d) PQW. 167
and (b) PQW. Center resonance positions are shown for varying (c) PQW

9.3

Fractional absorption by the QW system as a function of input power, shown for (a) scrambled realizations and (b) zero-Φ realizations.

9.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168

Temporal dynamics for observables of the probe absorption line shape: (a) center resonanceposition and (b) peak height of the HH 1s-resonance. The observables in the absence ofany pump excitation are also shown (cyan lines).

9.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169

Dynamics of the nonlinearity for single-pulse excitation, shown with fits (black dashedlines) for the same powers as shown in Fig. 9.4. The nonlinearity in the absence of pumpexcitation is also shown (cyan line) near zero. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9.6

Decay parameters extracted from the single-pulse temporal data using Eqn. 9.1.

9.7

Nonlinearity dynamics for the three-pulse realization with a simulation that uses parameters

170. . . . 172

from the single-pulse data and accounts for saturation behavior based on the three-pulse
data. The poor fit suggests that the temporal dynamics are nontrivial. . . . . . . . . .

173

xxiii
9.8

Measurements of the QW system response to chirped pulses. From the probe absorption,
we extract (a) the peak resonance position and (b) the peak height. The observables in theabsence of the pump light are shown for comparison (cyan lines). (c) The power absorbed by
the QW exhibits nontrivial dependence on chirp parameter. (d) The nonlinear observables
do not follow a simple trend with the absorbed powers. The extreme chirp parameter values
at ±5.8 meV−2 are marked. All four frames show the measurement from the transformlimited case for comparison and the black lines guide the eye through the chirp values nearφ′′ (ω0 )/2 = 0 meV−2 .

9.9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

Spectra for a variety of spectral chirp parameters φ′′ (ω0 )/2 with units meV−2 in the legend.
Negative chirp parameters produce similar spectra. A quadratic spectral phase φ′′ (ω0 )/2 =1.9 meV−2 is also shown (dashed line).

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175

A.1 Schematic shown for pump and probe beams traveling perpendicular to the plane of the
optical chopper wheel. As the wheel spins, the pump and probe beams are modulated atslightly different frequencies, a critical aspect to resolving the probe spectra in the presence
and absence of the pump.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190

B.1 Schematic for light path going into and out of the cryostat. We account for reflection losses
at interfaces (dotted lines) to construct the true transmission and reflection probabilities.

194

Chapter 1
Introduction

Semiconductors and their nanostructures respond to light fields in a wide variety ofways, including changes in conductivity and the formation of short-lived quasiparticles in
the lattice [1]. For intense optical excitation, the interactions between particles inside thematerials can dramatically affect the optical response. Research has explored the optical andelectronic dynamics in semiconductors; however, the complicated many-body interactions
between particles that give rise to optical responses need further investigation.
To elucidate the nature of many-body interactions, ultrashort laser pulses are used to
study the dynamics of quasiparticles, known as excitons, in GaAs quantum wells (QWs).
These excitons are of particular interest because they result in a strong spectral resonancefeature and tend to dominate the nonlinear optical response [10, 11]. Thus, the spectralfeatures of excitons can be used to monitor effects that occur at high excitation densities.
The effects at high densities are complicated. When carrier-excitation levels are elevated in a QW, the lowest-lying 1s-exciton resonance can undergo spectral changes such asbroadening and shifting due to excitation-induced effects [12, 3, 13, 14, 15]. Physically, theseeffects result from Coulomb-induced scattering of polarization from carrier densities, polarization itself, and exciton populations. These nonlinear interactions build up on picosecond
time scales, and it is typical that dephasing, phase-space filling, energy-renormalization, andscreening effects become mixed in a nontrivial manner. These effects are many-body interactions between a large number of particles, as compared with one- or two-body interactions as

2
are typically observed in atomic experiments [16]. Since the many-body effects are strongly
coupled, it is very challenging to determine the many-body effects that give rise to nonlinear
observables. Even though much research has been performed on the nonlinear properties
of GaAs QWs in the past few decades [17, 18, 19], to the best of our knowledge no work
until now has quantitatively determined how many-body configurations affect the exciton
line shape.
The experimental work described in this thesis combined with a microscopic theory
clarifies the many-body effects that give rise to nonlinear exciton spectra in GaAs QWs.
The microscopic theory was constructed by our theorist collaborators: Mackillo Kira, Martin
Schäfer, Johannes Steiner, and Stephan Koch at the Department of Physics and Material
Sciences Center, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
In addition to characterizing the many-body configurations, we find the nonlinearities
observed in GaAs QWs to be strong enough that the light statistics of the optical excitation may have an effect on the observed nonlinearities. The study of a system’s responseto the light statistics of an excitation source is termed “quantum-optical spectroscopy.” Although experiments in atomic vapor systems have explored nonlinear interactions between
exciting light statistics and atoms in a cavity [20, 21, 22], no experiments of this type havebeen performed in semiconductors. The extremely high photon densities required to observe nonlinearities in semiconductors are typically outside of the regime of quantum-opticalexperiments, which deal with a small number of photons.
To demonstrate quantum-optical spectroscopy in GaAs QWs, we perform several experiments involving optical pulse shaping to realize theory predictions concerning the responseof excitons to an excitation source with incoherent light statistics. Specifically, theory predicts that an excitation source with incoherent light statistics gives rise to lower scattering
rates than for coherent excitation that creates the same carrier density. The lower scattering
rates are predicted to be observable in the line shape of the exciton.

3
1.1

Thesis organization
This thesis reports the results of studies of the many-body exciton dynamics in a GaAs

QW system. Specifically, we perform spectrally resolved transient absorption measurements.
The thesis is divided into two parts: (i) the characterization of many-body configurations
through quantitative measurement techniques, and (ii) a study of the system response tolight statistics using pulse-shaping techniques.
In the first part, we describe pump-induced many-body configurations using a quantitative measurement technique combined with a microscopic theory. Chapter 2 introduces
direct-gap semiconductors, then explores the background and theory involved in optical studies of the nonlinearities in GaAs QWs. Previous optical studies of excitons in GaAs QWs arealso reviewed. Chapter 3 introduces a novel quantitative measurement technique. Spectrally
resolved transient absorption recorded in absolute units characterizes the nonlinear opticalresponse of excitons in a GaAs multiple QW system. The techniques presented here arecommon to both the transform-limited excitation studies and the pulse-shaping studies. In
Chapter 4, the results of the transform-limited excitation are combined with microscopic
theory, and the results are presented.
The second part of the thesis begins in Chapter 5 with some background on lightstatistics. We explain the predictions of our theorist collaborators concerning the nonlinear
exciton response to light with thermal statistics. A simple model validates the predictionthat a light source with thermal statistics should induce a pure exciton population without
creating a polarization. Chapter 6 describes the possibilities we explored for creating an
intense thermal light source and discusses the paradigm of density-matrix ensemble averaging
for exploring the exciton response to thermal light. The protocol for an ensemble of phaserandomized realizations is discussed. To realize these protocol, Chapter 7 explains the detailsof pulse shaping. In Chapter 8 we characterize the phase-randomized light source generated
by pulse shaping and discuss the results from the QW response. The nontrivial results inspire

4
exploration of the QW response to other pulse shapes. This work is described in Chapter 9.
We summarize our studies of many-body exciton dynamics in Chapter 10. In Appendix
A, a method for accurate detection of the probe absorption is explained. Appendix B contains
the details of the procedure for calibrating the pump and probe pulse energies.

Chapter 2
Background on excitons in semiconductors

2.1Interest in semiconductors and GaAs
Semiconductors have become an integral part of our modern world. Personal com-puters, cell phones, satellite communications systems, solar cells, traffic lights, and compact
disc players are all based on semiconductor devices [23]. The proliferation of these devices
in society has inspired much research into the understanding of the electronic and opticalproperties of a variety of materials.
Although semiconductors were being studied in laboratories as early as the 1830s,
semiconductor research expanded with the 1947 development of the transistor in Bell Labs.
The transistor revolutionized the fields of electronics and semiconductors. The fundamental
interest and industrial applications have driven research into the properties of semiconductor
structures [24].
Semiconductors are often studied with spectroscopic techniques using lasers [11]. The
advent of ultrashort pulsed mode-locked lasers has allowed investigation into extremely fasttime dynamics (10−15 seconds, or a femtosecond) inside materials [25]. These lasers canalso produce intense pulses of energy that can create novel regimes not previously available
experimentally, such as high electron densities. The latter and other unexplored regimes
may hold keys to developing new technologies and a better understanding of semiconductor
physics.
The semiconductor gallium arsenide (GaAs) has a rich optoelectronic structure that6
has many industrial applications [26]. GaAs offers certain advantages over the indirect-gap
semiconductor, silicon (Si), the primary semiconductor used in industrial applications. The
advantages over Si include a higher saturated electron velocity and electron mobility, insensitivity to heat, and the possibility to emit light. Si has the advantages of higher hole mobility,
allowing fast switching in field-effect transistors, and is less brittle than GaAs, abundant,
and cheap to process. Despite the disadvantages of GaAs compared to Si, its application
to high-speed electronic devices, laser diodes, light-emitting diodes, and photovoltaics has
fueled an enormous amount of research in the last 40 years [17, 18, 19, 27].
2.2

Semiconductors and direct band-gap picture
A semiconductor can be technically defined as a solid with a conductivity somewhere

between a metal and an insulator. A more useful explanation involves a map of the electronicenergy bands, a large number of discrete quantum states resulting from the extended wave
nature of the electrons in a periodic structure. In the unexcited semiconductor, electrons
fill the valence band, corresponding to no net motion of charge, or an insulating state. An
energy exceeding the band gap energy can promote a valence band electron to the conduction
band, which corresponds to electrons being free to move about the material and thus conduct
electricity. A population of electrons in the conduction band and the absence of electrons
in the valence band mark the transition from insulator behavior to conducting behavior.
Although electrons may be excited via thermal energy or optical excitation, this discussion
focuses on the latter.
We can visualize the optical interaction with a semiconductor by representing theenergy bands in momentum (k) space. Figure 2.1 depicts the absorption of a photon in thefirst Brillouin zone, the central cell in reciprocal lattice space (around k=0). A photon withenergy ~ω that exceeds the gap energy, Egap = Ec − Ev , can be absorbed by this material.
Here Ec and Ev are the conduction band and valence band energies, respectively. Photon
absorption results in an interband transition that promotes an electron from the valence7band to the conduction band, leaving the absence of an electron, or a “hole,” in the valenceband. Since the momentum of the photon is negligible compared to the electron momentum,
the electron and hole must have the same wave vector k.
A photon may also stimulate emission, inducing a transition of the electron back to thevalence band, resulting in the emission of a photon. Stimulated emission in semiconductors
has allowed the development of semiconductor lasers [28, 29].

E(k)Conduction
Bandelectron

Egap

k
hole
Valence
Band
Figure 2.1: Absorption of a photon by a direct-gap semiconductor. When an electron is promoted to the
conduction band, it can move freely about the material and thus conduct electricity.

In a direct-gap semiconductor, an electron can undergo a transition from the highestenergy state in the valence band to the lowest-energy state in the conduction band without
any change in crystal momentum. The transition shown in Fig. 2.1 is an interband transition
for a direct-gap semiconductor. The low-momentum transition in direct-gap semiconductors
allows use in light-emitting diodes and laser diodes [29]. This low-momentum transition will
be relevant to our discussion of bound exciton states.

8
2.3

Excitons in bulk GaAs
We study the optical properties of the direct-gap semiconductor, gallium arsenide(GaAs), a III-V compound with a zincblende lattice structure. The dominant optical features at low temperature below the band-gap energy are resonances due to the exciton, abound quasiparticle state between the electron and hole [10, 30]. The wave function andenergy levels of an exciton are analogous to those of a hydrogen atom.
When an electron is excited into the conduction band by the absorption of a photon,a hole is created in the valence band, which has opposite charge of the electron and canalso conduct electricity in the lattice. In GaAs (and other semiconductors), the electron andhole can form a bound state through Coulomb attraction. The resulting quasiparticle, an
exciton, has slightly less energy than the unbound electron and hole. The exciton that isformed in bulk GaAs can move throughout the lattice and can transport energy. However,it cannot transport charge because it is electrically neutral.
Excitons can form when the electron and hole have the same group velocity. Thiscondition is necessary for the electron and hole to move together as a bound pair. The groupvelocity of an electron or hole is given by:
vg =

1 ∂E
,
~ ∂k

(2.1)

where E is the band dispersion shown in Fig. 2.1. To satisfy this condition, the gradientsof the conduction and valence bands must be the same. The bands in a direct-gap semiconductor have zero gradient at k = 0. Hence, excitons can form efficiently during directtransitions in these materials [1].
The bound state is stable for a short period of time. When the electron ‘falls’ into
the hole, the recombination results in an effective annihilation of the exciton particle and isaccompanied by the emission of a photon. The lifetime of the bulk exciton, influenced bymany factors including temperature and scattering with other excitons, is on the order of
100 picoseconds in GaAs.

9
There are two basic types of excitons, as shown in Fig. 2.2: (a) Wannier-Mott, thathave a large radius encompassing many atoms; and (b) Frenkel, or tightly bound excitonsthat have a correlation radius to within one lattice spacing. For GaAs, excitons are theWannier-Mott type. In both cases the exciton wavefunction is delocalized in the lattice.

Figure 2.2: (a) A Wannier-Mott exciton with a large spatial extent compared with the size of a unit cell,typically found in semiconductors with large dielectric constant. (b) A tightly bound (Frenkel) exciton withsmaller radius, more common to insulator crystals. Figure from [1].

The wave function ψ(Re , Rh ) of an exciton is a solution to a Schrödinger equation thatis similar to hydrogen (or positronium), but with different masses and dielectric constant
[31]:


~2 2
∇
Ec −
2m∗e e~2 2− Ev +∇
2m∗h he2ψ(Re , Rh ) = Eψ(Re , Rh ).
−4πǫb |Re − Rh |(2.2)

The background dielectric constant ǫb = ǫ/ǫ0 = 12.8 is a scaling of the vacuum dielectric
constant, ǫ0 ; typical numbers for the effective electron and hole masses are m∗e = 0.067m0
and m∗h = 0.51m0 , where m0 is the free electron mass and e is the charge of the electron. The
electron energy (Ec ) and hole energy (Ev ) in the conduction and valence bands, respectively,
are modified by the kinetic energy operators (∇2e(h) ) and their Coulomb attractive potential∝ 1/|Re − Rh |. In solving the Schrödinger equation to find the binding energies of theexciton states, it is helpful to separate the motion into that of the center of mass RCM andthe relative coordinate R = Re − Rh of the electron and hole. The center of mass is

10

RCM =

m∗e Re + m∗h Rh.
m∗e + m∗h

(2.3)

The reduced mass is1
1
1= ∗ + ∗.
µ
me mh

(2.4)

The Schrödinger equation in the transformed coordinate system (RCM , R) is


~2
∇2
−
2(m∗e + m∗h ) CM~2 2
+ Egap −
∇
2µ





e2
ψ(RCM , R) = Eψ(RCM , R). (2.5)−
4πǫb |R|

The transformed coordinate system allows the wave function to be factored into a productof the functions of RCM and R since the operators with RCM and R appear additively. The
2equation for the center of mass part is simply a plane wave with energy ~2 KCM/2(m∗e + m∗h ).

The equation for the relative coordinate is  2 ~ 2e2−
φ(R) = (E − Egap )φ(R),∇ −2µ4πǫb R(2.6)

resulting in a binding energy for the nth level of the exciton in bulk GaAs relative to theionization limit of
Ebinding (n) = −RXµ 1 RH=− 2 ,
22
m 0 ǫb nn(2.7)

where RH is the Rydberg constant for hydrogen, or 13.6 eV. The new quantity RX =(µ/m0 ǫ2b )RH introduced here is the Rydberg constant for the exciton [1]. Additionally, theoscillator strength f of the exciton drops off with decreasing n as f (n) ∝ 1/n3 , leading to
a decrease in the height of absorption peaks for higher n exciton states. Experimentally,
however, only a few exciton states can be seen because of line-broadening mechanisms suchas the scattering of electron-hole pairs with phonons.
The optical transition energy for center of mass momentum KCM is the sum of the
band-gap energy, the binding energy (intrinsically negative), and the kinetic energy:
2
RX ~2 KCM.
∆E(n, KCM ) = Egap + Ebinding + Ekinetic = Egap − 2 +
n
2M

(2.8)

11
The modified Bohr radius for the exciton isaX =ǫb m 0
aH ,
µ

(2.9)

where aH is the hydrogen Bohr radius of 0.053 nm. Similar to hydrogen, the maximum
probability separation distance between the electron and hole changes with n as rn = n2 aX .
Using the above numbers for GaAs, the n = 1 exciton binding energy is RX = 4.2 meV
and the Bohr radius is aX = 13.5 nm. This radius compared with the a = 0.56 nm lattice
constant for GaAs confirms that the excitons are the Wannier-Mott since the electron andhole are separated by many lattice sites. Furthermore, the binding energy is small comparedto the room temperature energy kB T ≈ 25 meV. Room temperature thermal energy preventsthe formation of excitons in bulk GaAs since it provides the exciton ionization energy. Thus
cryogenic cooling is necessary before observation of the bound exciton state is possible.
Since an exciton is a two-particle state, its energy levels cannot be represented as thepromotion of an electron to the conduction band, as shown in Fig. 2.1. This picture isunable to capture the energy of both the electron and hole that make up the total energyof the bound state. Rather, the center of mass picture, as shown in Fig. 2.3a, correctly
describes the excitation of bound exciton states. The absorption of a photon creates a statethat lies along the photon dispersion line E(k) = ~ck/n, where c is the speed of light and√n = ǫb ≈ 3.7 is the nonresonant index of refraction for light at energies near the band gap.
The optical excitation to one of the bound exciton states follows Eqn. 2.8.
Excitons are the dominant spectral feature below the band gap edge. The absorbance
spectrum of GaAs, shown in Fig. 2.3b, illustrates the sharp peaks in absorption that correspond to the bound exciton states below the gap energy, Egap . Photons absorbed by thesemiconductor sample that exceed the gap energy create unbound electron-hole pairs. The
continuum absorption approaches a finite value as the photon energy decreases to Egap , instead of going to zero as predicted by free-carrier theory. This difference is known as the
Coulomb (or Sommerfeld) enhancement of continuum absorption [32].

12
For bulk GaAs at low temperature (< 10 K), the direct band-gap energy is 1519.1 meV[33]. This energy less the binding energy of RX = 4.2 meV of the n = 1 exciton at KCM =0 is1514.9 meV, which is the photon energy at which a peak occurs in the absorption spectrum.
This photon energy corresponds to E1 in Fig. 2.3b.

Figure 2.3: (a) Schematic diagram of exciton states and the continuum in the center of mass picture.
Excitons can form at discrete energies below Egap . Photons with energy exceeding Egap can create unboundelectron-hole pairs. (b) Cacluated absorbance spectrum of GaAs at 1.2 K including Sommerfeld enhancement,
based on Ref. [2]. As the photon energy increases, discrete peaks in the absorption correspond to the n = 1, 2,
and higher bound states of the exciton.

The above description of exciton formation is modified when carrier motion is confined
to two dimensions in a QW structure.
2.4

Excitons in GaAs quantum wells
It is possible to confine the motion of carriers to two dimensions by growth of het-

erostructures [34]. The basic technique typically involves molecular-beam epitaxial crystal
growth of different layers of semiconductor material. In our studies, a thin (10 nm) layer of13
GaAs is grown between two layers of Al0.3 Ga0.7 As, as illustrated in Fig. 2.4. The two materials have similar lattice constants, which allows for convenient growth of layers. However,Al0.3 Ga0.7 As has a band-gap energy of 1.95 eV, whereas GaAs has a band-gap energy of 1.52
eV. This means that carriers that are promoted to the conduction band in GaAs are not free
to move through the adjacent layers. The confinement of carriers in one dimension is known
as a quantum well (QW).
QWs are of interest to industry because of their potential for applications. Their
efficiency, speed, and optical response are superior to bulk semiconductors [35, 36]. QWs
are also of interest from a fundamental point of view, since they are simple structures thatclearly show quantum confinement effects [30, 37]. Confinement elevates the energy levelsof the electron in the conduction band and moves the hole energy levels down in energy,
leading to a stronger binding energy and a blue-shift in the exciton resonance as comparedwith bulk GaAs. In fact, because of the stronger binding energy between electrons and holes
in QWs, strong optical exciton signatures in QWs may be observed at room temperature[38]. In addition to modification of the binding energy, confinement modifies the Bohr radiusand oscillator strength of the exciton.
The effect of confinement on the exciton in one dimension becomes meaningful when thesize of confinement is comparable to the spatial extent of the exciton. Since the Bohr radius
is aX = 13.5 nm in three dimensions, a GaAs layer thickness of 10 nm leads to modificationsin the properties of the exciton. The wave function is modified such that the degrees of
freedom parallel to the growth plane (x̂-ŷ) remain the same, but the ẑ-direction component
is the solution to the quantum mechanical problem of a particle in a box. Essentially, the nin the solutions to 2.2 must be replaced by n − 1/2 when going from 3D to 2D. When we
include this modification, the binding energy becomes [39](2D)

Ebinding (n) = −RX(n − 1/2)2(2.10)

which means that the 2D exciton is more strongly bound than in bulk material. For example,

14

Figure 2.4: Lowest-lying energy states, n = 1, for QW excitons. Growing a thin layer of GaAs between
two layers Al0.3 Ga0.7 As creates a quantum well (QW). The confinement pushes the electron (e) and holeenergies away from each other and lifts the degeneracy between light-hole (LH) and heavy-hole (HH) states.

the n = 1 exciton in the ideal 2D case has a binding energy 4 times that in the bulk, or(2D)Ebinding (n = 1) = −16.8 meV. In practice, the binding energy is about half this value
because of the finite size of the barriers [40]. The oscillator strength increases with n as
f (n) ∝ 1/(n − 21 )3 in two dimensions compared with f (n) ∝ 1/n3 for the bulk. The Bohrradius decreases compared with the bulk exciton radius to aX = (n − 21 )2 aB . Continuing theexample for the ideal n = 1 exciton in 2D, the oscillator strength thus increases by a factorof 8 compared with the exciton in bulk GaAs. The dramatic increase in oscillator strength isbecause the confinement increases the overlap between the electron and hole wave functions
as well as decreasing the Bohr radius. The increased overlap leads to stronger interaction
between electrons and holes, increasing the probability of exciton formation. A more detailed
analysis of confinement on excitons can be found in [41].
Excitons in QWs couple with the light field only for the low-momentum states. Thiscan be visualized in Fig. 2.3 by picturing KCM in two dimensions, with the energy levelsweeps out
parabolas rotated about KCM = 0 into paraboloids. The light line with slope ~cn15a cone upon rotation. It is within this ‘light cone’ that QW excitons couple with light.
The wave functions for electron states in the conduction band in GaAs QWs are similar to those in the bulk; however, the holes’ wave functions in the valence band are more
complicated since the valence band at the center of the Brillouin zone (k = 0) is degenerate. In bulk GaAs, the conduction band at the Brillouin center has s-orbital character with
two-fold degeneracy since the electron spin J = 12 . The valence band around k = 0 has
p-orbital character wave functions for the upper sub-bands and the lower sub-band, withtotal angular momenta J = 32 and J = 21 , respectively. The lower sub-band, known as the
split-off band (J = 21 ), is separated by 0.34 eV from the upper band at k = 0 because ofspin-orbit coupling. The two upper valence bands (J = 32 ) are called the heavy-hole andlight-hole sub-bands, with projection of their angular momenta along the ẑ-axis Jz equal to± 21 and ± 32 , respectively.
The upper valence bands are named the heavy-hole (HH) and light-hole (LH) subbands because of their different effective masses, which lead to a lifting of band degeneracy
when confined in one dimension. Differentiating the dispersion relation (Eqn. 2.8) withrespect to momentum KCM and solving for the mass, we find that the effective mass m∗ ofa carrier depends on the curvature of its band:
1
1 d2 E(k)=.
m∗~2 dk 2

(2.11)

This equation is used to calculate the effective masses in bulk, m∗e and m∗h , based on theband structure of GaAs. Calculations of the band structure [32] in 2D yield a stronger
curvature for the LH band than for the HH band, thus yielding a lighter effective mass forthe light holes. When holes are confined in one dimension, the effective hole masses in the
direction of quantization yield a lifting in degeneracy, as depicted in Fig. 2.5. The lifting ofdegeneracy can be seen by noticing that the different masses have different energies in thesolution to the particle in a box E ∝ 1/mL2 , where L is the confinement size of the box,i.e., the quantum-well thickness.

16
In this thesis, we focus on the HH 1s exciton spectral feature, a bound state between
a hole in the HH band and an electron in the conduction band. The exciton binding energy
corresponds to n = 1 in Fig. 2.3, and has s-orbital character like the hydrogen ground state.
When a light field interacts with a QW, optical polarization plays a role in the transition
rates between the various bands. These rates are determined by the spin-selection rules
dictated by the angular momentum states in the valence and conduction bands.
2.5

Polarization selection rules QW electronic transitions
For the bands of interest near k = 0, the conduction band wave function has an “s-like”

character, and the valence band has a “p-like” character. The wave function characteristics
reflect the relative contributions to the density of states in each band from the atomic s- andp-orbitals of the atoms that form the solid.
The s-like electron in the conduction band is an eigenfunction of the momentum operator described by the extended-state Bloch function~

ψ~km = um (~r)eik·~r(2.12)

where m is the spin (m = ± 12 ), ~k is the crystal momentum, and um is the Bloch amplitude,invariant under periodic translations. The Bloch function is delocalized in the crystal, extending over many lattice sites. The Bloch amplitudes may be approximately separated into
orbital and spin parts [23]:u1/2 (~r) = R(r) ↑,(2.13)

u−1/2 (~r) = R(r) ↓,(2.14)

where R denotes the symmetrical coordinate part, and ↑ (↓) the spin part of the Blochamplitude.
The valence band has “p-like” character (L = 1) meaning that there exists large spinorbit coupling. The large spin-orbit coupling suggests that the Bloch amplitudes for the17valence-band electrons can be expressed as eigenstates of the total angular momentum operator, Ĵ = L̂ + Ŝ, and Jˆz , the ẑ-projection of total angular momentum. Written in |J, Jz i
notation, the eigenstates are
band, and3
, ± 32 i
2

for the HH valence band,3, ± 12 i
2

for the LH valence1, ± 12 i for the split-off band. We neglect the split-off band because it is energet2

ically separated by ∆ = 0.34 eV from the HH and LH bands.
Electrons may undergo interband optical transitions following selection rules. The
transition probability per unit time for an electron to be excited from the valence band
~ is given in theto conduction band by interacting with an incident electromagnetic field E
electric dipole approximation by Fermi’s golden rule:
E2E2
2π ~ D
2π D~ | vb
E · cb | d~ | vb
cb | d~ · E
δ(Egap − ~ω), (2.15)
δ(Egap − ~ω) =~~DE
where cb | d~ | vb = qe hcb | ~r | vbi is the electric dipole matrix element that connects the
Rvb→cb =valence and conduction bands, with qe = − |e| as the charge of the electron. From equation
2.15, we see that calculation of the dipole matrix elements (also called dipole moments) allow
determination of the probability for an optical transition to occur given an optical excitation
field.
In evaluating the dipole matrix elements, we consider electrons in a QW interactingwith photons that have electric fields in the in-plane (x̂-ŷ) direction. Thus, we consider the~ = Ex x̂+Ey ŷ, and we only evaluate the components hcb | x | vbi
electric field is of the form E
and hcb | y | vbi of the dipole moments. The dipole matrix elements can be calculated bydecomposing the J states into the irreducible L and S representations using the ClebschGordan coefficients CLLSJ, according to [42]:z Sz Jz|J, Jz i =

X

L+S=J

|L, Lz ; S, Sz i .
CLLSJ
z Sz Jz(2.16)

This representation allows direct calculation of the dipole matrix elements with byusing the radial hydrogen wave functions Rnl (r) and the spherical harmonics Ylm (θ, φ). For
example, the HH state J = 32 , Jz = 32

= L = 1, Lz = 1; S = 21 , Sz =↑ . The dipole ma-

18

Figure 2.5: (a) Schematic of the hole sub-bands in GaAs, with the lifting in degeneracy at k = 0 due
to confinement in one dimension between the light-hole (LH) (J = 32 ,Jz = ± 21 ) and heavy-hole (HH)
(J = 23 ,Jz = ± 32 ) sub-bands. The split-off band (J = 21 ) is shifted in energy because of spin-orbit coupling.
(b) A diagram of selection rules for optical interband excitation with σ + and σ − polarized light.

trix elements in the uncoupled representation between this valence-band state and the |↑iconduction-band state ( J = 21 , Jz = 12 = L = 0, Lz = 0; S = 12 , Sz =↑ ) are calculated:hcb | x | vbi = h0, 0; 1/2, ↑| x |1, 1; 1/2, ↑iZ1∗(r)Y00∗ (θ, φ)xR21 (r)Y11 (θ, φ) = √ µ0=
d3~xR102
hcb | y | vbi = h0, 0; 1/2, ↑| y |1, 1; 1/2, ↑iZ−i∗(r)Y00∗ (θ, φ)yR21 (r)Y11 (θ, φ) = √ µ0=
d3~xR102
DE
1∴ cb | d~ | vb = hcb | (xx̂ + yŷ) | vbi = µ0 √ (x̂ − iŷ),2(2.17)(2.18)(2.19)

where µ0 is the transition dipole modulus of the HH exciton, and x̂ and ŷ are unit vectors.
The forms of these transition calculations are identical in both 3D and 2D.
Continuing this calculation for all eight relevant transitions, the four nonvanishing

19
dipole matrix elements between initial and final Jz states in the form µ(Initial Jz →Final Jz ) =DEcb | d~ | vb are:
3

1

1

1

3

1

1

1

µ(− 2 → 2 ) =µ0 √12 (x̂ + iŷ) = µ0 σ +µ(− 2 → 2 ) = µ0 √16 (x̂ + iŷ) = √13 µ0 σ +µ( 2 → 2 )=(2.20)µ0 √12 (x̂ − iŷ) = µ0 σ −µ( 2 →− 2 ) = µ0 √16 (x̂ − iŷ) = √13 µ0 σ − ,where σ + and σ − are the Pauli operators, and µ0 is the transition dipole modulus of the
HH exciton. The transition dipole modulus of LH excitons is √13 times that of HH excitons,
implying that the transition probability |µ|2 is three times smaller. Calculation of the transition dipole moments for the HH and LH excitons yields a selection rule that ∆Jz = ±1
in an interband optical transition [43]. The selection rule is consistent with the fact that aphoton carries an angular momentum of 1 in the dipole approximation.
The matrix elements are conveniently written to clarify the result of interaction withdifferent polarization states of light. For right-circularly (left-circularly) polarized light, thefield may be written as E = √12 E0 (x̂ + iŷ) = E0 σ + (as E = √12 E0 [x̂ − iŷ] = E0 σ − ). This field
vector dotted into the first two (last two) dipole moments in Eqn. 2.20 yields unity (zero),
while the dot product with the last two (first two) dipole moments is zero (unity). These
facts, summarized in Fig. 2.5b, dictate the selection rules for the polarization of light ininterband transitions. Circularly polarized light excites a valence-band electron exclusively
into one of the two conduction-band states.
It is also worth noting that linearly polarized light E = E0x x̂ + E0y ŷ may be written in
the basis of circularly polarized light, e.g., E = Aσ + + Bσ − , where A and B are constants
determined by the linear transformation. In the simple case of horizontal and vertical polarizations, Ex = √12 E0 (σ + + σ − ) and Ey = E0 √12 (σ + − σ − ), respectively. If the linearlypolarized light source is tuned to the heavy-hole resonance, it would cause interband excitations with equal probability into both conduction-band spin states, in contrast to the casefor circular polarization.

20
While we have derived the optical transition rates for the electronic states, we wish
next to understand carrier dynamics in the presence of an exciting electric field. We uncover
the basic dynamics by modeling a two-level system using the optical Bloch equations.
2.6

Optical Bloch Equations
Most of the semiconductor community’s understanding of optical excitation of semi-

conductors comes from the semiconductor Bloch equations [44], discussed in §5.4.2. Theseequations describe the coupled dynamics of electrons, holes, and optical polarization. The
model includes Coulomb interactions between particles and the extended-state nature ofparticles expressed by Eqn. 2.12 by summing over a wide range of ~k-vectors.
We can gain insight about the response of a semiconductor system through a simpler
set of equations, known as the Optical Bloch Equations (OBEs). The OBEs describe thedynamics of a two-level system in the presence of an electric field. The two levels in oursystem are the valence and conduction bands of the semiconductor. We neglect Coulombinteractions and ~k-dependence.
We seek the dynamics of a system|ψ(t)i = cg (t) |gi + ce (t) |ei ,(2.21)

where |gi and |ei represent the electron in the valence band (ground state) and the electronin the conduction band (excited state), respectively. The coefficients ci (t) determine the time
dynamics. Since we have an ensemble of carriers in our system, we use the density matrix
in the {|gi , |ei} basis to solve for the temporal evolution: ρgg ρge ρ̂ = |ψi hψ| = ρeg ρee∗∗ cg cg cg ce = 
.
ce c∗g ce c∗e(2.22)

21
From this definition, we see that ρ∗ge = ρeg . The density matrix also has the propertyTr[ρ̂] = 1, from which it follows that ρgg + ρee = 1. The density matrix ρ̂ can be used to
calculate the expectation value of an observable Â by taking a trace [45]:D Eh iÂ = Tr ρ̂Â .

(2.23)The time evolution of the density matrix follows from Schrödinger’s equation [45]:
i
ih
∂ ρ̂
= ρ̂˙ = − Ĥ, ρ̂ − decays,∂t~(2.24)

where “decays” must be added phenomenologically to this simplistic theory, although they
can be determined rigorously in by quantizing the electromagnetic field [46]. The Hamiltonian H = H0 + V of the two level system can be written in our two-state basis asH =Xj,k=e,g|ji hj| (H0 + V ) |ki hk| Eg 0   0 Veg 
= 
+
,
0 Ee
Vge 0

(2.25)

where Eg and Ee are the eigenenergies of H0 for the ground and excited states, respectively.
The elements Veg and Vge represent the interaction between an electric field E and the twolevel system. The interaction is~ = −qe ~r · E,~
V = −µ̂ · E(2.26)~ is the envelope of the electric field. While the electric field and ~r generally havewhere E
three space components, we reduce the problem to a single dimension for simplification,using ~r = x̂ and ~ε = ε(t)x̂. The interaction term has the representation:0hg| E(t) qe x |ei 

V = 

he| E(t) qe x |gi0 0 µeg = E(t) ,µge 0(2.27)

22
where µge = µeg is the dipole matrix element that couples two levels that have an allowed
dipole transition, e.g., a 1s state with a 2p state. Dipole matrix elements were computed forour system in §2.5.
The electric field magnitude has the form:
E(t) =

1
ε(t)eiω t + ε∗ (t)e−iω t ,2(2.28)

where ε(t) is the slowly varying time envelope of the electric field and ω is the driving
frequency of the electric field.
We assume that the driving frequency is very close to the natural frequency of thesystem. Knowing that the matrix elements ρeg and ρge couple directly to the applied electricfield through the dipole moment µge , it is convenient to write these in the rotating frame as:
ρeg → ρeg eiω t ,ρge → ρge e−iω t .

(2.29)

By evolving ρ̂ in time through Eqn. 2.24, we find the time evolution of the matrix
elements of ρ̂ in the rotating frame. In the rotating wave approximation, we neglect terms
that oscillate at frequencies 2ω, −2ω, or −ω since they oscillate very fast in the rotating
frame. The OBEs in the rotating wave approximation are [47]:ρ̇gg =
ρ̇ee =
ρ̇eg =
ρ̇ge = ∗εiερge − ρeg + γee ρee
− µge
~
2
2
 ∗

i
ε
ε
µge
ρge − ρeg − γee ρee~22iiωeg ρeg + εµge (ρee − ρgg ) − γeg ρeg
2~i−iωeg ρeg − ε∗ µge (ρee − ρgg ) − γeg ρeg ,2~(2.30)

where ωeg = [Ee − Eg ]/~, and γee and γeg are phenomenological terms describing the decay
the excited state into the ground state and decay of the off-diagonal density-matrix element,

23
respectively. The relations ρ̇∗ge = ρ̇∗eg and ρ̇gg = −ρ̇ee both follow from the definition of thedensity matrix in Eqn. 2.22. We have assumed our two-level system to be closed, i.e., thepopulation is conserved.
The OBEs describe the temporal evolution of the system. The electric field drives the
population ρee via the off-diagonal density-matrix elements ρge and ρeg . The polarization isin turn driven by the electric field and the difference in population between the ground andexcited states ρee − ρgg and the energy difference between the ground and excited states.
The population in the ground or excited states can be found by calculating the expectation value of the projection operator |gi hg| or |ei he| using Eqn. 2.23:
h|gi hg|i = Tr[ρ̂ |gi hg|] = ρgg = c∗g cg = |cg |2h|ei he|i = Tr[ρ̂ |ei he|] = ρee = c∗e ce = |ce |2 ,(2.31)

where |cg |2 and |ce |2 are the probabilities of finding the electron in the ground and excitedstate, respectively.
The optical polarization response of the system can be found by calculating the expectation value of the dipole operator µ̂ also using Eqn. 2.23:hµ̂i = Tr[ρ̂µ̂]




0 
 µge ρge= Tr 0µeg ρeg= µge ρge + c.c.

(2.32)The induced macroscopic polarization for a group of N oscillators is
P = N hµ̂i = n [µge ρge + c.c.].

(2.33)

Since the term ρge is driven by the electric field, the induced polarization is proportional tothe electric field as P = χE, where χ is the complex susceptibility. The polarization radiates
a field in the direction of the exciting electric field according to Maxwell’s equations [48].

24
The OBEs predict observed phenomena such as Rabi flopping, self-induced transparency, and photon echoes in atomic and solid systems [49]. We will refer to these equationsin this chapter, and we will use them for simulations of our system in Chapter 8.
2.7

Decoherence and relaxation dynamics of QW excitons
A light field absorbed by a semiconductor generates a carrier population and polar-

ization according to Eqns. 2.30. Following optical excitation, a series of decay processes
occur until thermal equilibrium is reached. The processes can be considered in two regimes:
coherent and incoherent.
The coherent regime begins directly after an excitation and occurs for GaAs QWs
on a time scale of several picoseconds. As shown in the last section, optical excitation ofa transition can create a superposition state between the ground and excited states, Eqn.
2.21, leading to a nonzero off-diagonal density-matrix element, ρeg . After optical excitation,
we can transform the operator ρeg out of the rotating frame and see that it evolves in timeas [44]:iωt −γeg t
ρeg (t) = ρind
e
,
eg e

(2.34)

where ρindeg is the element induced by the optical field. The element ρeg determines themacroscopic polarization P . We see from Eqn. 2.34 that the polarization oscillates, radiating
light at a frequency ωeg , while decaying in magnitude. For this reason, the response of a twolevel system to an optical field is often referred to as an oscillator, in analogy to a classicalspring excited by an impulse [44]. As the polarization decays, it emits radiation according2

to Irad ∝ P̈ . This radiation is known as the ‘free polarization decay’ in analogy to the‘free induction decay’ radiation observed in magnetic systems [50].
For the case of excitons in GaAs QWs, the energy separation Ee − Eg = E1 = Egap −Ebinding , as in Fig. 2.3. Directly after pulsed on-resonance optical excitation, the induced
excitonic polarization oscillates with a period of ≈ 3 fs.

25
A polarization decays as a result of the oscillators becoming out of phase with one
another because of fluctuations in their energy spacings. The phenomenological term γeg in
Eqn. 2.34 accounts for the decay of the polarization, or dephasing of oscillators. We explore
the physical origins of dephasing.
A fluctuation in the energy spacing between ground and excited states corresponds toa fluctuation in the frequency of a oscillation. In an ensemble of oscillators, the fluctuationsin frequencies cause phase distortions of the oscillators with respect to each other, giving
rise to dephasing. Phase-destroying processes can be considered scattering processes. These
scattering processes include scattering with impurities or lattice defects, phonons, and otherelectronic excitations (e.g., exciton-exciton or exciton-carrier scattering) [50]. Elastic scattering events leave the energy level unchanged while perturbing the phase of an oscillator,
whereas inelastic scattering causes energy relaxation. Either situation brings the oscillators
out of phase with each other, or causes decoherence [11]. The characteristic time of phaserelaxation, T2 , is called the decoherence time (or dephasing time). In the absence of any scattering processes, the phase will ultimately be lost in the incoherent regime via an incoherent
recombination process, discussed below.
The second, incoherent regime of the exciton dynamics is characterized by the polarization having decayed. In this regime, the electron and hole populations undergo intrabandrelaxation and interband recombination processes. Both mechanisms are considered incoherent relaxation processes [51].
Intraband relaxation occurs when carriers within the conduction band lose their kinetic
energy and move in momentum space toward the band minima [50]. The relaxation occurs
via energy-losing processes such as inelastic scattering and phonon emission. In the processof intraband relaxation, the temperature of the carriers (bound and unbound electron-holepairs) approaches thermal equilibrium with the temperature of the lattice.
Interband recombination is the radiative process of an electron and hole recombining, oran electron relaxing in energy back into the valence band. This process is the opposite of the26previously described interband absorption process and is accompanied by the emission of aphoton. Like interband absorption, the electron and hole must have similar momentum wave
vectors because the momentum of a photon is small compared to the carrier momentum.
Recombination of carriers via interband recombination occurs with higher probability atband minima since the time scale of intraband relaxation is faster than that of interband
recombination in GaAs QWs [52]. The population lifetime, T1 , is the time scale for incoherent
relaxation.
For light to couple with excitons through the induced polarization, both the createdelectron and hole in a QW must have a low momentum. In other words, QW excitons must
be within the light cone (described in §2.4) in order to couple with the light field and emit
light out of the plane of the QW. Consequently, excitons in QWs radiatively recombine onlyat the lowest momentum states. Higher-momentum excitons may relax through scattering
processes into low-momentum states where they may radiatively recombine. In GaAs QWs,
populations of excitons decay at time scales on the order of tens of picoseconds, and free
carriers decay at much longer time scales (nanoseconds).
As mentioned above, the recombination process limits the dephasing time in the absence of scattering processes. Since for optical excitation the number of excited oscillators N
is proportional to the excitation field amplitude squared, according to Eqn. 2.15, and fromthe polarization P = χE,
N = N0 e−t/T1 ∝ P 2 ∝ [P0 e−t/T2 ]2 ,(2.35)

it follows that 2T2 ≤ T1 [50]. The equality holds in the absence of any phase destroying
processes. In GaAs (and in most semiconductors), T2 ≪ T1 because of the various scattering
processes that cause dephasing [53].

27
2.8

Homogeneous vs. inhomogeneous broadening
Effects that lead to dephasing and relaxation can be classified as homogeneous orinhomogeneous. While both lead to a broader resonance line shape, their origins are fundamentally different. We specifically discuss 1s excitons in QWs in this section.
In a homogeneously broadened situation, all oscillators have the same frequency ω0 ,and the linewidth is determined exclusively from the dephasing time T2 . This type of broadening may be due to either radiative decay or scattering events. Scattering events in general
are considered homogeneous dephasing because all groups of excitons have the same probabilities of undergoing a given scattering event. Excitons may scatter with other excitons,
polarization, free carriers, and phonons.
Inhomogeneous broadening refers a distribution of oscillator frequencies. The primary
example in our system is the effect of disorder. Disorder describes fluctuations in the latticespacing due to impurities in the lattice. In QWs, differences in well width size L lead todifferent oscillator energies since the particle-in-a-box energy depends on the size of confinement as 1/ ∼ L2 [42]. Disorder is an inhomogeneous source of dephasing since different
groups of excitons have different energy levels, or oscillation frequencies, depending on theirposition in the QW.
In GaAs QW systems at low temperatures, inhomogeneous broadening dominates thewidth of the resonance because of disorder. There exists disorder in thin QW systems
because fluctuations in well-thickness of a single-atom layer (0.56 nm) is sizeable comparedto the well thickness (10 nm). In high-quality bulk samples or in QW systems at elevatedtemperatures, homogeneous broadening can dominate as a result of inelastic scattering of
excitonic resonances with optic and acoustic phonons [50].
At high excitation densities, interactions between excited amplitudes (polarization, free
carriers, excitons, phonons) can be so strong that the linewidth is homogeneously broadened.
This effect, known as excitation-induced dephasing (EID), together with inhomogeneous

28
broadening and other effects that depend on excitation density, can be explored with theuse of nonlinear optical spectroscopy techniques. We review the common spectroscopy techniques used to characterize exciton resonances, and then consider the potential of nonlinear
techniques for accessing information about the system beyond the capabilities of linear techniques.
2.9

Spectroscopy of semiconductors
The linear and nonlinear properties of semiconductors can be explored by using op-

tical spectroscopy. Spectroscopic techniques have provided information about semiconductors including electronic band structure, phonons, excitation spectra such as excitons, andproperties of defects for a variety of materials [24]. The utility of optical spectroscopy is
introduced with a simple model which elucidates the relationship between the optical fieldand polarization. The remainder of this chapter explores linear and nonlinear spectroscopic
techniques.
2.9.1

Driven oscillator model

To understand the spectroscopy of semiconductors, is helpful to have the analogy ofa driven oscillator in mind [44, 47]. The displacement x for a mass m with charge e on aspring is governed by:
m

dx
d2 x
+ mω02 x = qe E,
+
mγ
dt2
dt

(2.36)

where γ is the damping rate, ω0 the resonant frequency of oscillation, qe = − |e| is the chargeof the electron, and E the driving electric field. We find that the position of the oscillator
in response to a sinusoidal field E(t) = E0 e−iωt to be:x(t) =e/m
ω02 − ω 2 − iγωE(t).

(2.37)

29
The polarization of an oscillating charge is given by p(t) = ex(t). For a group of N oscillators,
the macroscopic polarization may be computed as
P (t) = N p(t) = N ex(t)N e2 /mE(t)ω02 − ω 2 − iγωγωω02 − ω 2
2
E(t)
+i 2
= N e /m
(ω02 − ω 2 )2 − (γω)2(ω0 − ω 2 )2 − (γω)2== [χ′ + iχ′′ ]E(t)(2.38)

where χ′ and χ′′ represent the real and imaginary parts of the susceptibility, respectively.
We learn from the plot of the polarization response in Fig. 2.6a that the amplitudeof the induced polarization frequency response is at its maximum when the driving electricfield is on resonance with the oscillator, or ω = ω0 . The phase of the polarization is in phasewith the electric field well below resonance, and 180◦ out of phase far above resonance. Onresonance corresponds to a 90◦ phase shift of the polarization with respect to the electricfield. The real and imaginary parts of the polarization response are shown in Fig. 2.6b.
These are the χ′ and χ′′ , respectively, which relate the polarization response of a material tothe incident electric field.
A group of oscillators responds to an electric field by reradiating light. We explore
the material response to optical excitation in the linear and nonlinear regimes in the next
section.
2.9.2

Linear spectroscopy

A simple way to observe the linewidths of an excitonic resonance is to perform anabsorbance experiment, as illustrated in Fig. 2.7. In this experiment, a low-intensity tunable
monochromatic light source is incident on a sample. The light intensities Iin (ω) and IT (ω)
before and after the sample, respectively, are measured for a series of optical frequencies.
This experiment is called ‘linear’ because in the regime of a low-intensity light source,
the induced polarization P is linear to the electric field E, which is just the frequency-domain

30

Figure 2.6: Visualization of the Lorentz oscillator model [Eqn. 2.38]. (a) The real and imaginary parts of
the induced polarization. (b) The magnitude of the polarization and the phase.

E sig
Ein
Ein
sampleFigure 2.7: Linear absorption. An input field Ein induces a polarization in a sample which in turn radiates
Esig in the same direction, producing a cancelation with the input field.

expression of Eqn. 2.38:
P (ω) = χ(ω)E(ω) = [χ′ (ω) + iχ′′ (ω)]E(ω),(2.39)

where χ′ and χ′′ represent the real and imaginary parts of the susceptibility, respectively.
We note here that the real and imaginary parts of the polarization directly correspond to thereal and imaginary parts of the susceptibility in the linear regime, as shown in the Lorentz
oscillator model in Fig. 2.6. The induced polarization radiates light with two phases, in phase(real part of Eqn. 2.39) and with a 90◦ phase shift (imaginary part), both in the directionof the input beam. Maxwell’s equations show that the electric field from a polarization isanother 90◦ our of phase, meaning that the light radiated from the dipole at ω0 is 180◦ out of

31
phase with the incident field, causing destructive interference in the direction of the driving
electric field. The intensity measured in the direction of the input beam is the interference
between the input field Ein and the reradiated field from the induced polarization Esig [54]:= |Ein + Esig |2

Iout= |Ein + iχEin |2≈ Iin (1 − 2χ′′ ),(2.40)

where Iin = |Ein |2 is the intensity of the input field. The linear approximation assumes χ ≪ 1
so that the χ2 terms vanish. This approximation is acceptable in the situation where themedium is sufficiently dilute. In the case where the medium becomes very dense, local-fieldcorrections need to be applied [47]. We can see here a partial cancellation of the incoming
field in the measured intensity. The imaginary part of the susceptibility contains information
regarding the absorption as a function of frequency. Experimentalists typically perceive thelinear absorption as a measurement of the absorption coefficient, which is related to χ′′ .
According to the Lambert-Beer law [55], the transmitted light through a material has
a logarithmic dependence on the absorption coefficient: IT (ω) = Iin (ω)e−α(ω)L , where L isthe optical path length through the sample and α is the ‘absorption coefficient.’ Solving forαL yields the absorbance spectrum:α(ω)L = −ln

IT (ω)Iin (ω)

.

(2.41)

The absorption coefficient α is related to the index of refraction, n(ω) = n′ (ω) + in′′ (ω), as
proportional to the imaginary part [47]:α(ω) = 2n′′ (ω)ω/c.

(2.42)The index of refraction is related to the linear susceptibility χ:n(ω) =pp1
ǫ(ω) = 1 + χ(ω) ≈ 1 + χ(ω),
2(2.43)

32
where we have again invoked χ ≪ 1. From Eqns. 2.43 and 2.42, we may conclude therelationship α(ω) ≈ χ′′ (ω) ω/c. This relationship shows that the linear susceptibility is
directly related to optical absorption.
Linear absorption experiments have been performed in semiconductors to observe exciton spectral features, determine dielectric structure, and study the temperature dependenceof exciton linewidths [56]. Linear absorption measurements can also be extended to the casewhere the effects of an electric field applied across the sample on the absorbance spectrum
can be recorded. This technique is known as electroabsorption [57].
Another technique, known as photoluminescence (PL), is a measurement of the spontaneous emission from a material. The experiment involves illuminating a sample with anenergy greater than the band-gap energy. Electrons are promoted into the conduction band,relax into low-momentum states, and then recombine, radiating light in 4π steradians. A
portion of this light is collected with a lens and focused into a spectrometer, where it canbe spectrally resolved. PL experiments can reveal information about the intraband and interband relaxation processes through observation of the different intensities emitted as eachof the resonances. For example, the intensity of the 1s emission relative to other resonances
can help to quantify the recombination rates [58, 59].
In another linear technique, photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy (PLE), a sample is excited with a tunable laser, and the peak luminescence intensity is measured as thelaser wavelength is tuned. The shape of the emission is independent of the way that thecarriers are excited, and so the signal strength is proportional to the carrier density, which
is determined by the absorption coefficient [1]. While this technique provides the same information as the linear absorption experiment, it can be useful in situations where directtransmission is impossible, e.g., for thick substrates.
While these techniques are very helpful in characterizing the linear properties of asample, experiments in the nonlinear regime provide a greater range of information regarding
processes and kinetics in a sample.

33
2.9.3

Nonlinear spectroscopy

In nonlinear spectroscopy, the intensity of light is sufficiently intense that the induced
polarization in the sample is no longer proportional to the electric field strength of theincident light [11]. Rather, higher powers of the electric field must be considered, i.e.,
P = χ(1) E + χ(2) E 2 + χ(3) E 3 + · · · ,(2.44)

where the nonlinear susceptibility χ(n) is an n + 1 order tensor that may be sensitive to thedirections in which the electric fields are applied with respect to the crystalline axes of solidmaterials.
For example, if two optical fields are applied to a sample in different directions, asecond-order nonlinear polarization P (2) = χ(2) E1 E2 may be generated in along a third
direction. This may be computed [47] through the second-order susceptibility χ(2) :
(2)

Pi

=

X

(2)

χijk Ej Ek .

(2.45)

j,k=x,y,z

For materials lacking inversion symmetry, the induced polarization reradiates a field in a
direction that is a linear combination of the electric field wave vectors. For the example oftwo-field mixing, if two beams with wave vectors ~k1 and ~k2 and frequencies ω1 and ω2 wereincident on a sample, the second-harmonic generation signal (with frequency ω1 + ω2 ) would
be found in the ~k1 +~k2 direction, as indicated in Fig. 2.8. Additionally, a difference-frequency
signal (ω1 − ω2 ) may be found in the ~k1 − ~k2 direction.
Many materials have inversion symmetries that result in vanishing χ(2) . For the GaAs
QW sample used in this work, the QWs were grown along the (100) plane. For this orientation, the zinc-blende structure of GaAs is inversion symmetric. In an inversion symmetricplane, the sign of the induced polarization must change if the sign of the electric field in
Eqn. 2.45 is changed. However, for χ(2) (and χ(2n) ∀n ∈ N) processes, the polarization does
not change sign since it depends on E 2 . Since −P = P , the only possibility is that the generated polarization is zero. Thus it is impossible to observe any signals related to χ(2) unless34
symmetry is broken because of, e.g., application of strain or a strong static electric field.
However, two fields may still generate a nonlinear polarization through χ(3) regardless of
crystal symmetry. This is the susceptibility involved in a variety of nonlinear spectroscopies.
Nonlinear spectroscopy techniques typically involve multiple light fields incident on
the sample. Because of the fast (∼ps) dephasing and band-relaxation processes, ultrafast(femtosecond) laser pulses are often used to study the coherence and quantum kinetics insemiconductors. A thorough review of ultrafast spectroscopy is given by Shah [24].
2.9.3.1

Transient absorption

A common spectroscopy technique using two pulses is the transient-absorption experiment. The majority of the experiments reported in this thesis involve this technique.
The concept is illustrated in Fig. 2.8. In transient absorption, a high-intensity pump pulse(Epump ) incident on the sample generates a nonequilibrium state in the quantum wells. Sometime τ later, a weak-intensity probe pulse (Eprobe ) monitors the sample, and the light in the
direction of the probe is recorded by a photodetector. Information about the state createdby the pump may be then read by scanning the time delay and/or spectrally resolving lightin the direction of the probe beam.
In the experiments in this thesis, we perform spectrally resolved transient absorption.
Measurement of the probe spectrum for a series of τ delay times yields information about theincoherent population dynamics. The line shape of the probe absorption allows investigationof the many-body configuration created by the pump pulse.
Although the pump pulse itself could be spectrally resolved to gain information about
the many-body effects, it is more complicated to analyze since the dynamics that determine
its line shape happen during the pump pulse duration. Additionally, a single-pulse nonlinear
absorption measurement does not allow resolution of time dynamics. It is for these reasonsthat we perform spectrally resolved transient absorption.
For a transient-absorption experiment, the nonlinear signal is radiated in the direction

35

Figure 2.8: Schematic for a two-pulse nonlinear experiment. The sample is tilted for clarity. Two pulses

are separated by a delay τ , and focused with a lens onto a sample with directions ~k1 and ~k2 , respectively. For
transient absorption (TA), the pump ~k1 and probe ~k2 generate a signal (green dashed lines) in the reflected
and transmitted probe beam directions. For second-harmonic generation (SHG), the signal (blue dashedline) is detected in the ~k1 + ~k2 direction. A four-wave mixing (FWM) signal (black dashed line) may be
detected in the 2~k2 − ~k1 direction.

of the transmitted and reflected probe. This follows from calculating the induced χ(3) polarization, similarly to Eqn. 2.45, as proportional to three electric fields, with the pump field(~k1 ) acting twice, and the probe field (~k2 ) acting once [54]:P (3) ∝ E1 E1∗ E2~~~∝ (e−iω1 t+ik1 ·~r )(e+iω1 t−ik1 ·~r )(e−iω2 t+ik2 ·~r )~∴= e−iωsig t+iksig ·~r ,(2.46)

ωsig = +ω1 − ω1 + ω2

(2.47)~ksig = +~k1 − ~k1 + ~k2 ,(2.48)The emitted signal field Esig ∝ P (3) , assuming that only pump-induced absorption changes
matter. The total signal measured in transient absorption (valid for both the probe transmission and reflection directions) is typically the differential intensity with and without the36pump field present:∆I(τ ) = [|Eprobe + Esig (τ )|2 − |Eprobe |2 ].

(2.49)We see that Esig depends on the relative delay τ between pump and probe. Furthermore,for |Eprobe | ≫ |Esig |, the detected differential intensity is dominated by the cross term:∆I(τ ) ≈ 2Eprobe Esig (τ ) ∝ P (3) .

(2.50)The differential transmission represents then a direct measurement of the induced thirdorder polarization. This signal yields information about the incoherent dynamics, since∆I(τ ) ∝ |µeg |8 e−γee τ , where γee is the decay rate of the excited state and |µeg | is the transition
dipole modulus between the ground and excited state, both in Eqn. 2.30. The differential
intensity can be interpreted as the change in population of the states observed by the probe
field. Measurement of the effects due to population changes and relaxation is the strengthof the transient-absorption technique. Spectrally resolved transient absorption is discussed
in more detail in Chapter 3.
2.9.3.2

Four-wave mixing

Another common technique involving third-order polarization is called four-wave mixing (FWM). A generalization of the transient-absorption technique, FWM allows resolutionof the coherent dynamics, i.e., dephasing. While there are many versions of FWM experiments, the geometry of Fig. 2.8 can be used to detect a FWM signal. The only requiredchange is setting up a detector in a direction 2~k2 − ~k1 . The interpretation of this experiment is that the ~k1 and ~k2 pulses form a population grating inside the sample from whichthe ~k2 pulse then diffracts. This experiment can reveal information about the nature ofbroadening (homogeneous or inhomogeneous), dephasing times, and non-Markovian relaxation dynamics. Many forms of FWM are used to probe QW response, including timeresolved, time-integrated, and spectrally resolved FWM. Additionally, the new technique

37
of two-dimensional Fourier spectroscopy can be used to resolve coupling between excitonic
resonances and distinguish sources of dephasing [60, 61, 43, 62, 63].
Transient-absorption spectroscopy and FWM spectroscopy are both forms of nonlinear spectroscopy commonly used to investigate semiconductor systems. Other nonlinear
experiments include time-resolved and time-integrated photoluminescence [64, 6, 2] as wellas interferometric measurements of pulses transmitted through the sample [65]. Nonlinear
experiments are particularly helpful in revealing the effects of intense fields that produce
effects that can only be attributed to the interactions between particles and polarizations,
i.e., many-body effects. The next section discusses some of the many-body effects discovered
using nonlinear spectroscopy that motivated the experiments performed in my thesis work.
2.10

Many-body effects in GaAs QWs
Much research has been performed in the nonlinear regime for bulk GaAs over the past

40 years [17, 18, 19]; with the development of molecular-beam epitaxy techniques in the 1960s,
the study of QW structures became possible. Many-body interactions in QW structures
have application in optical switching [66, 67], integrated circuits [68], terahertz applications[69], communications [70], photovoltaics [71], and potentially in quantum computation [72]devices.
A wide variety of observable many-body effects manifest in a GaAs QW system upon
excitation by intense laser light. The effects are strongly coupled, which makes it challenging
to determine in practice which nonlinear observables can be attributed to which many-bodyeffects.
When a light source excites a QW system at low densities, interactions between boundexcitons and free carriers can be neglected in the theory and still match the experimental
result with accuracy [73]. This is known as the linear regime. At high densities, however, many-body effects become important. These effects include scattering events (e.g.,
exciton-exciton, exciton-phonon, exciton-polarization), phase-space filling, screening, energy

38
renormalization, radiative decay, effects of exciton populations, blue shifting of the exciton resonance, transient gain, and the formation of biexcitons. These effects are in general
coupled to each other These effects can be probed with nonlinear spectroscopy, and theirinfluence may be observed in the spectral line shape or in the time dynamics of emitted light.
Many-body effects may be observed when the intensity of the excitation source is high,generating a P (3) material response that is measurable. When coherent light with resonant
frequencies is incident upon a QW, a portion of the light is absorbed, generating polarization and free carriers. The interactions between polarization and carriers can influence
the dynamics and can even change the band structure. These changes influence the spectral line shape or the time dynamics of emitted light and can be observed using nonlinear
spectroscopy.
2.10.1

Excitation-induced dephasing and shifting

One manifestation of these excitation-induced interactions can be observed via a broadened excitonic linewidth due to dephasing [74, 3]. For example, in [3] the researchers observe
the broadening of the exciton linewidth as the excitation density is increased in a transientabsorption experiment in bulk GaAs. The broadening is inferred through the differential
transmission signal, as shown in Fig. 2.9, which represents the difference in the exciton
absorption profile with and without the pump excitation. The effect of excitation-induceddephasing (EID) may be interpreted as the effect of scattering between excited amplitudes(polarization, free carriers, excitons, phonons) leading to decoherence in the phase of theinduced polarization, as discussed in §2.7.
The many-body interactions may also lead to a shifting of the exciton resonance energy.
For example, in [4] a blue shift of a QW exciton resonance is observed for positive pumpprobe delay, when the pump pulse precedes the probe, as shown in Fig. 2.10. The −5 psdelay is considered unexcited since the probe comes before the pump. The researchers inthis paper attribute the blue-shift to repulsive interactions between excitons and screening

39

Figure 2.9: Excitation-induced dephasing (EID) observed in the differential transmission of a probe spectrum. The inset shows the probe absorbance in the absence of strong optical excitation. Figure from [3].

of the Coulomb potential. We discuss these effects in more detail below.

Figure 2.10: Blue shift in exciton absorption in a multiple QW structure. At positive delays (+2 and +15ps), a blue-shift of the exciton resonance is observed compared to the unexcited (-5 ps) delay. Figure from
[4].

40
2.10.2

Bleaching the exciton resonanceAt very high excitation densities, a ‘bleaching’ or saturation of the exciton populationis achieved where a smaller fraction of the light is absorbed by the quantum well as theintensity of the light source is increased [75, 76, 77, 78]. The observation of bleaching intransient-absorption measurements happens when increasing the pump intensity causes nofurther change in the probe response.
Bleaching can be attributed two effects: (i) phase-space filling, and (ii) Coulomb screening of the electric potential.
The phase-space filling effect is a consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle. Although
excitons themselves are bosons, their constituent particles (electrons and holes) are fermions.
Fermions have the property that no two identical particles may occupy the same state inphase space. Electrons in the conduction band and holes in the valence band must both beavailable in order to create bound exciton states. As more electrons are excited from thevalence band to create excitons, the excitation probability decreases because of the limited
availability of unique states in the bands. Phase-space filling contributes to a reduction in
the absorption of light via reduction of the exciton oscillator strength [75]. The effect is also
referred to as Pauli blocking since carriers in the conduction band block the promotion ofvalence band electrons into the same states.
Electrical screening, the other dominant effect that results in excitonic saturation,
comes about from an alteration in the mean field in the QW structure [77]. In the limit
where many carriers (free and bound) are created in the QW, the presence of charge changes
the mean field. To understand this, we consider the example of a positive charge in a plasmaof free carriers and excitons. The electric potential from the positive charge will fall off withincreasing distance r faster than 1/r because the negative carriers in the plasma will tend
to gather around the positive charge, weakening its Coulomb potential [79]. Although thebound exciton states have neutral charge, they have the possibility of screening the Coulomb

41
potential through the dipole interaction. The many-body effect of exciton populations on
the nonlinear line shape has not been quantified before the research presented in this thesis.
Our findings concerning the effects of the presence of exciton populations on the nonlinear
line shape is discussed in Chapter 4.
The effect of the screening of the electric potential on the excitons is a weakening of
the long-range Coulomb correlation between excitons, causing each exciton to be less tightly
bound. The broadening of the exciton lines has been attributed to screening of the electric
potential [75]. Although screening effects partly explain the line shape of the exciton, othereffects are involved, which we will explore.
When the screening is so large that the Coulomb attraction between the electron andhole is weakened, a bound exciton state cannot form, and increasing the excitation intensity
does not change the spectral features. A rough estimate of the densities at which excitons
dissociate is given by the Mott density. For a pure exciton system, bleaching of excitons
occurs when the density of carriers approaches the inverse volume of the exciton [80, 81]:
1
πrn3
3
1
2D
NM
,
ott ≈
4πrn2
3D
NM
ott ≈ 4(2.51)(2.52)

where rn is the exciton radius. Although this measure is inaccurate because of myriad
effects, it is a reasonable guideline for understanding the saturation density. For example,
using the value of the n = 1 exciton radius in §2.3, the 3D Mott density is 1×1017 cm−3 , andthe 2D Mott density is 2×1011 cm−2 . These estimates agree with the literature for reported
saturation densities of 2×1017 cm−3 for the bulk and 1×1011 cm−2 for 10 nm QWs [82, 83].
2.10.3Band-gap renormalization

Another nonlinear effect of a large number of electrons into the conduction band is
the modification of the band structure, known as band-gap renormalization [30]. The band
structure has influence over dipole matrix elements, broadness of energy levels, and the42
exciton binding energy [24, 84, 85]. In GaAs QW structures, the valence- and conductionband energies are pushed closer to each other in energy, decreasing the band-gap energy
Egap . The exciton energy levels stay at the same energies relative to the band gap, and so
the excitation energy necessary to create excitons actually decreases. The result is a red-shiftof the exciton energy [30]. This is a competing effect with the blue-shift described earlier. The
combined effects of screening and band-gap renormalization make possible overlap between
the continuum and exciton energies. If the conduction band energy matches the exciton
energy, the excitons are then said to have zero binding energy, thus ionizing the excitonsand promoting electrons into the conduction band. The effect of more free carriers causes
an intensifying of the screening.
While attempts have been made to distinguish such effects as being modifications of
the band structure (e.g., band-gap renormalization) and occupation effects (e.g., phase-spacefilling affecting transition rates), we recognize that these effects are coupled and do not attempt to make a distinction. Many-body effects depend on the total density of photoexcited
carriers (and excitons) and on their distribution functions in phase space.
2.10.4

Excitonic gain

Another interesting many-body effect is the transfer of energy between pump and probe
in a transient-absorption experiment. This effect was observed in Ref. [5]. The researchers
observed an anomalous transmittance compared to the unexcited case near the exciton resonance in a GaAs QW system, as seen in Fig. 2.11. The maximum gain was observed forshort time delays. The researchers explain their observations by using ‘dressed’ states of
excitons. The anomalous transmittance in the presence of the pump excitation implies that
the QW may be used as a gain medium or as an optical switch for communications devices.
The theory of gain for application of a QW laser was explored in [86]. Although the gain
has been observed before in GaAs QWs, the results presented in this thesis provide the mostdetailed understanding of this experimental phenomenon since the results are matched using

43
the semiconductor Bloch equations.

Figure 2.11: Optical gain observed in a transient-absorption experiment according to [5]. The unexcitedtransmittance spectrum (solid line) is shown in comparison to the excited probe spectra at two time delays.
Cross-hatched regions correspond to optical gain.

2.10.5

Biexcitons

Another effect that can be observed at high exciton densities is the formation of exciton
molecules called biexcitons, which are similar to an H2 molecule [87, 88]. Formation ofbiexcitons requires high densities because two excitons need to be near each other to form abound molecular state. Biexcitons are difficult to observe in bulk GaAs because the relatively
small binding energy of the exciton (4 meV) leads to a theoretical biexciton binding energyof only a few tenths of a meV [39]. Thus, the exciton density at which biexcitons could form
is beyond the Mott density, at which excitons dissociate because of scattering. However, in
QWs the enhanced binding energy of excitons compared with the bulk allows the formationof biexcitons below the Mott density. The binding energy in a GaAs QW is typically around 1
meV [89]. This results in a new optical resonance around 1 meV below the exciton resonancein energy, in agreement with the photoluminescence spectrum in Fig. 2.12. The spectrum

44shows two nearby spectral features, the exciton and biexciton, which are fit by a double
Gaussian function.

Figure 2.12: Exciton and biexciton features in a time-integrated luminescence spectrum. Figure from [6].

While many-body effects have been roughly explained by previous research, a moredetailed understanding of the physics of the many-body interactions comes through analysis
of quantitative data using the semiconductor Bloch equations (SBEs). The experimental
research in this thesis combined with a robust theory using the SBEs makes possible a
new level of quantitative analysis that allows a deeper understanding of the many-bodyinteractions in GaAs QWs.

Chapter 3
Experimental techniques

In this chapter we present the techniques used to perform quantitative experimental
characterization of the many-body configurations. We perform spectrally resolved transientabsorption measurements in a pump-probe configuration, as discussed in §2.9.3.1. While
many transient absorption measurements have been performed in the past, we make quantitative measurements of the probe absorption spectra in carefully calibrated absolute units.
These measurements, combined with a characterization of the sample structure, allow quantitative comparison with a microscopic theory that connects the nonlinear changes in theprobe absorption to many-body effects. The experiment-theory combination reveals new
insight about the physics of many-body interactions, as we will discuss in Chapter 4.
These techniques are applicable to our quantitative studies of Coulomb-induced nonlinearities (Chapter 4) and of the effects of phase-modulated excitation pulses (Chapters 8,9)
in a GaAs quantum-well (QW) sample.
The first step in characterizing the nonlinear effects in the sample is a full characterization of the sample structure. We then proceed to discuss the details of our transientabsorption technique.
3.1

Sample characterization
We chose a well-understood system to demonstrate our new characterization technique:a molecular beam-epitaxy sample containing ten layers of 10 nm GaAs QWs, each separated

46

anti-reflection coat
300 nm Al0.3Ga0.7As/AlAs etch layer
120 nm Al0.3Ga0.7As/GaAs super lattice
300 nm GaAs
300 nm Al0.3Ga0.7As
10 periods of GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As
quantum wells (10 nm/ 10 nm)
200 nm Al0.3Ga0.7As
10 nm GaAs

laser
direction

wax adhesive
sapphire disc

Figure 3.1: Schematic of the multiple quantum-well (QW) sample studied in this thesis. The 300 nm GaAs
layer is referred to as the bulk layer in the discussion. The direction of the incoming laser beam is shown.

by 10 nm-thick Al0.3 Ga0.7 As barriers [10, 30, 11]. Figure 3.1 shows a schematic of the sample.
Rich Mirin of NIST fabricated the high-quality QWs by growing GaAs in a between barrier
layers of Al0.3 Ga0.7 As in a superlattice structure. Oxidation is avoided by terminating thesample with a GaAs cap layer on one side. A bulk layer of GaAs is grown to smooth thegrowth front before the QWs are grown on the sample substrate. We affixed the sample to asapphire disk using optically clear epoxy, then thinned the sample by mechanical polishingand chemical etching. David Alchenberger, of the JILA instrument shop, then applied anantireflection coating for 800 nm light to the surface of the sample. This coating suppresses
multiple reflections within the material that could lead to destructive interference at thelocation of the QWs.
We perform all measurements at 4 Kelvin in a helium-flow cryostat. To fix the model
for sample-thickness parameters at low temperatures, we first measure a broad-spectrum
absorption from our sample. To measure the absorption spectrum in absolute units, we
carefully measure the transmission (T ) and reflection (R) probabilities of the unexcited
GaAs sample using a white-light source. In this case our source was broad-spectrum ampli-cryo
windowcryo
window

47

samplelight source

surf1

surf2

Figure 3.2: Detailed geometry of cryostat optics. The light source enters from the left side. There arelosses due to reflection from the two surfaces of the sapphire disc (surf1 and surf2) in addition to the cryostat
windows.

fied spontaneous emission from a Ti:sapphire laser cavity, with a bandwidth of around 400
meV and an average power of 100 nW. We calibrate the measured T and R spectra intotrue probabilities by careful consideration of the geometry of the elements in the cryostat(Appendix B). A schematic of the geometry of the cryostat optics is shown in Fig. 3.2. The
sapphire disc is wedged to prevent interference between the reflecting surfaces.

Figure 3.3: Measured (red) and theoretical (black) sample reflection probabilities. The reflection andtransmission (not shown) spectra, recorded in absolute units, allow the fixing of a model using transfermatrix theory. The bulk and QW exciton resonances are marked. The spacing ∆E between fringes allows
inference of the sample thickness.

We compare the spectra (Fig. 3.3) with a transfer-matrix computation [90] that includes all dielectric layers and QWs of the sample. We fine tune the refractive indices and48
thicknesses of the dielectric layers to reach a full agreement between linear theory and measurements for the energy range 1.4–1.7 eV. This procedure determines our sample parameters,
which are fixed in our subsequent quantitative theory-experiment comparisons.
The data and theory both show sharp resonances at energies corresponding to thebulk and QW excitons. The fact that the QW exciton is higher in energy than the bulk
exciton is a consequence of confinement, explained in §2.4. The large oscillations are due
to Fabry-Perot resonances that arise from interference between multiple reflections between
the extremal interfaces of the sample structure. The energetic spacing ∆E (labeled in Fig.
3.3) of the oscillations is related to the thickness of the sample L by:L=hc,
2 n ∆E(3.1)

where n ≈ 3.7 for GaAs at 4 K [91], h is Planck’s constant, and c is the speed of light.
From this equation along with a measured spacing of 118 meV we infer a sample thicknessof 1.42 µm, which is very close to the grower’s specifications of 1.43 µm after the etchingprocess. We can see from Fig. 3.3 that the exciton line shape is critically affected by the
sample structure. The exciton resonance can even dip up or down, depending on where afeature occurs on the Fabry-Perot oscillatory curve, as can be seen by comparing the bulk
and QW exciton features. Thus, a model that includes the sample structure is essential forunderstanding the detailed physics.
We also measure the T and R spectra at multiple positions across the sample, and findvery small changes change in the shape of the fringes, indicating that the sample has uniform
thickness within ±50 nm. The uniform thickness means that the position on the sample atwhich measurements are made does not critically affect the line shape. With the different
layer thicknesses in the sample structure fixed in the theoretical model, linear and nonlinear
absorption spectra can be analyzed to reveal the physics that generates the observed line
shapes.

49
3.2

Linear absorption spectrum
Although there are several spectral features in the broad-spectrum absorption, we study

the optical response of the heavy-hole (HH) 1s excitons from the ten QWs in the sample.
This resonance at E1s = 1.546 eV is well separated from other absorption resonances in thesample. In addition, it has a strong oscillator strength. These features make the line shapeof the HH 1s exciton resonance a good observable for revealing details of the many-bodydynamics inside the QWs.
In order to study the many-body signatures of the exciton resonance, we characterize
the physics in the linear regime. The linear absorption spectrum αQW (ω) = 1 − T (ω) − R(ω)
of the 10 QWs in the spectral region near the 1s HH exciton resonance is shown in Fig. 3.4.
The confinement of the exciton wave functions remove the degeneracy between the HH andlight-hole (LH) sub-bands. The HH exciton resonance is slightly lower in energy than thelight hole exciton resonance, consistent with the theory presented in Chapter 2 (Fig. 2.5).
For low excitation densities, the unexcited exciton absorption line shape has finite
broadness primarily because of radiative dephasing, phonon scattering, and disorder. Radiative dephasing refers to the emitted fields from the QWs decaying because of radiative
coupling with the QW system. Phonon scattering depends on the temperature of the sample.
Both of these processes are homogeneous in nature since all excitons respond in the same
way to the frequency range contained in the line shape. In contrast, the inhomogeneousbroadening mechanism of disorder results from fluctuations in QW thickness, as describedin §2.8.
3.3

Transient absorption in the nonlinear regime
Elevated densities of carriers and polarizations lead to modifications of the absorption

spectrum of a probe pulse. The changes to the probe include broadening of the absorption
line shape (i.e., excitation-induced dephasing, or EID), shifting the resonance center fre-

50

Figure 3.4: Linear absorption (blue line) from the QWs in absolute units in the region of the 1s heavy-hole(HH) exciton resonance. In arbitrary units, the probe spectrum before the sample is shown (green line)
along with the narrowed pump spectrum used in transient-absorption experiments (shaded area).

quency (i.e., excitation-induced shift, or EIS), and saturation. We described these effects inchapter 2. We describe in this section the experimental parameters and considerations forthe spectrally resolved transient absorption measurements performed in this work.
3.3.1

Experimental setup

To study the optical properties of the sample at densities where many-body dynamics
dominate the absorption line shape, we perform spectrally resolved transient absorption.
The concept of this measurement experiment was explained in §2.9.3.1. The experimental
setup is illustrated in Fig. 3.5.
In our experiment, we use a pump and probe pulse, both provided by a tunable Kerrlens mode-locked Ti:Sapphire laser system (Coherent Mira 900), pumped by a 5 W diodepumped laser centered at 532 nm (Coherent Verdi V5). The laser produces optical pulses in
the near-infrared (λ0 = 800 nm), with a repetition rate of 76 MHz and a pulse duration of∆τ = 287 fs full-width half maximum (FWHM). We estimate this pulse duration from an

51

Figure 3.5: Schematic setup for spectrally resolved transient absorption experiments. BS, beam splitter;
ND filter, neutral-density filter; τ delay, controls relative time delay between pump and probe; POL, polarizer;
QWP, quarter-wave plate; BB, computer-controlled beam blockers; PD, photodetector.

intensity autocorrelation width of 406.5 fs FWHM and by assuming a Gaussian line shape.
The details of temporal pulse measurement are discussed in §3.5. The laser spectrum forboth pump and probe are tuned near the interband transition of the GaAs QW HH exciton
at E1s with a bandwidth of ∆E = 6.8 meV (∆λ = 3.5 nm) FWHM. The pump pulse isspectrally narrowed to ∆E = 5.9 meV FWHM (∆λ = 3.05 nm) by a pulse shaper apparatus
in order to have a spectrum which is resonant with the HH 1s-resonance and avoids exciting
the e-h continuum or LH resonance. The pulse shaper is able to alter the spectral phaseof the pump as well; this will be discussed in Chapter 7. The probe and pump spectra areshown in Fig. 3.4.
Both the pump and probe beams are focused onto the GaAs QW sample within thecryostat. The intense pump creates a many-body configuration in the sample, and the

52
weak probe pulse with delay τ interrogates the configuration. We guide the transmitted andreflected probe beams with mirrors into a monochrometer, where they are spectrally resolved
and recorded with a photodetector. We record the probe transmission T and reflection R
spectra as functions of the photon energy ~ω for a matrix of pump powers, time delays, andpolarization configurations.
We adjust the pump power by varying the light transmitted through a neutral-density
filter. The original experiments performed in this work used a neutral-density plate filter
that attenuated the pump power as the position of the plate was translated. To increase
the stability of the experiment, we replace this with a variable phase retarder (Meadowlark
LVR-100) along with a polarizer. Amplitude modulation of a 2 kHz square-wave signal to thephase retarder allows variation in the pump power over three orders of magnitude, ranging
from the linear regime past the saturation density, without modifying the polarization state.
The saturation density is explained in §2.10.2.
We concentrate on short and long time delays between the pump and probe. For a shortdelay (τ = 3 ps), the probe interrogates the QW in the coherent regime, when polarizationis active in the QWs. For longer time delays (τ > 5 ps), the probe arrives in the incoherent
regime, when the polarization has decayed and only carrier populations remain. We chooseτ = 13 ps (or 27 ps for experiments in Chapter 8) for the long time delay.
We place a polarizer and quarter-wave plate in the each path for the pump and probe
beams. This configuration allows us to manipulate the polarization states, which influences
the interaction a subspace of spin states. Circular polarization (σ + or σ − ) excites one opticaltransition of the spin-degenerate HH states, as described §2.5. In contrast, linear-polarized
light excites both states with a combination of left and right circular-polarized light withequal probability. For the experiments, the pump and probe are configured to either be
the same circular polarization (i.e., co-circular, or CC), or the same linear polarization (i.e.,
co-linear, or CL). In either case, the pump and probe interact with the same subspace.
By varying this matrix of experimental parameters, we measure a set of probe absorp-

53tion spectra that reveal details of many-body interactions in our sample. The experimental
procedure involves using computer control (LabView) to loop through a matrix of pumpintensities and pump-probe delays. The polarizers and quarter-wave plates are adjusted
manually to create pure circular and linear polarization states to within 0.1%. The transmission and reflection of the probe beams are incident on a beam splitter, which guides bothbeams into a monochrometer. While the measurement would be faster with two monochrometers, we use one monochrometer and switch alternately between recording the transmission
and reflection of the probe beam by using computer-controlled beam blockers in both arms.
We next explain how we choose the pump and probe spot sizes that determine the excitation
densities.
3.3.2

Choosing appropriate pump and probe spot sizes

The spot sizes of the pump and probe were carefully chosen to balance several constraints. We desire high enough pump intensities to reach saturation of the QW. However,
we find experimentally that average pump powers beyond ≈100 mW (peak pulse power ≈ 13kW), heating of the sample can occur which can distort the spectral features and potentiallydamage the sample. To avoid heating the sample with the pump, we desire a small focus of
the pump beam so that the power can be relatively low and still create carrier densities thatsaturate the QW.
The probe beam must sample a spatially homogeneous part of the pump beam. To
satisfy this constraint, we would like a probe spot size which is much smaller than the pumpspot size at the sample plane. However, a smaller probe spot size means higher excitation
density. The probe must create carrier densities that are in the linear regime so that thenonlinear effects we measure are completely due to the pump light. Additionally, a minimum
amount of average probe power is necessary to obtain good signal-to-noise ratio in the probe
measurement.
To determine the optimal pump and probe spot sizes that satisfy these constraints,

54
we first experimentally determine the saturation densities with the pump and probe beams.
We then perform a calculation using a model which estimates the error due to the relative
spot sizes of the pump and probe. Since the probe must have a finite spot size, there isan unavoidable error in the measurement of the pump-generated configuration because of
the sampling of spatial inhomogeneity across the intensity profile of the pump spot. We
calculate this error by assuming that both beams have a Gaussian spatial intensity profileat the focus:
22

Ij (ρ) = I0j e−ρ /2w0j ,(3.2)

where ρ is the radial coordinate, I0 is the peak intensity at the center of the profile, and
w0 is the beam waist size, and j stands for either pump or probe. We also assume that thenonlinear broadening γ changes proportionally with the pump intensity, or:γ(ρ) = γ0 + a Ipump (ρ),(3.3)

where γ0 is the low-intensity FWHM of the 1s-resonance, and a is a constant chosen to match
experimental measurements. We integrate the probe intensity over the spatial distributionof gamma to find the average contribution to the measured broadening:
γ

meas

=

Z ∞ Z 2π00γ(ρ) Iprobe (ρ) ρ dρ dθ

Z ∞ Z 2π0Iprobe (ρ) ρ dρ dθ.

(3.4)

0

The result of this calculation for varying probe waist size is shown in Fig. 3.6. We plot
the fractional error in a measurement of the nonlinear broadening γ as the probe beam waist
increases as a fraction of the pump beam waist. From this estimate, we find that the waistof the probe beam may be up to 20% of the pump waist and still sample the homogeneouspart of the pump pulse to within a error of 2% in the measured nonlinearity.
In addition to these constraints, we also considered geometric constraints of the experiment including the distance a lens could realistically be before the cryostat windows and thefocusing power of lenses. We wrote a ray-tracing program [92] to visualize these constraints

55(γmeasured − γpeak value)/γpeak value

0

−0.05

−0.1

−0.15

−0.2

−0.25

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

spatial FWHM of probe as a fraction of FWHM of pump

Figure 3.6: Result of beam-sampling calculation. The error due to the probe sampling an inhomogeneous
portion of the pump spatial intensity is shown.

within the above framework. Considering all constraints, we chose the beam waists to be
100µm and 20µm for the pump and probe waists, respectively.
3.3.3

Estimation of excitation densities

The energy in an optical pulse along with the spatial profile determines the densityof electron-hole pairs generated in the QW. We estimate the excitation densities reported
above by considering the beam and sample parameters. These estimations apply to boththe pump and probe pulses. First, we calculate the photon density for a single pulse at thebeam focus. With a measurement of the beam power, we may use the formula
E = Nph hν = Nph

hc
,
λ

(3.5)

where E is the photon energy, Nph is the number of photons, and λ is the center wavelengthof the laser. A quasi-monochromatic approximation of the laser source is appropriate since∆λ3.5 nm≈ 800< 1%. Considering this formula along with the repetition rate of the laser, frep ,
λ
nm

56
and an average laser power Pavg , we calculate the number of photons in a pulse to be−1
Nph = Pavg frep

λ
.
hc

(3.6)

The beam is focused onto a spot size w0 . The beam out of the laser has a Gaussian
spatial intensity profile that may be expressed in radial coordinates:
22

I(ρ) = I0 e−ρ /2w0 ,(3.7)

where ρ is the radial coordinate, I0 is the average peak intensity at the center of the profile.
The average power Pavg is the integration of the intensity profile:
Pavg =Z ∞ Z 2π0I(ρ) ρ dρ dθ

0= 2π I0 w02 .

(3.8)

This result shows that the intensity at the center of the profile is
I=

Pavg
,
2πw02

(3.9)

which is equivalent to considering the power over in a circle with radius√

2w0 . This is avalid approximation for the pump density as sampled by the probe since the probe samples
the density near the center of the pump beam and wprobe ≪ wpump . Using Eqns. 3.6 and
3.9, we estimate the photon density nph [W/cm2 ] in a single pulse as:nph = Nph /2πw02−1= Pavg frep

λ 1.
hc 2πw02(3.10)The photon density is converted into an electron-hole carrier density in the QWs throughabsorption. It is important to note that the energy from the pulse is (a) subject to loss atinterfaces and the bulk, and (b) distributed over the 10 QWs. The reflection loss at thevacuum–sapphire and sapphire–GaAs interface is about 20%, calculated through Fresnel’sequations [93]. We measure a 28% loss due to absorption in the bulk material. We divide the57remaining photon density by 10 to account for the 10 QWs. Assuming that all remaining
photons are absorbed by the QWs, the electron-hole carrier density neh in each QW is
estimated as:
neh = nph × (1 − 0.20) × (1 − 0.28) ×1
10= 0.058nph .

(3.11)

This estimate does not take into account the spectral overlap between the pulse spectrum andthe exciton absorption probability spectrum. Taking into account the spectral overlap for thepump spectrum shown in Fig 3.4 yields an additional factor of 0.21, yielding neh = 0.012nph .
We use the above arguments to estimate the excitation density of electron-hole pairs forthe pump and probe pulses. The pump power is varied over a range of 1.6 to 40.5 mW, witha spot size of 100 µm. These parameters correspond to intensities of 5.1 kW/cm2 to 128.9
kW/cm2 , or estimated excitation densities of 1.6 × 109 − 8.3 × 1010 electron-holes/cm2 /layer.
The low-intensity probe beam has a power of 30.8 µW and a spot size of 20 µm, corresponding
to an intensity of 2.5 kW/cm2 , or a density of 7.9 × 108 electron-holes/cm2 /layer. The probe
thus samples the spatially homogeneous part of the pump-generated excitation. The probe
is also low enough in intensity to be in the linear regime. In this regime, changes in theprobe power (by up to about 50%) do not affect the absorption line shape.
A more careful estimate of the actual carrier densities would include taking into accountthe full dielectric structure of the sample. The theoretical microscopic calculation takes this
into account, as discussed in Chapter 4. We will use the above estimate of the pump electronhole densities to compare with the theoretically extracted excitation densities in Chapter
4. With the parameters in the experiment fixed, we now explain how the quantitative
measurements in the experiment are performed.

58
3.3.4

Quantitative measurement of the probe and pump absorption

We spectrally resolve the probe beam using a 1/4-meter monochromator with a 0.07 nm(140 µeV) resolution. The monochrometer scans through a range of wavelengths, and werecord the probe intensity at each wavelength. We also spectrally resolve the pump beamusing the same 1/4-meter monochrometer as for the probe.
probe
In order to calibrate the probe powers, we measure the input power (PIN), trans-mitted power (PTprobe ), and reflected power (PRprobe ) for the probe beam using a Coherent
Fieldmaster GS power meter. This sensor for this meter has a Silicon photosensitive material
which is responsive wavelengths in the near infrared.
For some of the transient-absorption experiments performed in this work, the pump
input power, and the transmitted and reflected powers from the sample are simultaneously
recorded in calibrated units to estimate the excited carrier densities. The schematic formeasuring these quantities is shown in Fig. 3.7, which is a zoomed-in version of Fig. 3.5,
where the probe is omitted for clarity.
pump
The input pump power PIN
is measured by a sampling window that reflects 1%of the light into a photodetector. The transmitted PTpump and reflected PRpump powers aremeasured on photodetectors after attenuation by neutral density filters that ensure that the
response of the detectors is in the linear regime. A measurement of the powers in absolute
units with a Coherent Fieldmaster GS power meter allows continuous measurement of thepump powers.
To accurately estimate the absorbed powers from the measurements, we must consider
reflection losses at interfaces inside the cryostat. We determine correction factors to accountfor these losses. The details of calculating these factors are explained in Appendix B.1.
After consideration of reflection losses, we determine the total estimated powers Pλest,probe ,where λ =R,T, and IN. From these estimated powers, it is possible to calibrate the probeabsorption spectra.

59

Figure 3.7: Setup for simultaneous measurement of the pump powers on photodetectors (PDs); BS, 1%
beam sampler.

We use a novel lock-in detection technique to calibrate the transmitted and reflectedprobe spectra in both the presence and absence of the pump light. The pump and probe
beams are both chopped by an optical chopper at frequencies around 2 kHz so that a lock-in
amplifier can be used for phase-sensitive detection. This technique is described in detail in
Appendix A. A calibration procedure described in Appendix B.2 allows the probe spectra
to be converted into absolute units such thatZ

Pλprobe (ω) dω = Pλest,probe ,(3.12)

From our careful measurement of the infer that the bulk material produces a backgroundabsorption of 28 % that is essentially constant since the bulk continuum spectral feature
has little variation over the relevant energy range. The fractional absorption by the bulk
material is independent of excitation density because the densities necessary for achieving
nonlinearities requires even higher photon densities than for the QW. Thus, removing the

60bulk absorption from the measured absorption for pump or probe beams determines the QW
absorption by αQW (ω) ≡ α(ω) − 0.28 for this sample. This means that the pump or probeabsorbed by the QW can be calculated by:est
PαQW = [α − 0.28] PINPTest PRestestest− 0.28PIN.
= 1 − est − est PIN
PIN
PIN(3.13)

Measurement of the calibrated pump powers along with Eqn. 3.13 allow an estimateof the power absorbed by the QWs. We can use this estimate to set either the input power
est(PIN) or the power absorbed by the QWs (PαQW ).

Because of the careful calibration, the low-intensity probe always yields the same T
and R spectra as the white-light source measurement, as shown in Fig. 3.4. In this figure
the absorption from the bulk material is subtracted from the total probe absorption.
Combining the measurements of the pump powers with the calibrations discussed inAppendix B.1 allow accurate estimates of the number of photons absorbed by the QWs. The
arguments in §3.3.3 then help to infer the excited carrier densities in the QWs. Knowledgeof the carrier densities allows comparison of the QW response for different excitation pulse
shapes that inject the same number of carriers into the QWs, as we will explore in Chapter
8.
3.4

Extraction of line shape parameters
After probe absorption data is collected, an extraction of relevant parameters provides

observables for comparing the response due to different excitation conditions.
For the parameter extraction, we use a model-independent fit. Model functions suchas a Lorentzian and Gaussian successfully fit the data for low intensities, but fail close tosaturation, where comparison is often the most important. We extract the peak height of
the absorption, the center resonance position, and the full-width at half maximum (FWHM)
of the line shape.

61
1

Absorption α

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550
Energy [meV]Figure 3.8: Model-independent fit procedure. The black triangle is the first guess of the resonance peak.
The parabola fit (cyan line) results in a maximum (black diamond) that yields the peak height and center
resonance position. The two baselines (blue lines) at high and low energy are used to estimate the halfwidths (blue and red diamonds) on either side of the resonance. Note that the low-energy baseline is used
to estimate the bulk absorption (αBulk = 0.28).

The parameters are extracted from the HH 1s-resonance absorption curve by fitting aparabola near the center of the peak of the line shape. The fit procedure is illustrated inFig. 3.8. The peak position of the absorption is first approximated by simply finding the
maximum absorption value measured. Since the resolution of the spectrum recorded limits
the accuracy of this peak point, the four nearest points on either side of this position on theabsorption curve (nine points total) are fit with a parabola function. The center energy ofthe parabola approximates of the center of the resonance, and the maximum of the parabolaapproximates the peak absorption height.
Additionally, we extract the FWHM of the line shape. The FWHM is found by fitting
a line to a group of four points on each side of the maximum around a guessed location at
the half-way point between the peak height and the baseline on each side. The value atthe center of this line approximates the half-width position on each side of the resonance.
The FWHM is the sum of the half-widths. The FWHM-extraction is challenging in practice62
because the nonlinear line shape has asymmetric baselines on either side, as illustrated in Fig.
3.8. In the extreme case of saturation, the high-energy side baseline is not distinguishable
from the peak of the resonance. The extracted FWHM thus does not consistently provide
a meaningful measure of the nonlinear width. Thus, we primarily use the peak height andcenter position from the model-independent fits as indicators of the nonlinear effects.
The model-independent fits are useful for understanding the trends in the data. The
microscopic theory extracts parameters through a model that contains the sample structureand detailed physics. However, the theoretical fits are computationally intensive; thus,themodel-independent procedure can provide real-time feedback about the nonlinearities.
3.5

Cross-correlation measurement of the pump
We record an intensity cross-correlation between the pump and probe by replacing thesample with a Beta-Barium Borate (b-BaB2 O4 , or BBO) crystal and recording the secondharmonic generation (SHG) signal generated from the interaction between the two beams.
The geometry for a cross-correlation measurement is shown in Fig. 2.8 for the ~kSHG = ~k1 + ~k2
direction. A spectral filter with a bandwidth around the doubled frequency (λSHG = λ0 /2 =400 nm) is placed between the BBO crystal and a photodetector to filter out any scattered
light at λ0 since the frequency-doubled signal is very weak. The delay τ between the pumpand probe pulses is varied over a range greater than the pulse duration. The frequencydoubled signal measured in this background-free direction is detected on a photodetector,
and electronically filtered using lock-in detection. The measured cross-correlation trace is
proportional to the convolution of the pump and probe intensities:
S(τ ) ∝

Z ∞−∞ε2probe (t − τ ) ε2pump (t) dt,(3.14)

where εprobe (pump) is the envelope of the electric field for the probe (pump) beam. Assumingthat the two beams have a Gaussian line shape, the width of the cross-correlation function

63
S(τ ) is the addition of the pulse durations in quadrature, or
 2
1/2
2
∆τS = ∆τprobe+ ∆τpump.

(3.15)In the case where the pump and probe have the same electric field, the trace is called an
autocorrelation and ∆τS = 1.414∆τpulse .
The pump pulse temporal duration is longer than the probe duration since the pump
spectrum is narrowed compared to the probe spectrum (Fig. 3.4). A cross-correlation ofpump with the probe yields a measured width ∆τS =520 fs. Using Eqn. 3.15 along with ameasured probe width of τprobe = 287 fs, we find that the pump pulse is 51% longer in time
duration than the probe pulse. In the pulse shaping experiments described in Chapter 8,
where the pump pulses are stretched out in time, the pump pulse temporal intensity profile
is characterized by the cross-correlation trace since ∆τpump ≫ ∆τprobe . In these experiments,
the probe intensity ε2probe (t) is essentially a δ-function.
3.6

Conclusion
The experimental setup, calibrations, and considerations described in this chapter pave

the way for experiments that mark new levels of quantitative measurement. These measurements, when combined with a microscopic theory, unveil the interactions that give rise to
the nonlinear effects observed. Additionally, this experimental setup, with the pulse shaper
active in the pump arm, opens an area of exploration where we are able to manipulate
the spectral phase of our pulses in order to gain deeper insight concerning the many-bodydynamics.

Chapter 4
Coulomb-induced nonlinearities in semiconductor quantum wells

4.1

Introduction
In this chapter, we report quantitative spectrally resolved transient probe absorption in

a GaAs multiple quantum-well structure for a variety of excitation conditions. Comparisonof the novel measurements with a microscopic theory allows for an unprecedented level ofanalysis and insight concerning the many-body interactions of excitons and carriers in thequantum wells. We draw conclusions about the sources of the nonlinearities, the effects ofspin selection, as well as the observed transfer of energy between the pump and probe in thecoherent regime. Unexpectedly, we find that true exciton populations do not significantly
contribute to spectral broadening because the resonance blue shifts we observe are dominatedby excited carrier densities. Characterization of the origins of the blue shifts and otherobserved nonlinear responses pave the way for the pulse shaping experiments, which we
present in later chapters.
4.2

Theory development
To analyze the experimental observations and extract physical meaning from our data,

we collaborate with Mack Kira, Hanno Steiner, Martin Schaefer, and Stephan Koch, atthe Department of Physics and Material Sciences Center, Philipps-University Marburg, in
Marburg, Germany. These researchers use a fully microscopic theory [7] to describe Coulombscattering contributions to excitonic nonlinearities. The theory uses the refractive-index

65
profile fixed from the white-light measurements described in §3.1. The theory includes up
to two-particle scattering in a systematic cluster-expansion approach [94]. By fixing allparameters in the microscopic theory except the overall carrier density (n), the fraction of
the carriers that are bound exciton pairs (x), and the polarization (P ), we are able to map
the density and temperature at the location of excitation with 10% accuracy.
While in principle the quantities n, x, and P could be computed by the theory that
includes all the dynamics, high computational costs made it necessary to leave these threequantities as free parameters. Exciton formation dynamics are well understood in theory.
Thus it is not necessary to include the full physics in the fitting procedure, and a single(n, x, P ) combination uniquely fits a given spectrum.
To generate a theoretical optical response from the sample, Kira et al. evaluate thedynamics of the microscopic probe-generated polarization δpk at the crystal momentum kusing the semiconductor Bloch equation [95]:i~∂δpk = ǫk δpk − (1 − fke − fkh ) δΩk (t) + Γk∂tX
δfkλ′ + (δfke + δfkh ) Ωk ,
−Pk

(4.1)

λ,k′

e(h)

which contains the pump-generated electron (hole) distribution fk, the polarization Pk , theCoulomb-renormalized energy ǫk , and the renormalized Rabi energies, Ωk (t) ≡ d Epump (t) +PPk′ Vk′ −k Pk′ and δΩk (t) ≡ d Epro (t) +k′ Vk′ −k δpk′ . The interactions involve the dipole-matrix element d, the electric field Epump (t) [Epro (t)] for the pump [probe], and the Coulombmatrix element Vk .
The probe δpk couples to two-particle Coulomb correlations Γk that produce screening of the Coulomb interaction, higher-order energy renormalizations, and Boltzmann-type
scattering of δpk from various quasi particles and transition amplitudes [7]. When the pump
Pk is still present, the carrier densities are changed linearly by δfkλ whose dynamics~∂ λδf = 2Im [δΩ⋆k Pk + Ω⋆k δpk ] + rk
∂t k

(4.2)

66
also change the probe response. The term rk provides relaxation of the carrier distributions
toward equilibrium.
Use of Eqns. 4.1 and 4.2 allow construction of the linear optical response of the probe.
P
k (ω)
after
This response follows directly from the linear QW susceptibility χ(ω) ≡ S1 k Eδppro(ω)

we Fourier transform Epro and δp with the normalization area S. The true QW absorption isthen evaluated via a transfer-matrix computation that has both χ(ω) and the full dielectric
structure of the sample as inputs. This procedure includes all the Coulomb-induced nonlinearities (discussed in chapter 2) for a given pump-generated many-body configuration. Thee(h)mean-field quantities, i.e., fk

and Pk , represent the simplest part of the excitation con-figuration, while bound excitons and biexciton amplitudes determine pair-wise correlations.
The microscopic influence of these quantities on χ(ω) is systematically evaluated with thecluster-expansion approach [7]. We find that the QW absorption, αQW , is extremely sensie(h)tive to the pump-induced fk, Pk , and exciton populations that compose the many-bodyconfiguration.
In Eqn. 4.1, the phase-space filling factor (1 − fke − fkh ) actually has spin dependence
according to the selection rules introduced in Chapter 2. Specifically, the phase-space fillingeh(1 − fk,s− fk,s) defines the amount of carriers a resonant optical pulse is able to excite.
e(h)Here fk,s is the electron (hole) occupation with momentum k and spin s, where s =↑ or ↓for electrons, and s = {−3/2, −1/2, 1/2, 3/2} for holes. As a reminder of selection rules forthese states for the heavy hole (HH) 1s-exciton resonance, σ + -polarized light excites alongs = −3/2 → s =↓, and σ − -polarized light excites along s = +3/2 → s =↑. Linearlypolarized light excites the HH exciton transitions with equal probability.
In the past, the actual pump-generated many-body configuration has only been computed for one-dimensional quantum wires [96, 7] because of the overwhelming numericalcomplexity involved. For our present studies, we significantly extend our numerical analysise(h)and solve Eqns. (4.1)–(4.2) for the two-dimensional QW system for any combination of fke(h)Pk , and exciton populations. We use fk,

in the form of a Fermi-Dirac distribution with

67
e(h)

a given temperature at a total density of n = S1 fk. We also allow Pk to be a mixture of

1s and 10 higher s-like exciton states. Because of the resonant excitation conditions of theexperiment, a fraction x of excited carriers is allowed to form 1s exciton populations. We
perform the calculations for a large number of physically reasonable parameter combinations.
For any given configuration, we can evaluate a normalized deviation between the computed and measured QW absorptions:ǫ≡Rdω |αth (ω) − αQW (ω)|
R.
dω |αQW (ω)|(4.3)

The computed excitation configurations are then searched via a multidimensional optimization to minimize ǫ, yielding a unique maximum-likelihood excitation configuration. We also
determine a confidence interval for the found configurations, yielding < 5% variation in ǫ.
4.3

Results and discussion
By combining quantitative experimental measurements with the microscopic theory,

we acquire a deeper understanding of the many-body physics of QWs. The theory finds very
close match to the measured absorption spectra. Figure 4.1 presents αQW , the measured
probe absorption (shaded areas), for three different pump powers using (a) co-circular (CC)and (b) co-linear (CL) polarization configurations (described in Chapter 3) for the pumpand probe. In both cases, the αQW recorded for the lowest pump excitation power behaveslinearly. We see that the linear absorption contains a clear 1s resonance yielding αQW = 57 %with a half width at half maximum (HWHM) of γ1s = 0.75 meV. Roughly half of this width
results from radiative decay in the nontrivial dielectric structure, which is corroborated by
the high absorption levels [7]. When the pump excitation power is increased, αQW experiences nonlinear changes. The 1s resonance is broadened and becomes strongly asymmetric,
similarly to prior observations [3, 14, 15]. We also see that the CC and CL configurations
yield very different nonlinearities. Under CC conditions, we obtain an almost 2 meV blue
shift of the 1s resonance while the CL configuration only exhibits a smaller, less than 1 meV,68
blue shift before saturation is reached. The nonlinear CL spectra are about 50% broader
than the CC spectra for the same excitation densities.

Figure 4.1: Probe QW absorption at large τ = 13 ps delay. (a) The measured CC-configuration αQW(shaded areas) are shown for pump-pulse photon densities np = 3.9, 16, and 27 × 1011 cm−2 and compared
to microscopically computed spectra (solid lines) for e-h densities neh = 0.14, 2.2, and 3.4 × 1010 cm−2 ,from top to bottom. The spectra are vertically offset by 15 %. The horizontal lines indicate the HWHM ofthe respective exciton resonances. (b) The corresponding CL comparison with 3.9, 27, and 48 × 1011 cm−2
pump-photon densities (shaded areas) and calculations for the densities 0.21, 4.4, and 5.0 × 1010 cm−2 (solidlines). (c) and (d): The deduced ML e-h densities (circles, left scale) and exciton fraction (squares, rightscale) as a function of photon density for CC and CL experiments, respectively. The arrows indicate thespectra presented in the left-side panel; the dashed vertical lines mark saturation.

The theory matching the data elucidates the microscopic interactions. Figure 4.1
shows the αth (solid lines) of the extracted ML configuration that reproduces the respective
experimental result (shaded areas). The insets give information about the actual ML e-hdensity neh (circles) and exciton fraction x (squares) as a function of the photon density,
along with error bars (shaded area for x) marking the confidence interval for each different
experiment separately. Since the pump-generated polarization has completely decayed forlong delay times (τ = 13 ps), we only need to find the fke , fkh , and x configurations thatmatch the experimental spectra by minimizing the deviation in Eqn. 4.3. The extremely good

69
quantitative agreement shown in Fig. 4.1 is found when the electron-hole density n first grows
linearly as a function of excitation power and then saturates (circles, insets). This saturation
is simply explained by the ionization of the 1s-exciton resonance for elevated densities, whichstrongly reduces the ability of the pump to generate more carriers. Saturation occurs close tothat ML configuration where the phase-space filling factor 1 − f0e − f0h becomes zero (dashedvertical line). The exciton fraction is initially high due to the almost 100% efficiency inpolarization-to-population conversion. Onset of ionization causes the exciton fraction to
rapidly decrease as a function of e-h density. For the cases studied, the best-fit electron andhole temperatures are 38 K and 11 K, respectively, producing fke ≈ fkh as expected if theelectrons and holes are bound in an exciton and in agreement with the theoretical prediction[7]. At low densities, based on a temperature-dependence experimental study, we estimate
the thermal contribution as less than 1% of the line width.
The pronounced differences between the CL and CC experiments are related to thefact that the CC case excites carriers only into one spin state, while under CL conditions,one populates both spin states. Since the Coulomb-scattering of δpk with the e-h plasmais spin sensitive, the CL and CC cases lead to different Coulomb-induced shifts of the 1s
resonance. The fact that the shifts persist to saturation, where no excitons exist, verifies
that the e-h plasma and not the exciton population is mostly responsible for the blue shift of
the 1s resonance. The enhanced broadening of the CL relative to the CC case is explainedby the fact that there are twice as many scattering partners for δpk in the CL case due tothe e-h occupations in both spin states.
The theory can also separate out two categories of decay processes in the QW system.
The internal QW dephasing rate γint consists of a superposition of broadening via Coulomb
and phonon scattering as well as disorder effects. Radiative decay results from a direct
coupling of polarization to light; in other words, a created polarization decays with at a rateΓrad as it emits an electric field. The rates γint and Γrad can be deduced from the experimental
absorption spectrum measured in absolute units. Figure 4.2 presents the actual γint (circles)

70

Figure 4.2: Internal decay rates γint (circles) and radiative-decay rates Γrad (squares) extracted from theexperimental measurements (squares and circles) along with theoretical predictions (lines). The excitation
saturates the probe response at intensity Isat .

and Γrad (squares) retrieved from the experiments compared to the microscopic theory (solidand dashed lines, respectively) using the formulae:
γint =

qγm 
1 − 1 − 2 αβm ,2Γrad =

qγm 
1 + 1 − 2 αβm ,
2

(4.4)

where αm is the measured peak absorption with respect to the bulk-absorption backgroundand γm is the measured half-width half-maximum of the 1s resonance. The constant β =1.15 extracted from the data determines how the radiative coupling is modified due to theradiative environment.
We find that the radiative environment combined with the coupling among 10 QWs
enhances the radiative decay to Γrad = 0.390 meV, eight times larger value than for asingle QW. We also see that Γrad is insensitive to the excitation level, which implies thatthe oscillator strength of the 1s resonance remains nearly constant up to its bleaching inagreement with Ref. [97]. At the same time, the low density γint is 0.4 meV. As a result,the internal dephasing of the studied system is comparable with radiative coupling at low
excitation levels. Thus, the QW is capable of absorbing and converting a major portion oflight into excited carriers. By increasing the pump intensity by a factor of 7, the carrier

71
excitation level increases so much that we find γint = 1.2 meV due to excitation induceddephasing.
We find that excitation produces excitation-induced dephasing that is 3 times the lowdensity γint . Thus, this system exhibits significant nonlinearities and it is a good candidate
to demonstrate how the nonlinear response can be altered through the quantum statistics ofthe pump pulse [98].
As a further test of our ML extraction procedure, we consider short pump-probe delay
conditions where coherent transients [99] and excitonic gain [5] have been observed previously.
Fig. 4.3 shows the measured αQW (dark area) and the extracted ML αth (solid line) just after
the excitation (τ = 3 ps) for (a) the CC and (b) the CL excitation. The short delay αQW
and αth not only agree but they are also distinctly different from the long delay αQW (lightshaded area). In particular, the CC case yields a 15% gain feature (negative absorption) justbelow the 1s resonance. As a main difference to the long delay investigations, the short-delay
ML configuration contains a significant portion of pump-generated Pk . Since the presenceof the induced QW polarization is needed to produce gain, the gain is transient and can be
attributed to coherent polarization transfer between pump and probe.
The transient gain delicately depends on the excitation conditions. It is not seen for
the CL case due to the above mentioned enhanced dephasing of δpk . For CC excitation,
we obtain the strongest transient gain for elevated e-h densities close to the 1s-saturation.
To obtain analytic insight on how δfkλ influences the coherent transients, we also solve
Eqns. (4.1)–(4.2) for the case where scattering is omitted. We find that δfkλ is proportional
−1showing that the coherent transients become increasingly strong nearto 1 − fke − fkh
the 1s-exciton saturation because the phase-space filling factor approaches zero. To verify

this, we plot in the inset to Fig. 4.3a the measured maximum values of αQW gain (opencircles) as a function of pump density. We clearly see that the transient gain reaches its
maximum value close to the 1s-ionization threshold (saturation), indicated by the verticaldashed line. The inset to Fig. 4.3b presents the energetic position of the measured CL

72(a) CC
a dip

0%

-10%

50%

0

20
np [1011 cm-2]

40

0

20
np [10 11 cm-2]

40

0%

50%

Epeak - E1s [meV]10-QW absorption

25%(b) CL

2

0

25%

0%
0

2

hw - E1s [meV]4

Figure 4.3: Probe QW absorption for the short τ = 3 ps delay. (a) CC conditions with pump photon
density np = 16 × 1011 cm−2 : the measured αQW (dark shaded), the computed αth (solid line), and the longtime delay αQW (light shaded). Inset: the measured (open circles) and computed (shaded area) absorption
dip (gain maximum) as a function of pump-photon density. The dashed vertical line marks saturation. (b)Same as (a), but for the CL configuration with the photon density 27 × 1011 cm−2 . Inset: the absorption
peak shift for CL (squares) and CC (circles) measurements compared with theory (lines).

(squares) and CC (circles) αQW , while the lines are from the ML calculations. We find thatthe pump-generated polarization also produces an additional blue shift for both CL and CC
excitations. In particular, the short delays produce blue shifts up to 2 meV (CL) and 4 meV(CC), which are roughly a factor of two larger than for those at long delays.
The ML analysis can also be used to quantitatively determine the role of excitons. The
inset to Fig. 4.4 shows the 5% ǫ confidence interval (shaded area) in carrier density and exciton fraction when the intermediate-intensity CL experiment of Fig. 4.1b is analyzed. The
overall difference between theory and experiment is minimized around a single (neh , x) con-

73
8n eh [1010-QW absorption

10

cm-2]

50%

4

0
0%

25%

50%

100%

1s-exciton fraction

0%
0

2

hw - E1s [meV]4

Figure 4.4: Influence of exciton populations on nonlinear αQW . The long-delay measured αQW (shadedarea) for np = 16 × 1011 cm−2 pump is compared with the ML result (solid line) as well as computations
having 0% (dashed line) and 100% (dotted line) excitons. Inset: The ML configuration (square) and the
5% confidence interval (shaded area) plotted in (neh , x) space. The 0% (open circle) and 100% (filled circle)
represent exciton configurations used for the dashed and dotted lines, respectively.

figuration (square). Fig. 4.4 shows the corresponding experimental αQW spectrum (shadedarea) together with the ML result (solid line) as well as cases where the exciton fraction is
reduced to x = 0% (dashed line) or raised to x = 100% (dotted line). Increasing the exciton
fraction leads to a reduction of the excitation-induced broadening and blue shifting of the
1s-resonance. These effects follow because the scattering of the probe induced δpk becomesless likely when electrons and holes are bound into charge-neutral excitons (x = 100%) thanwhen they remain as an ionized plasma (x = 0%). It is also interesting to see that formationof excitons (x = 100%) yields only a small energy renormalization that does not produce anadditional blue shift, in contrast to polarization studied in Fig. 4.3.
4.4

Conclusion
We have performed unprecedented quantitative measurements of spectrally resolved

probe absorption in a GaAs multiple QW sample under a variety of excitation conditions.
Detailed comparison between quantitative experiments and theory shows that the absorptive
nonlinearities in αQW depend so sensitively on the many-body configuration that we can

74
extract the maximum likelihood many-body excitation configuration with great confidence.
The analysis identifies the role of coherent polarization, exciton and electron-hole plasma
contributions. We find that carrier-polarization scattering dominates the nonlinear heavyhole 1s exciton line shape. The exciton populations are found to have little effect on the
nonlinear line shape compared with the effects of polarization and free carriers. In addition,
the theory matches spin-selective measurements, demonstrating the effects of phase-spacefilling. For the short-time co-circular pump-probe configuration, pronounced transient gain
is observed with a strength controlled by the pump.
4.5

Transition to the study of QW system response to light statistics
The work in this chapter demonstrates that the QW system has a strong nonlinear

response, and that the probe absorption is sensitive to the many-body configurations. Our
theorist collaborators, Mack Kira and Stephan Koch, predict that this system has strong
enough nonlinearities to display quantum statistics-dependent nonlinear effects. Their theory predicts that quantum-optical fluctuations of an excitation source can alter the opticalresponse. We explore their theory and our experimental work to realize their predictions in
the remaining chapters.

Chapter 5
Background on light statistics and predicted interaction with matter

This chapter introduces the quantum optics involved in the research discussed in theremainder of this thesis. Our theorist collaborators have predicted that the quantum statistics of a light field should influence the many-body interactions in a GaAs quantum wellstructure. In this chapter, we review the quantum mechanical properties of the light field,
and then use this to explain the predictions of our theorist team.
5.1

Coherence of a classical field
In this section we use classical fields to introduce the concept of coherence. A classicalelectromagnetic field in vacuum is a solution to the source-free and current-free Maxwell’swave equation [93]:∇2 E =1 ∂2E,
c2 ∂t2(5.1)

where c12 = µ0 ǫ0 . A vector quantity solution for a planar monochromatic wave may be
written as:
E(r, k, t) = Eei(k·r−ωt) n̂ + E ∗ e−i(k·r−ωt) n̂,(5.2)

where E is the complex field amplitude, k is the direction of propagation of the field and n̂
is the polarization vector, ω = c |k|. This representation of the field allows comparison with
the quantized field, discussed in §5.2.1. A field may be a sum over many wave vectors.

76
Coherence is a property of a wave that describes the correlation between its amplitudes.
In general terms, a physical process is typically defined as coherent if there exists a welldefined, deterministic phase — in other words, if the phase is not subject to random noise.
For a light wave, coherence describes the correlation between the amplitudes of a wave
separated in time or space. There are two types of coherence for a light wave: spatial andtemporal. We are concerned with temporal coherence, where we are interested in the phaserelationship between fields at the same place that are separated in time, as opposed to thephase relationship between fields at different locations across the beam profile.
5.1.1

First-order coherence

The degree to which a light wave is temporally coherent is quite complicated in general.
A first measure of the temporal coherence of a light source is the first-order coherence functiong (1) (τ ) defined by:g (1) (τ ) ≡hE ∗ (t)E(t − τ )i,hE ∗ (t)E(t)i(5.3)

where E is the complex field amplitude in Eqn. 5.2. The denominator is simply the intensityof the field I = h|E(t)|2 i. The symbol h· · · i means averaging over an ensemble. For a lightsource whose fluctuations are produced by ergodic random processes, the average over an
ensemble is equivalent to averaging over a long time interval T [100]:1hE (t)E(t − τ )i = lim
T →∞ T∗Z T /2−T /2

E ∗ (t)E(t − τ )dt.

(5.4)

The quantity g (1) (τ ) is called the first-order coherence function because it is based on theproperties of the first power of the electric field. This quantity might be measured byinterfering two beams using a Michelson interferometer to control the relative time delay τ
between two fields from the same light source, as shown in Fig. 5.1.
For a quasi-monochromatic field with a time-varying phase φ(t), the electric field is
E(t) = E0 e−iω0 t+iφ(t) .

(5.5)

77

Figure 5.1: A Michelson interferometer with adjustable relative delay τ between the optical path lengthsof the two beams, split by a beam splitter (BS). As the delay is scanned, the beams constructively anddestructively interfere on a photodetector (PD), producing ‘fringes.’ This measurement yields information
about the coherence properties of the light source.

Substitution of E(t) into Eqn. 5.3 yields the first-order coherence:g (1) (τ ) = e−iω0 τ ei[φ(t−τ )−φ(t)] .

(5.6)

From this we see that |g (1) (τ = 0)| = 1 for all fields. We observe that the real part ofthis expression yields an oscillatory function, or ‘fringes,’ with periodicity 2π/ω0 and unity
amplitude if the field has a constant phase φ = φ0 for all times. However, if the phase is atime-varying function, the phase relationship becomes weaker between the field at one timeand another, meaning that field amplitudes for two different times separated by τ correlate
less. A time-varying phase results in ei[φ(t−τ )−φ(t)] averaging to zero as the delay τ is increased
past the coherence time, leading to a decrease in the amplitude of the oscillatory function.
The coherence time must be finite for all light sources in practice because all fields have a
bandwidth broader than a δ-function.
The signal that is recorded on the photodetector (PD) in Fig. 5.1 for a single frequency
using a Michelson interferometer is:
IP D (τ ) = I0 (1 − cos(ω0 τ )),(5.7)

where I0 is proportional to the intensity of the light source. For a spectral density, I(ω), of

78
a given light source, the signal measured by the photodetector is the linear superposition of
the interference patterns in Eqn. 5.7 over all frequencies:
Z ∞I(ω)(1 − cos(ωτ ))dω.
IP D (τ ) =

(5.8)

0

While the first term is simply proportional to the total intensity of the light source, thesecond term may be identified as the cosine Fourier transform of the spectrum, which may
be reverse-transformed to reveal the power spectrum of the light source I(ω). In otherwords, the measurement of the coherence length of the light simply gives information thatis available by recording the power spectrum! In experiments, a measurement of the power
spectrum is routine with a spectrometer device.

Figure 5.2: (a) The signal IPD (τ ) read on a photodetector in a Michelson interferometer for varying delay
τ . The coherence time was chosen to be five times longer than the optical period. (b) The power spectrumof the light source is the Fourier transform of IPD (τ ). The inverse relationship between the widths of in thetime and frequency domains are depicted with arrows.

We illustrate the relationship between coherence time and bandwidth with a simple
example. The theoretical intensity measured by an interferometer for a quasi-monochromatic
beam (λ0 = 800 nm, or ~ω0 = 1.55 eV) while scanning the delay τ is illustrated in Fig. 5.2.
The measured signal is related to g (1) (τ ) by
IPD (τ ) = 1 − Re[g (1) (τ )].

(5.9)

In this example, the field has a bandwidth of ~∆ω= 0.15 eV. This bandwidth corresponds
to a coherence time τc = 1/∆ω= 28 fs, which is five times the optical period of 800 nm light.

79
For time delays beyond τc , the amplitude of the fringes decreases to zero, corresponding toa loss in first-order coherence between fields that are separated by more than the coherence
time. Thus, the broader the spectrum, the shorter the coherence time τc is measured.
Although the first-order coherence function is illustrative of the concept of coherence
measurement, it provides no more information than a measurement of the frequency spectrum of the light field. Since the first-order coherence does not yield new information about
the light source, we need a more sophisticated approach in quantifying the phase coherence.
5.1.2

Second-order coherence

The first-order coherence function says nothing about the statistical properties of thelight. That is, first-order coherence experiments are unable to distinguish between states oflight with identical spectral distributions but with different temporal intensity distributions.
The process for measuring the higher-order coherence of a light source originated withan astronomy experiment, the Hanbury-Brown and Twiss experiment [101]. Hanbury-Brown
and Twiss were interested in determining the spatial coherence of light emitted from a star.
The researchers realized that a star of finite spatial extent emits an angular pattern of brightand dark fringes that is related to the spatial coherence of the light emission from the star.
The visibility of these fringes as a function of angular spread between detectors then allowed
inference of the size of the star with high accuracy. They set up two detectors a variable
distance from each other, and measured the correlations in intensity fluctuations between
the detectors.
Extending this concept to the measurement of temporal coherence, a beam of light may
be split into two paths and intensity correlations on two separate photodetectors may bemonitored for varying time delay, as shown in Fig. 5.3. The second-order coherence functionof a light source is defined by:

PD

light
source80variabledelay tPD
correlator
Figure 5.3: A temporal coherence measurement based on the Hanbury-Brown and Twiss experiment. The
intensity of the light source is recorded on two separate photodetectors, and a variable delay (typically
digital) allows a computer to correlate the intensities at two times in the same light source, yielding thesecond-order coherence function.

hE ∗ (t)E ∗ (t − τ )E(t − τ )E(t)ihE ∗ (t)E(t)i hE ∗ (t − τ )E(t − τ )ihI(t)I(t − τ )i=hI(t)i hI(t − τ )i

g (2) (τ ) ≡(5.10)(5.11)

Because both terms in the denominator are integrated over a large time similar to Eqn. 5.4,
they are equivalent. For a light source with time-varying fluctuations around a constantintensity I(t) = hI(t)i + ∆I(t), g (2) (τ ) can be written as:
g (2) (τ ) = 1 +h∆I(t)∆I(t − τ )i,hI(t)i2(5.12)

where the second term is a measure of the correlation in intensity fluctuations between thelight source at two different times.
We gain insight about how g (2) (τ ) can distinguish between light sources with different
temporal intensity distributions by calculating its value for two extreme cases of intensity
distributions: chaotic and coherent light sources.
An idealized electric field for a chaotic light source can be imagined to be waves emitted
from a group of atoms, each at a frequency ω0 but with a different independent time-varying
phase φk (t). The total electric field is [102]:
E(t) = Ee−iω0 t

Xk

eiφk (t) ,(5.13)

81
where again, E is the complex field envelope. The chaotic light field has fluctuations in
intensity that are correlated for times within a coherence time τc . The correlations in theintensity fluctuations between two short times τ lead to a positive second term in 5.12,
limiting to g (2) (τ = 0) = 2. As τ is increased beyond τc , the intensity fluctuations become
uncorrelated, and g (2) (τ ≫ τc ) = 1. The second-order coherence function for Dopplerbroadened chaotic light is illustrated in Fig. 5.4, according to calculations in Ref. [102].
2

Chaotic
Coherent

1.8
1.6

g(2)(τ)

1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
−3

−2

−1

0

1

2

3

Time delay (τ/τc)

Figure 5.4: Second-order coherence for classical chaotic and coherent light sources.

In contrast, a coherent light source can be written as Eqn. 5.5 with a time-varying
deterministic phase. Inserting this definition into Eqn. 5.10, we see that g (2) (τ ) = 1.
Comparing this result with Eqn. 5.12, we find that h∆I(t)∆I(t − τ )i = 0, or that there areno correlations in the intensity fluctuations for coherent light. We plot g (2) (τ ) for coherent
light in Fig. 5.4 for comparison with g (2) (τ ) for chaotic light. We notice that the quantities
are indistinguishable for long time delays.
The function g (2) has a different interpretation than g (1) . Similar to the first-ordercoherence, for coherent light g (2) (τ ) = 1 for all τ . However, when there exist correlations between fluctuations at two nearby times, g (2) can be greater than 1. The intensity fluctuations
separated in time by more than τc no longer have correlations, leading to g (2) (τ ) = 1. The
second-order coherence function g (2) (τ ) can be seen to be a measure of how well intensity
fluctuations are correlated between different times.

82
The correlations in the fluctuations for chaotic light causing g (2) (τ ) > 1 are related toan effect called photon bunching, which will be discussed in the next section. The observationof bunching in photodetection events was a surprise to the researchers Hanbury-Brown andTwiss, and their discovery helped in opening the field of quantum optics through theirintensity correlation measurements [103, 104]. Their measurements contradicted classicaltheory and led scientists to consider in more detail the process of photon detection. We gain
more insight about the statistics of a light field if we treat the field quantum mechanically.
5.2

Statistics of the quantized electromagnetic field

5.2.1

Quantum-mechanical representation of the field

The quantum theory of light, including optical coherence, was developed originally by
Glauber [105]. In the theory, a photodetection event corresponds to the absorption of aphoton and the corresponding generation of an electron, which is measured via an electric
current. The classical field is transformed into a quantum mechanical representation:Ê(r, t) = Ê + (r, t) + Ê − (r, t) =

X
k

εk =

r

~ωk
,
2V ǫ0

[εk Uk (r)âk − εk U∗k (r)â†k ],(5.14)Uk (r) = eik·r−iωk t n̂,
where εk is the vacuum-field amplitude, ωk = c |k|, V is the quantization volume, Uk (r)is a plane wave with polarization direction n̂, and âk and â†k are the Bosonic annihilationand creation operators, respectively, and the sum is over all wave vectors. This formulation
determines the quantum-electrodynamical properties of the light field. The positive partand negative part of the field operator are Hermitian conjugates of each other, Ê + = (Ê − )† .
The field representation is analogous to Eqn. 5.2, where E0 → εk âk and E0∗ → εk â†k .
We consider only cases where the spatial variation of the field over the atomic system

83dimensions is negligible, or
λ1=≫ |ratom | .
2π|k|(5.15)In this case, e±ik·r ≈ 1 ± ik · r, and we can approximate the exponential function in Eqn.
5.14 as unity to obtain the dipole approximation representation of the field:
Ê(r, t) ≈ Ê(t) = iεk n̂[âe−iωk t − â† eiωk t ].

(5.16)

The annihilation and creation operation have the commutation property â, â† = 1. We

can use this representation of the electric field for calculations of the statistical properties oflight fields.
5.2.2

Density matrix

The density matrix is a tool for describing the statistical state of a system. For astatistical mixture of states |ψj i each having probability Pj of occurring,
ρ̂ =

X
j

Pj |ψj i hψj | .

(5.17)In a transformed basis, wavefunctions may be written as superposition states, of the form
Ψ = √12 (ψa + ψb ). This representation leads to a density matrix with off-diagonal elements|ψa i hψb |. The density matrix is written more generally as:
ρ̂ =

X
jk

Pjk |ψj i hψk | .

(5.18)

Calculation of the expectation value of an operator Â involves taking the trace overthe density matrix:
D E X
Â =
Pj hψj | Â |ψj i = [ρ̂Â].

(5.19)

j5.2.3

Coherence properties of light sources

Knowledge of the density matrix for a particular state of light allows calculation of thecoherence functions and other quantities. Following the example of Eqns. 5.3 and 5.10 to84
compute the coherence functions by replacing the electric fields with the operators of Eqn.
5.16, the first-order coherence function g (1) is given by:
hE − (t)E + (t − τ )ig (τ ) =hE − (t)E + (t)iâ† (t)â(t − τ )=hâ† (t)â(t)i
T r[ρ̂â† (t)â(t − τ )]=,T r[ρ̂â† (t)â(t)](1)(5.20)

where the trace is taken in the last line following Eqn. 5.19. The second-order coherencefunction g (2) is given by:
g (2) (τ ) ==hE − (t)E − (t − τ )E + (t)E + (t − τ )ihE − (t)E + (t)i2â† (t)â† (t − τ )â(t − τ )â(t)hâ† (t)â(t)i2
T r[ρ̂â† (t)â† (t − τ )â(t − τ )â(t)].
=T r[ρ̂â† (t)â(t)]2(5.21)

While we can now calculate the degree of coherence for many different light fields, we aremost concerned with the distinction in properties between coherent and thermal light states.
Other examples of states of the light field include squeezed, Fock, and Schrödinger cat states.
Although the coherence functions may be computed as a function of delay, for simplicity wecalculate the functions for τ = 0 for the purpose of comparing the properties of these two lightstates. For these two extreme cases, it turns out that the result is time-delay independent.
The coherent state is the quantum-mechanical description of the classical field in Eqn.
5.2, as we will discuss in §5.2.6. The coherent state is an eigenstate of the annihilation
operator [105]:â |αi = α |αi ,(5.22)

where the eigenvalue α is a complex number. The coherent state can be written as a superposition of Fock states:2|αi = e−|α| /2∞X
αn√ |ni .
n!
n=0

(5.23)

85
The density matrix for a coherent state can then be written in the number state basis:∞Xρ̂coherent = |αi hα| =Cml |mi hl|
m,l=0

=

∞
X

−|α|2

e

m,l=0
2



αm
√
m!



αl
√
l!



|mi hl| ,(5.24)

where |α| can be identified with the average photon number n̄. The coherent density matrix
ρ̂coherent satisfies T r[ρ̂2coherent ] = 1 and ρ̂2coherent = ρ̂coherent . These are the criteria for a pureensemble, meaning that there exists a basis for representation of ρ̂ for which all Pj = 0 in
Eqn. 5.17 except one [45]. That basis of representation for the coherent density matrix is
simply the basis of the coherent state, |αi.
Thermal light is electromagnetic radiation emitted by a hot body. The density matrix
for thermal light with some average number of photons n̄ is determined via Boltzmann’s law
to be a mixture of Fock states [49]:∞Xρ̂thermal =Pn |ni hn| =
n=0

n
∞ 
n̄
1 X
|ni hn| .
1 + n̄ n=0 1 + n̄

(5.25)The density matrices for the coherent and thermal state may be inserted into Eqns. 5.20

and 5.21 to learn how the properties of these states differ. Substitution of these expressions
into Eqns. 5.20 and 5.21 yields for a coherent and thermal source: 1
coherent(1)g (τ ) = 1
thermalg (2) (τ ) =



 1

 2

(5.26)

coherent
thermalIt is interesting to make a comparison with the classical analysis in §5.1. While the firstorder coherence function cannot distinguish different statistical states of light, the secondorder coherence shows a distinction between coherent and thermal light. Furthermore, thermal light can be identified as having similar intensity fluctuations as the phase-randomized
chaotic light in Eqn. 5.13 since they share the same value for g (2) (τ = 0).

86
5.2.4

Photon number distributions

As a further exploration of the properties of thermal and coherent light, we calculate thephoton number probability distribution and the variance in photon number for both states.
The distribution expresses the probability of measuring n photons in a time window T much
shorter than the coherence time τc , or T ≪ τc = 1/∆ω, where ∆ω is the bandwidth of thelight source. The photon number probability distribution Pn can be calculated by projecting
a density matrix into the number state (Fock) basis by calculating the expectation value ofthe projection operator |ni hn|:
Pnthermal = T r[ρ̂thermal |ni hn|]
= hn| Pn |ni =1
1 + n̄

(5.28)
n̄
1 + n̄

n(5.29)

Pncoherent = T r[ρ̂coherent |ni hn|](5.30)= hn| Cnn |ni = e−n̄(5.31)n̄n,n!

where n̄ = hni. The coherent photon probability distribution is also known as the Poisson
distribution, which limits to a Gaussian function in the limit of large n̄.
The photon probability distributions are compared in Fig. 5.5 for the same average
number of photons n̄ in a given time window T . While the coherent photon distribution
peaks near n̄, the thermal distribution is highest at n = 0. This fact implies that one islikely to measure the average number of photons n̄ in a time window for coherent light,
but is most likely to measure zero photons in the same time window for light with thermal
statistics. This property of thermal light is called ‘ photon bunching.’ This property refers
to the fact that a photons in a thermal light source tend to travel together, with large gapsof time in between where no photons are found.
Thermal and coherent light differ also in their fluctuations in photon number,∆n2 = (n̂ − hni)2 = n2 − hni2 .

(5.32)

87
0.14

ThermalCoherent

0.12

Probability

0.1

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Photon number nFigure 5.5: Comparison of photon number probability distributions for coherent and thermal light sources,
both with n̄ = 10.

For the coherent state, representation in the Fock basis allows simple calculation of thisquantity. We first calculate the expectation value of the number operator:hn̂i = â† â = |α|2 ,(5.33)

validating the previous assertion from Eqn. 5.24 that n̄ = |α|2 . The other term in Eqn. 5.32
can be calculated in a similar fashion:n̂2 = â† ââ† â = |α|2 + |α|4 .

(5.34)

Combining these results we find that the photon number variance h∆n2 i = n̄. The standard
deviation for the fluctuations of the photon number above and below the mean is given by√n̄. Dividing this by n̄ reveals that the fractional fluctuations decrease as we increase the√photon number for coherent light as 1/ n̄.
For thermal light, it is not possible to write the state as an eigenstate of any operator(and therefore as any superposition of pure states). Instead, we rely on the density matrix(Eqn. 5.25) to compute the variance.
hn̂i = T r[ρ̂thermal â† â] = n̄(5.35)n̂2= T r[ρ̂thermal â† ââ† â] = n̄ + 2n̄2(5.36)n̂2 − hn̂i2 = n̄ + n̄2(5.37)

∴ ∆n2

=

88
This result shows that the fractional fluctuations of the photon number about the meanpdoes not decrease since with increasing n̄ because h∆n2 i/n̄ → 1 in the limit of large n̄.

We should thus expect thermal light to have more fluctuations than coherent light for any
average photon number n̄. Though there exist other incoherent sources of light including
Fock states, the distinct contrast that thermal light has to coherent light leads us to use theterms ‘thermal statistics’ and ‘incoherent’ interchangeably in this thesis.
5.2.5

Singlet quantities

Another feature that distinguish the thermal to the coherent state is the expectation
values of the singlet quantities hai and a† . For the thermal state, the singlet quantities
hai = 0 and a† = 0, which can easily be seen by using the thermal density matrix (Eqn.
5.25) with Eqn. 5.19. In contrast the expectation values of the singlet quantities for thecoherent state are hai = α and a† = α∗ . The singlet quantities and the second ordercoherence function will be the quantities that distinguish our thermal source from a coherent
source in chapter 6.
5.2.6

Coherent state is the classical field

The coherent state is the quantum-mechanical state that reproduces the measurementsof the classical state described in §5.1. Since the coherent state is an eigenstate of the â, theraising and lowering operators can be replaced by complex amplitudes according to
a → α, a† → α∗ .

(5.38)The expectation value of the electric field has the formεhα| Ê(r, t) |αi = 2|α| √ sin(ωt − k · r),V(5.39)

which can be identified as the classical field Eqn. 5.2 for E0 = |α| √εV . In addition, thefluctuations in the field can be shown to be the same as those for a vacuum state [106]. The

89
fractional fluctuations in the field decrease as the photon number (∝ field intensity |E|2 )increases. The quantum theory of light is more fundamental than the classical theory, and it
follows that all states of light must have some quantum features (e.g., noise). Since coherent
light has a correspondence to the classical field and has the minimal field fluctuations, thecoherent state is the correct description for a classical field.
5.3

Phase-space representations of light fields
Phase-space offers useful visualization of the photon statistics of light fields. The

derivation of the quantized field (Eqn. 5.14) makes use of the canonical position-like andmomentum-like operators q̂ and p̂, whereq̂ = (â + â† )/2(5.40)p̂ = (â − â† )/2i.

(5.41)

These operators can be substituted into Eqn. 5.16 yielding the field operator in a new form:Ê(t) = εk n̂[q̂ cos(ωt) − p̂ sin(ωt)].

(5.42)

It is evident that q̂ and p̂ are associated with field amplitudes oscillating out of phase witheach other by 90◦ . These operators satisfy the commutation relationi[q̂, p̂] = ,2(5.43)

which implies an uncertainty relation between these variables [45]:∆q̂ 2∆p̂2 ≥

1.
16(5.44)

This relation leads to an uncertainty in the measured electric field amplitude and phase. A
convenient representation of the distribution of photons in a quantum state of light is inq̂-p̂ space, as shown in Fig. 5.6. This representation is similar to but more thorough thanthe photon number probability distribution since the photon number n = (q 2 + p2 )1/2 . The

90phase of the field for single measurement is given by θ = tan−1 (p/q). The spread of thesephases and amplitudes takes the form of a ‘fuzz-ball’ in phase space, with the center of theball around n̄ for the coherent state, and around zero for the thermal state, consistent with
Fig. 5.5. The q̂-p̂ allows an intuitive visualization of the statistics of amplitude and phase
for a given source of light.

Figure 5.6: Phase-space portraits in q̂-p̂ space. (a) The schematic for how amplitude n and phase θ ofa single measurement are plotted, resulting in a ‘fuzz-ball’ of uncertainty with widths ∆q and ∆p. The
distribution of measurements is shown for (b) a coherent state and (c) a thermal state.

We note that the thermal state distribution is centered in phase space at (q, p) =(0, 0). The zero expectation values hqi = hpi = 0 are a consequence of the vanishing singlet
quantities hai = a† = 0, as can be seen in Eqn. 5.40. The vanishing singlet operators help
us to visualize that the the photon number most likely to be measured is 0, even thoughhni = n. This picture is consistent with the discussion of photon number distributions in§5.2.4.
Furthermore, in the figure it can be seen that the thermal state does not have a welldefined phase. In other words, it is equally likely to measure a field with any θ.
In contrast, the center position for the coherent distribution is hni = n̄ = |α|2 . We
identified |α|2 earlier as the average photon number for the coherent state. Thus, these phasespace representation provides a helpful means of visualizing the quantum state of light. Also,
the phase is well-defined for a coherent state within some spread. Note also that the statesin Fig. 5.6 are exaggerated for the purposes of illustration. In reality, a coherent state with

91
large photon number n̄ has a comparatively small fuzzball with large displacement from theorigin.
The difference in quantum statistics between coherent and thermal light sources canbe described mathematically and measured experimentally. The theory of Kira and Koch
predicts that the quantum statistics of exciting light sources may have an effect on the
many-body interactions in semiconductor quantum wells.
5.4

Theoretical predictions concerning many-body interactions excited bylight having incoherent statistics
The Kira-Koch theory predicts that light statistics can influence the many-body dy-

namics in GaAs quantum wells at high excitation densities [98, 7, 94, 107]. The explorationof the effects of light statistics on matter is called quantum-optical spectroscopy [94]. We
consider the chosen system, GaAs quantum wells, then we summarize the theoretical predictions.
5.4.1

Why excitons in GaAs quantum wells?

We are interested in observing quantum optical effects in a semiconductor system.
Quantum optics can be observed in systems that demonstrate a nonlinear response to anelectric field. We study excitons in a GaAs quantum-well (QW) system in an effort to realize
the predictions of the Kira-Koch theory.
The theory focuses on this system for the study of nonlinear effects because of several
properties of the system. First, the system demonstrates clear nonlinear responses to opticalexcitation, as discovered in §4.3. This is because the wave functions of electrons in a semiconductor are delocalized throughout the crystal since they are eigenfunctions of momentum,
as compared with the localized wave functions of atoms. The delocalization means thatthe wavefunctions for multiple electrons overlap, which leads to strong collective effects andmany-body interactions compared with the few-body interactions in atoms. The observable92
nonlinear responses, including excitation-induced dephasing and excitation-induced shifting,are discussed in §2.10.1 and in our recent publication [108].
The material GaAs is a direct-gap material, which means that it is possible to induce
optical interband transitions of electrons from the maximum of the valence band to theminimum of the conduction band without any change in crystal momentum, as discussed
in Chapter 2. A direct-gap material thus allows direct coupling between the light-field andelectronic transitions, including excitons.
Excitons, delocalized bosons in the GaAs lattice, are the spectral feature we use tomonitor the nonlinearities in the QW system. Excitons in QWs have a large oscillator
strength and a lifetime of around 100 ps (which is long compared to optical pulse durations).
The Kira-Koch theory predicts that true incoherent optical excitation can create a quantum
degenerate state of low-momentum exciton states, analogous to Bose-Einstein condensation.
This prediction takes advantage of the fact that excitons have center-of-mass coordinate
momentum eigenfunctions. A QW also suppresses polariton effects, which can complicate
the interpretation of observed dynamics [50].
Quantum-optical effects have been observed in atomic systems. Successful observation of Rabi oscillations [20], collapse and revival of atomic inversion [21], and single-atom
nonlinearities [22] demonstrate quantum-optics for cavity-atom systems. Although these experiments typically involve few photons, the cavity enhances the interaction with a small
number of atoms so that nonlinear effects are observed. We search for quantum-opticaleffects in a more complicated system where there are many (> 1010 ) states. To observe
nonlinearities, we must excite the system with an intense light source. We explore Kiraand Koch’s predictions concerning the dependence on quantum statistics for intense opticalexcitation of GaAs QWs in the next sections.

93
5.4.2

Semiconductor Bloch equations

When a QW system is optically excited, the light field creates a macroscopic polarization in the system. Maxwell’s equation describes the coupling of the classical electromagnetic
field to the material’s response [98]:∂2n2 ∂ 22∇ − 2 2 E = µ0 2 P,c ∂t∂t

(5.45)

where E is the electromagnetic field, µ0 is the magnetic susceptibility, n is the nonresonant
index of refraction of the material, and P is the macroscopic resonant polarization responseof the material.
The polarization P is the sum of all transition amplitudes between the eigenstatesof the system. In crystalline materials, this sum may be expressed in the Bloch basis,PP =k dcv Pk + c.c., where Pk is the polarization amplitude (interband coherence), dcv

is the optical interband dipole matrix element between the conduction and valence bands,
and k is the crystal momentum of the charge carriers. By including all optically induced
interband transitions and the Coulomb interaction between carriers, the semiconductor Blochequations (SBEs) can be derived. These equations couple the polarization amplitude Pk to
the occupation probabilities fka for the electron (a = e) and hole (a = h) states. The SBEs
are [44]:∂∂
Pk = −i(ǫek (t) + ǫhk (t))Pk − i(fke (t) + fkh (t) − 1)ΩR
Pk |scatt
k +
∂t
∂t
∂ e
∂ e
∗
fk = −2Im(ΩR
f |scatt
k Pk ) +
∂t
∂t k
∂ h
∂ h
∗
fk = −2Im(ΩR
f |scatt .
k Pk ) +∂t∂t kHere ΩRk = dcv E(t) +(5.46)

P

k6=k′ V|k−k′ | Pk′ (t) is the renormalized Rabi energy, which includes

the fact that the system does not react to the applied field alone but the effective field
which is a combination of the applied field with the dipole field of all generated electronP
hole excitations. The renormalized energies are ǫak (t) = Eka − k6=k′ V|k−k′ | fk′ (t), where Eka

94
are the electron and hole energies given by the band structure of the unexcited material.
Renormalization of the band structure and fields is done in the Hartree-Fock approximation,in which the nonlinear equations treat each particle as if it is subjected to the mean fieldcreated by all other particles.
The equations also consider interactions beyond the Hartree-Fock approximation, in
which multiple particles interact with each other. The final term represents all the correlations due to scattering, which include exciton formation, dephasing of the polarization,screening of the interaction potential, relaxation of the carrier distributions, and scattering
events between carriers.
These equations provide the basis for most of the community’s understanding of the
optical properties of semiconductors [44]. The next few sections explore the predictions of
the SBEs for coherent and incoherent excitation of semiconductor QWs.
5.4.3

Coherent on-resonance excitation

Figure 5.7: Quantum wire (1D) calculation of on-resonance excitation dynamics. (a) A short pulse gener2
ates a carrier density and polarization |P | . (b) The polarization decays, generating an exciton population.
Most of the excitons are created in the ground 1s state. Figure from [7].

The absorption, transmission, and reflection of a resonant classical electromagnetic field
by a material are completely determined by the complex-valued optical polarization of thematerial. The polarization, a coherent quantity, cannot be described by a thermodynamic

95
distribution function, where the temperature and chemical potential determine the occupation probabilities of the allowed states. An optical pulse generates a macroscopic polarizationin the material as well as promotes electrons from the valence band to the conduction band,as we saw in §2.6. After the generation of a polarization by an optical pulse, microscopic
scattering interactions between the polarization and the generated carriers lead to the decayof the polarization resulting the formation of the 1s exciton population, as illustrated inFig. 5.7a. Pure exciton populations, created indirectly via the decay of polarization, areconsidered incoherent quantities since they are not subject to phase-destroying processes.
5.4.4

Radiative recombination of carriers and excitons

Figure 5.8: (a) Computed 1s exciton and (b) free carrier distributions in center-of-mass k-space for threetimes after coherent resonant excitation. The absence of excitons in the low-momentum states is due toradiative recombination. Figure from [7].

For on-resonance excitation, the polarization scatters via Coulomb interactions andphonons, which results in exciton populations. The excitons that are within the light cone
(low momentum states – described in §2.4) may recombine, radiating a photon. These“bright” states depopulate by spontaneous emission of photons, leaving behind highermomentum “dark” states that are unable to couple with the light field (and thus cannot
produce light through radiative recombination – hence the terms “bright” and “dark”). The
system dynamics illustrated in Fig. 5.8a show that the bright states deplete rapidly via ra-96
diatively recombination while the higher-momentum dark exciton states exhibit a slow decay.
These excitons eventually decay to bright states via inelastic collisions, where they are thenavailable to recombine radiatively. At any moment after resonant classical excitation, lessthan 5% of the excitons are found in the low-momentum states because of the fast radiative
recombination rates for excitons. Excitons recombine rapidly because the wave functions forthe electron and hole are spatially nearby.
In contrast, free electrons and holes, shown in Fig. 5.8b, are less likely to recombine
because their wave functions are spread throughout the crystal. Additionally, an electronwith arbitrary momentum can recombine with a hole with similar momentum, leading to athermal distribution in momentum-space. Radiative recombination leads to slow (nanosecond) changes in their populations. This difference in the radiative recombination between
excitons and free carriers highlights that excitons have non-thermal distributions.
5.4.5

Impact of quantum light statistics on matter

The Kira-Koch theory predicts that quantum-statistically incoherent (thermal photon
statistics) excitation can result in direct conversion of photons into a low-momentum exciton
population without the production of a polarization [94, 107]. To motivate this theory, we
discuss the relation between incoherent excitation and spontaneous emission.
For a classical excitation, the resulting polarization converts into an exciton population
via scattering. The motivation for the research described in this thesis arose from considering
the possibility of bypassing the polarization to directly convert photons into excitons, whichis the inverse process of spontaneous emission. Spontaneous emission from recombination of
excitons results in the emission of light with incoherent light statistics, i.e. g (2) > 1.
While a classical electromagnetic field must generate a polarization that decays into an
incoherent population, Kira and Koch hypothesize that the absorption of light with incoherent quantum statistics directly creates incoherent exciton populations without generating apolarization. This can be understood intuitively by realizing that the photons emitted from97
spontaneous emission lack temporal phase coherence. It follows that photons lack phasecoherence might generate exciton states that oscillate out of phase with one another, i.e.,
have no macroscopic polarization. The creation of a large number of excitons in the brightstates (within the light cone) would be considered a quantum-degenerate distribution. It
is predicted that such a highly singular state would modify the many-body interactions for
similar densities as a classically-excited system.
5.4.6

Quantum-optical spectroscopy

Quantum-optical spectroscopy is the exploration of the nonlinear response of a systemgiven different quantum statistics of the excitation source [94, 107]. We have explored the
many-body dynamics of a system under resonant classical excitation: a coherent polarizationis generated which is converted into an exciton population that is broadly-distributed in
momentum space with the low-momentum exciton states rapidly decaying due to radiative
recombination.
Kira and Koch predict that the quantum-statistical properties of exciton states aregoverned by that of the exciting light source, leading to nontrivial modifications in the
nonlinearities compared with a classical coherent source of the same photon density. Theirtheory predicts that for an incoherent (thermal) light source creating the same excitation
density as a coherent source, the many-body effects are modified.
The essential effects predicted for incoherent excitation are long-range order, anomalous
reduction of Coulomb and phonon scattering, and enhanced and directional photoluminescence (PL) emission, all compared with coherent excitation of the same density.
The qualitative differences between the predicted response of the QW excitons generated by coherent versus thermal statistics are illustrated in Fig. 5.9. This calculation was
performed for a 1D quantum wire (due to computation costs), which scales to two dimensions
without loss in generality. We focus here on the optically active excitons, or bright excitons(within the light cone). In Fig. 5.9a, for a coherent excitation, the bright exciton population

98

Figure 5.9: Comparison of excitation dynamics resulting from a pulse with coherent vs. incoherent statistics. (a) Coherent excitation; the optical excitation pulse (dashed line, scaled) is shown with the generated
polarization (shaded area, scaled) and the bright 1s exciton population (solid line). (b) Incoherent excitation;
the incoherent optical pulse (dashed line, scaled) is shown with the generated density of bright 1s exciton
populations (solid line). Note the dramatically different scale for the density compared with the coherent
excitation, and that no polarization is generated. (c) The generated exciton population in momentum spacefor coherent excitation (solid line, multiplied by 5) and incoherent excitation (shaded area) 11 ps after opticalpulse maximum. Figure from [7].

rises with the decay of the generated polarization. In contrast, an excitation with thermal
light statistics gives rise to a large (almost 50 times the density) bright exciton population
without generating any polarization, as seen in Fig. 5.9b. Lastly, the figure compares the 1s
exciton distributions after excitation with a thermal and coherent source. For the thermal
excitation, a degenerate population of bright exciton states is created. This is in contrast
to the absence of bright exciton states with a broad momentum distribution generated by acoherent excitation.
While the theoretical details may be found in [7], the QW response to thermal excitation is calculated through the SBEs (Eqns. 5.46) and by taking into account the incoherent

99
nature of thermal statistics.
The SBEs predict that for an incoherent light source, the polarization is suppressed.
We learned in chapter 4 that polarization-carrier scattering is the main cause of shifting
and broadening of the nonlinear 1s exciton lineshape. It follows from the SBEs that a
suppressed polarization results in a decrease in the nonlinear broadening, as illustrated inFig. 5.10. The half-width at half maximum (HWHM) broadening n this figure is read asa modification to the linear linewidth. The coherent excitation predicted is in agreementwith the data presented in chapter 4. The thermal excitation in the nonlinear regime is anexperimental goal that we discuss in next chapters.

Figure 5.10: Theoretical prediction of the excitation-induced dephasing (EID) half-width at half maximum(HWHM) in addition to the linear 1s resonance width (≈ 0.75 meV) for coherent vs. thermal excitation.
Thermal excitation is predicted to suppress scattering compared with coherent excitation for similar carrier
excitation levels. Suppressed scattering leads to lower dephasing rates.

5.4.7

Jaynes-Cummings model

The theory of quantum-optical spectroscopy describes the coupling of a light fieldwith the material response in a QW. The SBEs involve summing over many wave vectors
k and including correlations between single- and double-particle quantities [7]. To gain
insight about the physics of excitation with thermal light statistics, we perform a simplified

100
calculation using a Jaynes–Cummings model which does not include k-dependence or manybody correlations. However, the key result of the Kira-Koch theory is qualitatively predicted,
namely that a thermal excitation source produces a population without polarization. The
predicted effects including the suppression of scattering and long-range ordering in the fullmicroscopic calculation can be attributed to the anomalous reduction in the polarization.
In this model, we consider two-level system interacting with a single quantized modeof the radiation field. Analogous to an atom, the ground and excited states of the two-levelsystem describe the exciton quasiparticle and its absence. Ground state means no exciton;
excited state means we have an exciton in the 1s state.
We begin by defining the Hamiltonian describing a two-level system interacting witha light field:
Ĥ = ĤA + ĤF + ĤI=1~ω0 σ̂3 + ~ωâ† â − g(âσ̂+ + â† σ̂− ).
2(5.47)

The first term ĤA is the energy of the atomic state, the second term ĤF is the energy inthe field, and the third term ĤI represents the interaction between atom and photon forthis 2-level system. The operator σ̂3 is the energy operator on the atomic state, σ̂+ and σ̂−are the transition operators acting on the atomic state, and â and â† as annihilation andcreation operators of the photon. The transition operators σ̂+ and σ̂− have a representationin the basis of the atomic states {|gi , |ei}:(5.48)



(5.49)

 0 1 σ̂+ = |ei hg| = ,0 0
 0 0 σ̂− = |gi he| = ,1 0

and have the action σ̂+ |gi = |ei and σ̂− |ei = |gi. The inversion operator σ̂3 can be similarly

101
written in the atomic state basis as: −1 0 σ̂3 = |ei he| − |gi hg| = .
0 1(5.50)

This operator assigns an energy to a given atomic state. In this calculation, zero energy ischosen to be halfway between the ground and excited states, such that HA |gi = − 12 ~ω0 and
HA |ei = + 21 ~ω0 .
The atomic state operators can be identified as Pauli matrices obeying the commutation
properties:[σ̂+ , σ̂− ] = σ̂3[σ̂3 , σ̂+ ] = 2σ̂+[σ̂3 , σ̂− ] = −2σ̂− .

(5.51)

The field operators operate on the Fock state |ni:â |ni =â† |ni =√√n |n − 1i ,n + 1 |n + 1i ,(5.52)= 1,[â, â] = â† , â† = 0.

(5.53)and have the commutation properties:â, â†The interaction term ĤI acts in the atom–field basis {|e, ni , |g, n + 1i}. Here the firstbasis state is an atom in the excited state, with n photons in the field; the second state is anatom in the ground state, with n + 1 photons in the field. We choose this basis is because
HI couples the two states together.
We time evolve the Hamiltonian in the Heisenberg picture to find the time evolutionof the atomic operators:
i~

h
i
d
Â = Â, Ĥ .
dt

(5.54)

102
Using the evolution equation with Eqn. 5.47 yieldsdσ̂− = −~ω0 σ̂− + gσ̂3 âdt
di~ σ̂+ = ~ω0 σ̂+ − gσ̂3 â.
dti~(5.55)The time dynamics of the exciton states can be calculated through the density matrix
for the atomic states, which is the same as Eqn. 2.22:X ρgg ρge ρ̂Atom =|ji hk| = .
ρeg ρeej,k=e,g(5.56)In the semiconductor language, ρee corresponds to a pure population of excitons, whereas
ρgg is the nonexistence of excitons. The off-diagonal elements ρge and ρeg correspond to theexcitonic polarization (through Eqn. 2.33).
We wish to find the time dependence of ρee and ρeg in response to different quantizedradiation fields. In other words, we would like to know the time evolution of the density
matrix of the atomic states.
The density matrix at time zero (t = 0) can be written as a product of the field density
matrix ρ̂F and atomic density matrix ρ̂A because they are uncoupled:ρ̂(0) = ρ̂F (0) ⊗ ρ̂A (0)(5.57)The dynamics of this density matrix for t > 0 is governed by the interaction part of the
Hamiltonian ĤI in Eqn. (5.47). The terms ĤA and ĤF only contribute to an overall global
phase, which does not affect the physics.
The evolution of the system is given by [45]:
i
ih
∂ ρ̂
= − ĤI , ρ̂ ,∂t~

(5.58)

ρ̂(t) = ÛI (t)ρ̂(0)ÛI† (t),(5.59)

which has the solution

103
where the time evolution operator (with the interaction Hamiltonian) isÛI (t) = e−iĤI t/~.

(5.60)The matrix representation of the time evolution operator in the {|e, ni , |g, n + 1i} basis is′ C(t) S (t) ÛI (t) = (5.61)
′S(t) C (t)whereĈ(t) =

cos(g

′

√

ââ† t)′√†t)
= −iâ† sin(g√ââââ†√′′Ĉ (t) = cos(g â† ât)

Ŝ(t)

′

Ŝ (t) =
g

′

=

′√

(5.62)†−iâ sin(g√â†ââ ât)g/~

The C and S functions are operators with t as a parameter.
Assuming that we begin in the atomic ground state (i.e. no excitons), ρ̂A (0) = |gi hg|,
the time evolution of the total density matrix (using Eqns. (5.61), (5.62), and (5.59)) is:


′
′
′
F
F
 −Ŝ (t)ρ̂ (0)Ŝ(t) Ŝ (t)ρ̂ (0)Ĉ (t) ρ̂(t) = (5.63).
′′′F
F−Ĉ (t)ρ̂ (0)Ŝ(t) Ĉ (t)ρ̂ (0)Ĉ (t)We perform a partial trace over the field states to obtain the reduced density operator of
the atom:ρ̂Ajk (t) =∞X
n=0hj, n| ρ̂(t) |k, ni ,(5.64)

where the summation is over the field states and j, k = e, g. Now we are in a good position
to see how different photon statistics affects the off-diagonal element ρeg and the diagonal
element ρee of the density matrix.

We evaluate the result for thermal photon statistics first, because it is mathematically simpler. The density matrix for thermal light is diagonal in the Fock basis and can be expressed
as:

104
∞
X

n
∞ 
1 X
n̄
ρ̂thermal =Pn |ni hn| =|ni hn| .
1 + n̄ n=0 1 + n̄
n=0(5.65)

We may find the time evolution of the atomic density matrix components by using
Eqns. (5.64) and (5.62)-(5.63). The matrix elements evaluate to

ρee =
=
ρgg =

′
′
∞
X
sin(g mt) sin(g (n + 1)t)

n,m=0
∞
X

ρge

n+1

′

sin2 (g nt)(n + 1)Pn
2
n
n=0
∞
X

n,m=0

=

m

he, n| âPm |mi hm| â† |e, ni∞
X(5.66)′′

cos(g mt) he, n| âPm |mi hm| cos(g mt) |g, ni′

Pn cos2 (g nt)

n=0
∞
X

(5.67)′sin(g (n + 1)t) †â |e, ni=hg, n| cos(g mt)Pm |mi hm| (−i)
n+1
n,m=0
∞
X

′

′

sin(g (n + 1)t)=δm,n+1cos(g mt)Pm δm,n (−i)
n+1
n,m=0

ρeg

′

= 0
′
∞
X
sin(g mt)′âPm |mi hm| cos(g nt) |g, ni=
he, n| (−i)
mn,m=0(5.68)= 0(5.69)∞
X′

sin(g mt)′=Pm δn+1,m cos(g nt)δn,m
(−i)
m
n,m=0

This analysis reveals that excitation of a two-level system using quantum statistics
generates population the polarization elements ρeg = ρge = 0, consistent with the predictions
from the SBEs. The population exhibits nontrivial flopping behavior where the populationis periodically inverted. For certain thermal photon distributions, the system population
may undergo collapse and revivals [109].

105
In contrast, the density matrix for a coherent state is m  l 
∞
∞
X
X
α
α
|α|2
√
√ |mi hl| .
ρ̂coherent =Cml |mi hl| =
e
m
l
m,l=0
m,l=0

(5.70)

Evaluation of the time-evolution of the density matrix in a similar fashion yields that the polarization matrix elements ρeg and ρge as well as the population matrix elements ρee and ρgg
are non-zero in general (not particularly illuminating, but nonzero). This means that coherent light generates population and polarization for a two-level system. This result matches
qualitatively the theoretical predictions of §5.4.6 because the polarization is suppressed forthermal excitation.
5.5

Summary: thermal vs. coherent light statistics
We saw in chapter 4 that polarization-carrier scattering dominates the homogeneous

linewidth in excitation-induced dephasing. A true thermal source would generate a population of excitons with a vanishing polarization. This excitation would result in the suppressionof the scattering, leading to a narrower excitonic linewidth compared with a coherent excitation of the same density.
Summarizing the requirements for a thermal source, we require that the thermal
source have vanishing singlet quantities hâi = â†= 0 and g (2) = hn̂2 i / hn̂i2 = 2. Incomparison, a coherent source has nonvanishing singlet quantities hâi = â†= α, andg (2) = hn̂2 i / hn̂i2 = 1. For both coherent and thermal statistics, we have a nonvanishing
photon number expectation value hni = â† â . These are the criteria we use to distinguishthermal from coherent photon statistics.
As we will see in the next chapter, the source we choose to study the QW response to athermal excitation is not actually a thermal source but an ensemble of coherent pulses. The
ensemble of these pulses, however, mimics thermal statistics when an averaging technique isimplemented. Thus, we expect that the analysis of this chapter has qualitative predictive
power for the ensemble-averaging techniques described in the next chapter.

Chapter 6
Toward a thermal source

The previous chapter explained the theoretical prediction that, given a sufficiently
intense quantum-statistically incoherent light source, the many-body effects in a quantumwell (QW) system should be modified compared with a coherent source of the same photon
density. The demonstration of incoherent light statistics affecting the system response is a
first step in the experimental realization of quantum-optical spectroscopy [94]. We identifiedin §2.10.2 that the density necessary for saturating the QW system (Mott density) is around1011 photons/cm2 . To generate these densities in our GaAs 10-QW sample, the photon
energy of the source should have a photon density of at least 1012 photons/cm2 within the
exciton absorption linewidth of approximately 1 meV at a photon energy of 1.55 eV (800nm), corresponding to the 1s exciton energy, E1s . In addition, this photon density must
exist within the time window of the exciton lifetime, T1 = 100 ps. In practice, the photon
density must be about two orders of magnitude higher – approximately 1014 photons/cm2
because of reflection losses at dielectric interfaces.
In an effort to achieve a source that satisfies these parameters, we explored different
possibilities and ultimately arrived at a pulse-shaping technique as a way to mimic incoherent
photon statistics. We discuss some early efforts to achieve a light source with incoherent
quantum statistics. Once we rule these options out because of their low optical intensities,
we explain the spectral-phase randomization of femtosecond pulses as a means for exploring
the quantum-optical response of our system.

107
6.1

Early efforts for a thermal light source
Since the goal for performing quantum-optical spectroscopy entails generating a sourcewith thermal statistics, we first considered sources of light that are commercially available.
Namely, we considered constant-intensity sources: incandescent bulbs, light-emitting diodes(LEDs), and a below-threshold diode laser. We also designed a cavity-dumping experimentto produce pulses of incoherent light. However, all of the attempts described in this section
do not produce enough intensity to induce a strong nonlinear response in the QW system.
6.1.1

Incandescent bulbs

An incandescent light bulb is a simple device with thermal quantum statistics. The
bulb, like the sun, emits blackbody radiation depending on temperature. Planck’s law for
the frequency dependence of the radiation intensity of a black body object at temperature
T is: [110]I(ν, T ) =

1
2hν 3
,
2
hν/k
T −1
B
c e

(6.1)

where kB is Boltzmann’s constant, c is the speed of light, and h is Planck’s constant. The
intensity is in units of power per unit area of emitting surface, per unit solid angle, perunit frequency. We convert the units from Eqn. 6.1 to find the relationship between photon
density per second within a 1 meV bandwidth and photon energy. This relationship is plottedin Fig. 6.1 for three radiating temperatures, assuming that the entire emitting surface canbe imaged onto a two-dimensional spot. The intensity at a given wavelength increases withthe temperature. Thus it is desirable to have a very hot source to maximize the intensity
output at E1s = 1.55 eV. The light source could be spectrally narrowed by use of interference
filters to achieve the desirable spectrum.
The brightness (or radiance) theorem in geometrical optics states that the intensity ofan image formed by any passive optical system cannot exceed that of the light-emitting object[110]. Thus, the photon densities plotted from the Planck equation 6.1 are upper bounds

Photon density [photons/(second cm2 meV)]

108

11

2

x 10

T=5000 K
T=4000 K
T=3000 K

1.5

1

0.5

0
0

0.5

1
1.5
2
Photon energy [eV]2.5

3Figure 6.1: Photon densities per second within a 1 meV bandwidth for blackbody radiation at a few
temperatures. The intensity at 1.55 eV increases with blackbody temperature.

for the photon density that may be achieved by focusing a thermal blackbody source. Even
though there are ≈ 1011 photons arriving in a second from a blackbody source, the photon
density within a time window of the lifetime of excitons (T1 = 100 ps) is much smaller thanthe density required for creating nonlinearities in the QW system. The maximum photon
density in a 1 meV bandwidth emitted from a hot blackbody such as a halogen bulb (100W, 5000 K) within 100 ps is <10 photons/cm2 , more than 10 orders of magnitude below
the required photon density for generating many-body configurations in GaAs QWs. To
achieve photon densities of 1012 photons/cm2 in a 1 meV bandwidth about E1s =1.55 eVand within a 100 ps time window would require temperatures of over 1015 K! Even imaging
our sun (T = 5800 K) would not produce photon densities higher than an incandescent bulb
because of the limits on focusing indicated by the brightness theorem. As a reality check, we
calculate the photon density from the sun. With a luminosity of 4×1026 W and a diameterof 1×109 m, the sun’s intensity of 5×1012 W/cm2 corresponds to less than 1000 photons/cm2
within a 100 ps time window.
Light from a thermal source is unfeasible for quantum-optical spectroscopy. Thermal
events generated from electron-positron or hadron colliders (100 GeV of thermal energy

109
corresponds to 1015 K) may produce the intense thermal light necessary for generating manybody configurations in GaAs QWs. However, since imaging and filtering light from a collider
is experimentally unfeasible, we consider other potential sources of bright incoherent light.
6.1.2

Light-emitting diodes

Since no realistically attainable true thermal blackbody radiation source exists forgenerating many-body configurations, we considered light-emitting diodes (LEDs). LEDs
are p–n diodes that when forward biased cause electron hole recombination that emits light(spontaneous emission) corresponding to the band gap energy of the semiconductor [23].
The radiated light lacks temporal coherence since the recombination events are independent
processes. An LED can emit at a narrower bandwidth than a blackbody source, leading tobrighter emission within a small frequency window. These advantages make the LED a goodcandidate for generating many-body configurations in GaAs quantum wells.
We perform a calculation to determine the feasibility of LEDs for quantum-optical
spectroscopy. The highest intensity LEDs available on the market are superluminescentLEDs. These devices can emit up to 500 mW from an area of 0.001 cm2 (typically 1000µm× 100 µm). This corresponds to a near-field intensity of 500 W/cm2 . Appealing to thebrightness theorem again, we find that it is not possible to generate a photon density ofmore than 2 × 1011 photons/cm2 within the time window of the exciton lifetime, T1 = 100
ps. However, this calculation does not consider that the bandwidth of LEDs is typically
20-100 meV. Since the light needs to be within a 1 meV bandwidth, the relevant photon
density is at least an order of magnitude lower. Additionally, superluminescent LEDs may
also be partially coherent, which could complicate the experiment. While LEDs remain apotential option for the future, the best-available LEDs now on the market are not powerfulenough to generate the required densities to observe nonlinear effects. We also consider asimilar device for our studies, a laser diode.

110
6.1.3

Below-threshold diode laser

A laser diode, like the LED, uses a forward biased p − n junction to inject electrons
and holes to generate light [23]. However, the laser structure has a reflective optical cavity
that guides emitted photons back into the junction to induce stimulated emission. In thecase that there are enough electrons and holes injected at the junction, the optical feedback
will induce enough stimulated emission to cause lasing, i.e., condensation of photons into a
coherent state [92]. However, for lower electrical currents into the diode, the optical feedback
has the effect of amplifying the spontaneous emission without lasing. The light emitted froma laser cavity before the onset of lasing is incoherent, which we desire for our experiments.

0

Current (mA):
58

Light intensity [dB] -- with offsets

-10

57
56

-20

55
54

-30

53

-40

-50

-60

-70

1500

1505

1510

1515

1520

1525

1530

1535

Energy [meV]Figure 6.2: Diode laser output spectra for a range of carrier-injection currents. The peaks in the spectra
are evidence of lasing above a current threshold of 55 mA.

We use a wavelength-tunable Toptica DL100 Diode Laser System. While designed tolase with a power of up to 220 mW with a bandwidth of ∆E = 2 meV around 1.5 eV, we coatthe output coupler with an anti-reflection layer that suppresses lasing. We vary the carrierinjection current up to the threshold of lasing and measure the light emitted from the cavity.
The amplified spontaneous emission has a characteristic of a broader bandwidth, and the111
onset of lasing is marked by a pronounced peak in the optical spectrum. The results of themeasurements are shown in Fig. 6.2 at around 1.515 eV for a proof-of-principle experiment.
The feedback grating in the laser makes the center wavelength in principle tunable to the
HH 1s-resonance at E1s = 1.55 eV. The laser diode outputs 3.3 mW power within a 6.6 meV
bandwidth for a current of 55 mA that amplifies the spontaneous emission light without
lasing. The area of emission from the diode is 75 µm × 100 µm. Using the brightness
theorem, these facts means that the maximal intensity of 440 kW/cm2 corresponds to a
photon density of 1.8 ×1010 photons/cm2 within the time window of the exciton lifetime
T1 = 100 ps. Filtering the bandwidth to 1 meV to match E1s also makes the photon density
smaller by about a factor of 2. This density, while quite high, proves to be inadequate forgenerating many-body configurations in GaAs QWs. Again, this technique also may havepartial coherence, similar to LEDs. We next consider the related system of another laser
cavity below lasing threshold.
6.1.4

Cavity dumping

Realizing that no incoherent light sources are available with sufficient intensity to
produce many-body effects in our GaAs QW sample, we attempt to dynamically amplify
spontaneous emission in a Ti:sapphire laser cavity.
We follow a technique for generating pulses from a laser cavity called cavity dumping[111, 112]. While cavity dumping was originally designed to output high intensity pulses oflaser light, the same geometry can be used to output amplified spontaneous emission (ASE).
A laser operates by amplifying spontaneous emission on successive round trips of lightin a cavity until a critical density of photons is achieved that marks the onset of lasing, when
the gain in the cavity exceeds or equals the losses [92]. Before lasing, the ASE is incoherent[113, 114], and matches the photon statistics of the thermal source discussed in 5. With
the onset of lasing, the source transitions into coherent photon statistics. We attempted to
extract the photons from a pumped cavity just before the onset of lasing to achieve a high112
intensity source with incoherent photon statistics.
Our experiment involves inserting an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) into a cavity
that was aligned for lasing and another AOM in the path of the beam that optically pumps
the gain medium, as shown in Fig. 6.3. The AOMs were both Isomet 1205C, each witha switching time of 12 ns. The gain medium is ti:sapphire, which lases near the relevant
photon energy for the 1s heavy-hole exciton resonance of 1.55 eV. The cavity focuses the
spontaneously emitted light from the gain crystal back into the gain crystal from both sides.
The cavity length of 1.97 m corresponds to a repetition rate of frep = 76 MHz, or a roundtrip
time of 13 ns. Thus, the switching time of the AOMs is as fast as the roundtrip time in thecavity, meaning that it is possible to manipulate the light on the time scale of an arbitrary
number of round trips.

Figure 6.3: Schematic of setup used for cavity-dump experiment. OC, output coupler; AOM, acousto-optic
modulators; Xtal, the Ti:sapphire gain crystal. A 5 watt Verdi laser pumps the gain crystal. The dumped
light is collected with a fiber.

The AOMs are synchronized by means of a Stanford Research Systems digital delay
generator (DG645) [?]. The “pump and dump” schematic is illustrated in Fig. 6.4. In thisprocedure, the pump AOM is turned on at a time t1 , allowing the 2.33 eV (532 nm) pumplaser to excite the gain medium. The excited gain medium initiates the process building
up photons in the cavity as spontaneously emitted photons make round trips in the opticalcavity. Before the onset of lasing, the intracavity AOM is turned on. This “dumps” the113
incoherent photons out of the cavity. The resulting light is collected with a fiber to be
spectrally resolved on an optical spectrum analyzer. The optical power is measured with apower meter.
We find that for a build up time t2 − t1 = 590 ns, we were able to recover a spectrumwith no evidence of lasing. This corresponds to 45 round trips in the cavity, and a total
average power per pulse of 120 mW. The broad ASE spectrum in Fig. 6.5 at t2 indicatesthat the lasing has not yet started. The spectrum just after t3 shows the dramatic change
in the output spectrum after the onset of lasing.

Figure 6.4: “Pump and dump” technique. The pump AOM switches on at t1 to allow cavity build up.
The intracavity AOM switches on at t2 before the onset of lasing (at t3 ) to dump the incoherent photons
out of the laser cavity.

The cavity-dumping strategy does not generate a high enough intensity of incoherent
photons. We found that the 120 mW of average power in the ASE pulse contained 2.1% of
its power in the 1 meV bandwidth of the 1s exciton that we wish to pump, meaning that theexciton is pumped with 2.5 mW average power. Since the pulse width is determined by theround-trip time in the cavity, the incoherent pulse duration is approximately 12 ns. Thus,
approximately 1% of the photons arrive within the exciton lifetime T1 = 100 ps. Appealing to114

Intensity from laser cavity (arb. u.)

1
ASE
Lasing
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1500

1520

1540
1560
Photon energy

1580

1600

Figure 6.5: The dumped spectra at t = t2 (blue), and for t > t3 (red), corresponding to ASE and lasing,respectively.

the imaging theorem described earlier [110], and assuming a spot size on the gain crystal of 20µm, we expect a maximum photon density of 5×1010 photons/cm2 in a single pulse, which isseveral orders of magnitude below the density required (≈ 1014 photons/cm2 ) for generating
many-body configurations in our GaAs QW system. The cavity-dumping technique could
be slightly improved (an order of magnitude) by shortening the cavity length to generate
shorter incoherent pulses, but still would not be capable of saturating the QW system.
We explored several approaches theoretically and experimentally for generating a sourceof intense incoherent radiation at the E1s energy. We stress that the numbers calculated inthis section are all for the ideal conditions, i.e., optimal efficiencies and focusing of the source.
The photon densities calculated are at least four orders of magnitude lower than would benecessary to saturate the QW system. Since the options for true incoherent light sources
are not intense enough for performing quantum-optical spectroscopy, we explore a novel
technique using coherent femtosecond pulses to explore the response of the QW system to115
incoherent excitation.
6.2

Phase modulation of ultrashort pulses for incoherent light generation
After exploring a variety of strategies for producing high-intensity incoherent light in anarrow bandwidth, we developed with our theorist team a strategy that uses pulse-shaping
techniques with coherent optical pulses in order to explore the effects of quantum statistics
on the many-body state in GaAs QWs. The technique involves randomizing the spectralphase of a mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser spectrum in order to mimic the incoherent statisticsof thermal light. Although the theory by which we motivate the use of phase-randomized
pulses has philosophical issues concerning the interpretation of quantum mechanics, we havechosen to follow through with the experiments in order to test the theory.
6.2.1

Density-matrix ensemble averaging

In quantum mechanics, a single detection event produces only one outcome following aprobability distribution related to a specific quantity [115]. While quantum theory provides
a description of the probability distribution of repeated measurements, it cannot predict
the outcome of a single measurement with certainty. Nonetheless, one can experimentally
construct the probability distribution by repeating a measurement multiple times if the initialconditions are identical between measurements. The possibility to construct this distribution
is a consequence of Born’s rule [116].
Born’s rule allows measurement of the expectation value of an observable q is possible
through repeated measurements via
hqi =

Z

N

1 X measqj ,N →∞ Nj=1

qP (q)dq = lim(6.2)

where N is the total number of measurements, qjmeas is the outcome of a single measurement,
and P (q) is the probability distribution function. By categorizing many measurements in a

116
histogram, it is possible to reconstruct the probability distribution function P (q) by
P (q) = lim

∆q→0



1 Nq
lim
N →∞ N ∆q



,

(6.3)

where ∆q is the histogram bin interval, and Nq is the number of counts for corresponding
to an observable q.
The theorists Kira and Koch found that Born’s rule can be applied to the interactionof matter using a scheme known as density-matrix ensemble (DME) averaging. The conceptof DME averaging explores the possibility of experimentally measuring a probability distribution function by changing the initial conditions in a controlled manner. The intention
is to introduce a well-defined ensemble of classical excitation pulses that allow explorationof a system’s response to quantum statistics of light other than classical. The initial conditions are varied by changing the spectral phase of each pulse from a mode-locked laser
and measuring the many-body state in the QW system. We define the ensemble-averaged
quantityNens
1 X
hqienshhqii = limr ,Nens →∞ Nens
r=1

(6.4)

where Nens is the size of the ensemble and hqiens
refers to the quantity detected by manyrmeasurements of the single rth realization. The ensemble-averaged expectation value isdistinguished from the standard definition via hh· · · ii. An ensemble-averaged probability
distribution may be determined:hhP (q)ii =

Nens
1 X
Prens (q),Nens →∞ Nens
r=1

lim

(6.5)

where the single-realization distributions Prens (q) are defined in Eqn. 6.3. In analogy tothe ensemble-averaged probability distribution, an ensemble-averaged density matrix can beconstructed that determines the outcomes measurements from a system generated by an
excitation with quantum statistics other than coherent light:ρeff = hhρii =

Nens
1 X
ρens
r ,
Nens →∞ Nens
r=1

lim

(6.6)

117
where ρensis the density matrix of the rth realization. Thus, if a suitable combination ofr
realizations is chosen such that their density matrices average to an effective density matrix
ρeff that describes different quantum statistics, then the measurements acquired from theensemble of realizations allows reconstruction of the system response to the statistics of ρeff .
According to the theory, probes of the system dynamics may be averaged as in Eqn.
6.4 to reveal the system response under excitation conditions different from coherent light. If
absorption spectra are measured from a sample for each realization, the average absorption
spectrum hhSavg (ω)ii can be found by:Nens
1 X
Sj (ω),
hhSavg (ω)ii = lim
Nens →∞ Nens
j=1

(6.7)

where Sj (ω) is the absorption spectrum measured from the j th realization.
To realize the Kira-Koch theory, we are specifically interested in choosing a combinationof pulses with coherent photon statistics that average to an effective density matrix that
corresponds to thermal photon statistics. We consider phase-randomized pulses to achieve
this averaging.
6.2.2

Ensemble averaging for phase-randomized fields

The proposed scheme that we have followed involves randomizing the spectral phaseof successive mode-locked pulses from a Ti:sapphire laser. The details of the experimental
implementation of this is explained in the next chapter. This section justifies how thisstrategy produces an ensemble of pulses that average to thermal statistics in the limit of alarge number of realizations.
The concept of phase randomization is illustrated in Fig. 6.6. The light from thepulse of a mode-locked laser travels through a device called a pulse shaper that is able
to manipulate the spectral phase of the pulse. The phase function ∆φ(ω) is divided into
discrete spectral bins of size ∆ωbin . The value at each bin varies randomly in the interval
0 < ∆φ(ω) < 2π.

1

5

0.5

0

1542

1544

1546
1548
Energy [meV]1550

imposed phase [radians]

Intensity spectrum [arb. u.]

118

0

Figure 6.6: A spectrum from a mode-locked ti:sapphire laser with a random spectral phase function with
spectral bin sizes of ∆ωbin = 200 µeV. There are Nbins = 30 spectral bins across this spectrum.

The electric field of a single pulse realization in the frequency domain can then be
written in the form [115]:
E(ω) =Nbins
X

Ej0 ei∆φj ,

(6.8)

j=1

where Ej0 is the amplitude of the electric field in the absence of any phase modulation at thej th bin, eiφj is the random phase at the j th bin, and Nbins is the total number of bins acrossthe full-width at half maximum of the spectrum.
We can calculate the quantum statistics of the phase-randomized light fields using
DME averaging by transforming the field operators in Eqn. 5.16 according to Eqn. 6.8:
â =

N
bins
X

ei∆φj [r] α̂j

j=1

â† =

N
bins
X

e−i∆φj [r] α̂j† ,

(6.9)

j=1

where α̂j and α̂j† are the field operators associated with the j th spectral bin, r refers toa particular realization, and Nbins is the number of bins across the spectrum. The field

119
operator α̂j (α̂j† ) can be replaced by the complex-valued αj (αj∗ ) whenever it appears within
an expectation value since the light in each spectral bin corresponds to a coherent state. In
other words, the operator α̂j behaves like Eqn. 5.22 for each spectral bin:α̂j |αj i = αj |αj i .

(6.10)

From the definition of these operators, we obtain the following ensemble-averaging
rules:
i∆φj

e

Nens
1 X
ei∆φj [r] = 0,
= lim
Nens →∞ Nens
r=1

ei[∆φj [1]+∆φj [2]+···+∆φj [J]](6.11)= 0.

(6.12)

These both hold because each realization is completely random with respect to all of theothers. Both quantities approach zero in the limit of large Nens .
As a test of the quantum statistics of the ensemble average, we first compute the singlet
quantity using the ensemble-averaging procedure defined in Eqn. 6.4:
Nens
X
1 X
hhâii = lim
hâi =
Nens →∞ Nens
r=1
j

Similarly

â†

ei∆φj

αj = 0.

(6.13)= 0 for this ensemble average.

A calculation of the photon number (the numerator of the first-order coherence function, Eqn. 5.3) for the randomized ensemble yieldsâ† â

=X

ei[∆φk −∆φj ]αj∗ αk .

(6.14)

j,k

Since ∆φk and ∆φj are random with respect to each other for j 6= k, only the j = k term
contributes to Eqn. 6.14. Consequently,
†

â â

=

N
bins
X
j=1

αj∗ αj =Xj|αj |2 ,(6.15)

which is both nonvanishing and a real quantity. Assuming that each spectral bin has thesame amplitude αj = α (but each spectral bin has a different phase), we find thatâ† â

= Nbins |α|2 ,(6.16)

120
To determine the statistics of ρeff , we calculate the second-order coherence functiong (2) according to Eqn. 5.21 but in frequency space (essentially, the t’s and τ ’s are dropped).
We have already evaluated the denominator of g (2) in Eqn. 6.16. The numerator of g (2) canbe evaluated using the ensemble-averaging procedure as:
**
!++
N
2
bins Nbins Nbins N
bins
X
X
X
X
X
(s)
(s)
[â† ]2 â2 = |α|4exp i[∆φj − ∆φk ],(6.17)

s=1

j (1) =1 k(1) =1 j (2) =1 k(2) =1

where the index s = 1, 2 refers to the j (s) and k (s) indices of the outer sum. The sumsin Eqn. 6.17 produce nonvanishing values only for each j (s) value matching the k (s) value.
Nbins !
times. Using this result, we can
All nonvanishing terms produce the same result (N2bins−2)!

evaluate Eqn. 6.17:† 2 2[â ] âNbins !
= 2(Nbins |α| )N 2 (Nbins − 2)!
 bins
12 2
1−= 2 Nbins |α|
Nbins

2
−1
†
= 2 â â
1 + O(Nbins
) ,
2 2



(6.18)−1
where the last line uses the result from Eqn. 6.16. The term of order Nbins
is dropped in

the limit Nbins ≫ 2. We find by insertion of this result into Eqn. 5.21 that g (2) = 2 for ourensemble-averaged source. This result is worked out in general for g (m) in [115]; however,the second-order coherence g (2) is calculated here since this quantity is of primary interestfor distinguishing the statistics of thermal source from a coherent source.
We find that the statistics in Eqn. 6.18 corresponds to thermal light statistics. Since
the singlet quantity hhâii is vanishing, the expectation value of the photon number hhnii =â† â

is finite, and g (2) = 2, we conclude that the phase-randomized ensemble of pulses

satisfy the criteria for thermal statistics. Consequently, we expect that a series of separate
measurements performed for an ensemble of phase-randomized pulses, each with the same
number of large number of spectral bins Nbins ≫ 2, will allow construction of the densitymatrix for a true thermal source. Construction of the density matrix for a thermal source

121
has the power to reveal the nonlinear system response to light with true thermal photon
statistics.
To test the opposite limit where the number of spectral bins Nbins = 1, we expect that
we recover the statistics for the coherent state since there would be no phase modulation
across the spectrum. For this situation, the sums in the product of sums in Eqn. 6.17 eachhave just one term. The phase ∆φ is identical for the j (1) = k (1) = j (2) = k (2) = 1 terms forevery realization. Therefore,
1
1
1
1
X
X
X
X

j (1) =1 k(1) =1 j (2) =1 k(2) =1

**

exp i

2
X
s=1

(s)

(s)

!++

[∆φj − ∆φk ]= hhexp (i2[∆φj=1 − ∆φk=1 ])ii = 1(6.19)

The calculation of this product of sums combined with Eqn. 6.17 shows that[â† ]2 â2= |α|4 .

(6.20)

Combining this result with Eqns. 6.18 and 5.21 results in g (2) = 1, consistent with our
expectations for coherent light.
6.3

Philosophical issues
Although the theory described in 6.2.2 is mathematically self-consistent, it is important

to inquire about how this theory describes the experiment to be performed. The protocol
from the theory suggests that measurements from a large number of phase-randomized excitation pulses be separately recorded. While each measurement records the system response
to a coherent pulse of light, the ensemble of measurements make up the information necessary
for construction of the system response to thermal photon statistics.
The concept of DME averaging suggests that a source with quantum statistics can beconstructed from a coherent pulsed laser. This result is challenging to understand since therealizations need not interfere with each other in the QW system. The data for each realization could be recorded on separate days, and the DME technique would allow construction

122of the QW response to a different thermal statistics.
Results from quantum mechanics state that a system with density matrix composed offield and matter parts ρ̂ = ρ̂F ⊗ ρ̂M evolves in time as:i~∂ ρ̂= −[ρ̂, H],∂t(6.21)

where H is the Hamiltonian of the system [45]. This evolution was worked out for a simple
case using true thermal and coherent photon statistics in §5.4.7. It may seem counterintuitive that the dynamics for a system could be constructed from the traces of manytime-evolved density matrices from different realizations, since information is lost when one
traces over a density matrix. Additionally, there is no possibility of interference between
subsequent realizations in the experimental setup, as we will discuss in chapter 8. The
theory claims that construction of a new density matrix based on the trace of an ensembleof density matrices is possible. While this claim is puzzling, we have chosen to proceed withexperiments that seek to verify this assertion.
To generate pulses of light that satisfy the criteria for thermal light in DME averaging,
we use the experimental technique of pulse shaping, which is introduced in the next chapter.

Chapter 7
Pulse-shaping techniques

7.1

Concept of a pulse shaper
A pulse shaper is an apparatus that allows manipulation of the spectral amplitude

and phase of an ultrashort optical pulse. The apparatus has application in stretching andcompressing pulses, coherent control, optical imaging, and optical communications [9]. A
pulse shaper operates by converting an ultrashort pulse into the frequency domain, where
linear filtering can be applied, before converting the pulse back into the time domain.
We are interested in applying pulse-shaping techniques to our mode-locked laser pulses
in order to explore quantum-optical spectroscopy with density-matrix ensemble averaging,as discussed in chapter 6. We specifically wish to manipulate the phase of the spectrum ofa pulse as shown in Fig. 6.6. In this chapter we discuss the operation of a pulse shaper,
consider experimental parameters and limitations to obtaining an arbitrary pulse waveform.
7.2

Experimental setup
The basic experimental design for a 4f pulse shaper is illustrated in Fig. 7.1. The

design is called 4f because the total distance between the center of the first grating to thecenter of the second grating is four times the focal length f of the lenses used. A pulse froma mode-locked laser enters from one side. The pulse diffracts from a grating, which converts
the wavelengths of the pulse into angle in the first-order diffraction direction according to

124
the grating equation [9]:−1θdiffracted (λ) = sin

 
λ
,
d

(7.1)

where d is the spacing of the grating lines, and λ is the wavelength of light. The spreadin wavelengths is then collimated with a cylindrical lens of focal length f . The spreadin wavelengths is now mapped to a positional spread. Besides collimating the diffracted
beam, the lens focuses each frequency component onto the plane of the mask. The different
frequencies may then be manipulated individually at the plane of the mask by linear filteringof the amplitude or phase. This filtering can be accomplished with a variety of devices, suchas a spatial light modulator or acousto-optic modulator [9], or any material with varying
optical thickness or varying transparency. Undesired frequency components can thus easily
be blocked at the plane of the mask.
To reconstruct the pulse after linear filtering, the process that took place before themask is time-reversed by the remaining optics into a single collimated beam with an output
pulse shape given by the Fourier transform of the pattern transferred by the mask onto thespectrum. For an absent phase mask, the output pulse should be identical to the input pulse.

Figure 7.1: Layout for a 4f pulse-shaper apparatus. The spatial spread D corresponds to a spread in
optical wavelengths ∆λ.

Various factors determine the appropriate design parameters for the pulse-shaper apparatus. We discuss the design considerations in the frequency domain in the next section.

125
7.3

Shaper design considerations in the frequency domain

7.3.1

Spectral resolution constraints

To choose appropriate design parameters for the pulse shaper, we consider the fixed
conditions of the experiment and requirements for the experiment in the frequency domain.
The Ti:sapphire laser center wavelength is λ0 = 800 nm (~ω0 = 1.55 eV) with a bandwidthof around ∆λ = 3.5 nm (~∆ω = 7 meV). The theory estimates a constraint of needing tohave at least 6 bins across the 1s exciton spectrum in order to perform quantum-optical
spectroscopy using density matrix ensemble averaging, discussed in Chapter 6. The fullF W HM
width half maximum (FWHM) of the linear exciton absorption line shape is γ1s= 1.5

meV, determined in Chapter 4. Thus we require the resolution on the pulse-shaper system
to have an upper bound of δEres = 250 µeV. A smaller energy resolution provides flexibility
in the possible manipulations of the pulse.
We estimate the resolution of the pulse shaper by determining the wavelength-todisplacement conversion at the plane of the mask, allowing the spatial spot size of a single
color mode to be converted into an estimate of the spectral resolution. We use Eqn. 7.1 todetermine the spatial spread D across the phase mask for a small bandwidth ∆λ in orderto calibrate wavelength to displacement along the plane of the mask in the paraxial ray
approximation [92]:D = [θ1 (λ + ∆λ/2) − θ1 (λ − ∆λ/2)] f





λ − ∆λ/2
λ + ∆λ/2
−1
−1
− sin
f,
= sin
d
d

(7.2)

where f is the focal length of each lens in the setup. The ratio ∆λ/D can be used to convert
a spatial spread into a spread in wavelength. We then calculate the spot size of a single color
focused onto the shaper for a beam of initial waist wi according to [9]:w0 =cosθi λf,cosθd πwi

(7.3)

126
where θi = 40◦ and θd = 74◦ are the incident and diffracted angles with respect to the planeof the first grating, respectively. The diffracted angle θd is determined by Eqn. 7.1.
The resolution of the shaper is then estimated by using ∆λ/D to convert the units of
w0 from spatial spread into spectral spread:δλres [nm] =∆λ = 1[nm]× w0 [mm].
D[mm]

(7.4)

While it is strange to see a conversion between two length units, [nm] indicates a wavelengthand [mm] indicates a spatial spread.
The spectral resolution expression δλres allows us to see which parameters affect theresolution. Since both D and w0 are proportional to the focal length f , the resolution of
the shaper apparatus is completely independent of choice of focal length. The focal length
choice is determined by the pixel size of the mask device, which we will discuss next. The
parameters that we can choose to optimize the resolution of the pulse shaper are the initial
beam waist wi and the grating spacing d.
It is desirable to have a large initial beam waist and small grating spacing according
to Eqn. 7.4. The beam waist was expanded to a large but manageable size of wi = 10 mmgoing into the pulse-shaper apparatus. This parameter creates a spot size of w0 = 34µm at
the plane of the phase mask. The grating was chosen to have a spacing of d = 833 nm (1200lines/mm), nearly the smallest spacing before matching the laser wavelength of 800 nm, atwhich the efficiency of the grating vanishes [110]. We calculate the resolution using theseparameters to be δλres = 0.006 nm. This resolution corresponds to δEres = 12 µeV, which isan order of magnitude better than the estimated theoretical constraint of δEres = 250 µeV,
allowing flexibility in the choice of spectral bin size for the experiment.
7.3.2

Phase mask device

Of the many devices available for a mask in the pulse-shaper apparatus, we chose
Boulder Nonlinear Linear Series Spatial Light Modulator (SLM) with a 1×12,288 pixel array.

127
The device offers programmability, full-range (0 − 2π) phase modulation, a small pixel size
(pixel pitch = 1.6µm), and a large screen area (19 mm). This device can independently
modulate the phase of light rays reflected from each of its 12,288 pixels.
The SLM is reflective, which means that the 4f shaper design is folded on itself asshown in Fig. 7.2. To collect the output beam with minimal compromise in alignment, we
adjust the vertical pointing of the reflected beam so that it is one beam diameter lower than
the input beam, allowing pick-off with a compact mirror.

Figure 7.2: Layout for a 4f pulse-shaper apparatus in reflective geometry. Reflected beam is verticallyoffset from the input beam, but shown at a slightly different horizontal angle here only for illustration
purposes.

To utilize the many pixels of the shaper, we choose a long focal length of f = 50 cm.
This focal length produces a spread of 7.5 mm at the plane of the mask, given the otherparameters, named earlier. This large spatial spread does not overfill the 19 cm wide liquid
crystal screen of the SLM. The choice of focal length allows up to 4700 pixels across a 7 nm
(13 meV) bandwidth spectrum. Thus, we have flexibility in choosing arbitrary spectral bin
size with experimentally manageable parameters.

128
A schematic of the device is shown in Fig. 7.3. The 1.6 µm pixel pitch provides theflexibility to fit a large number of pixels across the spectrum if necessary. The space in
the interpixel gap (0.6 µm) does not reflect any light, meaning that 0.6µm/1.6µm = 37.5%of the incident light is lost due to diffraction at the interface. Aside from a change in the
total efficiency, the interpixel gap does not modify the resolution or other properties of the
shaper apparatus because the spot size at the single-color spot size according to Eqn. 7.3 is
w0 = 34µm, which is much larger than the pixel pitch.

Figure 7.3: Schematic of the Spatial Light Modulator (SLM) [8]. (a) A front-view drawing of the device.
(b) Detail of the pixel geometry. (c) Principle of operation using liquid crystals.

The principle of operation of the SLM is illustrated in Fig. 7.3c. The screen of theSLM consists of a one-dimensional array of liquid crystals. The light at the plane of themask travels through the liquid crystals and is reflected by a mirror. Each pixel of theliquid-crystal array has an electrode with adjustable voltage 0-5 V. For 0 V applied to a
pixel, the liquid crystals in that pixel are aligned parallel to the electrode. However, as thevoltage increases, the liquid crystals begin to align with the electric field produced between
the pixel electrode and the cover-glass electrode. The liquid crystals have the electro-optic
property of birefringence, which means that their alignment alters the index of refraction for
one polarization component (horizontal in this device) of an incident light field. We polarize
our beam horizontally to maximize the modulation of phase. Thus, the application of a129
different voltage on each of the liquid crystals can change the effective optical path length by
up to one full wavelength (800 nm), providing a phase shift ∆φ in the interval 0 < ∆φ < 2π.
Figure 7.3c demonstrates the phase retardance for 0 V, 2.5 V, and 5 V applied voltage.
Since the phase retardance has nonlinear dependence on the applied voltage, the device iscalibrated by an interferometer to create a look-up table that relates the two quantities.
We have discussed the design considerations and principles of operation of a pulseshaper apparatus. We next explore the limitations of a pulse shaper in producing a pulse
with arbitrary spectral phase and amplitude.
7.4

Physical limitations in pulse shaping
An ideal pulse shaper takes in a pulse of light and applies a spectral phase and ampli-

tude in the Fourier domain, outputting an electric field with Fourier transform [9]:Eout (ω) = Ein (ω)H(ω),(7.5)

where H(ω) is an arbitrary complex filter function in frequency space. However, because of
the finite spot size of each single color and the fact that the spectrum is continuous1 meansthat there exists spatial overlap between single-color modes in the beam at the plane of thephase mask.
Due to the finite spatial extent of each single-color mode, the filter function H(ω) is a
convolution of the spatial mask function M (x) with the intensity profile of the beam [9]:H(ω) =

2
πw02

1/2 Z22

dxM (x)e−2(x−αω) /w0 ,

(7.6)

where
α=
1

λ2 f
,
2 π c d cos(θd )

(7.7)

−1
), a temporal train of
For long integration times compared to the repetition rate of the laser (T ≫ frep
pulses Fourier transforms into a comb of frequencies spaced by frep = 76 MHz, or 0.3 µeV. However, since−1
the dynamics of the GaAs QW system completely decay in the time between pulses (frep= 12 ns), this is
not relevant. The system ‘sees’ the continuous spectrum of a single pulse.

130
and w0 is given by Eqn. 7.3. Here α is the spatial dispersion with units cm (rad/s)−1 . The
effect of this convolution is to limit the spectral FWHM resolution toδω = (ln2)1/2 w0 /α= 2(ln2)1/2 cos θi

cd
,
λ wi

(7.8)

which predicts a spectral resolution (using the above-mentioned numbers) that is in agreement with the analysis from Eqn. 7.4. It is clear to see here that the resolution is independentof the focal length f . Since the wavelength λ is a fixed parameter and the grating spacing
d can only be as short as the wavelength, the resolution can be made smaller by choosing alarge input beam waist wi .
The use of the convolution in Eqn. 7.6 allows accurate simulations of the effects ofvarious phase masks on the frequency- and time-domain electric fields by substituting H(ω)
into Eqn. 7.5.
While simulations accurately predict the effects of spectral phase masks on the amplitude of the power spectrum, we develop an intuitive picture of why amplitude modulationis unavoidable for a pulse shaper designed to modulate the phase. The consequence of theoverlap of single-color modes is illustrated in Fig. 7.4. Here five nearby single-color modes
with spatial widths determined by Eqn. 7.3 overlap spatially at the plane of the phase mask.
The location 50 µm marks a phase jump between two pixels. For the sake of this illustration,
the phase of the left-side pixel is φL = 0 radians and the right-right φR = π radians suchthat the difference in phase between the two pixels is ∆φ = π. This phase difference meansthat most of mode A undergoes a phase shift of φL = 0 and most of mode E undergoes aphase shift of φR = π. However, since the overlap between single-color modes is unavoidable,
each mode that lies between A and E will have a fraction of their light that undergoes bothphase shifts.
In the case of the single-color mode that lies at the phase discontinuity (mode C), halfof the mode will undergo a phase shift of φL = 0 and the other half will undergo a phase

131
shift of φR = π, resulting in complete cancellation of the field for that spectral mode. Fora phase discontinuity of ∆φ = π between two pixels, the intensity will drop to zero with awidth proportional to the resolution of the shaper, Eqn. 7.8.

Figure 7.4: (a) Illustration of the intensity distribution of overlapping single-color modes (A−E, blue lines)
at the plane of the phase mask in a pulse shaper. The spectral phase function across the mask (thick blackline) is shown with arbitrary units. (b) The consequence of finite spot size in a pulse shaper is amplitude
modulation at phase discontinuities with width corresponding to Eqn.7.8.

This picture reveals that regardless of the spectral resolution of the pulse shaper, thereis necessarily some amplitude modulation of modes that lie near phase discontinuities along
the phase mask. The effect of amplitude modulation can be minimized by designing a highresolution apparatus as we have done.
To understand the effects of shaping pulses, it is helpful to have an intuitive pictureof the relationship between the time- and frequency-domain representations of the electricfield.

132
7.5

Relationship between time- and frequency-domains

7.5.1

Time duration and bandwidth

The time- and frequency-domain representations of an optical field are related to eachother through the Fourier transform [117]:Z +∞dω ε̃(ω) eiωt
−∞
Z +∞
1
−1
dt ε(t) e−iωt ,ε̃(ω) = F {ε(t)} =2π −∞ε(t) = F {ε̃(ω)} =(7.9)

where ε(t) and ε̃(ω) are the envelopes of the electric field in the time- and frequency-domains,respectively. The first line is the forward Fourier transform, and the second line is the inverse
Fourier transform. Manipulation of the phase and amplitude of the frequency-domain electricfield ε̃(ω) affects the time-domain electric field through these two equations.
We can use Eqn. 7.9 to explore the relationship between the time duration and bandwidth of an ultrashort pulse. For a pulse with Gaussian temporal pulse width τp , we may
represent the field envelope ε(t) in the time domain as:22ε(t) = ε0 e−t /(2 τp ) ,(7.10)

where the FWHM duration of the temporal intensity of the pulse I(t) = |ε(t)|2 is ∆τ =√2 2 ln2τp ≈ 2.355τp . The field in the frequency domain is calculated through Eqn. 7.9 as:ε̃(ω) = F

−1

q
2 2
{ε(t)} = ε0 4πτp2 e−τp ω .

(7.11)A Gaussian temporal profile thus transforms into a Gaussian spectral profile. While center
frequency ω0 = 0 here for clarity purposes, this analysis is easily transferrable to any center
frequency with the replacement ω → (ω − ω0 ).
The time duration and bandwidth have an inverse relationship with each other. The√
bandwidth in Eqn. 7.11 is the FWHM of the power spectrum |ε̃(ω)|2 is ∆ω = 2 2 ln2/(2τp ) ≈1.177/τp . Thus, from Eqns. 7.10 and 7.11 we can see that a short temporal width corresponds to a wide bandwidth. For any shape pulse, the FWHM of the power spectrum and133
FWHM of the temporal intensity have a time-bandwidth product:∆ω∆τ ≥ 2πcB ,(7.12)

where the equal sign holds for transform-limited pulses, i.e., with no spectral phase modulation. For the Gaussian pulses introduced, ∆τ ∆ω/2π = cB = 0.441, indicating that the pulse
is transform-limited. From the time-bandwidth product relationship we see that a larger
bandwidth makes shorter temporal features possible.
A helpful visualization of the Fourier relationships is shown in Fig.7.5. For a Gaussian
pulse shape, the total bandwidth B in the frequency domain has the relationship B δt ≈ 0.44
with the shortest temporal feature in the time-domain [117]. The largest spread in the timedomain T is related to the smallest spectral feature δf by T δf ≈ 0.44.

Figure 7.5: Pictorial relationship between the power spectrum (frequency domain) and temporal intensity(time domain) features. Figure from [9].

This picture has consequences for the time-domain output of a pulse shaper. First,
the maximal temporal spread is limited by the resolution of the pulse shaper. For theparameters chosen in our apparatus, the estimated limit on the temporal spread is roughlyT ≈ 0.44/δf = 0.44/12 µeV = 8.8 ps. Second, the shortest temporal feature is determinedby the bandwidth B in our experiment according to δt ≈ 0.44/B = 0.44/7 meV = 260 fs,

134which is very close to the estimated pulse duration out of the laser, ∆τ =287 fs FWHM.
Narrowing the bandwidth in the pulse shaper limits the sharpness of temporal features in
addition to spreading the pulse out in time.
The Fourier relationship described between the time- and frequency-domains applies
to the modulation of spectral phase as well as amplitude. We discuss how spectral-phasemodulation affects the temporal fields of an ultrashort pulse.
7.5.2

Effects of the spectral phase in the time domain

Since it is possible to choose any arbitrary phase mask function M (x) (given the limitations presented in §7.4) to modulate the spectral phase of the electric field, we explore theeffects of spectral-phase modulation in the time domain.
To understand the effects of spectral phase in the time domain, it is helpful to separate
the spectral phase of a pulse into components via a Taylor expansion of the phase [117]:

φ(ω) = φ(ω0 ) + φ′ (ω0 )(ω − ω0 ) +1
1 ′′φ (ω0 )(ω − ω0 )2 + φ′′′ (ω0 )(ω − ω0 )3 + · · · ,2!
3!

(7.13)

where ω0 is the center frequency of the pulse. In this section, we consider the effects of the first
three terms of Eqn. 7.13 on a pulse in the time domain. A spectral phase function φ(ω) canbe applied to a field in the frequency domain by the multiplication ε̃(ω)modified = eiφ(ω) ε̃(ω).
7.5.2.1

Zero-order phase

The simplest phase application is a flat phase, or the first term in Eqn. 7.13. To see
the effects of a flat phase in the time domain, we multiply the field ε̃(ω) in Eqn. 7.11 by
the zero-order phase function eiφ(ω0 ) = eiφ0 . Taking the Fourier transform of the modified

135
frequency-domain field,
εflat (t) = F ε̃(ω)eiφ0= eiφ0 F {ε̃(ω)}= eiφ0 ε(t).

(7.14)

Thus, the electric field acquires a global phase φ0 , corresponding to the carrier-envelope
phase, which relates the phase of the electric field to its temporal envelope [117]. While theglobal phase is important in some experiments [118], the experiments performed in this work
are not affected because interfering beams have an angle with respect to each other at the
sample, averaging out the global phase [11]. A flat phase mask does not affect the temporal
intensity of the pulse I(t) = |ε(t)|2 . Since the global phase does not affect the physics forthis work, we omit it in the following analysis for clarity.
7.5.2.2

Linear phase′

Next, we consider application of a linear spectral phase, or eiφ (ω0 )ω = eiaω . In this case,
we find that the time domain is affected asεlinear (t) = F ε̃(ω)eiaω
2= ε0 e−(t+a) /(2τp )= ε(t + a).

2(7.15)

We find that a linear spectral phase function shifts the pulse in time, but otherwise does notaffect the temporal properties.

136
7.5.2.3

Quadratic phase′′2

Lastly, we consider a quadratic spectral phase. The multiplication of ε̃(ω) by eiφ (ω0 )ω /2 =2eibω yields the time-domain field:εquadratic

n
o
ibω 2
(t) = F ε̃(ω)e



τp
t2
2
,
= ε0 p 2
exp −ib̃t −(2τ̃p )2
τp − i b

where

b̃ =
τ̃p =

b
4(b2 + τp4 )b2 + τp4.
τp2(7.16),(7.17)The last line of Eqn. 7.16 shows that the temporal phase Φ(t) increases quadratically withtime. The instantaneous frequency of the pulse in time can be found by differentiating thephase with respect to time:
ω(t) =dd
Φ(t) = (ω0 t + b̃t2 ) = ω0 + 2b̃t.
dt
dt(7.18)The instantaneous frequency increases linearly with time for b > 0. In analogy with acoustic
frequencies, this is the sound that a bird makes when she chirps, increasing the pitch (frequency) with time. For this reason, φ′′ (ω0 ) is often called the ‘chirp’ parameter because of
its influence in the time domain. For b > 0, the lower frequencies (‘red’) are shifted to earlier
times, and the higher frequencies (‘blue’) are found at later times.
It is helpful to visualize the chirp with a spectrogram that captures the time andfrequency information about a pulse. Spectrograms from a transform-limited pulse and a
chirped pulse are compared in Fig. 7.6. A projection of the spectrogram onto the frequency
axis is the power spectrum; a projection onto the τ axis is the temporal intensity profile.
While the spectrum is (ideally) not modified for a positively chirped pulse, the red frequency
components tend to show up at earlier times than the blue components.

137

Figure 7.6: Spectrograms for ultrashort pulses with varying chirp: (a) no chirp (b = 0, or transformlimited), (b) moderate chirp (b = 0.5 ps−2 ), and (c) strong chirp (b = 5 ps−2 ). Chirp ‘rotates’ the spectrogramin this phase space.

The slope of the frequency b̃ in Eqn. 7.18 exhibits nontrivial dependence on the chirpparameter b. The dependence is shown in Fig. ??. As seen in the figure, for |b| ≪ τp2 ,b̃ ∝ b. However, for large spectral chirp parameter b, the instantaneous frequency exhibits
very weak dependence on time. The spectrogram for a large amount of chirp is seen in Fig.
7.6c, where the projection in time is broad. For the pump bandwidth used in this thesis(∆E = 5.9 meV), the spectral chirp parameter that maximizes b̃ is |b| = 2.7 meV−2 . A roughway to picture the effect of chirp on the time distribution of frequencies is as a rotation of
the spectrogram in frequency-time space. The actual picture is more complicated since thetemporal duration also increases for increasing |b|.
To see the effect of chirp on the temporal duration, we calculate the temporal intensity:
#2
"


2
τ
t2
p
∗
2
.
(7.19)
exp −I(t) = ε (t)ε(t) = ε0 p 2
2(τp4 + b2 )/τp2
b + τp4

The pulse width spreads in time with increasing chirp parameter b, and we recover theoriginal transform-limited field intensity for b → 0. The modified FWHM time duration of 2 1/2√
2, where τp is the transform-limited
the intensity envelope is ∆τ = 2 2 ln2 τp + τbp

pulse duration.

138

Figure 7.7: Relationship between the temporal chirp parameter b̃ and the spectral chirp parameter b.
Increasing the spectral chirp beyond |b| > 0.18 τp2 weakens the instantaneous frequency dependence on timeas the pulse spreads in time.

7.5.2.4

Summary of phase effects

Summarizing the effects of the first three terms of Eqn. 7.13 on a pulse in the time
domain, the zero-order phase φ = φ0 provides an overall phase shift, resulting in a change ofthe carrier-envelope phase. Linear phase φ = a ω causes a pure temporal shift of the pulse.
Quadratic phase, or chirp parameter φ = b ω 2 , is the lowest-order spectral phase that affects
the temporal intensity shape of a pulse.
In general, higher order spectral phase contributions have more complicated effects
on the temporal pulse intensity, but generally lead to a broadening of the pulse in time.
The random-phase masks, which we will introduce at the end of this chapter, contain manyhigher-order phase contributions in the spectral phase, leading to a nontrivial temporal pulse
shape.
7.6

Alignment of the pulse shaper apparatus
Using the described SLM in the reflective 4f geometry with the chosen grating spacing(d = 833 nm), focal length (f = 50 cm), and input beam waist (wi = 10 mm), we proceed

139
to align the shaper apparatus according to a procedure outlined in [9]. The pulse shaper
apparatus is aligned to optimize the spectral resolution, to minimize spectral dependence
on the spatial beam profile (known as ‘spatial chirp’), and to minimize the spectral chirp(φ = bω 2 ).
The reflective geometry of the pulse shaper (Fig. 7.2) presents a potential tradeoff
between optimal alignment and efficiency. The optimal alignment would involve placing abeam splitter in the path of the input beam so that the reflected beam traces exactly the
input path. This setup would result in a 75 % loss in power using a 50:50 beam-splitter.
The loss in power would make the experiment difficult since we need a high optical power
to achieve saturation of the QW system.
We find that the vertical-pointing pick-off geometry as described in §7.3.2 does nothinder the alignment significantly. We calculate from the cross-correlation FWHM of 388 fs
that the pulse width out of the pulse shaper is ∆τ = 274 fs. Combining this measurementwith a measured 4 nm bandwidth FWHM (= 1.18×1013 rad/s), we use Eqn. 7.12 to calculate
the time-bandwidth product as cB = 0.51. This value is close to the transform limit cB =0.441 for a Gaussian pulse . The temporal pulse duration for a transform limited Gaussian
pulse would be ∆τ = 241 fs. The pulse coming out of the laser has only approximately aGaussian temporal envelope, so it is not surprising that the time-bandwidth product does
not exactly correspond to a Gaussian function.
7.6.1

Spatial mode filtering

The analysis in §7.4 assumes that the output Gaussian spatial mode is selected tomatch the input mode. Filtering the spatial mode helps to ensure that this is experimentallythe case.
The spatial mode out of the mode-locked laser in our experimental setup is a transverse
electromagnetic TEM0,0 mode with a Gaussian spatial intensity profile. This mode is sent
into the pulse shaper apparatus. In the process of applying a spectral phase mask to the140

Figure 7.8: Spatial mode filtering using two lenses with a pinhole. The input distorted spatial mode is‘cleaned up’ into a TEM0,0 spatial mode by focusing the light through the pinhole.

pulse, higher order spatial modes are introduced, necessitating the filtering of modes higher
than the TEM0,0 mode.
Mode filtering is accomplished by constructing a spatial mode filter from two lenses
and a small pinhole aperture, as shown in Fig. 7.8. The principle of spatial mode filteringis that the TEM0,0 Hermite-Gaussian spatial mode focuses to a smaller spot size than thehigher order modes [92]. Consequently, the higher order modes are mostly blocked by theaperture.
To determine the initial beam waist size wi , focal lengths f , and pinhole diameter D
appropriate for filtering out the TEM0,0 mode and maintaining high efficiency, we consider
the focusing properties of the Hermite-Gaussian modes. The spatial profile of the electricfield of a Gaussian mode is the solution to the wave equation in the paraxial approximation[92]: 1/2 
 2
 1/2 2 y w0x + y22 x
Hp,
exp − 2E(x, y, z) = E0 Hmw(z)w(z) w(z)w (z)where the beam waistv "u 2 #uz,w(z) = tw02 1 +z0(7.20)(7.21)

w0 is the minimal spot size for the TEM0,0 mode, E0 is the electric field amplitude, and Hm
is the Hermite polynomial of order m.
We evaluate the electric fields for a variety of TEMm,0 modes and integrate the in-141tensities at their foci over the pinhole diameter D in order to determine the efficiency withwhich each Hermite-Gaussian mode passes through the pinhole. Results for a sample ofpinhole diameters and TEM0,0 spot sizes are plotted in Fig. 7.9. From the pinhole diameters
commercially available, we chose the D = 20 µm with a TEM0,0 spot size w0 = 10 µm
because this combination offers high efficiency of the TEM0,0 with reasonable suppression of
the higher-order modes. The chosen spot size corresponds to a focal length choice of f = 5
cm for the spatial mode filter apparatus.

% transmision

100
90

D=20,w0=1080

D=25,w0=10

70

D=25,w0=20

60

D=25,w0=14

50
40
30
20
10
0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

mode number
Figure 7.9: Transmission of the Hermite-Gaussian modes TEMm,0 through a spatial mode filter. A seriesof diameters D and TEM0,0 spot sizes w0 (both in µm) allow choice of appropriate mode-filtering geometry.

7.7

Calibration and testing of phase masks

7.7.1

Calibration procedure

After alignment of the shaper, we calibrate the phase masks to have the accurate
control of the spectral phase. To calibrate the SLM, we take advantage of the fact thatphase discontinuities produce a dip in the spectrum, as discussed in §7.4. The procedure for142calibration of the SLM is illustrated in Fig. 7.10. For a variety of phase masks with a single
phase discontinuity, we record the spectra on a monochrometer and note the pixel number
at which the discontinuity happens. The spectral positions are then plotted with the pixel
number, and a linear fit determines the relationship between photon energy and pixel number
on the SLM. From the linear fit we find the relationship Y [meV] = 0.00463 X[pixel #] +1499.74.

Figure 7.10: (a) A variety of power spectra, each with a single phase discontinuity that results in a dip in
the spectrum. (b) The center positions of the dips along with the recorded pixel number on the SLM allow
calibration of the SLM via a linear fitting procedure.

7.7.2

Comparison of simulation with experiment

To test the accuracy of the effects of the spectral phase masks in our experimental
setup, we perform simulations using Eqns. 7.6 and 7.5 to compare with the measured effects
of some simple phase masks. We explore the modulation of the linear and quadratic spectralphase.
To test that the SLM is calibrated, we compare simulations to experimental measurements for a variety of simple phase masks. For the simulations, we choose a transform-limited
pulse with the same power spectrum as measured in the experiment. Experimentally, wemeasure the output pulses after the pulse shaper apparatus by measuring a cross-correlation
trace, S(τ ). The measurement technique is explained in chapter 3. We extract parameters

143such as temporal center positions and widths from S(τ ) using a nonlinear fitting procedurethat fits a Gaussian function to each trace.
As demonstration of our control over the spectral phase, we create phase masks with
only linear phase, and only quadratic phase, in order to observe the effects of each phasecomponent in Eqn. 7.13 individually.
A linear phase φ = φ′ (ω0 )(ω − ω0 ) is applied to the SLM for a range of slopes fromφ′ (ω0 ) = 0 meV−1 up to φ′ (ω0 ) = 18.2 meV−1 . We expect the temporal pulse to be shiftedin time according to Eqn. 7.15. A simulation of the output pulse yields a pure shifting of
the pulse. The predicted shifts in time compare well with the experimentally measured time
shifts, as shown in Fig. 7.11.
Similar matching between simulation and experiment is achieved for negative linear
slopes in spectral phase, which results in negative temporal shifts of the pulse, or effectively
lengthening the optical path length which the pulse travels.
We attribute slight discrepancies between the measured and simulated shifts to theimperfect factory calibration of the SLM for the voltage to phase retardance at a wavelengthof 800 nm.
In addition, simulation predicts the broadening of a pulse with the application ofquadratic spectral phase. The chirp parameter φ′′ (ω0 )/2 in Eqn. 7.13 is varied from 0
meV−2 up to 5.8 meV−2 . We expect that the quadratic phase leads to a broadening in
the temporal pulse duration without shifting the pulse in time, according to Eqn. 7.19.
We extract the time duration of the experimentally measured cross-correlation. We findgood comparison between the experiment and simulation, as shown in Fig. 7.12. The pulse
duration levels off for higher chirp parameters because the maximal time duration is limitedby the spectral resolution of the pulse shaper, as discussed in §7.5.1. The observed crosscorrelation duration limit of ∆τS = 10.8 ps (corresponding to a pulse duration of 10.8 pssince ∆τprobe ≪ ∆τS in Eqn. 3.15) is roughly consistent with the estimated maximum
temporal width of 8.8 ps, calculated in §7.5.1. We attribute the slight discrepancies between

144

14
12

simulation
experimental

time shift [ps]

10
8
6
4
2
0
0

5
10
15
−1
slope of phase [meV ]20

Figure 7.11: Simulated and measured time shifts generated by a linear phase mask.

simulation and experiment to imperfect factory calibration of the SLM. The discrepancies
compared with the simulation are not critical because we record the experimental parametersin the analysis of the experiments.
Similar agreement between simulation and experiment is found for negative chirp parameters. The sign of the quadratic phase has no effect on the temporal intensity profile (inboth simulation and experiment), as predicted from Eqn. 7.19.
7.8

Comparison of chirp parameter range with material dispersion
One relevant inquiry is how the chirp that we impose on an ultrashort pulse comparesto the amount of quadratic phase that is incurred when a pulse travels through dispersive
media. The sign of chirp for most dispersive media is positive, which means that the redpart of the pulse experiences negative delay relative to the blue part, as can be seen in Eqn.
7.18. Thus, the red part of the spectrum arrives before the blue part of the spectrum formost dispersive materials.

145

10

transform−limited
simulation
experimental∆ τS [ps]

8

6

4

2

0

0

10
chirp parameter [meV−2]110Figure 7.12: Simulated and experimentally measured cross-correlation widths ∆τS for a range of chirpparameters. Cross-correlation width of ∆τS = 520 fs for a transform-limited pulse is shown as a baseline.

We compare the range of applied chirp using the pulse shaper to the material dispersion
for a common optical material, fused silica. We calculate the second-order dispersion of fusedsilica at 800 nm using the Sellmeier equation to be ψ ′′ (ω0 )/2 = 0.262 meV−2 /meter. The
chirp from dispersion is then given by φ′′ (ω0 )/2 = ψ ′′ (ω0 )/2 × L, where L is the length
traveled through the material [117]. Using this value, we find that a distance of L = 29 cm
would be necessary to achieve 0.15 meV−2 of chirp, and a distance of L = 11 m would benecessary to achieve 5.8 meV−2 of chirp. The amount of material that the laser light travels
through for the work in this thesis is on the order of a couple cm. Consequently, the amountof material used produces chirp much lower than an amount that would broaden the pulses
significantly for pulses of spectral width around ∆ω = 8 meV FWHM.

146
7.9

Arbitrary pulse shape generation
We have demonstrated the ability to control the linear and quadratic phase of an

ultrashort pulse. However, we desire to use the pulse shaper to study the effects of otherpulse shapes, and especially to realize the criteria for density-matrix ensemble averaging, as
discussed in §6.2.
As a proof of principle, we apply a randomized phase mask to a pulse spectrum (whichin this case is not spectrally narrowed) with large energy bin spacing ∆ΩEBS = 4.4 meV.
The original spectrum is modified at the locations of phase discontinuity, as shown in Fig.
7.13. While the agreement is not perfect (perhaps because of factory calibration error of
the SLM), the features of the width, location, and depth of the spectral dips are roughlymatched. The largest dip occurs at E − E1s = 0 meV, where there is a phase discontinuityof 0.82π, consistent with the arguments presented in §7.4. The phase discontinuity at E −E1s = 8.8 meV, while large in appearance, is actually a small phase jump because the phase‘wraps around’ between 2π and 0. Thus, the phase jump at this location is only 0.23π andcorresponds to a smaller fractional dip in the spectrum.
7.10

Prepared for density-matrix ensemble averaging
We conclude that we are able to create a large variety of pulses with almost arbitrary

phase modulation. We note the physical limitation of the dips in the spectrum at places ofphase discontinuity on the SLM. However, this does not present a problem for the experiments since we monitor the created carrier density in the QW system (discussed in §3.3.4),
and can correct for the amplitude modulation. We proceed in the next chapter to explain
the experiments that realize the density-matrix ensemble averaging scheme using the pulse
shaper apparatus.

147

7

intensity [arb. u.] or phase [radians]

6

original
simulation
expt,
phase fxn

5

4

3

2

1

0
−15

−10

−5

0
E − E1s [meV]

5

10

15

Figure 7.13: Comparison of simulation and experiment for a randomized phase mask function applied toa pulse spectrum.

Chapter 8
Phase-randomized pulse experiments

The last few chapters explained the motivations and techniques for using phase-randomized
pulses of light to learn about the response of the GaAs quantum-well (QW) system underincoherent excitation conditions. We refer to the phase-randomized pulses as ‘scrambled’
pulses. The scrambled pulses excite the sample, which is then inquired by a transformlimited weak probe pulse.
We present the procedure for characterizing the statistics of scrambled pulses using
density-matrix ensemble averaging. We then describe simulations performed using the optical
Bloch equations (OBEs) to qualitatively predict the effects of single realizations. We describe
the experimental methods used to measure the nonlinear response of the QW system underscrambled-pulse excitation, and then present the results of the measurements.
8.1

Characterization of average statistics
We seek to produce an ensemble of pulses that have the statistical properties of thermal

light, in contrast to the properties of coherent light. We demonstrate in this section thetechniques for characterizing the ensemble averages for the scrambled pulses, and discuss
the limitations in the measurements.
To perform experiments with the scrambled realizations, we prepare a group of randomized phase masks. A set of Nreal phase masks is created with random phases for eachfrequency bin ∆ωbin using a pseudo-random number generator. Before using these pulses

149
to perform transient absorption measurements, we analyze time-domain statistics to ensurethat the statistics of the ensemble corresponds to a thermal source.
We characterize the statistics of the set of pulse realizations through time domain
measurements. Typical cross-correlation traces for the scrambled realizations compared withthe transform-limited (flat mask) case are shown in Fig. 8.1. We observe that the pulses
are stretched out in time, and that the intensity at any given delay τ fluctuates between
realizations. We specifically seek the second-order coherence function g (2) , which is obtained
through measurement of the photon probability distribution. This function can be calculated
by constructing the probability distribution function from a collection of cross-correlation
traces.

0.06
flat mask
Xcorr signal [arb. u.]

0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0

−10

−5

0
delay τ [ps]5

10

Figure 8.1: Cross-correlation traces for six different scrambled realizations. All traces are normalized sothat the area is unity. For comparison, the normalized transform-limited pulse (flat spectral phase mask) is
shown as a dashed red line.

The photon number distribution Pm , discussed in §5.2.4, defines the probability ofmeasuring m photons in a time window T shorter than the coherence time of the lightsource. The probability distribution has a one-to-one correspondence with the k th -order150
coherence function value [119, 102]:
g

(k)

= n̂

k

k

/ hn̂i =

Nph
1 X

m!
Pm ,
hn̂i m=k (m − k)!
k

(8.1)

where Nph is the maximum number of photons that is measured in a particular time window
T and hn̂i = n̄ is the average number of photons per pulse. We are most interested in thesecond-order coherence function because this distinguishes coherent statistics from thermal
statistics. The second-order coherence function value is found by setting k = 2 in Eqn. 8.1:
g

(2)

= n̂

2

Nph
1 X
m(m − 1)Pm .
/ hn̂i =hn̂i2 m=k2

(8.2)

To calculate statistics for our ensemble, we obtain the probability distribution Pm
by measuring the intensity profile for a large number of pulse realizations. The temporal
intensity profile of a single pulse realization can be approximated by a cross-correlation
measurement with the short-duration probe pulse, as explained in §3.5. We measure thecross-correlations for 500 different pulse realizations. We histogram the intensity distribution
at a fixed delay for the many realizations. This histogram represents the intensity probability
distribution and is proportional to Pm . From the intensity probability distribution, we
calculate the coherence functions according to Eqn. 8.1 for the ensemble of Nreal = 500
realizations of scrambled pulses.
We measure the cross-correlations for Nreal = 500 different pulse realizations. The
cross-correlation traces are averaged according to:
Nreal
1 X
Sr (τ ),
Savg (τ ) =Nreal r=1

(8.3)

where Sr (τ ) is the normalized cross-correlation trace for the rth realization. Each trace isnormalized to have the same number of photons per realization. This simulation does nottake into account the more complicated nature of the differences in the fractional absorption
by the QWs between realizations. However, the difference in fractional absorption between
pulse realizations with the same number of photons is typically on the order of 5%. Thus,151
normalization of the cross-correlation traces is a reasonable approximation for our purposeof determining the statistics of the ensemble of pulse realizations.
We select a particular delay τ ′ and record the value Sr (τ ′ ) for each realization r. The
results are then histogrammed, creating a photon number probability distribution function
Pm . The distribution function can then be translated into a second-order coherence valueg (2) by Eqn. 8.2. We compare the g (2) for different bin spacings to quantify the statistics
compared with thermal statistics where g (2) = 2.
(b) Probability distribution function

20 bins
2 bins0 bins

20 bins
2 bins0 bins

0.15
Pn

20

0.2

0.1

10
0.05

200
300
Realization #400(c) Cross−correlation at several τ’ values
10
20 bins
2 bins80 bins6
τ’ studied
4
2
0
−5

0
0

500

10
20
30
photon number [normalized units](d) kth−order coherence

5
4<n > /<n>

100

k

0
0

k

X−corr [normalized]nX−corr [normalized units](a) Cross−correlation values at τ’
30

20 bins
2 bins0 bins32
10Delay τ [ps]

5

0
1

2
3
kth moment

4

Figure 8.2: (a) Cross-correlation values at time delay τ ′ = 0. (b) Probability distribution function for thenormalized cross-correlation values. (c) Cross-correlation values for serval τ values. (d) mth -order coherence
values calculated by Eqn. 8.2.

We plot some typical results for varied frequency bin spacing ∆ωbin in Fig. 8.2. We
compare frequency bin spacings of ∆ωbin = 0.3 meV, ∆ωbin = 3.0 meV, and a flat phasemask case. The flat mask case is equivalent to a bin spacing of ∆ωbin → ∞. The three cases
correspond to 20 bins, 2 bins, and 0 bins across the ∆ω = 6 meV spectrum. We choose the152
delay τ ′ = 0 for comparing these three cases. In Fig. 8.2a we notice that the 20-bins casehas the largest intensity fluctuations at τ ′ = 0 compared to the other two cases, whereas the
0-bin case has uniform intensity at τ ′ = 0.
To collect statistics on each sequence of realizations, we perform a normalization procedure. The total intensity measured from each cross-correlation is normalized, as it is also
in the transient absorption experiment, where we adjust the energy of each realization to be
the same. The total set of cross-correlations is divided by a constant so that the average
number of photons at τ ′ = 0 is normalized to n̄(τ ′ = 0) = 10. This second normalization is
performed for simplicity in the analysis and does not change the comparative result between
data sets.
The limitation in the accuracy of these measurements is from the number of realizations
for which we record traces. Ideally, the number of measurements should approach ‘infinity’
to have the most accurate measurements. However, we record only 500 traces because thismeasurement already requires many hours. Having a finite number of realizations meansthat the histogram bins must be chosen to be large enough to count multiple values in eachbin, but small enough so that the photon number distribution can be observed with someresolution. A bin size spacing of 10% of the total intensity combined with the normalization
procedure described earlier satisfies these two criteria. To determine the trend in accuracy
as we increase the number of measurements, we calculate g (2) for a variable number of traces
and use a nonlinear fitting procedure to fit the exponentially asymptotic functiong̃(Nreal ) = a1 + a2 1 − e−a3 Nreal ,(8.4)

where ai are constants determined by the fitting procedure. The measured g (2) values areshown in Fig. 8.3 along with the fit and the asymptote of the fit. The fitting procedureneglects measurements for Nreal < 50 because it is clear from Fig. 8.3 that these points arenoisy because of the small sample size. We consider the asymptote value limN →∞ g̃(N ) to be
the measured value of g (2) for an infinite number of measured realizations. This procedure

153
shows that for Nreal > 300 we match limN →∞ g̃(N ) to within 7.3%.

2
1.8

Measuredfit
asymptote

g(2)

1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0

100
200
300
400
Nreal [number of realizations measured]

500

Figure 8.3: Convergence of the measured second-order coherence function values g (2) as the number ofrealizations is increased. The measured g (2) function (blue squares) is fit with an asymptotic function g̃(green line) to determine the error in g (2) measuring a finite number of realizations. Asymptote of g̃ is shownfor limN →∞ g̃. This example uses the data from ∆ωbin = 0.3 meV, or the 20-bins case.

To interpret the results of the statistical study, it is necessary to consider the finite
number of traces measured. A consequence of the finite number of measured traces is seen in
the histogram in Fig. 8.2b. The probability distribution function for the 0-bin case (coherent
light) peaks to a probability of 1 at n = 10 photons. However, a glance back at Fig. 5.5
reminds us that coherent photon number statistics should follow a Poisson distribution withsome finite width. Because of the limited number of measurements, it is necessary to choose
the histogram width to be large enough that multiple values in each bin can be counted.
The 2-bin case exhibits coherent behavior, with a peak around n = 14 (the peak at n = 2 isa consequence of chosen bin size). However, for the 20-bin case, the probability distributionfunction roughly decays exponentially, very similar to the thermal probability distribution
curve in Fig. 5.5.

154
The cross-correlations that we measure are averaged in Fig. 8.2c. We notice thatthe width of the intensity profile increases as the number of bins increases. This fact isconsistent with the analysis accompanying Fig. 7.5. The smaller the frequency feature δfin the frequency domain, the longer the pulse shape is in the time domain. Because thecross-correlation is shown here for only a few delays, it is difficult to see that the 2-bins caseis longer in time duration than the 0-bin case. The cross-correlation width for the 0-bin caseis ∆τS = 520 fs, as reported in §3.5. The cross-correlation width for the 2-bin case is closerto ∆τS = 3 ps. In fact, since the spectral feature δf ∝ 1/Nbins , the time duration of thepulses is estimated to scale roughly as [115]:∆τ (Nbins ) ≈ Nbins ∆τ0 ,(8.5)

where the width of the cross-correlation ∆τ0 = 520 fs for Nbins = 0. As a reality check of thisestimate, the averaged temporal width ∆τSavg (20) = 4.5 ps = 8.7 ∆τ0 for the average crosscorrelation for the 20-bin case. The estimate in Eqn. 8.5 is reasonable considering that thewidth of Savg (τ ) is an approximation of the temporal extent of the average sequence of pulses.
The extended time duration of the pulses is relevant to interpretation of measurements in
the QWs. However, the feature that we are as interested in for this statistical analysis is theensemble-averaged coherence value.
It is possible to see a clear difference in the measured k th -order coherence value g (k)for the different bin spacings. We show in Fig. 8.2d that the first-order correlation function
is independent of bin spacing. The higher-order correlation functions diverge as k increases.
We primarily care about second-order coherence function values. The g (2) values in Fig.
8.2d are plotted in Fig. 8.4 with measured values from several other bin sizes. In all cases
Nreal = 500 realizations were measured to calculate g (2) . We find that the second-ordercoherence function value increases as we increase the number of bins across the spectrum,
consistent with Eqn. 6.17. Note that inconsistencies with the theory here are both becauseof the finite number of measurements and the fact that the theory is valid only for Nbins ≫ 2.

155

2
1.8

g(2)

1.6
1.4
1.2
Measured
Theory estimate
1
0

5

10
15
20
25
Nbins across the spectrum

30

Figure 8.4: Measured second-order coherence function values for several different bin spacings. Measured
values correspond to the trend predicted in Eqn. 6.17.

We have characterized the statistical properties for an ensemble of pulses for different
bin spacings and have found that indeed the photon statistics are closer to thermal lightthan coherent in the limit of a large number of bins across the laser spectrum, as predictedby the Kira-Koch theory [115].
Another prediction from the DME averaging scheme is that the average of the scramP ens scram
scram
Sr(ω) should limit to the transform-limited
bled pump spectra Savg
(ω) = N1ens Nrspectrum S flat (ω) (with a flat spectral phase mask). As a test of this, we successively average the spectra of an increasing number of realizations to confirm that the spectra of
the scrambled realizations converge to the transform-limited spectrum. We illustrate theconvergence of the pump spectra in Fig 8.5. The standard error of the normalized spectra2
P  scram
σ 2 = i Savg
(ωi ) − S flat (ωi ) < 10−6 for Nens > 50 realizations.

Considering that a single realization is a collection of multiple temporal modes, as

illustrated in Fig. 8.1, we investigate the possibility that a single scrambled realization may

156
0.025
Flat mask
1 Scrambled
1450

Intensity [arb. u.]

0.02

0.015

0.01

0.005

0

1544

1545

1546

1547 1548 1549
Energy [meV]

1550

1551

Figure 8.5: The average scrambled pump spectrum (shown for Nens = 1, 14, 50) converges to the flat mask
spectrum as the number of realizations Nens is increased.

produce some of the predicted effects. We simulate single scrambled realizations in a simple
model to gain insight about the effects of phase randomization.
8.2

Qualitative predictions using the optical Bloch equations
Each scrambled realization contains a small ensemble of pulses with varied peak inten-

sity, temporal phase, and relative time delay to the other pulses in the realization. These
three variables are selected from a distribution determined by the spectral phase bin size. It
is thus reasonable to inquire whether a single scrambled realization might have an effect on
the many-body interactions in the QW system when compared with a coherent light pulsethat creates the same electron-hole carrier density.
To estimate qualitative effects of using scrambled realizations, we perform a simulation
using the optical Bloch equations (OBEs), discussed in §2.6. We also compare the resultswith other pulse shapes to predict how temporal pulse duration affects system dynamics. The
pulse-shaper simulation discussed in Chapter 7 allows generation of the electric field in the157time domain. The temporal intensity waveforms from these electric fields agree with crosscorrelation measurements. Based on the matching between measurement and simulation, we
use the generated electric fields as an input to the optical Bloch equations simulation. Even
though this simulation does not include many-body interactions, we expect that conditions
giving rise to a lower polarization for the same generated carrier population should give riseto anomalous reduction in scattering and other effects, as discussed in §5.4.
We assume in our simulation that the electric field gives rise to excited carrier populations and off-diagonal density matrix elements according to the OBEs (Eqn. 2.30). We
attempt to see the qualitative effects of different temporal waveforms on the dynamics. This
simulation has nothing to do with the photon statistics. It is a semi-classical approach tounderstanding two-level system dynamics.
For the model, a population decay time of T1 = 1/γee = 10 ps and a dephasing time of
T2 = 1/γeg = 1 ps are chosen. The dynamics of ρee −ρgg and ρeg are simulated, corresponding
to the population and polarization, respectively. As an indicator of how much polarizationis generated for a given population, we record the maximal ratio of the population to thepolarization. We take the ratios of each absolute-value quantity squared so that we have amagnitude (instead of a complex value) for comparison between different pulse realizations.
An example of the dynamics for a transform-limited pulse excitation as simulated by the
OBEs is shown in 8.6. The excitation pulse drives the population inversion and polarization
terms in Eqn. 2.30. The population inversion ρee − ρgg = 2 ρee − 1 ranges between -1 and 1,
corresponding to full population in the ground state and the excited state, respectively. The
term ρeg is proportional to the macroscopic polarization, as discussed in §2.6. Both terms
are presented in absolute value squared to simplify the complex quantities. This simulation
can also reveal qualitative understanding of the dynamics for more complicated waveforms.
To apply the OBEs to different temporal intensity waveforms, we start with the spectrum in Fig 3.4, and use our pulse-shaping simulation (described in §7.7.2) to generate threesets of complex electric field envelopes ε(t). The generated fields drive the OBEs, and the158

Population and polarization [arb. u.]

0.1
Polarization |ρeg|2
Population |ρee−ρgg|2

0.08

pulse envelope
0.06

0.04

0.02

0

−2

0

2

4
time [ps]

6

8

10

Figure 8.6: Simulation using the optical Bloch equations (Eqn. 2.30) of the optical excitation of a two-levelsystem including phenomenological decay terms. The population term is offset such that 0 means populationis completely in the ground state.

results from the realizations are compared.
In one case, the spectrum of the pulse is narrowed, yielding a longer pulse durationin the time domain. In another case, two pulses are chosen to be a variable time delay
apart from each other. We compare both of these cases to the scrambled pulses, where weapply a random phase mask with varying energy bin spacing ∆ωbin . The smaller the bin
spacing, the longer the duration of the pulse sequence (illustrated in Fig. 7.5). In all threecases, the temporal duration is varied over a range from 0.5 ps up to 100 ps. The maximal population-to-polarization ratio |ρee − ρgg |2 / |ρgg |2 is recorded for each realization. We
choose this observable because we are interested finding trends concerning which waveforms
give rise to a low polarization for a fixed population.
To compare the results for the three separate cases, we quantify the temporal extent

159
of each realization by the second moment:
R∞
2

t

=

t2 ε∗ (t) ε(t) dt−∞R∞.
ε∗ (t) ε(t) dt
−∞

(8.6)

The second moment quantifies the temporal duration, allowing a rough comparison between
the results for the different realizations.
The maximal population-to-polarization ratio is plotted in Fig. 8.7 as a function of
the temporal duration of each realization. At short durations the three cases exhibit similar
behavior. However, for longer temporal durations, we see that the ratio is maximized for the
spectrum-narrowing case. This result is closely matched by the two-pulse configuration. The
randomized-phase realizations follow a trend similar to the other two cases, but the ratio
appears to flatten out for long temporal durations. The error bars at each point show thestandard deviation from five simulations of different scrambled realizations with the sameenergy bin spacing ∆ωbin .

Figure 8.7: Population-to-polarization ratios for three cases where the temporal duration is systematicallyvaried.

160
The simulations show that the population-to-polarization ratio increases with the temporal duration of a waveform, regardless of the type of realization. Since polarization scattering dominates the excitation-induced effects, as shown in Chapter 4, this simulation predicts
that the excitation-induced effects should be weaker for longer duration pulses comparedto the effects for a transform-limited pulse that create the same population. The weaker
excitation-induced effects manifest in a less saturated HH 1s resonance absorption spectrum: a higher peak height, less blue shift, and a narrower linewidth. We now proceed totest the effects of the scrambled realizations in the QW system, and in the next chapter we
explore the measured affects of different pulse shapes.
8.3

Experimental methods
We have verified that the ensemble of scrambled realizations corresponds to a thermal

source, and simulation indicates that single scrambled realizations may show a difference totransform-limited excitation. A group of measurements is performed to quantify the QW
response to scrambled realizations.
We perform spectrally resolved transient absorption measurements of the QW systemafter excitation by each scrambled realization. The procedure for transient absorption measurements is very similar to the methods described in Chapter 3. The modifications are as
follows. Between each measurement, we change the phase mask on the spatial light modulator in the pulse shaper to modulate the spectral phase of the pump light source. The
technique for spectral phase modulation is discussed in Chapter 7. Since the masks havediscontinuities in the phase leading to unavoidable amplitude modulation of the pulse, theaverage power is slightly different for each scrambled realization.
pump
We monitor the pump input power PIN
continuously as discussed in §3.3.4. We
pumpadjust the power of each phase mask realization so that PIN
is the same for all realizations.

Additionally, the reflected and transmitted pump powers are measured continuously. These
three calibrated measurements allow calculation of the pump power absorbed by the QW

161
pump
system PQW
by Eqn. 3.13. We spectrally resolve the absorption α(ω) of a probe pulse that

arrives at the sample a delay τ after the pump pulse creates a many-body configuration.
This delay must be chosen carefully since spectral phase modulation broadens out the pumppulse in time, as discussed in §7.5 and shown in Fig. 8.1. To simplify the interpretation of
the results, we want to compare the effects of the scrambled realizations to that of transformlimited pulses in the incoherent regime, where the polarization has decayed. Consequently,
the choice of a long probe delay τ = 27 ps ensures that the polarization has decayed by thetime the probe arrives at the sample.
pump
We repeat the measurement for a matrix of phase masks and PIN
powers, including

multiple measurements using the flat phase mask to ensure repeatability. From the spectrally
resolved probe absorption response, parameters are extracted via our model-independent
fitting procedure (§3.4) to allow comparison between different realizations.
8.4

Results of phase-randomized experiments
We present results from the measurements of the QW system response when excitedwith scrambled light. From each probe spectrum measured at one of the matrix of powers
and phase mask realizations, we extract the peak height and the center resonance position.
These observables relate information about how strongly the many-body configuration issaturating the exciton resonance. The peak heights and the center resonance positions areshown in Fig. 8.8. As a reminder of the results from Chapter 4, stronger nonlinearity meansa lower peak height and a stronger blue shift of the center resonance position.
The peak height and center position both indicate that the scrambled realizations giverise to less saturation than the transform-limited pulse for similar powers absorbed by thepump
QW (PQW). Fitting a line through the data for both the transform-limited pulse data andthe scrambled data, we see that the differences in nonlinear effect become more noticeable aspump
PQW
increases. The probe spectra converge at the lowest excitation densities, as expected

for the probe spectra in the absence of any pump excitation. The same trends are observed

162

Figure 8.8: Nonlinear observables as a function of power. Peak heights of αQW are shown for varying (a)
pump
pump
pump
pump
PQW
and (b) PQW. Center resonance positions are shown for varying (c) PQW
and (d) PQW. Fits(solid lines) through each set of points clarify the trends for the observables.

pump
as a function of the input excitation power PIN.

The results are consistent with the theoretical prediction (§5.4) that the scrambled
realizations should produce weaker nonlinear effects compared with the transform-limited
pulses for the same excitation densities in the QW. The probe absorption spectra are lesssaturated for the scrambled realizations compared with the transform-limited (coherent)case. The average absorption spectra, computed according to Eqn. 6.7, are shown in Fig.
8.9, along with the linear absorption spectrum. It is clear in this plot that not only do single
scrambled realizations saturate the HH 1s-resonance less than transform-limited excitation
pump
for the same PIN, the average absorption spectrum is less saturated for scrambled light

excitation than for transform-limited pulse excitation.
These data need confirmation from the theory to determine whether or not they are atrue demonstration of quantum-optical spectroscopy. The confirmation will be accomplishedthrough a theory technique known as cluster-expansion transformation, discussed in the163

1
Scrambled
Coherent
Pump off

0.9

Absorption α

0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
1544

1545

1546
1547
Energy [meV]

1548

1549

Figure 8.9: The average spectrum from the scrambled realizations saturates the HH 1s-resonance less thanpumpfrom coherent excitation with the same PIN. The spectra are shown with the linear absorption (pumpoff) for comparison.

literature [120].
While we do not yet have confirmation that we have demonstrated quantum-optical
spectroscopy, our observations of weaker saturation for the scrambled realizations comparedwith transform-limited excitation are consistent with the Kira-Koch prediction. However,the OBE simulations performed in this chapter suggest that the suppression of polarization(and thus also suppression of the nonlinear scattering) can be explained by a simpler reason
than suggested by the theory. It is possible that the longer temporal pulse duration (orlower peak intensity) is mainly responsible for the observed decrease in excitation-induced
effects. To explore this hypothesis, we compare the effects of scrambled realizations to thoseof different pulse shapes.

Chapter 9
Quantum-well response to other pulse shapes

We found in the previous chapter that each scrambled realization produces decreased
nonlinear effects on average in comparison to a transform-limited pulse excitation. The data
may possibly validate the theoretical prediction that the coherence properties of the scrambled pulses influence the many-body configurations. However, since the phase-randomization
technique also increases the time duration of the pulses (and consequently lowers the peakintensity), we consider the possibility that the longer duration may explain the observed decreased nonlinearities independent of the consequences of the statistics of the exciting lightsource.
To test this possibility, we create realizations with similar time duration as the scrambled realizations but with no statistical properties beyond that of a coherent state. In thesimulations discussed in Chapter 8, pulse shapes other than scrambled light were shown tohave effects similar to the phase-randomized realizations in a two-level system. While thecase of narrowing the excitation spectrum produces a high population-to-polarization ratio in
the simulations, it is difficult to compare this case to the scrambled realizations because theresonance condition is modified for a changed bandwidth [117]. Consequently, we examine
the effects of a pulse sequence in comparison to the effects for the scrambled realizations.

165
9.1

Three-pulse (zero-Φ) excitation
To achieve a set of realizations to compare with the scrambled cases, we create aseries of “zero-Φ” masks with the same energy bin spacing as for the scrambled masks,∆ωbin = 0.21 meV. The mask type is illustrated in the frequency and time domains in Fig.
9.1. Our name for this set of masks describes the spectral phase square wave pattern withmodulation amplitude Φ across the spectrum. In contrast to the random temporal nature of
the scrambled realizations, the zero-Φ masks produce a simple series of three pulses in thetime domain with even spacing. For this reason, we refer to the zero-Φ realizations in thetime domain as “three-pulse” realizations. While the two-pulse sequence described above is aslightly simpler candidate for comparison, we experimentally determine that this realization
results in a low efficiency, making tests in the nonlinear regime difficult. The three-pulse
sequence has a higher efficiency, and powers comparable to the randomized-phase masks areachievable. We test the quantum-well (QW) response for a range of amplitude modulations
Φ and shifts in the spectral location θ for the square-wave pattern, shown in Fig. 9.1.

Figure 9.1: (a) Frequency and (b) time domain representations of a zero-Φ (or three-pulse) realization.
The simulation is shown to roughly match the experimental cross-correlation data. In (a), the parameters θand Φ are labeled as described in the text.

We measure cross-correlations of the three-pulse realizations to determine the timedomain intensity profiles, similar to Fig. 9.1. The realizations are ordered in three groups

166of three realizations. All of the realizations exhibit a three-pulse sequence with the same
relative delay between pulses. In the first group, with modulation between ∆Φ = π/1.1, theouter two pulses are stronger than the central pulse. In the central group, the amplitudeof the spectral phase modulation was chosen (∆Φ = π/1.14) such that the three pulses areapproximately equal in intensity. This is the realization shown in Fig. 9.1. In the last group,with lower amplitude of modulation (∆Φ = π/1.3) , the central pulse is stronger than theouter two pulses. For each group, we shift the pattern by θ = 0, π2 , and π. We find thatthe shifting θ has no effect on the cross-correlation. However, simulations (discussed aroundFig. 7) show that the shift θ in the frequency domain leads to different relative temporalphases between the pulses in each sequence. For this reason, we try several θ shifts to see if
this has any affect on the quantum-well (QW) system response.
We collect spectrally resolved transient-absorption data using these three-pulse realizations along with 13 scrambled phase masks for comparison. The procedure for data collectionis the same as for the scrambled masks, discussed in Chapter 8. We apply each phase mask
pump
to the spectrally narrowed pump pulse, setting the pump power PIN
to a fixed input

value selected from a matrix of five values. The input, reflected and transmitted powers arerecorded to construct the power absorbed by the QW according to Eqn. 3.13. The power
absorbed by the QW is proportional to the electron-hole density created by the pump realization. The nonlinear response of the probe transmitted through the sample is recorded
at a delay of τ = 26.7 ps. Zero delay (τ = 0) corresponds to when the transform-limited
pulse arrives. Since the probe reflection is quite small compared with the transmission, andthe nonlinear effects we are searching for can be extracted from the transmitted pulse, we
approximate the probe absorption to be α(ω) ≈ 1 − T (ω); this allows measurements to bemade in half the time.
We find that the each of the three-pulse realizations produce similar QW probe responses that do not show a dependence on the amplitude Φ or shifting θ in the square-wave
spectral phase pattern. The lack of dependence on the shifting θ means that the excitation

167
effects for this bin spacing are insensitive to the exact spectral position of the dips in amplitude as long as the total power is set to a constant. However, it is possible that for wider bin
spacings (narrower time between the pulses), differences in relative temporal phases between
pulses may give rise to measurable effects.

pump
Figure 9.2: Nonlinear observables as a function of power. Peak heights are shown for varying (a) PQW
pump
pump
pump
and (b) PQW. Center resonance positions are shown for varying (c) PQW
and (d) PQW.

The zero-Φ realizations produce very similar nonlinear probe responses compared tothe scrambled phase masks for similar powers absorbed by the QW system. For the matrix
of input powers used, we extract two observables of the nonlinear effects from the recorded
probe absorption response: center position and peak height of the heavy-hole (HH) 1s excitonfeature, as discussed in §3.4. We plot the observables extracted from the probe absorption as
a function of the power absorbed by the QW system. Figure 9.2 shows the center positions
and the peak heights of the HH 1s exciton as a function of power. The two sets of ‘flat mask’shown in the figure (black and blue) are multiple measurements from transform-limited
excitation to ensure repeatability. We find that there is less spread for the set of zero-Φ168
realizations compared with the scrambled realization measurements. We perform a linear
fit to each type of realization to see the trends more clearly. The fits show a statisticallysignificant difference for both of these cases from the transform-limited case. Furthermore,
the zero-Φ and scrambled realization measurements yield observables that are extremely
close to each other. The absorption observables extracted from the probe absorption fromthe many-body state created by the zero-Φ realizations lie on the same line as the scrambled
pulses for both observables, whether we view the observables as a function of the input pump
power or of the pump power absorbed by the QW.
Although the zero-Φ and scrambled realizations produce similar results in terms of thenonlinearity, we noticed a difference between the results for the two sets. The fraction of
the pump power which is absorbed by the QW for the scrambled pulses is lower on averagethan for the zero-Φ pulses. This difference in fractional absorption is shown in Fig. 9.3 by
pump
pump
comparing the fraction of power absorbed by the QW (PQW
/PIN
) as a function of input

power. The data reveals that a single scrambled phase mask realization from our set actually
yields a higher absorbed fraction by the QW. However, the scrambled realizations have alower fractional power absorbed by the QW on average compared with the both the zero-Φand transform-limited (flat mask) realizations.

Figure 9.3: Fractional absorption by the QW system as a function of input power, shown for (a) scrambled
realizations and (b) zero-Φ realizations.

169
We attempt to explain in the time domain the results for the zero-Φ realizations concerning the reduced nonlinearity compared with the transform-limited pulses and the close
matching with the scrambled excitation. Since we now discuss the dynamics in the time
domain, we refer to a zero-Φ realization as a three-pulse sequence.
Since the three-pulse sequence has similar time duration as the scrambled realizations
and produces the same nonlinear effects, we hypothesize that the decreased nonlinear effectcan be explained by the longer temporal duration of the realization. If the dynamics canbe understood from a simple model, then it may be possible to predict the nonlinear effects
for different pulse shapes (including the scrambled realizations) given a temporal intensity
profile. To test this possible explanation for the measured decrease in nonlinearity, we
compare the QW system time dynamics for a three-pulse sequence to the dynamics generated
by a single transform-limited pulse.

Figure 9.4: Temporal dynamics for observables of the probe absorption line shape: (a) center resonanceposition and (b) peak height of the HH 1s-resonance. The observables in the absence of any pump excitation
are also shown (cyan lines).

We measure the probe absorption for the single-pulse transform-limited pump excitation using the previously described procedure but for a series of nine time delays τ as wellas five pump powers. The results from this measurement are shown in Fig. 9.4. While thecenter positions exhibits similar decay patterns for each excitation density, the peak heights
exhibit nontrivial behavior. We find that the peak heights decrease as a function of time for

170
the highest excitation densities before beginning to rise at longer delays. The lower excitation densities produce monotonically increasing peak heights as a function of time, as would
be expected for a decay. The relaxation times are much slower for the peak height than forthe center position.
To compare the single-pulse data to the three-pulse data, we extract parameters fromthe single-pulse dynamics and attempt to match the dynamics for a three-pulse sequence bya simulation based on the extracted decay parameters from the single-pulse case. Noticing apumplinear relationship between PQW
and the center position at time-zero for each pump power,

we apply a linear transformation on the data in Fig. 9.4a to yield a measure of the nonlinearity in arbitrary units that sets the unexcited value near zero. The linear transformationis ωcenter = A × n + B, where ωcenter is the center resonance position, n is the measure ofnonlinearity, A = 1.9 and B = 1546.8.

Figure 9.5: Dynamics of the nonlinearity for single-pulse excitation, shown with fits (black dashed lines)
for the same powers as shown in Fig. 9.4. The nonlinearity in the absence of pump excitation is also shown(cyan line) near zero.

The fitting procedure for the single-pulse data involves finding decaying exponential

171functions that best match each of the dynamics. We find that a single decaying exponentialfunction is unable to fit the data accurately. As discussed in §2.7, we are aware that two
time scales of decay processes are responsible for the relaxation: dephasing and interband
recombination. Consequently, we fit the single-pulse nonlinearity dynamics with the sum of
two decaying exponentials:
n(τ ) = n0 e−γpop τ + e−γpol τ ,(9.1)

with the parameters: n0 , the initial nonlinearity generated at the moment the pump pulse
arrives; γpol , the polarization decay (dephasing) time; and γpop , the recombination time (incoherent decay). The linear transformation of the center position dynamics to the nonlinear
dynamics along with the fits are shown in Fig. 9.5. From the fits we extract the parametersin Eqn. 9.1.
We find from the single-pulse data that both the recombination time and coherent
decay time exhibit a weak dependence on the pump intensity. The results of the fits fromthe single-pulse data are shown in Fig. 9.6. The average values of the decay parameters
are γpol = 0.211 ± 0.076 ps−1 , and γcoh = 0.015 ± 0.0067 ps−1 , corresponding to decay timesof Tpol =4.7 ps and Tpop =68.4 ps, respectively. We use these decay parameters from thesingle-pulse data to simulate the three-pulse data. The simulation includes the extracted
decay parameters and models each of the three pulses as an impulse function that generates
a nonlinearity proportional to its intensity.
To test how well the model predicts a sequence of pulses, we measure the parameter
dynamics from a sequence of three pulses that are equal in intensity. For this realization, we
pump
set the power to PIN= 6.73 mW, allowing comparison with the transformed limited pulse
pumpat PIN= 2.25 mW. The comparison is reasonable since each of the three pulses each haveapproximately the same photon density as the transform-limited pulse (6.73 mW/3 pulses =2.24 mW/pulse). As a reminder, the photon density in a pulse is simply proportional to theaverage power (Eqn. 3.6). We record the probe absorption αQW (ω) for a matrix of delays

172

Decay constants
0.35
γPOL
0.3

γPOP

γ (ps−1)

0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0

0.5
1
1.5
pump power absorbed by QW (mW)

2

Figure 9.6: Decay parameters extracted from the single-pulse temporal data using Eqn. 9.1.

to capture the dynamics after each of the three pulses.
We observe similar decay behavior for the three-pulse data compared with the singlepulse data, shown in Fig. 9.7. The vertical green lines of the simulation indicate the arrival
times of each pulse. After each pulse, the nonlinearity relaxes toward its “pump off” value.
We encounter challenges in matching the simulation with the three-pulse data. First,
we notice that there is not the same fractional absorption for the second and third pulses.
This fact implies that the fractional absorption depends on the excitation history. We accountfor the saturated behavior by fitting the function in Eqn. 9.1 to each of the three pulses
and extrapolating on each curve to the moment each pulse arrives. With this procedure, weestimate the total absorption from all three pulses to be 1.36 mW. This estimate is close to
the direct measurement of 1.55 mW (= 0.23 × 6.73 mW), as shown in Fig. 9.3. However,even after correcting for saturation effects, we see that the rates of decay after the second
and third pulse do not match those of the simulation. Namely, the decay times are also
affected by the excitation history.

173

Figure 9.7: Nonlinearity dynamics for the three-pulse realization with a simulation that uses parametersfrom the single-pulse data and accounts for saturation behavior based on the three-pulse data. The poor fit
suggests that the temporal dynamics are nontrivial.

These data with the simulations suggest that the temporal dynamics are both important and non-trivial. Since the theoretical computation that might explain the temporal
dynamics for individual scrambled realizations or the three pulse sequence is too expensive, we are motivated to perform another experiment to reveal the nature of the temporal
dynamics by using chirped pulses.
9.2

Chirped pulses
Seeing that the QW system response to excitation sources with wide temporal duration

exhibits nontrivial behavior, we further characterize the system response by studying theeffects of chirped pulses on the QW system dynamics. We have demonstrated in §7.7.2 thatchirp (quadratic spectral phase) broadens pulses in time. We apply a range of positive andnegative chirp parameters ranging from φ′′ (ω0 )/2 = 0 meV−2 up to φ′′ (ω0 )/2 = ±5.8 meV−2 ,corresponding to pulse durations ranging from ∆τpump = 430 fs to ∆τpump = 10.8 ps. These

174
pulse durations are shown as a function of chirp parameter in Fig. 7.12. For each of thesechirp parameters, we apply a quadratic phase mask to the pump spectrum, and then repeat
the transient absorption measurement as described in §8.3 for a probe delay of τ = 13 ps.
pump
For each realization, the input pump power PIN
is set to 7 mW. From the probe absorption

spectra α(ω), we extract the peak height and center position of the HH 1s-resonance using
the procedure described in §3.4.

Figure 9.8: Measurements of the QW system response to chirped pulses. From the probe absorption, we
extract (a) the peak resonance position and (b) the peak height. The observables in the absence of thepump light are shown for comparison (cyan lines). (c) The power absorbed by the QW exhibits nontrivial
dependence on chirp parameter. (d) The nonlinear observables do not follow a simple trend with theabsorbed powers. The extreme chirp parameter values at ±5.8 meV−2 are marked. All four frames show
the measurement from the transform-limited case for comparison and the black lines guide the eye throughthe chirp values near φ′′ (ω0 )/2 = 0 meV−2 .

The nonlinear probe measurements from the different chirped-pulse realizations, summarized in Fig. 9.8, demonstrate nontrivial dynamics. The nonlinear observables (higher
nonlinearity = blue shifting and lower peak height) and the pump power absorption exhibit
asymmetries with respect to the sign of chirp. The peak height and the center resonanceposition of the probe absorption for all measured values are strongly correlated, with a linear

175
relationship having coefficient of determination R2 = 0.974. For negative chirp parameters(blue arrives first at the QW), the nonlinearities mostly decrease as with increasing chirp
magnitude |φ′′ (ω0 )/2| (with the exception of the most extreme value at φ′′ (ω0 )/2 = −5.8
meV−2 ). The positive chirp case (red arrives first) shows stronger nonlinear behavior withincreasing chirp up until φ′′ (ω0 )/2 = 0.3 meV−2 , followed by decreasing nonlinearity thatlevels off to roughly the transform-limited values. The pump power absorbed by the QW
system (Fig. 9.8c) for negative chirp is lower than the transform-limited case (excepting thetwo extreme values). For positive chirp, the pump absorption is consistently higher than thetransform-limited case and grows roughly linearly with chirp parameter. A plot of the peakheight as a function of the power absorbed by the QW in Fig. 9.8d shows that the change
in nonlinearity cannot be simply attributed to a change in the power absorbed by the QW
since the different nonlinear effects happens for the same powers absorbed.

Figure 9.9: Spectra for a variety of spectral chirp parameters φ′′ (ω0 )/2 with units meV−2 in the legend.
Negative chirp parameters produce similar spectra. A quadratic spectral phase φ′′ (ω0 )/2 = 1.9 meV−2 isalso shown (dashed line).

To interpret these data, we also consider that for large chirp parameters the pump
spectra are strongly modified. The modification for large chirp parameters results from rapid176changes in phase at the edges of the spectrum. The phase “wraps around” between 0 and
2π, resulting in sharp discontinuities in phase between adjacent pixels. These discontinuities
diffract out the light at the spectrum edges according to the theory presented in §7.4. The
spectral amplitude modulation becomes noticeable for chirp parameters beyond |φ′′ (ω0 )/2| >1 meV−2 .
Considering the probe data along with the pump spectra, we attribute the observed
behavior to the pump-induced shifting of the center position of the resonance. For small chirpparameters (|φ′′ (ω0 )/2| < 1 meV−2 ), the pump spectra are not modified. Since the tendencyof the resonance is to blue shift, the positive chirp enhances the nonlinearity for low chirpparameters. This is because the red part of the pump spectrum, arriving first, contributes
to some blue shifting of the resonance, then the subsequent blue part of the spectrum is onresonance. Conversely, the negative chirp accomplishes the opposite. The blue part of thespectrum blue-shifts the resonance, causing the subsequent red part of the spectrum to be
off resonance. This explains the observed nonlinearities for small chirp parameters.
For larger chirp parameters, the pump spectra become narrower, which changes theresonance condition. For positive chirp, the pump becomes less resonant with the HH 1sresonance, thus weakening the nonlinearities. However, large values of negative chirp actually
begin to enhance the nonlinearities even though the pump spectra are narrowed. Because ofthis, our interpretation is not complete.
The most surprising feature from this study of chirped pulses is that the positively
chirped pulses, which are longer in time duration than the transform-limited pulse, canactually produce stronger nonlinearities than the transform-limited case. This fact indicatesthat the dynamics are complicated and that there is not a straight-forward relationshipbetween the time duration of an excitation pulse and observed nonlinearities.
It is challenging to make a connection between the chirped pulses and the scrambled
realizations because the bandwidth of the spectra are strongly modified for large chirp parameters, whereas the bandwidth for the scrambled realizations is not changed. However,

177
The results suggest that the system response is nontrivial and that analysis using microscopic theory may provide insight concerning the system dynamics in response to different
pulse shapes.

Chapter 10
Conclusion

We have explored the nonlinear dynamics of excitons in a GaAs quantum-well (QW)
system. The research is broken into two parts: (i) quantitative measurements of the Coulombinduced nonlinearities, and (ii) a study of the system response to light statistics using pulseshaping techniques.
Our quantitative measurements combined with a microscopic theory elucidate the
many-body interactions that give rise to observed changes in the probe response. The manybody configurations matched by the theory for a variety of excitation conditions quantitatively demonstrate the effects of polarization selection and reveal system dynamics. Specifically, we find that Coulomb scattering of polarization with free-carrier densities dominates
the excitation-induced shifting (EIS) and excitation-induced dephasing (EID) of the exciton
resonance in our sample. Surprisingly, exciton populations do not significantly contributeto the nonlinear line shape. Strong transient gain is observed only under co-circular pumpprobe conditions and is attributed to a transfer coherent transfer of energy between thepump and probe. The combination of experiment with theory provide the most complete
description to date of the many-body effects that contribute to observed nonlinear responses.
The work described in Chapters 3–4 established that the nonlinearities are large enoughto display light-statistic dependent excitation-induced (nonlinear) effects. To realize the firstexperimental demonstration of quantum-optical spectroscopy, where the nonlinear material
response depends on the light statistics of the excitation source, we introduced a novel

179
experimental technique combined with a theoretical paradigm known as density-matrix ensemble averaging. We used pulse-shaping techniques to generate spectral-phase-randomized
pulse realizations to create a many-body configuration in the QW system and measured
the response with spectrally resolved transient absorption techniques described in Chapter
3. We found that single phase-randomized realizations saturated the exciton resonance lessthan for a transform-limited pulse, on average. An ensemble of probe measurements after
phase-randomized realization excitation was averaged to construct the system response to
an incoherent excitation source.
Experimental measurements are consistent with the prediction that incoherent excitation at the same excitation densities as transform-limited excitation leads to suppressionof polarization (and thus a suppression of saturation effects). However, comparison of thesystem response to other pulse shapes suggests a simpler explanation for decreased nonlinearities than quantum-statistical fluctuations. We find that a sequence of pulses withsimilar time duration and excitation density, but with no statistical properties beyond thatof a coherent state, yields a similar nonlinear response to phase-randomized realizations.
This observation suggests that the observed decrease in saturation is primarily due to theincreased time duration of the phase-randomized realizations. While a simpler explanation
for the decreased nonlinearities observed in the system has been offered, the averaged experimental phase-randomized data may in fact represent a construction the system response tolight excitation with incoherent statistics. This claim will be verified by further theoreticalinvestigation.
10.1

Outlook
We are continuing work with our theorist collaborators to determine the meaning of

the constructed system response involving density-matrix ensemble averaging techniques.
However, it is also possible that the many-body interactions in our system are influenced by
the light statistics of the optical excitation source in ways that we have not been measuring.

180
We propose a future experiment to further explore quantum-optical spectroscopy of GaAs
QWs.
The experimental measurements reported in this thesis consist only of the transient
probe response. However, the theory predicts more observable effects than just the suppression of scattering for incoherent excitation. Specifically, incoherent excitation is predicted togenerate a macroscopic population of low-momentum states, shown in Fig. 5.9c. The photoluminescence from such a population is predicted to be directional and with incoherent
quantum statistics.
Measurement of the photoluminescence properties could directly verify the Kira-Kochpredictions for quantum-optical spectroscopy. This could be accomplished via time-resolved
measurements of the quantum statistics and directionality of the photoluminescence. The
pholuminescence must be time-resolved to separate it from the excitation light. Measurements of the photoluminescence with a balanced homodyne detection setup [121] allows
for characterization of the quantum statistics. These additional measurements may give further evidence that phase-randomized pulses corroborate theoretical predictions for quantumoptical spectroscopy.

Bibliography[1] M. Fox, Optical Properties of Solids (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
[2] G. W. Fehrenbach, W. Schfer, and R. G. Ulbrich, Excitonic versus plasma screening
in highly excited gallium arsenide, Journal of Luminescence 30, 154 (1985).
[3] H. Wang, K. Ferrio, D. G. Steel, Y. Z. Hu, R. Binder, and S. W. Koch, Transient
nonlinear optical response from excitation induced dephasing in GaAs, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 71, 1261 (1993).
[4] N. Peyghambarian, H. M. Gibbs, J. L. Jewell, A. Antonetti, A. Migus, D. Hulin, and A.
Mysyrowicz, Blue Shift of the Exciton Resonance due to Exciton-Exciton Interactions
in a Multiple-Quantum-Well Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2433 (1984).
[5] , .
[6] J. C. Kim, D. R. Wake, and J. P. Wolfe, Thermodynamics of biexcitons in a GaAs
quantum well, Phys. Rev. B 50, 15099 (1994).
[7] M. Kira and S. Koch, Many-body correlations and excitonic effects in semiconductor
spectroscopy, Progress in Quantum Electronics 30, 155 (2006).
[8] A. Linenberger, Data sheet for Linear Series Spatial Light Modulator, 2006,
http://www.bnonlinear.com/.
[9] A. M. Weiner, Femtosecond pulse shaping using spatial light modulators, Review of
Scientific Instruments 71, 1929 (2000).
[10] D.-S. Kim, J. Shah, J. E. Cunningham, T. C. Damen, W. Schäfer, M. Hartmann,and S. Schmitt-Rink, Giant excitonic resonance in time-resolved four-wave mixing inquantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1006 (1992).
[11] S. T. Cundiff, Coherent spectroscopy of semiconductors, Opt. Express 16, 4639 (2008).
[12] N. Peyghambarian, H. M. Gibbs, J. L. Jewell, A. Antonetti, A. Migus, D. Hulin, and A.
Mysyrowicz, Blue Shift of the Exciton Resonance due to Exciton-Exciton Interactions
in a Multiple-Quantum-Well Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2433 (1984).

182[13] Y. Z. Hu, R. Binder, S. W. Koch, S. T. Cundiff, H. Wang, and D. G. Steel, Excitationand polarization effects in semiconductor four-wave-mixing spectroscopy, Phys. Rev.
B 49, 14382 (1994).
[14] F. Jahnke et al., Excitonic Nonlinearities of Semiconductor Microcavities in the Nonperturbative Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5257 (1996).
[15] J. M. Shacklette and S. T. Cundiff, Role of excitation-induced shift in the coherent
optical response of semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 66, 045309 (2002).
[16] S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 1999).
[17] J. G. Gay, Screening of Excitons in Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 4, 2567 (1971).
[18] C. V. Shank, R. L. Fork, R. F. Leheny, and J. Shah, Dynamics of Photoexcited
GaAs Band-Edge Absorption with Subpicosecond Resolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42,
112 (1979).
[19] J. Shah, Hot electrons and phonons under high intensity photoexcitation of semiconductors, Solid-State Electronics 21, 43 (1978).
[20] M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Hagley, J. M. Raimond, and S.
Haroche, Quantum Rabi Oscillation: A Direct Test of Field Quantization in a Cavity,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1800 (1996).
[21] G. Rempe, H. Walther, and N. Klein, Observation of quantum collapse and revival ina one-atom maser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 353 (1987).
[22] I. Schuster, A. Kubanek, A. Fuhrmanek, T. Puppe, P. W. H. Pinkse, K. Murr, and G.
Rempe, Nonlinear spectroscopy of photons bound to one atom, Nature Physics 4, 382(2008).
[23] F. Meier and B. P. Zakharchenya, Optical Orientation (North-Holland, Amsterdam,
1984).
[24] J. Shah, Ultrafast Spectroscopy of Semiconductors and Semiconductor Nanostructures(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996).
[25] N. Sarukura, Y. Ishida, T. Yanagawa, and H. Nakano, All solid-state cw passively
mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser using a colored glass filter, Applied Physics Letters 57,
229 (1990).
[26] A. L. S. J. Moss, The Chemistry of the Semiconductor Industry (Springer, New York,
1987).
[27] R. F. Pierret, Semiconductor Device Fundamentals (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1996).

183[28] R. N. Hall, G. E. Fenner, J. D. Kingsley, T. J. Soltys, and R. O. Carlson, Coherent
Light Emission From GaAs Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 366 (1962).
[29] Y. Suematsu, Advances in Semiconductor Lasers, Physics Today 38, 32 (1985).
[30] S. Schmitt-Rink, D. S. Chemla, and D. A. B. Miller, Linear and nonlinear opticalproperties of semiconductor quantum wells, Advances in Physics 38, 89 (1989).
[31] J. Davies, The Physics of Low–Dimensional Semiconductors (Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 1998).
[32] N. Peyghambarian, S. W. Koch, and A. Mysyrowicz, Introduction to Semiconductor
Optics (Prentice Hall, New York, 1993).
[33] O. Madelung, Semiconductor Data Handbook (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006).
[34] J. Singh, Electronic and Optoelectronic Properties of Semiconductor Structures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
[35] D. A. B. Miller, D. S. Chemla, D. J. Eilenberger, P. W. Smith, A. C. Gossard, and W.
Wiegmann, Degenerate four-wave mixing in room-temperature GaAs/GaAlAs multiple
quantum well structures, Applied Physics Letters 42, 925 (1983).
[36] S. W. Kirchoefer, J. N. Holonyak, K. Hess, D. A. Gulino, H. G. Drickamer, J. J.
Coleman, and P. D. Dapkus, Absorption measurements at high pressure on AlAs–
Alx Ga1−x As–GaAs superlattices, Applied Physics Letters 40, 821 (1982).
[37] R. Dingle, W. Wiegmann, and C. H. Henry, Quantum States of Confined Carriers inVery Thin Alx Ga1−x As-GaAs–Alx Ga1−x As Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 827(1974).
[38] D. Chemla, D. Miller, P. Smith, A. Gossard, and W. Wiegmann, Room temperature
excitonic nonlinear absorption and refraction in GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum wellstructures, Quantum Electronics, IEEE Journal of 20, 265 (1984).
[39] R. L. Greene, K. K. Bajaj, and D. E. Phelps, Energy levels of Wannier excitons in
GaAs–Alx Ga1−x As quantum-well structures, Phys. Rev. B 29, 1807 (1984).
[40] G. Bastard, E. E. Mendez, L. L. Chang, and L. Esaki, Exciton binding energy inquantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 26, 1974 (1982).
[41] G. Bastard, Wave Mechanics Applied to Semiconductor Heterostructures (Halsted
Press, New York, 1988).
[42] D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prentice Hall, New York, 1994).
[43] L. Yang, I. V. Schweigert, S. T. Cundiff, and S. Mukamel, Two-dimensional optical
spectroscopy of excitons in semiconductor quantum wells: Liouville-space pathway
analysis, Phys. Rev. B 75, 125302 (2007).

184[44] H. Haug and S. W. Koch, Quantum Theory of the Optical and Electronic Propertiesof Semiconductors, 5th Ed. (World Scientific Publ., Singapore, 2009).
[45] J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1994).
[46] M. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997).
[47] R. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 3rd Ed. (Academic Press, New York, 2008).
[48] D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics (Prentice Hall, New York, 1999).
[49] M. Fox, Quantum Optics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
[50] C. F. Klingshirn, Semiconductor Optics, 3rd Ed. (Springer, New York, 2006).
[51] D. Oberhauser, K.-H. Pantke, J. M. Hvam, G. Weimann, and C. Klingshirn, Exciton
scattering in quantum wells at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 47, 6827 (1993).
[52] T. Müller, W. Parz, F. F. Schrey, G. Strasser, and K. Unterrainer, Intraband relaxation of photoexcited electrons in GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells and InAs/GaAs
self-assembled quantum dots, Semiconductor Science and Technology 19, S287 (2004).
[53] A. G. V. Spivey and S. T. Cundiff, Inhomogeneous dephasing of heavy-hole and lighthole exciton coherences in GaAs quantum wells, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 664 (2007).
[54] A. Tokmakoff, Introductory Quantum Mechanics II lecture notes,
http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Chemistry/5-74Spring-2009/LectureNotes/.

2009,[55] J. D. J. Ingle and S. R. Crouch, Spectrochemical Analysis (Prentice Hall, New York,
1988).
[56] M. D. Sturge, Optical Absorption of Gallium Arsenide between 0.6 and 2.75 eV, Phys.
Rev. 127, 768 (1962).
[57] D. A. B. Miller, D. S. Chemla, T. C. Damen, A. C. Gossard, W. Wiegmann, T. H.
Wood, and C. A. Burrus, Electric field dependence of optical absorption near the band
gap of quantum-well structures, Phys. Rev. B 32, 1043 (1985).
[58] G. D. Gilliland, D. J. Wolford, T. F. Kuech, and J. A. Bradley, Luminescence kinetics
of intrinsic excitonic states quantum-mechanically bound near high-quality (n-type
GaAs)/(p-type Alx Ga1−x As) heterointerfaces, Phys. Rev. B 49, 8113 (1994).
[59] S. M. Landi, C. V.-B. Tribuzy, P. L. Souza, R. Butendeich, A. C. Bittencourt, and G. E.
Marques, Photoluminescence of GaAs/Alx Ga1−x As multiple quantum well structurescontaining δ-doping superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 67, 085304 (2003).
[60] T. Zhang, C. Borca, X. Li, and S. Cundiff, Optical two-dimensional Fourier transform
spectroscopy with active interferometric stabilization, Opt. Express 13, 7432 (2005).

185[61] X. Li, T. Zhang, C. N. Borca, and S. T. Cundiff, Many-Body Interactions in Semiconductors Probed by Optical Two-Dimensional Fourier Transform Spectroscopy, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 96, 057406 (2006).
[62] D. Karaiskaj, A. D. Bristow, L. Yang, X. Dai, R. P. Mirin, S. Mukamel, and S. T. Cundiff, Two-Quantum Many-Body Coherences in Two-Dimensional Fourier-Transform
Spectra of Exciton Resonances in Semiconductor Quantum Wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.
104, 117401 (2010).
[63] A. D. Bristow, D. Karaiskaj, X. Dai, T. Zhang, C. Carlsson, K. R. Hagen, R. Jimenez,
and S. T. Cundiff, A versatile ultrastable platform for optical multidimensional Fouriertransform spectroscopy, Review of Scientific Instruments 80, 073108 (2009).
[64] B. Deveaud, F. Clérot, N. Roy, K. Satzke, B. Sermage, and D. S. Katzer, Enhanced
radiative recombination of free excitons in GaAs quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67,
2355 (1991).
[65] D.-S. Kim, J. Shah, D. A. B. Miller, T. C. Damen, W. Schäfer, and L. Pfeiffer,Femtosecond-pulse distortion in quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 48, 17902 (1993).
[66] F. T. S. Scandolo, Optical Bistability Induced by Charge Separation in Asymmetric
Quantum Wells, physica status solidi (b) 173, 453 (1992).
[67] Grosso, G., Graves, J., Hammack, A., High, A., Butov, L., Hanson M., and Gossard,
A., Excitonic switches operating at around 100 K, Nature Photonics 3, 577 (2009).
[68] A. A. High, E. E. Novitskaya, L. V. Butov, M. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Control ofExciton Fluxes in an Excitonic Integrated Circuit, Science 321, 229 (2008).
[69] K. M. M. Nakayama, Interactions between coherent optical phonons and excitonic
quantum beats in GaAs/AlAs multiple quantum wells: strategy for enhancement ofterahertz radiation from coherent optical phonons, physica status solidi (c) 5, 2911
(2008).
[70] R. J. Walters et al., Photovoltaically powered modulating retroreflectors, Optical Engineering 45, 034003 (2006).
[71] M. Mazzer et al., Progress in quantum well solar cells, Thin Solid Films 511-512, 76(2006), eMSR 2005 - Proceedings of Symposium F on Thin Film and Nanostructured
Materials for Photovoltaics - EMRS 2005- Symposium F.
[72] H. Azuma, Quantum computation with Kerr-nonlinear photonic crystals, Journal of
Physics D: Applied Physics 41, 025102 (2008).
[73] A. I. Shkrebtii, J. L. P. Hughes, J. E. Sipe, and O. Pulci, Linear and non-linear
spectroscopy of GaAs and GaP: theory versus experiment, Thin Solid Films 313-314,
574 (1998).

186[74] S. Wachter, M. Maute, H. Kalt, I. Galbraith, C. Sieh, T. Meier, and S. W. Koch, Excitation induced shift and broadening of the exciton resonance, Physica B: Condensed
Matter 314, 309 (2002).
[75] S. Hunsche, K. Leo, H. Kurz, and K. Köhler, Femtosecond intersubband relaxation in
GaAs quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 50, 5791 (1994).
[76] D. Morris, D. Houde, B. Deveaud, and A. Regreny, Ultrafast dynamics of intersubband relaxation in GaAs quantum wells: hot carrier and phonon populations effects,
Superlattices and Microstructures 15, 309 (1994).
[77] S. Schmitt-Rink, D. S. Chemla, and D. A. B. Miller, Theory of transient excitonic
optical nonlinearities in semiconductor quantum-well structures, Phys. Rev. B 32, 6601
(1985).
[78] F. Jahnke et al., Excitonic Nonlinearities of Semiconductor Microcavities in the Nonperturbative Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5257 (1996).
[79] C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 7th Ed. (Wiley, New York, 1995).
[80] G. Tränkle, E. Lach, M. Walther, A. Forchel, and G. Weimann, Optical investigation of
2D Mott transitions in GaAs/GaAlAs quantum well structures, Surface Science 196,584 (1988).
[81] G. R. H. Reinholz, Mott effect and screening in quantum well structures, Contributions
to Plasma Physics 43, 346 (2003).
[82] G. W. Fehrenbach, W. Schfer, and R. G. Ulbrich, Excitonic versus plasma screening
in highly excited gallium arsenide, Journal of Luminescence 30, 154 (1985).
[83] D. R. Wake, H. W. Yoon, J. P. Wolfe, and H. Morkoç, Response of excitonic absorption
spectra to photoexcited carriers in GaAs quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 46, 13452 (1992).
[84] H. Haug and S. Schmitt-Rink, Electron theory of the optical properties of laser-excited
semiconductors, Progress in Quantum Electronics 9, 3 (1984).
[85] L. Banyai and S. W. Koch, Absorption Blue Shift in Laser-Excited Semiconductor
Microspheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2722 (1986).
[86] W. W. Chow, A. F. Wright, A. Girndt, F. Jahnke, and S. W. Koch, Microscopic
theory of gain for an InGaN/AlGaN quantum well laser, Applied Physics Letters 71,
2608 (1997).
[87] J. C. Kim and J. P. Wolfe, Bose-Einstein statistics of an excitonic gas in two dimensions: Excitons and biexcitons in a GaAs quantum well, Phys. Rev. B 57, 9861 (1998).
[88] R. C. Miller, D. A. Kleinman, A. C. Gossard, and O. Munteanu, Biexcitons in GaAs
quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 25, 6545 (1982).

187[89] D. A. Kleinman, Binding energy of biexcitons and bound excitons in quantum wells,
Phys. Rev. B 28, 871 (1983).
[90] C. Ell, J. Prineas, T. R. Nelson, S. Park, H. M. Gibbs, G. Khitrova, S. W. Koch,and R. Houdré, Influence of Structural Disorder and Light Coupling on the Excitonic
Response of Semiconductor Microcavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4795 (1998).
[91] S. Adachi, GaAs, AlAs, and Alx Ga1−x As: Material parameters for use in research anddevice applications, Journal of Applied Physics 58, R1 (1985).
[92] J. Verdeyen, Laser Electronics (Prentice Hall, New York, 1995).
[93] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1999).
[94] M. Kira and S. W. Koch, Quantum-optical spectroscopy of semiconductors, Phys. Rev.
A 73, 013813 (2006).
[95] M. Lindberg and S. W. Koch, Effective Bloch equations for semiconductors, Phys. Rev.
B 38, 3342 (1988).
[96] M. Kira and S. W. Koch, Exciton-Population Inversion and Terahertz Gain in Semiconductors Excited to Resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 076402 (2004).
[97] G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs, F. Jahnke, M. Kira, and S. W. Koch, Nonlinear optics ofnormal-mode-coupling semiconductor microcavities, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1591 (1999).
[98] S. W. Koch, M. Kira, G. Khitrova, and H. M. Gibbs, Semiconductor excitons in newlight, Nature Materials 5, 523 (2006).
[99] C. Sieh et al., Coulomb Memory Signatures in the Excitonic Optical Stark Effect, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 82, 3112 (1999).
[100] J. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1985).
[101] R. H. Brown and R. Q. Twiss, A Test of a New Type of Stellar Interferometer on
Sirius, Nature 178, 1046 (1956).
[102] R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
[103] E. M. Purcell, The Question of Correlation between Photons in Coherent Light Rays,
Nature 178, 1449 (1956).
[104] B. L. Morgan and L. Mandel, Measurement of Photon Bunching in a Thermal Light
Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 1012 (1966).
[105] R. J. Glauber, The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence, Phys. Rev. 130, 2529
(1963).
[106] C. Gerry and P. Knight, Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 2005).

188[107] M. Kira, S.W.Koch, G. Khitrova, and H. Gibbs, Direct Optical Excitation of
Quantum-Degenerate Exciton States in Semiconductors, submitted 2004, arXiv:condmat/0408453/.
[108] R. Smith, J. Wahlstrand, A. Funk, R. Mirin, S. Cundiff, J. Steiner, M. Schafer, M.
Kira, and S. Koch, Extraction of many-body configurations from nonlinear absorption
in semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. .
[109] G. Rempe, H. Walther, and N. Klein, Observation of quantum collapse and revival ina one-atom maser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 353 (1987).
[110] M. Born, E. Wolf, A. B. Bhatia, and P. C. Clemmow, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
[111] Y. S. Liu, Nanosecond pulse generation from a self-injected laser-pumped dye laserusing a novel cavity-flipping technique, Opt. Lett. 3, 167 (1978).
[112] C. Cruz, E. Palange, and F. D. Martini, High power subnanosecond pulse generation
in Nd YAG lasers, Optics Communications 39, 331 (1981).
[113] N. N. Puscas, D. Scarano, R. Girardi, and I. Montrosset, Analysis of output statistics of
single and double pass Er-doped LiNbO3 waveguide amplifiers, Optical and Quantum
Electronics 29, 799 (1997).
[114] W. S. Wong, H. A. Haus, L. A. Jiang, P. B. Hansen, and M. Margalit, Photon statistics
of amplified spontaneous emission noise in a 10-Gbit/s optically preamplified directdetection receiver, Opt. Lett. 23, 1832 (1998).
[115] S. M. Kira, Quantum-optical spectroscopy with phase-randomized femtosecond pulses,
private correspondence, 2006.
[116] J. Wheeler and W. Zurek, Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University
Press, Princeton, NJ, 1984).
[117] J. Diels and W. Rudolph, Ultrashort Laser Pulse Phenomena (Elsevier, Burlington,2006).
[118] P. A. Roos, X. Li, R. P. Smith, J. A. Pipis, T. M. Fortier, and S. T. Cundiff, Solidstate carrier-envelope phase stabilization via quantum interference control of injected
photocurrents, Opt. Lett. 30, 735 (2005).
[119] M. Orszag, Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
[120] M. Kira and S. W. Koch, Cluster-expansion representation in quantum optics, Phys.
Rev. A 78, 022102 (2008).
[121] D. F. McAlister and M. G. Raymer, Ultrafast photon-number correlations from dualpulse, phase-averaged homodyne detection, Phys. Rev. A 55, R1609 (1997).

Appendix A
Double chop method for probe measurements

To optimally record the probe spectrum in the presence and absence of the pump, wedevelop a novel technique involving an optical chopper. We send the pump and probe beams
through the chopper wheel, as shown in Fig. A.1, so that they are modulated at slightly
different frequencies that have a fixed phase relationship. There are 30 slots for the outerradius, and 25 slots for the inner radius. The pump beam, traveling through the outer path,
is modulated at fpump = 2.12 kHz, whereas the probe beam, traveling the inner path, ismodulated at fprobe = 1.76 kHz.
The pump and probe beams travel along different paths before converging onto thesample. We then spectrally resolve the probe reflection and transmission and collect thesignal using a photodetector. The signal present on the photodetector is a combination of
the probe response, scattered pump light, and a signal resulting from the interaction between
the two beams. We want to extract the probe spectra in both the presence of and absenceof the pump, which involves considering the Fourier components involved. We filter out
these components by means of a lock-in detector (Stanford Research Systems, commercial
product SR-830). The lock-in detection technique involves narrow-band active filtering to
extract the Fourier component of interest from a signal that may contain a large amountof noise or other undesirable signals. The collected signal modulated at frequency fprobe
contains a mix of the probe response in the presence of, or absence of, the pump since thepump and probe are chopped at slightly different frequencies.

190

Probe beam
Pump beam
Aperture 4.3 mm
Aperture 3.1 mm

Figure A.1: Schematic shown for pump and probe beams traveling perpendicular to the plane of the
optical chopper wheel. As the wheel spins, the pump and probe beams are modulated at slightly different
frequencies, a critical aspect to resolving the probe spectra in the presence and absence of the pump.

pump
A nontrivial amount of pump light, Iscattered, scatters in the direction of the probereflection and transmission. Since we modulate the pump light at a different frequency
than the probe, we use the chopping frequency modulation in addition to lock-in detection
to ignore the scattered-pump-light contribution to the probe signal. Since the time scale ofprobe
interaction inside the sample is on the order of picoseconds, the interaction signal, ∆Iinteraction,

depends only on moments when the pump and probe are both present on the sample.
As we will demonstrate, analyzing the frequency contents of these contributions allows
probe
the extraction of the probe signal in the presence of the pump, IpumpON, and the probe
probe
signal in the absence of the pump, IpumpOFF. The chopping creates square waves that canbe represented as Fourier expansions. The signal measured on a photodetector will produce
a current with many frequency components ωi :Ii (t) = 12 + π2 sin(ωi t) + 31 sin(3ωi t) + 51 sin(5ωi t) + 15 sin(7ωi t) + · · · ,(A.1)

where ωi /2 π is the chopper modulation frequency fpump or fprobe . Since we detect the signal
using lock-in detection, we can filter specific frequency components to construct our final

191
result.
We find the total signal that appears on an oscilloscope (keeping only the first two
terms of the Fourier expansion since we filter out the higher harmonics contributing to thesquare wave) to be
probe
probe
Itotal= Ipump
OFF

1 2


pump
+ π2 sin(ωprobe t) + Iscattered+ π sin(ωpump t)2.
 1 2

1 2
probe
+
sin(ω
t)
+
sin(ω
t)
+∆Iinteraction
probe
pump
2
π
2
π
1
2

(A.2)

probe
Expanding the coefficient of ∆Iinteraction
through multiplication, we find two terms at addi-

tional frequencies: the sum, ωprobe + ωpump , and the difference, ωprobe − ωpump . Because of
the symmetry of the multiplication (in the pump and probe), these two frequencies containidentical information. We choose to use the sum frequency (3.88 kHz) because there is lessnoise at higher frequencies. We isolate the sum frequency as a reference signal by sending the
ωprobe and ωpump transistortransistor logic (TTL) reference signals from the optical chopper
through an XNOR logical gate in combination with active and passive filtering. We enumerate the contributions to the intensity measured in the probe direction at each frequency ofinterest:

IDC =Iωprobe =Iωpump =Iωsum =
Iωdiff =1 probe1 pump1 probeIpump OFF + Iscattered+ ∆Iinteraction,
22
4
1 probe2 probeIpump OFF + ∆Iinteraction,ππ
2 pump1 probe,Iscattered + ∆Iinteraction
π
π
2
probe
− 2 ∆Iinteraction
,
π
2
probe
∆Iinteraction
2
π

(A.3)
(A.4)
(A.5)
(A.6)
(A.7)
(A.8)

where DC means is the time-independent piece at ω = 0, ωsum = ωprobe + ωpump , andωdiff = ωprobe − ωpump . We neglect signals at the DC component and at ωdiff . From the

192
probe
probe
remaining quantities, we combine the intensities to construct Ipump
ON and Ipump OFF :
probe
Ipump
OFF =


π
π
Iωprobe + Iωsum ,
2
2

probe
probe
probe
Ipump
ON = Ipump OFF + ∆Iinteraction ,(A.9)(A.10)

whereprobe∆Iinteraction−π 2=Iωsum .
2

(A.11)

The ability to simultaneously measure the probe signal in the presence and absenceof the pump is important for a high-accuracy calibration of the probe transmission andreflection probabilities, as explained in Appendix B.

Appendix B
Calibration of the pump and probe powers

To construct the true absorption α(ω) = 1 − T (ω) − R(ω) for the pump and probe
beams, it is necessary to record the transmission T (ω) and reflection R(ω) probabilities
as accurately as possible. For both the pump and probe powers, we correct for interface
reflection losses. Additionally, the simultaneous measurement of the probe signal in thepresence and absence of the pump allows calibration of the probe signal in the presence ofthe pump.
B.1

Correction for reflection losses
In order to correct for the reflection losses at interfaces in our experiment, we consider

meas
the geometry of the experimental setup. We record the optical probe power going in (PIN)

to the cryostat and the reflected (PRmeas ) and transmitted (PTmeas ) powers from the sample
with a Coherent GS Fieldmaster power meter. However, because of reflection losses inside
the cryostat, it is necessary to introduce correction factors to accurately construct the true
reflection and transmission probabilities from the sample. We do not introduce a correction
factor for the measured input power, but the PR and PT powers are corrected by considering
all losses starting from before the cryostat until after the cryostat. This procedure allows
meas
accurate construction of the reflection and transmission probabilities, T = PRmeas /PINandmeas
T = PTmeas /PIN.

The schematic for the light path is shown in Fig. B.1. The figure shows the multiple

194
interfaces at which the beam experiences losses due to reflection at an interface between
two materials with different indices of refraction. The sample is mounted onto a wedged
sapphire disc, which has an antireflection (AR) coating on surface 1 (surf1). An AR coating
is applied to the sample after being mounted to surface 2 (surf2) of the sapphire disc tosuppress multiple reflections within the material, as discussed in §3.1. Since surfaace 2 ofthe sapphire disc is unavoidably also coated with an AR coat designed for the interface
between GaAs and vacuum, we expect surface 2 to have a higher reflection probability at
our optical wavelength of 800 nm.

Figure B.1: Schematic for light path going into and out of the cryostat. We account for reflection losses
at interfaces (dotted lines) to construct the true transmission and reflection probabilities.

We perform a procedure to determine the reflection probabilities from the sapphire
windows and the cryostat windows. We first remove the sample and mount to measure the
meas
meas
powers PIN,cryo
and PT,cryo
for the cryostat windows only. Since the beam passes throughtwo cryostat windows, this measurement allows for the induction of the reflection probability(the fractional loss) of a single cryostat window as RCryo Window = 0.0049.
We then replace the sample mount to measure the powers PRmeas and PTmeas from surface
2 of the sapphire window. The measured reflection and probabilities are given by

195

meas
Rsapph= PR /PIN = 0.1033

(B.1)

meas
Tsapph= PT /PIN = 0.8455.

(B.2)

Combining the measured values with a consideration of the reflection losses from each interface, we relate the measured powers through two coupled equations containing the reflection
probabilities of both surfaces of the sapphire disc:meas 2
meas
meas
meas
Rsapph= (1 − RCryo
Window )(1 − Rsurf1 ) (Rsurf2 ) = 0.1033,

(B.3)

meas
meas
meas
meas
Tsapph= (1 − RCryo
Window )(1 − Rsurf1 )(1 − Rsurf2 ) = 0.8455.

(B.4)

Since RCryoWindow is determined from an independent measurement, these two equations canbe then solved for Rsurf1 and Rsurf2 Solving these equations we find two pairs of solutions,one of which is unphysical. We thus find the values Rsurf1 = 0.0378 and Rsurf2 = 0.1127,
consistent with our earlier assertion that surface 2 should have a higher reflectance.
So far, we have only considered measurements through the sapphire (no measurements through the sample up to this point). We use the extracted reflection probabilities
RCryoWindow and Rsurf1 to account for the reflection losses for measurements involving thesample. The AR-coated sapphire surface Rsurf2 is irrelevant here because the sapphire interface under the sample is not coated. Accounting for the reflection losses incurred in
the transmission and reflection paths for measurements involving the sample, we derive theconversion equations that estimate the reflected and transmitted powers:
meas
est
,
= PIN
PIN

(B.5)

PRest = f acR × PRmeas=

PRmeas= 1.091PRmeas ,22(1 − Rsurf 1 ) (1 − RCryo Window )(B.6)

PTmeas= 1.050PTmeas .
(1 − RCryo Window )2 (1 − Rsurf1 )(B.7)

PTest = f acT × PTmeas=

196
The correction factors f acR and f acT correct for the losses that happen throughout theestcryostat, including the path of the input beam. If the laser is spectrally resolved, PR,T(E)
est
may be divided by PIN(E) to obtain the estimated transmission and reflection probabilities:

est
Rsample=est
Tsample=PRest(sample) (E)
est
PIN
(E)
est
PT (sample) (E)
est
PIN
(E)

,

(B.8)

.

(B.9)
(B.10)

While the correction factors f acR and f acT are determined by using measurements
involving the sapphire interfaces only, they are valid for determining transmission and reflection probabilities for the sample as well.
We test for energy conservation using the measured and corrected values for the sapphire disc. The measured fraction of energy lost (written as absorption α) due to reflections
from the sapphire interface ismeas
αsapphire=

meas −P meas −P meas
PIN
R
T
= 0.0513.
meas
PIN(B.11)

We find that the application of the correction factors yields a fractional energy loss ofest
αsapphire=est −P est −P est
PIN
R
T< 10−6 ,est
PIN(B.12)

consistent with our expectations for a material with vanishing imaginary part of the index ofrefraction. The balance of energy for the estimated absorption for the sapphire disc implies
that the conversion strategy accounts for the powers properly.
The correction factors f acR and f acT are valid for application to both the pump andprobe beams. Applying the correction factors to the measurements of the reflected andtransmitted low-intensity probe powers from the sample at 4 K in the absence of the pump,

197
we find:est
PIN= 25µW,(B.13)

estmeas
PRest(sapph) = f acR × PRmeas(sapph) = 1.091(0.1025PIN ) = 0.1118PIN ,(B.14)

est
meas
PTest(sapph) = f acT × PTmeas(sapph) = 1.050(0.845482PIN ) = 0.8878PIN .

(B.15)

estmeas
PRest(sample) = f acR × PRmeas(sample) = 1.091(0.035PIN ) = 0.0382PIN ,(B.16)

meas
est
PTest(sample) = f acT × PTmeas(sample) = 1.050(0.53PIN ) = 0.5567PIN .

(B.17)(B.18)The pump powers may be corrected for reflection losses in an identical fashion, allowing
estimations of the densities created in the sample by pump excitation.
The above probe values are helpful in calibration of the probe powers in the presenceof the pump, as we show in the next section.
B.2

Calibration of probe powers in the presence of the pump
The probe power is spectrally resolved using a scanning monochrometer, as describedin Chapter 3. We wish to record the effects of different pump excitation configurations(such as intensity and time delay) in the probe absorption. The probe absorption can beconstructed as α(ω) = 1 − T (ω) − R(ω), provided that we find T (ω) and R(ω) accurately.
We describe in this section a procedure for ensuring the accuracy of these measurements.
In the last section, we arrived at estimates for the reflected and transmitted probe
powers from the sample at 4 K in the absence of the pump. These powers are constantthroughout a measurement containing many pump excitation configurations because theprobe is at low-intensity. Since the double-chopping technique described in Appendix A
allows simultaneous measurement of the probe power in the presence and absence of thepump light, we can exploit Eqns. B.16 and B.17 to calibrate the probe power in the presenceof the pump light.

198
The probe light is measured by a photodetector placed after the scanning monochrometer. A spectrally resolved signal I(ω) is measured on a photodetector (a current proportional
to optical power) with high resolution for the full frequency range of the probe spectrum.
probe
probe
The signal can be split according Appendix A into two parts, Ipump
OFF (ω) and Ipump ON (ω),

representing the probe signal in the absence and presence of the pump light, respectively.
Since we have estimated the transmitted and reflected powers from the sample for the probe,
we can construct conversion factors by normalizing the measured transmitted and reflectedprobe signals:
λC =Rprobe,λIpump
OFF (ω)probe,λIpump
OFF (ω)dωPλest(sample) ,(B.19)

where λ = R, T corresponds to the reflected and transmitted probe. The factors C λ converts
the measured signal into units of power:probe,λλ probe,λPpump
OFF (ω) = C Ipump OFF (ω).

(B.20)The same factor can also be used to convert the measured probe signal in the presenceof the pump light into units of power because both signals are captured simultaneously.
Consequently, the part of the spectrally resolved signal from the photodetector after the
monochrometer that corresponds to the probe power in the presence of the pump can becalibrated byprobe,λλ probe,λPpump
ON (ω) = C Ipump ON (ω).

(B.21)In addition to providing a convenient calibration of the probe powers, this technique makes
the experimental measurements insensitive to small pointing fluctuations in the probe beamat the monochrometer. Small pointing fluctuations were found to affect the measurements on
a long-term (hours) scale for the measurements. The use of this calibration technique corrects
for any long-term drifts in power, thus removing the effects from pointing instabilities in theprobe beam.