PREFACE"Conquest of the Land through 7,000 Years" is Dr. Lowdermilk's personal report of a study hemade in 1938 and 1939. Despite changes in names of countries, in political boundaries, and inconservation technology, the bulletin still has significance for all peoples concerned withmaintaining and improving farm production.
Dr. Lowdermilk studied the record of agriculture in countries where the land had been undercultivation for hundreds, even thousands, of years. His immediate mission was to find out if theexperience of these older civilizations could help in solving the serious soil erosion and land use
problems in the United States, then struggling with repair of the Dust Bowl and the Sullied South.
He discovered that soil erosion, deforestation, overgrazing, neglect, and conflicts between
cultivators and herdsman have helped topple empires and wipe out entire civilizations. At thesame time, he learned that careful stewardship of the earth's resources, through terracing, crop
rotation, and other soil conservation measures, has enabled other societies to flourish for
centuries.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service has reprinted this bulletin without change to meetthe continuing demand from teachers, clergymen, writers, college professors, garden clubs,
environmental groups, and service organizations for copies of the report as originally written by
Dr. Lowdermilk.

CONQUEST OF THE LAND
THROUGH SEVEN THOUSAND YEARS
BY W. C. LOWDERMILK, formerly Assistant Chief, Soil Conservation Service

Sometime ago I heard of an old man down on a hill farm in the South, who sat on his front porch
as a newcomer to the neighborhood passed by. The newcomer to make talk said, "Mister, howdoes the land lie around here?" The old man replied, "Well—I don't know about the land a-lying;
it's these real estate people that do the lying."
In a very real sense the land does not lie; it bears a record of what men write on it. In a larger
sense a nation writes its record on the land, and a civilization writes its record on the land—arecord that is easy to read by those who understand the simple language of the land. Let us read
together some of the records that have been written on the land in the westward course ofcivilization from the Holy Lands of the Near East to the Pacific coast of our own country througha period of some 7,000 years.
Records of mankind's struggles through the ages to find a lasting adjustment to the land arefound written across the landscapes as "westward the course of empire took its way." Failures are
more numerous than successes, as told by ruins and wrecks of works along this amazing trail.
From these failures and successes we may learn much of profit and benefit to this young Nationof the United States as it occupies a new and bountiful continent and begins to set up house fora thousand or ten thousand years—yea, for a boundless future.

Freedom Bought and Sold for Food
Pearl Harbor, like an earthquake, shocked the American people to a realization that we are living
in a dangerous world—dangerous for our way of life and for our survival as a people, and perilous
for the hope of the ages in a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Whyshould the world be dangerous for such a philanthropic country as ours?
The world is made dangerous by the desperation of peoples suffering from privations and fearof privations, brought on by restrictions of the exchange of the good and necessary things ofMother Earth. Industrialization has wrought in the past century far-reaching changes in civilization,such as will go on and on into our unknown future.
Raw materials for modern industry are localized here and there over the globe. They are notequally available to national groups of peoples who have learned to make and use machines.
Wants and needs of food and raw materials have been growing up unevenly and bringing onstresses and strains in international relations that are seized upon by ambitious peoples andleaders to control by force the sources of such food and raw materials Wars of aggression, long
and well-planned, take place so that such materials can be obtained.
These conflicts are not settled for good by war. The problems are pushed aside for a time only
to come back in more terrifying proportions at some later time. Lasting solutions will come in another way. We can depend on the reluctance of peoples to launch themselves into war, for they
go to war because they fear something worse than war, either real or propagandized.
A just relation of peoples to the earth rests not on exploitation, but rather on conservation—noton the dissipation of resources, but rather on restoration of the productive powers of the land andon access to food and raw materials. If civilization is to avoid a long decline, like the one that has
blighted North Africa and the Near East for 13 centuries, society must be born again out of an
economy of exploitation into an economy of conservation.
We are now getting down to fundamentals in this relationship of a people to the land. My
experience with famines in China taught me that in the last reckoning all things are purchased withfood. This is a hard saying; but the recent world-wide war shows up the terrific reach of this fatefuland awful truth. Aggressor nations used the rationing of food to subjugate rebellious peoples ofoccupied countries. For even you and I will sell our liberty and more for food, when driven to thistragic choice. There is no substitute for food.
Seeing what we will give up for food, let us look at what food will buy—for money is merely asymbol, a convenience in the exchange of the goods and services that we need and want. Foodbuys our division of labor that begets our civilization.
Not until tillers of soil grew more food than they themselves required were their fellows released
to do other tasks than the growing of food—that is, to take part in a division of labor that became
more complex with the advance of civilization.
True, we have need of clothing, of shelter, and of other goods and services made possible by
a complex division of labor, founded on this food production, when suitable raw materials are athand. And of these the genius of the American people has given us more than any other nation
ever possessed. They comprise our American standard of living. But these other good things
matter little to hungry people as I have seen in the terrible scourges of famine.
Food comes from the earth. The land with its waters gives us nourishment. The earth rewards
richly the knowing and diligent but punishes inexorably the ignorant and slothful. This partnershipof land and farmer is the rock foundation of our complex social structure.
In 1938, in the interests of a permanent agriculture and of the conservation of our land
resources, the Department of Agriculture asked me to make a survey of land use in oldencountries for the benefit of our farmers and stockmen and other agriculturists in this country. Thissurvey took us through England, Holland, France, Italy, North Africa, and the Near East. After 18

months it was interrupted by the outbreak of war when Germany invaded Poland in September
1939. We were prevented from continuing the survey through Turkey, the Balkan States, southern
Germany, and Switzerland as was originally planned. But in a year and a half in the olden lands
we discovered many things of wide interest to the people of America.

Graveyard of Empires
We shall begin our reading of the record as it is written on the land in the Near East. Here,
civilization arose out of the mysteries of the stone age and gave rise to cultures that moved
eastward to China and westward through Europe and across the Atlantic Ocean to the Americas.
We are daily and hourly reminded of our debt to the Sumerian peoples of Mesopotamia
whenever we use the wheel that they invented more than 6,000 years ago. We do homage to theirmathematics each time we look at the clock or our watches to tell time divided into units of 60.
Moreover, our calendar in use today is a revision of the method the ancient Egyptians used individing the year. We inherit the experience and knowledge of the past more than we know.
Agriculture had its beginning at least 7,000 years ago and developed in two great centers—thefertile alluvial plains of Mesopotamia and the Valley of the Nile. We shall leave the interestingquestion of the precise area in which agriculture originated to the archaeologists. It is enough for
us to know that it was in these alluvial plains in an arid climate that tillers of soil began to growfood crops by irrigation inquantities greater than theirown needs. This released
their fellows for a division oflabor that gave rise to what
we call civilization. We shallfollow the vicissitudes ofpeoples recorded on theland, as nations rose and fellin these fateful lands.
A survey of such an
extensive area in the shorttime of 2 years called forsimple but fundamental
methods of field study. With
the aid of agricultural officialsof other countries, we hunted
FIGURE 1.—Ruins of Kish, one of the world's most important cities 6,000 years ago.
out fields that had been
Recently archaeologists excavated these ruins from beneath the desert sands ofcultivated for a thousand
Mesopotamia.
years—the basis of apermanent agriculture.
Likewise, we tried to find the reasons why lands formerly cultivated had been wasted or destroyed,
as a warning to our farmers and our city folks of a possible similar catastrophe in this new land of
America. A simplified method of field study enabled us to examine large areas rapidly.
In the Zagros Mountains that separate Persia from Mesopotamia, shepherds with their flocks
have lived from time immemorial, when "the memory of man runneth not to the contrary." From
time to time they have swept down into the plain to bring devastation and destruction upon farming
and city peoples of the plains. Such was the beginning of the Cain and Abel struggle between the
shepherd and the farmer, of which we shall have more to say.

At Kish, we looked upon the first capital after the Great Flood that swept over Mesopotamia inprehistoric times and left its record in a thick deposit of brown alluvium. The layer of alluvium
marked a break in the sequence of a former and a succeeding culture, as recorded in artifacts.
Above the alluvium deposits is the site of Kish (fig. 1).
At the ruins of mighty Babylon we pondered the ruins of Nebuchadnezzar's stables (fig. 2),
adorned by animal figures in bas-relief. We stood subdued as though at a funeral as we recalled
how this great ruler of Babylon had boasted:That which no king before had done, I did . . . A wall like a mountain that cannot be moved, Ibuilded . . . great canals I dug and lined them with burnt brick laid in bitumen and brought
abundant waters to all the people . . . I paved the streets of Babylon with stone from the mountains. . . magnificent palaces andtemples I have built . . . Huge
cedars from Mount Lebanon
I cut down . . . with radiantgold I overlaid them and withjewels I adorned them.

Then came to mind thewarnings of the Hebrew
prophets that were thundered against the wicked
city. They warned that
Babylon would become "Adesolation, a dry land, anda wilderness, a land
wherein no man dwelleth. . .
And wolves shall cry in theircastles, and jackals in thepleasant places." Believe it
FIGURE 2.—Ruins of the famous stables of Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon built during
or not, the only living thing
the sixth century B.C. Babylon died and was buried by the desert sands, not because itthat we saw in thiswas sacked and razed but because the irrigation canals that watered the land that
desolation that once was
supported the city were permitted to fill with silt.
Babylon was a lean graywolf, shaking his head as if
he might have a tick in his ear, as he loped to his lair in the ruins of one of the seven wondersof the ancient world—the Hanging Gardens of Babylon where air conditioning was in use
2,600 years ago.
Mesopotamia, the traditional site of the Garden of Eden, out of which come the stories of the
Flood, of Noah and the Ark, of the "Tower of Babel" and the confusion of tongues, of the Very
furnace which we found still burning today, is jotted full of records of a glorious past, of dense
populations, and of great cities that are now ruins and desolation. For at least 11 empires haverisen and fallen in this tragic land in 7,000 years. It is a story of a precarious agriculture practiced
by people who lived and grew up under the threat of raids and invasions from the denizens ofgrasslands and the desert, and of the failure of their irrigation canals because of silt.
Agriculture was practiced in a dry climate by canal irrigation with muddy water from the Tigris andEuphrates Rivers. This muddy water was the undoing of empire after empire. As muddy riverwaters slowed down, they choked up the canals with silt. It was necessary to keep this silt out of
the canals year after year to supply life-giving waters to farm lands and to cities of the plain.

As populations grew, canals were dug farther and farther from the rivers. This great system ofcanals called for a great force of hand labor to keep them clean of silt. The rulers of Babylon
brought in war captives for this task. Now we understand why the captive Israelites "sat down by
the waters of Babylon and wept." They also were, doubtless, required to dig silt out of canals of
Mesopotamia.
As these great public works of cleaning silt out of canals were interrupted from time to time byinternal revolutions and by foreign invaders, the peoples of Mesopotamia were brought face toface with disaster in canals choked with silt. Stoppage of canals by silt depopulated villages andcities more effectively than the slaughter of people by an invading army.
On the basis of an estimate that it was possible in times past to irrigate 21,000 of the 35,000
square miles of the alluvium of Mesopotamia, the population of Mesopotamia at its zenith wasprobably between 17 and 25 million. The present population of all Iraq is estimated to be about
4 million, including nomadic peoples. Of this total not more than 3 1/2 million live on the alluvial
plain.
Decline in population in Mesopotamia is not due to loss of soil by erosion. The fertile lands arestill in place and life-giving waters still flow in the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, ready to be spread
upon the lands today as in times past. Mesopotamia is capable of supporting as great a population
as it ever did and greater when modern engineering makes use of reinforced concrete
construction for irrigation works and powered machinery to keep canal systems open.
A greater area of Mesopotamia thus might be farmed than ever before in the long history of thistragic land. But erosion in the hinterlands aggravated the silt-problem in waters of the Tigris andEuphrates Rivers, as they were drawn off into the ancient canal systems. Invasions of nomads outof the grasslands and the desert brought about the breakdown of irrigation that spelled disaster
after disaster.

In Egypt's Land
Let's now turn to the other great center of population growth and development of civilization in
the Valley of the Nile. Here, the mysterious Sphinx ponders problems of the ages as he looks out
over the narrow green Valley of the Nile lying across a brown and sun-scorched desert.
In Egypt as well as in Mesopotamia, tillers of soil learned early to sow food plants of wheat andbarley and to grow surplus food that released their fellows for divisions of labor, giving rise to theremarkable civilization that arose in the Valley of the Nile. Our debt to the ancient Egyptians isgreat.
Here, too, farming grew up by flood irrigation with muddy waters. But the problems of farming
were very different frown those of Mesopotamia. Annual flooding with silt-laden waters spread thinlayers of silt over the land, raising it higher and higher. In these flat lands of slowly accumulating
soil, farmers never met with problems of soil erosion.
To be sure, there have been problems of salt accumulation and of rising water tables for which
drainage is the solution. This is especially true since yearlong irrigation has been made possibleby the Assuan Dam. But the body of the soil has remained suitable for cropping for 6,ooo years
and more.
It was perhaps in the Valley of the Nile that a genius of a farmer about 6,000 years ago hitchedan ox to a hoe and invented the plow, thus originating power-farming to disturb the social structureof those times much as the tractor disturbed the social structure of our country in recent years.
By this means farmers became more efficient in growing food; a single farmer released several

of his fellows from the vital task of growing food for other tasks. Very likely the Pharaohs haddifficulty in keeping this surplus population sufficiently occupied. For we suspect that the Pyramids
were the first WPA projects.

On the Trail of the Israelites
We shall follow the route of Moses out of the fertile, irrigated lands of Egypt into a mountainous
land where forests and fields were watered with the rain of Heaven. Fields cleared on mountainslopes presented a new problem in farming - the problem of soil erosion, which, as we shall see,became the greatest hazard to permanent agriculture and an insidious enemy of civilization.
We crossed the modern Suez Canal with its weird color of blue into Sinai where the Israelites
with their herds wandered for 40 years. They or someone must have overgrazed the Peninsulaof Sinai, for it is now a picture of desolation. We saw in this landscape how the original brown soil
mantle was eroded into enormous gullies as shown by great yellowish gashes cut into the brownsoil covering. I had not expected to find evidences of so much accelerated erosion in the arid landof Sinai.
On the way to Aqaba we crossed a remarkable landscape, a plateau that had been eroded
through the ages almost to a plain, called a peneplain in physiographic language.
This peneplain surface dates back to Miocene times, in the geological scale. In the plain now
there is no evidence of accelerated cutting by torrential streams and no evidence that climate haschanged for drier or wetter conditions since Miocene times. Here is a cumulative record going far
back of the ice age, proclaiming that in this region climate has been remarkably stable.
From this plateau we dropped down 2,500 feet into the Aqaba or gorge of the great rift valleythat includes the Gulf of Aqaba, the Araba, the Dead Sea, and the Valley of the Jordan. At thehead of the Gulf of Aqaba of the Red Sea we found Dr. Nelson Glueck excavating Ezion Geber
which he calls the ancient Pittsburg of the Red Sea, or Solomon’s Seaport. Here, copper was
smelted 2,800 years ago to furnish instruments for Solomon and his people. The mud brick used
for building these ancient houses looked just like our adobe brick of New Mexico and Arizona.
As we climbed out of the rift valley over the east wall to the plateau of Trans-Jordan that slopes
toward the Arabian Desert, we came near Amman upon the same type of peneplain that wecrossed west of the Araba. Topographically, these two plains are parts of the same peneplain thatonce spread unbroken across this region. But toward the end of Pliocene times - that is, justbefore the beginning of the ice age - a series of parallel faults let down into it the great rift valley
to form one of the most spectacular examples of disturbances in the earth’s crust that is known
to geologists.
From Ma’an we proceeded past an old Roman dam, silted up and later washed out and left
isolated as a meaningless wall. At Elji we took horses to visit the fantastic ruins of ancient Petra(called Sela in the Old Testament). This much discussed city was the capital of the Nabatean
civilization and flourished at the same time as the Golden Age of China - 200 B.C. to A.D. 200.
Rose-red ruins of a great city are hidden away in a desert gorge on the margin of the ArabianDesert.
Petra is now the desolate ruin of a great center of power and culture. It has been used by somestudents as evidence that climate has become drier in the past 2,000 years, making it impossible
for this land to support as great a population as it did in the past. In contradiction to thisconclusion, we found slopes of the surrounding valley covered with terrace walls that had fallen
into ruin and allowed the soils to be washed off to bare rock over large areas. These evidences
showed that food had been grown locally and that soil erosion had damaged the land beyond use

for crops.
Invasion of nomads out of the desert had probably resulted in a breakdown in these measures
for the conservation of soil and water. Also, erosion had washed away the soils from the slopes
and undermined the carrying capacity of this land for a human population. Before ascribing
decadence of the region to change of climate, we must know how much the breakdown ofintensive agriculture contributed to the fall and disappearance of this Nabatean civilization.
The great buildings used for public purposes are amazing. Temples, administrative buildings,
and tombs are all carted out of the red Nubian sandstone cliffs. A fascinating story still lies hiddenin the unexcavated ruins of this ancient capital. The influence of Greek and Roman civilization was
found in a great theater with a capacity to seat some 2,500 persons. It was carved entirely out ofmassive sandstone rock that now only echoes the scream of eagles, or the chatter of tourists.
And as we proceeded northward in the Biblical land of Moab, we came to the site of Mt. Nebo.
We were reminded of how Moses, after having led the Israelites through 40 years of wanderingin the wilderness, stood on this mountain and looked across the Jordan Valley to the Promised
Land. He described it to his followers in words like these:
For the Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land, a land of brooks of water, of fountains and depths that spring outof valleys and hips, a land of wheat and barley and vines and fig trees and pomegranates, a land of olive oil and honey; aland w herein thou shalt eat bread without scarceness; thou shalt not lack anything in it; a land whose stones are iron andout of whose hills thou Gayest dig brass.

The Land of Milk and HoneyWe crossed the Jordan Valley as did Joshua and found the Jordan River a muddy anddisappointing stream. We stopped at the ruins of Jericho and dug out kernels of charred grain
which the archaeologists tell us undoubtedly belonged to an ancient household of this ill-fated city.
We looked at the Promised Land as it is today, 3,000 years after Moses described it to theIsraelites as a "land flowing with milk and honey."
We found the soils of red earth washed off the slopes to bedrock over more than half the uplandarea. These soils had lodged in the valleys where they are still being cultivated and are still being
eroded by great gullies that cut through the alluvium with every heavy rain. Evidence of rocks
washed off the hills were found in piles of stone where tillers of soil had heaped them together tomake cultivation about them easier. From the air we read with startling vividness the graphic story
as written on the land. Soils had been washed off to bedrock in the vicinity of Hebron and only
dregs of the land were left behind in narrow valley floors, still cultivated to meager crops.
In the denuded highlands of Judea are ruins of abandoned village sites. Capt. P. L. O. Guy,
director of the British School of Archaeology, has studied in detail those sites found in thedrainage of Wadi Musrara that were occupied 1,500 years ago. Since that time they have been
depopulated and abandoned in greater numbers on the upper slopes.
Captain Guy divided the drainage of Musrara into 3 attitudinal zones: The plain, 0-325 feet;foothills, 325 - 975 feet; and mountains, 975 feet and over. In the plain, 34 sites were occupied
and 4 abandoned, in the foothills, 31 occupied and 65 abandoned; and in the mountains, 37
occupied and 124 abandoned. In other words, villages have thus been abandoned in the 3 zones
by percentages in the above order of 11, 67, and 77, which agrees well with the removal of soil.
It is little wonder that villages were abandoned in a landscape such as this in the upper zone
near Jerusalem. The soil the source of food supply, has been wasted away by erosion. Only
remnants of the land left in drainage channels are held there by cross walls of stone.

Where soils are held in place by stone terrace walls, that have been maintained down to thepresent, the soils are still cultivated after several thousand years. They are still producing, but notheavily, to be sure, becauseof poor soil management(fig. 3).
Most important, the soils
are still in place and willgrow bigger crops withimproved soil treatment. Theglaring hills of Judea, not far
from Jerusalem, are dottedwith only a few of theirformer villages. Terraces onthese hills have been kept in
repair for more than 2,000
years.
What is the cause of thedecadence of this country
FIGURE 3.—This is a present-day view of a part of the Promised Land to which Moses ledthat was once flowing with
the Israelites about 1200 B. C. A few patches still have enough soil to raise a meager crop of
milk and honey? As webarley. But most of the land has lost practically all of its soil, as observed from the rockponder the tragic history ofoutcroppings. The crude rock terrace in the foreground helps hold some of the remaining
soil in place.
the Holy Lands, we arereminded of the struggle ofCain and Abel. This struggle has been made realistic through the ages by the conflict that persists,even unto today, between the tent dweller and the house dweller, between the shepherd and thefarmer.
The desert seems to have produced more people than it could feed. From time to time thedesert people swept down into the fertile alluvial valleys where, by irrigation, tillers of soil grew
abundant foods to support teeming villages and thriving cities.
They swept down as a wolf on the fold to raid the farmers' supplies of food. Raiders sacked androbbed and passed on. Often, they left destruction and carnage in their path, or they replaced former populations and became farmers themselves, only to be swept out by a later wave of hungry
denizens of the desert.
Conflicts between the grazing and farming cultures of the Holy Lands have been primarily
responsible for the tragic history of this region. Not until these two cultures supplement each otherin cooperation can we hope for peace in this ancient land.
We saw the tents of descendants of nomads out of Arabia. In the seventh century theyswept in out of the desert to conquer and overrun the farming lands of Palestine. Again in the
12th century nomads drove out the Crusaders. They with their herds of long-eared goats let
terrace walls fall in ruin and unleashed the forces of erosion. For nearly 13 centuries erosion
has been washing the soils off the slopes into the valleys to make marshes or out to sea.
In recent times a great movement has been under way for the redemption of the Promised
Land by Jewish settlers. They have wrought in draining swamps, ridding them of malaria, andplanting them to thriving orchards and fields. These settlers have also repaired terraces,
reforested desolate and rocky slopes, and improved livestock and poultry.
Throughout our survey of the work of the agricultural colonies, I was asked to advise onmeasures to conserve soil and water. I urged that orchards be planted on the contour and theland bench-terraced by contour plowing. We were shown one orchard where the trees wereplanted on the contour, the land was bench-terraced and slopes above the orchard were furrowed on the contour and planted to hardy trees.
By these measures all the rain that had fallen the season before, one of the wettest in many
years, had been absorbed by the soil. After this work was done no runoff occurred to cut
gullies down slope and to damage the orchards below. We were told that the man responsible
for this had learned these measures at the Institute of Water Economy in Tiflis, Georgia, inTranscaucasia.

Across Syria
We crossed the Jordan again into a region famous in Biblical times for its oaks, wheat fields,
and well-nourished herds. We found the ruins of Jerash, one of the 10 cities of Decapolis, andJerash the second. Archaeologists tell us that Jerash was once the center of some 250,000
people. But today only a village of 3,000 marks this great center of culture, and the country about
it is sparsely populated with seminomads. The ruins of this once-powerful city of Greek andRoman culture are buried to a depth of 13 feet with erosional debris washed from eroding slopes.
We searched out the sources of water that nourished Jerash and found a series of springs
protected by masonry built in the Graeco-Roman times. We examined these springs carefully withthe archaeologists to discover whether the present water level had changed with respect to theoriginal structures and whether the openings through which the springs gushed were the sameas those of ancient times. We found no suggestion that the water level was any lower than it waswhen the structures were built or that the openings were different. It seems that the water supply
had not failed.
When we examined the slopes surrounding Jerash we found the soils washed off to bedrockin spite of rock-walled terraces. The soils washed off the slopes had lodged in the valleys. These
valleys were cultivated by the seminomads who lived in black goat-hair tents. In Roman times thisarea supplied grain to Rome and supported thriving communities and rich villas, ruins of which we
found in the vicinity.
In the alluvial plains along the Orontes River, agriculture supports a number of cities, much
reduced in population from those of ancient times. Water wheels introduced from Persia during
or following the conquests of Alexander the Great (300 B. C.) were numerous along the Orontes.
There were hundreds, we were told, in Roman times, but today only 44 remain. They are
picturesque old structures both in their appearance and in the groans of the turning wheel as theyslowly lift water from the river to the aqueduct to supply water for the city of Hama. These wheels
are more than 2,000 years old. But no part of a wheel is that old, because the parts have been
replaced piecemeal many times through the centuries.

The Hundred Dead Cities
Still farther to the north in Syria, we came upon a region where erosion had done its worst in anarea of more than a million acres of rolling limestone country between Hama, Alleppo, andAntioch. French archaeologists, Father Mattern, and others found in this man-made desert morethan 100 dead cities.
Butler of Princeton rediscovered this region a generation ago. These were not cities as we know
them, but villages and market towns. The ruins of these towns were not buried. They were left asstark skeletons in beautifully cut stone, standing high on bare rock (fig. 4). Here, erosion had done
its worst. If the soils had remained, even though the cities were destroyed and the populations
dispersed, the area might be repeopled again and the cities rebuilt. But now that the soils aregone, all is gone.
We are told that in A.D. 610 - 612 a Persian army invaded this thriving region. Less than ageneration later, in 633 - 638, the nomads out of the Arabian Desert completed the destructionof the villages and dispersal of the population. Thus, all the measures for conserving soil andwater that had been built up through centuries were allowed to fall into disuse and ruin. Thenerosion was unleashed to do its deadly work in making this area a man-made desert.

Looking for the Forests of Lebanon
About 4,500 years ago, we are told by archaeologists, a Semitic tribe swept in out of the desert
and occupied the eastern shore of the Mediterranean and established the harbor towns of Tyreand Sidon. On the site of another such ancient harbor town is Beirut, which today is the capitalof Lebanon. You can see it from a high point on the Lebanon Mountains overlooking theMediterranean Sea.
These early Semites were
Phoenicians. They foundtheir land a mountainous
country with a very narrowcoastal plain and little flat
land on which to carry out
the traditional irrigatedagriculture as it had grown
up in Mesopotamia andEgypt. We may believe thatas the Phoenician people
increased, they wereconfronted with threechoices: (1) Migration andcolonization, which we know
they did; (2) manufacturing
and commerce, which weknow they did; and (3)FIGURE 4.—Ruins of one of the Hundred Dead Cities of Syria. From 3 to 6 feet
cultivation of slopes, about
of soil has been washed off most of the hillsides. This city will remain deadwhich we have hitherto
because the land around it can no longer support a city.
heard little.

Here was a land covered with forests and watered by the rains of heaven, a land that held
entirely new problems for tillers of soil who were accustomed to the flat alluvial valleys of
Mesopotamia and the Nile. As forests were cleared either for domestic use or for commerce,
slopes were cultivated. Soils of the slopes eroded then under heavy winter rains as they would
now. Here under rain farming, they encountered severe soil erosion and the problem of
establishing a permanent agriculture on sloping lands.
We find, as we read the record on the land in this fascinating region, tragedy after tragedy
deeply engraved on the sloping land. To control erosion walls were constructed across the slopes.
Ruins of these walls can be seen here and there today. These measures failed, and erosion
caused the soil to shift downslope. As the fine-textured
soil was washed away,
leaving loose rocks at thesurface, tillers of the soil
piled the rocks together tomake cultivation about themeasier. In these cases thebattle with soil erosion was
definitely a losing one.

FIGURE 6.—Cedars still grow in Lebanon when given a chance. This is part ofone of the four small groves that still exist. It is in the grounds of a monasteryand is protected from goat grazing by the stone fence.

Elsewhere we found thatthe battle with soil erosion
had been won by theconstruction
andmaintenance of a remarkableseries of rock-walled terraces
extending from the bases tothe crests of slopes likefantastic staircases (fig. 5).
At Beit Eddine in themountains of Lebanon eastof Beirut, we found theslopes terraced even up togrades of 76 percent.

The mountains of ancient
Phoenicia were once
FIGURE 5.—Rock-walled bench terraces in Lebanon that have been in use forcovered by the famous
thousands of years. The construction of terraces of this type would cost fromforests, the cedars of$2,000 to $5,000 per acre if labor was figured at 40 cents per hour. Suchexpensive methods of protecting land are practical only where people have no
Lebanon. An inscription onother land on which to raise their food.
the temple of Karnak, astranslated by Breasted,announces the arrival in
Egypt before 2900 B. C. of 40 ships ladden with timber out of Lebanon.
You will recall that it was King Solomon, nearly 3,000 years ago, who made an agreement with
Hiram, King of Tyre to furnish him cypress and cedars out of these forests for the construction of
the temple at Jerusalem. Solomon supplied 80,000 lumberjacks to work in the forest and 70,000
to skid the logs to the sea. It must have been a heavy forest to require such a forte. What has
become of this famous forest that once covered nearly 2,000 square miles?
Today, only 4 small groves of this famous Lebanon cedar forest are left the most important ofwhich is the Tripoli grove of trees in the cup of a valley. An examination of the grove revealed
some 400 trees of which 43 are old veterans or wolf trees. As we read the story written in treerings, it appears that about
300 years ago the grove had
nearly disappeared with noless than 43 scatteredveteran trees standing.
These trees with widespreading branches had
grown up in an open stand.
About that time a little church
was built in their midst thatmade the grove sacred. A
stone wall was built about
the grove to keep out thegoats that grazed over themountains. Seeds from theveteran trees fell to theground, germinated, andFIGURE 7.—These bench terraces in Shansi Province illustrate the extent togrew up into a fine closewhich some Chinese farmers have gone to conserve the remaining soil on theirgrowing stand of tall straighthillsides.
trees that show how thecedars of Lebanon will makegood construction timber when grown in forest conditions (fig 6).
Such natural restocking also shows that this famous forest has not disappeared because ofadverse change of climate, but that under the present climate it would extend itself if it were safeguarded against the rapacious goats that graze down every accessible living on these mountains.

China's Sorrow
Before moving on to Cyprus and North Africa, let's look at China. Civilization here probably
arose somewhat later than that in the Near East and was influenced by it. Mixed agriculture, irrigation, the oxdrawn plow, and terracing of slopes are notable similarities in the two regions (fig.
7).
It was in China, where I was engaged in an international project for famine prevention in 1922 27, that the full and fateful significance of soil erosion was first burned into my consciousness.
During an agricultural exploration into the regions of North China, seriously affected by thefamine of 1920 - 21, I examined the site where the Yellow River, in 1852, broke from its enormous
system of inner and outer dikes. As we traveled across the flat plains of Honan, we saw a great
flat-topped hill looming up before us. We traveled on over the elevated plain for 7 miles to anothergreat dike that stretched across the landscape from horizon to horizon. We mounted this dike andthere before us lay the Yellow River, the Hwang Ho, a great width of brown water flowing quietlythat spring morning into a tawny haze in the east.
Here in a channel fully 40 to 50 feet above the plain of the great delta lay the river known for
thousands of years as "China's Sorrow." This gigantic river had been lifted up off the plain overthe entire 400-mile course across its delta and had been held in this channel by hand labor ofmen—without machines or engines, without steel cables or construction timber, and without stone.

Millions of Chinese farmers with bare hands and baskets had built here through thousands ofyears a stupendous monument to human cooperation and the will to survive. Since the days of
Ta-Yu, nearly 4,000 years ago, the battle of floods with this tremendous river have been lost andwon time and again.
But why should this battle with the river have to be endless? Any relaxation of vigilance let theriver break over its dikes, calling for herculean and cooperative work to put the river back again
in its channel. Then suddenly it dawned upon me that the river was brown with silt, heavily ladenwith soil that was washed out of the highlands of the vast drainage system of the Yellow River.
As its flood waters reached the gentler slope of the delta (1 foot to the mile), the current slowed
down and began to drop its load of silt. Deposits of silt in turn lessened the capacity of the channel
to carry floodwaters and called on the farmers threatened with angry floods to build up the dikes
yet higher and higher, year after year.
There was no end to this demand of the river if it were to be confined between its dikes. Finalcontrol of the river so heavily laden with silt was hopeless; yet millions of farmers toiled on.
In 1852, the yellow-brown waters of the Hwang Ho broke out of its elevated channel to seek
another way to the sea. It had emptied into the Yellow Sea, where it had usurped the old outletof the Shai River.
This time the river broke over its dikes near Kaifeng, Honan, and wandered to the northeast overfarm lands, destroying villages and smothering the life out of millions of humans, and discharged
into the Gulf of Chihli, 400 miles north of its former outlet. In its rage it had refused to be lifted any
higher off its plain. Hundreds of thousands of farmers had been defeated. Silt had defeated them,
valiant as they were.
Silt—silt—silt! We determined to learn where this silt came from, even up to the headwaters.
In a series of carefully planned agricultural explorations we discovered the source of the silt thatbrought ruin to millions of farmers in the plains. In the Province of Shansi we found how the lineof cultivation was pushed up slopes, following the clearing away of forests. Soils, formerly
protected by a forest mantle, were thus exposed to summer rains, and soil erosion began aheadlong process of destroying land and filling streams with soil waste and detritus.
Without a basis of comparison, we might easily have misread the record as written there on theland. But temple forests, preserved and protected by the Buddhist priests, gave me and my Chinese associates a remarkable chance to measure and compare rates of erosion within these
forests and on similar slopes and soils that had been cleared and cultivated.
In brief, my Chinese scientific associates and I carried out a series of soil erosion experiments
during rainy seasons of 3 years. In these experiments we measured the rate of runoff and erosion
by means of runoff plots within temple forests, out on farm fields under cultivation, and on fields
abandoned because of erosion. For the first time in soil-erosion studies, we got experimental data
for such comparisons. Here too, we found how the Yellow River had become China’s Sorrow, for
we found that runoff and erosion from cultivated land were many times as great as from temple
forests.
It was clear that if the farmers of the delta plain were ever to be safeguarded from the mounting
perils of the siltladen Yellow River, the source of the silt must be stopped by erosion control.

Farther west in the midst of the famous and vast loessial deposits of North China, we found in
the Province of Shansi that an irrigation system first established in 746 B. C. had been put out ofuse by silt. Here again silt was the villain.
We sought out the origin of the silt that had brought an end to an irrigation project that had fed
the sons of Han during the Golden Age of China. This origin was found in areas where soil erosion
had eaten out gullies 600 feet deep (fig. 8). It was while contemplating such scenes that I resolved
to challenge the conclusions of the great German geologist, Baron Von Richthofen, and of
Ellsworth Huntington that the decadence of North China was due to desiccation or pulsations of
the climate.
Temple forests gave the clue. They demonstrated beyond a doubt that the present climate
would support a generous growth of vegetation capable of preventing erosion on such a scale.
Human occupation of the land had set in motion processes of soil wastage that were inthemselves sufficient to account for the decadence and decline of this part of China, without
adverse change of climate.
It was in the presence of such tragic scenes on a gigantic scale that I resolved to run down thenature of soil erosion and to devote my lifetime to study of ways to conserve the lands on whichmankind depends.

Soil Waste in Ancient Cyprus
Let's now go back andfollow the westward courseof civilization from the Holy
Lands through North Africa
and on into Europe. In
Cyprus we found the land
use problems of theMediterranean epitomized in
a comparatively small area.
In the plain of Mesaoria is
a telling record in and abouta Byzantine church. The
church on the outskirts of thevillage of Asha in eastern
Cyprus is surrounded by agraveyard and its wall. The
alluvial plain now stands 8
feet above the level of thechurchyard as we measured
FIGURE 8.—These huge gullies indicate the severity of soil erosion in the deep, it. On entering the church weand once fertile loessial soils of northern China. Millions of acres have been cut
stepped down 3 feet fromup like this and are now almost worthless.
the yard level to the floor of
the church. Inside we notedthat low pointed arches were blocked off, and new arches had been cut for doors and windows.
The aged vestryman told us that about 30 years ago a flood from the plain had filled the churchwith water and left 2 feet of silt on the floor. Rather than clean it out, a new stone floor had beenlaid over the silt deposit. Thus, 8 plus 3 plus 2 equals 13 feet, the height of the present alluvial
plain above the original church floor. From these measurements we concluded that the plain had

filled in, not less than 13 feet, with erosional debris washed off the drainage slopes.

Across North Africa
Along the northern coast of Africa into Tunisia and Algeria we read the record of the granaryof Rome during the empire—by surveying a cross section from the Mediterranean to the
Sahara Desert, from 40 inches of rainfall to 4 inches, from Carthage on the coast to Biskra at
the edge of mysterious Sahara.
In Tunisia we found that it rains in the desert of North Africa in wintertime now as it did in thetime of Caesar—in 44 B. C. Caesar complained of how a great rainstorm with wind had blown
over the tents of his army encampment and flooded the camp. It rained hard enough to
produce flash floods in the wadies. At one place muddy water swept across the highway insuch volume that we decided to wait for the flash flow to go down before proceeding.
We stood on the site of ancient Carthage, the principal city of North Africa in Phoenician andRoman times—the city that produced Hannibal and became a dangerous rival of Rome. In 146
B. C. at the end of the Third Punic War, Scipio destroyed Carthage, but out of the doomed city
he saved 28 volumes of a work on agriculture written by a Carthaginian by the name of Mago.
Mago was recognized by the Greeks and Romans as the foremost authority on agriculture in
the Mediterranean area. These works of Mago on agricultural subjects were translated by such
Roman writers as Columella, Varro, and Cato. The translations tell us that the traditions ofconserving soil and water discovered on the slopes of ancient Phoenicia had been brought
there by colonists. We suspect these measures furnished the basis of the great agricultural
production that was so important to the Romans during the Empire.
Over a large part of the ancient granary of Rome we found the soil washed off to bedrockand the hills seriously gullied as a result of overgrazing. Most valley floors are still cultivated
but are eroding in great gullies fed by accelerated storm runoff from barren slopes. This is in
an area that supported many great cities in Roman times.
We found at Djemila the ghosts of Cuicul, a city that once was great and populous and rich
but later was covered completely, except for about 3 feet of a single column, by erosion debris
washed off the slopes of surrounding hills. For 20 years French archaeologists had been
excavating this remarkable Roman City and had unearthed great temples, two great forums,
splendid Christian churches, and great warehouses for wheat and olive oil. All this had beenburied by erosional debris washed from the eroding slopes above the city. The surrounding
slopes, once covered with olive groves, are now cut up with active gullies.
The modern village houses only a few inhabitants. The flat lands are still farmed to grain but
the slopes are bare and eroding and wasting away. What is the reason for this astounding
decline and ruin?

Timgad, Lost Capital of a Lost Agriculture
Farther to the south we stopped to study the ruins of another great Roman city of North
Africa, Thamugadi, now called Timgad (fig. 9). This city was founded by Trajan in the first
century A. D. It was laid out in symmetrical pattern and adorned with magnificent buildings,
with a forum embellished by statuary and carved porticoes, a public library, a theater to seatsome 2,500 persons, 17 great Roman baths, and marble flush toilets for the public.
After the invasion of the nomads in the seventh century had completed the destruction of the cityand dispersal of its population, this great center of Roman culture and power was lost to knowledge for 1,200 years. It was buried by the dust of wind erosion from surrounding farm lands until
only a portion of Hadrian's arch and 3 columns remained like tombstones above the undulating
mounds to indicate that once a great city was there.
The French Governmenthas been excavating thisgreat center for 30 years.
Remarkable examples ofbuilding, of art, and of waysof living during Roman times
in North Africa have been
disclosed, all supported by
the agriculture of theGranary of Rome.
But today this great centerof power and culture of the
Roman Empire is desolation.
It is represented by a modern village of only a few
hundred inhabitants who livein squalid structures, thewalls of which are for the
FIGURE 9.—The ruins of Timgad—an ancient Roman city built during the first century most part built of stone
A. D. The few huts seen in the center background now house about 300 inhabitants,
quarried from the ruins of thewhich is all the eroded land will support. Note that the eroded hills in the background
ancient city. Water erosion
are almost as desolate as the ruins of the city.
has cut a gully down into theland and exposed an ancientaqueduct that supplied water to the city of Timgad from a great spring some 3 miles away.
Within and surrounding Timgad, we studied remarkable ruins of great olive presses where today
there is not a single olive tree within the circle of the horizon.
On the plain of Tunisia we came upon in El Jem the ruins of a great amphi- theater, second onlyin size to that of Rome. (fig. 10). It was built to seat some 60,000 people, but it would be difficult
to find 5,000 persons today within this district. The ancient city now lies buried around theamphitheater and a sordid modern village is built on the buried city.
What was the cause of the decadence of North Africa and the decline of its population? Somestudents have suggested that the climate changed and became drier, forcing people to abandon
their remarkable cities and works. But Gsell, the renowned geologist who studied this problem for
40 years, challenged the conclusion that the climate has changed in any important way since
Roman times.

So Director Hodet of the Archaeological Excavations at Timgad decided as an experiment toplant olive trees on an unexcavated part of the city where there would be no possibility of
subirrigation. He planted young olive trees in the manner prescribed in Roman literature, watering
them in the following two long dry summer seasons. These olive trees are thriving, indicating that
where soils are still in place, olive trees will grow today probably very much as they did in Romantimes.
On the plains about Sfax,
ruins of olive presses were
found by early travelers, but
no olive trees. Forty years
ago an experiment to plant
olive trees there was
decided upon. Now morethan 150,000 acres areplanted to olive trees; theirproducts support thriving
industries in the modern cityof Sfax. These plantings
indicate that the climate oftoday has not become
significantly drier since
Roman times.
FIGURE 10.—Ruins of the amphitheater at the former city of Thysdrus, in Tunisia,
which would seat 60,000 people. Today, only a few thousand people inhabit this area.
The small flock of sheep in the foreground are a fair indication of the land s ability tosupport life.

Other students of thisbaffling probem havesuggested that pulsations ofclimate with intervening dry
periods, sufficient to blot out the civilization of North Africa, have taken place. Such undoubtedly
could have been the case. But at Sousse we found telling evidence on this point in an olive grovethat has survived since Roman times. These olive trees were at least 1,500 years old, we were
informed.
I was interested in the way these trees were planted—in basins bordered by banks of earth withways of leading in unabsorbed storm runoff from higher ground. We passed along this area at atime of heavy rains which showed just how this method had worked since the trees were firstplanted. If there have been pulsations of climate since Roman times, this grove should show thatthe drier periods were not sufficiently severe to kill the olive trees. We conclude that it does notseem probable that either a progressive change of climate or pulsations of climate account for the
decadence of North Africa. We must seek other causes.
On hillsides between Constantine and Timgad, we found on the land a record that indicateswhat has happened to soils of the granary of ancient Rome. We found some hills that, according
to the botanists, were covered with Savannah vegetation of scattered trees and grass. Vegetation
had conserved a layer of soil on these hills for unknown ages.
With the coming of a grazing culture, brought in by invading nomads of Arabia, erosion was
unleashed by overgrazing of the hills. We can see here on the landscape how the soil mantle waswashed off the upper slopes to bedrock. Accelerated runoff from the bared rock cut gullies into
the upper edge of the soil mantle, working it downhill as if a great rug were being pulled off thehills.
The accumulation of torrential flows during winter storms is cutting great gullies through the
alluvial plains just as it does in New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah of our own country. The effect ofthis is to lower the water table, bringing about the effects of desiccation without reduction in
rainfall.
In this manner has the country been seriously damaged, and its capacity to support a populationmuch reduced. Unleashed and uncontrolled soil erosion is sufficient to undermine a civilization,
as we found in North China and as seems to be true in North Africa as well.

The Dry Lands of North Africa
We traveled across North Africa southward toward the Sahara Desert into zones of less andless rainfall. Beyond the cultivated area in Roman times was a zone devoted to stockraising ona large scale. Thousands of cisterns were built in Roman or pre-Roman times to catch storm runoff
from the land to store it for outlying villages and for watering herds of livestock during the drysummer seasons.
Many of these cisterns were being cleaned out and repaired by the French Government before
World War II, to be used for the same purpose as they were in ancient times. One of the modern
cisterns was four times as large as any Roman cistern, with a capacity of 100,000 cubic feet. This
cistern was filled in 2 years and now furnishes water for the seminomads who inhabit this part ofNorth Africa.
Still farther toward the desert, about 70 miles south of Tebessa, we found a remarkable example
of ancient measures for the conservation of water. At some time in the Roman or possibly preRoman period, peoples of this region built check dams to divert storm water around slopes into
canals to spread it upon a remarkable series of bench terraces.
This area of unusual interest raises a number of questions we are not yet able to answer. If
these terraces were cultivated to crops in times past, they are the best evidence we have thatclimate has become drier since they were first built. But if they were built for spreading water toincrease forage production for grazing herds, as the French are using them today, they are notevidence of an adverse change of climate. This evidence alone could leave us in doubt, but otherevidence indicates that water spreading was most used here for crops.
It would be interesting to know the date and the reason for building these terraces. They may
indicate that with Roman occupation of North Africa the native tribes were driven beyond the border of the Roman Empire and were forced to devise these refined measures for conservation anduse of water in a dry area. Or they may indicate that North Africa was so densely populated that
it was necessary to use these refinements in the conservation of water to support the populationon the margins of a crowded region.
While the land of North Africa has been seriously damaged, as one can see written on
landscape after landscape, the country is still capable of far greater than its present production.
In Roman times a high degree of conservation of soils and waters was reached with an intensive
culture of orchards and vineyards on the slopes and intensive grain growing in the valleys.
All this depended on efficient conservation and use of the rainfall. We find numerous references
to such practices in the literature of the time. But, as nomads swept in out of the desert, theirextensive and exploitive grazing culture replaced these highly refined measures of land use andlet them fall into disuse and ruin. Erosion was unleashed on its destructive course, and thecapacity of the land to support people was seriously reduced.
The veteran student of North Africa, Professor Gautier, answered my query as to whether
climate of North Africa had changed since Roman times, in the following way: "We have noevidence to indicate that the climate has changed in an important degree since Roman times, butthe people have changed."
We conclude that the decline of North Africa is due to a change in a people and more especiallyto a change in culture and methods of use of land that replaced a highly developed and intensive
agriculture and that allowed erosion to waste away the land and to change the regime of waters.

A Word About Land Use in Italy
The westward course of civilization has left its marks in Italy. We found at Paestum, south of
Naples, one of the best preserved Greek temples, located on the coastal plain near the sea. Here,
there was no overwash of erosional material or accumulation of dust from wind erosion and no
gully erosion in the plain. We walked on the same level as the Greeks who built the temple 2,600
years ago.
But population pressure in Italy, under its smiling climate and blue skies, has pushed thecultivation line up the slopes and caused the building of villages on picturesque ridge points. In
Italy there are 826 persons per square mile of cultivated land, while in the United States there are
only 208.
This method of comparing population density gives us the advantage because of our vastgrazing lands that support great herds of livestock. But if we had the same density of population
per square mile of cultivated land in the United States as has Italy, we should have 520 million
people. This gives us some idea of the relative densities and pressures of population upon theland and accounts for the intensive use not only of the plains but of the steep slopes.
We do not have space to tell the details of how the Pontine Marshes, that for 2,000 years defied
the reclamation efforts of former rulers of Italy, were successfully reclaimed recently. This former
pestilential area has been drained and rid of malaria and is now divided into farms equipped withreinforced concrete houses of attractive design, where families are established free from perilsof malaria and safe in the security of their land.

Torrent Control in the French Alps
In southeastern France we found the same condition of intensive use of land on valley floors
and on steep, terraced slopes. In the French Alps, population pressure on land of the plains has
pushed the cultivation line up the slopes into mountains and has denuded grassy meadows by
overgrazing.
This excessive use of the mountainous areas in the French Alps unleashed torrential floods thatfor more than a century ravaged productive Alpine valleys. Erosional debris was swept down byrecurring torrential floods to bury fields, orchards, and villages; to cut lines of communication; andto kill inhabitants of the valleys.
So serious became this menace to the welfare of the region that the French Government, after
much study and legislation, undertook in 1882 a constructive program of torrent control. Since thattime hundreds of millions of francs have been spent for works of torrent control that are
remarkably successful.

Intensive Land Use in France
We found slopes insouthern France cultivatedon gradients up to 100 percent with terrace walls as
high as the benches were
wide. Some of these terraced fields had been undercultivation for more than athousand years—likely much
longer, for the Phoenicians
are believed to be
responsible for terracing inthis part of France (fig. 11).
When the soils of theseterraces become fatigued, as
the French say, they are
FIGURE 11.—A terraced citrus orchard in southern France. It is believed that terracesof this type were first built in France by the Phoenicians about 2,500 years ago. Modern turned over to a depth ofFrench farmers are still maintaining and farming such hillsides, however, because of the more than 3 feet once in 15
scarcity of good land.
to 30 years as the need may
be. Thereafter, a cover cropis planted on the newly exposed soil material for two or more years, followed by plantings oforchard trees or vines or vegetables.
In eastern France we found in various stages adjustments of farming to slopes. In places,
terraces were built with rock walls on the contour to reduce slope gradients; elsewhere, rock walls
were built on the contour toform level benches. At otherplaces, farmers dug up thesoil of the bottom furrow of
their fields that were laid out
in contour strip crops, loaded
the soil into carts, hauled it tothe upper edges of the fields,
and dumped it along theupper contour furrows tocompensate for downslope
movement of soil under theaction of plowing and thewash of rain (fig. 12). Thiswas done each year. Where
the slope was too steep tohaul the soil uphill, theyloaded the soil of the bottom
furrow in baskets and carried
it on their backs to the upperedges of the field. In this way
FIGURE 12.—These French farmers are digging up the soil along the lower furrow of
their field and loading it into a cart. It will be hauled uphill and spread along the upper these farmers of France takeedge. They do this job each winter to help compensate for the downhill movement ofcare of their soil fromsoil by erosion.
generation to generation.

In southwestern France, in the region of Les Landes, we studied, probably, the greatest
achievement of mankind in the reclamation of sand dunes. It is recorded that the Vandals in A.
D. 407 swept through France and destroyed the settlements of the people who in times past had
tapped pine trees of the Les Landes region and supplied resin to Rome. Vandal hordes razed thevillages, dispersed the population, and set fire to the forests, destroying the cover of a vast sandy
area. Prevailing winds from the west began the movement of sand. In time, moving sand dunes
covered an area of more than 400,000 acres that in turn created 2 1/4 million acres of marshland.
Sand dunes in their eastward march covered farms and villages and dammed streams, causing
marshes to form behind them. Malaria followed and practically depopulated the once well-peopled
and productive region. These conditions caused not only disease and death but impoverishmentof the people as well.
In 1778 Villers was appointed by the French Government to create a military port at Arcachon.
He reported that it was first necessary to conquer the movement of the sand dunes, andpresented the principle of "dune fixation." About 20 years later Napoleon appointed his famous
engineer, Bremontier, to control these dunes.
Space will not permit my telling the fascinating details of this remarkable story—of how thedunes were conquered by establishing a littoral dune and reforesting the sand behind, and how
marshy lands were drainedby Chambrelent after a long
period of experimentationand persuasion of public
officials. Now this entire
region is one vast forest
supporting thriving timber
and resin industries andnumerous health resorts.
Fortunately
forcomparison, one dune on
private land was for somereason left uncontrolled. Thisdune is 2 miles long, 1/2 milewide, and 300 feet high (fig.
13). It is now moving
landward, covering the forest
Figure 13.—One of the uncontrolled sand dunes in the Les Landes forest ofsouthwestern France. French engineers have, in the past, brought about 400,000 acres of at the rate of about 65 feet asuch dunes under control, and the area is again producing timber.
year. As I stood on this duneand saw in all directions an
undulating evergreen forest
to the horizon, I began to appreciate the magnitude of the achievement of converting the giant
sand-dune and marshland into profitable forests and health resorts.
How the Dutch Farm the Ocean Floor
In Holland we found another of mankind's great achievements—the reclamation of the ocean
floor for farming.
Holland is a land of about 8 1/4 million acres, divided into two almost equal parts—above andbelow high-tide level. It is inhabited by 8 million industrious people. Its land included the great deltaof the North Sea built up with the products of erosion sculptured out of the lands of Germany andSwitzerland and northeastern France, brought down by the Rhine and Meuse Rivers. Now 45
percent of the area lies below high-tide level and one-fourth lies below mean sea level. The Dutchfrom time immemorial have been carrying on an unending battle with the sea. They have become
expert in filching land from the grasp of the angry waters of the North Sea.
If the United States were as densely populated per square mile of cultivated land as Holland,
the population of the United States would be 1 1/4 billion. The density of population of Holland has
called for an increase of its
land area.
Rather than to seek
additional land by conquestof its neighbors it has turnedto the conquest of the sea.

FIGURE 14.—A Dutch farm in the Wieringermeer Polder of the Netherlands. Only 7
years before this picture was taken this land was covered by the North Sea.

The Zuider-Zee project,
two centuries in the planning,is Holland's masterpiece in a
2,000-year battle with theNorth Sea. This project adds
more than 550,000 acres of
new land to Holland’s
territory, converting the oldsalt ZuiderZee into a sweetwater lake renamed the
Yssel Meer.

The Dutch have built great dikes to dam off the sea and have pumped the water out of thebasins with great pumping plants. They have diked off the sea and dewatered the land, leached
it of its salt, and converted it into productive farm land. We stood on fertile farm land that was thefloor of the sea only 7 years earlier, but now is divided into farms equipped with fine houses andgreat barns (fig. 14). At a cost of about $200 an acre, this land was reclaimed from the sea anddivided into farms.
The Dutch by this means have created a new agricultural paradise into which only select farmers
may enter. Out of 30 applications for each farm, one applicant is selected on the basis ofcharacter, the past record of his family, and his freedom from debt. The successful applicant is
put on probation for a period of 6 years. If he farms the land in accordance with the best interestsof the land and of the country, he will be permitted to continue for another period. If he fails to doso, he must get off and give another farmer applicant a chance.

A Glance at England
In the mild climate of England, we find that tillers of soil have had little difficulty with soil erosion.
This is true because rains come as mists, slopes are gentle, and fields are usually farmed to closegrowing crops. England is well suited to grassland farming and to the growing of small grains.
Clean-tilled crops have never been in general use. We found fields in England that have beencultivated for more than a thousand years where the yields of wheat have been raised to averagesof 40 to 60 bushels per acre. The maximum yield thus far is 96 bushels to the acre. The principal
problems before the farmers of England are rotations, seed selection, and farm implements.
World War II made new demands on the lands of England. Before blockading action by theenemy, the British Isles depended on imports for two-thirds of their total food supply. One-third of
their population was fed from their own lands requiring about 12 million acres of cultivated landfor this purpose. Fully 50 percent more land was plowed to grow food crops. Pastureland andgrassland on slopes were cultivated. Soil erosion may become a problem more serious than everbefore in British agriculture, because of the extraordinary demands for the growing of food.

The New World
And now we cross the Atlantic to the new land which was isolated from the peoples of the Old
World until civilization had advanced through fully 6,000 years.
The peoples found here, presumably descendants of tribes coming from Asia in the distant past,
had been handicapped in the development of agriculture by lack of large animals suitable fordomestication and by ignorance of the wheel and the use of iron. They had, however, learned toconserve soil and water in a notable way, especially in the terrace agriculture of Peru and Central
America and in the Hopi country of southwestern United States. Some have held that thisknowledge was brought across the South Pacific by way of islands, on many of which suchpractices are still found. In any case, lacking iron or even bronze tools, these peoples for the mostpart still depended largely on hunting, fishing, and gathering—along with shifting cultivation—for
their livelihood. Thus, the soil resources seem to have been for the most part almost unimpaired
To the peoples of the Old World, the Americas were a land of promise and a release from theoppressions, economic and political, brought on by congested populations and failures of people
to find adjustments to their long-used land.
North America, as the first colonists entered it, was a vast area of good land more bountiful in
raw materials than ever was vouchsafed any people. Its soils were fat with accumulated fertilityof the ages, its mountains were full of minerals and forests; its clear rivers were teeming with fish.
All these were abundant—soil productivity, raw materials, and power for a remarkable civilization.
Here was the last frontier; for there are no more new continents to discover to explore, and to
exploit. If we are to discover a way of establishing an enduring civilization we must do it here; thisis our last stand. We have not yet fully discovered this way; we are searching for the way and thelight. Here is a challenge of the ages to old and young alike. Here is a chance to solve this age-old
problem of establishing an enduring civilization—of finding an adjustment of a people to its land
resources.
Our land is like a great farm with fields suited to the growing of cotton, corn, and other crops andwith land for pastures, woods, and general farming. In the West, our country has vast grazing
lands well suited to the raising of herds of sheep and cattle and fertile alluvial valleys in the arid
regions, overawed by high mountains that condense the waters out of moisture-laden winds toirrigate garden lands. Such is the American farm, capable of feeding at least 350 million people
when the land is intensively cultivated under full conservation and fully occupied with a complex
division of labor that will give us a higher general standard of living than we enjoy today.

The Record of Our Own Land
But now let us read the record of our own land in a short period of 300 years.
In the past 150 years, our occupation of this fabulous land has coincided with the coming of theage of science and power-driven machines.
Along the Atlantic coast in the Piedmont we find charming landscapes of fields with red soils andglowing grain fields. But in their midst we find an insidious enemy devouring the land—stealing
it away, ere we are aware, by sheet erosion, rain by rain, washing it down into the streams andout to the sea. Sheet erosion, marked by shallow but numberless rills in our fields, is blotted out

by each plowing.
We forget what is happening to the good earth until we measure these soil and water losses.
More than 300 million acres out of our 400-odd million acres of farm fields are now eroding fasterthan soil is being formed. That means destruction of the land if erosion is not controlled.
We are not guessing. Erosion experiment stations located throughout the country have given
us accurate answers. Let us compare rates of erosion under different conditions of land coverage
and use. Measurements through 5 years at the Statesville, N. C., erosion experiment station show
that, on an 8-percent slope, land in fallow without cropping lost each year an average of 29
percent of rainfall in immediate runoff and 64 tons of soil per acre in wash-off of soil.
This means that in 18 years, 7 inches of soil (the average depth of topsoil) would be washedaway. Under continuous cropping to cotton, as was once the general practice in this region, theland lost each year an average of 10 percent of rainfall and 22 tons of soil per acre per year.
At this rate it would take 44 years to erode away 7 inches of soil. Rotations reduced, but did not
stop, erosion for the land lost 9 percent of the rain and enough soil so that it would take 109 years
to erode away 7 inches of soil. That is a very short time in the life of our Nation. But where theland was kept in grass, it lost less than 1 percent of rain and so little soil that it would take 96,000
years to wash away 7 inches of soil. This rate is certainly no faster than soil is formed.
Under the natural cover of woods burned over annually, as has unfortunately been the custom
in southern woods, each year the land lost 3 1/2 percent of rain and 0.06 ton of soil per acre sothat it would take 1,800 years to erode away 7 inches of soil. But where fire was kept out of thewoods and forest litter accumulated on the forest floor, the land lost less than one-third of 1 percent of the rainfall. And, according to the calculations, it would require more than 500,000 years
to wash away 7 inches of soil. Such a rate of erosion is indeed far below the rate of soil formation.
Here in a nutshell, so to speak, we have the underlying hazard of civilization. By clearing andcultivating sloping lands—for most of our lands are more or less sloping—we expose soils toaccelerated erosion by water or by wind and sometimes by both water and wind.
In doing this we enter upon a regime of self-destructive agriculture. The direful results of thissuicidal agriculture have in the past been escaped by migration to new land or, where this was not
feasible, by terracing slopes with rock walls as was done in ancient Phoenicia, Peru, and China.
Escape to new land is no longer a way out. We are brought face to face today with the necessityof finding out how to establish permanent agriculture on our farms under cultivation before they
are damaged beyond reclamation, and before the food supply of a growing population becomes
deficient.
In an underpopulated land such as ours, farmed extensively rather than intensively, there will
be considerable slack before privations on a national scale overtake us. But privations of individual
farm families, resulting from wastage of soil by erosion, are indicators of what will come to the
Nation. As our population increases, farm production will go down from depletion of soil resources
unless measures of soil conservation are put into effect throughout the land.
We must be in possession of a certain amount of abundance to be provident: a starving farmer
will eat his seed grain; you will do it and I will do it, even though we know it will be fatal to next
year's crop. Now is the time, while we still have much good land capable of restoration to full or
greater productivity, to carry through a full program of soil and water conservation. Such is necessary for building here a civilization that will not fall as have others whose ruins we have studied
in this bulletin.

A solution to the problem of farming sloping lands must be found if we are to establish an
enduring agriculture in the United States. We have only about 100 million acres of flat alluvial land
where the erosion hazard isnegligible, out of 460 million
acres of land suitable forcrops. Most of our production
comes from sloping lands
where the hazard of soil
erosion is ever present. This
calls urgently for the
discovery, adaptation, andapplication of measures forconserving our soils.

In the results of theStatesvilleerosionexperiment station we saw
how a forest with its ground
litter was effective in keeping
FIGURE 15.—A formerly productive field in Virginia that has been cut to pieces by
gully erosion. About 50 million acres of good farm land in the United States have been down the rate of soil erosion
ruined for further practical cultivation by similar types of erosion.
well within rates of soil
formation. Out of untold agesof unending reactions between forces of erosion that wear down the land and forces of plant growth that build up the landthrough vegetation, the layer of forest litter has proved to be the most effective natural agent in
reducing surface wash of soil to a minimum. Here is clearly our objective for a permanent
agriculture, namely, to safeguard the physical body of the soil resource and to keep down erosion
wastage under cultivation as nearly as possible to this geologic norm of erosion under naturalvegetation.
A few years ago I came upon a hill farmer in an obscure part of the mountains of Georgia. He
was trying to apply on his cornfield the function of forest litter as he saw it under the nearby foreston the same slope and same type of soil.
It was for me a great experience to talk with J. Mack Gowder of Hall County, Ga., about thefields he had cultivated for 20 years in a way that has caught the imagination of thoughtful
agriculturists of the Nation. We talked about the simple device of forest ground litter and how
effective it is in preventing soil erosion even on steep slopes, and how he thought that if litter at
the ground surface would work in the forest it ought also to work on his cultivated fields along thesame slope.
Mr. Gowder told me how, as a young man when he bought this steep wooded land more than
20 years ago, he hoped to avoid the soil erosion that was ruining farms on smoother and better
land of the country. He planned to do this by stirring his land with deep plowing but without turning
the soil.
In this way, he could leave his crop litter at the surface to do the same kind of work that theforest litter does. Gowder chose a bull-tongue plow, only 4 inches wide, to do the trick. He told methat his neighbors laughed at him for such foolish ways of plowing. As a concession to customsof the region, he put in channel terraces with a slight grade as a precaution against storm runoff
from unusual rains. But, thus far, they have not been needed.

Now Gowder is cultivating topsoil on slopes up to 17 percent whereas his ridiculing neighbors
have only subsoil to farm.
They have lost all their
topsoil by erosion.
Leaving crop litter, which issometimes called stubble
mulch or crop residue, at the
ground surface in farming
operations is one of the mostsignificant contributions to
American agriculture. Certain
adaptations of the method
need to be made to meet the
problems of different farming
regions, but the new principle
is the contribution of importance.

Danger Signs in
America
FIGURE 16.—This airplane view shows parts of six different farms near Temple, Tex.,
where the farmers have banded together to combat erosion as a community problem.

Sheet erosion develops
into gullies if allowed tocontinue unchecked for a
few years. Such gullies become numberless gutters, leading off storm waters and flash floods that
gouge out miniature gorges and ruin the land for further cultivation (fig. 15). Material washed outof such gullies is swept down into river valleys to shoal streams, filling reservoirs, and destroying
water storage for hydroelectric power and for irrigation.
One of the most important findings of this survey of the use of land through 7,000 years is thattillers of soil have encountered their greatest problem throughout the ages in trying to establish
a permanent agriculture on sloping lands. We have read the record, as written on the land, of
failures from place to place but of few instances of success. This same problem is with us in our
new land of America, where millions of acres have been destroyed for further cultivation andabandoned.

The Way to an Enduring Agriculture
Our solution for safeguarding our soils on slopes where soil erosion by water is the hazard is(1) to increase the rainwater-intake capacity of the soil by retaining crop litter at the surface, soil
improvement, crop rotations, and strip cropping on the contour and (2) to lead away unabsorbed
storm waters in channels of broad-base terraces into outlet channels and into natural drainage
channels. We have applied these measures during recent years over millions of acres as you may
see from an airplane when you fly over the country.
Near Temple, Tex., in the drainage of North Elm Creek, 174 farmers of bordering farms formeda soil conservation association on a drainage basis, ignoring property and county lines in the same
way as runoff water ignores such arbitrary lines (fig. 16). Terrace-outlet channels were laid out
to carry water harmlessly through one farm and another to natural drainage channels. One
terrace-outlet system may serve in this way as many as 5 farms. By this approach to conservation,
it is possible to treat the land in accordance with its adaptabilities and to control storm waters
according to hydraulic principles. This is indeed physiographic engineering that builds a lastingbasis for a thriving civilization.

This does not mean that we have yet found the final answer to full control of soil erosion. Ourpresent practices may not yet stop erosion but will reduce it more and more as application of
measures is more and more complete. These measures and others will need further improvement
and adaptation to the problems as use of land becomes more and more intensive.
Wind erosion is a serious and destructive problem but restricted to a smaller area of the country
than water erosion. Wind erosion attacks level as well as sloping cultivated land in semiarid partsof the country. Wind erosion sorts the soil more thoroughly than water erosion, lifting fine andfertile particles of soil aloft and leaving behind coarser and heavier particles that become sandy
hummocks, then sand dunes. Such was the case in the so-called Dust Bowl of the Great Plains.
Control of wind erosion is based first upon a suiting of the land's use to its capabilities andconserving all or most all of the rain that falls on it. This calls for contour farming except on flat
lands. Appropriate measures include strip shelter belts of crops, tillage practices that leave crop
litter or residue at the surface, and rotations suited to moisture supplies in the soil. These, with
progressive improvement of soil-management practices, will control wind erosion. It has proveda simpler task, however, to control wind erosion than the less spectacular but insidious watererosion.

Lessons From the Old WorldIn this discussion on lessons from the Old and New Worlds in conserving the vital heritage ofour people, I have laid special emphasis on saving the physical body of soil resources rather thantheir fertility. Maintaining fertility falls properly to the farmer himself. Conserving the physicalintegrity of the soil resource falls to the Nation as well as to the farmer and landowner, in order tosave the people's heritage and safeguard the national welfare. If the physical body of the soil
resource is saved, we as a people are safeguarded in liberty of action. We can apply fertilizer andplant a choice of crops in accord with market demands and national needs.
If the soil is destroyed, then our liberty of choice and action is gone, condemning this and future
generations to needless privations and dangers. So big is this job—of saving our good land fromfurther damage and of reclaiming to some useful purpose vast areas of seriously damaged
land—that full cooperation of the individual interest of farmers with technical leadership andassistance of the Government is not only desirable, but necessary, if we are to succeed.
Another conclusion from our survey of the use of land through 7,000 years, where economic
conditions have changed for better or for worse more rapidly than climate, is that land after all is
not an economic commodity. It is an integral part of the Nation even as its people are and requires
protection by the individual owner and by the Nation as well. Nowhere have we found more telling
evidence of this than in California where gold in 1849 lured a host of people to the State, but soilsof its valleys have maintained its settlement.

An "Eleventh Commandment"
When in Palestine in 1939, I pondered the problems of the use of the land through the ages.
I wondered if Moses, when he was inspired to deliver the Ten Commandments to the Israelites inthe Desert to establish man's relationship to his Creator and his fellow men—if Moses had
foreseen what was to become of the Promised Land after 3,000 years and what was to becomeof hundreds of millions of acres of once good lands such as I have seen in China, Korea, North
Africa, the Near East, and in our own fair land of America—if Moses had foreseen what suicidal
agriculture would do to the land of the holy earth—might not have been inspired to deliver another
Commandment to establish man's relation to the earth and to complete man's trinity of
responsibilities to his Creator, to his fellow men, and to the holy earth.

When invited to broadcast a talk on soil conservation in Jerusalem in June 1939, I gave for the
first time what has been called an "Eleventh Commandment," as follows:
Thou shalt inherit the Holy Earth as a faithful steward, conserving its resources and productivity
from generation to generation. Thou shalt safeguard thy fields from soil erosion, thy living watersfrom drying up, thy forests from desolation, and protect thy hills from overgrazing by thy herds, thatthy descendants may have abundance forever. If any shall fail in this stewardship of the land thy
fruitful fields shall become sterile stony ground and wasting gullies, and thy descendants shalldecrease and live in poverty or perish from off the face of the earth.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin,sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons withdisabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
the USDA Office of Communications at (202) 720-5881 (voice) or (202) 720-7808 (TDD).
To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 20250, or call (202) 720-7327(voice) or (202) 690-1538 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity employer.
Issued August 1953. Slightly revised August 1975. Reviewed and approved for reprinting August 1994.