情報処理学会 インタラクション 2017
IPSJ Interaction 2017

1-410-67
2017/3/2†1†2

Discussion on
Presentation Feedback System to Reduce Mental Burden
MAIKO UTSUMI†1

KAZUTAKA KURIHARA†2

Abstract: In this pater, we propose a presentation feedback system to reflect on a presentation video that processed image
and sound and evaluate it. Recently, presentation skills are highly important. Reviewing a presentation video is one of theeffective ways to improve the presentation because we can understand listener’s view. But it may not be comfortable for us toreview a presentation video because we will listen to different voice from what we recognize every day and see our own
unconscious behaviors. So we feel much mental burden. Accordingly, we assumed that some processing is effective to reduce
our mental burden and surveyed about it. First, we conducted pre-survey. According to the pre-survey, we knew that imageand sound were related with our mental burden. And it suggested that some options were necessary for presenters to select theelements they want to confirm. Considering these results, we conducted the main survey by using a video that processed thepresenter’s face, body and voice. As a result, some processing is effective to reduce our mental burden. Finally, weimplemented a prototype based on our survey’s result.

21.

Processing    

Down

1
Figure 1

2

Reviewing a presentation video

Figure 2

The system we propose2.

†1
Graduate School of Science, Tsuda College†2
Tsuda College, and Diverse Institute of Technology© 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan337

情報処理学会 インタラクション 2017
IPSJ Interaction 2017

1-410-67
2017/3/2

[1]

3.2.1
[2]

3.

3.1!
•••!
•[3]••
•

[4]

•

[5]
3.2.2
1

3.2

© 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan338

情報処理学会 インタラクション 2017
IPSJ Interaction 2017

1-410-67
2017/3/2

1
Table 1

The average and standard deviation of the mental
burden

.

72025

83

91

4

6	 

3.3

3.3.2!
!
!
3.3.1

4.
4.1

© 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan339

情報処理学会 インタラクション 2017
IPSJ Interaction 2017

1-410-67
2017/3/2

Wizard of Oz

33

1.
2.
3.
4.2

3
Figure 3

F(2,14)=9.690,

the patterns of the video

p<.01

Dunnett

2
Table 2The elements that you can confirm from the video(-9',*<)

"A

 %@B@ 7p<.05/.1:5

6;4





6;&%

30







"





"#6;$)>2







p<.01

F(3,21)=2.799, p=.065!
"
?
+=8

(F(2,14)=15.961, p<.001)(F(2,14)=10.924, p<0.01)

DunnetiMovieGarageBand

6(F(3,21)=9.956, p<.001)(F(3,21)=9.267, p<.001)(F(3,21)=16.992,p<.001)(F(3,12)=22.896, p<.001)© 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan

Dunnet340情報処理学会 インタラクション 2017
IPSJ Interaction 2017

1-410-67
2017/3/2',

725
!

@ $ ?A ? 68& +);





(

.-0 94









5:3















5:%$ 2/











!









!"



5:# (=1

!
>*<74.3

13
Table 3The elements that have significant difference about5.

adequacy of the video related with sound
01 5

*

5.1
Processing0<

OS X Yosemite

10.10.5

MacBookAirPCPC.0

OpenCV564Table 4

The elements that have significant difference about
adequacy of the video related with sound4*

Figure 4

The environment of using the proposed system.
<5.20 51563

55
Table 5the types of videos and the elements that you canconfirm© 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan341

情報処理学会 インタラクション 2017
IPSJ Interaction 201771-410-67
2017/3/2[1],.

HMD	 . 2014.

, voi. 33,no. 1, Frb. 2016, p. 52-62..
[2]

,,,.
. 2014.

, vol. 2014-UBI-44, no. 8.
[3]5
Figure 5[4]

How to hide the user’s face.

. 1995.

.
. 2016.
, p. 19-23.

[5]

1 	 . http://diamond.jp/articles/-/75100.

6
FigureHow to hide the user’s body


7
Figure 7

GUIGUI

6.

JSPS

JP15H02735, JP16H02867© 2017 Information Processing Society of Japan342