Provisional Translation July , 2018
第29回原子力委員会
資料第2号

Summary of“White Paper on Nuclear Energy 2017”

July 2018
Japan Atomic Energy Commission

Background

White Paper on Nuclear Energy (1) The White Paper on Nuclear Energy has been published on a continuous basis since the launch of the Japan
Atomic Energy Committee (JAEC) in 1956 through 2010, the year before the TEPCO Fukushima nuclear
power plant accident (the Fukushima accident).
 Subsequent to the 2009 edition (published in March 2010), the White Paper was suspended until two years
ago, as attention was focused on responses to the Fukushima accident and subsequent review and reform of
the JAEC.
 The report of the Experts Committee for Review of the JAEC suggested that there was value in publishing thewhite paper, and the Amended Act for Establishment of JAEC clearly called for the task of "the collection of
information and conducting of surveys concerning nuclear utilization.“ Based on these, the White Paper on Nuclear Energy was resumed last year for the first time in seven anda half years in order to fulfill the responsibility to provide explanation to the Japanese people about
nuclear energy use. (Adopted by the Atomic Energy Commission on September 14, 2017, and decided by
the Cabinet on September 15, the same year)

Objectives

 The White Paper on Nuclear Energy is intended to fulfill the responsibility of the Japanese Government to
the Japanese people to comprehensively and continuously provide explanation on the Government's
initiatives in nuclear energy based on the lessons learned from the Fukushima accident and the changes in
attitudes surrounding nuclear energy. Additionally, with attention focused from overseas on the state ofnuclear energy in Japan, the White Paper is a suitable means of sharing information with the international
community.

 While placing emphasis on the management viewpoints on nuclear energy issues, and developing
comprehensive cross-disciplinary ideas that serve as a philosophy for nuclear power, JAEC adopted the"Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy“ last year in order to play a role as a compass indicating the direction of nuclear
utilization. The Cabinet has decided that this document is respected as the Government. It is essential topresent readily understandable information to the Japanese people, including the statement of "Basic Policy
2for Nuclear Energy".

Reference“Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy”

JAEC adopted on July, 20, 2017, and the cabinet decided on July 21, that government will respect it (forthe first time in 12years since the formulation of the Framework of Nuclear Energy)

1. Changing Environment Surrounding Nuclear Energy

 A need exists to sincerely address the public distrust and anxiety about nuclear energy and rebuild social confidence A new competitive electric power market has emerged with full liberalization of the retail electricity market
 Further substantial reduction of CO2 emissions over a long term will be difficult to achieve simply by applying existing
countermeasures Increased use of thermal power stations and introduction of a feed-in tariff (FIT) system for renewable energy have led to higher
electricity tariffs, which have had a major negative impacts on people’s livelihood and economic activities

2. Fundamental issues ingrained in nuclear energy-related organizations
 The unique mindset and groupthink in Japan, the pressure to conform tacitly or forcibly to the opinion of the majority, and thetendency to maintain the status quo are all very strong, and they can be a problem.
 Another tendency within organizations is to lapse into sub-optimization. Creating a culture in which people can exchange a varietyof opinions based on solid grounds, regardless of their standing inside or outside the organization, is necessary.

3. Basic objectives and important initiatives of nuclear energy use Appropriate use of nuclear energy with thorough risk-management by responsible organizations is necessary.
 It is important to proceed with the use of nuclear energy with peaceful use and safety assurance as basic preconditions, winning theconfidence of the people and bearing in mind both benefits and costs that nuclear technology can bring to the environment,
people’s livelihood, and economic activities.

1. Seriously reflect on the Fukushima accident and learn lessons therefrom

 Establish a safety culture that overcomes weakness of traditional Japanese organizations and national cultures.
 Shift in safety assurance of a “culture of prevention” by promotion of risk management.

2. Pursue nuclear energy use addressing global warming issues and people’s livelihood and the economy
 The National Government needs to clarify the role that nuclear power generation can play over a long term andexamine necessary measures therefor.

3Reference“Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy”

JAEC adopted on July, 20, 2017, and the cabinet decided on July 21, that government will respect it (forthe(JAEC
first timein 12years
since thethe formulationof the Frameworkof Nuclear Energy)
adoptedit andcabinet decided
that government
respect it on July 2017)

3. Basic objectives and important initiatives of nuclear energy use
3. Nuclear energy in the global context
 Collect and share international knowledge and experiences; improve international awareness

4. Peaceful use of nuclear energy: enhancing non-proliferation and security regimes
 Take steps to assure the international community of Japan’s peaceful use of plutonium; Ensure the plutonium balance
and responsible plutonium management; consume plutonium in the form of MOX fuel for light water reactor

5. Rebuilding public trust, as a major precondition Create an information base for people to be able to deepen their understanding of the circumstances surrounding
nuclear energy use in Japan based on scientifically accurate information and objective facts (evidence)

6. Steadily pursuing decommissioning and radioactive waste disposal The resolute implementation of disposal of radioactive waste by the current responsible generation.

7. Expanded use of radiation and radioisotopes
 Develop necessary infrastructure to enable further use of radiation and radioisotopes including the use of quantum
beams.

8. Strengthening the foundations for the use of nuclear energy
 R&D institutions and nuclear industry should collaborate and develop a deep and broad knowledge base.
 Securing qualified human resources and improving human resources development including on-the-job training
In light of the fact that the environment surrounding nuclear energy will keep changing substantially in the coming years,“Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy” is to be reviewed and revised, as necessary, basically every five years or roughly every five years.
4White Paper on Nuclear Energy (2)Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy (Decided by the Cabinet on July 21, 2017)
White Paper on Nuclear -Mainly following up the “Basic Policy”-It notes the Reconstruction Agency’s efforts and both promoting andEnergy 2017
regulatory perspectives.
[Structure of the “Basic Policy”]
Basic Objectives of the Important
Initiative for Using Nuclear Energy

The Structure of the White Paper on Nuclear Energy and Chapter- Points
SpecialreportCommunication in the nuclear energy fieldPromotion of a steady reconstruction and revival of Fukushima,utilization of the lessons, and efforts for the establishment of a nuclear
safety culture
Preventive approach for safety improvement

Chapter 2Role of nuclear energy in the energy scenario

Chapter 3Efforts for international collaboration and cooperation



Peaceful use of nuclear power (in terms of policy and the Regulation of
Nuclear Source Material, Nuclear Fuel Material and Reactors Act)
Updated version of the “Basic Policy on the Utilization of Plutonium inJapan” (2003)

Chapter 1(1) Seriously reflect on the Fukushima accident
and learn lessons therefrom(2) Pursue nuclear energy use addressing
global warming issues and people’s
livelihood and the economy(3) Nuclear energy in the global context(4) Peaceful use of nuclear energy andenhancing non-proliferation and security
regimes(5) Rebuilding public trust, as a major
precondition(6) Steadily pursuing decommissioning andradioactive waste disposal

Chapter 4Chapter 5Efforts for the establishment of evidence-based information systems

Chapter 6

Integrated approach to the decommissioning and processing and disposal ofradioactive waste

Increase the economic value of utilizing radiation and noteworthy caseexamplesThe importance of nuclear power as the common ground for science andengineering

Chapter 7

(7) Expanded use of radiation andradioisotopes(8) Solid foundation for nuclear energy useChapter 8

The launch of a collaborative platform for the solution to issues such as
the structure of the Nuclear Power Village and the construction of aknowledge baseA policy on technological development and R&D that supports the costshare policy and the importance of human resources development

5Special Report: Communication in the Nuclear Energy Field
The Fukushima accident caused tremendous suffering to Fukushima residents and other people. Seven years havepassed since the accident, but the public distrust and anxiety about utilizing nuclear energy still remains
deep-rooted.
In order to seriously face public distrust and anxiety, [Way of Communication]
deepen public understanding, and build trustwith the public, the two following factors are needed.
<Until Now>
Providing what was decided unilaterally and seek the- Establish information systems based onunderstanding and support of stakeholders (push typescientifically accurate information or objective
communication)
facts (evidence-based) (Chapter 5)- Communication activities with stakeholders(the public and interested parties)<From Now On>
Listening to stakeholders’ interests and opinions(pull type communication)

Two-way communication: Realizing mutual
understanding through two-way communication
with stakeholders
Engagement: Engaging in processes associatedwith policies or projects that will influence society《Viewpoints Needed》- Identifying stakeholders- Grasping what stakeholders want to know
- Acting in the interests of stakeholders’[Summary]- There is no uniform communication activity. It is important to seriously face stakeholders and issues.
- It is necessary for relevant organizations to think about what ideal communication should be like for trust
building, using case examples from foreign countries.
6Efforts for Improving Understanding of the Nuclear Energy Policy

Efforts for improved understanding of the nuclear energy policy

Key points of stakeholder involvement

7

Important Initiatives for Nuclear Energy in Japan and its Direction (1)Chapter 1: Steady reconstruction and revival of Fukushima and tireless safety improvement with lessons seriously learned

 The Fukushima accident was a terrible upheaval for the nuclear policy as represented by growing public distrust and anxiety. It is
important to reflect on the failure to prevent it, further promote efforts for easing the anxiety about nuclear energy, and utilize
lessons learned. It notes efforts by the Reconstruction Agency and other ministries and agencies for the reconstruction and revival of
Fukushima and the current situations.
As of April, 2011
（Competing areas setting immediately
after the accident）

As of August, 2013
（Competing a review of
evacuation area）

As of April, 2017

As of 5th November , 2011

As of 16th November , 2017

福島第一原子力発電所

福島第二原子力発電所Transition of evacuation area (from April 2011 to April 2017)

Air dose rates from a series of aircraft surveys

 In response to the recommendations in the accident investigation report, it is important that the government and nuclear agencies maketireless efforts for safety improvement to establish a culture of safety, in addition to reviewing the nuclear energy administration andestablishing new regulatory requirements for the enhancement of nuclear safety measures.

Basic policy on nuclear power plants’ safety designs

Comparison between conventional and new regulatory
standards for a practical nuclear reactor facility

Example of safety culture development activities
8
at Chubu Electric Power Co., Ltd.

Important Initiatives for Nuclear Energy in Japan and its Direction (2)(Current situation and the ongoing efforts in America)(Direction of Japan)

 Promoting the initiative for safety improvement in the long-term use of lightwater reactors
 The relevant industries have founded the Japan Nuclear Safety Institute,which, as an organization that helps improve self-motivated nuclear safety,
makes safety evaluations and provides advice on their improvement, and isconsidering safety efforts utilizing PRA in cooperation with the Nuclear Risk
Research Center.

Risk reduction efforts by nuclear operators

 Electric power operators aim to apply Risk-Informed Decision Making (RIDM)
based on PRA for the risk management of their power plants.

Conceptual diagram of risk management based on RIDM

 The relevant industries are considering the launch of new functions in orderto enhance cooperation beyond industrial boundaries, and to establish asystem that will raise the safety level of sites.
*The Atomic Energy Association (ATENA) was founded on July 1, 2018.
9

Important Initiatives for Nuclear Energy in Japan and its Direction (3)Chapter 2: Nuclear energy use addressing global warming issues and people’s livelihood and the economy

 In Japan, because of the full liberalization of electricity retailing and power generation,
regional monopolies of electricity and the rate-of-return regulation were abolished,
and a competitive environment has appeared.

(million kw)

USLatin America

 Nuclear power is a baseload power source and the long-term stable use of nuclear
power is important in terms of global warming, the economy, and the stable supply ofelectricity. It is necessary to consider measures to take advantage of the characteristics
of nuclear power generation under this liberalized environment, and measures forfinancial issues are discussed.
 It notes that while reports on the current status of nuclear power generation mention thatsome nations are shifting to denuclearization, other industrial nations are appreciating
again nuclear power as a low carbon power source, and that emerging nations are
increasingly developing and utilizing nuclear power.

EuropeSoviet Union

RussiaMiddle East

AfricaAsia

Changes in the capacity of nuclear power
plants around the world (in operation)

 It notes that in order to promote an ideal use of nuclear power, which is capable of stably supplying electricity at low cost and curbing
global warming, energy scenarios in a future world that are likely to come true must be developed to stress the need for responses tonuclear power based on a comprehensive judgment.
The World Energy Council “World Energy Scenarios 2016: The Grand Transition”
CO2 emissions in 2060 are down 28% in the “Modern
Jazz” scenario, down 61% in the “Unfinished
Symphony” scenario, and up 5% in the “Hard Rock”
scenario compared to the 2014 level. The share of
nuclear energy in 2060 increases by 91%, 197%, and
166% respectively in comparison to that of 2014. In
the “Modern Jazz” scenario, in which the combinationof power generation sources depends on market
trends, the rate of increase in nuclear energy is lower
than in the other scenarios, which means that the
scenario promotes global warming prevention.
Curbing global warming needs a long-term
investment recovery or other policy measures.

10

Important Initiatives for Nuclear Energy in Japan and its Direction (4)Chapter 3: Efforts at home and overseas in the global context

 It focuses on nuclear trends in nations that continue to depend on nuclear energy, or that are promoting nuclear energy development tomeet electricity demand and curb global warming.
 It focuses on various actions through participation in, and cooperation with, international organizations, such as the IAEA andOECD/NEA, or bilateral nuclear agreements or cooperation.
 It focuses on various actions in cooperation with members of the International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation (IFNEC) for
promoting peaceful use of nuclear energy.
 It focuses on various actions by the Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia (FNCA) such as joint utilization of radiation, joint utilization ofresearch reactors, sharing of issues including nuclear infrastructure and safety ensuring, and of information about the legal frameworks withneighboring Asian nations.
Chapter 4: Peaceful use, non-proliferation, and ensuring nuclear security

 It notes that nuclear research, development and utilization in Japan are limited to peaceful purposes based on the Atomic Energy
Basic Law.
 It clarifies “peaceful use in terms of policy” and “peaceful use
in terms of the Regulation of Nuclear Source Material, Nuclear
Fuel Material and Reactors Act.” It also notes efforts for theensuring of peaceful use.
 In addition to compiling explanatory documents regarding the current
status of plutonium utilization, JAEC has decided to update the
Basic Policy on the Utilization of Plutonium in Japan (2003).
- The government approve sufficient plutonium to be reprocessedfor pluthermal.
- It is necessary to achieve the goal of reducing Japan’s plutonium
Structure to ensure peaceful use of nuclear energy of Japan
stockpile in the long run.
 It notes global trends and Japan’s actions regarding international frameworks such as nuclear security and the nuclear
disarmament/non-proliferation regimes.
11

Important Initiatives for Nuclear Energy in Japan and its Direction (5)Chapter 5: Rebuilding public trust as a precondition for using nuclear energy※For communication, it is detailed in the special report It notes the governmental accident investigation report’s criticism that there were many problems with the way the government andTEPCO provided information to the public and that there are many problems in the way information is provided under normal
circumstances as well as in the case of emergencies.
 In response to the criticism above, it is essential to foster better understanding of nuclear energy based on scientifically-accurate
knowledge and objective facts (evidence-based) and develop an environment for the formation of opinions.(See Page 6)
 It notes that 10 relevant organizations have launched committees and a collaborative platform to consider measures for theestablishment of evidence-based information systems.
(Four themes: “3E+S,” “safety and disaster prevention,” “radioactive waste,” and “risk of exposure to radiation”)
 It notes that for the establishment of policy information systems, the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy has started to
distribute the special content on its website, and that the ideal communication of future efforts and directions are being discussed basedon the recommendations and discussions by JAEC.


It explains measures against issues according to their areas of location with their contributions reaffirmed.

Chapter 6: Decommissioning and the treatment of radioactive waste With regard to the decommissioning of TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, the following will be steadily implemented:
measures against contaminated water, removal of spent fuel and debris, measures against waste and R&D, human resources
development, and international cooperation with the decommissioning. Other nuclear power plants and R&D test facilities inuniversities and research institutes will be steadily decommissioned (the need for regarding the decommissioning, processing
and disposal of radioactive waste as a package is pointed out).
 With regard to the disposal of radioactive waste produced by nuclear energy, it is essential to adhere to the idea of never passing on
the costs to future generations, and radioactive waste from TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, and other nuclear power
plants and research institutes, must be stored and disposed appropriately.
 It notes the institutional frameworks for decommissioning and radioactive waste management policies outside of Japan At the request of JAEC, relevant organizations have formed a collaborative platform for dealing with decommissioning andradioactive waste. They are reinforcing it to promote collaboration among nuclear power plants and research institutes, and to put
information in order and extract issues.
12Important Initiatives for Nuclear Energy in Japan and its Direction (6)Chapter 7: Promotion of utilizing radiation and radioisotopes

 It notes that radiation and radioisotopes, which share the common scientific basis with nuclear energy, have a lot to do with people’s
lives as they are used in ways inseparable from each other in a wide range of areas, including advanced technologies, industry,
medicine (utilized in diagnosis and treatment), agriculture, environmental preservation, nuclear security, and nuclear forensics.
 Types of utilization of radiation(1) Utilization of radiation in accelerators or nuclear reactors etc.
 It notes that creating innovation utilizing radiation needs the sharing of the ideathat utilizing radiation helps improve people’s lives, while radiation’s impact on (2) Utilization of radiation using radioisotopes (RI)
the environment must be studied as well as the renewal of aging facilities andproper organization of personnel, in addition to strategic and effective utilization  Areas in which radiation is utilized(1) Medicine and medical care: Increasingly utilized inof the existing infrastructure.
recent times-Diagnosis: Radiation has been mainly utilized, but RI is
now also being used.

 It provides case examples of nuclear
power as an interdisciplinary
collaboration among the sciences,engineering, medicine etc.

-Treatment: Radiation and RI are utilized (RI capable ofdiagnosis and treatment has beendeveloped recently).

 It notes that it is necessary to consider
utilizing research reactors based on
demand.

Radiation utilization in a wide range of fields(2) Other areas- Industrial use: Material production, non-destructive
testing- Environmental and food-related material: Disinfecting,environments- Environmental pollution: Radioactive pollution etc.

○ Economic scale survey on utilizing radiation (August 29, 2017)- A market size survey was conducted to grasp the trends in utilizing radiation, for the first time in some 10 years since 2005.
-The market for radiation is growing, conspicuously so in medicine and medical care, compared
to 10 years ago.
（billion ¥）Year

FY2015

Industry

22,200

Medicine &Medical care

19,100Agriculture

2,400

TOTAL

43,700

Medical / Health Care Use Diagnosis by Radiation: ¥1,460bn.
Radiotherapy: 140bn.
Particle Therapy: 20 bn.
Breast Cancer Therapy: 20 bn.

Industrial Use

Equipment Device: ¥390bn.



Accelerators
Radiation Equipment for Diagnosis
Medial Radiation-related Equipment
a& Products for Medical

Semiconductor¥1,230 bn.

Energy Use

3,307

PET・CT Cancer
Diagnosis: 15 bn.

Medical / HealthCare Use¥1,910 bn.

Industrial Use¥4,370 billion

Radiation
Sterilization¥310 bn.

¥2,220 bn.


FY200523,00015,0002,800

41,11747,410

FY1997

21,773

12,0001,167

35,00057,913Yearly Comparison of Radiation Use

Agricultural
Use

Agricultural Use
Development of
Mutated Breed

Measurement& Inspection¥180 bn.

240 bn.
Sprouts Control
of Potatoes

・Food Irradiation
・Radiation
Analysis
etc.

Hypodermic Syringe& Needle
Vacuum Blood
Collecting Tube
Artificial Joint &Polymer Processing such as
Radial Tire Manufacturing¥110 bn.



Radiation measuring
Instruments
Non Destructive
Inspection etc.

Economic Scale of Utilization of Radiation in Japan(2015)13

Important Initiatives for Nuclear Energy in Japan and its Direction (7)Chapter 8: Strengthening the foundations for using nuclear energy Sufficient effort on interdisciplinary and cross-organizational cooperation
in industrial and academic circles has not been made in the nuclear field inJapan, given that scientific knowledge exists in the organizations.
 JAEC points out in the “Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy” that a network that
promotes academic and industrial cooperation and a cross-ministerial
system should be constructed immediately referring overseas case examples.
 It notes that for the establishment of a nuclear-related strong knowledge baseby relevant organizations, a collaborative platform that promotes academic
and industrial cooperation has been launched to focus on the long-term use
and safety of light-water reactors, severe accidents and disasterprevention, and decommissioning and radioactive waste.
Collaboration Program of Nuclear Energy Related Organizations

 It notes that in order for JAEA, which is responsible for basic and fundamental R&D contributing to sustainable utilization anddevelopment of nuclear energy, to play a major role in establishing a knowledge base (human resources, knowledge and R&D), it ishoped that the organization will improve its organizational management, particularly focusing on changing the mentality of its
organization, improving management methods and systems, and R&D according to demand. It also notes R&D management inforeign countries.
 It notes that JAEA has disclosed its “Policy on Technological Development and R&D,” suggesting that the future technologicaldevelopment and R&D of nuclear power generation should be based on cost sharing, and led by individual power companies
or makers with the government supporting them, since nuclear power generation methods should be market determined, andmarketable nuclear energy is significant.
 It notes that JAEA has prepared its “Human Resources Development in the Nuclear Field (perspective),” which mentions theimportance of human resources development through higher education and career accumulation in R&D and other jobs.
- Nuclear related universities are required to actively respond to various university reforms such as educational continuity fromundergraduate through to graduate levels.
- For future nuclear use, it is important to develop human resources through R&D and other jobs as well as find excellent students. It isessential that human resources be secured, and knowledge and technologies be passed down even in the face of environmental
changes or generational shifts.

14