July 2016 (FoE Japan)

Comparison of the pollution control technology between coal-fired power plants in Japan and ones overseas supported (to be supported) by JBIC
Name of Power Plant
Proponent
Location
Capacity (MW)JBIC to be requested JBIC to be requested JICA U. Consideration
Nga Yoke KaungAnn DinIndoramayu II
Mitsubishi, J-Power
TTCL
PLN
Myanmar
MyanmarIndonesia
300*2 (600)
640*2 (1280)
1000*1JBIC Under Consideration
Cirebon II
JEPARA III
CEPR
BJP
Indonesia
Indonesia
1070*2 (2140)
1000*1Batang
BPI (J-Power)Indonesia
1000*2 (2000)

JBIC SupportedKudgi
NTPCIndia
800*3 (2400)

Hai Phong II
HPTPJSC
Vietnam
300*2 (600)

Cirebon
CEP
Indonesia
660

Paiton III
PE
Indonesia
815

JEPARA II
CJPIndonesia
660*2 (1320)

Mindanao
SPIPhilippines
116*2 (232)

Isogo New 2
J-Power
Kanagawa
600

2018 (proposed) 2017 (proposed) 2017 (proposed) 2016 (proposed)

Safi
Safi Energy
Morocco625*2 (1250)

Meja
MUNPL
India
660*2 (1320)

Vinh Tan IV
EVN
Vietnam
600*2 (1200)

Existing coal-fired power plant in Japan
Isogo New 1
Hekinan 5
Niichi 2
Souma Kyodo
J-Power
Chubu
KanagawaAichi
Fukushima
600
1000
1000

Hekinan 1
Chubu
Aichi
700

Operation year
Type of Power
Generation
Hight of stack (m)2019 (proposed)

2019 (proposed)

2019 (proposed)

2020 (proposed)

2020 (proposed)

2018 (proposed)

August 2013

July 2012

June 2012

Feb 2012

Nov 2006

July 2009

April 2002

November 2002

July 1995

October 1991

SUBCRULTRSCULTRSCULTRSCULTRSCULTRSCULTRSCSUPERCSUPERCSUPERCSUBCRSUPERCSUPERC

SUBCR

SUBCR

ULTRSCULTRSCSUPERCSUPERCSUPERC

Unknown

Unknown

220200240240200275

210275200215220240

150200200200
FGD etc.

SWFGD

Unknown

SWFGDWLST

SWFGD

SWFGD

FGD

SWFGD

The space to beprovided for FGD

200
FGD etc.

Mitigation measureagainst SOx

The space to beprovided for FGD

200
FGD

(*See "Note 1")

CF

SWFGD

WLST

WL

DFGD

DFGD

(Type of FGD isunknown)(Type of FGD
is unknown)(Type of FGD isunknown)

SO2 = 35
(SO2 = 100 mg/Nm3)

250-300

SO2 = 70
(SO2 = 200mg/Nm3)

Unknown

SO2 = 123
(SOx = 350
mg/Nm3)SO2 = 321
(SO2 = 917mg/Nm3)

SO2 = 63
(SO2 = 180
mg/Nm3)SO2 = 227
(SO2 = 649
mg/Nm3)SO2 = 30
(SO2 = 84mg/Nm3)

SO2 = 106
(SO2 = 300mg/Nm3)

SO2＝245(SO2 =700mg/m3)

102025100() = after improvementin 2002SCR /LNB / TSCSCR /LNB / TSC

Emissionconcentration (ppm)
Mitigation measureagainst NOxEmission
concentration (ppm)
Mitigaion measureaginast PM
Emissionconcentration(mg/Nm3)

SO2 = 235-257
SO2 = 221
SO2 = 106
SO2 = 106
(SO2 = 665 mg/Nm3) (SO2 = 625 mg/Nm3) (SO2 = 300 mg/Nm3) (SO2 = 300 mg/Nm3)

LNB

Unknown

NO2 = 197
(NOx = 400 mg/Nm3)

200ESP

Unknown

ESP

ESP

ESP

BH

305042504050

LNB

LNB

LNB

LNB

NO2 = 212-231
NO2 = 251
NO2 = 197
NO2 = 127
(NOx = 430 mg/Nm3) (NOx = 510 mg/Nm3) (NO2 = 400 mg/Nm3) (NO2 = 260 mg/Nm3)

SCR/LNB

LNB

LNB

Unknown

LNB

LNB

LNB

LNB

LNB

SCR etc.

SCR etc.

NO2 = 107
(NOx = 200mg/Nm3)

Unknown

NO2 = 111
(NO2 = 228
mg/Nm3)NO2 = 316
(Nox = 648mg/Nm3)

NO2 = 438
(NO2 = 900mg/Nm3)

NO2 = 404
(NOx = 829
mg/Nm3)NO2 = 267
(NOx = 542mg/Nm3)

NO2 = 229
(NOx = 465mg/Nm3)

NO2 = 365
(NOx =750mg/m3)

1320

156045 (30)

ESP

ESP

ESP

ESP

ESP

ESP

ESP

ESP

BH

ESP

ESP

ESP

ESP

ESP

≦50

≤ 100

150

≦100200

29150505051053010 (5)

Note 2: Conversion from mg/Nm3 to ppm in emission concentration was made with the following calculation.
(When we need to convert the consentration of SOx or NOx from mg/Nm3 into ppm, each moleculare weight of SO2 and NO2 are applied here: M of SO2 = (32+16*2), M of NO2 = (14+16*2) )To convert X mg/Nm3 into Y ppm,
Y = X*10(-3)/M * 22.4*10(-3) *10(6) = X/M*22.4 (M = Molecular Weight)
As both are in the condition of the standard temperature and pressure (0℃ or 273K in absolute temperature, and 0.1MPa), there is no need to correct in each temperature and pressure.

Dry FGD scrubber
Seawater FGD scrubber
FGD (Type is unknown)Compliance fuel (no scrubbers)
Wet limestone FGD scrubber
Wet lime FGD scrubber

NOx ControlSCRLNB
TSC

Selective catalytic reductionLow NOx Burner
Two stage combustion

50 (28)

SCR /LNB / TSC

Note 1: The souces of the data on each power plant are the followings.
* Nga Yoke Kaung = Power Point Presentation Report on "Project Development Survey on High-efficient and Eco-friendly Coal-fired Power Plant Project in Myanmar" by Mitsubishi and J-POWER (July 2015)* Ann Din = Documents provided by TTCL to the local community, 2014
* Indramayu II = Feasibility Studies, 2010 (JICA) and EIA (ANDAL), May 2015
* Cirebon II = EIA (ANDAL), March 2016
* JEPARA III = EIA (ANDAL), March 2016
* Batang = EIA (ANDAL), August 2013
* Safi = EIA, October 2013. The conversion from NOx to NO2 was done on the assumption that the concentration of NO2 is 75%, according to the description of EIA.
* Meja = EIA, March 2013
* Vinh Tan IV = EIA, September 2013
* Kudgi = EIA, September 2011. The unit of the concentration is assumed as mg/Nm3.
* Hai Phong II = EIA, November 2006. According to the database of Platts WEPP (January 2015), SOx control measure used for Hai Phong II is only "Compliance fuel (CF)".
* Cirebon = EIA (ANDAL), April 2008. The unit of the concentration is assumed as mg/Nm3.
* Paition III = EIA (ANDAL), 2008. The unit of the concentration is assumed as mg/Nm3.
* JEPARA (Tanjung Jati B) II (Unit 3 and 4)= EIA (ANDAL)* Mindanao = EIS, January 2002. The unit of the concentration is assumed as mg/Nm3.
* Isogo New 2 and 1 = J-Power, Annual Report 2009
* Hekinan 5 and 1 = CCT Journal No. 1, Center for Coal Utilization, Japan (currently JCOAL), May 2002
* Niichi 2 and Hekinan 1 = "Is ODA fine like this", San-ichi Publishing Co., Ltd., 1996

SOx Control
DFGD
SWFGD
FGD
CF
WLST
WL

FGD

Particulate Control
BH
Baghouse (fabric filter)
ESP
Unspecified type of electrostatic precipitator (elektrofilter)