Feminism and Identity in the Work of Contemporary
Iranian Female Artists

Mozhdeh Khakbaz
Bachelor of Fine Arts (Tehran)Exegesis and Creative Work
Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree ofMasters of Research (Arts)

Creative Industries Faculty
Queensland University of Technology
Brisbane, Australia

Supervisors:
Dr. Debra Polson
Associate Professor Gavin Sade2015

Table of Contents
List	
  of	
  Figures	
  ......................................................................................................................	
  2	
  Statement	
  of	
  Originality	
  ..................................................................................................	
  4	
  Acknowledgements	
  ...........................................................................................................	
  5	
  Abstract	
  .................................................................................................................................	
  6	
  Chapter	  one:	
  Introduction	
  ..............................................................................................	
  7	
  Background	
  ...................................................................................................................................	
  7	
  Objectives of this Study	
  ...............................................................................................................	
  7	
  The research topic and significance	
  .........................................................................................	
  8	
  Structure of this Exegesis	
  ...........................................................................................................	
  9	
  Chapter	
  two:	
  Methodology	
  ..........................................................................................	
  11	
  Practice-led Research	
  ...............................................................................................................	
  11	
  Action Research	
  .........................................................................................................................	
  12	
  Case Study Analysis and Interviews	
  .....................................................................................	
  14	
  Overview of Practice Methods and Approaches	
  ................................................................	
  14	
  Chapter	  three:	
  Theoretical	
  exploration	
  ..................................................................	
  17	
  Feminism	
  .....................................................................................................................................	
  17	
  Art and Feminism	
  ...................................................................................................................................	
  20	
  Iranian feminist movement	
  .................................................................................................................	
  21	
  Islamic Feminism	
  ...................................................................................................................................	
  23	
  Current context	
  ........................................................................................................................................	
  26	
  Digital art and social movement	
  .............................................................................................	
  27	
  Cross cultural artistic practices	
  .............................................................................................	
  29	
  Chapter	
  four:	
  Case	  Studies	
  ...........................................................................................	
  31	
  Identifying and Engaging Participants	
  ............................................................................................	
  31	
  Shirin Neshat, New York City	
  ...........................................................................................................	
  32	
  Shadi Ghadirian, Tehran	
  ......................................................................................................................	
  41	
  Samira Eskandarfar, Tehran	
  ...............................................................................................................	
  48	
  Parastou Forouhar, Frankfurt	
  ..............................................................................................................	
  52	
  Nikoo Tarkhani, Tehran	
  .......................................................................................................................	
  57	
  Implication for my practice	
  .....................................................................................................	
  62	
  Chapter	
  Five:	  My	
  Practice	
  ............................................................................................	
  63	
  Creative Themes	
  ........................................................................................................................	
  63	
  Creative Process	
  ........................................................................................................................	
  64	
  Creative works	
  ...........................................................................................................................	
  65	
  Chapter	  Six:	
  Conclusion	
  and	
  reflection	
  ...................................................................	
  78	
  References:	
  .......................................................................................................................	
  82	
  

	
  

1	
  

List of Figures
Figure	
  1:	
  Change	
  for	
  equality	
  website	
  (2014),	
  screen	
  shot,	  http://www.we-­‐change.org/english	
  ......	
  26	
  Figure	
  2:	
  Shirin	  Neshat,	
  Speechless,	
  1996,	
  black	
  and	
  white	
  photography,	
  Women	
  of	
  Allah	
  series	  (Reckitt	
  2001)	
  ...........................................................................................................................................................................	
  33	
  Figure	
  3:	
  Shirin	  Neshat,	
  Untitled,	
  1996,	
  black	
  and	
  white	
  photography,	
  Women	
  of	
  Allah	
  series	
  ..........	
  34	
  Figure	
  4:	
  Shirin	  Neshat,	
  Turbulent,	
  1998,	
  Video	
  Art	  ................................................................................................	
  36	
  Figure	
  5:	
  Shirin	  Neshat,	
  Fervor,	
  2000,	  Video	
  Art	  .......................................................................................................	
  36	
  Figure	
  6:	
  Shirin	  Neshat,	
  Pulse,	
  2001,	
  Video	
  Art.	
  .........................................................................................................	
  37	
  Figure	
  7:	
  Shirin	  Neshat,	
  Logic	
  of	
  the	
  Birds,	
  2001,	
  Film	  ...........................................................................................	
  37	
  Figure	
  8.	
  Shirin	  Neshat,	
  Women	  Without	
  Men,	
  2009,	
  Film	  ...................................................................................	
  38	
  Figure	
  9:	
  Shirin	  Neshat,	
  The	
  Book	  of	
  Kings,	
  2012,	
  black	
  and	
  white	
  photography	
  series,	
  (Higgins,	
  Jo.	  2013).	
  ............................................................................................................................................................................................	
  38	
  Figure10:	
  Shadi	  Ghadirian,	
  Untitled,	
  2000,	  black	
  and	
  white	
  photography,	
  Qajar	  series,	
  (Issa,	
  R.	
  2008)	  .............................................................................................................................................................................................	
  42	
  Figure11:	
  Shadi	  Ghadirian,	
  Untitled,	
  2000,	
  from	  Like	  Every	  Day	  series,	
  C-­‐print,	
  500x500mm,	  (Higgins.	
  2013).	
  ........................................................................................................................................................................	
  43	
  Figure	  12:	
  Shadi	  Ghadirian,	
  Untitled,	
  2002,	  from	
  Be	
  Colourful	  series,	
  C-­‐print,	
  600x900mm	
  ................	
  44	
  Figure13:	
  Shadi	  Ghadirian,	
  #6,	
  2004,	
  from	  West	  by	
  East	  series,	
  C-­‐print,	
  600x900mm	
  ............................	
  45	
  Figure	  14:	
  Shadi	  Ghadirian,	
  #9,	  2011,	  from	  Miss	  Butterfly	
  series,	
  Digital	
  print,	
  630x420	
  mm	
  ............	
  46	
  Figure	  15:	
  Shadi	  Ghadirian,	
  #15,	
  2011,	  from	  Miss	  Butterfly	
  series,	
  Digital	
  print,	
  700x1000mm	
  ........	
  46	
  Figure16:	
  Samira	
  Eskandarfar,	
  Monologue	
  Under	  White,	
  2005,	
  video	
  ...........................................................	
  49	
  Figures	
  17:	  Samira	
  Eskandarfar,	
  Rugs	  and	
  Men,	
  2006,	
  video	
  .............................................................................	
  49	
  Figure	  18:	  Samira	
  Eskandarfar,	
  The	  Olive,	
  2009,	
  video	
  .........................................................................................	
  50	
  Figure	  19:	  Samira	
  Eskandarfar,	
  Root	  Canal,	  2013,	
  film	  .........................................................................................	
  50	
  Figures	
  20:	  Parastou	
  Forouhar,	
  Blind	  Spot,	
  2001,	  series	
  of	
  photographs	
  ......................................................	
  53	
  Figures	
  21:	  Parastou	
  Forouhar,	
  Blind	  Spot,	
  2001,	  series	
  of	
  photographs	
  ......................................................	
  53	
  Figure	  22:	  Parastou	
  Forouhar,	  Swanrider,	  2004,	  series	
  of	
  photographs	
  ........................................................	
  54	
  Figure	  23:	  Parastou	
  Forouhar,	  Signs,	
  2004,	  series	
  of	
  digital	
  drawing	
  .............................................................	
  54	
  Figure	  24:	  Parastou	
  Forouhar,	  Red	  3,	  2008,	
  Red	  is	
  my	
  Name,	  Green	
  is	
  my	
  Name	  I,	
  series	
  of	
  digital	  drawings	
  ......................................................................................................................................................................................	
  55	
  Figure	  25:	  Parastou	
  Forouhar,	  Green2,	
  2009,	
  Red	  is	
  my	
  Name,	  Green	
  is	
  my	
  Name	  II,	  series	
  of	
  digital	  drawings.	
  .....................................................................................................................................................................................	
  55	
  Figure	  26:	  Parastou	
  Forouhar,	  Revolvers,	
  2010,	  BLACK	
  is	
  my	
  Name,	
  WHITE	
  is	
  my	
  Name,	  series	  of	
  digital	
  drawings.	
  ......................................................................................................................................................................	
  56	
  Figure	  27:	  Parastou	
  Forouhar,	  Ashura	  Day,	
  2010,	
  Papillon	
  collection,	
  series	
  of	
  digital	
  prints	
  ............	
  56	
  Figure	  28:	
  Nikoo	
  Tarkhani,	
  Me-­‐ror,	  2011,	  digital	
  photography	
  .........................................................................	
  58	
  Figure	  29:	
  Nikoo	
  Tarkhani,	
  Me-­‐ror,	  2011,	  digital	
  photography	
  .........................................................................	
  58	
  Figure	  30:	
  Nikko	
  Tarkhani,	
  Scarlet	
  Letter,	
  2012,	  a	
  video-­‐performance,	
  14	
  minutes,	
  Courtesy	
  of	
  Anahita	
  Art	
  Studio	
  ..................................................................................................................................................................	
  59	
  Figure	  31:	
  Nikoo	
  Tarkhani,	
  Waiting	
  For	  A	
  Miracle,	
  2014,	
  digital	
  photography	
  .........................................	
  60	
  Figure	  32:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	  Ladan,	
  2012,	
  digital	
  print,	
  45	
  x	
  30cm	  (photographed	
  by	  Muhammad	  Raza)	  .............................................................................................................................................................................................	
  67	
  Figure	  34:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	  Ladan,	
  2012,	
  digital	
  print,	
  45	
  x	
  30cm	  (photographed	
  by	  Muhammad	  Raza)	  .............................................................................................................................................................................................	
  68	
  Figure	  35:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	  Ladan,	
  2012,	
  digital	
  photography,	
  45	
  x	
  30cm	  .............................................	
  68	
  Figure	  36:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	  Ladan,	
  2012,	
  digital	
  photography	
  and	
  print,	
  QUT	
  Block,	
  2012	
  ...........	
  69	
  Figure	  38:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	
  Hana,	  2012,	
  digital	
  photography,	
  48	
  x	
  26cm	  ...............................................	
  70	
  Figure	  39:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	
  Tuba,	  2013,	
  digital	
  print,	
  35	
  x	
  28cm	  (photographed	
  by	  Muhammad	  Raza)	  .............................................................................................................................................................................................	
  71	
  Figure	  40:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	
  Tuba,	  2013,	
  digital	
  photography,	
  35	
  x	
  28cm	  ...............................................	
  71	
  Figure	  41:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	  Motahareh,	  2013,	
  digital	
  print,	
  46	
  x	
  36cm	  (Photographed	
  by	
  Muhammad	
  Raza)	
  ...................................................................................................................................................................	
  72	
  Figure	  42:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	  Motahareh,	  2013,	
  digital	
  photography	
  46	
  x	
  36cm	  ....................................	
  72	
  Figure	  43:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	
  Roshanak,	  2013,	
  digital	
  print,	
  46	
  x	
  36cm	  (Photographed	
  by	
  Muhammad	
  Raza)	
  ...................................................................................................................................................................	
  73	
  Figure	  44:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	
  Roshanak,	  2013,	
  digital	
  photography,	
  46	
  x	
  36cm	  ......................................	
  73	
  

	
  

2	
  

Figure	
  45:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	  Mandana,	
  2013,	
  digital	
  print,	
  33	
  x	
  25cm	  (Photographed	
  by	
  Muhammad	
  Raza)	
  ...................................................................................................................................................................	
  74	
  Figure	  47:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	
  Nasrin,	
  2013,	
  digital	
  print,	
  25	
  x	
  33cm	  (Photographed	
  by	  Muhammad	  Raza)	  .............................................................................................................................................................................................	
  75	
  Figure	  48:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	
  Nasrin,	
  2013,	
  digital	
  photography,	
  25	
  x	
  33cm	  ............................................	
  75	
  Figure	  49:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	
  Adeleh,	
  2012,	
  digital	
  print,	
  20	
  x	
  25cm	  (Photographed	
  by	  Muhammad	  Raza)	  .............................................................................................................................................................................................	
  76	
  Figure	  50:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	
  Adeleh,	
  2012,	
  digital	
  print,	
  20	
  x	
  25cm	  .............................................................	
  76	
  Figure	  51:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	  Forough,	  2012,	
  digital	
  photography,	
  30	
  x	
  30cm	  (Photographed	
  by	
  Muhammad	
  Raza)	
  ...................................................................................................................................................................	
  77	
  Figure	  52:	  Mozhdeh	
  Khakbaz,	  Forough,	  2012,	
  digital	
  print,	
  30	
  x	
  30cm	  .........................................................	
  77	
  

	
  

3	
  

Statement of Originality
The work contained in this thesis has not been previously submitted to meet requirements foran award at this or any other higher education institution. To the best of my knowledge andbelief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person
except where due reference is made.

Signed: QUT Verified Signature

Date: December 2015

Name: Mozhdeh Khakbaz

	
  

4	
  

Acknowledgements
I would like to extend my thanks and appreciation to my supervisors Dr. Debra Polson and
Associate Professor Gavin Sade for their guidance and expertise. I would like to thank mycohort of artist friends for making it happen. To my sister Mitra for believing in me,
encouraging me, and helping me in all stages of my life. To my parents, as without their loveand support this work would not have been possible. Finally, to Sarah Pember for editing mythesis.

	
  

5	
  

Abstract
Feminism and Identity in the Work of Contemporary Iranian Female Artists focuseson the Iranian context and the role of female Iranian artists using digital mediums toinfluence the social, political and environmental life of Iranian women.
In the last three decades Iranian artists, in particular women, have played a major rolein presenting the life of Iranian women. These artists have found new creative
platforms to critique the political contexts in which these women find themselves.
Advancements in technology and increased access to digital tools have broadened thepotential for artists to engage with and influence social movements in the developingworld at a rate comparable to the industrial world.
This exegesis presents a discussion on the intersection between three theoretical areasof artistic practice in Iran; feminism, cross-cultural practice and digital image making.
Of particular concern to this study is the growing role of female Iranian artists inchallenging the social status quo. This is conducted through an investigation of anumber of Iranian female artists in the form of case studies and interviews and a
discussion on the impacts of their work on the creative practice portion of this study.
I believe digital art plays a major role in forming social norms and challenging thesocial constructs that create inequality and limitations for women.

	
  

6	
  

Chapter one: Introduction
This project, Feminism and Identity in the Work of Contemporary Iranian Female Artists,
adopts a combination of practice-led and case study research methodologies and is submitted
in two parts, 40% Creative Practice supported by a 60% exegetical component.

Background
I am an Iranian woman from a country with a longstanding culture. I completed mybachelor’s degree in fine art in Tehran in 2003 and have worked as an artist participating in a
number of group painting exhibitions in Iran. I acknowledge that my life would be completely
different if I was not born in Iran. My place of birth, my culture and the society I have lived
in has influenced who I am, how I see myself and how others perceive me.
Whenever I am in a country other than Iran people ask me where I am from. Most people
react with surprise, which makes me mindful of how deeply misunderstood Iranian womenare outside of Iran. Regardless of their personal values, all Iranian women must wear a hijab(full cover of hair and body) whenever they are out in public. This forces Iranian women tolead separate lives by presenting two different identities at home and in public. At times these
private and public identities are contradictory, but in neither contexts are they a true reflectionof a woman’s character.

Objectives of this Study
As an Iranian woman, studying and living temporarily in a democracy such as Australia, I
have an opportunity to present the current social situation of women from my homeland andto use my creative arts practice to promote Iranian women’s struggles. Living between two
different cultures gives me the privilege to pick and choose between elements of each culture
according to what suits my creative practice and me. By weaving an interactive practice with

	
  

7	
  

the study of contemporary female artists, I intend to gain insight into two relevant issues:
firstly, how Iranian female artists view their practice in the current social and political contextof Iran, through a combination of interviews and case studies. Secondly, how this practice canbe employed to demonstrate the difficulties faced by Iranian woman to both the Iranian andinternational communities.
What influences me and encourages me to take on this project is drawn from who I am. My
gender and my cultural heritage have had both a positive and negative influence on mycreative practice. I see myself and every other Iranian woman benefiting from the richness ofour shared cultural heritage while at the same time being limited and restricted by it.
As an artist I search for ways to challenge barriers and overcome limitations.
My creative practice and the practice of others analysed in this study are referred to as ‘digitalart’, specifically in the practice of image making such as photography, video art, and mixedmedia.

The research topic and significanceThe purpose of this research is to examine how digital art can be used as a tool for thepromotion of social change by influencing the existing political and social discourse,
specifically the social struggle faced by Iranian women against. It is my hope that this projectwill contribute to the mobilization of activism within the Iranian women's rights movement.
This research aims to develop a clear understanding of the role of digital tools in theartistic practice of marginalized groups and individuals, such as Iranian female artists.
The term ‘digital art’ “has itself become an umbrella for such a broad range of artistic
works and practices that it does not describe one unified set of aesthetics” (Paul 2008,
7). For the purposes of this study, any reference to a digital art practice includes work
produced with the use of digital production technology, such as video art, photography
and mixed media.
I hope to challenge existing stereotypes of Iranian women but also give a voice to Iranian
women artists in telling their stories. The visual works composed and exhibited as part of thisstudy will portray how Iranian women see themselves, how they perceive their peers in Iranand how they see the differences in their lives in comparison to women in developed
countries, as well as women in other developing countries. This work will also express theinfluence of political and religious factors of concern to Iranian women artists.

	
  

8	
  

It is hoped that this project will enable the contributing Iranian artists to share theirconcerns and their struggle but also showcase their strength and resilience. Western
media often portrays Iranian women as voiceless, powerless, and invisible. This
study intends to identify alternative views through case study analysis and to present
these views through the resulting creative practice. Iranian women are subject todifferent social rules and expectations, however over the last 35 years after Islamic
revolution there has been an increasing level of engagement of women in utilizing
creative medium as means of expression. The surge of Iranian female movie
directors, journalists, artists and critical thinkers is undeniable, like Marjan Satrapi,
Shadi Sadr, Shirin Ebadi, and Shirin Neshat. This study hopes to engage with andcontribute to this positive movement.
In summary, the outcomes of this study are:-­‐

A series of portraits that present Iranian woman in their diverse social role;
and

-­‐

An exegesis that reports on
o The emerging role of digital art and technologies for engaging womenin activism and the women rights movement;o Case studies and interview analysis showcasing creative works invarious social contexts in Iran; ando An analysis of how existing female Iranian artists respond to culturalissues, explicitly and implicitly.

Structure of this Exegesis
In order to support and inform my creative practice, I have adopted a practice-led action
research methodology (chapter 2). This is strengthened by in-depth case studies of Iranianartists living both within and outside of Iran, further refined and authenticated by interviews
with current Iranian female artists (chapter 4) to update and authenticate the analysis throughfirst person participation. This mixed methodology afforded me the ability to experiment withrelated theories and practices in a coordinated effort over the period of study.
Before presenting the case studies and interviews, an overview of the influential theories
associated with this study are articulated (chapter 3) to focus on the theoretical lens through

	
  

9	
  

which this study is conducted. Specifically, this study draws from the intersection between
three theoretical areas; feminism, cross-cultural practice and digital art approaches.
Subsequently, a series of works are presented (chapter 5) to demonstrate a synthesis oftheoretical concerns and the observations of this study and integration of the findings into myemerging creative practice.
I conclude this study with a reflection on the process and outcomes (chapter 6).

	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  

	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  

	
  

10	
  

Chapter two: Methodology
This chapter outlines the project methodologies adopted for the purpose of this research. This
project adopts a practice-led action research approach resulting in the submission of a 40%
Creative Practice supported by 60% exegetical component.
The reason for choosing this methodology of research is that it provides the opportunity toexperience research through the processes of reflective artistic practices. Barrett clarifies thisby stating the following:
The exegesis provides the opportunity for creative arts researcher to elucidate why
and how processes specific to the arts discipline concerned mutate to generatealternative model of understanding. At the same time, the researcher is also able toelaborate the significance of these models within the research context (2007, 162).
This approach will assist in highlighting the correlation between practice and theory. In thischapter I intend to detail the development of the research methodology beginning with an
overview of the different research methods adopted to ensure the valid nature of this practiceled research and the selection of case studies. This is followed by an overview of the practiceand approach that were accrued during the creating of the artworks.

Practice-led Research
The principal methodology used in Feminism and Identity in the Work of Contemporary
Iranian Female Artists is practice-led research defined by Carole Gray as:
Research which is initiated in practice, where questions, problems, challenges are
identified and formed by the needs of practice and practitioners; and secondly,that the research strategy is carried out through practice, using predominantly
methodologies and specific methods familiar to us as practitioners. (1996, 3)
Practice-led research highlights the essential interrelationship between theory andpractice and the consequence of applying theoretical and philosophical paradigms for thecontemporary art practitioner (Barrett, 2007, 1).
According to Haseman one of the main characteristics of practice-led researchers is “theirinsistence that research outputs and claims to knowing must be made through the

	
  

11	
  

symbolic language and forms of their practice” (2007, 101). A practice-led approachbrings practice ‘enthusiasm’ to the research (Haseman and Mafe 2009, 211).
The practice-led researcher has little interest in trying to translate the findings andunderstandings of practice into the numbers (quantitative) and words (qualitative) preferredby traditional research paradigms. The practice-led researcher uses first person pronoun ‘I’ asa centerpiece of the research formulation. While this might be a struggle, the practice-led
researchers are conflating their own subjectivity, or individual experience, with the research
topic and the research topic becomes the researcher (McNamara 2012, 6). This methodology
has enabled me to capture the voices of Iranian female artists who participated in this project.
It has challenged me with constant reflection on how my voice is intertwined with the voiceof the research participants.

Action ResearchThis practice-led study is also informed by action research. An action research strategy isadopted as a research method based around interactive cycles of action and reflection. Action
research is a useful strategy to guide the creative process. It is commonly used in interaction
design research as it allows practitioners to improve on their practice towards the goal ofcompleting a prototype as well as to reflect and develop on their practice with each iteration(Edelson 2002).
Action research consists in framing the problem of a situation, and strategies of action
appropriate to its solution, in such a way that both the problem and the action strategies can be
carried over to new situations perceived as being similar to the first. As Schon states:
In the new situations, one must still test the validity, action ability, and "interest"of the practice knowledge derived from the initial situation. Through theseprocesses of reflection-in- action and reflection on reflection-in- action, the newly
generated practice knowledge may be modified and incorporated into thepractitioner' s repertoire so as to be available for projection to further situations(2012, 31).
Action research in its applied approach, connecting the research process with the context of
Iranian women’s lives has enabled me to reflect on the social environment, the role of Iranian
women artists, and their artworks. McNiff and Whitehead state that in Action Research theresearcher becomes involved and participates in the research topic and the situation and can

	
  

12	
  

be an insider researcher. In this stance it is the researcher’s voice that is heard, rather than thatof the participants (2006, 11). To find the balance of how the voices of participants arecaptured, the action research practitioners can demonstrate how they have contributed to thenew practice and also how this new practice is transforming existing theories and creating
new theories (2006, 19).
The action research process is a “cyclic or spiral” process, which alternates between action
and critical reflection. It is about “ practitioners creating new ideas about how to improvepractice, and putting those ideas forward as their personal theories of practice” (McNiff andWhitehead 2006, 5). As such, this research adopts learning through action by investigationand evaluation of the artworks. The graph below describes the cyclic process I have utilised incompletion of this research.

In the context of this research project, each of the cycles involves four key elements; identify,act, reflect, and refine. As the graph above illustrates, the first cycle is concerned with thedevelopment of the idea for the artworks and methods and theories. The second cycle entails
experiments and case studies. One of the significant experiments for me as a researcher was
having the opportunity to present in two different conferences and display some of theartworks. These opportunities enabled me to witness the engagement of the audience with the
topic and also to reflect on how to improve the communication of my messages with future
audiences. The last cycle is implicated in the final artworks and writing of the exegesis.

	
  

13	
  

Case Study Analysis and Interviews
Along with this formal approach, the hypothesis that has guided me in this work has been
informed by my lived experience and my observation of the impact of public life on Iranian
women and their ways of communicating through digital tools. Practice-Led research hasenabled me to test this hypothesis in a creative and reflective process.
To expand upon my own experience and to add to the authenticity of this study, I also
engaged with contemporary Iranian female artists through both case study analysis andinterviews. In chapter four I present a number of Iranian female artists and their work. Before
doing so, I present an overview of the theoretical issues related to this study (chapter 3). The
theoretical framework has informed and guided analyses of the case studies and interviews by
providing a number of key issues for discussion.
In collecting the case studies I used a combination of methods including observation,interviews, artworks analysis, and discussion with participants.
Stake has classified three different types of case studies: the intrinsic case study, theinstrumental case study, and the collective case study (2000, 437-8). The collective casestudy, where a number of cases are studied in order to investigate some general phenomenon,is the key for this study. The interviews within the case studies and the reflection on mypractice under this new light have formed the basis of this research.

Overview of Practice Methods and Approaches
In accordance with the Action Research methodology, I have undertaken a cyclicalapproach to the development of the practice. The cyclical process has influenced myidea of presenting the artwork in an exhibition. The idea of the exhibition then has
influenced the selection of the case studies; the participants and then the collection of
the data have shaped the structure of the exegesis.
The first idea that raised itself in my mind was taking some photos of Iranian womenin different social settings representing different social roles. I went to Iran and foundthat taking photos in some public places required a permit from the government. To
avoid any complications and eliminate the risk of delay in the data collection, I

	
  

14	
  

decided to take photos in places that didn’t require any permit. The best option was totake photos in a studio. I arranged with women who were practice research subjects toattend the photographic sessions at the studios in Iran. To ensure consistency inpractice methods I also used the photographic studio at Queensland University ofTechnology (QUT) to take photo shoots of Iranian women here in Australia.
My creative practice is guided by the belief that emotions and feelings expressed
through art productions communicate directly with the audience. Therefore, to ensure
neutrality of the images and their ability to provide the viewer with the opportunity toform their own opinion, the women I photographed were asked to show no obvious
expressions in their faces.
At first I intended to present the artworks as digital photographs printed on regular
photographic paper. However, through the process I became interested in exploring how theaudience can interact with the portraits and how they engage and communicate their emotions
with the images. This led me to think of the process of reflection, which then led me to thinkof the reflection in a mirror. I then decided to print the photos on mirrors instead of paper.
Using mirrors as a communication tool made clear cultural sense to me. Mirrors have asignificant place in Iranian culture. The significance of a mirror is further described andexplained in chapter 5.
By presenting the photographic works on mirrors, the audience is able to see the portraits of
Iranian women while also seeing themselves and their current environment reflected, alltogether in one image.
I selected a number of Iranian women artists for case study analysis; Shirin Neshat, Shadi
Ghadirian, Samira Eskandarfar, Nikoo Tarkhani, and Parastou Forouhar. Shirin Neshat andNikoo Tarkhani are two visual artists who have most influenced my practice as I have been
following their artistic careers throughout my own professional development. All of the artists
were selected for case study analysis because their work is explicitly reflective of their Iranianculture and identity. In an effort to create paintings, photographs and videos, these Iranian
women artists each use various digital technologies to assist in the process of image making.
Another factor influencing my selection of these artists is their residency status. Currently twoof them are living outside of Iran while the others live in Iran. This provides an opportunity toobserve the influence of place and the cross-cultural dynamics that may be impacting thework of the artists. The literature review addresses the cross-cultural arts in more detail. The
	
  

15	
  

case studies are explained later in chapter 4. In chapter 5 I discuss how some famous andemerging Persian poets, such as Forough Farrokhzad and Erfan Daliri, have influenced mycreative practice.
In accordance with the Australian research framework, the application for ethical clearance
for Low Risk Human Research was submitted to the QUT Ethics committee on February 14,
2013 and approved on March 7, 2013 by the approval low risk QUT Ethics Approval Number
1300000056.

	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  

	
  

16	
  

Chapter three: Theoretical exploration
In this chapter I intend to describe the theoretical framework that has shaped this study andsubsequently influenced my creative practice. This chapter intends to demonstrate the role ofthe feminist and digital art practice in the social movement and how these features influence
the creative works. It then analyses the role and influence of art cross-culturally and its
interface with feminism, and for the purpose of this research paper, its boundaries with digitalart.
It is well documented that the role of feminism differs across cultures. Creative practices andartworks are great tools for engaging the broader public. The interpretations of different
artistic medium are so diverse amongst observers. Literature from different fields of study
will be explored to provide an insight into different aspect of theories and their influence onpractice.

The graph above showcases the intersection of the 3 key factors setting the foundation of thisresearch. The graph represents each area as they specifically pertain to contemporary Iranianfemale artists as feminist creative practitioners and image-makers in a particular social,political and religious context.

FeminismFeminism has been one of the most influential political and intellectual movements in the last
fifty years. This chapter begins by providing some background on feminism as a social
movement and its influence on feminist artists and the creation of feminist art. It then reviews
Islamic feminism, specifically the Iranian feminist movement.

	
  

17	
  

Feminism is defined as “the belief that women should have the same rights and opportunity asmen” (Longman dictionary 2009). Feminism provides an analysis of what oppresses women.
In the past few decades feminism has played a key role in outlining the socioeconomic
disadvantage of women in all social settings. The focus of the feminist movement is on
providing an equitable access to all members of society to all social, cultural and economic
opportunities. As Pollack defines “feminism as we know it today is, in part, the product of thehistorical moment in the 1950s/1960s which saw new political, social and cultural theories
developed to deal better with the problems posed by late capitalism” (1996, 4).
Despite this, the realisation that feminism cannot be restricted to a single definition resulted
from many years of self-reflection within the discipline itself. This has been significantly
apparent in the movements of women of colour and of women from the third-world that began
in the 1970s. The worldwide women’s movement started to grow in the 1970s. Global
feminist networks were determined through magazines and newsletters anxious to extend theirreach or through communication services struggling to connect women’s organizations
around the world (McQuiston 1997, 188).
One of the major concerns for some feminists, and also for this study, is the distinction
between the public sphere and private sphere. Some feminists believe that the private sphereis the domain where women’s labor is rendered invisible through traditional domestic roles(Felski quoted in Simsek 2012, 34). On the other hand, some feminists suggest that privacy isa fundamental need for women; to give them a chance to leave their social roles in the publicsphere, to discover their potential for creativity, and to construct their identities (Okin quoted
in Simsek 2012, 34). This aspect of the feminist movement is critical to this work. The
influence of the feminist movement in Iran is as long as the feminist movements in all otherparts of the world, however this influence has been shaped and framed in a particular context.
Iranian women’s lives and the influence of feminism on their lives is defined and restrainedby the social, political, cultural and religious influences on their private and public life. The
gendered cultural expectations, the patriarchal gender roles, and political influences define
how Iranian women are perceived both in their private lives and their public roles.
It is important to note that feminist theories, in their journey of seeking social change, haveengaged Iranian women in general, and Iranian women artists in particular, since the start of
the women’s movement in Iran in the early 1900s. However, while gender equality and thewomen’s movement had universal impact, feminism in its theoretical form cannot be applied
to all contexts universally. The wide and diverse experience of women, their social andpolitical context, and the cultural expectations of their gender roles needs to be considered.
	
  

18	
  

The Iranian feminism influence, by its long history, culture, religious and theologicalinfluence, plays a major role in defining Iranian women artists as agents of change.
Women artists in Iran, committed to influencing social structure, have utilised their artistic
expression as a medium to bring about change. These works showcase the influence offeminism in challenging social norms. This can be seen in the work of Shadi Ghadirian andNikoo Tarkhani. This what Phelan describes as “specificity of art”.
Is feminism a useful descriptive term for art that employs radically different
modes of address, aspiration and genre? The difficulty in answering this question
helpfully reminds us of the sharp difference between the conceptual possibilities
and limitations of art discourse and often anarchic specificity of art (Phelan 2012,18).
In this journey the thrive for equality influenced by feminist theories, shaped and presented byartistic methods, utilises new forms of technology and mediums to articulate the culturalvalues of Iranian women and their journey for achieving social and political freedom.
Exploring the impact of feminism on women artists engaged in this research project clearly
outlined the parallel influence of culture and diversity of views on how women artists arepresented in the final artistic product.
Humm identifies that “feminist theory shows that the universal subordination of women
cannot be explained biologically without reference to cultural diversity” (1995, 52).
Haraway (1998, 91) states “identities seem contradictory, partial and strategic. With the hardwon recognition of their social and historical constitution, gender, race, and class cannot
provide the basis for belief in essential unity. There is nothing about being female thatnaturally binds women.”
Recently the various waves of feminism have been stepping-stones on the pathway tointernational freedom and rights. The global movement of women’s rights will take us into
next century. It will continue to grow with the help of new communications technology. It
will continue, against all odds, to challenge the traditions of male domination and oppression(McQuiston 1997, 189). This will also influence and impact on the lives of women indeveloping and third world countries.
Although feminism is a complicated and broad concern with historic, political and religious
implications, there are particular expressions of Iranian feminism, as well as expressions offeminism in art, that shapes this research.

	
  

19	
  

This research focuses on the intersection of feminism, digital arts and cross cultural influences
and aims to explore the space where these three elements come together and interface to shape
the life of individual women in Iran and the expression of Iranian women artists of how they
see these influences.
While feminism has provided the theoretical framework for challenging the social norms, thecultural influences have enabled Iranian women artists to find ways to express those
influences in a way that every day audiences can relate to, as seen in the work of Samira
Eskandarfar.

Art and Feminism
Since the 1960s, feminism has been the source of remarkable theoretical and practicalinnovation in the arts. Through the work of artists such as Nancy Spero, Judy Chicago, Valie
Export, Adrian Piper, and Barbara Kruger, the feminist movement drew attention not only tothe role of sexuality in artistic creation but to that of edge, social class and race. All of these
artists have a different perspective about feminist art, but they have rallied the feminist cause
and proposed new ways of looking at private and public spheres, the objective of art and its
subjects. These artists have not only put feminist art on the map, but they have also haveencouraged others to take female artists and feminist art seriously.
As Pollack states:
Ignorance does not just mean not knowing women’s names or being able toidentify pictures, sculptures, photographs, films or videos by women. It is much
more complex. It is about an invisibility of meaning that arises from theindifference and indeed hostility of the culture to where these works come from,what they address and why might have something to offer that realigns ourunderstanding of the world in general (1996, 13).
In the context of Iranian women gaining a better understanding of their world, it is importantto understand the role of the feminist movement in shaping the identity of Iranian womenartists, as well as understanding the role of religion and in particular Islamist feminist views,
its theological roots and its influence on women’s movement.
These influences can be seen in the work of Shirin Neshat and Parastou Forouhar and how theparticipants in this project have described themselves, (See figure 35, figure 36 and figure 42.)

	
  

20	
  

To understand these influences better, it might be useful to review how the feminist
movement has started in Iran.

Iranian feminist movement
This section presents an overview of the Iranian feminist movement. It positions this study inthe historical context of the Iranian feminist movement and its struggles.
It could be argued that men have traditionally had much greater access to the economy andpower, and in Iran gender stratification and gender inequality is particularly prominent,
reinforced by the government policy and the legal framework. Law in Iran has evolved frommedieval Islamic legal code (Shari ‘a) and the Prophet Mohammad’s traditions (hadith). “Menpossessed the right to divorce their wives, polygamy was accepted, men had custody ofchildren in case of divorce, men’s share of inheritance was twice that of women, and wives
did not have custody of their children when the husband died. Killing women suspected ofadultery was acceptable” (Ettehadieh 2004, 86).
As a result of social conservatism, women lose much more than men, that is everywhere themarker of fundamentalist movements (Mahdi 2004, 427). The primary social role of Iranian
women as indicated in censuses in 1865 and 1900, the lower-class urban women performedsome works. Moreover serving as domestic slaves and servants, women worked as midwives,
bath attendants and teachers of small children (Ettehadieh 2004, 86).
The emergence of a women’s movement in Iran goes back to the nineteenth century when
Iran was experiencing a Constitutional Revolution between 1905 and 1907. Iranian society
experienced an organized attempt by women to change their social conditions (Mahdi 2004,
427).
The supplementary fundamental laws that granted freedom of the press had many benefits for
Iranian women. They published their own newspapers, which were not distributed by street
vendors as men’s newspapers were, but were available only by subscription. The firstnewspaper published by a woman and written for women, Danesh (Knowledge), was started
in 1910. It was followed by Shokoufeh (Blossom), founded by a man, who was entirely
dedicated to the question of women’s education and the historic neglect of girls (Ettehadieh
2004, 91). The Iranian women’s movement was supported by some of the revolution’s
leaders, popular poets and newspaper editors. It grew after the granting of the constitution andprogressed on its own until the change of the dynasty in 1925.

	
  

21	
  

During the Pahlavi era (1925-1979), women achieved the right to ask for divorce in certain
conditions and the minimum marriage age for girls was set at 15.
The year 1936 was a pivotal year for Iranian women. One of the most significant changes wasin education, particularly the founding of high schools and vocational schools for girls.
Women admitted to Tehran University a year after it opened (Ettehadieh 2004, 95). Reza
Shah (King Reza Pahlavi) imposed the second enormous change for Iranian women’s lives.
The government policy was presented as the emancipation and modernization of women, andit was called “the opening of the veil” (Ettehadieh 2004, 96). The veil is not a phenomenon
based on the Quran. During the reign of Safavids (1501-1722), the veil emerged as a symbolof status among the Muslim ruling class. It became more widespread during the nineteenth
century when the colonials promoted it as a symbol of the Muslim society (Hoodfar quoted inMoghissi 1999, 86).
Since the late 1920s, Iranian women activists, teachers and artists stopped wearing the veil inpublic. Then in 1936, Reza Shah forcefully ordered women to unveil - a decree, which hadsome negative effects on the Iranian feminist movement. As Mahdi states:
On the one hand the ulama used the decree as proof that the women’s movement
had no other aim than making women naked and showing their bodies in publicacts contrary to Islamic ethics. On the other hand, the state’s determination in
issuing the decree and implementing it vigorously, despite widespread opposition
by public and religious leaders, convinced many early “feminists” to support thedecree as a progressive measure necessary for confronting clerical misogynistic
approaches to women’s concerns (2004, 430).
The degree of general acceptance was mixed, “the upper classes, especially the younger
generation, welcome the law” (Ettehadieh 2004, 98).
After World War II, another page in the history of Iranian women’s movement was opened.
Women became active in national struggle and political events. Several new women’sorganizations that were previously independent from the government associated with various
political parties closely and inalienably (Sanasarian 1982, 73). In this period, for the first time,
younger women became involved in the student movement in universities to obtain electoral
rights.
According to Etemad Moghadam (2004, 164) existing debates among Iranian feminist
economist focus on the two aspects of female labor, both in which women are unfairly treated.
The first one emphasizes the devaluation of and low material rewards according to activities
and traits that traditionally have been considered appropriate for women. The second body of

	
  

22	
  

feminist thought emphasizes women’s exclusion from traditionally male activities andinstitutions “thus laws, cultural beliefs, and other discriminatory practices excluded womenfrom politics, religious leadership, military positions, and traditionally male crafts andprofessions within paid employment” (Etemad Moghadam 2004, 164).
In the context of the Iranian interface with the feminist movement and considering theintersectionality of culture, religion and social context we can not set a realistic picture
without describing Islamic feminism.

Islamic Feminism
Iran’s political and public environment has been strongly influenced by Islamic scholarly andreligious views. This is reflected in all forms of arts and expressive mediums. Religion plays adefinitive role in explaining women’s status in Iran even for non-Muslim Iranian women. The
women’s movement in Iran and many Middle Eastern countries are broadly similar because of
their common religious and cultural experiences. However the impact of these movements
varies form one country to another in the Middle East. These differences are due to crosscultural variations and the different ways gender roles are defined in each society.
In Islamic society, traditional attitudes toward gender have not much changed and there is noopportunity to bring about changes quickly. Using more accurate historical evidence andanalyses can help us to have a better understanding about women’s lives in these societies.
The description of feminism in an Islamic context is extremely different to western feminism,
but despite these differences women’s activism is of great import to the social movement. “In
nearly all Islamic countries women constitute the front line fighters in the battle of Middle
Eastern intellectuals against aggressive state terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism”(Moghissi 1999, 92). Many Muslim women are worried about the Islamic movement and thedecrease of women’s rights in the name of Islam. They take action locally and transnationally(Burn 2005, 207).
In the traditional model of a Muslim woman, “she never spoke of herself, she neverrepresented her emotions, presence or history” (Said 2003, 6) and this to some extent is thereality of the Muslim women in the contemporary era. The disposition of women in thiscontext is not solely the product of the religion but also caused by men. Nashat calls forattention to the causes of the inequality rather than its association with a belief system. “The

	
  

23	
  

root causes of women’s inequality need to be examined, rather than its symbol, which many
wrongly associate with religion in the Muslim world” (Nashat 2004, 2).
Mernissi also states “it is neither because of the Koran nor the prophet, nor the Islamic
tradition, but simply because those rights conflict with the interests of a male elite” (Mernissi1987).
The definition of women’s rights in the Muslim society is different from what we see inwestern societies, as “Muslim society is characterized by a contradiction between what can becalled ‘an explicit theory’ and ‘an implicit theory’ of female sexuality, and therefore a double
theory of sexual dynamics. The explicit theory is the prevailing contemporary belief that men
are aggressive in their interaction with women, and women are passive” (Mernissi 1985).
Constructing gender within Islamic discourse is a key motivation for many Iranian feminists:“In many cases, they have challenged the clergy’s monolithic power, starting a new trend in
Islamic feminism in Iran that differs from other Muslim women’s endeavors to reinterpret
traditional Islamic theological and legal sources” (Ahmadi 2006, 34). Hite also states that:
The language of the western press tends to reduce Islamic societies to stereotypes,
and ironically, many Islamist leaders have been able to manipulate thosestereotypes to the detriment of women. A nation such as Iran was portrayed by its
own leaders as monolithic; to question the role of women within that society was
to attack the cultural and national integrity of the state. By playing on theignorance and cultural blindness of western politicians, leaders in some parts of
the Islamic world have been able to obscure political actions with respect to theremoval of many rights from women in religious term. To challenge the record ofsuch states on women’s rights, therefore, could come to be portrayed as culturalimperialism (1999, 125).
Throughout 1977-1979, when the movement against the Shah (the last king of Iran) was
formed, women from different cultural, ideological, social class, ethnic, and religious
backgrounds again participated in the anti-government demonstrations. They wanted toachieve various goals, as Mahdi describes:
Islamic women participated in the revolution for bringing about the establishmentof an Islamic state based on Sharia. Secular women participated in the revolution
in opposition to the Shah’s dictatorship. Women associated with Marxist
organizations hoped for the end to the Shah’s regime as a puppet of the westernimperialist powers and the establishment of a socialist state. The majority of thewomen, not devoted to any ideology or political orientation, joined the movement
against the Pahlavi regime in the hope that their country would be free of

	
  

24	
  

dictatorship, foreign domination, and alienating cultural attitudes adopted by the
Pahlavi regime (2004, 436).
The Islamic revolution in Iran occurred in 1978, which resulted in major loss of rights for
non-religious secular women. The new government set up restricted policies based on areligious foundation, which restricted women’s freedom and their choice of attire whenaccessing the public sphere the so-called Islamic dress code. In addition the women were andare limited in their choice of occupational and educational activities. The complete exclusionof Iranian women from the public life and workforce was neither part of the Islamic
government’s plan, nor would that be possible as Iranian women had an established publicrole, however limiting that role was achievable and women who opposed the emerging
Islamic ruling ideology were harassed or arrested (Mahdi 2004, 436).
Iranian women face two fundamental issues when considering their agency in carrying
forward traditions that pass on cultural values to subsequent generations. “One is thepatriarchal culture that is being supported by gender-bias laws, and the other is the woman's
self-belief, which from the moment of birth she has been trained to believe in a patriarchal
system” (Sadr 2004).

	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  

	
  

25	
  

Current context
The women’s movement led by feminist activism and influenced by Islamist feminism has
engaged women from diverse social and cultural groups in addressing some key social andpolitical issues. Women activists and artists have utilised diverse digital mediums to addresssome of the social challenges.

Figure 1: Change for equality website (2014), screen shot, http://www.we-change.org/english

One example of these types of movements is “a million signatures campaign” (see Figure 1),
which is seeking Iranian public support to stop women being treated as second-class citizens.
The campaign seeks support from both males and females from diverse sectors of society inorder to achieve reforms in civil and family laws that place women at the bottom of the social
ladder. The campaign seeks to achieve equal status for women within the Iranian legal
system. Sadr describes the conflict between the traditional roles imposed upon Iranian womenand a society unable to escape the effects of modernity:
Today, the Iranian women are entangled in a contradictory and multifarious
situation. On one hand, in the family and social arena, there exists an endless listof laws in the books and policies that keep reminding the women that they aresecond-class citizens. On the other hand, rapid social mutations, especially inrecent years and with the explosion of the youth population, have brought about
fundamental changes that have caused new crises in the nation (2004).

	
  

26	
  

Women have played the leading role in the recent social changes in Iran, and refused to go
back to their traditional role, "We have nothing to hide. We know we're leaving ourselvesopen to imprisonment again, but we carry on meeting because fear is already a part of ourlives" (Ardalan 2008).
The only solution to women's social crises is to have their equal rights recognised and toallow for the application of human rights principles to their lives. The Iranian women's
movement attempts to make the society aware of its plight and to garner public support topressure the government to realise women’s equal rights (Sadr 2004).
Iranian women living in the current century are informed of their roles and their contribution
in finding solutions in addressing the system’s inequality. Modern technology has enabled
women’s access to information about women’s rights in the international context. Access to
the Internet, Websites, Weblogs and social media have assisted Iranian women to build a new
bridge between with themselves and the outside world, and have helped them find their voice
on a global platform. The women artists and their access to digital art have played a key rolein starting, supporting and moving forward various social movements. Examples include
promoting universal access of girls and women to education, seeking reforms in divorce laws,
seeking freedom of expression and participation, anti-domestic violence movements, humanrights campaigns and protests against imprisonment of writers, journalists and artists.

Digital art and social movement
This section is an effort to portray the connection between digital art and social movements.
The last two decades have seen a fast growth and advancement in the use of technology andthe accessibility of digital medium. A quick review of famous camera brands shows how
different the prices and the capabilities are today in comparison to what they were 15 years
ago. Fast Internet access, smart applications and ready-to-use software have made the use ofdigital mediums much easier. The history of digital art is linked to the history of technology
and science: “the technological history of digital art is inextricably linked to the militaryindustrial complex and to research centers, as well as consumer culture and it’s associated

	
  

27	
  

technologies. Computers were essentially ‘born’ in an academic and research environment,
and still today research universities and centers play a major role in the production of someforms of digital art” (Paul 2008, 8).
The terminology for different forms of technological art has been changed during the last fifty
years and what is now known as digital art has undertaken numerous titles, as Paul states:
Once referred to as ‘computer art’ (since the1970s) and then ‘multimedia art’,
digital art now takes its place under the umbrella term ‘ new media art’, which at
the end of the twentieth century was used mostly for film and video, as well assound art and other hybrid forms (2008, 7).
The relationship between art and digital technology has two different aspects. The first is theuse of digital technologies as a tool. Many artists utilise this technology as a tool for creationin different forms of art such as painting, photography, video, and sculpture. The creative
artworks display distinctive characteristics of the digital technology and reflect on their terms
and aesthetics (Paul 2008, 27). The second aspect is the use of digital technologies as a
medium, from production to presentation. The description for using digital technology as a
medium in the creation and presentation of an artwork is in the development process “Thedigital medium’s distinguishing features certainly constitute a distinct form of aesthetics: it isinteractive, participatory, dynamic, and customizable, to name just a few of its key
characteristics” (Paul 2008, 67).
One of the main characteristics of digital art is reproduction. The fact that any digital medium
has the ability to recreate the artworks faster and easier than other mediums provides theopportunity for artists to use their creation for social or political objects. “Digital art did not
develop in an art-historical vacuum either, but has a strong connection to previous art
movements, including Dadaism and Fluxus. The importance of these movements for digitalart resides in their emphasis on formal instructions and in their focus on concept, event, andaudience participation, as opposed to unified material objects” (Paul 2008, 11).
To understand the role of digital art in the work of Iranian women artists, the literature on
digital art and the role of women can provide some insights. As Prince states, women always
have participated in the computer art and technology movement, learning to speak thelanguage of the machine as well as enjoying the implementation of ideas, techniques, andexperiences derived from its inherent logical involvement (2003, 3).
Jasia Reichardt curated the first important exhibition of digital art in London in 1968, titled“Cynernetic Serendipity”. In this exhibition for the first time the artists contested withconcepts and artistic challenges, which are the foundation for the current digital works (Prince
	
  

28	
  

2003, 4). This movement has also reached out to the Iranian women artists and has
influenced their works. The development in technology, communication and digital medium
has blurred the boundaries between the private and the public spheres of Iranian women’s life.
As Neshat states “A new way of use of technology to open some of the boundaries andtraditions of art-making” (2002, 49) is a great way to present social and political issues aroundthe world. Using social networks and social journalism have opened a new page in Iranian
women’s movements. One of the best examples of this is a Facebook campaign page called
My Stealthy Freedom of Iranian women. This page is about Iranian women who face Legaland Social restrictions, but who do not belong to any political groups. An Iranian female
journalist started this page and all the photos posted are sent by women either from Iran,
Iranian women living out of Iran, or by women from other countries in solidarity with Iranian
women. This is a site dedicated to Iranian women inside the country who want to share their“stealthily” taken photos without the veil.
There are many other examples to refer to, but, as a way to control the scope of this study, I
will focus on digital image making as a sub-set of digital art. Most of the case studies andinterviews in this research involve Iranian artists engaged in digital photography, video andfilm. Subsequently, as part of this study, the work produces and exhibits a series of digital
photography with other material components, which will be further discussed at length in
Chapter five.

Cross cultural artistic practices
Artists play a fundamental role in most social movements. This has been evident inmovements from ancient times to the present and in every culture. For many artists, no matter
where they are, being socially and politically connected and engaged is simply part of theirwork/life existence. A major part of the world’s contemporary art consists of the work ofartists who have based their art on their personal lives. As an Iranian artist I can testify that it
is almost impossible to practice without considering the personal, social, political andhistorical impact of my environment. These issues are always evident in the creative process,the presentation of the work and the reception of the work.

	
  

29	
  

It can be argued that this is true of all artists, all around the world, and Moholy-Nagy clarifies
the artist’s situation as:
The true artist is the Grindstone of the senses, he sharpens eyes, mind and feeling,
he interprets ideas and concepts through his own media. In the midst of vast social
controversies he cannot escape that task. He has to take sides and proclaim his
stand, indeed the artist has a formative ideological function, and otherwise hiswork would be only an exercise of skills in composition (2007, 115).
Moholy- Nagy was highly influenced by constructivism and a strong advocate of theintegration of technology and industry into the art. However, it is important to note thatwomen across the globe face certain and varying limitations of artistic expression. Women are
also influenced by fear of censorship, imprisonment, and exile. It is undeniable that somecountries, such as Iran, have more extreme conditions for artists. As Neshat states:
Every Iranian artist, in one form or another, is political. Politics have defined ourlives. If you're living in Iran, you're facing censorship, harassment, arrest, andtorture - at times, execution. If you're living outside like me, you're faced with life
in exile - the pain of the longing and the separation from your loved ones and yourfamily. Therefore, we don't find the moral, emotional, psychological and politicalspace to distance ourselves from the reality of social responsibility (Neshat 2011).
Neshat is an Iranian woman artist currently living outside of Iran, in New York. This cansometimes complicate the issue further, but can also give an artist a certain amount of
freedom in creative expression.
Secular women in and outside the country have fought to obtain Iranian women’s social andpolitical rights as well as to draw the world’s attention to women’s situation in Iran (Ahmadi
2006, 34). While the Iranian artists are restricted and their hands are tied, because of thepolitical situation, they are able to tell stories in symbolic and simple ways. Numbers ofjournalist, filmmakers, video artists, photographers and even installation artists have focusedon the Iranian women’s social situation and have presented their work to the world. They use
their creative practice to connect with women and attempt to connect them with other people
across cultures.
This topic is of particular importance to Iranian women artists and is discussed in more length
during the interviews. This has also informed and shaped the case study analysis.

	
  

30	
  

Chapter four: Case Studies
This chapter provides an overview of the case studies undertaken through this research
project. These case studies illustrate how Iranian women, specifically contemporary Iranianfemale artists, combine theory and practice in order to complete a work.
Willis states “if we as consumers of images are to understand the power of the portrait
photograph, we must begin to ask critical questions regarding the visualization of gender,
race, identity, and sexuality in art” (2006, 61).
In this chapter a number of Iranian female artists are presented as case study analyses andsome of their artworks will be described by visual analysis.

Identifying and Engaging Participants
As Stake states, “the real business of case study is particularization, not generalization. Wetake a particular case and come to know it well, not primarily as to how it is different fromothers but what it is, what it does” (1995, 5). The following artists were selected as casestudies, because they best represent the role of Iranian artists in facilitating change and theirassociation with social and political movements in Iran through the use of digital medium.
As referred to earlier, I am using the qualitative approach to describe the role of Iranian
women artists and the impact of digital mediums in social movement. I have used interviews
to capture the voice of subject matters. “Qualitative researchers take pride in discovering andportraying the multiple views of the case. The interview is the main road to multiple realities”(Stake 1995, 64).
For the purpose of this research project, and to be able to find these realities, semi-structured
interviews with Iranian women digital artists were conducted. The interviews have enabled
me to gain insight into the limitations and opportunities presented to the women artists, aswell as insights into their aims and intentions in using digital arts, and influences on theirdecisions. From all the case studies, Nikoo Tarkhani and Samira Eskandarfar also participatedin an interview. I was privileged to be able to interview two Iranian female artists who areliving in Iran, as this study provided an opportunity for them to have a voice to tell their story.

	
  

31	
  

Shirin Neshat, New York City
Shirin Neshat, an Iranian woman and artist lives in the USA. She is one of the mostinternationally renowned Iranian contemporary artists. She is a visual artist who has gained
recognition for her photography, film, and video installation, working through a variety of
textual material, to express complex philosophical ideas behind contemporary Iran.
Neshat was born in 1957 in Qazvin, left Iran aged 17 to study art at the University ofCalifornia. After the Islamic revolution in 1978 she was unable to return to her home country
until 1990, and from that time her career as an artist began (Shirin Neshat 2002). Neshat’s
provocative photographs, videos and multimedia installation have resonated with the curatorsof many major international art exhibitions.
Her artwork explores issues of her native society, Iran, especially the position of women. She
uses the specifics of her cultural background to create works that communicate universal ideas
about loss, meaning, and memory. Neshat does not limit herself to one form or medium. She
uses a variety of skills and tools.
Gianelli (2002, 9) describes Neshat as an artist who has “shown that she is able not only of
analysing, but also of imagining and prefiguring a different, indeed better, order in therelationships between human beings and in their communities.”
Between 1993 and 1997 Neshat produced a series of groundbreaking black and whitephotographs called Women of Allah, in which she superimposed Farsi calligraphy on thehands and faces of her subjects. This series was created after her first visit to her home

	
  

32	
  

country. The Women of Allah series questions the role of Muslim women and the female bodyin relation to the violence they faced through the Islamic revolution. This series stunned theart world by promoting a new vision of Muslim women, whereas previously women had only
rarely appeared as subject in Islamic artworks (Darznik 2010, 108).
In addition Neshat used specific iconography to advocate such contradictory ideas as“repression, submission, resistance and aggression” and their expression of energy andserenity. Neshat created this series to explore various philosophical and ideological aspectsof the Islamic revolution such as the concept of “martyrdom” (Neshat 2002, 80).

Figure 2: Shirin Neshat, Speechless, 1996, black and white photography, Women of Allah
series (Reckitt 2001)

Figure 2 shows an Iranian woman wearing a chador (The strictest form of Islamic dress inIran). At first fleeting look this might be misread as a foreshortened barrel of a gun pointing
towards the viewer. The image is overlapped with Persian text. The image acts as an analogue
through the unspoken words and quotes feminist poets and writers.

	
  

33	
  

Figure 3: Shirin Neshat, Untitled, 1996, black and white photography, Women of Allah series

The Women of Allah photographs depict the repressed status of Iranian women and theirpower. They also illustrate the conflict between the freedom of expression evident in theimage and the complex demand of the Islamic heritage on women. As shown in figure 3, it
illustrates an Iranian woman’s face while putting her hand on her lips as a symbol of silence
and noiselessness. Despite this, the woman in the image can tell her story by using calligraphy
on her hand with parts of a poem of Forough Farrokhzad (1935-1967) written on each one ofher fingers, and through the use of religious symbols at the center of her hand “The lifted
hand that points to the lips at once allows for the fingers to silence the lips while letting thelips kiss the fingers” (Dabashi 2002, 36). The translation of the Farrokhzad poem is:I pity the garden
No one thinks of flowers
No one think of fishes
No one wishes
To believe the garden’s dying
That the garden’s hearth is swollen in the sun (Farrokhzad 2007)

	
  

34	
  

Dabashi analyses Neshat’s artwork as:
The Glory of Shirin Neshat’s photography is in her uncanny ability to turnviolence into an energetic serenity, sadness into sensuality. The result is an
unsettling revelation about the seductive force of violence. In this respect, she is
the visual conscience and photographic memory of an entire generation of hopes
turned into fears, laughter turned into tears, joyous ephemerality of the bodyturned into the dead certainties of a culture (2002, 38).
When Neshat started this work the use of digital medium was limited, and instead of using
digital technology Shirin Neshat printed photos and used her hand writing to add thetranscripts.
In her interview with Shapiro, Neshat titled film and video as “Moving photographs”. She
identified that film gives more opportunities to artists to create an artwork that tells its concept
in more than a single image using a collection of images. Neshat states, “I became interested
in film more for its narrative and cinematic perspective…. Also, most importantly, therelationship between the viewers to film (particularly narrative film) is quite different fromthe viewers' relationship with photography. Photography becomes an object at the end, butfilm must be experienced—it is temporary. I'm very interested in that aspect”(2002).
In the late 1990’s, Neshat began to turn her attention and her aesthetic sensibility to film andvideo art, and her reputation was made in 1998 when her work titled Turbulent, figure 4, won
the international prize at the Venice Biennale. Turbulent is the first film of her series to focus
on gender issues in relation to the social structure of Islamic Iran. In Turbulent a man andwomen are seen on opposite sides of the screen, the man sings a song for an all-maleaudience, and when he finishes his song the woman performs a complex vocal piece for no
audience and sings no lyrics. Her voice and performance are more powerful than that of theman (MacDonald 2004, 621). The absence of women’s voice in relation to the performance ofmusic in the public space in Iran is the main premise of this video art. Neshat’s definition ofthis video art is that “conceptually and visually, Turbulent is conceived around the notion of
opposites, through such contrasts as black/white, male/female, empty/full theater,
stationary/rotating camera, traditional/nontraditional music, communal/solitary, andrational/irrational” (2002, 98). This video art formed a world full of contrasts, which is similar
to the contrast in Iranian women’s lives.

	
  

35	
  

Figure 4: Shirin Neshat, Turbulent, 1998, Video Art	  “Neshat constructs images of Iranian’s identity that challenge assumptions about the meaningand status of visual representation associated with Islamic world” (Reckitt 2001, 181). In her
work Rapture (1999) Neshat focused on the subject of gender in relation to the Islamic
culture, and in Soliloquy (1999) she represented the problematic nature of the identity in exile
facing two different cultures, West/East, Modern/Traditional, and individualistic/communal.

Figure 5: Shirin Neshat, Fervor, 2000, Video Art

Turbulent and Rapture address the male and female contrast in relation to Islamic social
structure, however Fervor (2000), figure 5, focuses on commonalties between genders andhow sexual taboos have been internalized by both genders, and conflicted by human nature
versus social, cultural and religious factors (Neshat, 2002, 134).

	
  

36	
  

Figure 6: Shirin Neshat, Pulse, 2001, Video Art.

In Pulse, figure 6, for the first time she leads the audience to the private space of a Muslim
woman. This video is shot in a single take and a minimalist approach. “As the camera moved
closer and closer, we touch the wom soulful longing and yearning and share in her solitude, aspiritual pining” (Neshat, 2002, 144).

Figure 7: Shirin Neshat, Logic of the Birds, 2001, Film

Logic of the Birds, figure 7, is a feminist interpretation of the story of Simorgh (Thirty Birds)
by Attar, which describes the Journey of the woman from nature to the position of leadership.

	
  

37	
  

Figure 8. Shirin Neshat, Women Without Men, 2009, Film

Neshat’s first feature film, Women Without Men, figure 8, is an adaptation of Shahrnush
Parsipour’s novel with the same name. The film is set in Iran during summer of 1953 when acoup replaced the democratically elected Prime Minister by the royal forces led by the Shahof Iran. Women Without Men tells the stories of four women struggling to escape oppressionin Tehran. Their lives mysteriously converge in the countryside, in a house with a big garden.
“They try to create their own independent society: a sort of a utopia, a paradise, removed fromthe outside world” (MacDonald 2004, 635). Women Without Men won her the Silver Lion forbest director at the 2010 Venice Film Festival.
The film seems to navigate somewhere between reality and magic. “All her work has one footin society, history and politics, but is also profoundly timeless, philosophical and universal in
expression” (Higgins 2013, 170).

Figure 9: Shirin Neshat, The Book of Kings, 2012, black and white photography series,(Higgins, Jo. 2013).

	
  

38	
  

The Book of Kings (figure 9) is a black and white photographic series-installation, inspired by
the Arab Spring in 2012. “The title is a translation of the ancient book Shahnameh, written by
the Persian poet Ferdowsi between c.977 and 1010. Ferdowsi’s epic poem focuses, says
Neshat, on tragedies, the themes of sacrifice and patriotism, yet also war, atrocity, and death. I
thought that, both conceptually and visually, these could be a powerful connection between
the contemporary faces of our courageous youth, an ancient mythological text, and illustrationof heroes” (Higgins 2013, 173).
Neshat identifies herself as an American-Iranian artist, who is neither an activist nor afeminist. She is a woman artist from Iran, living in the USA. “I am not an expert on Islam andI am not an ambassador of all Moslem (Muslim) women. I am an artist living in New York,and this is my point of view” (Neshat 2002, 53).
In her work Neshat wishes to create the dynamic between the masculine and feminine andtries to bring men and women together. “It is a reading of society, of the way it functions, how
it treats women differently than men, and therefore of the female as opposed to the maleposition in relation to the social order” (Neshat 2002, 45).
Neshat always focuses on the concept first, forms then follow the idea in her works, whether
photograph, video installation or film (Goldberg 2002, 68). She states that medium and formof the artwork is not important, she states that the most important thing for creating an
artwork is the idea. Based on the idea the artist will be using different medium and visual
effect to tell her story. According to Shapiro, Neshat clarified her artworks as:
I don't see my work as a product of special talent, but rather as a product of aperson with specific experiences and a certain point of view. Had I not gone
through the various personal chapters in my life, I would have never been able to
make the work that I have made. My art is my personal response to the worlds that
I have been exposed to (2002).
Neshat’s transition from photography to film and video happened by 1997, when she wastotally interested in the social and political realities of her home country. “I felt the urge tomove beyond the realm of politics and take a more philosophical approach. While thinking
about reformatting my concepts, I thought it was also necessary to change the medium that I
was working with” (MacDonald 2004, 630).
As an artist who lived and worked outside of Iran, Neshat believes that it is impossible for her
to work inside of Iran, because of two main reasons; first because of the controversial nature

	
  

39	
  

of her subjects and secondly because of her safety, and she hasn’t wanted to take the risk
(MacDonald 2004, 636).

	
  

40	
  

Shadi Ghadirian, Tehran
Shadi Ghadirian is one of Iran’s leading contemporary artists. She is a photographer who
continues to live and work in Iran. Born in 1974 in Tehran, she obtained her BA in
photography. She has managed the first Iranian website dedicated solely to photography.
Ghadirian has exhibited widely in Europe, the United States, Russia, Canada and the Middle
East (Porter 2006, 132).
Her artworks are closely linked to her identity as a Muslim women living in Iran.
Nonetheless, her art also deals with issues relevant to women living in other parts of theworld. She questions the role of the women in society and explores ideas of censorship,
religion, modernity, and the status of women. Ghadirian’s oeuvre is a spirited wink at
authority. With witty parodies of domesticity, she neatly sidesteps both restrictions andexpectations.
Her photographs are startling. “They transcend geographical boundaries to bring us into directcontact with another world” (Issa 2008).
She examines the paradoxical position of women in Iran. She is the perfect example of how
artists can have a social function and maintain the highest visual and technical aesthetics.
During her study she worked in the museum of photography in Tehran and printed the oldphotos. She was so inspired by the pictures of women from the 19th-century, which displayed
women with thick black eyebrows wearing headscarves and short skirts over baggy pants.
Two years later, in 2000, Ghadirian began incorporating the imagery into her own
photography, by dressing female friends with clothes from the late 1800s, and posing them infront of painted backdrops to look like the women in the antique photos. But her womenappeared with a touch of the contemporary: a newspaper, a tape recorder, a Pepsi can, or avacuum cleaner, figure 10. This series became known as the Qajar series and made her one of

	
  

41	
  

Iran's most famous female photographers. ''My pictures became a mirror reflecting how I felt:
we are stuck between tradition and modernity'' (Ghadirian quoted in Fathi 2007).
“For the project I had everything reconstructed, I had a friend who was a painter prepare thebackdrop, I borrowed the dresses... I also had models reenact the poses that you see in the
Qajar pictures, and I tried to reconstruct the stance the models would take” (Ghadirian quoted
in Porter 2006, 106).

Figure10: Shadi Ghadirian, Untitled, 2000, black and white photography, Qajar series, (Issa,
R. 2008)

As can be seen in figure10, in a deliberate juxtaposition of tradition with modernity, themodel is reading newspaper in the antique atmosphere. When no forbidden elements areshown, her women are completely veiled and covered, resembling beautiful inanimate
objects, while others look out with a serene forceful gaze, their veil lifted, a sign which in
Qajar times (from 1785 to 1925) signified protest (Issa, 2001, 26).

	
  

42	
  

Figure11: Shadi Ghadirian, Untitled, 2000, from Like Every Day series, C-print,
500x500mm, (Higgins. 2013).

In 2000 after her marriage she created the Like Every Day series, Figure11. She used
tablecloths and strips of material draped over women, represented chadors (hijab), placing ahousehold object where the face should be, thus raising issues about domestic drudgery andthe cruel anonymity of many Iranian women. In this photograph she has replaced the facewith a meat cleaver, playing on the common phrase a "hatchet-faced wife" (Lack 2009).
Ghadirian states that it is natural that after “my marriage vacuum cleaner and pots and pansfound their way into my photographs” (Ghadirian 2004, 4).
In this series Ghadirian explores how some Iranian women are defined by their domesticity,rather than offering a literal critique on the requirement to wear the veil (Higgins 2013). The
Ministry of Culture and Art of Iran complained about the series; this series presenting theveiled women as limited and restrained (Ghadirian 2012, 41).
Ghadirian always takes her photos inside a house and other domestic areas, stating that “myseries is exactly a mirror of my life and other women like me, my sister, my friends, thewomen who live in this country” (Ghadirian 2012, 41).
In 2009, Saatchi Gallery organized an exhibition called "Unveiled: New Art from the Middle
East and Iran" in London. Iranian Artists were the stars of the show. Ghadirian’s Like Every
Day were displayed in the exhibition:
There was none of the sentimentalism that is often found in Middle Eastern
paintings. Instead the works on show were in turn humorous and subversive,

	
  

43	
  

suggesting that life under the mullahs is far more complex than most people
imagine. Shadi Ghadirian's women may be shrouded, with a yellow rubber glove,
an iron, or a broom for a face, but there is something about the way the artist
portrays them that tells the viewer they are not drudges (A Whole New World
2009, 15).
In 2002 Ghadirian created her second series titled Be Colourful, a collection of photographs ofwomen obscured by layers of fabric, glass or paint, figure 12. In this series she explores thelimitation on freedom for women in Iran. “Moving beyond the glass ceiling faced by women
broadly, Ghadirian’s colourful chadors hint at the life lead behind closed doors and in theirown company, when not in the commonly accepted black chador of public life in Iranianculture” (Higgins 2013, 116).

Figure 12: Shadi Ghadirian, Untitled, 2002, from Be Colourful series, C-print, 600x900mm

West by East is a series of ten photographic portraits that depict women in Western clothes
who have been appropriated for the audience of East/Iran with an obfuscating scribble ofblack marker, figure 13. This type of imagery is well engrained in Iranian women’s memories,
due to the fact that in the first decade after the Islamic revolution most of the fashion
magazines were censored and edited in this style.

	
  

44	
  

Figure13: Shadi Ghadirian, #6, 2004, from West by East series, C-print, 600x900mm

As Higgins states: “Ghadirian’s use of the black marker to hide any exposed flash is aneffective comment on the censorship constantly faced by women in Iran. However the images
could also be read more generally as a comment on issues surrounding women’s bodies, andsociety’s unhealthy obsession with so-called perfection” (2013, 119).
Miss Butterfly is another series of 15 mysterious black and white photographs, illustrating awoman making spider webs of thread in various contemporary domestic environments,
figures 14 and 15. The series is based on an old Iranian folk tale about a butterfly: captured bya spider, it gains its freedom by offering to sacrifice itself for the other insects.
Miss Butterfly follows through with the themes of isolation and strength that Ghadirian
established in her previous artworks. In this series the spider web is always placed on the lightsource. While a spider web can protect the woman, it can also build barriers for her life.
In Miss Butterfly #9, figure14, a lone woman is pictured in a living room, which is decorated,by wooden furniture, large windows, and figurines adorning the tables. Even though thewoman seems to be of an upper class household, her isolation is felt through the darkness andemptiness of the room. “There is no sense of warmth from a human connection in thephotograph, showcasing a separation between the woman and her surroundings. It is evident
that she is yearning for freedom and yet she is tangled up in the web” (Rieza 2012).

	
  

45	
  

Figure 14: Shadi Ghadirian, #9, 2011, from Miss Butterfly series, Digital print, 630x420 mm

Figure 15: Shadi Ghadirian, #15, 2011, from Miss Butterfly series, Digital print,
700x1000mm

As Heartney argues, “in Ghadirian's hands, the web becomes a metaphor for conditions thatboth restrict and structure women's lives. Rather than attempting to escape, her head- scarfwearing protagonist seems to be willingly weaving her own gossamer prison” (Heartney
2013, 78).
Ghadirian’s artworks symbolize the central dilemma facing Iranian women today: whether toconform to tradition or undertake modernization despite a difficult environment.
Issa defend her artworks as “Ghadirian’s dry humor illustrates the paradoxes faced by Iranian
women of her generation, and the contradictions of a society torn between tradition and

	
  

46	
  

modernity. The defiance of the women in the photographs seems real and forceful, eventhough it takes place within a studio or behind closed doors” (2001, 26).
Ghadirian’s artworks address the issues faced not only by Iranian women but also by all
women around the world, issues like religious restrictions, censorship, domestic violence, andthe relationship of the individual to the state, etc. Ghadirian explains her artworks as:
Now I know what I wish to say with my photographs. Many of them have shown
women as second-class citizen or the censorship of women. I wish to continue
speaking about women because I still have a lot to say. These are my words as awoman and the words of all the other women who live in Iran, where being awoman imposes its own unique system. The photographs are not authentic
documentation. I take them in my studio, but they deal with current social issues
all the same (2004, 4).
One of the main characters of Ghadirian artworks is the connection between all her series.
The photos of each series tell a story that is linked to the other series and together they make it
impossible to concentrate on just one part of the series. To create each series, Ghadirian isdeliberately composing these photographs with certain thematic elements as a means oftransferring her ideas to the audience. Her artworks always are fluid and show that they havebeen taken at the same moment and in the same atmosphere. In addition, Ghadirian insists toconnect the pictures in each series by their name. Instead of giving the photographs their own
unique titles, she numbers the photographs in each series.
“She most commonly covers themes in relation to women and violence that stems from herlife experiences. Ghadirian attempts to break down the stereotypes regarding women,
especially Iranian women and questions the state of women in Iran and also the effect of war”
(Rieza 2012).
Ghadirian tries to portray all aspects of Iranian women. The reality of Iranian women is not
only a black chador. The reality is an active woman who challenges the cultural and politicalsituation in Iran, who hopes to change it and to achieve a better life.

	
  

47	
  

Samira Eskandarfar, Tehran
Samira Eskandarfar was born in Tehran in 1980 and continues to work in Iran. She is a childof the Islamic revolution. Samira Eskandarfar is a rare example of a painter and also a
filmmaker who has emphasized her artistic approach in bringing two forms of art together.
Eskandarfar studied engineering at university, but she never worked in this field. Eskandarfar
participated in several courses, including creative writing, photography, painting, and cinema(Personal interview, July 26, 2012). She started painting in 1998 and since 2003 she has held
seventeen solo exhibitions. Eskandarfar has made sixteen videos and short-films since 2003
and has participated in over one hundred group exhibitions and screenings worldwide(Eskandarfar website).
Her artworks have been more focused on human relations and humans’ inner worlds.
According to Ettehad, the most important point of her artworks is the questions of death,birth, and her individual identity as a woman (2010).
Eskandarfar is one of the artists who agreed to participate in the interview for this study.
Eskandarfar states that: “in the first stage I wanted to be a film maker but all of my works
were based on my personal life and I did not follow any standard film’s criteria. Because ofthat reasons everyone found my works as an experimental practice. As a result I became avideo artist; now I am satisfied about it, the process of showing a video artwork is more safeand easier for the artist in Iran” (Personal interview, July 26, 2012).

	
  

48	
  

Amongst all her videos, just two of them are filmed with the hijab. Monologue Under WhiteLight, Figure 16, is one of them, which was played at the Cannes Film Festival. The other one
has not yet had the opportunity to be displayed in public. After this experience she decided tomake videos for herself based on her personal values (Personal interview, July 26, 2012).

Figure16: Samira Eskandarfar, Monologue Under White, 2005, video

In one of her videos, Rugs and Men (2006), Eskandarfar used a collection of old photos.
While the photos are displaying, suddenly the main characters disappear leaving nothing but ablank carpet. This makes the audience think about its identity, figure 17.

Figures 17: Samira Eskandarfar, Rugs and Men, 2006, video

In 2009 Eskandarfar made another video, The Olive, which symbolises peace and friendshipin all cultures, figure18.

	
  

49	
  

Figure 18: Samira Eskandarfar, The Olive, 2009, video

In the video the childhood dreams of the woman pictured mixes up with concepts like birth,
femininity and creation. The woman has grown up but still explores her childhood dreams andbeliefs and questions femininity, time and choice in one woman's existence. A man talks
about maternity, femininity and giving birth, some topics that he can never have personal
experience of. Similar to the rest of her artworks, the Olive is based on her personal journey.

Figure 19: Samira Eskandarfar, Root Canal, 2013, film

	
  

50	
  

Eskandarfar made her first experimental film, Root Canal in 2013. Root Canal, figure 19, has
focused on the inner life of three women. She has depicted their relationships in an abstract
world. Questions of the rules and regulations that femininity has imposed on them set forth all
the paradoxes that the inner and outer lives have created inside them. It is the expression of
the equality of women, from what they want for themselves and what others want from them.
Eskandarfar prefers for her work to be the central focus of the project rather than her cultural
identity; the fact that she is an Iranian female artist. She prefers that her work can be seen
beyond the political, geographical, and gender specific point of view in a more open way(Eskandarfar 2012).
For an artist from a visual background, one of the advantages of using the video and digital
medium is sound. Sound and voice can give more opportunity to the artwork to makeconnection with the audience (Personal interview, July 26, 2012).
Eskandarfar explained more about her artwork in the interview:
My artwork is based on my character and personal journey and the society that I
am living in. There are many things that influence an artist on their way but thenthere is the issue of choice. I removed nondomestic living from my life. Do not
get me wrong, I am having my social life, I am going out with my friends, but as awoman I am not feeling safe to walk outside of my house by myself.
Consequently you can see most of my artworks are in the domestic space(Personal interview, July 26, 2012).
For an artist living inside of Iran, there are some barriers to displaying their artworks,
Eskandarfar states: “when you are working and are engaged with a concept or topic you canwork freely. But when it comes to showing your work, then you can choose what to show andwhat not to show. You can choose what is appropriate to be shown and to which audience.
Every context has its own specifications and circumstances that have to be realized”(Eskandarfar 2012).

	
  

51	
  

Parastou Forouhar, Frankfurt
Parastou Forouhar was born in 1962 in Tehran, and she has lived and worked in Germany
since 1991. Her artworks have been exhibited widely around the world.
She grew up with politically active parents. Forouhar’s parents, respected intellectuals whofought for democracy in Iran, were savagely murdered in their home on November 21st, 1998.
These murders were revealed to be part of a series of killings intended to wipe out any
opposition to the Islamic Republic. She was exiled from her home country after her parents
were murdered. She became politically charged when the family was prevented from publicly
commemorating the death of their parents. Forouhar’s art reflects her criticism of the Iranian
government and often plays with the ideas of identity. The loss of her parents fuels Forouhar’s
work and challenges viewers to take a stand on war crimes against innocent citizens (Lauren2014).
She has said that when she arrived in the west, she was Parastou Forouhar, but
she soon became simply ‘Iranian.’ Her work explores interculturalcommunication, the production of identity and reality, and the repressive
mechanisms that often influence or inhibit that production.
Forouhar has persistently campaigned for a proper investigation into the extra-judicial
executions of her parents and other activists murdered in Tehran during the autumn of 1998.
Her commitment to justice and her incredible strength of character are perhaps the foundation
for the power emanating from her work. However, the constant tension between beauty andbrutality is not only personal, or even Iranian, but also universally human (Parastou Forouhar2012).
Blind Spot, Figures 20 and 21, is a series of photographs depicting a gender- ambiguous
human figure veiled from head to toe, its protruding head a whited-out or bulbous wooden
form beneath a chador. The figure in the chador is a man. He has no face. “Instead, the viewer

	
  

52	
  

is confronted with the back of a shaven head, a smooth, skin-coloured protuberance that has
no identity. Only a band of grey stubble betrays the gender of this human figure that has been
reduced to mere form” (Kiehl 2014).

Figures 20: Parastou Forouhar, Blind Spot, 2001, series of photographs
Figures 21: Parastou Forouhar, Blind Spot, 2001, series of photographs

In 2002, a few days before the opening of exhibition of photographs Blind Spot in Tehran, theIranian Cultural Ministry censored her work. In protest against the censorship, the artist
exhibited the empty frames on the wall on the opening night. To her delight, many peoplecame in support, and some even purchased the frames.
In 2004, she created another series of photography called Swanrider, figure 22. A woman
dressed in a black chador, is riding along a river on a huge white swan. The contrast between
black and white directs the vision; “this black-and-white imagery refers to the way fairytales
are structured by such opposites as good and evil, fortune and misfortune, the beautiful andthe ugly. There are also echoes of Hans Christian Andersen’s tale of the ugly duckling that
becomes a beautiful swan. Such references to miraculous transformations are an ironic takeon the role of the woman in the dark chador” (Karetzos 2014).

	
  

53	
  

Figure 22: Parastou Forouhar, Swanrider, 2004, series of photographs	  In the same year Forouhar created a series of digital drawing called Signs. The pictogramsigns cross any language barrier due to their simple designs. In this work she used the uniform
appearance to deliver a very different message to the world. This series depict faceless fullbody covered women, figure 23. “The fact that women are wearing the chador creates a directreference to the female population in the Middle East. The veiled women are squeezed into
smaller shapes and spaces of the signs compared to the ample room the male figures receive.
This is Forouhar’s direct critique of the marginalization of women in the Middle East”(Lauren 2014). This is a perfect example of using a digital medium to respond to culturalissues.

Figure 23: Parastou Forouhar, Signs, 2004, series of digital drawing

	
  

54	
  

During 2008 to 2010 Forouhar created a series of digital drawings called The Colour Is My
Name. She has come to distrust the pattern as a harmonizing system and sees in it instead a
metaphor for anti-individualistic tendencies. In 2008, Forouhar presented the first series ofthese collections; RED is my Name GREEN is my Name I. The next one was called RED is my
Name GREEN is my Name II. Then in 2010 she created BLACK is my Name White is myName. Forouhar intelligently used all the colours in the Iranian flag.
At first glance, the audiences see beautiful, colourful patterns and think that they get themessage from the artist. When they watch it close they will find more; the figures are
suffering from torture, violence, sexual abuse, or inequality, Figures 24, 25, and 26.

Figure 24: Parastou Forouhar, Red 3, 2008, Red is my Name, Green is my Name I, series ofdigital drawings

Figure 25: Parastou Forouhar, Green2, 2009, Red is my Name, Green is my Name II, seriesof digital drawings.

	
  

55	
  

Figure 26: Parastou Forouhar, Revolvers, 2010, BLACK is my Name, WHITE is my Name,
series of digital drawings.

In 2010, Forouhar presented a collection of digital prints called Papillon. “Forouhar uses
images of nude female figures that are bounded and gagged. The figures are repeated in sucha design to imitate a pattern found on wallpaper. The designs are then situated in strategic
ways to form the wings of butterflies. Forouhar’s mother’s first name in Farsi was Parveneh,
which means butterfly” (Lauren 2014). In addition she named every single artwork by the
major events about Iranian Green Movement, Figure 27. The Iranian Green Movement refers
to a political and social movement that arose after the 2009 Iranian presidential election in
Iran.

Figure 27: Parastou Forouhar, Ashura Day, 2010, Papillon collection, series of digital prints

	
  

56	
  

Nikoo Tarkhani, Tehran
Nikoo Tarkhani was born in 1981 in Tehran. She graduated from medical school but her
enthusiasm and passion was always about art. Since 2001 she started her professional creative
practice by participating in numerous art exhibitions in Iran, Sweden, the United Kingdom,
Mexico, Brazil and elsewhere. She works with different materials such as painting,photography, installation, video arts, video performance, and filmmaking.
Tarkhani states that: “I am not talking about Islam or any other religion, I am only talking
about social conditions which I have experienced up close. I think of this nudity as a feminist
cry of Iranian art; it is a way of expressing freedom from traditions and rules that kept us
women indoors” (Tarkhani Quoted in Pollack 2010).
Tarkhani was one of the artists who participated in the interviews for this study and I was
privileged to be able to interview her. She recognized herself as a feminist artist, “We shall beequal in rights and freedom but that doesn’t mean that we should be caricatures of men:imitating them or even looking like them (Personal interview, July 26, 2012)!
Tarkhani is one of the Iranian female artists presenting self-portraits, as Alimi states:
Among the young Iranian female artists, she presents a rather different body ofwork because she brings a handful of regional concerns into a personal debate.
Her obsession with herself in her work allows the title auto-portraitist to sit at the
top of the mighty gates of her identity. Her work encompasses various feminist
related topics and their interaction with the foundations of Middle Eastern
traditional interpretations of a feminine life style. She challenges gender both as agiven title and as a condition employed by one’s self as a differentiator of an
identity (2013, 166).

	
  

57	
  

In 2011, she presented a series of photography called Me-ror, figures 28 and 29. In this series
Tarkhani transferred her self-portrait into old photos which she had found in her mother’scommode when she was eight years old. In this series she challenged identity in a historicaland cultural context.

Figure 28: Nikoo Tarkhani, Me-ror, 2011, digital photography

Figure 29: Nikoo Tarkhani, Me-ror, 2011, digital photography“Me-ror is a synthetized word combined of two different words Me and Mirror. For me it wasa mirror that couldn’t reflect anything that stands in front of; it only reflects me: Nikoo”(Personal interview, July 26, 2012).
The statement of this series is based on the fact that I cried the first time I encountered thepicture of my grandmother. Although I never had the chance of meeting her in person, she

	
  

58	
  

was not a stranger to me. I could see a bit of myself in that old picture and that was whatmade me cry. Those people, my close relatives, were my mirrors (Personal interview, July 26,2012).
The Scarlet Letter, 2012, is a graphic video performance piece, Figure 30. Tarkhani tried tomake emotional pain physical and also addresses the limitations of the women’s right inIslamic society. She illustrated the stereotypes society can place on Muslim women. In thisvideo she stitched the word “I” in Farsi on her hand. The interpretation of The Scarlet Letteris widely diverse among audiences.

Figure 30: Nikko Tarkhani, Scarlet Letter, 2012, a video-performance, 14 minutes, Courtesyof Anahita Art Studio

Alimi analyzed Scarlet Letter thus: “With her reference to Hawthorne’s romantic novel The
Scarlet Letter, Tarkhani challenges the symbolic realm of public ethics as a female subject
encounters it in Iran. In The Scarlet Letter she revisits her earlier reading of the father and sets
her keen eyes to show how the father historically governed the feminine agenda. Slowly she
begins her imagery by narrating a disintegrated subject torn into incapable chunks of humanneurosis between what she is and what he desires of her ‘I’ ” (2013, 168).
In 2012, Tarkhani created her next series of photography Waiting For A Miracle, which isanother personal series based on staged photography, figure 31.

	
  

59	
  

Figure 31: Nikoo Tarkhani, Waiting For A Miracle, 2014, digital photography

Most of the photos were taken in the old house where she grew up. She placed herself as adoll in the old storeroom. The conflict between the woman in modern clothes and the oldstorage area reminds us of the contemporary situation faced by Iranian women. “It is about
me fighting with bad genes, the genes that made me lost in the black hole of depression,
losing hope and only waiting for a miracle to save me (Personal interview, July 26, 2012).
One of the most important problems for a digital artist who lives in Iran seems to be access tovarious reproductions. Still there are so many galleries, collectors, and dealers who think
digital artworks are not valuable enough to be actively presented in Tehran’s art scene. The
fact is that they think digital artwork cannot be unique; it can be reproduced many times.
There is the same problem with photography. With the exception of some pioneers in thisfield, most artworks in the fields of photography and digital media are not very well presented
in Tehran (Personal interview, July 26, 2012), regardless of the gender of the artists.
“For being accepted in the society sometimes you have to wear a mask; and sometimes thismask becomes a costume that you have to put on for a lifetime. Then where is the reality ofyourself (Tarkhani 2013) Tarkhani describes her life as a female artist in Iran as:“I believe that we all are marked with certain things. No matter where we live or
where we die there is no escape from our nationalities. Not that is something bador good, just it is what it is; we cannot pretend to be someone else. My life

	
  

60	
  

experience in Iran as an Iranian woman is something that an English woman could
not wholly understand: nor I could hers” (Tarkhani 2014).
Similar to the other artists in the Middle East, “she portrays the feminine as a repressedsubject, but she also claims that the repressors and the structure in which the repressions areapplied are crucial factors when defining a Middle Eastern female subject. This way theseemingly interminable issue of feminine subjectivity in the Middle East steps in a new
direction. Using this approach she not only concludes the feminist story in a different way but
she also provides a fine illustration of the establishment moment of a patriarchy and theinitiation of a feminine subject to the cult of the father” (Alimi 2013, 167).

	
  

61	
  

Implication for my practice
The findings from the analysis of interviews and case studies conclude that all artists
participating in this work have chosen this path to contribute to a broader sense of self andcommunity by:•

Intention to participate in social change through their artistic practice and resulting
works; and•Unintentional influence on social change through their works and reaching out to alarger audience internally and externally to Iran.

All Iranian women engaged in the public display of artistic images are participating in
discoveries around social change with various levels of intention. In the first case of
intentional participation, it is clear that this is more likely to be the intention of the practice of
the artists outside Iran. According to Shapiro, Neshat explained the role of the artist at the turnof the century as:
Art will become more and more global and interdisciplinary. I think for too longart has been too isolated and exclusive. Now, with the breaking down ofboundaries between media, artists are having the advantage of experimenting andapproaching the popular culture, and consequently, a larger public. I see a futurethat is far more integral between art and social and cultural realities of the world(2002).
The analysis of the interviews and case studies had an obvious impact on the practicecomponent of this research as well. Among all the case studies Nikoo Tarkhani and Samira
Eskandarfar participated in the interviews. As I mentioned before, I was privileged to be able
to interview two Iranian female artists who are living in Iran, as this study provided an
opportunity for them to have a voice to tell their story. It is not easy to be a contemporary
artist in Iran, and it is much more difficult if you are a woman artist. Many Iranian female
artists are not inclined to leave their home. Some artists, moreover, intimidate me more thanthey influence me. I am impressed with their artworks, avant-garde styles, and expressions intheir art, which encourage me to focus more on Iranian women and represent their story
through my own work.

	
  

62	
  

Chapter Five: My Practice
Creative Themes
In this chapter I will focus on the creative practice produced during my Master of Arts
research project. These final works are the result of a number of design choices andinterviews, the research outcomes, and their impact on my practice. I have used photography
to tell stories about Iranian women. “Reality existed within a split mind-body world of
objective and subjective states, of idea and image, of theory and practice” (Sullivan 2005, 6).
In this creative practice I used three different elements to present the artworks: Calligraphy,
Poem, and Mirror.
These three elements and their functions in Iranian art and culture will be explained in thischapter.
Calligraphy or using script in artworks is one of the fundamental aspects of contemporary
Middle Eastern art. The use of script in modern art in Iran was a response to the increasingly
ferocious criticism of the abstract tendency among Western-trained artists. “Saqqakhaneh”,
water fountain, was the result and is the term coined for the artistic movement that began in
Iran in the 1960s. Saqqakhaneh is a popular symbol of Shia culture in art and also it was the
new style of using calligraphy and script in visual art (Porter 2006, 19).
Poetry is pervasive in Iran. The concept of and the use of poetry in Iran are so different
compared to the Western world. “In Persian culture, the use of metaphoric poetic language isthe only way of expression for most of us who are not permitted to speak freely. Poetry
becomes a political statement, and the public becomes accustomed to reading between thelines” (Neshat quoted in MacDonald 2004, 656).
Forough Farrokhzad (1935-1967) is one of the contemporary Iranian poets who inspired
Iranian women and artists across a broad range of media. “Her four volumes of poetry, The
Captive (1955), The Wall (1956), Rebellion (1958), and Reborn (1964), and the posthumouscollection Let us believe in the beginning of the cold season (1974) sit squarely on every
vexed intersection in modern Iranian history: individualism and tradition, sexuality andreligion, nationalism and modernity” (Darznik 2010, 106). In my view, feminism andmodesty can be added to that list. Forough is not the first famous Iranian woman poet but sheis the first one who talks about femininity, sexuality, and equality openly.
Forough Farrokhzad’s poems have become a vital symbol for a number of contemporary
Iranian women artists who are working around edges of gender issues, faith, social justice,
	
  

63	
  

and human rights across historical and cultural boundaries (Darznik 2010, 104), Shirin Neshat
is one of those artists. Some of her poems are included in my practice too. Shirin Neshat
believes that a poem can be a final seal and the voice of the photograph, breaking the silenceof the women in the portraits. Neshat states that “poets use metaphors and symbolism toconstruct images” and to give them voice (Neshat quoted in Goldberg 2002, 67).
The concept of mirror and its reflection is central to my practice. I have used this concept to
express who I am and how I see my artistic profession. I come from a Persian background andin Persian culture the mirror is a symbol of honesty, clarity and light. The mirror is used inmany significant cultural events. For example, in preparation for Persian New Year (Nowruz),
based on the Zoroastrian calendar, a table with some specific items is set and a mirror is thefirst item to be put on this table. Another example is when moving to a new house the firstthing to be taken inside the new premises is a mirror. This is to bring guidance and light to thesacred place of home. At wedding ceremonies the bride and groom sit in front of a mirror
while the marriage ceremony is conducted, as a sign of having a bright future and an honest
marriage. This is for the couple to see their reflection together until infinity and for theirmarriage to be as honest and truthful as a mirror. In all these examples, the mirror is used as asymbol of light and brightness. It is hoped that the mirror will multiply positive energy.
People see themselves in the mirror and they see others around them. My artwork is the resultof subsequent choices in context, portrait, mirror, and poem, based on my life as an Iranian
woman.

Creative Process
The final practice is a series of portrait photography of Iranian women. I took portraits ofwomen, a friend or a relative who I find significant to interact with, and I have integrated thatimage with their story to express my views and journey through this research project. As
Edward Hopper explains, “why I select certain subjects rather than others, I do not exactly
know, unless it is that I believe them to be the best mediums for a synthesis of my innerexperience” (quoted in Renner 2002, 10).
Each portrait presents the unique character and identity of an Iranian woman. All artworks arepresented in different frames, using different typography and styles to showcase theindividuality of each one of the participants. I used simple and minimal arrangement to takethe photos. In the first stage I decided to take photos of Iranian women in different social
roles, in their real work place. As I mentioned before, taking photos in some public places in
Iran requires permission from the government. To avoid any complications and eliminate the
	
  

64	
  

risks I made the decision to take photos in a studio. I arranged with women who wereparticipating in this research to attend the photographic sessions at a personal studio in Iran.
As I mentioned earlier for the purpose of consistency in practice methods I also used thephotographic studio at QUT to stage photo shoots of Iranian women who were participating inthis research here in Australia.
I have used the mirror as an analogy to communicate how I see my role as an artist. I see myart as part of me. My expression of art is a reflection of me, in that audiences exist in my art
and we all are surrounded by our environment. The audiences are part of my artwork and they
can influence and change my dynamic. I believe that all of us are a part of a union and we arefrom a similar cradle. In artworks produced through this work they are reading her story (thewoman participating in this project); they are reading it from her face. She is being seen
through their eyes. They are watching her expressing herself, she sees them being them.
The artwork is a dialogue, which does not entail a one-way movement but a two-way
dynamic. I think that the creative art can provide a space, a platform for raising concerns
about different aspects of life in a way that is not confronting to others, but engaging thoseaffected in questioning and challenging the situation. This is more effective in a social setting
where democracy is invisible and challenged.

Creative works
In this section I will provide an overview of the creative works and the Iranian women who
participated in the photo shoots.
LADAN: Ladan is a painter and a theater performer working and living in Tehran.
Ladan is portrayed in two pieces of artworks that present two different characters ofan Iranian woman, one in the public (figure 32 and figure 33), and the other in theprivate context (figure 34 and figure35). She described herself through the poem by
Forough Farrokhzad, an Iranian feminist poet. The same poem is used in both of theartworks, one in Farsi and the other one translated into English.
HANA: Hana is a jewelry designer working and living in Tehran. Hana asked me to choose atext for her image. Based on her personality and her artworks I chose the poem from Erfan
Daliri, an Iranian poet living in Australia (figure 37 and figure38).

	
  

65	
  

TUBA: Tuba was forced to leave her home country and come to Australia. Tuba
described her life in Australia as a new page in her life (figures 39 and 40).
MOTAHAREH: Motahareh is doing her PhD in science, studying and living in Queensland.
Motahareh wrote the poem that reflects and describes her life journey (figures 41 and 42).
ROSHANAK: Roshanak is an IT engineer who lives in Brisbane, she did not give me any
script and I chose a poem from Erfan Daliri, based on the photo and her personality (figures
43 and 44).
MANDANA: When I took the photo of Mandana she was pregnant with her first child. She
gave me the poem from Forough Farrokhzad as well. Many Iranian women find themselves in
Forough’s poems (Figures 45 and 46).
NASRIN: Nasrin is a nurse who left her country and came to Australia to start a new life withher family. She gave me some sentences based on a poem from Forough Farrokhzad (figures
47 and 48).
ADELEH: Adeleh is an artist and lives in Italy. She chose a piece of poem from ForoughFarrokhzad too (Figure 49 and 50).
FOROUGH: Forough is an accountant who works and lives in Tehran. She gave me a quotefrom Anna Deavere Smith, an American actress, playwright, and professor (figures 51 and52).
In presenting this work I invite every viewer to see him or herself in the individual artwork,and allow him or herself to feel what they feel by reading the story, the poem and thereflection of the women’s journeys in the artworks.
The audience may be able to find one piece of this work that is so close to their own feeling.
They are watching the artworks and seeing a reflection of themselves. They are not justreading the other person’s story; they are creating their own story.

	
  

66	
  

Figure 32: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Ladan, 2012, digital print, 45 x 30cm (photographed by
Muhammad Raza)

Figure 33: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Ladan, 2012, digital photography, 45 x 30cm

	
  

67	
  

Figure 34: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Ladan, 2012, digital print, 45 x 30cm (photographed by
Muhammad Raza)

Figure 35: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Ladan, 2012, digital photography, 45 x 30cm

	
  

68	
  

Figure 36: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Ladan, 2012, digital photography and print, QUT Block, 2012

	
  

69	
  

Figure 37: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Hana, 2012, digital print, 48 x 26cm (photographed by
Muhammad Raza)

	
  
	
  

Figure 38: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Hana, 2012, digital photography, 48 x 26cm

	
  

70	
  

Figure 39: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Tuba, 2013, digital print, 35 x 28cm (photographed by
Muhammad Raza)	
  Figure 40: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Tuba, 2013, digital photography, 35 x 28cm

	
  

71	
  

Figure 41: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Motahareh, 2013, digital print, 46 x 36cm (Photographed by
Muhammad Raza)

Figure 42: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Motahareh, 2013, digital photography 46 x 36cm

	
  

72	
  

Figure 43: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Roshanak, 2013, digital print, 46 x 36cm (Photographed by
Muhammad Raza)

Figure 44: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Roshanak, 2013, digital photography, 46 x 36cm

	
  

73	
  

Figure 45: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Mandana, 2013, digital print, 33 x 25cm (Photographed by
Muhammad Raza)

Figure 46: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Mandana, 2013, digital photography, 33 x 25cm

	
  

74	
  

Figure 47: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Nasrin, 2013, digital print, 25 x 33cm (Photographed by
Muhammad Raza)	
  Figure 48: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Nasrin, 2013, digital photography, 25 x 33cm

	
  

75	
  

	
  
	
  

Figure 49: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Adeleh, 2012, digital print, 20 x 25cm (Photographed by
Muhammad Raza)

Figure 50: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Adeleh, 2012, digital print, 20 x 25cm

	
  
	
  

76	
  

	
  

Figure 51: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Forough, 2012, digital photography, 30 x 30cm (Photographedby Muhammad Raza)

	
  
	
  

	
  

Figure 52: Mozhdeh Khakbaz, Forough, 2012, digital print, 30 x 30cm

	
  
	
  
	
  

77	
  

Chapter Six: Conclusion and reflection	  This thesis had intended to explore the role of women artists in contemporary Iran in shaping
the women’s social movement and influencing the public and private sphere. It is important tonote that the author’s personal reflection, views and artistic expression have played a key rolein shaping the structure and the content of this paper.
As described in earlier chapters, this thesis is a practice-led action research combined of casestudies, creative practice and exegetical elements. Therefore, the paper explores theintersections between theoretical areas of feminism, cross-cultural practice and digital art andtheir impacts on how Iranian women artists, in particular those portrayed in this paper,
express their worldviews. In addition, my own personal worldviews and artistic perception
have played a key role in shaping the content of this thesis. I as an Iranian woman, as an artist,and as a woman committed to social change and the women’s rights movement have been
involved with this project as an observer of the research, as a researcher, and as a participant.
As an artist I believe digital art plays a major role in forming social norms and it can play a
key role in raising awareness of the challenges faced by women in any part of the world. My
life experience as an Iranian woman has shaped how I see the world and how I relate to theexpressive subjects around me. My educational background and my degree in fine art hasgiven me the privilege of being familiar with the work of women artists being actively
involved in shaping social context. In addition, my involvement with different art mediums
has provided me with an appreciation of how artistic expression influences the observer’s
perspective.
My life experience of living in Iran for most of my life and then migrating to Australia hasenabled me to understand the life of Iranian women through lived experience as well as
understanding how Iranian women are seen by the Western world. Through this thesis I have
tried to bring this knowledge to forefront of my work. I have attempted to utilise my practiceas an artist as a tool to study the role of these contemporary female artists. This has enabled
me to gain insight into two key areas of how these women artists see their practice and its rolein the current social, political and religious context of Iran. I have also have intended tooutline how their work influences change in this social context.
From a technical framework this paper has explored how digital art is used for social goodand for the promotion of social change. The exploration of the work of the Iranian female
artists outlines how digital art can influence the existing political and social discourse and

	
  

78	
  

provide a platform to discuss the social struggle for Iranian women and to contribute tomobilized activism for the women's rights movement. The voice of marginalized groups andindividuals is embedded in artistic perspectives explicitly described using digital mediums.
Similar to what Paul describes as “the term ‘digital art’ has itself become an umbrella for sucha broad range of artistic works and practices that it does not describe one unified set ofaesthetics” (2008, 7). The term of digital art in this project includes the visual arts, which areproduced by making use of digital technology as a tool to create the artworks, such as
photography, video art and mixed media. I had intended to challenge the stereotypes of
Iranian women but also give a voice to Iranian women artists in telling their stories.
In my exploration of the work of other artists I have found that in response to the current
political environment in Iran any action artists take is a response to a social context. This iswell described in the work of Mahdi; “in response to the government’s rules for hiding their
physical and social identities, secular women have creatively devised strategies for peeling off
the layers of physical and ideological covers imposed on them. As one Iranian woman has
observed, lipstick is not just lipstick in Iran. It transmits a political message. It is a weapon”(Mahdi 2004, 443).
In completion of this work I have concluded five case studies representing contemporary
Iranian female artists. In the process of collecting data I faced some challenges and gained
deeper knowledge of the work of these artists who have influenced my work and learningsince the beginning of this journey. To be authentic to each one of these artists’ points of viewand to the impact of their works on the life of Iranian women, I needed to ensure themethodologies I engaged responded to the diversity of their practices. In addition, recognizing
the limitation imposed on these artists by the social and political environment required agreater level of creativity to discuss and gain information on the role, impact and values ofeach individual involved with this project. In the process I became more aware of how eachartist engages with its subjects and influences their views. Meanwhile the artist is also
impacted through the process and influenced by how the observer engages with their work.
It became clear to me that through the use of digital medium we have the opportunity toreflect on each other, on our lives, on our expressions and on our creative works. These
reflections influence us. We make adjustments, changes and improvements. From my point ofview, I as an artist present my work to an observer. Both the observer and I are members of asociety. This society influences our views and our expressions, how we see things and how
we relate to matters. In my opinion, art is a dialogical conversation not a monologue. I express

	
  

79	
  

my views and vision with my artworks but the interpretations are so diverse amongst
observers. Diversity becomes part of my work.
One of the challenges I experienced in completing this work was capturing the images of thewomen presented in Chapter five of this paper. I took some of the photos in Iran and some ina professional setting in Australia. As I completed the reflective artworks I realized there wasa difference between the quality of the images captured in a professional studio environment
and the images taken in a casual setting. The result was reflected in the quality of the final
work. My learning from this work is to ensure the data collection variables are controlled inall settings and the quality of the final work is comparable.
Through this practice-led Action Research I have become more aware and informed of the
Iranian feminist movement and as a result my personal and professional views have seen agreat level of change and growth in the past two years. As Jones argues:
In the research for personal identity, it soon becomes clear that the mirror of theoutside world plays a crucial role in the manner in which one sees him/herself
reflected by others. Certain questions pose themselves in this tense process: Does
that mirror image a perfect metaphor for art flash back a recognized semblance orrather some skewed, partially coherent, stereotypical mask? Is this resulting image
a construction of the viewed him/ herself or of the viewer? What states ofrecognition has each deployed in their own interrogation of identity (1991, 16)?
The precious art, music, literature and poetry in Iran lead people to the road of Sufism andcalmness. However injustices, inequalities and power struggles motivate us to defend andfight for our rights. In this journey, as expressed in the case of Forouhar, the movement canlead to exclusion and exile but at the same time they create an avenue for expression ofthoughts and meanings and shape alliances and support.
For me the cultural, social, and political impacts of Iran, the country I was born and grew up
in, have collided with the Australian influence, the country where I am living now. These
clashes have provided an opportunity for me, as an artist, to challenge the Iranian women’ssituation and present their struggle and their journeys in a creative way.
This study, in its direct engagement with the artists and the role of digital art, has provided an
overview of how women and their gender shape digital art to simulate an alternate reality andhow they use the digital art to express this reality to a broader audience.
From my perspective, the lives of Iranian women are broadly influenced in this era oftechnology and digital media. Their art provides an expressive avenue to showcase theirrealities to a broader audience nationally and internationally. The digital art in its fluid, mass
	
  

80	
  

production and mass engagement enables a broader audience to question and critique thecurrent status of women and to engage women in a movement that demands change andequality.
This work has provided me with a great foundation for future work. In reflection and reviewof the learning through this work I feel there is room for greater collaborative work with thefemale artists presented in this paper and other emerging artists. I also feel there is an
opportunity for further work exploring feminism and its impact on the Eastern culturallandscape. The increasing access to expressive art and the ongoing advancement intechnology and digital mediums in arts provides a space to further observe. I as an artist hope
to be able to utilize this space and work with like-minded female artists who are interested increating works that will positively impact on social change and the advancement of women’s
rights and the capturing of women' voices.

	
  

	
  
	
  

	
  

81	
  

References:“A whole new world”. 2009. The Economist 393(8659): 15. Accessed October 30, 2013.
http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au//docview/223979897
Ahmadi, Fereshteh. “Islamic feminism in Iran: Feminism in a New Islamic Context”.
Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 22(2): 33-53. Accessed June 10, 2012.
http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/195310060
Alimi, Kiarash. 2013. “Nikoo Tarkhani”. Contemporary Practices 12: 166- 171.
Ardalan, Parvin. 2008. “Women's movement in Iran "powerful and unstoppable" –activist.” BBC Monitoring Middle East, March 17. Accessed February 2, 2014.
http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/459055961#
Barrett, E. 2007. “The Exegesis As Meme.” In Practice as Research: Approaches toCreative Arts Enquiry. Edited by Estelle Barrett and Barbara Bolt, 159-163. London; New
York: I.B.Tauris.
Burn, S. M. 2005. Women across cultures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Change for equality. 2006. Website. Accessed July 6, 2014. http://www.wechange.org/english
Dabashi, Hamid. 2002. “Bordercrossing: Shirin Neshat’s Body of Evidence.” In Shirin
Neshat, edited by Elena Carotti and Harlow Tighe, 36-59. Torino: Castell di Rivoli.
Darznik, Jasmin. 2010. “Forough goes West: The legacy of Forough Farrokhzad in Iraniandiasporic art and literature.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 6 (1):103-116.
Ebrahrahimian, B. & Neshat, S. 2002. Passage to Iran. PAJ: A Journal of Performanceand Art, 24(3), 44-55. Accessed June 10, 2012. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3246346

	
  

82	
  

Edelson, D.2002. “Design Research: What We Learn When Engage in Design.” Journalof the Learning Sciences 11(1): 105-121.
Eskandarfar, Samira. Accessed May 10, 2013.
http://www.samiraeskandarfar.com/biography/about/
Eskandarfar, Samira. 2012. “Interview with curator Andrea Fitzpatrick and artists Samira
Eskandarfar and Amirali Ghasemi.” Interviewed by Barbara D. Waginski.
http://www.artoronto.ca/?p=10282
Etemad Moghadam, Fatemeh. 2004. “Women and labor in the Islamic Republic of Iran.”
In Women in Iran: From 1800 to the Islamic Republic, Edited by Lois Beck and Guity
Nashat, 161- 181. Urbana: University of Illinois press.
Ettehad, Ali. 2010. “Clowns can’t have babies.” Accessed June 10,2012.
http://www.artomorrow.com/eng/index.asp?page=49&id=26
Ettehadieh, Mansoureh. 2004. “The Origins and Development of the Women’s Movementin Iran, 1906-1941.” In Women in Iran: From 1800 to the Islamic Republic, edited by Lois
Beck and Guity Nashat, 83-106. Urbana: University of Illinois press.
Farrokhzad, Forough. 2007. Another Birth. Translated by Ismail Salami. Tehran:Zabankadeh.
Fathi, Nazila. 2007. “Iran's Giant Shoe Box Of Faded Photographs, Full of theUnexpected.” New York Times, May 30. Accessed March 19, 2014.
http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/848068193
Forouhar, Parastou. 2012. RH Gallery. Accessed May 3, 2014.
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/9778834/parastou-forouhars-rh-gallery
Forouhar, Parastou. 2014. Accessed August 3, 2014. http://www.parastouforouhar.de/english/

	
  

83	
  

Ghadirian, Shadi. 2004. “Southern Exposure.” New Internationalist 374: 4. Accessed
October 30, 2013.
http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/200083952
Ghadirian, Shadi. 2012. “Like Every Day.” Foreign Policy 196: 41. Accessed October 30,
2013. http://qut.summon.serialssolutions.com/search?s.q=%22Shadi+ghadirian%22
Ghadirian, Shadi. 2013. Accessed June20, 2013.
http://shadighadirian.com/index.php?do=photography
Gianelli, Ida. 2002. “Foreword.” In Shirin Neshat, edited by Elena Carotti and Harlow
Tighe, 8-9. Torino: Castell di Rivoli.
Goldberg, Roselee, 2002. “Shirin Neshat. Material witness.” In Shirin Neshat, edited by
Elena Carotti and Harlow Tighe, 66-69. Torino: Castell di Rivoli.
Gray, C. 1996. Inquiry through Practice: developing appropriate research strategies. In No
Guru, No Method Discussions on Art and Design Research. Helsinki: University of Art
and Design. Accessed April 4, 2013.
http://www2.rgu.ac.uk/criad/cgpapers/ngnm/ngnm.pdf
Haraway, Donna. 1998. “A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist
feminism in the 1980s.” In the Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory,edited by Steven Seidman, 82-113. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press
Haseman, B. 2007. A Manifesto for Performative Research. Media International Australia
incorporating Culture and Policy, theme issue "Practice-led Research”. 118: 98-106.
Haseman, Brad and Daniel Mafe. 2009. “Acquiring Know-How: Research Training for
the Practice-led researcher.” In Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in theCreative Arts, edited by Hazel Smith and Roger T.Dean, 211-228. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.

	
  

84	
  

Heartney, Eleanor. 2013. “ Crescent Women.” Art in America. 101(2): 74-79. Accessed
October 30, 2013.
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=f561
494f-13d2-4d32-89c3-3b32317149ae%40sessionmgr4003&vid=2&hid=4201
Higgins, Jo. 2013. 21st Century Portraits. London: National Portrait Gallery.
Hite, Shere. 1999. “Women’s Right in Today’s Political Climate.” In Women’s Voice,
Women’s Rights, edited by Alison Jeffries, 101-133. Colorado: Westview Press.
Humm, Maggie. 1995. The dictionary of feminist theory. 2th ed. New York: PrenticeHall/ Harvester Wheatsheaf
Issa, R. 2008, Shadi Ghadirian: Iranian photographer, San Francisco; London: Saqi.
Issa, R. Shayegan, D. Pākbāz, R. & Barbican Art Gallery. 2001. Iranian contemporary
art. London: Booth-Clibborn Edition
Jones, Kellie. 1991. Interrogating Identity. New York: Grey Art Gallery & Study Centre.
Keihl, Phyllis. 2014. “Blind Spot”. Accessed August 3, 2014. http://www.parastouforouhar.de/english/Works/Blind-spot-series/2001-blind-spot/
Lack, Jessica. 2009. “ Artist of the week 27: Shadi Ghadirian.” The Guardian, February 5.
Accessed May6, 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2009/feb/05/artist-shadighadirian
Lauren,. 2014. “Parastou Forouhar”. Accessed May 3, 2014.
http://courses.washington.edu/femart/final_project/wordpress/laurens-test-post/
Longman Dictionary. 2009. 5th ed. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Longman.
Mahdi, Ali A. 2004. “The Iranian women’s movement: A century long struggle.” The
Muslim Word 94: 427-448.
	
  

85	
  

MacDonald, Scott. 2004. “Between Two Worlds: An Interview with Shirin Neshat.”
Feminist Studies 30 (3): 620-659. Accessed March13, 2013.
http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/233178700/fulltextPDF?accountid=13380
McNamara, Andrew E. 2012. “Six rules for practice-led research.” Journal of Writing
and Writing Courses, 1-15. Accessed October 3, 2013.
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/54808/
McNiff, Jean and Jack Whitehead. 2006. All you need to know about Action Research.
London: Sage Publications.
McQuiston, Liz. 1997. Suffragettes to she- devils: Women’s Liberation and Beyond.
London: Phaidon Press Ltd.
Mernissi, Fatima. 1985. Beyond the Veil: Male-Female Dynamics in Muslim Society.
London: Al Saqi Books
Moghissi, Haideh. 1999. Feminism and Islamic Fundamentalism, the limits of postmodern
analysis. London: Zed Books.
Moholy-Nagy, Laszlo. 2007. “Vision in Motion”. In Art and social change: A criticalreader, edited by Will Bradley and Charles Esche, 115-117. London: Tate.
Nashat, Guity, 2004. “Introduction.” In Women in Iran: From 1800 to the Islamic
Republic, edited by Lois Beck and Guity Nashat, 1-36. Urbana: University of Illinoispress.
Neshat, Shirin. 1999. Beyond Orientalism. Accessed July 6, 2014.
http://www.theglobalartproject.no/projects/beyond-orientalism

	
  

86	
  

Neshat, Shirin, 2002. “Works” In Shirin Neshat, edited by Elena Carotti and Harlow
Tighe, 77-167. Torino: Castell di Rivoli.
Neshat, Shirin. 2011. “Art in exile.” TED talk video, posted May 2011. Accessed August29, 2013. http://www.ted.com/talks/shirin_neshat_art_in_exile.html
Neshat Shirin. 2011. I know something about love. Accessed August 1, 2013.
http://www.berlinartlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/DSC_0201edit.jpg
Paul, Christine. 2008. Digital Art. 2nd ed. London: Thames & Hudson World of art.
Phelan, Peggy. 2012. Art and Feminism. Edited by Helena Reckitt. New York: Phaidon.
Porter, Venetia. 2006. Word into Art: Artists of the Modern Middle East. London: The
British Museum Press.
Prince, Patrick D. 2003. “Women and the Search for Visual Intelligence.” In Women, Art,and Technology, edited by Judy Malloy, 2-15. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Pollack, Barbara. 2010. Removing the veil. Accessed 12 March 2014.
http://www.werkstattgalerie.org/content/press/pdf/8_1.pdf
Pollack, Griselda, ed. 1996. Generation and geographies in the visual arts: Feminist
Reading. London: Routledge.
Reckitt, Helena. 2012. Art and Feminism, edited by Helena Reckitt, 50-187. New York:
Phaidon.
Renner, Rolf G. 2002. Hopper. Bonn: Taschen.
Rieza. 2012. “Shadi Ghadirian” Accessed March 21, 2014.
http://courses.washington.edu/femart/final_project/wordpress/test-post-rieza/

	
  

87	
  

Sadr, Shadi. 2004. “Iran-rights: Shadi Sadr Describes Iranian women’s Movement”
Global Information Network, May 27. Accessed February 2, 2014.
http://search.proquest.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/457552873
Said, Edward W. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin.
Sanasarian, Eliz. 1982. The women's rights movement in Iran: mutiny, appeasement, andrepression from 1900 to Khomeini. New York: Praeger.
Schon, Donald A. 2012. “Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New
Epistemology.” The Magazine of Higher Learning 27 (6): 27-34. Accessed April 3, 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673
Shapiro, David. 2002. “Shirin Neshat” Accessed August 12, 2014.
http://www.museomagazine.com/SHIRIN-NESHAT
Shirin Neshat. 2002. London: Waterhouse & Dodd Fine Art. Brochure.
Simsek, Burcu. 2012. “ Enhancing Women’s Participation in Turkey though Digital
Storytelling.” Journal of Cultural Science 5(2): 28-46.
Stake, R. E. 1995. The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications.
Stake, R. E. 2000. “ Case studies” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by
Denzin, Norman K and Lincoln, Yvonna S, 435-454. California: Thousand Oaks.
Sullivan, Graeme. 2005. Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. California:
Sage Publications.
Tarkhani, Nikoo. 2014. “Deaths without burial” Accessed June 26, 2014.
http://www.nikootarkhani.com/deaths-without-burial/.
Tarkhani, Nikoo. 2014. Accessed April 5, 2014. http://www.nikootarkhani.com/#

	
  

88	
  

Willis, Deborah. 2006. “Responsible looking” in Artistic Citizenship: A Public Voice for
the Arts, edited by Mary Schmidt Campbell and Randy Martin, 59-75. New York:
Routledge.

	
  

	
  

89