ly-Adverbs and the Acceptability of the it-Cleft Construction
HIROKI SHINOHARA
Osaka University
One of the questions about the it-Cleft construction is ly-adverbs standing in the focalposition as in (1). Matsuyama (2001) shows that ly-adverbs don’t usually occur in this position as in(1a), but emphatic words, negative and interrogative sentences make them acceptable as in (1b) and(1c).
(1) a. *It was carefully that John cut the cake.
b. It was {very / quite/ not} carefully that John cut the cake.
c. Was it carefully that John cut the cake?
Amano (1976) notes that (i) some manner adverbs and degree adverbs are accepted withemphatic words such as so, very as in (1b) or in negative and interrogative sentences as in (1b) and(1c), (ii) some adverbs of time, place and ways can fall into the place without any assistance asshown in (2), and (iii) conjunct adverbs and sentential adverbs aren’t available as in (3).
(2) It’s frequently that he loses money.
(3) *It was {certainly, frankly, thus, therefore} that they left early.

Amano (1976: 69, 79)

He explains that the ly-adverbs accepted above act as important units in the sentences. It is with theadditional information conveyed by negative and interrogative sentences and the additional phrases
that the unaccepted sentences can become acceptable. He also indicates contrastive contexts enhance
the acceptability strongly; for example, it is not … that …; it is … that ….
However, the linguistic phenomena should be treated more carefully, and we need to lookdeeply into the conditions allowing ly-adverbs to be accepted. First of all, adverb phrases including
ly-adverbs in the focal position show low frequency. Among corpus based approaches, Colins (1991:201) shows that the number of adverb phrases is 44 out of 752 (5.8 %) and Calude (2009: 181)
indicates 3 out of 113 (2.6%). If so, the occurrences including ly-adverbs will become less than theirnumbers. It is no doubt that ly-adverbs in the focal position are quite rare, and need some specialcontexts. The conditions proposed by Amano are sure related to the factors, but other factors do exist.
Interestingly, in COCA, or Corpus of Contemporary English, Amano’s contexts don’t show higher
type frequencies than affirmative contexts as shown in the following chart; namely, if the contexts
are crucial, the type frequencies are expected to show a wider variety of types. The brackets mean
raw frequencies.
It is *ly that
It was *ly thatIt’s *ly thattype (total)
Positive15(67)

13(82)

12(107)27(261)

Negative

6(66)

7(68)

9(85)

12(219)Interrogative

3(23)

4(12)

-5(35)

with a degree adverb

1(3)

0(0)

2(4)

2(7)

I don’t intend that Amano’s analysis is not accurate, but there exist other factors. The high type
frequency in affirmative sentences indirectly means other possibilities because the context has
difficulty accepting ly-adverbs as in (1), according to Amano (1976).
Next, I asked some native speakers various ly-adverbs in the focal position and incontrastive contexts as shown in (4), and questioned the acceptability. They agreed with Amano’s
observation that conjunct adverbs and sentential adverbs were not accepted basically, but didn’t
accept ly-adverbs both in negative and interrogative contexts and with additional phrases. Rather,
repeating the ly-adverbs was more effective than the ones as shown in (5). Therefore, repetitions
seem to be more crucial rather than negative and interrogative contexts, additional phrases andcontrastive contexts. Moreover, considering the fact that (4b) also repeats quickly, but cannot beaccepted, the ly-adverbs in the focal position should be repeated without any contrast as in (5);namely, it seems to be important that they are used anaphorically.
(4) a. How did he do it  *It was quickly that John did it.
b. Among carefully, slowly and quickly, how did he do it?  *It was quickly that John did it.
c. *It’s not slowly, but it’s quickly that John did it.
(5) John did it quickly. In fact, it was really quickly that John did it.
The last point to be noticed is that most of the ly-adverbs observed in COCA occur in theinferential construction, or it be that construction, named by Delahunt (1995). I will explain thedetail in the presentation.
In summary, ly-adverbs in the focal positions are quite rare, if any, and they need very
restricted contexts. The conditions proposed by Amano raise the acceptability, but repetitive contexts
boost the acceptability more than the contrastive contexts.
References
Amano, Masachiyo (1976) “Bunretubun no Shoutenichi ni okeru Fukushi (Adverbs in the Focal
Position in the it-Cleft Construction),” Eigogaku 14,66-80.
Calude, Andreea (2009) Cleft Constructions in Spoken English, VDM-Verlag, Berlin.
Collins, Peter (1991) Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English, Routledge, London.
Delahunty, Gerald. P. (1995) “The Inferential Construction,” Pragmatics 5, 341-364.
Matuyama, Tetuya (2001) “Fukushi (Adberbs),” Eigo Koubun Jiten (English ConstructionDictionary) ed. by Nakasjima Heizo, Taishusya, Tokyo.