Lessons Learned from Nearly Two Decades of Implementing PES for
Tropical Forests in Costa Rica
Hector Arce Benavides (FONAFIFO, Costa Rica)

DAY2Session 3

Lessons Learned from Nearly Two Decades of Implementing PES for Tropical Forests in Costa
Rica
Hector Arce Benavides (FONAFIFO, Costa Rica)

Lesson Learned from nearly two decades ofimplementing PES for Tropical Forest in CostaRica
Héctor Arce Benavides
San José, Costa Rica.
TOKYO, Japan , 4 – 02 -2015

First, I would like to thank the organization for the kind invitation to participate in this important seminar.
I am going to talk about the experience of Costa Rica in the development of financial mechanism in order tosupport the forest development and the recovery of forest cover.

1. Overview of Costa Rica

Total Area 51,100 km2
Population 4.872.166

70% land use capability Forest

Just let me take a few minutes only to remark on some general information about my country.

That is thecountry located in Central America close to the Panama Canal with a size of 52,000 square kilometers and a
population close to five million inhabitants.

In Central America, Costa Rica is the country with the lowest

poverty rate, but still 18% of our households are below the poverty line and 4% of the households are below
the extreme poverty line.

Since 1999, tourism has become the main source of financial income to the country.

Also, other important income sources are the exportation of traditional products like coffee, bananas, andrecently pineapple.

More recently we are in the service business, especially related with technology like thedevelopment of software and things like that.
income sources.

While you can see forest and lumber do not appear in the top

However, we can say there is a deep relationship between forest and protected areas’

vegetation, as the country is widely known as an eco-tourism destination.

DAY2Session 3

Challenges
Relationship between forest and poverty
persists

Poverty, like other tropical countries, is concentrated in rural areas and unfortunately there is a deep
relationship between forest cover and poverty. Where there are more forests, unfortunately, there is morepoverty.

Cobertura
Forestal 52.4%
Exactitud General(10 Clases)= 91.3 %(2 Clases) = 93.4 %Talking about forestry, our current forest cover is about 52.4% of the total surface of the country according
to the last forest inventory from 2013 and taking in consideration measured secondary and deciduous forest as
well as mangrove and palms on forest plantations.

Lessons Learned from Nearly Two Decades of Implementing PES for
Tropical Forests in Costa Rica
Hector Arce Benavides (FONAFIFO, Costa Rica)

However, this current reality has not always been.

DAY2
Session 3

During the ‘60s and ‘70s, in the past century, Costa Rica

was a country with a high deforestation rate and our forest cover used to be about 22%.

Concerned about

this situation of the forest, civil society and the government produced some changes in the legislation andpolicies.

In 1969, Costa Rica emmited the first forest law, and after that produced another importantlegislation like the reforestation law in 1977, also the creation of the first forest service and creation of thenational park service in the ‘70s.

This reforestation law in the ‘70s also created direct forest incentive systems

to those people or those landowners and landholders to reforest it first, and later on to protect and make goodpractices of forest management.
Also, later on in the ‘90s, the statements and the declarations Rio de Janeiro summit also produced somedeep changes in the environmental agenda in Costa Rica.

Among others, three new laws were submitted: anew forestry act, a biodiversity law and also the framework, environmental law that created the Ministry ofEnvironment.

With the forestry act in 1996, also the Forest Finance National Fund and the Payment forEnvironmental Services Program werw created.

We can say that some decisions at the political legislatives level also produced some changes in the landscapeof the country. Those decisions, with market situations like a reduction of the price of the cattle, produced arecovery of the forest and in 2005 the forest cover was 51% of the total area.

As a conclusion of this part,

we can say that the forest recovery in Costa Rica is a phenomenon with multiple causes like different forest

DAY2
Session 3
incentives at the beginning, market situation of livestock products, the creation of protected areas, and, ofcourse, since 18 years ago, the payment for environmental services program.

I will go to the forest cover survey in 2013. The result was 52.4% of forest coverage considering different
types of forests.

2. Success of Payment for Environmental Services

The payment for environmental services, as I will tell later, has been a successful mechanism and, in ourperception, has been caused by the assistance of these four pillars of the program.

First, legal framework:

this program was created by law. Second: Institutional framework, which is not only consisting of the forest
finance national fund, but from other institution and organizations involved within the system.

Third also,

very important, financial framework: the payment for environmental services program budget comes from thefuel tax.

3.5% of the fuel tax in the country is coming to my organization in order to pay environmental

services to the forest owners and forest holders. Fourth Another very important pillar is related to monitoring
activities.

We are using public resources, so we have to have a good monitoring system in order to meet therequest from the authorities and also to fulfill the taxpayer demands.

Lessons Learned from Nearly Two Decades of Implementing PES for
Tropical Forests in Costa Rica
Hector Arce Benavides (FONAFIFO, Costa Rica)

Now I will talk about some achievements of the program.

DAY2Session 3

Since 1996, more than one million hectares

under the payment for environmental services program, more than 5,600,000 planted trees, more than 13,500
families involved in the program, more than 130,000 hectares in indigenous territories with an investment of
more than USD$45 million.
indigenous people.

I can say that this is the first place in transference from the government to theAlso, the program has generated employment and eco benefits like mitigation of gas

emissions, enhancement of the carbon stocks, protection of biodiversity, protection of hydrological resources,
and also benefits to tourism as well.

3. Lessons Learned

Some learned lessons: in our opinion, political will and commitment are required. This should be the firststep in order to produce change like that.

If we have political will, we will have institution and government

schemes that require robust monitoring mechanisms require also financing sources for the long term, a legal
framework, and also it is very necessary clarity of proprietary rights of land, forest, and also of theenvironmental services.
That is important, at least in Costa Rica, payment for environmental services comes after an evaluation of
public policies for more than 40 years.

DAY2Session 3

Payments for environmental services have been an effective instrument to stop illegal logging and land usechange.

We can say that this kind of scheme is like a REDD mechanism, in this case paid with local funds.

We are looking now also for the participation of the private sector, that is very important.
far, the private sector has provided more than $18 million to our program.
instrument and must evolve over time. It is not perfect from the beginning.

In Costa Rica so

It should be a replicable

It is necessary to improve andimprove.

4. Future Challenges

Now, some challenges: a legal limitation of some landholders to join the program is still a problem in thecountry.

Also, it is necessary to better measure of the impact of the program, a better accounting to recall theeconomic importance of the program, and importance also of the forest sector in general.

Of course weneed more resources to fulfill all the demands for funds and we are trying now to incorporate the concept oflandscape.

Yesterday, somebody talked about the relationship between the agendas from the Minister ofAgricultural and the Minister of Environment, and I will say also from the urbanistic politics.

Lessons Learned from Nearly Two Decades of Implementing PES for
Tropical Forests in Costa Rica
Hector Arce Benavides (FONAFIFO, Costa Rica)

DAY2
Session 3

Talking about REDD, another important challenge is how to keep forest coverage improving benefit forrural communities (that is very important point) and how to reduce poverty to prevent the reversion oftheforest cover map that we saw at the beginning.

5. Conclusion

To finish, talking about REDD+ in Costa Rica, in 2008, Costa Rica was selected by the FCPF and we arean FCPF country.
Participants.

In 2010, the Readiness Preparation Program was approved by the Committee ofIn 2013, Costa Rica signed a Letter of Intention with the commitment of $63 million.

we have received funds for readiness activities.

So farDAY2Session 3

However, being a country that has invested a significant amount of financial resources, the REDD process
so far has not recognized our early actions.

We do not know if we could receive payments for that in thefuture because we have to produce more results.

However, we can say that the results go beyond thethousands of hectares that Costa Rican society had paid, and results go beyond the thousands of investment inmaintenance of our national park and other protected areas.
I think that we have to be able to produce some changes in this international discussion about REDD,
especially to introduce small countries and especially for those countries that have made important early action
like Costa Rica.

For that reason, these kinds of the forums are very important.

again your invitation.

For that reason, I appreciate