Lessons Learned on Setting Community Based Organizations in
Demonstration Activities of REDD+ in Conservation Areas of Indonesia:
Responsibility and Benefit Sharing
Bambang Supriyanto (Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Indonesia)

DAY2
Session 3

Lessons Learned on Setting Community Based Organizations in Demonstration Activities of
REDD+ in Conservation Areas of Indonesia: Responsibility and Benefit Sharing
Bambang Supriyanto (Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Indonesia)
I would like to say to all of you about the institutional setup to REDD+ and also to distribute not
only the benefit sharing but also the responsibility in term of PES in the global and also local level.

Lesson Learned on Setting
Community Based Organization in
The Demonstration Activities of
REDD+ in Conservation Areas ofIndonesia: Responsibility and
Benefit Sharing

Content of Presentation

13 Des 2010

Dr. Bambang Supriyanto
Director of Environmetal Services for Conservation
Forest and Protection Forest, Gov of Indonesia

13 Des 2010

• The Challenges of REDD+ implementation inIndonesia• Readiness of institution in the field andactivities monitoring (MRV) of REDD+
implementation• Setting Up Community Based Organization:
Responsibility and Benefit Sharing

University of Tokyo, 3-4 February 2015
DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

My presentation will be divided into two main parts. The first part is dealing with the challenges of
REDD+ implementation in Indonesia. The second one is dealing with the readiness of the institution in thefield and activities of monitoring including its responsibility and benefit sharing.
1. The Challenges of REDD+ Implementation in Indonesia
13 Des 201013 Des 2010

Emission reduction
from deforestation(conversion decreasing )The Challenges of REDD+
implementation in Indonesia

REDD +
Indonesia

DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANANNet Sink/
Balance &Sustainable
Development

Sustainable Forest
Management
Carbon stock
conservation( prevent emission)
Carbon stockenhancement(restoration,
Reforestation etc)

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNG

Modalities

Emission reduction
from forest degradation(forest governance )Safeguards

Scope of REDD+ activities according to
COP-13 and COP-16 Commitment

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNG
http://jasling.dephut.go.id

DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

May I start with the first? The scope of REDD+ activity according to the COP13 1 and COP16 isthat there are at least four pillars. The first one is dealing about the emission reduction from deforestation
and also degradation. The third deals with the carbon stock conservation. This is not exercised very well interm of global negotiation. Last but not least, it is dealing with the carbon stock enhancement.
In terms of communication in Indonesia especially, we prefer to use sustainable forest management
instead of carbon credit incentives due to the fact that the carbon market is uncertain. There is something1

http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf
1

DAY2
Session 3
counterproductive during the process of readiness of REDD in Indonesia because of that issue. Having
these institutions is to ensure the net sink and also the balance and also the sustainable development canhappen in Indonesia.
Challenges in sustaining Result
Based DA (The way to carbon market)

13 Des 2010

 Period of DA REDD for result based is 20-100 years(carbon credit can be re-calculated) Carbon with conservation (biodiversity) and social
benefit need premium price  has not yet
accomodated in market
 How conservation and biodiversity value could get
incentives from REDD+ scheme Readiness of institution in the field and activities
monitoring (MRV) of REDD+ implementation
including benefit sharings
 Search for alternative incentive source of Carbon
Credit to be used as a sustainable economic forcommunity
DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

We have at least three big challenges for us. The first one is dealing with the period of the DA 2
REDD for the result base is 20-100 years, while we understand clearly the readiness project funded by thegovernment as well as the donor normally only last for three to five years. My initiative is how to create interms of the institutional setup to ensure the carbon credit calculations in year 20 can be measured, can be
traded in terms of the regional and also international.
The second one is also what I said to all of you is the third pillar of the REDD+ about the ‘Carbon
Conservation’ is not really discussed in terms of the international level. By having the communication of theforest management/business management we assume there is a good buyer. They can lower that premium
price so that the best it can be happened in those issues.
Last, but not least, this is about the challenges about the community who live inside or nearby theforests. We understand clearly without the participation of the community, it is not possible to prevent andalso to halt the main driver of deforestation and degradation of the forest. We have to pay attention on thoseissues.

2

Demonstration Activities

2Lessons Learned on Setting Community Based Organizations in
Demonstration Activities of REDD+ in Conservation Areas of Indonesia:
Responsibility and Benefit Sharing
Bambang Supriyanto (Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Indonesia)

DAY2
Session 3

2. IJ-REDD+: Indonesia-Japan (JICA) Cooperation on REDD+
13 Des 201013 Des 2010

Readiness of institution in the field
and activities monitoring (MRV)of REDD+ implementation

IJ-REDD+ : Indonesian-Japan (JICA)
Cooperation on REDD+DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANANDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

Ladies and gentlemen, let me continue with the exercise of how to establish the institution of PES interms of institutions in three of our DA project Indonesia.

The first one is about the Indonesian-Japan

REDD+. I am the director of this project. I am responsible for the access strategy of this project.

IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT IJ-REDD+
13 Des 2010

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

There are five outputs that should be achieved during the next one and half years. The first one isabout cluster of the subnational approaches. We have three outputs that should be there. The first one isabout how the subnational framework on REDD+ is developed. The second one is very important. This isvery rare. Also, how can we model in terms of REDD+ in the national parks? This is related with the third
pillar of what I explained before.

The third one is about the REDD+ model, this is HP.

It means

protection forest and non-forested area including palm oil, mining, timber concessions and other areas. The
fourth output is the capacity of carbon monitoring is enhanced at the professional level. Last but not least,
how can we develop the mechanism of the REDD+ in terms of landscape subnational which comply with themethodology of national level? This will be the output of number five.

3

DAY2
Session 3

Outcome #1

13 Des 2010

Market-Based
Development-IJREDD+ toward REDD+,
JCM and CSR

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

In all of the readiness processes, the outcome should be directed in terms of PDD 3, in term of
REL , in term of MRV should be directed for the readiness, for the market and/or market purpose.
We understand clearly. We made a discussion with the JICA how can we propose our pilot projectwill be also under scheme of JCM (Joint Credit Mechanism)? Yesterday, I explained to all of you that only
nine projects in Indonesia are already undertaken, but most of them only related with energy. Now, we aregoing to start with the reforestation and degradation in terms of the land. We are also seeking corporatesocial responsibility domestically. We have the government act number 5,1995 saying that 2.5% of the profitof the company should go toward social and the environment. By having this document, I would like to use
it in terms of how we can get the support from the private, especially on the domestic level.

Outcome # 2

Landscape Gunung
Palung13 Des 2010

LandscapeApproach- Gunung PalungNP- HCVA Palm Oil
Plantation PT. PAS- Protection Forest
G Badung- Protection Forest
G. Tarak /G
Menangis

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

The second one, this is very important to be shared to all of you since our approach is landscape.
There are many multi-stakeholders involved in that approach. We understand clearly that is national park
inside of our area and then we also find some company, palm oil and then protection forest and timber
concessions.

3

Project Design Document4Lessons Learned on Setting Community Based Organizations in
Demonstration Activities of REDD+ in Conservation Areas of Indonesia:
Responsibility and Benefit Sharing
Bambang Supriyanto (Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Indonesia)

Outcome # 3

DAY2
Session 3

13 Des 2010

GovernanceDistinction on land-use,owners, management:- “Low Emission
Development”/ Green
Initiatives- Public Forum- Co-Benefit /Benefit Sharing

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

Since our approach is that multi-stakeholder approach. We understand clearly about how the typeof management differs greatly among the land use as the owner. By having this institution, we are going to
set up the collaborative management plan of how to produce the low emissions within the five or the coming
20 years. How do we do it? We need a public forum not only sharing about the benefit sharing, but also
cost and responsibility.
IJREDD+ Project - Development of National park REDD+ model
at Gunung Palung National Park : Strengthening Collaborative
Management

13 Des 2010

Awareness of Forest
Conservation (REDD+)

Co-benefits Activities(Biodiversity & Community
Livelihood)

Activities Plan of Forest
Conservation (REDD+)DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI12ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

This is how to do it in terms of the long-term low emission targets. Of course, we are going to ask
using the public forum. We set up the time series of deforestation and degradation to set up the REL andthen asking what kind of low emissions to be adopted in that area.

To give you an example, in theconservation forest and protection forest, we can use what we call the community-based national park
approach or best management practices on that area.
Another example is how we can endorse the high conservation value forest using some criteria of
RSPO 4? This is the one for palm oil. This is the area of Pasifik Agro Santosa company (PT.PAS). We aregoing to conduct the corridor between the conservation areas with a protection forest. Can you imagine thecommitment of the palm oil company would like to share about 10,000 hectares? It is not converted to thepalm oil, but leave it like a forest as a corridor of orangutan over there. It is fair if the consumer gives apremium price for that company.

4

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil: http://www.rspo.org/
5

DAY2
Session 3

IJ-REDD+: Low Emission Development”/
Green Initiatives monitoring

2000

2006

2009

2011

13 Des 2010

Time series changes
on Forest / Non-forest:
PDD/MRV methodology

Forest / Non-Forest area of 4
district total

2013

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

13 Des 2010

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

I used the time series data of our landscape approach to discuss with the stakeholders involved inthat area. We see that based on our REL the forested area is decreasing within the 15 year period by almost
20%. Then, for the coming year, we are going to at least remain constant or become increasing if it possible.
Who will monitor
and distributethe duties andbenefit sharing?

13 Des 201013 Des 2010

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANANDIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

This is the institutional forum we set up just four months ago, the stakeholder forum, especially fordiscussing issues.

The first one is how we can create the collaborative management plan in terms of

low-emission targets. The second one is dealing with the right and duties among the stakeholder. The
fourth, this is very important. When the benefit is already coming, normally the conflict will happen. The
third one is how to solve conflict internally. Last but not least, if there is public support in term of the fund,the fund is not managed individually, but managed by the forum.

6

Lessons Learned on Setting Community Based Organizations in
Demonstration Activities of REDD+ in Conservation Areas of Indonesia:
Responsibility and Benefit Sharing
Bambang Supriyanto (Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Indonesia)

DAY2
Session 3

3. Carbon Credit Monitoring & Payment Mechanism“Carbon Credit Monitoring &Payment Mechanism”• Tax : 10%  Government Regulation Number
12/2014• Forum Operational (10%)

13 Des 2010

Tax : 10%
Local/Headquarters

Complient -> G : G

Voluntary Private Sectors

REDD+ Forum of
Ketapang“Friends of Palung”

Joint Credit Mechanism• Transparency• Accountability• Mutual Trust & Benefits

13 Des 2010 Co-Workships
 Monitoring and evaluation
 Campaign, Publication, and Reporting Stakeholders forum operating

Rehabilitant : 20% *Alternative income
for community :30%*• Forum Members (30%)
Carbon Credit Fund distributed annualy based on
proportion of Carbon emission reduction
performance, agreed by board of forum.

Forum : 10%
Operational
Forum Members :30%(Based on
Proportum)* Proposals summited by forum members. The fund distributed using
standard and criterias
DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANANDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

This is just an idea. It has not been decided yet, about REDD+ forum of Ketapang. The name isFriends of Palung. If there is a payment in term of PES, then the distribution most likely will be that 50%(subject to discussion) will be to strengthen our rehabilitation and restoration in that area. The rest is for theadministrative support in terms of running operation of the forum. Last but not least 30% will be given toeach individual stakeholder involved to the low emission carbon target.

13 Des 2010

Tropical Forest Conservation for REDD
and Enhancing Carbon Stock :ITTO and Seven and I Holding Company (Japan
Company)

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

The second is example of tropical forest conservation REDD+ and enhancing carbon stock. Thisis ITTO and Seven and I Holdings, which is a Japanese company.
4. Tropical Forest Conservation for REDD and Enhancing Carbon Stock
Tropical Forest Conservation for REDD
and Enhancing Carbon Stock

13 Des 2010

 PURPOSE
GeneralTo Contribute for REDD+ and carbon stock enhancement through community
empowerment in conservation and Meru Betiri National Park management
Specific Strengthen community partnership/welfare by implementing deforestation,
degradation and biodiveristy loss prevention activities
 Develop credible system in monitoring REDD+ which is measeurable, reportable andverified (MRV)
Ministry Decree No : P.68/Menhut-II/2008
The aim of demonstration activities from deforestation and degradation is to have forest
management design which connects to carbon emission reduction from deforestation anddegradation

Budget: ITTO and Seven and I Holding Company (Japan Company) US$ 973,388
DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

7

DAY2
Session 3
The project is the ‘Tropical Forest Conservation for REDD+ and Enhancing Carbon Stock.’ The
purpose is to contribute for REDD+ and carbon stock enhancement through community empowerment.
The specific target is to strengthen community partnership by implementing deforestation, degradation,
biodiversity loss prevention activities, and develop credible systems in monitoring REDD+ that are measurable,
reportable, and verifiable.
Emission reduction from deforestation
prevention

Carbon stock enhancement from rehabilitation
13 Des 201013 Des 2010

300 ph/ha

200 ph/ha

160 ph/haBaseline

Carbon stock scenario :•160 trees/ha 1,020,966 t CO2-e,•
200 /ha trees  1,189,387 t CO2-e,•
300 trees/ha  1,610,441 t CO2-e.

Total of emission reduction from deforestration
 295,036 t C or 14.751 tCO2e/tahun.
DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANANDIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

21
http://jasling.dephut.go.id

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

This is the emission reduction from deforestation prevention by two activities. One is making acommunity protection unit, and another one is using community-based development.

By having theplantation, of course, the total emission reduction from deforestations is already calculated. The amount is
mentioned in this presentation.
This is also for the carbon stock enhancement.

Carbon potentials and Co Benefits
13 Des 2010

Landcover

Area

Forestland

47.761

Grassland

1.706

CroplandTon C/haTotal Stok
(Ton C)

Ton CO2-e149

7.102.061

26.040.890

712.28345.038

3

1.969

7.220

29

72.755266.768

7.189.068

26.359.916

679

Agroforestry (existing
condition)

2.535
52.681

 MBNP biodiversity sources (flora dan fauna) ex. Raflesia, wild cow,
Javan eagle, etc
 Future threat deforestation and degradation
 In relation with social safeguards, community as key stakeholder
decide the achievement of REDD+: what kind of institution set?
DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNG
up?
DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

The most important thing is the benefit sharing. If the project is dealing with carbon reductions,of course the impact is not only for the forest, but also the environmental services become good. Also, thehabitant of wildlife, flora and fauna also would be great. This is the benefit but there is a still question by Dr.
Ma. This is our responsibility, which is what kind of institutions should be set up, especially if there is carbon
payment in the future?

8Lessons Learned on Setting Community Based Organizations in
Demonstration Activities of REDD+ in Conservation Areas of Indonesia:
Responsibility and Benefit Sharing
Bambang Supriyanto (Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Indonesia)

DAY2
Session 3

5. Re-Wetting of Forest Peatland in Sebangau National Park
13 Des 2010

Re-Wetting of Forest Peatland in
Sebangau National Park
(cooperation between Ministry ofEnvironment and Forestry with WWF
Indonesia)

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

This is last but not the least about the project with WWF. I am an alumni of WWF, so we givepriority in terms of the project of re-wetting of forest peat-land in Sebangau National Park.’

DA REDD+:“SEBANGAU NP”

13 Des 2010

STRATEGIC ISSUES••

Ton CO2

Sebangau NP has 528,000 ha which consists of peat swamp forest
was established as a national park in Indonesia in 2004. Formerly, it
was logging consessions where around 13 timber concesssionaires
operated in this area. The forest was threaten by illegal logging bywhich the logs were transported through man-made canals to themain river.
Since 2004, logging permit in Sebangau forest was stopped, and anumber of efforts have been made to restore the forest throughcanal blocking, replanting and habitat management. The project
which refers to Demonstration Activity (DA) REDD+ is a copartnership based, carried out between National Park andcommunity. It was established in 2008 of which World Wild Fund(WWF) Indonesia facilitating the project.

13 Des 2010

(With Effort REDD+)
National Park (No Effort)
Suistainable Forest Production

Unsustainable Forest Production
2010

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANANDA REDD+:STRATEGIC ISSUES

2015

Years

2019

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

This is a very excellent example of how the national policy changes because of environmental
reasons. Previously, Sebangau National Park was a production forest, and there was so much illegal logging
happened over there. WWF, with us, initiated the initiative of national park in the year 2004.
Then of course, this is the scenario.

ENSURING

IMPLEMENTATIONOF DA-REDD+

13 Des 201013 Des 2010

IMPLEMENTATION OF DA-REDD+: Theoritical perspectives•

1 meter reduction of water table level in tropical peat will results CO2
emissions of 90 ton/hectare/year.

••

Establishment of 468 canal clocking have been built and theirimplication to the CO2 emissions
Natural succession with very limited intervention: Restoration
Before canal blocking

After canal blocking

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANANDIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNG
http://jasling.dephut.go.id

DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

We are only making two kinds of activity in that area. The first one is how to recover the ecological9

DAY2
Session 3
situation due to illegal logging and production forest activities by making a canal blocking to increase the watercontent of the peat-land. According to the research, it says that that one meter re-wetting of the carbon
yielded about 90 tons of CO 2 equivalent.

Orangutan
Conservation :DensityandNesting

13 Des 201013 Des 2010

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANANDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

Orang-utan Conservation :Density and Nesting

13 Des 2010

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

This is the calculations of the carbon stock reducing emissions from that area.

Creating Alternative Income:Ecotourisme Development••

Creating Alternative Income:Ecotourisme Development

13 Des 201013 Des 2010

Temporaryincome :ecotourisme
and Non Timber
Forest Product(Resin, Rattan,
fruit, Honey
Bee).
Ecotourisme :Accessibility,
attraction,accomodation
and Community
Acceptance.

••

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

Economic riil : US $ 823680/year
Nett revenue /family : US$ 458/month

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

10

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

Lessons Learned on Setting Community Based Organizations in
Demonstration Activities of REDD+ in Conservation Areas of Indonesia:
Responsibility and Benefit Sharing
Bambang Supriyanto (Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Indonesia)

Some of REDD+ Program Implementation
related to Biodiversity

13 Des 201013 Des 2010

Areas

Possibly
CarbonCreditProgramPartner

Meru Betiri NP, East Java

Tropical Forest Conservation for REDD
and Enhancing carbon stock

ITTO, Latin, Centre for Climate Change
and Policy Research (Puspijak), FORDA

Sebangau NP, Central
Kalimantan (Peat land)

DA REDD+ Pilot ProjectWWF Indonesia

Tesso Nilo NP, Riau, Sumatera

DA REDD+ Pilot ProjectWWF Indonesia

Berbak NP, Jambi, Sumatera

Berbak Carbon Value Innitiative

The Zoological Society of London (ZSL)

Sumatera and the HoB

The Forest Conservation Act 1 /TFCA(Sumatera), and the Forest
Conservation Act 2 / TFCA (Kalimantan)

US Government, TNC, WWF, Yayasan
KehatiKayan Mentarang NP, East
Kalimantan

Malinau Avoided Deforestation and DA
REDD+

KfW, GTZ

Gunung Palung NP

Indonesia Jepang Project forDevelopment of REDD+
Implementation Mechanism

JICA

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

DAY2
Session 3

DIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

What is the opportunity cost given to the community because the canal is blocked? We are offering
two kinds of policies in that area. The first one is that we give access to the community to use non-timber
forest product and also from the services like the tourism potential over there.
6. Setting up Community-Based Organizations: Responsibility and Benefit Sharing: Conclusion
13 Des 201013 Des 2010

COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATION
Forum 


Setting Up Community Based Organization:
Responsibility and Benefit Sharing:
Conclusion

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

Community based organization.
Stakeholder member who participate in the REDD+
project
Collaborative management plan
Right and responsibility of emission reduction
Resolving conflict between the members
Benefit Sharing Distribution

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

I go to the conclusions. This is about the community organization. For the land use approach orlandscape approach, we need a forum as stakeholder members who participate in the REDD+. Then themain function is to make a collaborative management plan and then the rights and responsibility of theemission reductions should be defined by themselves. Then this organization is also resolving conflict
between the members and benefit-sharing distribution.

Community Based Organizationof REDD+

13 Des 201013 Des 2010

National Park

Fund raisingand Decision
makingSteering Committee

Local Gov

Thank YouPrivate Sectors

Organizing Community
Project
Forum
Operational

Rehabilitation

Monitoring
performance,
benefit sharing

Alternative Income

DIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANANDIREKTORAT PEMANFAATAN JASA LINGKUNGAN KAWASAN KONSERVASI DAN HUTAN LINDUNGDIREKTORAT JENDERAL PERLINDUNGAN HUTAN DAN KONSERVASI ALAM - KEMENTERIAN KEHUTANAN

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

11

http://jasling.dephut.go.id

DAY2
Session 3
The idea is very simple. The champion of the stakeholder will be put in the steering committee.
This is to decide about the proposals, not only the task or the responsibility, but also the benefit sharing. We
also will hire for the organizing community project.

12