Journal of Natural Disaster Science, Volume 32, Number 1, 2010, pp39-49

Interpreting an urban ritual event in terms of improving the capacity to cope withdisaster risk: A case study of Kathmandu
Roshan Bhakta BHANDARI*
Katsuya YAMORI**
Norio OKADA***Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Japan**Graduate School of Engineering, Department of Urban Management, Kyoto University, Japan(Received January 9 .2009 accepted July 4 .2010)
ABSTRACTThis study uses structural ritualization theory to analyze an urban ritual event andinterprets its potential role in enhancing the capacity of the community to cope with disasterrisks. The case study area is the urban community of Lalitpur, Nepal, which organizes
an annual ritual event. The study area is located in a dense metropolitan region that ispredicted to be under eminent threats of natural hazards such as earthquakes. An extensive
field survey accompanied by interviews was carried out with the local respondents,organizers and authorities involved in the ritual event to study the ritualized symbolic
practices during the event. Field observations, experience and understanding of theritualized symbolic practices in the study area are also elucidated. The relative standing (orrank) of ritualized symbolic practices that are ingrained within the social life of people areconsidered as the capacity to cope with stress by use of the Structural Ritualization Theory(SRT). Then, the study attempts to interpret the urban ritual in terms of improving social
capacity to cope with disaster risks in a pre-disaster context.
Keyword: urban ritual, structural ritualization theory, ritualized symbolic practices, disaster
risk, capacity to cope

In the study of disasters and other extreme
events, the concept of coping can be defined as how
the individual interprets his or her situation and how
he or she behaves in response to a particular stressor (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984). Coping not only
includes an individualized process but also interdependence with society in the face of stressful situations. Urban ritual as a dynamic social event provides
opportunities for a community system to functionand enhance its efficiency while coping with several
unpredicted social disruptions. Previous researchin disaster affected communities shows that people

1. INTRODUCTION
Urban rituals mark the annual calendar of communities within the traditional neighborhoods ofKathmandu Valley. These regularly repeated rituals
are an engine for the local inhabitants that drive theirsocial life. The utility of scientifically studying apparently trivial matters such as rituals in disaster canbe doubted at first glance but there are conceptual
reasons for the study. Cultural representations such as
rituals carry widely accessible ideas and practices thatgive meaning to social life.
39

R. B. BHANDARI, K. YAMORI , N. OKADA

adopt various coping strategies such as seeking support from friends and families, engaging in prayer andother religious activities to seek meaning, and self
blaming or avoiding discussion related to the event(Ibanez et al., 2004). In order to cope with, withstandor recover from a disaster or other extreme event
people adopt soft measures, both individually and collectively, to address conditions of social vulnerability(Ibanez et al., 2004). Based on preliminary data froma field study of neighborhoods in Kathmandu, thisstudy analyzes the significance of urban ritual practices in building the capacity of people to cope withdisaster risks.

towards building the capacity to cope in the case ofdisaster risks:■■■■raise awareness of potential risks and vulnerability
access local knowledge and resources
motivate and mobilize local community members
strengthen social networks and support at different levels

A preliminary survey of the literature shows that
there has been little study on rituals associated withdisasters. In some studies, rituals are recommended as
disaster memories and elements in the process of handling grief and other emotions following a disaster (Eyre,
1999). In order to understand the impact of urban ritualin the community we need some theoretical clarification. Towards this end, Structural Ritualization Theory(SRT) developed by American Sociologist David J.
Knottnerus in 1997 is employed to explain the role ofritualized symbolic practices in social behavior. Whilevarious studies emphasize the importance of rituals insocial life, SRT differs from these as it provides a precise
theory on how rituals affect our behavior and facilitates
the use of this perspective for empirical research (Knottnerus, 2006). The theory explains the role of ritualizedpractices in social life. Knottnerus (1997) uses the concept of ritual not only to refer to ceremonial, religious,and sacred behaviors, but in a broader sense to refer toactivities such as routinized interaction sequences andsocial behaviors that occur in all kinds of contexts including secular settings. This approach defines ritual associally standardized and repetitive symbolic activity. It
focuses on ritualized symbolic practices (RSPs), which
are defined as action repertoire that are schema driven(Knottnerus, 1997). Schemas are cognitive frameworks.
RSPs involve regularly engaging in actions that possessmeaning and express symbolic themes. Such practices
are found throughout social life in different settings suchas periodic family gatherings and celebrations, religious
practices, musical performances and other recreational
pursuits. RSPs, which comprise much of the activities
that are taken for granted in the daily lives of people,
rest upon cognitive schemas (Knottnerus, 1997). People
may not be conscious about all their actions in everyday
lives, but these RSPs are based upon cognitive structuresor symbolic frameworks that communicate various thematic meanings (Knottnerus, 1997). The basic assumption underlying this approach is that ritualized practices

2. LITERATURE REVIEWThe term ‘capacity to cope’ has its roots in arange of disciplines and has been conceptualized witha plethora of meanings. Blaike et al. (1994) suggestthat coping is the manner in which people act within
the limits of existing resources and range of expectations to achieve various ends. They add that coping
points towards people’s ability to help them individually and collectively. Adger and Brooks. (2003) referto capacity development as the process of enhancing
adaptive capacity and the adaptation requires thecapacity to learn from previous experience and apply these lessons to cope with future surprises. The
capacity to cope with stress is related to the social
capital of societies and the functioning of the community system rather than maintaining a stable stateof its components (Adger, 2000). The capacity of asystem represents not only the set of resources available but also the ability of that system to use these resources effectively (Adger and Brooks., 2003). Twigg(1998) refers to coping strategy as the applicationof indigenous knowledge in the face of hazards andother threats. Smit and Wandel. (2006) refer to coping capability as short term capacity, the ability to justsurvive, and employ adaptive capacity for longer term
sustainable adjustments.
The literature survey shows that various mechanisms are employed to build coping and adaptive capacities at the community level. In this study, the term
capacity to cope with disaster risks has been used in
respect of a wide range of strategies and processes
that are aimed at reducing the impact of disasters. The
following key areas have been identified to contribute40

INTERPRETING AN URBAN RITUAL EVENT IN TERMS OF IMPROVING THE CAPACITY TO COPE WITH DISASTER RISK

play a significant role in providing meaning, focus and asense of stability to social behavior (Knottnerus, 1997).
Also, the ritualized actions performed in a wider social
environment acquire significance for actors and thenbecome part of individual cognitive scripts for their immediate world. The theory argues that the ritual practices
in which actors engage enable them to cope with disasterevents. During disaster events such as hurricanes, floods,
earthquakes and fires there is disruption and breakdownof ritualized practices enacted by people in their daily
lives. The theory suggests that under such circumstancesindividuals adapt or cope by reconstituting old or constructing new rituals (Knottnerus et al., 2008). The recreation of ritualized symbolic activities in this type ofsituation enables people to recreate meaning and focus,
and direction in their social behavior (Knottnerus et al.,2008).
Knottnerus (2006) explains how collective ritual
events such as rallies, holiday celebrations and religious ceremonies operate and influence actors’ emotional states and commitment to a group. Four factors
are expected to play a role in the process of generating emotional intensity and building commitment andsolidarity within the group. The factors include:
1.
2.
3.
4.

and knowledgeable members to conduct the practicewhile non-human resources include equipment, audio
visual systems, costumes or food that are also needed
to enact the collective activity (Knottnerus, 2006).
Structural ritualization theory also involves therelative standing of ritualized practices or ranking interms of the four factors mentioned above. According to the theory, rank is a function of these factors[Rank = F (attention, repetition, interdependence,resources)] and if RSP ranks high it is repeated often,
draws attention, involves encouraging a number ofdifferent actors, and resources are available and adequate (Knottnerus, 1997). The higher the rank of the
RSPs, the greater is its impact on the behavior of actors at community level and the greater the likelihoodthat similar RSPs will be reproduced in an embeddedgroup (Knottnerus, 1997). The commitment to ritualized practices also results in strong social ties andrelations among group members (Knottnerus, 1997).
Although it can be argued that the ritualized practices
are not designed consciously for reducing a particulardisaster, the ritualized practices managed at the community level are developing social bonds and solidarity, which are important resources that help the community to cope with disasters. In this sense, we canconceptualize ritual as a strategic means to enhancesocial capacity through the development and maintenance of social relations and mutual support.
While relating the key areas of capacity building
with the Structural Ritualization Theory (SRT) we canunderstand more about how ritual practices contributein enhancing the capacity to cope with disaster risks(see Fig. 1).

Attention
Interactional pace / Repetition
Interdependence
Resources.

Attention in a collective event means different
symbolic elements, items or logos that intend to draw
focus or awareness (Knottnerus, 2006). The interactional pace refers to the degree to which actors areengaged in a sequence of repetitive acts (Knottnerus,2006). For instance, during collective events we canobserve rhythmic behavior such as audiences executing some act in a coordinated manner. Interdependence of actors refers to the degree to which actors
may or may not be contributing equally to the ritual
performance (Knottnerus, 2006). In some cases, few
people may engage in the ritual act while in others
all those who are present may equally participate in
the ritual performance. Collective events such as rituals may involve multiple practices calling everyone
to contribute to the event. Finally resources, bothhuman and non-human are important for enacting
ritualized behavior. Human resources include skillful

Factors affecting
capacity to cope

Factors of SRT

Raisingawareness

Attention /Salience

Access to local
knowledge /resources

Repetition

Mobilizing
community

Interdependence

Networking &supportResources

Fig.1 Interrelationship between factors of structural ritualization theory and capacity to cope with disaster risk

41

R. B. BHANDARI, K. YAMORI , N. OKADA

The composite theoretical framework conceptualized in Fig. 1 explains how the four factors of SRT
overlap with the capacity to cope with disaster risks
in the following ways:

vation, such as taking part in ritual preparation anddiscussions on the subject matters of the ritual withthe local respondents. Over the course of one and ahalf months of field research, we interacted with local
people, ritual organizers, local priests, experts fromuniversity, disaster professionals and government officials in order to gather information about the ritualand community participation in Lalitpur in Kathmandu Valley. Our familiarity with the local culture andenvironment facilitated the research work. In orderto obtain complete information about the activities,
many long hours of observations were followed up bylong discussions and interviews with key informants.
The most helpful informants were senior men. In
their capacity as shopkeepers and farmers, they were
not only able to tell us what was going on but theyalso engaged in friendly discourse with their acquaintances in the neighborhood to provide rich evidence
and facts about the ritual. Apart from them, membersof the ritual event organizing committee and local
government representatives were consulted at theirrespective offices to inquire about the ritual event.
However, the study largely lacks the perspective thatwomen would give the subject. The interaction withwomen was constrained due to local cultural practices
that impede women from interacting with strangers.
Furthermore, we had little interaction with low-caste
members of Lalitpur society. For the most part then,information came from personal observation and interviews with local residents in their shops and out on
the streets.
The study also utilized secondary information
sources such as ritual manuscripts, articles and books.
Content analysis was performed to compare andverify the ethnographic evidence collected during theparticipant observation. Traditional urban communities in Lalitpur, Kathmandu Valley were used as casestudy areas because of the good repository of cultural
heritage such as rituals and their experience of natural
disasters such as earthquakes. Interviews were also
carried out to grasp the local respondents’ perceptions of the ritual event. Those who participated were
mostly senior men whom we met at their residences,
shops and public rest houses. They gave more interesting insights into the potential use of the ritual eventin enhancing the capacity of the community to copewith social disruptions and disasters.

■ Ritual as a symbolic activity reminds audiences
about a past event and helps to build memory about
the event. Being an important event in social life,
it draws a lot of attention and generates awareness.
Several symbolic elements such as logo, flags andbanners are used in the ritual event carrying various
messages to the audience.
■ The regularity of a ritual event over time and inspecified urban spaces can be conceptualized as a
medium to convey the ritual message among peopleof the same generation and over different generations.
Ritual mishap can help to build memory of disasterand regularly activate the capacity of people to copeon every ritual occasion.
■ Rituals are participatory events providing an opportunity for people from different backgrounds, agegroups and social hierarchies to cooperate in order toachieve the ritual goals. It is not only a fun event but
also teaches community values to the younger generation and develops relationships among people within
and outside the community. These networks develop
social bonds that can act as channels for information
flows to mobilize the community and build mutual
support.
■ Ritual occasion provides an opportunity to strategically utilize both human and non-human resources
to successfully operate different functions that canhelp to enhance the capacity of the community.
■ Indigenous knowledge and skill related to reducing disaster risks can be demonstrated in ritualizedpractices. People become involved unconsciously inthese practices and build their capacity to cope withrisks.
On the basis of this theoretical framework, thestudy analyzes some preliminary evidence of an urban
ritual event in the study area in Kathmandu.
3. METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY
An ethnographic account of a ritual event at
Kathmandu was collected during a ritual in the year
2009. The study primarily involved participant obser42

INTERPRETING AN URBAN RITUAL EVENT IN TERMS OF IMPROVING THE CAPACITY TO COPE WITH DISASTER RISK

one witnessed by more than fifty thousand people.
It is carried out for more than one month beginningfrom March/April each year. All the participatingneighborhoods pay their homage to a shrine kept on
a built-in throne on a sixty feet tall chariot, mademainly of wood. The chariot is an honor to the deity,a manifestation of his royalty and power. Participatingin the ritual procession is a gala moment when everyone likes to be blessed by touching the god physically. In a stratified manner, the chariot is pulled bymen, women and children then general public along
the streets. People believe that pulling the chariot
brings them good luck. They wish to serve the deity
by making arduous efforts pulling the gigantic chariot. Mythologies exist among the local farming community that the deity brings rain and good harvests.
The timing of the festival before the monsoon also
focuses on farming systems in Kathmandu, so we see
wholehearted participation by the population regardless of caste, ethnic background and religious beliefs.
Occasionally the smooth chariot procession is punctuated by chariot stops, wailing crowds on the streets
and on the roof tops of surrounding houses. Everyone
assembles around their neighborhoods for the grandarrival of the city deity, which is a symbol of sanctity
bringing harmony in their daily lives. Whenever theritual procession is disrupted due to a chariot mishap
everyone takes it as a bad omen. Some people blame
the （1）Guthi, the ritual based-organization for bad
management and building a weak chariot, while others show their anxiety about the misfortune that isbound to occur. People remind themselves about the

4. CASE STUDY AT LALITPUR, KATHMANDU
Lalitpur, one of the old cities within Kathmandu
Valley, is a dense urban area. The total area of Lalitpur municipality is 15.4 square kilometers and constitutes a total of 22 wards. The population density varies from around 540 people per hectare (pph) in thecore area up to 46 pph in the outlying areas of new
urban development (LSMC, 2008). The present study
focuses on densely inhabited areas of Ward 16 and 18
of Lalitpur City with total households of 989 and 1,287
respectively. Past records show that there were regular occurrences of huge earthquakes at intervals of
every 75 years in Kathmandu (NSET and GHI, 1998).
At the same time, a recent report on earthquake vulnerability analysis in these inner city areas shows thatthey are liable to be severely affected by earthquake
hazards. The indigenous people are living with seismic risks. In this context, the present study on a ritual
event is relevant in terms of enhancing the inbuilt
capacity of the local community system to cope withsocial adversities.
4.1 Brief Introduction of Urban RitualTraditional urban communities in Kathmandu
Valley conduct various urban rituals, each marking
some special social moment within the society. There
are several ritual processions connecting different
open spaces within the city. The configuration of theprocession routes is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig 2 Ritual routes and open spaces in Lalitpur, Nepal(Base map Source: KVMP, 2001)
Among the rituals, Machhendranath rath jatraor chariot ritual (see Figs. 3 and 4) is a magnificent

Fig .3 Chariot pulling along city streets43

R. B. BHANDARI, K. YAMORI , N. OKADA

sequences of bad events in the country followed byritual mishap such as political instability, death of theKing and even natural disasters. Among the misfortunes to which people often relate are the royal massacre of 2001 A.D. and the catastrophic earthquake of1934 A.D.
The ritual event is also an occasion for thousands of people to get away from their hard labor ofdaily tasks and enjoy family get-togethers and entertain themselves. During the festival, one can witness
young people from the villages gathering in small
groups, singing and dancing largely unaware of thefestival they have come to attend. Similar to otherrituals in the community, people have feasting andcommunal eating. Guests, especially family relatives
are invited to join the feast. After attending the ritual,people eat together to celebrate the auspicious visit
made by the city deity in their locality. And then, thedeity is expected to bless the people and solve theirhardships in life.

the light of Structural Ritualization Theory reveals
that the ritual event contributes towards enhancing thecapacity of the community to cope with disaster risks.
The explanation below illustrates the four factors
mentioned in structural ritualization theory and theirrelationship with enhancing the capacity of the community in the context of Kathmandu.
5.1 Four factors of structural ritualization
theory5.1.1 Attention / AwarenessThe chariot ritual, as an annual event takes theshape of an anniversary celebrated in the memoryof a tragic past event. Some people relate this eventto a severe drought in the past while others remindthemselves of the catastrophic earthquake of 1934
A.D. that occurred after the festive mishap. This event
has a strong psychological and emotional impact
upon individuals and groups. Such events powerfully
evoke and activate the disaster experience as they
are remembered and periodically revisited forming acollective memory. As a ritualized symbolic practicethe ritual event is able to draw sufficient human attention and while sharing experience in the collective
memory people are expected to activate their capacity
to cope with the risks.
5.1.2 Repetition
The ritual event is organized annually at different
locations within the city area. It continues for morethan one month and people revealed that the ritualexperience lasts them throughout the year. The ritual
dates back to 299 A.D. and the memory of the eventand the community values it holds have been passed
down through generations. The scenario of the chariot
mishap and danger associated with the event remainin the memory of people. It can help to build awareness and activate the social capacity to cope withrisks.

Fig. 4 Chariot mishap along the ritual route
Machhendranath rath Jatra as a local festival ispart of local life and occupies a significant place inthe local calendar, as well as in individual and collective memories. Several studies mention the symbolic
meaning of ritual in representing strong local character and community religious beliefs. This study attempts to explore a new dimension of ritual event interms of its symbolic role in activating social memoryof disasters and enhancing the efficiency of community systems to overcome social stress during dynamicsocio-cultural events such as rituals.

5.1.3 Interdependence
The local community system named Guthi,
which is hierarchically structured according to age
and corresponding functions is proactive in preparations and organization of the ritual event. The city of
Lalitpur consists of fifteen different Guthis responsible for carrying out various activities in rituals suchas building a movable shrine, collecting different

5. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
Analyzing the findings from the field study in
44

INTERPRETING AN URBAN RITUAL EVENT IN TERMS OF IMPROVING THE CAPACITY TO COPE WITH DISASTER RISK

items to conduct various rites and organizing large
feasts for community people. In the process of realizing enjoyable and accident free festive goals, local
residents are compelled to act in a spirit of mutual
aid, interdependence, teach civility to the local youth
and take care of local neighborhoods. Features in theprocession include, neighborhood elders directing theprocession and crowd, local volunteers ensuring thesafety of ritual participants from possible chariot accidents, chariot pulling in groups, young adults exhibiting musical performance and participants chanting
prayers in unison. The event features a slower paced
parade in which small children get a chance to pull asmall chariot. On a special occasion organized during
the later part of the festival, women also join in andpull the chariot. In this way, the festival incorporates
people from every sector of society and most importantly children are acculturated to and participate in
the event from an early age. Since roles in the festival
are defined by age hierarchy, it also works as a riteof passage providing community members a sense of
maturity and manhood. Thus the festival and its supporting organization can be seen to both embody andtransmit social values in the process of continuing a
local tradition.
The ritual function itself mirrors the organization of society. Rules and regulations are passed down
through a hierarchy with the community administration at the top and individual residents at the bottom.
This structure is duplicated in daily life as well, andbeing able to operate effectively in a festive atmosphere contributes in enhancing the efficiency of thesystem. Residents, through the process of preparation,
presentation and celebration, spend a considerable
amount of time in close contact and are highly interdependent. The resulting kinship is very importantsince it represents emotional ties of common understanding developed through the process of sharedexperience. Residents belong to many types andlevels of groups throughout their social lives but theemotional ties they develop through this type of close
contact remain some of the strongest. The community
consciousness and cooperation that are engendered
in local people become extremely helpful in disastersituations. These community systems also play a vitalrole in solving local problems and managing the local
life of people apart from conducting annual festive
events.

5.1.4 Resources
Finally, both human and non-human resources
are extensively utilized during the ritual event. Thereis reorientation of space during rituals. Streets andopen spaces are cleared out for free movement of theshrine. Residents participate at all levels of planningand execution. In doing so, the residents must assume
proactive roles as members of society, interactingwith each other. A number of services deemed essential to a successful event are provided such as firstaid, fire safety courses or hiring technical advisors
to provide training of these kinds. As uncertainties
are part and parcel of the event, local organizers are
kept alert throughout the event. In some instances, attendees’ burst into drunken revelry and police need tobe called in to make arrests. While overcoming these
uncertainties on festive occasions, local community
systems build functioning capability that can be useful for coping with unforeseen circumstances during
disasters.
Based on findings about the ritual event in Kathmandu, the ritual practice contributes in enhancing
group commitment of actors in overcoming local
level problems during the festive occasion. In termsof the findings on four factors of structural ritualization theory, we suggest that the ritualized practice isdominant within the community. The ritualized practice shows a high degree of attention, repetition, interdependence among actors and use of both human andnon-human resources. On this basis we can claim thatthe ritual practice ranks high. Also, according to thetheoretical framework of this study we can conclude
that the dominant standing of this ritualized practiceindicates its higher potential in enhancing the capacity
to cope with disaster risks. The proactive community
system during ritual functions is building a capacitythat is useful in the wake of catastrophic events anddisasters. However, everything is latent in the present
context of a non-disaster situation.
The local perceptions of people regarding the ritual event provide some insight in the impact of suchpractices in the social life of residents and enhancing
their capacity to cope with social stresses such as disasters.
5.2 Local perceptions about ritual
The local passion for festival is so strong thatvarious neighborhood Guthis begin preparations sev45

R. B. BHANDARI, K. YAMORI , N. OKADA

eral months before the event. Festival is central in the
lives of residents so they do not attend work or planother major events during this time. When asked thequestion; “What do you think about the festival as aresident of Lalitpur?’ a local shopkeeper aged fiftyfive responded that it is like a party and is an important event for the residents. He went on to explainthat the festival is important in his life because it was
something he participated in when he was younger
and something in which his father and brothers still
participate. Many residents perceive the festival asa well deserved break from the monotonous normallife and an opportunity to renew friendships withneighbors and visit public spaces in their surroundings. While some residents perceive benefit in participating, whether they see it as an opportunity tosocialize or simply because it is fun, there are some
who perceive festivities as too hectic and bothersome.
The latter group of residents argues that rituals look
more chaotic and unorganized and even cause humancasualties because of weak preparation and planning.
Most of these respondents were young job holders
and housewives who did not like public gatherings
and were not willing to socialize with strangers. At
the same time, it should be noted that on several occasions, residents who make such remarks attend andactively participate in the ritual as they are tied totheir local custom and an immense social pressure andfear of social exclusion prevails among them. Many
participate in the ritual event for these compelling societal reasons.
Most of the residents are not conscious about
the strategic use of ritual functions in developing thecapacity of the community to cope with disaster risks.
People adopt their respective roles within the community system to successfully conduct the ritual without
any casualties. But many of them are familiar about
the chariot mishap, which is dramatic and threatening
to life and property. People also show their concern
about human injuries and crime during the ritual occasion, and mention that they are becoming more
conscious to increase the level of safety each year.
Local organizers are more alert and seek support fromlocal police, the Red Cross, and emergency centersat hospital to ensure the safety of participants duringritual occasions. Community volunteers from Guthis
are mobilized throughout the procession route tominimize any rioting and help any participants who

have minor injuries. Another interesting feature of
the chariot festival is the general belief that if it goesawry, it forebodes some disaster in the city. Amongthe evidence referred to here by local respondents isthe massive earthquake of 1934 A.D., which occurredin the same year that the chariot suddenly collapsed
during the procession. Through this it can be realizedthat the ritual event has been remarkable in contributing to the creation of memory and awareness about
the disaster event.
An interesting perception at the local level about
the ritual procession is that it brings sanctity withincity spaces and ensures safety by driving away evil
spirits. The rationale behind this local belief can beinterpreted in terms of visual surveillance that ritual
procession provides in urban areas. Regular movement of residents around city spaces symbolizes amonitoring activity to check the status of open spaces
and their use. In this sense, ritual procession is vitalin keeping the widely distributed open spaces intact
and helping to avoid private encroachments on public spaces. Open spaces located within densely built
urban housing are the breathing areas during normal
times and evacuation spaces during disasters suchas earthquake. In this manner, the ritual function resembles community disaster risk reduction practices,which can be explored in much detail by a closer lookat the various facets of urban ritual.
5.3 Possible usage of urban ritual in disasterrisk reduction practices
Local inhabitants within the traditional urban
settlement in Lalitpur are under eminent threat ofseismic risks as the area is regularly obliterated bya catastrophic earthquake of 8.4 Richter scale every
75 years. In this context, it is relevant to highlightthe utility of local cultural practices such as ritual indisaster preparedness and risk reduction in order tocope with real emergency situations. For instance, oneof the findings shows that ritual procession serves asa town watching practice that helps local people become familiar with open spaces and the routes linking
these spaces. It has been confirmed by a participatory
mapping exercise and focused group discussion organized by the study with respect to open spaces andevacuation routes among a group of local people andmembers of a community disaster management committee in Ward 16 and 18 of Lalitpur. While mapping46

INTERPRETING AN URBAN RITUAL EVENT IN TERMS OF IMPROVING THE CAPACITY TO COPE WITH DISASTER RISK

tional Non Government Organization) or governmentorganizations is necessary to establish these centers.
Along with this, open spaces at various locationsof traditional settlements can serve as convergencepoints after initial evacuation, and also provide spacefor medical assistance and disaster rescue. Coincidentally, these open spaces are nodal points where
neighbors come together during the ritual activities.
Apart from this, local people possess indigenous
construction skills for building the ritual chariot andtraditional buildings, which are useful during disasterrecovery and quick resettlement of disaster victims.
NGOs and INGOs such as the National Society
for Earthquake Technology (NSET, Nepal), National
Centre for Disaster Management (NCDM), OXFAM
and Action Aid Nepal are concerned about natural
disaster risk management activities in Kathmandu
Valley. A separate institutional body in the government under the home ministry is the central authority
in charge of mostly post-disaster management activities in the country. NGOs have been proactive in disseminating earthquake and fire risk information andreduction measures within the urban communities ofKathmandu. The NGO activities are crucial for predisaster awareness building and disaster preparedness.
In the mean time, significant achievements in this
sector can be made by employing the disaster relatedsocio-cultural practices at the community level thathave long played important roles in the social lives of
local people.
Ritual scenarios can be used strategically as anapparent disaster preparedness exercise to train local people and activate their capacity to cope withdisaster risks. For instance, the sixty feet tall chariot
that swings sideways when people pull it along thecity streets gives the impression of mansions that
may swing similarly during severe seismic vibrations. Occasionally, the chariot collapses (see Fig. 4)
symbolizing failure of tall and weak structures during
random shaking. An analogy can be built between（3）shake-table demonstrations carried out for earthquake
disaster awareness and the swinging chariot. More
proactive roles of disaster professionals and facilitators are required to convey disaster related messages
from spectacular ritual events. Various agencies are
involved in ritual events in order to ensure the safetyof large numbers of participants. Local authorities
such as police, volunteers, fire agencies and hospital

the access to the identified evacuation spaces in theneighborhoods, most of the participants chose a routefrom their place of stay overlapping part of the ritualroute in the city. The selected open spaces by local
residents as evacuation areas during participatory
mapping were also agreed upon by scientific experts
who included a disaster expert from a local NGO (NonGovernment Organization) and a city planner fromthe municipal office. The experts mentioned that the
selected evacuation spaces were suitable for disasters
like earthquakes in terms of the availability of infrastructure such as wider roads, public shelters, public
water supply, larger size and proximity from households. Thus, it is found that ritual practices are crucial
in enhancing awareness about urban open spaces,
which are important infrastructure for evacuation incase of disasters. This can contribute in saving the
lives of people living with seismic risks in the dense
and fragile built fabric of old city areas in Lalitpur.
Rituals conducted in various urban open spaces
are solely local initiatives and the traditional social
institution named Guthi plays a proactive role inleading the event. Local people with different ethnic
backgrounds, gender, age groups, occupational groups
and educational backgrounds gather together and in
this process renew and rebuild their relationships witheach other. Several old aged and disabled people in
the neighborhoods who are prone to becoming victims during disaster are expected to be recognizedwith the active involvement of household members invarious ritualized practices. However, this fact needs
to be verified with a closer study in the field.
The artifacts and social skills people exhibit during ritual practices are the most viable social resources that can be useful during disasters. For instance,
the equipment such as large hammers, ropes and large
cooking utensils for ritual feasts can serve people during disaster rescue and recovery. Also, a community
building named （2）Chapa in the local language, islocated an accessible distance from neighborhood
households where all the public equipment is stored.
Mostly these public store houses are located beside
open spaces within every neighborhood. There is apossibility of utilizing these public houses as community disaster centers where first aid boxes and otheressential items can be stored for compelling immediate needs of people during urgent response efforts in
disasters. Support from local NGOs, INGOs (Interna47

R. B. BHANDARI, K. YAMORI , N. OKADA

are kept alert for timely response in case of casualties.
In this process, community authorities are mobilized
and trained to cope with sudden threats, which aresimilar to disaster simulations conducted for enhancing community preparedness.
In a developing country such as Nepal, the government has low capacity to invest in disaster risk
reduction measures and resources to respond to upcoming disasters. Self-organized community practices
are the most efficient ways to train local people about
possible disaster risks and the various means to copewith them. At the same time, inbuilt community systems such as Guthi will be the first to assist victims
after catastrophic disasters. So, disaster risk reduction
efforts that are locally calibrated to meet the needsof a community under threat can be better realizedwith the joint collaboration of disaster professionals(NGO’s or government sector) and local Guthi.

vital for successful organization of ritual events. However, due to modernization and increasing populationof migrant communities the traditional social values
that had sustained the community system are slowly
degrading. It is important for the local government tointroduce appropriate policy measures to save these
local social systems without which the social functions cannot be sustained, which would subsequently
reduce the social capacity built through these systems.
Through this study, it can be realized that ritual activities are crucial in keeping the local people proactive
and obedient to their roles within the social system,
which helps the community to cope with adversity.
This study investigated a ritual event that was
not designed to manage a particular disaster as suchand may sound irrelevant at first. However, although
the urban ritual may not be designed as a risk reduction medium intentionally, there are good reasons tohypothesize that the traditionally repeated voluntary
involvement of city residents annually in various city
spaces over a long period of time makes it an effective platform for social marketing of disaster-related
risk reduction measures, particularly effective for rare
event disasters, for which common people may not beable to maintain their coping capacity against risks.
Collaborative efforts between ritual organizations andcommunity based disaster risk management organizations are important for sustaining risk reduction
efforts in the study area. Initiatives are taken by local
NGOs in raising awareness about earthquakes andconducting disaster drills in the community. Thesecan be further enhanced by strategically using the
Guthi or ritual based organizations so that an effective
community outreach program in disaster risk reduction can be designed to realize the desired impact in
the community.

6. CONCLUSION
There has been little study on socio cultural
practices such as rituals in pre-disaster planning andbuilding the social capacity of communities. This
study focuses on the roles rituals play in solving local
problems and enhancing the capacity of communities in pre-disaster situations. It uses the concept ofstructural ritualization theory to explain how ritual
practices help in building the capacity of communities to cope with disaster risk. Based on a case studyof ritual practices in neighborhoods of Kathmandu,
the behaviors of local residents are identified that canhelp them to cope with uncertainties during festive
occasions. Similarly, symbolic practices are identified
during the ritual event that influence the emotional
state of the actors and build their commitment to thegroup. Local people’s perceptions examined in thisstudy strongly suggest that rituals activate the social
memory of people about past disasters and contributein building awareness. The preliminary data presented
here shows that the ritualized practice of parading
raises the awareness of community people regarding
their surrounding open spaces, which is useful during
disasters for evacuation. One practical implication ofthis study is that more attention should be paid to urban ritual as a memorial event to enhance awarenessabout disasters. In the context of Kathmandu, the roleof the indigenous community system named Guthis is

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by the Disaster Reduction Systems Laboratory at DPRI, Kyoto University,
Japan. We are grateful for the kind cooperation ofstaff at Machhendranath Guthi Lalitpur, representatives from Lalitpur Municipality Office and the National Society for Earthquake Technology (NSET)
during the period of field research. We are also grateful to the students at Tribhuvan University, Institute ofEngineering, Department of Architecture and Urban
48

INTERPRETING AN URBAN RITUAL EVENT IN TERMS OF IMPROVING THE CAPACITY TO COPE WITH DISASTER RISK

Planning, Pulchowk, Nepal for their assistance in collecting the data reported here.

home.pNational Society for Earthquake Technology. Nepal (NSETNepal) and Geo-Hazards International, USA (GHI),
1998. “The Kathmandu valley Earthquake Risk Man-

References

agement Action plan”, published report by NSET, Nepal and GHI, USA.

Adger, N., 2000. Social and ecological resilience: are they

Smit ,B. Wandel, J., 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capac-

related? , Progress in Human Geography 24, 3 (2000)

ity and vulnerability; Global Environmental Change,

pp.347-364.

Vol.16, 282-292

Adger, N. Brooks, N. 2003. Assessing and enhancing adap-

Twigg, J (ed.),1998. Living with Disaster. Intermediatetive capacity, technical paper 7.

Technology Publication; London.

Blaike, P. Cannon, T. Devis,I and Wisner, B.1994. At Risk:
Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters ,London, Routledge.

（1）

The residential neighborhoods or various social groups

Eyre, A., 1999. In Rememberance: Post –Disaster Rituals

within it, form a social trust called ‘Guthi’, collectively

and Symbols, Australian Journal of Emergency Man-

owning a large parcel of land, known as Guthi land.

agement, Vol. 14: 23-29.

Such land, which exists within the settlement and

Ibanez G.E., Buck C.A., Khatchikian N. & Norris F.H.,

around it, is used for farming as well as for carrying

2004. Qualitative Analysis of Coping Strategies amongout various socio-religious practices within the com-

Mexican Disaster Survivors, Anxiety, Stress and Cop-

munity. Guthis are inbuilt social systems based on fa-

ing, March 2004, Vol. 17, No.1, pp.69-85.

milial and non-familial relations and play vital roles in

KVMP, 2001. Department of Urban Development andpeople’s social lives for instance, carrying out rituals,

Building Construction, Kathmandu Valley Mapping

funerals and solving problems at the local level.

Program, Nepal Government.

（2）

Every neighborhood within indigenous settlements

Knottnerus J.D., 2006. Rituals, Emotions, and Collectiveof Lalitpur consists of public amenities such as stone

Events, Submitted for presentation at the 101st annual

water conduits, rest houses and a community building

meeting of the American Sociological Association,

named Chapa. A Chapa is a public store house where

Montreal, 2006.

necessary items for community gatherings such as fes-

Knottnerus J.D., Thornburg P.A. & Webb R. G., 2008. Rit-

tivals and feasts are stored. All these items are publicly

ual and Disruption: Insights from Early Disaster Re-

owned by indigenous social institutions i.e. Guthi andused during rituals, marriages and other social events.

search, International Journal of Sociological Research
1:91-109, June 2008.

（3）

Shake tables are hands-on experiment for students or

Knottnerus, J. David., 1997. The Theory of Structuraltrainees to investigate the seismic behavior of build-

Ritualization, Pp. 257-279 in Advances in Group Pro-

ings to better understand the way in which building

cesses, Vol. 14, edited by Barry Markovsky, Michael J.

structures respond to earthquakes. In earthquake disas-

Lovaglia and Lisa Troyer. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

ter awareness programs small scale building models

Lazarus, R.S. and Folkman, S., 1984. Stress, Appraisal, andare erected on tables that are subjected to artificial

Coping. Springer, New York.

vibration in order to demonstrate how such structures

LSMC,2008. Lalitpur Sub Metropolitan City, Kathmandu

behave during earthquakes.

Valley, Nepal available http://www.lalitpur.org.np/e_49