Earthquake hazards prediction
Kojiro Irikura
Aichi Institute of Technology, Japan
1247 Yachigusa, Yagusa, Toyota 470-0392, JAPANABSTRACTCountries and areas in Asia and Oceania have suffered from large earthquake and tsunami
disasters. The 2005 Kashmir earthquake occurring in northern Pakistan flattened almost all houses
and structures due to strong shaking in towns near the source areas, killing more than 80,000 people.
The 2004 Ache earthquake occurring north-west off the Sumatra Island generated catastrophic
tsunamis that hit coastal areas in the Indian Ocean as well as Indonesia where more than 200,000
people were killed. Those earthquakes taught us the importance of earthquake hazard prediction as
well as warning systems for tsunami. In Japan, we experienced more than 6,400 dead or missing and
100,000 totally collapsed buildings during the 1995 Kobe earthquake, which are the greatest damage
in Japan since the great Kanto earthquake of 1923.
One of the lessons from the 1995 Kobe earthquake we learned is the importance of evaluatingstrong ground motions from future earthquakes to mitigate earthquake damage in urbanized areassurrounded by active faults and located close to subduction-zone earthquakes. The basic policy ofpreparation for earthquake hazards in Japan was defined as the 1999 fundamental mission
statement governing earthquake research over the next ten years as “The promotion ofearthquake research – comprehensive basic policies for the promotion of seismic researchthrough the observation, measurement, and survey of earthquakes –“, established by theHeadquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (Director: Ministry of Education, Culture,Sports, Science, and Technology). It proposed developments of making seismic hazard maps bypromoting the survey of active faults, long-term evaluation of occurrence potentials andprediction of strong ground motion.
The Earthquake Research Committee under the Headquarter started to make the seismic
hazard maps from two different approaches, probabilistic and deterministic. The probabilistic
seismic hazard map is shown as the predicted likelihood of a ground motion level such as PGA,
PGV, and seismic intensity occurring in a given area within a set period of time. It provides
important information for land planning, design standards of structures and people’senlightening as to seismic risks. The deterministic seismic hazard map is shown as thedistribution of the ground motion level predicted for a specific earthquake fault. The strong
ground motions at specific sites near the source fault should be estimated as time histories aswell as shaking levels. The ground motion time histries are effectively used for nonlinear
dynamic analysis of structures, which are needed to design earthquake-resistant buildings,
bridges, lifelines, and so on, in particular to secure seismic safety of critical structures such as
and nuclear power plants.

To obtain the ground motion time histories (waveforms) from individual specificearthquakes, we have developed a new methodology, “recipe of strong motionprediction”. This recipe give source modeling for specific earthquakes based on source
characteristics from the waveform inversion using strong motion data. Main features ofthe source model are characterized by three kinds of parameters, which we call: outer,inner, and extra fault parameters. The outer fault parameters are to outline the overall
pictures of the target earthquakes such as entire source area and seismic moment. The
inner fault parameters are parameters characterizing stress heterogeneity inside the fault
area. The extra fault parameters are considered to complete the source model such as thestarting point and propagation pattern of the rupture. The validity and applicability of theprocedures for characterizing the earthquake sources for strong ground prediction are examinedin comparison with the observed records and broad-band simulated motions for recent
earthquakes such as the 1995 Kobe and the 2003 Tokachi-Oki earthquakes. In future directions,prediction of strong ground motions are encouraged to constrain fault parameters physicallytaking into account the source dynamics as well as empirically from past earthquakes.