Willem van Mieris(Leiden 1662 – 1747 Leiden)

How To CiteBakker, Piet. "Willem van Mieris." In The Leiden Collection Catalogue. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr.
New York, 2017.
https://www.theleidencollection.com/archive/.
This page is available on the site's Archive. PDF of every version of this page is available on the Archive,
and the Archive is managed by a permanent URL. Archival copies will never be deleted. New versions areadded only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs.

Willem van Mieris was born in Leiden on 3 June 1662. He was the second son of the painter Frans van
Mieris the Elder (1635–81) and Cunera van der Cock. Willem’s brother Jan had been born two years
earlier, and he too became a painter. Naturally, both sons were instructed by their father, and according toWeyerman, who had known Willem personally, the latter was so advanced that after his father’s sudden
death in 1681, he was able to “to stand on his own two artistic feet.”[2] It is highly likely that Frans was theonly teacher of Willem and Jan. The assumption that the two brothers took over their father’s workshopupon his untimely death also seems obvious. If this was indeed the case, Willem was probably in charge
given that he was the first of the two to join the Guild of Saint Luke in Leiden, on 21 June 1683; Janfollowed suit three years later. The brothers’ good relationship emerges from the fact that Jan witnessed thebanns of his brother’s marriage to Agneta Chapman, the daughter of a surgeon, on 21 April 1684.[3]From all accounts, Willem van Mieris’s career was remarkably successful. Evidence of this is found in hisstanding in the Guild of Saint Luke, on whose board he sat a number of times.[4] Moreover, together with
Jacob Toorenvliet (1640–1719) and Carel de Moor (1655–1738), he founded the Leiden Tekenacademie(Drawing Academy)—no later than 1694 but probably already in the 1680s—which he led with De Moor
until 1736.[5] Although his enrollment at the Tekenacademie on 22 December 1695 was not related to an
academic course of study (he was thirty-three years old), he was, in fact, learned.[6] Although nothing is
known about the books he owned, it is plausible that a significant share of the library that was auctioned
after the death of his son Frans in 1764 had previously belonged to him. He also seems to have dabbled in
the theoretical side of his craft, even though the writings relating to this were intended solely for his ownuse. In any event, there is no indication that his writings were ever published.[7]Willem’s social position mirrored his success as a painter. His work was highly sought after and hegenerally charged steep prices for it.[8] In 1705 he could even afford to buy a house on the elegant
Breestraat, where he would live for the remainder of his life. He also never had a shortage of important
patrons, “the most notable among whom are Madam Oortmans and the Honorable Mister Pieter de la Court
van der Voort.”[9] “Madam Oortmans” was Petronella de la Court (1624–1707), a first cousin of the father ofPieter de la Court van der Voort (1664–1739) and a great art lover.[10] She was the first leading buyer of© 2017 The Leiden Collection

Willem van Mieris
Page 2 of 7

Van Mieris’s work, especially in the early years of his career. At her death in 1707 she owned six works byhim.[11] Moreover, he painted three miniature pictures for her famous dollhouse. By far his most important
benefactor, however, was the wealthy Leiden cloth manufacturer Pieter de la Court van der Voort, whoengaged him for numerous commissions chiefly after 1700. De la Court owned fifteen works by Willem,
which fetched amounts ranging from 60 to 1,600 guilders.[12] He paid the latter sum in 1709 for Van Mieris’s
Armida Binding the Sleeping Rinaldo, to which Weyerman, who had seen the picture, gave the highest
praise.[13]Van Mieris also copied for De la Court pictures by Gerrit Dou (1613–75) and by his father, Frans van Mieris
the Elder, among others (original works by whom were difficult to come by in these years).[14] De la Court
also had him finish, touch up, or add figures to paintings in his own collection, which ultimately counted 215
works. The work Willem carried out for De la Court was not limited to painting alone. That he disposed overvarious artistic talents emerges from the four handsome monumental garden vases with bas-reliefs hedesigned and modeled around 1703 for his patron’s house on the Rapenburg.[15]De la Court’s patronage ended abruptly in 1731: that year marked the beginning of a profound andprotracted conflict between the De la Court and Backer families, which had become closely interwoven
through marriage.[16] Van Mieris also regularly received commissions from the Backers, but this wasnegligible in comparison to his work for De la Court.[17] It is therefore difficult to understand why Van Mieris
sided with the Backer family. This choice, however, is illustrative of his social position and artistic success.
Although De la Court was clearly his most important benefactor, Van Mieris was not dependent solely on hispatronage: he worked regularly for many other art lovers, some from the very highest circles.[18]The most striking illustration of Van Mieris’s international reputation is his contact with several foreign
princely art collectors. The Archbishop of Mainz and Elector of the Holy Roman Empire, Lothar Franz vonSchönborn (1655–1729), for example, was a great lover and collector of Dutch painting. He ordered a few
works from Willem and kept up an extensive personal correspondence with the painter about the desired
result.[19] Duke Anton Ulrich von Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel (1633–1714) also collected Dutch masters andwas one of Lothar Franz’s fiercest competitors in acquiring the very best works. Just like his rival, Anton
Ulrich highly valued Willem van Mieris and visited him in his workshop on one of his trips to the Dutch
Republic.[20] Count Christoph August von Wackerbarth (1662–1734), a high-ranking German military manand confidant of the Polish king Friedrich August, courted the artist as well.[21] Weyerman gives an amusing
account of von Wackerbarth’s unremitting attempts, after visiting the collection of Pieter de la Court in 1703,
to buy an earlier version of the above-mentioned Armida Binding the Sleeping Rinaldo from the cloth
manufacturer. He finally succeeded in doing so by paying an exceptionally high price. Van Mieris garnered
great fame with his depiction of this subject based on an epic poem by Torquato Tasso (1544–95), four
versions of which are known.[22] The most unusual one is the portrait of the German envoy DanielMeinertzhagen (1675–1730) in the role of Rinaldo and his wife, Amelia van Stockum (1677–1743), asArmida. The satisfied customer paid Van Mieris a hefty “300 goude pistoolen” (300 gold pistoles) for thisportrait historié.[23]Van Mieris never lacked for orders, even when his sight diminished at the end of his life. He was certainly© 2017 The Leiden Collection

Willem van Mieris
Page 3 of 7

one of the most famous painters of his time, and it is in this light that we can understand why De la Court,
rather than Van Mieris, bitterly lamented the rift between the former friends in 1732.[24] Fortunately, Van
Mieris outlived De la Court; had he not, the news that the painter had died in the Backers’ country house, ofall places, would certainly have pained De la Court.[25] A fatal cold took Van Mieris’s life at Backershagen inWassenaar on 26 January 1747; he was eighty-four years old. The following day his body was transferred
to Leiden, where he was buried in a grave in the Pieterskerk that he had bought for himself in 1731.[26]-Piet BakkerEndnotes
1. For the other members of the Van Mieris family of painters, see the various biographies in thiscatalogue.
2. “Op zijn eyge konstwieken kon flodderen.” Jacob Campo Weyerman, De levensbeschryvingen der Nederlantsche konstschilders en konstschilderessen , 4 vols. (The Hague,1729), 3:388.
3. Agneta Chapman (1663–1744) was the daughter of the surgeon Thomas Chapman(1637–before 1701) and Elisabeth Martens. Thomas Chapman’s parents came from England orScotland, and settled in Nijmegen in the 1630s. Thomas Chapman was born there, as was hisdaughter Agneta. Willem van Mieris was a witness when Chapman took a second wife, Elisabeth
Clincq, in Leiden in 1690.
4. Eric J. Sluijter et al., Leidse fijnschilders: van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge,1630–1760 (Exh. cat. Leiden, Stedelijk Museum de Lakenhal) (Zwolle, 1988), 152.
5. He was succeeded as director in 1736 by his son Frans van Mieris the Younger (1689–1763).
6. Album Studiosorum Lugduno Batavae 1575–1875 (The Hague, 1875), 739. (Wilhelmus vanMieris, delineandi artem docens, p.33). This enrollment, with no mention of a specific discipline,
like so many others in the Album was probably motivated by the fiscal benefits it engendered.

© 2017 The Leiden Collection

Willem van Mieris
Page 4 of 7

7. From the will that Willem van Mieris had drawn up in 1715, it emerges that not only was he acollector of an unknown number of books, but he also seems to have written books as well.
Frans van Mieris the Younger inherited both the entire workshop inventory and his father’sbooks, to which Willem counted his own writings on the art of painting: “Voorts verklaarde hij[Willem van Mieris] aan zijn voorn[oemde] zoon Frans van Mieris noch te prelegateren (…) allezijn comp[aran]ts teykeningen, prenten, geschilderde modellen, medailies, beelden, klederen die
tot de schilderkonst behoren, en alle verdere ornamenten die hij comp[aran]t tot de schilderkonst
heeft vergadert, item alle verwen ende gereetschappen tot de schilderkonst behorende, alsmedealle zijn comp[aran]ts bouken, d geen uitgesondert, mitsg[ader]s zijne geschreven schriften vande schilder en andere konsten” (He [Willem van Mieris] stated that he is giving a pre-legacy to
his aforementioned son Frans van Mieris of all of his drawings, prints, painted models, medals,sculptures, clothes associated with the art of painting, and all other ornaments that he hasgathered with respect to the art of painting, ditto all of the paints and tools for painting, as well as
his books, all without exception, and moreover the painter’s own writings and other arts).
Regionaal Archief Leiden, NA not. Johan de Blauwer, inv. 1348, deed 84, 28 June 1715.
8. For example, in 1725 the Delft art collector Valerius Röver paid him a total of 1,050 guilders fortwo pictures. E. W. Moes, “Het Kunstkabinet van Valerius Röver te Delft,” Oud-Holland 31(1913): 8.
9. “Onder de welken uytstaaken Mejuffrouw Oortmans en den Heer en Meester Pieter de la
Court van der Voort.” J. C. Weyerman, De levens- beschryvingen der Nederlantsche
konstschilders en konstschilderessen, 4 vols. (The Hague, 1729), 3:388; Johan van Gool, Denieuwe schouburgh der Nederlantsche kunstschilders en schildereseen , 2 vols. (The Hague,1750–51), 1:192.
10. Petronella de la Court, now known primarily for her exquisite dollhouse, married Adam
Oortmans (1622–84), a silk merchant at that time, in Leiden in 1649. The couple moved toAmsterdam, where they bought the Zwaan beer brewery on the Singel in 1657. On Petronella,see: I. H. van Eeghen, “Het poppenhuis van Petronella de la Court, huisvrouw van Adam
Oortmans,” Maandblad Amstelodamum 47 (1960): 159–67.
11. For her painting collection, see: Stadsarchief Amsterdam, Notarial Archives, not. G. Ypelaer,inv. 5338, fol. 553–642, 16 August 1707 (Inventory of Petronella de la Court). Fewer paintings
are mentioned in this inventory than in the catalogue of the auction of her collection inAmsterdam on 19 October of the same year. Conversely, a few paintings appear in the cataloguethat are absent in her inventory. See: Gerard Hoet I,Catalogus of naamlyst van schilderyen, metderselver pryzen, 2 vols. (The Hague, 1752), 1:104–9; Sale Petronella de la Court, 17 October
1707, Lugt 0207. See the biography of Jan van Mieris in this catalogue.
© 2017 The Leiden Collection

Willem van Mieris
Page 5 of 7

12. E. J. Sluijter et al., Leidse fijnschilders: van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge,
1630–1760 (Exh. cat. Leiden, Stedelijk Museum de Lakenhal) (Zwolle, 1988), 42.
13. Oil on panel, 66.8 x 85.7 cm, signed and dated 1709, Mauritshuis, The Hague. See J. C.
Weyerman,Delevens-beschryvingen

derNederlantsche

konstschilders

enkonstschilderessen, 4 vols. (The Hague, 1729), 3:388–89.
14. For a survey of the copies Van Mieris painted for Pieter de la Court, see: Junko Aono,“Imitation and Innovation: Dutch Genre Painting 1680–1750 and Its Reception of the GoldenAge” (Ph.D. diss., University of Amsterdam, 2011), 142–43 (list II-1).
15. C. W. Fock, “Willem van Mieris als ontwerper en boetseerder van tuinvazen,” Oud-Holland
87 (1973): 27–48.
16. C. W. Fock, “Willem van Mieris en zijn mecenas Pieter de la Court van der Voort,”Leids
Kunsthistorisch Jaartboek (1983): 277.
17. C. W. Fock, “Willem van Mieris en zijn mecenas Pieter de la Court van der Voort,”LeidsKunsthistorisch Jaartboek (1983): 261–82; see: J. C. Weyerman, De levens- beschryvingen derNederlantsche konstschilders en konstschilderessen, 4 vols. (The Hague, 1729), 3:391; Johanvan Gool, De nieuwe schouburgh der Nederlantsche kunstschilders en schildereseen , 2 vols.
(The Hague, 1750–51), 1:199.
18. Count Johan Hendrik van Wassenaer Obdam (1683–1745) was also an important patron ofVan Mieris. Between 1713 and 1721 the count bought six paintings for amounts ranging between
380 and 825 guilders directly from the artist. Van Wassenaer paid the latter amount for a
Grocer’s Shop of 1717, the highlight of his collection. Junko Aono, “Imitation and Innovation:Dutch Genre Painting 1680–1750 and Its Reception of the Golden Age” (Ph.D. diss., Universityof Amsterdam, 2011), 80–8. See also J. C. Weyerman, De levens- beschryvingen derNederlantsche konstschilders en konstschilderessen, 4 vols. (The Hague, 1729), 3:390–91;
Johan van Gool, De nieuwe schouburgh der Nederlantsche kunstschilders en schildereseen , 2vols. (The Hague, 1750–51), 1:198–99.
19. K. Bott, “Zwei Zeichnungen des Willem van Mieris in den Kunstsammlungen Graf vonSchönborn,” Oud-Holland 103 (1989): 243–48, passim; K. Jonckheere, The Auction of King
William’s Paintings (1713): Elite International Art Trade at the End of the Dutch Golden Age(Amsterdam, 2008), 161.

© 2017 The Leiden Collection

Willem van Mieris
Page 6 of 7

20. K. Jonckheere, The Auction of King William’s Paintings (1713): Elite International Art Tradeat the End of the Dutch Golden Age (Amsterdam, 2008), 194.
21. On him and his collection of Dutch masters, with its emphasis on Leiden fijnschilders, see: C.
Niedner, “Der sächsische Kabinettsminister Graf August Christoph von Wackerbarth († 1734)
und die Königliche Gemäldegalerie in Dresden,” Neues Archiv für Sächsische Geschichte undAltertumskunde 31 (1910): 86–99.
22. In addition to the works mentioned, in 1706 Van Mieris painted a fourth—no longeridentifiable—version of the picture for Lothar Franz von Schönborn, Elector of Mainz. B. Broos,“Weyerman en ‘Wackerbaert,’” Mededelingen van de Stichting Jacob Campo Weyerman 24(2001): 143–45.
23. Oil on panel, 62 x 92 cm, signed and dated 1715, Schloss Grünewald, Berlin. See B. Broos,“Weyerman en ‘Wackerbaert,’” Mededelingen van de Stichting Jacob Campo Weyerman 24(2001): 145; J. C. Weyerman, De levens- beschryvingen der Nederlantsche konstschilders en
konstschilderessen, 4 vols. (The Hague, 1729), 3:391, Johan van Gool,De nieuwe schouburgh
der Nederlantsche kunstschilders en schildereseen, 2 vols. (The Hague, 1750–51), 1:199.
24. C. W. Fock, “Willem van Mieris en zijn mecenas Pieter de la Court van der Voort,”LeidsKunsthistorisch Jaartboek (1983): 277.
25. C. W. Fock, “Willem van Mieris en zijn mecenas Pieter de la Court van der Voort,”LeidsKunsthistorisch Jaartboek (1983): 277.
26. Eric J. Sluijter et al., Leidse fijnschilders: van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge,
1630–1760 (Exh. cat. Leiden, Stedelijk Museum de Lakenhal) (Zwolle, 1988), 152.

Literature
Weyerman, Jacob Campo. De levens- beschryvingen der Nederlantsche konstschilders en
konstschilderessen. 4 vols. The Hague, 1729, 3:387–92.
Van Gool, Johan. De nieuwe schouburgh der Nederlantsche kunstschilders enschildereseen. 2 vols. The Hague, 1750–51, 1:191–203.
Fock, C. W. “Willem van Mieris als ontwerper en boetseerder van tuinvazen.” Oud-Holland
87 (1973): 27–48.
Fock, C. W. “Willem van Mieris en zijn mecenas Pieter de la Court van der Voort.”Leids
Kunsthistorisch Jaartboek (1983): 261–82.
© 2017 The Leiden CollectionPowered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Willem van Mieris
Page 7 of 7Sluijter, Eric J. et al. Leidse fijnschilders: van Gerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge,
1630–1760. Exh. cat. Leiden, Stedelijk Museum de Lakenhal. Zwolle, 1988, 152–68.
Bott, K. “Zwei Zeichnungen des Willem van Mieris in den Kunstsammlungen Graf vonSchönborn.” Oud-Holland 103 (1989): 243–48.
Aono, Junko. “Imitation and Innovation: Dutch Genre Painting 1680–1750 and Its Receptionof the Golden Age.” Ph.D. diss., University of Amsterdam, 2011.

© 2017 The Leiden Collection