研究東洋

Reconsideration of Asami kesai's understanding of therelationship between Neo-Confucianism and theory ofheigaku
Tohoku university doctor's degree program
Fan chuanshen
Abstract:Asami keisai（1652-1711）was pupil of Yamasaki ansai. Asami is
known as one of the “three great nobles of Yamasaki’ school. It’s called Kimon
sannketsu. Before the end of WW2, many researchers think this theory wasrelated to national politic theory. Now, they try to focus on his traditionalstudies. For example, shintoism, theory of meibun, Chu Hsi's Family Rituals
and Seokjeon Daeje. One of the researcher, prof Maeda also researched them.
In addition, the series of papers deal with the theory of heigaku proselytizedby Yamaguchi syusui. Asami kesai is separated from political science andmoral theory, and theory of heigaku is simply a military idea as is the casewith Ogyu sorai. However, there is a great distance between the characteristicof Asami keisai's theory that he takes up temperance and emphasizes his own
preparation rather than attacking the enemy, and Ogyu sorai, who emphasizes“falsehood”. Based on the research of various predecessors, I think that I will
directly examine the theory of heigaku of Asami keisai. As focusing on thedevelopment of theory of heigaku of Asami keisai, clarify the relationshipbetween the theory of heigaku and universal truth.

v

■論文外国語要旨

Zhuànjìbóshì was forced to leave the authentic Chinese history. According toreadings, uncritically the literature of『漢書』“Hànshū” by 班固 Bāngù, 董仲舒Dǒngzhòngshū 対策 Duìcè seen from the view of philosophy and the order of 功令 Gōnglìng by 公孫弘 Gōngsūnhóng seen from the view of history of systems
could be identified as the main cause.

After all, it was determined that 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshì had the advantages over the other because "the teacher of太 学 Tàixué", "the preliminary teacher before becoming 博 士 弟 子 Bóshìdìzǐand 郎 Láng", and "the examiner of the examination for becoming 博 士 弟 子
Bóshìdìzǐ" joined the job of 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshì.
Finally, the politics of 儒 者 Rúzhě and 五 経 博 士 Wǔjīng bóshì had been
increasing from 前 漢 Qiánhàn 武 帝 期 to 前 漢 Qiánhàn 宣 帝 期 . That 経 書Jīngshū, they obeyed and participated in the political ideology of the nation
directly and that 経書 Jīngshū and its succession acquired 博士 Bóshì decided
on how to take the leadership in 儒学 Rúxué・儒教 Rújiào.

iv

研究

東洋

The Empirical Study of the System of 博士Bóshì
during the Qin-Han Period(Ⅱ)―On the early 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshì and 賢良対策 Xianliang Duìcèof 董仲舒 Dǒngzhòngshū―
Takanobu Shiroyama
Continuing with the previous study, I take up the transcript documents
through the generations and previous studies, to examine the characteristics
of 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshì's development which was one of the most important
issues of the governmentalization of Confucianism from 秦 Qín and was the period when the government of 博士 Bóshì was being replaced to 前漢 Qiánhàn
which was the age when the concept of government of 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshìwas being set up. This paper is the first part of that, and the following results
were found.
First of all, I think the government of 博士 Bóshì from 秦 Qín to 前漢 Qiánhàn was given to the person such as 法 家 Fǎjiā and 陰 陽 家 Yīnyángjiā whohave the special abilities of not being bound much by the ideas, the theories,
and the group such as 儒家 Rújiādàojiā・道家 Dàojiā. It is to appropriate 博士Bóshì that is backed by 諸子 Zhūzǐ be called 諸博士 Zhūbóshì.
In addition to that, it became the important job for 博士 Bóshì after 前漢Qiánhàn 文 帝 期 to manage the books. and then 博 士 Bóshì and the books,
and the schools, following the books became essential. Such 博士 Bóshì werecalled 伝記博士 Zhuànjìbóshì in 後漢 Hòuhàn. Whereas, 博士 Bóshì like 諸博士 Zhūbóshì were disappeared gradually. On the other hand, 五経博士 Wǔjīngbóshì who collected and edited the book was later known as 経書 Jīngshū wasorganized in 前漢 Qiánhàn 武帝期 . It seems that 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshì took
the responsibility for the job after 伝記博士 Zhuànjìbóshì.
Accordingly, I think 伝記博士 Zhuànjìbóshì existed for the time being after
the organization of 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshì in the early 前漢 Qiánhàn. So 伝記博士 Zhuànjìbóshì and 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshì existed at the same time.
After that, while 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshì gained the upper hand, 伝記博士iii

■論文外国語要旨

Hospitality and Death
Research on the Hospitality on the Changesof “Morality and Identity” in the East
Kenichi Miura
Keywords：Hospitality, Bodhisattva practice, the Lotus Sutra
The purpose of this paper is to reflect on my previous work on Buddhist
thought and to summarize it as a research on hospitality. Hospitality is a wordwith Western origins. In this paper interprets hospitality by comparing it with
the Buddhist concept of bodhisattva behavior. It also gives an overview of theBuddhist view of life and death. It will also focus on the Mahayana sutra, theLotus Sutra, which has had a major influence on Eastern ethics and culture,
particularly in East Asia. The Lotus Sutra, while continuing the developmentof traditional Buddhist thought, encourages bodhisattva practice based on anawareness of the interconnectedness of the self and the world. This essay aims
to find in the Lotus Sutra's thought a symbolic representation of hospitality inthe East, and to decipher the differences and similarities between Eastern andWestern hospitality.

ii

研究

東洋

Oriental Studies
Volume 11

February 2021

CONTENTS

Abstracts in OTHER LANGUAGES
Hospitality and Death
Research on the Hospitality on the Changes of “Morality and Identity”
in the East

Kenichi Miura ii

The Empirical Study of the System of 博士 Bóshì during the QinHan Period(Ⅱ) ―On the early 五経博士 Wǔjīng bóshì and 賢良対策 Xianliang Duìcè of 董仲舒 Dǒngzhòngshū ―Takanobu Shiroyama iii

Development of theory of heigaku in the early modern period―centered on Asami kesai

Fan chuanshen v

Published annually by the Institute of Oriental Thoughts
Higashi Nippon International Universityi