Investors’ Meeting for Business Strategy
for the Petrochemicals & Plastics Sector
Q&A Summary
Date and time: Thursday, October 8, 1 p.m. to 2:45 p.m.
Presenter: Tomohisa Ohno, Representative Director & Senior Managing Executive
Officer＜Supply-Demand and Market Situation for Petrochemical Products＞
Q. A total of 30 million tons of olefins are expected to be produced in China by
coal-to-olefins and methanol-to-olefins projects. It is said that coal-to-olefins andmethanol-to-olefins process technologies are cost-competitive when crude oil prices
are above 70 dollars to 80 dollars per barrel. If oil prices stay at their current levelsof below 50 dollars per barrel, to what extent do you think these coal-to-olefins andmethanol-to-olefins projects will be implemented in China?
A. If crude oil prices move between 50 dollars and 60 dollars per barrel, I think theimplementation of these projects will be delayed from a cost-effectivenessperspective. Compared to some years ago, such projects in China are now
implemented after considering their cost-effectiveness, so there are fewer cases ofplants going into the red after the start of operations. Therefore, we do not expect
these projects in China to become a big threat to us unless crude oil prices recover toa certain level.
An increase in Iran’s oil exports puts downward pressure on crude oil prices, but I
don’t think oil prices will remain at the current level of around 50 dollars per barrel.
Crude oil prices have been rising in recent days, and I expect prices to continue
rising gradually. Higher oil prices will lead to implementation of coal-to-olefins andshale gas projects. Our manufacturing bases in Japan and Singapore target
customers who need value-added products and offer products that meet customers’
demands, so these bases will not be directly affected by the launch of operations ofnew plants overseas. Our manufacturing base in Saudi Arabia produces productsthat will be in direct competition with products of these new plants, but our base in
Saudi Arabia has cost advantages over our rivals if it can maintain stable operations,by using highly cost-competitive ethane as feedstock. Our business is thus in a goodposition to compete with new plants that will start operations.

Q. Slide 14 in the presentation shows cash margins on polyolefins. What is your view on
cash margins? Is there any concern over margin erosion, as occurred in 2012 and2013?
A. The bar graph in slide 14 indicates cash margins on general-purpose resins. Whenmargins are negative, the supply of resins should decline, theoretically, due toproduction adjustments. In 2012 and 2013, however, despite negative cash margins,production was not adjusted, and the supply of resins increased following the start ofoperations of new plants in China. In the past, there were negative cash margins
temporarily, but, in contrast to 2012 and 2013, large loss margins did not continue
for long periods of time. We should consider such periods, when money-losing
operations lasted for such a long time, as aberrations.
Margins were quite good in the first half of the current fiscal year. I think they werealmost too good, benefiting from lower oil prices. In the second half of the year, weexpect cash margins to shrink by 100 dollars to 200 dollars per ton from those in thefirst half. We hope margins will fluctuate within a narrower range amid recentchanges in attitudes in purchases by Chinese customers, who have refrained from
speculative purchasing, such as increasing or decreasing procurement volumes in
anticipation of higher or lower market prices.

＜Domestic Operations＞
Q. You closed the MMA polymer plant and the liquid-phase caprolactam process plantat your Ehime Works. Are there any domestic businesses left that need
restructuring?
A. Considering domestic operations at our Chiba Works and Ehime Works, there are noplants left that need restructuring at our Chiba Works. We closed our styrene
monomer and propylene oxide joint production plant, from which no stable long-term
profitability could be expected. Currently, only polyethylene and polypropylene
plants as well as a propylene oxide plant using a proprietary process remain at theChiba Works, but they are competitive enough. Unlike Chiba, our Ehime Works
produce a wide variety of products. Among them, the performance of ourcaprolactam business is especially weak. At the Ehime Works, we closed ourliquid-phase caprolactam process plant that was influenced by market prices ofammonium sulfate. But, unlike the Chiba Works, restructuring of the Ehime Works
is not over yet. As business becomes more global, it is important to maintain ourdomestic operations. From this perspective, we want to retain our operations inJapan as much as possible. We will carefully consider the restructuring of the Ehime
Works by closely examining structural changes in the business environment.
Q. Do you have any plans to use the former site of the ethylene plant at the ChibaWorks?
A. The site is very conveniently located about one hour by train from Tokyo, and it iswell equipped with utilities, so it could be used for a plant in the process industry.
We want to consider various possible uses of the land, and we have not yet made any
final determination.

＜Operations in Singapore＞
Q. It is said that utility costs are high in Singapore. How does it affect your business? In
your operations in Singapore, higher margins on ethylene make Petrochemical
Corporation of Singapore (PCS) profitable, and lower margins on ethylene make The
Polyolefin Company (TPC) profitable. Can we consider this as your earnings
structure?
A. It has long been pointed out that utility costs in Singapore are high. The Singaporean
government is very much aware of the issue and has taken measures to address thisissue. Utility costs have been decreasing in the past two or three years due to lower
crude oil prices and new utility plants constructed at the encouragement of theSingaporean government. Utility costs are still high compared with emerging
countries, but the situation has improved. The Singaporean government andindustry agree that high utility costs are a big problem that must be resolved, andthey are working together to solve the issue.
The earnings structures of PCS and TPC are a little more complicated, but as ageneral understanding, what you said is correct. Anyway, as our final products arepolymer products, our basic strategy is to build good relationships with customers
who need polymers of high value and to increase profit by offering high-value-addedproducts.

Q. The graph in slide 25 shows TPC’s shift to high-value-added products. Would you
explain each product in the graph?
A. Let me explain from the bottom of the bar graph. EVA is polyethylene containing
vinyl acetate, and HEVA is polyethylene with higher vinyl acetate content. These aredifferentiated products of low-density polyethylene. Demand for HEVA, which isused as an encapsulating material for photovoltaic cells, surged temporarily, but isnow leveling off. There recently has been a shift in demand from EVA tohigher-value-added HEVA. The red part of the bar graph shows random copolymer,
and the green part shows terpolymer, both of which are polypropylene products.
Random copolymer and terpolymer are mainly used as food packaging materials.
TPC is the first manufacturer in Asia to develop markets for films and packaging
materials, and its customers include leading food packaging producers. Amid
growing demand in our areas of strength, we have been investing in plants andequipment. At the top of the bar graph is capacitor film, which is very difficult toproduce due to the need to remove all impurities in the manufacturing process. We
were able to launch a capacitor-grade product developed in Singapore, where wehave a plant using a bulk polymerization process, which was suitable for producing
this higher grade of product. We also offer many high-value-added low-density
polyethylene products, which are used in a wide range of applications and still havegreat potential.

Q. There have been large fluctuations in the performance of your methyl methacrylate(MMA) business. What efforts, such as reducing procurement costs for the raw
material, MTBE, are being made to improve profitability?
A. The price of MTBE, which is used to produce MMA, is linked to gasoline prices, butthe price of MMA is determined by other factors. Unlike the prices of naphtha andpolyolefin, which move in tandem with each other in the long term, the price of MMA
sometimes moves opposite from the price of MTBE. When that happens, fluctuations
in earnings get larger. In order to stabilize earnings, it is very important to ensure astable supply of MTBE at low cost. For our MMA business in Singapore, we procure
more than half of the MTBE from PCS. We are trying to lower procurement costs for
MTBE from PCS and to purchase MTBE from outside suppliers at a low cost. Inaddition to reducing raw material procurement costs, we are also working toenhance the added value of MMA polymer, as most of the MMA products that we sell
are polymers. When demand for MMA polymer for use in light-guide plates
increased, we focused on cultivating this demand, and did not give enough attention
to cultivating demand for other uses. We have dispatched researchers to Singapore
to explore new applications. We can also expect synergy effects of the reorganizationthat took place in April of this year, through which our MMA business wastransferred to the Petrochemicals & Plastics Sector, where staff engaged in our MMA
business can learn about such things as TPC’s shift to high value-added products.
＜Petro Rabigh＞
Q. In addition to operational problems, low margins on oil refining apparently wereanother factor in the unstable performance of the Rabigh Phase I Project. Do you
have any plans to improve margins by upgrading oil refining facilities?
A. In order to make Petro Rabigh’s profit base stronger, it is necessary to upgrade oil
refining facilities. We are moving forward with the Rabigh Phase II Project, andafter the operations of plants in the Rabigh Phase II Project become stable, we willconsider investing to make the oil refining facilities more advanced. As it requires alarge-scale investment, depending on the type of upgrades undertaken, we willconsider making investments in several stages while thinking about the best timingof such investments. Looking at the past performance of the Rabigh Phase I Project,however, lost business opportunities resulting from the low operating rates of theplants had a greater impact than margin fluctuations. Therefore, for now, ourpriority is on maintaining stable operations.

Q. Among diversified chemical companies in Japan, your plants cause fewer accidents
than others. Please tell me why your plants are operating smoothly. Your plants inSingapore also continue stable operations. Why is Petro Rabigh’s plant operation
unstable? Is it caused by the introduction of new technologies? New technologies arealso introduced in the Rabigh Phase II Project. Are there any operational risks?
A. You have such an impression because large accidents occurred at other companies’plants. But there are no major differences in operating technologies among Japanesechemical manufacturers. Fortunately, no serious accident has occurred at our plants,
but it is not because our plants are especially superior.
There are two factors behind the successful launches of our plants in Singapore. The
primary factor was excellent human resources. In addition, we had enough time toprovide training for employees, as our plants in Singapore were completed during a
tough economic time in Asia and did not start operations until two years later.
Petro Rabigh’s unstable operations were chiefly due to limited human resources
rather than the introduction of new technologies. We have taken necessary measures,and we believe that operations will become stable sooner or later. As for the RabighPhase II Project, we think there will be no major problems as we learned lessons
from the Rabigh Phase I Project about how to solve operational problems.
Q. Petro Rabigh will start periodic maintenance of its plants this weekend. But why is
the start of the maintenance delayed by about a week from an earlier
announcement? The period of the periodic maintenance four years ago was extended.
Will the maintenance this time be completed as planned?
A. Before the scheduled start date, Petro Rabigh considered the right timing anddecided to delay the start to carry out periodic maintenance smoothly. When periodic
maintenance was performed at Petro Rabigh for the first time in 2011, the plan wasa little too optimistic. Careful preparations have been made for the second periodic
maintenance, such as considering ways of doing construction work based on lessons
learned from the previous maintenance. I cannot say it's 100% certain, but we expect
Petro Rabigh’s plants to restart as planned after the maintenance.

Q. This time, work needs to be done to connect an ethane cracker with the plants of theRabigh Phase II Project. Are there any risks of a delay in periodic maintenance?
A. The connections of the ethane cracker were completed before the start of periodic
maintenance. So the periodic maintenance will not pose an obstacle to construction
work.
Q. What do you think of the competitiveness of the Rabigh Phase II Project?
A. In the Rabigh Phase II Project, although the procurement volume of ethane issmaller than that for the Rabigh Phase I Project, Petro Rabigh will create value by
producing petrochemical products using naphtha as feedstock, which is produced forsale in the Rabigh Phase I Project. The Rabigh II Project’s main products will
include low-density polyethylene and methyl methacrylate (MMA), which havehigher added value compared with products of the Rabigh Phase I Project.

Q. In your premarketing research, how are customers evaluating the Rabigh II Project’sproducts? There are disadvantages in the delivery of products. Is the projectsufficiently competitive compared with competitors’ products?
A. As for the distribution costs you just mentioned, we have implemented variousmeasures to establish efficient distribution networks. In the Asian region, we sell
the Rabigh Phase I Project’s products produced in Saudi Arabia. We do not think it isa disadvantage to supply products from Saudi Arabia to Asian markets.
Petrochemical products are not necessarily produced in locations where they areconsumed. There is no particular disadvantage, as many petrochemical products, notlimited to those of Petro Rabigh, are delivered to distant places.
Q. Do you still continue to consider investment in acrylic acid, superabsorbent polymer(SAP) and polyols in the Rabigh Phase II Project?
A. We have the will to invest in these products, but we want to keep this issue underconsideration for the time being because the cost-effectiveness is currently limited.
(END)

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements made in this material with respect to Sumitomo Chemical’s plans,
projections, strategies, and beliefs that are not historical facts are forward-looking
statements about the future performance that were calculated based on information
available at the present time and include risks and uncertainties. Factors that could
materially affect actual results of Sumitomo Chemical’s future performance include, but
are not limited to, economic conditions in the areas of Sumitomo Chemical’s business,changes in demand for Sumitomo Chemical’s products in markets, downward pricepressure on Sumitomo Chemical’s products resulting from intensifying competition,
Sumitomo Chemical’s ability to continue to provide products that are accepted bycustomers in highly competitive markets, and movements of currency exchange rates.