Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works
Air Permit No. 03735T45

Aug-19

Table 1Inventory of Emissions of GenX Compounds(Per Consent Order, Paragraph 8a)
August-19

MonthNotes

Status

October 6-31, 2018
November 2018
December 2018
January 2019
February 2019
March 2019
April 2019
May 2019
June 2019
July 2019
August 2019
September 2019
October 1-5, 2019

1

ActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualProjected
Projected
Projected

23

GenX CompoundEmissions
(lbs)
0.1
57.9
69.5
10.9
31.7
46.8
9.7
10.3
11.9
3.0
10.5
4.3
0.1

Total GenX Compound Emissions(12-Month Period from October 6, 2018
through October 5, 2019)

266.5

2017 Baseline Emissions

2,302.7

Percent Reduction

88.43%

Notes:1) Contains emissions from October 6, 2018 - October 31, 20182) Contains summation of emissions from December 1 - 30, 2018 and December 31, 20183) Contains emissions from October 1, 2019 - October 5, 2019
Assumptions:
1) Emission rates for PPVE campaign runs determined using the following for theFeb/March campaign: 52.4% operating time ABR is on, 2.7% burnout, and 44.9%
ABR is off. And the following for Dec 20-30, 2018 PPVE Campaign: 38.2%
operating time ABR is on, 2.1% burnout, and 59.7% ABR is off.
2) Carbon bed became operational on VE-South process and equipment emissions
on June 29, 2019. Emissions from July stack testing data were utilized for theperiod after installation.
3) [For March only] Emission rate for when the ABR only was operating wasdetermined by subtracting the 230 kg/hr ABR on and ABR off runs from theFebruary 2019 stack testing. Stack testing following the permeator tie-in (March2019) was not utilized for determining ABR only emissions since those specificconditions were not tested independently. Therefore, emissions rates after thepermeator was tied in to the scrubber were calculated using the following control
efficiencies: 99.1% for Division Scrubber (obtained from acid fluoride testing
conducted by Entec Services in 2013), 45% for Secondary Scrubber (mostconservative efficiency from the Dec 2018 stack testing), and 95.1% for Carbon
Bed (from March 2019 stack testing).
4) Unless otherwise noted, emissions are calculated using average stack test datafrom relevant stack testing.

Chemours Company - Fayetteville Works
Air Permit No. 03735T45

Aug-19

Table 2Inventory of Emissions of GenX Compounds(Per Consent Order, Paragraph 8b)
August-19

MonthNotes

Status

December 31, 2018
January 2019
February 2019
March 2019
April 2019
May 2019
June 2019
July 2019
August 2019
September 2019
October 2019
November 2019
December 1-30, 2019

1

ActualActualActualActualActualActualActualActualProjected
Projected
Projected
Projected
Projected

2

GenX CompoundEmissions
(lbs)
0.3
10.9
31.7
46.8
9.7
10.3
11.9
3.0
10.5
4.3
0.4
8.2
3.2

Total GenX Compound Emissions(12-Month Period from December 31, 2018
through December 30, 2019)

151.02017 Baseline Emissions

2,302.7

Percent Reduction

93.44%

Notes:
1) Contains emissions from December 31, 2018 only2) Contains emissions from December 1, 2019 - December 30, 2019
Assumptions:
1) Emission rates for PPVE campaign runs determined using the following for theFeb/March campaign: 52.4% operating time ABR is on, 2.7% burnout, and 44.9% ABRis off. And the following for Dec 20-30, 2018 PPVE Campaign: 38.2% operating time
ABR is on, 2.1% burnout, and 59.7% ABR is off.
2) Carbon bed became operational on VE-South process and equipment emissions on
June 29, 2019. Emissions from July stack testing data were utilized for the period afterinstallation.

3) [For March only] Emission rate for when the ABR only was operating wasdetermined by subtracting the 230 kg/hr ABR on and ABR off runs from the February
2019 stack testing. Stack testing following the permeator tie-in (March 2019) was not
utilized for determining ABR only emissions since those specific conditions were nottested independently. Therefore, emissions rates after the permeator was tied in to thescrubber were calculated using the following control efficiencies: 99.1% for Division
Scrubber (obtained from acid fluoride testing conducted by Entec Services in 2013), 45%
for Secondary Scrubber (most conservative efficiency from the Dec 2018 stack testing),
and 95.1% for Carbon Bed (from March 2019 stack testing).
4) Unless otherwise noted, emissions are calculated using average stack test data fromrelevant stack testing.