INTERNATIONAL LIFE SAVING FEDERATIONSIMULATED EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMPETITION(SERC)
Revised – January 2020

COACHES, COMPETITORS, JUDGES, AND TECHNICALOFFICIALS GUIDEWorld Water Safety
Gemeenteplein 26, 3010 Leuven, Belgium
Telephone: +32 (0) 16 89 60 60
Email: ils.hq@telenet.be
Web: www.ilsf.org

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 1TABLE OF CONTENTS
Purpose2

Introduction

2

Definition of Terms

2

Marking System

3

Rank Marking Scale

3

Weighting Factor

4

Overview of Weighting Factor for Judge Scoring Sheet

4

Sample Scenario Design with Weighting Factors

8Judge Scoring Sheets

8

Pool Set-up, Equipment, and Victims

9Overall - Chief Judge Scoring Sheet

10

Non-Swimmer - Judge Scoring Sheet

11

Weak Swimmer - Judge Scoring Sheet

12

Unconscious/non-breathing Victim - Judge Scoring Sheet

13

Injuried Swimmer - Judge Scoring Sheet

14

Bystander – Judge Scoring Sheet

15

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 2SIMULATED EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMPETITION
COACHES, COMPETITORS, JUDGES, AND TECHNCIAL OFFICIALS GUIDEPURPOSEThe purpose of this document is to provide coaches, competitors, judges and technicalofficials with:• A broad understanding of the principles of judging the Simulated Emergency
Response Competition (SERC) event.
• The structure and content of judging sheets aligned to the priorities andprinciples of rescue outlined in the 2019 Edition of the ILS Rule Book.
• The ILS gratefully acknowledges the work of colleagues in Lifesaving Canada increating this guide
INTRODUCTION
The SERC tests the initiative, judgment, knowledge, and abilities of four lifesavers who
act as a team. The team under the direction of a team leader – apply lifesaving skills ina simulated emergency situation unknown to them prior to the start. This competition is
judged within a two-minute time limit and all teams respond to the same scenario andare evaluated by the same judges. Every effort will be made to ensure that the scenario
is executed in the same manner for every team.

DEFINITION OF TERMS
Bystander means a person who role plays as a trained or untrained individual who may
assist in the rescue under the direction of the competitor.
Victim means a person who role plays as a victim type such as; weak or tired, injured,
unconscious, or non-swimmer.
Rescue means to assess the situation, plan a course of action to overcome the problem,
perform actions to effect the rescue, and provide aftercare to the victims.
Rescue aid means to select an appropriate equipment item that is available in thecompetition area and is able to be utilized effectively during the rescue.
Securing means to make safe from imminent danger with a rescue technique such as athrowing line/rope, reaching pole/object, throwing a ring/buoyant aid, craft/boat, support
with a tow/carry.
Landing means to safely remove the victim from the water and position them safely on
the beach, dock, or deck.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 3

MARKING SYSTEM
Overall a weighted marking system is used however the judge’s use direct marking andthe weighting is tallied by using a weighting factor during the final results collation.
The direct marking component requires each judge to observe their section and allocate
up to 10 marks in each of the five sections to provide a relatively objective basis for
judging. This enables each judge to provide a consistent score from 0-10 in all sectionsof the judge scoring sheets to ensure that a consistent value is applied to each teamperformances.
The relative merit / value of the rescuer performance in each section is accounted for by
the application of a weighting factor to the raw score in each component in that section.
This provides high scores for a rescue performance requiring a greater degree of skill,
judgment or priority. The Scenario Design Team, approved by the Chief Referee,determines the weighting factors based on the specific test elements which are thenfactored into the final event recording sheets. Refer to the Weighting Factor section
below.
The judge scoring sheets is separated into essential elements grouped into 5 sections
with 10 marks assigned to each section with a raw total of 50 marks.
Judges should avoid using a pass/fail criteria based on their lifesaving principles andmay use the full range of marks available. Therefore, when allocating marks judges
must assess the competitor’s actions when rescuing a victim. They must analyze therescue performance and compare it with each of the other teams so that ultimately theperformances are ranked by their comparative judging.
It is important that judges ensure that their allocation of marks will rank the team’s
performance in a consistent manner throughout the whole event and that those whocompete earlier in an event are not disadvantaged by an overly cautious allocation ofmarks. This will not occur providing the allocation of marks is consistently applied basedon performance from the first to last team.
Judges need to be aware that some teams may have one competitor dealing with a
victim where other teams may have several different competitors’ dealing with the victim.
To ensure a consistent measure of the team performance the focus needs to remain on
the victim to ensure an on-going evaluation of the victim’s condition, and the actions
performed, throughout the rescue.
RANK MARKING SCALE
The following ranking scale provides an overview and acts as a guide for judges whenallocating marks. Increments of 0.5 can be allocated by the judge.

Excellent10

Very Good

7.5-9.5

Satisfactory

5.0-7.0

Weak

2.5-4.5

Poor

0-2.0

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 4

WEIGHTING FACTOR
In order to recognize and acknowledge that some victim rescues require a greater
degree of skill and judgment, a weighting factor or multiplier is applied to areas of thejudge scoring sheets. Note: This enables a competitor to receive a higher score for the
performance of rescues with a higher weighting factor linked to the priorities andprinciples of the rescue. These weighting factors are applied using an electronic
recording spread sheet and the calculations are reflected in the final score for the victim.
The Judges give a mark out of 10 for each performance criteria and the weighting factor
accounts for the high, moderate or low degree of difficulty.
A weighting factor matrix guide is outlined in the tables below to allow for the use of arange depending on the position and type of victim. The weighting factor is set by the
scenario designer and approved by the Chief Referee based on the degree of difficulty
to rescue the victims. This allows flexibility between two similar victims with one being
more difficult to rescue than the other.
OVERVIEW OF WEIGHTING FACTOR FOR CHIEF JUDGE SCORE SHEET
Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

ASSESSMENT

Degree of Difficulty

Significant barrier to assess and identify victim
priorities (distance, obstacles, etc.)

1.5Moderate barrier to assess and identify victim
priorities (distance, obstacles, etc.)

1.25

Minor barrier to assess and identify victim priorities(distance, obstacles, etc.)

1

Rationale: The Team Leaders needs to assess the victim priorities, redirects ordispatches rescuers as the priorities are identified or changed.
Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

CONTROL OVER THE SCENARIO

Degree of Difficulty

Significant limitations that provide difficulty forteams to maintain safety (lack of safety equipment,
dangers, etc.)

1.5Moderate environment, equipment, condition
limitations to maintain safety (lack of safety
equipment, dangers, etc.)

1.25

Minor environment, equipment, condition
limitations to maintain safety (lack of safety
equipment, dangers, etc.)

1

Rationale: Control over the scenario is essential, monitoring safety and environmental
conditions, approaches may need to be adjusted to ensure the lowest risk to therescuers.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 5OVERVIEW OF WEIGHTING FACTOR FOR JUDGE SCORING SHEETS
Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

COMMUNICATION

Degree of Difficulty

Significant interference to communication due tosize and layout or dimension of the area, noise,
etc.

1.5

Moderate interference to communication due tosize and layout or dimension of the area, noise,
etc.

1.25

Minor interference to communication due to sizeand layout or dimension of the area, noise, etc.

1

Rationale: Interferences in communication due to size and layout or dimension of thearea may require adjustments to the methods of communication to be effective.
Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

SEARCH

Degree of Difficulty

Victim is significantly hidden from view andsearching

1.5

Victim is moderately hidden from view or searching

1.25

Victim is minimally hidden from view or searching1

Rationale: Locating victims can be a challenge if the victims are hidden from view
and/or observed by equipment or other victims. This criteria reflects the difficulty
associated with searching victims in these circumstances.
Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

TEAMWORK

Degree of Difficulty

Teamwork without bystanders/victim assistance or
bystanders are uncooperative/distracting

1.5

Teamwork with reluctant bystanders/victim
assistance

1.25

Teamwork with cooperative bystander/victim
assistance1

Rationale: Teamwork is improved when bystanders/victims are cooperative andavailable noting that clear concise instructions need to be given. Teams need to listen
and respond effectively when working as a team.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 6OVERVIEW OF WEIGHTING FACTOR FOR JUDGE SCORING SHEETS

Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

VICTIM RECOGNITION, APPROACH

Degree of Difficulty

Victim far from landing i.e. 15m+

1.5

Victim near to landing i.e. 6-10m

1.25

Victim close to landing or on deck i.e. 5m

1

Rationale: It is more difficult to recognize victims that are further away from thedeck/dock or entry / exit point and it takes more time to rescue them. Therefore,
victims that are at a greater distance would receive a higher weighting factor.
Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

RESCUE

Degree of Difficulty

Refuses aid and will not swim in unless clear andconcise directions are given

1.5

Accepts aid but will not swim in unless clear andconcise directions are given

1.25

Accepts aid and swims in

1

Rationale: Victims are more difficult to rescue due to refusal or inability to hold an aid
or swim to safety. Therefore, a higher weighting factor is allocated for victims that are
more difficult to rescue or are uncooperative and the rescuer is rewarded for
persistence and securing them. Mobilize the mobile, secure those in imminent danger
and recover and resuscitate.
Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

CONTROL OF VICTIM

Degree of Difficulty

Talk or Throw rescue expected

1.5

Reach or Tow rescue expected

1.25

Carry rescue expected1

Rationale: Rescuers should rescue those that have the highest chance of survival firstand present the lowest risk of danger to the rescuer. Mobilize the mobile, secure thosein imminent danger and recover and resuscitate. Therefore, victims that can be rescued
easily should be rescued first and the more difficult victims rescued last.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 7OVERVIEW OF WEIGHTING FACTOR FOR JUDGE SCORING SHEETS
Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

LANDING

Degree of Difficulty

Weak Swimmer/Mobile at time of landing

1.5

Non/Injured Swimmer at time of landing

1.25

Unconscious/Non breathing/Spinal Injured
Swimmer at time of landing

1

Rationale: Rescuers should assist those who can help themselves or who could help
others first to land then help those that require more effort and attention such as those
who are in imminent danger like non swimmers, injured swimmers, and then finallythose victims that require continuous care and resuscitation.
Performance Criteria

Weighting Factor/

CARE AND AFTERCARE OF VICTIM

Degree of Difficulty

Unconscious/Non breathing/Spinal Injured
Swimmer

1.5

Non/Injured Swimmer

1.25

Weak Swimmer/Mobile

1

Rationale: Care and aftercare for victims that require continuous care or resuscitation
is more difficult than those in imminent danger or who are weak or mobile. Therefore, ahigher factor is assessed for victims that are more difficult to provide aftercare andmonitoring.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 8SAMPLE SCENARIO DESIGN WITH WEIGHTING FACTORSScenario Description:
You are at the sea on a pier; you observe several people who are on the pier and in thewater following an explosion on a ferry which sinks in the harbor. The craft isoverturned.
The only access to the sea is the designated area of the pier (side of deck) to enter andexit the water. The ends of the pool and other side of the pool do not exist and are outof bounds.
Victims:
Victim 1 – Weak swimmer wearing backpack/jug of water
Victim 2 – Weak swimmer holding sport bag/rope
Victim 3 – Non swimmer
Victim 4 – Non swimmer
Victim 5 - Injured swimmer with burns on face and hands
Victim 6 – Injured swimmer with broken leg
Victim 7 – Injured swimmer with cervical spinal injury holding a floating ring
Victim 8 – Non breathing submerged manikin
Victim 9 – Non breathing, submerged manikin

Victim # /Weighting
Factor
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

VictimRecognition

RescueControl ofVictimLanding

1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.5

1.5
1.5
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.0
1.0

1.5
1.5
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.0
1.0
1.0

1.5
1.5
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.0
1.0

Care andAftercare ofVictim
1.0
1.0
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.5
1.5
1.5

JUDGE SCORING SHEETSThe judge scoring sheets provide for the victim types you may to see in a SERC and
how it will be scored. The sheets are made up of four key areas;•

Victim notes – includes general notes for the judge to direct the victim on howthat type of victim might act or respond.

•

Judges notes – includes general notes for the judge on that type victim andhelpful hints on how the victim should act or will respond including how theyshould be rescued or secured to achieve high marks.

•

Judge scoring sheet – separated into five different sections with key criteria thejudge will be looking for.

•Marking scale – summarizes the ranking scale.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 9SAMPLE POOL SETUP, EQUIPMENT AND VICTIMS
Equipment – Each zone: (1X) craft, (1X) paddle, (1X) lifejacket, (1X) spinal board, (1X)
sport bag/rope, (1) backpack/jug of water, (1X) floating ring (2X) manikins, (7X) victims

Scenario

No access to side of pool

5 inj

No
accessto endof pool

4 ns

1 ws

6 inj

9 nsc
bouybouynoodlering

3 ns

craft/paddle/lifejacket

Sport bag/rope

Backpack/jug of water

8 nsc

Legend:TEAM
ENTRY
Weak swimmer - ws&
Bystander - byst
EXIT
Injured - inj
Non-swimmer – ns
No breathing and no signs of circulation – nsc

2 ws

7 inj

floating ring

Spinal Board

Note: Sample Pool Setup, equipment and victims are intended to provide guidance and are not the actual
Setup that may be used for the SERC Event.

No
accessto endof poolInternational Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 10OVERALL: SAMPLE CHIEF JUDGE SCORING SHEET
Draw No: ___________Team Name: __________________

Judge Identification: _______________

Judges notes: You have the overview of the SERC area and assess overall efficiency of the team. In particular you
mark the Team Leader’s control of the team – assessment of priorities and dispatch/direction of team members to deal
with the victims. You will also mark communication between the Leader and the team and between team members andthis may include information about the condition of the victims and what help is needed.
Your marks MUST take into account:• Any loss of control by the Leader becoming committed or involved to such an extent that overall control is lost.
• Do not mark any rescues the leader carries out as another judge is allocated to that victim.
• Whether assistance was sought. Any person sent for help as assistant will not be allowed to return.
Areas of marking

Mark (10)Assessment
Assessment of the emergency
Did the Leader coordinate the team and direct to the correct priorities of rescue?
On-going assessment / re-assessment
Control
Control and safety over the scenario area
Leader retains control throughout the scenario
On-going assessment / re-assessment
Communication
Communication and feedback between Leader and team members,
And between team members and victims
Basic questioning and simple instructions given to victims and team
Note: Emphasis is on non-verbal and simple verbal communication and not on extensive
verbal communication.
SearchEffective search of scenario area
Identification and location of victims
Teamwork
Teamwork, summon assistance (emergency services called) with appropriate information
provided
Identification and securing of all victims
Effective use of bystanders / victims
Rough handling of victims – Deduct 10 points
Total

Excellent 10

Very Good 7.5 – 9.5

Satisfactory 5.0 – 7.0

Weak 2.5 – 4.5

Poor 0 – 2.0

Specific aspects of the scenario may be weighted to provide higher scores for a rescue performance requiring agreater degree of skill and judgment. Marking in increments of 0.5 allotted by the judge.
Note: Sample Judge Scoring Sheets are intended to provide guidance and are not the actual Judge Sheets that
may be used for the SERC Event.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 11

NON-SWIMMER: SAMPLE JUDGE SCORING SHEET
Draw No: ___________Team Name: __________________

Judge Identification: _______________

Victim: non-swimmer
The victim is struggling to stay above the water and is starting to panic as they cannot get to safety. They are capableof taking a rescue aid if pushed into their reach (judge will give specifics based upon scenario description). However if
a contact rescue is attempted, they will struggle and try to grab hold of the rescuer (they will not turn on their back).
They need assistance to get out of the water and when out will be exhausted from the experience.
Judges notes
Non-swimmer is in imminent danger and is a high priority for rescue. They will attempt to grab any rescuer who
approaches them directly without an aid. If a contact rescue is used, low marks should be recorded for the rescuecomponent. The victim should be made safe with an effective and efficient return to safety. Landing should be donewith care. They will answer questions asked of them.
Areas of marking

Mark (10)Victim recognition/approach
Recognition of non-swimmer (high priority), speed of reaching victim
Safe approach by rescuer
RescueRescue with extreme caution(low marks for contact rescue if not required – maximum 5 marks for this section)
Monitor while still in water; may require further directions/instructions
Control of victim
Clear effective questioning and reassurance
Reassurance during rescue until returned to safety
Landing
Care of the victim; protection of the head
Appropriate landing for size and strength of rescuer
Care and aftercare of victim
Safe position away from the edge; warmth and protection where possible;
monitor safety; ongoing reassurance
Rough handling of victims – Deduct 10 points
Total

Excellent 10

Very Good 7.5 – 9.5

Satisfactory 5.0 – 7.0

Weak 2.5 – 4.5

Poor 0 – 2.0

Specific aspects of the scenario may be weighted to provide higher scores for a rescue performance requiring agreater degree of skill and judgment. Marking in increments of 0.5 allotted by the judge.
Note: Sample Judge Scoring Sheets are intended to provide guidance and are not the actual Judge Sheets that
may be used for the SERC Event.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 12WEAK SWIMMER: SAMPLE JUDGE SCORING SHEET
Draw No: ___________Team Name: __________________

Judge Identification: _______________

Victim: weak swimmer
The victim is a weak swimmer struggling to get back to safety. They will be capable of shouting or calling out for help.
They will be able to take an aid to get to safety. If a contact carry is performed they will struggle and resist. They will beable to land themselves. They will provide assistance or contact emergency services and will cooperative throughout.
Judges notes
Weak swimmers need to be made safe very quickly. The victim can be talked at or given signs to return to safety; they
will need to be kept monitored. They will struggle if a contact rescue is used; low marks should be awarded for contact
rescueAreas of marking

Mark (10)Victim recognition/approach
Recognition that he is a weak swimmer and high priority to mobilize
Safe approach by rescuer
RescueEncourage return to safety with clear directions; perform a non-contact rescue(low marks for contact rescue if not required – maximum 5 marks for this section)
Monitor while still in water; may require further directions/instructions
Control and use of victim
Effective communication / instruction; use for keeping another victim warm / safe
Landing
Make secure and land
Appropriate landing for size and strength of rescuer
Care and aftercare of victim
Safe position away from danger; warmth and protection where possible;
monitor safety; ongoing monitoring and care
Rough handling of victims – Deduct 10 points
Total

Excellent 10

Very Good 7.5 – 9.5

Satisfactory 5.0 – 7.0

Weak 2.5 – 4.5

Poor 0 – 2.0

Specific aspects of the scenario may be weighted to provide higher scores for a rescue performance requiring agreater degree of skill and judgment. Marking in increments of 0.5 allotted by the judge.
Note: Sample Judge Scoring Sheets are intended to provide guidance and are not the actual Judge Sheets that
may be used for the SERC Event.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 13

UNCONCIOUS/NON-BREATHING VICTIM: SAMPLE JUDGE SCORING SHEET
Draw No: ___________Team Name: __________________

Judge Identification: _______________

Victim: unconscious, not breathing
This victim will be on the bottom of the pool.
Judges notes
This victim is a low-order rescue priority and rescuers should deal with the high priority victims as quickly as possible inorder to get to this victim who requires continuous care.
CPR should be commenced when it is safe to do so; on land, boat, rescue breaths with a buoyant aid in the water, etc.
and your marks should reflect the efficiency and effectiveness of the CPR simulation (and not measured against yourown Country/Nation’s teaching / standards).
Areas of Marking

Mark (10)Victim Recognition/Approach
Identification of casualty
RescueSpeed of rescue (considering priority of rescue)
Speed in getting back to safety
Control of victim
Effective and efficient carry
Landing
Careful handling/landing of the casualty
Care and aftercare of victim
Effective and efficient CPR likely to assist recovery
Safe position away from danger; monitor safety; ongoing monitoring and care
Rough handling of victim – Deduct 10 points
Total
Excellent 10

Very Good 7.5 – 9.5

Satisfactory 5.0 – 7.0

Weak 2.5 – 4.5

Poor 0 – 2.0

Specific aspects of the scenario may be weighted to provide higher scores for a rescue performance requiring agreater degree of skill and judgment. Marking in increments of 0.5 allotted by the judge.
Note: Sample Judge Scoring Sheets are intended to provide guidance and are not the actual Judge Sheets that
may be used for the SERC Event.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 14INJURIED VICTIM: SAMPLE JUDGE SCORING SHEET
Draw No: ___________Team Name: __________________

Judge Identification: _______________

Victim: conscious victim with injury
Victim will be complaining of a specific injury and will not be calmed.
Judges notes
This is a medium priority victim requiring assistance. Rescuer should use an aid. Victim may not be able to hold an aid
depending on the injury and may need assistance in the water and on landing. The victim should be removed carefully
from the water with attention to the injured part of the body. They will not be cooperative.
Areas of Marking

Mark (10)Victim recognition/approach
Recognition that they are an injured swimmer and medium priority to mobilize
Safe approach by rescuer
RescueEncourage to return to the edge with clear directions
Perform non-contact rescue(low marks for contact rescue if not required – maximum 5 marks for this section)
Monitor while still in water; may require further directions/instructions
Control of victim
Effective communication / instruction
Reassurance throughout rescue
Landing
Careful removal from water with attention to injury
Make secure and land (monitor while still in water; may require further directions/instructions)
Appropriate landing for size and strength of rescuer
Care and aftercare of victim
Safe position away from the edge; warmth and protection where possible;
monitor safety; ongoing monitoring and care
Rough handling of victim – Deduct 10 points
Total
Excellent 10

Very Good 7.5 – 9.5

Satisfactory 5.0 – 7.0

Weak 2.5 – 4.5

Poor 0 – 2.0

Mark - Specific aspects of the scenario may be weighted to provide higher scores for a rescue performance requiring
a greater degree of skill and judgment. Marking in increments of 0.5 allotted by the judge.
Note: Sample Judge Scoring Sheets are intended to provide guidance and are not the actual Judge Sheets that
may be used for the SERC Event.

International Life Saving Federation
SERC Guide for Coaches, Competitors, Judges & Technical Officials

Page 15BYSTANDER: SAMPLE JUDGE SCORING SHEET
Draw No: ___________Team Name: __________________

Judge Identification: _______________

Victim: conscious victim with injury
The bystander will not offer assistance but will be cooperative and take direction.
Judges notes
This is a high priority bystander as they can lend assistance when given direction. .
Areas of Marking

Mark (10)Victim recognition/approach
Recognition that they are a bystander and cooperative.
Assesses relevant information
Questions bystander to assess information about the scenario.
(low marks for not giving the bystander directions – maximum 5 marks for this section)
Provides direction and instructions
Rescuer provides directions or instructions to assist the rescue scenario such as; asst.
removals, reassure victims, call emergency services.
Monitoring bystander actions
Check periodically to ensure that bystander has followed the directions of the Rescuer
throughout rescue
Provides ongoing encouragement
Provides feedback to bystander on their actions to encourage them to assist with victim
supportRough handling of victim – Deduct 10 points
Total
Excellent 10

Very Good 7.5 – 9.5

Satisfactory 5.0 – 7.0

Weak 2.5 – 4.5

Poor 0 – 2.0

Mark - Specific aspects of the scenario may be weighted to provide higher scores for a rescue performance requiring
a greater degree of skill and judgment. Marking in increments of 0.5 allotted by the judge.
Note: Sample Judge Scoring Sheets are intended to provide guidance and are not the actual Judge Sheets that
may be used for the SERC Event.