CONFÉRENCE EUROPÉENNE DES MINISTRES DES TRANSPORTS
EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORTRESOLUTION No. 92/2 ON NEW CLASSIFICATION OF INLAND WATERWAYS[CEMT/CM(92)6/FINAL]

The Council of Ministers meeting at Athens, on 11 and 12 June 1992,

TAKING NOTE of the report, [reproduced below]

RECOMMENDSA) Concerning the technical aspects of infrastructures:
1.

Governments should give consideration to the new classification of European inland waterways, as set
out in Table 1, with a view to classifying their own country’s inland waterways. The maps of theirnetwork should be brought into line with this classification. Under their responsibility, a document
should be set out considering all the characteristics of any waterway or part of it ( waterway
outline, fairway location, permissible draught, minimum height under bridges, recommended
dimensions for locks and other elevators for ships...) in view of achieving the best and as complete
as possible exchange of information between each inland waterway user. With the same objective,
the ECE and ECMT’s maps of European inland waterways are also to be reviewed. This work will
be assigned to a group of experts.

2.

In view of the completion of an homogeneous European inland waterway network, governments
should also take into consideration this new classification in their modernisation and improvement
programs of their network or when renewing the structures.
Where a regional or Class IV waterway is to be modernised, the parameters to be adopted should be atleast Class Va. When modernising or creating a waterway of international importance, theparameters to be used should be at least Class Vb with a minimum draught of 2.80 metres and aminimum height under bridges of 7.00 metres where necessary for container transport. For inland
waterways where a bridge clearance of 700 cm is not considered as economically reasonable, thepossibility of using longer convoys (Class Vb) should be taken into account. The lengths of locks
or other structures through which vessels pass must be established with reference to the maximum
dimensions of pushed units.

3.

Navigational techniques can still be considerably improved. Progress can be made as regards both theconstruction and equipment of vessels handling traditional bulk traffic and research on new typesof vessel better able to handle other traffic that has developed over the past few decades.
Governments must ensure the promotion of initiatives to modernise transport equipment and theequipment used for loading, unloading and transhipment. Although coasters and fluvio-maritime
vessels are not referred to in this report, they also must be taken into account, at least on waterways
that have a gauge compatible with their dimensions.

4.

Following the adaptation of the networks, their maintenance in good condition and improvements intransport equipment, the authorities must be particularly careful to ensure that inland navigation isready for smooth integration into the Single Market of 1993, able to cater for available traffic andto adapt to the computerisation of the management, business and navigational techniques that will
be developing in the next few years.

B) Regarding inland waterways development policy:
1.

Governments should recognise the importance of inland waterways transport and give it all theattention needed to ensure development consistent with all its potential. In this connection,
attention should again be drawn to the conclusions of report CM(89)27 of 25 October 1989
concerning, in particular, the role of inland navigation in transport economics at both national andinternational levels.

2.

The forthcoming entry into service of the Rhine-Main-Danube link and the opening of the East
European countries to the market economy will have a favourable impact on inland waterways
transport. New links will be developed and probably modify existing flows of traffic to someextent. It will be necessary to ensure that the transition is as smooth as possible so that vessels canmake use of the whole of the European network with no breaks in the continuity.

3.

Many studies of combined transport have been undertaken, but mainly in connection with rail/roadlinks. However, inland waterways can also be incorporated effectively in such systems. Studies inthis connection are moreover now on the agendas of the international bodies concerned. Thesestudies must be supported and pursued with a view to reaching practical solutions.

4.

There is considerable capacity available on the European network which can be used with no need for
substantial investment. Everywhere competition exists between types of infrastructure, the transfer
of some road and rail traffic to the waterways is often suggested as a means of reducing congestion
and improving environmental conditions. A campaign to provide information and incentives toindustry, shippers and potential users should be undertaken on the initiative of those governmentsthat would find this partial transfer of traffic a response to the problems of congestion andenvironmental disamenities which are becoming increasingly difficult.

2ECMT Resolution 92/2 on New Classification of Inland Waterways

3ECMT Resolution 92/2 on New Classification of Inland Waterways

4

ECMT Resolution 92/2 on New Classification of Inland Waterways

Notes for table

1. The class of a waterway is determined by the horizontal dimensions of the vessels or pushed units,especially by their width.
2. The draught of a inland waterway must be specified with reference to local conditions.
3. Characteristic tonnage for each class according to dimensions and draughts indicated.
4. Takes into account a security clearance of 30 cm between the highest point of the vessel or its load and theheight under the bridge.
5. Vessels used in the Oder region and on waterways between the Oder and Elbe.
6. Adapted for container transport:-- 5.25 metres for vessels carrying two layers of containers;-- 7.00 metres for vessels carrying three layers of containers;-- 9.10 metres for vessels carrying four layers of containers;
50 per cent of the containers may be empty, otherwise ballast must be used.
7. The first figure relates to existing situations and the second to future developments or, in some cases, also
existing situations.
8. Takes account of the dimensions of motor vessels proposed for ro-ro transport and shipments ofcontainers; the dimensions given are approximate.
9. Relates to pushed units on the Danube which often consist of more than nine barges.

5ECMT Resolution 92/2 on New Classification of Inland Waterways