October 7, 2016

Address by CHRISTINE LAGARDE,
Chairman of the Executive Board andManaging Director of the International Monetary Fund,to the Board of Governors of the Fund,at the Joint Annual Discussion

Managing an Inclusive Transition for the Global Economy
By Christine Lagarde
2016 IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings Plenary, Washington, DC, October 7, 2016
Let me express our concern and convey our warm thoughts and condolences to all those whoare currently affected by Hurricane Matthew, who are suffering and struggling to escape thedisaster caused by yet another weather catastrophe. We all feel the same—and we standready to help.
Chairman Cardenas, President Kim, Governors, honored guests: on behalf of the IMF, let me
warmly welcome you to the 2016 Annual Meetings!
Beyond economic forecasts and policies, our discussions over the last few days have also
been about the economic transition that looms ahead—driven by innovation and newtechnology, but by other factors too.
Today, as we review our work and look ahead, I would like to talk about how we can manage
that transition in a way that is inclusive—that benefits everyone.
And I was wondering, wouldn’t it be marvelous if we could call on some of the GreatThinkers of the past to help us in this task? They would have plenty to tell us about economictransitions. So I am going to invite some of them into our conversation today.
Who better to start with than John Maynard Keynes, one of the IMF’s founding fathers? Hesaid that the challenge often “lies not so much in developing new ideas, as in escaping fromold ones.”1I will try to meet that challenge this morning—just as I have tried during the five years since
I first stood before you here.
1. A changing IMF, a changing world
What a journey! The IMF has embraced change at a phenomenal pace:
From dealing with the financial crisis, to reform of our lending facilities, surveillance, andcapacity building. About 75 programs for a total of US$415 billion; close to 670 Article IVconsultations; and almost 17,000 technical assistance missions.
Just since our Annual Meetings last year, we have been able to complete the 2010 Quota andGovernance reforms, following ratification by the U.S. Congress. This led to an important
shift in the Fund’s representation—with four emerging market countries now in our top-ten
shareholders. Let me thank President Obama for his personal support in getting us across thefinish line.
1Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Preface.

2
Just a week ago, we were able to include the Chinese renminbi in the Special Drawing Rights
basket—a significant step for China and the global economy. I would like to recognize theChinese authorities for their efforts in fulfilling the SDR criteria.
Just a few days ago, our membership decided to extend zero interest rates on all IMF
concessional facilities—an important step to help low-income countries deal with future
shocks and to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals
And as of today, our members have pledged to strengthen our third line of defense with aframework of bilateral borrowing agreements totaling more than $340 billion – which will
help to maintain the IMF’s firepower at around $1 trillion. Our thanks to those countries thathave already committed to this effort—and to those who intend to commit.
How have we been able to reach these milestones? With the tremendous support received
from you—and from your representatives on our Executive Board. And, of course, we would
not have been able to do anything had it not been for my exceptional colleagues on theManagement team; and our talented, dedicated, and excellent staff.
Please join me in acknowledging them.
One more thing: I want to thank you, our members, for putting your trust in me—bysupporting my second term as Managing Director. It is my greatest honor to serve thisinstitution.
2. The global outlook
So… some positive developments for the Fund. Global developments have been lessencouraging.
Advanced economies remain stuck in a low-growth, low-investment, low-inflation cycle.
And while growth in emerging markets is picking up, low-income commodity exporters are
struggling with low prices.
We project global growth at 3.1 percent this year, with only a modest acceleration to
3.4 percent next year. Putting it simply: growth has been too low, for too long, and benefiting
too few.
The social and political consequences are becoming all too apparent. Inequality remains toohigh in too many countries. Conflict and migration exert a terrible toll. Trade has become apolitical football. And supporters of economic integration—and cooperation—are on thedefensive.
If our founders were here today, they would surely be concerned. They shared a convictionthat trade and openness are beneficial to those who embrace them. They agreed thatmultilateral dialogue is key to the stability of the global economy.
This is the essence of Article 1 of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement. Now, those principles
are facing their biggest test in decades.

3And yet, we know that openness and international cooperation are needed more than ever toimprove the lives of people everywhere. We also know that they are needed to face thechallenges posed by demographic pressures, climate change, and new technology.
3. Moving into the digital age
You have heard me talk about these challenges before. But as is becoming increasingly clear,
nowhere are the changes coming so fast as in technology.
The way we think about the industrial revolution, our grandchildren may well look back on
the first quarter of the 21st century as the digital revolution.
We could approach an inflection point where autonomous cars and trucks become
ubiquitous. Where robots and automation become indispensable in all industries. Where cell
phones replace bank branches. Where artificial intelligence and quantum computing
turbocharge research and revolutionize the global economy.
Nobody knows exactly how this future will unfold. But it seems safe to say that this newmachine age will lead to further gains for higher-skilled workers, and put further pressure on
those who are less well-equipped to compete – whether in advanced, emerging, ordeveloping economies.
What would our Great Thinkers make of it? Well, there is one who argued that:“Substitution of machinery for human labor… may render the population redundant.”2Well – wait a minute!
The Great Thinker I just quoted is—David Ricardo. He voiced his concern about 200 years
ago, at the dawn of the industrial age. And on this particular point, he was proven wrong.
Time and again—from the Bronze Age, to the steam engine, to electricity—great innovations
have reshaped and created new industries, lifted productivity, and increased employment.
There is no doubt that technology has added to global welfare. Just imagine, for example,
where would we be if agriculture would still rely on ploughs pulled by horses?
Yet, we also know that during major economic transitions, some get left behind, and manysuffer. History tells us that education and social safety nets must be retooled to support andenable people to adjust to a fast-changing world.
Otherwise, globalization may face major reversals—think of what happened during the Great
Depression and the infamous Smoot–Hawley Tariff.
So, while embracing the coming transition, we must manage it wisely.

2David Ricardo: Principles, chapter 31, “On Machinery,” 1821.

4
We need growth—but we need inclusive growth. We need to transition to the digital age—
but a transition that benefits everyone. And we need to accelerate now.
4. Policies for inclusive growth
The first priority for inclusive growth is to escape the “new mediocre” of low growth, lowemployment, and low wages.
That means using all policy tools – monetary, fiscal, and structural: to maximize thesynergies within countries—and amplify the impact though coordination across countries.
This “three-pronged” approach would free up more policy space – more room to act – than iscommonly assumed.
Implementing structural reforms to unleash economic potential is key. Using fiscal tools—
where available—to prepare for the transition is also key.
With interest rates at historic lows, there is no better time for public investment: to expand
access to high-speed internet, promote energy-efficient transport, and build climate-friendly
infrastructure.
Even where fiscal space is unavailable, governments can reallocate funds into R&D—byoffering tax credits and supporting public research institutions.
Remember: all the technologies that make our mobile phones “smart” have benefited
from public funding—wireless networks, GPS, touch screens.
This shows that good public policies can boost growth for decades to come.
To reinvigorate growth, we also need to reinvigorate trade. Over the past 25 years, trade hasleveraged new technologies into productivity increases worldwide—helping to reduce by half
the proportion of the global population living in extreme poverty.3 and creating millions of
new jobs with higher wages.4
Conversely, building trade barriers is a sure way to reduce overall output, investment, and jobs.
But again, we need to put greater emphasis on policies that can help mitigate the negative
effects of trade, and make everybody benefit.
Achieving greater inclusion is actually a tall order. It requires more than macroeconomics. It
also involves politics. And social contracts—which must reflect national, regional, andcultural diversity.

34

From 1990–2010. World Bank figures: World Development Indicators.

In the U.S., for instance, workers in export-intensive industries earn a premium perhaps as high as 15 percent
over other industries.

5But still, economists know policies that can help.
Indeed, the second priority for inclusive growth is providing everybody with a level playing
field. Let me give you three examples:First – increase equality of opportunity. Think of smart education policies, especially forgirls. Think of retraining to help workers displaced by outsourcing. Think of minimum wages
and tax incentives to give women more opportunities in the labor market.
Second – promote fair burden-sharing. We need an international tax system that minimizes
loopholes and guards against the corrosive effects of corruption. And we need to protect lowincome countries from the harmful effects of tax base erosion and profit-shifting.
Third – preserve competition and market access. This is especially important for the digital
economy, where network effects can lead to increases in market concentration—which harms
innovation and concentrates wealth at the top. By injecting more—and fairer—competition,
we can ensure that the vast potential of the digital age can be managed for the benefit of all.
5. International cooperation and the role of the IMF
Let us assume that, with all these policies, we manage to reduce inequality within countries.
How then will we reduce inequality between countries?
The international community made a big step toward this objective when it came together
last year to set the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. But to reach them, low-income
countries need higher and more reliable government revenue—so they can invest in
infrastructure, healthcare, and education. Building capacity in this area is a priority for them.
It is also a priority for the IMF.
Every year, we help more than 100 countries improve their domestic revenue mobilization –and we are responding to increasing demand.
Reducing inequality also means creating a stronger global financial safety net—to help
emerging and developing countries better cope with volatility. Strengthening the IMF’s
lending toolkit will help here—as will stronger cooperation with other regional institutions.
At last year’s Annual Meetings, I talked to you about “AIM”—an IMF that is more Agile,
Integrated, and Member-focused. Have we made progress? Yes!
We have stepped up efforts in our core areas of expertise—including fiscal, monetary,and exchange rates, as well as expanding our macro-financial analysis.

We have stepped up work on other macro-critical issues—such as financial inclusion,
gender equality, corruption, migration, and climate change.

And we have grown our ability to support capacity development through a growing
number of regional training centers and through technology. More than 13,000 people—
from 184 countries—have successfully completed our online courses (MOOCs).

6
So we have raised our game—and we will continue to do so. That is our commitment—mycommitment—to you.
Conclusion
Let me conclude by turning to one more Great Thinker—U.S. Treasury Secretary HenryMorgenthau. Speaking at the original Bretton Woods conference, he said:“Prosperity has no fixed limits… Prosperity, like peace, is indivisible. We cannot
afford to have it scattered here or there among the fortunate or to enjoy it at theexpense of others.”5
So our task is to manage wisely the economic transition facing us, so that we can achieve
greater prosperity—not just for the fortunate few, but for all.
Since I became Managing Director, I have travelled to more than 60 member countries. I
have learned so much. I have so many wonderful memories. But what stands out most are thepeople I have met.
One unforgettable example is the Syrian woman in a refugee camp in Jordan who held myhand and said: “Can you help us rebuild my country?”
These are the people who inspire me. The people that we serve. The people that we can help
build a better world, if we work together.
Thank you.

5Inaugural address by Henry Morgenthau Jr, Bretton Woods Conference, July 1, 1944.