FLUOROMONOMERSMANUFACTURING PROCESSVINYL ETHERS NORTH CARBON BEDREMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND
DIVISION STACK TEST REPORTTEST DATES: 25 AND 26 MARCH 2019
THE CHEMOURS COMPANYFAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:

THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
22828 NC Hwy 87 W
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28306

Prepared by:

WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.
1400 Weston Way
P.O. Box 2653
West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380

April 2019
W.O. No. 15418.002.011

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

4/19/2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section1.

Page

INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1
1.1

FACILITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ...........................................1

1.2

TEST OBJECTIVES ...............................................................................................1

1.3

TEST PROGRAM OVERVIEW .............................................................................1

2.

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ...................................................................................43.

PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................6

4.

5.

3.1

FLUOROMONOMERS ..........................................................................................6

3.2

PROCESS OPERATIONS AND PARAMETERS .................................................6

DESCRIPTION OF TEST LOCATIONS .......................................................................7
4.1

DIVISION STACK..................................................................................................7

4.2

VINYL ETHERS NORTH CARBON BED INLET AND OUTLET .....................7

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS ...........................................................10
5.1
5.2

5.3
6.

STACK GAS SAMPLING PROCEDURES .........................................................10
5.1.1
Pre-Test Determinations .........................................................................10
STACK PARAMETERS .......................................................................................10
5.2.1
EPA Method 0010...................................................................................10
5.2.2
EPA Method 0010 Sample Recovery .....................................................125.2.3
EPA Method 0010 Sample Analysis.......................................................14
GAS COMPOSITION ...........................................................................................16

DETAILED TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .....................................................19

APPENDIX APROCESS OPERATIONS DATAAPPENDIX B

RAW AND REDUCED TEST DATAAPPENDIX CLABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTAPPENDIX DSAMPLE CALCULATIONSAPPENDIX E

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION RECORDSAPPENDIX F

LIST OF PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMDi

4/19/2019

LIST OF FIGURES
Title

Page

Figure 4-1 Division Stack Test Port and Traverse Point Location ................................................ 8
Figure 4-2 VE North Process Carbon Bed Inlet and Outlet Schematic ......................................... 9
Figure 5-1 EPA Method 0010 Sampling Train ............................................................................. 11
Figure 5-2 HFPO Dimer Acid Sample Recovery Procedures for Method 0010 ......................... 15
Figure 5-3 WESTON Sampling System ...................................................................................... 18

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

ii

4/19/2019

LIST OF TABLES
Title

Page

Table 1-1 Sampling Plan for VEN Carbon Bed Testing................................................................. 3
Table 1-2 Sampling Plan for Division Stack .................................................................................. 4
Table 2-1 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid VEN Carbon Bed and Division Stack Test Results ... 5
Table 6-1 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid Test Data and Test Results Carbon Bed Inlet – Runs
1, 2, and 3 .............................................................................................................................. 20
Table 6-2 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid Test Data and Test Results Carbon Bed Outlet – Runs
1, 2, and 3 .............................................................................................................................. 22
Table 6-3 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid Test Data and Test Results Division Stack – Runs 1,
2 and 3 ................................................................................................................................... 24

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

iii

4/19/2019

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 FACILITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATIONThe Chemours Fayetteville Works (Chemours) is located in Bladen County, North Carolina,
approximately 10 miles south of the city of Fayetteville. Chemours operating areas on the site
include the Fluoromonomers, IXM and Polymers Processing Aid (PPA) manufacturing areas,
Wastewater Treatment, and Powerhouse.
Chemours contracted Weston Solutions, Inc. (Weston) to perform HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride,
captured as HFPO Dimer Acid, emission testing on the Vinyl Ethers North (VEN) Carbon Bed
and Division stack at the facility. Testing was performed on 25 and 26 March 2019 and generally
followed the “Emission Test Protocol” reviewed and approved by the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). This report provides the results from theemission test program.
1.2 TEST OBJECTIVESThe specific objectives for this test program were as follows:Measure the emissions concentrations and mass emissions rates of HFPO Dimer Acid
Fluoride from the Carbon Bed inlet and outlet and Division stack which are located in the
Fluoromonomers process area.
Calculate the Carbon Bed removal efficiency for HFPO Dimer Acid.
Monitor and record process and emissions control data in conjunction with the test
program.
Provide representative emissions data.

1.3 TEST PROGRAM OVERVIEW
During the emissions test program, the concentrations and mass emissions rates of HFPO Dimer
Acid were measured at three locations.
Tables 1-1 and 1-2 provide a summary of the test locations and the parameters that were
measured along with the sampling/analytical procedures that were followed.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

1

4/19/2019Section 2 provides a summary of test results. A description of the processes is provided in
Section 3. Section 4 provides a description of the test locations. The sampling and analyticalprocedures are provided in Section 5. Detailed test results and discussion are provided in
Section 6.
Appendix C includes the summary reports for the laboratory analytical results. The fulllaboratory data packages are provided in electronic format and on CD with each hard copy.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

2

4/19/2019Table 1-1
Sampling Plan for VEN Carbon Bed Testing
Sampling Point & Location
Number of Tests:
Parameters To Be Tested:

Sampling or Monitoring Method

Sample Extraction/ Analysis Method(s):Sample Size
Total Number of Samples Collected1
Reagent Blanks (Solvents, Resins)1
Field Blank Trains1
Proof Blanks1
Trip Blanks1,2
Lab Blanks
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Samples(LCS)
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Sample
Duplicate (LCSD)Media Blanks
Isotope Dilution Internal Standard Spikes
Total No. of Samples

VEN Carbon Bed
6 (3 Carbon Bed inlet, 3 Carbon Bed outlet)
HFPO Dimer
Volumetric
CarbonOxygen Water Content
Acid
Flow Rate andDioxideGas Velocity(HFPO-DA)
EPA M4 in
EPA M-0010
EPA M1, M2,
EPA M3/3A
conjunction
M3A, and M4
with M-0010
in conjunction
testswith M-0010
tests
LC/MS/MS
NA6
NA
NA
3
≥ 1.5m
NA
NA
NA
NA
6
1 set
1 per source

6
0
0

3
0
0

3
0
0

6
0
0

1 per train
1 set
1 per fraction3
1 per fraction3

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0

1 per fraction3

0

0

0

0

1 set4Each sample
105

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

6

3

3

6

0
0

Key:
1 Sample collected in field.
2 Trip blanks include one XAD-2 resin module and one methanol sample per sample shipment.
3 Lab blank and LCS/LCSD includes one set per analytical fraction (front half, back half and condensate).
4 One set of media blank archived at laboratory at media preparation.
5 Actual number of samples collected in field.
6 Not applicable.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

3

4/19/2019Table 1-2
Sampling Plan for Division Stack
Sampling Point & Location
Number of Tests:
Parameters To Be Tested:

Sampling or Monitoring Method

HFPO Dimer
Acid(HFPO-DA)
EPA M-0010

Sample Extraction/ Analysis Method(s):Sample Size

LC/MS/MS≥ 1.5m3

Total Number of Samples Collected1
Reagent Blanks (Solvents, Resins)1
Field Blank Trains1
Proof Blanks1
Trip Blanks1,2
Lab Blanks
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Samples(LCS)
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Sample
Duplicate (LCSD)Media Blanks
Isotope Dilution Internal Standard Spikes
Total No. of Samples

Division Stack
3 (3 Division Stack)
Volumetric
CarbonOxygenFlow Rate andDioxideGas Velocity
EPA M1, M2,
M3A, and M4
in conjunction
with M-0010
tests
NA6

Water Content

EPA M3/3A

EPA M4 inconjunction
with M-0010
tests

NA

NA
NA
3
0
0

3
1 set
1 per source

NA
3
0
0

NA
3
0
0

NA
3
0
0

1 per train
1 set
1 per fraction3
1 per fraction3

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0

1 per fraction3

0

0

0

0

1 set4Each sample
45

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

3

3

3

3

0
0

Key:
1 Sample collected in field.
2 Trip blanks include one XAD-2 resin module and one methanol sample per sample shipment.
3 Lab blank and LCS/LCSD includes one set per analytical fraction (front half, back half and condensate).
4 One set of media blank archived at laboratory at media preparation.
5 Actual number of samples collected in field.
6 Not applicable.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

4

4/19/20192. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
A total of three test runs each were performed on the VEN Carbon Bed inlet and outlet andDivision stack. Table 2-1 provides a summary of the HFPO Dimer Acid emissions test resultsand Carbon Bed removal efficiencies. Detailed test results summaries are provided in Section 6.
It is important to note that emphasis is being placed on the characterization of the emissions
based on the stack test results. Research conducted in developing the protocol for stack testing
HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride, HFPO Dimer Acid Ammonium Salt and HFPO Dimer Acid
realized that the resulting testing, including collection of the air samples and extraction of thevarious fraction of the sampling train, would result in all three compounds being expressed as
simply the HFPO Dimer Acid. However, it should be understood that the total HFPO Dimer
Acid results provided in Table 2-1 and in this report include a percentage of each of the threecompounds.
Table 2-1
Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid VEN Carbon Bed and Division Stack Test Results
Inlet
R1
R2
R3
Averageg/sec
7.75E-02
6.23E-03
1.13E-02
3.17E-02

lb/hr
6.16E-01
4.95E-02
8.98E-02
2.52E-01

Outletg/sec
7.84E-04
3.74E-04
8.67E-04
6.75E-04

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

lb/hr
6.23E-03
2.97E-03
6.89E-03
5.36E-03

5

RemovalEfficiency
%
99.0
94.0
92.3
95.1

Division Stackg/sec
1.03E-03
6.50E-04
1.36E-03
1.01E-03

lb/hr
8.20E-03
5.16E-03
1.08E-02
8.05E-03

4/19/20193. PROCESS DESCRIPTIONSThe Fluoromonomers area is included in the scope of this test program.
3.1 FLUOROMONOMERS
These facilities produce a family of fluorocarbon compounds used to produce Chemours
products such as Nafion®, Krytox®, and Viton®, as well as sales to outside customers.
Process emissions are vented to the Division waste gas scrubber system (which includes thesecondary scrubber) and vents to the Carbon Bed and then onto the Division Stack. The VE
North building air systems are vented to the carbon bed and then onto the Division Stack.

3.2 PROCESS OPERATIONS AND PARAMETERS
The following table is a summary of the operation and products from the specific areas tested.
SourceVE
North

Operation/Product
PPVE

Batch or Continuous
Condensation is continuous. Agitated Bed Reactor
and Refining are batch.

During the test program, the following parameters were monitored by Chemours and areincluded in Appendix A.
Fluoromonomers Process
o VEN Precurser Rateo VEN Condensation Rateo VEN ABR RateIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

6

4/19/20194. DESCRIPTION OF TEST LOCATIONS
4.1 DIVISION STACK
Two 6-inch ID test ports were installed on the 36-inch ID fiberglass stack as shown below. The
four vents that enter the top of the stack and the one vent ~11 feet below are catch pots which,under normal process operations, do not discharge to the stack. They are used to vent process gas
to the stack in the event of a process upset and are not considered a flow contributor or a
disturbance.
Per EPA Method 1, a total of 12 traverse points (six per axis) were used for M-0010 isokinetic
sampling. Figure 4-1 provides a schematic of the test ports and traverse point locations.
4.2 VINYL ETHERS NORTH CARBON BED INLET AND OUTLET
Each fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) duct at the inlet and outlet of the carbon bed is 34-inch
ID. The test ports are located as shown below. Based on EPA Method 1, a total of 24 traverse
points (12 per port) were required for HFPO Dimer Acid sampling at both locations. Figure 4-2
provides a schematic of the test port and traverse port locations.
Location
Carbon Bed Inlet
Carbon Bed Outlet
Division Stack

Distance from Flow DisturbanceDownstream (B)Upstream (A)67 inches
61 inches> 1.9 duct diameters> 1.8 duct diameters
58 inches
57 inches> 1.7 duct diameters> 1.5 duct diameters
30 feet9 feet> 10 duct diameters> 3 diameters

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

7

4/19/2019

CATCH POT VENTS

36 "

~9'
~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ 128 "

~ 30 'TRAVERSEPOINT
NUMBERDISTANCE FROMINSIDE NEAR
WALL (INCHES)

1
2
3
4
5
6

1 5/8
5 3/8
10 7/826
31 5/833 3/8

CATCH POT~~BUILDING
EXHAUST
ID FANDISCHARGEDRAWING NOT TO SCALE

FIGURE 4-1
DIVISION STACK TEST PORTAND TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS
8IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\FIGURE 4-1 DIVISION STACK34 "TRAVERSEPOINT
NUMBERDISTANCE FROMINSIDE NEAR
WALL (INCHES)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

3/4
2 1/4
4
6
8 1/2
12 1/821 5/825 1/228
30
31 3/433 1/4

CEMENT BLOCK WALL

57 "

67 "

61 "

58 "
CARBON BED
ID
FAN

INLET

OUTLETDRAWING NOT TO SCALE

FIGURE 4-2
VE NORTH PROCESS CARBON BED INLET AND OUTLET SCHEMATIC
9IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\FIGURE 4-2 VE NORTH PROCESS SCHEMATIC

5. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
5.1 STACK GAS SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The purpose of this section is to describe the stack gas emissions sampling trains and to provide
details of the stack sampling and analytical procedures utilized during the emissions test
program.
5.1.1 Pre-Test Determinations
Preliminary test data were obtained at each test location. Stack geometry measurements were
measured and recorded, and traverse point distances verified. A preliminary velocity traverse
was performed utilizing a calibrated S-type pitot tube and an inclined manometer to determine
velocity profiles. Flue gas temperatures were observed with a calibrated direct readout panel
meter equipped with a chromel-alumel thermocouple. Preliminary water vapor content wasestimated by wet bulb/dry bulb temperature measurements.
A check for the presence or absence of cyclonic flow was previously conducted at each test
location. The cyclonic flow checks were negative (< 20°) verifying that the test locations were
acceptable for testing.
Preliminary test data was used for nozzle sizing and sampling rate determinations for isokinetic
sampling procedures.
Calibration of probe nozzles, pitot tubes, metering systems, and temperature measurement
devices was performed as specified in Section 5 of EPA Method 5 test procedures.
5.2 STACK PARAMETERS
5.2.1 EPA Method 0010
The sampling train utilized to perform the HFPO Dimer Acid sampling at all three locations was
an EPA Method 0010 train (see Figure 5-1). The Method 0010 consisted of a borosilicate nozzle
that attached directly to a heated borosilicate probe. In order to minimize possible thermal
degradation of the HFPO Dimer Acid, the probe and particulate filter were heated above stacktemperature to minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The probe was connected
directly to a heated borosilicate filter holder containing a solvent extracted glass fiber filter.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

10

HEATED AREATEMPERATURESENSORFILTER HOLDER
VENT
WALL

RIGID BOROSILICATE TUBINGOR FLEXIBLE SAMPLE LINECONDENSER
XAD-2 SORBENTMODULES ONE AND TWO

TEMPERATURESENSORTEMPERATURESENSORHEATED PROBE/
BUTTON HOOKNOZZLEREVERSE TYPEPITOT TUBE

CHECK
VALVE

ICE WATERRECIRCULATIONSILICA GEL

11
ICE WATER RECIRCULATION PUMPCONDENSATE TRAPTEMPERATURESENSORSIMPINGERSCONDENSATE TRAPICE BATH
IMPINGERVACUUMGAUGE

BY-PASS VALVEORIFICE
VACUUM LINE
MAIN
VALVE

NOTE: THE CONDENSER MAY BE POSITIONED HORIZONTALLY.
THE XAD-2 SORBENT MODULE WILL ALWAYS BE IN A VERTICAL POSITION..

ORIFICE
MANOMETERDRY GAS METER

AIR-TIGHT PUMPFIGURE 5-1
EPA METHOD 0010 SAMPLING TRAIN
IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\FIGURE 5-1 METHOD 0010

A section of borosilicate glass or flexible polyethylene tubing connected the filter holder exit to a
Grahm (spiral) type ice water-cooled condenser, an ice water-jacketed sorbent module containing
approximately 40 grams of XAD-2 resin. The XAD-2 resin tube was equipped with an inlet
temperature sensor. The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout impinger anda series of two impingers that contained 100 mL of high-purity distilled water. The train also
included a second XAD-2 resin trap behind the impinger section to evaluate possible sampling
train breakthrough. Each XAD-2 resin trap was connected to a 1-liter condensate knockout trap.
The final impinger contained 300 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. All impingers and thecondensate traps were maintained in an ice bath. Ice water was continuously circulated in thecondenser and both XAD-2 modules to maintain method-required temperature. A control consolewith a leakless vacuum pump, a calibrated orifice, and dual inclined manometers was connectedto the final impinger via an umbilical cord to complete the sample train.
HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride (CAS No. 2062-98-8) that is present in the stack gas is expected tobe captured in the sampling train along with HFPO Dimer Acid (CAS No. 13252-13-6). HFPO
Dimer Acid Fluoride underwent hydrolysis instantaneously in water in the sampling train andduring the sample recovery step, and was converted to HFPO Dimer Acid such that the amountof HFPO Dimer Acid emissions represented a combination of both HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride
and HFPO Dimer Acid.
During sampling, gas stream velocities were measured by attaching a calibrated S-type pitot tube
into the gas stream adjacent to the sampling nozzle. The velocity pressure differential wasobserved immediately after positioning the nozzle at each traverse point, and the sampling rateadjusted to maintain isokineticity at 100% ± 10. Flue gas temperature was monitored at eachpoint with a calibrated panel meter and thermocouple. Isokinetic test data was recorded at eachtraverse point during all test periods, as appropriate. Leak checks were performed on thesampling apparatus according to reference method instructions, prior to and following each run,component change (if required) or during midpoint port changes.
5.2.2 EPA Method 0010 Sample Recovery
At the conclusion of each test, the sampling train was dismantled, the openings sealed, and thecomponents transported to the field laboratory trailer for recovery.
A consistent procedure was employed for sample recovery:

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

12

4/19/20191. The two XAD-2 covered (to minimize light degradation) sorbent modules (1 and 2) weresealed and labeled.
2. The glass fiber filter(s) were removed from the holder with tweezers and placed in apolyethylene container along with any loose particulate and filter fragments.
3. The particulate adhering to the internal surfaces of the nozzle, probe and front half of thefilter holder were rinsed with a solution of methanol and ammonium hydroxide into apolyethylene container while brushing a minimum of three times until no visible
particulate remained. Particulate adhering to the brush was rinsed with methanol/ammonium hydroxide into the same container. The container was sealed.
4. The volume of liquid collected in the first condensate trap was measured, the value
recorded, and the contents poured into a polyethylene container.
5. All train components between the filter exit and the first condensate trap were rinsed withmethanol/ammonium hydroxide. The solvent rinse was placed in a separate polyethylene
container and sealed.
6. The volume of liquid in impingers one and two, and the second condensate trap, were
measured, the values recorded, and the sample was placed in the same container as Step 4
above, then sealed.
7. The two impingers, condensate trap, and connectors were rinsed with methanol/ammonium hydroxide. The solvent sample was placed in a separate polyethylene
container and sealed.
8. The silica gel in the final impinger was weighed and the weight gain value recorded.
9. Site (reagent) blank samples of the methanol/ammonium hydroxide, XAD resin, filterand distilled water were retained for analysis.
Each container was labeled to clearly identify its contents. The height of the fluid level was
marked on the container of each liquid sample to provide a reference point for a leakage check
during transport. All samples were maintained cool.
During the Carbon Bed inlet and outlet test campaign, a Method 0010 blank train was set up near
the test location, leak-checked and recovered along with the respective sample train. Following
sample recovery, all samples were transported to TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. (TestAmerica)
for sample extraction and analysis.
See Figure 5-2 for a schematic of the Method 0010 sample recovery process.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

13

4/19/2019

5.2.3 EPA Method 0010 Sample Analysis
Method 0010 sampling trains resulted in four separate analytical fractions for HFPO Dimer Acid
analysis according to SW-846 Method 3542:


Front-half Composite—comprised of the particulate filter, and the probe, nozzle, andfront-half of the filter holder solvent rinses;

Back-half Composite—comprised of the first XAD-2 resin material and the back-half ofthe filter holder with connecting glassware solvent rinses;Condensate Composite—comprised of the aqueous condensates and the contents ofimpingers one and two with solvent rinses;



Breakthrough XAD-2 Resin Tube—comprised of the resin tube behind the series ofimpingers.

The second XAD-2 resin material was analyzed separately to evaluate any possible sampling
train HFPO-DA breakthrough.
The front-half and back-half composites and the second XAD-2 resin material were placed inpolypropylene wide-mouth bottles and tumbled with methanol containing 5% NH4OH for 18
hours. Portions of the extracts were processed analytically for the HFPO dimer acid by liquid
chromatography and duel mass spectroscopy (HPLC/MS/MS). The condensate composite wasconcentrated onto a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge followed by desorption from the
cartridge using methanol. Portions of those extracts were also processed analytically by
HPLC/MS/MS.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

14

4/19/2019

FILTERSAMPLE FRACTION 1

XAD-2 MODULE ONESAMPLE FRACTION 3

BACK-HALF FILTER HOLDERCONNECTORS, FLEXIBLE LINECONDENSERSAMPLE FRACTION 5

XAD-2 MODULE TWOSAMPLE FRACTION 7

SEAL IN LABELED POLYETHYLENE
BOTTLE. COMPLETE CUSTODY
FORM, SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEPCOOLREMOVE FROM IMPINGER TRAIN

WASH WITH NANOGRADEMETHANOL/AMMONIUM HYDROXIDEREMOVE FROM IMPINGER TRAINNOZZLE, PROBE AND
FRONT-HALF FILTER HOLDERSAMPLE FRACTION 2

SEAL ENDS WITH GLASS CAPS,
COVER, LABEL, COMPLETECUSTODY FORM, SECURE SAMPLE
AT AND KEEP COOL

TRANSFER WASHINGS TO
POLYETHYLENE BOTTLE; LABEL,SEAL AND MARK LIQUID LEVEL,COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM,
SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEP COOL

WASH WHILE BRUSHING WITH
NANOGRADE METHANOL/AMMONIUM HYDROXIDEFIRST AND SECOND CONDENSATETRAPS AND IMPINGER NOS. 1 AND 2
SAMPLE FRACTION 4FIRST AND SECOND CONDENSATETRAPS AND IMPINGER NOS. 1 AND 2
SAMPLE FRACTION 6

MEASURE VOLUME OF LIQUID AND
RECORD

WASH WITH NANOGRADEMETHANOL/AMMONIUM HYDROXIDEWEIGH AND RECORD

TRANSFER WASHINGS TO
POLYETHYLENE BOTTLE; LABEL,SEAL AND MARK LIQUID LEVEL,COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM,
SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEP COOL

TRANSFER WASHINGS TO
POLYETHYLENE BOTTLE; LABEL,SEAL AND MARK LIQUID LEVEL,COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM,
SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEP COOLRETAIN FOR REGENERATIONSEAL ENDS WITH GLASS CAPS,
COVER, LABEL, COMPLETECUSTODY FORM, SECURE SAMPLE
AT AND KEEP COOL

IMPINGER NO. 4 (SILICA GEL)

15
SEAL WASHINGS IN LABELEDPOLYETHYLENE BOTTLE. MARKLIQUID LEVEL, COMPLETE CUSTODY
FORM, SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEP
COOL

FIGURE 5-2
HFPO DIMER ACID SAMPLE RECOVERY PROCEDURES FOR METHOD 0010
IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\FIGURE 5-2 EPA 0010

Samples were spiked with isotope dilution internal standard (IDA) at the commencement of their
preparation to provide accurate assessments of the analytical recoveries. Final data was corrected
for IDA standard recoveries.
TestAmerica developed detailed procedures for the sample extraction and analysis for HFPO
Dimer Acid. These procedures were incorporated into the test protocol.
5.3 GAS COMPOSITION
The Weston mobile laboratory equipped with instrumental analyzers was used to measure carbon
dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2) concentrations. A diagram of the Weston sampling system ispresented in Figure 5-3.
For the Division stack test campaign, the sample was collected at the exhaust of the Method0010 sampling system. At the end of the line, a tee permitted the introduction of calibration gas.
The sample was drawn through a heated Teflon® sample line to the sample conditioner. The
output from the sampling system was recorded electronically, and one minute averages wererecorded and displayed on a data logger.
Each analyzer was set up and calibrated internally by introduction of calibration gas standards
directly to the analyzer from a calibration manifold. The calibration manifold is designed with anatmospheric vent to release excess calibration gas and maintained the calibration at ambientpressure. The direct calibration sequence consisted of alternate injections of zero and mid-range
gases with appropriate adjustments until the desired responses were obtained. The high-range
standards were then introduced in sequence without further adjustment.
The sample line integrity was verified by performing a bias test before and after each test period.
The sampling system bias test consisted of introducing the zero gas and one up-range calibration
standard in excess to the valve at the probe end when the system was sampling normally. The
excess calibration gas flowed out through the probe to maintain ambient sampling systempressure. Calibration gas supply was regulated to maintain constant sampling rate and pressure.
Instrument bias check response was compared to internal calibration responses to insure sample
line integrity and to calculate a bias correction factor after each run using the ratio of themeasured concentration of the bias gas certified by the calibration gas supplier.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

16

4/19/2019

The oxygen and carbon dioxide content of each stack gas was measured according to EPA
Method 3A procedures which incorporate the latest updates of EPA Method 7E. A Servomex
Model 4900 analyzer (or equivalent) was used to measure oxygen content. A Servomex Model
4900 analyzer (or equivalent) was used to measure carbon dioxide content of the stack gas. Bothanalyzers were calibrated with EPA Protocol gases prior to the start of the test program andperformance was verified by sample bias checks before and after each test run.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

17

4/19/2019

STACK WALL
HEATED FILTERHOLDER OR METHOD
0010 SAMPLE TRAIN

HEATEDSAMPLEPROBE

SAMPLE
CONDITIONINGSYSTEM

HEATED SAMPLE LINE
MOISTUREREMOVALVENT

CO2
SAMPLEPUMPO2

CALIBRATION BIAS LINE

18

ANALOG
SIGNALLINEGAS
ANALYZERSCALIBRATIONGASES= ON / OFF VALVECOMPUTER FOR DATAACQUISITION AND
REDUCTIONACQUISTIONINTERFACE

FIGURE 5-3
WESTON SAMPLING SYSTEMIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\FIGURE 5-3 WESTON SAMPLING SYSTEM2

6. DETAILED TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Each test was a minimum of 96 minutes in duration. A total of three test runs were performed ateach location.
Tables 6-1 through 6-3 provide detailed test data and test results for the Carbon Bed inlet, theCarbon Bed outlet and the Division stack, respectively.
The Method 3A sampling on all sources indicated that the O2 and CO2 concentrations were atambient air levels (20.9% O2, 0% CO2), therefore, 20.9% O2 and 0% CO2 values were used in all
calculations.
The carbon bed removal efficiency was calculated based upon the HFPO Dimer Acid inlet andoutlet mass emission rates in lb/hr.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.011\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT MARCH 2019-AMD

19

4/19/2019

TABLE 6-1
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
CARBON BED INLET
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1
CBed Inlet
3/25/20191315-1528

2
CBed Inlet
3/26/20190852-1052

3
CBed Inlet
3/26/2019
1510-1709

SAMPLING DATA:
Sampling duration, min.
Nozzle diameter, in.
Cross sectional nozzle area, sq.ft.
Barometric pressure, in. Hg
Avg. orifice press. diff., in H2O
Avg. dry gas meter temp., deg F
Avg. abs. dry gas meter temp., deg. R
Total liquid collected by train, ml
Std. vol. of H2O vapor coll., cu.ft.
Dry gas meter calibration factor
Sample vol. at meter cond., dcf

96.0
0.215
0.000252
30.02
1.01
78.0
538
30.1
1.4
1.000157.65196.0
0.215
0.000252
30.06
0.92
53.5
513
24.6
1.2
0.992049.92696.0
0.215
0.000252
30.06
1.11
64.5
525
31.7
1.5
0.992055.61056.888109.4

51.262100.4

55.917
99.6

GAS STREAM COMPOSITION DATA:
CO2, % by volume, dry basis
O2, % by volume, dry basis
N2, % by volume, dry basis
Molecular wt. of dry gas, lb/lb mole
H20 vapor in gas stream, prop. by vol.
Mole fraction of dry gas
Molecular wt. of wet gas, lb/lb mole

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.024
0.976
28.57

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.022
0.978
28.60

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.026
0.974
28.55

GAS STREAM VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW DATA:
Static pressure, in. H 2O
Absolute pressure, in. Hg
Avg. temperature, deg. F
Avg. absolute temperature, deg.R
Pitot tube coefficient
Total number of traverse points
Avg. gas stream velocity, ft./sec.
Stack/duct cross sectional area, sq.ft.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, wacf/min.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, dscf/min.

-6.50
29.54
83
543
0.84
24
38.3
6.31
14478
13551

-6.50
29.58
62
522
0.84
24
36.0
6.31
13610
13300

-6.50
29.58
69
529
0.84
24
40.2
6.31
15217
14624

Sample vol. at std. cond., dscf
Percent of isokinetic sampling

(1)

(1)

Standard conditions = 68 deg. F. (20 deg. C.) and 29.92 in Hg (760 mm Hg)

4/8/2019 4:17 PM

20032519 CBed IN

TABLE 6-1 (cont.)
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
CARBON BED INLETTEST DATA
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1
CBed Inlet
3/25/20191315-1528

2
CBed Inlet
3/26/20190852-1052

3
CBed Inlet
3/26/2019
1510-1709

LABORATORY REPORT DATA, ug.
HFPO Dimer Acid

19542.00

1442.312596.11EMISSION RESULTS, ug/dscm.
HFPO Dimer Acid

12128.59

993.391639.22

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/dscf.
HFPO Dimer Acid

7.57E-07

6.20E-08

1.02E-07

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/hr.
HFPO Dimer Acid

6.16E-01

4.95E-02

8.98E-02

EMISSION RESULTS, g/sec.
HFPO Dimer Acid

7.75E-02

6.23E-03

1.13E-02

21
4/12/2019 10:33 AM

032519 CBed IN

TABLE 6-2
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
CARBON BED OUTLET
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1
CBed Outlet
3/25/20191315-1529

2
CBed Outlet
3/26/20190852-1052

3
CBed Outlet
3/26/2019
1510-1709

SAMPLING DATA:
Sampling duration, min.
Nozzle diameter, in.
Cross sectional nozzle area, sq.ft.
Barometric pressure, in. Hg
Avg. orifice press. diff., in H2O
Avg. dry gas meter temp., deg F
Avg. abs. dry gas meter temp., deg. R
Total liquid collected by train, ml
Std. vol. of H2O vapor coll., cu.ft.
Dry gas meter calibration factor
Sample vol. at meter cond., dcf

96.0
0.215
0.000252
30.02
1.43
80.5
541
38.0
1.8
1.002760.36596.0
0.215
0.000252
30.06
1.38
51.8
512
29.8
1.4
1.002757.41896.0
0.215
0.000252
30.06
1.46
66.4
526
40.1
1.9
1.002759.95459.509104.4

59.852103.3

60.776102.2

GAS STREAM COMPOSITION DATA:
CO2, % by volume, dry basis
O2, % by volume, dry basis
N2, % by volume, dry basis
Molecular wt. of dry gas, lb/lb mole
H20 vapor in gas stream, prop. by vol.
Mole fraction of dry gas
Molecular wt. of wet gas, lb/lb mole

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.029
0.971
28.52

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.023
0.977
28.59

0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
0.030
0.970
28.51

GAS STREAM VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW DATA:
Static pressure, in. H 2O
Absolute pressure, in. Hg
Avg. temperature, deg. F
Avg. absolute temperature, deg.R
Pitot tube coefficient
Total number of traverse points
Avg. gas stream velocity, ft./sec.
Stack/duct cross sectional area, sq.ft.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, wacf/min.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, dscf/min.

3.50
30.28
86
546
0.84
24
41.3
6.31
15630
14856

3.50
30.32
68
528
0.84
24
40.3
6.31
15245
15097

3.50
30.32
72
532
0.84
24
42.0
6.31
15895
15491

Sample vol. at std. cond., dscf
Percent of isokinetic sampling

(1)

(1)

Standard conditions = 68 deg. F. (20 deg. C.) and 29.92 in Hg (760 mm Hg)

4/8/2019 4:19 PM

22032519 CBed OUT

TABLE 6-2 (cont.)
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
CARBON BED OUTLETTEST DATA
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1
CBed Outlet
3/25/20191315-1529

2
CBed Outlet
3/26/20190852-1052

3
CBed Outlet
3/26/2019
1510-1709

LABORATORY REPORT DATA, ug.
HFPO Dimer Acid

188.630

89.00

204.25EMISSION RESULTS, ug/dscm.
HFPO Dimer Acid

111.9152.50

118.66EMISSION RESULTS, lb/dscf.
HFPO Dimer Acid

6.99E-09

3.28E-09

7.41E-09

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/hr.
HFPO Dimer Acid
HFPO Dimer Acid (From Inlet Data)

6.23E-03
6.16E-01

2.97E-03
4.95E-02

6.89E-03
8.98E-02

EMISSION RESULTS, g/sec.
HFPO Dimer Acid

7.84E-04

3.74E-04

8.67E-04

99.0

94.0

92.3

Carbon Bed Removal Efficiency, %23
4/12/2019 10:30 AM

032519 CBed OUT

TABLE 6-3
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTSDIVISION STACK
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1
Divison Stack
3/25/20191315-1528

2
Divison Stack
3/26/20190852-1052

3
Divison Stack
3/26/2019
1510-1709

96.0
0.160
0.000140
29.92
1.34
80.6
541
30.7
1.4
1.001051.53596.0
0.160
0.000140
29.96
1.39
46.5
507
26.7
1.3
1.001051.01496.0
0.160
0.000140
29.96
1.42
58.5
519
20.6
0.97
1.001051.63350.532
97.5

53.46598.9

52.864
97.3

GAS STREAM COMPOSITION DATA:
CO2, % by volume, dry basis
O2, % by volume, dry basis
N2, % by volume, dry basis
Molecular wt. of dry gas, lb/lb mole
H20 vapor in gas stream, prop. by vol.
Mole fraction of dry gas
Molecular wt. of wet gas, lb/lb mole

0.1
21.0
79.1
28.84
0.028
0.972
28.53

0.0
21.0
79.1
28.84
0.023
0.977
28.59

0.0
21.2
79.1
28.84
0.018
0.982
28.64

GAS STREAM VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW DATA:
Static pressure, in. H 2O
Absolute pressure, in. Hg
Avg. temperature, deg. F
Avg. absolute temperature, deg.R
Pitot tube coefficient
Total number of traverse points
Avg. gas stream velocity, ft./sec.
Stack/duct cross sectional area, sq.ft.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, wacf/min.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, dscf/min.

-0.70
29.87
83
543
0.84
12
68.3
7.07
28976
27357

-0.70
29.91
63
523
0.84
12
68.2
7.07
28913
28516

-0.70
29.91
69
529
0.84
12
69.0
7.07
29265
28665

SAMPLING DATA:
Sampling duration, min.
Nozzle diameter, in.
Cross sectional nozzle area, sq.ft.
Barometric pressure, in. Hg
Avg. orifice press. diff., in H 2O
Avg. dry gas meter temp., deg F
Avg. abs. dry gas meter temp., deg. R
Total liquid collected by train, ml
Std. vol. of H2O vapor coll., cu.ft.
Dry gas meter calibration factor
Sample vol. at meter cond., dcf
Sample vol. at std. cond., dscf
Percent of isokinetic sampling

(1)

(1)

Standard conditions = 68 deg. F. (20 deg. C.) and 29.92 in Hg (760 mm Hg)

24
4/8/2019 4:20 PM

032519 Division

TABLE 6-3 (cont.)
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTSDIVISION STACKTEST DATA
Run number
Location
Date
Time period

1
Divison Stack
3/25/20191315-1528

2
Divison Stack
3/26/20190852-1052

3
Divison Stack
3/26/2019
1510-1709

114.4573.19

150.62EMISSION RESULTS, ug/dscm.
HFPO Dimer Acid

79.97

48.33

100.60EMISSION RESULTS, lb/dscf.
HFPO Dimer Acid

4.99E-09

3.02E-09

6.28E-09

EMISSION RESULTS, lb/hr.
HFPO Dimer Acid

8.20E-03

5.16E-03

1.08E-02

EMISSION RESULTS, g/sec.
HFPO Dimer Acid

1.03E-03

6.50E-04

1.36E-03

LABORATORY REPORT DATA, ug.
HFPO Dimer Acid25
4/8/2019 4:20 PM

032519 DivisionAPPENDIX APROCESS OPERATIONS DATAIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT 01162019-AMD

4/15/20194/22/2019

APPENDIX B
RAW AND REDUCED TEST DATAIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT 01162019-AMD

4/15/2019

CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
INPUTS FOR HFPO DIMER ACID CALCULATIONSCARBON BED INLET
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period
Operator

1
CBed Inlet
3/25/20191315-1528
RS/JL

2
CBed Inlet
3/26/20190852-1052
RS/JL

3
CBed Inlet
3/26/2019
1510-1709
RS/JL

Inputs For Calcs.
Sq. rt. delta P
Delta H
Stack temp. (deg.F)
Meter temp. (deg.F)
Sample volume (act.)
Barometric press. (in.Hg)
Volume H2O imp. (ml)Weight change sil. gel (g)
% CO2
% O2
% N2
Area of stack (sq.ft.)
Sample time (min.)Static pressure (in.H2O)
Nozzle dia. (in.)
Meter box cal.
Cp of pitot tube
Traverse points

0.66432
1.012583.2
78.0
57.651
30.02
14.4
15.7
0.0
20.9
79.1
6.305
96.0
-6.50
0.215
1.00010.84
240.63766
0.9221
62.2
53.5
49.926
30.06
7.9
16.7
0.0
20.9
79.1
6.305
96.0
-6.50
0.215
0.99200.84
240.70790
1.107168.8
64.5
55.610
30.06
16.2
15.5
0.0
20.9
79.1
6.305
96.0
-6.50
0.215
0.99200.84
24

4/12/2019 10:32 AM

032519 CBed IN

~ 6~ar~'ina~ po..~;•hS~-~er ECitG. ,~oc'~`~~w.~.w«~~, ,

~~ ~~

4~

ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEETEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Dimer Acid

Cnent

Meter eox i~chen,o~xs

W.O.#
Project ID
Mode/Source ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Sounce/Locatlon
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator

Stack Conditions
Assumed15418.002.011

chemours%Moisture
Impinger Vol(ml)
SIAca gel(g)CO2,% by Vol
02, % by Vol
Temperature(°F)
Meter Temp ("F)

Carbon Bed
IN
1
M0010
25MAR2019
VE North 7r~gt

Z
'
0' '
~D.

Static Press (in HZO) j",S^ 25- Zo1`~~(~, ~j3~.0~.
S

Actualo
Ambient Temp(°~

5L

f

0
~

,~1~

Meter Box Y
Metar Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot /Thermocouple ID
Pltot Coefflclent
Noale IDNoale Measurements
Avg NoaJe Dia (in)9"'Yd

Area of Stack (ft')
i Sample Tfine
Total Traverse Pts

~8

'7 ~

a

,Z~S

ofi

Page!

,`27
t.o
r-42t3
~•Tc.
Bwo

0.8 `
.ZIS

~/

.215
,2i5

.ZIS

K Factor

L,32

Initial

Mid-Point

Sample Tra(n (ft3)
Leak Check Q Qn Hg)
Pltot leak check good
Pitot Inspectlon good
Method 3 System good
Temp Check
Meter Box Temp

j

{$+~
/ no
/ no
Pre- est

Reference Temp
Pass/Fail (+/- 2°~
Temo Chance Response'(o ,30.5
9
(
o
~/
~,~}

~~_.

Final
p,Q a ~,S~~
/ no"? / noo
Post-Test Set'~~ / no/ noetPass /Fallves / noPass /FallvPc i rte,

i

~Jr

~
~-~~~~
~
~-~
:.•
~ iL

~~~~~:J~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~v~~r~~~~:~m~A~~~~ ~ ~~~~o~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~ ~~~m~~~~~~sL~ =• ~~o~o~~~000~~------i~~~~~~-----~~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r•~~~~■~~~~~~~
~~~~~
~

~~

~~~~~-~~ao~~~~oo~~~~~o~~~r~~~oo~■~~~~a~~~~~a■~~~~~~~,~0~~~~~~~=~~m~~~~~~~~~_~~-Y~~"o.'{~(Z9 ~~.oc2s J

S`7 . (vSI

Avg Sgrt Defta P

Avg Sgrt Del I~ 4+~'t 3u~~j~ .oc~+'18

n s:

r/~/

~/j/

om~

/
.v

83^ry
,Zo8
1jv
h~;d Po1h~(rM =

Z8ray 1~tIJ
1cgX~l~l 'vi2 2

i'1q 122~s

3~Z. q9~ '~ 3~3. 7S`~
~ . Z~Z ~`{MINMBX

36 't0EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846

L1,ca.K

7 -~i 368.

mac vac~~cbz

ch4r~~a.~-i„~~d Po~n~'

3 ~>~~' '~' /
~v"

b`

~4t

.~

ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
cnent
w.o.#

chea,ours
1sa~a_oo2.0~~

Project ID
Ma1e/Source ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Sounce/Locatlon
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator

Chemours
Carbon Bed
W
2
M0010
~s~MAR2019
VE North Inlet
3.. ~ _ ZQ ~t~~p , C `(Z~
7~k~~"'1 ~~~5'~

Stack Conditions
AssumedAmbient Temp (°F);~J✓

EPA Method 0010 - I3FP0 Diener Acid
Meter Box ID

Actual°/a Moisture
Impinger Vol (ml)Silica gel (g)CO2, % by Vol
02, % by Vol
Temperature (°F)
Meter TemP ("F)

(;
2~,[
(~C
LG_
Static Press (in Hz0) ; ~ /e„~~-~Metereox v
Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot /Thermocouple ID
Pitot Coefficienti Noale ID
NoaJe Measurements
Avg NoaJe Dfa (in)_P "rb'"/K Factor.215

2. Z'~Mid-Point

Final

C

~

S•'
e / noVii/ nono
Pre-Test Set

~+
no
no
no
Post-Test Set

Initial"^I~;, ~ '
B

Area of Stack (ftZ)
Sample Tlme
Total Traverse Pts~QPage~of~

AD 24
,q42
►.$(g
yp

B4
. 2) ~~/-215, ~2) s.2I~j(o , ~js'a(o~}' Sample Train (ft')
Leak Check @ (in Hg)
Pkot leak check good
Pitot Inspection goad
Method 3 System good ~Temp Check
Meter Box Temp
Reference Temp
PasslFall (+/- p°)
Temp Change Response ~, O i~
1$ ~~
i no
/ ro

Pass /Failves / no~ss

Peaa:! Fall
vos / no0~~~-~~~~~~:~-~~~~~~~~~I~~~-~~~~~~~~s~~~~~
r:~o~~~~~~~~~~~~■~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~am~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~J,..y ....~... ~ `w ~«b J

Avg Sgrt Delta~~'.~.y ...,~.o ~J, ~i22op., o~ „ ~..~~~o.,.y ~ ~~ ya •92b dz.i

Avg Sgrt Del H Comm
.e}s:

1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~-~~~~~~
tr~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~o~~~~~mo~~~~~~~~~■~r~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~m~~~■~~~~~~~~~~~om~~~~o~~~..,,y i iu

iv~numanmirurviau

S~.~ls J tit ~z~ i~a ~2i

M3X

S~

MBJC V8C

MINM2X`f

37 /4b

EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846

a~ ` 562. 33 6 -~ 5~ 2 _ ~{~n~ , ~2~-{ ~`3 ~. ~. ~v
r^

~,,.

ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
Cuent

ct~,p„rs

W.O.#
Project ID
Mode/Sour~ce ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Location
Sample Date

15418.OQ2.D11
Chemours
Carbon Bed
IN
3
M0010
'LV ~MAR2019
VE North Inlet

EPA Method 0010 - HFPO Dimer Acid

Stack Conditions
Assumed%Moisture
Impfnger Vol(ml)Silica gel(g)CO2,% by Val
02,% by Vol
Temperature(°F)
Meter Tamp("F)
Static Press (in H2O)

3o20-q ~'ZQ

3- 2(~ — 2C ~q~ , pb,
QS f ~'Ambient Temp(°F)

Baro. Press (In Hg)
Operator

Meter Box ID
ACtuelMeterBox Y
Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length~ Probe Material
PRot /Thermocouple ID
Pitot Coefficient' Noale ID—~NonJe Measurements- 1,,5
Avg Noale Dfa (in)~Z'z ~

InitialP "'tp~7

Sample Train (ft')
Boro

'?p'7

,~

0.84
~ 7t$
.2($
p
, ab
2~

t orb

K Factor,q92(~

Area of Stack(HZ)
Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts

~gj

Page

Ac 2q

.21~

./

Leak Check (a~ (In Hg)
Pitot leak check good
Pitot Inspection good
Method 3 System good
Temp Chetk
Meter Box Temp
Reference Temp
Pass/Fail (+1- 2°)
Temp Change Response 5

Mid-Point

Finalp,~~iL~j'~'s~ / no/ no~ / no~ / nonooPfe- est Set

'i
! no
/ no
no
Post- est et

Pesa !Fall
yes / noPass 1 FaU
yea / no•~m—~~~t1~~~~0~—~
m—~~~~i't~~t2:!

~~~~~—~~~0~—~~—~~~'lt~s~~I~—~~~~~~~~~~—~~~~~—~~—~~~~

Hvg ue¢a r~ /~JC'~t5 v
Avg Sgrt Delta P

r+vg uena ~r~~1~. ~O"tQ V
Avg Sgrt Del F.?o?`i V

I.o~F$~F

0[01 VOIURI

55~~~~
Comments:

HV9 1 5` ~~~~~~—,vvg i m~$.g3v~`t.5`~ J
Vh•d P~'~ nt ltq K tl~wl~~~ Io ~

MINM2XMINM2Xi~~~2tii8/~2~

M87(

~

I

M37( V8CSI

MINM87(36~y 1

EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846

i~~

SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATAEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Dimer Acid
ClientLocation/Plant

Chemours
Fayettevit~e, NC

W.O.#
Source &Location

15418.002.011
VE North Inlet

Run No.

1

Sample Date ~Sample I.D.

Chemours -Carbon Bed - IN - 1 - M0010 -AnalystContentsjImpinger
5

3

Empty

HPLC H2O

HPLC H2O

~ ~'~

~D

~

~ ~~,ga ~ F~5

goo

goo

~

~

~y~,~

3

p

~ ,[

Gain

4

Labeled?
d2

Sample Date

Sample I.D.

Chemours -Carbon Bed - IN - 2 - Moo10 -Analyst1

2

3

Contents

Empry

HPLC H2O

HPLC H2O

Final

v~

~J

.~ ~c

~

Initial

(~

100

100

~

Gain

~

4

~

Labeled?

D

Sealed?
Sample Date

Sample I.D.

Chemours -Carbon Bed - IN - 3 - M0010 -AnalystInitial

~

6

p`

~

~

~,

Q

/~'~

~~

~

~'~'~ r100v~

Labeled?

`Imp.Total

t1

f~'

8

Total

Sealed?

~. 4
t~

300

~~

Lg

6

~

q,

Imp.Total

8
Silica Gel

q

~

~ ~i

Recovery Date 3 /~ ~s7.~

Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks~

Filter Number

~~~

~

~

Recovery Date~

4

Silica Gel Condition

soo
~ !~~

7

3
HPLC H2O~e

Filter Number

Impinger5

Gain
Impinger Color~~/'~ li2
HPLC H2O

100

Total

r ~,

~~

3

Final

8

Silica Gel

Run No.

1
Empty

s

l/

Impin er
5(~

Silica Gel Condition

Imp.Total

Sealed?

Run No.

Impinger Color

7

Silica Gel

Impinger Color
Silica Gel Condition

6

~ ~~

Filter Number

2~

Contents

Recovery Date

1

Final
Initial

~s ~~

~~

(~

300

,!i

~~
Total

SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATAEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid
Cli@ntLocation/Plant
Run No.

cnemours
Fayetteville, NC

W.O. #~

BT

1

2

3

Empry

HPLC H2O

HPLC H2O
co~

Final

~

Initial

100

~~—

Gain

vE Norm Inlet

Sample Date

Sample I.D. Chemours -Carbon Bed - IN - BT - M0010 -Contents

15418.002.011

Source &Location$~ Z(n ~O19

Analyst4

Impin er
5

6

8

,

100

~

300

~`~

Z--

~
Labeled?

~{~5

Silica Gel Condition~~

Sealed?

'~F_S

BT

Sample I.D. Chemours -Carbon Bed - IN - BT - M0010 -Contents

Imp.Total

2
HPLC H2O

3
HPLC H2O

goo

goo

Total

Silica Gel

~~~Q

1
Empty

7

Z.

qb

,3~ L(o~ l9Filter Number

Impinger Color

Run No.

Recovery Date4

0.2

Sample Date

Recovery Date

AnalystFilter Number

Im in er
5

6

7

Imp.Total

8
Silica Gel

~~L

Total

Final
InitialsooGain
Impinger Color

Labeled?

Silica Gel Condition

Sealed?

Run No.

Sample Date

Recovery Date

AnalystFilter Number

BT

Sample I.D. Chemours -Carbon Bed - IN - BT - M0010 -Contents

1
Empty

2
HPLC H2O

3
HPLC H2O

100

100

4

Impinger
5

6

7

Imp.Total

8Siiica GeI

Final
Initial300

Gain
Impinger Color

Labeled?

Silica Gel Condition

Sealed?

Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks

Total

CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
INPUTS FOR HFPO DIMER ACID CALCULATIONSCARBON BED OUTLET
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period
Operator

Inputs For Calcs.
Sq. rt. delta P
Delta H
Stack temp. (deg.F)
Meter temp. (deg.F)
Sample volume (act.)
Barometric press. (in.Hg)
Volume H2O imp. (ml)Weight change sil. gel (g)
% CO2
% O2
% N2
Area of stack (sq.ft.)
Sample time (min.)Static pressure (in.H2O)
Nozzle dia. (in.)
Meter box cal.
Cp of pitot tube
Traverse points

4/8/2019 4:23 PM

1
CBed Outlet
3/25/20191315-1529
KA/AS

2
CBed Outlet
3/26/20190852-1052
KA/AS

3
CBed Outlet
3/26/2019
1510-1709
KA/AS

0.72388
1.425885.5
80.5
60.365
30.02
18.7
19.3
0.0
20.9
79.1
6.305
96.0
3.50
0.215
1.00270.84
240.719221.384667.7
51.8
57.418
30.06
14.8
15.0
0.0
20.9
79.1
6.305
96.0
3.50
0.215
1.00270.84
240.74565
1.4621
72.2
66.4
59.954
30.06
20.3
19.8
0.0
20.9
79.1
6.305
96.0
3.50
0.215
1.00270.84
24032519 CBed OUT

~~ ~~-~ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEETEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Dimer Acid

CUent
w.o.#

c~~mo~Ksisa~e.00z.oi~

Meter Box ID

Project ID
Mode/Source ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Locadon
Sample Date
Baro. Press (fn Hg)
Operator

Chemours
Carbon Bed
OUT
1
M0010
25MAR2019
VE Noah Outlet

Stack Conditions
Assumed% Moisture
Impinger Vol(ml)S1Nca gel(g)CO2,% by Vol
02,% by Vol
Temperature(°F).Meter Temp(F)Actual
_

~,n
J
Q '

S5
~~

Static Press (in Hz0)
b'1.~
~S

Ambient Temp(°F)

nnetereox rMeter Box Dal H_
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot /Thermocouple ID ~Pitot Coefficient~~ S
Noale ID
IVonJe Measurements
Avg NoaJe Dia (in)~~r{~7~~

j~Sample Train (ft9)

D
or
Q
0.8

', Leak Check @ (In Hg)
PRot leak check good
Pitot Inspection good
Method 3 System good
Temp Check
Meter Box Temp
Reference Temp
Pass/Fail (+/- p°~~O

Total Traverse Pts

O~L~K Factor,p

Area of Stack (ftZ),Sample Time~b

Page~of'L

Initial~J.(~~7~~

Temp Change Response 5

r 2.6
Mid-Point
lb
~"

Final
0

e's / no`e / noYe 1 noyss I noyes! noyes / na
Pre-Test Set

y~g I no%yes / noyes / noPost-Test Set

Pasa / Faii
yes / noPass /Fellyea I no~~~~~1~~~1~~:~iL~m~m~~~~~~i~~~t~~~~~1~~r[~fl~ '•~Q~~~!~t~~~~~C~~~~~~l~~~I11~~I~~f~it~ifEiG'~ :+.
,vy vo„o ~6~

Avg Sgrt Delta P

~~~~g
✓~

y vo~~ ~ ~1. ~-b `'

~ v~~

, ~,

y

~~.

HV9 I RI

Avg Sgrt Del H Comments:~. ~ti~[~c~[~~~~f~~
MINMB)CMINMBX37C

M2X V8C

MINM2X

EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846~~" ~~ 0~~¢. sq.
d~

~~ ~~ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
clientw.o.#Project ID
Mode/Souree ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test McUiod ID
Date ID
Source/Locatlon
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator

ct,emo~xs
i say a.00z.o i i
Chemours
Carbon Bed
OUT
2
M0010
25MAR2019
VE North O~ Nl~t

EPA Method 0010
o - I3FP0 Dimer Acid

Stack Conditions
Assumed°/, Moisture
Impinger Vol (ml)
SIAca gel(g)CO2,% by Vol
02,% by Vol
Temperature(°F)'Meter Temp ("F)

pJ
~
—
'LQ

Static Press (in HZO)~-

6

Meter Box ID
ActualMeter Box Y
Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pftot /Thermocouple ID
Pitot Coefficient
Noale ID
~Noale Measurements_ Avg NoaJe Dia (In)

00

~~
~,.(9

K Factor

7$~

InitialI Sample Train (ft')

'
`] ~
.8
.'L1S
,y~rj' ,1,~5~r,2Area of Stack (ft2)'Sample TimeJ Total Traverse Pts

Am6lent Temp(°F) ~_Page~of ~~Zp

Leak Check ~(in Hg)
Pitot leak check good
Pitot Inspection good
McUwd 3 System good
Temp Check
Meter Box Temp

2,S
Mid-Point

y„

Final

~,

e / no/ noe 1 nos / nayes / no'yes / no
Pre-Test Set

e / no1 noyes. / no
Post-Test Set

Pasa / FaN
yes / noPass / FaA
yes' / noReference Temp
Pass/Fail (+/- 2°~
Temp Change Response ir~o■~~~~~~~~t~~+ ir~~~~~~i~c~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0
~

~f

~

~~~~~~~~~c~a~~:~~~~~~~ ~ - ~~~e~~~~►~d~~s:~~~~~~■~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~i~~~~c~~W~~~~~~Q~~~~m~~.~~~~~~~~~~~
y~~I~~~~~~~~—

Oi~~63~ ' ,rGf~~G~r~f~
Oi~~~~~~. ~~~~~~~i~~~Q~«.~i~~~~l~.~ft3~~~Tc~~[~~

i~iII~~►~i~~~~S. ~ t1~~~'~OL'~~~1G~f~i7yJii►~~~~.*~~~0~f~~~i~IF~O~~r~~~r:~~~~r~~r►~~~5;~~~a~~~~~~i~~~~«iJ~~~~~~o~~r~~ir~-~
R~i~~~~~~~■~~:~~~I~r'f~~l~~[ ~Y~[~i~~~~4'~~~eft'J4`~~~~~r~i~~~ir~~fly3'~~:~1~i[ir~~y1'~~~i~Ofil~~5~.

Avg Sgrt Delta~,

Av Sgrt Del

5?~Kl$
Commen

6Z 67

SI,.

Z

llq/ tiIlq/Itil

`IS

5

~l6

~

EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846

('~(~
"

~~~~~

'"~~_r~ ~~l~ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEETEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid

ClientChemours
W.O.#
15418.002.011
Project ID
Chemours
Mode/Source ID
Carbon Bed
Samp. Loc. ID
OUT
Run No.ID
3
Test Method ID
M0010
Date ID
25MAR2019
Source/Location'
VE NoFth O(~{
Sample Date
'
3 'y
Cj
Baro. Press (In Hg)
Operator

Meter Box ID
pMeter Box Y
DOZMeter Box Del H(J
Probe ID /Lengthp O~
Probe Material
eoro
Pitot /Thermocouple IDp~ ~Pitot Coefficient
0.84 J
NoaJe ID,'L l
Noale Measurementst
i~g ,1.~,'l,~sAvg NoaJe Dia (in)-~~/Leak Check Q (in Hg)
Pitot leak check good
Pitot Inspection good
Method 3 System good
Temp Check
Meter Box Temp

Area of Stack (ft2)
Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts

Reference Temp
Pass/Fall (+/- 2°~
Temp Change Response 5

Stack Conditions%Moisture
Impinger Vol(ml)Silica gel(g)CO2,% by Vol
02,% by Vol
Temperature(°F)
Meter Temp ("F)
Static Press (fn Hz0)
Ambient Temp(°F)

s5

Qr
'v{

or 1

Page~
K Factor /~h5
InitialSample Train (ft')

Q.Qrl
~

Mid-Point
01
-~~

Final
~;, ;

e / noe~ / no/ no~/ no
yes / noyes / noPre-Test Set(yes/ no/ no
yes ! noPost-Test et

Pasa !Fall
yes / noPaes, / FaUyea / noJ~A~~ o~~SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATAEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid
Cfleflt
Locatiofl/Plant
Run No.

Chemours
Fayetteville, NC

W.O.#
Source & LoCetion

1

Sample I.D. Chemours -Carbon Bed -OUT - 1 - M0o10 1

2

3

Contents

Empty

HPLC H2O

HPLC H2O

Final

~

~~b

~

~

Initial

D

100

100

~

Gain

Recovery Date ~ -~Analyst4~

Filter Number

Impin er
5

~S

6

7

~

2

~O 6,
I/o

Labeled?

~

Final

Sealed?

J

3HPLC H2O

4

J~

~~

v
~

~

~

100

100

Gain

. 'S

~

d
~

Sample I.D. Chemours -Carbon Bed -OUT - 3 - M0010 -Final
InitialO

2HPLC H2O

3
HPLC H2O

4be -t~ a

~

goo

goo

'~

O

D

Gain
Impinger Color
Silica Gel Condition
Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks

300
~

~

~ fl

Imp.Total

~ D~~

j~+~~

8
Siiica Gel

Total~ /S.~~tv ,~

300

6~

,~j

,~

✓

Sealed?

3

1
Empty

3~~~.

Recovery Date ?
j

7~

Labeled?
~

~f

6

~~

Impinge[Color
Silica Gel Condition

Total

Filter Number

2
HPLC H2Op8r

AnalystIm in er5

Initial~/~r`~

Sample Date J ~~

1
Empty

Contents

Imp.Total~

Sample I.D. Chemours -Carbon Bed -OUT - 2 - M0010 -Contents~~ ~~Silica Gel

Lc l (~

Silica Gel Condition

Run No.

Sample Date~

Impinger Color

Run No.

415418.002.011
VE North Outlet~~

Sample Date ~1j~ l ~I

Recovery Date 3'~ L

AnalystFilter Number~

Im in er56

7

r2- ,~

3~~~

Imp.Total~.

8
Silica GelsooyLabeled?

''3/

Sealed?

'~

~~~

2.~~~

~

r

Total

CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
INPUTS FOR HFPO DIMER ACID CALCULATIONSDIVISION STACK
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period
Operator

Inputs For Calcs.
Sq. rt. delta P
Delta H
Stack temp. (deg.F)
Meter temp. (deg.F)
Sample volume (act.)
Barometric press. (in.Hg)
Volume H2O imp. (ml)Weight change sil. gel (g)
% CO2
% O2
% N2
Area of stack (sq.ft.)
Sample time (min.)Static pressure (in.H2O)
Nozzle dia. (in.)
Meter box cal.
Cp of pitot tube
Traverse points

4/8/2019 4:23 PM

1Divison Stack
3/25/20191315-1528
CH

2
Divison Stack
3/26/20190852-1052
CH

3
Divison Stack
3/26/2019
1510-1709
CH

1.192211.343382.5
80.6
51.535
29.92
12.0
18.7
0.0
20.9
79.1
7.070
96.0
-0.70
0.160
1.00100.84
121.21398
1.392562.6
46.5
51.014
29.96
10.0
16.7
0.0
20.9
79.1
7.070
96.0
-0.70
0.160
1.00100.84
121.22257
1.4192
68.9
58.5
51.633
29.96
7.0
13.6
0.0
20.9
79.1
7.070
96.0
-0.70
0.160
1.00100.84
12032519 Division

ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
Clientw.o.#

Ghemours~5418:oD2.o~~Project ID
Mode/Source ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Location
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator

EPA Method 0010 - HFPO Dimer Acid

Stack Conditions
AssumedMeter Box ID

ActualChemours%Moisturep
Division
Impinger Vol(ml)
~~
12
STK
SiNca gel(g)/ ~,71CO2,% by Vol
Q,
D,~
M0010
02,% by Vol
2~,
!
~
2~ ,~
Temperature(°F) 7
25MAR2019
Meter Temp("F)~
division StacKp
SfaHc Press (fn H2O) .— p'j "ZS — IG
,~j
~
~$,Q
~/
[~ _ ~- Ambient Temp(°F)
~ rj
—~~

0
~

Metereox v
i Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length
Probe Material
Pitot /Thermocouple ID
Pitot Coefficient
Noale ID
NoaJe Measurements
Avg Noale Dia (in)Area of Stack (ft~)
Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts

7`(

Initials'Bo[o0.84 ✓(~ / S'p
0. j66

✓
~/
✓

t ~/

_

•

~r V

4

~ ~ FilialrJ

Leak Check @ (In Hg) ~~w
Pitot leak check good:.
.a'yT,~.
rYi~► .
Pitot Inspectlon good^~lr~`~1i`~~~!y~Method 3 System good
Temp Checkri a- i oai oCirear i cs~ oG~
Meter Box Temp~~
Reference Temp~~
Pass/Fail (+/- zo~
Temp Change Response
~'►
~v~'

~"~Q

'7,a'7~(~~ 2 ~/

Sample Train (ft')

Q~R~-~

Mira-Point

I~~-~~~~~~~~~~~--~--~-~v~~~~~~~~~
~
~~
~~~~

1 ,A~9 333 J i ,A~yU33 J 5 (0~50~5~ a~~

Avg Sgrt Del H Comments:

1, i5~-10

ry

r ~

~~~-

~~~~~V~~~~~-~Ir------~~-~~~~

Avg Sgrt Detta PJ

2. ~/p'7 C~(K Factor.$-~~~~~~-~~~~[. L922

Page~
`
of

ZZ
1, bpto ✓w~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~9'b J I~~~"~z~~g~a51 ~~i 15.~s I ~, "
r v

♦ 1~

~
~~~-

EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846

U~ ~'

t

7

r

L

ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEETEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Dimer Acid

Clientw.o.#Meter Box ID~Z

Meter sox v~ ~ oa fd
Z,~ d ~ yProject ID
Mode/Source ID
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Source/Location
Sample Date
Baro. Press (fn Hg)
Operator

Chemours~5a~8:aU2.ot ~Stack Conditions
AssumedActualChemours%Moisture
2.c7^ Meter Box DeI H
Division
Impinger Vol(ml)cProbe ID /Length
STK
Silica gel(g)Probe Material
2CO2, °/, by Vol~, ~Pitot /Thermocouple ID
M0010
02, °/a by Vol'Z~j,~"
Pitot Coefficient
Temperature(°F) ~Q
25MAR2019
NoaJe ID
Meter Temp ("F)
~p
DW(
$teak
Noale Measurements
v3~/ StaUc Press (in HZO)O+{~,'~
Av9 Noale Dia (in)~q (~~/Area of Stack (ftZ)~jAmbient Temp (°F)
S;~Sample Tfine"
1_
Total Traverse Pts

or

Page!

K Factor~ ~ c( C.~~Initialp'7p i

Mid-Point

Final

Sample Train (ft3)
r W
~ •
~
Leak Check @ (in Hg)
Pitot leak check good~Ai~` ~~l~~Iri~
M-i>•
Pitot Inspection good
Method 3 System good~~~~
Temp Checkre- es e
os =fes eMeter Box Tempp
Reference TemppPass/Fail (+/- z°~
as ;' Fefl
F
Temp Change Response i~ i nn~ r~o

Bpro
0.84 ,/j, ~d , j~^7 ,p"~
a~
(
j
q/,
~ 'Z

~a~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~Q~~~~si~~~■~~~tr.~~r~~cr~~~~~~~~~■~~~~~~~Q~~~~~~.~ n~m~~~■~~~-~~~~~~~~~- ~m~-~~~~~~-~~ r ~~~~~~~~~~r~
~
~~~~
vl~
~
~
~
~~~.w~wrw~~s~~~~w~~~~
nvy vcnn r
r~vy ue~i oiai vaume
Hvg i s ~v i
J[ ,~i~S33[. '~~~ ~~ ail ~c~ i~.(~' ~ ~ ~ - , I .1`1~ ~—Avg Sgrt Delta PA /~COY ~ .2~wo

Avg Sgrt Del H Comments:

2~ ~D

~Y
•r

~~~~i ~~~~~~~Er~~■~ ~MINMaxG~

ILJ►~~~~-

MW

Max

~3

Mau Vac5~~

Min/Max

it

EPA Method 0010 from EPA SW-846

r ~~ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
Clientw.o.#Protect ID
nnooeiaource iu
Samp. Loc. ID
Run No.ID
Test Method ID
Date ID
Souroe/Location
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator

Cnemours
15a~s.002.0~7
Chemours°io Mastureurv~sion
STK
3
MQ010
25MAR2019
Di~(siStack

Impinger Vol(ml)Silica gel(g)CO2,% by Vol
02,% by Vol
Temperature(°F)
Meter Temp ("F)

EPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid

Stack Conditions
AssumedActual

~
!j, ~

~Q
c~
Static Press (In H2O) «.~', C,q~~

Ambient Temp(°F)

nneter sox v

K Factor~.

Meter Box Del H
Probe ID /Length~77p~~~, Fj' ~Probe Material
Borg
Pitot /Thermocouple ID
Pitot Coefficient
0.84 ~' Noale ID
j c9
Noale Measurements as ~600, i60 0. i 6p
Avg Noale Dia (fn)O. ~ d d ✓

~

,~S

0
~

Pam~of~22~ ,vv ~ p_~,y ~ 7 ~I Meter Box ID

Area of Stack Cft~)
Sample Time
Total Traverse Pts~,cS ~?
q ~
~ 7

✓
~(

InitialSample Train (ft3)
Leak Check @ (In Hg)
Pitot leak check good
Pitot Inspection good
Method 3 System good
Temp Check
Meter Box Temp

,(~]
/

~~

Mid-Point

d,p~p

~. ~~

~T

/ no
~/ ~
/ ~q
rq
yes / no/ no
re- est et

Reference Temp
Pass/Fail (+/- p°)
Temp Change Response i

Final~ ~ ~;

Ja'm3+~F~;' Fall.
r~/ ~pyeg / tto
ost-Test et~a'Fall'
nr,~~~■■~~~~QQ~rza~~~~~e~~~r~~~~~~~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~'.
-~ .. ~~~~■~~~~~~~- ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~■~~~~~~~~n~~~~~~~~~~~~~n~~~r~~~-~~~aa■~ec~~r~~■~~~~~~~~;z..

7~~Rl_ ._R!~tf~i7~l~R[t1RI~1~~~~.w1~J~i...
•.a •_~ ~~ .~
R~ , 21Z~,Z~

Avg Sgrt Del H,

L . ~ 33
mments:~S'. ~~ , ••y . ~.~5~ . 6

~F ,~

0

~.,~

r.~~~4~r~w

i~o tc~ 3 Y6 ~ ~ I Z

rv~nn

5~

Iv1aA vdl:

m11

Vld]l

5 + 5 `1`~ 5c-J
EPA Method 001 from EPA SW-846

SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATAEPA Method 0010 - HFPO Diener Acid
ClientLocation/Plant
Run No.

Chemours
Fayetteville, NC

W.O.#
Source &Location

1

15418.002.011
Division Stack

Sample Date

Sample I.D. Chemours -Division - STK - 1 - M0010 1

2

3

Contents

Empty

HPLC H2O

HPLC H2O

Final

7

7

~ l~

Initial

a

100

100

Gain

~

3

~

Analyst

Silica Gel Condition

6

Filter Number
7

Imp.Total

8

~~
Total

Silica Gel

~

~y

~

300

3

~`~'►"

Impinger Color~^~'v~`

Impin er
5

4

Recovery Date

Labeled?

(~w~

~~*~

tZ

"5A,1

J

Sealed?

Run No.

2

Sample Date~~

Recovery Date~~

Sample I.D.

Chemours -Division - 5TK - 2 - M0010 -AnalystFilter Number

N~

r ~w

Im in er
5

1
Empty

2
HPLC H2O

3
HPLC H2O

4

Contents

Final

~

~~'~

w~

2

Initial

`~

goo

goo

G

300

Gain

7

~

~

~

~t~s;"1Impinger ColorU

Silica Gel Conditionl~

Sealed?

Sample I.D.

Chemours -Division - STK - 3 - M0010 -Analyst3
HPLC H2O

4

~'~

Final

~

`t ~

~~

initial

~

goo

goo

Gain

~-

~"~

Silica Gel Conditionti~► ~~

Z~~'7

Recovery Date ~ ~ ~ ~~~Impin er56Filter Number
7

Imp.Total

8
Silica Gel

p
Total

,3 ~•3,

b

soo

3

~~.

~4.s

Labeled?

`~

~~~ b

Sealed?

~Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks

Q

Total

'/

Sample Date ~2
HPLC H2O

8
Silica Gel

J

3

Impinger Color

Imp.Total,~1~,~Run No.

Contents

7

Labeled?

~~~j'~

1Empty

6~~,~ ~~ rfig' ~ :~ ~~.~

i~dt~

METHODS AND ANALYZERSClient: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 25 Mar 2019

\Client Folders.A-F\Chemours Fayetteville\15418.002.011 Fayetteville March 2019 VEN Test\Data\15418 Chemours
Program Version: 2.1, built 19 May 2017 File Version: 2.03
Computer: WSWCAIRSERVICES Trailer: 27
Analog Input Device: Keithley KUSB-3108
Channel 1
AnalyteMethodAnalyzer Make, Model & Serial No.
Full-Scale Output, mv
Analyzer Range, %Span Concentration, %O2
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
25.0
21.0

Channel 2
AnalyteMethodAnalyzer Make, Model & Serial No.
Full-Scale Output, mv
Analyzer Range, %Span Concentration, %CO2
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
20.0
16.6

CALIBRATION DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 25 Mar 2019
Start Time: 09:26
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards%
Cylinder ID
12.0
CC18055
21.0
SG9169108
Calibration Results
4 mv
Zero
7991 mv
Span, 21.0 %Curve Coefficients
Slope
Intercept
380.3
4
CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards%
Cylinder ID
8.9
CC18055
16.6
SG9169108
Calibration Results
1 mv
Zero
8293 mv
Span, 16.6 %Curve Coefficients
Slope
Intercept
500.1
1CALIBRATION ERROR DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Calibration 1

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 25 Mar 2019

Start Time: 09:26
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Slope 380.3
Intercept 4.0
Standard
%
Zero
12.0
21.0

Result
%
0.0
12.0
21.0

Difference
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6 %Slope 500.1
Intercept 1.0
Standard
%
Zero
8.9
16.6

Result
%
0.0
8.9
16.6

Difference
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass
Pass

BIAS
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Calibration 1

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 25 Mar 2019

Start Time: 12:14
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Error
%
0.6
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
8.9

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.1
0.1
8.9
0.0

RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 25 Mar 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

RUN 1 START
PORT 1
13:15
21.0
0.1
13:16
21.0
0.1
13:17
21.0
0.1
13:18
21.0
0.1
13:19
21.0
0.1
13:20
21.0
0.1
13:21
21.0
0.1
13:22
21.0
0.1
13:23
21.0
0.1
13:24
21.0
0.1
13:25
21.0
0.1
13:26
21.0
0.1
13:27
21.0
0.1
13:28
21.0
0.1
13:29
21.0
0.1
13:30
21.0
0.1
13:31
21.0
0.1
13:32
21.0
0.1
13:33
21.0
0.1
13:34
21.0
0.1
13:35
21.0
0.1
13:36
21.0
0.1
13:37
21.0
0.1
13:38
21.0
0.1
13:39
21.0
0.1
13:40
21.0
0.1
13:41
21.0
0.1
13:42
21.0
0.1
13:43
21.0
0.1
13:44
21.0
0.1
13:45
21.0
0.1
13:46
21.0
0.1
13:47
21.0
0.1
13:48
21.0
0.1
13:49
21.0
0.1
13:50
21.0
0.1
13:51
21.0
0.1
13:52
21.0
0.1

RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 25 Mar 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

13:53
21.0
0.1
13:54
21.0
0.1
13:55
21.0
0.1
13:56
21.0
0.1
13:57
21.0
0.1
13:58
21.0
0.1
13:59
21.0
0.1
14:00
21.0
0.1
14:01
21.0
0.1
14:02
21.0
0.1
14:03
21.0
0.1
PORT CHANGE
PORT 2
14:40
21.0
0.1
14:41
21.0
0.1
14:42
21.0
0.1
14:43
21.0
0.1
14:44
21.0
0.1
14:45
21.0
0.1
14:46
21.0
0.1
14:47
21.0
0.1
14:48
21.0
0.1
14:49
21.0
0.1
14:50
21.0
0.1
14:51
21.0
0.1
14:52
21.0
0.1
14:53
21.0
0.1
14:54
21.0
0.1
14:55
21.0
0.1
14:56
21.0
0.1
14:57
21.0
0.1
14:58
21.0
0.1
14:59
21.0
0.1
15:00
21.1
0.1
15:01
21.1
0.1
15:02
21.1
0.1
15:03
21.1
0.1
15:04
21.1
0.1
15:05
21.1
0.1
15:06
21.1
0.1

RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 25 Mar 2019

Calibration 1
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

15:07
15:08
15:09
15:10
15:11
15:12
15:13
15:14
15:15
15:16
15:17
15:18
15:19
15:20
15:21
15:22
15:23
15:24
15:25
15:26
15:27
15:28
Avgs

21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.1
21.0

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

RUN SUMMARY
Number 1
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 25 Mar 2019

Calibration 1
MethodConc. Units

O2
EPA 3A%CO2
EPA 3A%

Time: 13:14 to 15:28
Run Averages
21.0

0.1

Pre-run Bias at 12:14
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.0
12.0
12.0

0.1
8.9
8.9

Post-run Bias at 15:30
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.0
12.0
12.0

0.0
8.9
8.9

Run averages corrected for the average of the pre-run and post-run bias
21.0

0.1

BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Calibration 1

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 25 Mar 2019

Start Time: 15:30
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0
Initial*%0.0
12.0*Bias No. 1

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0

Drift
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.9
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
-0.1
8.9
0.0

Drift
%
-0.6
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
8.9
Initial*%
0.1
8.9*Bias No. 1

CALIBRATION DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019
Start Time: 07:40
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards%
Cylinder ID
12.0
CC18055
21.0
SG9169108
Calibration Results
16 mv
Zero
7985 mv
Span, 21.0 %Curve Coefficients
Slope
Intercept
379.5
16
CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards%
Cylinder ID
8.9
CC18055
16.6
SG9169108
Calibration Results
53 mv
Zero
8288 mv
Span, 16.6 %Curve Coefficients
Slope
Intercept
496.7
53CALIBRATION ERROR DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Calibration 1

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Start Time: 07:40
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Slope 380.3
Intercept 4.0
Standard
%
Zero
12.0
21.0

Result
%
0.0
12.0
21.0

Difference
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6 %Slope 500.1
Intercept 1.0
Standard
%
Zero
8.9
16.6

Result
%
0.0
8.9
16.6

Difference
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass
Pass

BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Calibration 2

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Start Time: 07:44
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0
Initial*%0.0
12.0*Bias No. 2

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0

Drift
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.9
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.9
0.0

Drift
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
8.9
Initial*%
0.0
8.9*Bias No. 2

RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Calibration 2
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

RUN 2 START
PORT 1
08:53
21.0
0.0
08:54
21.0
0.0
08:55
21.0
0.0
08:56
21.0
0.0
08:57
21.0
0.0
08:58
21.0
0.0
08:59
21.0
0.0
09:00
21.0
0.0
09:01
21.0
0.0
09:02
21.0
0.0
09:03
21.0
0.0
09:04
21.0
0.0
09:05
21.0
0.0
09:06
21.0
0.0
09:07
21.0
0.0
09:08
21.0
0.0
09:09
21.0
0.0
09:10
21.0
0.0
09:11
21.0
0.0
09:12
21.0
0.0
09:13
21.0
0.0
09:14
21.0
0.0
09:15
21.0
0.0
09:16
21.0
0.0
09:17
21.0
0.0
09:18
21.0
0.0
09:19
21.0
0.0
09:20
21.0
0.0
09:21
21.0
0.0
09:22
21.0
0.0
09:23
21.0
0.0
09:24
21.0
0.0
09:25
21.0
0.0
09:26
21.0
0.0
09:27
21.0
0.0
09:28
21.1
0.0
09:29
21.1
0.0
09:30
21.1
0.0

RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Calibration 2
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

09:31
21.1
0.0
09:32
21.1
0.0
09:33
21.1
0.0
09:34
21.1
0.0
09:35
21.1
0.0
09:36
21.1
0.0
09:37
21.1
0.0
09:38
21.1
0.0
09:39
21.1
0.0
09:40
21.1
0.0
PORT CHANGE
PORT 2
10:04
21.1
0.0
10:05
21.1
0.0
10:06
21.1
0.0
10:07
21.1
0.0
10:08
21.0
0.0
10:09
21.1
0.0
10:10
21.1
0.0
10:11
21.1
0.0
10:12
21.1
0.0
10:13
21.1
0.0
10:14
21.1
0.0
10:15
21.1
0.0
10:16
21.1
0.0
10:17
21.1
0.0
10:18
21.1
0.0
10:19
21.1
0.0
10:20
21.1
0.0
10:21
21.1
0.0
10:22
21.1
0.0
10:23
21.1
0.0
10:24
21.1
0.0
10:25
21.1
0.0
10:26
21.2
0.0
10:27
21.2
0.0
10:28
21.1
0.0
10:29
21.2
0.0
10:30
21.2
0.0
10:31
21.2
0.0

RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Calibration 2
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

10:32
10:33
10:34
10:35
10:36
10:37
10:38
10:39
10:40
10:41
10:42
10:43
10:44
10:45
10:46
10:47
10:48
10:49
10:50
10:51
10:52
Avgs

21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.1

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

RUN SUMMARY
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Calibration 2
MethodConc. Units

O2
EPA 3A%CO2
EPA 3A%

Time: 08:52 to 10:52
Run Averages
21.1

0.0

Pre-run Bias at 07:44
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.0
12.0
12.0

0.0
8.9
8.9

Post-run Bias at 10:54
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.0
12.1
12.0

0.0
8.9
8.9

Run averages corrected for the average of the pre-run and post-run bias
21.0

0.0

BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 4
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Calibration 2

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Start Time: 10:54
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0
Initial*%0.0
12.0*Bias No. 3

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.1
0.1

Error
%
0.0
0.5

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.1
0.1

Drift
%
0.0
0.5

Status
Pass
Pass

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.9
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.9
0.0

Drift
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
8.9
Initial*%
0.0
8.9*Bias No. 3

BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 5
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Calibration 2

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Start Time: 14:22
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0
Initial*%
0.0
12.1*Bias No. 4

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
-0.1

Drift
%
0.0
-0.5

Status
Pass
Pass

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.8
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.8
-0.1

Drift
%
0.0
-0.6

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
8.8
Initial*%
0.0
8.9*Bias No. 4

RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Calibration 2
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

RUN 3 START
PORT 1
15:10
21.1
0.0
15:11
21.1
0.0
15:12
21.0
0.0
15:13
21.1
0.0
15:14
21.1
0.0
15:15
21.1
0.0
15:16
21.1
0.0
15:17
21.1
0.0
15:18
21.1
0.0
15:19
21.1
0.0
15:20
21.2
0.0
15:21
21.1
0.0
15:22
21.1
0.0
15:23
21.2
0.0
15:24
21.2
0.0
15:25
21.2
0.0
15:26
21.2
0.0
15:27
21.2
0.0
15:28
21.2
0.0
15:29
21.2
0.0
15:30
21.1
0.0
15:31
21.2
0.0
15:32
21.2
0.0
15:33
21.2
0.0
15:34
21.2
0.0
15:35
21.2
0.0
15:36
21.2
0.0
15:37
21.2
0.0
15:38
21.2
0.0
15:39
21.2
0.0
15:40
21.1
0.0
15:41
21.1
0.0
15:42
21.2
0.0
15:43
21.2
0.0
15:44
21.2
0.0
15:45
21.2
0.0
15:46
21.2
0.0
15:47
21.2
0.0

RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Calibration 2
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

15:48
21.2
0.0
15:49
21.2
0.0
15:50
21.2
0.0
15:51
21.2
0.0
15:52
21.2
0.0
15:53
21.2
0.0
15:54
21.2
0.0
15:55
21.2
0.0
15:56
21.2
0.0
15:57
21.2
0.0
15:58
21.2
0.0
PORT CHANGE
PORT 2
16:21
21.1
0.0
16:22
21.1
0.0
16:23
21.1
0.0
16:24
21.1
0.0
16:25
21.1
0.0
16:26
21.1
0.0
16:27
21.1
0.0
16:28
21.2
0.0
16:29
21.2
0.0
16:30
21.2
0.0
16:31
21.2
0.0
16:32
21.2
0.0
16:33
21.2
0.0
16:34
21.2
0.0
16:35
21.2
0.0
16:36
21.2
0.0
16:37
21.2
0.0
16:38
21.2
0.0
16:39
21.2
0.0
16:40
21.2
0.0
16:41
21.2
0.0
16:42
21.2
0.0
16:43
21.2
0.0
16:44
21.2
0.0
16:45
21.2
0.0
16:46
21.2
0.0
16:47
21.2
0.0

RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Calibration 2
Time

O2
%

CO2
%

16:48
16:49
16:50
16:51
16:52
16:53
16:54
16:55
16:56
16:57
16:58
16:59
17:00
17:01
17:02
17:03
17:04
17:05
17:06
17:07
17:08
17:09
Avgs

21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

RUN SUMMARY
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Calibration 2
MethodConc. Units

O2
EPA 3A%CO2
EPA 3A%

Time: 15:09 to 17:09
Run Averages
21.2

0.0

Pre-run Bias at 14:22
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.0
12.0
12.0

0.0
8.8
8.9

Post-run Bias at 17:11
Zero Bias
Span Bias
Span Gas

0.0
12.0
12.0

0.0
8.9
8.9

Run averages corrected for the average of the pre-run and post-run bias
21.2

0.0

BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 6
Client: Chemours
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Source: Division Stack

Calibration 2

Project Number: 15418.002.011.0001
Operator: Dryden
Date: 26 Mar 2019

Start Time: 17:11
O2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
12.0
Initial*%0.0
12.0*Bias No. 5

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0

Error
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.0

Drift
%
0.0
0.0

Status
Pass
Pass

Bias Results
Bias
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.9
0.1

Error
%
0.0
0.6

Status
Pass
Pass

Calibration Drift
Final
Difference
%
%
0.0
0.0
8.9
0.1

Drift
%
0.0
0.6

Status
Pass
Pass

CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6 %Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span

Cal.
%
0.0
8.8
Initial*%
0.0
8.8*Bias No. 5

APPENDIX CLABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT

Note: The analytical report is included on the attached CD.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT 01162019-AMD

4/15/2019

Chem
mours VEN
N Carbon Bed
B Inlet T
Test Analyttical Reporrt
Tes
stAmerica Job No. 14
40-14725-1
Aprril 10, 2019
9T
The following
g samples exceeded thee Method 83
321A calibrattion range fo
or HFPO-DA
A and require
ed thatddilution of thee extracts bee performed:•

K-207
72,2073,207
75 CB INLET
T R1 M0010
0 Back Half C
Composite (X
XAD-2 Resin and Glasssware
Rinse
es)

T
The original analysis con
ncentration whichw
displays the “E” flaag is provide
ed with the ddata set indicatingthat the value provided iss estimated.. The 13C3 – HFPO-DA isotope diluttion internal standard (IDDA)
rrecovery perrcentage (%)) however, iss provided withw this anallysis run.
A second an
nalysis conce
entration displays an acc
curate conce
entration of tthe HFPO-D
DA in the dilu
uted
ssample extra
act, but the valuev
is uncoorrected for thet IDA reco
overy percen
ntage from the original mmatrix.
T
The recovery
y percentage
e presented with the sec
cond concen
ntration repre
esents a posst-spike of ID
DA tobbenchmark thet instrument quantifica
ation of nativ
ve HFPO-DA
A.
F
Final recovery-correctedd concentrations of the nativen
HFPO
O-DA are pro
ovided by callculation using theooriginal recovvery value ofo the IDA an
nd the diluted
d extract vallues of the nnative HFPOO-DA. The final
cconcentrations are calcu
ulated as follows:

•

K-207
72,2073,207
75 CB INLET
T R1 M0010
0 Back Half C
Composite (X
XAD-2 Resin and Glasssware
Rinse
es)
ሺʹʹͺͲͲ‫݃ݑ‬ሻ  ൈ  ൬͹Ͷ൰  ൌ ͳͶͶʹͳ‫݃ݑ‬ͳͳ͹\\\tafs\Lab\Knoxville\Public\Users Folders\AdkinsC
F\Project Documeents\Special Rep
porting\Chemourss Corrected Valuues\Fayetteville\C
Chemours
C
Corrected Results for E-values HF
FPO-DA_CB_INLET_04102019.docx Created oon 01/30/2018 Last edited on 4
4/11/2019 8:25 A
AMPage 8 of 217

04/11/2019   !"#$%&'(





  !"#

 





 '()*++,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&0"1& )0"1
& 2  5 6$#"01&*


   )

! 4
)*+ ,$%   *  !#

0$ $)+$ -$- -& 23)$ +$-++*" (

   




 

 '()*++,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&0"1& )0"1)& 2  5 6$#"01&#"01&. . #





   

  !!07*! 4
)
,$%
) ,$%    

0$ $)+$ .$- .
$ .$- +-& 23)$ +$-.
$ $- .

" (

       





 

* '()*++,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&#"01&& 2  5 6$#"01&*,


   



)

! 4) ,$%   

0$ $)+$ -$- +& 23)$ +$- " (

   



 


8  !
 & # 149#:&  4 '()*++,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&0"1& )0"1
& 2  5 6$#"01&,..




   



 )
  
 ! 4
),$%



0$ $)+$ .$- .& 23)$ +$-  " (

    '/ 0#12&
Page 11 of 217

04/11/2019   !"#$%&'(





.  !"#

 





 '()*+8+,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&0"1& )0"1
& 2  5 6$#"01&;*




   



) 

! 4
) - ,$%   ,..  !#

0$ $)+$ -$- -& 23)$ +$-++-" (

   




 

8 '()*+8+,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&0"1& )0"1
& 2  5 6$#"01&

*


)




   

.  !!07*! 4
+),$%   

0$ $)+$ .$- .& 23)$ +$- 
     " (
 '()*+8+,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&#"01&& 2

  5 6$#"01&).

;.




   )! 4
. ,$%   

0$ $)+$ -$- +& 23)$ +$-  .

" (


   




 


.*  !
 & # 149#:&  4.

 '()*+8+,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&0"1& )0"1
& 2  5 6$#"01&;




   
 


)

)

! 4
,$%   ..  *!"#0$ $)+$ .$- .& 23)$ +$-  .

" (

    




 

, '()*+8+,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&0"1& )0"1
& 2  5 6$#"01&

.


) *

! 4
)+* ,$%



0$ $)+$ -$- -& 23)$ +$-+ *" (
'/ 0#12&
Page 12 of 217

04/11/2019   !"#$%&'(





..  *!"# 

, '()*+8+,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ 


! $%&$      
 .8..,  *!#   

 '()*+8+,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&0"1& )0"1
& 2  5 6$#"01&




)




    

..  *!!07*! 4
)
,$%   

0$ $)+$ .$- .& 23)$ +$- " (

   



 



 '()*+8+,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&#"01&& 2  5 6$#"01&*;


   


)




! 4)   ,$%   

0$ $)+$ -$- +& 23)$ +$- +" (

   




 


,  *!
 & # 149#:&  4 '()*+8+,  (-)*++,.
' $&$ $ ! $%&$!/').*&0"1& )0"1
& 2  5 6$#"01&.;


   
 


)
  
 )! 4
,$%



0$ $)+$ .$- .& 23)$ +$- " (

   

'/ 0#12&
Page 13 of 217

04/11/2019

Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: Fayetteville Emissions CB Outlet

Job ID: 140-14729-1

Client Sample ID: E-2070,2071 CB OUTLET R1 M0010 FH

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-1

Date Collected: 03/25/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
1.26

140
%Recovery Qualifier
73 D

MDL Unit
0.136 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: E-2072,2073,2075 CB OUTLET R1 M0010 BH

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:49

Dil Fac10Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:49

Dil Fac
10

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-2

Date Collected: 03/25/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.250

39.3
%Recovery Qualifier
17 X

MDL Unit
0.0500 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: E-2074 CB OUTLET R1 M0010 IMP 1,2&3

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:21

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:21

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-3

Date Collected: 03/25/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.210

9.33
%Recovery Qualifier
69

MDL Unit
0.0107 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:34

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:34

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-4

Client Sample ID: E-2076 CB OUTLET R1 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 03/25/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
18 X

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

Client Sample ID: E-2077,2078 CB OUTLET R2 M0010 FH

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:24

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:24

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-5

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA

Result Qualifier

68.9

RL
1.01

MDL Unit
0.109 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:52

Dil Fac10

Eurofins TestAmerica, KnoxvilleClient Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: Fayetteville Emissions CB Outlet

Job ID: 140-14729-1

Client Sample ID: E-2077,2078 CB OUTLET R2 M0010 FH

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-5

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Matrix: Air%Recovery Qualifier
75 D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:52

Client Sample ID: E-2079,2080,8082 CB OUTLET R2 M0010 BH

Dil Fac
10

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-6

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.250

20.1
%Recovery Qualifier
13 X

MDL Unit
0.0500 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: E-2081 CB OUTLET R2 M0010 IMP 1,2&3

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:27

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:27

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-7

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.205

%Recovery Qualifier
71

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0105 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:38

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:38

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-8

Client Sample ID: E-2081 CB OUTLET R2 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
12 X

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

Client Sample ID: E-2084,2085 CB OUTLET R3 M0010 FH

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:34

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:34

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-9

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier

192%Recovery Qualifier
72 D

RL
1.26
Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.136 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:55

Dil Fac10Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:55

Dil Fac10

Eurofins TestAmerica, KnoxvilleClient Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: Fayetteville Emissions CB Outlet

Job ID: 140-14729-1

Client Sample ID: E-2086,2087,2089 CB OUTLET R3 M0010 BH

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-10

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.225

12.0
%Recovery Qualifier
25 X

MDL Unit
0.0450 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: E-2088 CB OUTLET R3 M0010 IMP 1,2&3

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:37

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:37

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-11

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.210

%Recovery Qualifier
73

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0107 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:41

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:41

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14729-12

Client Sample ID: E-2090 CB OUTLET R3 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.253

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA%Recovery Qualifier
21 X

RL
0.200
Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:40

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 12:40

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, KnoxvilleClient Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: Fayetteville Emissions Division Stack

Job ID: 140-14723-1

Client Sample ID: Q-1470,1471 DIV STACK R1 M0010 FH

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-1

Date Collected: 03/25/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
1.51

89.2
%Recovery Qualifier
76 D

MDL Unit
0.163 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: Q-1472,1473,1475 DIV STACK R1 M0010 BH

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:26

Dil Fac10Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:26

Dil Fac
10

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-2

Date Collected: 03/25/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.200

23.4
%Recovery Qualifier
19 X

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: Q-1474 DIV STACK R1 M0010 IMP 1,2&3

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:35

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:35

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-3

Date Collected: 03/25/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.202

1.85
%Recovery Qualifier
70

MDL Unit
0.0103 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:12

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:12

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-4

Client Sample ID: Q-1476 DIV STACK R1 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 03/25/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
23 X

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

Client Sample ID: Q-1477,1478 DIV STACK R2 M0010 FH

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:38

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:38

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-5

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA

Result Qualifier

60.0

RL
1.02

MDL Unit
0.110 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:29

Dil Fac10

Eurofins TestAmerica, KnoxvilleClient Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: Fayetteville Emissions Division Stack

Job ID: 140-14723-1

Client Sample ID: Q-1477,1478 DIV STACK R2 M0010 FH

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-5

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Matrix: Air%Recovery Qualifier
81 D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:29

Client Sample ID: Q-1479,1480,1482 DIV STACK R2 M0010 BH

Dil Fac
10

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-6

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.200

12.8
%Recovery Qualifier
18 X

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: Q-1481 DIV STACK R2 M0010 IMP 1,2&3

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:42

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:42

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-7

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.0783 J

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA%Recovery Qualifier
77

RL
0.202

MDL Unit
0.0103 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:15

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:15

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-8

Client Sample ID: Q-1483 DIV STACK R2 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA

0.309

Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA%Recovery Qualifier
16 X

RL
0.200

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: Q-1484,1485 DIV STACK R3 M0010 FH

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:45

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:45

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-9

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier

144%Recovery Qualifier
78 D

RL
1.02
Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.110 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:32

Dil Fac10Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:19 04/03/19 13:32

Dil Fac10

Eurofins TestAmerica, KnoxvilleClient Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: Fayetteville Emissions Division Stack

Job ID: 140-14723-1

Client Sample ID: Q-1486,1487,1489 DIV STACK R3 M0010 BH

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-10

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteResult Qualifier

HFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

RL
0.200

6.62
%Recovery Qualifier
23 X

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Limits50 - 200

Client Sample ID: Q-1488 DIV STACK R3 M0010 IMP 1,2&3

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:48

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:48

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-11

Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.198

%Recovery Qualifier
76

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0101 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:21

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/29/19 07:34 04/03/19 14:21

Dil Fac
1

Lab Sample ID: 140-14723-12

Client Sample ID: Q-1490 DIV STACK R3 M0010
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 03/26/19 00:00
Date Received: 03/27/19 08:55
Sample Container: Air Train

Matrix: Air

Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
AnalyteHFPO-DA
Surrogate
13C3 HFPO-DA

Result Qualifier
ND

RL
0.200

%Recovery Qualifier
24 X

Limits50 - 200

MDL Unit
0.0400 ug/Sample

D

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:51

Dil Fac1

Prepared
Analyzed
03/28/19 08:51 04/03/19 11:51

Dil Fac1

Eurofins TestAmerica, Knoxville

APPENDIX DSAMPLE CALCULATIONSIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT 01162019-AMD

4/15/2019

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORHFPO DIMER ACID (METHOD 0010)

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 1
Test Location: CBed Inlet

Plant: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 3/25/2019
Test Period: 1315-1528

1. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

Conc1

=

W x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------Vm(std)

Conc1

=

19542.0 x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------56.888

Conc1

=

7.57E-07

Where:W=

Weight of HFPO Dimer Acid collected in sample in ug

Conc1

=

HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

2.2046x10 -9 =Conversion factor from ug to lbs.

2. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.

Conc2

=

W / ( Vm(std) x 0.02832)

Conc2

=

19542.0 / ( 56.888 x 0.02832 )

Conc2

=

12128.6

Where:
Conc2=

0.02832 =4/12/201910:34 AM

HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.
Conversion factor from cubic feet to cubic meters.

032519 CBed IN

3. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.
MR1(Inlet) =Conc1 x Qs(std) x 60 min/hr

MR1(Inlet) =7.57E-07 x 13551 x 60

MR1(Inlet) =6.16E-01

Where:
MR1(Inlet) =HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.

4. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.
MR2(Inlet) =MR1(Inlet) x 453.59 / 3600

MR2(Inlet) =6.16E-01 x 453.59 /3600

MR2(Inlet) =7.75E-02

Where:
MR2(Inlet) =HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.

453.59 =Conversion factor from pounds to grams.

3600 =

Conversion factor from hours to seconds.

5. HFPO Dimer Acid Removal Efficiency, %RE=

MR1(Inlet) - MR1(Outlet)-------------------------MR1(Inlet)

RE=(7.22E-01) - (6.23E-03)---------------------7.22E-01

RE

=

99.0

Where:
RE

4/12/201910:34 AM=

Carbon Bed Removal Efficiency.

MR1(Inlet) =Carbon Bed Inlet HFPO Dimer Acid mass rate, lbs/hr.

MR1(Outlet) =Carbon Bed Outlet HFPO Dimer Acid mass rate, lbs/hr.

032519 CBed IN

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR
VOLUMETRIC FLOW AND MOISTURE AND ISOKINETICS

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 1
Test Location: VEN-Carbon Bed Inlet

Facility: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 3/25/19
Test Period: 1315-1528

1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68 deg F, 29.92 in. Hg), dscf.

Vm(std) =Vm(std) =delta H
17.64 x Y x Vm x ( Pb + ------------ )13.6-------------------------------------------(Tm + 460)
1.013
17.64 x 1.0001 x 57.651 x ( 30.02 + --------------------- )13.6------------------------------------------------------------ = 56.888
78.04 + 460

Where:Vm(std) =Vm =Pb =delt H =Tm =Y=
17.64 =
13.6 =

Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter,
corrected to standard conditions, dscf.
Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meterat meter conditions, dcf.
Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Average pressure drop across the orifice meter, in H2O
Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Dry gas meter calibration factor.
Factor that includes ratio of standard temperature (528 deg R)
to standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), deg R/in. Hg.
Specific gravity of mercury.

2. Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to standard conditions, scf.
Vw(std) =(0.04707 x Vwc) + (0.04715 x Wwsg)

Vw(std) =( 0.04707 x 14.4 ) + ( 0.04715 x 15.7 ) = 1.42

Where:Vw(std) =Vwc =Wwsg =
0.04707 =Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected tostandard conditions, scf.
Volume of liquid condensed in impingers, ml.
Weight of water vapor collected in silica gel, g.
Factor which includes the density of water(0.002201 lb/ml), the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolute

0.04715 =pressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), ft3/ml.
Factor which includes the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolutepressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), and453.6 g/lb, ft3/g.

4/8/20194:25 PM

032519 CBed IN

3. Moisture contentbws =Vw(std)------------------------Vw(std) + Vm(std)

bws =

1.42
------------------------- = 0.024
1.42 + 56.888

Where:
bws =Proportion of water vapor, by volume, in the gas
stream, dimensionless.

4. Mole fraction of dry gas.
Md =1 - bws

Md =1 - 0.024 = 0.976

Where:
Md =Mole fraction of dry gas, dimensionless.

5. Dry molecular weight of gas stream, lb/lb-mole.
MWd =( 0.440 x % CO2 ) + ( 0.320 x % O2 ) + ( 0.280 x (% N2 + % CO) )MWd =( 0.440 x 0.0 ) + ( 0.320 x 20.9 ) + (0.280 x ( 79.1 + 0.00 ))

MWd =

28.84

Where:MWd =% CO2 =% O2 =% N2 =% CO =
0.440 =
0.320 =
0.280 =

Dry molecular weight , lb/lb-mole.
Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.
Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.
Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis.
Percent carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis.
Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide,
divided by 100.

6. Actual molecular weight of gas stream (wet basis), lb/lb-mole.
MWs =( MWd x Md ) + ( 18 x ( 1 - Md ))MWs =( 28.84 x 0.976 ) +( 18 ( 1 - 0.976 )) = 28.57

Where:
MWs =18 =4/8/20194:25 PM

Molecular weight of wet gas, lb/lb-mole.
Molecular weight of water, lb/lb-mole.

032519 CBed IN

7. Average velocity of gas stream at actual conditions, ft/sec.
Ts (avg)
Vs =

Vs =

85.49 x Cp x ((delt p)1/2)avg x ( ---------------- )1/2
Ps x MWs
543
85.49 x 0.84 x 0.66432 x ( -------------------- )^1/2 = 38.3
29.54 x 28.57

Where:
Vs =85.49 =
Cp =
Ts =
Ps =
delt p =Average gas stream velocity, ft/sec.
(lb/lb-mole)(in. Hg)1/2
Pitot tube constant, ft/sec x -----------------------------------(deg R)(in H2O)
Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless.
Absolute gas stream temperature, deg R = Ts, deg F + 460.
P(static)
Absolute gas stack pressure, in. Hg. = Pb + -------------13.6
Velocity head of stack, in. H2O.

8. Average gas stream volumetric flow rate at actual conditions, wacf/min.
Qs(act) =60 x Vs x As

Qs(act) =60 x 38.3 x 6.31 = 14478

Where:Qs(act) =
As =
60 =

Volumetric flow rate of wet stack gas at actual
conditions, wacf/min.
Cross-sectional area of stack, ft2.
Conversion factor from seconds to minutes.

9. Average gas stream dry volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscf/min.

Qs(std) =Ps
17.64 x Md x ----- x Qs(act)Ts

Qs(std) =29.54
17.64 x 0.976 x -------------------- x 14478
543.2

Qs(std) =13551

Where:Qs(std) =4/8/20194:25 PM

Volumetric flow rate of dry stack gas at standard
conditions, dscf/min.

032519 CBed IN

10. Isokinetic variation calculated from intermediate values, percent.

I=

17.327 x Ts x Vm(std)----------------------------------Vs x O x Ps x Md x (Dn)2

I=

17.327 x 543 x 56.888-------------------------------------------------- = 109.4
38.3 x 96 x 29.54 x 0.976 x (0.215)^2

Where:
I=O=
Dn =17.327 =Percent of isokinetic sampling.
Total sampling time, minutes.
Diameter of nozzle, inches.
Factor which includes standard temperature (528 deg R),
standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), the formula for
calculating area of circle D2/4, conversion of square
feet to square inches (144), conversion of seconds
to minutes (60), and conversion to percent (100),(in. Hg)(in2)(min)(deg R)(ft2)(sec)

4/8/20194:25 PM

032519 CBed IN

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORHFPO DIMER ACID (METHOD 0010)

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 1
Test Location: CBed Outlet

Plant: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 3/25/19
Test Period: 1315-1529

1. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

C1=

W x 2.2046 x 10 -9-----------------------------Vm(std)C1=

188.6 x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------59.509=

6.99E-09

Where:W=

Weight of HFPO Dimer Acid collected in sample in ug.

C1=

HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

2.2046x10-9 =Conversion factor from ug to lbs.

2. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.

C2=

W / ( Vm(std) x 0.02832)

C2=

188.6 / ( 59.509 x 0.02832 )=1.12E+02

Where:
C2=

0.02832 =4/8/20194:26 PM

HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.
Conversion factor from cubic feet to cubic meters.

O:\S\A\FMC\032519 CBed OUT

3. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.
PMR1 =
PMR1 ==

C1 x Qs(std) x 60 min/hr
6.99E-09 x 14856 x 60
6.23E-03

Where:
PMR1 =HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.

4. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.
PMR2 =
PMR2 ==

PMR1 x 453.59 / 3600
6.23E-03 x 453.59 /3600
7.84E-04

Where:

4/8/20194:26 PM

PMR2 =HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.

453.6 =

Conversion factor from pounds to grams.

3600 =

Conversion factor from hours to seconds.

O:\S\A\FMC\032519 CBed OUT

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FORHFPO DIMER ACID (METHOD 0010)

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 3
Test Location: Divison Stack

Plant: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 3/26/2019
Test Period: 1510-1709

1. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

Conc1

=

W x 2.2046 x 10 -9-----------------------------Vm(std)

Conc1

=

150.6 x 2.2046 x 10-9-----------------------------52.864

Conc1

=

6.28E-09

Where:W=

Weight of HFPO Dimer Acid collected in sample in ug.

Conc1

=

Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.

2.2046x10-9 =Conversion factor from ug to lbs.

2. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.

Conc2

=

W / ( Vm(std) x 0.02832)

Conc2

=

150.6 / ( 52.864 x 0.02832 )

Conc2

=

1.01E+02

Where:
Conc2=

0.02832 =4/8/20194:27 PM

Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.
Conversion factor from cubic feet to cubic meters.

032519 Division

3. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.
MR1(Outlet) =Conc1 x Qs(std) x 60 min/hr

MR1(Outlet) =6.28E-09 x 28665 x 60

MR1(Outlet) =1.08E-02

Where:
MR1(Outlet) =Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.

4. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.
MR2(Outlet) =PMR1 x 453.59 / 3600

MR2(Outlet) =1.08E-02 x 453.59 /3600

MR2(Outlet) =1.36E-03

Where:
MR2(Outlet) =4/8/20194:27 PM

Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.

453.6 =

Conversion factor from pounds to grams.

3600 =

Conversion factor from hours to seconds.

032519 Division

EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR
VOLUMETRIC FLOW AND MOISTURE AND ISOKINETICS

Client: Chemours
Test Number: Run 3
Test Location: Division Stack

Facility: Fayetteville, NC
Test Date: 3/26/2019
Test Period: 1510-1709

1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68 deg F, 29.92 in. Hg), dscf.

Vm(std) =Vm(std) =delta H
17.64 x Y x Vm x ( Pb + ------------ )13.6-------------------------------------------(Tm + 460)
1.419
17.64 x 1.0010 x 51.633 x ( 29.96 + --------------------- )13.6------------------------------------------------------------ = 52.864
58.50 + 460

Where:Vm(std) =Vm =Pb =delt H =Tm =Y=
17.64 =
13.6 =

Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter,
corrected to standard conditions, dscf.
Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meterat meter conditions, dcf.
Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Average pressure drop across the orifice meter, in H2O
Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Dry gas meter calibration factor.
Factor that includes ratio of standard temperature (528 deg R)
to standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), deg R/in. Hg.
Specific gravity of mercury.

2. Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to standard conditions, scf.
Vw(std) =(0.04707 x Vwc) + (0.04715 x Wwsg)

Vw(std) =( 0.04707 x 7.0 ) + ( 0.04715 x 13.6 ) = 0.97

Where:Vw(std) =Vwc =Wwsg =
0.04707 =Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected tostandard conditions, scf.
Volume of liquid condensed in impingers, ml.
Weight of water vapor collected in silica gel, g.
Factor which includes the density of water(0.002201 lb/ml), the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolute

0.04715 =pressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), ft3/ml.
Factor which includes the molecular weight of water(18.0 lb/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolutetemperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolutepressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), and453.6 g/lb, ft3/g.

4/8/20194:28 PM

032519 Division

3. Moisture contentbws =Vw(std)------------------------Vw(std) + Vm(std)

bws =

0.97
------------------------- = 0.018
0.97 + 52.864

Where:
bws =Proportion of water vapor, by volume, in the gas
stream, dimensionless.

4. Mole fraction of dry gas.
Md =1 - bws

Md =1 - 0.018 = 0.982

Where:
Md =Mole fraction of dry gas, dimensionless.

5. Dry molecular weight of gas stream, lb/lb-mole.
MWd =( 0.440 x % CO2 ) + ( 0.320 x % O2 ) + ( 0.280 x (% N2 + % CO) )MWd =( 0.440 x 0.0 ) + ( 0.320 x 20.9 ) + (0.280 x ( 79.1 + 0.00 ))

MWd =

28.84

Where:MWd =% CO2 =% O2 =% N2 =% CO =
0.440 =
0.320 =
0.280 =

Dry molecular weight , lb/lb-mole.
Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.
Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.
Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis.
Percent carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis.
Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide,
divided by 100.

6. Actual molecular weight of gas stream (wet basis), lb/lb-mole.
MWs =( MWd x Md ) + ( 18 x ( 1 - Md ))MWs =( 28.84 x 0.982 ) +( 18 ( 1 - 0.982 )) = 28.64

Where:
MWs =18 =4/8/20194:28 PM

Molecular weight of wet gas, lb/lb-mole.
Molecular weight of water, lb/lb-mole.

032519 Division

7. Average velocity of gas stream at actual conditions, ft/sec.
Ts (avg)
Vs =

Vs =

85.49 x Cp x ((delt p)1/2)avg x ( ---------------- )1/2
Ps x MWs
529
85.49 x 0.84 x 1.22257 x ( -------------------- )^1/2 = 69.0
29.91 x 28.64

Where:
Vs =85.49 =
Cp =
Ts =
Ps =
delt p =Average gas stream velocity, ft/sec.
(lb/lb-mole)(in. Hg)1/2
Pitot tube constant, ft/sec x -----------------------------------(deg R)(in H2O)
Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless.
Absolute gas stream temperature, deg R = Ts, deg F + 460.
P(static)
Absolute gas stack pressure, in. Hg. = Pb + -------------13.6
Velocity head of stack, in. H2O.

8. Average gas stream volumetric flow rate at actual conditions, wacf/min.
Qs(act) =60 x Vs x As

Qs(act) =60 x 69.0 x 7.07 = 29265

Where:Qs(act) =
As =
60 =

Volumetric flow rate of wet stack gas at actual
conditions, wacf/min.
Cross-sectional area of stack, ft2.
Conversion factor from seconds to minutes.

9. Average gas stream dry volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscf/min.

Qs(std) =Ps
17.64 x Md x ----- x Qs(act)Ts

Qs(std) =29.91
17.64 x 0.982 x -------------------- x 29265
528.9

Qs(std) =28665

Where:Qs(std) =4/8/20194:28 PM

Volumetric flow rate of dry stack gas at standard
conditions, dscf/min.

032519 Division10. Isokinetic variation calculated from intermediate values, percent.

I=

17.327 x Ts x Vm(std)----------------------------------Vs x O x Ps x Md x (Dn)2

I=

17.327 x 529 x 52.864-------------------------------------------------- = 97.3
69.0 x 96 x 29.91 x 0.982 x (0.160)^2

Where:
I=O=
Dn =17.327 =Percent of isokinetic sampling.
Total sampling time, minutes.
Diameter of nozzle, inches.
Factor which includes standard temperature (528 deg R),
standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), the formula for
calculating area of circle D2/4, conversion of square
feet to square inches (144), conversion of seconds
to minutes (60), and conversion to percent (100),(in. Hg)(in2)(min)(deg R)(ft2)(sec)

4/8/20194:28 PM

032519 DivisionAPPENDIX E
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION RECORDSIASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT 01162019-AMD

4/15/2019

INTERFERENCE CHECK
Date: 12/4/14-12/5/14
Analyzer Type: Servomex - O2
Model No: 4900
Serial No: 49000-652921
Calibration Span: 21.09 %Pollutant: 21.09% O2 - CC418692

ANALYZER RESPONSE
INTERFERENT GASINTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE (%)

INTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE, WITH
BACKGROUND POLLUTANT (%)% OF CALIBRATION
SPAN(a)CO2 (30.17% CC199689)

0.00
.

-0.01

0.00

NO (445 ppm CC346681)

0.00

0.02

0.11

NO2 (23.78 ppm CC500749)

NA

NA

NA

N2O (90.4 ppm CC352661)

0.00

0.05

0.24

CO (461.5 ppm XC006064B)

0.00

0.02

0.00

SO2 (451.2 ppm CC409079)

0.00

0.05

0.23

CH4 (453.1 ppm SG901795)

NA

NA

NA

H2 (552 ppm ALM048043)

0.00

0.09

0.44

HCl (45.1 ppm CC17830)

0.00

0.03

0.14

NH3 (9.69 ppm CC58181)

0.00

0.01

0.03

(a)

TOTAL INTERFERENCE RESPONSE

1.20

METHOD SPECIFICATION< 2.5%The larger of the absolute values obtained for the interferent tested with and without the pollutant present was used in summing the interferences.

Chad Walker

Interference Check 2014.xlsO2-Servomex 4900

3/26/2019

INTERFERENCE CHECK
Date: 12/4/14-12/5/14
Analyzer Type: Servomex - CO2
Model No: 4900
Serial No: 49000-652921
Calibration Span: 16.65%
Pollutant: 16.65% CO2 - CC418692

ANALYZER RESPONSE
INTERFERENT GASINTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE (%)

INTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE, WITH
BACKGROUND POLLUTANT (%)% OF CALIBRATION
SPAN(a)CO2 (30.17% CC199689)

NA
.

NA

NA

NO (445 ppm CC346681)

0.00

0.02

0.10

NO2 (23.78 ppm CC500749)

0.00

0.00

0.02

N2O (90.4 ppm CC352661)

0.00

0.01

0.04

CO (461.5 ppm XC006064B)

0.00

0.01

0.00

SO2 (451.2 ppm CC409079)

0.00

0.11

0.64

CH4 (453.1 ppm SG901795)

0.00

0.07

0.44

H2 (552 ppm ALM048043)

0.00

0.04

0.22

HCl (45.1 ppm CC17830)

0.10

0.06

0.60

NH3 (9.69 ppm CC58181)

0.00

0.02

0.14

(a)

TOTAL INTERFERENCE RESPONSE

2.19

METHOD SPECIFICATION< 2.5%The larger of the absolute values obtained for the interferent tested with and without the pollutant present was used in summing the interferences.

Chad Walker

Interference Check 2014.xlsCO2-Servomex 4900

3/26/2019

Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA, LLC
600 Union Landing Road
Cinnaminson, NJ 08077-0000
Airgas.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:Laboratory:
PGVP Number:Gas Code:

E03NI79E15A00E4
CC18055
124 - Riverton (SAP) - NJ
B52018
CO2,O2,BALN
Expiration Date:

Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
Sep 04, 2026

82-401288926-1
150.5 CF2015 PSIG
590
Sep 04, 2018

Certification performed in accordance with “EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)” document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analyticaluncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
volume/volume basis unless otherwise noted.
Do Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.

ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component

Requested
Concentration

ActualConcentration

ProtocolMethodTotal Relative
Uncertainty

Assay
Dates

CARBON DIOXIDEOXYGENNITROGEN

9.000 %
12.00 %
Balance

8.864 %
12.00 %

G1
G1+/- 0.7% NIST Traceable+/- 0.4% NIST Traceable-

09/04/2018
09/04/2018

CALIBRATION STANDARDSType

Lot ID

Cylinder No

NTRM

13060629

CC413730

Concentration

Uncertainty

13.359 % CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN+/- 0.6%

Expiration Date
May 09, 2019

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Instrument/Make/Model

Analytical Principle

Last Multipoint Calibration

Horiba VIA 510-CO2-19GYCXEG
Horiba MPA 510-O2-7TWMJ041

NDIR
Paramagnetic

Aug 09, 2018
Aug 09, 2018

Triad Data Available Upon Request

Signature on file

Approved for Release

Page 1 of 82-401288926-1

Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA, LLC
600 Union Landing Road
Cinnaminson, NJ 08077-0000
Airgas.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
Part Number:
Cylinder Number:Laboratory:
PGVP Number:Gas Code:

E03NI62E15A0224
SG9169108
124 - Riverton (SAP) - NJ
B52017
CO2,O2,BALN
Expiration Date:

Reference Number:
Cylinder Volume:
Cylinder Pressure:
Valve Outlet:
Certification Date:
Nov 18, 2025

82-401044874-1
157.2 CF2015 PSIG
590
Nov 18, 2017

Certification performed in accordance with “EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)” document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analyticaluncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
volume/volume basis unless otherwise noted.
Do Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.

ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component

Requested
Concentration

ActualConcentration

ProtocolMethodTotal Relative
Uncertainty

Assay
Dates

CARBON DIOXIDEOXYGENNITROGEN

17.00 %
21.00 %
Balance16.58 %
21.00 %

G1
G1+/- 0.7% NIST Traceable+/- 0.5% NIST Traceable-

11/18/2017
11/18/2017

CALIBRATION STANDARDSType

Lot ID

Cylinder No

NTRM
NTRM

12061336
09061415

CC360792
CC273526

Concentration

Uncertainty

11.002 % CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN
22.53 % OXYGEN/NITROGEN+/- 0.6%+/- 0.4%

Expiration Date
Jan 11, 2018
Mar 08, 2019

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Instrument/Make/Model

Analytical Principle

Last Multipoint Calibration

Horiba VIA 510-CO2-19GYCXEG
Horiba MPA 510-O2-7TWMJ041

NDIR
Paramagnetic

Oct 30, 2017
Oct 27, 2017

Triad Data Available Upon Request

Signature on file

Approved for Release

Page 1 of 82-401044874-1

Long Cal and Temperature Cal Datasheet for Standard Dry Gas Meter Console
Calibrator

MDW

Meter Box Number

Date 21-Feb-19

Setting
Orifice
Manometerin H20
(∆H)
0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

3.0

Gas Volume
Wet Test
Dry gas Meter
Meter
ft3
ft3
(Vw)
(Vd)
272.601
5.0
277.6205.019
278.6205.0
283.6305.010
284.300
10.0
294.306
10.006295.74010.0
305.748
10.008307.74510.0
317.835
10.090

Ambient Temp

Wet Test Meter Number

P-2952

Dry Gas Meter Number

16787479

Temp Reference Source

Wet Test
Meter
o
F
(Tw)
72.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

70.0

Dry Gas MeteroOutlet, F
(Tdo)
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
77.00
76.50

o

Inlet, F
(Tdi)
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
76.00
77.00
76.50

Average, F(Td)

Time, min
(O)

Y

∆H

75.0

12.7

1.00061.855175.0

9.0

1.00111.863375.0

15.2

1.0012

1.993176.0

13.0

1.00171.940276.5

10.7

0.99571.9550

Average1.0001

1.92130 - Time of calibration run
Pb - Barometric PressureY=∆H - Pressure differential acrossorificeY - Ratio of accuracy of wet test
meter to dry gas meter

Vw ∗ Pb ∗ ( td + 460 )(∆H)  ∗ (tw + 460 )
Vd ∗ Pb +
13
.6 


 0.0317 ∗ ∆H   (tw + 460 ) ∗ O ∆H = 
∗Vw Pb ∗ (td + 460 )  

Temperature Reading from Individual Thermocouple Input 1
o

C
32
212
932
1832

F

1
32
212
932
1831

1 - Channel Temps must agree with +/- 5oF or 3oC
2 - Acceptable Temperature Difference less than 1.5 %Long Cal Box 27 2-21-19

2
32
212
932
1831

Channel Number
3
4
32
31
212
211
932
931
1831
1830

(

( )

29.16

Calibration ResultsoSelect Temperatureo72
Thermocouple Simulatoro(Accuracy +/- 1 F)

Baro Press, in
Hg ( Pb)

Temperatures

Vw - Gas Volume passing through the wet test meter
Vd - Gas Volume passing through the dry gas meterTw - Temp of gas in the wet test meter
Tdi - Temp of the inlet gas of the dry gas meter
Tdo - Temp of the outlet gas of the dry gas meter
Td - Average temp of the gas in the dry gas meter

Reference
Temperature

27

5
31
211
931
1830

) (
( )

2

Average
Temperature
Reading

Temp
Difference 2
(%)

31.6
211.6
931.6
1830.6

0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%

6

( )

)

 Re ference Temp o F + 460 − Test Temp o F + 460 
Temp Diff = Re ference Temp o F + 460Y Factor Calibration Check Calculation
METHOD 0010 TEST TRAIN CARBON BED INLETMETER BOX NO. 27
RUN NO. 1
3/25/2019
MWd = Dry molecular weight source gas, lb/lb-mole.
0.32 = Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
0.44 = Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
0.28 = Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide, divided by 100.
% CO2 = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.

0.0% O2 = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.

20.9

MWd = ( 0.32 * O2 ) + ( 0.44 * CO2 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( CO2 + O2 )))MWd = ( 0.32 * 20.9 ) + ( 0.44 * 0 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( 0 + 20.9 )))MWd = ( 6.69 ) + ( 0.00 ) + ( 22.15 )MWd = 28.84
oTma = Source Temperature, absolute( R)
Tm = Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.

78.0

Tma = Ts + 460
Tma = 78.0 + 460
Tma = 538.04
Ps = Absolute meter pressure, inches Hg.
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury.
delta H = Avg pressure drop across the orifice meter during sampling, in H2O
Pb = Barometric Pressure, in Hg.

1.01
30.02

Pm = Pb + (delta H / 13.6)
Pm = 30.02 + ( 1.0125 / 13.6)
Pm = 30.09
Yqa = dry gas meter calibration check value, dimensionless.
0.0319 = (29.92/528)(0.75)2 (in. Hg/°/R) cfm2.
29 = dry molecular weight of air, lb/lb-mole.
Vm = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter at meter conditions, dcf.
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor (based on full calibration)
Delta H@ = Dry Gas meter orifice calibration coefficient, in. H2O.
avg SQRT Delta H = Avg SQRT press. drop across the orifice meter during sampling , in. H2O
O = Total sampling time, minutes.

57.6511.0001
1.9213
1.048496

Yqa = (O / Vm ) * SQRT[( 0.0319 * Tma * 29 ) / ( Delta H@ * Pm * MWd ) ] * avg SQRT Delta H
Yqa = ( 96.00 / 57.65 ) * SQRT[ ( 0.0319 * 538.04 * 29 ) / ( 1.92 * 30.09 * 28.84 ) ] * 1.05
Yqa = 1.665 * SQRT[ 497.742 / 1,667.064]* 1.05

Yqa = 0.954
Diff = Absolute difference between Yqa and Y
Diff = (( Y - Yqa ) / Y ) * 100
Diff = (( 1.0001 - 0.954 ) / 1.0001 ) * 100
Diff = 4.61

4/8/2019 4:33 PM

Z:\IASData\Client Folders.A-F\Chemours Fayetteville\15418.002.011 Fayetteville March 2019 VEN Test\Data\CBed IN\032519 CBed IN

Y Factor Calibration Check Calculation
METHOD 0010 TEST TRAIN CARBON BED INLETMETER BOX NO. AO29
RUN NO. 3
3/26/2019
MWd = Dry molecular weight source gas, lb/lb-mole.
0.32 = Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
0.44 = Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
0.28 = Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide, divided by 100.
% CO2 = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.

0.0% O2 = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.

20.9

MWd = ( 0.32 * O2 ) + ( 0.44 * CO2 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( CO2 + O2 )))MWd = ( 0.32 * 20.9 ) + ( 0.44 * 0 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( 0 + 20.9 )))MWd = ( 6.69 ) + ( 0.00 ) + ( 22.15 )MWd = 28.84
oTma = Source Temperature, absolute( R)
Tm = Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.

64.5

Tma = Ts + 460
Tma = 64.5 + 460
Tma = 524.54
Ps = Absolute meter pressure, inches Hg.
13.6 = Specific gravity of mercury.
delta H = Avg pressure drop across the orifice meter during sampling, in H2O
Pb = Barometric Pressure, in Hg.

1.11
30.06

Pm = Pb + (delta H / 13.6)
Pm = 30.06 + ( 1.1071 / 13.6)
Pm = 30.14
Yqa = dry gas meter calibration check value, dimensionless.
0.0319 = (29.92/528)(0.75)2 (in. Hg/°/R) cfm2.
29 = dry molecular weight of air, lb/lb-mole.
Vm = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter at meter conditions, dcf.
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor (based on full calibration)
Delta H@ = Dry Gas meter orifice calibration coefficient, in. H2O.
avg SQRT Delta H = Avg SQRT press. drop across the orifice meter during sampling , in. H2O
O = Total sampling time, minutes.

55.6100.992
1.868
1.048496

Yqa = (O / Vm ) * SQRT[( 0.0319 * Tma * 29 ) / ( Delta H@ * Pm * MWd ) ] * avg SQRT Delta H
Yqa = ( 96.00 / 55.61 ) * SQRT[ ( 0.0319 * 524.54 * 29 ) / ( 1.87 * 30.14 * 28.84 ) ] * 1.05
Yqa = 1.726 * SQRT[ 485.253 / 1,623.511]* 1.05

Yqa = 0.990
Diff = Absolute difference between Yqa and Y
Diff = (( Y - Yqa ) / Y ) * 100
Diff = (( 0.992 - 0.990 ) / 0.992 ) * 100
Diff = 0.2

4/8/2019 4:34 PM

Z:\IASData\Client Folders.A-F\Chemours Fayetteville\15418.002.011 Fayetteville March 2019 VEN Test\Data\CBed IN\032519 CBed IN

Long Cal and Temperature Cal Datasheet for Standard Dry Gas Meter Console
Calibrator

MDW

Meter Box Number

Date 27-Mar-18

Setting
Orifice
Manometerin H20(∆H)

Gas Volume
Wet Test
Dry gas
Meter
Meter
3

ft
(Vw)

0.5

5.0

1.0

5.0

1.5

10.0

2.0

10.0

3.0

10.0

Ambient Temp

Wet Test Meter Number

P-2952

Dry Gas Meter Number

15042594

Temp Reference Source

Wet Test
Meter
o

ft
(Vd)
728.890733.868
4.978
734.860
739.855
4.995
740.852750.865
10.013751.869
761.915
10.046762.921773.009
10.088

F
(Tw)
71.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
69.0

Vw - Gas Volume passing through the wet test meter
Vd - Gas Volume passing through the dry gas meterTw - Temp of gas in the wet test meter
Tdi - Temp of the inlet gas of the dry gas meter
Tdo - Temp of the outlet gas of the dry gas meter
Td - Average temp of the gas in the dry gas meter

Dry Gas MeteroOutlet, F
(Tdo)
72.00
73.00
72.50
73.00
74.00
73.50
74.00
75.00
74.50
75.00
76.00
75.50
76.00
77.00
76.50

o

Inlet, F
(Tdi)
72.00
73.00
72.50
73.00
74.00
73.50
74.00
75.00
74.50
75.00
76.00
75.50
76.00
77.00
76.50

Average, F(Td)

Time, min
(O)

Y

∆H

72.5

13.3

1.00601.968973.5

9.5

1.0052

1.997874.5

16.7

1.00352.310875.5

13.7

1.00092.069676.5

11.3

0.99802.1001

Average

1.00272.0895

0 - Time of calibration run
Pb - Barometric PressureY=∆H - Pressure differential acrossorificeVw ∗ Pb ∗ ( td + 460 )(∆H)  ∗ (tw + 460 )
Vd ∗ Pb +13 .6 

 0.0317 ∗ ∆H   (tw + 460 ) ∗ O ∆H = 
∗Vw Pb ∗ (td + 460 )  

Y - Ratio of accuracy of wet test
meter to dry gas meter

Temperature Reading from Individual Thermocouple Input 1
o

C

F

32
212
932
1832

1
32
213
932
1832

1 - Channel Temps must agree with +/- 5oF or 3oC
2 - Acceptable Temperature Difference less than 1.5 %Long Cal Box#28 3-27-18.xls

2
32
213
933
1832

Channel Number
3
4
32
32
213
213
932
932
1831
1832

(

( )

30.16

Calibration ResultsoSelect Temperatureo

70
Thermocouple Simulator(Accuracy +/- 1oF)

Baro Press, in
Hg ( Pb)

Temperatures

3

Reference
Temperature

28

5
33
214
932
1834

) (
( )

2

Average
Temperature
Reading

Temp
Difference 2
(%)

32.2
213.2
932.2
1832.2

0.0%
-0.2%
0.0%
0.0%

6

( )

)

 Re ference Temp o F + 460 − Test Temp o F + 460 
Temp Diff = Re ference Temp o F + 460Y Factor Calibration Check Calculation
MODIFIED METHOD 0010 TEST TRAINCARBON BED OUTLETMETER BOX NO. WC 28
3/25/2019 + 3/26/2019
Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

MWd = Dry molecular weight source gas, lb/lb-mole.
0.32 = Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
0.44 = Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
0.28 = Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide, divided by 100.
% CO2 = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.

0.0

0.0

0.0

% O2 = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.

20.9

20.9

20.9

28.84

28.84

28.84

80.5

51.8

66.4

540.50511.79526.38

1.43
30.02

1.38
30.06

1.46
30.06

30.12

30.16

30.17

60.3651.00272.089557.4181.00272.089559.9541.00272.0895

1.170096

1.145496

1.185096

0.97670.97750.9821

2.59

2.51

2.05

MWd = ( 0.32 * O2 ) + ( 0.44 * CO2 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( CO2 + O2 )))MWd = ( 0.32 * 20.9 ) + ( 0.44 * 0 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( 0 + 20.9 )))MWd = ( 6.69 ) + ( 0.00 ) + ( 22.15 )MWd =oTma = Source Temperature, absolute( R)
Tm = Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Tma = Ts + 460
Tma = 80.50 + 460
Tma =Ps = Absolute meter pressure, inches Hg.
13.60 = Specific gravity of mercury.
delta H = Avg pressure drop across the orifice meter during sampling, in H2O
Pb = Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Pm = Pb + (delta H / 13.6)
Pm = 30.02 + ( 1.42583333333333 / 13.6)
Pm =Yqa = dry gas meter calibration check value, dimensionless.
0.03 = (29.92/528)(0.75)2 (in. Hg/°/R) cfm2.
29.00 = dry molecular weight of air, lb/lb-mole.
Vm = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter at meter conditions, dcf.
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor (based on full calibration)
Delta H@ = Dry Gas meter orifice calibration coefficient, in. H2O.
avg SQRT Delta H = Avg SQRT press. drop across the orifice meter during sampling , in. H2O
O = Total sampling time, minutes.

Yqa = (O / Vm ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * Tma * 29 ) / ( Delta H@ * Pm * MWd ) * avg SQRT Delta H
Yqa = ( 96.00 / 60.37 ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * 540.50 * 29 ) / ( 2.09 * 30.12 * 28.84 ) * 1.17
Yqa = 1.590 * SQRT 500.017 / 1,814.815 * 1.17
Yqa =Diff = Absolute difference between Yqa and Y
Diff = (( Y - Yqa ) / Y ) * 100
Diff = (( 1.0027 - 0.977 ) / 1.0027 ) * 100
Average Diff = 2.38
Allowable = 5.0

4/8/20194:36 PM

032519 CBed OUT

Long Cal and Temperature Cal Datasheet for Standard Dry Gas Meter Console
Calibrator

MDW

Meter Box Number

Date 23-May-18

Setting
Orifice
Manometerin H20
(∆H)
0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

3.0

Gas Volume
Wet Test
Dry gas Meter
Meter
ft3
ft3
(Vw)
(Vd)
973.135
5.0
978.2105.075
985.000
5.0
990.0105.010
990.81010.0
1000.780
9.970
4.162
10.0
14.21010.04826.68010.0
36.69510.015

Ambient Temp

Wet Test Meter Number

P-2952

Dry Gas Meter Number

15550528

Temp Reference Source

Wet Test
Meter
o
F
(Tw)
72.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

72.0

Dry Gas MeteroOutlet, F
(Tdo)
75.00
76.00
75.50
76.00
77.00
76.50
76.00
77.00
76.50
77.00
78.00
77.50
78.00
78.00
78.00

o

Inlet, F
(Tdi)
75.00
76.00
75.50
76.00
77.00
76.50
76.00
77.00
76.50
77.00
78.00
77.50
78.00
78.00
78.00

Average, F(Td)

Time, min
(O)

Y

∆H

75.5

15.2

0.99052.624376.5

10.4

1.00392.452576.5

17.1

1.00772.486477.5

14.6

1.00052.4122

78.0

11.80

1.00232.3614

Average

1.00102.4674

0 - Time of calibration run
Pb - Barometric PressureY=∆H - Pressure differential acrossorificeY - Ratio of accuracy of wet test
meter to dry gas meter

Vw ∗ Pb ∗ ( td + 460 )(∆H)  ∗ (tw + 460 )
Vd ∗ Pb +
13
.6 


 0.0317 ∗ ∆H   (tw + 460 ) ∗ O ∆H = 
∗Vw Pb ∗ (td + 460 )  

Temperature Reading from Individual Thermocouple Input 1
o

C

F

32
212
932
1832

1
33
212
933
1833

1 - Channel Temps must agree with +/- 5oF or 3oC
2 - Acceptable Temperature Difference less than 1.5 %Long Cal box#22 5-23-18_bellows ChangeOut

2
33
213
933
1833

Channel Number
3
4
32
33
211
211
933
933
1833
1832

(

( )

29.5

Calibration ResultsoSelect Temperatureo72
Thermocouple Simulatoro(Accuracy +/- 1 F)

Baro Press, in
Hg ( Pb)

Temperatures

Vw - Gas Volume passing through the wet test meter
Vd - Gas Volume passing through the dry gas meterTw - Temp of gas in the wet test meter
Tdi - Temp of the inlet gas of the dry gas meter
Tdo - Temp of the outlet gas of the dry gas meter
Td - Average temp of the gas in the dry gas meter

Reference
Temperature

22

5
33
211
932
1832

) (
( )

2

Average
Temperature
Reading

Temp
Difference 2
(%)

32.8
211.6
932.8
1832.6

-0.2%
0.1%
-0.1%
0.0%

6

( )

)

 Re ference Temp o F + 460 − Test Temp o F + 460 
Temp Diff = Re ference Temp o F + 460Y Factor Calibration Check Calculation
MODIFIED METHOD 0010 TEST TRAINDIVISION STACKMETER BOX NO. 22
3/25/2019 + 3/26/2019
Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

MWd = Dry molecular weight source gas, lb/lb-mole.
0.32 = Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
0.44 = Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
0.28 = Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide, divided by 100.
% CO2 = Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.

0.1

0.0

0.0

% O2 = Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.

21.0

21.0

21.2

28.86

28.84

28.85

80.6

46.5

58.5

540.58506.50518.50

1.34
29.92

1.39
29.96

1.42
29.96

30.02

30.06

30.06

51.5351.00102.467451.0141.00102.467451.6331.00102.4674

1.154096

1.176296

1.185996

1.03981.03591.0440

3.88

3.49

4.30

MWd = ( 0.32 * O2 ) + ( 0.44 * CO2 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( CO2 + O2 )))MWd = ( 0.32 * 21 ) + ( 0.44 * 0.1 ) + ( 0.28 * ( 100 - ( 0.1 + 21 )))MWd = ( 6.72 ) + ( 0.04 ) + ( 22.09 )MWd =oTma = Source Temperature, absolute( R)
Tm = Average dry gas meter temperature , deg F.
Tma = Ts + 460
Tma = 80.58 + 460
Tma =Ps = Absolute meter pressure, inches Hg.
13.60 = Specific gravity of mercury.
delta H = Avg pressure drop across the orifice meter during sampling, in H2O
Pb = Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
Pm = Pb + (delta H / 13.6)
Pm = 29.92 + ( 1.34333333333333 / 13.6)
Pm =Yqa = dry gas meter calibration check value, dimensionless.
0.03 = (29.92/528)(0.75)2 (in. Hg/°/R) cfm2.
29.00 = dry molecular weight of air, lb/lb-mole.
Vm = Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter at meter conditions, dcf.
Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor (based on full calibration)
Delta H@ = Dry Gas meter orifice calibration coefficient, in. H2O.
avg SQRT Delta H = Avg SQRT press. drop across the orifice meter during sampling , in. H2O
O = Total sampling time, minutes.

Yqa = (O / Vm ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * Tma * 29 ) / ( Delta H@ * Pm * MWd ) * avg SQRT Delta H
Yqa = ( 96.00 / 51.54 ) * SQRT ( 0.0319 * 540.58 * 29 ) / ( 2.47 * 30.02 * 28.86 ) * 1.15
Yqa = 1.863 * SQRT 500.094 / 2,137.403 * 1.15
Yqa =Diff = Absolute difference between Yqa and Y
Diff = (( Y - Yqa ) / Y ) * 100
Diff = (( 1.001 - 1.040 ) / 1.001 ) * 100
Average Diff = 3.89
Allowable = 5.0

4/8/20194:37 PM

032519 Division

Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
P-699

Pitot Tube Identification Number:
Inspection Date

2/22/19 Individual Conducting Inspection

A-Side Plane
Dt
A
B

PB

B-Side Plane

1.05 Dt < P < 1.5 Dt
AksDistance to A Plane (PA) - inches
Distance to B Plane (PB) - inches
Pitot OD (Dt) - inchesPA

If all Criteria PASS
Cp is equal to 0.84
0.463
0.463
0.375

PASS/FAIL
PASS
PASS

PA must Equal PB

B

Are Open Faces Aligned
Perpendicular to the Tube Axis

YES

NO

PASS

Face Opening
Planes

Q2

Q1

Q1

B

A

Angle of Q1 from vertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)Angle of Q2 from vertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

A
B

0

PASS

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Horizontal offset between A andB Tubes (Z) - inches

0.005

PASS

Vertical offset between A and B
Tubes (W) - inches

0.016

PASS

Distance between Sample
Nozzle and Pitot (X) - inches

0.85

PASS

Q1 and Q2 must be < 10o
B

B

Flow

A

Flow

A

B1(+)

B1(-)

B2(+ or -)B
A

B1(+ or -)B1 or B2 must be < 5oZBZ mustA be < 0.125 inches

B

A

W

W must be < 0.03125 inches

X
Sampling

D

X must be > 0.75 inches
Impact Pressure
Opening Plane

Nozzle Entry Plane

Impact Pressure
Opening Plane isabove the Nozzle
Entry Plane

YES

NO

NA

2 inchTemperature Sensor

DtType S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

NO

NA

3 inchTemperature Sensor
3/4 inch

Dt

Sample Probe

P-699 all in one.MOD

Type S Pitot Tube

NA

NO

Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
P-707

Pitot Tube Identification Number:
Inspection Date

6/15/18 Individual Conducting Inspection

A-Side Plane
Dt
A
B

PB

B-Side Plane

1.05 Dt < P < 1.5 Dt
AKSDistance to A Plane (PA) - inches
Distance to B Plane (PB) - inches
Pitot OD (Dt) - inchesPA

If all Criteria PASS
Cp is equal to 0.84
0.44
0.44
0.375

PASS/FAIL
PASS
PASS

PA must Equal PB

B

Are Open Faces Aligned
Perpendicular to the Tube Axis

YES

NO

PASS

Face Opening
Planes

Q1

Q1

Q2

B

A

Angle of Q1 from vertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)Angle of Q2 from vertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

A
B

0

PASS

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Horizontal offset between A andB Tubes (Z) - inches

0.007

PASS

Vertical offset between A and B
Tubes (W) - inches

0.018

PASS

Distance between Sample
Nozzle and Pitot (X) - inches

0.86

PASS

Q1 and Q2 must be < 10o
B

B

Flow

A

Flow

A

B1(+)

B1(-)

B2(+ or -)B
A

B1(+ or -)B1 or B2 must be < 5oZBZ mustA be < 0.125 inches

B

A

W

W must be < 0.03125 inches

X
Sampling

D

X must be > 0.75 inches
Impact Pressure
Opening Plane

Nozzle Entry Plane

Impact Pressure
Opening Plane isabove the Nozzle
Entry Plane

YES

NO

NA

2 inchTemperature Sensor

DtType S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

NO

NA

3 inchTemperature Sensor
3/4 inch

Dt

Sample Probe

P-707 all in one.MOD

Type S Pitot Tube

NA

NO

Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
P-710

Pitot Tube Identification Number:
Inspection Date

2/19/19 Individual Conducting Inspection

A-Side Plane
Dt
A
B

PB

B-Side Plane

1.05 Dt < P < 1.5 Dt
AksDistance to A Plane (PA) - inches
Distance to B Plane (PB) - inches
Pitot OD (Dt) - inchesPA

If all Criteria PASS
Cp is equal to 0.84
0.453
0.453
0.375

PASS/FAIL
PASS
PASS

PA must Equal PB

B

Are Open Faces Aligned
Perpendicular to the Tube Axis

YES

NO

PASS

Face Opening
Planes

Q2

Q1

Q1

B

A

Angle of Q1 from vertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)Angle of Q2 from vertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

A
B

0

PASS

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Horizontal offset between A andB Tubes (Z) - inches

0.012

PASS

Vertical offset between A and B
Tubes (W) - inches

0.022

PASS

Distance between Sample
Nozzle and Pitot (X) - inches

0.87

PASS

Q1 and Q2 must be < 10o
B

B

Flow

A

Flow

A

B1(+)

B1(-)

B2(+ or -)B
A

B1(+ or -)B1 or B2 must be < 5oZBZ mustA be < 0.125 inches

B

A

W

W must be < 0.03125 inches

X
Sampling

D

X must be > 0.75 inches
Impact Pressure
Opening Plane

Nozzle Entry Plane

Impact Pressure
Opening Plane isabove the Nozzle
Entry Plane

YES

NO

NA

2 inchTemperature Sensor

DtType S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

NO

NA

3 inchTemperature Sensor
3/4 inch

Dt

Sample Probe

P-710 all in one.MOD

Type S Pitot Tube

NA

NO

Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
P-701

Pitot Tube Identification Number:
Inspection Date

5/30/18 Individual Conducting Inspection

A-Side Plane
Dt
A
B

PB

B-Side Plane

1.05 Dt < P < 1.5 Dt
ASRDistance to A Plane (PA) - inches
Distance to B Plane (PB) - inches
Pitot OD (Dt) - inchesPA

If all Criteria PASS
Cp is equal to 0.84
0.466
0.466
0.375

PASS/FAIL
PASS
PASS

PA must Equal PB

B

Are Open Faces Aligned
Perpendicular to the Tube Axis

YES

NO

PASS

Face Opening
Planes

Q2

Q1

Q1

B

A

Angle of Q1 from vertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)Angle of Q2 from vertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

A
B

0

PASS

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical A Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Angle of B1 fromvertical B Tubedegrees (absolute)

0

PASS

Horizontal offset between A andB Tubes (Z) - inches

0.008

PASS

Vertical offset between A and B
Tubes (W) - inches

0.02

PASS

Distance between Sample
Nozzle and Pitot (X) - inches

0.89

PASS

Q1 and Q2 must be < 10o
B

B

Flow

A

Flow

A

B1(+)

B1(-)

B2(+ or -)B
A

B1(+ or -)B1 or B2 must be < 5oZBZ mustA be < 0.125 inches

B

A

W

W must be < 0.03125 inches

X
Sampling

D

X must be > 0.75 inches
Impact Pressure
Opening Plane

Nozzle Entry Plane

Impact Pressure
Opening Plane isabove the Nozzle
Entry Plane

YES

NO

NA

2 inchTemperature Sensor

DtType S Pitot Tube

Sample Probe

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

Thermocouple meets
the Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure

YES

NO

NA

3 inchTemperature Sensor
3/4 inch

Dt

Sample Probe

P-701 all in one.MOD

Type S Pitot TubeNANOAPPENDIX F
LIST OF PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT 01162019-AMD

4/15/2019

The following WESTON employees participated in this project.
Paul Meeter

Senior Project Manager

Jeff O’Neill

Senior Project Manager

Steve Rathfon

Team Member

Robert Scroggins

Team Member

Jacob Little

Team Member

Austin Squires

Team Member

Kris AnsleyTeam Member

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\CBED IN OUT DIVISION REPORT 01162019-AMD

4/15/2019