The 26th ifva Awards
Open Category Jury Meeting Transcript
Jury Members ：Jacqueline Liu (Liu), Amy Chin (Chin), Law Sum-po Jamsen (Law),
Cheung King-wai (Cheung), Ernest Chan Chi-wa (Chan)
Organizer representative： Kattie Fan (Fan), Samantha Szeto (Szeto)
Fan:

This year, ifva received around 140 works, which is fewer than previous years.
Usually, Open Category gets around 180 to 200 works. However, due to thepandemic, many creators have not been able to participate. In the first round, weselected 50 works out of more than 140, and then finalist round jurors including
Jacqueline Liu, Jamsen Law and Peng Shan selected 10 finalist works from 50
works.

Liu:

Watching the works on the big screen is different from watching them in the firstround.

Fan:

Let’s discuss each work one by one.

Chan:

I want to talk about Chan Tze-woon’s Dream Residue. I know that he has been
undergoing a project called Blue Island, and I am not sure if it is related to thisshort film, or whether Dream Residue is part of Blue Island or a side project from it.
I think Dream Residue is interesting. The whole film never mentions the name of
Kenneth Lam, and for a documentary about a person, this type of treatment is rare.
We know that the profession of the main character is district councillor and lawyer.
Maybe because he is a district councillor and is used to facing the public, he is verymuch aware of the camera and knows what to say in front of the camera. The
director has made good use of these 30 minutes. The film could have exploredmany issues, but when it comes to the social conflicts of 2019, it does not go
further, and only uses montage to explain things. We can see the character
participated in the first protest in June, but does not deal with his experiences andthoughts afterwards. Is Dream Residue a prequel? There seems a big gap between
the hiking scene at the end and the part before it. The character was involved insocial affairs, but we know nothing about his thoughts after experiencing the eventsof 2019.

Liu:

When watching the film on the big screen with Jamsen (Law), we saw that sometechnical contact points were lost. I don't know much about the director's
background, so I don't feel that the work is incomplete. The work reveals thecharacter to the audience in a three-dimensional manner. The character has some
defects, which is apparent in the work. Perhaps he is lost, and no one cansummarize his situation.

Law:

I watched it on the computer and on the big screen. I think the biggest difference isthe sound effects and the rhythm. The fragmented parts are still attractive, and I
also like the inserted incidents. Watching it in the cinema today, I feel that the1speed and rhythm at the beginning of the work are very different from the ending
part.
Cheung: Chan Tze-woon has made many films on this kind of subject matter, and his
persistence is worthy of admiration. Some directors may switch to narrative
features after making one or two films with social themes. Chan Tze-woon is
obviously pursuing something, but I don't know what he is thinking. Perhaps hewants to make a film like West of the Tracks, and keep filming until the character
reveals himself. However, perhaps this character will not reveal himself, and it
would be better if he includes interviews. For example, in the scene where thecharacter is holding a wine glass, I don’t know if the director or the character isdrunk, but in fact he is not drunk at all, and the character's performance is terrible.
The director insists on not using interviews, like Salesman, but this becomes aproblem in this work. Even though we are Hong Kongers, we still feel that things
jump around too much. There are too many missing pieces, such as June 4th, teargas, and failed elections. The audience can only sense the atmosphere but cannot
grasp the background of the whole thing. The scenes about the district councillor at
the beginning shows us the reality of being a politician, which is without any
sanctification. For example, residents come to the councillors with trivial problems.
I like how the film reveals their lives without pretence, and I also admire thedirector's spirit.
Chin:

The opening scenes are very good. This is the only work that made me note thescreen breakdown. The June 4th rally and the dinner scenes ae worth discussing. I
feel that the dinner is scripted, and it is a little jumpy. The protagonist goes to theJune 4th rally, and the scenes of burning paper offerings are very beautiful, but it
seems that he and the people around him are very depressed. Our society isconstantly changing. I think there is something wrong with the scene ofconfrontation with the police in 2019. If I were a foreigner and saw this scene, I
would think that the demonstrators are at fault. I think the characters are very selfconscious, but I also respect the director for trying to bring out their stories. I'm
curious if there will be a longer version of this work in the future? The only thing I
want to see more is his family. In addition to his work, we can’t see anything about
his family life.

Chan:

The work mainly focuses on how he faces the public. As for the demonstration
scene, the director may assume that the audience already knew what happened atthat time, but if you didn’t know the whole story, that the police refused to open
the way for the demonstration, some would be led to think that the demonstrators
are being unreasonable.

Chin:

The work should not just be intended for Hong Kong audiences. Overall, my
feelings about this film is positive.

Chan:

Over the past years, Chan has produced works that show social concern. There is
no doubt about that.

Cheung: This shows his perseverance, which I admire it very much.
2

Chin:

I hope he will continue to make films. There is still a lot of materials on thissubject matter.
Cheung: He asks the characters to talk about what they encountered during June 4th, but hisloose approach in editing fails to capture the audience’s attention.

Law:

When watching it for the third time, I began to feel that it might not be a
documentary, but the director's expression. I started wondering what exactly was
his intention? Why did he choose this character? What did he want the audience tounderstand or feel?

Liu:

I think he provided an explanation. He thinks this character is interesting andmeaningful. This may also explain why the director is willing to let this characterbe self-indulgent, because the director thinks he has this kind of charm.

Chin:

The haircut scene feels too scripted.

Chan:This character has experienced the frustration of two large-scale demonstrations,the 1989 democracy movement and the 2014 Umbrella Movement. It’s a pity that
there are not many depictions of 2014, just a few fragments and some mentions in
the dinner scene, in which he says he is envious of the new generation, but he does
not clarify the differences in the two eras.

Law:

He worked in a factory before as a lawyer, but this part is not explained.

Cheung: If it is an interview, you can ask him directly. Even if he wants to make up a story,
he has to answer directly.
Chan:

Is becoming a lawyer related to the June Fourth Incident? Did he have someinsights after the June Fourth Incident and then decided to become a lawyer? There
may also be many stories behind that decision.

Cheung:

The director insists on doing it in the most difficult way, which is pureobservation. It can be seen that the director is very persistent, but maybe there is
not enough time. We can draw many different conclusions about this person.
Maybe this person is just an opportunist? Maybe he just doesn't know how to dobusiness?

Chin:

Or maybe he likes to be an actor? Some people enjoy being the focus of attention,
so it’s hard to tell. But the hiking scene at the end, I didn’t know exactly what
conclusion the director wants to express.

Fan:

Okay, the next film is now we will discuss Blue Hour.

Chan:

I like Tam Wan Kai’s cinematography. It is very professional and can capture theinteraction between people. However, the part with Isabel Chan is not complete. It
seems the story branches off but quickly return to the child. The performance of the3child actor is effective, even though his acting is sometimes unnatural. I understandthat it is difficult. The main actor's performance is also very competent.
Liu:

When I watched it on the screen, I paid attention to the male protagonist. I think his
acting is pretty good, with a lot of details.

Chin:

He is an excellent stage actor. The starting point of the film is very good. The childleads the father on his job, and the father and son relationship is played well. I was
hoping initially that the film will go on to different families and reveal otherrealities. Watching the film today feels a bit surreal, how can anyone not want toleave? The beginning is good, but not complete. The music is too loud, and thetheme song appears too early. Does the filmmaker want the audience to pay
attention to the lyrics? The highway ending is beautiful, but the theme song makes
it into an anti-climax.

Chan:

It comes right after the scene where he makes a wish at the bus, but the mood is
overwhelmed by the song appearing too soon.

Cheung: I think the father is played very well, and one feels very comfortable watching him.
Even if the child overacts, the father acts calm and composed.
Chin:

When he looks at his son, his expression is gentle.

Cheung: So, he is a stage actor; he is very good.
Chin:

I have seen him in musicals, which are also very good.

Liu

As a short film, it is complete.

Chin:

I also know a lot of people who have switched to delivering food to earn a living.
Having a motorcycle is already a luxury, many other people deliver food on foot.
The story is very good and the story is very complete. Unfortunately, the part with
Chan Yat Ning seems not very relevant.

Liu:

Maybe it's a budget issue, so they can’t film so many families. The Chan Yat Ningpart can be longer. Now the dialogue is superficial.

Chin:

The work has some strong points.

Fan:

Okay, the next work is Night is Young.

Chan:

This is the second time I watched it. The scene in which the two women get on thebus in Wan Chai is a bit too exaggerated. The director wants to use that scene tobring out the driver's change, but it is not as natural as the later scenes. On the other
hand, the scenes with the young people are much better. I can feel the director's
delicate and gentle touch, and the scenes are filled with many details. In the scene
in which a young boy and a young girl get into the car and the driver starts
coughing, tear gas is not mentioned, but we know what is going on. The two young4

people are on the alert for the driver. When the girl gets off, it is revealed that they
had just met, and they don't even know each other’s names, and they only
exchange online names. Then when the young boy gets out of the car and goes tothe park to wash his face with bottled water, and the driver stops and looks at him.
Without any dialogue, we can feel his tenderness and concern. I appreciate thesedetails.
Liu:

The scene where the driver talks to his daughter is a bit strange. It could be shorter.
The conversation with the daughter is repetitive.

Cheung: I have noticed this director for a long time and he is very talented. He has masteredfilm technique and the rhythm is good. He is very accurate, the timing of the main
title is precise, and the driver is well-acted. I was laughing as I watched. The work
is so successful that I understand the driver's wimpy mentality, which is depictedwith humor. It’s a kind of sad laughter. I want to laugh at him, but I don't hate him.
The director's perspective is very good, every scene is done well, and the driver's
transformation is smooth. The scene with the two middle-aged women is also
credible and does not make me feel uncomfortable, but the daughter scene is too
middle-class and the dialogue is unnecessary. At the end, the driver watches thegirls play in front of the school. It could have been a perverted scene, but becauseof the previous scene with daughter, this feeling is lessened.
Chin:

The Facetime conversation with the daughter feels very unbalanced. The daughter
is too middle-class.

Cheung: The driver loves his daughter very much, but the portrayal is very staid with noother points of view. The scene where the young man gets off the car is very welldone. Looking at his back makes my eyes well up with tears.
Chin:

The best thing about the director is that he knows the different facets of the whole
movement very well, and brings them out section by section. Although the scene
where the girl changes clothes in the car is a bit weird, because people usually put
on black clothes at home before going out, or perhaps the director wants to express
her absent-mindedness. The scene is very simple and explains a lot of details. You
believe that the driver and the passenger have experienced many nights like this.
Although the section with the two women is strange, it is necessary to show thecontrast and social contradictions. They are non-professional actors, so theperformance is a bit excessive. In addition, the sense of space is handled well,because taxi interiors are hard to film.

Cheung: The yellow bear doll reflects the director’s confidence. He does not overly
dramatize coincidences, but keeps a sense of distance. He is not self-indulgent andis skilful.
Law:

Watching it on the big screen allows me to notice the locations more, which is now
much clearer. It was really filmed in the actual locations, just like reporters visiting
areas of conflict. I like these details very much, but some parts of the dialogue feela little disjointed.
5

Fan:

The next work is Home, and a Distant Archive.

Chan:

The interview clips of the four women are well-filmed. They talk about theirresearch in London on Hong Kong-related matters. One of them talks about
drinking Yakult is especially impressive. The director films her own monologue,
which somehow reminds me of Anson Mak. I don't know if she is Mak's student,
but she seems to be influenced by her. But the monologue does not really matchwith the other parts. I like the interviews with the four women, but her own part is
too jumpy and a little abrupt. Of course, I think it's praiseworthy of her to make afilm about this subject, because when it comes to social movements, most people
only think of Hong Kong. In fact, the overseas part is also significant.

Law:

I know the director. I agree that she is influenced by Anson Mak, mainly in themonologue part. The voice in the monologue makes me feel a bit uncomfortable, it
may be a technical problem. The unnatural texture of the voice made it difficult forme to listen to her.

Liu:

When played on the big screen, the quality of the sound affects my impression,and the texture of the monologue is too jumpy.

Law:

I don't understand why the sound quality of the monologues are quite different
from the interviews.

Cheung: I noticed three sections. The first is homesickness, but I only realized it was
Amsterdam towards the middle of the film. I had assumed it was Britain. The
second part is the historical significance and value of Decoding Hong Kong's
History, and the third part is the history, told with subtitles. These three partscannot be linked together, it is very confusing. What does the work want to say? Ialso know what the subtitles explain, and the director may want to bring out
another level of meaning, but the different parts can't be combined. The only partthat impressed me is the protagonist saying that after living in a foreign country fora long time, she would go to Chinatown to listen to people speaking Cantonese, but
the whole part is a bit self-indulgent. Of course, the sense of nostalgia is wellexpressed.
Law:

I accept the part about speaking to herself from the beginning, because she made it
clear that no matter whether everyone accepts it or not, she wants to do it. Did shewant to film interviews at the beginning, did she start adding her personal feelings
because of social events? I don’t know. The interviewees mostly talk about the
research institute, and on the whole it is not closely related to social events in Hong
Kong.

Chin:

The work seems to be very artsy, with beautiful images, raindrops, windows, andinterviewing the few women at the beginning. The film seems to record the historyof Hong Kong, and the subtitles also provide historical explanations. Apart fromadding some exclamation marks and question marks to the parts about Thatcher,they never explained their feelings after reading thousands of pages of archival
6

materials. Could it be because they haven't finished reading those files? I was
curious about the Decoding Hong Kong’s History project, but then the work moves
on to her monologue, and I don’t know what she wants to say. I think her voice
may not be suitable for monologues, it is not artistic nor sentimental enough toexpress her feelings.
Law:

.
Chin:

Law:

At the beginning of the film, she explains that the monologue is like talking toherself. I appreciate her attempt to truly record how she faced events in Hong Kong
while she was in the Netherlands. The visuals have a sense of beauty and are very
personal
I agree that it is okay to be personal. The visuals and monologues are very
sentimental. Frankly speaking, I can't remember what she said, although I feel thesense of homesickness.
The tones of the interview and the monologue are quite different, and the use of
text is also different. It is advisable to use a more visual art approach for the images.

Cheung: There are several scenes that recur, such as cooking, but the dishes are not very
Hong Kong-style. The other part is archives. For example, China does not allow
the colonial governments to carry out elections, but this part of history has actually
been made public in the news. She wants to express her personal homesickness, but
the overall style was too blunt and the director cannot fully grasp the feelings
conveyed by the visuals and sounds. Of course, it is interesting to see that there
were also demonstrations in the Netherlands.
Chin:

The part with Apple is very touching, but the whole work is too jumpy. Theinterviewee's tears are not too sensational and is touching, but the whole thing is
too jumpy. Of course, I also respect her creative intentions.

Fan:

The next work Yuen Yeung.

Chin:

I am familiar with Leung Ming Kai and his wife, and I have strong feelings when
watching them today. The work is very close to everyday life, and it is nice to use
food as a metaphor for cultural differences. The KFC scene is good, but of course
there is no need to deliberately insert the scene of the Admiralty demonstration, but
perhaps it is necessary for foreign audiences. Kwok Zune is more confident, so hedoes not feel the need to add such background in his works. The story is very
interesting. It takes place in Sham Shui Po. It is a rare and interesting short filmwith competent performances by the actors.

Chan:

Both actors are very good. The shot in Admiralty where they explain why it is themost romantic KFC is also clever. It is subtle to put the shot in near the end. The
work is very playful. The subject of two people with different cultural backgrounds
coming together has been done many times, but this film successfully portrays how
the two get along. You believe that two teachers in real life would act like this. It is
enjoyable to watch.

7

Liu:

It looks even better on the big screen, and it feels different. The emotions are better
portrayed, the performance is clearer, and we could appreciate theircommunication.

Law:

What attracts me to the work is that the two protagonists are always eating. Is it
necessary to describe the flow of time from the beginning of the semester to theend? It does not need to be so linear, I don’t know why it is important to show alinear timeline. I like the music and insertions, they are more rhythmic and fun.
The use of food as a motif is also fun.

Cheung: It is difficult to use motifs. In Kwok Zune’s work, the metaphors are traceable.
This short film is like Juzo Itami's Tampopo. which reflects Japanese society andculture through food. This work also reflects the culture of Hong Kong, using
metaphors and overtones to bring out the main themes, which demonstrates the
director's skill. The actors are very charming, appropriate and cool, and the
dialogue is very good. The two actors communicate naturally. The film seems to beartless, but the filmmaker actually has good technique. The crowd scenes are
impactful. I have seen many similar scenes recently, but the ones in this film is best,
which I admire. The actress is also very good.
Chin:

The actress herself has participated in the screenwriting. I like the food she chooses,
such as rice noodles, yuen-yeung, street noodles, and even KFC. The choice offood is very good. At least I also want to find the French toast mentioned in thefilm. I agree with you that the communication between the two is natural.

Cheung: Yes, just like a documentary.
Chin:

It’s a good thing that Gregory Wong speaks English in the film, which adds
another level to the work. It's different from speaking Cantonese, and his speaking
is a bit laid-back, which makes it more comfortable to watch.

Cheung: His performance is a real plus.
Chin:

It is good to end with the scene of students holding hands. It echoes theirprofession as teachers.

Cheung: The use of "Internationale" is also good.
Chan:

Originally, they want to use the song “Glory to Hong Kong.”

Cheung: It’s very smart of them to find an alternative song.
Fan:

The next work Mummy.

Law:

It looks better on the big screen than on the computer.

Liu:

I agree.

8Law:

Technically, it may not follow events comfortably, but it is nice to watch on the big
screen. Although this young director seemed to be shooting with vlogging
equipment, there are not too many technical problems. The scene on the sofa also
looks good on the big screen.

Liu:

Their body language is also clearly visible on the big screen.

Cheung: The interviews are very conventional. It may be deliberate. The technique seems to
be poor, with out-of-focus and wrong exposure shots, but then he turns the camera
on himself, expressing the selfie culture to the extreme.
Chan:

I see that the credits thanks Louisa Wei. Maybe the director is her student. The
films becomes more enjoyable as it progresses.

Cheung: The film goes back and forth between expression and holding back, the dialogue iswell written. It criticizes the mother without being too bloody. Some of the
documentaries from a few years back were so bloody that they were unbearable.
The part where he talks about his mom going to Macau to gamble is a bit...
Chin:

It is a bit tawdry. In fact, this feeling is apparent in the very first shot.

Cheung: I don’t dare to say that. The director has a good grasp of cinema technique, he has aclear understanding of the medium and audience expectations. The character often
says that all mothers are the same, and it shows a sense of caring, making theaudience think about their own mothers. The airport scene expresses the pain of
growing up, and it was obvious that the director is extremely clever and justplaying dumb.
Law:

I wonder how the airport scene was arranged. Was it really a sudden question, or
what?

Chin:

It was set up from the start.

Cheung: It's a very interesting film.
Chin:

The director is clever, but also crafty. The whole thing was planned in advance,otherwise there would not be the scene with the selfie wide shot on the sofa. When
talking about his mother, he uses his cousin to explain things, then ends the filmwith the airport scene, as if to say that the world is full of lies, including the film
itself. This may be what he means when talking about keeping secrets. I like that heis not judgemental.

Cheung: This is actually a drama.
Fan:

The next work is The Truth of the Dead YouTubers.

Liu:

It looks terrible on the big screen.

9Chan:

I believe this film is fun to watch on YouTube or on a small screen, but on the big
screen, it feels a bit wrong and it drags on for a long time. The actors try very hard,
but the big screen magnifies their shortcomings and the overall effect is notconvincing enough. I don't know if the filmmakers only planned to show it on theInternet at the beginning.

Liu:

I think the work is very interesting, but on the big screen, all its problems are alsomagnified.

Cheung: It reminds me of Blair Witch Project. In that film, when the protagonists arefrightened, and the audience will be frightened too, but in this work, it is not the
case.
Chan:

They just pretend to be frightened.

Cheung: It's a pity, the following words may hurt their feelings. I have met every one ofthese actors, but unfortunately, they are the reasons the film fails. Theirperformances are not good. They are not even frightened. Blair Witch Projectmakes people feel frightened. Hidden camera is more difficult to shoot than adocumentary, but the performance in this work cannot convince people that thecharacters are frightened, but merely expose its shortcomings. This is the director's
problem. There are not enough close-ups to scare the audience. It just makes
people wonder when the film will end.
Chan:

I wonder if the problem is due to the director intending to show the film on
YouTube instead of the big screen from the beginning?

Chin:

I don’t agree that the film is completely like Blair Witch Project. It is also a bit like
One Cut of the Dead with its plot within a plot design. This is something seen often
on Youtube, so why would the audience be frightened? It is just not enjoyable. You
know there has got to be a twist and the character didn’t really die, but it's a goodtry.

Cheung: I can see that these actors are eager for performance opportunities. I know them.
Their feeling is that if you don't let me act, I will make a film by myself.
Chin:

It is a cultural by-product of YouTube. Nowadays, many people watch YouTube
videos, but when it comes to making a drama or a movie, the content must be
improved, otherwise it will only stay at the level of free YouTube movies. I think
this work is a good attempt, but it is not successful.

Fan:

The next work is Eternal Sunshine.

Chan:

The performances by Hui So-ying and So Chun-wai are very good.

Law:

Seeing it on the big screen is even better, and one can feels its rhythm. Watching
the film in a darkened theatre, you really appreciate what the film wants to say.

10

Liu:

I think there is too much dialogue, leaving things unsaid will be better. Overall, it
is very complete.

Chan:

The work reminds me of Tomorrow is Another Day, but Eternal Sunshine is muchbetter.

Chin:

It is much more real.

Chan:

The actors’ performance is convincing, the rhythm is slow and the story isn’t very
dramatic, but the human emotions are conveyed.

Chin:

The title of the film and the color timing are well-considered. The situation of thecharacters is miserable, but the director does not wallow in misery. Although themale protagonist is a bit too good-looking, it is okay. I like the use light to create a
bleak situation, which is distinctive.

Cheung:It reminds me of the mother-child relationship in Dung Kai Cheung’s novel SmartWorld, the movie Oasis, as well as the French film Humanité and The Way We Are.
This type of subject is hard to make. It has achieved the basic requirements and theactors are good enough, but comparisons with Oasis is hard to avoid, although theit may be unfair.

Chin:

This is a work by a new director, one can hardly compare him to Lee Chong Dong.

Cheung: I understand, but I wonder if he has seen Oasis. Hui So-ying is a good actor, and I
don't want to say that she is not good, but I think Mummy is cleverer. Eternal
Sunshine tackles a difficult subject, and I know the comparison is unfair, but I don't
understand why he chose this subject.
Chin:

Mummy is a documentary, this is a drama, it is difficult to compare the two. I think
Hui So-ying’s performance is very loose, but the son’s role is more difficult,because it is hard to use body language in a performance. I'm not sure whether
people like this really speak like this in real life, but as a drama it is good, although
it is far from being excellent. It should not be compared with Mummy.

Law:

The previous few works are worthy of praise. Some works have no clear themes,
are very abstract and have no issues, but does it mean they are not good? Mummy’s
technique seems inadequate, but it expresses its subject matter well. I agree that
this work does not move me.

Cheung: Appreciating Longjing and Tieguanyin tea is different. It is hard to compare the
two.
Chin:

You said that the film is not touching, but this is what I appreciate about it, that it is
not melodramatic. If it tried too hard to move me, it would be melodramatic. I likethe light falling on the son's back.

Law:

I appreciate the visual effects of this film.
11Chin:

Thinking about the subject matter personally, I can never take care of my son likethe mother in the film. The mother is terminally ill, so what will happen to the son?
However, the film does not wallow in misery. It would be bad if it moved me.

Cheung: The scene where they go to the park is very good, and expresses the humancondition well. Leaving the son there is abandoning him, but would you blame her?
Many decisions in life are not selfish, but helpless. When I may not even be able totake care of myself, how can I take care of you? I think the work is not bad, it also
grasps the helplessness of the human condition.
Fan:

The next work is Loves, with love.

Liu:

Watching it on the big screen, there are many problems.

Chin:

Those problems were not obvious on the small screen.

Liu:

There are problems with the actors, the structure is not sound and the rhythm is not
good. The friendship between the children is enjoyable and the actors do a good
job.

Chan:

It is a smart idea to feature children, which make the work look good, but Chan
Kin Long’s part is a bit not clear. It seems to imply that the girl's brother wasarrested because of taking part in demonstrations.

Chin:

Chan Kin Long’s character is dressed in all black in the first scene, so thesymbolism is actually quite obvious.

Chan:

It leaves everything to the audience’s interpretation, which is a good thing, but thefilm does not provide enough hints.

Cheung: I only understood after Amy (Chin) pointed it out.
Liu:

The hint is not strong, but the friendship between the children is nice to watch.

Chin:

When I watched it on the big screen, I noticed a lot of over-exposed shots.

Cheung: Yes, the images have a lot of noise, perhaps due to color timing or the use of filters.
I think the use of filters can be adjusted. Now the image quality is like wedding
photos. Obviously, they want to create a romantic atmosphere. The children’s
performances are enjoyable, and the Tai O setting is reasonable, since Tai O
children are more innocent, but this is a bit conventional. I saw a film at the Asian
Film Festival that depicts the lives of the aborigines of Hokkaido. In fact, they haveturned their village into a tourist attraction, so they don’t really suffer any
persecution. The Tai O background of this work is taken for granted, and thecinematography is too deliberately romantic.

12

Chin:

The fat boy dancing scene is very interesting. That shot is very good. Because there
is no filter, it makes it comfortable to watch.

Fan:

The last work This Is Not The End.

Liu:

I like it very much. Even though the film is not set in Hong Kong, there are manythings people can draw from the main character. I can appreciate his feelings.

Cheung: This story is hard to film. It successfully conveys a sense of oppression and is notoverly sentimental. The character cannot do hurdle jumps, while the relationshipwith his mother is tense. They are both lower-class characters, and the mother also
plays the mom in Mummy. When the mother first appears, she is wearing black
stockings and hot pants, and I think what kind of mother will this be? The work
made me reflect on many problems. The scene where the student brings condoms
to school and he is punished, he yells "Is this fair?" That scene is very powerful.
The son puts an anti-theft device in the bag, which reveals the dark side of people’s
hearts. The dialogue is extremely well-written.
Chan:

The script is very well written. The whole film is very mature, and the editing,directing, acting, and cinematography are all good.

Cheung: The dialogue at the beginning when the mother says she stole something because
she had to give birth to the son comes out inadvertently. The protagonist persuades
his mother not to steal, and her mother replies, "I don't have anything, whyshouldn’t I make myself happy?" You know that their relationship is not right. The
mother says she has nothing she had nothing on account of giving birth to the son.
The conflict between this woman and her son is explained with just a few lines of
dialogue. The visuals and the script are both superb.
Law:

The actors are all competent.

Chin:

If the protagonist wants to practice three step hurdle jumping, he should not bekicking the wall. This would not happen in real life, even though it looks goodvisually.

Liu:

Those shots express his emotions.

Chin:

Some of the details in the film, such as the loss of red shoes, reflect the love-hate
relationship between mother and son. One can see that the director has a kind heart.
Sometimes you can see from the work whether the director is a kind person. Even
though the mood of the work is dark, it is clear he has a kind heart.

Cheung: It hurts even more when a friend gives him the shoes. The work is not
melodramatic, and it is a difficult film to make.
Liu:

It starts with a small topic, but ends up exploring a lot of things.

13

Chin:

When the mother is on the phone with her friend, she says that her son is buy one
get one free. The son would be really sad to hear that.

Cheung: The dialogue is profound and mean. Her laughing at herself is a bit perverse. This
explains why she steals.
Fan:

Okay, now we decide on the awards, Gold, Silver and Special Mention. You cannarrow down the selection first, and it may not be necessary to immediately namethe Gold and Silver Award winners.

Cheung: I choose Night is Young, Mummy, This Is Not The End and Yuen Yeung.
Chan:

My choices are the same: Night is Young, This Is Not The End, Yuen Yeung andMummy.

Chin:

My choices are the same, but I add one more, Eternal Sunshine.

Liu:

I didn’t choose Mummy. My choices are Night is Young, This Is Not The End, Yuen
Yeung and Blue Hour.

Law:

I choose Night is Young, Mummy, This Is Not The End and Eternal Sunshine.

Liu:

We all chose Night is Young and This Is Not The End,Fan:

You all chose Night is Young and This Is Not The End, but this does not mean these
are automatically prize winners.

Chin:

Shall we eliminate Eternal Sunshine, since no one else chose it?

Cheung: Two jury members chose it.
Liu:

Only I picked Blue Hour. Let’s eliminate it first. This leaves Yuen Yeung andEternal Sunshine.

Fan:

Do you have any favorites for Gold Award?

Liu:

Night is Young.

Chin:

Mummy wouldn’t be Gold, right?

Chan:

I want to nominate Night is Young for Gold and This Is Not The End for Silver.

Chin:

Aside from Night is Young for Gold, my choice also include This Is Not The End
and Yuen Yeung.

Fan:

Now Jacqueline (Liu) nominates Night is Young for Gold and This Is Not The End
for Silver. Chan’s choice is the same. Are there other nominations for Gold Award?

14

Chin:

Gold Award should be Night is Young and This Is Not The End.

Cheung: My choices are Yuen Yeung and This Is Not The End.
Fan:

Do you rank one higher than the other?

Cheung: Yuen Yeung is Gold Award and This Is Not The End is Silver Award.
Law:

Between Yuen Yeung and Night is Young, I pick Night is Young.

Fan:

So Night is Young gets Gold Award?

Chin:

My favorite work is Night is Young, Yuen Yeung and This Is Not The End. I would
pick Night is Young for Gold Award because its content is timely. For SilverAward I choose This Is Not The End. For Special Mention, I pick Yuen Yeung andMummy because they are distinctive.

Fan:

Let’s decide the Gold Award first. Except for Cheung, the other 4 jurors choseNight is Young for Gold Award.

Cheung: I am okay with it.
Fan:

Now for Silver Award. You all chose This Is Not The End for Silver Award. Does
Cheung have any adjustments? You also chose This Is Not The End for SilverAward, but your choice for Gold Award, Yuen Yeung, does not appear.

Cheung: I am fine with it, because both works are equally good.
Chan:

They both have their strong points. I like This Is Not The End more, but Yuen
Yeung is also good.

Chin:

The director of This Is Not The End has a lot of potential. He would succeed inboth Hong Kong and Taiwan.

Fan:

Okay, so This Is Not The End gets Silver Award. Let’s decide Special Mention. We
don’t have Bronze Award, and Special Mention honors works that may not be
equal to Gold or Silver Awards in terms of quality, but contain elements that touch
you and are deserving of mention. Some jurors see this award as Bronze Award,
and you can determine the criteria.

Chin:

Can we have two Special Mentions? I want to give awards to both Yuen Yeung andMummy.

Chan:

Both works are good, and it is hard to choose among the two.

Chin:

The director of Mummy is clever and deserves encouragement, but Yuen Yeung’s
technique is more mature. If I have to choose one, I’d pick Yuen Yeung, but
Mummy is also worth encouragement.
15

Law:

I would also like to nominate Mummy for this award. Yuen Yeung is also distinctive,
but Mummy is more alternative and has its own style, and the independent spirit isstronger. So, I think Mummy deserves this award.

Chan:

If all jury members think that both works deserve to be awarded, can there be twoawards?

Fan:Jacqueline (Liu) didn't choose Mummy. Do you have anything to add?

Liu:

I don't mind, it's okay.

Chan:

How about encouraging two works at the same time?

Fan:

Jamson (Law), you didn't choose Yuen Yeung.

Law:

I also like Yuen Yeung, but Special Mention should reward independent spirit.
Many works are also well shot. I chose Mummy because it has independent spirit,and it is not like mainstream works.

Chin:

Yuen Yeung is also very weird, with all English dialogue.

Law:

I also like Yuen Yeung, but I think it will be more fun and unconventional if thenarrative arrangement is not linear.

Cheung: When discussing Mummy, we have to wonder whether it is a documentary. I also
want both works to win.
Chin:

People will understand why we picked two films for this award, since their subject
matters are completely different.

16

26th ifva Open Category Award Winners
Gold Award
Night is Young
Kwok Zune
Silver Award
This Is Not The End
Chan Kam-hei
Special Mention
Yuen Yeung
Leung Ming-kai, Kate Reilly
Mummy
Tsang Chung-yin

17