Annex5IPSI Case Study Summary Sheet
Please submit this form along with your SDM project evaluation. We ask that you keep your responses
here as concise as possible. This information along with your SDM project evaluation will be posted on
the IPSI website unless otherwise requested. With this in mind, please provide accurate information in
the fieldsbelow in a manner that will help readers understand your project.Please inform the SDM
Secretariat if there are any responses you would not like made public.

Basic Information
Keywords (3-5 key concepts included in the case study)Indigenous paddy, Highland Agriculture, Black-necked crane, Tourism, Livelihood, habitat restoration
http://www.safeinch.org
http://www.speciesonthemove.com/3252
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/why-these-birds-are-skirting-arunachal/articleshow/69077719.cms

Geographical Information
Longitude/latitude or Google Maps link(if location is identified)
27°24'13'83" N, 92°18'17.07" E, elevation 1870 m (https://goo.gl/maps/8CHRmNnv5DFxV5Aw5)
Ecosystem(s) (please place an “x” in all appropriate boxes)
Forestx
GrasslandAgriculturalx
In-land water
CoastalDrylandMountainxUrban/peri-urban
Other (Please specify) Rural
Socioeconomic and environmental characteristics of the area(within 50 words)
Sangti village is in West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. The landscape has wide open mountain valley withpaddy fields, marshy land and river. Agriculture is prime occupation of villagers, followed by horticulture andtourism. Landraces of Japanese paddy is cultivated here and it is the winter habitat of Black-necked crane since
1950.
Description of human-nature interactions in the area
(land-use, traditional resource management practices etc. – within 50 words)

The agrarian community practice traditional agro-forestry in mountain valleys and highland terrains, wherein
black-necked cranes (BNC), a near-threatened avian species migrates to the paddy fields from Tibet for winterroosting and feed on insects and the grains post harvest. The villagers believe these birds are harbingers of better
yield in the following season.

Contents
Note: The following fields are used for information about activities described in the case study or the production of the case study itself,and contents may vary depending on the nature of the case study. For example, a case study about on-the-ground activities may include
the rationale, objectives etc. for the activities; a case study about a SEPLS-related policy may describe the policymaking process; or a casestudy describing a SEPLS may address particular practices used there. Please make an effort to fill as many fields as possible.
Rationale (why activities or policies described, or information shared in thecase study are needed – within 50 words)

This remote socio-ecological production landscape, being a part of eastern Himalayan biodiversity hotspot hosts
several landraces of Japanese highland rice cultivated through indigenous practices, wherein IUCN red-listed
Black-necked Cranes migrate for winter roosting. Anthropogenic activities are destroying the unique habitat
threatening rich biodiversity and indigenous resilient practices in this agri-scape.
Objectives(goals of activities or policies described, or of producing the case study –within 50 words)
To produce an adaptive framework planning for conserving the production agriscape through sustainable
intensification of ecosystem services, a following set of objectives were set:
1. Map the changing trends of indigenous farming practices and identify the drivers of change
2. Assess the direct impact of the changing farming practices on local agro-biodiversity, and ecosystemservices and its tandem effects on local livelihood and wildlife habitat

3. Prepare a place-based habitat conservation framework for adaptive agriscape management
Activities and/or practices employed (within 50 words)
1. Identification of intervention area in SEPLs, sociometric study and resource mapping
2. Plotting the ‘practice changes’, seasonal trend analysis and impact assessments
3. Community sensitization, capacity building and technology cooperation, financial inclusion of local
institutions.
4. Forest-Fire preparedness, enabling shared values in conservation partnership.
5. Developing place-based conservation framework for SEPLs, Report review and dissemination.
Results(within 50 words)
Geospatial resource map, livelihood vulnerability and need assessment in the intervention area are prepared forecosystem-based adaptations along with trend analysis studies on changing agro-farming practices to identify
drivers and determinants of change. Accordingly capacities built in 370 households for resilient farming andretention of indigenous practice that brought back the migratory avian fauna that disappeared owing to habitatchange. The learnings are compiled as a framework for policy implications.
Lessons learned(factors in success or failure, challenges and opportunities – within 40 words)i.
Conservation of agro-avian biodiversity is an intertwined ecological phenomenon that needs holistic
approach at community-ecosystem interface in a SEPL.
ii.
Resource poor communities must have sustainable alternatives for intensifying ecosystem services thosesupports their livelihood; otherwise the opportunity costs need to be compensated through fiscal
conservation paradigms.
Key messages(within 40 words)
i.
Local agrarian economy is extensively dependent on indigenous gene pool conservation, as landraces of
paddy and BNC herein, through nature-based solutions.
ii.
Habitat restoration and biodiversity conservation incentivize nature ecotourism through sustainable
intensification of ecosystem services.
iii.
Socio-ecological paraphernalia that hasn’t suitably modified spatiotemporally for climate adaptive
mitigation, needs to be addressed through place-based solutions.
Relationship to other IPSI activities(if the case study is related to any other IPSI collaborative activities, case studies, etc.)
Contributed in SITR volume 7
Funding (any relevant information about funding of activities or projects described in the case study)
None

Contributions to Global Agendas
CBD Aichi Biodiversity Targets (https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/)
Please place an “x” in the “direct” or “indirect” boxes next toany of the CBD’s Aichi Biodiversity Targetsto which the work described inthis case study contributes as appropriate. Note: please mark only those that the case actually has made or is making a contribution,
not those to which it could make a potential contribution in the future.
TargetDescription
DirectIndirectBy 2020, at the latest, people are aware of the values of biodiversity and the steps they can take toconserve and use it sustainably.
By 2020, at the latest, biodiversity values have been integrated into national and local
development and poverty reduction strategies and planning processes and are being incorporated
into national accounting, as appropriate, and reporting systems.
By 2020, at the latest, incentives, including subsidies, harmful to biodiversity are eliminated,phased out or reformed in order to minimize or avoid negative impacts, and positive incentives forthe conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity are developed and applied, consistent and inharmony with the Convention and other relevant international obligations, taking into accountnational socio economic conditions.

By 2020, at the latest, Governments, business and stakeholders at all levels have taken steps toachieve or have implemented plans for sustainable production and consumption and have kept theimpacts of use of natural resources well within safe ecological limits.
By 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at least halved and wherefeasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation is significantly reduced.

x

By 2020 all fish and invertebrate stocks and aquatic plants are managed and harvested sustainably,
legally and applying ecosystem based approaches, so that overfishing is avoided, recovery plans
and measures are in place for all depleted species, fisheries have no significant adverse impacts on
threatened species and vulnerable ecosystems and the impacts of fisheries on stocks, species andecosystems are within safe ecological limits.
By 2020 areas under agriculture, aquaculture and forestry are managed sustainably, ensuringconservation of biodiversity.

x

By 2020, pollution, including from excess nutrients, has been brought to levels that are not
detrimental to ecosystem function and biodiversity.

By 2020, invasive alien species and pathways are identified and prioritized, priority species arecontrolled or eradicated, and measures are in place to manage pathways to prevent theirintroduction and establishment.
By 2015, the multiple anthropogenic pressures on coral reefs, and other vulnerable ecosystems
impacted by climate change or ocean acidification are minimized, so as to maintain their integrity
and functioning.
By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water, and 10 per cent of coastal and marine
areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, areconserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and wellconnected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, andintegrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes.

xx

By 2020 the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation
status, particularly of those most in decline, has been improved and sustained.

By 2020, the genetic diversity of cultivated plants and farmed and domesticated animals and ofwild relatives, including other socio-economically as well as culturally valuable species, ismaintained, and strategies have been developed and implemented for minimizing genetic erosion
and safeguarding their genetic diversity.

x

By 2020, ecosystems that provide essential services, including services related to water, andcontribute to health, livelihoods and well-being, are restored and safeguarded, taking into accountthe needs of women, indigenous and local communities, and the poor and vulnerable.
By 2020, ecosystem resilience and the contribution of biodiversity to carbon stocks has beenenhanced, through conservation and restoration, including restoration of at least 15 per cent ofdegraded ecosystems, thereby contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation and tocombating desertification.

xBy 2015, the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharingof Benefits Arising from their Utilization is in force and operational, consistent with nationallegislation.
By 2015 each Party has developed, adopted as a policy instrument, and has commenced
implementing an effective, participatory and updated national biodiversity strategy and actionplan.
By 2020, the traditional knowledge, innovations and practices of indigenous and local communities
relevant for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and their customary use of
biological resources, are respected, subject to national legislation and relevant international
obligations, and fully integrated and reflected in the implementation of the Convention with thefull and effective participation of indigenous and local communities, at all relevant levels.
By 2020, knowledge, the science base and technologies relating to biodiversity, its values,functioning, status and trends, and the consequences of its loss, are improved, widely shared andtransferred, and applied.
By 2020, at the latest, the mobilization of financial resources for effectively implementing theStrategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 from all sources, and in accordance with the consolidated
and agreed process in the Strategy for Resource Mobilization, should increase substantially fromthe current levels. This target will be subject to changes contingent to resource needs assessments
to be developed and reported by Parties.

x

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs)
Please place an “x” in the “direct” or “indirect” boxes next toany of the UN Sustainable Development Goalsto which the work
described in this case study contributes as appropriate. Note: please mark only those that the case actually has made or is making acontribution, not those to which it could make a potential contribution in the future.
SDG
Description
DirectIndirect

End poverty in all its forms everywhere

End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainableagriculturexx

Ensure healthy lives and promote wellbeing for all at all ages

Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning
opportunities for all
Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls

Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all

Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all

Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive
employment, and decent work for all
Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization, andfoster innovation
Reduce inequality within and among countriesx
Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainablex
Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns

Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impactsxConserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable
development
Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably
manage forests, combat desertification and halt and reverse land degradation, andhalt biodiversity lossx

Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide accessto justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership forsustainable developmentx