ARCHAEOLOGIA JAPONICA

Korean Peninsula
Koike Fumihiro1
Archaeological Society of Kyushu and Yeongnam Archaeological Society, as well as
Kyushu Jomon Kenkyukai and Korean Neolithic Research Society are both holding a
joint archaeological convention biannually, and the 10th joint archaeological conventionof Kyushu and Yeongnam archaeological societies, “Production and Distribution” washeld on August 17th and 18th at Yeungnam University in Gyeongsan City. They bothhave been mutually holding conventions for about 20 years, and secured a place toexchange opinions. Thus, opportunities where Japanese and Korean researchers can meetand exchange opinions are steadily increasing, and ﬁscal 2012 saw many symposia ofeach period on various themes.
Regarding excavation of Neolithic sites in Korea, 5 pit dwellings, 14 outdoor hearths,
one pit and features from one farm were excavated at Goseong Munam-ri site, Goseong
County, Gangwon Province. The farm features had two strata, and since the lower
stratum was dug out by at least two Neolithic pit dwellings, farm features that clearly
belong to the Neolithic age were discovered for the ﬁrst time [CHO Misun “Excavationof Gangwon Goseong Munam-ri.” 2012 Academic Conference of Korean Neolithic
Research Society]. Results of additional research are awaited.
HEGURI Tatsuya, Funbo Shiryo kara Mita Seidoki Jidai Shakai (Bronze Age Society
Seen from Mound Tombs), Sogyonn Munhuasa (written in Korean), consists of trends for
funeral system study for each period, analysis on tomb zone structure, nature of funeralequipment and rituals, regional exchange networks and interaction networks seen fromfunerary equipment, and the transition of bronze age society seen from mounded tombs.
iNoUe Chikara assumed bargaining between the Gimhae authority and Nakoku asJapanese bronze tools were excavated from tumuli of Daeseong-dong and Yangdon-ri
in Gimhae City. Along the Gyeongnam coast, Nuk-to site was shown to have played
a role as the foothold for a trade route that tied Lelang Commandery with northern
Kyushu from around the second century B.C. However, as Guya-kok of Byeongjin grewin the latter half of the ﬁrst century, ancient Gimhae Bay prospered as an international
trade harbor, and closely related to the rise of Gimhae power during Byeonghan andJinhan, it played a major role in Byeonhan [“Rokuto Iseki Suitai no Rekishiteki Haikei
1 Amagi Historical Museum, 216–2 Amagi, Asakura City, Fukuoka Prefecture, 838–0068, Japan(ama-reki@city.asakura.lg.jp)

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY 2 (2014): 90–92© Japanese Archaeological Association90

TRENDS IN JAPANESE ARCHAEOLOGICAL
Title
ACTIVITIES ABROAD(Historical Background of Decline of Nuk-to Site)” Cultura Antiqua Vol. 64, No. 2].
The seventh excavation of Daeseong-dong tumuli, which was conducted in ﬁscal 2012,
has yielded a 5.7 meter by 2.7 meter No. 88 wooden burial chamber with a tomb forsacriﬁcial death (junso) that was assumed to belong to the third quarter of the 4thcentury. A socketed bronze spearhead with a wide middle section was excavated fromthe soil covering the chamber and a large amount of bronze cogwheel plaques, bonearrowheads, and bronze arrowheads either with or without stems were excavated fromthe ﬂoor. Also, No. 91 wooden burial chamber was a little larger than No. 88 chamber,and it yielded gold plated bronze or bronze horse trappings, a bronze bowl, a ﬁre pitshaped pedestal, a short-necked jar, a pedestaled bowl and so on. From contemporary
pottery, it was assumed to belong to the second quarter of the 4th century. Assumingfrom the size and excavated artifacts, these tombs seem to have belonged to chiefs
who were in charge of trades with Yan state (China) and Wa (Japan). 成周鐸教授追慕
論叢刊行実行委員会 (Committee for Publication of Theses to Cherish the Memory ofProf. SoNG Chutak) ed. Baekje and Surrounding World has a huge volume of 900
pages, and contributions from 40 historians and archaeologists in China, Japan, andSouth Korea. TSUCHIDA Junko examined Japanese artifacts such as Sue-ware pottery,armor, and iron arrowheads that were excavated from Baekje sites, and discussed thechronology and transition of Baekje pottery that coexisted with Japanese pottery, as well
as excavation backgrounds of Japanese artifacts [“Kudara Iseki Shutsudo Wakei Ibutsu
ni Taisuru Kento: Kudara Doki to Kyohan Suru Shiryo wo Chushin ni” (Examination on
Wa Artifacts Excavated from Baekje Sites: Mainly on Artifacts Coexisted with BaekjePottery), written in Korean]. Also, Lee Dongguan and TAKeSUe Junichi examined
the function and usage of trapezoid casted iron axes, and examined their transition andhistory, as well as trapezoid iron axes in Baekje, and the emergence of steelmaking
techniques [“Kudara no Tetsu to Seiko Gijutsu ni Kansuru Shiron: Teikei Juzo Tetsufu
wo Chushin ni” (Iron and Steelmaking Technology in Baekje: Mainly on Trapezoid IronAxes), written in Korean]. YAMAMoTo Takafumi discussed style changes of Sue-wareand their background, changes of pottery style in Baekje, changes of pottery style inShilla, and types of style changes and East Asian backgrounds [“Higashi Ajia ChiikiDoki Yoshiki no Henka to Sono Haikei: 7 Seiki no Nihon Retto/Kudara/Shiragi wo
Taisho ni” (Pottery Style Change and Its Background in East Asia: 7th Century JapaneseIslands, Baekje, and Shilla)]. There were many theses on ancient mountain forts, andODA Fujio discussed research at Dazaifu castle city, formation of Dazaifu system, anddefense systems in western Japan and East Asia. He proposed a lineage in which singlepetal type i round tiles that were excavated from Shujobaru of onojo castle originatedin Goguryeo and came via Baekje, and that Onojo, Kiijo, Mizuki should be called a“castle city system type mountain fort (tojo-sei-gata-sanjo) [“Dazaifu Tojo-sei Kenkyu no© Japanese Archaeological Association91

Author JAPONICA
ARCHAEOLOGIA

Genzai (Present status of Dazaifu Castle City Study)”]. KITAGAKI Soichiro comparedstone walls of modern castles, ancient mountain forts such as Kaneda, ono, Kii, andYashima castles that were mentioned in Nihon Shoki, and mountain forts in Baekje suchas Dong Naseong, Seo Naseong, and Geumsan Baekryeong-sex [“Nihon Shoki ga Toku
Kodai Sanjo to Kudara Sanjo wo Meguru Kadai (Issues of Ancient Mountain Forts andBaekje Mountain Forts in Nihon Shoki)”]. KAMEDA Shuichi examined walls, gates andfacilities of Tsushima Kaneda castle, and compared them to ancient mountain forts ofthe Korean peninsula and Japanese islands. While stone forts and two-holed foundationstones for gates at Kaneda castle are unique, there are similarities with Yashima and Kino
castles, and he referred to the relationship with Baekje mountain forts on the Koreanpeninsula [“Tsushima Kanedajo Shoko (Thoughts on Kaneda Castle in Tsushima)”].
Also, AZUMA Ushio discussed various sites for the capital of Shilla dynasty, space
distribution around Hwangryong temple, reconstruction of the capital of Shilla dynasty,
and the comparison between Fujiwarakyo palace and Chanan [“Shiira Kinkyo no Borisei
Sairon (Reexamination of Bo-ri System at the Capital of Shilla)”].
As for excavation, outstanding excavations were the Gyo-dong No. 7 tomb ofChangnyeong by Woori Research Institute for Cultural Properties, and Goheung-Yamak
mounded tomb by Naju National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage. Construction
processes of mounds were reexamined at the Gyo-dong No. 7 tomb, and for excavationof Yamak mounded tomb by Naju National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage, aconnection with Wa was assumed from paving stones on the slope, the form of stonechamber, and excavated artifacts such as sankakuita-kawatoji-tanko (cuirass made oftriangular iron pieces sewn together with leather thongs).

© Japanese Archaeological Association92