UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM SD
SPECIALIZED DISCLOSURE REPORTTOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English)Japan

001-14948

22-2251454(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

1 Toyota-cho, Toyota City,
Aichi Prefecture, Japan

471-8571(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)Hiroaki Shimizu
Telephone number: +81 565 28-2121
Facsimile number: +81 565 23-5800(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report)

Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period
to which the information in this form applies:

Rule 13p‐1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p‐1) for the reporting period fromJanuary 1 to December 31, 2013.

Section 1 – Conflict Minerals Disclosure
Item 1.01

CONFLICT MINERALS DISCLOSURE AND REPORT

Toyota Motor Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, “Toyota”, “we” or “our”) is primarily engaged indesigning, manufacturing, assembling and selling passenger cars, minivans and commercial vehicles such as trucks,
as well as related parts and accessories worldwide.
Toyota conducted a reasonable country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) with due diligence, based on the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines, for its products related to automotive operations and marineoperations.
As a result of the RCOI survey, Toyota was unable to determine whether all of its necessary conflict mineralsoriginated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country, or whether they come from recycled orscrap sources.
Conflict Minerals Disclosure
Published Results A copy of this Form SD and the attached Conflict Minerals Report may be found publicly on ourwebsite at:
http://www.toyota-global.com/investors/ir_library/
Item 1.02

EXHIBIT

See Item 2.01.
Section 2 – EXHIBITS
Item 2.01

EXHIBITS

Exhibit 1.01 – Conflict Minerals Report

SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to besigned on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.

Toyota Motor Corporation

By:/s/ Takuo Sasaki
Name: Takuo Sasaki
Title: Managing Officer
Date: May 30, 2014

Exhibit 1.01 to Form SD filed on May 30, 2014

Conflict Minerals Report
as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of Form SD
This report for the year ended December 31, 2013 is presented to comply with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Rule”). This Rule was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) toimplement reporting and disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals as directed by the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Rule imposes certain reporting obligations on SEC
registrants whose manufactured products contain tin, tantalum, tungsten, or gold (“3TG,” also defined by Form
SD as “conflict minerals”), and who have a reason to believe that the products they manufacture, or contract tomanufacture, contain conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of those products. If
the SEC registrant has a reason to believe that any of those conflict minerals may have originated in theDemocratic Republic of the Congo (“DRC”) or an adjoining country (together with the DRC, the “CoveredCountries”), or is unable to determine the country of origin of those conflict minerals, the SEC registrant isrequired to submit a Conflict Minerals Report to the SEC that includes a description of the measures it took toexercise due diligence on the conflict minerals’ source and chain of custody.
1.

Products
Toyota Motor Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, “Toyota”, “we” or “our”) conducted a reasonablecountry of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) with due diligence for the following products. We were able to identify
for some of our products the smelters where the metals were processed. However, we were unable todetermine with reasonable certainty the mines or locations of origin of all the necessary conflict minerals
contained in our supply chain.
Toyota produces and sells passenger cars, minivans and commercial vehicles such as trucks. Toyota’s
subsidiary, Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd. (“Daihatsu”), produces and sells mini-vehicles and compact cars. HinoMotors, Ltd. (“Hino”), also a subsidiary of Toyota, produces and sells commercial vehicles such as trucks
and buses. We also manufacture automotive parts, components and accessories for our own use and for saleto others. Our vehicles (produced by Toyota, Daihatsu and Hino) can be classified into two categories:
hybrid vehicles and conventional engine vehicles. Our product line-up includes subcompact and compact
cars, mini-vehicles, mid-size, luxury, sports and specialty cars, recreational and sport-utility vehicles,
pickup trucks, minivans, trucks and buses. In addition, we also manufacture and sell pleasure boats, marineengines and a variety of marine components.

2.

PolicyToyota and its subsidiaries promote obtainment of materials with full deliberation and care to avoid theprocurement or usage of materials which are unlawful or which are obtained through unethical or otherwise
unacceptable means. We recognize that the issue of the conflict minerals originating in the Covered
Countries is one of the significant social issues among supply chains. We aim at procurement and usage thatare free from conflict minerals originating in the Covered Countries and relating to illegal conduct
including human rights infringement. To realize such procurement and usage, we conduct inquiries tracing
back through our supply chains and confirm if conflict minerals are used. In addition, we take appropriate
steps to discontinue procurement of materials that can cause social problems or finance armed groups, if
such usage is detected. Based on mutually beneficial relationships, we ask our suppliers to understand ourpolicies and approaches and to promote responsible material procurement.
The link to our policy relating to conflict minerals is included below:
http://www.toyota-global.com/sustainability/csr_initiatives/stakeholders/partners/conflict_minerals.html
http://www.toyota-global.com/sustainability/csr_initiatives/stakeholders/partners/#conflict_minerals

3.

Steps Taken to Identify Risks in the Supply Chain and Due Diligence Measures
Toyota conducted due diligence on the source and chain of custody of its conflict minerals to ascertain
whether these conflict minerals originated in the Covered Countries, or financed or benefited armed groups
in any of such countries. Our conflict minerals due diligence measures have been designed to conform withthe Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible

Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, Second Edition, as applicable fortin, tantalum, tungsten, gold and downstream companies, in all material respects.
Toyota designed its due diligence measures to:(i) Step 1 Establish strong company management systems:
Toyota has adopted a company policy for conflict minerals and CSR guidelines for business partners
and communicated them to both internal and external parties. We structured a team of individuals
from various areas within the organization to support the due diligence on the origin of conflictminerals and chain of custody. We also held sessions for suppliers and designed and developed
conflict minerals materials.
(ii) Step 2 Identify and assess risk in the supply chain:Toyota has held meetings with Toyota’s management to discuss the policy and measures relating tothe RCOI survey. We carried out the RCOI survey, using the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template
published by the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (“CFSI”) and compared the results of the survey on
smelter information with the list of Conflict-Free Smelter Program (“CFSP”).
(iii) Step 3 Design and implement a strategy to respond to identified risks:
Based on the risks identified in Step 2 above, Toyota discussed this assessment with Toyota’smanagement, then designed and implemented a strategy to respond to such risks. We also requested
survey cooperation through automotive industry organizations such as the Automotive Industry Action
Group (“AIAG”) and the Japan Auto Parts Industries Association (“JAPIA”), and maintained regularcommunication including exchange of opinions. Through AIAG, we supported and contributed toCFSI activities. We established the Japan Conflict Free Sourcing Working Group with othercompanies from the automotive industry and the electronics industry to collaborate with the Electronic
Industry Citizenship Coalition and cooperate on smelters’ survey activities. We have visited some
3TG industry organizations through the Japan Conflict Free Sourcing Working Group. We also
participated in the Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (“PPA”).
(iv) Step 4 Carry out independent third-party audit of supply chain due diligence at identified points in thesupply chain:
The Japan Conflict Free Sourcing Working Group has interviewed 3TG industry organizations andsmelters and encouraged them to participate in CFSP.
(v) Step 5 Report on supply chain due diligence:
Toyota has compiled its results and filed this report in accordance with the Rule under Form SD.
Further information is also available on our website.
4.

Results for Calendar Year 2013
Toyota was able to determine the origin of a portion of the conflict minerals contained in our supply chain
and whether some of them come from recycled or scrap sources. We are, however, unable to determine allof the facilities used to process them, the country of origin, or the mine or location of origin.
(i) Conflict minerals’ country of origin
Because sufficient information to identify a portion of the smelters/refiners and the countries of originof conflict minerals was not provided by its suppliers, Toyota was unable to determine any of its
products to be “DRC conflict free”, as defined by Form SD.
(ii) Facilities used to process conflict minerals
During the course of our due diligence on the source and chain of custody of the necessary conflictminerals, Toyota has collected information on some, but not all, of its smelters/refiners. Among thosesmelters/refiners, we found some of them processed minerals sourced in the Covered Countries.
However, through our due diligence, we were unable to obtain sufficient information to determine
whether those conflict minerals were from mines which financed or benefited any armed group.
(iii) Efforts to determine the conflict minerals’ mines or locations of origin
Through its participation in CFSP and the RCOI survey completed by its suppliers, Toyota has
determined that its efforts to seek information about the conflict minerals smelters/refiners in its

supply chain represents the most reasonable effort Toyota can make to determine the mines orlocations of origin of the necessary conflict minerals contained in its supply chain.
5.

Steps Toyota Will Take Subsequent to Calendar Year 2013
The due diligence process discussed above is an ongoing process. As Toyota continues to conduct due
diligence on its products, it will continue to refine procedures to meet the goals and adhere to values set
forth in the policy outlined above.
Toyota will conduct the following procedures to mitigate the risk that its conflict minerals benefit armed
groups:
a.
b.
c.

d.
e.

Toyota will improve the RCOI survey and due diligence.
Toyota will improve the measures of the RCOI survey based on feedback from major Tier-1
suppliers.
Toyota will conduct awareness-raising activities for suppliers such as providing conflict minerals
survey-related materials including guidance manuals, holding sessions on a regular basis incooperation with JAPIA and continuing to communicate and exchange opinions with trade
partners with direct business.
Toyota will encourage smelters/refiners to participate in CFSP through the industry organizations
such as AIAG and JAPIA.
Toyota will continue industry-wide cooperation such as contribution to CFSI through AIAG andparticipation in PPA.

This Conflict Minerals Report was not subjected to an independent private sector audit, in accordance withForm SD.