17 December 2010
Company Announcements Office
Australian Securities Exchange
Exchange Centre
Level 420 Bridge Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

Dear Sir
Annual General Meeting on 17 December 2010
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
The outcome of the poll conducted on the Items of Business set out in the Notice of 2010
Annual General Meeting held on 17 December 2010 is:

Item

Resolution

Result of the poll

Item 2Modification of the Constitution

Passed as a special resolution

Item 3Adoption of the Remuneration Report

Passed as an ordinary resolution(advisory only)

Item 4

Grant of Performance Rights to Mr
Michael Smith

Passed as an ordinary resolution

Item 5

Election of Directors

The following candidates werere-elected as Directors:•Dr G. J. Clark•

Mr D. E. Meiklejohn•

Mr I. J. Macfarlane

As required by section 251AA of the Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rule 3.13.2, thefollowing details are provided in respect of each motion on the agenda.
Item 2 – Modification of the Constitution
The total number of votes exercisable by all validly appointed proxies was:•Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘for’ the motion 1,200,628,628•Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘against’ the motion 4,875,528•Votes where the proxy may exercise a discretion how to vote 32,016,077

Company Secretary’s Office
ANZ Centre Melbourne, Level 9A, 833 Collins StreetDocklands VIC 3008
www.anz.com
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ABN 11 005 357 522

Page 2
In addition, the number of votes where the proxy was directed toabstain from voting on the motion was 6,201,971
The result of voting on the motion is as follows:
The motion was carried as a special resolution on a poll the details of which are:
•The number of votes cast ‘for’ the motion was 1,234,786,637•

The number of votes cast ‘against’ the motion was 4,875,654

In addition, the number of votes which abstained from voting was 6,240,364
Item 3 – Adoption of the Remuneration Report
The total number of votes exercisable by all validly appointed proxies was:•Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘for’ the motion 1,169,150,570•

Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘against’ the motion 34,571,725•

Votes where the proxy may exercise a discretion how to vote 30,338,233

In addition, the number of votes where the proxy was directed toabstain from voting on the motion was 9,657,706
The result of voting on the motion is as follows:
The motion was carried as an ordinary resolution (advisory only) on a poll the details ofwhich are:•

The number of votes cast ‘for’ the motion was 1,192,543,577•

The number of votes cast ‘against’ the motion was 43,467,366

In addition, the number of votes which abstained from voting was 9,795,900
Item 4 – Grant of Performance Rights to Mr Michael Smith
The total number of votes exercisable by all validly appointed proxies was:•Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘for’ the motion 1,149,652,299•

Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘against’ the motion 55,688,667•Votes where the proxy may exercise a discretion how to vote 19,290,369

In addition, the number of votes where the proxy was directed toabstain from voting on the motion was 8,917,690
The result of voting on the motion is as follows:
The motion was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll the details of which are:
•The number of votes cast ‘for’ the motion was 1,161,425,510•

The number of votes cast ‘against’ the motion was 64,573,378

In addition, the number of votes which abstained from voting was 9,030,082

Page 3Item 5 – Election of Directors
To re-elect Dr G. J. Clark
The total number of votes exercisable by all validly appointed proxies was:•Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘for’ the motion 1,197,065,181•

Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘against’ the motion 10,443,243•

Votes where the proxy may exercise a discretion how to vote 31,629,045

In addition, the number of votes where the proxy was directed toabstain from voting on the motion was 4,601,131
Dr Clark was re-elected as a Director.
The details of the poll in relation to the re-election of Dr Clark are:
•The number of votes cast ‘for’ the motion was 1,230,531,077•

The number of votes cast ‘against’ the motion was 10,475,688

In addition, the number of votes which abstained from voting was 4,603,905
To re-elect Mr D. E. Meiklejohn
The total number of votes exercisable by all validly appointed proxies was:•Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘for’ the motion 1,195,266,769•

Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘against’ the motion 12,203,447•

Votes where the proxy may exercise a discretion how to vote 31,590,435

In addition, the number of votes where the proxy was directed toabstain from voting on the motion was 4,668,468
Mr Meiklejohn was re-elected as a Director.
The details of the poll in relation to the re-election of Mr Meiklejohn are:•

The number of votes cast ‘for’ the motion was 1,228,629,758•

The number of votes cast ‘against’ the motion was 12,267,381

In addition, the number of votes which abstained from voting was 4,667,930
To elect Mr R. J. Reeves
The total number of votes exercisable by all validly appointed proxies was:•Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘for’ the motion 70,952,304•

Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘against’ the motion 1,134,744,959•

Votes where the proxy may exercise a discretion how to vote 32,120,642

Page 4
In addition, the number of votes where the proxy was directed to abstain fromvoting on the motion was 5,855,613
Mr Reeves was not elected as a Director.
The details of the poll in relation to the election of Mr Reeves are:•

The number of votes cast ‘for’ the motion was 71,012,596•

The number of votes cast ‘against’ the motion was 1,168,558,359

In addition, the number of votes which abstained from voting was 5,961,183
To re-elect Mr I. J. Macfarlane
The total number of votes exercisable by all validly appointed proxies was:•Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘for’ the motion 1,202,769,546•

Votes where the proxy was directed to vote ‘against’ the motion 4,898,561•

Votes where the proxy may exercise a discretion how to vote 31,553,627

In addition, the number of votes where the proxy was directed toabstain from voting on the motion was 4,515,132
Mr Macfarlane was re-elected as a Director.
The details of the poll in relation to the re-election of Mr Macfarlane are:•

The number of votes cast ‘for’ the motion was 1,236,180,728•

The number of votes cast ‘against’ the motion was 4,914,238

In addition, the number of votes which abstained from voting was 4,514,464
Dated this 17th day of December 2010.

John PriestleyCompany Secretary