WORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONS/WPDR/W/15
3 May 2001
(01-2270)
Working Party on Domestic Regulation Original:  English
COMMUNICATION FROM AUSTRALIA
Regulatory Impact Analysis in Australia
The following communication has been received from the delegation of Australia with the
request that it be circulated to the Members of the Working Party on Domestic Regulation.
_______________
1. This paper describes the application of regulatory impact analysis in Australia, with particular
focus on necessity tests, transparency and competition policy.
A. ORIGINS AND OBJECTIVES OF REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS IN AUSTRALIA
2. Australia is a federation of six States and two Territories.  The Constitution confers specific,
apparently limited, powers on the Commonwealth (n ational) Government, and all other powers rest
with State and Territory governments.  In practice  there is considerable overlap, with, for example,the Commonwealth having responsibility for all international treaties, but the States and Territories
regulate environmental matters.  The consequent blurring of jurisdictional responsibilities makes it
essential that there be some coordination of regulatory activities.  Furthermore, there are regular
meetings of as many as 40 different Ministerial Councils. For example, the Ministers responsible for
consumer affairs from each of the nine governments often agree on nationwide regulatory action (for
implementation by the separate governments).
3. A common set of principles was judged desirable for these disparate activities.  The Council
of Australian Governments (COAG), the paramount government coordinating body in Australia,
decided in 1995 that all such national regulatory activity should be subjected to regulatory impact
analysis .  The requirements are set down in the COAG document Principles and Guidelines for
National Standard Setting and Regulatory Action by Ministerial Councils and Standard-Setting
Bodies .
4. While these Principles and Guidelines  are aimed primarily at domestic regulation, there are
two elements of particular interest to the WTO.  Firstly, there is a fundamental principle that domestic
regulation should not restrict international trade.
"There should be no discrimination in the way regulatory measures, mandatory standards or
conformity procedures are applied between domestic products or imported products, norbetween imports from different supplying countries.  Regulations should not be applied in a
way that creates unnecessary obstacles to international trade." (p. 8)
Secondly,
"Wherever possible, regulatory measures or standards should be compatible with relevant
international or internationally accepted standards or practices in order to minimise theS/WPDR/W/15
Page 2
impediments to trade. ……. National regulations or mandatory standards should be consistent
with Australia’s international obligations. Australia has obligations under the GATT Technical
Barriers to Trade Agreement (Standards Code) and the World Trade Organisation’s Sanitary
and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Code." (p. 8)
5. Those commitments made in 1995 were taken further by the Commonwealth Government in
1997, driven by widespread concerns about the compliance burdens imposed on businesses,
particularly small businesses, by government regulations.  Since 1997 the Commonwealth has
required that regulation impact statements be prepared at two stages — when a proposal goes to the
decision maker (which may be Cabinet, the Prime Minister, another Minister, etc), and when the
proposal is later tabled in Parliament.  These requirements apply not only to primary legislation (Acts
of Parliament) but also to delegated (subordinate) legislation, to treaties, and to co-regulatory and
quasi-regulatory activity.  The requirements for regulatory impact analysis for Commonwealth
regulations are not embedded in law, but are imposed administratively with the authority of Cabinet.
6. While the eight State and Territory governments have common national commitments,
differences exist in their internal requirements for regulatory impact analysis.  Many of them have
formal subordinate legislation Acts requiring th at regulatory impact statements accompany any
subordinate regulations that are tabled in the Parlia ments.  This approach stems from views that those
Parliaments typically had adequate scrutiny of primary legislation, but that subordinate legislation
needed more scrutiny than it had been receivin g.  The three largest States implemented their
subordinate legislation Acts about ten years ago.
B. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS
7. While regulatory impact analysis in Australia is undertaken under widely different
administrative and legal arrangements, in many cases regulation impact statements must be prepared,
typically covering the following elements.
Elements of a Regulation Impact Statement (RIS)
A RIS has seven key elements which set out:
• the problem or circumstances which give rise to the need for action;
• the desired objectives;
• the options (regulatory and non-regulatory) that may constitute viable means for achieving the
desired objectives;
• an assessment of the impact (costs and benefits) on consumers, business, government and the
community of each option, including the impact on small business paperwork and compliance
costs;
• a consultation statement (the process and results of consultation);
• a recommended option; and
• a strategy to implement (including consideratio n of appropriate enforcement mechanisms) and
review the preferred option.
8. Several aspects of these requirements may be of particular interest to the WTO.
(a) The first element, defining the problem, requires that some basic questions be
addressed, including whether the unregulated market could be expected to reduce the
problem within a reasonable timeframe, why government regulatory action isS/WPDR/W/15
Page 3
necessary, and how a regulatory scheme will improve the situation. These
requirements are fundamental to an y ‘necessity test’ for regulations.
(b) The second element of a RIS is a clear statement of the objectives that the
government is pursuing with the proposed regulation.  The Australian experience is
that without such well defined objectives, regulations risk being poorly targeted andineffective and incur unnecessary costs.
(c) The third element, setting out a range of viable options for addressing the proposed
regulation, also is an important ‘necessity test’.  It is here that non-regulatory
solutions (such as information and education campaigns, the use of codes of practice
and of voluntary standards) must be described, as well as some different regulatory
options.  Indeed, there is an obligation on Commonwealth officials to first consider if
a self-regulation solution is viable and only after demonstrating that is not so, should
they then consider some form of co-regulatory (industry/government) option.  Only if
that is demonstrated as unlikely to succeed, should a regulatory option be proposed.
(d) The fourth element is the core of any RIS — an assessment of the impact of a range
of viable options (both non-regulatory and regulatory) on all groups affected.
The Government-endorsed RIS handbook, A Guide to Regulation , published by the
Office of Regulation Review, specifies that  any impacts on importers and exporters
should be analysed.  Indeed, if a proposed regulation has a direct bearing on export
performance, a Trade Impact Assessment should be incorporated in the RIS.  Costs to
be considered would include changes likely to be required in production,
transportation and marketing procedures, or shifts to alternative sources of supply,delays in the introduction of goods to the marketplace and/or restrictions in product
availability.  Trade-related reductions in costs or prices, improvements in product and
service quality, and availability of a wider range of products and services would be
considered in the assessment of benefits.
(e) The fifth element of a RIS sets out what consultation was undertaken and summarises
the views of the main affected groups.  Ideally, those affected are given a draft of the
RIS and are asked to contribute to the assessment of how and to what extent they will
be affected.  This is an important aspect of the ‘transparency’ of the regulation-
making process and provides those most affected with adequate ‘lead-in time’ before
the regulations take effect.
C. 
APPLICATION OF REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS TO COMMONWEALTH REGULATIONS
9. It is mandatory to prepare a RIS for each proposed new or amended Commonwealth
regulation and proposed treaty which directly or indirectly affects business, or restricts competition.
The RIS requirements apply to all Commonwealth Government departments, agencies, statutory
authorities and boards that review or make legislation or regulations.
10. In the year ended 30 June 2000, there were 207 Commonwealth proposals that required
regulatory impact analysis at the decision-making stage; RISs of an adequate standard of analysiswere available in 82% of those cases.  At the later stage when proposals were tabled in Parliament or
otherwise made public, adequate RISs were prepared in 91% of cases.  The Office of Regulation
Review (ORR) advises departments and agencies in the preparation of RISs and assesses whether an
adequate level of analysis is attained.  Brief qualitative RISs are often adequate for proposals with
lesser impacts, but progressively more rigorous an alysis is required for proposals with significant
potential impacts.S/WPDR/W/15
Page 4
11. Transparency and accountability are not limited to the fact that RISs are publicly available.
Each year the Productivity Commission (of which the ORR is a part) publishes information on
compliance with the requirements.  For the year ended June 2000, specific details were published for
each department and regulatory agency — compliance at the decision-making stage varied from
complete, down to only 28% for one particular department ( Regulation and its Review 1999-2000 ,
p. 12).  In addition, each agency is soon to publish a regulatory plan showing its intended activity for
the year ahead, so that all groups affected can participate in consultations and prepare for any pending
regulatory changes.  Access to regulation is facilitated by a “Business Entry Point” website
(http://www.business.gov.au ) which provides extensive information and contacts regarding regulation
that applies to any business activity in any jurisdic tion in Australia.  Finally, the text of many laws
and regulations, and the relevant RISs, are available on a government-maintained website
(http://scaleplus.law.gov.au).  Taken together, thes e facilities have substantially improved access to,
and understanding of, legislation and regulation in Australia.
D. APPLICATION OF RIS TO THE NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PROGRAMME
12. As well as subjecting new regulatory proposals to regulatory impact analysis, Australian
governments have committed to a systematic review of the existing stock of legislation.  That has
been done as an important part of competition policy in Australia (see WT/WGTCP/W/159 of 13March 2001) whereby, in 1995, all governments agreed to a comprehensive six-year programme of
review of 1700 separate pieces of legislation having the potential to restrict competition.  A feature of
the programme is that the ‘onus of proof’ is placed on those arguing for the retention of the restriction
on competition.  Governments agreed that legislation should not restrict competition  unless it can be
demonstrated that:
• the benefits to the community as a whole outweigh the costs; and
• the objectives of the legislation can be achieved only by restricting competition.
13. The Office of Regulation Review (ORR) has the role of reminding Commonwealth agencies
of their annual review obligations, and ensuring that the essential elements of regulatory impact
analysis are embedded in the terms of reference for each review.  The general practice of publishingreview reports contributes to the transparency of the regulation review process.
14. Examples of Commonwealth legislation reviewed are international air services agreements
and food standards.  Examples of State and Territory legislation reviewed are agricultural statutory
marketing arrangements, shop trading hours and gambling.  As a result of this review programme to
reduce restrictions on competition, tangible reforms have been achieved in areas such as the
regulatory framework of Australia’s financial system, in business licence simplification, deregulated
shop trading hours, and in reductions to advertising and commercial controls on health and medicalpractitioners.
E. 
ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN
15. The administrative burden that these requirements place on officials and governments is a
resources issue in Australia, but it does not call into question the use of regulatory impact analysis.
This is principally because regulatory impact analysis should be an integral part of any policydevelopment process: sound policy making should use a consistent, systematic and transparent
framework for assessing alternative policy approaches to problems; RISs simply formalise that
process.  The primary role of a RIS is to improve government decision-making processes by ensuring
that all relevant information is presented to the decision maker.  In addition, after the decision is
made, the RIS is tabled in Parliament or may be published elsewhere, providing an open andS/WPDR/W/15
Page 5
transparent account of that decision.  Australian governments have identified these as core
responsibilities that must be met unless an excessively high administrative burden results.
16. In practice, a balance is achieved by setting triggers that exempt relatively minor matters from
regulatory impact analysis.  For significant matters, the resources applied to regulatory impact
analysis is proportionate to the importance of the issue.
F. CONCLUSION
17. Australia makes widespread use of regulatory impact analysis, both in reviewing existing
laws and in weighing up options for new regulatory proposals.  The process imposes a common
system of quality assurance on a wide range of regulatory proposals, with the aim of better achieving
effective and efficient regulatory arrangements.  The process makes it difficult for governments to
implement regulation that is unnecessarily costly, that is unlikely to achieve objectives, or that
imposes a disproportionate burden on small businesses.  Regulatory impact analysis promoteswidespread consultation with groups likely to be affected and leads to published documentation of
why governments have chosen particular regulatory options and how different groups will be affected.
__________
Relevant Websites
The COAG document  Principles and Guidelines for National Standard Setting and Regulatory Action
by Ministerial Councils and Standard-Setting Bodies can be found at
http://www.dpmc.gov.au/pdfs/coagpg.pdf .
The Commonwealth Government endorsed handbook on how to prepare a regulation impact
statement can be found at http://www.pc.goc.au/orr/reguide2/index.html .
The Productivity Commission reports in the annual series Regulation and its Review are at
http://www.pc.gov.au/orr  and selected examples of RISs are at  http://www.pc.gov.au/orr/index.html .
Australian legislation and regulations with associated explanatory memoranda (some including RISs)
are available at  http://scaleplus.law.gov.au .
Information on regulatory requirements can be found in  http://www.business.gov.au .