ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL  
DEL COMERCIO  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 
G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
1° de julio de 2005 
 
 (05-2830) 
 Original:   inglés 
 
 
  
ESTADOS UNIDOS - MEDIDAS QUE AFECTAN AL COMERCIO 
DE GRANDES AERONAVES CIVILES 
Solicitud de celebración de consultas presentada
 
por las Comunidades Europeas  
Addendum  
 La siguiente comunicación, de fecha 27 de  junio de 2005, de la Delegación de las 
Comunidades Europeas a la delegación de los Estados  Unidos y al Presidente del Órgano de Solución 
de Diferencias, se distribuye de conformida d con el párrafo 4 del artículo 4 del ESD. 
_______________ 
 Las Comunidades Europeas se remiten a la d eclaración pronunciada por los Estados Unidos 
en la reunión del Órgano de Solución de Diferenc ias ("OSD") de 13 de junio en relación con la 
solicitud de establecimiento de un grupo especial presentada por las Comunidades Europeas en el 
asunto mencionado supra , declaración en la que afirmaron que 13 de los 28 programas de 
subvenciones citados en la solicitud de establecimi ento de un grupo especial no se habían enumerado 
en la solicitud de celebración de consultas de 6 de octubre de 2004 (distrib uida con la signatura 
WT/DS/317/1, el 12 de octubre de 2004) y no pued en ser objeto del procedimiento de un grupo 
especial. 
 Las Comunidades Europeas no pueden estar de acuerdo con esta aseveración pero están 
dispuestas a celebrar consultas sobre las cuestiones planteadas en el presente procedimiento con el fin 
de aclararlas y, si es posible, resolverlas, lo cual se  entiende sin perjuicio de la posición jurídica de las 
Comunidades Europeas y de los derechos que les correspondan. 
 Por consiguiente, las Comunidades Europeas solicitan por la presente la celebración de 
consultas con los Estados Unidos de conformidad c on el párrafo 1 del artículo 4, el párrafo 1 del 
artículo 7 y el artículo 30 del Acuerdo sobre Subvenciones y Medidas Compensatorias  
("Acuerdo SMC "), el párrafo 1 del artículo XXIII del Ac uerdo General sobre Aranceles Aduaneros y 
Comercio de 1994 ("GATT de 1994") y el artículo 4 del Entendimiento relativo a las normas y procedimientos por los que se rige la solución de  diferencias ("ESD").  Es tas consultas serán una 
continuación de las celebradas el 5 de noviembr e de 2004 de conformidad con la solicitud de 
celebración de consultas de 6 de octubre de 2004. WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 2 
  
  Las medidas objeto de la presente solicit ud son subvenciones prohibidas y recurribles 
otorgadas a los productores estadounidenses de grandes aeronaves civiles
1 ("rama de producción LCA 
de los Estados Unidos"), y en particular a Bo eing Company y McDonnell Douglas Corporation, antes 
de su fusión con Boeing, incluid as las leyes, los reglamentos y los instrumentos legales conexos, así 
como las modificaciones de los mismos.  Entre l as medidas figuran actualmente las siguientes: 
1. SUBVENCIONES LOCALES Y ESTATALES 
 Los Estados de los Estados Unidos y las auto ridades de las localidades donde se sitúan las 
instalaciones de producción y de sede de la ra ma de producción LCA de los Estados Unidos 
transfieren de diversas formas recursos económicos a dicha rama de producción.  Entre esos Estados y 
autoridades locales se encuentran, pero no exclus ivamente, los de Washington, Kansas e Illinois. 
 Estos recursos económicos transferidos a la rama de producción LCA de los Estados Unidos 
incluyen numerosos incentivos fina ncieros y otras ventajas hechos efectivos, por ejemplo, mediante 
ventajas fiscales, financiación mediante emisi ón de bonos, exenciones de tasas, acuerdos de 
arrendamiento, asistencia para el traslado de la sede de la empresa, financiación de la investigación, 
medidas relativas a la infraestructura y otros beneficios. 
2. SUBVENCIONES DE LA NASA 
 La Administración Nacional de Aeronáutica Espacial ("NASA") transfiere recursos 
económicos a la rama de producción LCA de los Es tados Unidos, entre otras, de las siguientes 
formas: 
i) permitiendo que la rama de pr oducción LCA de los Estados Uni dos participe en programas de 
investigación, realizando pagos a dicha rama de  producción en el marco de esos programas o 
permitiéndole que explote los resultados de éstos, por medios entre los que se incluyen, pero 
no exclusivamente, el abandono o la renuncia de  derechos de patente valiosos, la concesión 
de datos sobre derechos exclusivos limitados ("LERD"), o, el acceso exclusivo o anticipado a 
datos, secretos comerciales y otros conocimientos  resultantes de la investigación financiada 
por el Gobierno.  A continuación figuran ejemplos de esos programas de la NASA: 
• High Speed Research Program;  
• Advanced Subsonic Technology Program;   
• Aviation Safety Program/Aviation Safety & Security Program/Aviation Security & 
Safety Program;  
• Quiet Aircraft Technology Program;   
• High Performance Computing and Communications Program;   
                                                      
1 De conformidad con el Acuerdo entre las Comunidades Europeas y el Gobierno de los Estados 
Unidos de América relativo a la aplicación del Acuerdo GATT sobre el comercio de aeronaves civiles al 
comercio de grandes aeronaves civiles de 1992 , las grandes aeronaves civiles incluyen todas las aeronaves, tal 
como se definen en el artículo 1 del Acuerdo sobre el comercio de aeronaves civile s, excepto los motores tal 
como se definen en el punto 1. b) del artículo 1, que estén destinadas al transporte de pasajeros y de carga, y 
tengan 100 o más plazas para pasajero s o su equivalencia en configuraci ón para carga.  Boeing produce o 
comercializa los siguientes grupos de grandes aeronaves civiles:  717, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777 y 787.  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 3 
  
 • Research & Technology Base Program;   
• Advanced Composites Technology Program";   
• Vehicle Systems Program;   
• Materials and Structures Systems Technology Program;   
• Aircraft Energy Efficiency Program, including Composite Primary Aircraft 
Structures, Transport Aircraft Systems Technology, and Advanced Composite Structures Technology Programs; 
ii) destinando gastos de la NASA de ayuda institucional y de personal a actividades de 
investigación y desarrollo de la rama de  producción LCA de los Estados Unidos;  
iii) mediante investigación y desarrollo independien tes, y reembolsos de ofertas y propuestas de 
la NASA; 
iv) a través de la utilización por la rama de  producción LCA de los Estados Unidos de 
instalaciones de investigación, prueba y evalu ación que son de propiedad del Gobierno de los 
Estados Unidos, incluidos los túneles aerodinámico s de la NASA, en particular el centro de 
investigación Langley;  
v) mediante contratos de compra de la NASA. 
3. SUBVENCIONES DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE DEFENSA 
 El Departamento de Defensa ("DOD") tran sfiere recursos económicos a la rama de 
producción LCA de los Estados Unidos, entre otras, de las siguientes formas: 
i) permitiendo que dicha rama de producción par ticipe en la investigación financiada por 
el DOD, realizando pagos a esa rama de pr oducción o permitiendo que explote los resultados 
de esa investigación, por medios entre los que se incluyen, pero no  exclusivamente, el 
abandono o la renuncia de derec hos de patente valiosos y la concesión de acceso exclusivo o 
anticipado a datos, secretos comerciales y otro s conocimientos resultantes de la investigación 
financiada por el Gobierno, por ejemplo, mediante: 
• Programas de investigación, desarrollo, prueba y evaluación; 
• Investigación y desarrollo independientes, y reembolsos de ofertas y propuestas; 
ii) la utilización por la rama de producción LC A de los Estados Unidos de instalaciones de 
investigación, prueba y evaluación que son de propiedad del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos, 
incluidas las Major Range Test Facility Bases;   
iii) contratos de compra, incluidos los de adqui sición de productos de la rama de producción LCA 
de los Estados Unidos por una remuneración superior a la adecuada, entre los que se incluyen, 
en particular, pero no exclusivamente, el contra to de la US Air Force con la Boeing para la 
adquisición de determinadas piezas de repuesto pa ra sus aeronaves equipadas con el Airborne 
Warning and Control System  (AWACS), el Boeing KC-767A Tanker Program (contrato de 
arrendamiento), el National Polar-orbitin g Operational Environmental Satellite WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 4 
  
 System-Conical Microwave Imager Sensor, Bo eing, el C-22 Replacement Program (C-40), 
Boeing, el KC-135 Programmed Depot Maintenance, Boeing/Pemco, el C-40 Lease and Purchase Program, Boeing, el programa de modernización y actualización de la aviónica de 
los C-130, el contrato C-17 H22 (Boeing BC-17X) y el contrato de la US Navy con Boeing 
para la producción y el mantenimiento de 10 8 aeronaves civiles B-737 y su conversión en 
detectores de submarinos de la rgo alcance Multi-Mission Aircraft. 
 También preocupa a las CE la legislación a ún pendiente de aprobación, en particular el 
proyecto de modificación (Section 817 - Prohibition  on Procurement from Beneficiaries of Foreign 
Subsidies) del proyecto de ley FY06 Defense Authorisation (HR 1815) (Enmienda Hunter). 
4. SUBVENCIONES DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE COMERCIO 
 El Departamento de Comercio de los Es tados Unidos ("DOC") transfiere recursos 
económicos a la rama de producción LCA de los Es tados Unidos, entre otras cosas, permitiendo que 
dicha rama de producción participe en el Advanced Technology Program  del National Institute of 
Standards & Technology (Instituto Nacional de Normas y Tecnología) ("NIST"), realizanso pagos a la 
rama de producción LCA de los Estados Unidos en  el marco de ese programa de investigación o 
permitiéndole que explote los resultados de dicho pr ograma, por medios entre los que se incluyen, 
pero no exclusivamente, el abandono o la renuncia de  derechos de patente valiosos y la concesión de 
acceso exclusivo o anticipado a datos, secretos come rciales y otros conocimientos resultantes de la 
investigación financiada por el Gobierno. 
5. SUBVENCIONES DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE TRABAJO 
 El Departamento de Trabajo de los Estados Un idos transfiere recursos económicos a la rama 
de producción LCA de los Estados Unidos a través,  entre otras cosas, de  la Aerospace Industry 
Initiative, un elemento de la High Growth Training Initiative del Presidente, al conceder al Edmonds 
Community College del Estado de Washington fondos  para la capacitación de trabajadores de la 
industria aeroespacial. 
6. SUBVENCIONES FISCALES FEDERALES 
 El Gobierno de los Estados Unidos transfiere  recursos económicos a la rama de producción 
LCA de los Estados Unidos a través del sistema fiscal federal, y en particular a través de las siguientes 
medidas fiscales: 
 Los artículos 921-927 del Internal Revenue Code  (antes de su derogación) y medidas conexas 
por las que se establece un trato fiscal especial pa ra las "empresas de ventas en el extranjero" 
("EVE"), incluida su aplicación a casos concretos;   la FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income 
Exclusion Act de 2000, Pub. L. Nº 106-519, incluida su aplicación a casos concre tos;  y la American 
Jobs Creation Act de 2004, Pub. L. Nº 108-357, incluida su aplicación a casos concretos. 
 Las Comunidades Europeas consideran que estas medidas son incompatibles con las 
obligaciones de los Estados Unidos en virtud de las disposiciones siguientes: 
 1) los apartados a) y b) del párrafo  1 y el párrafo 2 del artículo 3 del Acuerdo SMC ; 
 2) los apartados a) y c) del artículo 5 del Acuerdo SMC ; 
 3) los apartados a), b) y c) del párrafo 3 del artículo 6 del Acuerdo SMC ;  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 5 
  
  4) el párrafo 4 del artículo III del GATT de 1994. 
 Las Comunidades Europeas consideran que las medidas mencionadas supra  son 
incompatibles con estas disposiciones en sí mismas y en su aplicación. 
 Estas medidas son subvenciones porque en cad a caso hay una contri bución financiera del 
Gobierno de los Estados Unidos, de los gobiernos estatales o de los gobiernos locales y se confiere un 
beneficio en el sentido de los apartados a) y b) del párrafo 1 del artículo 1 del Acuerdo SMC .  Cada 
una de ellas es específica para la rama de producci ón LCA de los Estados Unidos en el sentido del 
artículo 2 del Acuerdo SMC . 
 Las subvenciones enumeradas supra  están supeditadas de jure  o de facto  a la exportación, y 
están supeditadas al empleo de productos nacional es con preferencia a los importados.  La utilización 
de estas medidas causa efectos desfavorables, en particular , un perjuicio grave o una amenaza de 
perjuicio grave, a los intereses de las Comunida des Europeas y un daño importante o una amenaza de 
daño importante a la rama de producción de grandes aeronaves civiles de las Comunidades Europeas: 
- las medidas tienen por efecto una signifi cativa subvaloración de precios de los 
productos subvencionados de la rama de pr oducción LCA de los Estados Unidos en 
comparación con el precio de los productos LCA de las Comunidades Europeas, o una amenaza de tal subvalo ración de precios en violación del apartado c) del 
artículo 5 y del apartado c) del párrafo 3 del artículo 6 del Acuerdo SMC ; 
- las medidas tienen por efecto una significativa reducción de los precios o contención 
de la subida de los precios en los me rcados de productos LCA o una amenaza de 
reducción de los precios y contención de la  subida de los precios en violación del 
apartado c) del artículo 5 y del aparta do c) del párrafo 3 del artículo 6 del 
Acuerdo SMC ; 
- las medidas tienen por efecto una pérdida de ventas significativa en los mercados de 
productos LCA o una amenaza de pérdida de ventas significativa en violación del 
apartado c) del artículo 5 y del aparta do c) del párrafo 3 del artículo 6 del 
Acuerdo SMC ; 
- las medidas tienen por efecto desplazar u obstaculizar las exportaciones de productos 
LCA de las Comunidades Europeas en el mercado estadounidense o una amenaza de desplazarlas u obstaculizarlas en violación del apartado c) del artículo 5 y del 
apartado a) del párrafo 3 del artículo 6 del Acuerdo SMC ; 
- las medidas tienen por efecto desplazar u obstaculizar las exportaciones de productos 
LCA de las Comunidades Europeas en los mercados de terceros países o una amenaza de desplazarlas u obstaculizarlas en violación del apartado c) del artículo 5 y del apartado b) del párrafo 3 del artículo 6 del Acuerdo SMC ; 
- las medidas tienen por efecto un daño im portante a la rama de producción de grandes 
aeronaves civiles de las Comunidades Europeas o una amenaza de daño importante en violación del apartado a) del artículo 5 del Acuerdo SMC ; 
- la Enmienda Hunter sería también incompa tible con, entre otras disposiciones, el 
artículo 23 del ESD y el artículo 32 del Acuerdo SMC . WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 6 
  
  El párrafo 2 del artículo 4 y el párrafo 2 del artículo 7 del Acuerdo SMC , considerados 
conjuntamente, exigen que en las solicitudes de cel ebración de consultas figu re una relación de las 
pruebas de que se disponga respecto de:  1) la exis tencia y naturaleza de las subvenciones de que se 
trate y 2) los efectos desfavorables para los intere ses de las Comunidades Europeas.  Las pruebas de 
que se dispone se enumeran en el anexo a la presente  carta, que combina las pruebas que ya figuraban 
en la carta del 6 de octubre de 2004 y pruebas adicionales que se ha n obtenido desde entonces sobre la 
existencia y naturaleza de las subvenciones. 
 Las Comunidades Europeas se reservan el de recho de solicitar a los Estados Unidos que 
presenten más información y documentos respecto de las medidas en cuestión y de sus efectos para 
los intereses de las Comunidades Europeas.  Las Comunidades Europeas se reservan también el 
derecho de plantear medidas y alegaciones adicionales en el marco de otras disposiciones de la OMC. 
 Las autoridades de las Comunidades Europeas quedan a la espera de recibir en su debido 
momento una respuesta de los Estados Unidos a esta solicitud.  Las Comunidades Europeas están 
dispuestas a considerar con los Estados Unidos fechas que sean mutuamente convenientes para 
celebrar consultas en Ginebra.  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 7 
  
 ANEXO
 
RELACIÓN DE LAS PRUEBAS DE QUE SE DISPONE 
 Las pruebas que figuran a continuación son las pruebas de que disponen actualmente las 
Comunidades Europeas respecto de la existencia y naturaleza de las subvenciones objeto de esta 
diferencia, y los efectos desfavorables que causan a los intereses de las Comunidades Europeas.  Están 
apoyadas también por documentos comerciales conf idenciales internos de Airbus que se reseñan 
infra .  Las Comunidades Europeas se reservan el derecho de complementar o modificar esta lista en el 
futuro, según proceda. 
a) Existencia y naturaleza de las subvenciones 
 Las pruebas de que disponen actualmente  las Comunidades Europeas comprenden los 
documentos siguientes.  En la solicitud de celebr ación de consultas presentada por las Comunidades 
Europeas se describe más detalladamente la naturaleza de estas subvenciones. 
H.B. 2294, 58th Leg., 2d Spec. Sess. (Wash. 2003) 
Final Bill Report, H.B. 2294 
Memorandum of Agreement for Project Olympus between the Boeing Company and the State of 
Washington, dated as of 19 December 2003, available at  
http://www.effwa.org/pdfs/boeing_olympus.pdf  
Project Olympus Master Site Development and Location Agreement between the Boeing Company 
and the State of Washington, dated as of 19 December 2003, available at  
http://www.effwa.org/pdfs/boeing_olympus.pdf  
First Amendment to Project Olympus Master Site  Development and Location Agreement between the 
Boeing Company and the State of Washington, dated as of 19 December 2003, available at  
http://www.effwa.org/pdfs/boeing_amended.pdf  
News Release, Office of Governor Gary Locke, Gov.  Gary Locke Unveils Tax Incentives Package to 
Help Land Boeing 7E7, Outlines Project's  Significant Economic Impact on State , 9 June 2003, 
available at  http://www.governor.wa.gov/press/press-vi ew.asp?pressRelease=1372&newsType=1  
Bryan Corliss, 7E7 Perks Go to Boeing , HeraldNet, 20 December 2003, available at  
http://www.heraldnet.com/st ories/03/12/20/17926878.cfm  
Action Washington, Boeing 7E7 Site Agreement:  Tax Adjustment Package, 6 December 2004, 
available at  http://dir.cted.wa.gov/DesktopModules/Documents/DocumentsView.aspx?tabID=  
0&alias=ActionWA&lang=en&ItemI D=146&MId=116&wversion=Staging  
News Release, Office of Governor Gary Locke, Gov.  Locke, Business, Labor and Government 
Leaders Celebrate Delivery of State's 7E 7 Proposal at ‘Action Washington' Rally , 20 June 2003, 
available at  http://www.governor.wa.gov/press/press-vi ew.asp?pressRelease=1379&newsType=1  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 8 
  
 News Release, Office of Governor Gary Locke, Gov. Gary Locke Credits States Aggressive Proposal, 
Unified Effort in Winning 7E7 Bid , 16 December 2003, available at  
http://www.governor.wa.gov/press/press-vi ew.asp?pressRelease=1491&newsType=1
  
David Ammons, Boeing 7E7 Deal Includes Perks , The Olympian, 22 January 2004, available at  
http://www.theolympian.com/home/new s/20040122/business/19223_Printer.shtml  
Our View:  Sweet Boeing Deal Leaves a Sour Taste , King County Journal, 22 January 2004, available 
at http://www.kingcountyjournal. com/sited/story/html/154305  
Press Release, Evergreen Freedom Foundation, Details of Boeing Agreement Revealed , 
21 January 2004, available at  http://www.effwa.org/press_releases/2004_01_21a.php  
Open Letter to Washington Legislators from Bob Williams, President of EFF, 15 October 2004, 
available at  http://www.effwa.org/commentaries/2004_10_15.php  
John Gillie, A Smooth Landing for the 7E7 , The News Tribune, 20 December 2004, available at  
http://www.thenewstribune.com/business/ aerospace/story/4356715p-4127928c.html  
Action Washington, available at http://dir.cted.wa.gov/portal/alia s__ActionWA/lang__en/tabID__63/  
DesktopDefault.aspx  
State of Washington, House and Senate Floor Debates, HB 2294, 10-11 June 2003 
Executive Message Video, 20 June 2003, available at  http://dir.cted.wa.gov/  
DesktopModules/Documents/DocumentsView.as px?tabID=0&alias=Acti onWA&lang=en&ItemID=1
77&MId=115&wversion=Staging  
Washington State and the Boeing Company:  Working Together for the Boeing 7E7 Dreamliner, 
Continuing Support and Collaborative Actions , September Presentation, Greenville, SC 
(September 2003) 
Project Management Services Contract Between State of Washington Employment Security 
Department and Accenture, LLP, ESD Contract Nº  05-415-PS, 5 May 2005, and related exhibits 
Boeing's 747 Large Cargo Freighter Development on Plan, 22 February 2005, available at  
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005/q1/nr_050222g.html  
Snohomish County Airport, Aircraft Ra te Schedule, effective 1 April 2002 
Aircraft Models and Weights for Reporting A ll-Cargo Data to FAA, CY 2003 FAA ACAIS, 
February  2005, available at http://www.faa.gov/arp/planning/stats/2005/  
Cy04CargoAircraftEnc2.pdf  
Joint Use Agreement between Snohomish County and the Boeing Company with regard to Boeing's 
use of the Snohomish County Airport (Paine Fiel d), dated 17 June 1966 , and all subsequent 
amendments and letter agreements in relation thereto, including those dated 14 July 1969, 25 
August 1999, 7 December 2000, 17 December 2002, and any amendments pursuant to the Project 
Olympus Master Site Agreement  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 9 
  
 Port of Everett, Rail/Barge Transfer Facility, available at  
http://www.portofeverett.com/boeingrailbarge.shtml
 
Port Commission authorizes staff to go out to bid on Rail-Barge Facility , Port of Everett Press 
Release, 26 May 2005, available at  http://www.portofeverett.com/press/  
2005_05_26BidRailBarg.shtml  
City of Everett Ordinance 2759-04 (2004), amendi ng Chapter 3.24 of the Everett Municipal Code 
Boeing Major Production Facilities, Everett, Washington, available at  
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/facilities/  
Spreadsheets of top Everett manufacturing companies as compiled by the City of Everett Mayor's 
Office 
Economic Revitalization and Reinvestment Act, S.B.  281, 2003 Sess., Reg. Sess., § 1(e) (Kan. 2003) 
Supplemental Note on S.B. 281, available at  
http://www.kslegislature.org/supplemental/2004/SN0281.pdf   
Richard Williamson, Kansas Lands Piece of Jet, but Boeing May not Use the Bonds , The Bond Buyer, 
24 November 2003 
Caroline Daniel, Boeing Eyes Highest Handout in Bid to Soar Above Europe , The Financial Times, 
16 June 2003 
Steve Painter, Boeing Wichita Lands State Bonds , The Wichita Eagle, 22 May 2003 
Jean Hays, Tweaks to Boeing Bill Pass Senate , The Wichita Eagle, 7 May 2003 
Chris Grenz, Boeing Banking on State , The Topeka Capital-Journal , 20 April 2003 
Kansas Department of Commerce, Legislative Session Track for S.B. 281, available at 
http://kdoch.state.ks.us:82/NewsApp/news_legis lative_updates_bill_displa y.jsp?id=1049378817480  
Steve Painter and Molly McMillin, State Sees Bonds as Boeing's Best Shot , The Wichita Eagle, 
2 April 2003 
Kansas Development Finance Authority, Financial Statements Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, 
and Independent Auditors' Report, available at  
http://www.kdfa.org/admin/UPLOADS/FinalAuditReport-FY2003.pdf   
Now You Know:  Who Received Incentives?  The Wichita Eagle, 11 July 2004 
City of Wichita, IRB Overview, "Industrial Revenue Bond Issuance in the State of Kansas,"  available 
at http://www.wichita.gov/Business/Econom icDevelopment/IRB/IRBOverview.htm   
Minutes of Meetings of the Wichita City Council, 1995-2005, available at  
http://www.wichitagov.org/Government/MinutesAndAgendas/CityCouncil/  
Lillian Zier Martell, The Wichita Eagle, 10 November 1999 WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 10 
  
 David Dinell, City approves Boeing industrial revenue bonds , 7 November 2002, available at  
http://wichita.bizjournals.com/w ichita/stories/2002/11/04/daily44.html
 
Karen Pierog, Wichita Council OKs Tax Break for Boeing , Reuters News Service, 10 November 1999 
Council approves Boeing bonds , Wichita Business Journal, 14 November 2000, available at  
http://wichita.bizjournals.com/w ichita/stories/2000/11/13/daily21.html   
City of Wichita Industrial Revenue Bond Policy, Resolution Nº R-98-151, available at  
http://www.wichita.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5C4F7504-A681-47EC-8369-F1AD7C400FAE/0/  
Industrial_Revenue_Bond_Policy_06d.pdf   
Wichita City Council Ordinance Nos 46-401 (2004), 45-914 (2003), 45-495 (2002), 45-133 (2001), 
44-811 (2000), 44-428 (1999), 44-102 (1998), 43-642 (1997), 43-325 (1996), 42-949 (1995), 42-553 (1994), 42-228 (1993), 41-916 (1992), and 41-592 (1991) 
Bond transcripts for industrial revenue bonds issued  on behalf of Boeing by the City of Wichita 
since 1979 
Letters of intent for Industrial Re venue Bonds issued to the US LCA industry pursuant to actions of 
the Wichita City Council taken on 17 May 2005, 13  July 2004, 9 November 1999, 13 February 1996, 
24 March 1992, 5 December 1989, 21 December 1982, 9 June 1981, and 23 October 1979  
Tax Abatement Cost-Benefit Analyses for US LCA- industry industrial reve nue bonds performed by 
the Center for Economic Development and Business R esearch, W.  Frank Barton School of Business, 
Wichita State University 
Council approves Onex IRBs , Wichita Business Journal, 17 May 2005, available at  
http://wichita.bizjournals.com/wic hita/stories/2005/05/16/daily16.html 
K.S.A. §§ 12-1740 et seq ., as amended 
K.S.A. §§ 79-201 et seq ., as amended, and Article 11, Section 13  of the Constitution of the State of 
Kansas  
K.S.A. §§ 79-3601 et seq ., as amended 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Wichita  Division, "Wichita Overview," available at  
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/wichita/commercial.htm
 
List maintained by the City of Wichita that contains  information about all IRBs issued by the City of 
Wichita since 1979 
City of Wichita/Sedgwick County Econom ic Development Incentives Policy, available at  
http://www.wichita.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5C4F7504-A681-47EC-8369-F1AD7C400FAE/0/  
Industrial_Revenue_Bond_Policy_06d.pdf  
The City of Wichita Industrial Revenue Bond Policy, Resolution Nº R-98-151 Property Tax Exemption Orders issued by the Kansas Board of Tax Appeals for property owned by or 
leased to the Boeing Company from FY 1985 to present  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 11 
  
 Property Tax Exemption Applicati ons filed with the Kansas Board of Tax Appeals by the Boeing 
Company from FY 1985 to present 
Kansas Department of Revenue Ruling Nº 19-1996-1, 1 July 1989 
Kansas Private Letter Ruling Nº P-2001-098, 30 September 2001 
Kansas Private Letter Ruling Nº P-1999-44, 26 February 1999 
Funding provided by the State of Kansas, Kans as Technology Enterprise Corporation ("KTEC"), and 
the Federal Government to the National Institute for Aviation Research at Wichita State University 
for collaborations with the US LCA industry, as detailed in the National Institute for Aviation 
Research, 2003 Annual Report 
Economic Development for a Grow ing Economy Tax Credit Act, Illinois Public Act 91-476, as 
amended 
35 Ill. Comp. Stat. §§ 10/5 et seq. 
35 Ill. Comp. Stat. §§ 5/211 et seq. 
Corporate Headquarters Relocation Act, Illinois Public Act 92-0207, 20 Ill. Comp. Stat. §§ 611/1 
et seq. 
35 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 200/18-165 
Ordinance of the County of Cook, Illinois, Appr oving Execution of a Tax Reimbursement Payment 
Agreement with the Boeing Company (2001) 
Ordinance of the City of Chicago, Illinois, A pproving Execution of a Tax Reimbursement Payment 
Agreement with the Boeing Company (2001) 
The Boeing Company - Corporate Headquarters Re location Grant Application (10 December 2001), 
prepared for the Illinois Department  of Commerce and Community Affairs 
John O'Connor, Chicago's Boeing Incentives May Be Cut , Denver Post, 24 May 2001 
Tax Reimbursement Payment Agreemen t Between the City of Chicago and the Boeing Company, 
1 November 2001, attached as Exhibit A to An Ordina nce of the City of Chicago, Illinois Approving 
Execution of a Tax Reimbursement Payment Ag reement with the Boeing Company (ordinance 
available at http://egov.cityofchicago/webportal/COCWe bPortal/COC_Editorial/ Boeing.txt
) 
Tax Reimbursement Payment Ag reement Between the County of Cook and The Boeing Company , 
1 November 2001 
Boeing amended certification of real estate taxes paid in accordance with the Lease Agreement 
(attached to Boeing's 23 July 2003 request for Tax Reimbursement from the County of Cook) 
Boeing certification of real estate taxes pa id in accordance with  the Lease Agreement 
(2 December 2003) (attached to Boeing's 29 Janua ry 2004 request for Tax Reimbursement Payment 
from the City of Chicago) WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 12 
  
 Statement of Robert Kunze (Deputy Commissioner, Department of Planning and Development, City 
of Chicago), Report of the Committee on Finance, Board of Commissioners of Cook County, 12 September 2001, available at http://www.co.cook.il.us/secr etary/CommitteePages/
 
Meeting%20Reports/Finance%20Committee/2001/09-12-01.htm  
Meeting of the Cook County Board of Commissioners:  Post Agenda Report, 29 September 2001, 
available at http://www.cookctyclerk.com/ag endas/2001/092001/092001meeting.pdf  
Boeing Moving Headquarters to Chicago, 14 May 2000, available at  http://www.spaceandtech.com/ 
digest/sd2001-19/sd2001-19-001.shtml  
City of Chicago, Office of City Comptroller, Order Payment Voucher , Nº PV08030801779  
City of Chicago, Office of City Comptroller, Order Payment Voucher , Nº PV08040800041 
City of Chicago, Office of City Comptroller, Order Payment Voucher , Nº PV08040801118  
City of Chicago, Office of City Comptroller, Order Payment Voucher , Nº PV08040800574  
Cook County, Bureau of Finance, Cashier's Check 461492 , 25 May 2004  
Cook County, Bureau of Finance, Cashier's Check 456646 , 23 December 2003 
Boeing Headquarters Relocation Projected Cost/Benefit Analysis Lease Termination Compensation Agreement between  100 North Riverside, LLC and the City of 
Chicago, 15 January 2003  
Jack Lyne, US$63 million in Incentives, Last-Second Space Deal Help Chicago Land Boeing , 
June 2001, available at  www.conway.com/ssinsider/incentive/ti0106.htm
 
Press Release from The Boeing Company, Boeing Begi ns World Headquarters Operations in Chicago 
(4 September 2001), available at http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2001/q3/nr_010904z.htm   
Press Release from the Office of Illinois Governor  George Ryan (10 May 2001), available at 
http://www.state.il.us/gov/press/01/may/0510boeing.htm   
Ron Starner and Mark Arend, "Behind Boeing's Fli ght Plan:  Why the New Chicago Headquarters is 
Just Part of the Story," Site Selecti on Magazine, September 2001, available at 
http://www.siteselection.com/issues/2001/sep/p572   
Illinois Economic and Fiscal Commission, Corporate Incentives in the State of Illinois (August 2001) 
Memo to Honorable Members of the General A ssembly from Pam McDonough, Director, Department 
of Commerce and Community Affairs,  regarding the Corporate Headquarters Relocation Act 
(23 May 2001) 
State of Illinois, 92nd General Assembly, House of Repr esentatives, Transcription Debate, 
69th Legislative Day, 31 May 2001   WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 13 
  
 Jeff McCourt and Greg Le Roy, Good Jobs First, A Better Deal for Illinoi s:  Improving Economic 
Development Policy  (January 2003), available at http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=12828
 
Corporate Headquarters Relocation Act Master Ag reement between The Illinois Department of 
Commerce and Community Affairs and The Boeing Company (27 March 2002) 
Marc J. Lane, It Pays to Invest in State's Homegrown Technology , 24 Crain's Chicago Bus. 11, 
2001 WL 7067142 
Reports of Job Creation/Retention and Capital Improvements Expenditures for several years  
EDGE Tax Credit Report of Annual Compliance for Year Ending 12/31/2003 
Report of the Committee on Finance, Board of Commissioners of Cook C ounty (12 September 2001), 
available at http://www.co.cook.il.us/secretary/ CommitteePages/Meeting%20Reports/  
Finance%20Committee/2001/09-12-01.htm  
Hearing Charter, The Future of Aeronautics at NASA:  Hearing Before the House Subcomm.  on 
Space and Aeronautics of the Comm.  on Science , 16 March 2005 
Statement of Dr. J. Victor Lebacqz, NASA Associ ate Administrator for Aeronautics Research, before 
the House Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, 16 March 2005 
Achieving Aeronautics Leadership, NASA Aer onautics Strategic Enterprise Plan, 1995-2000, 
April 1995 
Statement of Dr. John M.  Klineberg, Chair, Committee to Review NASA's Aeronautics Technology 
Program, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, 
National Research Council, the National Academie s, before the House Subcommittee on Space and 
Aeronautics, 16 March 2005 
NASA Langley Research Center, Economic Impact, Fiscal Year 1998 Joseph R. Chambers, Concept to Reality:  Contributions of the NASA Langley Research Center to US 
Civil Aircraft of the 1990s (2003) 
Minutes of the NASA Advisory Council, Aero space Technology Advisory Committee, and 
Technology and Commercialization Advisory Committee 
Federal Support for US Aeronautics Industry:  Hearing Before the House Subcomm. on Government 
Activities and Transportation of the Comm. on Government Operations , 102nd Cong. 182 (1992) 
FY98 Budget for NASA:  Hearing Before the Senate Subcomm. on Science, Technology and Space of 
the Comm. on Commerce, Science and Transportation , 105th Cong. (1997), Federal News Service, 
24 April 1997 
Competitiveness of the Aerospa ce Industry:  Hearing on S. 419 Before the Senate Comm. on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation , 103rd Cong. 80-81 (1993) 
The Clinton Administration's Initiative to Pr omote a Strong Competitive Aviation Industry, 
January 1994 WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 14 
  
 Joe Cobb, Clinton's Welcome Plan to Improve Air Travel , Heritage Foundation Reports, 
28 January 1994 
Competition in the US Aircraft Manufacturing Indu stry:  Hearing before the House Subcomm. on 
Aviation of the Comm.  on Transportation and Infrastructure , 107th Cong. 4 (2001) 
Jeffrey L. Ethell, Fuel Economy in Aviation , NASA SP-462 
NASA's Aeronautics Program:  Hearing Before the Senate Subcomm. on Science, Technology and 
Space of the Comm. on Commerce, Science and Transportation , 107th Cong. (2001), FDCH Political 
Transcripts, 24 April 2001 
Innovations in Aircraft Design, available at  http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/spinoff1997/t1.html
 
Statement of Billy M. Glover, Director of E nvironmental Performance Strategy, Boeing Commercial 
Airplanes, before the House Subcommittee on Av iation of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure, 5 June 2003 
Dawn C. Jegley and Harold G. Bush, Structural Response and Failure of a Full-Scale Stitched 
Graphite-Epoxy Wing , AIAA Paper Nº 2001-1334-CP 
Randy Tinseth, Boeing Innovations in Technology and Airplane Design , April 2004 
National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Pub. L. Nº 85-568 NASA Appropriations Acts, P.L. 94-116 (FY 1976);  P.L. 94-378 (FY 1977);  P.L. 95-119 (FY 1978);  
P.L. 95-392 (FY 1979);  P.L. 96-103 (FY 1980);  P.L. 96-526 (FY 1981);  P.L. 97-101 (FY 1982);  P.L. 97-272 (FY 1983);  P.L. 98-45 (FY 1984);  P.L. 98-371 (FY 1985);  P.L. 99-160 (FY 1986);  
P.L. 99-500 & P.L. 99-591 (FY 1987);  P.L. 100-202 (FY 1988);  P.L. 100-404 (FY 1989);  
P.L. 101-144 (FY 1990);  P.L. 101-507 (FY 1991);  P.L. 102-139 (FY 1992);  P.L. 102-389 (FY 1993);  P.L. 103-124 (FY 1994);  P.L. 103-327 (FY 1995);  P.L. 104-134 (FY 1996);  P.L. 104-204 (FY 1997);  P.L. 105-65 (FY 1998);  P.L. 105-276 (FY 1999);  P.L. 106-74 (FY 2000);  P.L. 106-377 (FY 2001);  P.L. 107-73 & P.L. 107-117 (FY 2002);  P.L. 108-7 (FY 2003);  
P.L. 108-199 (FY 2004);  P.L. 108-447 (FY 2005) 
Basis of NASA FY 1976-FY 2006 Funding Requirements,  including sections relevant to the Aircraft 
Energy Efficiency ("ACEE"), Materials and St ructures Systems Technology ("MSST"), Advanced 
Composites Technology ("ACT"), High Speed Resear ch ("HSR"), Advanced Subsonic Technology 
("AST"), High Performance Computing and Communi cations ("HPCC"), Aviation Safety/Aviation 
Safety & Security/Aviation Security & Safety ("Aviation Safety"), Quiet Aircraft Technology 
("QAT"), Vehicle Systems, and Research and T echnology Base ("R&T Base") Programs, as well as 
Research and Program Management ("R&PM"), and Institutional Support 
Basis of NASA ACEE FY 1976-FY 1987 Funding Requirements Basis of NASA MSST FY 1988-FY 1995 Funding Requirements Basis of NASA ACT FY 1996-FY 1997 Funding Requirements 
Basis of NASA HSR FY 1990-FY 2001 Funding Requirements  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 15 
  
 Basis of NASA AST FY 1992-FY 2001 Funding Requirements 
Basis of NASA HPCC FY 1991-FY 2003 Funding Requirements Basis of Aviation Safety FY 2000-FY 2006 Funding Requirements 
Basis of NASA QAT FY 2000-FY 2006 Funding Requirements 
Basis of NASA Vehicle Systems FY 2003-FY 2006 Funding Requirements Basis of NASA R&T Base FY 1991-FY 2004 Funding Requirements Basis of NASA R&PM FY 1976-FY 2003 Funding Requirements Basis of NASA Aerospace Institutional Suppor t FY 2002-FY 2005 Funding Requirements 
48 C.F.R. § 31.205-18 
14 C.F.R. § 1274.204(g) 48 C.F.R. §§ 9904.420 et seq . 
Requirements for Documentation, Approval, and Dissemination of NASA Scientific and Technical 
Information, section 4.5.7.1 (NPG 2200.2A) 
48 C.F.R. §§ 27.400 et seq . 
L.B. Ilcewicz, P.J. Smith, C.T. Hanson, T.H. Wa lker, S.L. Metschan, G.E. Mabson, K.S. Willden, 
B.W. Flynn, D.B. Scholz, D.R. Polland, H.G. Fredrikson, J.T. Olson, and B.F. Backman, The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA, NASA/CR 4734, Advanced Technology Composite Fuselage-Program 
Overview , April 1997 
Robert H. Kinder, Douglas Aircraft Company, N95-29030, Impact of Composites on Future 
Transport Aircraft 
John Quinlivan, N95-29031, Challenges and Payoff of Composites in Transport Aircraft:  
777 Empennage and Future Applications  
R.H. Liebeck, D.A. Andrastek, J. Chau, R. Girvin, R. Lyon, B.K. Rawdon, P.W. Scott, R.A. Wright, 
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace, Long Beach, CA, NASA/CR-195443, Advanced Subsonic Airplane 
Design & Economic Studies , April 1995 
L.B. Ilcewicz, T.H. Walker, K.S. Willden, G.D.  Swanson, G. Truslove, S.L. Metschan, and 
C.L. Pfahl, The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA, NASA/CR-4418, Application of a Design-Build Team 
Approach to Low Cost and Weight Composite Fuselage Structure , 1991 
Individual Budgets for DOD Project Related Elemen ts of US Navy, Army, and the Defense Research 
Projects Agency WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 16 
  
 10 U.S.C. §§ 2511, 2521 
DOD Appropriations Acts P.L. 101-511 (FY 1991 );  P.L. 102-172 (FY 1992);  P.L. 102-396 
(FY 993);  P.L. 103-139 (FY 1994);  P.L. 103-335 (FY 1995);  P.L. 104-61 (FY 1996);  P.L. 104-208 
(FY 1997);  P.L. 105-56 (FY 1998);  P.L. 105-262 (FY 1999);  P.L. 106-79 (FY 2000);  P.L. 106-259 
(FY 2001);  P.L. 107-117 (FY 2002);  P.L. 107-248 (FY 2003);  P.L. 108-87 (FY 2004);  P.L. 108-287 (FY 2005) 
RDT&E US Civil Aircraft Related Project El ement Budgets for FY 1991-FY 2005, including:  
Defense Research Sciences (PE# 0601102F), Ma terials (PE# 0602102F), Aerospace Flight 
Dynamics\Vehicle Technologies (PE# 0602201F), Ae rospace Propulsion (PE# 0602203F), Aerospace 
Sensors (PE# 0602204F), Dual Use Applications\Science & Technology (PE# 0602805F), Advanced Materials for Weapon Systems (PE# 0603112F), Flight Vehicle Technology (PE# 0603205F), 
Aerospace Structures\Technology  Dev/Demo (PE# 0603211F), Aerospace Propulsion & Power 
Technology (PE# 0603216F), Flight Vehicle T echnology Integration (PE# 0603245F), RDT&E For 
Aging Aircraft (PE# 0605011F), Manufacturi ng Technology/Industrial Preparedness (PE# 
0603771F/0708011F/0708011N), C-17 (PE# 0401130F/0604231F), CV-22 (PE# 0401318F), Joint Strike Fighter (PE# 0603800F/0603800N/0603800 E/0604800F/0604800N), AV-8B Aircraft (PE# 
0604214N), Comanche (PE# 0604223A), F-22 (PE# 0604239F), B-2 Advanced Technology Bomber 
(PE# 0604240F), V-22 (PE# 0604262N), A-6 Squa dron (PE# 0204134N), F/A-18 Squadrons (PE# 
0204136N), Dual Use Applications Program (incl uding its predecessor, the Technology Reinvestment 
Project) 
DOD RDT&E Budget Item Justification,  Exhibits R-2, FY 1991-FY 2006 
DOD FY 1991-FY 2006 Budgets for RDT&E Progr ams (Exhibit R-1), DOD Component Summary 
Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General, "Major Range and Test Facility Base," 
D-2004-035, 8 December 2003 
Report of 15 February 2005 of the General Accountability Office (GAO) of the United States' 
Government to the Secretary of Defense, Contr act Management, The Air Force Should Improve How 
It Purchases AWACS Spare Parts, GAO-05-169. 
Management Accountability Review of the Boeing KC -767A Tanker Program, Office of the Inspector 
General of the Department of Defense, 13 Ma y 2005, Report No OIG-2004-171, available at:  
http:/www.dodig.osd.mil/tanker.htm. 
Daily Briefing, 15 April 2005 
GAO says problems justify rebidding C-130 contract By Amy Klamper, CongressDaily, available at:  
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0405/041505cdam2.htm
 
E-Mails Detail Air Force Push for Boeing Deal 
Pentagon Official Called Proposal Lease of Tankers a "Bailout", Report Finds 
By R. Jeffrey Smith, Washington Post, Tuesday 7 June 2005;  A01  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 17 
  
 Holes in the Tanker Story 
Washington Post, Monday, 20 June 2005;  A14 Factual information and various statements coveri ng, among other things, the "Tanker Deal" available 
at http:/www.pogo.org/p/x/archivecontractover.html  (Project on Government Oversight website) 
Report of 14 April 2005 of the General Acco untability Office (GAO) of the United States' 
Government, Air Force Procurement, Protests Challenging Role of Biased Official Sustained, GAO-05-436T, available at:  http:/ www.gao.gov/new.items/d05436t.pdf 
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Report, Letter of Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Director addressed to the 
Honorable Don Nickles, Chairman of the Comm ittee on the Budget United States Senate dated 
26 August 2003 and related documents available at:  http:/www.cbo.gov/showdoc. cfm?index=4494&sequence=0 
Statement of The Honorable Joseph E. Schmitz, Inspect or General, Department of Defense before the 
Airland Subcommittee, Senate Co mmittee on Armed Services on "Air  Force Acquisition Oversight", 
14 April 2005 available at:  http://armed-services.senate.gov/statemnt/2005/April/Schmitz%2004-14-
05.pdf  
DOD Follow-Up on Boeing Probe Results in 8 Contract s Referred to IG, in particular the National 
Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellit e System-Conical Microwave Imager Sensor, 
Boeing, the C-22 Replacement Program (C-40), Boeing, the KC-135 Programmed Depot Maintenance, Boeing/Pemco, the C-40 Lease and Purchase Program, Boeing, the upgrade to the 
avionics of the C-130J aircraft, the C-17 H22 contract, the Boeing KC-767A tanker program, the 
contract for the purchase of certain spare parts for the Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft and Pentagon statement on DCMA  Identified Questionable Contracts, BNA of 
15 February 2005. 
FY06 Defense Authorisation bill (HR 1815), Hou se Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan 
Hunter's amendment (Section 817 - Prohibition on  Procurement from Beneficiaries of Foreign 
Subsidies) adopted by the US House on 25 May 2005. 
Jeanne Rapley, Testing for Private Industry:  A Legal Perspective , powerpoint presentation, 
17 March 1997, available at  http://www.dtc.army.mil/apb i/1997/legal97/index.html
 
AEDC, "Commercial Success Stories," available at  
http://www.arnold.af.mil/aedc/commercial/commercial.pdf  
10 U.S.C. § 2681 
10 U.S.C. § 2539b NAWCAD, "Commercial Service Agreements (CSAs)," available at  
http://nawcadcounsel.nav air.navy.mil/CSAs.htm
 
US General Accounting Office, "Aerospace Testi ng:  Promise of Closer  NASA/DOD Cooperation 
Remains Largely Unfulfilled," GAO/NSIAD-98-52, March 1998 WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 18 
  
 US Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration News Release, US Secretary of 
Labor Elaine L.  Chao Announces Nearly $1.5 Milli on to Train Washington Workers for Careers in 
the Aerospace Industry , 5 November 2004, available at 
http://www.doleta.gov/whatsnew/new_releases/november052004-Washington.cfm
  
Notification of Award for Grant Nº AN-14571-05-60 to Edmonds Community College, 
4 February 2005 
Workforce Investment Act of 1998, Pub. L. Nº 105-220 (1998) Statement of Work for Grant Nº AN-14571-05-60 to Edmonds Community College, undated 
35 U.S.C. §§ 200 et seq . 
48 C.F.R. §§ 27.300 et seq . 
Memorandum to the Heads of Execu tive Departments and Agencies:  Government Patent Policy, 
Pub. Papers 248 (18 February 1983) 
Executive Order 12591 (10 April 1987) 
14 C.F.R. §§ 1274.911 - 1274.914 
48 C.F.R. §§ 1827.301 et seq . 
48 C.F.R. §§ 227.303 et seq . 
48 C.F.R. §§ 227.7100 et seq . 
Contract Nº NAS1-20267 19 C.F.R. § 351.524(b) (1998)  
NASA Langley Research Center, High-Speed Research Program:  Technology Transfer Control 
Handbook (April 1998) 
National Research Council, Committee on High Speed Research, US Supersonic Commercial 
Aircraft:  Assessing NASA's High Speed Research Program (1997)  
James Schultz, "HSR Leaves Legacy of Sp inoffs," Aerospace America, September 1999 
United States notification to the WTO Committee  on Subsidies and Coun tervailing Measures, 
G/SCM/N/3/USA/Suppl.1 (19 November 1998)  
United States Updating and New and Full Notification to the WTO Committee on Subsidies and 
Countervailing Measures, G/SCM/N/48/USA (2 July 2002) 
Aviation Systems Analysis Capability, Executiv e Assistant Development, NASA/CR-1999-209119, 
Logistics Management Institute, March 1999 
Testimony to the Subcommittee on Technology, Environment, and Aviation of the US House of 
Representatives, 10 February 1994, Federa l Document Clearing House, 1994 WL 214062  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 19 
  
 Advanced Subsonic Technology Program, Technol ogy Transfer Control Handbook (August 1998) 
Federal News Service, Hearing of the Science,  Technology and Space Subcommittee of the Senate 
Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, 24 April 1997 
Flight International, 11 August 1999  
NASA HPCC, Status of Ames Sponsored  HPCC NASA Research Announcements 
NASA HPCC, Computational Aerospace Sciences ("CAS") Project Description NASA HPCC, Computational Aerospace Sciences NASA HPCC 1999 Brochure NASA HPCC, Mission Description 
NASA Budget Estimates for FY 1993-FY 2003, NAS A Mission Support, Research and Program 
Management 
NASA News, Boeing Names New Airplane Wing Composites Development Center 35 U.S.C. §§ 154, 271  NASA Property Rights in Inventions, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2457 et seq . 
NASA Patent Waiver Regulations, 14 C.F.R. §§ 1245 et seq . 
Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on th e Impact of NASA and other Federal Labs on 
Commercial Innovation, National Bureau of Economic Research (May 1997) 
General Information Concerning Patents, published by USPTO 
Sylvia K. Kraemer, NASA's Director of Policy De velopment Office of Policy and Plans, Monopolies, 
and the Cold War:  The Origins and Con sequences of NASA Patent Policy, 1958-1998 
(October 1999)  
NASA Office of Policy and Plans, Valu e of Patent Rights Waived by NASA 
US Patent Nº 6,497,389 US Patent Nº 6,126,110 US Patent Nº 6,053,050 
US Patent Nº 6,014,606 
US Patent Nº 5,971,252 US Patent Nº 6,138,895 US Patent Nº 5,953,231 US Patent Nº 5,931,107 WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 20 
  
 US Patent Nº 5,902,535 
US Patent Nº 5,242,523 US Patent Nº 5,893, 535 
US Patent Nº 5,909,858 
US Patent Nº 5,899,413 US Patent Nº 5,740,984 US Patent Nº 5,681,013 Independent Research and Developm ent and Bid and Proposal Costs:  Payments to Contractors, 
10 U.S.C. § 2372 
Independent Research and Development and Bi d and Proposal Cost Federal Acquisition Rule, 
48 C.F.R. § 31.205-18 
Independent Research and Development and Bi d and Proposal Cost Defense Acquisition Rule, 
48 C.F.R. § 231.205-18  
Department of Defense Directive Regarding IR&D Number 3204.1 (10 May 1999) 
Internal Revenue Service National Office Tec hnical Advice Memorandum, Private Ruling 8633004 
(unpublished), 1986 PLR LEXIS 2296 (9 May 1986) 
Defense Contract Audit Agency Contract Audit Manual, DCAAM 7640.1, January 2001 DOD Independent Research & Development, Program Report (May 2002) Assessing the Impact of Regulatory and Legislative Changes to the Independent Research and 
Development Program, Prepared for Office of th e Director, Defense Research & Engineering 
Acquisition and Technolog y, DOD (14 March 1997) 
Michael E. Davey & Dahlia Stein, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress:  DOD's 
Independent Research and Development Progr am:  Changes and Issues (17 December 1993) 
10 U.S.C. § 2324(l)(1) (version in effect from FY 1995-FY 2001) 
10 U.S.C. § 2306a (version in effect FY 1991-FY 1992) 
10 U.S.C. § 2324(m) 48 C.F.R. § 16.301-3(a)(1) 48 C.F.R. § 12.207 48 C.F.R. §§ 37.602-4, et seq . 
48 C.F.R. § 36.207(a)  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 21 
  
 48 C.F.R. § 216.104-70(b)(2), (c), (d)(2) 
48 C.F.R. § 235.006(b)(i)  48 C.F.R. § 35.006(c) 
Defense Contract Audit Agency, Independent Resear ch and Development and Bid and Proposal Costs 
Incurred by Major Defense Contractors (Multiple  Reports for Fiscal Years 1989 through 2004) 
GSA Contract Database  Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, Co mpeting Economies:  Government Support of 
Large Civil Aircraft Industries of Japan, Europe and the United States (Washington, 1991) 
Dual Use Technology 1995 Report 
BC-17X Background Information  US Department of Defense News Release:  T echnology Reinvestment Project Announces FY 94 
Selections, 25 October 1994 
Commerce Business Daily, "Technology Reinv estment Project Program Announcement," 
21 October 1994 
Anne Kellogg, "Clinton Administration to Diversify Defense Under Attack," The Hartford Courant, 
11 May 1996, p. A9 
Richard Burnett, "Defense Conversion Faces Own War;  The Program Has Come Under Attack by 
Congress as Lawmakers Search for Prime Budget Cuts ," Orlando Sentinel, 15 October 1995, p. H1 
Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, A Review  of the Technology Reinvestment Project, 
30 January 1999  
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997, 10 U.S.C. § 2511 Defense Acquisition Reform:  Hearing before th e Subcommittee on Acquis ition and Technology of 
the Senate Committee on Armed Services, 105th C ongress, 19 March 1997 (Statement of Hon. Paul 
G. Kaminski, Under Secretary of De fense for Acquisition and Technology) 
Dual Use Science and Technology Program Web Site, at Fact Sheet hyperlink 
FY02 Air Force Dual Use Science & Technology A nnual Competition:  Updated FY 02 Solicitation 
Schedule 
Department of Defense, Report to Congress on the Activities of the DOD Office of Technology 
Transition, January 1998 
Department of Defense, Dual Use Scien ce & Technology Report to Congress, March 1999, 
Appendix C 
DOD Research & Development Contrac ting Definitions, 48 C.F.R. § 235 WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 22 
  
 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Ac t of 1988, Pub. L. Nº 100-418,  codified at 15 U.S.C. § 278n 
American Technology Preeminence Act of 1991, Pub. L. Nº 102-245 National Institute of Standards & Tec hnology Rules, 15 C.F.R. §§ 295.1 et seq . 
NISTIR-6099, Connie K.N. Chang, ATP Eligibility Cr iteria for US Subsidiaries of Foreign-owned 
Companies:  Legislation, Implementation and Results, Chapter 1 
NISTIR-5896, Rosalie Ruegg, Guidelines For Proposing Economic Evaluation Studies to The 
Advanced Technology Program (ATP), Chapter 1.4 
Slides by Marc G. Stanley, Acting Director of  ATP (ATP Awards to Date by Technology Area 
(1990-2001)) 
US Secretary of Commerce, A Progress Report on the Impacts of an Industry-Government 
Technology Partnership 
NISTIR-6491, Jeanne W. Powell and Karen L. Le llock, Development, Commercialization, and 
Diffusion of Enabling Technologies:  Progress Report (2000) 
Slides About the ATP Proposers' Conference (1999) 
Replies to Questions Posed by Chile, the Europ ean Community, Mexico and Poland Regarding the 
New and Full Notification of the United States, G/SCM/Q2/USA/20 (7 April 1999) 
NIST Overview of the Advanced Technology Program Statements of US Senators Danforth and Holli ngs Regarding ATP Program, 140 Cong. Rec. S2851 
(11 March 1994), Cong. Rec. S2763 (10 March 1994) 
Historical Statistics on Awards/Winners (1990 - 5 September 2002) 
ATP Project Briefs, Projects 93-01-0089 (CVD Diamond-Coated Rotating Tools for Machining 
Advanced Composite Materials), 95-12-0024 (An Agen t-Based Framework for Integrated Intelligent 
Planning - Execution), 95-01-0108 (Precision Optoelectronics Assembly), 91-01-0267 (PREAMP - Pre-competitive Advanced Manufacturing of Elect rical Products), 97-05-0020 (EECOMS:  Extended 
Enterprise Coalition for Integrated Collaborat ive Manufacturing Systems), and 98-01-0168 
(Hot Metal Gas Forming) 
Sections 921-927 of the Internal Revenue Code  (prior to repeal) and related measures  
FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000, Pub. L. Nº 106-519 American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Pub. L. Nº 108-357 
b) Perjuicio grave a los intereses de las Comunidades Europeas 
 Las Comunidades Europeas disponen de a bundantes pruebas de que las subvenciones 
concedidas a la rama de producción LCA de los Estados Unidos han causado y continúan causando 
efectos desfavorables por la significativa contención de  la subida de los precios o la reducción de los  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 23 
  
 precios de las grandes aeronaves civiles a nivel mundi al, la significativa subvaloración de precios y la 
significativa pérdida de ventas de la rama de producción comunitaria en el mercado de grandes 
aeronaves civiles. 
 Las pruebas de que se disponen incluyen las siguientes: 
Information regarding Airbus products, including at  http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/ and 
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/flash.html
, and related links and company information 
Airbus and Boeing documents describing aircraft in terms of range and seats Boeing pricing, order and delivery data, including at http://www.boeing.com/commercial/prices/
 and 
http://active.boeing.com/commercial/o rders/userdefinedselection.cfm 
Airbus order and delivery data, including at 
http://www.airbus.com/en/corporate/orders_and_deliv eries/ (and in internal business confidential 
sources) 
Airbus marketing material analysing the competiti ve relationship between the various Airbus and 
Boeing products 
Airclaims, Client Aviation System Inquiry data (paid access database) Boeing Current Market Outlook, various editions (including at 
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/cmo/index.shtml) 
Airbus Global Market Forecast, various editions (including at 
http://www.airbus.com/store/mm_repository/pdf /att00003033/media_object_file_GMF2004_full_issu
e.pdf) 
"Bouncing Boeing," The Economist, 13 June 1998 "Airbus Eclipses Boeing, Sets Order Book R ecord," Aviation Week and Space Technology, 
10 January 2000 
"Boeing increases base price for commercial aircraft  by 5 percent," Seattle Times, 10 July 1998 
Cumulative Deliveries for the Boeing 737 Family since 1974 
"Airbus bets the company, " The Economist, 18 March 2000 
"Boeing, Banking on a big bird," The Economist, 12 March 1994 "Wall Street frets over Boeing," Airline Business, August 1998 "Just in time, not just in case;  Boeing's push fo r production casts," Air Transport World, April 1994 
"Boeing hit by 737 problems," Financial Times, 23 April 1998 
"Airbus, Boeing in costs dogfight," Financial Times, 12 July 1994 
"USA:  Strong gains expected  from Boeing commercial unit," The Seattle Times, 14 January 2000 WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
G/L/698/Add.1 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
Página 24 
  
 "USA:  Software City starts to find major bugs in reality," Independent, 5 December 1998 
"USA:  City - what's bugging Boeing, " Sunday Telegraph, 6 September 1998 
"USA:  Boeing sold below cost, study su ggests," The Seattle Times, 4 March 1999 
"Fearful Boeing," The Economist, 27 February 1999 
"Boeing to Revive Plans for Larger Supe r Jumbo," Seattle Times, 9 September 1998 
"Medium Residual Values of 747 Buoyed by A3 XX Delay," Aircraft Value News, 13 April 1998 
"A340-500/600 Nears Go-Ahead," Aviation W eek and Space Technology, 11 August 1997 
"Too Big to Fly?," Washington Post, 4 May 1997 
Airbus press releases (including at http://www.airbus.com/en/presscentre/pressreleases/)  
Boeing press releases (including at http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/archive2004.html
, and for 
earlier years included in website archives) 
Press releases by Airbus and Boeing customers Commission Decision of 30 July 1997 declaring a c oncentration compatible with the common market 
and the functioning of the EEA Agreement, OJ L 336/16 (8 December 1997) 
Moody's Investors Service, Global Aerosp ace/Defense - Industry Outlook January 2002 
Society General, Aerospace and De fense Industry Report, June 2002 
Aircraft Value News, various editions Aviation Week & Space Technology, various editions Air Transport World, various editions 
Airline Business, various editions 
Citigroup Smith Barney, Boeing analyst reports Credit Suisse First Boston, Boeing analyst reports JP Morgan, Boeing analyst reports Wachovia Securities, Boeing analyst reports 
Society of British Aerospace Companies, Has the Business model for commercial aviation changed 
permanently post September 11
th? 
US International Trade Commission, Investig ation Nº 332-414, Publication 3433, June 2001  WT/DS317/1/Add.1 
 G/L/698/Add.1 
 G/SCM/D63/1/Add.1 
 Página 25 
  
 US Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, "The US Jet Industry:  
Competition, Regulation, and Global Market Factors Affecting US Producers," March 2005 
Statement by Airbus that it has also gathered s ubstantial evidence of a business confidential nature 
(e.g., internal memoranda, communications to and from actual and potential airline and leasing 
company customers, and internal analyses of camp aigns), which confirms th e existence of injury, 
market displacement or impediment, price suppr ession, depression and undercutting as well as lost 
sales. 
__________