. /.   WORLD TRADE  
ORGANIZATION  WT/DS337/R/Corr.1 
17 September 2008 
 (08-4304) 
  
  
 
EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – ANTI-DUMPING MEASURE 
ON FARMED SALMON FROM NORWAY 
 
Report of the Panel 
 
Corrigendum
 
 
 
 Please note the following corrections to the above-referenced report – deleted text is in 
strikethrough , added text is underlined : 
 
English version only : 
 1. Item VII.J. in the Table of C ontents should read as follows: 
 "J.
 Alleged Inconsistency of the EC 's Conduct of the Proceedings with Articles 6.2, 6.4, 6.9, 
12.2 and 12.2.2  of the AD Agreement".  
 
English, French and Spanish versions : 
 2. Following paragraph 7.479, heading (ii) (Wheth er the NRCs at issue were appropriately 
counted as costs of production) should be re-designated heading (i). 
3. Following paragraph 7.488, heading (iii) (Wheth er the investigating authority was entitled to 
calculate the NRC adjustments for [[XXX]] and [[XXX ]] on the basis of a three-year average) should 
be re-designated heading (ii).  English version only
: 
 
4. Para. 7.504, 2nd sentence should read as follows: 
 "Our assessment of the facts that were before the investigating authority and  that the parties 
have submitted for our review indicates that [[XXX]] did not report the "weighted average cost of production for all salmon generations that were harvested during the investigation 
period"."   
 
English, French and Spanish versions
: 
 5. Following paragraph 7.529, heading (ii) ( Facts ) should be re-designated heading (i). 
6. Following paragraph 7.533, heading (iii) ( Whether the investigating authority was entitled to 
calculate finance costs on the basis of a three-year average ) should be re-designated heading (ii). WT/DS337/R/Corr.1 
Page 2  
 
  English version only
: 
 7. Para. 7.539, final sentence should read as follows: 
"Once again, we find that the evidence presented in the Definitive Disclosure supports the 
conclusion that: (i) [[XXX]] did not report its pe r kilogram costs of production on the basis of 
project accounting, but rather on the basis of an
 all costs relating to its salmon farming 
activities over the period of investigation; and ( ii) that the investigating authority calculated 
all but three of the costs used for the purpose of arriving at [[XXX]] per kilogram cost of 
production on the basis of information from the period of investigation." 
 
8. Para. 7.610, 3rd sentence should read as follows: 
 "Second, Norway argues that the EC violated Articles 3.1.  and 3.2, and consequently, 
Article 3.5, because it failed to adequately examine the existence of price undercutting."  
 9. Para. 7.622, first sentence following quotation should read as follows: 
 "Thus, Article 3.1,
 requires consideration of the volume, price, and consequent impact of 
dumped  imports on the domestic industry."  
 10. Para. 7.642, 4
th sentence should read as follows: 
 "While in a particular case, this might be possible, if all domestic producers  operate in the 
same currency, that possibility do es not justify the conclusion that  such analysis is required." 
 
English, French and Spanish versions : 
 11. Para. 7.711, 4
th sentence should read as follows: 
 "Thus, to the extent that we may find any flaw  in the investigating authority's calculation of 
the "non-dumped" MIPs that could potentially have  caused them to be overstated, we believe 
that the factual basis for the investigating authority's conclusion that the "non-injurious " MIPs 
were lower than the "non-dumped " MIPs must also be flawed, rendering the imposition of the 
former  on the investigated parties inconsistent with  the obligation under Article 9.2 to collect 
anti-dumping duties in the "appropriate amounts"."  
 
 
__________