WORLD TRADE  
ORGANIZATION  WT/DS378/1 
S/L/337 23 June 2008 
 
(08-2985) 
 Original:   English 
  
 
CHINA - MEASURES AFFECTING FINANCIAL INFORMATION SERVICES AND 
FOREIGN FINANCIAL INFORMATION SUPPLIERS 
 
Request for Consultations by Canada
 
 
 
 The following communication, dated 20 June 2008, from the delegation of Canada to the 
delegation of China and to the Chairman of the Dis pute Settlement Body, is ci rculated in accordance 
with Article 4.4 of the DSU.  
_______________ 
 
 
My authorities have asked me to request consu ltations with the Government of the People's 
Republic of China ("China") pursuant to Articles 1 and 4 of the Understanding on Rules and 
Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes  and Article XXII of the General Agreement on 
Trade in Services ("GATS") with respect to certain measure s pertaining to financial information 
services and service suppliers.  
In the financial services sector, as set out in its GATS Schedule of Specific Commitments on 
Services (the "Schedule"),
1 China made market access and national treatment commitments with 
regard to the provision and transfer of financia l information.  China also undertook a horizontal 
"standstill" commitment in its Schedule not to make the conditions of ownership, operation, and scope 
of activities - as set out in contractual agreements or licences establishing or authorizing the operation or supply of services by an existing foreign service su pplier - more restrictive than they were as of the 
date of China's accession to the World Trade Or ganization ("WTO").  Despite those commitments, 
various measures of China appear to impose market access restrictions and discriminatory 
requirements on foreign service suppliers seeking to  supply financial information to customers in 
China.   
 China requires foreign financial information suppliers to supply their services through an 
entity designated by Xinhua News Agency ("Xinhua").  Xinhua has designated only one agent, China 
Economic Information Service ("CEIS"), one of Xi nhua's commercial enterprises.  China prohibits 
foreign financial information suppliers from direct ly soliciting subscriptions for their services, 
requiring that solicitation of subscriptions be do ne through the Xinhua-designated entity.  China 
likewise prohibits users of financial informati on services in China from directly subscribing to 
services supplied by foreign suppliers.  Furthermore,  in order to renew their licences, China requires 
foreign financial information suppliers to provide  the Foreign Information Administration Center 
("FIAC"), a regulatory body within the Xinhua framework, detailed and confidential information 
concerning their financial information services and th eir customers along with a copy of an agreement 
with the designated agent.  China also requires customers to provide FIAC detailed information 
regarding their financial information services c ontracts with foreign suppliers.  These and other 
                                                     
 
1 Annex 9 of the Protocol on the Accession of the People’s Republic of China , WT/L/432, 
23 November 2001 (the "Accession Protocol").    WT/DS378/1 
S/L/337 Page 2 
 
 
  requirements and restrictions appear to accord less favorable treatment to foreign financial 
information services and service suppliers than th at accorded Chinese financ ial information services 
and service suppliers which are not affected by these requirements and restrictions. 
 
China also appears to prevent foreign fi nancial information service suppliers from 
establishing any commercial presence in China other than limited representative offices.  
 In its Accession Protocol (which incorpor ates the commitment in paragraph 309 of the Report 
of the Working Party on the Accession of China
2), for the services included in its Schedule, China 
committed to maintain regulatory authorities that are separate from, and not accountable to, service 
suppliers they regulate.  Xinhua, through its orga nizational structure, including related entities and 
affiliates, appears to be both the regulator of foreign financial information suppliers and their 
competitor in the domestic market.  For exampl e, in addition to having responsibility for the 
examination and approval of forei gn financial information suppliers , Xinhua also supplies financial 
information services through its commercial entity , CEIS.  On 20 June 2007, Xinhua also launched 
"Xinhua 08", a financial information supplier th at supplies services on a commercial basis and in 
competition with foreign service suppliers.  Individu als within Xinhua who have authority over FIAC 
also appear to be participants in Xinhua's commercia l activities.  China thus a ppears to have failed to 
provide a regulatory authority that is separate fro m, and not accountable to, a service supplier that that 
authority regulates.   
 
China's measures also appear to impose re quirements on foreign financial information 
suppliers that are more restrictive than those impo sed on them at the time of China's accession to the 
WTO.  Pursuant to licences granted at that time, foreign financial informati on suppliers were allowed 
to contract with customers in China, to distribut e their services directly to these customers, and to 
have their license applications approved withou t providing the regulator details of financial 
transactions with their customers.   
 Canada understands that the measures thr ough which China has maintained these 
requirements and restrictions include, but are not limited to:  
 
• Notice Authorizing Xinhua News Agency to Implement Centralized Administration 
over the Release of Economic Information in the People's Republic of China by 
Foreign News Agencies and their Subsidiary  Information Institutions (State Council, 
31 December 1995 (issued as Circular No.1 of 1996));  
• Decision on Establishing Administrative Permission for the Administrative 
Examination and Approval of Items that Must Be Retained (State Council Order 
No. 412, 29 June 2004); 
 
• Measures for Administering the Release of  News and Information in China by 
Foreign News Agencies (Xinhua News Agency, 10 September 2006);   
 
• Notices on the Annual Inspection of Foreign News Dissemination Entities (Notice 
provided to foreign financial information suppliers regardi ng information that must be 
provided to FIAC as part of its annual licensing procedures);  
 
• Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment (Order No. 57 of the National 
Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce, 
31 October 2007);  
                                                      
2 WT/MIN(01)/3, 10 November 2001, para. 309 (the "Working Party Report").  WT/DS378/1 
 S/L/337 
 Page 3 
 
 
  • Decisions of the State Council Regarding Entrance of Non-Public Capital into 
Cultural Industries (Promulgated by the State Council, 13 April 2005); 
 
• Several Opinions on Introducing Foreign Investment into the Cultural Sector 
(Ministry of Culture No. 19, 6 July 2005); 
 
• Opinion on Foreign Investment in Cultural Industries (Promulgated by the Ministry of 
Culture, 5 August 2005); 
 
• Detailed Rules on the Approval and Contro l of Resident Representative Offices of 
Foreign Enterprises (MOFTEC Order No. 3, 13 February 1995); 
 
• Procedures of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce for the 
Registration and Administration of Resident Representative Offices of Foreign 
Enterprises (Promulgated by the State Council, 5 March 1983); 
 
• Rules for Internet Information Se rvices (State Council Decree No. 292, 
September 2000); and 
 
• Administrative Rules for Internet News Information Services (State Council 
Information Office and Ministry of Info rmation Industry, 25 September 2005);  
 as well as any amendments, related measures, or implementing measures.  
These measures appear to be inconsiste nt with the following provisions: 
 
• Article XVI of the GATS;  
• Article XVII of the GATS;  
• Article XVIII of the GATS;  
• The horizontal standstill commitment contained in China's Schedule; and 
• China's Accession Protocol (including Part I.1.2 which incorporates the commitments 
reproduced in paragraph 309 of the Working Pa rty Report), which is an integral part 
of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing  the World Trade Organization . 
China's measures also appear to nullify or impair  the benefits accruing to Canada directly or 
indirectly under the cited agreements. 
 
 Canada reserves the right to address additiona l issues regarding the above matters in the 
course of the consultations. 
We look forward to receiving your reply to the present request and to fixing a mutually 
convenient date for consultations.   
__________