G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3   
18 January 2021  
(21-0535) Page: 1/10 
Committee on Anti -Dumping Practices  
Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures  Original: Spanish  
 
  
NOTIFICATION OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS UNDER  
ARTICLES 18.5 AND 32.6 OF THE AGREEMENTS  
PERU 
Supplement  
The following communication, dated 14 January 2021, is being circulated at the request of the 
delegation of Peru.  
_______________  
 
 
 The Permanent Mission of Peru to the International Organizations at Geneva presents its 
compliments to the Secretariat of the World Trade Organization  (Rules Division) and refers to its 
notification obligations pursuant to Article 18.5 o f the Anti -Dumping Agreement (Agreement on 
Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994) and Article 32.6 
of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.  
 In this regard, the Permanent Mission is pleased to sub mit a copy of Supreme Decree 
No. 136-2020-PCM, Supreme Decree amending Supreme Decree No.  006-2003-PCM, regulating the 
rules provided for in the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on 
Tariffs and Trade 1994, the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and the 
Agreement on Agriculture , of 9 August  2020.  
The text of the aforementioned Supreme Decree is available at: 
https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/normaslegales/decreto -supremo -que-modifica -el-decreto -
supremo -n-006-2003-decreto -supremo -n-136-2020-pcm-1876234 -1. 
  G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3 • G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
 
- 2 - 
 
  SUPREME DECREE AMENDING SUPREME DECREE NO. 006 -2003 -PCM, REGULATING  
THE RULES PROVIDED FOR IN THE AGREEMENT ON IMPLEMENTATION  OF 
ARTICLE VI OF THE GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE 1994,  
THE AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND COUNTERVAILING MEASURES  
AND THE AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE  
SUPREME  DECREE  NO. 136-2020 -PCM 
THE PRESIDENT  OF THE REPUBLIC   
WHEREAS : 
 By virtue of Legislative Decision No.  26407, published in the Official Journal El Peruano  on 
18 December 1994 and in effect since 1 January 1995, the Democratic Constituent Congress adopted 
the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the multilateral trade 
agreements contained in the Final Act of the Uruguay Round signed at Marrakesh, Morocco, 
on 15 April 1994;  
 The aforementioned multilateral trade agreements include the Agreement on Implementation 
of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, the Agreement on Subsidies and 
Countervailing Measures, and  the Agreement on Agriculture, which provide that the Republic of Peru 
shall take all necessary steps, of a general or particular character, to ensure that its laws, regulations 
and administrative procedures comply with the provisions of those Agreements;  
 Supreme Decree No.  006-2003-PCM established regulations pursuant to the Agreement on 
Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, the Agreement 
on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, and the Agreement on Agriculture ", amended by 
Supreme Decree No.  004-2009-PCM approving provisions with the aim of preventing and correcting 
distortions of competition in the market caused by dumping and subsidies;  
 It has been deemed appropriate to review and amend  Supreme Decree No. 006-2003-PCM, 
with the aim of strengthening the implementation of trade defence regulations in the country , and  
optimizing the proceedings  for the investigation of dumping and subsid ization practices ; 
 In accordance with the powers conferred by Article 118 (8) of the Political Constitution of Peru;  
ORDERS : 
Article 1. Amendment of Articles  2, 18, 19, 22, 27, 28, 32, 33, 39, 46, 55, 57, 59, 60, 62, 
64, 67, 68  and the Fifth Final Supplementary Provision  of Supreme Decree 
No. 006-2003 -PCM, regulating the rules provided for in the Agreement on Implementation 
of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, the Agreement on 
Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and the Agreement on Agriculture.  
 Articles 2, 18, 19, 22, 27, 28, 32, 33, 39, 46, 55, 57, 59, 60, 62, 64, 67, 68 and the  Fifth Final 
Supplementary Provision  of Supreme Decree No. 006-2003-PCM, regulating the rules provided for 
in the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 
1994, the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and the Agreement on Agriculture, 
have been amended and read as follows:  G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3 • G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
 
- 3 - 
 
  "Article 2.- General  - For the purposes of these Regulations, the following definitions shall apply:   
 I. Anti-Dumping Agreement : Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General 
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 , which forms part of the multilateral tra de agreements 
contained in the Final Act of the Uruguay Round , adopted by the Democratic Constituent Congress 
in Legislative Resolution No. 26407 . 
 II. Agreement on Subsidies : Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Meas ures, which 
forms part of  the multilateral trade agreements contained in the Final Act of the Uruguay Round , 
adopted by the Democratic Constituent Congress in Legislative Resolution No. 26407 . 
 III. The Commission : the Commission on Dumping, Subsidies and the Elimination of 
Non-Tariff Trade Barrie rs (CDB) of the National Institute for the Defence of Competition and the 
Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI) . 
 IV. Technical Secretariat : the Technical Secretariat of the Commission.  
 V. Court : the Court  for the Defence of Competiti on and Intellectual Property  of the National 
Institute for the Defence of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI).  
 VI. WTO: the World Trade Organization . 
 VII. D ays: calendar days, unless indicated otherwise. Where the last day of a time -limit is a 
non-working day, the time -limit shall be extended automatically until the next working day.  
Article 18.- Determination of causal link 
 The demonstration of a causal link between the dumped or subsidized imports and the injury 
to the domestic industry shall be based  on an examination of all relevant evidence before the 
Commission. The Commission shall also examine any known factors other than the dumped or 
subsidized imports which at the same time are injuring the domestic industry, and the injuries caused 
by these other factors must not be attributed to the dumped or subsidized imports.  Factors which 
may be relevant in this respect include, inter alia, the volume and prices of imports not sold at 
dumping or subsidized prices, contraction in demand or changes in the patterns of consumption, 
trade restrictive practices of and competition between the foreign and domestic producers, 
developments in technology and the export performance , productivity of the domestic industry, the 
evolution of the exchange rate and changes in the tariff regime . 
Article 19.- Determination of a threat of material injury  
 A determination of a threat of material injury shall be based on evidence and not merely on 
allegation, conjecture or remote possibili ty. To determine  the existence of a threat of material injury, 
an evaluation shall be carried out of, inter alia , the factors indicated in Articles  3.4 and 3.7 of the 
Anti-Dumping Agreement and Articles 15.4 and 15.7 of the Agreement on Subsidies.  
Article  22.- Application  
22.1.  An application to initiate an investigation shall include evidence of the following:  
 (a) The dumping or subsidy;  
 (b) injury, threat of injury or material retardation of the establishment of the domestic 
industry ; 
 (c) the causal link between the dumped or subsidized imports and the alleged injury or 
threat of injury . G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3 • G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
 
- 4 - 
 
  22.2.  Simple assertion, unsubstantiated by relevant evidence , cannot be considered 
sufficient  to comply with the above provision . The application mus t contain  such information 
as is reasonably available to the applicant on the following : 
 (a) Information on  the applicant : business name, number of the entry in the registry 
in which the legal person is recorded , taxpayer s' registration number , domicile , 
telephone number and email ; activity or main line of business and date on which 
operations began ; industry and association to which the applicant belongs . If possible, 
the business name and domicile of any other enterprises besides the applicants 
producing the product;  
 (b) Information on the legal representative : name, domicile, telephone number  and email 
address of the representative ; the number of the entry in the registry in which the  
power of attorney  is registered  or, where applicable , certification that the representative 
has power of attorney before administrative authorities . Where the p ower of 
attorney was granted abroad , it shall be duly authenticated  or, failing that, 
duly legalized before the corresponding Peruvian Consul ar Office,  and be 
legalized by the Ministry of Foreign Relations of Peru.  If the power of attorney 
was granted in a language other than Spanish, the provisions of Article 36 of 
these  Regulations shall be applied.  
 (c) Information on the natural or legal exporter: name or business name, telephone number  
and email  of the natural or legal person exporting the product cited in the application ; 
 (d) Information on the natural or legal importer: name or business name;  
 (e) Information on the total national production of the product that is the subject 
of the applicatio n, and the percentage share of each applicant in this 
production, in order to prove the lawful right of the applicant to submit an 
application for the initiation of an investigation by or on behalf of the domestic 
industry ; 
 (f) Information on the imported product  and the like domestic product:  description  of the 
product, units of measurement and, where applicable , the conversion  factors used; 
trade and technical names, model or type, physical and technical characteristics, 
physical and/or chemical analysis where applicable, uses, domestic or imported inputs 
used in the domestic product, presentation of the product;   
 (g) Information on the imports of the product that is the subject of the application: 
country of origin or provenance of the imports, tariff heading, value and 
volume of the imports during the previous three years from the exporting 
country specified in the application ; 
 (h) Information on the volume  and value of domestic sales of the applicant 
submitting the application, and the production costs of the like product 
manufactured by the applicant;  
 (i) Information on the economic and financial indicators of the applicant, such as 
those listed in Artic le 17 of these Regulations;  
 (j) Date on which the payment of the processing fee was made and the number of 
the relevant receipt  of payment . 
22.3.  The application shall be submitted  together with a duly completed "Questionnaire for 
producers applying to initiate an investigation  into alleged dumping or subsidies ", which is freely 
available on the INDECOPI institutional portal. All economic, accounting and financial 
information  provided with the application must be submitted in digital format t o facilitate 
the processing of data.   G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3 • G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
 
- 5 - 
 
  22.4.  The Commission shall  examine  the accuracy and adequacy of the evidence provided in the 
application to determine whether there is sufficient proof to justify the initiation of an investigation . 
Article 27.- Interested parties and participation  
27.1.  For the purposes of these Regulations, interested parties entitled to participate in the 
proceedings shall mean  the following:  
(i) an exporter or foreig n producer or the importer of a product subject to investigation, or 
a trade or business association a majority of the members of which are producers, 
exporters or importers of the product ; 
(ii) the Government of the exporting country; and,  
(iii) producers  of the like product in Peru, or trade or business associations a majority of 
whose members are producers of the like product in the territory of Peru.  
27.2.  The Commission may admit other natural or legal persons different from the above as 
interested parties, provided they demonstrate a legitimate interest in the investigation.  
27.3.  Legal or natural persons  may intervene in the procedure through representatives with the 
corresponding powers of attorney . Where the power of attorney was granted outside Peru  
and before a foreign competent authority, the power shall be duly authenticated or, failing 
that, it shall be duly legalized before the corresponding  Peruvian Consular Office , and be 
legalized by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.  Where the power of attorney was granted in 
a language other than Spanish , the provisions of Article  36 of these Regulations must be 
applied.  
Article 28.- Evidentiary period and essential facts  
28.1.  Within six (6) months from the publication of the decision to initiate an investigation, the 
period for the submission of evidence or arguments by the parties shall be concluded , without 
prejudice to the right of the Technical Secretariat and the Com mission to request information at any 
stage of the proceedings.  However, if there are sufficient grounds, the Commission may extend the 
evidentiary period by a maximum of three (3) additional months.  
28.2.  Within twenty -one (21) working days  after the end of the evidentiary period, the 
Commission shall issue  the document of Essential Facts, forming the basis for its final decisio n, 
which shall be notified to the parties participating in the proceedings within five (5) working days . 
The parties may submit their comments on the Essential Facts within a maximum of seven (7) 
working days  calculated from the day following their notification.  
28.3.  Following expiry of the period for receipt of comments on the Essential Facts, the Commission 
shall adopt a  final decision  within a period of twenty -one (21) working days . 
28.4.  At the request of any of the parties, a final hearing shall be convened  at which they may 
put forward arguments relating only to the Essential Facts notified.  The final hearing must  be 
requested in the written submission containing the comments on the Essential Facts.  The parties 
shall have five (5) working days  to present in writing the arguments put forward at the hearing.  
Following expiry of this period, the Commission shall adopt  a final decision  within a period of 
twenty -one (21) working days . 
Article 32.- Time -limit for investigation procedures  
Except in exceptional circumstances, the Commission shall have a period of tw elve (12) 
months to conclude the investigation  from  the date of publication in the Official Journal 
El Peruano  of the decision  initiating the investigation.  In no case may the investigation exceed 
eighteen (18) months from its initiation.  G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3 • G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
 
- 6 - 
 
  Article 33.- Publi cation of decisions  
33.1 Decisions  initiating an investigation or review , as well as those applying provisional or 
definitive anti -dumping or countervailing  duties, abolishing or changing such duties, or terminating 
or postponing an investigation or review , shall be published , once only, in the Official Journal.  
33.2 The reports of the Technical Secretariat of the Commission and of the Court  that 
support the decisio ns of both bodies shall be published on the INDECOPI institutional 
portal, so that they may be accessed by any interested party , without prejudice to being 
notified to the parties together with the respective decision . 
Article 39.- Hearings and technical meetings  
39.1.  During the evidentiary period, the parties may request a hearing, without prejudice to the 
hearing that the Commission must  convene ex officio  within the same period.  There shall be no 
obligation on any party to attend a hearing, and failure to do so shall not  be prejudicial to that 
party's case.  
39.2.  Information provided at a hearing shall only be taken into account if it is submitted in writing 
to the Commission within five (5) working days  after the hearing.  
39.3.  Without prejudice to the conduct of the hearings, the participating parties may 
request  the Technical Secretariat of the Commission to hold technical meetings to consult 
on the methods used in the reports and decisions  to determine the existence of dumping 
or subsid ization  practices , injury and causal link , as well as to receive guidance on the 
completion of questionnaires and responses to requests for information.  In no case may 
the positions expressed by the parties in the relevant investigation be discussed  at these 
technical meetings .  
Article 46.- Legal character of definitive duties  
46.1.  Anti-dumping and countervailing duties are measures designed to offset the distortions caused 
to the market by dumping and subsidization practices.  Pursuant to Article 18.1  of the Anti -Dumping 
Agreement and Article 32.1  of the Subsidies Agreem ent, no other measure besides anti -dumping 
or countervailing duties, as applicable, may be applied in response to these practices . 
46.2.  Provisional or definitive anti -dumping and countervailing duties do not constitute any form of 
taxation.  
46.3.  Provisio nal and definitive anti -dumping and countervailing duties are not subject to rebates, 
discounts for prompt payment, reductions by breaking up payments or of any other kind.  
Article 55.- Body responsible for the collection of anti-dumping  or countervailing duties  
55.1.  The National Supervisory Authority for Customs and Tax Administration (SUNAT ) is 
the body responsible for the collection of anti-dumping  or countervailing duties  established by the 
Commission, in accordance with the provisions contained in these Regulations.   
55.2.  The payment of provisional or definitive antidumping or countervailing duties shall 
not apply  to goods that are imported into the national territory as  donations under 
Article  147(e) and (f) of Legislative Decree No. 1053, General Customs Law . Importers 
shall prove that the imported goods  qualif y as a donation from abroad and that they have 
the corresponding authorizations to import t hem as a donation.  Where a false declaration 
of the imported goods  as a donation is identified, the Commission shall initiate a 
sanctioning procedure in accordance with Article 5 of Legislative Decree No. 807, Law on 
the Functions, Regulations and Organization of INDECOPI,  without prejudice to the filing 
of the corresponding criminal complaint by INDECOPI.  G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3 • G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
 
- 7 - 
 
  Article 57.- Reports submitted by  SUNAT  
57.1.  SUNAT shall submit  to the Commission, within one month following the close of each 
quarter, monthly reports on the applicati on of the anti -dumping or countervailing duties in force. 
These reports shall contain  the following information:  
(a) The volume and value of imports of each of the products subject to definitive and 
provisional anti -dumping or countervailing duties in force, broken down by origin;  
(b) The amount collected in respect of each of the definitive and provisional anti -dumping 
or countervailing duties in force, broken down by origin;   
(c) A list of the securities lodged for provisional duties in force;  
(d) The volume and value of imports corresponding to the subheadings comprising spare 
parts and components of finished products, subject to definitive anti -dumping or 
countervailing duties . 
57.2.  Within the period of application of anti-dumping  or countervaili ng duties, the 
Commission may periodically request SUNAT  to provide information on the procedures 
regarding verification of origin referred to in Supreme Decree No.  005-2011 -MINCETUR, 
Supreme Decree establishing the regulatory framework for the declaration  and control of 
the origin of goods subject to trade defence measures, as well as details of the imports 
subject to such procedures to each customs department , and details of the procedures 
completed and the results of those procedures. The information to be provided shall refer 
to the application of anti -dumping or countervailing duties in force . To this end, the 
Commission and SUNAT shall agree in advance on th e information to be submitted and 
the respective points of contact.  
Article 59.- Review procedure owing to changed circumstances  
 After a period of at least twelve (12) months has elapsed from publication of the decision that 
ended  the investigation, the C ommission may, at the request of any interested party or ex officio , 
consider whether the definitive anti -dumping or countervailing duties in force should be maintained 
or modified.  In evaluating the application , the Commission shall  verify  whether there is sufficient 
evidence of a significant change in circumstances which warrants a review of the duties imposed . 
 The application  shall be submitted to gether with the  duly completed  "Questionnaire for 
initiating the changed circumstances revie w procedure" , which is freely available on the INDECOPI 
institutional portal.  To facilitate the processing of data, the economic, accounting and financial 
information provided with the application shall be submitted in digital format.  
 The review procedure  shall be governed by the provisions laid down in Articles 21 to 57 of 
these Regulations, where applicable . This review procedure shall normally close within a 
period of twelve (12) months following the date of its initiation , with an evidentiary period 
for such cases of up to six (6)  months.  
Article 60.- Procedure for reviewing the expiry of measures  (sunset review)  
60.1.  A sunset review of anti -dumping or countervailing  measures may be initiated before the 
end of the period provided f or in Article 48 of these Regulations; or, before the deadline specified in 
the last review conducted under this paragraph . 
60.2.  A review under this paragraph shall be initiated  upon written request made by or on behalf 
of the domestic industry . The request is to be submitted no less than eight (8) months ahead of the 
date of expiry of the measures, contain information reasonably available to the applicant and explain 
why, in the view of the applicant, dumping or subsidization  and injury are likel y to continue or 
recur should the duty expire. The application must contain , in particular, information on the G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3 • G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
 
- 8 - 
 
  development of the condition of the domestic industry since the imposition of the anti-dumping  or 
countervailing  duty, the present condition of t he domestic industry and the potential impact that 
any continuation or recurrence of dumping or subsidization  could have thereon if the duty were 
terminated . The application  shall be submitted together with the duly completed 
"Questionnaire for the initiat ion of the expiry review (sunset review) procedure" , which 
is freely available on the INDECOPI institutional portal. To facilitate the processing of 
data, the economic, accounting and financial information provided with the application 
shall be submitted in digital format.  
 When evaluating the application , the Commission shall consider whether there is 
sufficient evidence of a significant change in circumstances which warrants a review of 
the duties imposed . In any case, a review may only be init iated  if the Commission  determines, 
on the basis of an examination of the degree of support for, or opposition to, the application 
expressed by domestic producers of the like product, that the application has been made "by or on 
behalf of" the domestic ind ustry.   
60.3.  The Commission may  initiate a review under this Article in the absence of a written 
application "by or on behalf of" the domestic industry only if it has sufficient evidence  that the 
dumping or subsidization  and injury will continue or recur should the anti -dumping or 
countervailing  duty expire.  The Commission shall give public notice  of the initiation of the 
review where there is no written application "by or on behalf of" the domestic industry.   
60.4.  The review proced ure shall be governed  by the provisions laid down in Articles 21 to 57 of 
these Regulations, where applicable.  This review procedure shall normally close within a 
period of twelve (12) months following the date of its initiation.   
Article 62.- Administrative remedies  
62.1.  The administrative remedies available against final decision s that end a procedure are an 
application for reconsideration or an appeal . The time -limit for lodging such cases is fifteen (15) 
working days as from the date follow ing notification of the decisio n, or the date of publication of the 
Commission's decision  in the Official Journal El Peruano , as appropriate.   
62.2.  An application for reconsideration shall be submitted  to the body that issued the decision  
complained of  and must be substantiated  by new evidence with facts relating to the issues 
discussed during the investigation stage .  
62.3.  An appeal may be lodged when the complaint is based on a different interpretation of the 
evidence produced or relates  to questions of pure law, with the authority that issued the decision  
complained of, so that the case may be referred to the higher authority.  During the appeal stage, 
no further investigative actions shall be carried out, and no new facts other than thos e 
examined during the investigation stage shall be considered . 
62.4.  Definitive duties imposed shall not be suspended as a result of the filing of administrative 
remedies.  
62.5.  The time -limit for decision s issued by the Commission under the procedures covered by these 
Regulations shall be ten (10) working days after the notified decision  has been issued . 
Article 64.- Time -limit for taking a decision on applications for reconsideration  
 The time -limit for t he Commission to take a decision on an application for reconsideration shall 
be thirty ( 30) working days  from the date of its submission.   
Article 67.- Administrative proceedings to challenge the collection of anti -dumping or 
countervailing duties  G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3 • G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
 
- 9 - 
 
  67.1.  The importer may institute administrative proceedings before the Commission to challenge 
collection of duties by SUNAT on the specific basis that the imported goods classified in tariff terms 
by SUNAT do not correspond to the product subject to anti-dumping  or countervailing duties, in 
accordance with the respective decision to impose duties issued by INDECOPI. Any challenge relating 
to the determination of origin, the physical characteristics, the tariff classification, the value of the 
imported good s, the liquidation of duties, the evaluation of applications  regarding  the 
requirement to collect  anti-dumping and countervailing duties during the stage prior to 
the enforcement of such duties,  or any other matter within the exclusive competence of SUNAT , 
shall be declared inadmissible by the Commission.  
67.2.  The Commission shall have  a period of sixty (60) working days for administrative adjudication 
at first instance.  The Commission's decision may be appealed within no more than fifteen  (15) 
working day s of its notification, and the appeal shall be adjudicated by the  INDECOPI Court 
within sixty (60)  working days.  
Article 68.- Reimbursement of anti -dumping or countervailing duties  
68.1.  The importer may in itiate  administrative proceedings before the Commission to 
request the reimbursement of definitive anti -dumping or countervailing duties, where the 
payments have been undue or excessive, or whe re SUNAT  has revoked or withdrawn  the 
customs declaration used to imp ort the goods subject to anti -dumping or countervailing 
duties. The time -limit for requesting a reimbursement must not exceed four (4) years as 
from the date on which the payment was made or on which SUNAT revoked or withdrew  
the customs declaration , as ap propriate . 
68.2.  Requests for the reimbursement of definitive anti-dumping  or countervailing duties , in any of 
the situations described above , shall be submitted to the Commission, which will have a 
time-limit of sixty (60) working days to take a decision . In such cases, where it sees fit, the 
Commission may request information from SUNAT , which must be communicated to  INDECOPI 
within a period of no more than fifteen (15) working days.  The Commission's dec ision may be 
appealed within no more than fifteen  (15) working days of its notification, and the appeal shall be 
adjudicated by the INDECOPI  Court within sixty (60)  working days.   
68.3.  Where the decision  to impose definitive anti -dumping or countervailing duties is 
revoked or annulled, requests for the reimbursement of the amounts paid shall be made 
directly to the  INDECOPI  Finance and Accounts Sub -Division  or whichever service is acting 
on its behalf . The decision  revoking or annulling the duties shall provide  information on 
the reimbursement procedure to be carried out as part of the application of that decisi on. 
Furthermore, immediately after the publication of the decision  revoking  the imposition of 
duties, INDECOPI shall publish a notice , once only, in the Official Journal El Peruano , 
informing importers that they may request reimbursement  within four (4) years from the 
publication of the decision  revoking or annulling the imposition of anti -dumping or 
countervailing duties. The time -limit for addressing these reimbursement requests is 
thirty (30) working days.  
Fifth: - Enforcement of anti -dumping and countervailing duties  
 INDECOPI shall be respon sible for the enforcement of anti -dumping or countervailing duties, 
upon express communication from SUNAT  that such duties are due. The procedure shall take place 
in accordance with Law, No. 26979, Law on Enforcement Procedure and the relevant regulations . 
 INDECOPI, by means of its enforcement procedure, is competent to evaluate the 
applications  regarding  the requirement to collect anti -dumping or countervailing duties 
submitted during the enforcement phase . 
Article 2. Publica tion 
 This Supreme Decree shall be published in the Official Journal El Peruano , and on the 
institutional portals of INDECOPI (www.indecopi.gob.pe ), the Office of the President of the Council G/ADP/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3 • G/SCM/N/1/PER/2/Suppl.3  
 
- 10 - 
 
  of Ministers (www.gob.pe/pcm ), the Ministry of the Economy and Finance  (www.g ob.pe/mef ), the 
Ministry of Foreign Trade and Tourism (www.gob.pe/mincetur ), the Ministry of Production 
(www.gob.pe/produce ) and the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation  (www.gob.pe/minagri ). 
Article 3. Financi ng 
 The implementation of this Supreme Decree shall be financed through the institutional budget 
of INDECOPI, with no additional resources requested from the Publi c Treasury . 
Article 4. Signature  
 This Decree shall be signed by the President of the Council of Ministers  , the Minister of the 
Economy and Finance, the Minister of Foreign Trade and Tourism and the Minister of Agriculture and 
Irrigation.  
FINAL SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISION  
Sole provision .- Application  
 The provisions contained in this Supreme Decree shall apply i mmediately to the proceedings 
in process, regardless of the stage reached . 
Done at Government House, in Lima, on the s eventh  day of August two thousand and twenty.  
MARTÍN ALBERTO VIZCARRA CORNEJO  
President of the Republic  
WALTER MARTOS RUIZ  
President of the Council of Ministers  
JORGE LUIS MONTENEGRO CHAVESTA  
Minister of Agriculture and Irrigation  
MARÍA ANTONIETA ALVA LUPERDI  
Minister of the Economy and Finance  
JOSÉ ANTONIO SALARDI RODRÍGUEZ  
Minister of Production  
ROCÍO BARRIOS ALVARADO  
Minist er of Foreign Trade and Tourism  
__________