. /.   WORLD TRADE  
ORGANIZATION  WT/DS389/1 
G/SPS/GEN/894 
G/AG/GEN/81 G/TBT/D/35 G/L/881 
20 January 2009  
 
(09-0221) 
 Original:   English 
  
EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES – CERTAIN MEASURES AFFECTING POULTRY MEAT 
AND POULTRY MEAT PRODUCTS FROM THE UNITED STATES 
 
Request for Consultations by the United States
 
  
 The following communication, dated 16 January 2009, from the delegation of the United States to the delegation of the European Communitie s and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement 
Body, is circulated in accordance with Article 4.4 of the DSU. 
 
_______________ 
 
 My authorities have instructed me to request  consultations with the European Communities 
("EC") pursuant to Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement 
of Disputes  ("DSU"), Article 11 of the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary 
Measures  ("SPS Agreement"), Article 19 of the Agreement on Agriculture  ("Agriculture 
Agreement"), Article 14 of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade  ("TBT Agreement"),  and 
Article XXII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994  ("GATT 1994") regarding certain 
measures of the EC affecting poultry meat a nd poultry meat products ("poultry") from the United 
States. 
  The EC prohibits the import of  poultry treated with any substa nce other than water unless that 
substance has been approved by the EC.  Conseque ntly, the EC prohibits the import of poultry that 
has been processed with chemical treatments ("pat hogen reduction treatments" or "PRTs") designed to 
reduce the amount of microbes on the meat, effectively prohibiting the shipment of virtually all US 
poultry to the EC.  The EC has not published or otherwise made available the process for approving a 
substance.  The EC also maintains a measure re garding the marketing standards for poultry meat, 
which defines "poultrymeat" as only "poultrymeat suitable for human consumption, which has not 
undergone any treatment other than cold treatment."  
 In 2002, the United States requested the Eu ropean Commission ("Commission") to approve 
the use of four PRTs in the production of poultry intended for export to the EC:  chlorine dioxide, 
acidified sodium chlorite, trisodium  phosphate, and peroxyacids.  Howeve r, after more than six years, 
including unexplained delays, the EC has not a pproved any of these four PRTs and instead has 
rejected the approval of the use of these four PRTs. 
 The EC's failure to approve is despite the fact  that various EC agencies have issued scientific 
reports regarding a number of different aspects rela ted to the processing of poultry with these four 
PRTs, the cumulative conclusion of which is th at the importation and consumption of poultry 
processed with these four PRTs does not pose a risk to human health.
1 
                                                      
1 Of those reports, the EU Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures Relating to Public Health 
(SCVPH) adopted Opinions on 30 October 1998, entitled "Benefits and Limitations of Antimicrobial WT/DS389/1, G/SPS/GEN/894,  
G/AG/GEN/81, G/TBT/D/35,  G/L/881 
Page 2 
  
   In particular, in May 2008, the Commissi on submitted a proposal to the EC Standing 
Committee on Food Chain and Animal Health ("SC oFCAH") that purported to approve the import 
into the EC of poultry treated with these four PRTs.  On 2 June 2008, SCoFCAH rejected the 
Commission's proposal unanimously, with the Unite d Kingdom abstaining.  On 18 December 2008, 
the EC Agricultural and Fisheries Council rejected the same Commission proposal by the same tally 
as SCoFCAH had.    The United States understands that these EC measures are reflected in, among others: 
 
(1) Regulation (EC) No 853/2004, including Articles 3 and 6;
2 
(2) Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2 007, including Annex XIV(B)(II)(2);3 
(3) SCoFCAH's rejection of the Commission's proposal regarding the removal of surface 
contamination from poultry carcasses on 2 June 2008;4 
(4) the EU Agricultural and Fisheries Council' s rejection of the Commission's proposal 
regarding the removal of surface c ontamination from poultry carcasses on 
18 December 2008;5 and 
(5) any amendments, related measures, or implementing measures.   
 The EC measures appear to be inconsistent w ith the EC's WTO obligations, including, but not 
limited to, the following:   
 
(i) SPS Agreement Articles 2.2, 5, and 8, and Annex C(1);  
(ii) GATT 1994 Articles X:1 and XI:1;  
(iii) Agriculture Agreement Article 4.2; and 
(iv) TBT Agreement Article 2.   
 The EC measures also appear to nullify or impa ir the benefits accruing to the United States 
directly or indirectly under the cited agreements.    We look forward to receiving your reply to this request and to fixing a mutually acceptable date for consultations. 
__________  
                                                                                                                                                                    
 
Treatments for Poultry Carcasses," and on 14-15 April 2003, entitled "The Evaluation of Antimicrobial 
Treatments for Poultry Carcasses," both of which purport, in part, to be risk assessments. 
2 Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004, 
O.J. L. 226 (25 June 2004), pp. 26-27. 
3 Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007, O.J. L 299 16 (Nov. 2007), p. 110. 
4 See Summary Record of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health Held in 
Brussels on 2 &3 June 2008, SANCO D1 – D(08) 411209, para. 18A. 
5 See, e.g ., Press Release 16916/08, 2917th Meeting of the Agricultural and Fisheries Council (18-19 
Dec. 2008), p. 8 ("The Council unanimously rejected a proposal for a Decision regarding the possibility of using 
antimicrobial substances to remove surface contamination from poultry carcasses.").