WT/DSB/W/531  
 
6 November 2014  
(14-6348)  Page: 1/11  
    
 
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT BODY 
DRAFT ANNUAL REPORT (2014) 
The Report was prepared pursuant to the Procedur es for an Annual Overview of WTO Activities and 
for Reporting under the WTO (WT/L/105), and sets out the actions taken by the Dispute 
Settlement Body (DSB) in the period since its previous Annual Report.1 
 
In carrying out its tasks, the DSB held 13 meetin gs since the period covered by the previous 
Report. The minutes of these meetings, which rema in the record of the DSB's work, are contained 
in documents WT/DSB/M/339 – WT/DSB/M/3512 a n d  s h o u l d  b e  r e a d  i n  c o n j u n c t i o n  w i t h  t h i s  
Report. The overview of the state of play  of WTO disputes since 1 January 1995 to 
31 October 2014 prepared by the Secretariat on its own responsibility is included in Addendum 1 
to this Report.  
The following matters are included in this Report: 
 
Table of Contents 
1   ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON ....................................................................................... 1
 
2   APPOINTMENT/REAPPOINTMENT OF APPELLATE BO DY MEMBERS ............................. 2  
3   INDICATIVE LIST OF GOVERNME NTAL AND NON-GOVERNMENTAL PANELISTS ........... 3  
4   THE DS DIGITAL REGISTRY INITIATIVE ...................................................................... 3  
5   ESTABLISHMENT OF PANELS AND REQUESTS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF 
PANELS ........................................................................................................................ .... 3 
6   ADOPTION OF APPELLATE  BODY/PANEL REPORTS ..................................................... 6  
7   STATEMENTS OF INTENTIONS IN RESPECT OF IMPLEMENTATION PURSUANT 
TO ARTICLE 21.3 OF THE DSU .......................................................................................... 7  
8   STATUS REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 
RECOMMENDATIONS ADOP TED BY THE DSB .................................................................... 7  
9   MATTERS RAISED BY MEMBERS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 21.6 OF THE DSU 
(SURVEILLANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION) ........................................................................ 9  
10   RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU (COMPLIANCE PANEL) .............................. 9  
11   OTHER MATTERS ..................................................................................................... 10  
12   CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................... 11  
 
 
1  ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON 
1.1.  At its meeting on 26 March 2014, the DSB elected by acclamation H.E. Mr. Fernando 
De Mateo (Mexico) as Chairman of the DSB (WT/DSB/M/343). 
                                               
1 WT/DSB/61. 
2 The present report includes activities that  took place during me etings of the DSB from 
25 November 2013 through 20 October 2014. WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 2 - 
 
  2  APPOINTMENT/REAPPOINTMENT OF APPELLATE BODY MEMBERS 
2.1.  Regarding the reappointment of Mr. Peter Van den Bossche: 
 At its meeting on 25 November 2013, the DSB considered this matter and agreed to 
reappoint Mr. Peter Van den Bossche for a second four-year term of office starting on 
12 December 2013 (WT/DSB/M/339). The following delegations made statements: Brazil, 
the European Union, the United States, Mexico and China. 
2.2.  Regarding the appointment of one Appellate Body member: 
 At the DSB meeting on 25 November 2013, the Chairman referred to his fax of 
14 November 2013 and noted that, as stated in the fax, due to the remarkably intense pace of meetings and consultations in preparation for the Ministerial Conference, it had been 
impossible for the Selection Committee to find adequate time to schedule a meeting where it 
could complete its deliberations on a recommendation. He said that it was the intention of the Selection Committee to resume its deliberations after the Ministerial Conference 
(WT/DSB/M/339). 
 At the DSB meeting on 22 January 2014, the Chairman said that, on 20 January 2014, he 
had circulated a fax on behalf of the Selection Committee constituting a report on the 
ongoing process to appoint an Appellate Body member. In that communication, the Selection Committee had proposed that the DSB decide, either at the present meeting or as soon as practicable thereafter, to open the process for further nominations and for 
consultations of the Selection Committee. The Chair said that it was his intention to submit 
formally a draft decision on this matter for consideration by the DSB at a special meeting to be held on 7 February 2014. The draft decision  would be based on the elements outlined by 
the Selection Committee reflected in the Chair's fax and would take into account the views 
expressed by delegations at the present meeting and any further views delegations may wish to express to the Chair directly or through the Secretariat prior to 27 January 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/341). The following delegations made statements: Australia, Kenya, Egypt, 
Cameroon, India, Japan, the United States, Brazil and China. 
 At the DSB meeting on 26 February 2014, the Chairman referred to a communication from 
the Selection Committee which had been circulated to Members by fax on 24 February 2014. 
He noted that the Selection Committee communication contained the final report of the Selection Committee and its recommendation. He said that it would be up to the DSB to 
determine the next steps (WT/DSB/M/342). The following delegations made statements: 
Kenya, the European Union, Australia, Eg ypt, Norway, Turkey, Japan, Brazil, the 
United States, Chile, China, Canada, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Honduras, South Africa and Hong Kong, China. 
 At the DSB meeting on 26 March 2014, the Chairman said that one of the most urgent and 
pressing issues was to fill the vacancy in the Appellate Body. He said that he would consult 
with delegations on this matter in order to find a way forward (WT/DSB/M/343). The 
following delegations made statements: Kenya and Saudi Arabia. 
 At the DSB meeting on 25 April 2014, the Chairman  drew attention to his proposal regarding 
the AB selection process (room document) and said that he would give delegations some 
time in order to consult with capitals. He said that he would inform delegations as soon as possible when the matter would be considered by the DSB (WT/DSB/M/344). Kenya made a 
statement. 
 At the DSB meeting on 23 May 2014, the Chairman drew attention to his revised proposal 
on the AB selection process, which had been circulated to all Members by fax on 
12 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345). As set out in that  fax, the Chairman proposed that the DSB 
agree to the following five elements: (i) to launch a selection process for the vacant position in the Appellate Body to invite nominations of candidates for that position; (ii) to agree that 
the candidates nominated for the 2013 process initiated by the DSB (WT/DSB/60) will 
remain under consideration and that it will not be necessary for Members to re-nominate WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 3 - 
 
  them; (iii) to set a deadline of 30 June 2014 for Members' nominations of any additional 
candidates for the vacant position; (iv) to establish a Selection Committee, consistent with 
the procedures set out in document WT/DSB/1 and with previous selection processes, 
composed of the Director-General and the 2014 Chairpersons of the General Council, the Goods Council, the Services Council, the TRIPS Council and the DSB, to be chaired by the 
DSB Chair; and (v) to request the Selection Committee to carry out its work, including 
conducting interviews with all candidates and hearing the views of delegations on all candidates during July and September 2014, as necessary, in order to make a 
recommendation to the DSB no later than 15 September 2014 so that the DSB can take a 
decision to appoint a new Appellate Body member by its regular meeting scheduled for 26 September 2014. The DSB agreed to the Chairman's proposal, which had been subsequently circulated in document WT/DSB/63. Australia made a statement. 
 At the DSB meetings on 18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346), 10 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/347), 
22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348) and 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349), the Chairman made 
statements providing updates on the AB selection process. 
 At the DSB meeting on 26 September 2014 (WT/DSB/M/350), in accordance with the 
recommendation of the Selection Committee, which was circulated to delegations on 
10 September 2014, the DSB agreed to appoint Mr. Shree Baboo Chekitan Servansing (Mauritius) as a member of the Appellate Body for a four-year term, starting on 1 October 2014. The following delegations made statements: Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Mauritius, 
Singapore, Ghana, Chinese Taipei, India, Jama ica, Australia, the European Union, Russia, 
the United States, Japan, Korea, Ca nada, Mexico and Hong Kong, China. 
2.3.  Currently, the Appellate Body is composed of the following members (in alphabetical order): 
Mr. Ujal Singh Bhatia (India), Mr. Seung Wha Chang (Korea), Mr. Thomas Graham (US), 
Mr. Ricardo Ramírez-Hernández (Mexico), Mr. Sh ree Baboo Chekitan Servansing (Mauritius), 
Mr. Peter Van den Bossche (Belgium) and Ms. Yuejiao Zhang (China). 
3  INDICATIVE LIST OF GOVERNMENT AL AND NON-GOVERNMENTAL PANELISTS 
3.1.  The DSB approved a total of three new nominations for inclusion on the Indicative List of 
Governmental and Non-Governmental Panelists, in accordance with Article 8.4 of the DSU. These names are contained in documents: WT/DSB/W /518, WT/DSB/W/522 an d WT/DSB/W/530. The 
DSB approved these nominations at its meetings on 22 January 2014 (WT/DSB/M/341), 
25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344) and 20 October 2014 (WT/DSB/M/351). 
3.2.  During the period under review, Members suggested and the DSB approved the following new 
names for the Indicative List: (i) Chile – Mr. Sergio Escudero; (ii) China - Ms Hong Zhao; and 
(iii) the European Union – Mr. Geert Van Calster (Belgium). 
4  THE DS DIGITAL REGISTRY INITIATIVE 
4.1.  At the DSB meeting on 26 March 2014, the Ch airman, at the request of several delegations, 
invited the Director of the Legal Affairs Division, Ms. Valerie Hughes, to make a report to Members on progress in the Digital DS Registry Initiative (WT/DSB/M/343). Progress was reported with respect to all three elements of the project, namely: (i) development of a central electronic 
storage facility for all dispute settlement records; (ii) design of a research facility for Members and 
the Secretariat to search for dispute settlement information, and (iii) creation of a secure electronic registry for filing and serving dispute settlement documents on line. The United States 
made a statement. 
5  ESTABLISHMENT OF PANELS AND REQUESTS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF PANELS 5.1.  During the period under review, the DSB established 13 Panels in accordance with Article 6 of 
the DSU. These actions are described below with reference to each of the disputes in question. 
 "Russian Federation – Recycling Fee on Motor Vehicles": The DSB considered, for the second 
time, the European Union's panel request at its meeting on 25 November 2013 
(WT/DS462/8; WT/DSB/M/339), and agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 4 - 
 
  provisions of Article 6 of the DSU, with standard terms of reference. The European Union 
and the Russian Federation made statements. The following delegations reserved third-party 
rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Brazil, China, India, Japan, Korea, Norway, 
Turkey, Ukraine and the United States. 
 "United States – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Measures on Large Residential Washers 
from Korea": The DSB considered, for the first time, Korea's panel request at its meeting on 
18 December 2013 (WT/DS464/4; WT/DSB/M/340). Korea and the United States made 
statements. The DSB considered this matter, for the second time, at its meeting on 
22 January 2014 and agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU, with standard term s of reference (WT/DSB/M/341). Korea and the 
United States made statements. The following delegations reserved third-party rights to 
participate in the Panel's proceedings: Brazil,  Canada, China, the European Union, India, 
Japan, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, Turkey and Viet Nam. 
 "European Union – Measures on Atlanto-Scandian Herring": The DSB considered, for the first 
time, a panel request by Denmark in respect of the Faroe Islands, at its meeting on 
22 January 2014 (WT/DS469/2; WT/DSB/M/341). Denmark, in respect of the Faroe Islands, 
and the European Union made statements. The DSB considered this matter, for the second 
time, at its meeting on 26 February 2014 and agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU, with  standard terms of reference (WT/DSB/M/342). 
Denmark, in respect of the Faroe Islands, and the European Union made statements. The 
following delegations reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: 
Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China, Guatemala, Honduras, Iceland, India, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Peru, the Russian Federation, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, 
Turkey and the United States. 
 "Ukraine – Definitive Safeguard Measures on Certain Passenger Cars": The DSB considered, 
for the first time, Japan's panel request at its meeting on 26 February 2014 (WT/DS468/5; 
WT/DSB/M/342). Japan and Ukraine made statements. The DSB considered this matter, for the second time, at its meeting on 26 March 2014 and agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of  the DSU, with standard terms of reference 
(WT/DSB/M/343). Japan and Ukraine made statements. The following delegations reserved 
third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Australia, the European Union, India, Korea, the Russian Federation, Turkey and the United States. 
 "United States – Certain Methodologies and Th eir Application to Anti-Dumping Proceedings 
Involving China": The DSB considered, for the first time, China's panel request at its meeting on 26 February 2014 (WT/DS471/5; WT /DSB/M/342). China and the United States 
made statements. The DSB considered this matter, for the second time, at its meeting on 
26 March 2014 and agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU, with standard terms of reference (WT/DSB/M/343). China, the United States 
and Ukraine made statements. The following delegations reserved third-party rights to 
participate in the Panel's proceedings: Brazil,  Canada, the European Union, India, Japan, 
Korea, Norway, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Chinese Taipei, Turkey, Ukraine and 
Viet Nam. 
 "Australia – Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Other 
Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to  Tobacco Products and Packaging": The DSB 
considered, for the first time, Indonesia's panel request at its meeting on 26 March 2014 
(WT/DS467/15; WT/DSB/M/343). At that meeting, the DSB agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU with standard terms of reference. 
Indonesia, Australia, Ukraine and Honduras made statements. The following delegations 
reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, the European Union, Guatemala, 
Honduras, India, Japan, Korea, Malawi, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, 
Norway, Oman, Peru, the Philippines, the Russi an Federation, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, 
Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, the Unit ed States, Uruguay and Zimbabwe. WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 5 - 
 
   "European Union – Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Argentina": The DSB 
considered, for the first time, Argentina's panel request at its meeting on 26 March 2014 
(WT/DS473/5; WT/DSB/M/343). Argentina and the European Union made statements. The DSB considered this matter, for the second time, at its meeting on 25 April 2014 and agreed 
to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU with standard 
terms of reference (WT/DSB/M/344). Argentina and the European Union made statements. 
The following delegations reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's 
proceedings: Australia, China, Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, the 
Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United States.  
 "Australia – Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Other 
Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to  Tobacco Products and Packaging": The DSB 
considered, for the first time, the Dominican Republic's panel request at its meeting on 17 December 2012 (WT/DS441/15; WT/DSB/M/327). The Dominican Republic, Australia, 
Honduras, New Zealand, Uruguay, Norway, Ukra ine, Trinidad and Tobago, Cuba, Zimbabwe 
and Nicaragua made statements. The DSB considered this matter, for the second time, at its meeting on 25 April 2014 and agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions 
of Article 6 of the DSU, with standard te rms of reference (WT/DSB/M/344). The Dominican 
Republic, Australia, Ukraine, Honduras, Ne w Zealand and Cuba made statements. The 
following delegations reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Cuba, the European Union, Guatemala, Honduras, 
India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexi co, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, 
Peru, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Ukraine, the United States, Uruguay 
and Zimbabwe. 
 "Australia – Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Trademarks and Other 
Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to  Tobacco Products and Packaging": The DSB 
considered, for the first time, Cuba's panel request at its meeting on 25 April 2014 (WT/DS458/14; WT/DSB/M/344). At that meeting, the DSB agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU with standard terms of reference. 
Cuba, Australia, Ukraine, Honduras and the Dominican Republic made statements. The 
following delegations reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, the Dominican Republic, the European Union, 
Guatemala, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Japa n, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, 
Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Peru, the Phili ppines, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, 
Singapore, South Africa, Chinese Taipei, Tha iland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United States, 
Uruguay and Zimbabwe.  
 "India – Certain Measures Relating to Solar Cells and Solar Modules": The DSB considered, 
for the first time, the US panel request at its meeting on 25 April 2014 (WT/DS456/5; 
WT/DSB/M/344). The United States and India made statements. The DSB considered this 
matter, for the second time, at its meeting on 23 May 2014 and agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU with standard terms of reference 
(WT/DSB/M/345). The United States and India made statements. The following delegations 
reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Brazil, Canada, China, Ecuador, the European Union, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Norway, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Chinese Taipei and Turkey. 
 "European Union – Cost Adjustment Methodolog ies and Certain Anti-Dumping Measures on 
Imports from Russia": The DSB considered, for the first time, the Russian Federation's panel 
request at its meeting on 18 June 2014 (WT/DS474/4; WT/DSB/M/346). The Russian 
Federation and the European Union made stat ements. The DSB considered this matter, for 
the second time, at its meeting on 22 July 2014 and agreed to establish a panel in 
accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU with standard terms of reference 
(WT/DSB/M/348). The Russian Federation and the European Union made statements. The following delegations reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Indonesia, Mexico, Norway, Saudi Arabia, 
Turkey, Ukraine and the United States. WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 6 - 
 
   "Russian Federation – Measures on the Importat ion of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products 
from the European Union": The DSB considered , for the first time, the European Union's 
panel request at its meeting on 10 July 2014 (WT/DS475/2; WT/DSB/M/347). The European Union and the Russian Federation made statements. The DSB considered this matter, for the 
second time, at its meeting on 22 July 2014 and agreed to establish a panel in accordance 
with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU with standard terms of reference (WT/DSB/M/348). The European Union and the Russian Federation made statements. The 
following delegations reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: 
Australia, Brazil, China, India, Japan, Korea, Norway, South Africa, Chinese Taipei and the United States. 
 "Russia – Anti-Dumping Duties on Light Commercial Vehicles from Germany and Italy": The 
DSB considered, for the first time, the European Union's panel request at its meeting on 
26 September 2014 (WT/DS479/2; WT/DSB/M/350). The European Union and the Russian 
Federation made statements. The DSB considered this matter, for the second time, at its 
meeting on 20 October 2014 and agreed to establish a panel in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the DSU with standard terms of reference (WT/DSB/M/351). The 
European Union and the Russian Federation made statements. The following delegations 
reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Brazil, China, India, Japan, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine and the United States.  
5.2.  The following panel request was considered by the DSB for the first time: 
 "Pakistan – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations on Certain Paper Products 
from Indonesia": The DSB considered, for the first time, Indonesia's panel request at its 
meeting on 23 May 2014 (WT/DS470/2; WT/DSB/M/345). Indonesia and Pakistan made 
statements. No further action by the DSB had taken place by the time of writing this Report. 
6  ADOPTION OF APPELLATE BODY/PANEL REPORTS 
6.1.  During the period covered by this Report, the DSB adopted seven Panel Reports and six 
Appellate Body Reports. 
 "European Communities – Measures Prohibitin g the Importation and Marketing of Seal 
Products": The DSB adopted the Appellate Body Reports contained in WT/DS400/AB/R – 
WT/DS401/AB/R and the Panel Reports contained in WT/DS400/R and Add.1 – WT/DS401/R and Add.1, as modified by the Appellate Body Reports in these disputes at its meeting on 
18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346). The following delegations made statements: Canada, 
Norway, the European Union, the United States, Guatemala, Norway and Japan.  
 "China – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Automobiles from the 
United States": The DSB adopted the Panel Report in this dispute contained in WT/DS440/R 
and Add.1 at its meeting on 18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346). The following delegations made statements: the United States and China.   
 "United States – Countervailing and Anti-Dum ping Measures on Certain Products from 
China": The DSB adopted the Appellate Body  Report contained in WT/DS449/AB/R and 
Corr.1 and the Panel Report contained in WT/DS449/R and Add.1, as modified by the 
Appellate Body Report in this dispute at its meeting on 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348). The following delegations made statements: China, the United States, Japan and Korea.  
 "China – Measures Related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten and Molybdenum": 
The DSB adopted the Appellate Body Reports contained in WT/DS431/AB/R – 
WT/DS432/AB/R – WT/DS433/AB/R and the Panel Reports contained in WT/DS431/R and 
Add.1 – WT/DS432/R and Add.1 – WT/DS433/R and Add.1, as upheld by the Appellate Body 
Reports at its meeting on 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349). The following delegations made statements: the United States, Japan, the European Union, China, the Russian Federation and Canada.  WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 7 - 
 
  7  STATEMENTS OF INTENTIONS IN RESPECT OF IMPLEMENTATION PURSUANT TO 
ARTICLE 21.3 OF THE DSU 
7.1.  The DSB took note of Members' statements of intentions with respect to implementation of 
the DSB recommendations and rulings in connection with six disputes.  
 "European Communities – Measures Prohibitin g the Importation and Marketing of Seal 
Products": The European Union informed the DSB of its intentions in respect of 
implementation of the recommendations and rulin gs of the DSB in these disputes at the DSB 
meeting on 10 July 2014 (DS400-DS401; WT/DSB/M/347). The following delegations made 
statements: the European Union, Canada and Norway. 
 "United States – Countervailing and Anti-Dum ping Measures on Certain Products from 
China": The United States informed the DSB of its intentions in respect of implementation of 
the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in this dispute on 21 August 2014 (WT/DS449/11). The United States further confirmed its intentions in respect of 
implementation of the recommendations and rulin gs of the DSB in this dispute at the DSB 
meeting on 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349). The following delegations made statements: the United States and China.  
 "China – Measures Related to the Exportation of Rare Earths, Tungsten and Molybdenum":  
China informed the DSB of its intentions in respect of implementation of the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in these disputes at the DSB meeting on 
26 September 2014 (DS431 – DS432 – DS433; WT/DSB/M350). The following delegations 
made statements: China, the European Union, Japan and the United States. 
8  STATUS REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 
RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED BY THE DSB 
8.1.  The DSB received status reports with respect to implementation of DSB rulings and 
recommendations during the period considered in this Report with regard to nine matters as 
follows. 
 "United States – Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998": status reports by the 
United States (WT/DS176/11/Add.132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142) 
submitted at the DSB meetings held on 25 November 2013 (WT/DSB/M/339), 
22 January 2014 (WT/DSB/M/341), 26 February 2014 (WT/DSB/M/342), 26 March 2014 (WT/DSB/M/343), 25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344), 23 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345), 
18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346), 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348), 29 August 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/349), 26 September 2014 (WT/DSB/M/350) and 20 October 2014 (WT/DSB/M/351). In the course of the year, the following Members made statements on this matter: the United States (11 times), the Eu ropean Union (11), Angola (3), Antigua and 
Barbuda, on behalf of the OECS (3), Argentina (11), the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela 
(11), Brazil (11), Chile (3), China (11), Cuba (11), Dominica, on behalf of the OECS (4), the Dominican Republic (6), Ecuador (10), El Salvador (9), India (11), Jamaica (9), Kenya (2), 
Mexico (11), Nicaragua (10), the Plurinational State of Bolivia (9),the Russian Federation 
(8), South Africa (9), Trinidad  &Tobago (2), Uruguay (10), Vi et Nam (8) and Zimbabwe (8). 
 "United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan": 
status reports by Japan (WT/DS184/15/Add.132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 
141, 142) submitted at the DSB meetings held on 25 November 2013 (WT/DSB/M/339), 22 January 2014 (WT/DSB/M/341), 26 February 2014 (WT/DSB/M/342), 26 March 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/343), 25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344), 23 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345), 
18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346), 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348), 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349), 26 September 2014 (WT/DSB/M/350) and 20 October 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/351). In the course of the year, statements on this matter were made by the 
United States (11 times) and Japan (11). WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 8 - 
 
   "United States – Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act": status reports by the 
United States (WT/DS160/24/Add.107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117) 
submitted at the DSB meetings held on 25 November 2013 (WT/DSB/M/339), 22 January 2014 (WT/DSB/M/341), 26 February 2014 (WT/DSB/M/342), 26 March 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/343), 25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344), 23 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345), 
18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346), 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348), 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349), 26 September 2014 (WT/DSB/M/350) and 20 October 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/351).  In the course of the year, statements on this matter were made by the 
United States (11 times) and the European Union (11). 
 "European Communities – Measures Affectin g the Approval and Marketing of Biotech 
Products": status reports by the European Union (WT/DS291/37/Add.70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 
76, 77, 78, 79, 80) submitted at the DSB meetings held on 25 November 2013 (WT/DSB/M/339), 22 January 2014 (WT/DSB/M/341), 26 February 2014 (WT/DSB/M/342), 
26 March 2014 (WT/DSB/M/343), 25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344), 23 May 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/345), 18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346), 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348), 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349), 26 September 2014 (WT/DSB/M/350) and 
20 October 2014 (WT/DSB/M/351).  In the course of the year, statements on this matter 
were made by the European Union (11 times) and the United States (11). 
 "Thailand – Customs and Fiscal Measures on Cigarettes from the Philippines": status reports 
by Thailand (WT/DS371/15/Add.19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25) submitted at the DSB meetings 
held on 25 November 2013 (WT/DSB/M/339), 22 January 2014 (WT/DSB/M/341), 26 February 2014 (WT/DSB/M/342), 26 March 2014 (WT/DSB/M/343), 25 April 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/344), 23 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345) and 18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346). In 
the course of the year, statements on this matter were made by Thailand (7 times), the Philippines (7) and the United States (1).  
 "United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Shrimp from Viet Nam": status reports 
by the United States (WT/DS404/11/Add.18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28) submitted at the DSB meetings held on 25 November 2013 (WT/DSB/M/339), 
22 January 2014 (WT/DSB/M/341), 26 February 2014 (WT/DSB/M/342), 26 March 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/343), 25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344), 23 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345), 18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346), 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348), 29 August 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/349), 26 September 2014 (WT/DSB/M/350) and 20 October 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/351). In the course of the year, statements on this matter were made by the United States (11 times), Viet Nam (9), Cuba (9) and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (8). 
 "Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Re newable Energy Generation Sector/Canada – 
Measures Relating to the Feed-In Tariff Program": status reports by Canada (WT/DS412/17 
– WT/DS426/17 and Add.1, 2, 3) submitted at the DSB meetings held on 26 February 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/342), 26 March 2014 (WT/DSB/M/343), 25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344) and 23 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345). In the course of the year, statements on this matter were 
made by Canada (4 times), Japan (4), the European Union (4) and the United States (1). 
 "China – Definitive Anti-Dumping Duties on X-Ray Security Inspection Equipment from the 
European Union": a status report by Chin a (WT/DS425/9) submitted at the DSB meeting 
held on 26 February 2014 (WT/DSB/M/342). Statements on this matter were made by China 
and the European Union. 
 "China – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures on Broiler Products from 
the United States": a status report by China (WT/DS427/8) submitted at the DSB meeting 
held on 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348). Statements on this matter were made by China and the United States. WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 9 - 
 
  9  MATTERS RAISED BY MEMBERS PURS UANT TO ARTICLE 21.6 OF THE DSU 
(SURVEILLANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION) 
9.1.  The DSB considered at several meetings the implementation of the DSB recommendations 
and rulings with respect to five matters. 
 "United States – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000" (DS217; DS234): The 
European Union and Japan raised the implementation of the DSB recommendations and 
rulings in these disputes at the DSB meetings held on 25 November 2013 (WT/DSB/M/339), 
22 January 2014 (WT/DSB/M/341), 26 February 2014 (WT/DSB/M/342), 26 March 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/343), 25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344), 23 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345), 18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346), 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348), 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349), 26 September 2014 (WT/DSB/M/350) and 20 October 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/351). In the course of the year, th e following delegations made statements: the 
European Union (11 times), Japan (11), Brazil (11), Canada (11), India (11), Thailand (7) 
and the United States (11). 
 "United States – Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting 
Services" (DS285): Antigua and Barbuda raised the implementation of the DSB 
recommendations and rulings in this dispute at the DSB meetings held on 26 February 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/342), 25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344), 23 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345), 18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346) and 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349). In the course of the year, the following delegations made statements: Antiqua and Barbuda (2 times), Dominica, 
on behalf of Antigua and Barbuda (3), Dominica, on behalf of the OECS (4), Dominica, on 
behalf of CARICOM (2), Argentina (4), the Boliva rian Republic of Venezuela (5), Brazil (4), 
China (4), Chile (1), Cuba (5), the Domini can Republic (2), Grenada (1), India (4), 
Jamaica (5), Nicaragua (2), South Africa (1), Trinidad and Tobago (5) and the United States 
(5). 
 "China – Certain Measures Affecting Electr onic Payment Services" (DS413): The United 
States raised the implementation of the DSB recommendations and rulings in this dispute at 
the DSB meetings held on 25 November 2013 (WT/DSB/M/339), 22 January 2014 (WT/DSB/M/341), 26 February 2014 (WT/DSB/M/342), 26 March 2014 (WT/DSB/M/343), 
25 April 2014 (WT/DSB/M/344), 23 May 2014 (WT/DSB/M/345), 18 June 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/346), 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348), 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349), 26 September 2014 (WT/DSB/M/350) and 20 October 2014 (WT/DSB/M/351).  In the 
course of the year, the following delegations made statements: the United States (11 times) 
and China (11). 
 "Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Re newable Energy Generation Sector/Canada – 
Measures Relating to the Feed-In Tariff Program" (DS412-DS426): Japan and the European 
Union raised the implementation of the DSB re commendations and rulings in these disputes 
at the DSB meetings on 18 June 2014 (WT/DSB/M/346), 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348) and 
29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349). In the course of the year, the following delegations made 
statements: Japan (3 times), the European Union (3), Canada (3) and the United States (1). 
 "Thailand – Customs and Fiscal Measures on Cigarettes from the Philippines" (DS371): the 
Philippines raised the implementation of the DSB recommendations and rulings in this 
dispute at the DSB meetings held on 22 July 2014 (WT/DSB/M/348), 29 August 2014 (WT/DSB/M/349), 26 September 2014 (WT/DSB/M/350) and 20 October 2014 
(WT/DSB/M/351).  In the course of the year, the following delegations made statements: 
the Philippines (4 times), Thailand (4) and the United States (1). 
10  RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU (COMPLIANCE PANEL) 
10.1.  Three matters were referred by the DSB to a compliance panel pursuant to Article 21.5 of 
the DSU. 
 "United States – Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and 
Tuna Products": At its meeting on 25 November 2013, the DSB considered, for the first WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 10 - 
 
  time, a panel request pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Mexico (WT/DS381/20; 
WT/DSB/M/339). Mexico and the United States made statements. The DSB considered this 
matter, for the second time, at its meeting on 22 January 2014 and agreed, pursuant to 
Article 21.5 of the DSU, to refer to the original Panel, if possible, the matter raised by Mexico in document WT/DS381/20. It was agreed that the Panel would have standard terms 
of reference (WT/DSB/M/341). Mexico and the United States made statements. The 
following delegations reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Australia, Canada, China, the European Unio n, Guatemala, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, 
Norway and Thailand.   
 "European Communities – Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Iron or Steel 
Fasteners from China": At its meeting on 18 December 2013, the DSB considered, for the 
first time, China's panel request pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU (WT/DS397/18; 
WT/DSB/M/340) and agreed, pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU, to refer to the original Panel, if possible, the matter raised by China in document WT/DS397/18. It was agreed that 
the Panel would have standard terms of reference. China and the European Union made 
statements. The following delegations reserved third-party rights to participate in the Panel's proceedings: Japan and the United States. 
 "China – Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties on Grain Oriented Flat-Rolled Electrical 
Steel from the United States": At its meeting on 26 February 2014, the DSB considered, for the first time, the US panel request pursuant  to Article 21.5 of the DSU (WT/DS414/16; 
WT/DSB/M/342) and agreed, pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU, to refer to the original 
Panel, if possible, the matter raised by the United States in document WT/DS414/16. It was agreed that the Panel would have standard term s of reference. The United States and China 
made statements. The following delegations reserv ed third-party rights to participate in the 
Panel's proceedings: the European Union, India, Japan and the Russian Federation. 
11  OTHER MATTERS 
11.1.  The DSB also considered a variety of other matters. 
11.2.  At the DSB meeting held on 22 January 2014, the European Union raised the matter related 
to the pending proceedings in the dispute: "United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes" (DS406). The European Union, Mexico, China, Guatemala, Brazil, 
Canada, Japan, India, Indonesia and the United States made statements (WT/DSB/M/341). At the 
DSB meeting held on 26 February 2014, the European Union raised this matter again as set out in its communication (WT/DS406/15; WT/DSB/M/342). The European Union, Mexico, Canada, Japan, 
Brazil, Chinese Taipei, Norway, India, Australia, China, Argentina, Ecuador, Indonesia, Honduras 
and the United States made statements. 
11.3.   At the DSB meeting held on 26 March 2014, Panama raised the matter related to 
Venezuela's decision to break off its economic and trade relations with Panama (WT/DSB/M/343). 
Panama, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Cuba, Nicaragua and Ecuador made statements. 
11.4.   At the DSB meeting held on 26 March 2014, Australia raised the matter related to some 
systemic issues with respect to the disputes on: "Australia – Tobacco Plain Packaging" 
(WT/DSB/M/343). The following delegations made statements: Australia, Ukraine, New Zealand, Honduras, the European Union, Uruguay, Norway , Cuba, Indonesia, Canada, Japan, Zimbabwe, 
Brazil and Hong Kong, China. 
11.5.  At the DSB meeting held on 29 August 2014,  the Chairman informed delegations that the 
Director-General would make a presentation at the September DSB meeting on the current DS 
situation, and that he would brief delegations on  the steps to address the unprecedented increase 
in the number of disputes before the system (WT/DSB/M/349). At the DSB meeting held on 26 September 2014, the Director-General made a presentation regarding dispute settlement activities (WT/DSB/M/350). The following delegations made statements: Korea, Canada, Norway, 
the United States, Mexico, China, Brazil, India,  the European Union, Lesotho, South Africa, 
Ecuador, the Dominican Republic, Cuba, Japan, Argentina, Guatemala, Uganda and Hong Kong, 
China. WT/DSB/W/531 
 
- 11 - 
 
  11.6.  At the DSB meeting held on 20 October 2014, the United States raised the matter 
concerning a mutually agreed solution reached by Brazil and the United States in the dispute: 
"United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton" (WT/DS267/46; WT/DSB/M/351). The United States 
and Brazil made statements. 
11.7.  At the DSB meeting held on 20 October 2014, the United States made a statement 
regarding a mutually agreed solution reached by Indonesia and the United States in the dispute: 
"United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes" (WT/DS406/17; WT/DSB/M/351). 
12  CONCLUSION 
12.1.  This brief overview demonstrates that during the period from 25 November 2013 through 
20 October 2014, the DSB was called upon to consider a variety of significant matters and took a number of important decisions. As set out in detail in previous Sections above, the DSB agreed to 
reappoint one member of the Appellate Body, Mr. Peter Van den Bossche, for a second four-year 
term of office, starting on 12 December 2013. The DSB also agreed to appoint Mr. Shree Baboo Chekitan Servansing as a new member of the Ap pellate Body for a four-year term, starting on 
1 October 2014. It approved a total of three new nominations proposed for inclusion on the 
Indicative List of Governmental and Non-Governmental Panelists. It established 13 panels in accordance with Article 6 of the DSU. The DSB also  referred three matters to the original Panel in 
accordance with Article 21.5 of the DSU. It adopted seven Panel Reports and six Appellate Body 
Reports. As part of its surveillance function, the DSB considered status reports on implementation 
with regard to nine matters. Finally, the Director-General made a presentation to the DSB about the unprecedented high level of dispute settlement activity, and explained the actions he was 
taking in terms of budget and personnel allocations to address the situation. He also encouraged 
Members to give thought to actions they could take to respond to what he expected to be a continuing trend in WTO dispute settlement activities. 
__________