53835 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
reference. In accordance with 
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference revisions to OAC 3745–31–01 [with the exception of OAC 3745–31–01(I), (NN)(2)(b) and (c), (SSS)(1)(b), (CCCC)(2)(d) through (h), (QQQQ), (JJJJJ), and (BBBBBB)], as effective on March 20, 2017; and OAC 3745–31–03 [with the exception of OAC 3745–31– 03(B)(1)(p) and (C)(2)(c)(iii)], OAC 3745–31–05 [with the exception of OAC 3745–31–05(A)(3)(a)(ii) and (E)], OAC 
3745–31–06, OAC 3745–31–11, OAC 3745–31–13 [with the exception of OAC 3745–31–13(H)(1)(c)], and OAC 3745– 31–14, as effective on May 1, 2017. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the 
EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the person identified in the 
FOR FURTHER  
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 
preamble for more information). 
V. Statutory and Executive Order 
Reviews 
Under the CAA, the Administrator is 
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: 
•Is not a significant regulatory action 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); 
•Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; 
•Does not impose an information 
collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 
•Is certified as not having a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 
•Does not contain any unfunded 
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 
•Does not have Federalism 
implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); •Is not an economically significant 
regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 
•Is not a significant regulatory action 
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); 
•Is not subject to requirements of 
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and 
•Does not provide EPA with the 
discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 
In addition, the SIP is not approved 
to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 
Environmental protection, Air 
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 
Dated: October 11, 2018. 
Cathy Stepp, 
Regional Administrator, Region 5. 
[FR Doc. 2018–23363 Filed 10–24–18; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 
HUMAN SERVICES 
42 CFR Part 84 
[Docket No. CDC–2018–0068; NIOSH–318] 
RIN 0920–AA67 
Removal of Compliance Deadline for 
Closed-Circuit Escape Respirators 
AGENCY : Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, HHS. 
ACTION : Notice of proposed rulemaking. 
SUMMARY : With this deregulatory action, 
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposes to revise regulatory language which establishes a deadline by which respirator manufacturers must discontinue the manufacturing, labeling, and sale of certain self-contained self-rescuer models. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS, has determined that discontinuing the manufacturing, labeling, and sale of certain self-contained self-rescuer models is likely to result in a shortage of person-wearable large capacity escape respirators for underground coal miners who rely on these devices. 
DATES : Comments must be received by 
November 26, 2018. 
ADDRESSES :
Written comments: You may submit 
comments by any of the following methods: 
•Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 
www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments to the docket. 
•Mail: NIOSH Docket Office, Robert 
A. Taft Laboratories, MS–C34, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45226. 
Instructions: All submissions received 
must include the agency name (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS) and docket number (CDC–2018– 0068; NIOSH–318) or Regulation Identifier Number (0920–AA67) for this rulemaking. All relevant comments, including any personal information provided, will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov. For 
detailed instructions on submitting public comments, see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 
this document. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Rachel Weiss, Office of the Director, NIOSH; 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS:C– 48, Cincinnati, OH 45226; telephone (855) 818–1629 (this is a toll-free number); email NIOSHregs@cdc.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :
I. Public Participation 
Interested parties may participate in 
this rulemaking by submitting written views, opinions, recommendations, and data. Comments received, including attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. Do not include any information in your comment or supporting materials that you do not wish to be disclosed. You may submit comments on any topic related to this notice of proposed rulemaking. 
II. Statutory Authority 
Pursuant to the Occupational Safety 
and Health (OSH) Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Oct 24, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS53836 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
177 FR 14168. 2See Metzler R, Rehak T, Szalajda J, Berry Ann 
R, Understanding the Breathing Gas Capacities 
(Rating) of Escape Respirators for Mineworker Use, 
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2013–148, May 2013, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2013-148/ 
pdfs/2013-148.pdf. 
3See NIOSH National Personal Protective 
Technology Laboratory, Standard Testing Procedure (STP) to Conduct Man Test 4 for Closed- Circuit Escape Respirators (CCERs) to be Used in Underground Coal Mines, https://www.cdc.gov/ niosh/npptl/stps/pdfs/TEB-CCER-STP-0615- 508.pdf. 4The regulatory text, promulgated at 42 CFR 
84.301(a), reads: ‘‘The continued manufacturing, 
labeling, and sale of CCERs previously approved under subpart H is authorized for units intended to be used in mining applications with durations comparable to Cap 1 (all CCERs with a rated service time ≤20 minutes), and units intended to be used 
in mining and non-mining applications with durations comparable to Cap 3 (all CCERs with a rated service time ≥50 minutes), until 1 year after the date of the first NIOSH approval of a respirator model under each respective category specified.’’ See 80 FR 48268. 
5Joe Main, Assistant Secretary of Labor, MSHA, 
letter to John Howard, Director, NIOSH, December 14, 2016. This letter is available in NIOSH docket 285. 
6NIOSH and MSHA received a letter on 
December 12, 2016 from Ocenco Incorporated stating its opposition to extension of the January 4, 2017 deadline for the sale of subpart H-approved SCSR devices. Steven K. Berning, Ocenco Incorporated, letter to Mr. Joseph A. Main, Assistant Secretary of Labor, MSHA and [Dr.] John Howard, Director, NIOSH, December 12, 2016. 91–596), the Organic Act of 1910 (Pub. 
L. 179), and the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 842(h), 844, 957; Pub. L. 91–173), NIOSH is authorized to approve respiratory equipment used in mines and other workplaces for the protection of employees potentially exposed to hazardous breathing atmospheres. The Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) requires U.S. coal mine operators to supply NIOSH-approved respirators to miners whenever the use of respirators is required. 
III. Background 
The closed-circuit escape respirator 
(CCER), one of two types of respirator 
considered ‘‘self-contained breathing apparatus,’’ is known in the mining industry as a ‘‘self-contained self- rescuer’’ (SCSR). In order to distinguish closed-circuit devices approved under 42 CFR part 84, subpart H from those approved under subpart O, the former will be identified here as SCSRs and the latter will be identified as CCERs. The SCSR approved under subpart H and CCER approved under subpart O reflect two generations of the same respirator type used in certain industrial and other work settings during emergencies to enable users to escape from atmospheres that can be immediately dangerous to life and health. The SCSR and CCER are used by miners and other workers to escape dangerous atmospheres. 
Technical requirements for the 
approval of CCERs were promulgated in a final rule published March 8, 2012, in which HHS codified the new subpart O, intended to eventually take the place of older requirements in 42 CFR part 84, subpart H that were applicable to the SCSR closed-circuit escape respirators.
1 
The purpose of these updated requirements is to enable NIOSH and MSHA to more effectively ensure the performance, reliability, and safety of escape respirators used in underground coal mining and in other workplaces, 
such as the maritime industry, where these devices are used. The March 2012 rulemaking was conducted in response to decades of reports from the field, particularly underground coal mines, documenting user concerns about the inability to check subpart H-approved SCSRs for internal damage and the damage sustained to such devices in harsh underground environments. Furthermore, incidents in which users did not receive the expected duration of breathing air were common. The subpart H performance rating system classifies SCSRs by the duration of breathing air, and is widely known to create confusion 
among users because performance duration is highly variable, dependent on a variety of factors such as breathing rate and physiology of the user which can result in less protection time than the wearer expects. The need for the rulemaking was discussed in greater detail in the March 2012 final rule; background documents, including public comments, are available in NIOSH Docket 005. 
The subpart O CCER standards 
established a classification system based on the quantity (capacity) of oxygen available in an escape respirator. For the purpose of comparing the SCSR to the CCER, a device classified as a ‘‘10- minute’’ SCSR under subpart H may be approximately equivalent to a ‘‘Cap 1’’ unit under subpart O, delivering between 20 and 59 liters of oxygen. A ‘‘1-hour’’ SCSR under subpart H may be 
approximately equivalent to a ‘‘Cap 3’’ CCER under subpart O, delivering at least 80 liters of oxygen.
2CCERs of any 
capacity used in mining are still required to pass the subpart H ‘‘Man Test 4.’’
3This test is used to 
demonstrate that CCERs used in mining will continue to meet the criteria established by MSHA in 30 CFR part 75 by providing a minimum duration of breathing air. 
Because NIOSH determined that the 
resulting advances in CCER performance and reliability warranted accelerated adoption of the enhanced standards, manufacturers were authorized to continue to manufacture, label, and sell subpart H-approved SCSRs only until April 9, 2015. The three-year period between April 9, 2012 and April 9, 2015, was provided for manufacturers to obtain certificates of approval for CCER designs developed under the subpart O standards. Beginning on April 10, 2012, no new applications for approval of subpart H SCSRs have been accepted. 
However, manufacturers were unable 
to develop Cap 3 CCERs in time to meet this transition deadline and, as a result, NIOSH initiated a rulemaking to extend the deadline. On August 12, 2015, NIOSH issued a final rule extending the concluding date for the transition to the subpart O technical requirements to 1 
year after the date that the first approval was granted to certain CCER models.
4 
On February 10, 2016, NIOSH issued a Federal Register notice announcing the first approval of a Cap 3 CCER on January 4, 2016, issued to Ocenco Incorporated (Ocenco) of Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin. In accordance with the August 2015 final rule, respirator manufacturers were permitted to continue to manufacture, sell, and label 1-hour Subpart H-approved SCSRs until January 4, 2017. The manufacturing, sale, or labeling of such devices subsequent to this date, however, could result in NIOSH revoking, for cause, the certificate of approval under 42 CFR 84.34 or 84.43(c). The deadline extensions have contributed to the availability of new escape respirator designs which conform to the subpart O requirements, and have addressed the needs of certain broad segments of the market for such devices; however, MSHA has recently expressed concern that a market gap is imminent in the underground coal mining industry.
5 
In November 2016, the NIOSH 
National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory had a series of communications with representatives from MSHA, the underground coal mine industry, and two respirator manufacturers concerning the current supply of person-wearable escape respirators. Specifically, all but one of the manufacturers expressed concern that, without continued authorization to manufacture, label, and sell 1-hour, person-wearable SCSRs, manufacturers would be unable to fulfill the unmet needs of the underground coal mines that require the use of 1-hour person- wearable devices to satisfy MSHA regulatory requirements.
6 
MSHA regulations require that two 
‘‘approved self-rescue device or 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Oct 24, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS53837 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
730 CFR 75.1714(a), 75.1714–4. 
830 CFR 75.1714–2(b). 
930 CFR 75.1714–1(a) and (b). 
10Although the CSE respirator, the SR2000, is 
designed to be person-wearable, MSHA has asserted 
that the size and weight prevent them from being worn in underground coal mines. 
11Supra note 5. 12Scott Shearer, CSE Corporation, letter to 
Maryann D’Alessandro, Director, NIOSH National 
Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Subject: Cap 3 Closed-Circuit Escape Respirators Transition Plan, November 4, 2016. This letter is available in NIOSH docket 285. 
13See NIOSH National Personal Protective 
Technology Laboratory Certified Equipment List, https://www2a.cdc.gov/drds/cel/cel _form_ code.asp. 
14Allen Dupree, Contura Energy, letter to 
Maryann D’Alessandro, November 23, 2016, Subject: Concerns regarding SCSR Rule. This letter is available in NIOSH docket 285. 
1581 FR 95623. 1682 FR 18002. devices’’ each sufficient to provide at 
least one hour of protection be available to every person underground in a coal mine;
7at least one escape respirator of 
any size must be ‘‘worn or carried at all times by each person when underground.’’
8Mine operators are 
allowed the discretion to determine whether to require miners to carry a 1- hour respirator and cache at least one additional 1-hour respirator per miner, or carry a 10-minute respirator and cache two additional 1-hour units.
9 
MSHA and others argue that although both CSE Corporation, of Export, Pennsylvania, and Ocenco hold approvals for Cap 3 CCERs for mining, neither is effectively person-wearable.
10 
Ocenco offers an approved Cap 1 mining CCER which is person-wearable, but provides only 10 minutes of oxygen under the current approval requirements. 
According to MSHA,
11in many 
underground coal mines, miners traveling to multiple stations underground during their shift may not presently have access to caches with 1- hour respirators (as required by MSHA regulations), and therefore must be provided with a 1-hour or Cap 3 person- wearable escape respirator to be in compliance and ensure their safety. MSHA also indicates that miners may have to search for a cache of escape respirators during an emergency, and if so, the lack of a person-worn, 1-hour SCSR or Cap 3 CCER would constitute a reduction in protection since they would have less time to find a cache. Accordingly, although the newly- approved subpart O CCERs meet the higher performance requirements of the new standard, MSHA is concerned that the protection offered to miners currently wearing a subpart H-approved, 1-hour device called the ‘‘SRLD,’’ the only 1-hour, belt-wearable escape respirator currently available on the market, would be diminished if they were required to switch to a 10-minute person-wearable subpart O CCER. MSHA further asserts that data on escape respirators deployed in underground coal mines indicate that in mines that rely on 1-hour person- wearable respirators, a substantial portion of their respirator inventory was expected to reach the end of its service life in 2017 and 2018. According to MSHA, these would need to be replaced with additional belt-wearable 1-hour SRLDs since the Cap 3 CCERs approved by NIOSH that are belt or person- wearable are heavier and bulkier than their subpart H counterparts. Accordingly, MSHA asked that NIOSH extend the deadline. 
In a letter to the NIOSH National 
Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, CSE Corporation, manufacturer of the 1-hour belt- wearable SCSR model named ‘‘SRLD,’’ reported similar concerns among its mining industry customers.
12On behalf 
of its customers, CSE expressed two primary concerns: (1) ‘‘how to implement the new Cap 3 CCER technology under the current budgetary constraints,’’ and (2) ‘‘the Cap 3 CCER technology is so new that many in the mining industry have not had the opportunity to evaluate it as related to their operational needs let alone even 
see a new Cap 3 CCER.’’ CSE concluded that, ‘‘[a]s a result of these concerns, many in the mining industry have not fully issued purchase orders for either technology SCSR or Cap 3 CCER to replace the expiring SCSRs.’’ CSE received NIOSH approval for its Cap 3 mining CCER on March 28, 2016,
13and 
planned to be in full production in May 2017. CSE informed NIOSH that it had a backlog of orders for subpart H SCSRs, which it was unable to fill before the January 4, 2017 manufacturing deadline. 
Finally, a mining industry 
representative communicated with NIOSH National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory to register similar concern about the availability of the 60-minute belt-wearable CSE model SRLD.
14 
In response to the requests from 
MSHA, the mine industry, and respirator manufacturers, NIOSH announced an interim guidance document and requested public comment in a Federal Register document published on December 28, 2016.
15In a final guidance document 
published on April 14, 2017, NIOSH announced our intent not to revoke any certificate of approval for 1-hour escape respirators, approved under subpart H, that are manufactured, labeled, or sold prior to June 1, 2019, provided that no 
cause for revocation exists under NIOSH regulations.
16 
Since the publication of the guidance 
document, no new CCER approvals have been issued by the NIOSH National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory. Accordingly, NIOSH has determined that removing further restrictions on manufacturers’ abilities to manufacture, label, or sell subpart H SCSRs is necessary for the safety of underground coal miners who rely on these devices. Therefore, HHS proposes to allow the continued manufacturing, labeling, and sale of subpart H SCSRs with current certificates of approval, indefinitely. No new approvals under subpart H will be issued. 
IV. Summary of Proposed Rule 
In order to remove administrative 
barriers to an adequate market supply of 
SCSRs and CCERs, HHS proposes to make revisions to part 84, including revising §§ 84.70 and 84.301. Section 84.70 would be revised by removing paragraph (a), which was added in 2012 to limit the scope of subpart H to open- circuit escape respirators and those closed-circuit escape respirators approved under subpart H. Removing this paragraph will alleviate any confusion about the applicability of subpart H. The remainder of the section would be unchanged but for the remaining paragraphs being redesignated (a) through (d). 
Paragraph § 84.301(c) would be 
redesignated as paragraph (a) and revised to state plainly that any CCER approvals issued after April 9, 2012, the original effective date for the subpart O standards, must comply with the technical requirements of subpart O. Paragraph § 84.301(a) would be redesignated as paragraph (b) and would be revised to indicate that the manufacturing, labeling, and sale of SCSRs already holding a subpart H approval for units intended to be used in mining may continue indefinitely. Finally, paragraph § 84.301(b) would be redesignated as paragraph (c) and revised to strike the word ‘‘former,’’ to indicate that the subpart H technical requirements would still be used for maintenance of subpart H approvals. The paragraph would continue to state that major modifications to a design approved under subpart H must meet the technical requirements of subpart O and be issued a new approval accordingly. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Oct 24, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS53838 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
V. Regulatory Assessment 
Requirements 
A. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory 
Planning and Review) and Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) 
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. 
This proposed rule has been 
determined not to be a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866. The revision proposed in this notice would allow respirator manufacturers to continue the indefinite manufacturing, labeling, and sale of SCSRs approved under subpart H of 42 CFR part 84 and co-approved by MSHA pursuant to 30 CFR 75.1714–1. In accordance with current NIOSH guidance, manufacturers are currently expected to discontinue the manufacturing, labeling, and sale of subpart H SCSRs after June 2019. 
Because this proposed rule is 
intended to remove a restriction on the future sale of subpart H SCSRs, HHS expects that manufacturers holding approvals under subpart H will continue making and selling these devices without the uncertainty caused by the sunset clause in 42 CFR 84.301 and the NIOSH guidance document. Manufacturers will not be forced to stop making and selling previously approved subpart H devices, nor will they need to develop new respirators under subpart O. Mine operators will be able to choose between purchasing subpart H devices, some of which are belt-wearable, and subpart O devices, some of which are also belt-wearable but may be larger, heavier, and more expensive. 
This deregulatory action will not 
impose costs on either manufacturers or mine operators. Accordingly, HHS has not prepared an economic analysis and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed this rulemaking. 
B. Executive Order 13771 (Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs) 
Executive Order 13771 requires 
executive departments and agencies to eliminate at least two existing regulations for every new significant 
regulation that imposes costs. HHS has determined that this rulemaking is cost- neutral because it does not require any new action by stakeholders. The rulemaking ensures that mine operators who rely on subpart H respirators can continue to purchase them as needed, which is likely to be more economical than switching to the subpart O devices. Because OMB has determined that this rulemaking is not significant, pursuant to E.O. 12866, and because it is both a deregulatory action and does not impose costs, OMB has determined that this rulemaking is exempt from the requirements of E.O. 13771. Thus it has not been reviewed by OMB. 
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires each 
agency to consider the potential impact 
of its regulations on small entities 
including small businesses, small governmental units, and small not-for- profit organizations. HHS certifies that this proposed rule has ‘‘no significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small entities’’ within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
D. Paperwork Reduction Act 
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., requires an 
agency to invite public comment on, 
and to obtain OMB approval of, any regulation that requires 10 or more people to report information to the agency or to keep certain records. In accordance with section 3507(d) of the PRA, HHS has determined that the Paperwork Reduction Act does apply to information collection and recordkeeping requirements included in this rulemaking. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has already approved the information collection and recordkeeping requirements under OMB Control Number 0920–0109, Information Collection Provisions in 42 CFR part 84—Tests and Requirements for Certification and Approval of Respiratory Protective Devices (expiration date 4/30/2021). The proposed amendments in this rulemaking would not impact the collection of data. 
E. Small Business Regulatory 
Enforcement Fairness Act 
As required by Congress under the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), HHS will report the promulgation of this rule to Congress prior to its effective date. F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995 
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) directs agencies to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, and the private sector ‘‘other than to the extent that such regulations incorporate requirements specifically set forth in law.’’ For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, this proposed rule does not include any Federal mandate that may result in increased 
annual expenditures in excess of $100 million by State, local, or Tribal governments in the aggregate, or by the private sector. 
G. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice 
Reform) 
This proposed rule has been drafted 
and reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12988 and will not unduly burden the Federal court system. This rule has been reviewed carefully to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguities. 
H. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) 
HHS has reviewed this proposed rule 
in accordance with Executive Order 
13132 regarding federalism, and has determined that it does not have ‘‘federalism implications.’’ The rule would not ‘‘have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.’’ 
I. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of 
Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks) 
In accordance with Executive Order 
13045, HHS has evaluated the environmental health and safety effects of this proposed rule on children. HHS has determined that the rule would have no environmental health and safety effect on children. 
J. Executive Order 13211 (Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use) 
In accordance with Executive Order 
13211, HHS has evaluated the effects of this proposed rule on energy supply, distribution or use, and has determined that the rule would not have a significant adverse effect. 
K. Plain Writing Act of 2010 
Under Public Law 111–274 (October 
13, 2010), executive Departments and 
Agencies are required to use plain language in documents that explain to 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Oct 24, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS53839 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 207 / Thursday, October 25, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
the public how to comply with a 
requirement the Federal government administers or enforces. HHS has attempted to use plain language in promulgating the proposed rule consistent with the Federal Plain Writing Act guidelines. 
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 84 
Mine safety and health, Occupational 
safety and health, Personal protective 
equipment, Respirators. 
Proposed Rule 
For the reasons discussed in the 
preamble, the Department of Health and 
Human Services proposes to amend 42 CFR 84.70 and 84.301 as follows: 
PART 84—APPROVAL OF 
RESPIRATORY PROTECTIVE DEVICES 
■1. The authority citation for part 84 
continues to read as follows: 
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.; 30 U.S.C. 
3, 5, 7, 811, 842(h), 844. 
§ 84.70 [Amended] 
■2. Amend § 84.70 by removing 
paragraph (a) and redesignating 
paragraphs (b) through (e) as (a) through (d). 
■3. Revise § 84.301 to read as follows: 
§ 84.301 Applicability to new and 
previously approved CCERs. 
(a) Any CCER approval issued after 
April 9, 2012 must comply with the 
technical requirements of subpart O. 
(b) The continued manufacturing, 
labeling, and sale of closed-circuit apparatus previously approved under subpart H is authorized for units required for use in underground coal mines pursuant to 30 CFR 75.1714–1. 
(c) Any manufacturer-requested 
modification to a device approved under the subpart H technical requirements must comply with the subpart H technical requirements and address an identified worker safety or health concern to be granted an extension of the NIOSH approval. Major modifications to the configuration that will result in a new approval must meet and be issued approvals under the requirements of this subpart O. 
Dated: October 9, 2018. 
Alex M. Azar II, 
Secretary, Department of Health and Human 
Services. 
[FR Doc. 2018–22494 Filed 10–24–18; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration 
50 CFR Part 622 
[Docket No. 180427420–8420–01] 
RIN 0648–BH92 
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of 
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Revisions to Sea Turtle Release Gear; Amendment 49 
AGENCY : National Marine Fisheries 
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. 
ACTION : Proposed rule; request for 
comments. 
SUMMARY : NMFS proposes to implement 
management measures described in Amendment 49 to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) (Amendment 49), as prepared by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council). This proposed rule would add three new devices to the Federal regulations as options for fishermen to meet requirements for sea turtle release gear and would update the regulations to simplify and clarify the requirements for other sea turtle release gear. The new devices would provide additional options to fulfill existing requirements for carrying sea turtle release gear on board vessels with Federal Gulf commercial or charter vessel/headboat reef fish permits. This proposed rule would also modify the FMP framework procedure to allow for future changes to release gear and handling requirements for sea turtles and other protected resources. The purpose of Amendment 49 is to allow the use of new devices to safely handle and release incidentally captured sea turtles, clarify existing requirements, and streamline the process for making changes to the release devices and handling procedures for sea turtles and other protected species. 
DATES : Written comments must be 
received by November 26, 2018. 
ADDRESSES : You may submit comments 
on the proposed rule identified by ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2018–0087’’ by either of the following methods: 
•Electronic Submission: Submit all 
electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018- 0087, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. 
•Mail: Submit all written comments 
to Susan Gerhart, NMFS Southeast Regional Office, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701. 
Instructions: Comments sent by any 
other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), 
confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). 
Electronic copies of Amendment 49 
may be obtained www.regulations.gov or 
from the Southeast Regional Office website at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/ sustainable_ fisheries/gulf_ fisheries/ 
reef_ fish/index.html. Amendment 49 
includes an environmental assessment, a fishery impact statement, a regulatory impact review, and a Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Susan Gerhart, NMFS Southeast Regional Office, telephone: 727–824– 5305; email: susan.gerhart@noaa.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : NMFS and 
the Council manage the Gulf reef fish fishery under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the Council and is implemented by NMFS through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.). 
Background 
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) 
directs all Federal agencies to insure that any action they authorize, fund, or carry-out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of endangered or threatened species, or destroy or adversely modify designated critical habitat. The ESA requires that any Federal agency proposing an action that may adversely affect ESA-listed species or critical habitat formally consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or NMFS (i.e., consulting agencies). 
In February 2005, NMFS issued a 
biological opinion (2005 BiOp), in accordance with section 7 of the ESA, that evaluated the impact of the Gulf reef fish fishery on ESA-listed sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish. The 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Oct 24, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS