G/SPS/W/280  
 
19 June 2014  
(14-3591)  Page: 1/45  
Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures    
 
REVIEW OF THE OPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION 
OF THE SPS AGREEMENT 
DRAFT REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE1 
1  INTRODUCTION 
1.1.  Article 12.7 of the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures 
("the Agreement") provides that "the Committee sh all review the operation and implementation of 
this Agreement three years after the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement, and 
thereafter as the need arises". A First Review of the Agreement was completed in March 1999.2 
1.2.  At the Fourth Session of the Ministerial Conference, Ministers instructed the Committee to 
review the operation and implementation of the Agreement at least once every four years. The 
Second Review of the Agreement was completed in July 20053 and the Third Review in May 2010.4 
At its October 2013 meeting, the Committee adopted a procedure and timetable to undertake the Fourth Review of the Agreement.
5 
1.3.  In accordance with the procedures adopted by the Committee, this draft report of the Review 
is for discussion at the 8-10 July meeting of the Committee, and written comments by Members on 
this draft are to be submitted to the Secretariat by  31 July 2014. 
1.4.  As in the preceding reviews, in the Fourth Review the Committee has considered operation 
and implementation issues related to: 
 Monitoring the use of internationa l standards (Article 3.5 and 12.4); 
 Equivalence (Article 4); 
 Consistency (Article 5.5); 
 Regionalization (Article 6); 
 Transparency (Article 7 and Annex B); 
 Technical assistance and training activities (Article 9); 
 Special and differential treatment (Article 10); 
 Dispute settlement activities (Article 11); 
 Implementation of the Agreement (Articles 12.1 and 12.2) – Specific trade concerns; 
 Implementation of the Agreement (Article 12.2) – Use of ad hoc consultations; 
 Cooperation with Codex Alimentarius (Codex), International Plant Protection Convention 
(IPPC) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) (Article 12.3); 
 Good regulatory practice; and 
 SPS-related Private Standards. 
                                               
1 This document has been prepared under the Secret ariat's own responsibility and is without prejudice 
to the positions of Members or to their rights or obligations under the WTO. 
2 G/SPS/12. 
3 G/SPS/36. 
4 G/SPS/53. 
5 G/SPS/W/270 and G/SPS/W/270/Add.1. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 2 - 
 
  1.5.  In addition, in this Fourth Review the Committee also considered: 
 Risk Analysis: risk assessment (Article 5), risk management and communication; and 
 Catalogue of instruments to manage SPS issues. 
1.6.  Information presented in this document, particularly in sections 2 and 4 below, has been 
retrieved from the SPS Information Management System (SPS IMS: http://spsims.wto.org ). The 
categories of level of development and the geog raphical groupings used rely on the WTO IDB 
reference database ( idb@wto.org ). 
1.7.  Appendix A of this document provides a summary of Committee activities since the Third 
Review in 2010. Appendix B provides a list of documents submitted by Members since the last 
review of the Agreement relevant to the various issues raised in this report. Appendix C provides information about SPS-related dispute settlement activities. 
1.8.  This draft report includes possible recommendations for consideration by the Committee. 
Where no specific recommendations were put forw ard by Members, those resulting from the Third 
Review were included, without prejudging whether the Committee may wish to agree on new or 
modified recommendations. 
2  MONITORING THE USE OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS (ARTICLES 3.5 AND 12.4) 2.1.  Articles 3.5 and 12.4 of the SPS Agreement require the Committee to develop a procedure to 
monitor the process of international harmonization and the use of international standards, 
guidelines and recommendations. The Committee initially adopted a monitoring procedure in 1997, which was revised in November 2004.
6 In June 2006, the Committee decided to extend this 
procedure indefinitely, and to review its operation as  an integral part of the periodic review of the 
operation and implementation of the Agreement under Article 12.7. 
2.2.  The monitoring of the use of international standards is a standing item on the agenda of 
regular Committee meetings and, in accordance with the agreed procedure, the Committee has 
produced annual reports relating to the process of monitoring international harmonization.7 
2.3.  In October 2010, Members agreed to prioriti ze three issues for consideration under the work 
of the Committee arising from the Third Review: (i) the cooperation between the SPS Committee 
and the Three Sisters; (ii) improving the proc edure for monitoring the use of international 
standards; and (iii) control, inspection and approval procedures (Article 8 and Annex C).8 
2.4.  In June 2011, there was discussion relate d to the lack of adoption of Codex standards 
relating to ractopamine.9 Several Members were concerned that unjustified opposition to the 
adoption of a science-based international standard threatened the institutional integrity of the 
Codex. Furthermore, non-adoption of MRLs could re sult in systemic problems that jeopardized the 
Codex' role in food safety and posed a risk to the credibility of JECFA, the scientific advisory body 
of the Codex, and Codex. These Members all shared  the concerns that had been raised regarding 
the need to ensure the basic principles and processes of Codex be respected.10 At the same time, 
other Members, while recognising the importance of science in the development of international 
standards, emphasised that it was imperative to understand the role of science as part of the risk 
analysis approach. Codex, as a risk manager, had to consider a wider range of factors. These Members shared the concern that overlooking dive rgent scientific conclusions and the lack of a 
consensus on the adoption of MRLs for ractopamine would create systemic concerns and 
jeopardize the role of Codex as the leading food  safety standard-setting body. In October 2012, 
Members drew attention to Codex' adoption of specific MRLs for ractopamine, on 7 July 2012. 
                                               
6 G/SPS/11/Rev.1. 
7 G/SPS/37, G/SPS/42 and G/SPS/ 42/Corr.1, G/SPS/45, G/SPS/49, G/SPS/51 and G/SPS/51/Corr.1, 
G/SPS/54, G/SPS/56, G/SPS/59, G/SPS/GEN/1332. 
8 G/SPS/GEN/1086. 
9 G/SPS/GEN/1092 and G/SPS/56. 
10 The concern was first raised by Brazil at the October 2009 Committee meeting. The issue was raised 
again at the June 2010 Committee meeting. At the meeting of March 2011, Brazil noted the continuing failure of Codex to adopt MRLs for ractopamine. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 3 - 
 
  2.5.  At the March 2012 meeting, some Members raised a horizontal concern regarding the 
number of SPS measures that were not based on international standards, guidelines and recommendations.
11 These Members reaffirmed: (i) the need for science-based international 
guidelines, standards and recommendations; (ii) the need to support and strengthen confidence in 
SPS international standard-setting bodies; and (iii ) the need for SPS measures that resulted in a 
higher level of protection than would be achieved by measures based on the relevant international standards to be established on the basis of science. 
2.6.  In July 2012, Argentina submitted a proposal
12 to revise the monitoring procedure13 so as to 
enable the Secretariat to include, in the annual report, issues that had been raised under the agenda item on Specific Trade Concerns when these related to the non-use of international standards or the absence of existing standa rds, unless the submitting Member requested 
otherwise. While agreeing that the monitoring procedure appeared to be under-utilized, some 
Members noted that no clear problem with the proc edure had been articulated and maintained that 
it was their right to decide under which agenda item they wished to raise such problems. The 
Chairperson encouraged bilateral discu ssions among Members on the subject. 
2.7.  Also in July 2012, Brazil noted the increase in demand for scientific advice to support food 
control systems and the need for Members to ensure that adequate resources were available for 
these bodies to carry out their functions.
14 In particular, a number of Members agreed on the 
crucial role of the scientific advice bodies. 
2.8.  At the October 2012 meeting, the United States encouraged all Members to promote the use 
of international standards in their national SPS programmes and to actively participate in the on-
going work of the three standard-setting bodies recognised under the SPS Agreement, as 
international standards were critical for ensuring safe food for consumers and facilitating trade. Members also stressed the importance of in ternational standards and emphasized that 
international standard-setting bodies needed  to be inclusive to achieve harmonization.
15 
2.9.  Codex indicated that it did not have a sp ecific system of monitoring like the IPPC, but 
regularly gathered information on how Codex standards were being used, the needs of member 
countries and/or why standards were not being used in certain regions. Codex used a 
questionnaire for this monitoring process.16 
2.10.  At the October 2012 and March 2013 meetings  of the Committee, the IPPC reported on its 
Implementation Review and Support System (IRSS).17 The IRSS provides a help desk to address 
specific issues identified by members. A summa ry of the major actions, review and support 
activities completed through the IRSS can be found in G/SPS/GEN/1225. 
2.11.  In June 2013, Argentina and Chile reiter ated their proposal that the SPS Committee's 
monitoring procedure adequately reflect how in ternational standards are used by Members. 
Argentina noted that the topic of monitoring the use of international standards could be addressed in the context of the Fourth Review of the Oper ation and Implementation of the SPS Agreement. 
2.12.  In October 2013, Argentina recalled its proposal and suggested that this topic be addressed 
in the context of the Fourth Review, and in particular that it could be included in the catalogue of tools available to WTO Members for the management of SPS issues proposed by Canada.
18 
2.13.  The IPPC reported on the activities of  the Implementation Review and Support System 
(IRSS), including a general survey on the IPPC and 32 standards.19 The IPPC requested 
contracting parties to complete a survey on pest reporting and regulated pest listing as soon as 
possible, as this information would help identify ways that the IPPC Secretariat and the IRSS 
                                               
11 G/SPS/GEN/1143/Rev.2. 
12 G/SPS/W/268. 
13 G/SPS/11/Rev.1. 
14 G/SPS/GEN/1165 and G/SPS/59. 
15 G/SPS/W/269. 
16 Ibid. 
17 G/SPS/GEN/1204. 
18 G/SPS/W/271. 
19 G/SPS/GEN/1284. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 4 - 
 
  program could better assist countries to fulfil related IPPC obligations. The IRSS website and help 
desk had been launched and IPPC was seeking donors for translation of existing IRSS analyses, tools and resources, as well as donors for the second 3-year cycle of the IRSS. 
2.14.  Possible recommendations: 
 The Committee should continue to monitor the use of international standards at each of its 
regular meetings and should consider revising the procedure to monitor the use of international standards (G/SPS/11/Rev.1) to more closely correspond to the provisions of 
Article 12.4. 
 Members are encouraged to provide information regarding their experiences, or lack 
thereof, in the implementation of international standards (Articles 3.5 and 12.4). 
 Members should ensure their full implementati on of the transparency provisions of the 
SPS Agreement, and to the extent possible, follow the recommended procedures 
established by the Committee (G/SPS/7/Rev.3), in cluding those relating to the notification 
of measures conforming to international standards. 
3  EQUIVALENCE (ARTICLE 4) 
3.1.  The Committee adopted an initial decision regarding the implementation of Article 4 on 
equivalence in October 2001. This initial decision included a commitment to develop a specific 
work programme to further the implementation of Article 4, which was concluded by the adoption 
of the current version of the equivalence guidelines in July 2004
20 and the agreement that 
equivalence would be a standing agenda item for the regular meetings of the Committee. 
3.2.  In March 2011, Chile reported that it was working with the European Union on two issues 
relating to equivalence as outlined in their Plan of Action Agreement, namely with regard to 
molluscs and exports of EU packaged beef. This is  the only experience regarding equivalence that 
has been reported to the Committee. 
3.3.  In October 2011, Codex provided informatio n regarding the development of guidelines for the 
judgement of equivalence of food control system s by the Codex Committee on Food Import and 
Export Inspection and Certification Systems (CCF ICS). It was proposed that the principle of 
recognition, which provides that other systems co uld be capable of meeting the same food safety 
objectives, be included in the general guidelines for food control systems. This could be applied at the national and international levels. The Principles and Guidelines for National Food Control Systems were adopted by Codex at its 36
th session in July 2013.21 Codex guidelines already exist 
for the development of equivalence agreements regarding import and export certification and 
inspection systems and for the judgment of equivalence of sanitary measures. 
3.4.  In March 2012, IPPC indicated that it had engaged CABI to undertake a study on the 
application of the concept of equivalence in the phytosanitary area. ISPM 24, adopted in 2005, 
provides guidelines for determination and recognition of equivalence of phytosanitary measures, and ISPM 1 includes principles on equivalence. In  the case of the IPPC, equivalence is managed at 
the level of application of phytosanitary measures. These measures are applied as single 
measures, combined measures or as a package of measures in systems approaches. Most of these measures are negotiated based on agreements at bilateral or multi-lateral levels. The study seeks to provide a clearer picture of the importance and frequency of the use of this concept and 
recognition of the IPPC's application of the concept. 
3.5.  The OIE has developed guidelines for determining the equivalence of sanitary measures 
contained in Article 5.3 of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code.  
3.6.  Possible recommendations: 
 The Committee should maintain equivalence as a standing item of the agenda for its 
regular meetings. 
                                               
20 G/SPS/19/Rev.2. 
21 CAC/GL 82-2013. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 5 - 
 
   Members are encouraged to provide information regarding their experiences, or lack 
thereof, in the implementation of Article 4 an d in the use of the guidance developed by the 
Committee (G/SPS/19/Rev.2). In particular, Members are encouraged to notify any agreement reached on the recognition of equivalence in accordance with the agreed 
procedure. 
 The relevant international organizations are invited to keep the Committee informed of any 
work they undertake with regard to the recognition of equivalence. 
4  CONSISTENCY (ARTICLE 5.5) 
4.1.  Article 5.5 required the Committee to develop guidelines to further the practical 
implementation of that provision. The Committee adopted such guidelines (G/SPS/15) in July 2000, and subsequently agreed to review them as part of the periodic review of the operation 
and implementation of the SPS Agreement. To da te no Member has suggested a need to modify 
these guidelines. Although there is no standing  agenda item regarding Article 5.5, there is 
opportunity for Members to provide information re garding their experiences in this regard under 
the Agenda Item "Activities of Members". 
4.2.  Possible recommendations: 
 Members are encouraged to provide information regarding their experiences in the 
implementation of Article 5.5 and in the use of the guidelines (G/SPS/15). 
 The Committee should agree to review the guidelines in G/SPS/15 as part of the periodic 
review of the operation and implementation of the SPS Agreement, unless any Member requests a specific review of these guidelines  in the intervening period, based on specific 
proposed amendments to the existing guidelines. 
5  REGIONALIZATION (ARTICLE 6) 5.1.  Following adoption of the "Guidelines to Further the Practical Implementation of Article 6 of 
the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures", the Committee agreed 
to monitor the implementation of Article 6, on  the basis of information provided by Members 
through notifications and from information presented during SPS Committee meetings, and to 
revise the guidelines, if necessary, in light of ex perience gained through the implementation of the 
Agreement and the use of the guidelines themselv es. Three reports have been issued by the SPS 
Secretariat: the first one covering the year 2009 through the end of 2011
22; the second one 
covering the year 2012 through the first quarter of 201323; and the third one covering the period 
from 1 June 2013 until 31 March 2014.24 
5.2.  Both the IPPC and the OIE have provided guidance for countries seeking to establish, or to be 
recognized for, pest- or disease-free status. 
5.3.  The IPPC currently has several directly relevant standards: ISPM 4 on requirements for the 
establishment of pest-free areas; ISPM 10 for the establishment of pest-free places of production 
and production sites; ISPM 22 on requirements for the establishment of areas of low pest 
prevalence; ISPM 26 on the establishment of pest-f ree areas for fruit flies; and ISPM 29 on the 
recognition of pest-free areas and areas of low pest  prevalence. In addition, IPPC has a number of 
supporting standards, including guidelines for pest surveillance. 
5.4.  The IPPC concluded a study on the implementa tion by its members of their national reporting 
obligations in May 2013. The study found that WTO Members had notified to the IPPC less than 
5% of the obligatory information that they were reporting to the WTO Secretariat. This could be due to a lack of understanding, communication, resources, capacities or coordination. 
Governments should be aware that providing in formation regarding pests at the SPS Committee 
                                               
22 G/SPS/GEN/1134. 
23 G/SPS/GEN/1245. 
24 G/SPS/GEN/1333. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 6 - 
 
  meetings or through SPS notifications is not sufficient to meet their obligations under the IPPC or 
the OIE.25 
5.5.  The OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code describes the requirements for obtaining disease-free 
status including requirements for surveillance an d monitoring based on the concept of geographic 
zones. During its annual General Sessions the OIE has adopted a number of resolutions related to 
recognition of disease-free areas. In 2011 the World Assembly adopted Resolution 18, declaring that the world had achieved freedom from rinderpest. This was the first animal disease eradicated 
globally, and represents a great achievement of national Veterinary Services.
26 
5.6.  At the 80th General Session, in 2012, the OIE adopted the revised Chapter 12.1 on African 
horse sickness (AHS), and from 2013, AHS is one of the diseases for which OIE provides official disease status recognition. During the 81
st General Session, in 2013, the Assembly adopted the 
revised Chapters 14.8 and 15.2 to provide official recognition of disease-free status for peste des 
petits ruminants and swine fever. Official free status recognition by the OIE can now be granted for six diseases: foot-and-mouth disease (FMD);  African horse sickness (AHS); classical swine 
fever (CSF); contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP); peste des petits ruminants (PPR); and 
bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE).
27 
5.7.  The OIE has undertaken, in collaboration with the CBD Secretariat, to consider the 
development of guidelines on risk assessment for invasive animal species.28 Two volumes of the 
OIE Scientific and Technical Review were dedicated to the issue of invasive species (G/SPS/GEN/1043).
29 
5.8.  In June 2013 the OIE tabled a document describing the OIE BSE risk assessment process 
that had been in place since 2004.30 OIE also indicated that the latest results of the official disease 
status recognition of OIE members were available for FMD, BSE, contagious bovine pleuropneumonia and, for the first time, also for African Horse sickness.
31  
5.9.  Possible recommendations: 
 The Committee should maintain regionalization as a standing item of the agenda for its 
regular meetings. 
 Members are encouraged to provide information on their experiences in the 
implementation of Article 6, including on the use of the Guidelines adopted by the 
Committee in that regard (G/SPS/48). 
 The observer organizations are invited to keep  the Committee informed of their activities 
relevant to the recognition of pest- or disease-free areas or areas of low pest or disease 
prevalence. 
6  TRANSPARENCY (ARTICLE 7 AND ANNEX B) 
6.1.  A step-by-step procedural manual for the operation of Enquiry Points and National 
Notification Authorities was made available in February 2011, on the basis of the transparency 
procedures and notification formats contained in G/SPS/7/Rev.3. 
6.2.  Up-to-date information on SPS notifications as well as Committee documents, specific trade 
concerns and Members' National Enquiry Points and Notifications Authorities continues to be available electronically via the SPS Information Management System (SPS IMS). This facilitates the 
                                               
25 See for more information on the IPPC work documents G/SPS/GEN/1226-1247-1283 for 2013; 
G/SPS/GEN/1152-1171-1201 for 2012; G/SPS/GEN/1102- 1123 for 2011; and G/SPS/GEN/999-1028-1049 for 
2010. 
26 See for more information Annex 1 of document G/SPS/GEN/1096. 
27 The full list of countries and th eir recognised disease status fo r FMD, CBPP, BSE and AHS can be 
found in Annex 1 of document G/SPS/GEN/1255. 
28 G/SPS/GEN/1120. 
29 See for more information on the OIE work documents G/SPS/GEN/1231-1255-1277 for 2013; 
G/SPS/GEN/1141-1164-1198 for 2012; G/SPS/GEN/ 1073-1096-1120 for 2011; and G/SPS/GEN/1000-1024-
1043 for 2010. 
30 G/SPS/GEN/1256. 
31 G/SPS/GEN/1255. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 7 - 
 
  conduct of searches according to specific needs and interests (product codes, geographic groups, 
etc.) and also the preparation of reports and summaries which can be shared with interested stakeholders. 
6.3.  To further facilitate Members' management of the large volume of SPS-related information, 
the Secretariat regularly produces summary documents containing relevant SPS-related 
information, including an annual listing of all SPS documents. Links to these documents can be 
found on the SPS web page. Documents previously containing monthly summaries of notifications 
received by the Secretariat are no longer circulated as this information is easily retrievable via the 
SPS IMS. 
6.4.  At the March 2011 meeting, the Secretariat launched the SPS Notification Submission System 
(SPS NSS) which allows National Notification Authorities to fill out and submit SPS notifications 
online. The SPS NSS allows for more accurate and complete notifications, and a substantial 
reduction in the time required for the WTO to circulate them. The system was made available to Members on 1 June 2011 upon request. Interested Members are requested to send an email to the 
Secretariat so that their National Notification Authority can receive a login name and access 
passwords. As of end-February 2014, 54 Members had requested and been given access to the system, and 30 of these have officially submitted notifications via the SPS NSS. About half of SPS 
notifications are now submitted via the on-line system. 
6.5.  The Secretariat organized workshops on transparency in October 2010 and 2012 (see also 
paragraph 6.8 below). The latter was the fourth SPS workshop on transparency organized by the WTO Secretariat since 1999. The workshop was a highly interactive, "hands-on" training event 
focussing in particular on the use of the SPS IM S and SPS NSS, as well as sharing of national 
experiences thereof. This training was complemented by information from Codex, IPPC and OIE ("Three Sisters") on their online tools. 
6.6.  The main recommendations from the October 2012 workshop involved the following issues: 
suggestions for technical and substantial changes to the SPS IMS and SPS NSS; and the need to 
provide LDCs with training in the use of the SP S NSS. Budgetary approval has just been granted 
for a project to improve the two systems. Training  to LDCs and other developing country Members 
has become a regular component of technical assistance activities. In addition, the WTO Secretariat has provided demonstration sessions on the SPS IMS and the SPS NSS during the SPS Committee meetings and responded to ad hoc requests from Members and other interested parties 
for assistance. 
6.7.  The Secretariat continues to provide annual updates on the level of implementation of the 
transparency provisions of the SPS Agreement; the latest revision to the background note, 
G/SPS/GEN/804/Rev.6, was issued in October 2013. The development of the SPS IMS facilitates 
the compilation and analysis of data related to th e implementation of the transparency provisions. 
Furthermore, Members' implementation of the re commendations on transparency, as provided for 
in G/SPS/7/Rev.3, should result in substantially enhanced information. 
6.8.  Managing information on transparency rema ins, however, challenging for many developing 
country Members and many have flagged their need for assistance and support to resolve their individual transparency difficulties, for example with the process of sending notifications to the 
WTO. Other difficulties faced by developing country Members relate to the operation of their SPS 
National Notification Authority and their National Enquiry Point(s). 
6.9.  As of end-February 2014, Members had submitted 11,079 regular notifications and 
1,531 emergency notifications (plus related addenda and corrigenda). The Committee has also 
adopted a special format and recommended procedures  for the notification of determination of the 
recognition of equivalence of sanitary or phytosanitary measures, now included in the 
transparency procedures. Furthermore, the Secretariat has established a mechanism for Members 
to inform each other of the availability of translat ions of notified measures into one of the official 
languages of the WTO. These are submitted in the form of supplemental notifications. As of end-
February 2014, two equivalence and 17 supplem ental notifications had been circulated. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 8 - 
 
  6.10.  Out of the 159 WTO Members, 110 (69%) ha d submitted at least one notification to the 
WTO. Members which had not submitted any notification included 19 developing countries and 21 LDCs, as well as a number of EC member States.
32 
6.11.  As can be seen in Chart 7, the share of  notifications submitted by developing country 
Members (excluding LDCs) reaches 51% while the share of those submitted by developed country 
Members is 48%, reflecting the steady increase in notifications from developing country Members over the years. A very small share comes from LDCs. 
Chart 1 – Development status of noti fying Members as of 28 February 2014 
48%
51%1%
Developed Developing Least-developed
 
 
6.12.  Looking at the geographic regions from whic h the notifications originate, Chart 8 shows that 
the majority of notifications come from North America, followed by Asia, and then South and Central America and the Caribbean.
33 
                                               
32 See G/SPS/GEN/456 for notification procedures for the European Communities and its member 
States. 
33 The geographical groupings used rely on WTO working definitions as identified in the Integrated 
Database (IDB) for analytical purposes. The same gr oupings are used in the WTO Annual Reports. North 
America (NA) here, as well as in Chart 2, in cludes Canada, Mexico and the United States. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 9 - 
 
  Chart 2 – Notifications by geographic al region as of 28 February 2014 
NA
SA, CA and the 
Caribbean
Europe
CISAfricaMiddle EastAsia
0100020003000400050006000Notifications by Geographical Region
 
 
6.13.  Under the SPS Agreement, Members are requir ed to notify both an Enquiry Point to provide 
answers to all reasonable questions from interest ed Members and a National Notification Authority 
to implement the notification procedures de tailed in the Agreement. Among the 159 WTO 
Members, 151 Members have, as of February 2014, designated a "Notification Authority". Those which had not yet done so include four LDCs and four developing country Members. Of the 159 WTO Members, 154 had provided the WTO with the contact information of their Enquiry 
Point(s). Those which had not done so included four LDCs and one developing country. The 
updated lists containing the contact information of National Enquiry Points and of National Notification Authorities are available from the SPS IMS. 
6.14.  At each meeting, Members are invited to ra ise any questions or concerns with regard to the 
implementation of the transparency provisions of  the Agreement. Contributions made by Members 
since 2010 are listed in Appendix A. 
6.15.  Transparency regarding SPS measures and po licies is also provided by Members reporting 
on relevant activities and developments under the agenda item "Information from Members". Members frequently use this opportunity to present information on new regulatory policies, risk assessment practices, establishment of national SPS coordinating committees, etc. The standard-
setting observer organizations also provide relevant information under this agenda item, further 
enhancing transparency. 
6.16.  In the context of the Fourth Review, the European Union, Chile, Morocco and Norway made 
submissions related to transparency.
34 At the March 2014 meeting, the European Union noted that 
with the rapidly growing number of SPS notifications, it was crucial that the information provided be clear, complete, reliable and timely. It proposed that the recommended procedures be 
reviewed, with a view to improve such matters  as: (i) the quality and completeness of the 
information provided in the notification; (ii) the timeliness of the publication of regular and emergency notifications; (iii) interactions with trading partners; and (iv) access to all measures adopted and proposed by a Memb er. Many Members recognized the importance of transparency 
and supported the proposal, and one Member suggeste d that it was also important to identify the 
problems encountered by countries and further improve technical assistance in this area. 
6.17.  The Secretariat recalled that the Committee had agreed to hold a transparency workshop 
every three years and that the next one would ta ke place in 2015. This was an opportunity to 
ensure the participation of a large number of national notification authorities to discuss and agree 
                                               
34 EU's general communication, G/SPS/W/274, and the joint submission by Chile, the European Union, 
Morocco and Norway, G/SPS/W/277. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 10 - 
 
  on changes to notification formats and templates. The Secretariat also reported that a project to 
revise and modernize the SPS NSS and SPS IMS tool s had been approved and would start in 2014.  
6.18.  Chile, the European Union, Morocco and No rway agreed to draft a proposal highlighting 
specific modifications to the recommended procedures35, for further consideration by the 
Committee. In their proposals for actions, circulated as G/SPS/W/278, dated 26 May 2014, they 
suggest that such actions take two forms: (i) Specific proposals for modifications in the Recommended Procedures for implementing the Transparency Obligations of the SPS Agreement 
(Article 7); and (ii) Recommendations to the SPS Secretariat to consider when revising and 
modernizing the SPS Information Management System  and (SPS IMS) and Notification Submission 
System (SPS NSS). 
6.19.  Possible Recommendations: 
 The Committee should maintain transparency as  a standing item of the agenda for its 
regular meetings. 
 Members should ensure their full implementation  of the transparency provisions of the SPS 
Agreement, and to the extent possible, follow the recommended procedures established by 
the Committee in G/SPS/7/Rev.3. 
 Developing country Members should clearly id entify specific problems they face in 
implementing the transparency provisions of the Agreement. Assistance should be 
provided to least-developed and developing country Members, and to their National Notification Authority and Enquiry Points as required, in order to enable them to fully implement the transparency provisions and to make use of the benefits associated with 
transparency. 
 Recognizing that the recommended procedures established by the Committee 
(G/SPS/7/Rev.3), while not creating legal obligations, can facilitate Members’ 
implementation of the provisions of the SP S Agreement, the Committee should consider:  
o Specific proposals for modifications in the Recommended Procedures for implementing 
the Transparency Obligations of the SPS Agreement (Article 7); and  
o Recommendations to the SPS Secretariat to  take into account when revising and 
modernizing the SPS Information Management System and (SPS IMS) and Notification Submission System (SPS NSS). 
 The Committee welcomes the approved project to revise and modernize the SPS NSS and 
SPS IMS tools and encourages Members to make use of these tools wherever possible. 
7  TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND TRAINING ACTIVITIES (ARTICLE 9) 7.1.  Technical assistance is a standing agen da item. At each regular meeting, Members and 
Observers are invited to identify any specific technical assistance needs which they may have, 
and/or to report on any SPS-related capacity bu ilding activities in which they are involved.
36 
7.2.  A number of Members have used the occasion of the SPS Committee meetings to comment 
on particular projects or activities that have enhanced their capacity to implement and benefit 
from the SPS Agreement. Some Members provide periodic updates regarding their SPS-related 
technical assistance activities, in particular Australia, Canada the European Union and the United States. Others provide such information on an ad hoc basis. 
7.3.  The WTO Secretariat, as well as observer organizations, also regularly report on their 
assistance activities. WTO's technical assistance activities in the SPS area contribute towards the strengthening of the capacities of developing country Members in meeting standards for market 
access of food and other agricultural commodities. The activities increase participants' awareness 
about rights and obligations under the SPS Agreement and its implications at the national level. In the organization of SPS technical assistance activities, the levels of familiarity with the Agreement 
and advancement in its implementation are take n into consideration to meet and respond to 
individual country/regional needs. The programmes of national/regional activities include 
                                               
35 G/SPS/7/Rev.3. 
36 Contributions made by Members since 2010 are listed in Appendix B, tables C.1 and C.2. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 11 - 
 
  presentations on the transparency obligations, dispute settlement, implementation problems, 
specific trade concerns and technical/scientific issues such as risk analysis and equivalence, as well as the work undertaken by the Three Sisters. 
7.4.  A three-week advanced course on the app lication of the SPS Agreement provides in-depth 
and "hands-on" SPS training, where at the end of the course participants must elaborate an 
"action plan" to address identified SPS needs in th eir countries. Progress on the implementation of 
the action plans is then monitored through peri odic reporting and is presented at the ten-day 
Course follow-up session the subsequent year. The Se cretariat also offers an E-Learning Course on 
the SPS Agreement.
37 
7.5.  Since 2010, Members have been informed at the beginning of each year of all SPS-related 
planned technical assistance activities and interested officials are invited to submit applications for 
specific events. The latest revision of G/SPS/ GEN/997 contains all the detailed information on 
eligibility criteria, deadlines, funding, pre-requis ites and application processes. In 2013, an online 
application form38 was used for the first time to solicit applications for SPS technical assistance 
activities. 
7.6.  The Secretariat has developed a number of tools to assist Members with the understanding 
and implementation of the Agreement. In part icular, a booklet discussing the text of the 
SPS Agreement was published under the WTO Agreements Series (Volume No. 4). The Secretariat 
has also issued a Procedural Step-by-Step Manua l for SPS National Notification Authorities and 
SPS National Enquiry Points to facilitate the implementation of the transparency provisions of the SPS Agreement. 
7.7.  In October 2010 and 2012, the Committee held special workshops on the transparency 
provisions of the SPS Agreement. The participation of officials from Members' SPS Enquiry Points and Notification Authorities was particularly encouraged in these training workshops. The objective 
of the 2010 workshop was to enhance the implem entation and benefits of the transparency 
provisions, in particular by sharing experience s on how to operate an effective SPS National 
Notification Authority and Enquiry Point. Many of the presentations from this workshop highlighted 
the importance of internal coordination within and across the public and private sector. The 2012 
workshop was a highly interactive, "hands-on" training event focusing on the use of the SPS Information Management System (SPS IMS) and on the system for the on-line submission of SPS notifications (SPS NSS). The workshop benefi tted from presentations by government officials 
on their national experiences with submitting SP S notifications through the SPS NSS. Codex, IPPC 
and OIE also provided information on their on line tools. Summary reports of the 2010 and 2012 
workshops were circulated as G/SPS/R/60 and G/SPS/R/68, respectively. 
7.8.  In October 2011, the Secretariat organized a workshop entitled "SPS Coordination at National 
and Regional Levels". This workshop was held in response to a recommendation adopted at the 
October 2009 workshop on the Relationship between the SPS Committee and the Three Sisters
39, 
that the SPS Committee identify ways to improve coordination at a national level among the 
relevant representatives of the Three Sisters and SP S representatives, and Japan's proposal in this 
regard.40 In October 2013, the Secretariat held a workshop entitled "SPS-related Market Access 
Challenges and Opportunities", which brought toge ther officials, selected from among former 
participants to the Advanced SPS Course, for an in -depth session focusing on specific SPS-related 
challenges faced by Members in their agricultur al exports and how these had been addressed. 
Several former participants of the Advanced SPS Course and other invited speakers presented 
experiences in gaining and maintaining market acce ss. The role of government, public and private 
sector collaboration and technical cooperation in enhancing SPS-related market access was also highlighted in the presentations. The IPPC and OIE presented the technical aspects of enabling 
market access and a new IPPC manual "Market Access: A guide to phytosanitary issues for 
national plant protection organizations" was introduced. A summary report of the workshop was circulated as G/SPS/R/72. 
                                               
37 More information on these training tools an d material is available on the SPS webpage 
(http://www.wto.org/sps ).  
38 This application form is accessible via a web link, which is included in the latest version of 
G/SPS/GEN/997. 
39 G/SPS/R/57. 
40 G/SPS/W/251. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 12 - 
 
  7.9.  The Secretariat reports annually on all SPS-related technical assistance activities provided by 
the WTO Secretariat since September 1994 (G/SPS/GEN/521 revisions). 
7.10.  For the period 1994 to 2013, the WTO Secretariat had undertaken a total of 288 technical 
assistance activities on the SPS Agreement, including 84 regional (or sub-regional) and 
127 national seminars. Table 1 provides inform ation about the number of sub-regional and 
national activities per year since the last review  of the operation and implementation of the SPS 
Agreement in 2010. Table 2 shows the overall number of activities per region since 1994. 
Table 1: Number of SPS tec hnical assistance activities 
Year Type of Activity 
Total National 
Seminar (Sub)Regional 
Workshop Other 
2010 11 3 3 17 
2011 10 4 6 20 
2012 14 4 7 25 
2013 7 3 9 19 
Total 42 14 25 81 
 
Table 2: SPS technical assistance activities per region (1994-2013) 
Region Type of Activity 
Total National 
Seminar (Sub)Regional 
Workshop Other 
Africa 41 28 13 82 
Arab and Middle East Countries 14 8 4 26 
Asia and the Pacific 30 15 17 62 
Central and Eastern Europe 
and Central Asia 10 7 5 22 
Europe 1 3 7 11 
Latin America and the 
Caribbean 31 23 8 62 
North America - - 1 1 
Global - - 2241 22 
Total 127 84 77 288 
 
The Standards and Trade De velopment Facility (STDF) 
7.11.  The Standards and Trade Development Facility (STDF) was established in 2002 following the 
commitment made by the Heads of the FAO, the OIE, WHO, the WTO and the World Bank at the 
Doha Ministerial Conference to explore new tec hnical and financial mechanisms to promote the 
efficient use of resources in SPS-related activities. Other organizations involved in SPS-related technical cooperation, donors contributing funds to the STDF and selected developing country experts participate actively in the Facility's wo rk. The STDF is managed and housed by the WTO, 
and has reported to Members on its activities and projects in each SPS Committee meeting. The 
STDF supports developing countries in building capacity to implement international SPS standards, guidelines and recommendations as a means to improve their human, animal and plant health 
status and ability to gain and maintain access to markets. In doing so, it contributes to sustainable 
economic growth, poverty reduction, food securi ty and environmental protection in developing 
countries. More specifically, the STDF increase s awareness, mobilizes resources, strengthens 
collaboration and identifies and disseminates good practice to enhance the effectiveness of SPS 
assistance. The STDF also provides support to beneficiaries on issues related to SPS project                                                
41 This category also includes the Advanced SPS Course. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 13 - 
 
  development and finances the development and implementation of projects that promote 
compliance with international SPS requirements.42  
7.12.  As part of its coordination function, the STDF has undertaken work and organized a series of 
events that provided information and assistance to Members on several cross-cutting thematic SPS 
capacity building issues. In 2009, the STDF prod uced a film: "Trading Safely: protecting health, 
promoting development", which, to date, continues to be widely distributed and used by STDF partners, donors, beneficiaries and other organizations in awareness raising and training activities. 
In 2011, the STDF produced Arabic, Chinese and Russian versions of this film.
43 
7.13.  In 2010, the STDF organized an international workshop on public-private partnerships 
(PPPs) to build SPS capacity, in The Hague, the Netherlands, followed by the release of a joint 
STDF/IDB publication on this topic in 2012. The paper analyses the emergence, operation and 
performance of selected SPS-related partnerships  between government agencies responsible for 
food safety, animal and plant health and/or trade and the private sector. It raises awareness about the potential value and role of PPPs in enhancing SPS capacity and provides practical guidance to 
facilitate and promote PPPs for SPS capacity development. In July 2013, the STDF organized a 
side-event on this topic during the Fourth Global Review of Aid for Trade.
44 
7.14.  In October 2009, on the margins of the SPS Committee meeting, the STDF organized a 
workshop on the use of economic analysis to inform SPS decision-making. Building on the 
recommendations of this event, the STDF has su pported the development of a decision-support 
tool, based on Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), to help developing countries prioritize investments needed to strengthen SPS capacity for market access. The tool, which has been 
applied in several countries
45, helps to: (i) enhance the economic efficiency of SPS resource 
allocation decisions so that scarce resources are allocated in a manner that best meets a country's economic development, poverty alleviation, public health and/or other objectives; (ii) promote 
more transparent and accountable choices between multiple investment options; and (iii) facilitate 
dialogue and coordination among public and priv ate sector SPS stakeholders and encourage more 
inclusive decision-making processes. The STDF ai ms to revise and fina lize this tool in 2014.
46 
7.15.  Two publications were issued on the role  and functioning of regional and national SPS 
coordination mechanisms in Africa.47 Conclusions and recommendations, including the 
identification of concrete ways to enhance their operation and effectiveness, were presented at a WTO workshop on this topic in 2011. Both papers illustrated that strengthening coordination 
among relevant government institutions at the national and sub-national level, and with the 
private sector, reduces information gaps, promotes synergies in the implementation of SPS measures and enhances the effectiveness of available resources. Participants recommended, inter 
alia, that the Committee consider the development of guidelines on national SPS coordination 
and/or a manual of good practices on SPS coordination. The papers and the subsequent briefing note on enhancing SPS coordination at the country level may provide useful input and guidance if 
the Committee were to decide to undertake additional work in this area. 
7.16.  In 2012, on the margins of the Committee meeting, the STDF organized a seminar on 
International Trade and Invasive Alien Species (IAS), which considered the mutually supportive objectives of the SPS Agreement and the Convention  on Biological Diversity (CBD). Participants 
agreed on the contribution of effective SPS control systems to help protect against the entry, 
establishment and spread of harmful species, including pests, diseases and other IAS. A publication on this topic, released in 2013 in collaboration with the IPPC and the OIE, reviews 
and analyses key concepts and principles relevant to IAS and international trade in the context of 
                                               
42 More information on the STDF and its activities, in cluding projects and project preparation grants, is 
available on the STDF website ( http://www.standardsfacility.org ). Members can also subscribe to the STDF 
mailing list to receive news  on relevant activities 
(http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news13_e/sps_29nov13_e.htm ). 
43 See http://www.standardsfa cility.org/IRVideos.html. 
44 See for more information: http://www.standardsfacility.org/en/TAPPP.htm  as well as 
http://www.standardsfacility.org/en/TAAidForTrade.htm . 
45 Including Belize, Mozambique, Viet Nam and Zambia. In addition, the tool was used in Ethiopia, 
Malawi, Rwanda and Uganda  with support from th e Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa 
(COMESA) and the United States De partment for Agriculture (USDA). 
46 See for more information: http://www.standardsfacility.org/en/TAEcoAnalysis.htm . 
47 See for the publications: http://www.standardsfacili ty.org/en/IROthers.htm . G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 14 - 
 
  the SPS Agreement and the CBD, and in relation to  the IPPC and OIE (i.e. the relevant standard-
setting bodies under the SPS Agreement). It also considers various initiatives to enhance capacities for managing the entry and spread of IAS (including plant pests and animal diseases), 
reviews common challenges and good practices, and makes a number of targeted 
recommendations. 
7.17.  In 2012, the STDF initiated work on the im plementation of SPS measures in the context of 
trade facilitation. This work seeks to identify, analyse and foster dialogue on experiences, lessons 
and good practices to improve the implementation of SPS controls in a way that facilitates safe 
trade. The objectives are to: (i) raise awarene ss about the synergies between the implementation 
of SPS measures and trade facilitation; (ii) identify key needs, opportunities and good practices to improve the implementation of SPS measures in a way that ensures the appropriate level of health 
protection while minimizing trade transaction costs; and (iii) make recommendations to enhance 
future work and technical cooperation focused on SPS capacity building and trade facilitation. As part of this work, in 2013-14, the STDF carried out research in selected countries in Southeast 
Asia and Africa (in collaboration with TradeM ark Southern Africa) on how SPS measures are 
implemented in practice for specific product groups  based on the provisions of the SPS Agreement. 
Relevant government agencies and the private sector collaborated in this research. Parallel 
research was carried out in Latin America by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB).The 
preliminary findings of this work were presented in a half-day seminar on 26 March 2014, on the margins of the Committee meeting.
48 
7.18.  An independent review of the Facility recently judged that "the results are impressive and a 
testament to the effective operation of the STDF" and praised the STDF's role in coordinating 
assistance projects as "significant value added".49 
7.19.  Possible recommendations: 
 The Committee should maintain technical assistan ce as a standing item of the agenda of 
its regular meetings. 
 Members requiring technical assistance are encour aged to identify their specific needs in a 
clear and detailed manner that will permit these needs to be effectively addressed. 
 Members providing technical assistance are encouraged to keep the Committee informed 
of specific programmes of assistance, including hard or soft infrastructure developments or any other technical assistance approaches. 
 Members are encouraged to report on the effe ctiveness of the technical assistance they 
have received to assist them in complying with international and official standards. 
 Members are invited to share information on their experiences regarding the use of the 
tools developed by the Secretariat to assist Members with the understanding and 
implementation of the SPS Agreement. 
 The Secretariat is requested to keep the Committee informed of its relevant technical 
assistance activities and of the activities of the STDF. 
 The observer organizations are invited to keep the Committee informed of their capacity 
building activities relevant to the SPS Agreement. 
8  SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT (ARTICLE 10) 
8.1.  Special and differential treatment continues to be a standing agenda item, although no 
Member has raised any specific matter under th is agenda subsequent to the Third Review. The 
Secretariat has kept the SPS Committee informed  of discussions in the Committee on Trade and 
Development Special Session on proposals relating to Articles 10.2 and 10.3 of the SPS 
Agreement. 
8.2.  In the context of the Fourth Review , during its March 2014 meeting, the Committee 
considered South Africa's proposal on risk assessment and the appropriate level of protection.
50 
                                               
48 See for more information: http://www.standardsfacility.org/en/TATradeFacilitation.htm . 
49 See for further information: http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news13_e/sps_29nov13_e.htm . 
50 G/SPS/GEN/1307. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 15 - 
 
  South Africa suggested that its proposal, whic h consisted of two questions related with the 
implementation of Article 5.4 of the SPS Agreem ent, could be addressed in the context of the 
workshop on risk analysis to  be held in October 2014 
8.3.  Several Members supported South Africa's proposal and the suggestion to discuss the issue 
of minimizing negative trade effects in the ri sk assessment process. Furthermore, one Member 
proposed that the issue of special and differential treatment should also be taken into account when establishing the ALOP.   
8.4.  Possible recommendations: 
 The Committee should maintain special and differential treatment as a standing item of the 
agenda for its regular meetings. 
 The Committee should continue to consider specific, concrete actions to address the 
problems faced by developing country Members and, in particular, least-developed country 
Members, in the implementation of the SPS Agreement and in making use of the benefits of the Agreement. 
 Members are encouraged to provide informat ion regarding the special and differential 
treatment or technical assistance they have provided in response to specific needs identified by Members in accordance with the procedure adopted by the Committee 
(G/SPS/33/Rev.1), to be periodically compiled in a report by the Secretariat. 
 The Committee agrees to consider South Africa's proposal in the workshop on risk analysis 
to be held in October 2014. 
9  DISPUTE SETTLEMENT 
9.1.  Article 11 of the SPS Agreement indicates that the Dispute Settlement Understanding applies 
to SPS disputes, and provides for the consultation of experts when a dispute involves scientific or 
technical issues. As of end-February 2014, more than 470 disputes had formally been raised under 
the WTO's dispute settlement system. Of these, 40  alleged violation of the SPS Agreement, and 
the SPS Agreement was relevant also in two other disputes. 24 resulted in the establishment of a 
dispute settlement panel. These panels were established to look at 15 different SPS issues, listed 
below. Subsequent to the Third Review, action has occurred on the DS367 and on the last four 
disputes, as further detailed in Appendix C
51: 
a. Canada and the United States' complaint against Australia's measures affecting the 
importation of salmon (DS18 and DS21); 
b. Canada and the United States' complaint against the European Communities' measures 
concerning meat and meat products (ban on meat treated with growth-promoting 
hormones, DS26 and DS48); 
c. The United States' complaint against Japan's measures affecting agricultural products 
(requirement to test different  fruit varieties with regard to treatment efficacy, DS76); 
d. Ecuador's complaint against Turkey's import procedures for fresh fruit (DS237); 
e. The United States' complaint against Japan's measures affecting the importation of 
apples (restrictions due to fire blight concerns, DS245); 
f. The Philippines' complaint against Australia's measures affecting the importation of fresh 
fruit and vegetables (DS270); 
g. The European Communities' complaint against Australia's quarantine procedures 
(DS287); 
h. Argentina, Canada and the United States' complaint against EC measures affecting the 
approval and marketing of biotech products (DS291-293); 
                                               
51 Please note that in four disput es, the panels (and the Appellate Body) made findings principally under 
the TBT Agreement. These cases concerned Canada's co mplaint against the European Communities' ban on 
asbestos and products containing as bestos, Canada and Mexico's complain t against the United States' country 
of origin (COOL) labelling requirements, and Indonesia's complaint against the United States' ban on clove cigarettes. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 16 - 
 
  i. The European Communities' complaint against Canada and the United States regarding 
their continued suspension of obligations re lating to the EC-Hormones dispute (DS320); 
j. New Zealand's complaint against Australia's measures affecting the importation of apples 
(restrictions due to concerns related to fire blight and two other plant pests, DS367); 
k. The United States' complaint against the European Communities' measures affecting 
poultry meat and poultry meat products (DS389); 
l. China's complaint against the United States' measures affecting imports of poultry 
(DS392); 
m. Canada's complaint against Korea's restrictions on bovine meat and meat products 
(DS391); 
n. The United States' complaint against India's measures concerning the importation of 
certain agricultural products (due to concerns about avian influenza; panel proceedings 
on-going, DS430); and 
o. Argentina's complaint against the United States' measures affecting the importation of 
animals, meat and other animal products (due to concerns about foot-and-mouth 
disease; panel proceedings on-going, DS447). 
10  IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AGREEMENT – SPECIFIC TRADE CONCERNS 
10.1.  Part of each Committee meeting is devoted to the consideration of specific trade concerns 
raised by Members. At the March 2000 meeting of the SPS Committee, the Secretariat was requested to prepare a paper summarizing the specific trade concerns that had been brought to the Committee's attention since 1995 and to update this document annually to include new 
information provided by Members. The statistics below are derived from the fourteenth revision of 
G/SPS/GEN/204
52, and include all issues which have been raised at SPS Committee meetings 
through to the end of 2013. 
10.2.  Altogether, 368 specific trade concerns  were raised between 1995 and the end of 2013.53 
Chart 1 shows the number of new concerns raised each year; about 20 new concerns have been raised annually since 2010. Chart 2 categorizes the trade concerns raised since 2010 into food 
safety, animal or plant health issues. It is important to keep in mind, however, that some issues 
may relate to more than one of these categories. Concerns relating to zoonoses, for example, may 
relate to measures taken with both animal health  and food safety objectives. For the purposes of 
these graphs, a single objective has been designated as the principal concern, however all relevant 
keywords have been assigned for purposes of electronic searches of the data on specific trade 
concerns. Since 2010, 45% of trade concerns raised relate to food safety, 17% relate to plant health, and 6% concern other issues such as certification requirements or translation. 32% of 
concerns raised relate to animal health and zoonoses. The animal health and zoonoses category is 
further divided into foot-and-mouth disease (FMD ), transmissible spongiform encephalopathies 
(TSEs), avian influenza (AI) and other animal health concerns (OAH). Chart 3 shows that TSEs 
account for 24% of animal health concerns raised since 2010, and issues related to FMD also 
account for 24%. The remaining 52% relate to OAH concerns and AI. 
10.3.  In the 2010 Review, the Committee encouraged Members to make use of the Committee's 
meetings to share, on an ad hoc basis, in formation regarding their experiences in the 
implementation of Article 13. Members were reminded that specific problems relating to the 
implementation of Article 13 may be raised as specific trade concerns. 
                                               
52 G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.14 was circulated to Members on 4 March 2014. 
53 Information relevant to this se ction, but which precedes the peri od under review, can be found in 
former revisions of do cument G/SPS/GEN/204. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 17 - 
 
  Chart 3 – Number of new issues raised 
2112423
13
102942
29
2131
1016 16
1322
16 1624
051015202530354045
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
 
Chart 4 – Trade concerns since 2010, by subject 
Animal Health
32%
Food Safety
45%Plant Health
17%Other
6%
 
 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 18 - 
 
  Chart 5 –Trade concerns since 2010, re lated to animal health and zoonoses 
TSE
24%
FMD
24%
AI
8%OAH
44%
 
 
10.4.  Developing country Members have been participating actively under this agenda item in the 
SPS Committee meetings. Chart 4 indicates that over the last four years, developing country 
Members have raised 56 trade concerns (on many occasions more than one Member has raised, 
supported or maintained an issue) compared to 28 raised by developed country Members and one raised by a least-developed country Member. A developing country Member has supported another 
Member raising an issue in 54 cases, compared to 34 for developed country Members and two for 
least-developed country Members. In 35 cases, the measure at issue was maintained by a developed country Member, and in 40 cases it wa s maintained by a developing country Member. 
Only one trade concern regarding measures maintained by least-developed country Members has 
been raised. Chart 5 shows the number of new issues raised since 2010 by each category of 
Member.
54 
Chart 6 – Participation by WTO  Members (2010-2013) 
353428
405456
121
0 2 04 06 0Members Maintaining the
Measure in QuestionSupporting MembersMembers Raising the IssueNumber of Members
Least-Developed Countries Developing Countries Developed Countries
 
                                               
54 As any individual trade concern can potentially be raised by more than one Member, this explains the 
apparent double-counting shown in Charts 4 and 5 comp ared with the overall count of the 78 specific trade 
concerns raised since 2010. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 19 - 
 
  Chart 7 – Number of new issues raised by Members since 2010 
578818
12
1016
1
02468101214161820Number of Issues
Developed countries Developing countries Least-Developed Countries
 
 
10.5.  Members are regularly invited to report on resolved issues without delay. Chart 6 indicates 
that 141 trade concerns have been reported as resolved out of the 368 trade concerns raised over 
the 18 years. 62 issues were reported as reso lved between 2010 and 2013, 40 of these in 2013 
alone. 13 trade concerns were reported as partia lly solved during the period under review. In 
these instances, trade may have been allowed for selected products or by some of the importing 
Members maintaining the measure in question. No solutions have been reported for the remaining 196 trade concerns. It is also likely that other concerns have been resolved without the Committee 
being made aware of these developments. 
Chart 8 – Solved trade concerns 
196
141
31
050100150200250
No solution reported Solution reported Partial solution reportedNumber of Issues
Status
 
 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 20 - 
 
  10.6.  Possible recommendations: 
 The Committee should continue to consider specific trade concerns raised by Members as a 
standing item of the agenda of its regular meetings. 
 Members are encouraged to make use of this opportunity to identify specific trade 
problems and to seek to find expeditious an d mutually satisfactory resolutions of these 
problems. 
 Members are encouraged to inform the Committee of all specific trade concerns resolved. 
 The Secretariat is requested to continue to provide regularly updated information on the 
specific trade concerns considered by the Committee. 
11  IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AGREEMENT – USE OF AD HOC CONSULTATIONS 11.1.  Article 12.2 states that the Committee "shall encourage and facilitate ad hoc consultations 
or negotiations among Members on specific sanitary or phytosanitary issues". In each of the 
previous reviews, the Committee has recognized the usefulness of Article 12.2, and in particular of 
the good offices of the Chairperson, as a means of  facilitating the resolution of trade problems.
55 
11.2.  Following the Committee's decision in the Third Review to expeditiously conclude this issue, 
several Members submitted proposals for a procedure to facilitate the use of ad hoc consultations 
and negotiations among Members.56 In May 2011, the Secretariat circulated a document that 
sought to combine the proposals made, to facilitate the identification and consideration of those 
areas where there were substantive differences among the proposals.57 The document was 
subsequently revised several times to reflect co mments received from Members and discussions at 
informal meetings of the Committee. 
11.3.  At its meeting in October 2012, the Commi ttee established an electronic Working Group 
(e-WG) to make progress between Committee meetings. Individual delegates offered to act as 
stewards or co-stewards, working towards compromises in five areas where important differences 
remained. The resulting fifth revision was discussed in March 2013 by the e-WG and in an informal 
meeting of the Committee. After this meeting, the stewards considered all comments received and 
revised their proposed compromise texts. After more  inputs from Members, a sixth revision of the 
proposal was circulated to Members. 
11.4.  At the June 2013 meeting, the Committee discussed the sixth revision and few substantive 
concerns were raised by Members. These were ta ken into account in the preparation of a seventh 
revision, which was presented for adoption at th e October 2013 meeting of the Committee. There 
was no consensus to adopt the proposal. Members unable to join the consensus were requested to 
submit constructive suggestions for compromi s e  l a n g u a g e  b y  1 7  D e c e m b e r  2 0 1 3 .  A s  n o  
compromise language was suggested by the deadline, the Committee considered again the adoption of the seventh revision at its March 2014 meeting.  
11.5.  At the SPS Committee meeting in March 2014, India sought clarification on several specific 
issues relating to the procedure outlined in G/SPS/W/259/Rev.7. In response, the Chairperson invited India to submit in writing its specific queries in order for these to be circulated to all 
Members. This was done in RD/SPS/4, dated 6 May 2014. 
11.6.  The Committee agreed that the stewards and co-stewards of the e-WG would review the 
queries submitted by India, with the intention of providing the requested clarifications. This was done in RD/SPS/5, dated 13 June 2014. 
11.7.  Possible recommendations: 
 Members should endeavour to expeditiously conclude this outstanding issue from the 
Second Review in a manner which facilitates the use of ad hoc consultations, including 
through the good offices of the Chairperson of the SPS Committee, for the resolution of 
specific trade concerns. 
                                               
55 G/SPS/12, paragraph 24; G/SPS/36, paragraphs 87-88; G/SPS/53, paragraphs 116-126. 
56 G/SPS/W/243/Rev.4 and JOB/SPS/1. 
57 G/SPS/W/259. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 21 - 
 
  12  COOPERATION WITH THE CODEX, IPPC AND OIE 
12.1.  Following a proposal submitted by Japan on cooperation between the SPS Committee and 
the Three Sisters, the WTO Secretariat organized, on 17 October 2011, a Geneva-based workshop on coordination of SPS matters at national and regional levels. The objective of the workshop was 
to bring together officials responsible for participation in and implementation of the 
SPS Agreement, Codex, IPPC and/or OIE for an in-depth discussion, at a technical level, on best practices in coordination at national and regional levels. In the workshop, the Secretariat 
presented a background document
58 that described and compared the procedures used by the 
Three Sisters to develop standards. Codex, IPPC and OIE outlined the strengths and challenges of their respective standard-setting procedures, and changes under consideration. The WTO Secretariat, in its report on the coordination workshop, highlighted two specific recommendations 
resulting from it, namely a possibility to develop guidelines for good national coordination and/or a 
manual of good practices.
59 Also, at its October 2011 meeting, the SPS Committee formally agreed 
to a proposal from Canada and Japan to encourage the Three Sisters to undertake joint work on 
cross-cutting issues, such as, inter alia, certification, inspection, approval procedures and/or risk 
analysis.60 A preliminary analysis of the treatment of SPS matters in Regional Trade Agreements 
was also presented by the Secretariat, and the Standards and Trade Development Facility (STDF) 
presented the results of two studies concerning national and regional coordination in Africa. 
12.2.  Possible recommendations: 
 Members are encouraged to provide information on their experiences in coordinating their 
involvement in the work of Codex, IPPC and OIE at the national level. 
13  GOOD REGULATORY PRACTICE 
13.1.  In March 2013, the Secretariat recalled that  in the past two reviews of the SPS Agreement, 
one of the issues that had been raised by Member s related to good regulatory practices. There had 
been several suggestions for the Committee to look at guidelines on Good Regulatory Practice 
(GRP), but the Committee had not agreed to do so. 
13.2.  Possible recommendations: 
 Members are invited to provide information regarding their experiences in the use of the 
guidelines developed by the Committee with respect to transparency, equivalence, recognition of pest- or disease-free areas, and the avoidance of arbitrary or unjustifiable distinctions in levels of protection. 
14  SPS-RELATED PRIVATE STANDARDS 
14.1.  The effects of SPS-related private standards ("private standards") on trade and the 
appropriate role of the SPS Committee has been discussed by the Committee since the issue was 
first raised in 2005 by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines with regard to EurepGAP (now called 
GLOBALGAP) requirements on pesticides used on bananas destined for sale in European markets.
61 
After considerable discussion in the SPS Committee, an ad hoc working group was established to 
identify "Possible Actions for the SPS Committee Regarding SPS-Related Private Standards".62 At 
its March 2011 meeting, the Committee endorsed five of the six actions put forward by the ad hoc 
working group.63 Despite further revision and discussions, consensus was not reached on 
Action 6.64 In addition to the six actions it put forw ard for endorsement, the working group also 
identified six other actions on which consensus could not be reached. These proposed actions are 
listed in Annex I of the ad hoc working group re port, along with a brief explanation of the main 
differences of opinion. 
                                               
58 G/SPS/GEN/1115. 
59 G/SPS/R/65. 
60 G/SPS/58. 
61 G/SPS/R/37/Rev.1, paras.16-20. 
62 G/SPS/W/256. 
63 G/SPS/55. 
64 G/SPS/W/261. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 22 - 
 
  14.2.  Since 2011, the Committee's discussions on private standards have focused on the five 
actions agreed by the Committee and, in particular , on Action 1 relating to the development of a 
working definition of SPS-related private standa rds. The Committee discussed a working definition 
on the basis of draft definitions prepared by the Secretariat based on proposals from Members.65 
However, as no consensus emerged, China and Ne w Zealand, the only Me mbers having submitted 
new proposals for a definition by a 19 April 2013 deadline, were requested to develop a joint proposal. 
14.3.  A first joint proposal was discussed in June 2013 and taking into account the comments 
made during the meeting and additional co mments submitted by Members, China and 
New Zealand tabled a revised joint working definition of an SPS-related private standard for discussion at the October 2013 informal meeting of the Committee.
66 As there was no consensus 
on the joint definition tabled by China and New Zealand, the Committee agreed to move the 
process forward by forming an electronic wo rking group focussed on developing a working 
definition of an SPS-related private standard, with China and New Zealand as "co-stewards". 
14.4.  The co-stewards circulated a report on the work of the e-WG,67 for discussion at the March 
2014 meeting. This report noted that no consen sus had been reached by the e-WG on a working 
definition, thus the co-stewards had put forward a compromise working definition on their own 
responsibility. 
14.5.  Following a suggestion by Canada, the Committee agreed to request the Secretariat to 
research existing definitions of "private standa rds" from other international organizations and 
circulate these before the meeting in July 2014.68 The Committee would then decide whether to 
continue discussions in the Committee as a whole or  in the e-WG, with the objective of adding SPS 
elements to an existing definition of private standards. 
14.6.  The Committee also discussed the implementati on of the other four actions agreed by the 
Committee. On Action 2, it was noted that information exchange mechanisms between the SPS 
Committee and the Three Sisters were already in place and functioning. Some Members encouraged Codex, IPPC and OIE to contact the private schemes identified by Members in 
document G/SPS/GEN/932/Rev.1 to promote the use of international standards, and report back 
to the Committee on those contacts. Codex provided updates on its work on the issue of private standards, including its discussions on private standards in the framework of Codex regional 
bodies. The OIE highlighted steps it was taking to promote compatibility and avoid conflict 
between private and official standards, and dr ew attention to the OIE General Assembly's 
Resolution on Private Standards.
69 The IPPC noted that it had requested that ISO clarify that there 
were no obligations to implement ISO standards in order to comply with IPPC standards. 
14.7.  On Action 3, the Secretariat has kept the Committee informed of relevant discussions in 
other WTO fora, including: (i) the publication of the 2012 World Trade Report that focuses on TBT and SPS measures; (ii) a session on Non-Tariff Measures at the 2012 WTO Public Forum; and (iii) 
the thematic discussion on standards organized during the March 2013 and March 2014 TBT 
Committee meetings.
70 
14.8.  On Action 4, it was noted that useful ideas could be shared amongst Members regarding 
their efforts to reach out to entities involved in private standards in their territories. China 
suggested that when communicating with private standard-setting entities, Members make 
reference to the Code of Good Practice of the TBT Agreement and to the TBT Committee's Decision 
on the "Six Principles" for the preparation of international standards.71 Belize also noted that 
Action 4 could be enhanced by sensitizing private standard-setting entities to the list of concerns in 
paragraph 24 under Action 6 of document G/SPS/W/256.72 Belize drew Members' attention to its 
                                               
65 G/SPS/W/265, G/SPS/W/265/Rev.1 and G/SPS/W/265/Rev.2. 
66 G/SPS/W/272. 
67 G/SPS/W/276. 
68 G/SPS/GEN/1334. 
69 G/SPS/GEN/1024. 
70 JOB/TBT/41/Rev.1, JOB/TBT/42 and JOB/ TBT/42/Corr.1, and G/TBT/GEN/144 and 
G/TBT/GEN/144/Add.1.  
71 G/SPS/GEN/1261. 
72 G/SPS/GEN/1290. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 23 - 
 
  recommendations regarding the implementation of Action 4 in document G/SPS/GEN/1290, and 
encouraged Members to give those recommendations due consideration. 
14.9.   Several Members noted the importance of sensitizing private standard-setting entities and 
actors and reported on efforts undertaken at the national level. Members who were already 
communicating with private standard-setting entities in their territories were encouraged to share 
their experiences in that regard. 
14.10.  The Philippines reported on recent regional and national briefing sessions jointly organized 
by the Department of Agriculture and UNFSS. China referred to its submission G/SPS/GEN/1261 
on Action 4, and noted that some Members were already communicating with private entities in 
their territories involved in the development, application and certification of private standards. 
14.11.  The Secretariat referred to various relevant examples under Action 5 regarding 
collaboration between the SPS Committee and the Three Sisters to develop and/or disseminate 
informative materials on the importance of international standards. In particular, the Secretariat highlighted: (i) the usefulness of the STDF film on Trading Safely; (ii) the joint regional SPS 
workshops with the Three Sisters; as well as (iii)  the development of a new e-learning module with 
the Inter-American Development Bank. The Secretariat also noted that Codex had developed new materials on the role Codex standards can play in ensuring the trade of safe food. Members could 
use those new Codex materials as well as materials that already existed from the other sisters, 
and disseminate them to their private sector. 
14.12.  IPPC drew attention to a publication on the application of international phytosanitary 
standards developed by IPPC with the FAO Forestry Division and to upcoming similar guidelines for 
the seeds sector. The IPPC noted that all IPPC communications, including its standards, were 
available in its six official languages. The IPPC continued to raise the awareness of its members on 
the issue of private standards, and would address any future appearance of private standards in 
the plant health area. The OIE noted that all its publications were available in its three official 
languages and that any further translation, while encouraged, was at the discretion of the end-user. The OIE also noted that it constantly emphasized the importance of adopting and adhering to 
international standards. Some Members noted th e importance of increased awareness about the 
operations of private standards-setting bodies, and referred to the OIE Resolution guiding OIE's 
relations with private standard-setting bodies. The collaboration of both Codex and OIE with 
private standards-setting bodies was encouraged in order to foster the development and 
implementation of science-based food safety and ot her standards, whether official or private. It 
was further suggested that Codex, IPPC and OIE li aise directly with the various private schemes 
identified by Members in document G/SPS/GEN/932/Rev.1. Such contact could then inform the 
Three Sisters' efforts in developing and/or disseminating materials underlying the importance of 
international standards.  
14.13.  The Committee also discussed how to address the seven outstanding proposed actions on 
which consensus had not been reached. Some Members suggested moving forward on outstanding 
Actions 6 to 12 through a voluntary working group.  However, other Members were not prepared to 
work on those actions as there had been no consensus. Belize drew Members' attention to document G/SPS/GEN/1291, which flagged the need to consider Actions 6 to 12 in parallel with 
those in document G/SPS/55, and which also provided specific recommendations for the 
implementation of Actions 10 and 11. Belize also noted that IICA's report on private food standards in the Southern Cone (G/SPS/GEN/1 100) contained several recommended actions for 
the Committee and/or governments to address concerns associated with SPS-related private 
standards. 
14.14.  Regarding Action 6, some Members were of the view that private standards are outside the 
scope of the SPS Agreement and thus related information exchanges should take place on the 
margins of the Committee meetings. Others, however, believed that private standards did fall within the jurisdiction of the SPS Committee and th at information exchange on these issues should 
be on the agenda of the Committee. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 24 - 
 
  14.15.  With regards to Action 10, Belize encouraged Members to review the TBT Code of Good 
Practice and determine its applicability for the implementation of the action.73 On Action 11, Belize 
encouraged Members liaising with entities involved  in private standards to share their experience 
with the Committee as the approaches used could be considered in the implementation of 
Action 11.74 Belize, supported by several Members, expr essed concerns regarding the proliferation 
of private standards and how these affected market access and stressed the relevance of addressing the issue of private standards in the SPS Committee.
75 
14.16.  On other matters related to private standards, ISO encouraged increased engagement 
between ISO, Codex, OIE and non-governmental organizations working on private standards such as the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI). Th ese organizations were encouraged to move away 
from private standard-setting to focus on implem entation and harmonization. ISO also flagged the 
publication of a brochure entitled International Standards and Private Standards . IICA reported on 
a study undertaken on the impact of private food standards in the Southern Cone.
76 Work in other 
fora relating to private standards was also presented, in particular the creation of the UN Forum on 
Sustainability Standards (UNFSS) by the FAO, ITC, UNCTAD, UNEP and UNIDO. The UNFSS is 
intended to provide an unbiased and credible policy dialogue with analytical, empirical and capacity-building activities, based on demand by developing countries and involving all concerned 
non-governmental stakeholders.
77 
14.17.  The ITC presented the most recent iteratio n of its online "Standards Map", an interactive 
web-tool which provides information on over 130 private and public voluntary standards, across 700 different criteria of analysis. In relation to the concern expressed about the multiplication of 
testing and costs for producers, as well as the pr oliferation of private schemes, ITC confirmed that 
it was being consulted by ISEAL and GIZ
78 regarding the development of a Sustainability 
Standards Comparison Tool. The tool was being currently developed and should be piloted by the 
end of 2014. The ITC confirmed that the term inology of "voluntary standards" and the 132 
schemes identified in the Standards Map encompassed both government and private voluntary standards, but these could be separated through a dedicated search. 
14.18.  Possible recommendations: 
 Members and Observers are encouraged to provide information on any relevant studies or 
analysis which they have undertaken, or of which they are aware. 
 The Committee may continue its consideration of SPS-related private standards and their 
effects on international trade taking into acco unt the guidance to be provided by the ad 
hoc working group on this matter. 
 The Committee should continue its implementation of the agreed actions (G/SPS/55), in 
particular on the development of a working definition of SPS-related private standards. 
15  RISK ANALYSIS: RISK ASSESSMENT (ART. 5), RISK MANAGEMENT AND 
COMMUNICATION 
15.1.  In the context of the Fourth Review, the US proposed the organization of a workshop on risk 
analysis.79 The United States noted that since the last workshop on this topic was in 2000, a 
significant amount of work must have been carried out by Members and the Three Sisters. 
15.2.  Many Members supported the proposal and proposed that a session on risk communication 
be included in the programme. It was also suggested that the session related to dispute 
settlement be presented by WTO staff. Furthermore,  given the amount of material to be covered, 
the possibility of splitting the workshop into two events was discussed. 
                                               
73 G/SPS/GEN/1291. 
74 G/SPS/GEN/1291. 
75 G/SPS/GEN/1240. 
76 G/SPS/GEN/1088. 
77 http://www.unfss.org . 
78 International Social and Environmental Accreditat ion and Labelling Alliance  (ISEAL); and Deutsche 
Gesellschaft für Internationa le Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). 
79 G/SPS/W/275. G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 25 - 
 
  15.3.  The Secretariat noted that the topic of the October thematic workshop had not yet been 
identified and the Committee suggested that risk analysis be the topic of the October 2014 workshop. Members were invited to submit suggestions regarding the programme, based on that contained in the US proposal, to the Secretariat by 24 April 2014. A revised programme will be 
circulated for discussion at the July meeting. 
16  CATALOGUE OF INSTRUMENTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SPS ISSUES 16.1.  In the context of the Fourth Review, Canada proposed that the Committee develop a 
"Catalogue of Instruments Available to the WTO Members to manage SPS issues"
80, noting that 
the timely use of these tools could help Members avoid, manage or escalate issues. The proposed catalogue would include all mechanisms relevant to the SPS Agreement framework; for instance, the right to provide comments on notifications and to discuss them, the targeted or strategic use 
of the STC agenda item, and the use of the IPPC or OIE dispute settlement procedures. 
16.2.  Many Members welcomed the proposal an d highlighted the usefulness of developing a 
compendium of all the actions available. It was proposed that the Secretariat collaborate with 
Canada on preparing a draft of the catalogue, for subsequent comments by other Members. The 
draft catalogue, jointly submitted by Canada and Kenya, was circulated as G/SPS/W/279, on 18 June 2014. 
 
                                               
80 G/SPS/W/271.  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 26 - APPENDIX A - SUMMARY OF MAJOR SPS COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES, 2010-2014 
Subject Year Type of Activity Related Documents 
Transparency 2010 Implementation of the Transparency Ob ligations as of 26/02/2010 G/SPS/GEN/27/Rev.20 
 2010 Overview Regarding the Level of Implementation of the 
Transparency Provisions of the SPS Agreement G/SPS/GEN/804/Rev.3 
 2010 Draft Programme for Transparency Workshop G/SPS/GEN/1021/Rev.1 
 2010 Workshop on transparency held on 18 and 22/10/2010 G/SPS/R/60 
 2011 Implementation of the transparency ob ligations as of 10/03/2011 G/SPS/GEN/27/Rev.21 
 2011 Update on the mentoring system of assistance relating to the 
transparency provisions of the SPS Agreement G/SPS/GEN/1097 
 2011 Overview regarding the level of implementation of the transparency 
provisions of the SPS Agreement G/SPS/GEN/804/Rev.4 
 2012 Implementation of the transparen cy obligations as of 17/02/2012 G/SPS/GEN/27/Rev.22 
 2012 Overview regarding the level of implementation of the transparency 
provisions of the SPS Agreement G/SPS/GEN/804/Rev.5 and 
G/SPS/GEN/804/Rev.5/Corr.1 
 2012 Programme for Transparency Workshop G/SPS/GEN/1156/Rev.1 
 2012 Workshop on Transparency  G/SPS/R/68 
 2013 Procedure to monitor the process of international harmonization - 
Draft fifteenth annual report G/SPS/W/269 
 2013 Overview regarding the level of implementation of the transparency 
provisions of the SPS Agreement G/SPS/GEN/804/Rev.6 
Monitoring International Standards 2010 Procedure to monitor the process of International Harmonization – 
Twelfth Annual Report G/SPS/54 
 2010 Summary Report of the Workshop on the Relationship between the 
SPS Committee and the International Standard-Setting 
Organizations G/SPS/R/57 
 2011 Procedure to Monitor the Process of International Harmonization – 
Thirteenth Annual Report G/SPS/56 
 2011 Monitoring the Use of International Standards G/SPS/GEN/1086 
 2011 Joint Work by Codex, IPPC and OIE on Cross-cutting Issues – 
Decision of the Committee G/SPS/58 
 2011 Three Sisters Standard-setting Procedures G/SPS/GEN/1115 
 2012 Summary Report of the Workshop on SPS Coordination at the 
National and Regional Levels – 17 October 2011 G/SPS/R/65 
 2012 Procedure to Monitor the Process of International Harmonization – 
Fourteenth Annual Report G/SPS/59 
 2013 Procedure to Monitor the Process of International Harmonization – 
Fifteenth Annual Report G/SPS/60  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 27 - Subject Year Type of Activity Related Documents 
Technical Assistance 2010 SPS Technical Assistance and Training Activities G/SPS/GEN/521/Rev.5 and 
G/SPS/GEN/521/Rev.5/Corr.1 
 2010 WTO SPS Technical Assistance Activities in 2010 – General 
Information, Selection Processes and Application Form G/SPS/GEN/997 
 2010 Update on the Operation of the Standards and Trade Development 
Facility (STDF) G/SPS/GEN/1002 
 2010 Agency for International Trade Information and Cooperation 
(AITIC) G/SPS/GEN/1009 
 2010 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1029 
 2010 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1046 
 2011 SPS Technical Assistance and Training Activities G/SPS/GEN/521/Rev.6 
 2011 WTO SPS Technical Assistance Activities in 2011 – General 
Information, Selection Processes and Application Form G/SPS/GEN/997/Rev.1 
 2011 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1075 
 2011 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1089 
 2011 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1114 
 2012 SPS Technical Assistance and Training Activities G/SPS/GEN/521/Rev.7 
 2012 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1144 
 2012 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1158 
 2012 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1193 
 2012 WTO SPS Technical Assistance Activities in 2012 – General 
Information, Selection Processes and Application Form G/SPS/GEN/997/Rev.2 
 2013 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1221 
 2013 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1251 
 2013 Update on the Operation of the STDF G/SPS/GEN/1279 
 2013 SPS technical assistance and training activities G/SPS/GEN/521/Rev.8 
 2013 WTO SPS Technical Assistance Activities in 2013 – General 
Information, Selection Processes and Application Form G/SPS/GEN/997/Rev.3 
 2014 Mid-term review of the standards and trade development facility 
(STDF) G/SPS/GEN/1304 
Implementation of the Agreement – 
Specific Trade Concerns /Ad Hoc Consultations 2010 Proposed Recommended Procedure for Ad Hoc Consultations or 
Negotiations among Members under the SPS Agreement (Article 12.2) G/SPS/W/243/Rev.3 
 2010 Specific Trade Concerns G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.10 and Addenda 
 2011 Proposed Recommended Procedure for Ad Hoc Consultations or 
Negotiations among Members under the SPS Agreement (Article 12.2) G/SPS/W/243/Rev.4 
 2011 Proposed Recommended Procedure to Encourage and Facilitate Ad 
Hoc Consultations or Negotiations among Members under the SPS 
Agreement (Article 12.2) G/SPS/W/259/Rev.1  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 28 - Subject Year Type of Activity Related Documents 
 2011 Specific Trade Concerns G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.11 and Addenda 
and Corrigenda 
 2012 Proposed Recommended Procedure to Encourage and Facilitate 
Ad Hoc Consultations or Negotiations among Members under the 
SPS Agreement (Article 12.2) G/SPS/W/259/Rev.4 and 
G/SPS/W/259/Rev.4/Corr.1 
 2012 Specific Trade Concerns G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.12 
 2013 Proposed Recommended Procedure to Encourage and Facilitate 
Ad Hoc Consultations or Negotiations among Members under the 
SPS Agreement (Article 12.2) G/SPS/W/259/Rev.7 
 2013 Specific Trade Concerns G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.13 and 
G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.13/Corr.1 
 2014 Specific Trade Concerns G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.14 
Private Standards 2010 Possible Actions for the SPS Committee Regarding Private SPS 
Standards G/SPS/W/247/Rev.3 
 2010 The Global Food Safety  Initiative (GFSI) G/SPS/GEN/1004 
 2011 Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on SPS-related Private 
Standards to the SPS Committee G/SPS/W/256 
 2011 Actions Regarding SPS-related Private Standards – Decision of the 
Committee G/SPS/55 
 2011 Proposed Revisions to Action 6 of the Report of the Ad Hoc Working 
Group on SPS-related Private Standards (G/SPS/W/256) G/SPS/W/261 
 2012 Proposed Working Definition on SPS-related Private Standards  G/SPS/W/265/Rev.2 
Regionalization 2012 Annual Report on the Implementation of Article 6 of the Agreement 
on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures G/SPS/GEN/1134 
 2013 Annual Report on the Implementation of Article 6 of the Agreement 
on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures G/SPS/GEN/1245 
Other 2010 Review of the Operation and Im plementation of the SPS Agreement 
– Report adopted by the Committee on 18 March 2010 G/SPS/53 
 2010 Report (2010) on the Activities of the Committee on Sanitary and 
Phytosanitary Measures G/L/943 
 2010 Membership in WTO and International Standard-Setting Bodies G/SPS/GEN/49/Rev.10 
 2011 Report to the Council for Trade in Goods on China's Transitional 
Review G/SPS/57 
 2011 Programme for a Workshop on SPS Coordination at National and 
Regional Levels G/SPS/GEN/1110 
 2011 Outstanding Requests from International Intergovernmental 
Organizations – Criteria for Observer Status G/SPS/GEN/1112 
 2011 Report (2011) on the Activities of the Committee on Sanitary and 
Phytosanitary Measures G/L/969 
 2011 Membership in WTO and International Standard-Setting Bodies G/SPS/GEN/49/Rev.11  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 29 - Subject Year Type of Activity Related Documents 
 2012 Observers in the SPS Committee - Their Role and Outstanding 
Requests G/SPS/GEN/1157 
 2012 Report (2012) on the activities of the Committee on Sanitary and 
Phytosanitary Measures G/L/1013 
 2012 Revised Secretariat Procedures for Production and Distribution of 
Certain SPS Committee Documents G/SPS/INF/18/Rev.1 
 2013 Programme - Workshop on SPS-related market access challenges 
and opportunities G/SPS/GEN/1270 
 2013 Proposed process for the fourth review of the operation and 
implementation of the Agreement on  the Application of sanitary and 
phytosanitary measures G/SPS/W/270 and 
G/SPS/W/270/Add.1 
 2013 Report on Workshop on SPS-related market access challenges and 
opportunities G/SPS/R/72 
 2014 Fourth review of the operation and implementation of the 
Agreement on the Application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures - Summary of prop osals submitted by Members G/SPS/GEN/1307 
 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 30 - 
 
  APPENDIX B: LIST OF SPS COMMITTEE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS 2010-
2014 
A. Comments/Proposals regarding Tran sparency (Article 7 and Annex B) 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 European Union Experience After the Revision of the 
Transparency Provisions of the SPS 
Agreement G/SPS/GEN/1044 
 Morocco Authority Responsible for the Implementation 
of the WTO SPS Agreement and Serving as 
the Enquiry Point G/SPS/GEN/1017 
 Morocco Moroccan Authority Responsible for 
Implementation of the WTO SPS Agreement  G/SPS/GEN/1039 
 Morocco Measures Taken by Morocco to Implement 
the Transparency Obligations of the SPS 
Agreement  G/SPS/GEN/1047 
 
B. Comments/Proposals regarding monitori ng the use of international standards 
(Article 3.5 and 12.4) 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 Argentina Procedure to monitor the use of international 
standards G/SPS/W/255 
 Canada Work of the Committee Arising from the Third 
Review – Proposed Priorities – Cooperation 
between the SPS Committee and the 
International Standards-Setting Bodies G/SPS/W/253 
 Indonesia Implementation of the International Standard 
for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) No. 15 
concerning Wood Packaging Material G/SPS/GEN/998 
 Japan Work of the Committee Arising from the Third 
Review – Proposed Priorities – Cooperation 
between the SPS Committee and the 
International Standards-Setting Bodies G/SPS/W/251 
2011 Canada/Japan Review of the Operation and Implementation 
of the SPS Agreement Proposal to Advance 
Recommendation 3 of the Workshop between 
the SPS Committee and the International Standard-setting Bodies (G/SPS/R/57) G/SPS/W/258 
 Costa Rica Defense of the Scientific Principles of Codex - 
Ractopamine  G/SPS/GEN/1092 
2012 Argentina Revision of the Procedure to Monitor the 
Process of International Harmonization G/SPS/W/268 
 Argentina/ 
Australia/Brazil/
Canada 
Chile/Colombia/
Costa Rica/ 
New Zealand/ 
Paraguay/Peru/
Philippines/ 
United States of 
America SPS Measures and International Standards, 
Guidelines and Recommendations G/SPS/GEN/1143/Rev.2 
 Chile/United 
States of America International Standard-Setting Bodies' 
Involvement in the WTO SPS Committee on Specific Trade Concerns – Proposal by Chile 
and the United States G/SPS/W/267 
2013 Brazil 50th anniversary of the Codex Alimentarius 
Commission - The importance of the scientific 
principle G/SPS/GEN/1253 
 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 31 - 
 
  C.1 Information regarding Members' provisio n of technical assistance and training 
activities (Article 9) 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 Australia Technical Assistance to Developing Countries 
provided by Australia G/SPS/GEN/717/Add.2 
 Canada Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/1008 and 
G/SPS/GEN/1027 
 Philippines EU Trade-Related Technical Assistance 
Project – Standards Harmonization and SPS 
Conformity G/SPS/GEN/995 
 United States of 
America Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/181/Add.8 
2011 Canada Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/1099 
 European Union Overview of SPS Related Technical 
Assistance Activities G/SPS/GEN/1074 
 United States of 
America Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/181/Add.9/
Rev.1 and 
G/SPS/GEN/181/Add.9/Rev.1/Corr.1 
2012 Australia Technical Assistance to Developing Countries 
provided by Australia G/SPS/GEN/717/Add.3 
 Canada Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/1149 and 
G/SPS/GEN/1196 
 European Union Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/1139 
 European 
Union/ 
Philippines Standards Harmonization and SPS 
Conformity under the Trade Related 
Technical Assistance Project 2 (TRTA 2) – A 
Joint Project of the Philippines and the European Union G/SPS/GEN/1154 
 Japan Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/1160 
2013 European Union Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/1139/Add.1 
 Japan Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/1160/Add.1 
 United States of 
America Technical Assistance to Developing Countries G/SPS/GEN/181/Add.10 
 
C.2 Information regarding Members' tec hnical assistance and training needs 
(Article 9) 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 Dominican 
Republic Technical Assistance G/SPS/GEN/1034 
 Kenya Technical Assistance G/SPS/GEN/1020 
 Madagascar Establishment of a National SPS Committee G/SPS/GEN/1011 
 Morocco National SPS Workshop organized by the 
WTO in Morocco (Rabat) on 18 and 19 
September 2012 G/SPS/GEN/1199 
 Pakistan Need for Technical Assistance and Global 
Cooperation G/SPS/GEN/1188/Rev.1  
2013 Belize Technical assistance - Information from 
Members G/SPS/GEN/1239 
 Botswana National SPS Workshop in October 2012 G/SPS/GEN/1223 
 Costa Rica National Seminar on the SPS Agreement G/SPS/GEN/1294 
 Philippines Report on the follow-up national workshop on 
the SPS agreement for the Philippine Department of Agriculture Regulatory 
Agencies and the SPS Workshop for Regional 
Regulatory  G/SPS/GEN/1275 
 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 32 - 
 
  D. Comments/Proposals regarding special and differential treatment (Article 10) 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 Cuba Statement on the Issues of Technology 
Transfer and Private Standards G/SPS/GEN/1055 
 
 
E.1 Comments/Proposals regarding Regionalization (Article 6) 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2012 European 
Union Application of Article 6 of the Agreement on 
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures G/SPS/GEN/1159 
 
E.2 Information regarding Members' experience  related to Regionalization (Article 6) 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 Argentina Actions Aimed at the Implementation of the 
WTO SPS Agreement G/SPS/GEN/994 
 Argentina Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with BSE 
in Argentina G/SPS/GEN/1038 
 Argentina National Programme for the Prevention and 
Eradication of Lobesia Botrana G/SPS/GEN/1059 
 Madagascar Detection of Varroasis in Madagascar G/SPS/GEN/1012 
 Paraguay Health Status Report G/SPS/GEN/1023 
 Philippines FMD Status G/SPS/GEN/1031 
2011 Argentina Information on Official OIE Recognition of 
Food and Mouth Disease Free Status G/SPS/GEN/1128 
 China An Introduction to China's Regionalization 
Management System on Food Safety G/SPS/GEN/1101 
 Colombia Bovine Tuberculosis Status G/SPS/GEN/1060 
 Colombia Brucellosis Status G/SPS/GEN/1061 
 Colombia National Plan for the Detection, Control and 
Eradication of Fruit Flies G/SPS/GEN/1064 
 Colombia Avian Influenza Situation G/SPS/GEN/1083 
 Costa Rica Detection of a Focus of the Huanglongbing 
Bacterium G/SPS/GEN/1070 
 European 
Union Foot and Mouth Disease Status in Bulgaria G/SPS/GEN/1072 and 
G/SPS/GEN/1072/Add.1  
 Jamaica Information on the Activities to Control 
Huanglongbing G/SPS/GEN/1118 
 Korea, 
Republic of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Situation G/SPS/GEN/1116 
 Mexico Report on the Epidemiological Analysis of 
Outbreaks of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis (Enzootic IE Strain) G/SPS/GEN/1124 
 Paraguay Report on Health Status Developments G/SPS/GEN/1077 and 
G/SPS/GEN/1081 
2012 Argentina Information on the Recognition of Fruit Fly 
Free Areas G/SPS/GEN/1178 
 Argentina Sanitary Status of Foot and Mouth Disease 
(FMD) G/SPS/GEN/1179 
 Argentina Health Status with regard to Bovine 
Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) and other Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSE) G/SPS/GEN/1180 
 Botswana Re-entry into the EU Beef Market by 
Botswana G/SPS/GEN/1162 
 Chile Establishing Compartmentalization as a Tool 
for Health Management G/SPS/GEN/1147 
 European 
Union Review of the EU Plant Health Regime – 
Update G/SPS/GEN/1145 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 33 - 
 
  Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
 European 
Union Restriction to Trade adopted in relation to the 
occurrence of the Schmallenberg Virus in the 
European Union G/SPS/GEN/1161 
 Mexico Information on Outbreaks of the AH7N3 
Avian Influenza Virus G/SPS/GEN/1175 
 Mexico Declaration of Mexico as an Area Free from 
Avian Salmonellosis G/SPS/GEN/1184 
 Mexico Declaration of Mexico as an Area Free from 
Classical Swine Fever G/SPS/GEN/1185 
 Mexico Declaration of the State of Tabasco as an 
Area Free from Aujeszky's Disease G/SPS/GEN/1189 
 Mexico Declaration of the State of Coahuila, 
excluding the Lagunera Region, as an Area 
Free from Aujeszky's Disease G/SPS/GEN/1190 
 Mexico National Tick ( Boophilus  Spp.) Control 
Campaign G/SPS/GEN/1192 
 Mexico Declaration of Various Municipalities and 
Communities in the State of Guerrero as 
Areas with a Low Prevalence of Fruit Flies of 
the Genus Anastrepha  G/SPS/GEN/1207 
 Mexico Declaration of Various Municipalities in the 
State of Chihuahua as Areas Free from Pink 
Bollworm and Boll Weevil G/SPS/GEN/1208 
 Mexico Declaration of Certain Regions in the State of 
Morelos as Areas Free from Fruit Flies of the 
Genus Anastrepha  G/SPS/GEN/1209 
 Mexico Declaration of the Municipality of Sayula, 
Jalisco, as an Area Free from Avocado Seed 
Weevils and Moths G/SPS/GEN/1210 
2013 Brazil Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy case in 
Brazil G/SPS/GEN/1232 
 Chile Declaration of Chile as a country free from 
caprine and ovine Brucellosis G/SPS/GEN/1229 
 Costa Rica Statement by Costa Rica on the sanitary 
status of bovine spongiform encephalopathy 
(BSE) G/SPS/GEN/1263 
 European 
Union Notification G/SPS/N/RUS/8 G/SPS/GEN/1216 
 Guatemala Declaration of areas free of Mediterranean 
fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata wied) and other 
fruit flies G/SPS/GEN/1274 
 Honduras Declaration of a pest free area (for Ceratitis 
Capitata Wied. ) in accordance with ISPM no. 
10 G/SPS/GEN/1222 
 Japan Current status after the nuclear power plant 
accident G/SPS/GEN/1233 
 Mexico Communication regarding two new cases of 
highly pathogenic avian influenza in the State 
of Aguascalientes, Mexico G/SPS/GEN/1212 
 Mexico Declaration of the State of Nayarit as an area 
free from Aujeszky's disease G/SPS/GEN/1214 
 Mexico Declaration of the State of Tlaxcala as an 
area free from the tick Boophilus spp G/SPS/GEN/1215 
 Mexico Declaration of the municipality of Purépero, 
Michoacán, as an area free from avocado 
seed weevils and moths G/SPS/GEN/1265 
 Mexico Declaration of municipalities in the State of 
Aguascalientes as an area free from fruit flies 
of the genus Anastrepha G/SPS/GEN/1266 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 34 - 
 
  Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
 Mexico Decision declaring the Municipality of 
Asientos in the State of Aguascalientes to be 
an area free from fruit flies of the quarantine-
significant genus  G/SPS/GEN/1267 
 Mexico Declaration of various communities in the 
State of Michoacán as areas with a low 
prevalence of fruit flies of the genus Anastrepha G/SPS/GEN/1268 
 Mexico Declaration of the State of Sonora as an area 
free from the tick Boophilus  spp. G/SPS/GEN/1286 
 Mexico Declaration of the Municipality of Urique, 
Chihuahua, as an area free from the tick 
Boophilus  spp. G/SPS/GEN/1287 
 Paraguay Phytosanitary emergency due to the 
detection of citrus greening disease 
(Huanglongbing, HLB) G/SPS/GEN/1219 
 Paraguay Sanitary status concerning foot and mouth 
disease - 2013 G/SPS/GEN/1238 
 Paraguay Citrus greening disease (Huanglongbing, 
HLB) G/SPS/GEN/1273 
 Peru Peru: country free from citrus black spot, 
sweet orange scab, citrus canker, citrus 
variegated chlorosis, citrus leprosis and 
Huanglongbing G/SPS/GEN/1243 
 Peru OIE recognition of Peru as a foot-and-mouth 
disease-free country G/SPS/GEN/1281 
 Philippines Philippines area freedom from mango pulp 
weevil (MPW) and mango seed weevil (MSW) G/SPS/GEN/1278 
2014 Armenia Animal health risk assessment and zoning 
reports G/SPS/GEN/1309 
 European 
Union Notification G/SPS/N/RUS/48 G/SPS/GEN/1305 
 Honduras Declaration of a pest free area (for Ceratitis 
Capitata Wied. ) in accordance with ISPM No. 
10 G/SPS/GEN/1300 
 Mexico Declaration of areas free from large avocado 
seed weevils (Heilipus Lauri), small avocado 
seed weevils (Conotrachelus Aguacatae and 
C. Perseae) and avocado seed moths 
(Stenoma Catenifer) G/SPS/GEN/1297 
 Mexico Declaration of an area with a low prevalence 
of fruit flies of the genus Anastrepha of 
quarantine significance and rhagoletis 
Pomonella G/SPS/GEN/1298 
 Mexico Declaration of area free from large avocado 
seed weevils (Heilipus Lauri), small avocado 
seed weevils (Conotrachelus Aguacatae and C. Perseae) and avocado seed moths 
(Stenoma Catenifer) G/SPS/GEN/1299 
 Mexico Declaration of area free from large avocado 
seed weevils (Heilipus lauri), small avocado 
seed weevils (Conotrachelus aguacatae and 
C. Perseae) and avocado seed moths 
Sstenoma catenifer) G/SPS/GEN/1301 
 Mexico Declaration of areas free from large avocado 
seed weevils (Heilipus lauri), small avocado 
seed weevils (Conotrachelus aguacatae and C. Perseae) and avocado seed moths 
(Stenoma catenifer)  G/SPS/GEN/1302 
 Mexico Declaration of the State of Mexico as an area 
free from Aujeszky's disease  G/SPS/GEN/1303 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 35 - 
 
  F. Comments/Proposals regarding Monitori ng Implementation of the Agreement 
(Articles 12.1 and 12.2) – Specific trade concerns/Use of Ad Hoc Consultations 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 Brazil Ad Hoc Consultations G/SPS/GEN/1052 
 European 
Union Updated List of Specific Trade Concerns 
Raised in the SPS Committee G/SPS/GEN/1051 
 Morocco Brazilian Draft Technical Regulation on the 
Identity and Quality of Canned Sardines G/SPS/GEN/1048 
 Nicaragua Measures Applied by Mexico to Imports of 
Bovine Meat G/SPS/GEN/1056 
2011 Canada Canadian Experience Using Article 12.2 Ad 
Hoc Consultations to Facilitate the Resolution of an SPS Trade-related Issue G/SPS/GEN/1080 
 Chile Ad Hoc Consultations of Negotiations among 
Members under Article 12.2 of the SPS 
Agreement G/SPS/W/263 
 Madagascar EU Decision Concerning Certain Protective 
Measures with Regard to Certain Products Originating from Madagascar G/SPS/GEN/1113 
 Norway Quarantine and Testing Procedures Applied 
to Salmon Imported from Norway – 
Questions to China G/SPS/GEN/1090 
 Paraguay Maximum Residue Limits for Certain 
Agricultural Pesticides Applied to Sesame G/SPS/GEN/1091 
 Peru Regulation 258/97 of the European 
Parliament and of the Council Concerning 
Novel Foods G/SPS/GEN/1087 
 Peru Implementation of Regulation 258/97 
Concerning Novel Foods G/SPS/GEN/1117 
2012 Cameroon/ 
Colombia/ 
Ecuador/Ghana
/Mexico/ 
Nicaragua/Peru  New Maximum Cadmium Levels for Foodstuff 
in the European Union G/SPS/GEN/1173/Rev.1 
 Peru Restrictions on Access to the European 
Market through the Implementation of 
Regulation 258/97 concerning Novel Foods G/SPS/GEN/1137 
 Peru Implementation of Regulation. 258/97 
concerning Novel Foods G/SPS/GEN/1194 
2013 European 
Union Updated list of specific trade concerns raised 
in the WTO SPS Committee G/SPS/GEN/1269 
 Paraguay Maximum residue limits for certain 
agricultural pesticides applied to sesame G/SPS/GEN/1220 
 Paraguay Maximum residue limits for certain 
agricultural pesticides applied to sesame by Japan G/SPS/GEN/1272 
 Peru Implementation of Regulation. 258/97 
concerning Novel Foods G/SPS/GEN/1218 
 Peru Application and amendment of European 
Union Regulation. 258/97 concerning Novel 
Foods G/SPS/GEN/1280 
 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 36 - 
 
  G. Review of the Agreement 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 Argentina Work of the Committee Emanating from the 
Third Review – Proposed Priority Issues G/SPS/W/252 
2011 Canada/ 
New Zealand Work of the Committee Emanating from the 
Third Review – Proposed Priority Issues – 
Comments on the Communication from 
Argentina G/SPS/W/257 
2013 Canada Fourth Review of the Operation and 
Implementation of the Agreement on the 
Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures – Catalogue of Instruments G/SPS/W/271 
2014 European 
Union Fourth Review of the Operation and 
Implementation of the Agreement on the 
Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary 
Measures - The transparency obligations of 
the SPS Agreement (Article 7 and Annex B) G/SPS/W/274 
 United States 
of America Fourth Review of the Operation and 
Implementation of the Agreement on the 
Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary 
Measures - Workshop on decision making 
and communication during the risk analysis 
process G/SPS/W/275 
 
H. SPS-Related Private Standards 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 Cuba Statement on the Issues of Technology 
Transfer and Private Standards G/SPS/GEN/1055 
2013 Belize Concerns with private and commercial 
standards G/SPS/GEN/1240 
 Belize Actions regarding SPS-related private 
standards G/SPS/GEN/1290 
 Belize Actions regarding SPS-related private 
standards G/SPS/GEN/1291 
 China/ 
New Zealand Proposed working definition of SPS-related 
private standards G/SPS/W/272 
 China Actions regarding SPS-related private 
standards G/SPS/GEN/1261 
 
I. Other 
Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2010 Argentina Phytosanitary Import Authorizations (AFIDI) G/SPS/GEN/1041 and 
G/SPS/GEN/1041/Add.1 
 Argentina On-site Audit Procedures G/SPS/W/254 
 Dominican 
Republic Activities of Members G/SPS/GEN/1014 
 Kenya Activities of Members G/SPS/GEN/1019 
 Malawi Information on Relevant Activities G/SPS/GEN/1013 
 Mexico Publication of the National Standardization 
Programme for 2010 G/SPS/GEN/491/Add.11 
and 
G/SPS/GEN/491/Add.12 
 Philippines Pilot Implementation of the INS Trade 
Software System G/SPS/GEN/1001 
 Zambia Report on SPS Activities of the Plant 
Quarantine and Phytosanitary Service G/SPS/GEN/996 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 37 - 
 
  Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2011 Argentina National Plan for the Prevention of Entry and 
Transmission of Pests and Diseases through 
Waste Regulation G/SPS/GEN/1129  
 Argentina Organizational Structure of SENASA – 
National Agriculture and Food Health and 
Quality Service  G/SPS/GEN/1130 
 Belize Comprehensive Surveillance Programme for 
Bovine Tuberculosis, Bovine Brucellosis, BSE 
and the Implementation of an Animal 
Identification System G/SPS/GEN/1107  
 Canada Entry into Force of Canada's Aquatic Animal 
Health Regulations G/SPS/GEN/1122 
 European 
Union Transitional Review Mechanism Pursuant to 
Para. 18 of the Protocol on the Accession of China – Questions from the EU to China 
concerning SPS G/SPS/W/262 
 European 
Union Establishment of a List of Approved or 
Registered Establishments and Plants for the 
Import or Transit of Animal By-products G/SPS/GEN/1063 
 European 
Union The European Union's Approach to SPS 
Audits and Inspections in Third Countries G/SPS/GEN/1095 
 Korea, 
Republic of Quarantine Inspection Agency  G/SPS/GEN/1104 
 Mexico Use of Electronic Sanitary and Phytosanitary 
Certificates in World Trade G/SPS/W/264 
 Mexico National Standardization Programme for 
2011 G/SPS/GEN/491/Add.13 
and 
G/SPS/GEN/491/Add.14 
 New Zealand Amalgamation of the New Zealand Food 
Safety Authority and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry G/SPS/GEN/1071 
 New Zealand Change to Format for Phytosanitary 
Certificates G/SPS/GEN/1103 
2012 Argentina New Version of Phytosanitary Certificate G/SPS/GEN/1191 
 Brazil Importance of Scientific Advice Body – 
Science for Safe Food G/SPS/GEN/1165 
 Canada Transition Process for Foods Marketed as 
Natural Health Products to the Food 
Regulator Framework G/SPS/GEN/1170 
 European 
Union General Guidance on Implementation and 
Interpretation of Article 24 of Council 
Directive 97/78/EC – Re-enforced Checks G/SPS/GEN/1167 
 European 
Union New Models of Health Certificates for the 
Import of Aquatic Animals and Fishery Products G/SPS/GEN/1211 
 Mexico National Standardization Programme for 
2012 G/SPS/GEN/491/Add.15 
and 
G/SPS/GEN/491/Add.16 
 Mexico Publication of the Regulations relating to the 
Federal Law on Animal Health in the Official Journal of 21 May 2012 G/SPS/GEN/1176 
 Mexico Agreement establishing the Additives and 
Processing Aids in Food, Beverages and Food 
Supplements, the use thereof and Health 
Provisions G/SPS/GEN/1177 
 Mexico Import and Export Certificates for 
Agricultural, Livestock, Aquaculture and Fisheries Products G/SPS/GEN/1183 
 New Zealand Change of Name for the New Zealand 
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry G/SPS/GEN/1142 G/SPS/W/280 
 
- 38 - 
 
  Year Member Title/Subject Symbol 
2013 Argentina Phytosanitary Import Authorizations (AFIDI) G/SPS/GEN/1041/Add.2 
 Australia Responses to comments received following 
release of the Draft Biosecurity Bill and 
Inspector-General of Biosecurity Bill G/SPS/GEN/1213 
 Canada A new regulatory framework for federal food 
inspection: discussion document G/SPS/GEN/1282 
 Costa Rica Phytosanitary certificate G/SPS/GEN/1244 and 
G/SPS/GEN/1244/Corr.1  
 Costa Rica Ban on the use of methyl bromide as a 
fumigant for agricultural use G/SPS/GEN/1295 
 Ecuador Action by Agrocalidad in the framework of 
Ecuador's single window G/SPS/GEN/1217 
 European 
Union Healthier animals and plants and a safer 
agri-food chain - A modernised legal framework for a more competitive European 
Union G/SPS/GEN/1252 
 Indonesia Encouragement to eliminate the use of non-
ecofriendly methyl bromide in phytosanitary 
treatments G/SPS/GEN/1271 
 Korea, 
Republic of SPS-related government agency changes in 
the Republic of Korea G/SPS/GEN/1242 
 Mexico National Standardization Programme for 
2013 G/SPS/GEN/491/Add.17 
and 
G/SPS/GEN/491/Add.18 
 Paraguay Processed products certificate G/SPS/GEN/1264 
2014 Argentina Phytosanitary re-export authorizations G/SPS/GEN/1296 
 Armenia Plant health risk assessment reports G/SPS/GEN/1310 
 Burundi Creation of the National Committee for the 
Coordination and Monitoring of Sanitary and 
Phytosanitary Measures G/SPS/GEN/1306 
 Burundi Informations concernant le bureau burundais 
de normalisation et contrôle de la qualité G/SPS/GEN/1308/Rev.1 
 
 
  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 39 - APPENDIX C - WTO DISPUTES INVOKING THE SPS AGREEMENT  
Since 1 January 1995, violations of the SPS Agreement have been alleged in the following disputes. Those which have been referr ed to a panel are highlighted 
in italics. 
 Please note that in the WTO, the European Union was officially called the European Communities until 30 November 2009. In this table, reference is made to 
"the European Communities" or "the EC" regarding dispute developments that took place before this date. 
 
 STC No. DS Number Parties and nature of complaint Request for consultations Panel/Appellate Body proceedings 
1 STC 2* WT/DS3  US complaint against Korea's inspection 
procedures for fresh fruits. Consultations requested on 
6/04/1995 (WT/DS3/1). DSU consultations pending 
2 STC 1 WT/DS5 US complaint against Korea's shelf-life 
requirements for frozen processed meats 
and other products. Consultations requested on 
3/05/1995 (WT/DS5/1). Mutually agreed solution notified on 
20/07/1995 (WT/DS5/5). 
3 STC 8 WT/DS18 Canada's complaint against Australia's 
import restrictions on fresh, chilled or frozen 
salmon. 
Australia - Salmon Consultations requested on 
5/10/1995 (WT/DS18/1). Panel established on 10/04/1997. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS18/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS18/R) adopted on 6/11/1998. 
 
Suspension of concessions authorized on 
24/12/1998; Request for Arbitration 
3/08/1999 (WT/DS18/13). 
 
Mutually agreed solution notified on 
18/05/2000 (WT/DS18/RW). 
4 STC 1 WT/DS20 Canada's complaint against Korea's 
restrictions on treatment methods for 
bottled water  Consultations requested on 
8/11/1995 (WT/DS20/1). Mutually agreed solution notified on 
24/04/1996 (WT/DS20/6). 
5 STC 8 WT/DS21 US complaint against Australia's import 
restrictions  on fresh, chilled or frozen 
salmon. 
Australia - Salmonids  Consultations requested on 
17/11/1995 (WT/DS21/1). Mutually agreed solution notified on 
27/10/2000 (WT/DS21/10).  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 40 -  STC No. DS Number Parties and nature of complaint Request for consultations Panel/Appellate Body proceedings 
6 N/A WT/DS26 US complaint against EC's prohibition of 
meat from animals treated with growth-
promoting hormones. 
EC – Hormones (US) Consultations requested on 
26/01/1996 (WT/DS26/1). Panel established on 20/05/1996. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS26/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS26/R/USA) 
adopted on 13/02/1998. 
 
Suspension of concessions authorized on 
26/07/1999; Request for Arbitration on 
22/12/2008 (WT/DS26/ARB). 
 
Memorandum of Understanding notified on 
25/09/2009 (WT/DS26/28).  
7 STC 2* WT/DS41 US complaint against Korea's inspection 
procedures for fresh fruits. Consultations requested on 
24/05/1996 (WT/DS41/1). DSU consultations pending 
8 N/A WT/DS48 Canada's complaint against EC prohibition of 
meat from animals treated with growth-
promoting hormones. 
EC – Hormones (Canada) Consultations requested on 
28/06/1996 (WT/DS48/1). Panel established on 16/10/1996. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS48/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS48/R/CAN) 
adopted on 13/02/1998. 
 
Suspension of concessions authorized on 
26/07/1999; Request for Arbitration on 
22/12/2008 (WT/DS48/ARB). 
 
Memorandum of Understanding notified on 
17/03/2011 (WT/DS48/26). 
9 STC 12 WT/DS76 US complaint against Japan's "varietal 
testing" requirement for fresh fruits. 
Japan – Agricultural Products II Consultations requested on 
7/04/1997 (WT/DS76/1). Panel established on 18/11/1997. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS76/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS76/R) adopted on 
19/03/1999. 
 
Mutually satisfactory solution notified on 
23/08/2001 (WT/DS76/12). 
10 N/A WT/DS96 EC complaint against India's quantitative 
restrictions on agricultural and other 
products. Consultations requested on 
18/07/1997 (WT/DS96/1). Mutually agreed solution notified on 
7/04/1998 (WT/DS96/8).  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 41 -  STC No. DS Number Parties and nature of complaint Request for consultations Panel/Appellate Body proceedings 
11 N/A WT/DS100 EC complaint against US restrictions on 
poultry imports. Consultations requested on 
18/08/1997 (WT/DS100/1). DSU consultations pending 
12 STC 4* WT/DS133 Switzerland's complaint against Slovakia's 
BSE-related restrictions on cattle and meat. Consultations requested on 
7/05/1998 (WT/DS133/1). DSU consultations pending 
13 N/A WT/DS134 India's complaint against EC restrictions on 
rice imports. Consultations requested on 
27/05/1998 (WT/DS134/1). DSU consultations pending  
14 N/A WT/DS135 Canadian complaint against EC (French) 
measures affecting asbestos. 
EC - Asbestos Consultations requested on 
28/05/1998 (WT/DS135/1). Panel established on 25/11/1998. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS/135/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS/135/R) adopted 
on 5/04/2001. No findings under the SPS 
Agreement. 
15 N/A WT/DS137 Canada's complaint against EC restrictions 
due to pine wood nematodes. Consultations requested on 
17/06/1998 (WT/DS137/1). DSU consultations pending 
16 N/A WT/DS144 Canada's complaint against US state 
restrictions on movement of Canadian trucks 
carrying live animals and grains. Consultations requested on 
25/09/1998 (WT/DS144/1). DSU consultations pending 
17 N/A WT/DS203 US complaint against Mexico's measures 
affecting trade in live swine. Consultations requested on 
10/07/2000 (WT/DS203/1). DSU consultations pending 
18 STC 77 WT/DS205 Thailand's complaint against Egypt's GMO-
related prohibition on imports of canned 
tuna with soybean oil. Consultations request on 
22/09/2000 (WT/DS205/1). DSU consultations pending 
19 STC 92 WT/DS237 Ecuador's complaint against Turkey's import 
requirements for fresh fruit, especially 
bananas. 
Turkey – Fresh Fruit Import Procedures Consultations requested on 
31/08/2001 (WT/DS237/1). Panel established on 29/07/2002; 
composition suspended on the same day. 
 
Mutually agreed solution notified on 
22/11/2002 (WT/DS237/4). 
20 STC 100 WT/DS245 US complaint against Japan's restrictions on 
apples due to fire blight. 
Japan - Apples Consultations requested on 
1/03/2002 (WT/DS245/1). Panel established on 3/06/2002. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS245/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS245/R) adopted 
on 10/12/2003. 
 
Mutually agreed solution notified on 
30/08/2005 (WT/DS245/RW).  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 42 -  STC No. DS Number Parties and nature of complaint Request for consultations Panel/Appellate Body proceedings 
21 STC 76* WT/DS256 Hungary's complaint against Turkey's 
restrictions on imports of pet food (BSE) Consultations requested on 
3/05/2002 (WT/DS256/1). DSU consultations pending. 
22 STC 74 WT/DS270 Philippine complaint against Australia's 
restrictions on fresh fruits and vegetables, 
including bananas 
Australia - Fresh Fruit and Vegetables Consultations requested on 
18/10/2002 (WT/DS270/1). Panel established on 29/08/2003. 
23  STC 74 WT/DS271 Philippine complaint against Australia's 
restrictions on pineapple Consultations requested on 
18/10/2002 (WT/DS271/1). DSU consultations pending. 
24 N/A WT/DS279 EC complaint against India's export and 
import policy Consultations requested on 
23/12/2002 (WT/DS279/1). DSU consultations pending. 
25 STC 164 WT/DS284 Nicaragua's complaint against Mexico's 
phytosanitary restrictions on black beans Consultations requested on 
17/03/2003 (WT/DS284/1). 
 Mutually agreed solution notified on 
8/03/2004 (WT/DS284/4 – withdrawal of 
request for consultations). 
26 STC 139 WT/DS287 EC complaint  against Australian quarantine 
regime 
Australia – Quarantine Regime Consultations requested on 
3/04/2003 (WT/DS287/1). Panel established on 7/11/2003. 
 
Mutually agreed solution notified on 
9/03/2007 (WT/DS287/8). 
27 STC 
106/110 WT/DS291 US complaint against EC on GMO approvals. 
EC – Approval and Marketing of Biotech 
Products Consultations requested on 
13/05/2003 (WT/DS291/1). Single panel established for disputes 
DS291, DS292 and DS293 on 29/08/2003. 
 
Panel report (WT/DS291/R) was adopted 
on 21/11/2006. 
 
Suspension of concessions authorized on 
15/02/2008; Arbitration requested on 
7/02/2008 (WT/DS291/34). 
28 STC 
106/110 WT/DS292 Canada's complaint against EC on GMO 
approvals. 
EC – Approval and Marketing of Biotech 
Products Consultations requested on 
13/05/2003 (WT/DS292/1). Single Panel established to examine 
disputes DS291, DS292 and DS293, on 
29/08/2003. 
 
Panel report (WT/DS292/R) adopted on 
21/11/2006. 
 
Mutually agreed solution notified on 
15/07/2009 (WT/DS292/40).  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 43 -  STC No. DS Number Parties and nature of complaint Request for consultations Panel/Appellate Body proceedings 
29 STC 
106/110 WT/DS293 Argentina's complaint against EC on GMO 
approvals. 
EC – Approval and Marketing of Biotech 
Products Consultations requested on 
14/05/2003 (WT/DS293/1). Single Panel established to examine 
disputes DS291, DS292 and DS293, on 
29/08/2003. 
 
Panel report (WT/DS293/R) adopted on 
21/11/2006. 
 
Mutually agreed solution notified on 
19/03/2010 (WT/DS293/41). 
30 STC 166 WT/DS297 Hungary's complaint against Croatia's 
restrictions on live animals and meat 
products (TSEs). Consultations requested on 
9/07/2003 (WT/DS297/1). Mutually agreed solution notified on 
30/01/2009 (WT/DS297/2). 
31 N/A WT/DS320** EC complaint against the US continued 
suspension of obligations in the EC-
Hormones dispute. 
US – Continued Suspension of 
Obligations  Consultations requested on 
8/11/2004 (WT/DS320/1). Panel established on 17/02/2005. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS320/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS320/R) adopted 
on 14/11/2008, no further action was 
required. (See also Memorandum of 
Understanding, DS26). 
32 N/A WT/DS321** EC complaint against Canada's continued 
suspension of obligations in the EC-
Hormones Dispute. 
Canada– Continued Suspension of 
Obligations  Consultations requested on 
8/11/2004 (WT/DS321/1). Panel established on 17/02/2005. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS321/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS321/R) adopted 
on 14/11/2008, no further action was 
required. (See also Memorandum of 
Understanding, DS48).  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 44 -  STC No. DS Number Parties and nature of complaint Request for consultations Panel/Appellate Body proceedings 
33 STC 217 WT/DS367 New Zealand's complaint against Australia's 
restrictions on apples. 
Australia - Apples  Consultations requested on 
31/08/2007 (WT/DS367/1). Panel established on 21/01/2008. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS367/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS367/R) adopted 
on 17/12/2010. 
 
Reasonable period of time for 
implementation expired on 17/08/2011. 
Implementation notified by respondent on 02/09/2011. 
 
Agreed procedures (Sequencing 
agreement) notified on 13/09/2011 
(WT/DS367/21). 
34 STC 91 of 
TBT WT/DS384 Canada's complaint against the US country 
of origin labelling requirements. 
United States – Certain Country of 
Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements Consultations requested on 
1/12/2008 (WT/DS384/1). Single panel established with that of 
Mexico (DS386) on 19/11/2009.  
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS384/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS384/R) adopted 
on 23/07/2012. No findings under the SPS 
Agreement.  
35 STC 91 of 
TBT WT/DS386 Mexico's complaint against the US country of 
origin labelling requirements. 
United States – Certain Country of 
Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements  Consultations requested on 
17/12/2008 (WT/DS386/1). Single panel established with that of 
Canada (DS384) on 19/11/2009. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS386/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS386/R) adopted on 23/07/2012. No findings under the SPS Agreement. 
36 STC 242 WT/DS389 US complaint against EC measures affecting 
poultry meat and poultry meat products. 
EC - Poultry  Consultations requested on 
16/01/2009 (WT/DS389/1). Panel established on 19/11/2009; 
composition pending.  
  G/SPS/W/280  
 
- 45 -  STC No. DS Number Parties and nature of complaint Request for consultations Panel/Appellate Body proceedings 
37 STC 247 WT/DS391 Canada's complaint against Korea's 
measures affecting the importation of bovine 
meat and meat products 
Korea – Bovine Products  Consultations requested on 
9/04/2009 (WT/DS391/1). Panel established on 31/08/2009: Panel 
proceedings suspended on 4/07/2011. 
 
Mutually agreed solution notified on 
19/06/2012 (WT/DS391/9). 
 
Panel report (WT/DS391/R) circulated to 
Members on 3/07/2012, reporting on the 
solution reached by parties. 
38 STC 257 WT/DS392 China's complaint against US measures 
affecting imports of poultry. 
US — Poultry Consultations requested on 
17/04/2009 (WT/DS392/1). Panel established on 31/07/2009. 
 
Panel report (WT/DS392/R) adopted on 
25/10/2010, no further action required. 
39 STC 257 
in TBT WT/DS406 Indonesia's complaint about US ban on clove 
cigarettes. 
US - Measures Affecting the Production 
and Sale of Clove Cigarettes  Consultations requested on 
7/04/2010 (WT/DS406/1). Panel established on 20/07/2010. 
 
Appellate Body report (WT/DS406/AB/R) 
and Panel report (WT/DS406/R) adopted on 24/04/2012. No findings under the SPS 
Agreement. 
40 STC 185 WT/DS430 US complaint against India's import 
restrictions on agricultural products. 
India — Agricultural Products Consultations requested on 
6/03/2012 (WT/DS430/1). Panel established on 25/06/2012. 
 
Panel composed on 18/02/2013; Panel 
proceedings on-going. 
41 STC 318 WT/DS447 Argentina's complaint against US restrictions 
on beef and other meat products. 
US - Animals Consultations requested on 
30/08/2012. Panel established on 28/01/2013. 
 
Panel composed on 08/08/2013; Panel 
proceedings on-going. 
42 STC 336 WT/DS448 Argentina's complaint against US measures 
affecting the importation of fresh lemons. Consultations requested on 
3/09/2012. DSU consultations pending. 
* Whilst the DSU consultations on this case are pending, the Commi ttee was notified that the specific trade concern itself had been resolved. 
** DS320, 321: Neither of these two requests for consultations clai med violation of the SPS Agreement, however, one of the issu es of concern regarded the EC implementation of 
the rulings in WT/DS26 and WT/DS48; hence, the SPS Agreement was relevant to these disputes. 
 
 
__________