WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47  
 
19 March 2014  
(14-1729)  Page: 1/16  
Committee on Trade and Development  
Aid for Trade    
 
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND 
DEVELOPMENT (OECD) 
The following communication, dated 17 March 2014, received from the Organisation for 
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), is being circulated to delegations for 
information. 
_______________ 
  
DONOR REPORTING ON TRADE FACILITATION ASSISTANCE 
 
Table of contents 
 
1   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 2
 
2   INTROD UCTION  .......................................................................................................... 2  
3   METHOD OLOGY ........................................................................................................... 2  
4   HOW MUCH TRADE FACILITATION ASSISTANCE HAS BEEN COMMITTED AND 
DISBURSED? ....................................................................................................................  3 
Donors and Trade Facilit ation Assistance .............................................................................. 5  
Geographical breakdown of Trad e Facilitation Assistance ........................................................ 6  
ANNEX 1 – TEN LARGEST TRADE FACILITATION PROJECTS IN 2012  ........................................ 8  
ANNEX 2 – TRADE FACILITATION COMMITMENTS BY AID PROVIDER  ....................................... 9  
ANNEX 3 – TRADE FACILITATION COMMITMENTS BY RECIPIENT  ........................................... 10  
ANNEX 4 – TRADE FACILITATION DISBURSEMENTS BY PROVIDER  ........................................ 13  
ANNEX 5 – TRADE FACILITATION DISBURSEMENTS BY AID RECIPIENT  .................................. 14  
 
Table of figures:  Figure 1 - Trade Fac ilitation Assistance Co mmitments, 2002-2012 ........................................... 3
 
Figure 2 - Trade Facilitation Assistance Di sbursements, 2006-2012  .......................................... 4  
Figure 3 - Trade Facilit ation by re gion .................................................................................. 6  
 
List of tables: 
 Table 1 - Trade Facilitation related Other Official Flows ........................................................... 4
 
Table 2 - Trade Facilitation commi tments by top 10 donors ..................................................... 5  WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 2 - 
 
   
1  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
1.1.  This paper has been prepared in the cont ext of the on-going OECD commitment to monitor 
and evaluate the WTO-led Aid-for-Trade Initia tive. The paper examines current OECD data 
collection in support of trade facilitation and aims to help trade negotiators review existing data 
before the Trade Facilitation Agreement enters into force.  
1.2.  The Trade Facilitation Agreement requires Me mbers to submit information on their assistance 
and support for capacity building. Reporting should cover information on assistance that has been 
disbursed in the preceding twelve months and is committed for the next twelve months.  
1.3.  OECD members can base their submission s to the Trade Facilitation Committee on their 
reporting to the OECD DAC aid activity database, i.e. the Creditor Reporting System (CRS). This 
database is the authoritative source of data on Official Development Assistance (ODA) and Other 
Official Flows (OOF) and includes a specific  reporting code for trade facilitation.  
1.4.  Donor reporting shows that over the last ten years more than US$2.5 billion in ODA was 
committed to trade facilitation and since 2006 US$1.4 billion disbursed. This assistance has been 
provided in a mixture of grants from bilateral donors and both grants and concessional loans from multilateral institutions. Annual flows have grown strongly in recent years, mostly benefiting 
African countries. Since 2006, a further US$678 million has been disbursed in OOF (in the form of 
non-concessional loans to middle income countries).  
1.5.  Project descriptions under the CRS code for trade facilitation illustrate that a variety of 
activities are being supported ranging from tec hnical assistance to improving transport links, 
promoting regional integration and helping producers meet international standards. Donor 
reporting to the CRS on trade facilitation has thus been considered in a broader sense than that envisaged by the Trade Facilitation Agreement.  
2  INTRODUCTION 
2.1.  This note outlines the methodology of the OECD Creditor Reporting System. It examines how 
much aid for trade facilitation has been committed and disbursed, the donors, recipients and the 
terms at which the assistance is provided.  
3  METHODOLOGY 3.1.  The CRS is an internationally recognized source of authoritative data on ODA and OOF to 
developing countries.
1 The CRS is based on regular reporting by members of the OECD 
Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and other providers of development cooperation, based 
on approved policy guidelines. It is estimated that the CRS covers around 90% of all bilateral and multilateral ODA and OOF. Increasingly non-memb ers of the DAC are reporting their aid to the 
CRS.
2 
3.2.  The OECD collects, collates, and verifies  the consistency of the data, and maintains the 
database which provides comparable data over time and across countries. Dimensions include: 
 recipient countries (possibility of groupi ng by continent or by income group); 
 donors (grouped into bilateral and multilateral); 
 sectors and sub-sectors; 
 annual commitments and disbursements; 
 flows: grants, loans, ODA, OOF; 
                                               
1 See http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/crsguide.htm  
2 See http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/docu mentupload/Evolution%20of%20ODA.pdf  WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 3 - 
 
   channels of delivery; 
 type of aid. 
3.3.  The CRS dataset allows users to view and export the detailed list of transactions behind each 
amount. A text search on the project descriptions provides the data users with further information 
on the relevant activities, although text search results are dependent on the quality of the 
descriptive information provided by donors. 
3.4.   Governments, organizations and researchers make frequent use of it, and for the OECD, the 
CRS serves as a tool for monitoring specific policy issues. Unless otherwise stated, aid activity data 
are expressed in United States dollars at the exch ange rate prevailing in the year of the flow ( i.e. 
in current dollars). Analyses of trends in aid over longer periods should be based on constant 
dollars so as to take account of inflation and exchange rate variations. 
3.5.  Donor support (i.e. ODA and OOF) for trade facilitation programmes are recorded in the CRS 
under the heading trade facilitation  with the following additional notes on coverage: Simplification 
and harmonisation of international import and export procedures (e.g. customs valuation, licensing 
procedures, transport formalities, payments, insurance); support to customs departments; tariff 
reforms).3 
4  HOW MUCH TRADE FACILITATION ASSISTANCE HAS BEEN COMMITTED AND 
DISBURSED? 
4.1.  The CRS indicates that commitments for trade facilitation assistance have increased 
substantially in recent years, and by almost three times since 2006, amounting to US$477 million 
in 2012 (Figure 1). Since 2002, the accumulated commi tments stand at more than US$2.5 billion. 
While there was a slight dip in 2011, commitments rebounded in 2012 increasing by 27% in real terms.  
Figure 1 - Trade Facilitation As sistance Commitments, 2002-2012 
 
         US$ million (2011 constant) 
0100200300400500
2002‐05
avg.2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Source: OECD-DAC/CRS 
                                               
3 See http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/39961177.pdf  WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 4 - 
 
   
4.2.  The CRS also shows that disbursements of trad e facilitation have also increased substantially, 
albeit inconsistently, reflecting higher past commitments (Figure 2). Since 2006, a total of US$1.4 billion has been disbursed to trade facilitation. In 2010, disbursements reached their 
highest level at US$348 million reflecting the large amounts of post-crisis support disbursed mainly 
by multilateral institutions, but this level was not sustained. In 2012, annual disbursements stood at almost US$250 million, down slightly on 2011. 
Figure 2 - Trade Facilitation Assi stance Disbursements, 2006-2012 
 
           US$ million (2011 constant) 
0100200300400500
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012( )
 
Source: OECD-DAC/CRS 
 
 4.3.  Other Official Flows (OOF) are the transactions which do not meet the conditions for eligibility as ODA, either because they are not primarily aimed at development, or because they have a 
grant element of less than 25 per cent. OOF for trade facilitation increased substantially in 2012 
and the total amount exceeds that of ODA at over US$500 million. This represents a five-fold increase since 2011.  
4.4.  There are only two providers, the Euro pean Bank for Reconstruction and Development 
(EBRD) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). Traditionally OOF are provided mostly to middle-income countries, evenly divided between lower and upper middle- 
income countries (see Table 1).  
4.5.  In 2012, the EBRD provided the vast majori ty (over 90%) with Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia and 
Kazakhstan among the highest recipients. IBRD resources were provided to Indonesia and Mauritius. Trade facilitation related OOF disbursements have been inconsistent with US$345 million 
disbursed in 2010 but only US$64 million in 2012. Overall US$678 million has been disbursed 
since 2006. 
Table 1 - Trade Facilitation re lated Other Official Flows 
US$ million (2011 constant) 
  2002-05 
avg. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Other low-income 
countries 0.13  .. .. .. .. .. .. ..  
Lower middle-income 
countries 1.84  .. 33.01  35.53  5.38  68.40  59.12   299.77  
Upper middle-income 
countries 106.74  .. 27.75   ..  403.65  185.92  38.45   215.92  
Total Trade 
Facilitation 108.71  .. 60.76  35.53  409.03  254.32  97.58  515.69  
Source: OECD/DAC/CRS WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 5 - 
 
   
 
4.6.  The remainder of the paper focuses on tr ade facilitation commitments qualifying as ODA 
reported to the CRS.   
Donors and Trade Facilitation Assistance 4.7.  A small number of donors provide the bulk of  trade facilitation assistance (Table 2). Four 
donors, i.e. the EU institutions, the World Bank, the United Kingdom, and Japan, together 
accounted for 76% of all trade facilitation assistance reported in the period 2006-2012.  The relative weight of bilateral and multilateral assistance has changed over the reporting period. 
Whereas in 2006, almost 75% was provided by bilateral donors, this fell to under 30% in 2012.  
Overall, multilateral donors accounted for 58% of trade facilitation assistance reported to the CRS in the period 2006-2012.  
4.8.  The World Bank has scaled up its support significantly since 2007 and is consistently among 
the largest providers. One single project, a Worl d Bank loan-funded transport project in Ethiopia, 
accounts for over US$200 million of the US$585 million committed since 2006.
4  (For details of the 
10 largest trade facilitation projects in 2012 see Annex 1). The European Union was the largest 
donor committing US$652 million since 2006. The United Kingdom made a few large commitments 
in 2009 and 2010, committing over US$79.1 million and US$140 million respectively mostly for the TradeMark Southern Africa
5 and TradeMark East Africa, which are multi-donor programmes 
(with  Belgium, Denmark,  Finland,  Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States). Japan is also a 
strong supporter of trade facilitation with US $50 million in 2012, committed mostly to technical 
cooperation among Asian countries. 
Table 2 - Trade Facilitation commitments by top 10 donors 
US$ million (2011 constant) 
 2002-
05 avg. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2006-
2012 
EU Institutions  13.7   31.4   19.4   175.8   88.0   109.1   182.4   46.2   652.3  
World Bank  11.0  ..  46.6   48.6   68.9   91.3   56.2   263.2   574.9  
United 
Kingdom ..  9.9  ..  0.3   79.1   143.2   4.5   14.0   251.1  
Japan  25.6   49.1   45.9   14.5   11.4   21.9   25.6   49.7   218.0  
United States  5.9   10.1   16.8   11.1   4.3   7.3   0.9   12.1   62.6  
Sweden  0.2   1.3   1.2   9.9   12.8   11.8   4.1   18.9   60.1  
Switzerland  6.4   7.1   0.5   0.3   17.7  ..  33.5  ..  59.1  
Canada  1.3   2.5   0.7   0.6   18.7   5.3   12.2   5.7   45.8  
Netherlands  2.4  ..  2.5   11.4   4.2   0.9   0.4   23.0   42.3  
Denmark .. ..  1.4   7.7   2.0  ..  30.0   0.0   41.1  
Sub-total 66.4  111.4  135.1  280.4  306.9  390.9  349.9 432.7 2 007.2  
Total Trade 
Facilitation  81.8  124.8  170.5  311.9  339.0  421.9  376.8  477.4  2 222.4  
Top 10 share 
in total  81.2 
% 89.2 
% 79.2 
% 89.9 
% 90.5 
% 92.6 
% 92.8 
% 90.6 
% 90.3 
% 
For reference:                    
Total DAC  47.6   93.5   95.8   76.4   172.9   215.2   135.5   140.1   929.4  
Total 
multilateral  34.3   31.4   74.7   235.5   166.1   206.7   241.4   337.3  1 293.0  
Source: OECD-DAC aid activity database (CRS), commitments 
  
4.9.  All trade facilitation assistance provided by bilateral donors is in grant form. Multilateral 
institutions traditionally also provided most of their assistance in grant form. In fact grants represented 85-90% of total annua l trade facilitation prior to 2 012. However in 2012, with the 
large World Bank loan project in Ethiopia, loans represent over half of the total. 
                                               
4 More details of this project can be found here: http://www.worldbank.org/projects/P117731/ethiopia-
transport-sector-project-support-rsdp4?lang=en  
5 This programme was recently evaluate d and the findings can be found here: 
http://www.oecd.org/dere c/unitedkingdom/DFIDs-Trade-Development-Work-in-Southern-Africa-Report.pdf  WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 6 - 
 
  Geographical breakdown of Trade Facilitation Assistance 
4.10.  Trade facilitation commitments have la rgely benefitted Africa. In 2012 commitments to 
Africa stood at just under US$290 million, a 13-fold increase since 2006 (Figure 3). African countries now receive over 60% of total commitments and their share has risen steadily in recent 
years. As mentioned above, the World Bank committed over US$200 million to facilitate trade 
through improving the condition of regional trade corridors.
6 This World Bank project for trade 
facilitation reported to the CRS is only a part of a larger US$416 million programme to improve 
roads in Ethiopia. Another example is the commitment of US$15 million from the Swedish 
International Development Agency (SIDA) to TradeM ark East Africa, with the aim of strengthening 
Regional Economic Integration through trade facilitation (and infrastructure) as well as capacity building. 
4.11.  Flows to Asia have fluctuated over the years. Commitments dropped to US$39 million in 
2011 but strongly rebounded to just under US$100 million in 2012. This included a US$33.7 million project for E-Customs and a National Single Window for Customs Modernization in 
Vietnam supported by Japan. The United Kingdom also committed US$8 million to regional trade 
facilitation efforts. The Asian Development Special Fund has major programmes in Laos and Cambodia which will improve Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) handling in the Greater Mekong 
Sub-region Trade Project. 
Figure 3 - Trade Facilitation by region 
          US$ million (2011 constant) 
050100150200250300
Africa America Asia Europe Oceania
2002‐05 avg.
2006‐10 avg.
2011
2012
 
Source: OECD-DAC aid activity database (CRS) 
 
 
4.12.  Flows to the Americas stood at US$62 millio n in 2011 because of European Union support to 
the Caribbean. The European Union provided over  US$30 million to the Dominican Republic and 
just less than US$30 million to Haiti in a programme to expand the Dajabon market on the border 
through the construction of additional infrastructure for Dominican and Haitian customs. Several 
bilateral donors contributed to the Regional Infrastructure Integration Fund 2012 which is managed by the Inter-American Development Ba nk. However, commitments declined to under 
US$30 million in 2012. 
4.13.  Under the leadership of the Inter-American Development Bank, Central American countries 
have been discussing how to develop single windows for trade, create a central website with information on import requirements, establish a regional database of sanitary records, encourage 
the automation and interconnection of customs systems, adopt risk-management policies, and 
invest in the improvement of border posts.
 7 
                                               
6 More details of this project can be found here: http://www.worldbank.org/projects/P117731/ethiopia-
transport-sector-project-support-rsdp4?lang=en  
7 http://www.iadb.org/en/topics/trade/idb-support-f or-trade-facilitation-in-central-america,7609.html  WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 7 - 
 
  4.14.  The amounts committed to both Europe and Oceania has a combined share of less than 4% 
of total trade facilitation support. In 2012, US$14 million was committed to Europe with over 90% for just two countries, i.e. Moldova and Kosovo. Finally, aid to Oceania for trade facilitation stood at US$5 million, this is down slightly from 2011. However, in 2010, the European Union made 
commitments of US$40 million to "strengthen Pacific economic integration through trade".  
4.15.  Other donor commitments are not region specific. For example, in 2012 the Netherlands 
provided US$21 million to the World Bank’s Trade Facilitation Facility (TFF) Multi-Donor Trust 
Fund. The TFF brings together expertise from across the World Bank Group to scale up the 
institution’s trade facilitation-related activities to support trade for development. The TFF can also play an important role in helping developing countries implement trade facilitation provisions of international trade agreements, including the Bali Trade Facilitation Agreement.
8 In 2011, Denmark 
provided US$24 million for a programme in the Ea st African Community (Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, 
Tanzania and Uganda) to foster economic integration through the establishment of a Common Market with the aim of promoting economic growth.  
 
 
                                               
8 More details of the Trade Facilitation Facility can be found here: 
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOP ICS/TRADE/0,,contentMDK:22109269~menuPK:5937761~p
agePK:210058~piPK:210062~theSitePK:239071,00.html  WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 8 - 
 
  ANNEX 1 – TEN LARGEST TRADE FACILITATION PROJECTS IN 2012  
Aid provider Aid recipient US$ 
million Type of finance Description 
World Bank Ethiopia 212.08 ODA loan Ethiopia-transport sector 
project of RSDP4 
Japan Vietnam 33.68 ODA grant E-customs and national 
single window for customs 
modernization 
EU Institutions Peru 17.86 ODA grant Euro Eco Trade 
EU Institutions Kenya 16.62 ODA grant Standards for market access 
programme (SMAP) 
Sweden South of Sahara, 
reg. 15.25 ODA grant TMEA core support (regional 
window) 
Netherlands Global unallocated 14.27 ODA grant DDE trade facilitation facility 
World Bank Central African 
Republic 12.61 ODA grant CEMAC – transport-transit 
facilitation 
Asian Dev. Bank Lao PDR 11.24 ODA grant Trade Facilitation – 
Improved sanitary & 
phytosanitary handling in 
GMS project 
Asian Dev. Bank Cambodia 11.24 ODA grant Trade Facilitation – 
Improved sanitary & phytosanitary handling in Mekong sub-region. 
World Bank Côte d'Ivoire 11.04 ODA grant Abidjan-Lagos trade and 
transport facilitation 
programme – APL-2 
 WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 9 - 
 
  ANNE 
ANNEX 2 – TRADE FACILITATION COMMITMENTS BY AID PROVIDER  
US$ million (2011 constant) 
  2002-05 
avg. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Australia  2.3   3.3   0.4   2.7   14.6   8.0   5.3   1.4  
Austria  0.0  .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Belgium  0.1  .. ..  1.9   1.1   0.7   0.1   0.2  
Canada  1.3   2.5   0.7   0.6   18.7   5.3   12.2   5.7  
Czech Republic .. ..  .. .. .. .. .. ..  
Denmark .. ..  1.4   7.7   2.0  ..  30.0   0.0  
Finland  0.0   2.4   0.2   1.9   0.0   6.0   0.3  .. 
France  1.4  ..  4.8   1.4  ..  0.6  .. .. 
Germany  0.5   2.9   2.5   2.1   1.8   2.5   2.2   0.1  
Greece  0.0  ..  0.0   1.8   0.7  .. ..   
Iceland .. ..  .. .. .. .. .. ..  
Ireland  0.0  ..  0.0  .. .. .. ..  0.2  
Italy  0.0   0.2  .. ..  0.1   0.0   0.1  .. 
Japan  25.6   49.1   45.9   14.5   11.4   21.9   25.6   49.7  
Korea    0.6   0.6   3.9   1.0   1.5   6.7   4.4  
Luxembourg .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Netherlands  2.4  ..  2.5   11.4   4.2   0.9   0.4   23.0  
New Zealand  0.7   2.5   1.0   2.2   1.6   4.5   5.2   6.3  
Norway  0.4   1.5   16.1   1.1   1.5   0.8   3.8   3.8  
Poland .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Portugal  0.0  .. .. .. .. .. .. ..  
Spain  0.3   0.0   1.0   1.6   0.3   0.3   0.6   0.4  
Slovak Republic .. ..  .. .. .. .. .. ..  
Slovenia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Sweden  0.2   1.3   1.2   9.9   12.8   11.8   4.1   18.9  
Switzerland  6.4   7.1   0.5   0.3   17.7  ..  33.5    
United Kingdom ..  9.9  ..  0.3   79.1   143.2   4.5   14.0  
United States  5.9   10.1   16.8   11.1   4.3   7.3   0.9   12.1  
Total DAC  47.6   93.5   95.8   76.4   172.9   215.2   135.5   140.1  
Turkey .. .. .. .. ..  0.0  .. .. 
Other bilateral .. ..  .. .. ..  0.0  .. ..  
AsDB  9.5  ..  5.9  .. .. .. ..  25.6  
EU Institutions  13.7   31.4   19.4   175.8   88.0   109.1   182.4   46.2  
FAO .. ..  0.2   0.5   0.6   1.4   1.3   1.1  
IADB .. ..  .. ..  6.7  .. .. ..  
IMF .. ..  1.5  .. .. .. .. .. 
UNDP  0.0  .. ..  0.0   0.4   0.5   0.3  .. 
UNECE .. .. ..  0.9   0.0   0.0   0.2   0.2  
UNESCAP .. ..  ..  0.1   0.3   0.4   0.2   0.2  
UNESCWA .. ..  0.1  ..  0.0  ..  0.1   0.0  
UNIDO .. ..  ..  8.1  ..  2.7  .. ..  
World Bank  11.0  ..  46.6   48.6   68.9   91.3   56.2   263.2  
WTO .. ..   1.0   1.2   1.1   1.2   0.6   0.9  
Other multilateral 
donors .. .. ..  0.1  .. .. .. .. 
Total multilateral  34.3   31.4   74.7   235.5   166.1   206.7   241.4   337.3  
Total Trade 
Facilitation  81.8   124.8   170.5   311.9   339.0   421.9   376.8   477.4  
For reference: Shares in total Trade Facilitation 
Bilateral  58.1   74.9   56.2   24.5   51.0   51.0   35.9   29.3  
Multilateral  41.9   25.1   43.8   75.5   49.0   49.0   64.1   70.7  
Source: OECD-DAC aid activity database (CRS) WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 10 - 
 
  ANNEX 3 – TRADE FACILITATION COMMITMENTS BY RECIPIENT  
US$ million (2011 constant) 
  2002-
05 
avg. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Afghanistan  10.61   0.01 ..  14.34  7.43  77.79   0.02   0.20 
Albania ..  0.07 ..  5.03 .. ..  0.10   0.11 
Algeria  0.84   7.47  0.14 ..  1.97  0.06   0.09   0.22 
Angola .. .. .. ..  0.10 .. .. .. 
Antigua and Barbuda .. .. ..  0.04 .. .. .. .. 
Argentina  0.01   0.08  0.02 ..  0.01  0.10  ..  0.18 
Armenia .. ..  9.79 .. ..  0.21  ..  0.05 
Azerbaijan  0.00  .. .. ..  0.01 .. ..  0.00 
Bangladesh  0.13   0.01  0.03  0.00 ..  0.86   0.02   0.36 
Barbados ..  0.00 ..  0.07  0.04  0.01  .. .. 
Belarus ..  0.22  0.29 .. .. ..  0.01  .. 
Belize  0.01  ..  0.01 ..  0.03 .. ..  0.02 
Benin  0.01  ..  0.52  0.04  0.10  4.79   7.50  .. 
Bhutan ..  0.01 ..  0.00  0.00  0.00   0.02   0.02 
Bolivia  1.49   1.12 .. .. .. .. ..  0.03 
Bosnia and Herzegovina  0.07  .. .. .. ..  3.17   2.68   0.09 
Botswana  0.09   0.01  0.08  0.10  0.01  0.17   0.21   0.46 
Brazil  0.03   0.01 ..  0.06  0.69  0.01   0.33   0.70 
Burkina Faso .. ..  9.90  11.75  0.10  0.02  ..  0.01 
Burundi .. ..  0.01 ..  0.10  0.07   0.02  .. 
Cambodia  0.58   0.02  4.95  7.94  0.15  0.16   0.58   12.01 
Cameroon .. ..  16.30  0.21  30.34  11.51   11.20   0.11 
Cape Verde .. .. .. ..  0.04 .. .. .. 
Central African Rep. .. ..  2.64  0.03  7.31 .. ..  12.78 
Chad .. ..  3.30 ..  0.10 .. .. .. 
Chile ..  0.09  0.02  0.16  0.08  0.01   0.00   0.01 
China  5.30   0.72  0.31  0.35  0.55  2.42   0.41   0.31 
Colombia  0.18  ..  0.25  0.45  0.01 .. ..  0.65 
Comoros .. .. .. ..  0.14 .. .. .. 
Congo, Dem. Rep.  0.00   0.17  0.01  0.25  0.10  2.80   0.04   0.24 
Congo, Rep. .. .. .. .. ..  0.07  .. .. 
Cook Islands  0.04  .. ..  0.12  0.00  0.04   1.67  .. 
Costa Rica  0.06   0.80 ..  6.46  5.70 ..  0.00   0.26 
Côte d'Ivoire .. ..  0.14 ..  22.70  1.51   0.01   11.04 
Croatia  0.11  ..  3.32 .. .. .. .. .. 
Cuba  0.01  .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Djibouti .. ..  0.22 ..  0.13 .. .. .. 
Dominica .. .. ..  0.03 .. .. .. .. 
Dominican Republic  0.01   7.50  0.02 .. .. ..  32.57   0.36 
Ecuador  0.10   0.02 ..  0.18  0.42  0.03   0.29   0.47 
Egypt  0.16   9.90  0.06  0.03  2.02  0.79   0.16  .. 
El Salvador  0.13   9.94  0.07  0.02  0.13  0.15   0.21   0.10 
Ethiopia ..  0.01 .. ..  0.17  0.03   0.01   212.09 
Fiji  0.05  ..  0.00  0.02  0.00  0.00   0.01   0.01 
Former Yugoslav Republic of 
Macedonia  0.12  .. ..  13.54  4.13  2.53  ..  0.01 
Gabon .. .. ..  0.05 .. .. .. .. 
Gambia .. .. .. ..  0.10 .. ..  0.00 
Georgia .. ..  2.65  4.95  8.24  8.52  ..  8.48 
Ghana  0.12  .. ..  13.41  0.04  20.37   20.01  .. 
Grenada ..  0.00 ..  0.81 .. .. .. .. 
Guatemala  0.10   14.95  0.27  0.02  0.39 ..  0.20   0.18 WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 11 - 
 
    2002-
05 
avg. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Guinea .. .. .. ..  0.10 .. .. .. 
Guinea-Bissau .. .. .. ..  0.10 .. .. .. 
Guyana  0.00  .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Haiti  0.00  .. .. ..  0.26 ..  26.01   0.27 
Honduras  0.18  ..  0.01  0.01 .. ..  0.08   0.09 
India  1.82   0.01  0.04  0.27  0.13  1.12   0.12   0.69 
Indonesia  2.52   0.13  0.03  21.63  0.20  1.24   1.26   0.79 
Iran  0.03  .. .. ..  0.00 ..  0.00   0.00 
Iraq  0.23  .. ..  3.73 .. ..  1.09   0.13 
Jamaica ..  0.00 ..  0.02  0.01 .. .. .. 
Jordan .. ..  9.07  47.53  2.20  0.02   0.01   0.62 
Kazakhstan  0.03   0.14  1.63  0.15  0.08  0.01   0.08   0.16 
Kenya  0.00   0.10  0.00  0.05  0.13  0.17   0.68   16.70 
Kiribati  0.12  .. .. ..  0.10 .. .. .. 
Korea, Dem. Rep. .. .. .. .. ..  0.14  .. .. 
Kosovo .. .. .. .. .. ..  0.05   3.43 
Kyrgyz Republic  5.72   1.55  0.25 ..  2.21  0.01  ..  0.11 
Laos .. ..  6.13  6.48  11.20  1.13   0.54   18.39 
Lebanon .. ..  0.01 ..  0.03 .. ..  0.14 
Lesotho  0.01   0.54  0.19  0.32  0.10  0.15   0.05  .. 
Liberia .. ..  0.03 ..  0.10 .. ..  4.12 
Libya  0.03  .. .. .. ..  0.25  ..  0.23 
Madagascar  0.40   0.11  0.18  0.74  0.13 ..  0.01  .. 
Malawi  0.00   0.30  0.32  0.31  0.33  17.44   0.39   0.66 
Malaysia  0.93   0.09  0.25  0.04  0.10  1.10   0.05   1.19 
Maldives .. ..  0.06 ..  0.12 ..  0.02   0.02 
Mali .. ..  2.57  14.61  0.83  1.33   0.03  .. 
Mauritania  0.01  .. .. ..  0.10 .. .. .. 
Mauritius  0.02   0.01  0.10  0.12 ..  0.15   0.15  .. 
Mexico  0.33  ..  0.99  0.03  0.10  1.37   0.31   1.11 
Micronesia, Fed. States .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Moldova  0.17  .. .. ..  0.05  6.13   2.06   9.21 
Mongolia ..  0.06  5.87  2.75  0.11  0.98   0.05   0.05 
Montenegro .. .. ..  1.43 .. .. .. .. 
Morocco  0.13   0.13  0.13  0.35  2.09  0.37   0.52   0.45 
Mozambique  0.87   0.13  0.36  9.79  0.10 ..  0.02   0.00 
Myanmar  0.00  ..  0.00  0.08  0.01  0.95   0.02   0.99 
Namibia  0.04   0.17  0.00 .. ..  0.10   0.11   0.02 
Nauru .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Nepal .. ..  0.05  0.07  0.17  0.12   5.02   0.03 
Nicaragua  1.91  .. .. ..  5.45 ..  0.16   0.24 
Niger .. .. .. ..  0.10  0.04  ..  8.69 
Nigeria .. .. ..  0.02  0.09 ..  0.01   0.01 
Niue .. .. ..  0.00 .. .. .. .. 
Oman .. .. ..  0.08  0.25 .. .. .. 
Pakistan  0.12   0.01  0.03  0.02  26.92  0.00  ..  0.02 
Palau .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Panama  0.01  .. ..  0.02 .. ..  0.08   0.33 
Papua New Guinea  0.00   0.09  0.11  0.04  0.04  0.01   0.01   0.54 
Paraguay ..  0.02  0.02 ..  0.00  0.02  ..  0.02 
Peru  5.77   0.18  0.06  0.05  4.33  0.02   0.63   17.89 
Philippines  1.71   0.10  0.03  0.06  0.08  1.90   0.05   0.65 
Rwanda  0.00  .. ..  0.04  0.10  7.00   17.50   0.01 
Samoa .. .. .. ..  0.10  0.04  .. .. WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 12 - 
 
    2002-
05 
avg. 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Sao Tome & Principe .. .. ..  0.03  0.10 .. ..  0.53 
Senegal  0.07  .. .. ..  14.34  0.00  .. .. 
Serbia  2.04   0.01  0.31  1.72  2.40  0.61   25.78  .. 
Sierra Leone .. .. .. ..  0.10  0.14   0.33  .. 
Solomon Islands  0.01   0.10  0.11  0.80  1.63  0.82   1.20   0.81 
South Africa  0.03   0.03  0.18  0.01  3.77  0.29   0.28   1.47 
South Sudan .. .. .. .. .. ..  0.72   1.65 
Sri Lanka  0.00   1.74 ..  0.00  0.03  0.00   0.26   0.46 
St. Kitts-Nevis .. .. ..  0.28 .. .. .. .. 
St. Lucia ..  0.00 .. .. ..  1.11  .. .. 
St. Vincent & Grenadines ..  0.00 .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Sudan  0.00  ..  0.02 ..  0.12 .. ..  0.02 
Suriname  0.00   0.00 .. ..  0.04 .. .. .. 
Swaziland  0.02  .. ..  0.07 ..  0.08   0.21  .. 
Syria  0.01  .. .. .. ..  0.01  .. .. 
Tajikistan  3.81   1.55  0.27  0.29  2.16 .. ..  0.09 
Tanzania  0.95   0.20  0.29  0.51  0.25  4.86   0.02   0.77 
Thailand  1.09   0.09  0.46  0.11  0.09  1.26   0.13   0.74 
Timor-Leste  0.23  ..  0.04 ..  0.23  0.67  .. .. 
Togo .. .. ..  0.01  0.14  2.11  .. .. 
Tonga  0.18   0.03  0.01 ..  0.00 ..  0.02  .. 
Trinidad and Tobago  0.29  ..  0.13  0.01 ..  0.17  .. .. 
Tunisia  0.01  .. ..  0.12  2.65 ..  0.05   0.30 
Turkey  0.03  ..  0.16  0.05  20.29  0.77  ..  0.04 
Turkmenistan ..  0.01 .. .. ..  0.00  ..  0.29 
Tuvalu .. .. .. ..  0.10 .. .. .. 
Uganda  0.07  ..  0.03  0.47  0.10  0.07   3.74   0.35 
Ukraine  0.01  ..  0.09  64.45  1.81  0.04  ..  0.24 
Uruguay .. ..  0.11  0.14  0.02 .. .. .. 
Uzbekistan ..  0.03 .. ..  0.23  0.77   0.08   0.21 
Vanuatu .. .. ..  0.01  0.10 .. ..  0.01 
Venezuela  0.09   0.00 .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Vietnam  2.41   2.84  1.18  10.65  10.78  2.70   0.71   34.44 
West Bank & Gaza Strip ..  0.01  6.65 ..  0.03  0.04  ..  0.37 
Yemen ..  0.01 ..  0.02  0.20 .. .. .. 
Zambia  0.05   0.67  0.27  0.01  0.10  0.15   0.22   0.00 
Zimbabwe  0.12  .. ..  0.03  0.03  0.24   0.34  .. 
Total bilateral  55.00   64.26  94.17  271.08  213.95  198.46   169.62   392.35 
Regional and global unallocated  26.82   60.58  76.34  40.83  125.16  223.49   207.23   85.03 
Total Trade Facilitation  81.82   124.84  170.51  311.91  339.11  421.95   376.85   477.38 
Source: OECD-DAC aid activity  database (CRS) commitments 
Note: "0.00" represent negligible amounts.   
 WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 13 - 
 
  ANNEX 4 – TRADE FACILITATION DISBURSEMENTS BY PROVIDER  
 US$ million (2011 constant)  
  2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Australia  3.7   3.7   3.5   8.2   2.6   5.3   1.4  
Austria .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Belgium .. ..   1.6   1.1   0.7   0.1   0.2  
Canada  0.3   2.3   2.5   9.3   10.2   12.1   14.9  
Czech Republic .. ..  .. .. .. .. ..  
Denmark ..  0.8   1.1  ..  5.3   0.9   10.3  
Finland ..  1.4   1.9   0.0   2.9   3.2   0.1  
France  1.0   0.7   1.3   2.1   2.8   1.8   0.6  
Germany  2.9   2.5   4.4   1.8   2.5   2.2   2.0  
Greece ..  0.0   1.8   0.7  .. .. .. 
Iceland .. ..  .. .. .. .. ..  
Ireland ..  0.0  .. .. .. ..  0.2  
Italy  0.0  ..  0.0   0.1   0.0   0.1   0.1  
Japan  41.4   50.5   6.7   4.2   28.2   26.6   15.9  
Korea  0.6   0.6   15.8   7.7   1.2   6.1   6.9  
Luxembourg .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Netherlands  2.0   1.7   4.0   3.3   4.9   3.2   7.0  
New Zealand  1.6   0.6   1.7   1.9   1.3   2.6   3.4  
Norway  1.1   7.2   3.3   4.2   3.0   2.4   3.0  
Poland .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Portugal .. ..  .. .. .. .. ..  
Spain  0.0   1.0   1.8   0.3   0.3   0.7   0.0  
Slovak Republic .. ..  .. .. .. .. ..  
Slovenia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Sweden  0.7   2.0   4.7   8.4   8.7   8.4   12.2  
Switzerland  13.6   0.9   0.8   14.3   0.3   1.5   0.1  
United Kingdom .. ..   0.3   5.0   142.7   35.6   31.8  
United States  5.8   18.1   35.0   11.3   7.4   2.4   8.4  
Total DAC  74.7   94.3   92.1   84.0   224.9   115.1   118.7  
Turkey .. .. .. ..  0.0  .. .. 
Other bilateral .. ..  .. ..  0.0  .. ..  
AfDB  0.4  .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Arab Fund .. ..  .. ..  0.9  .. ..  
AsDB .. .. .. ..  6.2   3.4   4.0  
EU Institutions  1.3   24.3   43.2   44.5   84.7   88.0   71.2  
FAO ..  0.2   0.5   0.6   1.4   1.3   1.1  
IADB .. ..  ..  1.7   0.8   0.6  .. 
IMF .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
UNDP  0.0   0.0   0.0   0.4   0.5   0.3  .. 
UNECE .. ..  0.9   0.0   0.0   0.2   0.2  
UNESCAP .. ..   0.1   0.3   0.4   0.2   0.2  
UNESCWA ..  0.1  ..  0.0  ..  0.1   0.0  
UNIDO .. ..  .. .. .. .. ..  
World Bank  7.1   28.2   18.2   25.9   27.0   45.2   53.0  
WTO ..  1.0   1.2   1.1   1.2   0.6   0.9  
Other multilateral donors .. ..  0.1  .. .. .. .. 
Total multilateral  8.7   53.9   64.3   74.7   123.2   139.9   130.7  
Total Trade Facilitation  83.4   148.2   156.5   158.7   348.1   255.1   249.4  
Source: OECD-DAC aid activity database (CRS) WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 14 - 
 
  ANNEX 5 – TRADE FACILITATION DISBURSEMENTS BY AID RECIPIENT  
US$ million (2011 constant)  
  2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Afghanistan 7.0 7.0 3.8 7.7 6.2 10.4 22.9 
Albania .. 0.4 3.1 2.3 4.0 1.2 1.8 
Algeria .. 0.1 0.1 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 
Angola .. .. .. 0.0 .. .. 0.1 
Antigua and Barbuda .. .. 0.0 .. .. .. .. 
Argentina 0.0 0.0 .. 3.4 0.1 .. 0.2 
Armenia .. 4.1 4.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.1 
Azerbaijan .. .. 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.1 
Bangladesh 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.8 0.0 0.4 
Barbados 0.0 .. 0.1 0.0 0.0 .. .. 
Belarus 0.2 0.3 .. .. .. 0.0 .. 
Belize .. 0.0 .. 0.0 .. .. 0.4 
Benin 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 
Bhutan 0.0 .. 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 
Bolivia 1.4 .. .. 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 
Bosnia-Herzegovina .. 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 1.4 
Botswana 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 
Brazil .. .. 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.3 0.5 
Burkina Faso .. 10.1 0.2 0.6 3.1 2.6 3.0 
Burundi .. 0.0 .. 0.0 0.1 0.0 .. 
Cambodia 1.0 5.6 1.4 1.1 4.5 0.6 0.6 
Cameroon .. .. 0.3 2.3 5.3 6.5 5.3 
Cape Verde .. .. .. 0.0 .. .. .. 
Central African Rep. .. .. 0.2 0.9 0.4 4.1 2.5 
Chad .. .. .. 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 
Chile 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 
China 0.2 0.9 0.4 0.9 2.5 0.4 0.3 
Colombia .. 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 
Comoros .. .. .. 0.1 .. .. .. 
Congo, Dem. Rep. 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 4.0 2.6 
Congo, Rep. .. .. .. .. 0.1 .. .. 
Cook Islands .. .. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 
Costa Rica 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.8 
Côte d'Ivoire 0.0 0.1 .. .. 0.0 0.0 0.3 
Croatia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Cuba .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Djibouti .. .. .. 0.0 .. .. .. 
Dominica .. .. 0.0 .. .. .. .. 
Dominican Republic .. 4.9 16.2 6.8 .. 3.2 1.2 
Ecuador 0.0 .. 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 
Egypt 4.8 10.8 21.4 1.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 
El Salvador 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 
Ethiopia 0.0 .. .. 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 
Fiji .. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
Gabon .. .. 0.1 .. .. 0.1 0.0 
Gambia .. .. .. 0.0 .. .. 0.0 
Georgia .. 2.5 5.1 9.5 8.9 1.7 9.1 
Ghana 0.4 .. 0.2 0.6 0.2 1.6 2.7 
Grenada 0.0 .. 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 
Guatemala 0.0 5.9 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 
Guinea .. .. .. 0.0 0.0 .. .. 
Guinea-Bissau 0.0 .. .. 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 
Haiti .. .. .. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 15 - 
 
    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Honduras 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 
India 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 1.1 0.1 0.7 
Indonesia 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.2 3.2 3.0 
Iran 0.0 0.0 .. 0.0 .. 0.0 0.0 
Iraq .. .. 3.5 0.0 .. 0.4 0.6 
Jamaica 0.0 .. 0.0 0.0 .. .. .. 
Jordan .. 3.0 4.6 2.7 22.8 9.1 4.5 
Kazakhstan 0.1 0.2 0. 8 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.1 
Kenya 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.1 
Kiribati .. .. .. 0.0 0.0 .. .. 
Korea, Dem. Rep. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Kosovo .. .. .. .. .. 0.1 .. 
Kyrgyz Republic 0.8 0.1 1.4 2.0 0.3 0.9 3.0 
Laos .. .. 0.1 3.8 1.1 1.9 6.3 
Lebanon .. 0.0 .. 0.2 .. .. 0.1 
Lesotho 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 .. 
Liberia .. .. .. 0.0 .. .. .. 
Libya .. .. .. .. 0.4 0.1 0.2 
Macedonia, FYR .. .. 1.4 1.0 4.1 1.7 0.9 
Madagascar 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 
Malawi 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.4 4.4 
Malaysia 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.1 0.6 
Maldives .. 0.1 .. 0.0 .. 0.0 0.0 
Mali 0.0 .. 5.4 4.1 2.0 1.0 0.6 
Mauritania .. .. .. 0.0 0.0 .. 0.6 
Mauritius 0.0 0.1 0.1 .. 0.2 0.1 .. 
Mexico .. 0.7 0.0 0.4 2.1 1.5 0.5 
Micronesia, Fed. States .. .. .. .. 0.0 .. .. 
Moldova .. .. 1.7 2.2 7.2 1.3 8.2 
Mongolia 0.1 0.0 1.3 1.0 2.6 1.2 0.0 
Montenegro .. 0.0 .. 0.1 .. .. 0.4 
Morocco 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.3 
Mozambique 0.3 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 
Myanmar .. 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.9 0.0 1.0 
Namibia 0.2 0.0 .. .. 0.1 0.1 0.0 
Nauru .. .. .. 0.3 0.0 .. .. 
Nepal .. 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.2 1.0 
Nicaragua 0.8 1.8 1.3 2.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 
Niger 0.0 .. .. 0.0 0.0 .. .. 
Nigeria .. .. 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 
Niue .. .. 0.0 .. 0.0 .. .. 
Oman .. .. 0.1 0.3 .. .. .. 
Pakistan 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.6 1.7 1.4 
Palau .. .. .. .. 0.0 .. .. 
Panama 0.0 .. 0.0 0.2 .. 0.1 0.5 
Papua New Guinea 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.5 
Paraguay 0.0 0.0 .. 0.0 0.9 1.7 0.6 
Peru 1.4 0.7 0.3 7.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 
Philippines 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.9 0.1 0.3 
Rwanda .. .. 0.0 0.0 2.3 19.1 2.3 
Samoa .. .. .. 0.0 0.0 0.0 .. 
Sao Tome & Principe .. .. 0.0 0.1 .. 0.0 0.6 
Senegal 0.0 .. .. 0.1 8.2 0.9 1.1 
Serbia 0.8 0.3 0.5 4.4 2.6 2.5 0.2 
Sierra Leone .. .. .. 0.0 0.2 1.2 0.1 WT/COMTD/AFT/W/47 
 
- 16 - 
 
    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 
Solomon Islands 0.1 0.0 0.8 1.6 0.8 1.2 0.8 
South Africa 0.0 0.8 0.1 2.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 
South Sudan .. .. .. .. .. 0.2 1.3 
Sri Lanka 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.4 
St. Kitts-Nevis .. .. 0.3 .. .. .. .. 
St. Lucia 0.0 .. .. .. 1.1 .. .. 
St. Vincent & Grenadines 0.0 .. .. .. 0.1 0.1 .. 
Sudan .. 0.0 .. 0.0 0.1 .. 0.0 
Suriname 0.0 .. .. 0.0 .. .. .. 
Swaziland .. .. 0.1 .. 0.1 0.2 .. 
Syria .. .. .. .. 0.0 .. .. 
Tajikistan 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.5 4.3 1.3 0.7 
Tanzania 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 7.0 3.6 2.9 
Thailand 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.3 0.1 0.2 
Timor-Leste .. .. 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 
Togo 0.0 .. 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 
Tonga 0.4 0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.0 .. .. 
Trinidad and Tobago .. 0.1 0.0 .. 0.2 .. .. 
Tunisia .. .. 0.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 0.3 
Turkey .. .. 0.0 1.3 0.1 1.8 1.9 
Turkmenistan 0.0 .. .. .. 0.0 .. 0.0 
Tuvalu .. .. .. 0.0 0.0 .. .. 
Uganda .. 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 6.8 2.4 
Ukraine .. 1.0 11.2 5.0 2.4 2.7 2.5 
Uruguay .. 0.0 0.1 0.0 .. .. .. 
Uzbekistan 0.0 .. 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.1 
Vanuatu .. .. 0.0 0.0 0.0 .. 0.0 
Venezuela 0.0 .. .. .. .. .. .. 
Vietnam 1.5 2.1 0.6 5.2 9.0 2.8 1.4 
West Bank & Gaza Strip 0.0 4.6 0.8 2.8 0.9 .. .. 
Yemen 0.0 .. 0.0 0.1 0.0 .. .. 
Zambia 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 
Zimbabwe .. .. 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 .. 
Total bilateral  26.7   74.1   105.5   104.1   141.3   122.9   124.3  
Regional and global 
unallocated  56.7   74.1   51.0   54. 7   206.8   132.2   125.1  
Total Trade Facilitation  83.4   148.2   156.5   158.7   348.1   255.1   249.4  
Source: OECD-DAC aid activity database (CRS) 
Note: '0.0' represent negligible amounts 
 
 
 
__________