15426 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 
This rule continues in effect the 
action that decreased the assessment 
obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate reduces the burden on handlers, and may reduce the burden on producers. 
In addition, the Committee’s meeting 
was widely publicized throughout the Florida tomato industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the August 25, 2015, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. 
In accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the order’s information collection requirements have been previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 ‘‘Vegetable and Specialty Crops.’’ No changes in those requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. 
This action imposes no additional 
reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Florida tomato handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. 
USDA has not identified any relevant 
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule. 
Comments on the interim rule were 
required to be received on or before January 25, 2016. No comments were received. Therefore, for reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim rule as a final rule, without change. 
To view the interim rule, go to: 
http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=AMS-FV-15-0058- 0001. 
This action also affirms information 
contained in the interim rule concerning Executive Orders 12866, 12988, 13175, and 13563; the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35); and the E- Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101). 
After consideration of all relevant 
material presented, it is found that finalizing the interim rule, without change, as published in the Federal Register (80 FR 73642, November 25, 
2015) will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966 
Marketing agreements, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Tomatoes. 
PART 966—TOMATOES GROWN IN 
FLORIDA 
Accordingly, the interim rule 
amending 7 CFR part 966, which was published at 80 FR 73642, November 25, 2015, is adopted as a final rule, without change. 
Dated: March 17, 2016. 
Elanor Starmer, 
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 
Service. 
[FR Doc. 2016–06459 Filed 3–22–16; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 
10 CFR Parts 429 and 431 
[Docket No. EERE–2013–BT–TP–0055] 
RIN 1905–AD50 
Energy Conservation Program: Test 
Procedure for Pumps; Correction 
AGENCY : Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. 
ACTION : Final rule; correction. 
SUMMARY : On January 25, 2016, the U.S. 
Department of Energy (DOE) published a final rule amending the test procedures for pumps. This correction addresses a technical error in that final rule. 
DATES : Effective: March 23, 2016. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Ms. Ashley Armstrong, U.S. 
Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, EE–5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–6590. Email: pumps@ee.doe.gov. 
Ms. Jennifer Tiedeman, U.S. 
Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 287–6111. Email: Jennifer.Tiedeman@hq.doe.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The U.S. 
Department of Energy (DOE) published a final rule in the Federal Register on January 25, 2016 (‘‘the January 2016 final rule’’) amending the test procedure for pumps. (81 FR 4085.) As part of that final rule, DOE amended 10 CFR 429.134 to add a paragraph (h), which addresses product-specific enforcement provisions related to pumps. This correction addresses the placement of 
those provisions under 10 CFR 429.134 at paragraph (h). At the time of publication of the January 2015 final rule, 10 CFR 429.134(h) already existed. In order to remedy this error, DOE is issuing this final rule correction to move these provisions, verbatim, to 10 CFR 429.134(i). 
Correction 
In final rule FR Doc. 2016–00039, 
published in the issue of Monday, 
January 25, 2016 (81 FR 4085), on page 4145, in the second and third columns, amendatory instruction 10 is corrected to read as follows: 
■10. Section 429.134 is amended by 
adding paragraph (i) to read as follows: 
§ 429.134 Product-specific enforcement 
provisions. 
* * * * * 
(i) Pumps. (1) The volume rate of flow 
(flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of 
rotation of each tested unit of the basic model will be measured pursuant to the test requirements of § 431.464 of this chapter, where the value of volume rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation certified by the manufacturer will be treated as the expected BEP flow rate. The results of the measurement(s) will be compared to the value of volume rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation certified by the manufacturer. The certified volume rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation will be considered valid only if the measurement(s) (either the measured volume rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation for a single unit sample or the average of the measured flow rates for a multiple unit sample) is within five percent of the certified volume rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation. 
(i) If the representative value of 
volume rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation is found to be valid, the measured volume rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation will be used in subsequent calculations of constant load pump energy rating (PERCL) and constant load pump energy index (PEICL) or variable load pump energy rating (PERVL) and variable load pump energy index (PEIVL) for that basic model. 
(ii) If the representative value of 
volume rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation is found to be invalid, the mean of all the measured volume rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation values determined from the tested 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:23 Mar 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM 23MRR1jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES15427 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 
unit(s) will serve as the new expected 
BEP flow rate and the unit(s) will be retested until such time as the measured rate of flow (flow rate) at BEP and nominal speed of rotation is within 5 percent of the expected BEP flow rate. 
(2) DOE will test each pump unit 
according to the test method specified by the manufacturer in the certification report submitted pursuant to § 429.59(b). 
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 15, 
2016. 
Kathleen Hogan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 
[FR Doc. 2016–06580 Filed 3–22–16; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 
COMMISSION 
16 CFR Part 1201 
[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2012–0049] 
Safety Standard for Architectural 
Glazing Materials 
AGENCY : Consumer Product Safety 
Commission. 
ACTION : Final rule. 
SUMMARY : The Consumer Product Safety 
Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) amends the Safety Standard for Architectural Glazing Materials to replace the testing procedures for glazing materials in certain architectural products with the testing procedures contained in the voluntary standard ANSI Z97.1–2015, American National Standard for Safety Glazing Materials Used in Buildings—Safety Performance Specifications and Methods of Test. 
DATES : The rule is effective on April 22, 
2016. The incorporation by reference of the publication listed in this rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of April 22, 2016. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Brian Baker, Project Manager, Division of Mechanical Engineering, Directorate for Laboratory Sciences, Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850; telephone: 301–987–2289; bbaker@cpsc.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
I. Background 
A. Safety Standard for Architectural 
Glazing Materials 
On January 6, 1977 (42 FR 1427), as 
amended on June 20, 1977 (42 FR 31164), the Commission issued the Safety Standard for Architectural Glazing Materials under the Consumer Product Safety Act (‘‘CPSA’’) to reduce or eliminate risks of injuries associated with walking, running, or falling through or against glazing materials (‘‘CPSC standard’’). The standard applies to glazing materials used or intended for use in any of the following architectural products: 
(1) Storm doors or combination doors; 
(2) Doors (both exterior and interior); 
(3) Bathtub doors and enclosures; (4) Shower doors and enclosures; and (5) Sliding glass doors (patio-type). The standard applies to glazing 
materials and architectural products 
incorporating glazing materials that are produced or distributed for sale to or for the personal use, consumption or enjoyment of consumers in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence or in recreational, school, public, or other buildings or parts thereof. The standard was codified at 16 CFR part 1201. 
The standard exempts certain 
products, materials, and uses including: Wired glass used in doors or other assemblies to retard the passage of fire where such door or assembly is required by federal, state, local, or municipal fire ordinance; louvers of jalousie doors; and openings of doors through which a 3 inch diameter sphere is unable to pass. Carved glass, dalle glass, or leaded glass, which is used in doors and glazed panels are exempt if the glazing material meets all of the following criteria: 
•The coloring, texturing, or other 
design qualities or components of the glazing material cannot be removed without destroying the material; and 
•The primary purpose of such 
glazing is decorative or artistic; and 
•The glazing material is 
conspicuously colored or textured so as to be plainly visible and plainly identifiable as aesthetic or decorative rather than functional (other than for the purpose of admitting or controlling admission of light components or heat and cold); and 
•The glazing material, or assembly 
into which it is incorporated, is divided into segments by conspicuous and plainly visible lines. 
Other exempt materials include 
glazing materials used as curved glazed panels in revolving doors; and commercial refrigerator cabinet glazed doors. See, 16 CFR 1201.1(c). 
On September 27, 1978, (43 FR 
43704), the Commission amended the standard to clarify the definitions, description of test apparatus, and test procedures in the standard. The Commission subsequently revoked portions of the standard that prescribed 
requirements for ‘‘glazed panels’’ (45 FR 67383, August 28, 1980); an accelerated environmental durability test for plastic glazing materials intended for outdoor exposure (45 FR 66002, October 6, 1980); and a modulus of elasticity test, a harness test, and an indoor aging test applicable to plastic glazing materials (47 FR 27853, June 28, 1982). 16 CFR 1201.1(d) n.1. Tempered glass, wired glass, and annealed glass are also exempt from the accelerated environmental durability tests. See, 16 
CFR 1201.4(a)(2). 
B. Petition 
On June 26, 2012, the Commission 
received a petition from the Safety 
Glazing Certification Council (‘‘SGCC’’ or ‘‘petitioner’’) requesting that the Commission initiate rulemaking to replace the testing procedures for glazing materials in certain architectural products set forth in 16 CFR 1201.4 with the testing procedures contained in the voluntary standard, ANSI Z97.1–2009
ε2, 
American National Standard for Safety Glazing Materials Used in Buildings— Safety Performance Specifications and Methods of Test (the ANSI standard). SGCC stated that consumers and the glazing industry would be better served if the test procedures for glazing materials used in architectural products in 16 CFR 1201.4 were replaced with 
the ANSI standard because the ANSI test procedures are more efficient and modern, having been updated periodically, in contrast to the CPSC standard. On April 9, 2013, the Commission voted to grant the petition. 
C. The Proposed Rule 
On May 22, 2015, the Commission 
published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (‘‘NPR’’) in the Federal Register (80 FR 29555) to amend the 
Safety Standard for Architectural Glazing Materials (16 CFR part 1201). The NPR proposed to replace the testing procedures for glazing materials in certain architectural products, set forth in 16 CFR 1201.4, with the testing procedures contained in the voluntary standard, ANSI Z97.1–2009
ε2. The ANSI 
standard establishes specifications and methods of testing for the safety properties of glazing materials used for building and architectural purposes. The tests for safety glazing materials in the ANSI standard include impact, center punch fragmentation, thermal, weathering, indoor aging, hardness, and modulus tests. 
The NPR proposed to replace the 
CPSC test procedures in 16 CFR 1201.4 with the ANSI Z97.1–2009
ε2to clarify 
the existing test procedures. The 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:23 Mar 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM 23MRR1jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES