STAATSKOERANT, 24 DESEMBER 2010 No.33899 37 
GENERAL NOTICES 
ALGEMENE KENNISGEWINGS 
NOTICE 1120 OF 2010 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES 
FERTILIZERS, FARM FEEDS, AGRICULTURAL REMEDIES AND STOCK 
REMEDIES ACT, 1947 (ACT NO. 36 OF 1947) 
ADOPTION OF PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT POLICY FOR SOUTH AFRICA 
I, Tina Joemat-Pettersson, Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries acting under Section 
7bis of the Fertilizers, Farm Feeds, Agricultural Remedies and Stock Remedies Act, 1947 (Act 
No. 36 of 1947) hereby publish the Pesticide Management Policy for South Africa. 
T. Joemat-Pettersson, 
Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 
G10-113028-D 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 38 No. 33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
DEPARTMENT: AGRICULTURE, FORESTY AND FISHERIES 
PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT POLICY 
FOR SOUTH AFRICA 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 24 DES EMBER 2010 No. 33899 39 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 
2. PROBLEM STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 2 
3. OBJECTIVES ....... , ............................................................................................................ 3 
4. POLICY TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM ....................................................................... 4 
5. LEGISLA TJON .............................................................................................................. 11 
6. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ........................................................................... 12 
6.1 Pesticide Regulation Unit ........................................................................................... 12 
6.2 Inter-departmental Cooperation ................................................................................. 12 
6.3 Advisory Bodies ......................................................................................................... 13 
A. ANNEXURE 1 ............................................................................................................... 15 
Definitions/Glossary of Terms .............................................................................................. 15 
B. ANNEXURE 2 ............................................................................................................... 19 
Acronyms ............................................................................................................................... 19 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 40 No.33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
1 
PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT POLICY FOR SOUTH AFRICA 
1. INTRODUCTION 
Pesticides are widely used to control the growth and proliferation of undesirable organisms that, 
if left unchecked, would cause significant damage to forests, crops, stored food products, 
ornamental and landscape plants, and building structures. The use of pesticides in both 
agricultural and non-agricultural settings provides important benefits to society, contributing to 
an abundant supply of food and fibre and to the control of a variety of public health hazards and 
nuisance pests. 
Owing to the fact that they are designed to be biologically active, pesticides have potential to 
cause undesirable side effects. These include adverse effects on workers, consumers. 
community health and safety, groundwater. surface waters, and non-target wildlife organisms. 
In addition, pesticide use raises concerns about the persistence and accumulation of pesticides 
in food chains quite distant from the original point of use, and about the role of certain pesticides 
in causing reproductive failure and endocrine system abnormalities in both wildlife and humans 
and other species that are not their intended target. It is therefore, important to control the use 
of pesticides, by carefully weighing the benefits that they confer against any possible adverse 
effects. 
The Fertilisers, Farm Feeds, Agricultural Remedies and Stock Remedies Act, which governs 
amongst other things pesticides and their use was passed by Parliament in 1947. Although the 
Act has been amended on several occasions since then. it has never been systematically 
revised. The activities of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF). the body 
that administers the Act, have not been publicly scrutinised since the inception of the Act. In 
addition, of the more than 3000 pesticides products approved for use in South Africa, many 
have not been re-evaluated for years. Their safety therefore, has not been reassessed to bring 
them in line with today's more stringent standards of risk assessment. 
The absence of effective management of pesticides to ensure that pesticides are used in ways 
that lead to the minimisation of significant adverse effects on human health and the environment 
is of concern. Scientific and medical journals increasingly report the risks posed to human 
health by pesticides, including links between pesticides and diseases such as cancer and 
hormone disruption. The mounting evidence of the negative impacts of pesticides on wildlife 
and the environment has prompted South Africans to register their disapproval of pesticides and 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 24 DESEMBER 2010 	 No.33899 41 
2 
take action to reduce their use. Consumer perception, nationally as well as internationally, 
demanded a move from a production-centred system purely based on quantity parameter 
towards more quality oriented production methods and also residue-free agricultural produce. 
In the light of these developments, changes to the method used to manage pesticides are 
required. These changes must be based on a policy that aims to eliminate all significant risks to 
human health and environment potentially from pesticides use and also incorporates sound 
production systems. Human health, environmental quality and economic development depend 
on effective systems that enable South Africans to manage and use pesticides safely and 
sustainably. Effective systems are those that identify the potential impacts that pesticide use 
may have on human health and the environment and provide government, industry and the 
community with correct tools to reduce and manage those impacts. Thus, the premise of this 
Policy is that sustainable development, built on a balance economic growth, equitable access 
and long-term environmental sustainability, is fundamental to global competitiveness. 
This Policy provides information and will serve as guidelines to support the legislation and 
regulations. It provides decision- makers with direction by setting out a framework to ensure 
improvements that are aimed at ensuring that pesticides are produced, used and disposed of 
throughout their full life-cycle in ways that pose no significant adverse effects on health and the 
environment. 
2. PROBLEM STATEMENT 
The Fertilisers, Farm Feeds, Agricultural Remedies and Stock Remedies Act, 1947 (Act No. 36 
of 1947) is almost 60 years old. Changes to the context within which pestiCides are managed 
have taken place and have led to a need to consider reviewing the current Act to improve 
efficiency and effectiveness of pesticides management in South Africa. The review yielded a 
number of concerns, including, inter alia: 
• 	The Act does not adequately address Constitutional requirements in relation to Bill of Rights 
(Le. right of environment which is not harmful to health), Access to Information, openness, 
transparency and participate in decision- making and also just administration action; 
• 	The Act does not adequately incorporate international obligations and agreements to which 
South Africa is a Party; 
• 	Under the current Act, anyone contravening a provision of the Act or the regulations is guilty 
of an offence and will be summarily convicted and liable to a fine not exceeding R1000, and 
such penalties have limited deterrent effect; 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 42 No.33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
3 
• 	There is no requirement for review of registered pesticides or re-evaluation of old 
chemicals; 
• 	lack of establishment of pesticide use surveillance and monitoring systems to 
gather information on common conditions of use and their impact on health and 
environment; 
• 	The act does not adequately protect non-target areas (e.g. residential areas, 
schools, hospitals, etc) from exposure to activities spraying activities; 
• 	The act does not require prior training and certification to use/apply the most toxic 
pesticides (e.g. WHO hazard class 1 and II); 
• 	lack of capacity for research on alternative pest control and crop production measures 
• 	lack of awareness raising, education and training appropriate to the public and the user 
• 	Does not adequately encourage registration that favours lower risk products and reduced 
reliance on pesticides overall; 
• 	The Act does not adequately address the problem of obsolete stockpile pesticides and 
their disposal; 
• 	The Act does not adequately address the issue of pesticide container management; and 
• 	Inadequate integration across government departments and complementing other 
legislations. 
3. OBJECTIVES 
The objectives of this policy are: 
• 	To improve legislative framework to ensure that South Africans are better protected from 
health and environmental risks posed by pesticides; 
• 	To encourage the development and use of alternative products and techniques and 
reduce dependence on chemical plant protection products 
• 	To integrate relevant international agreements and initiatives from other government 
departments; 
• 	Increased transparency. access to information and improve public participation in the 
registration of pesticides. 
These objectives can only be achieved effectively through partnerships between Government, 
the agro-chemical industry. farmers, Community Based Organizations, labor, Non 
Governmental Organizations, consumer groups and other stakeholders nationally and through 
international initiatives. 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 24 DESEMBER 2010 No.33899 43 
4 
4. POLICY TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM 
The objectives of the policy will be achieved through the application of relevant and existing 
international agreements, policies and regulatory frameworks, with particular reference to the 
following­
(i) Protection of human health and promotion of non-toxic environment 
The stage for the development of a cohesive body of law has been set by the inclusion of an 
environmental clause in South Africa's Constitution (the Constitution of the Republic of South 
Africa, Act No. 108 of 1996). Section 24 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 
specifically imposes a duty on the State to promulgate legislation that ensures that the 
environment is not harmful to the health or well being of its inhabitants; as well as the need to 
have the environment protected for future generations. Also, section 33 (Just Administrative 
Action) of the Constitution grants the right to fair, lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair 
administrative action and provides that where administrative action has adversely affected 
rights, written reasons must be given. This right is important, for example, where regulatory 
decision authorised in terms of pesticide legislation is refused. 
To fulfil the environmental rights, the Department Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries shall 
endeavour to use sound scientific criteria that are generally consistent worldwide, and this must 
be the cornerstone of our regulatory decision- making, and should be central to the 
responsibility that South Africans have entrusted us with; that is. to safeguard their health and 
environment. Thus, regulatory decisions will be made, using a risk management approach that 
will involve risk assessment. The evaluation process will focus on whether the health and 
environmental risks posed by a pesticide, when used as directed, are likely to be acceptable, 
and whether the product offers a worthwhile contribution to pest management. The Policy takes 
into cognisance the fact that speCial attention should be given to pesticides that pose 
unmanageable risk, with an understanding that such pesticides should be considered for phase­
out, severe restriction and bans. Those that will be considered include those with Endocrine 
Disrupting Properties (EDP), Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), carCinogenic and 
immunotoxic potential, formulations classified by WHO as Extremely Hazardous (class 1a) and 
Highly Hazardous (class 1b), as well as pesticides associated with frequent and severe 
poisoning incidents. 
Furthermore, the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA). 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998) 
provides for cooperative environmental governance by establishing principles for decision­
making on matters affecting the environment. To further these goals, the DAFF shall develop 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 44 No.33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
5 
and implement comprehensive pesticide reduction strategies that would apply to all of its 
activities, including the registration process. The pesticide reduction strategies will include the 
incorporation of an appropriate application of the "SUbstitution principles· as an important tool to 
promote the replacement of pesticides with less toxic products and non-chemical altematives. 
The substitution prinCiple requires or encourages phasing out the use of harmful substances 
when less harmful substances or methods can be identified to achieve the same or similar level. 
Also, the DAFF shall incorporate the requirements of review of existing registered pesticides in 
the new legislation. The review shall be done if there is new evidence that indicates that they 
(pesticides) might carry a significant risk of harm to human health, safety or the environment or 
that the product is no longer efficacious. 
Protection of Biodiversity: Another key issue for pesticides is the effect they might have on 
biodiversity. The National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) 2004, (Act 
No. 10 of 2004) provides for the management and conservation of South Africa's biodiversity 
within the framework of the NEMA; the protection of species and ecosystems that warrant 
protection; and the sustainable use of indigenous biological resources. 
ConSidering how prevalent the use of pesticide is in ecosystems where endangered species are 
at risk, the DAFF shall give explicit protection for such species. However, the approval system 
will not eliminate non-target species' effect altogether, and it will be difficult to reduce 
environmental effects from the use of pesticides to the low level desired, owing to the fact that 
much of the environmental impact from approved pesticides is attributed to indirect effects -for 
example, affecting bird chick survival rates by reducing insect populations at critical times. 
These indirect effects often result from products acting as intended and could sometimes be 
tackled through major changes to agronomic practice -which may not be practical -or through 
mitigation. Examples of mitigation measures might include the requirement for the use of certain 
pesticides or prescribing use only at a specific time. 
Protection of water quality: National Water Act, 1998 (Act No. 36 of 1998) makes provision for 
the protection of water resources, including the prevention of pollution. Part 4 deals with the 
prevention of pollution, and in particular the situation where pollution of a water resource occurs 
or might occur as a result of activities on land. 
The Department of Water Affairs (DWAF) has initiated the National Toxicity MonitOring 
Programme, which will monitor the levels of a number of pesticides in groundwater and surface 
water to ensure that water pollution from pesticides does not threaten compliance with the 
National Water Act, 1998 (Act No. 36 of 1998). An effective approach to reducing pollution of 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 24 DESEMBER 2010 No.33899 45 
6 
water by pesticides would be, first, to release fewer pesticides and/or less toxic pesticides into 
the environment and, second, to use practices that minimize the movement of pesticides to 
surface water and groundwater. Where necessary, the DAFF, through the regulatory system, 
shall place requirements or restrictions on users to limit the movement of pesticides to water. 
These will include instituting buffer zones, restricting aerial spraying in a certain proximity to 
water sources. 
Food Safety: Efforts to maintain and enhance the safety of the nation's food supply are critical 
as established in the Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Act (FCDA), 1972 (Act No. 54 of 
1972). The FCDA Regulations make provision to establish maximum limits for pesticide 
residues that may be present in foodstuffs to ensure that food is safe to eat. To regulate the 
safety of food, the DAFF's regulatory systems shall ensure that pesticides are properly labeled, 
and the producers apply those pesticides in accordance with the label. To ensure compliance 
with FCDA, monitoring of residues on food is important. 
Worker Protection: The Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA). 1993 (Act No. 85 of 
1993) regulates health and safety at the workplace for all workers. This Act places the onus on 
employers to maintain a safe workplace. The regulation makes provision for various mandatory 
safety measures to protect the health of workers handling hazardous chemicals, such as risk 
assessment, safety training, safe practices. and medical, biological and environmental 
monitoring of all workplaces. 
The DAFF shall, in accordance with OHSA Act, engage with employers and employees to raise 
awareness, institute educational and training and programmes appropriate to the public and 
users. Training and information programmes should include all sectors handling and using 
pesticides. Aside from farmers, pesticide retail store-owners and attendants. government 
technicians and extension workers, pest control operators, and even medical doctors, 
environmental health offICers, nurses and paramedics should also be trained on the safe use of 
pesticides. Also, the DAFF shall require that any person applying and selling pesticides must be 
certified in order to apply or sell pesticides in South Africa. 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 46 No. 33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
7 
(ii) International obligation and agreements 
Contributing to the safe use of chemicals at a global level: Over the past decade, there has 
been growing international concern over the state of the global environment and the complex 
linkages with human and environmental health as well as economic and social development. 
The recognition of human health and the environment, the efforts of countries to improve 
chemicals (including pesticides) management at international level over the past few decades 
have resulted in improvements in information and knowledge and the construction of principles, 
processes (formal and informal), institutions, and legally binding and non-binding agreements 
that now constitute the prevailing international regime for chemicals management. 
Internationally a number of bodies, which impose specific requirements on South Africa, have 
been created to address aspects of chemicals management. The recommendations in this 
Policy will fit into international programmes and make a major contribution to achieving safer 
use of pesticides at a global level. 
Compliance with the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure 
(PIC) for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticide in international trade: The Rotterdam 
Convention on Prior Informed Consent (PIC) for certain hazardous industrial chemicals and 
pesticides obliges an exporter of such chemicals to obtain consent of the receiving country 
before delivery. This Convection was adopted in 1998 after the realisation that trade and 
environmental poliCies should be mutually supportive with a view to achieving sustainable 
development. 
This policy supports the use of international instruments such as PIC that address the 
international trade (import and export) of pesticides developed to protect human health and the 
environment from the potential harmful effects of certain hazardous pesticides. As a Party to the 
PIC procedure, South Africa has to comply with the procedure that international shipment of 
pesticides that are banned or severely restricted to protect human health or the environment 
should not proceed without the agreement, or contrary to the decision, of the participating 
country. This policy however, supports the notion that the ban or restrictions of these highly 
toxic pesticides should go along with the promotion of crop protection alternatives to the users. 
Furthermore, the policy considers prohibiting the export of a particular product to other 
countries, unless the importing countries have given their consent. In addition, imported 
pesticides, which do not meet the quality requirements and regulations and certain minimal 
product labeling requirements should be refused entry into South Africa. 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 24 DES EMBER 2010 	 No. 33899 47 
8 
Compliance with the Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the 
Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer: Vienna Convention and 
the Montreal Protocol were adopted in 1985 and 1992, respectively. Ozone depleting 
substances include methyl bromide, which is a form of a pesticide. As Party to this Convention 
and Protocol, South Africa has to take the necessary steps and action to control the use of 
methyl bromide. South Africa has reduced the use of methyl bromide by restricting the quantity 
imported. It is also exploring possible substances as substitutes. South Africa is expected to 
implement a total ban by 2015, as stipulated in the provisions of the Protocol. South Africa 
therefore, is under obligation to set clear targets for action by formulating a definite plan of 
action for the reduction and total ban on methyl bromide. To ensure that the use of methyl 
bromide in South Africa conforms to the international requirements with minimal domestic 
impacts, either of an environmental, social or economic nature, the policy considers the 
following: 
• 	Raising awareness about the phasing out of methyl bromide and conducting research and 
studies on possible substitutes; 
• 	Reduce the use of methyl bromide to a complete ban by 2015. The Parties to the 
Montreal Protocol have agreed on some exemptions, which include: quarantine and pre-­
shipment uses (QPS), and critical and emergency uses. 
Compliance with the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): 
This convention was adopted in 2001. Its overall objective is to protect human health and the 
environment from POPs. With the exception of Dichloride Diphenyl Trichloroethane (DDT), 
South Africa has already banned all the POPs listed under this Convention. South Africa will 
work with international communities to prevent the production and use of substances with POPs 
characteristics. The policy considers that research to find alternate measures to control malaria 
should be conducted. 
Conformity with international obligations under the World Trade Organisation (WTO): 
South Africa should conform with Article 2.1 of the WTO's Technical Barrier to trade, which sets 
out that imported products shall be accorded treatment no less favourable than that accorded to 
products on national origin. To comply with the above, the import of pesticides shall be based 
on scientific risk assessments. 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 48 No.33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
9 
(iii) Labelling 
The DAFF shall ensure that pesticides are properly labelled to ensure that infonnation 
necessary to ensure their safe use is prominently displayed. Infonnation should be presented in 
such a way that it enables a person to understand the risks and develop a sense of proportion 
in order to make a judgement on the acceptability of those risks. The Policy on Labelling would 
be consistent with the new Globally Harmonised System (GHS) of Classification and Labelling 
of Chemicals. 
(iv) Monitoring and Research 
Many pesticides are known to accumulate in the environment and to have detrimental effects on 
human health and the environment. Long-tenn monitoring programmes and targeted research 
are essential in order to evaluate these impacts. Without adequate and reliable data, it would be 
impossible for the Government to assure South Africans that pesticides in current use are not 
posing such a risk to wildlife and people. 
The Policy recognizes that effective regulations are based on good science, and that strong ties 
are needed between research/monitoring and regulation. Research and monitoring will help to 
identify changes in pesticide pollUtion, danger spots, and particularly problematiC pesticides. 
Furthennore, socio-economic studies need to be conducted to better assess the impact of 
pestiCides on public health, the environment, and on fanning practices that may be used in a 
particular area. Research and monitoring will provide useful infonnation for use in refining 
regulatory risk assessments on registered pesticides under re-evaluation or special review. 
(v) Pesticide disposal and container management 
The environmentally sound disposal of cancelled, banned or unwanted pesticides poses a 
significant challenge to producers of agricultural products and other pesticide users, owing to its 
high cost. The proper disposal of waste pesticides eliminates a potential threat to health and the 
environment. 
South Africa has enacted several laws in an attempt to ensure that toxic wastes are disposed of 
without becoming a danger to people or the environment. This legislation includes the 
Hazardous Substance Act, 1973 (Act No. 15 of 1973), the Environmental Conservation Act. 
1989 (Act 73 of 1989), the AtmospheriC Pollution Prevention Act, 1965 (Act No. 45 of 1965), 
and the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998. South Africa is also a 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 24 DESEMBER 2010 	 No. 33899 49 
10 
signatory of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous 
Wastes and their Disposal. The Convention's main objectives are as follows: 
• 	To ensure that the generation of hazardous waste is reduced to a minimum; 
• 	To dispose as much as possible, hazardous wastes within the country of their 
generation; 
• 	To establish enhanced controls on exports and imports of hazardous waste; and 
• 	To prohibit the shipment of hazardous wastes to countries that lack the legal, 
administrative and technical capacity to manage and dispose them of in an 
environmentally sound manner; and 
• 	To cooperate on the exchange of information, transfer of technology, and the 
harmonization of standards, codes and guidelines. 
This Policy considers that programmes to collect old, out-of-date or otherwise unusable 
pesticides to avoid the build up of obsolete pesticide used by farmers and other users must be 
instituted by the DAFF. The programmes should also be expanded to include recovery and 
recycling of plastic pesticide containers used by farmers. 
(vi) Support for alternatives product and/or methods 
The Policy proposes that the Government should support the development, availability and 
adoption of sustainable pest management tools and practices in agriculture. This will include the 
following: 
• 	Help address farmers' needs in achieving effective and sustainable pest 
management; 
• 	Develop and implement strategies to reduce environmental and health risks from 
pesticides; 
• 	Support research to develop and improve pest management tools; 
• 	Facilitate the registration of reduced-risk pestiCide and adoption by farmers; and 
• 	Support the development of and provide information on the best Integrated Pest 
Management and organic production. 
Furthermore the policy considers that incentives and disincentives should be introduced to 
support sustainable pest management. Disincentives will include introducing a registration levy 
on pesticides (proportional to the potential damage to human health and the environment). Such 
levies would encourage users to look for alternatives, and therefore, make non-chemical, low­
risk chemical methods and biopesticides more competitive. Incentives will include introducing a 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 50 No.33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
11 
low or no registration levy fee for companies seeking registration of biopesticides or registration 
meant for organic farming. 
(vii) Increasing transparency 
According to section 32, (Access to Information), of the Constitution of Republic of South Africa, 
Act No. 108 of 1986, the public has a right to access to information on pesticides to which they 
are exposed. 
To ensure transparency and access to information, the DAFF shall incorporate all aspects of the 
regulatory system and also avail the opportunity for public involvement in the development of 
new aspects of the regulatory decision in the new legislation. Information must be presented in 
such a way that it enables a person to understand the risks and develop a sense of proportion 
in order to make a judgement on the acceptability of those risks. This will enable them to make 
informed choices and avoid products containing harmful pesticides, and put pressure on 
industry to develop safer substitutes. However, commercially sensitive information will be 
suitably protected. To provide South Africans with the opportunity to provide inputs into 
requirements, processes and poliCies for assessing pesticide risk and efficacy, regulatory 
proposals and consultation documents will be made publicly available. 
5. LEGISLATION 
The Policy considers that the current legislation, the Fertilisers, Farm Feeds, Agricultural 
Remedies and Stock Remedies Act, 1947 (Act No. 36 of 1947) and its regulations that sets up 
framework for regulations of pesticides is outdated and therefore will need to be 
revised/repealed. Thus new legislation is needed that will: 
(i) Strengthen health and environmental protection by: 
• 	IntrodUCing special protection for vulnerable populations (e.g. children, women,): 
• 	Taking into account pesticide exposure from all sources, including, food and 
water; 
• 	Consider cumulative effects of pesticides that act in the same way; 
• 	Support sustainable pest management; 
• 	Prohibiting registration of products that poses unacceptable risk to people's 
health or the environment; 
• 	Expediting the registration of lower-risk products; 
• 	Mandate buffer zones for pesticides use areas; and 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 24 DESEMBER 2010 	 No.33899 51 
12 
• 	Mandate disclosure of hazardous formulants (inerts). 
(ii) Make the registration system more transparent and participatory by the public: 
• 	By establishing a public register containing information about permits. 
applications. re-evaluations and special reviews; and 
• 	The legislation will establish conditions that will allow for pre and post- decision 
access to health. safety and environmental data. The conditions will include 
provisions that will ensure confidential business information 
(iii) Strengthen post-registration control of pesticides by: 
• 	Requiring pesticide companies to report adverse effects; 
• 	Requiring pesticide companies to report sales data; 
• 	Requiring re-evaluation of older pesticide or special reviews of registered pesticides; 
• 	Providing a comprehensive compliance strategy, with appropriate enforcement 
provisions. 
6. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 
6.1 Pesticide Regulation Unit 
The policy considers that the DAFF should have a statutory mandate to regulate pestiCides. The 
Unit will: 
• 	Review applications for registration of pesticides; 
• 	Conduct science-based health, environmental and effICacy assessments; 
• 	Develop and implements policies and guidelines related to pesticide management; 
• 	Promote sustainable development; 
• 	Enforce compliance with the legislation; and 
• 	Disseminate information on pesticide management issues. 
6.2 Inter-departmental Cooperation 
The policy recognised that effective and efficient management of pesticides is a concerted effort 
that requires inter-departmental coordination from a range of team players. The responsibility 
for the enforcement of pesticide regulation will be shared among the Department of 
Health. Trade and Industry, Finance (Custom and Excise) Labour, Water Affairs, Environmental 
Affairs, with the DAFF having the statutory responsibility. Recognising that these 
departments will have complementary responsibilities. the DAFF and the above-mentioned 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 52 No. 33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
13 
government departments will develop interdepartmental Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) in 
relation to pesticide management issues. These MOUs are intended to foster a strong working 
relationship between the parties by delineating their respective responsibilities and Identifying 
areas of mutual interest. 
6.3 Advisory Bodies 
This policy considers it Is necessary to form advisory bodies to the pesticide regulation unit to 
advise on policy and issues relating to the regulatory system and to monitor the system for 
effIciency and performance. 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 24 DESEMBER 2010 	 No.33899 53 
14 
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY 
• 	The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 1996 (Act No. 108 of 1996) 
• 	The Strategic Plan for South African Agriculture, 2001 
• 	The Fertilisers, Farm Feeds, Agricultural Remedies and Stock Remedies Act, 1947 (Act No. 
36 of 1947) 
• 	Hazardous Substance Act, 1973 (Act No. 15 of 1973), 
• 	The Environmental Conservation Act. 1989 (Act 73 of 1989) 
• 	The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes 
and their Disposal 
• 	International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides. 1985 
• 	Intergovernmental Relations Management Bill 
• 	National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998) 
• 	National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004) 
• 	Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Act, 1972 (Act No. 54 of 1972) 
• 	Policy on Agriculture in Sustainable Development 
• 	Rother, A. and London. L. Pesticide health and safety policy mechanisms in South Africa: 
the State of the debate. 1998. 
• 	Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, 2001 
• 	Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1987 
• 	Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer, 1985 
• 	Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous 
Chemicals and Pesticide In international trade, 1998. 
• 	Wond Summit on Sustainable Development, 2002. 
• 	Pesticides: Making the right choices for the protection of Health and the Environment, 2000 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 54 No. 33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
15 
A. ANNEXURE 1 
Definitions/Glossary of Terms 
active ingredient 	 means the biologically active part of the pesticide. 
advisory bodies 	 means the bodies that advises the registration authority on 
any matter pertaining to pesticide registration and control. 
banned pesticide 	 means a pesticide for which all uses have baan prohibited by 
final regulatory action, in order to protect human health or the 
environment. The term includes a pesticide that has been 
refused approval for first-time use, or has been withdrawn by 
industry either from the domestic market or from further 
consideration in the domestic approval process, and where 
there is clear evidence that such action has been taken in 
order to protect human health or the environment. 
disposal 	 means any operation to recycle, neutralize, destruct or 
isolate pesticide waste, used containers and contaminated 
materials. 
environment 	 means surroundings, including water, air, soil and their inter­
relationship as well as their relationship with any living 
organisms. 
formulation 	 means the combination of various ingredients designed to 
render the product useful and effective for the purpose 
claimed; the form of pesticide as purchased by users. 
hazard 	 means the inherent property of a substance, agent or 
situation having the potential to cause undesirable 
consequences (e.g. properties that can cause adverse 
effects or damage to health, the environment or property). 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT. 24 DESEMBER 2010 No.33899 55 
16 
label means the written, printed or graphic matter on, or attached 
to, the pesticide; or the immediate container thereof and the 
outside container or wrapper of the retail package of the 
pesticide. 
manufacture means the production, by a corporation or other entity in the 
public or private sector or any individual engaged in the 
business or function (whether directly or through an agent or 
through an entity controlled by or under contract with it), of a 
pesticide, active ingredient or preparation of its formulation or 
product. 
Maximum 
(MRL) Residue Limit means the maximum concentration of a residue that is legally 
permitted or recognized as acceptable in or on a food or 
agricultural commodity or animal feedstuff. 
pesticide means any substance or mixture of substances intended to 
prevent, destroy or control any pest, including vectors of 
human or animal disease, unwanted species of plants or 
animals causing harm during or otherwise interfering with the 
production, processing, storage, transport, or marketing of 
food, agricultural commodities, wood and wood products, or 
animal feedstuffs, or which may be administered to animals 
for the control of insects, arachnids or other pests in or on 
their bodies. The term includes substances intended for use 
as a plant growth regulator, defoliant. desiccant, or agent for 
thinning fruit or preventing the premature fall of fruit, and 
substances applied to crops either before or after harvest to 
protect the commodity from deterioration during storage and 
transport. 
pesticide Industry means all those organisations and individuals engaged in 
manufacturing, formulating or marketing pesticides and 
pesticide products. 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 56 No.33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE. 24 DECEMBER 2010 
17 
pesticide legislation 	 means any laws or regulations introduced to regulate the 
manufacture, marketing, distribution, labelling, packaging, 
use and disposal of pesticides in their qualitative, 
quantitative, health and environmental aspects. 
poisoning 	 means occurrence of damage or disturbance caused by a 
poison, and includes intoxication. 
product (or pesticide means the pesticide active ingredient(s) and other 
product) components, in the form in which it is packaged and sold. 
Registrar 	 means the person appointed by the responsible Minister to 
administer the pesticide legislation 
registration 	 means the process whereby the responsible national 
government authority approves the sale and use of a 
pesticide following the evaluation of comprehensive scientific 
data demonstrating that the product is effective for the 
intended purposes and does not poses unacceptable risk to 
human or animal health or the environment. 
residue 	 means any specified substances in food, agricultural 
commodities, animal feed resulting from the use of a 
pesticide. The term includes any derivatives of a pesticide, 
such as conversion products, metabolites, reaction products, 
and impurities considered to be of toxicological significance. 
The "term pesticide residue" includes residues from unknown 
or unavoidable sources (e.g. environmental) as well as 
known used of the chemical. 
risk 	 is a function of the probability of an adverse health or 
environmental effect, and the severity of that effect, following 
exposure. 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 severely restricted 
toxicity STAATSKOERANT, 24 DESEMBER 2010 No. 33899 57 
18 
means a pesticide for which virtually all registered uses have 
been prohibited by final government regulatory action in 
order to protect human health or the environment, but certain 
specific registered use or uses remain are allowed. It 
includes a pesticides that has, for virtually all uses, been 
refused for approval or been withdrawn by industry either 
from domestic market or from further consideration in the 
domestic approval process, and where there is clear 
evidence that such action has been taken in order to protect 
human health or the environment. 
means a physiological or biological property which deter­
mines the capacity of a chemical to do harm or produce 
injury to a living organism by other than mechanical means. 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 58 No.33899 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 24 DECEMBER 2010 
19 
8. ANNEXURE 2 
Acronyms 
DAFF Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 
DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane 
EOP Endocrine Disrupting Properties 
FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation 
MOU Inter-Departmental Memoranda of Understanding 
MRLs Maximum Residue Limits 
POPs Persistent Organic Pollutants 
PIC Prior Informed Consent 
WHO World Health Organisation 
WTO World Trade Organisation 
Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyri ght Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998