6468 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules 
5846, 5851); National Environmental Policy 
Act sec. 102 (42 U.S.C. 4332); Nuclear Waste Policy Act secs. 131, 132, 133, 135, 137, 141, 148 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 10153, 10155, 10157, 10161, 10168); Government Paperwork Elimination Act sec. 1704 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109–58, 119 Stat. 788 (2005). 
Section 72.44(g) also issued under Nuclear 
Waste Policy Act secs. 142(b) and 148(c), (d) (42 U.S.C. 10162(b), 10168(c), (d)). 
Section 72.46 also issued under Atomic 
Energy Act sec. 189 (42 U.S.C. 2239); Nuclear Waste Policy Act sec. 134 (42 U.S.C. 10154). 
Section 72.96(d) also issued under Nuclear 
Waste Policy Act sec. 145(g) (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)). 
Subpart J also issued under Nuclear Waste 
Policy Act secs. 117(a), 141(h) (42 U.S.C. 10137(a), 10161(h)). 
Subpart K also issued under Nuclear Waste 
Policy Act sec. 218(a) (42 U.S.C. 10198). 
■2. In § 72.214, Certificate of 
Compliance No. 1014 is revised to read 
as follows: 
§ 72.214 List of approved spent fuel 
storage casks. 
* * * * * 
Certificate Number: 1014. 
Initial Certificate Effective Date: May 
31, 2000. 
Amendment Number 1 Effective Date: 
July 15, 2002. 
Amendment Number 2 Effective Date: 
June 7, 2005. 
Amendment Number 3 Effective Date: 
May 29, 2007. 
Amendment Number 4 Effective Date: 
January 8, 2008. 
Amendment Number 5 Effective Date: 
July 14, 2008. 
Amendment Number 6 Effective Date: 
August 17, 2009. 
Amendment Number 7 Effective Date: 
December 28, 2009. 
Amendment Number 8 Effective Date: 
May 2, 2012, as corrected on November 
16, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12213A170), superseded by Amendment 8, Revision 1 on April 21, 2015. 
Amendment Number 8, Revision No. 
1, Effective Date: April 21, 2015. 
Amendment Number 9 Effective Date: 
March 11, 2014. 
SAR Submitted by: Holtec 
International. 
SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis 
Report for the HI–STORM 100 Cask System. 
Docket Number: 72–1014. 
Certificate Expiration Date: May 31, 
2020. 
Model Number: HI–STORM 100. 
* * * * * 
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26 day 
of January. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 
Mark A. Satorius, 
Executive Director for Operations. 
[FR Doc. 2015–02309 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL 
PROTECTION 
12 CFR Parts 1005 and 1026 
[Docket No. CFPB–2014–0031] 
RIN 3170–AA22 
Prepaid Accounts under the Electronic 
Fund Transfer Act (Regulation E) and the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) 
Correction 
In proposed rule document 2014– 
27286, appearing on pages 77102 
through 77335 in the issue of Tuesday, December 23, 2014, make the following corrections: 
1. On pages 77103 to 77104, in 
footnote 1, ‘‘https://.frbservices.org/files/communications/pdf/general/2013_ fed_res_paymt_ study_ detailed_
rpt.pdf’’ should read ‘‘https://
www.frbservices.org/files/communications/pdf/general/2013 _fed_
res_paymt_ study_ detailed_ rpt.pdf’’. 
2. On page 77105, in footnote 19, 
‘‘https://www.fdic.gov/householdsurvey/report.pdf’’ should read ‘‘https://www.fdic.gov/householdsurvey/2013report.pdf ’’. 
3. On page 77107, in footnote 36, 
‘‘http://.com/blackhawkcomments-on- parent-company-safeways-spin- offannouncement/’’ should read ‘‘http:// 
blackhawknetwork.com/blackhawk- 
comments-on-parent-company- safeways-spin-off-announcement/’’. 
4. On page 77109, in footnote 43, 
‘‘http://.consumerfinance.gov/f/201309_
cfpb_ payroll-cardbulletin.pdf’’ should 
read ‘‘http://www.consumerfinance.gov/ 
f/201309_ cfpb_ payroll-card- 
bulletin.pdf’’. 
5. On page 77120, in the third 
column, in the third paragraph, on the fifth and sixth line, ‘‘et se’’ should read ‘‘et seq.’’. 
6. On page 77131, in footnote 206, 
‘‘https://www.consumer.ftc.gov//0182- gift-cards’’ should read ‘‘https://
www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0182- gift-cards’’. 
7. On page 77141, in footnote 222, 
‘‘http://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/es/2014_ Prepaid_ Cards_
Final.pdf’’ should read ‘‘http://
www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/2014_ Prepaid_ Cards _Final.pdf’’. 
8. On page 77154, in footnote 258, 
‘‘http://www.nielsen.com/content//corporate/us/en/reportsdownloads/2014%20Reports/the-digital- consumerreport-feb-2014.pdf’’ should read ‘‘http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports- downloads/2014%20Reports/the- digital-consumer-report-feb-2014.pdf’’. 
9. On the same page, in the same 
footnote, ‘‘http://www.Federalreserve.gov//mobile-device- report-201203.pdf’’ should read ‘‘http:// 
www.Federalreserve.gov/econresdata/
mobile-device-report-201203.pdf’’. 
10. On the same page, in footnote 259, 
in the fifth line, ‘‘100 a.m.’’ should read ‘‘100 Am.’’. 
11. On page 77179, in footnote 296, 
‘‘http://cfsinnovation.s3.amazonaws.com/ _
Prepaid_ Industry_ Scorecard_ 2014.pdf’’ 
should read ‘‘http://cfsinnovation.s3.amazonaws.com/CFSI _
Prepaid_ Industry_ Scorecard_ 2014.pdf’’. 
12. On page 77227, in footnote 365, 
on the ninth line, ‘‘1026.4(c)(4)).’’ should read ‘‘1026.4(C)(4).)’’. 
13. On page 77262, in footnote 430, 
‘‘http://.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and- analysis/reports/2014/02/06/consumers- continue-to-load-up-on-prepaid-cards’’ should read ‘‘http://www.pewtrusts.org/ 
en/research-and-analysis/reports/2014/
02/06/consumers-continue-to-load-up- on-prepaid-cards’’. 
PART 1005 [Corrected] 
Supplement I to Part 1005 [Corrected] 
14. In Supplement I to Part 1005, on 
page 77315, in the first column, in the 
first paragraph, on the eleventh line, ‘‘2(a)(15))–2)’’ should read ‘‘2(a)(15)– 2)’’. 
15. In Supplement I to Part 1005, on 
the same page, in the same column, in the second paragraph, on the forty-first line, ‘‘2(a)(15))–2.i.F’’ should read ‘‘2(a)(15)–2.i.F’’. 
16. In Supplement I to Part 1005, on 
the same page, in the third column, in the second paragraph, on the first line, ‘‘12(a))–’’ should read ‘‘12(a)–’’. 
[FR Doc. C1–2014–27286 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 
Food and Drug Administration 
21 CFR Part 73 
[Docket No. FDA–2015–C–0245] 
Signature Brands, LLC; Filing of Color 
Additive Petition 
AGENCY : Food and Drug Administration, 
HHS. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:44 Feb 04, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM 05FEP1rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS6469 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules 
1The 2014 HUD Appropriations Act is Title II of 
Division L of Public Law 113–73, approved January 
17, 2014. ACTION : Notice of petition. 
SUMMARY : The Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA or we) is 
announcing that we have filed a petition, submitted by Signature Brands, LLC, proposing that the color additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments in egg decorating kits for coloring shell eggs. 
DATES : The color additive petition was 
filed on December 22, 2014. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Ellen Anderson, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740– 3835, 240–402–1309. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Under 
section 721(d)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1)), we are giving notice that we have filed a color additive petition (CAP 5C0301), submitted by Signature Brands, LLC, c/o Keller and Heckman, LLP, 1001 G Street NW., Suite 500 West, Washington, DC 20001. The petition proposes to amend the color additive regulations in § 73.350 Mica-based pearlescent pigments (21 CFR 73.350), to provide for the safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments in egg decorating kits for coloring shell eggs. 
We have determined under 21 CFR 
25.32(r) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. 
Dated: January 30, 2015. 
Dennis M. Keefe, 
Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, 
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 
[FR Doc. 2015–02239 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE P 
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 
URBAN DEVELOPMENT 
24 CFR Part 570 
[Docket No. FR–5767–N–02] 
RIN 2506–AC35 
Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program: 
Announcement of Proposed Fee To Cover Credit Subsidy Costs and Solicitation of Comment 
AGENCY : Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD. 
ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : This notice announces and 
solicits public comment on the fee that 
HUD proposes to collect from borrowers of loans guaranteed under the HUD’s Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program (Section 108 Program) for the purpose of covering the credit subsidy costs of operating the program. Elsewhere in today’s Federal Register, HUD is 
publishing a proposed rule that would amend its regulations for the Section 108 Program to permit HUD to collect a fee for the Section 108 Program. 
DATES : Comment Due Date: March 9, 
2015. 
ADDRESSES : Interested persons are 
invited to submit comments regarding 
this proposed rule to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410–0500. Communications must refer to the above docket number and title. There are two methods for submitting public comments. All submissions must refer to the above docket number and title. 
1. Submission of Comments by Mail. 
Comments may be submitted by mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410–0500. 
2. Electronic Submission of 
Comments. Interested persons may 
submit comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly 
encourages commenters to submit comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to the public. Comments submitted electronically through the www.regulations.gov Web site can be 
viewed by other commenters and interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the instructions provided on that site to submit comments electronically. 
Note: To receive consideration as public 
comments, comments must be submitted 
through one of the two methods specified above. Again, all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of the notice. 
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile 
(FAX) comments are not acceptable. 
Public Inspection of Public 
Comments. All properly submitted 
comments and communications 
submitted to HUD will be available for public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at the above address. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, an 
appointment to review the public comments must be scheduled in advance by calling the Regulations Division at 202–708–3055 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or hearing impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service at 800–877– 8339. Copies of all comments submitted are available for inspection and downloading at www.regulations.gov. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Paul 
Webster, Director, Financial Management Division, Office of Block Grant Assistance, Office of Community Planning and Development, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 7180, Washington, DC 20410; telephone number 202–708–1871 (this is not a toll- 
free number). Individuals with speech or hearing impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the toll- free Federal Relay Service at 800–877– 8339. FAX inquiries (but not comments) may be sent to Mr. Webster at 202–708– 1798 (this is not a toll-free number). 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
I. Background 
HUD’s proposed rule, published 
elsewhere in today’s Federal Register, describes the current Congressional funding status of the Section 108 Program. HUD’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Appropriations Act
1authorized HUD in 
FY 2014 to impose a fee to eliminate the need for credit subsidy appropriations. As discussed in more detail in the preamble to the proposed rule, imposition of a fee, as statutorily authorized, will permit the Section 108 guaranteed loan financing to remain available. 
II. Proposed 2015 Fee: 2.42 Percent of 
the Principal Obligation of the Loan 
As described in the proposed rule, 
when determining the appropriate level of fee to charge, HUD took into consideration the amount required to fully offset the credit subsidy cost to the Federal Government associated with making a loan guarantee. Credit subsidy cost calculations incorporate assumptions based on: (i) Data on default frequency for municipal debt where such debt is comparable to loans in the Section 108 loan portfolio; (ii) data on recovery rates on collateral security for comparable municipal debt; (iii) the expected composition of the Section 108 portfolio by end users of the guaranteed loan funds (e.g., third party 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:44 Feb 04, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM 05FEP1rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS