48702 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
adjudicated youth and adults; culturally 
diverse populations such as African Americans, Native Americans, and non- English speaking persons; individuals living in rural areas; and persons with multiple disabilities such as deaf- blindness. 
This notice does not preclude us from 
proposing additional priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements. 
Note: This notice does not solicit 
applications. In any year in which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through a notice in the Federal Register. 
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Regulatory Impact Analysis 
Under Executive Order 12866, the 
Secretary must determine whether this 
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and, therefore, subject to the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as an action likely to result in a rule that may— 
(1) Have an annual effect on the 
economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to as an ‘‘economically significant’’ rule); 
(2) Create serious inconsistency or 
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; 
(3) Materially alter the budgetary 
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or 
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues 
arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles stated in the Executive order. 
This final regulatory action is not a 
significant regulatory action subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. 
We have also reviewed this final 
regulatory action under Executive Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order 13563 requires that an agency— 
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only 
upon a reasoned determination that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits and costs are difficult to quantify); (2) Tailor its regulations to impose the 
least burden on society, consistent with 
obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into account—among other things and to the extent practicable—the costs of cumulative regulations; 
(3) In choosing among alternative 
regulatory approaches, select those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity); 
(4) To the extent feasible, specify 
performance objectives, rather than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must adopt; and 
(5) Identify and assess available 
alternatives to direct regulation, including economic incentives—such as 
user fees or marketable permits—to encourage the desired behavior, or provide information that enables the public to make choices. 
Executive Order 13563 also requires 
an agency ‘‘to use the best available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future benefits and costs as accurately as possible.’’ The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these techniques may include ‘‘identifying changing future compliance costs that might result from technological innovation or anticipated behavioral changes.’’ 
We are issuing the final priority and 
definitions only on a reasoned determination that their benefits justify their costs. In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, we selected those approaches that maximize net benefits. Based on the analysis that follows, the Department believes that this regulatory action is consistent with the principles in Executive Order 13563. 
We also have determined that this 
regulatory action does not unduly interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of their governmental functions. 
In accordance with both Executive 
orders, the Department has assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and qualitative, of this regulatory action. The potential costs are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as necessary for administering the Department’s programs and activities. 
The benefits of the Rehabilitation 
Training program have been well established over the years through the successful completion of similar projects. The priority and definitions would better prepare State VR agency personnel to assist individuals with disabilities living in targeted communities to achieve competitive integrated employment in today’s challenging labor market. 
Intergovernmental Review: This 
program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance. 
This document provides early 
notification of our specific plans and actions for this program. Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities 
can obtain this document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person listed under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION  
CONTACT . 
Electronic Access to This Document: 
The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you 
can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site. 
You may also access documents of the 
Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search 
feature at: www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. 
Dated: August 7, 2015. 
Michael K. Yudin, 
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and 
Rehabilitative Services. 
[FR Doc. 2015–20014 Filed 8–13–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 
POSTAL SERVICE 
39 CFR Part 111 
Standards Governing the Design of 
Curbside Mailboxes 
AGENCY : Postal ServiceTM. 
ACTION : Final rule. 
SUMMARY : The Postal Service is 
replacing USPS STD 7B, which governs the design of curbside mailboxes, with 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES48703 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
new USPS STD 7C. The new STD 7C 
was developed internally to meet the operational requirements of the Postal Service. 
DATES : Effective: September 14, 2015. 
ADDRESSES : Written inquiries regarding 
the new standards should be mailed to 
U.S. Postal Service, Delivery Operations ATTN: Vanessa Lawrence, 475 L’Enfant Plaza, Room 7142, Washington, DC 20260–7142. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Vanessa Lawrence, (deliveryoperations@usps.gov), (202) 268–2567. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Overview 
On April 14, 2015, at 80 FR 19914, the 
U.S. Postal Service proposed to adopt a new USPS STD 7C, to replace USPS STD 7B which currently governs the design of city and rural curbside mailboxes. Pursuant to the Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM
®) 
508.3.2.1, USPS STD 7 applies to mailboxes manufactured to be erected at the edge of a roadway or curbside of a street and to be served by a carrier from a vehicle on any city route, rural route, or highway contract route. Copies of USPS STD 7, or other information about the manufacture of curbside boxes may be obtained from USPS Engineering, 8403 Lee Highway, Merrifield, VA 22082–8101 (see DMM 608.8.0). We proposed this action because the current standard, effective February 8, 2001 (66 FR 9509–9522), prescribes designs that in several respects are no longer ideal for the operational requirements of the Postal Service. As detailed in our proposal, the design and performance requirements for new versions of both 
locking and non-locking curbside mailboxes were included in the proposed USPS STD 7C. As proposed, the new STD 7C most notably: 
•Provided design parameters for a 
new version of locked and non-locked mailbox designs that can accommodate the insertion and removal of a test gauge measuring 7 inches high by 13 inches wide by 16 inches deep. 
•To thwart quick-strike attacks, 
introduced the requirement that the new locked mailbox designs must pass a 3- minute physical security test of the customer access door (using commonly available hand and pry tools) and a 3- minute manual test to ensure that no mail item can be removed through the front carrier access door. 
•Reaffirmed the prohibition of any 
style of locks, locking devices, or inserts that require the carrier to use a key or restrict or reduce the interior opening of the mailbox, once the front door has been fully opened for any approved 
non-locked curbside mailbox. (To assure 
the effectiveness of the new minimum parcel capacity requirement under USPS STD 7C, internal obstructions that prevent this requirement from being met would result in a suspension of service when the situation is identified.) 
•Introduced minimal door catch and 
signal flag force tests to ensure those components meet prescribed limits. 
•Updated the provisions regarding 
Application Requirements and Approval 
or Disapproval to establish a new 180- day time limit for the submission of a 
mailbox for security testing (if applicable), and final review after the manufacturer has received approval of a design upon preliminary review. 
•Provided updated quality 
requirements in a new section exclusively concerned with Quality Management System Provisions. 
•Introduced provisions concerning 
the use of both USPS and third-party intellectual property, including the requirement that manufacturers agree not to use USPS marks without USPS approval, have sole responsibility for acquiring all necessary licenses for the use of third-party intellectual property, and bear all liability concerning the use of third-party intellectual property regarding any USPS approved mailboxes. 
We believe that instituting these 
mailbox design options will allow for improvement in the Postal Service’s capacity for this mode of delivery as vendors choose to produce these curbside mailboxes, and the mailboxes come into widespread use. 
As a further matter, we note that the 
addition of these new design options would not have any impact on any currently approved USPS STD 7B product. Any mailbox manufacturer wishing to seek approval for either or both of the new locked and non-locked design options introduced by USPS STD 7C would follow the process detailed in the new standard. 
Comments and Analysis 
We received comments from two 
firms involved in the manufacture of 
mailboxes. One set of comments focused on the security tests proposed for the new locked, large-capacity designs. The other set of comments covered a broader range of topics, including the timeframe established for the mailbox review process, the number and type of drawings required to accompany a mailbox submitted for approval, certain unintentional errors in the mailbox design figures, the dimensions and color of the mailbox flag, the design and dimensions of the slot for locked mailbox designs, and the need to 
provide information regarding how to obtain permission for the use of proprietary USPS marks. Our response to these comments is as follows. 
Security Tests 
With regard to the security testing 
requirements for locked, large capacity 
mailboxes set forth in section 4.12 of the proposed standard, one set of comments suggested that we should further standardize the testing process by providing a specific list of ‘‘pry tools, defined even by specific brands and model available in the marketplace,’’ to 
be used in the tests. We declined to accept this suggestion, in the belief that the current, more generic description of ‘‘tools such as screwdrivers, flat plates, knives, pry bars, vise grips, pliers, chisels, and punches’’ was adequate for testing purposes. 
The same set of comments also 
suggested that the maximum length of pry tools used for testing should be reduced from 18 inches to reflect the more typical dimensions of such instruments (as well as establish a more reasonable balance between security and cost), and that the manual test for removal of items through an opened carrier access door should specify that no tools were to be used. These suggestions were accepted. The maximum length of pry tools for testing purposes was reduced to 12 inches, and it is specified that no tools were to be used in the manual test. 
Mailbox Review Process 
The second set of comments 
questioned certain aspects of the 
mailbox review process in section 6.1 of the proposed standard, including the 180-day time limit for submitting a mailbox for final review after receiving preliminary approval, and the requirement that two paper drawing sets be provided. These comments addressed the timeframe required to move from a conceptual design to a production unit that can be released for tooling, as well as complete the third-party testing process. The comments also questioned the reliance on 2–D paper drawings, in view of the growing reliance on 3–D electronic drawings for the manufacturing process. These suggestions were accepted. The 180-day time limit was extended to one year, and the requirement for two paper drawings has been replaced by a requirement for one paper drawing set and one electronic drawing set. 
Mailbox Design Figures 
This set of comments also questioned 
the width of the mailbox door handles 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES48704 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
shown in design Figure 5 of the 
proposed standards, and suggested that they reflected a change from the current standards of USPS STD 7B. No such dimensional changes were intended, and Figure 5 has been reworked accordingly. 
Mailbox Flag Requirements 
These comments also suggested the 
need for clarification of the 
requirements concerning the flag dimension for traditional mailboxes in Figure 1A, and more specificity regarding the requirement in section 3.9 that the color of the flag present a ‘‘clear contrast’’ with the predominant color of the mailbox. These suggestions were not accepted. We believe that such changes to longstanding requirements for boxes already approved under former STD 7B would not be appropriate in this context. 
Mailbox Slot Requirements 
These comments further questioned 
the requirement in section 3.1.2.1 that 
the slot for a locked mailbox measure at least 1.75 inches high by 10 inches wide, suggesting that other shapes (such as a modified trapezoid) that allowed the insertion of the test gauges should be acceptable. This change was not accepted. We believe that the dimensions as proposed will facilitate the delivery of mail to the new boxes by simplifying the carrier’s task. 
Intellectual Property 
With regard to the rules concerning 
the use of intellectual property in 
section 3.14 of the proposed standard, these comments also inquired how a manufacturer might obtain a ‘‘license’’ to use USPS marks. In response, we have included the online address of the Postal Service’s Rights and Permissions information in a footnote to that section. 
For these reasons, the Postal Service 
has determined to replace USPS STD 7B with USPS STD 7C as set forth in the Appendix to this document. 
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111 
Administrative practice and 
procedure, Postal Service. 
Stanley F. Mires, 
Attorney, Federal Compliance. 
The Postal Service adopts the 
following changes to Mailing Standards 
of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, 39 CFR part 111 is amended as follows: PART 111—[AMENDED] 
■1. The authority citation for 39 CFR 
part 111 continues to read as follows: 
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 13 U.S.C. 301– 
307; 18 U.S.C. 1692–1737; 39 U.S.C. 101, 
401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001–3011, 3201– 3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632, 
3633, and 5001. 
■2. Remove U.S. Postal Service 
Standard 7B and add U.S. Postal Service 
Standard 7C in its place to read as follows: 
Appendix 
U.S. Postal Service Standard 7C 
Mailboxes, Curbside (USPS STD 7C) 1. Scope and Classification 
1.1 Scope—This standard covers all 
curbside mailboxes. Curbside mailboxes are 
defined as any design made to be served by a carrier from a vehicle on any city, rural, or highway contract route. This standard is not applicable to mailboxes intended for door delivery service (see 8.1). 
1.2 Classifications—Based on their 
design, curbside mailboxes are classified as either: 
•Non-Locked Mailboxes: 
T—Traditional—Full or Limited Service 
(see 3.1.1, 3.1.1.1, and Figure 1A). 
C—Contemporary—Full or Limited Service 
(see 3.1.1 and 3.1.1.2). 
LC—Large Capacity—Full or Limited 
Service (see 3.1.1, 3.1.1.3, and Figure 1B). 
•Locked Mailboxes: 
LMS—Locked, Mail Slot Design—Full or 
Limited Service (see 3.1.2, 3.1.2.1, and Figures 2A and 2B). 
LLC—Locked, Large Capacity/USPS 
Security Tested—Full or Limited Service (see 3.1.2, 3.1.2.2, and Figure 3). 
1.3 Approved Models 
1.3.1 Approved Models—A list of 
manufacturers whose mailboxes have been approved by the United States Postal Service (USPS) will be published annually in the Postal Bulletin. A copy of the most current list of approved models is also available from the office listed in 1.3.2. 
1.3.2 Interested Manufacturers— 
Manufacturing standards and current information about the manufacture of curbside mailboxes may be obtained by writing to: 
USPS ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, DELIVERY 
AND RETAIL TECHNOLOGY, 8403 LEE 
HIGHWAY, MERRIFIELD, VA 22082–8101. 
2. Applicable Documents 
2.1 Specifications and Standards— 
Except where specifically noted, the specifications set forth herein apply to all curbside mailbox designs. 
2.2 Government Document—The 
following document of the latest issue is incorporated by reference as part of this standard: United States Postal Service Postal 
Operations Manual (POM). 
Copies of the applicable sections of the 
POM can be obtained from USPS Delivery and Retail, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., 
Washington, DC 20260–6200. 
2.3 Non-Government Documents—The 
following documents of the latest issue are incorporated by reference as part of this standard: 
American Standards for Testing Materials 
(ASTM) 
•ASTM G85 Standard Practice for 
Modified Salt Spray (Fog) Testing 
•ASTM D968 Standard Test Methods for 
Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coatings 
by Falling Abrasive 
Copies of the ASTM documents can be obtained from the American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959. Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 
•UL 771 Night Depositories (Rain Test 
Only) 
Copies of the UL document can be obtained from Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062–2096. 
3. Requirements 
3.1 General Design—Mailboxes must 
meet regulations and requirements as 
stipulated by USPS collection and delivery, operation, and policy (see 2.2). This includes carrier door operation (see 3.3), flag operation (see 3.6), incoming mail openings and the retrieval of outgoing mail (see below in 3.1). The manufacturer determines the opening style, design, and size; however, the carrier must be able to deposit the customer’s mail. Outgoing mail for full service designs must be able to be pulled straight out of the mailbox without interference from protrusions, hardware, etc. Mailboxes must be capable of passing the applicable testing requirements (see Section 4). Mailboxes must not be made of any transparent, toxic, or flammable material (see 3.2). The mailbox must protect mail from potential water damage which may result from wet weather conditions (see 4.4). Any advertising on a mailbox or its support is prohibited. Additional specific requirements follow. 
3.1.1 Non-Locked Designs (Limited and 
Full Service)—Mailbox designs that conform to any of the three design types specified in 3.1.1 will be classified as non-locked with the appropriate sub-designation. Designs incorporating a carrier signal flag (see 3.6) will be classified as full-service mailboxes. Designs with no flag will be classified as limited service (see 3.11). As specified in 3.4, a rear door is permitted to enable the customer to remove mail without standing in the street. The use of any ancillary items (i.e., locks, locking devices, or inserts) that either require the carrier to use a key to gain access to a non-locked mailbox or that restrict or reduce the interior opening of the mailbox, once the front door has been fully opened, is prohibited. There is no local Postmaster 
approval exception for this prohibition. 
3.1.1.1 Traditional Designs (Limited and 
Full Service)—Mailbox designs that conform to Figure 1A and meet the limited capacity requirements specified in 4.2.1 will be classified as Traditional (T). 
3.1.1.2 Contemporary Designs (Limited 
and Full Service)—Mailbox designs that do 
not conform to the dome-rectangular shape of Traditional designs but meet the limited 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES48705 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
1The term ‘preferred’ as used throughout this 
document in conjunction with any requirement 
implies that compliance is desired but not mandatory. capacity requirements specified in 4.2.1, 
while not exceeding the maximum dimensions of Figure 1A, will be classified as Contemporary (C). 
3.1.1.3 Large Capacity Designs (Limited 
and Full Service)—Mailbox designs that conform to Figure 1B and meet the expanded capacity requirements specified in 4.2.2 will be classified as Large Capacity (LC). 
3.1.2 Locked Designs—Mailbox designs 
that conform to either of the two design types specified in 3.1.2 will be classified as Locked with the appropriate sub-designation. 
3.1.2.1 Locked, Mail Slot Designs (Limited 
and Full Service)—Mailbox designs that conform to either Figure 2A or 2B and meet the limited-capacity requirements specified in 4.2.1 will be classified as Locked, Mail Slot Design (LMS). This locking design option provides non–USPS-tested security for the customer’s incoming mail. Although the shape and design are less restrictive, these Locked mailbox designs must meet the same applicable functional requirements. Designs having a slot for incoming mail must be at least 1.75 inches high by 10 inches wide. If a slot has a protective flap, it must operate inward to ensure mail can be inserted in a horizontal manner without requiring any additional effort by the carriers (see Figure 2B). The slot must be positioned on the front side of the mailbox facing the street. In addition, the slot must be clearly visible and directly accessible by mail carriers. Any designs that allow for outgoing mail must meet all applicable requirements of this standard. 
3.1.2.1.1 Full Service—Locked mailbox 
designs of this class allow for both incoming and outgoing mail as depicted in Figure 2A. Both incoming and outgoing mail functionality must be located behind a single carrier service door as shown in Figure 2A. While it is preferred
1that the outgoing mail 
function be handled via use of the backside of the front door, any alternate use of a separate outgoing mail compartment, such as beneath or side-by-side with the incoming mail compartment, is permitted provided that no additional carrier service is introduced. All designs must allow the carrier direct access to grasp and retrieve the outgoing mail. 
3.1.2.1.2 Limited Service—Locked 
mailbox designs of this class allow only for incoming mail as shown in Figure 2B. 
3.1.2.2 Locked, Large Capacity/USPS- 
Security-Tested Designs (Limited and Full Service)—Mailbox designs that conform to Figure 3 and meet both the expanded capacity requirements specified in 4.2.2 and security testing specified in 4.12 will be classified as Locked, Large Capacity/USPS- Security-Tested (LLC). 
3.1.2.2.1 Full Service—Locked mailbox 
designs of this class allow for both incoming and outgoing mail as depicted in Figure 3. Both incoming and outgoing mail functionality must be located behind a single carrier service door as shown in Figure 3. While it is preferred
1that the outgoing mail function be handled via use of the backside 
of the front door, any alternate use of a separate outgoing mail compartment, such as beneath or side-by-side with the incoming mail compartment, is permitted provided that no additional carrier service is introduced. All designs must allow the carrier direct access to grasp and retrieve the outgoing mail. 
3.1.2.2.2 Limited Service—Locked 
mailbox designs of this class allow only for incoming mail. Refer to the two Locked mailbox feature exceptions linked to Note 10 of Figure 3. 
3.1.3 Mailbox Accessories—Decorative art 
and devices can be attached to the exterior of approved mailbox designs, provided they do not interfere with mail delivery or present a safety hazard. Devices can also be mounted in the interior of approved mailboxes, provided they do not cause the intended 
mailbox to fail either capacity test described in 4.2, and do not interfere with mail delivery or present a safety hazard. Any advertising on a mailbox or its support is prohibited. Unrestricted spring-loaded devices and designs are prohibited. Auxiliary flags or devices used to signal the customer that the mail has arrived must operate automatically without requiring additional carrier effort. 
3.2 Materials—Ferrous or nonferrous 
metal, wood (restrictions apply), plastic, or other materials may be used, as long as their thickness, form, mechanical properties, and chemical properties adequately meet the operational, structural, and performance requirements set forth in this standard. Materials used must not be toxic, flammable or transparent. 
3.2.1 Mailbox Floor—The entire bottom 
area of all mailboxes, where mail would rest, must be fabricated to prevent mail from damage due to condensation or moisture. Except for the internal mail compartment of locked style mailboxes, all designs must not present a lip or protrusion that would prevent the mail from being inserted or pulled straight out of the mailbox. The surface of the floor cannot be made of wood material. The floor must be ribbed as shown in Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, and 3, or dimpled, embossed, or otherwise fabricated provided the resulting surface area (touching mail) does not exceed the boundary of a square with sides of 0.25 inch (per dimple or impression) and is a minimum of 0.12 inch high on centers not exceeding 1 inch. A mat insert having a raised surface contour may be used for the internal mail compartment of locked style mailboxes only (see Figures 2A, 2B, and 3). 
3.2.2 Carrier Signal Flag—The carrier 
signal flag cannot be made of wood. Plastic is the preferred material. 
3.2.3 Door Handle—The door handle 
cannot be made of wood. Plastic is the preferred material. 
3.3 Carrier Service Door –There must be 
only one carrier service door that must provide access for mail delivery and collection at the unit and meet USPS delivery operational requirements (see 2.2). The door must meet the applicable testing requirements specified in 4.3. The carrier service door must operate freely and solely by pulling outward and downward with a 
convenient handle or knob. The design of the door, including hinges and handles must provide protection against wind, rain, sleet, or snow (see 4.4). Door latches must hold the door closed but allow easy opening and closing requiring no more than 5 pounds of force. The action of the latch must be a positive mechanical one not relying solely on friction of the hinge parts. The door must not be spring-loaded. Magnetic latches are acceptable provided adequate closure power is maintained during ambient conditions specified in 4.7 and applicable testing described in Section 4. It is preferred that by either tactile sensation or sound (i.e., a snap 
or click) carriers are alerted that the door is properly shut. The door, once opened, must remain in the open position until the carrier pushes it closed. The door must rotate a minimum of 100 degrees when opened and 
it is preferred that the maximum rotation be limited to 120 degrees or less. When in a fully opened and rest position, the opening angle of the door cannot measure more than 180 degrees. No protrusions other than the handle or knob, door catch, alternate flag design, decorative features or markings are permitted on the carrier service door. Protrusions of any kind that reduce the usable volume within the mailbox when closed are not acceptable. See 3.1.2 for carrier service door requirements for Locked mailbox designs. 
3.3.1 Handle or Knob—The handle or 
knob must have adequate accessibility to permit quickly grasping and pulling it with one hand (with or without gloves) to open the door. The handle or knob must be located within the top 1/3 of the door. Various acceptable handle and knob designs with required dimensions are depicted in Figure 5. Other designs may be acceptable provided they allow enough finger clearance and surface area for carriers to grasp. 
3.4 Rear Doors—Both locking and non- 
locking mailbox designs may have rear doors. 
3.4.1 Non-Locking Mailbox Designs— 
These mailbox designs may have a rear door, provided that it does not interfere with the normal delivery and collection operation provided by the carrier, require the carrier to perform any unusual operations, or prevent the applicable capacity test gauge from fully inserting. The rear door must not be susceptible to being forced open as a result of large mail items such as newspapers and parcels being inserted through the carrier service door. The rear door must meet the applicable testing requirements specified in 4. 
3.4.2 Locking Mailbox Designs—These 
designs must have a customer access door that may be located as shown in Figures 2A, 2B, and 3 on the rear wall of the mailbox. However, for locking mailbox designs, the customer access door may be located on a side wall. For locking designs submitted for approval under 3.1.2.2, this door must be subject to the security test requirement in 4.12. 
3.5 Locks—Locked mailbox designs, 
which are submitted for approval under 3.1.2.2, must meet the security test requirements of 4.12 to ensure that incoming mail is accessible only by the customer to the 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES48706 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
2For additional information concerning the use of 
USPS marks or intellectual property, see: https://
about.usps.com/doing-business/rights-permissions/welcome. performance level required. The use of locks 
on all non-locked mailbox designs is prohibited. Manufacturers must include the following statement in their instructions to customers: 
IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT IT IS 
NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MAIL CARRIERS TO OPEN MAILBOXES THAT ARE LOCKED, ACCEPT KEYS FOR THIS PURPOSE, OR LOCK MAILBOXES AFTER DELIVERY OF THE MAIL. 
3.6 Carrier Signal Flag—Non-locked and 
locked mailbox designs classified as Full Service must have a carrier signal flag. While it is preferred that the flag design be one of the approved concepts depicted in Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, 3, and 4, alternates will be considered for approval if all other dimensional and test requirements are otherwise met. As shown in each figure, the flag must be mounted on the right side when facing the mailbox from the front. The flag must not require a lift of more than 2 pounds of force to retract. Additionally, when actuated (signaling outgoing mail), the flag must remain in position until retracted by the carrier. The color of the flag must be in accordance with the requirements described in 3.9. The operating mechanism of the flag must not require lubrication and must continue to operate properly and positively (without binding or excessive free play) after being subjected to the test described in Section 4. Optionally, the flag may incorporate a self-lowering feature that causes it to automatically retract when the carrier service door is opened provided no additional effort is required of the carrier. The self-lowering feature cannot present protrusions or attachments and must not interfere with delivery operations in any manner or present hazardous features as specified in 3.1. 
3.7 Marking—The mailbox must bear two 
inscriptions on the carrier service door: ‘‘U.S. MAIL’’ in a minimum of 0.50 inch-high letters and ‘‘Approved By The Postmaster General’’ in a minimum of 0.18 inch-high letters. These inscriptions may be positioned beneath the incoming mail slot for Limited Service Locked (Mail Slot Design) mailboxes as shown in Figure 2B. Markings must be permanent and may be accomplished by applying a decal, embossing on sheet metal, raised lettering on plastic, engraving on wood or other methods that are suitable for that particular unit. The manufacturer’s name, address, date of manufacture (month and year), and model number or nomenclature must be legible and permanently marked or affixed on a panel (rear, backside of door, 
bottom or side interior near the carrier service door) of the mailbox that is readily accessible and not obscured. 
3.7.1 Modified Mailbox Marking— 
Mailboxes that use previously approved units in their design must include marking stating the new manufacturer’s name address, date of manufacture, and model nomenclature in a permanent fashion and location as described in 3.7. Additionally, the ‘‘U.S. MAIL’’ and ‘‘Approved By The Postmaster General’’ marking must be reapplied if it is obscured or obliterated by the new design. 
3.8 Coatings and Finishes—The choice of 
coatings and finishes is optional, provided all requirements of this standard are met. All 
coatings and finishes must be free from flaking, peeling, cracking, crazing, blushing, and powdery surfaces. Coatings and finishes must be compatible with the mailbox materials. Except for small decorative accents, mirror-like coatings or finishes are prohibited. The coating or finish must meet the applicable testing requirements described in 4.6. 
3.9 Color—The color of the mailbox and 
flag must be in accordance with the 
requirements stated in 3.9. The mailbox may be any color. The carrier signal flag can be any color except any shade of green, brown, white, yellow or blue. The preferred flag color is fluorescent orange. Also, the flag color must present a clear contrast with predominant color of the mailbox. 
3.10 Mounting—The mailbox must be 
provided with means for convenient and locked mounting that meets all applicable requirements. The manufacturer may offer various types of mounting accessories, such as a bracket, post or stand. Although the Postal Service does not regulate the design of mounting accessories, no part of the mounting accessory is permitted to project beyond the front of the mounted mailbox. Mounting accessories must not interfere with delivery operations as described in 3.1.3 or present hazardous features as described in 3.13. See Section 8 for additional important information. 
3.11 Instructions and Product 
Information 
3.11.1 Assembly and Installation—A 
complete set of instructions for assembling and mounting the mailbox must be furnished with each unit. The instructions must include the following conspicuous message: 
CUSTOMERS ARE REQUIRED TO 
CONTACT THE LOCAL POST OFFICE BEFORE INSTALLING THE MAILBOX TO ENSURE ITS CORRECT PLACEMENT AND HEIGHT AT THE STREET. GENERALLY, MAILBOXES ARE INSTALLED AT A HEIGHT OF 41–45 INCHES FROM THE ROAD SURFACE TO EITHER THE INSIDE SURFACE OF THE MAILBOX THAT THE MAIL IS PLACED ON BY THE CARRIER OR TO THE LOWEST EDGE OF MAIL ENTRY (FOR LOCKED MAIL SLOT DESIGNS) AND ARE SET BACK 6–8 INCHES FROM THE FRONT FACE OF CURB OR ROAD EDGE TO THE MAILBOX DOOR. 
3.11.2 Limited Service Mailboxes—The 
following conspicuous note must be included with each mailbox: 
THIS IS A LIMITED SERVICE MAILBOX 
(WITHOUT FLAG) AND IT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR CUSTOMERS WHO DO NOT WANT POSTAL CARRIERS TO PICK UP THEIR OUTGOING MAIL. UNLESS POSTAL CARRIERS HAVE MAIL TO DELIVER, THEY WILL NOT STOP AT LIMITED SERVICE MAILBOXES. 
3.12 Newspaper Receptacles—A 
receptacle for the delivery of newspapers may be attached to the post of a curbside mailbox provided no part of the receptacle interferes with the delivery of mail, obstructs the view of the flag, or presents a hazard to the carrier or the carrier’s vehicle. The receptacle must not extend beyond the front of the box when the door is closed. No 
advertising may be displayed on the outside of the receptacle, except the name of the publication. If the mailbox design does not require a post, a separate mounting arrangement must be made. 
3.13 Workmanship—The mailbox must 
be properly assembled and utilize the best commercial practice workmanship standards in the fabrication of all components and assemblies. All movable parts must fit and operate properly with no unintended catch or binding points. The unit must be free from harmful projections or other hazardous devices. The unit must not have any sharp edges, sharp corners, burrs or other features 
(on any surfaces) that may be hazardous to carriers or customers, or that may interfere with delivery operations as described in 3.1. 
3.14 Intellectual Property—Under no 
circumstances does the Postal Service intend that manufacturers use third-party intellectual property without an appropriate license agreement between the manufacturer and the third party at issue. The manufacturer is solely responsible for obtaining any necessary licenses and is solely responsible for any liability incurred in connection with any intellectual property infringement allegations concerning devices that the USPS reviews and approves. The manufacturer agrees not to use any USPS marks, including but not limited to APPROVED BY THE POSTMASTER GENERAL or USPS–APPROVED, without prior USPS approval and a license from the USPS.
2 
4. Testing Requirements 
4.1 Testing Requirements—Mailboxes 
will be subjected to all applicable testing described herein (specific requirements follow). A mailbox that fails to pass any test will be rejected. Testing will be conducted in sequence as listed herein and in Table III. 
4.2 Capacity—Non-locked and locked 
designs must meet the applicable minimum capacity requirements as tested by insertion and removal of a test gauge or appropriate mail test items as specified in 4.2.1 and 4.2.2. 
4.2.1 Capacity (Limited Capacity Test 
Gauge)—Traditional and Contemporary designs, submitted for approval under 3.1.1.1 and 3.1.1.2, must meet minimum capacity requirements tested by insertion and removal of a standard test gauge which measures 18.50 inches long x 5.00 inches wide x 6.00 inches high. The test gauge is inserted with its 6-inch dimension aligned in the vertical axis (perpendicular to the mailbox floor). The gauge must be capable of easy insertion and removal; and while inserted, allow for all doors to be completely closed without interference. 
The capacity of Locked designs, submitted 
for approval under 3.1.2.1, which have slots, chutes or similar features, will be tested and approved based upon whether standard USPS mail sizes (see Table I) can be easily 
inserted through the mail slot or opening. Retrieval of this mail from the locked compartment must be equally as easy. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES48707 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
TABLE I—S TANDARD MAIL 
[Locked designs] 
Description Size 
(L x H x Thk) 
(inches) 
Express & Priority Mail 
Envelopes ................... 121⁄2x 91⁄2x 1⁄2 
Priority Mail Box ............. 85⁄8x 53⁄8x 15⁄8 
4.2.2 Capacity (Expanded Capacity Test 
Gauge)—Non-Locked and Locked designs, 
submitted for approval to either 3.1.1.3 or 3.1.2.2, must meet minimum capacity requirements tested by insertion and removal of a standard test gauge which measures 16.00 inches long x 13.00 inches wide x 7.00 inches high. The test gauge is inserted with its 7-inch dimension aligned in the vertical axis (perpendicular to the mailbox floor). The gauge must be capable of easy insertion and removal; and while inserted, allow for all doors to be completely closed without interference. The capacity of Locked designs must also meet this capacity test requirement; however, any dimension may be aligned in the vertical axis. Retrieval of the test gauge from the locked compartment must be equally as easy. 
4.3 Operational Requirements—Carrier 
service doors, auxiliary doors, door catches or mechanisms, carrier signal flags, and applicable accessory devices must be capable of operating 7,500 normal operating cycles (1 cycle = open/close) at room temperature, continuously and correctly, without any failures such as breakage of parts. Testing may be performed either manually or by means of an automated mechanically driven test fixture which essentially mimics a manual operation. This test applies to all mailbox designs. 
4.Water-Tightness—A rain test in 
accordance with UL 771, section 47.7, must be performed to determine a mailbox’s ability to protect mail from water. The rain test must be operated for a period of 15 minutes for each side. At the conclusion of the test, the outside of the unit is wiped dry and all doors are opened. The inside of the compartment must contain no water other than that produced by high moisture condensation. This test applies to all mailbox designs. 
4.5 Salt Spray Resistance—A salt spray 
test must be conducted in accordance with method A5 of ASTM G85, Standard Practice for Modified Salt Spray (Fog) Testing. The salt test must be operated for 25 continuous cycles with each cycle consisting of 1-hour fog and 1-hour dry-off. The mailbox must be tested in a finished condition, including all protective coating, paint, and mounting hardware and must be thoroughly washed when submitted to remove all oil, grease, and other nonpermanent coatings. No part of the mailbox may show finish corrosion, blistering or peeling, or other destructive reaction upon conclusion of test. Corrosion is defined as any form of property change such 
as rust, oxidation, color changes, perforation, accelerated erosion, or disintegration. The build-up of salt deposits upon the surface will not be cause for rejection. However, any corrosion, paint blistering, or paint peeling is cause for rejection. This test is primarily applicable to ferrous metal mailbox designs. 
The test is also valid for mailbox designs made of plastic, wood, or other materials that use any metal hardware. 
4.6 Abrasion Resistance—The mailbox’s 
coating or finish must be tested for resistance to abrasion in accordance with method A of ASTM D968. The rate of sand flow must be 2 liters of sand in 22 ±3 seconds. The 
mailbox will have failed the sand abrasion test if it requires less than 15 liters of sand to penetrate its coating, or if it requires less than 75 liters of sand to penetrate its plating. This test applies to metal mailbox designs only. 
4.7 Temperature Stress Test—The 
mailbox under test must be placed in a cold chamber at -65 °F for 24 hours. The chamber 
must first be stabilized at the test temperature. After remaining in the -65° environment for the 24-hour period, the unit must be quickly removed from the cold chamber into room ambient temperature and tested for normal operation. The removal from the chamber and the testing for normal operation must be accomplished in less than 3 minutes. The room ambient temperature must be between 65° and 75 °F. Normal 
operation is defined as operation required and defined by this document. The unit under test must undergo a similar temperature test, as described above, at a temperature of 140 °F. This test applies to all 
mailbox designs. 
4.8 Structural Rigidity Requirements— 
Forces of specified magnitude (see Table II) must be slowly applied at specific points on the mailbox under test (see Figure 6). These forces must be held for a minimum of 1 minute and then released. After their release, the deformation caused by the forces must be measured. If the deformation exceeds the limit specified in Table II, the mailbox under test has failed to meet the structural rigidity requirement. The doors must remain closed for test positions 1 through 6. The forces at positions 1 and 2 must be applied with the mailbox in its normal upright position, supported by a horizontal board. The forces at positions 3, 4, and 5 must be applied with the mailbox lying on its side (flag side down). The mailbox must be supported, on the flag side, by a flat board that is relieved in the immediate area of the flag mechanism. The force at position 6 (Non-Locked mailbox flags only) must be applied with the mailbox lying on its side (flag side up). This load may be 
applied as shown in Figure 5 or from the other direction. If visible cracks in the material develop as a result of the testing, the mailbox under test has failed to meet the structural rigidity requirement. At the conclusion of the Structural Rigidity testing, if the mailbox under test fails to operate normally, as defined by this document, the mailbox under test has failed to meet the structural rigidity requirement. This test applies to all mailbox designs. 
TABLE II—P ERMANENT DEFORMATION  
LIMITS  
Position Deformation 
(inches) Load 
(pounds) 
1 ........................1⁄8 200 TABLE II—P ERMANENT DEFORMATION  
LIMITS —Continued 
Position Deformation 
(inches) Load 
(pounds) 
2 ........................1⁄8 200 
3 ........................1⁄8 50 
4 ........................1⁄8 50 
5 ........................1⁄8 100 
6 ........................1⁄2 2 
4.9 Impact Test—Refer to Figure 6 for 
load positions. Precondition the mailbox for 
4 hours at ¥20 °F. The following testing 
must be performed within 3 minutes of removing the mailbox from the temperature chamber. At both load positions 3 and 4, with the mailbox lying on its side (flag side down) with all doors closed, apply an impact load force generated by a 10-pound weight dropped from a height of 3 feet above the mailbox surface onto a bolster plate having a surface not larger than 2 inches by 6 inches. The mailbox must be supported, on the underside, by a flat board that is relieved in the immediate area of the flag mechanism. If any noticeable perforation, occurrence of sharp edges, or cracking of the material (either inside or outside the mailbox) develops as a result of the impact, or if the door becomes inoperable or fails to close normally, the mailbox under test has failed to meet the impact resistance requirement. This test applies to all mailbox designs. 
4.10 Door Catch or Mechanism Test— 
Door catches and mechanisms must be tested to demonstrate that a force not greater than 5 pounds or less than 1 pound is required to open and close them (see 3.3). A force measurement device must be attached to the front door’s knob or handle. The load must be applied slowly in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the door. The device must allow for the measured force limits to be recorded accurately. 
4.11 Carrier Signal Flag Test—The 
mailbox flag must be tested to demonstrate that a force not exceeding 2 pounds is required to deploy, extend, raise, or retract it. The load must be applied at the flag edge furthest from the hinged end or at the leading edge, if the flag retracts and extends. A force measurement device must be attached to the flag so as to apply the load and allow for it to be recorded accurately. 
4.12 Security Test (Locked, Large 
Capacity Designs)—Locked design mailboxes, submitted for 3.1.2.2 approval, must be tested as described below for resistance to tampering and unauthorized entry through the use of tools such as screwdrivers, flat plates, knives, pry bars, vise grips, pliers, chisels, and punches for a period not to exceed 3 minutes for each feature tested. Pry tools used for testing must not exceed 12 inches in length. 
4.12.1 Customer Access Door—Gaps and 
seams around the perimeter of the customer 
access door must be tested using pry tools listed in 4.12 for a period not to exceed 3 minutes to ensure that access to the compartment cannot be gained within that period of time. 
4.12.2 Carrier Access Door—A manual 
test must be conducted for a period of 3 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES48708 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
minutes to ensure that no customer mail 
items can be accessed and removed through an opened carrier access door within that period of time. No tools are to be used in the performance of this test. 
5. Quality Management System Provisions 
5.1 Quality System—The approved 
source must ensure and be able to 
substantiate that manufactured units conform to requirements and match the approved design. 
5.2 Inspection—The USPS reserves the 
right to inspect units for conformance at any 
stage of manufacture. Inspection by the USPS does not relieve the approved source of the responsibility to provide conforming product. The USPS, may, at its discretion, revoke the approval status of any product that does not meet the requirements of this standard. 
5.3 System—The approved source must 
use a documented quality management system acceptable to the USPS. The USPS has the right to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of the approved source’s quality management system prior to approval, and during tenure as an approved source. At a minimum, the quality management system must include controls and record keeping in the areas described in 5.3.1 through 5.3.8. 
5.3.1 Document Control—Documents 
used in the manufacture of product must be controlled. The control process for documents must ensure the following: 
•Documents are identified, reviewed, and 
approved prior to use. 
•Revision status is identified. 
•Documents of external origin are 
identified and controlled. 
5.3.2 Supplier Oversight—The approved 
source must use a documented process that ensures the following: 
•Material requirements and specifications 
are clearly described in procurement documents. 
•Inspection or other verification methods 
are established and implemented for validation of purchased materials. 
5.3.3 Inspection and Testing—The 
approved source must monitor and verify that product characteristics match approved design. This activity must be carried out at appropriate stages of manufacture to ensure that only acceptable products are delivered. 
5.3.4 Control of Nonconforming 
Product—The control method and disposition process must be defined and ensure that any product or material that does not conform to the approved design is identified and controlled to prevent its unintended use or delivery. 
5.3.5 Control of Inspection, Measuring, 
and Test Equipment—The approved source must ensure that all equipment used to verify product conformance is controlled, identified, and calibrated at prescribed intervals traceable to nationally recognized standards in accordance with documented procedures. 
5.3.6 Corrective Action—The approved 
source must maintain a documented complaint process. This process must ensure that all complaints are reviewed and that appropriate action is taken to determine cause and prevent reoccurrence. Action must be taken in a timely manner and be based on 
the severity of the nonconformance. In addition to outlining the approved source’s approach to quality, the documentation must specify the methodology used to accomplish the interlinked processes and describe how they are controlled. The approved source must submit its quality documentation to the Postal Service for review along with the preliminary design review. 
NOTE: It is recognized that each approved 
source functions individually. Consequently, the quality system of each approved source may differ in the specific methods of accomplishment. It is not the intent of this standard to attempt to standardize these systems, but to present the basic functional concepts that when conscientiously implemented will provide assurance that the approved source’s product meets the requirements and fully matches the approved design. 
5.3.7 Documentation Retention—All of 
the approved source’s documentation pertaining to the approved product must be kept for a minimum of 3 years after shipment of product. 
5.3.8 Documentation Submittal—The 
approved source must submit a copy of its quality system documentation relevant to the manufacture of curbside mailboxes for review as requested during the approval process and tenure as an approved source. 
6. Application Requirements 
6.1 Application Requirements—All 
correspondence and inquiries must be 
directed to the address in 1.3.2. The application process consists of the steps described in 6.1.1 through 6.1.3.4. 
6.1.1 Preliminary Review—Manufacturers 
must first satisfy requirements of a preliminary review prior to submitting samples of any sample mailboxes or accessories. The preliminary review consists of a review of the manufacturer’s conceptual design drawings for each mailbox for which the manufacturer is seeking approval. Computer-generated drawings are preferred, but hand-drawn sketches are acceptable provided they adequately depict the overall shape and interior size of the proposed 
mailbox design. Drawings must also include details about the design of applicable features such as the carrier service door (including the mail drop design and mechanism, for locking mailboxes), latch, handle, flag, floor, and mail induction opening size. If drawings show that the proposed mailbox design appears likely to comply with the requirements of this standard, manufacturers will be notified in writing and may then continue with the application requirements described in 6.1.2. Do NOT submit any sample units to the USPS prior to complying with the requirements of 6.1.2. Notification that a manufacturer’s drawings satisfy the requirements of the preliminary review does NOT constitute USPS approval of a design and must NOT be relied upon as an assurance that a design will ultimately be approved. 
6.1.2 Independent Lab Testing—Upon 
receiving written notification from the USPS that a submitted design satisfies requirements of the preliminary review, manufacturers must, at their own expense, submit one 
representative sample of their mailbox or accessory for which the vendor seeks USPS approval to an independent laboratory for testing along with a copy of the preliminary review letter from the USPS. Manufacturers with more than one unique model must have each one tested independently. Models that are generally of the same size, shape, and material of previously approved designs but only have different decorative features (i.e., color scheme and surface contours) are not considered unique and do not require any testing. Manufacturers seeking approval of models that are not unique must submit documentation for each model in accordance with 6.1.3.2. This documentation must be reviewed and the proposed model must either be approved or disapproved (see Section 7). All tests must be performed by an approved independent test lab, except for the 
security tests, which must be performed by the Postal Service. See Appendix A for information on how to receive the list of USPS-approved independent test labs. 
6.1.3 Final Review—Within one year of 
receipt of USPS preliminary review approval, manufacturers must submit one sample mailbox or accessory to the USPS for security testing (if applicable), final review, and approval. The sample must be accompanied with a certificate of compliance and a copy of the laboratory test results (see 6.1.3.3). Mailboxes submitted to the USPS (see 1.3.2) for final evaluation must be identical in every way to the mailboxes to be marketed, and must be marked as specified in 3.7. Manufacturers may be subject to a verification of their quality system prior to approval. This may consist of a review of the manufacturer’s quality manual (see 6.1.3.4) and an onsite quality system evaluation (see 5.2). If this final review submission does not occur within the prescribed timeframe, the preliminary review approval will be rescinded. 
6.1.3.1 Installation Instructions— 
Manufacturers must furnish a written copy of their installation instructions for review. These instructions must contain all information as detailed in 3.11. 
6.1.3.2 Documentation—Units submitted 
for approval must be accompanied by one complete set of manufacturing drawings consisting of black on white prints (blueprints or sepia are unacceptable). The drawings must be dated and signed by the manufacturer’s representatives. In addition, a second complete drawing set must be provided in electronic form. This drawing set does not have to be images of the signed drawings. The drawings must completely document and represent the design of the unit tested. If other versions of the approved mailbox are to be offered, the drawings must include the unique or differing design items of these versions. The drawings must include sufficient details to allow the USPS to inspect all materials, construction methods, processes, coatings, treatments, finishes (including paint types), control specifications, parts, and assemblies used in the construction of the unit. Additionally, the drawings must fully describe any purchased materials, components, and hardware including their respective finishes. The USPS 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES48709 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
may request individual piece parts to verify 
drawings. 
6.1.3.3 Certification of Compliance and 
Test Results—Manufacturers must furnish a written certificate of compliance indicating that their design fully complies with the requirements of this standard. In addition, the manufacturer must submit the lab’s original report which clearly shows results of each test conducted (see Table III). The manufacturer bears all responsibility for its units meeting these requirements and the USPS reserves the right to retest any and all units submitted, including those which are available to the general public. Any changes to the design after approval and certification must be submitted to the USPS for evaluation. 
TABLE III—T ESTREQUIREMENTS  
Test Requirement Reference Applicable document 
Capacity ............................................................... Insertion of test gauge ................................. ....... 4 .2 
Operational Requirements ................................... 7,500 cycles ........................................................ 4 .3 
Water-Tightness .................................................. No appreciable moisture ..................................... 4 .4 UL 771, Section 47.7. 
Salt Spray Resistance ......................................... 25 cycles ........................................................ ..... 4 .5 ASTM G85. 
Abrasion Resistance ............................................ 75 liters ....................................................... ......... 4 .6 ASTM D968. 
Temperature Stress Test ..................................... Must function between ¥65° F and 140° F ....... 4 .7 
Structural Rigidity Requirements ......................... Refer to Table II for loads and points, maximum 
1⁄8inch permanent deformation.4 .8 
Impact Test .......................................................... 10 lbs. dropped from 3 feet ............................... .4  .9 
Door Catch/Mechanism Test ............................... Max 5 lbs./Min 1 lb. to open/close door ............. 4 .10 
Carrier Signal Flag Test ...................................... Max 2 lbs. required to use flag ........................... 4 .11 
6.1.3.4 Quality Policy Manual—The 
manufacturer must submit its quality policy 
manual to the address listed in 1.3.2. 
7. Approval or Disapproval 
7.1 Disapproval—Written notification, 
including reasons for disapproval, will be 
sent to the manufacturer within 30 days of completion of the final review of all submitted units. All correspondence and inquiries must be directed to the address listed in 1.3.2. 
7.1.1 Disapproved Mailboxes—Mailboxes 
disapproved will be disposed of in 30 calendar days from the date of the written notification of disapproval or returned to the manufacturer, if requested, provided the manufacturer pays shipping costs. 
7.2 Approval—One set of manufacturing 
drawings with written notification of approval will be returned to the manufacturer. The drawings will be stamped and identified as representing each unit. 
7.2.1 Approved Mailboxes—Mailboxes 
that are approved will be retained by the USPS. 
7.2.2. Rescission—The manufacturer’s 
production units must be constructed in accordance with the USPS-certified drawings and the provisions of this specification and 
be of the same materials, construction, coating, workmanship, finish, etc., as the approved units. The USPS reserves the right at any time to examine and retest units obtained either in the general marketplace or from the manufacturer. If the USPS determines that a mailbox model is not in compliance with this standard or is out of conformance with approved drawings, the USPS may, at its discretion, rescind approval of the mailbox as described in 7.2.2.1 through 7.2.2.5. 
7.2.2.1 Written Notification—The USPS 
will provide written notification to the manufacturer that a mailbox is not in compliance with this standard or is out of conformance with approved drawings. This notification will include the specific reasons that the unit is noncompliant or out of conformance and will be sent via Registered Mail
TM. 7.2.2.1.1 Health and Safety—If the USPS 
determines that the noncompliance or 
nonconformity constitutes a danger to the health or safety of customers or letter carriers, the USPS may, at its discretion, immediately rescind approval of the unit. In addition, the USPS may, at its discretion, order that production of the mailbox cease immediately, that any existing inventory not be sold for receipt of U.S. Mail, and that USPS Approved corrective design changes be applied to sold and unsold units. 
7.2.2.2 Manufacturer’s Response—In all 
cases of noncompliance or nonconformity other than those determined to constitute a danger to the health or safety of customers or letter carriers, the manufacturer must confer with the USPS and must submit one sample of a corrected mailbox to the USPS for approval no later than 45 calendar days after receipt of the notification described in 7.2.2.1. Failure to confer or submit a 
corrected mailbox within the prescribed period will constitute grounds for immediate rescission. 
7.2.2.3 Second Written Notification—The 
USPS will respond to the manufacturer in writing, via Registered Mail, no later than 30 calendar days after receipt of the corrected mailbox with a determination of whether the manufacturer’s submission is accepted or rejected and with specific reasons for the determination. 
7.2.2.4 Manufacturer’s Second 
Response—If the USPS rejects the corrected mailbox, the manufacturer may submit a second sample of the corrected mailbox to the USPS for approval no later than 45 calendar days after receipt of the notification described in 7.2.2.3. Failure to confer or submit a corrected mailbox within the prescribed period will constitute grounds for immediate rescission. 
7.2.2.5 Final USPS Rescission 
Notification—The USPS will provide a final response to the manufacturer in writing no later than 30 calendar days after receipt of the second sample corrected mailbox with a determination of whether the manufacturer’s submission is accepted or rejected and with specific reasons for the determination. If the second submission is rejected, the USPS may, at its discretion, rescind approval of the 
mailbox. In addition, the USPS may, at its discretion, order that production of the mailbox cease immediately, and that any existing inventory not be sold or used for receipt of U.S. Mail. If the USPS rescinds approval, the manufacturer is not prohibited from applying for a new approval pursuant to the provisions of 6. 
7.2.3 Revisions, Product or Drawings— 
Changes that affect the form, fit, or function (e.g., dimensions, material, and finish) of 
approved products or drawings must not be 
made without written USPS approval. Any proposed changes must be submitted with the affected documentation reflecting the changes (including a notation in the revision area), and a written explanation of the changes. One unit, incorporating the changes, may be required to be resubmitted for testing and evaluation for approval. 
7.2.3.1 Corporate or Organizational 
Changes—If any substantive part of the approved manufacturer’s structure changes from what existed when the manufacturer became approved, the manufacturer must promptly notify the USPS and will be subject to a reevaluation of its approved products and quality system. Examples of substantive structural changes include the following: Change in ownership, executive or quality management; major change in quality policy or procedures; relocation of manufacturing facilities; and major equipment or manufacturing process change (e.g., outsourcing vs. in-plant fabrication). Notification of such changes must be sent to the address given in 1.3. 
7.2.4 Product Brochure—Within 60 days 
upon sale to the public, manufacturers must submit one copy of their product brochures representing approved mailbox designs to the address listed in 1.3.2 and to: USPS, Delivery Program Support, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Rm. 7142, Washington, DC 20260–7142. 
8. Notes 
8.1 Mailboxes intended to be used in 
delivery to customers’ doors are not currently 
‘‘approved’’ by the United States Postal Service as referenced in this standard. However, it is recommended that these boxes 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES48710 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
conform to the intentions of this 
specification, particularly the safety of the carrier and customer and the protection of the mail. The local postmaster must be contacted prior to the installation and use of any door mailbox. 
8.2 The United States Postal Service does 
not approve mailbox posts or regulate mounting of mailboxes other than the 
requirements specified in 3.10 and 3.11. Please note that mailbox posts are often subject to local restrictions, state laws, and federal highway regulations. Further information may be obtained from: 
American Association of State Highway and 
Transportation Officials, 444 N. Capitol St. NW., Suite 249, Washington, DC 20001– 
1512, http://www.transportation.org 
Federal Highway Administration, Office of 
Safety, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001, safety.fhwa.dat.gov 
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1
ER14AU15.081</GPH>tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SEENOTE3 SEENOTE2 
( ( 
r 
B 11 G • i I ..::;::.:._ 
~=~ --------- ---( ( 
F 
Dlliol 
A 
8 c 
D 
E 
F --------- ---
t----A----'1111 
MIN MAX Dlliol 
6.25 11.00 G 
4.50 8.25 H 
3.12R 5.5llR J 
1&56 22.81 K -2.oo t 
3.15 8.50 
lNTS:1NCHES MIN 
6.00 
1.00 
1.00 
.50 
Jf1 MAX 
15.00 
2.12 
2.oo 
Jf1 
1.25 14-------D--------t 
.12MN 
NOTES: RIIIJED R.OORDETAL 
VIBNA 
1.) DIM:NSIQt.IS AJJ.C,ID AFE INTERIOR 
2.) SIGNAL PORTION OF FLAG (4 SQ. IN. Mill) 
NDtiE TOP Sl.RFACE. OF BOX. 
3.) NO SliMP EDGES. 
TRADmONAL MAILBOX 
FIGURE 1A 48711 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1
ER14AU15.082</GPH>tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
B 
r 1 r-M SIGNAL PORTION OF FlAG (4 SQ IN. MIN) 
ABOVE TOP SURFACE OF BOX. 
K 
Jl_ 
I L--.A 
12__ 
l-+ 
D ~ 
C\[ 
E 
(INTERIOR) 
U.S. MAIL ~ @] 
APPROVED BY THE 
POITMAITI!R GI!NI!RAL 
DIM 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F A 
(INTERIOR) 
MIN MAX DIM 
13.06 13.88 G 
725 7.88 H 
1625 16.50 J 
1125 12.00 K 
9.88 10.75 L 
R8.94 R9.44 M 
UNIT: INCHES MIN 
--
5.00 
1.00 
.50 
1.00 
.87 I 
MAX 
2.00 
-
2.00 
.87 
2.13 
1.25 H A 
.rl r 
~ ~ 1m 1 : r~--+-
~ ( .. ~ .I 11' •I G 
1 r-100MAX 
I II-19MAX ~ 
.12MIN 
NON-LOCKED MAILBOX 
(FULL SERVICE) 
FIGURE 1B SECTION A-A 
RIBBED FlOOR DETAIL .75MIN 48712 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1
ER14AU15.083</GPH>tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
c 
SEEIID'I'E1 ~ D •I 
----WVIr n·a· r----, .. ___ ..... 
jiiiOCIIIMCII'I!NI'CIIIIIalll} 
looi-----A-----1 
SEEIID'I'E1 .25MN ltiGfr 
SEEVEWA 
RDDMARICIIG 
(DXRAU«SIIE) 
SEEVEWA 
SEEIID'I'E4 
DU liN 
A -
B -c -
D 10JD 
E 1.15 
f' -
G -MAX -----
2m 
15m 
l.NmNH!5 SEENJTE3 
SEEIID'I'E1 
Ntm:S: 
1.)DII:JI!IIC.HiA, B,&Ct:EnRaimtl'f~ 
I!IUTIIJSTPMSCAAIIaiY113Sr. 
2.)MQ.NIIse:r.M:'.KRJUilOTIS2m'WEN 
IIE'AS.II!DFIUffRH"WIU.CJ"lJ£IIiti..ID( 
3.)CCIFIWIENr111Sn!EIJR:EI!JUJ.itllO~ 
Sf.!IIEIW.:Q!D'l.X4.2S'KI.EI"R!RS.i.E1'1BGCNtBE 
fi(AtmOIIIIIOI!Itea"'DECJ!fRERSI!RYJCEIXDI 
BJIIINIImNGNEB)f'(ftNII~.W!La:l!IIMJM:HJ 
FRMB>IIM..DC&NOrFAU.QifWBIIXDIIS<HND. 
4.)AIMTJNERrNrOOMRF<JMG~ AI£~ 
S..)HIIIIGE9flllLBEPOSniCI\B)W1tent:PWa" 
CAFRER!iERIIIECXXRNrOIWM!Etm" ..... 
fftlERaEI.IW«E. 
fl)fRH"BJGEa"RAGIIIJSI"f«JTBEErllifO(ID'IE'ltM 
2DJ'WBIII5ASI.fB)FIUfRUfTWIU.CJ"IIiti..ID( 
1.)CPIKNI.I.OCAllQrfa"al!m:MRAD::BISDOQt 
LOCKED MAILBOX- MAIL SLOT DESIGN 
(FULL SERVICE) 
FIGURE2A SEEIID'I'E7 48713 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1
ER14AU15.084</GPH>tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
c 
SEE NOTE1 D 
t 
E 
u.s. f 
MAIL .::::..'-. ...........__ 
~ / 
A 
SEENOTE1 fiEQDIMAKJNG 
SEEVSNA 
SEENOIE3 
IJIM MIN 
A -
It -c -
D 10.111 
E 1.75 
F -SEE NOTES 
SEENOTE2 
1M)( -----
2JX) IID1ES: ~------8------~ 
SEENOIE1 SEENOTE4 
1.) DIMENSICNSA, B. &C OE:IEAioiiB)BYI.WU'ACI\.AER 
2.) Ml\lCIIUIII5Ef~RlRSLOTIS2JIII"I'ROM FRa'fT 
WALL CFTI£ MIIILBOX. 
3.) A Mo\T INSERT /IHJOTHERFClliiii.W'G 'IEOftiQJES 
ME ACCEPrAII.£. 
4.)<PI'IOIIIAllOOATDICFQJSTCMERA<lCESSIJO(R. 
5.) F SLOT HIIISAPR01ECT111E flAP FrMIJST<J'ERI.lE 
INWARD. FriSFRB EAIEDlHATSLOTBELOCAlED 
aa.I>ACARRIIRSER\IICEIJO(R. 
II\ITS:tNQES 
LOCKED MAILBOX- MAIL SLOT DESIGN 
(UMITED SERVICE) 
FIGURE2B 48714 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1
ER14AU15.085</GPH>tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
G 
SEENOTE1 
DIM 
A 
8 
G 
D 
E I_ 
r 
MIN 
-
-
-
13.25 
7:15 D 
(OPENING WIDTH) 
I I SEENOTE5 4.00 SQ IN. MIN. 
NO SHARP EDGES 
SEE NOTES 9 & 10 
I 
,-----+-! SEE NOTE 2 
U.S. MAl SEE NOTES 8 & 101 I IIi ; 
APPROVED BYnE 
POSTMASTER GENE! 
SEENOTE2 SEENOTE3 
SEENOTE7D l 
REQUIRED MARKING 
MAX 
-
-
-
18.1lll 
13.50 A 
SEENOTE1 J 
I 
RIBBED FLOOR DETAIL 
DETAIL A SEENOTE6 
Notes: L 
I 
L _j 
--, 
1. Dimensions A. B & G determined by manufac:turer, 
but must allow mail box to pass capacity test 
2. front door opening and mail induction section of 
mail box must be laJge enough ID accomoo!Odate 
l X 13" X 16" !lest gauge. 
3. Any mail drop mechanism attached to the fiunt door 
shall still oper.lfe (openldose) after il test gauge has 
been dropped to lhe lower section of mailbox_ 
4. Milil dmp section illld o:uslomer ao::mss door must 
be lilrge enough to acmmmodille one lest giluge, 
minimum. D • 
~SEENOTE4 
Notes am1: 
6. A mill insert and olherbming techniques ilre 
acceptilble. Aoor shilll have a min 1:40 slope 
from back to fmnt 
1_ Optional location of ruslomer access door_ 
8. lele!s can be placed an backside of lhe carrier 
seiVic:e door, eliminalillg need fur-ill1 out-going mail 
compartment, pmllided mail does nat fall wt when 
door is OflEIII-
9. front edge of tag must nat be set back more lhan 
2.00" when measured from front wall of mailbox. 
UNITS: INCHES LOCKED MAILBOX 
(FULL SERVICE SHOWN} 
FIGURE 3 5. Handle shall be positioned within top ~ of carrier 
sei:Vice door ilnd provide 1.00" min. finger cleilrance. 10. This fealule is nat applil:able for linifed service 
mailboxes. 48715 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1
ER14AU15.086</GPH>tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
U.S. MAIL 
APPRCJVED In' TIE 
POMIIM'I'a: GI!NEIIAL 
U.S. MAIL 
APPRIDVED IIY"TlE 
PCJII'IIIUI'ER GENERAL 3.50MAX 1----
~ 
~ -
#1 
3.50MAX I• •I 
I 
II n 
u 
o') .. .. n .. .. In]] lJ!_ 
U.S. MAIL 
APPRCJVED In' TIE 
POI'niM1'Eil GI!IIEIW. 3.50MAX 
~ 
#2 
~ IOJ I Notes: 
1. Flag must have a minimum visible area 
of 4 sq inches when engaged. 
#3 
ALTERNATE FlAG DESIGN 
FIGURE4 2. No sharp edges. 48716 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1
ER14AU15.087</GPH>tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
3.25MIN 
(4.00) I• •I 
jA 1.00MIN 
(125} 
SeeNote4 
U.S. MAIL ,...........,,.. ........--.. 
_jA 
#1 
.75MIN 
(125) 
U.S. MAIL 
N'I'IIMIDIIt'­....... -. 
#4 
U.S. MAIL ...,.....,,.. ............... 
_jo 
#1 c Hill MIN 
(1.50) 
SECTION A-A 
1.00MIN 
(1.50) 
_L 
1.38MIN 
(2.00) ? 
• -1-.00" m -10.00" --1 
SECTION D-O ¢1.50±25 
\lB 
U.S. MAIL ................ ~-
_jB 
#2 
U.S. MAIL ............ ...,.....-., 
-.Jc 
#5 
cr: _, 
U.S. MAIL ............ .......,. ..... 
_jE 
#8 I 
.50±.12 
.. 
SECllONB-8 
1.00 MIN l 1..­
(UO) II 
SECTIONC-C 
1.00MIN 
(1.50) 
SECTIONE-E 
HANDLE/KNOB DESIGNS 
FIGURES .38MIN 
_l 
f 
Noles: U.S. MAIL ......... ....... ......... -. 
#3 
U.S. MAIL ........ ... ,.. ........... -. 
#6 
1. Units: Inches_ 
2_ Prelerred dimensions are shown in parentheses. " 
3. Minimum depth must remain consl:anl for minimum 
width of handle. 
4_ Dim A= .38 min for-free swinging rings and 1.0Dmin 
h fixed rmgs. D 
5_ Handlell<nobs depided are suggested examples ONlY . 
Other designs may be acceptable. 48717 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1
ER14AU15.088</GPH>tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES48718 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 157 / Friday, August 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 
Appendix A 
USPS-APPROVED INDEPENDENT TEST 
LABORATORIES 
To obtain the latest list of USPS-approved 
test labs, contact: 
USPS ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, DELIVERY 
AND RETAIL TECHNOLOGY, 8403 LEE 
HIGHWAY, MERRIFIELD, VA 22082–8101 
Additional test laboratories may be added 
provided they satisfy USPS certification 
criteria. Interested laboratories should contact: 
USPS ENGINEERING, TEST EVALUATION 
AND QUALITY, 8403 LEE HIGHWAY, 
MERRIFIELD, VA 22082–8101 
[FR Doc. 2015–20033 Filed 8–13–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 
AGENCY 
40 CFR Part 52 
[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0103 FRL–9926–85– 
Region 7] 
Approval and Promulgation of Air 
Quality Implementation Plans; Iowa; Update to Materials Incorporated by Reference 
AGENCY : Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA). 
ACTION : Final rule; notice of 
administrative change. 
SUMMARY : The Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) is updating the materials submitted by Iowa that are incorporated by reference (IBR) into the state implementation plan (SIP). EPA is also notifying the public of the correction of certain typographical errors within the IBR table. The regulations affected by this update have been previously submitted by the state agency and approved by EPA. This update affects the SIP materials that are available for public inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and the Regional Office. 
DATES : This rule is effective on August 
14, 2015. 
ADDRESSES : SIP materials which are 
incorporated by reference into 40 CFR part 52 are available for inspection at the following locations: Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; or at http://www.epa.gov/region07/air/rules/fedapprv.htm; For 
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go to: www.archives.gov/federal- register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jan 
Simpson at (913) 551–7089, or by email at simpson.jan@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
I. Background 
The SIP is a living document which 
the state revises as necessary to address 
the unique air pollution problems in the state. Therefore, EPA from time to time must take action on SIP revisions containing new and/or revised regulations to make them part of the SIP. On May 22, 1997 (62 FR 27968), EPA revised the procedures for incorporating by reference Federally- approved SIPs, as a result of consultations between EPA and the Office of Federal Register. The description of the revised SIP document, IBR procedures and ‘‘Identification of plan’’ format are discussed in further detail in the May 22, 1997, Federal Register document. 
On February 12, 1999, EPA published 
a document in the Federal Register (64 FR 7091) beginning the new IBR procedure for Iowa. On September 23, 
2004 (69 FR 56942), and on July 29, 2009, (74 FR 37556) EPA published an update to the IBR material for Iowa. 
In this document, EPA is publishing 
an updated set of tables listing the regulatory (i.e., IBR) materials in the 
Iowa SIP taking into account the additions, deletions, and revisions to those materials previously submitted by the state agency and approved by EPA. We are removing the EPA Headquarters Library from paragraph (b)(3), as IBR materials are no longer available at this location. In addition, EPA has found errors in certain entries listed in 40 CFR 52.820(c), as amended in the published IBR update actions listed above, and is correcting them in this document. Table (c) revisions include: 
•Adding the inadvertent omission of 
the following explanation to the explanation column for 567.22.1 (Permits Required for New or Existing Stationary Sources): In 22.1(3) the following sentence regarding electronic submission is not SIP approved. The sentence is ‘‘Alternatively, the owner or operator may apply for a construction permit for a new or modified stationary source through the electronic submittal format specified by the department’’. 
•Adding the inadvertent omission of 
the following explanation to the explanation column for 567–22.3 (Issuing Permits): Subrule 22.3(6) has not been approved as part of the SIP. Subrule 22.3(6), Limits on Hazardous Air Pollutants, has been approved under Title V and section 112(l). The remainder of the rule has not been approved pursuant to Title V and section 112(l). 
•567.22.105 (Title V Permit 
Applications): Correcting the state effective date, correcting the EPA approval date column to the correct date and Federal Register citation, and 
adding the inadvertent omission of the following explanation to the explanation column: In 22.105(1) Duty to apply the last sentence ‘‘Alternatively, an owner or operator may submit a complete and timely application through the electronic submittal format specified by the department.’’ is not approved. In 22.105(1) ‘‘a’’ new subparagraph (9) is not approved. 
•Adding the inadvertent omission of 
the following explanation to the explanation column for 567–23.1 (Emission Standards): Sections 23.1(2)– (5) are not approved in the SIP. Section 23.1(5) is approved as part of the 111(d) plan. 
Table (e) revisions include: 
•Adding text in the explanation 
column for (4)–(39). 
II. EPA Action 
In this action, EPA is doing the 
following: 
A. Announcing the update to the IBR 
material as of December 31, 2014; 
B. Revising the entry in paragraph 
52.820(b) to reflect the update and 
corrections; 
C. Revising certain entries in 
paragraph 52.820 (c) as described above; 
D. Correcting the date format in the 
‘‘State effective date’’ or ‘‘State submittal date’’ and ‘‘EPA approval date’’ columns in paragraphs 52.820 (c), (d) and (e). Dates are numerical month/ 
day/year without additional zeros; 
E. Modifying the Federal Register 
citation in paragraphs 52.820 (c), (d) and (e) to reflect the beginning page of the preamble as opposed to the page number of the regulatory text. 
EPA has determined that today’s rule 
falls under the ‘‘good cause’’ exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’ authorizes agencies to dispense with public participation and section 553(d)(3), which allows an agency to make a rule effective immediately (thereby avoiding the 30-day delayed effective date otherwise provided for in the APA). Today’s rule simply codifies provisions which are already in effect as a matter of law in Federal and approved State programs. Under section 553 of the APA, an agency may find good cause where procedures are ‘‘impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.’’ Public comment is ‘‘unnecessary’’ and ‘‘contrary to the public interest’’ since the codification only reflects existing law. Immediate notice in the CFR benefits the public by 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Aug 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM 14AUR1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES