34346 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules 
(3) The FAA approved the instrument 
training and instrument tasks performed 
in the device. 
(j) A person may not credit more than 
20 total hours of instrument time in a flight simulator, flight training device, aviation training device, or combination toward the instrument time requirements of this section. 
PART 141—PILOT SCHOOLS 
■3. The authority citation for part 141 
continues to read as follows: 
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 
44701–44703, 44707, 44709, 44711, 45102– 
45103, 45301–45302. 
■4. Revise § 141.41 to read as follows: 
§ 141.41 Flight simulators, flight training devices, aviation training devices, and training aids. 
An applicant for a pilot school 
certificate or a provisional pilot school 
certificate must show that its flight simulators, flight training devices, aviation training devices, training aids, and equipment meet the following requirements: 
(a) Flight simulators and flight 
training devices. Each flight simulator and flight training device used to obtain flight training credit in an approved pilot training course curriculum must be: 
(1) Qualified under part 60 of this 
chapter; and 
(2) Approved by the Administrator for 
the tasks and maneuvers. 
(b) Aviation training devices. Each 
aviation training device used to obtain flight training credit in an approved pilot training course curriculum must be evaluated, qualified, and approved by the Administrator. 
(c) Training aids and equipment. Each 
training aid, including any audiovisual aid, projector, mockup, chart, or aircraft component listed in the approved training course outline, must be accurate and relevant to the course for which it is used. 
■5. Amend Appendix C to part 141 by 
revising paragraph (b) in section 4 to read as follows: 
Appendix C to Part 141—Instrument 
Rating Course 
* * * * * 
4. Flight training. ***  
(b) For the use of flight simulators, flight 
training devices, or aviation training 
devices— 
(1) The course may include training in a 
flight simulator, flight training device, or aviation training device, provided it is representative of the aircraft for which the course is approved, meets the requirements of this paragraph, and the training is given by an authorized instructor. (2) Credit for training in a flight simulator 
that meets the requirements of § 141.41(a) cannot exceed 50 percent of the total flight training hour requirements of the course or of this section, whichever is less. 
(3) Credit for training in a flight training 
device that meets the requirements of § 141.41(a), an aviation training device that meets the requirements of § 141.41(b), or a combination of these devices cannot exceed 40 percent of the total flight training hour requirements of the course or of this section, whichever is less. 
(4) Credit for training in flight simulators, 
flight training devices, and aviation training devices if used in combination, cannot exceed 50 percent of the total flight training hour requirements of the course or of this section, whichever is less. However, credit for training in a flight training device or aviation training device cannot exceed the limitation provided for in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. 
* * * * * 
Issued in Washington, DC, under the 
authority of 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 44701(a)(5), and 44703(a), on June 10, 2015. 
Michael J. Zenkovich, Acting Director Flight Standards Service. 
[FR Doc. 2015–14836 Filed 6–15–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 
Federal Aviation Administration 
14 CFR Part 91 
[Docket No.: FAA–2015–2147; Notice No. 
15–05] 
RIN 2120–AK51 
Transponder Requirement for Gliders 
AGENCY : Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA), DOT. 
ACTION : Advance Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (ANPRM). 
SUMMARY : The FAA requests public 
comment on removal of the current 
transponder exception for gliders. This action responds to recommendations from members of Congress and the National Transportation Safety Board. The purpose of this action is to gather information to determine whether the current glider exception—from transponder equipment and use requirements—provides the appropriate level of safety in the National Airspace System. The FAA will use the information gathered from this action to determine whether additional transponder equipment and use requirements are necessary for gliders operating in the excepted areas. 
DATES : Send comments on or before 
August 17, 2015. ADDRESSES : Send comments identified 
by docket number FAA–2015–2147 using any of the following methods: 
•Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 
http://www.regulations.gov and follow 
the online instructions for sending your comments electronically. 
•Mail: Send comments to Docket 
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590–0001. 
•Hand Delivery or Courier: Take 
comments to Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. 
•Fax: Fax comments to Docket 
Operations at 202–493–2251. 
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in 
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL– 14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. 
Docket: Background documents or 
comments received may be read at http://www.regulations.gov at any time. 
Follow the online instructions for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12–140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : For 
technical questions concerning this action, contact Jon M. Stowe, Airspace Regulations Team, AJV–113, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267–8783; email jon.m.stowe@faa.gov. 
For legal questions concerning this 
action, contact Anne Moore, Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC–220, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267–3073; email Anne.Moore@faa.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Comments Invited 
See the ‘‘Additional Information’’ 
section for information on how to comment on this advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) and how the FAA will handle comments received. The ‘‘Additional Information’’ section also contains related information about the docket, privacy, 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Jun 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM 16JNP1asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS34347 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules 
1Technical Standard Order, TSO–C199: Traffic 
Awareness Beacon System (TABS), October 10, 
2014. 
2The rule states that, with a few exceptions, all 
aircraft must have an operating transponder with Mode C (altitude reporting information) in the following areas: Class A, Class B, and Class C airspace; below 10,000 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) and within 30 nautical miles (nm) of the 36 airports listed in Appendix D to part 91 (Mode C Veil); and above 10,000 feet MSL, except that airspace that is below 2,500 feet Above Ground Level (AGL). 
3The exceptions to the rule allow aircraft that 
were originally certificated without an engine- driven electrical system, balloons, and gliders to be operated in the following areas without a transponder: Within the 30 nm of the 36 listed airports listed in Appendix D to part 91 (Mode C Veil) provided they remain outside the Class A, B, or C airspace and are below the ceiling of the airspace designated for the Class B or C airport, or 10,000 feet MSL, whichever is lower; Above 10,000 feet MSL; and in the airspace from the surface to 10,000 feet MSL within a 10-nautical-mile radius of any airport listed in appendix D, excluding the airspace below 1,200 feet outside of the lateral boundaries of the surface area of the airspace designated for that airport. 
4A–08–10 through 13, Safety Recommendations. 
National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC 20594, March 31, 2008. A copy of this report has been placed in the docket. http://www.ntsb.gov/ 
doclib/recletters/2008/a08 _10_13.pdf. 5Copies of the congressional recommendations 
have been placed in the docket. and the handling of proprietary or 
confidential business information. In addition, there is information on obtaining copies of related rulemaking documents. 
Authority for This Rulemaking 
The FAA’s authority to issue rules on 
aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the 
United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. 
This rulemaking is promulgated 
under the authority described in 49 U.S.C. 40103, which vests the Administrator with broad authority to prescribe regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace, and 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5), which requires the Administrator to promulgate regulations and minimum standards for other practices, methods, and procedures necessary for safety in air commerce and national security. 
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms 
Frequently Used in This Document 
ADS–B—Automatic Dependent 
Surveillance—Broadcast 
ANPRM—Advance Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking 
LASE—Light Aircraft Surveillance 
Equipment 
LPSE—Low Powered Surveillance 
Equipment 
MSL—Mean Sea Level 
NAS—National Airspace System NMAC—Near Midair Collision NTSB—National Transportation Safety 
Board 
TABS—Traffic Awareness Beacon 
System 
TCAS—Traffic Alert and Collision 
Avoidance System 
TSO—Technical Standard Order 
I. Executive Summary 
The purpose of this advance notice of 
proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) is to 
solicit input from interested persons involving glider operations in the National Airspace System (NAS). The ultimate goal is to ensure safety of flight for gliders and other aircraft operating in the NAS. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and two members of Congress requested rulemaking because of a midair collision between a glider and a private jet. The FAA notes that it is currently encouraging the voluntary equipage of Traffic Awareness Beacon System (TABS) devices on aircraft excepted from carrying a transponder, such as gliders.
1The FAA is also considering 
the current and future implications of 
Automatic Dependent Surveillance- Broadcast (ADS–B) that may impact this potential rule change. 
II. Background 
The FAA is initiating this ANPRM for 
comment from the public regarding the 
removal of the glider exception from the transponder equipment and use requirements established in 14 CFR 91.215.
2 
This section establishes the specific 
technical standards for the transponder equipment’s functionality, and defines the airspace where transponder equipment is required to operate. Generally, these areas include specific classes of airspace surrounding many airports (e.g. Class B and Class C 
airspace), most airspace above 10,000 
ft., and airspace within 30 nautical miles (NM) of some of the nation’s busiest airports. There are certain types of aircraft, including gliders, that are excepted from the transponder requirement within a portion of these areas.
3The FAA is not seeking comment 
on this exception for aircraft other than gliders. 
A. National Transportation Safety 
Board (NTSB) Recommendations 
On March 31, 2008, the NTSB 
provided safety recommendations
4to 
the FAA resulting from an investigation following an August 28, 2006, Reno midair collision between a Hawker 800XP airplane, N879QS, and a Schleicher ASW27–18 glider, N7729. The collision occurred in flight about 42 
NM south-southeast of the Reno/Tahoe International Airport (RNO), at an altitude of about 16,000 feet (ft.) mean sea level (MSL)—an area excepted from transponder equipment and use requirements for gliders. Although the glider was equipped with a transponder, 
the glider pilot had turned off the equipment to conserve power. The findings of this accident investigation address the limitations of the see-and- avoid concept in preventing midair collisions, and specifically, the benefits of transponders in gliders for collision avoidance. 
The NTSB recommended that the 
FAA remove the glider exceptions pertaining to the transponder equipment and use requirements, finding that ‘‘transponders are critical to alerting pilots and controllers to the presence of nearby traffic so that collisions can be avoided.’’ The FAA agrees with the NTSB on the benefits of transponders in collision avoidance. 
B. Congressional Actions 
On March 13, 2012, The Honorable 
Harry Reid, United States Senate, wrote 
to the FAA expressing concerns about the safety of both gliders and other aircraft utilizing the same airspace around RNO. Senator Reid requested the FAA ‘‘invoke its emergency rulemaking procedure to remove the glider exemption’’ from § 91.215. Additionally, on April 27, 2012, the Honorable Mark E. Amodei, United States House of Representatives, wrote to the FAA to voice similar concerns about the impact of gliders on the safety of air traffic operations into and out of RNO. Congressman Amodei also encouraged the FAA to expedite the process to remove the glider exception from § 91.215. 
C. FAA Response 
The FAA Administrator responded to 
both Members of Congress on May 18, 
2012, explaining that while the FAA had considered emergency rulemaking, the FAA decided an ANPRM was an opportunity to gather input from the glider community.
5In response to both 
the NTSB safety recommendations and the congressional requests, the FAA analyzed the reports in the Aviation Safety and Reporting Subsystem (ASRS) database. The NTSB safety recommendation cited 60 Near Mid-Air Collisions (NMAC) in the ASRS database involving air carrier/corporate jet traffic and gliders from 1998 to August 2007 for all airspace areas. The 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Jun 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM 16JNP1asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS34348 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules 
6This database does not specifically indicate if a 
glider is equipped with a transponder or other 
beacon system. 7During the development of the new TSO–C199, 
these systems were referred to as Low Powered Surveillance Equipment (LPSE), and Light Aircraft Surveillance Equipment (LASE). The current acceptable terminology for these systems is Traffic Awareness Beacon System (TABS). FAA reviewed the ASRS database from 
1988 to October 2014 and found approximately 45 reports of NMACs involving gliders in or near the excepted areas of § 91.215.
6 
It is important to recognize the 
limitations of air-traffic radar services. In some instances, Air Traffic Control (ATC) may not be able to issue traffic advisories concerning aircraft that are not under ATC control and are not displayed on radar. Radio waves normally travel in a continuous straight line. However, they may be ‘‘bent’’ by abnormal atmospheric phenomena such as temperature inversions, and/or screened by high terrain features, reflected or attenuated by dense objects such as heavy clouds, precipitation, ground obstacles, or mountains, etc. Many glider operations take place near mountains to take advantage of ridge lift and mountain waves. As a result, areas near mountains where glider pilots often operate may have minimal to no radar coverage. 
Primary radar energy that strikes 
dense objects is reflected and displayed on the controller’s scope. The amount of reflective surface of an aircraft determines the size of the radar return. Therefore, a small light aircraft, like a glider, is more difficult to see on primary radar than a large commercial jet or military bomber. Additionally, primary radar uses filters to eliminate the display clutter caused by reflections from stationary objects (e.g. buildings, 
mountains) and slow-moving vehicles (e.g. trucks, cars). Gliders, when not 
moving very fast across the ground, may be filtered out as ground clutter and not displayed to the controller. 
The use of transponders has been 
important in achieving a higher level of safety, particularly in areas where high and low speed traffic is intermixed under Instrument and Visual Flight Rules (IFR and VFR respectively). In issuing this ANPRM, the FAA understands that glider design and electrical power limitations present unique challenges for the installation and operation of transponders. The FAA requests comments on removing the transponder use exception for gliders in order to improve safety. 
D. Traffic Awareness Beacon System 
(TABS) 
The FAA notes that it is currently 
encouraging the voluntary equipage of TABS devices on aircraft excepted from carrying a transponder or ADS–B equipment, such as gliders, balloons and aircraft without electrical systems.
7 
TABS is described in FAA Technical Standard Order (TSO)–C199 and allows aircraft equipped with collision avoidance and traffic advisory systems to track and display the TABS equipped aircraft. 
E. Automatic Dependent Surveillance— 
Broadcast (ADS–B) Requirements 
The FAA also acknowledges that the 
exception from certain ADS–B Out requirements in § 91.225 is provided to gliders in the same manner as they are excepted from the transponder requirement. This ANPRM also seeks comment and information specifically on issues relating to the glider exception from the current transponder equipment and ADS–B requirements and use. 
III. Discussion/Questions Concerning 
Proposal Under Consideration 
The FAA is aware that removing 
established equipment exceptions for glider operations could impose significant costs on the glider community. Therefore, the FAA is issuing this ANPRM, rather than a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), to seek comments from the public and industry to aid in the development of a proposed rule and the analysis of its economic impact. 
The FAA requests comments and 
recommendations on the following issues. The sequence in which the issues are presented does not reflect any specific FAA preference. 
Please refer to the specific question 
number when submitting comments. 
A. TSO–C199, Traffic Awareness 
Beacon System (TABS) 
A TABS device is a low cost compact 
system that allows other aircraft equipped with collision avoidance systems and traffic advisory systems to track and display the TABS aircraft. TABS devices are intended for use on aircraft that are excepted from carrying a transponder or ADS–B equipment, such as gliders. TABS are not for use in receiving air-traffic control services. The intent of TABS is to enable equipped aircraft to be more visible to other aircraft operating with Traffic Advisory System (TAS), Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System I (TCAS I), Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System II (TCAS II), TCAS II hybrid surveillance, and aircraft equipped with ADS–B In capability. TABS devices are manufactured under a TSO authorization with less rigorous specifications than transponders meeting the requirements of § 91.215. The FAA requests comments and recommendations on the following issues related to proposing the use of TABS devices: 
A1. Rather than requiring gliders to 
meet §§ 91.215 and 91.225, should the FAA require TABS equipment? Please explain your answer. 
A2. Do you have an alternative 
suggestion to increase safety? 
A3. Please provide cost estimates, 
with supporting details or documentation, including equipment, glider manufacturer, and model: 
A3.1. Provide estimate of total 
equipment cost(s). List all necessary components. 
A3.2. Provide estimate of installation 
cost(s). 
A.3.3. Provide estimate of 
maintenance costs (e.g. batteries, 
antenna). 
A4. Do you have, or plan to have, 
TABS installed on your glider? Please explain your answer. 
B. Transponder Equipment and Use in 
Gliders 
Section 91.215 describes transponder 
equipment and use requirements for aircraft. Under § 91.215, gliders may conduct operations without transponder equipment within 30 NM of an airport listed in appendix D, section 1 of part 91—provided such operations are conducted outside any Class A, Class B, or Class C airspace areas, and below the altitude of the ceiling of a Class B or Class C airspace area designated for an airport, or 10,000 feet mean sea level (MSL), whichever is lower. Gliders operating above 10,000 feet MSL are also excepted from the transponder requirement. The FAA requests comments and recommendations on the following issues relating to removing the exception for gliders provided in § 91.215: 
B1. Should the FAA remove the glider 
exception from § 91.215 and require gliders to comply with the transponder equipment and use rules? Please explain your answer. 
B2. If the FAA removes the glider 
exception from § 91.215, how would safety be affected? 
B3. Please provide cost estimates, 
with supporting details or documentation, including equipment, glider manufacturer, and model: 
B3.1. Provide estimate of total 
equipment cost(s). List all necessary components. 
B3.2. Provide estimate of installation 
cost(s). 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Jun 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM 16JNP1asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS34349 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules 
B.3.3. Provide estimate of 
maintenance costs (e.g. batteries, 
antenna). 
B4. If the FAA requires gliders to be 
equipped with transponders in excepted 
airspace, should they also be subject to the ADS–B equipment requirements under § 91.225? Please provide supporting information. 
C. ADS–B Out Equipment and Use in 
Gliders 
Section 91.225 describes ADS–B Out 
equipment and use requirement for aircraft operating after January 1, 2020. Under § 91.225(e) certain gliders may conduct operations without ADS–B Out, within 30 NM of an airport listed in appendix D, section 1 of part 91 provided these operations are conducted outside any Class A, Class B, or Class C airspace area and below the altitude of the ceiling of a Class B or Class C airspace area designated for an airport, or 10,000 feet MSL, whichever is lower. Further exception from the ADS–B requirement is provided to gliders operating above 10,000 feet MSL. The FAA requests comments and recommendations on the following issues relating to removing the exception for gliders provided under § 91.225(e): 
C1. Should the FAA require gliders to 
meet the ADS–B equipment and use rules? Please provide supporting information. 
C2. If the FAA removes the glider 
exception from § 91.225, would the level of operational safety increase? Please provide supporting information. 
C3. Please provide cost estimates, 
with supporting details or documentation, including equipment, glider manufacturer, and model: 
C3.1. Provide estimate of total 
equipment cost(s). List all necessary components. 
C3.2. Provide estimate of installation 
cost(s). 
C.3.3. Provide estimate of 
maintenance costs (e.g. batteries, 
antenna). 
C4. If gliders are required to meet the 
ADS–B equipment and use rules, should they also be required to meet the transponder equipment requirements? Please provide supporting information. 
C5. Do you have or plan to have ADS– 
B In or ADS–B Out installed on your glider? Please explain your answer. 
D. Additional Considerations 
D1. Can you suggest changes to 
current requirements or other 
equipment that would reduce the risk of collision for glider operations? If so, what specific requirements or procedures should be considered? D2. Have you had a collision or near 
collision while operating a glider? If so, please explain what happened. 
D3. Have you had a collision or near 
collision with a glider while operating an aircraft other than a glider? If so, please explain what happened. 
D4. Do you operate a glider within 
any of the following excepted areas? Please describe the type of airspace, location, frequency of operations, and any safety concerns during these operations. 
•Within 30 nautical miles of an 
airport listed in appendix D, section 1 of part 91 provided such operations are conducted outside any Class A, B, or C airspace areas, and below the altitude of the ceiling of a Class B or Class C airspace area designated for an airport or 10,000 feet mean sea level (MSL), whichever is lower. 
•Above 10,000 feet MSL 
D5. Do you receive air traffic services 
while flying a glider? Please explain the frequency and location of services, and any other information supporting your answer(s). 
IV. Regulatory Notices and Analyses A. Regulatory Flexibility Determination 
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to 
review rulemakings to assess their 
impact on small entities unless the agency determines that a rule is not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The FAA invites comment to facilitate its assessment of the potential impact of a rule removing the glider exceptions pertaining to transponder equipment and use requirements. 
B. Paperwork Reduction Act 
The FAA has not yet determined 
whether there will be an information 
collection associated with this rulemaking. This will be addressed at the time a NPRM, if any, is published. 
C. International Compatibility and 
Cooperation 
In keeping with U.S. obligations 
under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to conform to International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards and Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. The FAA has reviewed corresponding ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices and will identify any differences with future proposed regulations. These differences will be addressed at the time a NPRM, if any, is published. D. Environmental Analysis 
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA 
actions that are categorically excluded 
from preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has determined this ANPRM would qualify for the categorical exclusion identified in paragraph 312f, and would involve no extraordinary circumstances. 
V. Executive Order Determinations A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism 
The FAA has analyzed this ANPRM 
under the principles and criteria of 
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The agency has determined that this action would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, or the relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, and, therefore, would not have Federalism implications. 
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations 
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use 
The FAA analyzed this ANPRM under 
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The 
agency has determined that it would not be a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under the executive order and would not be likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. 
C. Executive Order 13609 
Executive Order 13609, Promoting 
International Regulatory Cooperation, 
(77 FR 26413, May 4, 2012) promotes international regulatory cooperation to meet shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues and to reduce, eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements. The FAA will analyze any future action under the policies and agency responsibilities of Executive Order 13609, and determine if the action will have an effect on international regulatory cooperation. This will also be addressed at the time a NPRM, if any, is published. 
VI. Additional Information A. Comments Invited 
The FAA invites interested persons to 
participate in this rulemaking by 
submitting written comments, data, or 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Jun 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM 16JNP1asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS34350 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules 
views. The agency also invites 
comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should submit only one time. 
The FAA will file in the docket all 
comments it receives, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this ANPRM. Before acting on this ANPRM, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. The agency may change the direction of this rulemaking in light of the comments it receives. 
Proprietary or Confidential Business 
Information: Do not file proprietary or confidential business information in the docket. Such information must be sent or delivered directly to the person identified in the 
FOR FURTHER  
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 
document, and marked as proprietary or confidential. If submitting information on a disk or CD–ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM, and identify electronically within the disk or CD– ROM the specific information that is proprietary or confidential. 
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), if the FAA is 
aware of proprietary information filed with a comment, the agency does not place it in the docket. It is held in a separate file to which the public does not have access, and the FAA places a note in the docket that it has received it. If the FAA receives a request to examine or copy this information, it treats it as any other request under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). The FAA processes such a request under Department of Transportation procedures found in 49 CFR part 7. 
B. Availability of Rulemaking 
Documents 
Electronic copies of rulemaking 
documents may be obtained from the Internet by— 
1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal (http://www.regulations.gov); 
2. Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and 
Policies Web page at http://www.faa.gov/regulations_ policies or 3. Accessing the Government Printing 
Office’s Web page at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/. 
Copies may also be obtained by 
sending a request to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM–1, 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling 202–267–9677. Commenters must identify the docket or notice number of this rulemaking. 
All documents the FAA considered in 
developing this ANPRM, including economic analyses and technical reports, may be accessed from the Internet through the Federal eRulemaking Portal referenced in item (1) above. 
Issued under authority provided by 49 
U.S.C. 106(f), 40103, and 44701(a)(5)(a) in 
Washington, DC, on June 10, 2015. 
Jodi S. McCarthy, Director, Airspace Services. 
[FR Doc. 2015–14818 Filed 6–15–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 
COMMISSION 
47 CFR Part 4 
[PS Docket No. 15–80; FCC 15–39] 
Amendments to the Commission’s 
Rules Concerning Disruptions to Communications 
AGENCY : Federal Communications 
Commission. 
ACTION : Proposed rule. 
SUMMARY : In this document, the 
Commission seeks comment on proposals to improve its rules governing the reporting of disruptions to communications. The proposals contained in this document seek to build on the Commission’s decade of experience administering these rules and the associated Network Outage Reporting System (NORS). This experience has provided perspective on aspects of the rules that could be refined so as to improve the quality and utility of the outage reporting data the Commission receives. Improving the reporting that occurs under the Commission’s rules will advance the Commission’s efforts to monitor the reliability and resiliency of the nation’s communications networks, including 911 networks, and to address systemic vulnerabilities and threats to the communications infrastructure. 
DATES : Submit comments on or before 
July 16, 2015, and reply comments on or before July 31, 2015. Written comments on the Paperwork Reduction Act proposed information collection requirements must be submitted by the public, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and other interested parties on or before August 17, 2015. 
ADDRESSES : You may submit comments, 
identified by PS Docket No. 15–80, by any of the following methods: 
•Federal Communications 
Commission’s Web site: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments. 
•People with Disabilities: Contact the 
FCC to request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202– 418–0432. 
For detailed instructions for 
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
section of this document. In addition to filing comments with the Secretary, a copy of any comments on the Paperwork Reduction Act information collection requirements contained herein should be submitted to the Federal Communications Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov and to 
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of Management and Budget, via email to Nicholas_ A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov or via 
fax at 202–395–5167. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Brenda D. Villanueva, Attorney Advisor, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418–7005 or brenda.villanueva@fcc.gov. For 
additional information concerning the Paperwork Reduction Act information collection requirements contained in this document, send an email to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Nicole On’gele, (202) 
418–2991. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : This is a 
summary of the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in PS Docket No. 15–80, released on March 30, 2015. The complete text of this document is available for public inspection and copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET Monday through Thursday or from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in the FCC Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, the complete text is available online http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc- adopts-part-4-improvements-item. 
This document contains proposed 
information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Jun 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM 16JNP1asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS