RESTRICTED  
  
WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
10 July 2017 
(17-3597) Page: 1/12 
Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration    
 
2016 ANNUAL REPORT  ON GRADING STRUCTURE  IN THE WTO SECRETARI AT 
 
1  INTRODUCTION  
1.  This document presents an update on staffing and post related statistics  in the WTO Secretariat  
as of 31 December 2016 . Key information covered includes detailed data on the compo sition of 
WTO staff by grade as well as the  evolution of the grading structure for professional and support 
staff since 1995. Moreover, statistics are also provided on post and staffing allocation , as well as 
internal staff mobility .  
2.  The report also inclu des data on staff recruitment as of  31 December 201 6, including the 
overall number of positions advertised  through vacancy notice, as well as the number of 
separations  and appointments . Furthermore, d etailed data is included on promotions through the 
annua l promotions exercise  from 1996 to 201 1 and 2016  as well as on a competitive basis since 
2007.  
2  UPDATE ON STAFFING A ND POST RELATED STAT ISTICS IN THE SECRET ARIAT AS OF 
31 DECEMBER 201 6 
2.1  Grading Structure   
3.  The WTO grade structure in the professional staff ca tegory r anges from grade 6 to g rade 1 0, 
with s upport grades ranging  from grade  1 to grade  7. Director level positions are at grade s 11 
and 12. Over the last few years, the policy  of the organization has been to increasingly recruit staff 
at entry-level, with professional staff appointed mainly at grades 6 and 7 . Recruitment may be 
above entry -level grades when (1) a position requires additional years of experience ; and where 
(2) there is a demonstrated need for additional expertise or a managerial/superviso ry role.   
4.  In terms of the WTO grade structure  as of  31 December 201 6, the number of staff in 
professional positions surpasses  the number in support positions. As illustrated in Chart 1, 399 
staff members ( 60%) are in the pro fessional category  (grade 6 to g rade 12) , while 262 staff 
members (4 0%) are in support positions  (grade 2 to grade 7) . Looking specifically at professional 
staff, t he highest number  of staff members continues to be in  grade  9. For support staff, the 
highest number  continues to be in grade 5. Chart 1 further illustrates a comparison of the grading 
structure as of 31 December 2016 along with the peak periods in each grade since 1995. It is also 
a visual representation of the figures provided in Annex 1  and 2 . The largest decrease can be 
observed at the senior levels (grade 10 and grade 8). Looking at the support staff structure  in 
general , the number of staff has reduced as the organizational priorities have required further 
resources at the professional levels.  WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 2 - 
 
  Chart 1 Grading  Structure Comparison for Professional and Support Staff , as of  
31 December 201 6  
234567Support Staff
4
17
87
112
66
61
52
25
55
87
56
37
216
27
118
118
84
61
5341
68
98
69
50
11
 
 
 
 
Total Professional (G6P -G12): 399
Percentage total staff: 60%Total Support (G2 -G7S): 262
Percentage total staff: 40%
 
 
Chart 2 Grading Structure for Male and Female Staff, as of 31 December 2016  
2345676789101112Support Professional
2345676789101112Support Professional
3
32
57
24
30
34
20
40
64
37
16
4
14
55
55
42
31
18
5
15
23
19
21
2Female Staff Male Staff
 
 
5.  In terms of the grade structure evolution for professional staff sinc e 1995, the percentage of 
staff members in more senior positions has been steadily de creasing, specifically in grade  10 
(Chart 3 ). Staff members in grade  10 represent 22 % of all professional staff, the lowest 
percentage since 1999 (see Annex 1). At the sam e time, a significant inflow of staff in  grade 6  
professional since 2010 can be clearly observed . While grade 6 professionals consistently 
represented 1% or less of total professional staff until 20 10, there are 52 staff in this category as Professional – Grading  Structure  
 
Peak Period si nce 1995  Support – Grading  Structure  
 
Peak Period since 1995  WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 3 - 
 
  of December 201 6, representing 1 3% of professional staff. In comparison to 2015 , the biggest 
increase in professional staff can be seen in grade 8 (representing 1 7% from 15 % in the previous 
year). The staffing data set out in Annex 1 further illustrates a decrease in average grade for 
professional  staff and is now at its lowest level (from 9.24 in 1995 to 8.47 in 2016). This is due to 
the retirements taken at senior levels and entry -level professional staff recruited  in the 
Secretariat . There was negative growth in the to tal number  of professional and support staff ( -1% 
and -4% respectively) as the number  of separations last year (42) surpassed  the number of 
appointments (34)  in 2016 . 
6.  In the grade structure evolution for support staff since 1995, the trend since 2006 repre sents a 
decreasing number  of staff in support positions . The highest number of staff continues to be shown 
at the grade 5 level, representing 3 3% of all support staff . In contrast to the professional grades, 
the average grade for support staff has increase d from 4.76 in 1995 to 4. 88 in 201 6, as illustrated 
in Annex 2.  
Chart 3  Grading Structure Evolution for Professional and Support Staff , from 1995 t o 
31 December 201 6 
020406080100120140199520002002200420062008201020122014201612
11
10
9
8
7P
6P
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%
1995
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
201612
11
10
9
8
7P
6PProfessional Grades, 
by number of staffProfessional Grades, 
by percentage
 
 
020406080100120
1995
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
20167S
6S
5
4
3
2
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%
1995
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
20167S
6S
5
4
3
2Support Grades,      
by number of staffSupport Grades, 
by percentage
 
 
2.2  Post and Staffing Allocation  
7.  The majority of WTO staffing is financed  by the regula r budget of the organiz ation. As 
illustrated in Chart 4 , the WTO employs a total of 7 09 staff, with 9 5% (671 staff) funded from the 
regular budget and 5% (38 staff) from extra -budgetary trust funds1.  
                                                
1 Extra -budgetary trust funds are targeted to Technical Assistance Programmes for Members . WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 4 - 
 
  Chart 4  Staffing Under Regular Budget and Extra -Budgetary Trust Funds , as of  
31 December 2016  
Of the 671 staff on the regular 
budget:
628 are on regular/fixed -
term  contracts
39 are on short -term 
contracts
4 are on project -based 
contracts
All 38 staff on extra budgetary 
funding are on fixed -term 
contracts
38
671Extra 
Budgetary
5%
Regular 
Budget
95%
 
 
8.  Furthermore , out of a total of 671 staff on the regular budget , 628 are on  fixed-term/regular 
contracts, 4 are on project -based contracts for dispute settlement lawyers  (hired to assist with the 
number of dispute s ettlement cases)  and 39 are on short -term contracts.  
Chart 5  Number  of Staff by Contract Type for Divisions under Regular Budget , as of  
31 December  2016  
9
66
19
21
13
21
38
24
28
38
33
16
117
30
16
2
15
9
28
1
13
18
532
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
7
1
1
7
4
2
1
11
2
1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140Accessions
Admin. & General Services
Agriculture & Commodities
Appellate Body Secretariat
Council & TNC
Development
Economic Res. & Statistics
Human Resources
Inf. & External Relations
Inf. Technology Solutions
Institute for Training & Tech. Coop.
Intellectual Property, Govn. Proc. & Comp.
Languages, Doc. & Inf. Mgmt.
Legal Affairs
Market Access
Office of Internal Oversight
Office of the Director-General
Offices of the DDGs
Rules
Staff Counsellor
Trade & Environment
Trade in Services & Investment
Trade Policies ReviewRegular/Fixed-term
Short-term
Project-Based
 
 
9.   Chart 5  above illustrates the breakdown of all staff members funded from the regular budget 
per div ision. Although the  highest number of staff continues to  be in LDIMD  (Languages, 
Documentation, and Information Management)  with 117 regular/fixed -term staff , this percentage  
has decreased  since 2015 (from 19.4% to 18.6%) . Furthermore , the largest  growth within the 
divisions shown above can be observed in Rules and Legal Affairs  (.6% and .4% respectively).  
There was also a staff decrease in the Information Technology Solu tions Division since 2015 
(from  6.7% to 6.1%).   
10.  As shown  by division in Chart 6  below , 38 staff members on fixed-term L -Post contracts2 are 
funded  from extra -budgetary funds . This number represents 5% of overall WTO staff as of  
31 December 2016 . 
                                                
2 Posts of limited durati on funded from extra -budgetary resources  WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 5 - 
 
  Chart 6  Number  of Staff by Contract Type for Divisions under Extra -Budgetary Trust 
Funds , as of  31 December 2016  
4621221011
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Admin. & General ServicesAgriculture and CommoditiesEconomic Res. and StatisticsExec. Sec. for the Enhanced Integr. FrameworkInf. Technology SolutionsInstitute for Training & Tech. Coop.Intellectual Property, Govn. Proc. & Comp.Market Access
Fixed-term
 
 
2.3  Staff Mobility  
11.  External mobility  opportunities  have been established through staff loan/exchange 
agreements with several international organizations with a view to broaden the staff members'  
professional experience as well as deepen  their knowledge in a specific subject area.  In 2016, 
there were agreements made with six  individuals (including three current staff members going to 
other international organizations, as shown  in Table 1 below).  
Table 1 External Staff Mobility by Division, fr om 1 January to 31 December 2016  
 International Organization  
Division  United Nations 
Conference on Trade 
and Development  
(UNCTAD)  United Nations Office at 
Geneva  
(UNOG)  Institute for 
International Trade - 
Adelaide  
(IIT) 
 Incoming  Outgoing  Incoming  Outgoing  Incoming  Outgoing  
Development      1  
Economic Res. & Statistics  1      
Languages, Doc. & Inf. Mgmt.    1 1   
Office of the Director -General       1 
Trade Policies Review       1 
  
12.   In terms of internal staff mobility, 21 inter -divisional staff m ovements were made from 
1 January  to 31 December 2016  (illustrated in Chart 7).  WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 6 - 
 
  Chart 7  Internal Staff Mobility by Division , from 1 January to 31 December 2016  
-3-2-1012345
Incoming
Outgoing
 
 
3  RECRUITMENT  AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2016  
3.1  Positions  Advertised  through Vacancy Notice  
13.  From 1 January  to 31 December 201 6, a total of 73 vacancy notices were released.  More than 
one position was advertised in three  of these vacancy notices,  bringing  the total number of 
positions advertised to 76. Of these , 47 were for professional positions , of which 22 were 
advertised at grades 6 and 7 . This represents 51% of professional posts advertised, excluding four 
director position s advertised at grade  11. Table 2  below shows  the number of positions advertised 
by division and the respective  grade level s. Table 3  further illustrates the number of positions 
advertised since 2007.  
Table 2  Positions Advertised by Division , from 1 January to 31 December 2016  
Division  Grade  
3 4 5 6S 7S 6P 7P 8 9 10 11 Total  
Accessions                1       1 
Admin. & General Services      4                 4 
Agriculture & Commodities  1         1 1       1 4 
Appellate Body Secretariat    2 1       1 1       5 
Council & TNC                  1     1 
Development            1           1 
Economic Res. & Statistics  1         2           3 
Exec. Sec. for the Enhanced 
Integrated Framework            1     2 2   5 
Human Resources            1           1 
Inf. & External Relations                2   2   4 
Inf. Technology Solutions            2 5 1   2   10 
Institute for Training & Technical  
Coop.      3 1   2   1       7 
Intellectual Property, Govn. Proc. 
& Comp.        1               1 
Languages, Doc. & Inf. Mgmt.    3 1 4     2   1 1 1 13 
Legal Affairs    1 2       2 2     1 8 
Office of the Director -General    3                   3 
Rules  1         1       2   4 
Trade in Services & Investment                      1 1 
Total 3 9 11 6 0 11 11 8 4 9 4 76 WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 7 - 
 
  Table 3  Positions Advertised  by Grade , from 2007 to 201 6 
Year Grade  
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total 
2007 5 4 3 1 8 10 5 2 2 - 40 
2008 1 2 - 2 8 4 1 - 1 - 19 
2009 5 3 6 3 8 7 1 - 2 - 35 
2010 1 2 3 18 5 2 4 - 1 - 36 
2011 3 2 2 13 2 4 3 - 2 - 31 
2012 3 2 1 6 - 2 2 1 2 - 19 
2013 5 1 1 11 13 3 3 1 3 - 41 
2014 1 5 4 13 13 3 10 - 4 - 53 
2015 3 6 10 15 12 7 7 4 1 - 65 
2016 3 9 11 17 11 8 4 9 4 - 76 
Total 30 36 41 99 80 50 40 17 22 - 415 
 
3.2  Separations and Appointments  
14.  Table 4  below shows  staff separations since 2007 ra nging from grades 3 through  12. The 
highest number of staff separations from the Secretariat since 20 07 continues to be shown in 
grade 10 , totalling 58. This is followed by staff in grade  7, totalling 43. In 201 6, there were a total 
of 42 separations . From 1 January to 31  December 201 6, 29 separations (69%) were due to 
retirements , while the remaining departures were from resigna tions. 
Table 4  Staff Separations by Y ear, from 2007 to 31 December 2016  
Year Grade  
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total 
2007 2 4 2 5 4 2 4 5  - 3 31 
2008 4 3 2 2 2 2 3 7  - 4 29 
2009 2 -  4 4 4 2 1 4 2  - 23 
2010  - 2  - 2 6 -  1 4  - 1 16 
2011  - 2 2 2 5 6 1 3 1  - 22 
2012  - 1 4 2 1 3 1 6 -  3 21 
2013 1 - 4 3 7 3 3 6 3 2 373 
2014 - - 2 4 1 2 3 9 2 1 24 
2015 2 6 5 13 6 3 3 7 1 - 46 
2016 1 3 6 4 7 2 8 7 4 - 42 
Total 12 21 31 41 43 25 28 58 13 14 291 
 
15.  In regards to fixed -term/regular staff appointments  since 2007, a total of 7 8 staff members 
have been appointed for grade  6 positions, the highest number of staff appointments throughout  
grade s 3 through  12 (Table 5 ). In 201 6, 12 staff members were appointed through a competitive 
process to the  legal divis ions (Rules  - 4, Legal Affairs  - 5, and Appellate  Body Secretariat  - 3), 
which include  seven  Dispute Settlement La wyers, one Paralegal , and four Secretaries.  
Table 5  Staff Appointments by Yea r, from 2007 to 31 December 2016  
Year Grade    
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total Internal  External  
2007 1 8 3 2 12 11 1 1 - - 39 15 24 
2008 6 3 - 1 6 6 3 2 2 - 29 11 18 
2009 1 3 1 4 8 4 1 - 1 - 23 6 17 
2010 4 4 1 9 6 - 1 - 2 - 27 10 17 
2011 4 - 5 15 6 2 2 - 1 - 35 16 19 
2012 2 3 - 7 - 2 1 - 1 - 16 3 13 
2013 4 1 1 10 4 1 1 2 1 1 313 12 19 
2014 4 - 1 10 6 1 2 - 2 - 26 14 12 
                                                
3 Figure includes 1 DG and 4 DDGs  WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 8 - 
 
  Year Grade    
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total Internal  External  
2015 3 3 2 12 10 2 4 - 2 - 38 15 23 
2016 5 8 4 8 6 1 1 1 - - 34 15 19 
Total 34 33 18 78 64 30 17 6 12 1 298 117 181 
  
4  PROMOTIONS AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2016  
16.  Table 6  below shows the number of staff pr omotions through the annual promotions exercise. 
Between 2012 and 2015, a freeze was introduced and  no such promotions were awarded.  The 
budget for post re -gradings4 was approximately CHF 217,000 per annum.    
17.  In 2016, the Performance -Based Promotions polic y was published after a collective effort by 
staff members through the Strategic Review, Joint Advisory Committee, and Staff Council. The 
Director -General announced a total of 30 performance -based promotions  to be allotted for the first 
annual exercise sin ce the freeze. Furthermore, an ad -hoc promotions procedure was announced in 
order to address  the staff members whose posts were formally reclassified by a Classification 
Committee between 2004 and 2010  without subsequent implementation . This procedure resu lted 
in 13 promotions, totalling 43 (Table  6).  
Table 6  Promotions by Grade , from 1996 to 2016  
Year Grade  
2 to 3  3 to 4  4 to 5  5 to 6  6 to 7  7 to 8  8 to 9  9 to 10  Total  
1996 4 14 4 18 1 1 5 5 52 
1997 5 3 11 5 1 4 14 4 47 
1998 - 12 5 5 2 5 13 4 46 
1999 - 6 12 11 2 11 14 4 60 
2000 - 10 5 6 2 11 7 10 51 
2001 - 8 12 1 7 8 12 10 58 
2002 - 6 7 5 9 5 12 10 54 
2003 2 7 8 9 3 6 10 6 51 
2004 - 3 14 6 6 7 5 10 51 
2005 2 7 6 3 4 10 9 7 48 
2006 - 4 6 9 2 9 13 7 50 
2007 1 6 7 4 6 5 12 5 46 
2008 1 5 7 9 7 6 8 10 53 
2009 1 6 8 4 3 6 13 9 50 
2010 1 3 7 3 3 7 11 6 41 
2011 - 3 4 4 1 4 2 - 18 
2012-
2015 - - - - - - - - - 
2016 - 7 12 3 10 6 3 2 43 
Total 17 110 135 105 69 111 163 109 819 
  
18.  In accordance with Staff Rule 107.1 (d), it is also defined as a promo tion when a staff 
member is selected to fill a job at a higher grade for which there has been a vacancy notice and a 
competitive process (see below):  
"A promotion on a competitive basis shall occur when a staff member is selected to fill a job at a 
higher  grade for which there has been a vacancy notice. The Director -General may issue a vacancy 
notice in respect of a job reclassified at a higher grade. " 
                                                
4 The number of post  re-gradings were increased from 25 to 5% of regular posts  in 2007  
(WT/BFA/SPEC/171).  WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 9 - 
 
  19.  Table 7 further shows  the number of promotions on a competitive basis since 2007. During 
the freeze on pr omotions  from 2012 and 2015 , a competitive selection process was the only 
avenue for staff to attain a higher grade.  In 2016, a total of 20 staff members were promoted 
through a competitive recruitment process.  
Table 7  Promotions on a Competitive Basis  by Grade , from 20 07 to 31 December 2016  
Year Grade  
To 3 To 4 To 5 To 6 To 7 To 8 To 9 To 10  To 11  Total  
2007 - - - - - - - - 1 1 
2008 - - - - - - - - - 0 
2009 - 1 1 - - 1 - - - 3 
2010 - - - 2 - - 3 - - 5 
2011 - - - - - 1 - - 1 2 
2012 - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 7 
2013 - - - 1 1 1 3 - - 6 
2014 - - 2 3 3 1 6 1 - 16 
2015 1 3 2 5 7 4 4 - 2 28 
2016 - 1 1 6 2 4 2 4 - 20 
Total 1 5 7 17 14 13 19 6 6 88 
 WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 10 - 
 
  LIST OF ANNEXES  
Annex 1:  WTO Grade Structure Evolution, Professional Staff by Grade (1995 -2016) 
Annex 2:  WTO Gr ade Structure Evolution , Support Staff by Grade (1995 -2016) 
_______________  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 11 - 
 
  ANNEX  1 
WTO GRADE STRUCTURE E VOLUTION, PR OFESSIO NAL STAFF BY GRADE  
(1995 -2016) 
  12/D2  11/D1  10/P5  9/P4  8/P3  7P/P2  6P TOTAL  Avg. Gr  Growth  
31/12/1995  6 16 43 59 42 5 0 171 9.24   
%-age 3.5%  9.4%  25.1%  34.5%  24.6%  2.9%  0.0%  100%      
31/12/1999  7 27 53 79 54 34 1 255 9.01 49% 
%-age 2.7%  10.6%  20.8%  31.0%  21.2%  13.3%  0.4%  100%      
31/12/2000  12 22 65 76 61 31 1 268 9.07 5% 
%-age 4.5%  8.2%  24.3%  28.4%  22.8%  11.6%  0.4%  100%      
31/12/2001  11 22 75 79 65 30 3 285 9.06 6% 
%-age 3.9%  7.7%  26.3%  27.7%  22.8%  10.5%  1.1%  100%      
31/12/2002  13 19 90 82 74 41 1 320 9.03 12% 
%-age 4% 6% 28% 26% 23% 13% 0% 100%      
31/12/2003  11 19 89 91 72 38 3 323 9.01 1% 
%-age 3% 6% 28% 28% 22% 12% 1% 100%      
31/12/2004  16 12 98 85 79 50 5 345 8.93 7% 
%-age 5% 3% 28% 25% 23% 14% 1% 100%      
31/12/2005  14 12 100 89 82 40 3 340 8.99 -1% 
%-age 4% 4% 29% 26% 24% 12% 1% 100%      
31/12/2006  13 12 108 92 77 35 4 341 9.04 0% 
%-age 4% 4% 32% 27% 23% 10% 1% 100%      
31/12/2007  12 12 107 97 81 41 3 353 8.99 4% 
%-age 3% 3% 30% 27% 23% 12% 1% 100%      
31/12/2008  9 16 113 95 84 40 1 358 9.01 1% 
%-age 3% 4% 32% 27% 23% 11% 0% 100%      
31/12/2009  8 15 115 97 81 42 5 363 8.97 1% 
%-age 2% 4% 32% 27% 22% 12% 1% 100%      
31/12/2010  9 15 118 104 75 38 15 374 8.94 3% 
%-age 2% 4% 32% 28% 20% 10% 4% 100%      
31/12/2011  9 16 114 107 75 38 28 387 8.84 3% 
%-age 2% 4% 29.5%  28% 19% 10% 7% 100%      
31/12/2012  6 19 106 107 72 39 32 381 8.78 -2% 
%-age 2% 5% 28% 28% 19% 10% 8% 100%      
31/12/2013  5 17 102 110 69 40 39 382 8.70 0% 
%-age 1% 4% 27% 29% 18% 10% 10% 100%      
31/12/2014  4 16 97 114 62 48 45 386 8.61 1% 
%-age 1% 4% 25% 30% 16% 12% 12% 100%    
31/12/2015  4 19 88 118 61 61 53 404 8.50 5% 
%-age 1% 5% 22% 29% 15% 15% 13% 100%      
31/12/2016  4 17 87 112 66 61 52 399 8.47 -1% 
%-age 1% 4% 22% 28% 17% 15% 13% 100%      WT/BFA/W/ 422 
 
- 12 - 
 
  ANNEX 2  
WTO GRADE STRUCTURE EVOLUTION, SUPPORT  STAFF BY GRADE  
(1995 -2016) 
  7G 6G 5 4 3 2 1 TOTAL  Avg. Gr  Growth  
31/12/1995  26 43 63 72 36 3 0 243 4.76   
%-age 10.7%  17.7%  25.9%  29.6%  14.8%  1.2%  0.0%  100%      
31/12/1999  19 59 56 66 48 6 0 254 4.67 5% 
%-age 7.5%  23.2%  22.0%  26.0%  18.9%  2.4%  0.0%  100%      
31/12/2000  23 62 58 68 44 8 0 263 4.73 4% 
%-age 8.7%  23.6%  22.1%  25.9%  16.7%  3.0% 0.0%  100%      
31/12/2001  26 54 71 63 44 11 0 269 4.71 2% 
%-age 9.7%  20.1%  26.4%  23.4%  16.4%  4.1%  0.0%  100%      
31/12/2002  32 50 76 59 44 6 0 267 4.81 -1% 
%-age 12% 19% 28% 22% 16% 2% 0% 100%      
31/12/2003  34 59 77 58 40 5 0 273 4.90 2% 
%-age 12% 22% 28% 21% 15% 2% 0% 100%      
31/12/2004  36 58 86 49 45 7 0 281 4.89 3% 
%-age 13% 21% 31% 17% 16% 2% 0% 100%      
31/12/2005  36 57 91 48 37 5 0 274 4.97 -2% 
%-age 13% 21% 33% 18% 14% 2% 0% 100%      
31/12/2006  36 68 87 62 50 7 0 310 4.86 13% 
%-age 12% 22% 28% 20% 16% 2% 0% 100%      
31/12/2007  37 64 90 69 42 6 0 308 4.89 -1% 
%-age 12% 21% 29% 22% 14% 2% 0% 100%      
31/12/2008  41 65 88 65 39 5 0 303 4.96 -2% 
%-age 14% 21% 29% 21% 13% 2% 0% 100%      
31/12/2009  39 64 92 66 29 4 0 294 5.02 -3% 
%-age 13% 22% 31% 22% 10% 1% 0% 100%      
31/12/2010  41 61 96 64 31 3 0 296 5.03 1% 
%-age 14% 21% 32% 22% 10% 1% 0% 100%      
31/12/2011  37 64 98 60 32 3 0 294 5.02 -1% 
%-age 13% 22% 33% 20% 11% 1% 0% 100%      
31/12/2012  35 64 96 61 34 3 0 293 4.99 0% 
%-age 12% 22% 33% 21% 12% 1% 0% 100%      
31/12/2013  31 62 92 62 37 3 0 287 4.93 -2% 
%-age 11% 22% 32% 22% 13% 1% 0% 100%      
31/12/2014  29 63 90 59 41 3 0 285 4.90 -1% 
%-age 10% 22% 32% 21% 14% 1% 0% 100%      
31/12/2015  27 56 88 58 41 2 0 272 4.87 -5% 
%-age 10% 21% 32% 21% 15% 1% 0% 100%      
31/12/2016  25 55 87 56 37 2 0 262 4.88 -4% 
%-age 10% 21% 33% 21% 14% 1% 0% 100%      
 
 
__________