G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
10 May 2017 
(17-2505) Page: 1/27 
Committee on Agriculture    
 
  EXPORT SUBSIDIES, EXPORT CREDITS, EXPORT CREDIT GUARAN TEES  
OR INSURANCE PROGRAM MES,  INTERNATIONAL FOOD A ID AND 
AGRICULTURAL EXPORTI NG STATE TRADING ENT ERPRISES  
BACKGROUND DOCUMENT BY THE SECRETARIAT1 
Revision  
1.   The Ministerial Declaration on Export Competiti on (document WT/MIN(13)/40 and WT/L/915) 
adopted by Ministers on 7 December 2013 at the 9th WTO Minis terial Conference in Bali 
(the "Bali Declaration ") states , inter alia , that: 
"10. Accordingly, we commit to enhance transparency and to improve monitoring in relation 
to all forms of export subsidies and all export measures with equivalent effect, in order to 
support the reform process.  
11. We therefore agree to hold dedicated discussions on an annual basis in the Committee 
on Agriculture to examine developm ents in the field of export competition . This examination 
process shall provide an opportunity for Members to raise any matter relevant to the export 
competition pillar, in furtherance of the final objective set out in the 2005 Hong Kong 
Ministerial Declar ation.  
12. This examination process shall be undertaken on the basis of timely notifications under 
the relevant provisions of the Agreement on Agriculture and related decisions, 
complemented by information compiled by the WTO Secretariat, consistent with t he practice 
followed in 20132, on the basis of Members' responses to a questionnaire, as illustrated in 
the Annex."  
2.   The first and second annual dedicated discussion s took place respectively on 5 June 2014 and 
4 June 2015 at the regular meeting s of the Comm ittee on Agriculture .3  
3.   These  dedicated discussions were based on a  background document  by the Secretariat4, which 
compiled information from Members' relevant notifications along with responses to an  export 
competition questionnaire  circulated by the Chair person of the Committee on Agriculture .5 
4.   The Ministerial Decision  on Export Competition (document WT/MIN(15)/45  - WT/L/980 ) 
adopted by Ministers on 19  December  2015 at the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference in Nairobi  
(the "Nairobi Decision")  states, inter al ia, that:  
"4. The Committee on Agriculture shall monitor the implementation of this Decision by 
Members in accordance with existing notification requirements under the Agreement on 
Agriculture, as complemented by the provisions set out in the Annex to this  Decision. " 
                                                
1 This document has been prepared under the Secretariat's own responsibility and is without prejudice 
to the positions of Members or to their rights and obligations under the WTO. It has been prepared for 
information only and is not intended to provide any authoritative or official legal interpretation of the provisions 
of the WTO Agreements in general or in relation to any specific entity or measure listed in this document.  
2 TN/AG/S/27 and TN/AG/S/27/Rev.1.  
3 See summary report s issued as document  G/AG/R/75 and document G/AG/R/78 as modified by 
document G/AG/R/78/Corr.1  
4 Documents G/AG/W/125, G/AG/W/125/ Rev.1, G/AG/W/125/ Rev.2 and G/AG/W/125/ Rev.3 and their 
addenda. The documents were updated after the meeti ngs to include  additional information from Members.  
5 The questionnaire s circulated respectively on 10 February 2014 and 26 November 2014 reflected the 
Elements for Enhanced Transparency on Export Competition contained in the Annex to the Bali Declaration.  G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 2 - 
 
  5.   The Annex to the Nairobi Decision  states  that, consistent with the Bali Declaration, Members 
shall continue to provide information on export subsidies, export credit, export credit guarantees 
or insurance programs, international food aid and ag ricultural exporting state trading enterprises, 
within the context of an annual examination process  based on the structure contained in the Annex 
to the Nairobi Decision.  
6.   In addition, footnote 17 of the Nairobi Decision states that " Notwithstanding paragr aph 4 of 
this Decision, developing country Members, unless they are in a position to do so at an earlier 
date, shall implement this Annex no later than five years following the date of adoption of this 
Decision ". 
7.   Based on these elements, the Chairperson of  the Committee on Agriculture  circulated on 
20 January  2016 a questionnaire  in accordance with the terms of the Annex of the Nairobi 
Decision, in preparation for the annual examin ation process referred to in this  Annex.  
8.   The third  annual dedicate d discussi on took place at the 7  June 2016 regular meeting of the 
Committee on Agriculture, based on the Secretariat's background document G/AG/W /125/Rev.4  
and its four addenda which constitute an integral part of it , circulated on 11  May 2016. 
9.   To conclude this thir d annual examination process, the Secretariat circulated an updated 
version (document G/AG/W/125/Rev.5 and its four addenda) to include  additional information and 
replies received from Members up to 1  July 2016.  
10.   On 31 October 2016, t he Chairperson of the C ommittee on Agriculture circulated a  
questionnaire , in accordance with the terms of the Annex of the Nairobi Decision, in preparation  
for the annual examination p rocess referred to therein. This examination process will take place  
during the June  2017 regular meeting of the Committee on Agriculture.  
11.   Consistent with previous practice under the Bali Declaration, the present document and its  
four addenda update document G/AG/W/125/Rev.5, with the addition of replies to the 
questionnaire circulated on 31 Octob er 2016, as well as relevant information from Table  ES:1 and 
ES:3 notifications , and notifications to the Working Party on State Trading Enterprises rece ived by 
the Secretariat up to 5 May  2017.  
12.   The following Members replied to th e questionnaire circulated  on 31 October : Argentina ; 
Australia;  Canada;  Chile;  Colombia;  Ecuador;  the European Union; Fiji; Honduras; Hong Kong , 
China; Iceland; Israel; Japan; Liechtenstein; Macao, China; Malaysia; Mauritius; New Zealand; 
Norway; Panama; Peru; Philippines; the Russian Federation ; Seychelles; Singapore; Switzerland; 
Chinese Taipei; Thailand; Trinidad and Tobago; Turkey; Ukraine; the United States  and Uruguay . 
13.   This document, read i n conjunction with its addenda , is organized in four  parts6 
corresponding to the four ar eas covered by the questionnaire : 
a. Part A : Export subsidies  (cf. also addendum  G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.1) ; 
b. Part B : Export credits, export credit guarantees or insurance programmes  (cf. also 
addendum  G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.2) ; 
c. Part C : International food ai d (cf. also addendum  G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.3);  and 
d. Part D: Agricultural exporting state tradin g enterprises (cf. also addendum  
G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.4) . 
14.   Parts A to D of this document describe how  data transmitted by Members was collected and  
compiled in the relevan t addenda . The document  also contains  a number of related  summary 
tables and chart s. Part A also reflects  updated information on Members' export subsidies 
commitments.    
                                                
6 Part E , that was  included in  previous  documents , has been removed since it  corresponded  to an 
information request  not included in the questionnai re resulting from the Nairobi Decision . G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 3 - 
 
  TABLE OF CONTENT S 
PART A – EXPORT SUBSIDIES  ................................ ................................ ..........................  5 
PART B – EXPORT CREDITS, EXPO RT CREDIT GUARANTEES  OR INSURANCE 
PROGRAMMES  ................................ ................................ ................................ ................  23 
PART C – INTERNATIONAL FOOD A ID ................................ ................................ ............  24 
PART D – AGRICULTURAL EXPORTI NG STATE TRADING ENT ERPRISES  ..........................  25 
TABLE OF TABLES  
Table 1 – Product groupings  ................................ ................................ ................................ . 7 
Table 2 – Number of product -specific export subsidy reduction commitme nts by Member  ............  8 
Table 3 – Number of agricultural exporting STEs per Member  ................................ .................  26 
Table 4 – Distribution of agricultural exporting S TEs by product grouping  ................................  26 
TABLE OF CHARTS  
Chart 1: Australia  ................................ ................................ ................................ .............  10 
Chart 2: Canada  ................................ ................................ ................................ ...............  10 
Chart 3: Colombia  ................................ ................................ ................................ .............  10 
Chart 4: European Union  ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 11 
Chart 5: Iceland  ................................ ................................ ................................ ...............  11 
Chart 6: Israel  ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................  11 
Chart 7: Mexico  ................................ ................................ ................................ ................  12 
Chart 8: Norway  ................................ ................................ ................................ ...............  12 
Chart 9: South Africa  ................................ ................................ ................................ .........  12 
Chart 10: Switzerland -Liechtenstein  ................................ ................................ ....................  13 
Chart 11: Turkey  ................................ ................................ ................................ ..............  13 
Chart 12: United States of America  ................................ ................................ .....................  13 
Chart 13: Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of  ................................ ................................ .........  14 
Chart 14: Category 1 – Wheat and wheat flour  ................................ ................................ ..... 15 
Chart 15: Category 2 – Coarse grains  ................................ ................................ ..................  15 
Chart 16: Category 3 – Rice ................................ ................................ ...............................  16 
Chart 17: Category 4 – Oilseeds  ................................ ................................ .........................  16 
Chart 18: Category 5 – Vegetable oils  ................................ ................................ .................  16 
Chart 19: Category 6 – Oilcakes  ................................ ................................ .........................  17 
Chart 20: Category 7 – Sugar  ................................ ................................ .............................  17 
Chart 21: Category 8 – Butter and butte r oil ................................ ................................ ........  17 
Chart 22: Category 9 – Skim milk powder  ................................ ................................ ............  18 
Chart 23: Category 10 – Cheese  ................................ ................................ .........................  18 
Chart 24: Category 11 – Other milk products  ................................ ................................ ....... 18 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 4 - 
 
  Chart 25: Category 12 – Bovine meat  ................................ ................................ ..................  19 
Chart 26: Category 1 3 – Pigmeat  ................................ ................................ ........................  19 
Chart 27: Category 14 – Poultry meat  ................................ ................................ .................  19 
Chart 28: Category 15 – Sheepmeat  ................................ ................................ ...................  20 
Chart 29: Category 16 – Live animals  ................................ ................................ ..................  20 
Chart 30: Category 17 – Eggs ................................ ................................ ............................  20 
Chart 31: Category 18 – Wine ................................ ................................ ............................  21 
Chart 32: Category 20 (includes 19) – Fruits and vegetables  ................................ ..................  21 
Chart 33: Category 21 – Tobacco  ................................ ................................ ........................  21 
Chart 34: Category 22 – Cotton  ................................ ................................ ..........................  22 
Chart 35: Category 23 – Incorporated products  ................................ ................................ .... 22 
Chart 3 6: Category 24 – Other agricultural products  ................................ .............................  22 
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 5 - 
 
  PART A – EXPORT SUBSIDIES  
15.   This part  relates to  the information on the use of export subsidies  by Members  with export  
subsidy reduction commitments , which is contained in docu ment G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.1.  
16.   Document G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.1  updates document G/AG/W/125/ Rev.5/Add.1 . 
It incorporates  information from  Table  ES:1 notifications , as well as  replies by Members  to the first  
section of the questionnaire o n operational changes in Export Subsidies  up to  5 May  2017. In the 
absence of a reply to the questionnaire or new notification by a Member, the information contained 
in document G/AG/W/125/Rev.5 /Add.1  has been left unchanged.  
17.   Members'  informa tion on  export subsidy reduction com mitments, both in terms of budgetary 
outlay and quantity commitments , at the time of adoption of  the Nairobi Ministerial Decision on 
export competition  was adopted  can be found in the Section  I of Part  A of document s 
TN/AG/S/27/Rev.1  and TN/AG/S/27/Rev.1/A dd.1. Information on new developments in relation to 
Members' export subsidies commitments pursuant to the Nairobi Ministerial decision on export 
competition can be found in paragraph 27 below.   
18.   As was the case in document G/AG/W/125/ Rev.5 /Add.1  and in pre vious similar documents , 
document  G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.1  does not include the data corresponding to export subsidies 
granted by developing country Members notified under Article  9.4 of the Agreement on Agri culture 
(Supporting Table ES:2)7 or the replies to  the questionnaire in which Members without export 
subsidy reduction commitments confirmed the absence of such export subsidies.  
19.   Export subsidy b udgetary outlays and quantities , as notified by Members8, are shown  in two 
different tables . The symbol "n.r." indicates that the products concerned were not subject to 
notification requirements in the year in question (either because the country concerned was not 
a Member or because that type of commitment – budgetary outlay or quantity – did not apply) . 
A blank i ndicates that no notification has been received for the year in question.  
20.   The following column headings are used:  
REF The last digit or the two last digits of the reference number ( Export 
Subsidy  ID-XSID) used in the Consolidated Tariff Schedules ( CTS) File to 
identify each export subsidy reduction commitment;  
PRODUCT  The product or group of products as specified in the Member 's schedules 
(or abbreviated)9; 
UNIT  The currency/quantity unit used for reduction commitments and a percentage 
symbol below (in ital ic); and 
1995…2016  For each year:  
- the notified budgetary outlay or quantity ; and 
- the resulting share of the Member's corresponding annual commitment for 
that year expressed in percentage (in italic).  
21.   The Members ' annual commitment levels used to calcul ate the shares are tho se listed in 
Section  I of Part A  of document s TN/AG/S/27/Re v.1 and TN/AG/S/27/Rev.1/Add.1.  
22.   For each Member, the type of year (i.e. calendar, financial , fiscal  or marketing year)  used is 
indicated in the title complemented in some case s by a note attached to the relevant table.  
23.   Australia, Canada , Colombia, Israel, Switzerland and Turkey  also provided additional 
informa tion in their replies  to the first section of the questionnaire , which  was added before the 
relevant  tables . 
                                                
7 Those Members are Barbados; India; Korea, Republic of; Mauritius; Mexico; Morocco; Pakistan; 
Sri Lanka; Thailand; and Tunisia.  
8 And in the case of Canada, as included in Canada's reply to the questionnaire  for 2015 . 
9 In original language only.  G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 6 - 
 
  SUMMARY INFORMATION ON MEMBERS' EXPORT SUBSIDIES  COMMITMENTS  
24.   Out o f the 164 WTO Members, 25 initially had export subsidy reduction commitments in 
Section  II of Part IV of their schedules.10, 11 These Members are listed in Table  2 below , along with 
the number of product  specific commitments . The latter are classified in various product groupings 
in order to facilitate the presentation . The product groupings used are set out in Table  1.12 
They reflect the categories of products (or groups of products ) used for the establis hment 
of export subsidy reduction commitments during the Uruguay Round as in document 
MTN.GNG/MA/W/24 and in relation to total exports as in document G/AG/2, subject to the 
following presentational adjustments (shown in bold in Table  1): 
i. reflecting the nat ure of many schedules, the fruit s (category 19) and vegetables 
(category 20) groups have been com bined into one (with the code  20); 
ii. subsidies for  agricultural products contingent on their incorporation in exported products 
("incorporated products") have be en given the code 23;  
iii. "other" agricultural products, i.e. those that do not fit into any of the groupings used 
during the Uruguay Round, have been given the code 24 ; and 
iv. "all agricultural products" (combined) have been given the code 25.  
25.   The information in  Table  2 on the number of product -specific commitments by Member 
in each product grouping is taken from the schedules of Members . For the purposes of Table  2, 
budgetary outlay commitments have been used . Members also have commitments on a quantity 
basis al though, in total, there are fewer of these than budgetary outlay commitments, reflecting 
aggregate export subsidy reduction commitments ( e.g. "incorporated products" and 
"all agricultural products") for which there are no quantity -based commitments.  
26.   As res ult of  this calculation, there are 428  export subsidy reduction commitments . 
Two commitments apply to "all agricultural products" and five to "incorporated products" . 
The remaining 421 are product -specific commitments with both budgetary outlay and quantit y 
commitments.13 
                                                
10 The European Union is counted as one Member wi th commitments based on the certified 
Schedule  CLXXIII – European Union 25, effective as of 1 December 2016  (document WT/LET/1220) . The 
European Union indicated through a communication (G/SECRET/26) its intention to withdraw the tariff 
concessions in Schedule CXXXIX of Bulgaria and L XIX of Romania.  This withdrawal became effective on 
1 January 2007 . Since Marketing Year 2 006/2007, the European Union had  notified its calculation of 
"EC-25 commitment levels following Article  XXIV.6 negotiations for the EU enlargement of 2004" 
(document  G/AG/N/EEC/57/Rev.1).  
11 Costa Rica has commitments only in Section III of Part IV of its schedule (commitments limiting the 
scope of export subsidies) . However as this section of schedules is not covered by the notification requirements 
(document G/AG/2),  it is not taken into consideration here.  
12 These groupings were also used in documents G/AG/NG/S/5, G/AG/NG/S/5/Rev.1, TN/AG/S/8, 
TN/AG/S/8/Rev.1, TN/AG/S/27 and TN/AG/S/27/Rev.1.  
13 In the case of Poland's "animal husbandry products" commitment, there is no quantity commitment in 
the schedule.  G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 7 - 
 
  Table 1 – Product groupings  
Code  Products coverage  
1 Wheat and wheat flour  
2 Coarse grains  
3 Rice 
4 Oilseeds  
5 Vegetable oils  
6 Oilcakes  
7 Sugar  
8 Butter and butter oil  
9 Skim milk powder  
10 Cheese  
11 Other milk products  
12 Bovine meat  
13 Pigmeat  
14 Poultry meat  
15 Sheepmeat  
16 Live animals  
17 Eggs 
18 Wine 
20 
(includes  19) Fruits and vegetables  
21 Tobacco  
22 Cotton  
23 Incorporated products  
24 Other agricultural products  
25 All agricultural pro ducts  
 
   
  G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 8 - Table 2 – Number of product -specific export subsidy reduction commitments by Member  
Member  Product groupings (see Table 1 for definitions)  
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 ALL 
Australia         1 1 1 1        1      5 
Brazil   1   1 1 1    1 1  1    1 2 1 1  4  16 
Bulgaria  1   1      2  1 1 3 1 2 1 1 28 1  1   44 
Canada  1 1  1 1 1  1 1 1 1        1   1   11 
Colombia    1    1     1       3 1 1  10  18 
Cyprus           1 1 1 1 1 1   1 2      9 
Czech Republic  1 1   1  1  1  1 1 1 1 1   1 1    4  16 
European Union  1 1 1 1 1  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1   1 1 2 1  1 1  20 
Hungary  1 1  1 1  1   1  1 1 1 1 3  1 2      16 
Iceland            1    1          2 
Indonesia    1                      1 
Israel                    3  1  2  6 
Mexico  1 2     1            1      5 
New Zealand                         1 1 
Norway         1  1 1 1 1 1 1  1  1   1 1  11 
Panama                         1 1 
Poland     1 1  1  1  1 1  1  1   4    5  17 
Romania   1  1 1  1 1  1  1  1  1 1 1 2      13 
Slovak Republic  1 1   1  1  1  1 1 1 1 1   1 1    5  17 
South Africa  1 4  1 2  2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1  1 1 5 2 1  33  62 
Switzerland -Liechtenstein            1     1   2   1   5 
Turkey  2 3   4   1  1 3 3  1 1  1  14 1   9  44 
United St ates of America  1 1 1  1   1 1 1 1 1 1 1  1 1        13 
Uruguay    1   1  1                 3 
Venezuela, Boliv arian 
Republic of   1 4        1        46 4   16  72 
All Members  11 18 9 7 15 3 11 9 8 12 17 17 9 15 9 9 7 9 121 11 4 5 90 2 428 
 
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 9 - 
 
  NEW DEVELOP MENTS IN RELATION TO  MEMBERS' EXPORT SUBS IDIES COMMITMENTS  
27.   Australia submitted on 17 February 2017 a draft containing modificat ions to Part IV of  
Schedule I Australia to eliminate its export subsidy entitlements pursuant to the Nairobi Ministerial  
Decision  on Export Competition .14 
SUMMARY INFORMATION  ON THE EVOLUTION IN THE  USE OF EXPORT SUBSIDIE S 
28.   The following table summarizes the information available in relation to the export subsidies 
granted by the Members who have notified such export subsidies in thei r latest Table ES:1 
notification15, since 2004.  
Member  Latest 
notification 
year available  Sum notified export subsidy 
budgetary outlays  as % of 
sum export subsidy budgetary 
outlay commitment levels  Products covered  
Canada  2015 19% Skim milk powder, cheese,  other 
milk, i ncorporated products  
European Union  2015 0% Sugar16 
Israel  2015 3% Cut flowers, f ruits other than 
citrus, fresh vegetables  
Norway  2015 27% Swine meat,  butter cheese, 
processed agricultural products  
Switzerland  2015 22% Cattle for breeding and horses, 
processed products  
Sum of  the export subsidy budgetary outlays notified and scheduled per Member  
29.   The charts 1 -13 show by Member17 and by year the sum of the  export subs idy outlays  
notified and the sum of the export subsidy budgetary outlay comm itment levels scheduled for the 
corresponding  year of notification . 
30.   The charts also show for each year the sum of the  notified export subsidy budgetary outlays 
expres sed as a percentage of the sum of the  export subsidy budgetary outlay commitm ent le vels. 
31.   These charts, which  aim at giving some indications on the trends in the use of export 
subsidies by Members, should be considered as illustrative only, in particular since : 
i. Members'  commitments are expressed on a product -specific basis ; 
ii. the trend in terms of  notified export subsidies quantities are not recorde d18; and 
iii. the type of year can differ from one product to the other.  
                                                
14 Circulated as d ocument G/MA/TAR/RS/454 dated 22 February 2017 . 
15 And in the case of Canada, as included in Canada's reply to the questionnaire . 
16 Only notified quantities, representing 98.2 % of the corresponding ex port subsidies quantity 
commitment level, as expressed in  WT/LET/1220  (cf. footnote  10 above).  
17 Except for Brazil, Indonesia and Uruguay who have not notified any export subsidy during the whole 
period covered by their notifications, for New Zealand and P anama who have now a zero export subsidy 
commitment and for the new European Union member States.  
18 Firstly, Members may use different units to measure the quantities for different products (and 
quantities are absent for some product categories, like "proc essed products"). Secondly, adding quantities 
corresponding to very different categories of products might prove problematic. Exhaustive information on the 
export subsidies quantities notified per Member can be found in the tables contained in 
document  G/AG/W/125/Rev.5 /Add.1.  G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 10 - 
 
  Chart 1: Australia  
0% 0% 0%2% 4%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
020406080100120140160
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million A$)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million A$)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 
Chart 2: Canada  
7%
1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%20% 22% 24% 24% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 24% 20% 19% 19%
0100,000200,000300,000400,000500,000600,000700,000800,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum notified budgetary outlays  (Thousand Can$)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments  (Thousand Can$)
 
Chart  3: Colombia  
4%5%6% 6%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
050100150200250300350400
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million US$)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million US$)
 
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 11 - 
 
  Char t 4: European Union  
42%51%
43%58%68%
37%35%42%40%35%
26%
18%
11%
6%5% 2%2%0.7%0.0005% 0%0%02,0004,0006,0008,00010,00012,00014,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million €)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million €)
 
Chart  5: Iceland  
21%
3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
02468101214161820
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million SDR)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million SDR)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 
Chart  6: Israel  
0%24%
11%
2% 3% 0%10%13%
9%
1% 2%0.4% 0%0.4% 3% 4% 5% 2% 2% 4% 3%
0102030405060
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million US$)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million US$)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 12 - 
 
  Chart  7: Mexico  
0% 0%7%
1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0100200300400500600700800
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million US$)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million US$)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 
Chart  8: Norway  
55%59%94%
86%171%
80%
59% 53%65%75%67% 69%
49%42%50%56%46% 47%54%
39%
27%
02004006008001,0001,200
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million NOK)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million NOK)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 
Chart  9: South Af rica 
17%23%
11%
3%5%4%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0100200300400500600700800900
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million Rand)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million Rand)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 13 - 
 
  Chart  10: Switzerland -Liechtenstein  
82%
79%
74% 81%90%
72%
50%48%47%42%
32%31%
23% 24%27%
17% 17% 15% 16% 16%22%
0100200300400500600700
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million Chf)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million Chf)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 
Chart  11: Turkey  
3% 2%6%
5% 5% 6%
01002003004005006007008009001,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million US$)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million US$)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 
Chart  12: United States of America  
2%12% 12%18%
11%
3%9%5%0.5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3%0.4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
02004006008001,0001,2001,400
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million US$)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million US$)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 14 - 
 
  Chart  13: Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of  
9%60%
7%17%
0510152025303540
1995 1996 1997 1998
Sum notified budgetary outlays (Million US$)
Sum budgetary outlays commitments (Million US$)
% : Notified budgetary outlays as share of budgetary outlay commitments
 
 
Sum of the export subsidy budgetary outlays notified and scheduled per product 
grouping  
32.   The charts 14 -36 show, for the period 1995 -2015, the sum of  the export subsidy budgetary 
outlays notified and scheduled  per product grouping (as set out in T able 1 above) .19 
33.   The figures a re calc ulated  by adding the Members'  export subsidy budgetary outlays  notified 
(respectively, the export subsidy budgetary outlay commitment levels scheduled by all the 
Members with reduction commitments) for the products (or group of products ) in their schedules 
corresponding to each  product grouping , following the distribution  summarized  in Table 2. 
The figures a re expresse d in US  Dollar  using the relevant  yearly exchange rate .20 
34.   The charts also show , for each product grouping,  the sum of  the notifie d expo rt subsidy 
budgetary outlays  expressed as a percentage of the sum of the export subsidy bu dgetary outlay 
commitment levels  of the M embers who  have submitted notifications . This per centage gives some 
indication of  the effective use of export subsidies  by the se Members  for the relevant product 
grouping.  
35.   Finally, the charts also show, for each product grouping, the sum of the export subsidy 
budgetary outlay commitments levels of the Members  who have submitted notifications  as a 
percentage of the sum of t he export subsidy budgetary outlay  commitment levels  of all the 
Members  with reduction commitments  corresponding to this product grouping . This percentage 
gives an indication of  the compl eteness  of the data available  for the relevant  year. 
36.   These charts, th at aim at giving some indications of  the trends in the use of export subsidies 
by broad product grouping , should be considered as illustrative only, in particular since : 
i. some changes can be partly due to exchange rate fluctuation ; 
ii. this information is only partial since notified export subsid ies quantities are not 
recorded21; 
iii. the products or groups of products regrouped under one specific commitment are not 
always fully covered within the scope of one  product grouping ; and 
                                                
19 Except for category 25 "All agricultural products", for which the two Members who had an export 
subsidy commitment (New Zealand and Panama) falling under this category now have a zero export subsidy 
commitment.  
20 Using exchange rates  from the IMF's "International Financial Statistics".  
21 Budgetary outlays are used rather than quantities consistent with the approach followed to constitute 
Table  2. It also permits having comparable figures across the board for all product groupings. Usi ng quantities 
for some product groupings might prove problematic due to the different units used by Members to measure 
quantities in the same product groupings but also due to the large coverage of certain product groupings 
(like fruits and vegetables, pro cessed products or other agricultural products).  G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 15 - 
 
  iv. the type of year can differ from one  product to the other and from one Member to 
the other.  
Finally,  some changes in the data on the sum of the export subs idy budgetary outlay commitment 
levels  of all the Members with reduction commitments can also be explained by the successive 
European Uni on enlargements  during the period under consideration .22 
Chart  14: Category 1 – Wheat and wheat flour  
3%8%5%17%21%
5%
0%8%
0%3%6%
3%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%20%40%60%80%100%
05001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  15: Category 2 – Coarse grains  
14%19%
15%45%49%
14%
8%13%
6%14%
8%
4%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
02004006008001,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
                                                
22 New EU member States commitments are taken into account until their accession to the 
European  Union and the figures notified by the European Union as its calculation of "EC -25 commitment levels 
following A rticle XXIV.6 negotiations for the EU enlargement of 2004" are used for 2006 and the  following 
years  (cf. footnote 10  above ). G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 16 - 
 
  Chart  16: Category 3 – Rice 
12%29%
15%12%16%18% 17%15% 15%
1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
050100150200250
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  17: Category 4 – Oilseeds  
0.3% 0.3% 0% 0% 0%1.3%0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
0102030405060708090100
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  18: Category 5 – Vegetable oils  
27.8%
19.1%
4.6%
0.7% 0.8% 1.9%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
020406080100120140160180200
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 17 - 
 
  Chart  19: Category 6 – Oilcakes  
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
0123456
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  20: Category 7 – Sugar  
23.2%35.3%59.9%61.4%
42.8%
34.2%42.9%
26.4%33.3%51.2%
48.8%51.2%
50.7%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
02004006008001,0001,2001,400
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart 21: Category 8 – Butter and butter oil  
18.2%40.9%
24.7%
23.8%31.8%34.0%32.3%55.7%61.8%
52.3%
30.2%
24.8%
0.2%6.6%5.0%
0.2%
0.01%0.8%0.1% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
02004006008001,0001,2001,4001,600
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 18 - 
 
  Chart  22: Category 9 – Skim milk powder  
27.4%42.4%
36.8%62.9%86.2%
10.0%22.7%48.3%49.0%
23.9%
9.3%
5.5% 5.4%13.1% 13.3%
5.7% 5.7% 6% 5.7% 5.3%6.9%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
0100200300400500600700
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  23: Category 10 – Cheese  
67.9%
50.6%
41.6%40.0%61.4%65.9%
52.7%71.9%
68.9%
48.4%
44.6%
35.4%
8.0%13.2% 12.1%
6.8% 7.0% 7.2% 6.9%5.2% 4.4%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
0100200300400500600700
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  24: Category 11 – Other milk  products  
67.9%71.0%78.4%84.1%106.8%
57.1%
51.9%70.8%75.6%
49.0%
34.7%
17.7%
2.7%12.3% 12.1%
1.7% 1.6% 1.8% 1.3% 1.4% 1.5%
0%20%40%60%80%100%120%
02004006008001,0001,2001,4001,600
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 19 - 
 
  Chart  25: Category 12 – Bovine meat  
70.1%76.6%
46.9%
39.1%51.5%
28.8%28.9%
22.0%22.0%18.6%
9.4%
4.3%2.4% 2.2% 2.3%4.9%2.3%0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
02004006008001,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  26: Category 13 – Pigmeat  
27.7%
22.6%29.8%132.7%
115.4%
17.7%
10.6%7.2%22.4%
13.9%11.6%9.0%44.3%
14.1%
7.2%9.8%7.9%
2.8% 3.8% 2.1%0.2%
0%20%40%60%80%100%120%140%
050100150200250300350400450
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  27: Category 14 – Poultry meat  
48.2%
30.8%36.2%46.8% 46.1%
40.2%
37.1%55.3%55.8%58.3%
47.5%44.9%49.5%
45.2%50.5%
38.0%39.7%
28.1%
0.02% 0.00% 0.00%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
050100150200250300
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 20 - 
 
  Chart  28: Category 15 – Sheepmeat  
4.7%11.5%20.0%
7.6%5.4%
0.7%4.6%12.7%11.3%23.0%37.8%
24.7%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
02468101214161820
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  29: Category 16 – Live animals  
30.2%
21.8%
10.9% 9.7% 9.1% 9.0%7.6%9.4%14.9% 14.2%11.7%10.4%15.3% 15.6%19.4%
0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
020406080100120140160180200
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  30: Category 17 – Eggs  
22.4%
14.1%25.1%33.0%
31.1%
21.4%
16.9%
13.6%
9.0%17.9% 17.2%
11.3% 10.7%7.9% 7.6%10.7%
6.1%4.5% 4.2%
0.0% 0.0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
01020304050607080
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 21 - 
 
  Chart  31: Category 18 – Wine  
81.0%96.9%
63.1%
51.2%
49.5%48.8%50.7%
44.1%
37.4%43.4%40.4%37.6%
32.8%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
010203040506070
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  32: Categor y 20 (includes 19)  – Fruit s and vegetables  
17.9%19.3%
10.7%11.8% 14.2%
8.7% 7.7% 7.2% 8.0% 7.1%12.9%
6.0%
2.7% 3.0% 3.5%0.3% 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% 0.4% 0.3%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
0100200300400500600700800
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  33: Category 21 – Tobacco  
15.6%
4.6%
0.8%1.0%0%0%0%
0%0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
020406080100120
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 22 - 
 
  Chart  34: Category 22 – Cotton* 
0%0% 0%0%0% 0% 0%1.3%0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
0102030405060708090
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
* This chart does not include the export subsidies for upland cotton notified by the United States of America 
in 2003, 2004, 2005 and  2006.  
Chart  35: Category 23 – Incorporated products  
69.0%79.3%86.5%99.7%136.2%
93.3%91.2%93.9%96.0%
91.7%
70.9%
54.0%
38.3%
30.4%
21.6%
16.4%16.7%
14.0% 14.0% 14.2%19.6%
0%20%40%60%80%100%120%140%
0100200300400500600700800900
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 
Chart  36: Category 24 – Other agricultural products  
12.8%25.4%25.8%30.6%63.9%
32.5%
17.2%29.4%
18.1%
1.6%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
0100200300400500600
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays (US$ Million) (left axis)
Sum notified budgetary outlays as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members (right axis)
Sum budgetary outlay commitments by notifying Members as % of sum budgetary outlay commitments by all Members (right axis)
 G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 23 - 
 
  PART B – EXPORT CREDITS, EXPO RT CREDIT GUARANTEES  OR INSURANCE PROGRAM MES 
37.   This part relates to  the information on the use of export credi ts, export credit guarantees or  
insurance pr ogrammes  by Members for the export of agricultural products  which is  contained 
in document G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.2.  
38.   Document G/AG/W/125/ Rev.6 /Add.2  updates document G/AG/W/125/Rev.5 /Add.2. 
It incorporates replies by Members to the second section of the questionnaire on Export Credit, 
Export Credit Guarantees or Insurance Programmes (Export financing)  up to  5 May  2017. 
In the absence of a reply to the questionnaire  by a Member , the information contained in 
document G/A G/W/125/Rev.5 /Add.2 h as been left unchanged.  
Members who replied to the previous questionnaires23 Members who replied to th e ques tionnaire  
circulated on 31 October  2016 
Australia ; Brazil ; Canada ; Colombia;  the 
European  Union ; Jamaica; Japan ; Malaysia ; 
New Zealand ; Peru; the Russian Federation;  
Switzerland ; Thailand; T urkey;  the United  States of 
America;  Viet Nam Australia;  Canada;  the European  Union; Iceland; 
Japan; Malaysia; New Zealand; 
the Russian  Federation; Switzerland; Thailand; 
Trinidad and Tobago; Turkey; 
the United  States  of America  
 
39.   In addition,  the following  Members indicated in their replies to the questionnaires that they 
do not provide export financing programmes for agricultural products.  
Members  with nil reply to the previous questionnaire s21 Members with nil reply to the questionnaire  
circulated on 31 October  2016 
Albania; Argentina; Chile; China; Costa  Rica; 
Côte d'Ivoire;  Dominican Republic; Ecuador; Georgia;  
Guatemala; Honduras; Hong Kong,  China;  Israel; 
Jordan; Liechtenstein; Macao,  China; Madagascar; 
Mauritius; Moldova,  Republic of; Montenegro; Norway;  
Pakistan;  Panama; Paraguay; Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of; 
Seychelles; Singapore; South  Africa;  Chinese  Taipei ; 
Thailand; Ukraine;  Uruguay  Chile; Colombia; Ecuador; Fiji; Honduras; 
Hong Kong,  China; Israel; Liechtenstein; 
Macao,  China; Mauritius; Norway; Panama; Peru; 
Philippines; Seychelles; Singapore; 
Chinese  Taipei ; Ukraine; Uruguay  
 
 
                                                
23 Circulated on 10 February, 26 November 2014 and 20 January 2016 . G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 24 - 
 
  PART C – INTERNATIONAL FOOD A ID 
40.   This part relates to  the information on international food aid provi ded b y Members which is  
contai ned in document G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.3 . 
41.   Document G/AG/W/125/ Rev.6 /Add.3 u pdates document G/AG/W/125/Rev.5 /Add.3. 
It incorporates information contained in Table  ES:1 and ES:3 notifications as well as replies by 
Members to the third  section of the questionnaire on Food Aid  up to  5 May  2017. In the absence 
of a reply to the questionnaire  or new notification by a Member , the information contained in 
document G/AG/W/125/Rev.5 /Add.3 h as been left unchanged.  
42.   The information relative t o food aid contained in Table  NF:1 notifications, which is specific to 
certain group of destination count ries, is not incorporated in  document G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.3. 
43.   The following column headings are used to report data contained in Table ES:1 notifications:  
REF The last digit or the two last digits of the r eference number (Export 
Subsidy  ID – XSID) used in the Consolidated Tariff Schedules database  (CTS) to 
identify each export subsidy reduction commitment;  
PRODUCT  The product or group of products as specified  in the Members' schedules;  
UNIT  The quantity unit used in the notification ; and 
1995… 2016  For each year, the notified quantity.  
44.   The following column headings are used to report data contained in Table  ES:3 
notifications :24 
PRODUCT  The product or group of p roducts as indicated in the Member's notification;  
UNIT  The quantity unit used in the notification ; and 
1995…2 016 For each year, the notified quantity.  
45.   The addition al information provided in the  replies by Members to the third section of the 
questionnaire on Food Aid  was inserted before the tables reflecting  ES:1 and/or 
ES:3 notifications.  
Members who replied to the previous questionnaire s25 Members who replied to the questionnaire  
circulated on 31 October  2016 
Australia ; Brazil ; Canada ; China ; Cuba; 
the European  Union ; Indonesia; Japan ; New Zealand ; 
Norway; the Russian  Federation ; South  Africa ; 
Switzerland ; Chinese  Taipei ; Thailand ; Turkey; 
the United  States of  America;  Viet Nam Australia;  Canada;  the European  Union; Iceland; 
Japan; New Zealand; Norway; 
the Russian  Federation; Switzerland; 
Chinese  Taipei ; Turkey; 
the United  States  of America   
46.   In addition, the following Members indicated in their replies to the questionnaires that they 
do not provide international food aid.  
Members with nil reply to the previous questionnaire s24 Members with nil reply to the questionnaire  
circulated on 31 October  2016 
Albania; Argentina; Chile; Colombia; Costa  Rica; 
Côte d'Ivoire; Dominican Republic ; Ecuador; Georgia; 
Guatemala; Honduras; Hong Kong,  China; Israel; 
Jamaica; Jordan; Liechtenstein; Macao,  China; 
Madagascar; Malaysia;  Montenegro;  Mauritius; 
Moldova,  Republic  of; Panama; Par aguay; Peru;  
Seychelles;  Singapore ; Thailand; Ukraine;  Uruguay  Argentina; Chile; Colombia; Ecuador; Fiji; 
Honduras; Hong Kong, China; Israel;  
Liechtenstein;  Macao,  China; Malaysia; Mauritius; 
Panama; Peru; Philippines; Seychelles; Singapore ; 
Thailand; Trinidad and Tobago; Ukraine; Uruguay   
 
                                                
24 In the case of Japan, an additional column heading entitled " destination" was added to reflect the 
notification practice followed by this Member.  
25 Circulated on 10 February and  26 November 2014 and 20 January 2016 . G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 25 - 
 
  PART D – AGRICULTURAL EXPORTI NG STATE TRADING ENT ERPRISES26 
47.   This part relates to  the information on agri cultural exporting State Trading Enterprises (STEs)  
which is contained in document G/AG/W/125 /Rev.6 /Add.4. 
48.   Document G/AG/W/125/ Rev.6 /Add. 4 updates document G/AG/W/125/Rev.5 /Add. 4. 
It incorporates the replies by Members to the fourth  section  of the question naire on Agriculture 
Exporting State Trading Enterprises  up to 5 May  2017. 
49.   In addition, consistent with the practice followed since 2013, the Secretariat looked whether 
STEs covering totally or partially agricultural products were contained in the notifica tions 
submitted by Members between 1 July  2016 (cut-off date for the document 
G/AG/W/125/ Rev.5 /Add.4 ) and 5  May 2017 , pursuant to Article  XVII:4(a) of the GATT  1994 and 
Paragraph  1 of the Understanding on the interpretation of Article  XVII under the auspic es of the 
Working Party on State Trading Enterprises .27 
50.   Based on the information contained in these notifications, the Secretariat verified with the 
Members concerned whether some of these STEs ought to be considered as agricultural exporting 
STEs in the co ntext of this compilation of information by the Secretariat and whether some of the 
information contained in these notifications ought to be incorpora ted in document 
G/AG/W/125/ Rev.6 /Add.4.  
51.   For the purpose of this verification exercise, agricultural export ing STEs were understood as 
"governmental and non -governmental enterprises, including marketing boards, which have been 
granted exclusive or special rights or privileges, including statutory or constitutional powers, in the 
exercise of which they influence  through their purchases or sales the level or direction of [ imports 
or] exports ", following the working definition of paragraph 1 of the Understanding on the 
interpretation of Article XVII.  
52.   As a result of this process, document G/AG/W/125/Re v.6/Add.4 incl udes the information on 
agricultural exporting STEs contained in document G/AG/W/125/Rev.5 /Add.4, as updated by the 
additional information received from  Australia, Canada, Ecuador, Indonesia, Israel, New Zealand, 
Tunisia  and Ukraine . In the absence of a re ply to the questionnaire or modification following a new 
notification by a Member, the information contai ned in document G/AG/W/125/Rev.5 /Add.4 has 
been left unchanged.  
                                                
26 This compilation of information should in no way be considered to substitute or interfere with the 
rights and obligations under the normal notification process in the framework of the Working Group on 
State  Trading Enterprises.  
27 According to available information, the updated list of Members having notified such STEs covering 
totally or partially agric ultural products in their latest notification to the Working Party on State Trading 
Enterprises is: Australia ( G/STR /N/16/AUS ); Barbados ( G/STR/N/13/BRB , G/STR/N/14/BRB, 
G/STR/N/15/BRB ); Brazil (G/STR/N/3/BRA); Cabo Verde (G/STR/N/13/CPV); Canada (G/ STR/N/ 15/CAN); 
Chile (G/STR/N/16 /CHL); China (G/STR/N/10/CHN, G/STR/N/11/CHN, G/STR/N/12/CHN, G/STR/N/13/CHN, 
G/STR/N/14/CHN, G/STR/N/15/CHN) ; Colombia (G/STR/N/15/COL); Costa Rica (G/STR/N/16/CRI) ; Dominica 
(G/STR/N/4/DMA, G/STR/N/5/DMA, G/STR/N/6/DMA); Ecuador  (G/STR/N15/ ECU); 
European  Union  (G/STR/N/16 /EU and G/STR/N/16/EU/ Add.1 ); Fiji (G/STR/N/4/FJI); Grenada 
(G/STR/N/13/GRD); Iceland (G/STR/N/5/ISL); India (G/STR/N/14/IND);  Indonesia ( G/STR/N/16 /IDN); Israel 
(G/STR/N /1/ISR/Rev.1); Japan (G/STR/N/16 /JPN); Jor dan (G/STR/N/9/JOR); Korea,  Republic of 
(G/STR /N/16 /KOR); Malaysia ( G/STR/N/16 /MYS); Mali (G/STR/N/16/MLI) ; Mauritius (G/STR/N/16 /MUS ); 
New Zealand (G/STR/N/16 /NZL); Oman (notification of an  entity not considered by Oman as being a state 
trading enterprise  according to article XVII of  GATTT  1994 and the Understanding on interpretation of 
Article  XVII – G/STR/N/10/OMN, G/STR/N/11/OMN, G/STR/N/12/OMN, G/STR/N/13/OMN, G/STR/N/14/OMN, 
G/STR/N/15/OMN); Philippines (G/STR/N/4/PHL, G/STR/N/5/PHL, G/STR/N/6/PHL, G/ STR/N/7/PHL); 
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (G/STR/N/4/VCT, G/STR/N/5/VCT, G/STR/N/6/VCT ); Switzerland 
(G/STR/N/16 /CHE); Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Peng hu, Kinmen and Matsu (G/STR/N/16 /TPKM); 
Thailand (G/STR/N/13/THA, G/STR/N/14/THA); Trinida d and Tobago (G/STR/N/12/TTO, G/ST R/N/13/TTO); 
Tunisia (G/STR/N/15/TUN and G/STR/N/15/TUN/Suppl.1 , G/STR/N/16 /TUN and G/STR/N/16/TUN/ Suppl.1); 
Ukraine ( G/STR/N/16 /UKR); the United States o f America ( G/STR/N/16 /USA/Rev.1 ) and Viet  Nam 
(G/STR/N/15/ VNM, G/STR /16/VNM) . G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 26 - 
 
  53.   The following Members indicated in their replies to the questionnaire the absence of an y such 
agricultural exporting STEs:  
Members with  nil reply to the previous questionnaire s28 Members with nil reply to the questionnaire 
circulated on 31 October  2016 
Albania; Argentina; Brazil; Chile; Côte d'Ivoire;  
Dominican Republic;  the European  Union; Georgia; 
Guatemala;  Honduras;  Hong Kong,  China; Jamaica; 
Japan; Jordan; Liechtenstein; Macao, China; 
Madagascar; Malaysia;  Mauritius;  Montenegro; Norway; 
Oman; Panama; Pakistan; Paraguay; Peru; 
the Russian  Federation; Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of; 
Seychelles;  Singapore; South  Africa; Switzerland; 
Chinese  Taipei ; Thailan d; Turkey; 
the United  States  of America;  Uruguay; Viet Nam  Argentina; Chile; The European  Union; Fiji; 
Honduras; Hong Kong, China; Iceland; Japan; 
Liechtenstein; Macao, China; Malaysia; Norway; 
Panama; Peru; Philippines; 
the Russian  Federation; Seychelles; Singapore; 
Switzerland; Chinese  Taipei ; Thailand;  
Trinidad  and Tobago29; Turkey;  
the United  States  of America; Uruguay  
 
54.   As a result, 16 out of the 164 WTO Members  have notified  or reported in th eir reply  to the 
questionnaire  a total of 59 agricultural exporting STEs according to the methodology described 
above . These Members are listed in Table 3 below.  
Table 3 – Number of agricultural exporting STE s per Member  
Member  Numb er of  agricultural exporting STE s 
Australia  1 
Canada  1 
China  25 
Colombia  4 
Costa Rica  1 
Dominica  1 
Ecuador  1 
Fiji 1 
Grenada  1 
India 14 
Indonesia  1 
Israel  3 
Moldova, Republic of  1 
New Zealand  1 
Tunisia  2 
Ukraine  1 
 
55.   In Table 4, t he identifie d agricultural exporting STEs are classified for illustration purposes by 
product grouping based on the same groupings as in Table 1 of Part A on Export Subsidies , subject 
to an additional presentational adjustment consisting in merging of wheat and wheat flour, coarse 
grains and rice groups (shown in bold in Table  4). 
56.   In case an agricultural expor ting STE covers  a group of products belonging to more than one 
of the  other product groupings, it is  classified under the "all agricultural products" product 
grouping. 
Table 4 – Distribution  of agricultural exporting STE s by product grouping  
Product groupings  Number of agricultural exporting STEs  
Wheat and wheat flour, coarse grains and rice  5 
Oilseeds  1 
Vegetable oils  1 
Oilcakes   
                                                
28 Circulated on 10 February, 26 November 2014 and 20 January 2016 . 
29 As indicated in Trinidad and Tobago's reply: " Previously, the Cocoa and Coffee Industry Board  (CCIB) 
was the only operating Agricultural Exporting State Trading Enterprise. In O ctober 2013, the Cabinet of 
Trinidad and Tobago  repealed the CCIB Act and the Cocoa Development  Company of Trinidad and 
Tobago  (CDCTT) was incorporated as a Wholly Owned State Enterprise under the Companies Act, 1995 of 
Trinidad and Tobago.  The CDCTT will operate more as a facilitator  to cocoa producers in their production and 
marketing of cocoa, nationally and internationally ." G/AG/W/125/Rev.6  
 
- 27 - 
 
  Product groupings  Number of agricultural exporting STEs  
Sugar  3 
Butter and butter oil   
Skim milk powder   
Cheese   
Other milk products   
Bovine meat   
Pigmeat   
Poultry meat   
Sheepmeat   
Live animals   
Eggs  
Wine 1 
Fruits and vegetables  14 
Tobacco  20 
Cotton  4 
Incorporated products   
Other agricultural produc ts 7 
All agricultural products  3 
 
 
__________