G/TBT/W/428  
19 January 2016  
(16-0369)  Page: 1/2  
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade  Original: Spanish  
 
  CHILE - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE FOOD HEALTH REGULATIONS 
- SUPREME DECREE NO. 977/96 
STATEMENT BY MEXICO TO THE COMMITT EE ON TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE 
4-6 NOVEMBER 2015 
The following communication, dated 15 January 2016, is being circulated at the request of the 
delegation of Mexico. 
 
_______________ 
  
1. As you are aware, this concern was first raised at the TBT Committee meeting of 
6 and 7 March 2013. It has been reiterated on several occasions and on 8 May 2015 we circulated the "Statement by Mexico to the 18-19 March 2015 TBT Committee meeting" regarding Chile's 
food health regulations, published on 11 May as document G/TBT/W/406. We thank Chile for being 
available to continue our bilateral dialogue, and for the clarifications provided yesterday at our bilateral meeting. 
2. As we have indicated, concern focuses on the proposed amendment to the Food Health 
Regulations, Supreme Decree No. 977/96, issued  by Chile and notified to WTO Members on 
22 August 2014 in document G/TBT/N/CHL/282, an d on its recent amendment, Decree No. 13, 
published in the Official Journal of 16 April 2015. 
3. On 27 August last, Chile distributed to the TBT Contact Points the replies to the comments 
submitted during the public consultation on the technical regulations in question. 
4. Without prejudice to other Members consulting the aforementioned document with Mexico's 
comments, I will now address some individual comments: 
a. The Food Health Regulations contain provisions on the nutritional composition of food 
and on food advertising (including labelling), in accordance with Law No. 20.606, with 
the aim of informing the public of the energy , sugar, sodium and saturated fat content of 
the foods they consume. 
b. It should first be noted that, although the statute establishing the amendment to the 
Food Health Regulations (Law No. 20.606) has technical regulation characteristics as 
provided for in Annex 1 to the TBT Agreement, the Chilean Government is considered to 
have failed to comply with the transparency  obligation set forth in Article 2.9 of the 
TBT Agreement, and this prevented Mexico an d other Members from being able to issue 
comments for consideration in the course of its preparation. 
c. However, the amendment to the Food Health Regulations provides that "it shall be 
compulsory to highlight the nutritional characteristics of any type of food or food product 
when its energy, sodium, total sugar or saturated fat content is not the same as in 
natural form and exceeds the value established in Table No. 1 of this Article". The table 
in question sets forth limits on the energy, sodium, sugar and saturated fat content of foods. Foods that exceed the establishe d limits shall highlight the nutritional 
characteristics by means of the descriptive stamp "HIGH IN", followed by: 
"SATURATED FATS", "SODIUM" , "SUGAR" or "CALORIES". G/TBT/W/428 
- 2 - 
  d. Mexico considers that Chile may be contra vening principles of the TBT Agreement, 
specifically the need to base technical regulations on international standards, as stipulated in Article 2.4 of the TBT Agr eement, since these provisions are not based 
on the General Guidelines on Claims of the Codex Alimentarius (CAC/GL 1-1979, point 3.5). 
e. Every food is considered to possess inherent nutritional characteristics, as each person 
has different nutritional needs, and no food can therefore be characterized as "good" or 
"bad" in relation to its nutritional content, so that the provisions of the amendment to 
the Regulations, specifically the provision relating to the label "HIGH IN", could arouse 
fear in consumers by leading them to assume  that non-transmissible diseases such as 
obesity are caused by the consumption of specific foods. 
f. With regard to the above, the "Directrices del Codex Alimentarius sobre Etiquetado 
Nutricional"  (Codex Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling) state that the label "should not 
lead consumers to believe that there is exac t quantitative knowledge of what individuals 
should eat in order to maintain health, but rather to convey an understanding of the quantity of nutrients contained in the product", given that a "more exact quantitative 
delineation for individuals is not valid because there is no meaningful way in which 
knowledge about individual requirements can be used in labelling." 
g. In the light of the principl e of proportionality established in Article 2.2 of the 
TBT Agreement, Mexico is of the view that the provision contained in the measure most recently notified to WTO Members requires solid scientific and technical support that 
allows the proposed label to be used withou t constituting a measure more onerous than 
is necessary for pursuing the legitimate aim of the policy being followed. 
h. Moreover, the Food Health Regulations stipulate that "foods or food products whose 
nutritional composition comprises energy, sodium, sugars or saturated fats in amounts 
higher than those specified in Table No. 1 of Article 120 bis, may not be advertised in 
the media or channels of communication, irrespective of location, that targets minors aged under 14 [...]". This prohibition on adve rtising does not apply to foods containing 
energy, sugars, sodium, or saturated fats in a natural form. 
i. In this connection, Mexico would like to see the scientific or technical evidence justifying 
this prohibition on advertising to minors aged under 14 as well as the exception established for products whose energy, sugar, sodium or saturated fat content is in a natural form. There are products on the market  with a higher sugar, sodium or saturated 
fat content than natural foods; if the aim is therefore for children below the age of 14 to 
refrain from eating foods high in sugars, sodium or saturated fats, this requirement does 
not meet the legitimate objective of the Regulations. 
5. Mexico therefore requests Chile: 
a. To submit to public consultation the provisions that have given rise to the amendments 
to the Food Health Regulations. 
b. To harmonize the requirements set forth in the regulations with the General Guidelines 
on Claims of the Codex Alimentarius (CAC/GL 1-1979, point 3.5). 
c. To provide an explanation of the scientific and technical evidence supporting the use of 
labels bearing the term "HIGH IN", consider ing the legitimate objective pursued by the 
amendment to the Food Health Regulations. 
d. To modify the classification of foods on the basis of a distinction between liquid and solid 
foods and, in accordance with international parameters, to classify foods ccording to the 
category to which they belong. 
e. To provide information in support of the prohibition on advertising certain foods to 
minors aged under 14 and to clarify and, if necessary, eliminate the exemption for foods 
whose energy, sugar, sodium or saturated fat content is in natural form, having regard 
to the provisions of the amendment to the Regulations. 
__________