14324 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 52 / Monday, March 20, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 
TABLE 2—E CONOMIC DATAWITH1-YEAREFFECTIVE DATEDELAY: COSTS AND BENEFITS STATEMENT —Continued 
Category Primary 
estimate Low estimate High estimate Units 
Notes 
Year dollars Discount rate 
(%) Period 
covered 
Transfers 
Federal Annualized Monetized $millions/ 
year ............................................................ ........................ ........................ ............... ......... ........................ 7 ........................
........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 3 ........................
From/To ......................................................... From: To: 
Other Annualized Monetized $millions/year ........................ ........................ ........................ .............. .......... 7 ........................
........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 3 ........................
From/To ......................................................... From: To: 
Effects 
State, Local or Tribal Government: No Effect 
Small Business: No effect 
Wages: No estimated effect 
Growth: No estimated effect 
The full analysis of economic impacts 
is available in the docket for this final 
rule (FDA–2015–N–2002) and at http:// 
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Reports
ManualsForms/Reports/EconomicAnalyses/default.htm. 
V. References 
The following references are on 
display in the Division of Dockets 
Management (see 
ADDRESSES ) and are 
available for viewing by interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; they are also available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has verified 
the Web site addresses, as of the date this document publishes in the Federal Register, but Web sites are subject to change over time. 
1. United States v. LA Rush, 2:13–cr– 
00249, First Superseding Information (C.D. 
Cal. April 3, 2014). 
2. United States v. Carlson, 12–cr–00305– 
DSD–LIB, Amended Superseding Indictment (D. Minn. Sept. 11, 2013). 
3. United States v. Carlson, 12–cr–00305– 
DSD–LIB, Court’s Instructions to the Jury, (D. Minn. Oct. 8, 2013). 
4. United States v. Bowen, 14–cr–00169– 
PAB, Indictment (D. Colo. May 5, 2014). 
5. United States v. Bowen, 14–cr–00169– 
PAB, Rule 11(c)(1)(A) and (B) Plea 
Agreement and Statement of Facts Relevant to Sentencing (D. Colo. Jan. 29, 2015). 
6. United States v. Zeyid, 1:14–cr–0197, 
First Superseding Indictment (N.D. Ga. June 24, 2014). 
7. U.S. Department of Justice, ‘‘Atlanta 
Man Convicted of Illegally Importing and Distributing Male Enhancement Products from China’’, Feb. 16, 2017, available at https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndga/pr/atlanta-man-convicted-illegally-importing-and-distributing-male-enhancement-products. Dated: March 16, 2017. 
Leslie Kux, 
Associate Commissioner for Policy. 
[FR Doc. 2017–05526 Filed 3–17–17; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P 
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 
AGENCY 
40 CFR Parts 22, 51, 124, 171, 300, and 
770 
[FRL–9960–28–OP] 
Further Delay of Effective Dates for Five Final Regulations Published by the Environmental Protection Agency Between December 12, 2016 and January 17, 2017 
AGENCY : Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA). 
ACTION : Final rule; further delay of 
effective dates. 
SUMMARY : In accordance with the 
Presidential directive as expressed in the memorandum of January 20, 2017, from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Freeze Pending Review,’’ and the Federal Register document published by EPA on January 26, 2017, EPA is further delaying the effective dates for the five regulations listed in the table below. 
DATES : This regulation is effective 
March 21, 2017. The effective date of each regulation listed in the table below is delayed to a new effective date of May 22, 2017. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Sarah Rees, Director, Office of Regulatory Policy and Management, Office of Policy, Mail code 1804, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460; (202) 564–1986; rees.sarah@epa.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On 
January 26, 2017, EPA published a document in the Federal Register entitled ‘‘Delay of Effective Date for 30 Final Regulations Published by the Environmental Protection Agency Between October 28, 2016 and January 17, 2017’’ (82 FR 8499) (January 26 Document). In that document, EPA delayed the effective dates of the five regulations listed in the table below to March 21, 2017, as requested in the memorandum of January 20, 2017, from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Freeze Pending Review’’ (January 20 Memo). That memo directed the heads of Executive Departments and Agencies to temporarily postpone for 60 days from the date of the January 20 Memo the effective dates of all regulations that had been published in the Federal Register but had not yet taken effect. 
The January 20 Memo also directs that 
where appropriate and as permitted by applicable law, agencies should consider a rule to delay the effective date for regulations beyond that 60-day period. In this document, EPA is taking action to further delay the effective dates for five regulations listed in the table below until May 22, 2017. EPA is taking this action to give recently arrived Agency officials the opportunity to learn more about these regulations and to decide whether they would like to conduct a substantive review of any of those regulations. If Agency officials decide to conduct a substantive review 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:08 Mar 17, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM 20MRR1nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES14325 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 52 / Monday, March 20, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 
of any of those regulations, EPA will 
take appropriate actions to conduct such a review, including, but not limited to, issuing a document in the Federal Register addressing any further delay of 
the effective date of such regulation. If Agency officials decide not to conduct a substantive review of a regulation listed in the table below, it will become effective on May 22, 2017. 
The Agency’s implementation of this 
action without opportunity for public comment is based on the good cause exception in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). (The 
good cause exception is also referenced in section 307(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).) The Agency has determined that seeking public comment is impracticable, unnecessary and contrary to the public interest. The further temporary delay in effective date until May 22, 2017, is necessary to give Agency officials the opportunity to decide whether they would like to conduct a substantive review of the five 
regulations, consistent with the January 20 Memo. The intent of the January 20 Memo was to delay the effective dates of rules that had recently been promulgated to give the new Administration time to review them. When that delay was implemented through the January 26 Document, the EPA believed 60 days would be sufficient time for incoming Agency officials to review rules recently promulgated by the EPA. However, given the length of the confirmation process for the EPA Administrator and the fact that the Agency lacks Senate- confirmed officials elsewhere, the new Administration has not had the time contemplated by the January 20 Memo for this review. Thus, the EPA is deferring the effective date for the five 
regulations listed in the table below for another 62 days to allow Agency officials to conduct this review. Given the imminence of the effective date, 
seeking prior public comment on this further temporary delay would be impractical, as well as contrary to the public interest in the orderly promulgation and implementation of regulations. Specifically, the Agency has been faced with circumstances beyond its control; as was the case on January 26, it is difficult to predict when the appropriate officials might assume their responsibilities. Indeed, as noted above, even today the EPA has only one Senate-confirmed official in place. Furthermore, allowing these regulations 
to go into effect without first deciding whether to undertake a substantive review may create public confusion. In addition, to the extent this extension is a procedural rule, it is exempt from notice and comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A), which is also referenced in CAA section 307(d). 
Federal Register citation Title Publication 
date Original 
effective date New effective 
date 
82 FR 2760 ............................. Addition of a Subsurface Intrusion Component to the Haz-
ard Ranking System.1/9/17 2/8/2017 5/22/2017 
81 FR 89674 ........................... Formaldehyde Emission Standards for Composite Wood 
Products.12/12/16 2/10/2017 5/22/2017 
82 FR 5182 ............................. Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Enhance-
ments to the AERMOD Dispersion Modeling System and 
Incorporation of Approaches to Address Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter.1/17/17 2/16/2017 5/22/2017 
82 FR 952 ............................... Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators ................... 1/4/17 3/6/2017 5/ 22/2017 
82 FR 2230 ............................. Consolidated Rules of Practice Governing the Administra-
tive Assessment of Civil Penalties, Issuance of Compli-ance or Corrective Action Orders, and the Revocation/ Termination or Suspension of Permits; Procedures for Decisionmaking.1/9/17 3/10/2017 5/22/2017 
For the foregoing reasons, the EPA 
relies on the good cause exceptions in 
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and 553(d)(3) to make today’s action effective on March 21, 2017. 
Dated: March 14, 2017. 
E. Scott Pruitt, 
Administrator. 
[FR Doc. 2017–05462 Filed 3–17–17; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 
AGENCY 
40 CFR Part 50 
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0408; FRL–9958–29– 
OAR] 
RIN 2060–AS89 
Technical Correction to the National 
Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter 
AGENCY : Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA). 
ACTION : Final rule. 
SUMMARY : The Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to make a technical correction to equation 2 in appendix N to part 50, section 4.4(b) of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particulate Matter. Equation 2 in appendix N describes an intermediate step in the calculation of the design value for the annual PM
2.5(particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers) NAAQS. This action corrects Equation 2 to properly account for cases where a site has quarters without daily values and passes the minimum quarterly value data substitution test. This change accurately reflects the intended calculation of the annual PM
2.5design 
value and is consistent with the text of section 4.1 in appendix N to part 50. 
DATES : This final rule is effective on 
May 19, 2017. 
ADDRESSES : The EPA has established a 
docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0408. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web 
site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:08 Mar 17, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM 20MRR1nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES