This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposedissuance of rules and regulations. Thepurpose of these notices is to give interestedpersons an opportunity to participate in therule making prior to the adoption of the finalrules.Proposed RulesFederal Register21188 
Vol. 83, No. 90 
Wednesday, May 9, 2018 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 
Agricultural Marketing Service 
7 CFR Part 945 
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–17–0077; SC18–945–1 
PR] 
Irish Potatoes Grown in Certain 
Designated Counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon; Modification of Handling Regulations 
AGENCY : Agricultural Marketing Service, 
USDA. 
ACTION : Proposed rule. 
SUMMARY : This proposed rule would 
implement a recommendation from the Idaho-Eastern Oregon Potato Committee (Committee) to revise the varietal classifications that determine the size requirements for Irish potatoes grown in certain designated counties of Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon. As provided under section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, the proposed modification would also apply to all imported long type Irish potatoes. This proposed rule would also make administrative revisions to the subpart headings to bring the language into conformance with the Office of Federal Register requirements. 
DATES : Comments must be received by 
July 9, 2018. 
ADDRESSES : Interested persons are 
invited to submit written comments concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or internet: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Comments should reference the document number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be available for public 
inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov. All comments 
submitted in response to this proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet at the address provided above. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Barry Broadbent, Marketing Specialist, or Gary D. Olson, Regional Manager, Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326– 2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or Email: Barry.Broadbent@usda.gov or 
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov. 
Small businesses may request 
information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– 2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email: Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : This 
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 945 (7 CFR part 945), as amended, regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in certain designated counties in Idaho, and Malheur County, Oregon. Part 945 (referred to as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised of potato producers and handlers operating within the production area. 
Section 8e of the Act provides that 
whenever certain specified commodities, including potatoes, are regulated under a Federal marketing order, imports of these commodities into the United States are prohibited unless they meet the same or comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity requirements as those in effect for the domestically produced commodities. 
The Department of Agriculture 
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. Additionally, because this proposed rule does not meet the definition of a significant regulatory action it does not trigger the requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017). 
This proposed rule has been reviewed 
under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
The Act provides that administrative 
proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. 
There are no administrative 
procedures which must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of import regulations issued under section 8e of the Act. 
Under the terms of the Order, fresh 
market shipments of Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes are required to be inspected and are subject to minimum grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, and container requirements. This proposed rule would revise the varietal classifications that determine the size requirements for potatoes handled under the Order. As required under section 8e of the Act, the proposed revisions to the Order’s varietal classifications would also be applied to imported long type potatoes. 
At its meeting on November 8, 2017, 
the Committee unanimously recommended revising the varietal 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 May 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09MYP1.SGM 09MYP1amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS21189 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
classifications that determine the size 
requirements for U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes. Sections 945.51 and 945.52 provide authority for the establishment and modification of grade, size, quality, and maturity regulations applicable to the handling of potatoes. 
Section 945.341 establishes minimum 
grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, and container requirements for potatoes handled subject to the Order. The Order’s handling regulations currently have two different size requirements for U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes. The requirements are applied based upon the varietal classification of the subject potato. Currently, the varietal classifications that determine which of the different size requirements are applicable are designated as ‘‘round varieties’’ in § 945.341(a)(2)(i), and ‘‘all other varieties’’ in § 945.341(a)(2)(ii). 
This proposed rule would remove the 
designation ‘‘round varieties’’ in § 945.341(a)(2)(i) to make the size requirements in that paragraph applicable to all U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes, unless otherwise specified. In addition, this proposed rule would change the designation for ‘‘all other varieties’’ in § 945.341(a)(2)(ii) to ‘‘Russet types,’’ maintaining the larger size requirements for ‘‘Russet types’’ only. 
Committee members reported that the 
Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato industry has been producing and shipping an increasing number of non-traditional potato varieties, such as oblong, fingerling, and banana potatoes. The current size requirements contained in the handling regulations do not adequately differentiate between the various types of potatoes to effectively regulate the unique varieties that are now being marketed from the production area. Without a clear distinction, there exists the potential to inhibit orderly marketing of such potatoes by requiring them to adhere to size requirements that were never intended to be applied to that type or variety. Designating potatoes as ‘‘round varieties’’ and ‘‘all other varieties’’ was appropriate when the regulations were initially established but potatoes from the production area are now segmented into two different market sectors, Russet type potatoes and all other non-Russet varieties. The characteristics of each of 
these market sectors continues to need different minimum size requirements. However, with the current size requirement classifications in the handling regulations, some varieties of potatoes are being required to meet size requirements that do not match their natural characteristics or their intended market outlet. For example, Russet varieties are 
primarily utilized as baked potatoes or 
are peeled and further prepared by the consumer as products such as french fries, potato salad, or mashed potatoes. The Committee intends for the size requirements for these potatoes to be greater than for other varieties of potatoes and those size requirements match the likely utilization of such potatoes. Non-Russet type potatoes are typically marketed fresh and are prepared and consumed whole. These types, while predominantly round varieties, include unique varieties that could not be described as ‘‘round’’ but are also not comparable to Russet types. Requiring non-Russet type potatoes to meet size requirements intended for potatoes used for baking or french fries puts those potatoes at a marketing disadvantage. 
The Committee believes that potato 
size is a significant consideration of potato buyers. Providing potato buyers with the sizes desired by their customers for the type of potato that is being marketed is important to promoting potato sales. The size requirements intended to facilitate orderly marketing should not unintentionally inhibit a market segment, even if that segment is a minor one. Modifying the size requirement classifications to meet the intent of the Committee would help facilitate the growth of the emerging market for unique potato varieties. This proposed change is expected to improve the marketing of Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes and enhance overall returns to handlers and producers. 
This proposed rule would relax the 
current handling regulations for non- round potatoes that are also not Russet type. Such potatoes would be subject to the smaller size requirements that are currently applied to round varieties. The Committee believes that, while these potatoes represent a small market segment relative to the total output from the production area, the market is expected to grow and the Order’s handling regulations should be responsive to it. 
Section 8e mandates the regulation of 
certain imported commodities whenever those same commodities are regulated by a domestic marketing order. Irish potatoes are one of the commodities 
specifically covered by section 8e in the Act. In addition, section 8e stipulates that, whenever two or more such marketing orders regulating the same agricultural commodity produced in different areas are concurrently in effect, imports must comply with the provisions of the order which regulates the commodity produced in the area with which the imported commodity is 
in the ‘‘most direct competition.’’ 7 CFR 980.1(a)(2)(iii) contains the determination that imports of long type potatoes during each month of the year are in most direct competition with potatoes of the same type produced in the area covered by the Order. 
Minimum grade, size, quality, and 
maturity requirements for potatoes imported into the United States are currently in effect under § 980.1. Section 980.1(b)(3) stipulates that, through the entire year, the grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements of the Order applicable to potatoes of all long types shall be the respective grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements for imported potatoes of all long types. Therefore, this proposed action would relax the minimum size requirements for imports of non-round U.S. No. 2 grade long type potatoes, other than Russet types, accordingly. 
This rule would also allow potato 
importers to respond to the changing demands of domestic consumers. The domestic market’s increasing preference for unique potato varieties applies to imported potatoes as well as to domestically produced potatoes. In 
addition, the higher prices that the unique potatoes are expected to command would also apply to imported product. Thus, importers are expected to benefit along with domestic producers and handlers by increased sales of U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes and increased total revenue. 
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 
Pursuant to the requirements set forth 
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis. 
The purpose of the RFA is to fit 
regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. Import regulations issued under the Act are based on those established under Federal marketing orders. 
There are approximately 32 handlers 
of Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes who are subject to regulation under the Order and about 450 potato producers in the regulated area. In addition, there are approximately 255 importers of all types of potatoes, many of which import long 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 May 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09MYP1.SGM 09MYP1amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS21190 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
types, who are subject to regulation 
under the Act. Small agricultural service firms, which include potato handlers and importers, are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less than $7,500,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201). 
During the 2016–2017 fiscal period, 
the most recent full year of statistics available, 37,449,300 hundredweight of Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes were inspected under the Order and sold into the fresh market. Based on information provided by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), the average producer price for the 2016 Idaho potato crop was $6.75 per hundredweight. Multiplying $6.75 by the shipment quantity of 37,449,300 hundredweight yields an annual crop revenue estimate of $252,782,775. The average annual fresh potato revenue for each of the 450 producers is therefore calculated to be $561,740 ($252,782,775 divided by 450), which is less than the SBA threshold of $750,000. Consequently, on average, most of the Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato producers may be classified as small entities. 
In addition, based on information 
reported by USDA’s Market News Service (Market News), the average f.o.b. shipping point price for the 2016–2017 Idaho potato crop was $11.79 per hundredweight. Multiplying $11.79 by the shipment quantity of 37,449,300 hundredweight yields an annual crop revenue estimate of $441,527,247. The average annual fresh potato revenue for each of the 32 handlers is therefore calculated to be $13,797,726 ($441,527,247 divided by 32), which is above the SBA threshold of $7,500,000 for agricultural service firms. Therefore, most of the Idaho-Eastern Oregon potato handlers would be classified as large entities. 
Further, based on information from 
USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service 
(FAS), potato importers imported 11,157,190 hundredweight of potatoes into the U.S. in 2016 (the most recent full year that statistics are available). FAS also reported the total value of potato imports for 2016 to be $212,331,000. The average annual revenue of the estimated 255 potato importers is therefore calculated to be $832,670 ($212,331,000 divided by 255), which is significantly less than the SBA threshold of $7,500,000. Consequently, on average, most of the entities importing potatoes into the U.S. may be classified as small entities. 
This proposed rule would revise the 
varietal classifications that determine the size requirements for U.S. No. 2 
grade potatoes handled under the Order. Specifically, this action would remove the designation ‘‘round varieties’’ in § 945.341(a)(2)(i) to make the size requirements in that paragraph applicable to all U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes, unless otherwise specified. In addition, this proposed rule would change the designation for ‘‘all other varieties’’ in § 945.341(a)(2)(ii) to ‘‘Russet types,’’ maintaining the larger size requirements that were previously applied to all non-round varieties, but would only apply them to ‘‘Russet types.’’ 
Pursuant to section 8(e) of the Act, 
this proposed revision to the Order’s varietal classifications that determine the size requirements for U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes would also be applied to imported long type Irish potatoes. 
This proposed action was 
recommended by the Committee to ensure that the size profile of non- round, non-Russet type U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes would consistently be a size preferred by consumers. This proposed change is expected to improve the marketability of Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes and increase returns to handlers and producers. Authority for this proposed rule is provided in §§ 945.51 and 945.52 of the Order. 
At the November 8, 2017, meeting, the 
Committee discussed the impact of this change on handlers and producers. The proposed change to the varietal classifications that determine the size requirements is a relaxation in regulation. The proposed regulatory change is expected to have a positive, or neutral, impact on industry participants. 
The Committee relied on the opinions 
of producers and handlers familiar with 
the industry to draw its conclusions regarding the recommended handling regulation change. The Committee received anecdotal evidence from industry members at the November 8, 2017, meeting that there is some confusion in the industry with regards to which size requirements apply to which varieties of potatoes and that some varieties are being inspected and sized to requirements that were not intended by the Committee. The proposed change to the size requirements would clarify which size requirements are applicable to which potatoes. 
If implemented, this proposed change 
is expected to lead to increased revenue for handlers and producers. Currently, non-round potato varieties that are not Russet type are required to conform to the larger size requirements, even though the Committee does not believe that this meets its intent with regards to the handling regulation. Defining the 
distinct classifications would allow more of the non-round, non-Russet type potatoes to enter the market, thereby allowing the sale of potatoes that would have otherwise been restricted. The benefits derived from this proposed action are not expected to be disproportionately more or less for small handlers or producers than for larger entities. 
The Committee discussed alternatives 
to this proposed change. One consideration was making no change at all to the current regulation. Another alternative was to further differentiate between various varieties and types of potatoes in the handling regulations. There was some discussion of adding another classification. After consideration of all the alternatives, the Committee decided that the proposed changes would provide the greatest amount of benefit to the industry with the least amount of burden to producers and handlers. 
Further, the Committee’s meeting was 
widely publicized throughout the potato industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all Committee meetings, the November 8, 2017, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small businesses. 
In accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Order’s information collection requirements have been 
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581–0178, Generic Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No changes in those requirements would be necessary as a result of this proposed rule. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. 
This proposed rule would not impose 
any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on small or large potato handlers and importers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. 
AMS is committed to complying with 
the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 May 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09MYP1.SGM 09MYP1amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS21191 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
USDA has not identified any relevant 
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or 
conflict with this proposed rule. 
A small business guide on complying 
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the previously mentioned address in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT  
section. 
In accordance with section 8e of the 
Act, the United States Trade Representative has concurred with the issuance of this proposed rule. 
A 60-day comment period is provided 
to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be considered before a final determination is made on this matter. 
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 945 
Marketing agreements, Potatoes, 
Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements. 
For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR 
part 945 is proposed to be amended as follows: 
PART 945—IRISH POTATOES GROWN 
IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN IDAHO, AND MALHEUR COUNTY, OREGON 
■1. The authority citation for 7 CFR 
part 945 continues to read as follows: 
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A] 
■2. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Order 
Regulating Handling’’ as ‘‘Subpart A— Order Regulating Handling’’. 
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B 
and Amended] 
■3. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Rules and 
Regulations’’ as subpart B and revise the heading to read as follows: 
Subpart B—Administrative 
Requirements 
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C] 
■4. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Assessment 
Rates’’ as ‘‘Subpart C—Assessment 
Rates’’. 
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart D 
and Amended] 
■5. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Handling 
Regulations’’ as subpart D and revise the heading to read as follows: 
Subpart D—Handling Requirements 
■6. In § 945.341, revise paragraphs 
(a)(2)(i) and (ii) to read as follows: § 945.341 Handling regulation. 
* * * * * 
(a) * * * 
(1) * * * (2) Size—(i) All varieties, except 
Russet types. 1
7⁄8inches minimum 
diameter, unless otherwise specified on 
the container in connection with the grade. 
(ii) Russet types. 2 inches minimum 
diameter, or 4 ounces minimum weight: Provided, That at least 40 percent of the 
potatoes in each lot shall be 5 ounces or heavier. 
* * * * * 
Dated: May 3, 2018. 
Bruce Summers, 
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing 
Service. 
[FR Doc. 2018–09820 Filed 5–8–18; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 
Federal Aviation Administration 
14 CFR Part 39 
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0391; Product 
Identifier 2017–NM–165–AD] 
RIN 2120–AA64 
Airworthiness Directives; ATR–GIE 
Avions de Transport Re ´gional 
Airplanes 
AGENCY : Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA), DOT. 
ACTION : Notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM). 
SUMMARY : We propose to adopt a new 
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain ATR–GIE Avions de Transport Re ´gional 
Model ATR42–200, –300, and –320 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a determination that more restrictive maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations are necessary. This proposed AD would require updating the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. 
DATES : We must receive comments on 
this proposed AD by June 25, 2018. 
ADDRESSES : You may send comments, 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: 
•Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments. 
•Fax: 202–493–2251. •Mail: U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. 
•Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 
address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. 
For service information identified in 
this NPRM, contact ATR–GIE Avions de Transport Re ´gional, 1 Alle ´e Pierre 
Nadot, 31712 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 (0) 5 62 21 62 21; fax +33 (0) 5 62 21 67 18; email continued.airworthiness@atr- aircraft.com; http://www.atr- aircraft.com. You may view this service 
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. 
Examining the AD Docket 
You may examine the AD docket on 
the internet at http://
www.regulations.gov by searching for 
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– 0391; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in the 
ADDRESSES  
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–231– 3220. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Comments Invited 
We invite you to send any written 
relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under the 
ADDRESSES  
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 2018–0391; Product Identifier 2017– NM–165–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM based on those comments. 
We will post all comments we 
receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any 
personal information you provide. We 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 May 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09MYP1.SGM 09MYP1amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS