42438 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules 
That airspace extending upward from 700 
feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile 
radius of Chillicothe Municipal Airport. 
* * * * * 
ACE MO E5 Cuba, MO [Amended] 
Cuba Municipal Airport, MO 
(Lat. 38°04′08″ N., long. 91°25′44″ W.) 
That airspace extending upward from 700 
feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile 
radius of the Cuba Municipal Airport. 
* * * * * 
ACE MO E5 Farmington, MO [Amended] 
Farmington Regional Airport, MO 
(Lat. 37°45′40″ N., long. 90°25′43″ W.) 
Farmington VORTAC 
(Lat. 37°40′24″ N., long. 90°14′03″ W.) 
That airspace extending upward from 700 
feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 
radius of Farmington Regional Airport, and within 4 miles each side of the 204° bearing 
from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 11.5 miles southwest of the airport, and within 1.3 miles each side of the Farmington VORTAC 300° radial extending 
from the 6.4-mile radius of the airport to the VORTAC. 
* * * * * 
ACE MO E5 Lamar, MO [Amended] 
Lamar Municipal Airport, MO 
(Lat. 37°29′10″ N., long. 94°18′43″W.) 
That airspace extending upward from 700 
feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile 
radius of Lamar Municipal Airport. 
* * * * * 
ACE MO E5 Mountain View, MO 
[Amended] 
Mountain View Airport, MO 
(Lat. 36°59′34″ N., long. 91°42′52″ W.) 
That airspace extending upward from 700 
feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile 
radius of Mountain View Airport. 
* * * * * 
ACE MO E5 Nevada, MO [Amended] 
Nevada Municipal Airport, MO 
(Lat. 37°51′09″ N., long. 94°18′17″ W.) 
That airspace extending upward from 700 
feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile 
radius of Nevada Municipal Airport. 
* * * * * 
ACE MO E5 Poplar Bluff, MO [Amended] 
Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport, MO 
(Lat. 36°46′26″ N., long. 90°19’30″ W.) 
That airspace extending upward from 700 
feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile 
radius of Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport. 
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on July 7, 2015 
Robert W. Beck 
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 
Central Service Center. 
[FR Doc. 2015–17501 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 
COMMISSION 
16 CFR Part 1251 
[Docket No. CPSC–2011–0081] 
Toys: Determination Regarding Heavy 
Elements Limits for Unfinished and Untreated Wood 
AGENCY : U.S. Consumer Product Safety 
Commission. 
ACTION : Notice of proposed rulemaking. 
SUMMARY : The Consumer Product Safety 
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘CPSC’’) is proposing to determine that unfinished and untreated trunk wood does not contain heavy elements that would exceed the limits specified in the Commission’s toy standard, ASTM F963–11. Based on this proposed determination, unfinished and untreated trunk wood in toys would not require third party testing. In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this Federal Register, the Commission is issuing this 
determination as a direct final rule. If we receive no significant adverse comment in response to the direct final rule, we will not take further action on this proposed rule. 
DATES : Submit comments by August 17, 
2015. 
ADDRESSES : You may submit comments, 
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2011– 0081, by any of the following methods: 
Electronic Submissions: Submit 
electronic comments to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at: www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments. The Commission does not accept comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through www.regulations.gov. The Commission 
encourages you to submit electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described above. 
Written Submissions: Submit written 
submissions by mail/hand delivery/courier to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504–7923. 
Instructions: All submissions received 
must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted without change, including any personal identifiers, contact information, or other personal information provided, to: www.regulations.gov. Do not submit 
confidential business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information that you do not want to be available to the public. If furnished at all, such information 
should be submitted in writing. 
Docket: For access to the docket to 
read background documents or comments received, go to: www.regulations.gov, and insert the 
docket number CPSC–2011–0081, into the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the prompts. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Randy Butturini, Project Manager, Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Hwy, Room 814, Bethesda, MD 20814; 301–504–7562: email; rbutturini@cpsc.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Along 
with this proposed rule, CPSC is publishing a direct final rule in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this issue of the Federal Register. This direct final rule establishes a determination that unfinished and untreated trunk wood does not contain heavy elements that would exceed the heavy elements limits specified in the Commission’s mandatory toy standard, ASTM F963– 11. Based on this determination, unfinished and untreated trunk wood in toys does not require third party testing. CPSC did not issue a proposed rule before today because CPSC believes that this action is not controversial and CPSC does not expect significant adverse comment. CPSC has explained the reasons for the determination in the direct final rule. Unless CPSC receives significant adverse comment regarding the determination during the comment period, the direct final rule in this issue of the Federal Register will become effective September 15, 2015, and CPSC will not take further action on this proposal. If CPSC receives a significant adverse comment, CPSC will publish a document in the Federal Register withdrawing the direct final rule, and the rule will not take effect. CPSC will then respond to public comments in a later final rule, based on this proposed rule. CPSC does not intend to institute a second comment period on this action. Parties interested in commenting on this determination must do so at this time. For additional information, please see 
the direct final rule published in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this issue of the Federal Register. 
Dated: July 13, 2015. 
Todd A. Stevenson, 
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 
Commission. 
[FR Doc. 2015–17414 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Jul 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS