DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD FINAL DRAFT UGANDA 
STANDARD  
  FDUS EAS 762 
Second  Edition  
2013-mm-dd 
 
 Reference number  
FDUS EAS 762: 2013 
© UNBS 201 3 
  
Dry soybeans — Specification  
 DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDFDUS EAS 762: 2013 
ii                © UN BS 2013 - All rights reserved 
 Compliance with this standard does not, of itself confer immunity from legal obligations  
A Uganda Standard does not purport to include all necessary provisions of a contract. Users are 
responsible for its correct application  
© UNBS 2013 
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilised in any 
form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without prior written 
permission from UNBS. 
Requests for permission to reproduce this document should be addressed to 
The Executive Director 
Uganda National Bureau of Standards 
P.O. Box 6329 
Kampala 
Uganda 
Tel: 256 41 505 995 
Fax: 256 41 286 123 
E-mail: unbs@infocom.co.ug  
Web: www.unbs.go.ug  
 DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDFDUS EAS 762: 2013 
© UNBS  2013 - All rights reserved                iii National foreword 
Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS) is a parastatal under the Ministry of Tourism, Trade and 
Industry established under Cap 3 27, of the Laws of Uganda. UNBS is mandated to co-ordinate the elaboration 
of standards and is  
(a) a member of International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) and  
(b) a contact point for the WHO/FAO Codex Alimentarius Commission on Food Standards, and  
(c) the National Enquiry Point on TBT/SPS Agreements of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). 
The work of preparing Uganda Standards is carried out through Technical Committees. A Technical 
Committee is established to deliberate on standards in a given field or area and consists of representatives of 
consumers, traders, academicians, manufacturers, government and other stakeholders. 
Draft Uganda Standards adopted by the Technical Committee are widely circulated to stakeholders and the 
general public for comments. The committee reviews the comments before recommending the draft standards 
for approval and declaration as Uganda Standards by the National Standards Council. 
This Final Draft Uganda Standard, FDUS EAS 762 : 2013, Dry soybeans  — Specification , is identical with  and 
has been reproduced from an East African  Standard , EAS 762: 2013 , Dry soybeans  — Specification , and is 
being proposed for adoption as a Uganda Standard.  
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (US EAS 762 :2011) which has been technically 
revised. 
Wherever the words, “ East African Standard" appear, they should be replaced by "Uganda Standard." 
 
  DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD FDEAS 762:2013 
ICS 67.060  
© EAS 2013                                                                                                                         First Edition 2013  
 
FINAL DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD 
Dry soybeans — Specification 
EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDDRAFT UGANDA STANDARDFDEAS 762:2013 
ii © EAC  2013  – All rights reserved  
 Copyright notice 
This EAC document is copyright-protected by EAC. While the reproduction of this document by 
participants in the EAC standards development process is permitted without prior permission from EAC, 
neither this document nor any extract from it may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form for 
any other purpose without prior written permission from EAC. 
Requests for permission to reproduce this document for the purpose of selling it should be addressed 
as shown below or to EAC’s member body in the country of the requester:  
© East African Community 2013  — All rights reserved 
East African Community  
P.O.Box 1096 
Arusha 
Tanzania 
Tel: 255 27 2504253/8 
Fax: 255 27 2504481/2504255 
E-mail: eac@eachq.org 
       Web: www.eac -quality.net  
Reproduction for sales purposes may be subject to royalty payments or a licensing agreement. 
Violators may be persecuted DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDFDEA S 762:2013 
© EAC 2013 – All rights reserved  iii 
 Contents Page 
Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................  iv 
1 Scope  ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 1 
2 Normative references  ................................ ................................ ............................................................  1 
3 Terms and definitions  ................................ ................................ ...........................................................  1 
4 Quality requirements ................................ ................................ .............................................................  2 
4.1 General requirements  ................................ ................................ ...........................................................  2 
4.2 Specific requirements  ................................ ................................ ...........................................................  3 
5 Contaminants  ................................................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 3 
5.1 Pesticide residues  ................................ ................................................................ ................................ . 3 
5.2 Other contaminants  ................................ ................................ ...............................................................  3 
6 Hygiene  ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 4 
7 Packaging  ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 4 
8 Labelling  ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 4 
9 Sampling methods  ................................ ................................ ................................................................  5 
 
 DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDFDEAS 762:2013 
iv © EAC  2013  – All rights reserved  
 Foreword 
Development of the East African Standards has been necessitated by the need for harmonizing requirements 
governing quality of products and services in the East African Community. It is envisaged that through 
harmonized standardization, trade barriers that are encountered when goods and services are exchanged 
within the Community will be removed.  
In order to achieve this objective, the Community established an East African Standards Committee mandated 
to develop and issue East African Standards.   
The Committee is composed of representatives of the National Standards Bodies in Partner States, together 
with the representatives from the private sectors and consumer organizations. Draft East African Standards 
are circulated to stakeholders through the National Standards Bodies in the Partner States. The comments 
received are discussed and incorporated before finalization of standards, in accordance with the procedures 
of the Community. 
East African Standards are subject to review, to keep pace with technological advances. Users of the East 
African Standards are therefore expected to ensure that they always have the latest versions of the standards 
they are implementing .  
FDEAS 762:2013 was prepared by Technical Committee EAS/TC 014 , Cereals, Pulses and related products  
 DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDFDEA S 762:2013 
© EAC 2013 – All rights reserved  v 
 Introduction 
This standard has been developed to take into account: 
a) the needs of the market for the product;  
b) the need to facilitate fair domestic, regional and international trade and prevent technical barriers to 
trade by establishing a common trading language for buyers and sellers; 
c) the structure of the CODEX, UNECE, USA, ISO and other internationally significant standards; 
d) the needs of the producers in gaining knowledge of market standards, conformity assessment, 
commercial cultivars and crop production process; 
e) the need to transport the product in a manner that ensures keeping of quality until it reaches the 
consumer; 
f) the need for the plant protection authority to certify, through a simplified form, that the product is fit for 
cross-border and international trade without carrying plant disease vectors; 
g) the need to promote good agricultural practices that will enhance wider market access, involvement of 
small-scale traders and hence making farming a viable means of wealth creation; and 
h) the need to ensure a reliable production base of consistent and safe crops that meet customer 
requirements. 
 
 DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDDRAFT UGANDA STANDARDFINAL DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD  FDEAS 762:2013 
 
© EAC 2013 – All rights reserved  1 
 Dry soybeans — Specification 
1 Scope 
This Final Draft East African Standard specifies the requirements and methods of sampling and test for dry 
whole soybeans of varieties (cultivars) grown from Glycine max (L.) Merr. intended for human consumption.  
2 Normative references 
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated 
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced 
document (including any amendments) applies. 
EAS 38, Labelling of prepackaged foods — Specification  
EAS 39, Hygiene in the food and drink manufacturing industry — Code of practice  
EAS 79, Cereals and pulses as grain — Methods of sampling  
EAS 217, Methods for the microbiological examination of foods 
ISO 605 , Pulses — Determination of impurities, size, foreign odours, insects, and species and variety — Test 
methods 
ISO 711, Cereals and cereal products — Determination of moisture content (Basic reference method)  
ISO 712 , Cereals and cereal products — Determination of moisture content — Routine reference method 
ISO 13690, Cereals, pulses and milled products — Sampling of static batches  
ISO 16050,  Foodstuffs — Determination of aflatoxin B 1, and the total content of aflatoxin B 1, B2, G 1 and G 2 in 
cereals, nuts and derived products  — High performance liquid chromatographic method 
CODEX Stan 193, Codex general Standards for contaminants and toxins in food and feed 
3 Terms and definitions  
For the purpose of this standard, the following terms and definitions shall apply. 
3.1 
soybeans 
whole mature dry seeds of varieties ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.)   
3.2 
damaged/defective  
soybeans and pieces of soybeans that are badly ground-damaged, badly weather-damaged, diseased, frost-
damaged, germ-damaged, heat-damaged, insect-bored, mould-damaged, sprout-damaged, stinkbug-stung, or DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD 
2 © EAC  2013  – All rights reserved  
 otherwise materially damaged. Stinkbug-stung kernels are considered damaged kernels at the rate of one-
fourth of the actual percentage of the stung kernels. 
3.3 
foreign matter  
any extraneous matter than dry soybeans or other food grains comprising of 
a) "inorganic matter" includes metallic pieces, shale, glass, dust, sand, gravel, stones, dirt, pebbles, 
lumps or earth, clay, mud and animal filth etc; 
b) "organic matter" consisting of detached seed coats, straws, weeds and other inedible grains etc. 
3.4 
immature 
characterized by a green exterior appearance in conjunction with green discolouration penetrating the 
cotyledon. Examination of the cotyledons is determined by cutting the soybeans in cross section. For grading 
purposes, immature damaged soybeans are considered as part of the ―Total Damage‖ grade specification. 
Soybeans that are green in appearance and have no discolouration of the cotyledon or just a halo of green 
around the outside of the cotyledon are to be assessed against the overall colour of the sample.  
3.5 
poisonous, toxic and/or harmful 
seed which if present in quantities above permissible limit may have damaging or dangerous effect on health, 
organoleptic properties or technological performance such as Jimson weed — datura ( D. fastuosa  Linn and D. 
stramonium  Linn.) corn cokle ( Agrostemma githago  L., Machai Lallium remulenum  Linn.) Akra (Vicia species), 
Argemone mexicana , Khesari and other seeds that are commonly recognized as harmful to health 
3.6 
rancidity 
characterized by a deep pink discolouration on the seed coat and varying degrees of discolouration of the 
cotyledon 
3.7 
splits 
broken soybean seeds that are less than three-quarters of the whole seed, and cotyledons that are loosely 
held together by the seed coat 
3.8 
food grade material 
packaging material, made of substances which are safe and suitable for their intended use and which will not 
impart any toxic substance or undesirable odour or flavour to the product 
4 Quality requirements  
4.1 General requirements 
Soybeans shall be: 
a) grain that consists of 50 % or more of whole or broken soybeans ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) that will not 
pass through an 8/64 round-hole sieve and not more than 10 .0 % of other grains for which standards 
have been established; 
b) hard, clean, wholesome, uniform in size, shape, colour and in sound merchantable condition; 
NOTE The colour of soybeans may be yellow, green, brown or black. 
c) safe and suitable for human consumption; DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD 
© EAC 2013 – All rights reserved  3 
 d) free from abnormal flavours, obnoxious smell and discolouration; and  
e) free from micro-organisms and substances originating from micro-organisms or other poisonous or 
deleterious substances in amounts that may constitute a hazard to human health. 
4.2 Specific requirements 
Soybeans shall be categorized into three grades on the basis of the tolerable limits established in Table 1. 
Table 1 — Specific requirements 
S/N Characteristics  Maximum limits  Method of 
test Grade 1  Grade 2  Grade 3  
i)  Moisture, % m/m  14 ISO 711/ ISO 
712 
ii)  Test weight , kg/h (g/0.5L) min.  70(357)  68(347)  66(337)  
ISO 605  
 iii)  Foreign matter, % m/m  1 2 3 
iv)  Inorganic matter, % m/m  0.1 0.3 0.5 
v)  Broken/split grains, % m/m  1 2.5 5 
vi)  Pest damaged grains, % m/m  0.3 0.8 1.5 
vii)  Rotten and diseased grains, % m/m  0.2 0.5 1.0 
viii)  Heat damaged grains %m/m  0.1 0.2 0.5 
ix)  Contrasting colours, % m/m  2 3 5 
x)  Immature/shrive lled grains, % m/m  0.1 0.2 0.5 
xi)  Filth, % m/m  0.1 
xii)  Total defective grains, % m/m  2 3 5 
xiii)  Total aflatoxin (AFB 1+AFB 2+AFG1 
+AFG 2), ppb max  10 
ISO 16050  
xiv)  Aflatoxin B 1, ppb max  5 
xv)  Fumonisin , ppm max  2 AOAC 
2001.04  
NOTE  The parameter, Total defective grains is not the sum total of the individual defects. It is limited to 
70 % of the sum total of individual defects  
5 Contaminants 
5.1 Pesticide residues 
Dry soybeans shall comply with those maximum pesticide residue limits established by the Codex 
Alimentarius Commission for this commodity.  
NOTE Where the use of certain pesticides is prohibited by some Partner States, it should be notified to all Partner 
States accordingly. 
5.2 Other contaminants 
Dry soybeans shall comply with those maximum limits for other contaminants established in CODEX STAN 
193.  DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD 
4 © EAC  2013  – All rights reserved  
 6 Hygiene 
6.1 Dry soybeans  shall be produced, prepared and handled in accordance with the provisions of 
appropriate sections of EAS 39.  
6.2 When tested by appropriate standards of sampling and examination listed in Clause 2, the products 
shall: 
a) be free from microorganisms in amounts which may represent a hazard to health and shall not exceed 
the limits stipulated in Table 2; 
b) be free from parasites which may represent a hazard to health; and 
c) not contain any substance originating from microorganisms in amounts which may represent a hazard 
to health. 
Table 2 — Microbiological limits 
S/N Type of micro -organism  Limits  Method of test  
i) Yeasts and moulds, cfu per g , max.  104  
 
EAS 217  
 ii) Staphylococcus .aureus  cfu per g , max.  103 
iii) Escherichia  coli, per g  Absent  
iv) Salmonella per 25 g  Absent  
 
7 Packaging 
7.1 Dry soybeans shall be packed in suitable packages which shall be clean, sound, free from insect, fungal 
infestation and the pack aging material shall be food grade. 
7.2 Dry soybeans shall be packed in containers which will safeguard the hygienic, nutritional, technological 
and organoleptic qualities of the products. 
7.3 Each package shall contain soybeans of the same type and of the same grade designation. 
7.4  If dry soybeans are presented in bags, the bags shall also be free of pests and contaminants. 
7.5 Each package shall be securely closed and sealed. 
8 Labelling 
8.1 In addition to the requirements in EAS 38, each package shall be legibly and indelibly labelled with the 
following: 
a) product name as ― Dry Soybeans ‖; 
b) variety; 
c) grade; 
d) name, address and physical location of the producer/ packer/importer; 
e) lot/batch/code number; DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD 
© EAC 2013 – All rights reserved  5 
 f) net weight, in k ilograms; 
NOTE EAC partner states are signatory to the International Labour Organizations (ILO) for maximum package weight 
of 50 kg where human loading and offloading is involved. 
g) the de claration ―Food for Human Consumption’’ ; 
h) storage instruction as ―Store in a cool dry place away from any contaminants’’;  
i) crop year; 
j) packing date; 
k) instructions on disposal of used package; 
l) country of origin; and 
m) a declaration on whether the soybeans were genetically modified or not. 
9 Sampling methods 
Sampling shall be done in accordance with the EAS 79/ISO 13690. 
 DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDDRAFT UGANDA STANDARDFDEAS 762:2013    
 
© EAC 2013 – All rights reserved