16280 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
specific dates for the gas dispensing 
rule’s effective and compliance dates, as well as specifying the counties subject to the reporting requirement under the cross-referenced rule are approvable under section 110(l) because they merely clarify the application of the rule and are consistent with the CAA and EPA’s regulations. 
III. Incorporation by Reference 
In this rule, EPA is proposing to 
include in a final EPA rule regulatory 
text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the TDEC Regulation section 1200–03– 18–.24 entitled ‘‘Gasoline Dispensing Facilities-Stage I and II Vapor Recovery’’ effective August 31, 2017. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA 
Region 4 office (please contact the person identified in the 
FOR FURTHER  
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 
preamble for more information). 
IV. Proposed Action 
EPA is proposing to approve 
Tennessee’s November 11, 2017, SIP 
revision consisting of minor revisions to the gasoline dispensing regulations to add clarifying language, effective and compliance dates and to specify counties subject to reporting requirements under the cross-referenced rule. The revision changes TDEC Regulation 1200–03–18–.24, Gasoline Dispensing Facilities-Stage I and II Vapor Recovery, to provide greater clarity as to the application of the rule and the start and finish dates, as well as specifying which counties are subject to reporting requirements. EPA is proposing this approval because the Agency has made the preliminary determination that the revision is consistent with the CAA and with EPA’s regulations. 
V. Statutory and Executive Order 
Reviews 
Under the CAA, the Administrator is 
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: •Is not a significant regulatory action 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); 
•Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866. 
•Does not impose an information 
collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 
•Is certified as not having a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 
•Does not contain any unfunded 
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 
•Does not have Federalism 
implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); 
•Is not an economically significant 
regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 
•Is not a significant regulatory action 
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); 
•Is not subject to requirements of 
section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and 
•Does not provide EPA with the 
discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 
The SIP is not approved to apply on 
any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. 
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 
Environmental protection, Air 
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 
Dated: April 2, 2018. 
Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III, 
Regional Administrator, Region 4. 
[FR Doc. 2018–07748 Filed 4–13–18; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 
National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration 
49 CFR Part 571 
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0036] 
RIN 2127–AL05 
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 
Standards; Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages 
AGENCY : National Highway Traffic 
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). 
ACTION : Notification of availability of 
technical reports. 
SUMMARY : This notification announces 
the availability of documents supplementing NHTSA’s March 2015 Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (SNPRM) to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 210, ‘‘Seat belt assembly anchorages.’’ The SNPRM proposed an alternative test procedure that would maintain the current FMVSS No. 210 body blocks and specify zones for the placement of the blocks at preload. The agency has conducted additional research since the publication of the SNPRM. This notification announces the docketing and availability of this research. 
DATES : The documents referenced in 
this notification will be available in the docket as of April 16, 2018. 
ADDRESSES : You may submit comments 
to the docket number identified in the heading of this document by any of the following methods: 
•Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
online instructions for submitting comments. 
•Mail: Docket Management Facility, 
M–30, U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. 
•Hand Delivery or Courier: West 
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. 
•Fax: 202–493–2251. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:47 Apr 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16APP1.SGM 16APP1daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS16281 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2018 / Proposed Rules 
Regardless of how you submit your 
comments, you should state the docket 
number of this document. 
You may call the Docket at 202–366– 
9826. 
Instructions: For detailed instructions 
on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public Participation heading of the Supplementary Information section of this document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any 
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act discussion below. 
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search 
the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78). 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Ms. 
Carla Rush, Office of Crashworthiness Standards, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202–366–4583, fax 202–493– 2739). 
Mr. John Piazza, Office of the Chief 
Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202–366–2992, fax 202–366– 3820). 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
On March 30, 2012, the agency 
published in the Federal Register a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) (77 FR 19155) that proposed to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 210, ‘‘Seat belt assembly anchorages,’’ to replace the current pelvic body block and the upper torso body block with a new Force Application Device (FAD). The rationale provided for the proposal included the FAD’s ease of use, that it is representative of the human form, and that it provides a consistent test configuration and load path to the seat belt assembly anchorages without affecting the stringency of the compliance test. 
The agency received a number of 
comments on the NPRM that raised issues concerning the feasibility of the FAD proposal. In light of those comments, NHTSA published a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (SNPRM) on March 2, 2015 (80 FR 11148). The SNPRM proposed, as an alternative to the FAD proposed in the NPRM, to maintain the current FMVSS No. 210 body blocks and specify ‘‘zones’’ for the preload placement of the body blocks. In the SNPRM, the agency noted that it had initiated research to aid in the development of the zones bounding the initial placement for the current body blocks. This research has now been completed. 
The agency is docketing a variety of 
research reports. This research falls into three categories. The first category is additional research tests on passenger vehicles in order to evaluate the performance of the FAD in comparison to the body blocks in the same vehicle. The second category is research and testing performed to establish practical, repeatable, and validated zones for initial positioning (at preload) of the current FMVSS No. 210 body blocks (‘‘Development of Positioning Zones for FMVSS No. 210 Body Blocks’’). The third category is testing of the proposed FAD on buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) (Report Nos. 207/210–MGA–2013–001 and 207/210– MGA–2013–002). The objective of this testing was to determine whether the proposed FAD affects the stringency of FMVSS No. 210 compliance tests on heavy duty vehicle seats and to assess how the FAD performs in these tests. 
How do I prepare and submit 
comments? 
Your comments must be written and 
in English. To ensure that your comments are correctly filed in the docket, please include the docket number of this document in your comments. 
Your comments must not be more 
than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21). We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length of the attachments. 
Comments may also be submitted to 
the docket electronically by logging into http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
online instructions for submitting comments. 
Please note that pursuant to the Data 
Quality Act, in order for substantive data to be relied upon and used by the agency, it must meet the information quality standards set forth in the OMB and DOT Data Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you to consult the guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB’s guidelines may be accessed at http://www.whitehouse.gov/ omb/fedreg/reproducible.html. How can I be sure that my comments 
were received? 
If you wish DOT’s Docket 
Management Facility to notify you upon its receipt of your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, the Docket Management Facility will return the postcard by mail. 
How do I submit confidential business 
information? 
If you wish to submit any information 
under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete submission, including the information you claim to be confidential business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given above under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION  
CONTACT . In addition, you should 
submit two copies, from which you have deleted the claimed confidential business information, to Docket Management at the address given above under 
ADDRESSES . When you send a 
comment containing information claimed to be confidential business information, you should include a cover letter setting forth the information specified in our confidential business information regulation. (49 CFR part 512.) 
How can I read the comments 
submitted by other people? 
You may read the comments at DOT’s 
Docket Management Facility at the address given above under 
ADDRESSES . 
The hours of the facility are indicated above in the same location. You may also see the comments on the internet. To read the comments on the internet, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets. 
Authority: delegation of authority at 49 
CFR 1.95 and 501.8. 
Raymond R. Posten, 
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. 
[FR Doc. 2018–07132 Filed 4–13–18; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:32 Apr 13, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\16APP1.SGM 16APP1daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS