73721 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Notices 
domestic swine that can spread rapidly 
in swine populations with extremely high rates of morbidity and mortality. A list of regions where ASF exists or is reasonably believed to exist is maintained on the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/ aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal- and-animal-product-import- information/animal-health-status-of- regions/. This list is referenced in 
§ 94.8(a)(2) of the regulations. 
Section 94.8(a)(3) of the regulations 
state that APHIS will add a region to the list referenced in § 94.8(a)(2) upon determining ASF exists in the region, based on reports APHIS receives of outbreaks of the disease from veterinary officials of the exporting country, from the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), or from other sources the Administrator determines to be reliable, or upon determining that there is reason to believe the disease exists in the region. Section 94.8(a)(1) of the regulations specifies the criteria on which the Administrator bases the reason to believe ASF exists in a region. Section 94.8(b) prohibits the importation of pork and pork products from regions listed in accordance with § 94.8 except if processed and treated in accordance with the provisions specified in that section or consigned to an APHIS-approved establishment for further processing. Section 96.2 restricts the importation of swine casings that originated in or were processed in a region where ASF exists, as listed under § 94.8(a). 
APHIS added the Dominican Republic 
to the list of regions where ASF exists or is reasonably believed to exist on July 28, 2021, following notification by the Dominican Republic of samples obtained from swine that had tested positive for ASF. On July 29, 2021, the veterinary authorities of the Dominican Republic reported to the OIE the occurrence of ASF in that country. This notice serves as an official record and public notification of the APHIS action. 
As a result, pork and pork products 
from the Dominican Republic, including casings, are subject to APHIS import restrictions designed to mitigate the risk of ASF introduction into the United States, effective July 28, 2021. 
Congressional Review Act 
Pursuant to the Congressional Review 
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this action as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1633, 7701–7772, 
7781–7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 
2.22, 2.80, and 371.4. 
Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of 
December 2021. 
Mark Davidson, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant 
Health Inspection Service. 
[FR Doc. 2021–28054 Filed 12–27–21; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 
Food Safety and Inspection Service 
[Docket No. FSIS–2021–0001] 
Eligibility of Lithuania to Export Egg 
Products to the United States 
AGENCY : Food Safety and Inspection 
Service, USDA. 
ACTION : Notice and request for 
comments. 
SUMMARY : The Food Safety and 
Inspection Service (FSIS) is announcing that it intends to list Lithuania as a country eligible to export egg products to the United States. FSIS has reviewed Lithuania’s laws, regulations, and documents concerning their egg products inspection system, audited the system as implemented, and determined that Lithuania’s egg products inspection system is equivalent to the system that the United States has established under the Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA) and its implementing regulations. Should FSIS make a final determination to list Lithuania as eligible to ship egg products to the United States, only egg products produced in certified Lithuanian establishments would be eligible for export to the United States. All such products would continue to be subject to re-inspection at U.S. points- of-entry by FSIS inspectors. FSIS is requesting comment before it makes a final determination concerning Lithuania’s equivalence for egg products. FSIS will announce its final determination in a subsequent Federal Register notice. 
DATES : Comments must be received on 
or before February 28, 2022. 
ADDRESSES : FSIS invites interested 
persons to submit comments on this notice. Comments may be submitted by 
any of the following methods: 
•Federal eRulemaking Portal: This 
website provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on this web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the on-line instructions at that site for submitting comments. 
•Mail: Send to Docket Clerk, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Mailstop 3758, Washington, DC 20250–3700. 
•Hand- or Courier-Delivered 
Submittals: Deliver to 1400 
Independence Avenue SW, Jamie L. Whitten Building, Room 350–E, Washington, DC 20250–3700. 
Instructions: All items submitted by 
mail or electronic mail must include the Agency name and docket number FSIS– 2021–0001. Comments received in response to this docket will be made available for public inspection and posted without change, including any personal information, to https://www.regulations.gov. 
Docket: For access to background 
documents or comments received, call (202) 205–0495 to schedule a time to visit the FSIS Docket Room at 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–3700. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Rachel Edelstein, Assistant Administrator, Office of Policy and Program Development, telephone (202) 205–0495. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Background 
FSIS is announcing that it intends to 
list Lithuania as a country eligible to export egg products to the United States. Lithuania is currently eligible to export processed beef and pork to the United States. 
Statutory and Regulatory Basis for 
Action 
The EPIA prohibits the importation of 
egg products capable of use as human food into the United States unless they were processed under an approved inspection system of the government of the foreign country of origin and are labeled and packaged in accordance with, and otherwise comply with, the standards of the Act and regulations issued thereunder applicable to such articles within the United States (21 U.S.C. 1046(a)(2)). The regulatory requirements for foreign countries to become eligible to export egg products to the United States are provided in 9 CFR 590.910(a). 
Section 590.910(a) requires a foreign 
country’s inspection system to be authorized by a legal authority that imposes requirements equivalent to those of the United States, specifically with respect to labeling, packaging, sanitation, processing, facility requirements, and Government inspection. The foreign country’s inspection system must ensure that establishments preparing egg products for export to the United States comply 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:45 Dec 27, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES73722 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Notices 
1The SRT template can be found on the FSIS 
website at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/ 
files/import/srt.pdf. with requirements equivalent to those of 
the EPIA and the regulations promulgated by FSIS under the authority of that statute. The foreign country is required to certify establishments as having met the required standards and to notify FSIS of those establishments that are either certified or removed from certification. 
Before the foreign country can export 
egg products to the United States, FSIS needs to evaluate the country’s inspection system for egg products to determine whether it is equivalent to FSIS’, and therefore, eligible to export egg products to the United States. This evaluation consists of two processes: A document review and an on-site review. The document review is an evaluation of the laws, regulations, and other 
written materials used by the country to effect its inspection program (9 CFR 327.2(a)(2)(iii), 381.196(a)(2)(iii), and 590.910(a)). FSIS requests that countries provide information about their inspection systems through the Self Reporting Tool (SRT).
1The SRT is a 
standardized questionnaire that FSIS provides to foreign governments to gather information that characterizes foreign inspection systems. Through the SRT, FSIS collects information on practices and procedures in six areas, known as equivalence components: (1) Government Oversight (e.g., Organization and Administration, Enforcement Authority, Government Inspection Personnel-Training/Staffing), (2) Government Verification of Food Safety and Other Consumer Protection Requirements (e.g., Humane Handling, 
Ante-Mortem Inspection, Post-Mortem Inspection, Product Standards and Labeling), (3) Government Sanitation Verification, (4) Government Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems Verification, (5) Government Chemical Residue Programs, and (6) Government Microbiological Pathogen and Process Control Programs. FSIS evaluates the information submitted to verify that the critical points in the six equivalence components are addressed satisfactorily with respect to standards, activities, resources, and enforcement. If the document review is satisfactory, an on- site review is scheduled using a multidisciplinary team to evaluate all aspects of the country’s inspection program. This comprehensive process is described more fully on the FSIS website at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/ inspection/import-export/equivalence. FSIS regulations (9 CFR 590.910(b)) 
provide that a list of countries eligible 
to export egg products to the United States be maintained at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/importlibrary. Once 
listed, the government of an eligible country certifies to FSIS that establishments that wish to export egg products to the United States are operating under requirements equivalent to those of the United States. To verify that products imported into the United States are not adulterated or misbranded, FSIS reinspects all product imported under FSIS jurisdiction and samples a subset of those products for pathogens and residues at points-of- entry before they enter U.S. commerce, as discussed in more detail below. 
Evaluation of Lithuania’s Egg Products 
Inspection System 
In November 2014, the government of 
Lithuania requested approval to export egg products to the United States. FSIS conducted a document review of Lithuania’s egg products inspection system and concluded, on the basis of that review, that Lithuania’s laws, regulations, control programs, and procedures were equivalent to those of the United States. 
Accordingly, from October 24, 2016, 
to November 2, 2016, FSIS proceeded with an on-site audit of Lithuania’s egg products inspection system to verify that Lithuania’s State Food and Veterinary Service (SFVS), the central competent authority (CCA) in charge of food inspection, effectively implemented an egg products inspection system equivalent to that of the United States. FSIS audited the SFVS headquarters, one territorial office, and one local inspection office, the single establishment that was to be certified to export egg products to the United States, and the National Food and Veterinary Risk Assessment 
Institute (NFVRAI), the national government laboratory. During the visit, the establishment was not producing egg products for export to the United States. However, the FSIS auditor was able to conduct observations of SFVS’s inspection at the establishment and to verify information that was provided during the document review. 
The 2016 on-site audit of Lithuania’s 
egg products inspection system found that SFVS was unable to demonstrate adequate government oversight regarding implementation and verification of its sanitation requirements as evidenced by the establishment’s failure to conduct candling procedures and washing, sanitizing, and drying dirty eggs. The FSIS auditors observed that dirty eggs were in direct contact with each other 
and other eggs on the conveyor and that the establishment’s employees were not removing those eggs prior to the breaking operation. In addition, the FSIS auditors observed after the breaking step an accumulation of intact shell eggs or large fragments of broken shells in the egg products containers, resulting in direct product contamination. Lastly, FSIS auditors observed beaded condensate, dust on overhead structures, and pooling water on the establishment’s floor. SFVS responded with its proposed corrective actions for the deficiencies identified during the 2016 audit. 
On April 25, 2017, FSIS sent its audit 
report to SFVS. In the letter accompanying the report, FSIS advised SFVS that as the next step in the review process, the Agency would evaluate SFVS’s proposed corrective actions identified during the 2016 audit and would schedule a verification audit in the near future. Additionally, after further assessment of the country’s written program, FSIS determined that Lithuania needed to submit updated supporting documentation and to clarify some of the information previously provided to FSIS as part of its initial equivalence request for egg products. Throughout 2018 and 2019, the SFVS continued to provide supporting documents in response to FSIS requests. 
From July 15 to July 24, 2019, FSIS 
conducted an on-site audit to verify whether the food safety system governing egg products was implemented as described in the FSIS SRT and is effective in providing an equivalent level of public health protection as achieved in the United States. Specifically, the audit was intended to determine whether Lithuania’s corrective actions in response to the prior findings were implemented and effective. FSIS audited the SFVS headquarters, two territorial offices, and four local inspection offices, and the one establishment that was to be certified to export egg products to the United States. 
The FSIS auditors found that the 
corrective actions for the 2016 Government Sanitation component findings were implemented and effective in resolving the findings. However, they also determined that the 
2016 Government Oversight finding was not resolved and that SFVS was still unable to demonstrate adequate government oversight regarding implementation and verification of its egg products requirements. For example, the government inspection personnel failed to identify several deficiencies at the establishment and 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:45 Dec 27, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES73723 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Notices 
could not explain how the egg products 
pasteurization records presented during the audit supported that pasteurization requirements were met. The FSIS auditors also identified that the establishment was not able to produce a current calibration certificate for one flow rate probe used during the pasteurization process and was not monitoring and documenting product temperature during heat treatment of each lot of dried whites at a supportable frequency. Furthermore, the auditors found that the government inspectors had not identified these noncompliances. 
Also, during the 2019 audit, the FSIS 
auditors observed multiple blood spots on the yolks of multiple eggs with no actions taken by the official government veterinarians or establishment personnel to remove the blood spots or reject the affected egg products. FSIS auditors also identified blocks of yeast used in the fermentation of egg products stored in a refrigerator without any labeling indicating the actual product contents. SFVS responded to FSIS with its corrective actions to the identified deficiencies. 
FSIS sent its audit report to SFVS on 
January 7, 2020. SFVS addressed the FSIS audit findings through corrective action plans presented to FSIS on February 14, 2020 and September 10, 2020. Specifically, veterinarians who perform inspections in egg products establishments were introduced to the FSIS audit findings and the SFVS conducted training on FSIS’ egg products training program. The SFVS revised the working procedures to incorporate corrective actions to the audit findings, including instructions on pasteurization requirements. As part of the corrective action plan, the audited egg products establishment installed new pasteurization equipment and an inedible egg rejection system and purchased a replacement flow meter to have on-site while one is being calibrated. The SFVS established requirements for the establishments to include a once per year calibration frequency into their equipment control program and to label every package of yeast indicating the original name, product manufacturer, shelf life, lot number, and weight. Lithuania also provided documentary evidence to demonstrate adequate function of newly installed equipment and for government inspection activities verifying implementation of corrective actions. FSIS evaluated the corrective action plans and Lithuania’s inspection verification activities, based on the 
information Lithuania submitted, and determined that Lithuania had satisfactorily addressed all the audit 
findings and was able to meet FSIS requirements and equivalence criteria related to all six components. 
On October 29, 2020, FSIS published 
the final rule, Egg Products Inspection Regulations (85 FR 68640). The rule established new requirements for official plants that process egg products to develop and implement Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) and Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (Sanitation SOPs) and to meet other requirements, including sanitation performance standards, consistent with FSIS’ meat and poultry regulations. On April 15, 2021, FSIS sent a letter to SFVS notifying it of the policy changes and explaining that some requirements for foreign countries had taken effect on December 28, 2020. The letter also stated that the Sanitation SOP requirements would become effective on October 29, 2021, while the HACCP requirements would take effect on October 31, 2022. 
On May 17, 2021, Lithuania provided 
FSIS with documentation that outlined the changes that were made to the SFVS’ egg products inspection system to achieve equivalence with the revised U.S. regulations related to the requirements for establishments to develop and implement HACCP and Sanitation SOPs, including sanitation performance standards. FSIS conducted a document review of SFVS’s updated operating procedure and has determined that Lithuania’s egg products inspection system is equivalent with the new U.S. regulatory requirements for sanitation and HACCP described in the October 29, 2020 final rule. 
In summary, FSIS has completed the 
document review, on-site audit, follow- up audits with verification of corrective actions as part of the equivalence process and determined that all outstanding issues have been resolved. FSIS has concluded that, as implemented, Lithuania’s inspection 
system for egg products is equivalent to that of the United States. All audit reports on Lithuania’s egg products inspection system can be found on the FSIS website at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/inspection/import- export/international-reports/foreign- audit-reports. 
At this time, Lithuania intends to 
certify one establishment as eligible to export egg products to the United States. After considering comments in response to this notice, should FSIS make a final determination that Lithuania maintains an equivalent inspection system, FSIS will publish a subsequent Federal Register notice announcing that Lithuania is eligible to export egg products to the United States. In addition, the government of Lithuania would need to certify to FSIS those establishments that wish to export egg products to the United States and that operate in accordance with requirements equivalent to that of the United States (9 CFR 590.510(a)). FSIS would verify that the establishments certified by Lithuania’s government are meeting the United States requirements through additional verification audits of Lithuania’s egg products inspection system. Although a foreign country may be listed on FSIS’ website as eligible to export egg products to the United States, the exporting country’s products must be found to comply with all other applicable requirements of the United States. Accordingly, egg products exported from Lithuania would be subject to re-inspection at U.S. points- of-entry for, but not limited to, transportation damage, product and container defects, labeling, proper certification, general condition, and accurate count. In addition, FSIS would conduct other types of re-inspection activities, such as taking product samples for laboratory analysis for the detection of chemical residues and pathogens for a subset of Lithuania’s egg products imported into the United States. Products that pass re-inspection would be stamped with the official mark of inspection and allowed to enter U.S. commerce. If they do not meet U.S. requirements, they would be refused entry and within 45 days would be exported to the country of origin, destroyed, or converted to animal food (subject to approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration), depending on the violation. 
Economic Impact Analysis 
As explained above, FSIS intends to 
list Lithuania as a country eligible to 
export egg products to the United States. Given the limited market in the United States for Lithuania’s egg products and Lithuania’s projected low export volume, there is likely to be little, if any, impact on the United States economy. 
In comparison to the United States, 
Lithuania is a low volume egg products producer with limited capacity to export egg products. Between 2015 and 2019, Lithuania had an annual average of 3.2 million egg laying hens that produced 55,300 tons of eggs, of which approximately 50,800 tons were consumed within Lithuania. The remaining eggs were exported mainly to the European Union, of which Lithuania is a member. Of these exports, approximately 17.2 percent were in the 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:45 Dec 27, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES73724 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 28, 2021 / Notices 
2Detailed data on Lithuanian egg products is 
limited. We use the available egg data to estimate 
the potential amount of egg products Lithuania would be able to export to the United States. Lithuania’s production, trade and consumptions data are based on the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO, 2021) Food Balance Sheet: Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS. The maximum 
expected exports potential is based on production plus imports minus consumption and assuming zero ending stock. FSIS calculated 17.2 percent as a five-year average based on 2015–19 FAO data. 
3Noted that FSIS has jurisdiction over only some 
egg products, not all. 
4U.S. Chicken Layers Inventory are based on 
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) data for July 1st each year from 2015–19. The data were accessed from the USDA/NASS Quick Stats at: https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/ results/53032069-6FCE-3AA2-99E7- B33E1C1AD8F2. 
5U.S. Production and Consumption Data 
accessed from USDA/World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE): https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/ 3t945q76s?locale=en. WASDE’s egg data are 
published in dozen; FSIS converted these data into tons using Grade A Large Egg Weight based on USDA/Agricultural Marketing Service conversion rate: Accessed from https://www.ams.usda.gov/ sites/default/files/media/Shell_ Egg_
Standard%5B1%5D.pdf. 
6U.S. Import and Export Data accessed from 
USDA Foreign Agricultural Service: Global Agricultural Trade System: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/GATS/default.aspx. Egg products 
are based on Harmonized System (HS) codes 040811, 040819, 040891, 040899, 350211, and 350219. form of egg products.2As such, FSIS 
estimates the total potential egg 
products available for export to be approximately 3,200 tons
3(17.2 percent 
of 18,800 tons). Assuming that the European Union will continue to be Lithuania’s largest trading partner, the amount of egg products to be exported to the U.S. is likely to be less than 3,200 tons. 
From 2015 to 2019, the U.S. had an 
annual average of 375 million egg laying hens
4that produced 6.6 million tons of 
eggs, of which approximately 5.6 million tons were consumed domestically.
5While the U.S. imports 
around 11,200 tons of egg products annually, it is a net exporter of egg products.
6 
With only one establishment 
intending to export egg products to the U.S., Lithuanian egg products exports volume to the U.S. are likely to be low in comparison to the total U.S. egg products market and are expected to have little or no effect on U.S. egg products supplies or their prices. U.S. consumers, however, are expected to enjoy more choices when purchasing egg products. 
Effect on Small Businesses 
The FSIS Administrator has made a 
preliminary determination that this 
notice will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities, as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601). The trade volume is expected to have little or no effect on all U.S. establishments, regardless of size. 
Additional Public Notification 
Public awareness of all segments of 
rulemaking and policy development is 
important. Consequently, FSIS will announce this Federal Register publication on-line through the FSIS website located at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/policy/federal- register-rulemaking. FSIS will also 
announce and provide a link to it through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal Register notices, 
FSIS public meetings, and other types of information that could affect or would be of interest to our constituents and 
stakeholders. The Constituent Update is available on the FSIS web page. Through the web page, FSIS is able to provide information to a much broader, more diverse audience. In addition, FSIS offers an email subscription service which provides automatic and customized access to selected food safety news and information. This service is available at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/subscribe. Options 
range from recalls to export information, regulations, directives, and notices. Customers can add or delete subscriptions themselves and have the option to password protect their accounts. 
Congressional Review Act 
Pursuant to the Congressional Review 
Act at 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this notice is not a ‘‘major rule,’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement 
In accordance with Federal civil 
rights law and U.S. Department of 
Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/ parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing 
deadlines vary by program or incident. 
Persons with disabilities who require 
alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large 
print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. 
To file a program discrimination 
complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD– 3027, found online at https://www.usda.gov/oascr/how-to-file-a- program-discrimination-complaint and 
at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632–9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410; (2) fax: (202) 690–7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 
Paul Kiecker, 
Administrator. 
[FR Doc. 2021–28119 Filed 12–27–21; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P 
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 
Food and Nutrition Service Agency Information Collection 
Activities: Family Day Care Home (FDCH) Participation Study 
AGENCY : Food and Nutrition Service 
(FNS), USDA. 
ACTION : Notice. 
SUMMARY : In accordance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment on this proposed information collection. This collection is a New collection for the Family Day Care Home (FDCH) Participation Study. 
DATES : Written comments must be 
received on or before February 28, 2022. 
ADDRESSES : Comments may be sent to: 
Chanhatasilpa Chanchalat, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1320 Braddock Place, 5th floor, Alexandria, VA 22314. Comments may also be submitted via email to chanchalat.chanhatasilpa@usda.gov, 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:45 Dec 27, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES