70762 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices 
8415–01–623–5237—M–XXS 
8415–01–623–5525—M–XS 8415–01–623–5526—M–S 8415–01–623–5528—M–R 8415–01–623–5529—M–L 8415–01–623–5534—M–XL 8415–01–623–5537—M–XXL 8415–01–623–5541—L–XXS 8415–01–623–5542—L–XS 8415–01–623–5543—L–S 8415–01–623–5552—L–R 8415–01–623–5553—L–L 8415–01–623–5554—L–XL 8415–01–623–5557—L–XXL 8415–01–623–5740—XL–XXS 8415–01–623–5742—XL–XS 8415–01–623–5789—XL–S 8415–01–623–5790—XL–R 8415–01–623–5793—XL–L 8415–01–623–5795—XL–XL. 8415–01–623–5796—XL–XXL 8415–01–623–5797—XXL–R 8415–01–623–5801—XXL–L 8415–01–623–5803—XXL–XL 8415–01–623–5805—XXL–XXL 
Mandatory Source(s) of Supply: Industries of 
the Blind, Inc., Greensboro, NC 
Mississippi Industries for the Blind, 
Jackson, MS 
San Antonio Lighthouse for the Blind, San 
Antonio, TX 
Mandatory Purchase for: U.S. Army for up to 
200,000 ACU Coats for a period of one year 
Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics 
Agency Troop Support, Philadelphia, PA 
Distribution: C-List 
Barry S. Lineback, 
Director, Business Operations. 
[FR Doc. 2015–28922 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P 
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM 
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED 
Procurement List; Addition and 
Deletion 
AGENCY : Committee for Purchase From 
People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled. 
ACTION : Addition to and deletion from 
the Procurement List. 
SUMMARY : This action adds a service to 
the Procurement List that will be provided by nonprofit agency employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities, and deletes a service from the Procurement List previously furnished by such agency. 
DATES : Effective Date: 12/16/2015. 
ADDRESSES : Committee for Purchase 
From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 715, Arlington, Virginia 22202–4149. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703) 603–0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Addition 
On 10/2/2015 (80 FR 59740–59741), 
the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice of proposed addition to the Procurement List. 
After consideration of the material 
presented to it concerning capability of qualified nonprofit agency to provide the service and impact of the additions on the current or most recent contractors, the Committee has determined that the service listed below is suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 8501–8506 and 41 CFR 51–2.4. 
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 
I certify that the following action will 
not have a significant impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. The major factors considered for this certification were: 
1. The action will not result in any 
additional reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other than the small organization that will furnish the service to the Government. 
2. The action will result in 
authorizing small entities to furnish the service to the Government. 
3. There are no known regulatory 
alternatives which would accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner- O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 8501–8506) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the Procurement List. 
End of Certification 
Accordingly, the following service is 
added to the Procurement List: 
Service 
Service Type: Landscaping Service 
Service is Mandatory for: GSA PBS Region 1, 
John F. Kennedy Federal Building, 25 New Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 
Mandatory Source of Supply: Work, 
Incorporated, Dorchester, MA 
Contracting Activity: GSA/Public Buildings 
Service, Boston, MA 
Deletion 
On 10/2/2015 (80 FR 59740–59741), 
the Committee for Purchase From 
People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice of proposed deletion from the Procurement List. 
After consideration of the relevant 
matter presented, the Committee has determined that the service listed below is no longer suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 8501–8506 and 41 CFR 51–2.4. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 
I certify that the following action will 
not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors considered for this certification were: 
1. The action will not result in 
additional reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities. 
2. The action may result in 
authorizing small entities to furnish the service to the Government. 
3. There are no known regulatory 
alternatives which would accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner- O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 8501–8506) in connection with the service deleted from the Procurement List. 
End of Certification 
Accordingly, the following service is 
deleted from the Procurement List: 
Service 
Service Type: Custodial Service 
Service is Mandatory for: Isle Royale National 
Park & Ranger III Vessel, 800 East Lakeshore Drive, Houghton, MI 
Mandatory Source of Supply: Goodwill 
Industries of Northern Wisconsin & Upper Michigan, Inc., Marinette, WI 
Contracting Activity: National Park Service, 
MWR Regional Contracting, Omaha, NE 
Barry S. Lineback, 
Director, Business Operations. 
[FR Doc. 2015–28923 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P 
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 
COMMISSION 
[Docket No. CPSC–2010–0038] 
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Third Party Testing of Children’s Products 
AGENCY : Consumer Product Safety 
Commission. 
ACTION : Notice. 
SUMMARY : As required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) requests comments on a proposed extension of approval of a collection of information for Third Party Testing of Children’s Products, approved previously under OMB Control No. 3041–0159. The Commission will consider all comments received in response to this notice before requesting an extension of this collection of information from the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’). 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES70763 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices 
DATES : Submit written or electronic 
comments on the collection of 
information by January 15, 2016. 
ADDRESSES : You may submit comments, 
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2010– 0038, by any of the following methods: 
Electronic Submissions: Submit 
electronic comments to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. The Commission does not accept comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through www.regulations.gov. The Commission encourages you to submit electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described above. 
Written Submissions: Submit written 
submissions by mail/hand delivery/courier to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504–7923. 
Instructions: All submissions received 
must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted without change, including any personal identifiers, contact information, or other personal information provided, to: http://www.regulations.gov . Do not 
submit confidential business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information that you do not want to be available to the public. If furnished at all, such information should be submitted in writing. 
Docket: For access to the docket to 
read background documents or comments received, go to: http://www.regulations.gov, and insert the 
docket number CPSC–2010–0038, into the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the prompts. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504–7815, or by email to: rsquibb@cpsc.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : CPSC 
seeks to renew the following currently approved collection of information: 
Title: Third Party Testing of 
Children’s Products. 
OMB Number: 3041–0159. 
Type of Review: Renewal of collection 
for third party testing of children’s 
products and inclusion of the previously approved burden for marking and labeling of durable infant and toddler products into this collection of information. General Description of Collection 
Testing and Certification: On 
November 8, 2011, the Commission issued two rules for implementing third party testing and certification of children’s products, as required by section 14 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (‘‘CPSA’’): 
•Testing and Labeling Pertaining to 
Product Certification (76 FR 69482, codified at 16 CFR part 1107; ‘‘the testing rule’’); and 
•Conditions and Requirements for 
Relying on Component Part Testing or Certification, or Another Party’s Finished Product Testing or Certification to Meet Testing and Certification Requirements (76 FR 69547, codified at 16 CFR part 1109; ‘‘the component part rule’’). 
The testing rule establishes 
requirements for manufacturers to conduct initial third party testing and certification of children’s products, testing when there has been a material change in the product, continuing testing (periodic testing), and guarding against undue influence. A final rule on Representative Samples for Periodic Testing of Children’s Products (77 FR 72205, Dec. 5, 2012) amended the testing rule to require that representative samples be selected for periodic testing of children’s products. 
The component part rule is a 
companion to the testing rule that is intended to reduce third party testing burdens by providing all parties involved in the required testing and certifying of children’s products the flexibility to conduct or rely upon testing where it is the easiest and least expensive. Certification of a children’s product can be based upon one or more of the following: (a) Component part testing; (b) component part certification; (c) another party’s finished product testing; or (d) another party’s finished product certification. 
Records required by the testing rule 
and the rule on selecting representative samples appear in 16 CFR 1107.26. Required records include a certificate, and records documenting third party testing and related sampling plans. These requirements largely overlap the recordkeeping requirements in the component part rule, codified at 16 CFR 1109.5(g). Duplicate recordkeeping is not required; records need to be created and maintained only once to meet the applicable recordkeeping requirements. The component part rule also requires records that enable tracing a product or component back to the entity that had a product tested for compliance, and also requires attestations of due care to ensure test result integrity. Section 104 Rules: The Commission 
has issued 14 rules for durable infant 
and toddler products under section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (‘‘CPSIA’’) (‘‘section 104 rules’’). Section 104 rules issued to date appear in Table 1. Each section 104 rule contains requirements for marking, labeling, and instructional literature: 
•Each product and the shipping 
container must have a permanent label or marking that identifies the name and address (city, state, and zip code) of the manufacturer, distributor, or seller. 
•A permanent code mark or other 
product identification shall be provided on the infant carrier and its package or shipping container, if multiple packaging is used. The code will identify the date (month and year) of manufacture and permit future identification of any given model. 
Each standard also requires products to 
include easy-to-read and understand instructions regarding assembly, maintenance, cleaning, use, and adjustments, where applicable. 
OMB has assigned control numbers 
for the estimated burden to comply with marking and labeling requirements in each section 104 rule. With this renewal, CPSC is moving the marking and labeling burden requirements for section 104 rules into the collection of information for Third Party Testing of Children’s Products. The paperwork 
burdens associated with the section 104 rules are appropriately included in the collection for Third Party Testing of Children’s Products because all of the section 104 products are also required to be third party tested. Having all of the burden hours under one collection for children’s products provides one OMB control number and eases the administrative burden of renewing multiple collections. CPSC will discontinue using the OMB control numbers currently assigned to individual section 104 rules. The discontinued OMB control numbers are listed in Table 1. 
Frequency of Response: On occasion. 
Affected Public: Manufacturers and 
importers of children’s products subject 
to a children’s product safety rule. 
Estimated Number of Respondents 
Testing and Certification: CPSC 
reviewed every category in the NAICS 
and selected categories that included firms that could manufacture or sell any consumer product that could be covered by a consumer product safety rule. Using data from the U.S. Census Bureau, we determined that there were approximately 34,000 manufacturers, about 77,000 wholesalers, and about 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES70764 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices 
133,000 retailers in these categories. 
However, these categories also include many non-children’s products, which are not covered by any children’s product safety rules. Therefore, these numbers would constitute an 
overestimate of the number of firms that are subject to the recordkeeping requirements. Section 104 Rules: Table 1 
summarizes the durable infant and 
toddler products subject to the marking and labeling requirements being moved into OMB control number 3041–0159. 
TABLE 1—E STIMATED BURDEN FOR MARKING AND LABELING IN SECTION 104 R ULES  
Discontinued OMB Control No. 16 CFR part Description Mfrs. Models Total respond-
ent hours 
3041–0145 ........................................ 1215 Safety Standard for Infant Bath 
Seats.7 2 14 
3041–0141 ........................................ 1216 Safety Standard for Infant Walkers .. 16 4 64 
3041–0150 ........................................ 1217 Safety Standard for Toddler Beds ... 78 10 780 
3041–0157 ........................................ 1218 Safety Standard for Bassinets and 
Cradles.62 5 310 
3041–0147 ........................................ 1219 Safety Standard for Full-Size Cribs 78 11 858 
3041–0147 ........................................ 1220 Safety Standard for Non-Full-Size 
Cribs.24 4 96 
3041–0152 ........................................ 1221 Safety Standard for Play Yards ....... 31 4 124 
3041–0160 ........................................ 1222 Safety Standard for Infant Bedside 
Sleepers.5 2 10 
3041–0155 ........................................ 1223 Safety Standard for Swings ............. 10 11 110 
3041–0149 ........................................ 1224 Safety Standard for Portable 
Bedrails.17 2 34 
3041–0158 ........................................ 1225 Safety Standard for Hand-Held In-
fant Carriers.71 2 142 
3041–0162 ........................................ 1226 Safety Standard for Soft Infant and 
Toddler Carriers.54 2 108 
3041–0164 ........................................ 1227 Safety Standard for Carriages and 
Strollers.85 8 680 
3041–0166 ........................................ 1230 Safety Standard for Frame Child 
Carriers (not effective until 9/
2016).16 3 48 
Total Burden Hours ................... ........................ ........................................................... ....... ................. ........................ 3,378 
Estimated Time per Response 
Testing and Certification: Based on 
comments received during rulemaking 
for the testing rule, we estimate recordkeeping for approximately 300,000 non-apparel children’s products per year, with an average of 5 hours of recordkeeping burden associated with each product. We also estimate recordkeeping for approximately 1.3 million children’s apparel and footwear products per year, with an average of 3 hours of recordkeeping burden associated with each product. Manufacturers that are required to conduct periodic testing have an additional recordkeeping burden estimated at 4 hours per representative sampling plan. 
Section 104 Rules: Each section 104 
rule contains a similar analysis for marking and labeling that estimates the time to make any necessary changes to marking and labeling requirements at one hour per model. 
Total Estimated Annual Burden 
Testing and Certification: The total 
estimated annual burden for 
recordkeeping associated with the testing rule is 5.4 million hours (300,000 non-apparel children’s products × 5 hours per non-apparel children’s product + 1,300,000 children’s apparel products × 3 hours per children’s 
apparel product = 1.5 million hours + 3.9 million hours, or a total of 5.4 million hours). 
Representative Sampling Plans for 
Periodic Testing: We estimate that if each product line averages 50 individual models or styles, then a total of 32,000 individual representative sampling plans (1.6 million children’s products ÷ 50 models or styles) would 
need to be developed and documented. This would require 128,000 hours (32,000 plans × 4 hours per plan). If 
each product line averages 10 individual models or styles, then a total of 160,000 different representative sampling plans (1.6 million children’s products ÷ 10 models or styles) would 
need to be documented. This would require 640,000 hours (160,000 plans × 4 hours per plan). Accordingly, the requirement to document the basis for selecting representative samples could increase the estimated annual burden by up to 640,000 hours. 
Component Part Testing: The 
component part rule shifts some testing costs and some recordkeeping costs to component part and finished product suppliers because some testing will be performed by these parties rather than by the finished product certifiers (manufacturers and importers). Even if a finished product certifier can rely entirely on component part and finished product suppliers for all required testing, however, the finished product supplier will still have some recordkeeping burden to create and maintain a finished product certificate. Therefore, although the component part testing rule may reduce the total cost of the testing required by the testing and certification rule, the rule increases the estimated annual recordkeeping burden for those who choose to use component part testing. 
Because we do not know how many 
companies participate in component part testing and supply test reports or certifications to other certifiers in the supply chain, we have no concrete data to estimate the recordkeeping and third party disclosure requirements in the component part rule. Likewise, no clear method exists for estimating the number of finished product certifiers who conduct their own component part testing. In the component part rulemaking, we suggested that the recordkeeping burden for the 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES70765 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices 
component part testing rule could 
amount to 10 percent of the burden estimated for the testing and labeling rule. 76 FR 69546, 69579 (Nov. 8, 2011). Currently, we have no basis to change this estimate. 
In addition to recordkeeping, the 
component part rule requires third party 
disclosure of test reports and certificates, if any, to a certifier who intends to rely on such documents to issue its own certificate. Without data, allocation of burden estimation between the recordkeeping and third party disclosure requirements is difficult. However, based on our previous analysis, we continue to estimate that creating and maintaining records 
accounts for approximately 90 percent of the burden, while the third party disclosure burden is much less, perhaps approximately 10 percent. Therefore, if we continue to use the estimate that component part testing will amount to about 10 percent of the burden estimated for the testing rule, then the hour burden of the component part rule is estimated to be about 540,000 hours total annually (10% of 5.4 million hours); allocating 486,000 hours for recordkeeping and 54,000 hours for third party disclosure. 
Section 104 Rules: The burden for 
marking and labeling for each section 104 rule is provided in Table 1. The estimated total number of respondent hours is 3,378. 
Request for Comments 
The Commission solicits written 
comments from all interested persons 
about the proposed renewal of this collection of information. The Commission specifically solicits information relevant to the following topics: 
—Whether the collection of information 
described above is necessary for the 
proper performance of the Commission’s functions, including whether the information would have practical utility; 
—Whether the estimated burden of the 
proposed collection of information is accurate; 
—Whether the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected could be enhanced; and 
—Whether the burden imposed by the 
collection of information could be minimized by use of automated, electronic or other technological collection techniques, or other forms of information technology. Dated: November 9, 2015. 
Todd A. Stevenson, 
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 
Commission. 
[FR Doc. 2015–28845 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
Office of the Secretary 
[Docket ID DoD–2015–OS–0127] 
Privacy Act of 1974; System of 
Records 
AGENCY : Office of the Secretary of 
Defense, DoD. 
ACTION : Notice to alter a System of 
Records. 
SUMMARY : The Office of the Secretary of 
Defense proposes to alter a new system of records, DHRA 10 DoD, entitled ‘‘Defense Sexual Assault Advocate Certification Program’’ to track the certification of SARC and SAPR VAs. Information will be used to review, process, and report on the status of SARC and SAPR VA certification to Congress. 
DATES : Comments will be accepted on or 
before December 16, 2015. This proposed action will be effective the day following the end of the comment period unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 
ADDRESSES : You may submit comments, 
identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods: 
*Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments. 
*Mail: Department of Defense, Office 
of the Deputy Chief Management Officer, Directorate of Oversight and Compliance, Regulatory and Audit Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–9010. 
Instructions: All submissions received 
must include the agency name and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are 
received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Ms. 
Cindy Allard, Chief, OSD/JS Privacy Office, Freedom of Information Directorate, Washington Headquarters Service, 1155 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–1155, or by phone at (571) 372–0461. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The Office 
of the Secretary of Defense notices for systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available from the 
address in 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION  
CONTACT or at http://dpcld.defense. 
gov/. The proposed system report, as 
required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, was submitted on November 4, 2015, to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to paragraph 4c of Appendix I to OMB Circular No. A– 130, ‘‘Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals,’’ dated February 8, 1996 (February 20, 1996, 61 FR 6427). 
Dated: November 10, 2015. 
Aaron Siegel, 
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 
Officer, Department of Defense. 
DHRA 10 DoD 
SYSTEM NAME : 
Defense Sexual Assault Advocate 
Certification Program (July 11, 2012, 77 
FR 40861). 
CHANGES : 
* * * * * 
SYSTEM LOCATION : 
Delete entry and replace with 
‘‘National Organization for Victim Assistance, 510 King Street, Suite 424, Alexandria, VA 22314–3132. 
Back-up: Suntrust Bank, 515 King 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314–3157.’’ 
* * * * * 
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM : 
Delete entry and replace with 
‘‘Applicant’s first name, middle initial, 
and last name; position type (Sexual Assault Response Coordinator (SARC) or Sexual Assault Prevention Representative Victim Advocate (SAPR VA)); Service/DoD affiliation and status; grade/rank; installation/command; work email address and telephone number; official military address of applicant and applicant’s SARC (commanding officer, street, city, state, ZIP code, country); position level (Level I, II, III, or IV); certificates of training; date of application; verification of sexual assault victim advocacy experience (position, dates, hours, supervisor; name, title, and work telephone number of verifier); evaluation of sexual assault victim experience (description of 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES