35661 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 
ELT other than a Model AK–450–( ) and AK– 
451–( ) series ELT produced by Ameri-King Corporation. 
(j) Optional Terminating Action 
Doing the applicable action specified in 
paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD terminates 
the actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD. 
(1) For aircraft required by operating 
regulations to be equipped with an ELT: Replace the ELT with a serviceable FAA- approved ELT as specified in paragraph (i) of this AD (‘‘Definition of Serviceable FAA- approved ELT’’). 
(2) For aircraft not required by operating 
regulations to be equipped with an ELT: Replace the ELT with a serviceable FAA- approved ELT as specified in paragraph (i) of this AD (‘‘Definition of Serviceable FAA- approved ELT’’). The ELT may be removed as an alternative to the ELT replacement; if an ELT is re-installed, it must be a serviceable ELT as specified in paragraph (i) of this AD (‘‘Definition of Serviceable FAA- approved ELT’’). 
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance 
(AMOCs) 
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to 
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. 
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. 
(l) Related Information 
(1) For more information about this AD, 
contact Gilbert Ceballos, Aerospace Engineer, 
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712–4137; phone: 562–627–5372; fax: 562–627–5210; email: gilbert.ceballos@faa.gov. 
(2) For service information identified in 
this AD, contact Ameri-King Corporation, 17881 Sampson Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92648; telephone: 714–842–8555; fax: 714– 842–4235; Internet: http://ameri-king.com; email: ameriking9@aol.com. You may view 
this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 20, 
2016. 
Victor Wicklund, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 
[FR Doc. 2016–12852 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 
16 CFR Part 460 Labeling and Advertising of Home 
Insulation 
AGENCY : Federal Trade Commission 
(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’). 
ACTION : Advance notice of proposed 
rulemaking; extension of deadline for submission of public comments. 
SUMMARY : The FTC is extending the 
deadline for filing public comments on its recent Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the ‘‘Trade Regulation Rule Concerning the Labeling and Advertising of Home Insulation’’ (the ‘‘R-value Rule’’ or ‘‘Rule’’). 
DATES : The comment period for the 
advance notice of proposed rulemaking published April 6, 2016 (81 FR 19936), is extended. Comments must be received on or before September 6, 2016. 
ADDRESSES : Interested parties may file a 
comment online or on paper, by following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 
below. Write ‘‘16 CFR part 460—R-value Rule Review, File No. R811001’’ on your 
comment, and file your comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ 
ftc/rvaluerule, by following the 
instructions on the web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC–5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th St. SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC 20024. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Hampton Newsome, (202) 326–2889, Attorney, Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
I. Comment Period Extension 
On April 6, 2016 (81 FR 19936), as 
part of the Commission’s systematic review of its rules and guides, the FTC published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) in the Federal Register requesting public comments on the R-value Rule. The ANPR set June 6, 2016 as the deadline for filing comments. On May 12, 2016, the American Chemistry Council’s (ACC) Center for the Polyurethanes Industry and Spray Foam Coalition 
requested a 90-day extension to the comment period. ACC represents manufacturers of various types of home insulation products, including spray polyurethane foam (SPF) and rigid polyurethane foam board insulation. The requesters explained that the insulation industry and certain insulation products have changed substantially since the Commission completed its last regulatory review in 2005. In particular, new industry research has become available on the short-term and long-term thermal performance of SPF products. ACC also noted that new research exists about the energy efficiency benefits of insulation products that combine air sealing with high thermal resistance properties. Accordingly, it asserted that additional time is necessary for companies and industry trade organizations to present this new information in a useful manner through comments. 
Given the complexity and range of 
issues raised in the ANPR, the Commission agrees that allowing additional time for filing comments would help facilitate the creation of a more complete record. Moreover, this extension would not harm consumers because the current Rule will remain in effect during the review process. The Commission agrees that extending the comment period to allow interested parties adequate time to address issues raised by the ANPR will facilitate a more complete record. Therefore, the Commission has decided to extend the comment period to September 6, 2016. 
II. Request for Comment 
You can file a comment online or on 
paper. For the Commission to consider 
your comment, we must receive it on or before September 6, 2016. Write ‘‘16 CFR part 460—R-value Rule Review, File No. R811001’’ on your comment. 
Your comment—including your name and your state—will be placed on the public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable, on the public Commission Web site, at http://www.ftc.gov/os/ publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of 
discretion, the Commission tries to remove individuals’ home contact information from comments before placing them on the Commission Web site. 
Because your comment will be made 
public, you are solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive personal information, such as anyone’s Social Security number, date of birth, driver’s license number or other state identification number or foreign country 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS35662 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 
1In particular, the written request for confidential 
treatment that accompanies the comment must 
include the factual and legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). equivalent, passport number, financial 
account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive health information, such as medical records or other individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not include any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information which is . . . privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed in section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names. 
If you want the Commission to give 
your comment confidential treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for confidential treatment, and you must follow the procedure explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
1Your comment will be kept 
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel grants your request in accordance with the law and the public interest. 
Postal mail addressed to the 
Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your online comment, you must file it at https:// ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ rvaluerule, by following the instruction 
on the web-based form. If this Notice appears at http://www.regulations.gov, you also may file a comment through that Web site. 
If you prefer to file your comment on 
paper, mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC–5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC 20024. If possible, submit your paper comment to the Commission by courier or overnight service. 
Visit the Commission Web site at 
http://www.ftc.gov to read this ANPR 
and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws that the Commission administers permit the collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding, as appropriate. The Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that it receives on or before September 6, 2016. You can find more information, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in the Commission’s privacy policy, at http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm. 
By direction of the Commission. 
Donald S. Clark, 
Secretary. 
[FR Doc. 2016–13097 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 
DELAWARE RIVER BASIN 
COMMISSION 
18 CFR Parts 401 and 420 Rules of Practice and Procedure 
Concerning Regulatory Program Fees and Basin Regulations—Water Supply Charges Concerning Rates 
AGENCY : Delaware River Basin 
Commission. 
ACTION : Proposed rule; notice of public 
hearing. 
SUMMARY : The Commission is proposing 
amendments to the Rules of Practice and Procedure to adopt a new project review fee structure and to the Basin Regulations—Water Supply Charges to provide for automatic inflation adjustments. These changes also are proposed to be incorporated into the Commission’s Comprehensive Plan. 
DATES : The Commission will hold a 
public hearing at 1 p.m. on Wednesday, July 27, 2016. The hearing will continue until all those wishing to testify have had an opportunity to do so. Written comments will be accepted and must be received by 5 p.m. on Friday, August 12, 2016. 
ADDRESSES : The public hearing will be 
held in the Goddard Conference Room at the Commission’s office building located at 25 State Police Drive, West Trenton, NJ. As Internet mapping tools are inaccurate for this location, please use the driving directions posted on the Commission’s Web site. 
Oral Testimony and Written 
Comments: Persons wishing to testify at 
the hearing are asked to register in advance by phoning Paula Schmitt at 609–883–9500, ext. 224. Written comments may be submitted as follows: If by email, to paula.schmitt@drbc.nj.gov; if by fax, to Commission 
Secretary at 609–883–9522; if by U.S. Mail, to Commission Secretary, DRBC, P.O. Box 7360, West Trenton, NJ 08628– 0360; and if by overnight mail, to Commission Secretary, DRBC, 25 State Police Drive, West Trenton, NJ 08628– 0360. Comments also may be delivered by hand at any time during the Commission’s regular office hours (Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. except on national holidays) until the close of the comment period at 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 12, 2016. In all cases, please include the commenter’s name, address and affiliation, if any, in the comment document and ‘‘Fees Rulemaking’’ in the subject line. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : An 
FAQ document explaining this proposal in further detail is available on the Commission’s Web site, www.drbc.net. For queries about the rulemaking process, please contact Pamela Bush at 609–477–7203. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Background. The Delaware River 
Basin Commission (‘‘DRBC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) is a Federal interstate compact agency charged with managing the water resources of the Delaware River Basin on a regional basis without regard to political boundaries. Its members are the governors of the four basin states—Delaware, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania—and the North Atlantic Division Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, representing the federal government. DRBC is proposing a comprehensive revision of its project review fee structure, including an automatic annual indexed inflation adjustment for most fees. The inflation adjustment is also proposed for DRBC’s water supply charges rates applicable to consumptive and non-consumptive surface water withdrawals. 
Current fees. DRBC’s current project 
review fee structure was adopted by the Commission in 2009 by (uncodified) Resolution No. 2009–2. For projects involving total costs of $250,000 or less, it consists of a flat project review fee of $1,000 for privately sponsored projects and $500 for publically sponsored projects. For projects with total costs greater than $250,000, DRBC’s current project review fee is based upon a percentage of the costs of the project attributable to project components physically located within the basin, and is capped at $75,000. However, projects for which the review is exceptionally involved may be charged DRBC’s actual costs, which may exceed $75,000. The current fee structure generates an uneven revenue stream that between 2011 and 2015 produced average annual revenues of $610,843. The Commission’s total cost associated with 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS