RESTRICTED  
  
WT/WGTTT/W/25  
 
21 October 2015  
(15-5545)  Page: 1/3  
Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology    
 
 DRAFT 
 
REPORT (2015) OF THE WORKING GROUP ON TRADE AND TRANSFER  
OF TECHNOLOGY TO THE GENERAL COUNCIL 
 
 
1. INTRODUCTION 
1.1.  At the Fourth Ministerial Conference in Doha in November 2001, Ministers agreed to "an 
examination, in a Working Group under the auspices of the General Council, of the relationship between trade and transfer of technology, and of any possible recommendations on steps that 
might be taken within the mandate of the WTO to  increase flows of technology to developing 
countries".
1 Paragraph 43 of the Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration of 18 December 2005 
reaffirmed the Ministers' commitment to advance the work of the Working Group and instructed 
the General Council "to report further to our next Session".   
1.2.  Since the October 2013 Report of the Workin g Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology to 
the Ministers, the Working Group has held [six] sessions during the period 2014 to 2015. The 
reports of the meetings are contained in documents WT/WGTTT/M/45, WT/WGTTT/M/46, 
WT/WGTTT/M/47, WT/WGTTT/M/48, WT/WGTTT/M/49 and WT/WGTTT/M/50.2 At these meetings, 
Members continued the analysis of the relationship  between trade and transfer of technology, as 
well as considered any possible recommendations on steps that might be taken within the 
mandate of the WTO to increases flows of technology to developing countries. 
2. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRAD E AND TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY 
2.1. During the year 2014, Members continued thei r analysis of the relationship between trade 
and transfer of technology, largely on the basi s of: (a) the findings of a WTO Workshop on 
Environmental Technology Dissemination, which looked at the challenges and opportunities related to environmental technology dissemination; and (b) the themes that emerged in a dedicated 
Workshop organized under the aegis of Working Gr oup in June 2014. In addition, the Philippines 
briefed Members on some important initiatives taken by its Government in the field of innovation, technology generation and its transfer. 
2.2. The deliberations on the main findings of  the WTO Workshop on Environmental Technology 
Dissemination, focused on barriers to the dissemination of environmental technologies and on the 
extent to which their elimination would contribute to sustainable development. The discussion underscored that information-sharing exercises were  crucial in enhancing Members' understanding 
of the complex relationship between technology transfer and trade.  
2.3. The Working Group held a Workshop on Tr ade and Transfer of Technology in June 2014, 
back-to-back with the 46
th Session of the Working Group. Th e Workshop was structured around 
two sessions, with each session having three further sub-sessions, in which a cross section of 
experts from public/private sectors, IGOs an d the academia discussed the nexus between trade 
and transfer of technology. Among the themes that emerged from the debate, was the broad 
                                               
1 Paragraph 37 of document WT/MIN/(01)/DEC/1.   
2 To be issued. 
 WT/WGTTT/W/25 
 
- 2 - 
 
  agreement that technology transfer remains a key determinant of increased labour productivity, 
and thus of economic growth and development. Trade was seen as an important factor in the 
technology transfer process, both as a direct ve hicle for transfer of technology in the form of 
imports of machinery, equipment, and services , and less directly, through FDI, licensing, 
Non-Equity Modes (NEMs) of production, global value chains (GVCs), and temporary labour 
movement. Speakers expressed the view that GVCs, in many industries and across countries, could foster innovation, learning and technological upgrading in developing country firms. The 
speakers also emphasized the importance of services and trade facilitation measures in bolstering 
GVC-oriented investment and consequently, technology transfer. Emphasis was also laid on the importance of education and the availability of skilled human resources and appropriate institutional and policy environments in the host country, for both the transfer and 
absorption/adaptation of technology. Some Members expressed the view that given the complexity 
of the relationship between trade and transfer of technology other factors may also have a bearing 
on the issue. A report of the workshop is contained in document WT/WGTTT/W/23.  
2.4. Some Members expressed the view that, on  the basis of what had been said by the 
academics/experts in the workshop, the Working Grou p could: (a) explore how liberalization in the 
services sector could facilitate technology and knowledge transfer; and (b) discuss ways on how 
the Working Group could benefit from synergizing it s work with other WTO bodies. In this context, 
a proposal tabled by Ecuador in the TRIPS Council that pertained to Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) and their impact on green technologies and climate change was particularly mentioned. Members hoped that the deliberations in the Workshop would lead the way for meaningful 
progress and consequently to the fulfilmen t of the mandate of the Working Group.  
2.5. In the meetings held during 2015, Ecuado r briefed the Working Group on the deliberations 
of a workshop titled "Contribution of Intellectual Property to Facilitating the Transfer of 
Environmentally Rational Technology" that the Pe rmanent Mission of Ecuador had organized in May 
2015 in Crozet, France, in collaboration with Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. The objective of the workshop, that gathered experts from the ICTSD, South Centre, UNCTAD, WTO and the academia, 
was to discuss and refine a proposal (IP/C/W/585) that Ecuador had earlier tabled in the TRIPS 
Council on the subject.   
2.6. The Philippines briefed Members on some of the recent initiatives taken by its Government 
to encourage and generate technology transfer. It shares the specific legislative measures that had 
been enacted to encourage and generate technology  and its transfer, including the setting up of 
technology-focused institutional infrastructure to implement development-oriented programmes to promote international cooperation and public sector involvement. In February 2015, the 
Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) launched the IP DEPOT, an online platform 
which provides an avenue for IP stakeholders to freely promote their own IP assets, not only in the 
Philippines but also around the world through IPOPHL’s international partners.  
2.7. Chinese Taipei informed the Working Gr oup about its e-Customs ICT Project on Trade 
Facilitation to Central American countries. The ob jective of the project was to offer technology 
solutions to streamline custom procedures through using high-tech integration processes so as to reduce delays, transaction and trade costs. At the 50
th session of the Group, Chinese Taipei  
offered to share its experience from its different development cooperation programs. 
2.8. Members underscored the significance of  sharing experiences and lessons learnt in 
innovation and technology generation, particularly by countries that have undergone rapid 
technological advancement. Such experience-sharing exercises would not only enrich and advance 
the work of this Group but also facilitate building of synergies and finding technology solutions besides helping technology-deficient countries make more informed choices in terms of 
pro-technology policies and measures. 
3. ANY POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE STEPS THAT MIGHT BE TAKEN 
 WITHIN THE MANDATE OF THE WTO TO INCREASE FLOWS OF TECHNOLOGY TO 
 DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 
3.1. During 2014, Members continued to discuss a submission made earlier by India, Pakistan 
and the Philippines entitled "Facilitating Access to Information on Appropriate Technology Sourcing - A Step to Increase Flows of Technology to Developing Countries". A number of WT/WGTTT/W/25 
 
- 3 - 
 
  Members commented and raised questions on certain elements that were contained in the 
document. The proponents, on their part, indicated that they were reviewing their proposals and hoped to develop a revised submission whic h they would table in the Working Group.  
3.2. Continuing to discuss this submission in 2015,  the proponents informed  the Group that they 
were still in the process of revising their submission and that they intended to table it in the near 
future. The Chair encouraged the proponents to do so at the earliest so as to enable the Working 
Group to engage in a productive discussion on the recommendations with a view to fulfilling its 
mandate.  
3.3. At the 50
th Session, India suggested that the Secretariat host a webpage on transfer of 
technology issues for the benefit of producers in developing countries. Other Members expressed 
interest and asked for more detail on the contents of this website. They requested India to submit 
this in writing for further consideration in the Working Group. 
4. FUTURE WORK 4.1. Pursuant to the mandate contained in paragraph 37 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration, and 
its subsequent affirmation, in paragraph 43, by Ministers in the Hong Kong Declaration, Members 
have continued their examination of the relationsh ip between trade and transfer of technology and 
have also considered possible recommendations on steps that might be made within the mandate 
of the WTO to increase flows of technology to developing countries. The ongoing work has covered 
a number of issues and has helped to enhance Members' understanding of the complex nexus between trade and transfer of technology. Althou gh progress has been made, more work remains 
to be done. In view of this, Members recommend that the Ministers direct the Working Group to 
continue its work in order to fully achieve the mandate of the Doha Ministerial Declaration. 
__________