33431 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 
Terminal Instrument Procedures 
(TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in less than 30 days. 
Conclusion 
The FAA has determined that this 
regulation only involves an established 
body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866;(2) is not a ‘‘significant rule ’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979) ; and (3)does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97 
Air Traffic Control, Airports, 
Incorporation by reference, and 
Navigation (air). 
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 23, 
2014. 
John Duncan, Director, Flight Standards Service. 
Adoption of the Amendment 
Accordingly, pursuant to the 
authority delegated to me, Title 14, 
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows: 
PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT 
APPROACH PROCEDURES 
■1. The authority citation for part 97 
continues to read as follows: 
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 
40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 
44719, 44721–44722. ■2. Part 97 is amended to read as 
follows: 
Effective 26 JUNE 2014 
Alexander City, AL, Thomas C Russell Fld, 
Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 
3 
Aliceville, AL, George Downer, RNAV (GPS) 
RWY 6, Orig–B 
Mojave, CA, Mojave, Takeoff Minimums and 
Obstacle DP, Amdt 2A 
Akron, NY, Akron, Takeoff Minimums and 
Obstacle DP, Amdt 1 
Bend, OR, Bend Muni, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 
16, Amdt 2 
Bend, OR, Bend Muni, VOR/DME RWY 16, 
Amdt 10 
Lewisburg, TN, Ellington, Takeoff Minimums 
and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1 
Dallas, TX, Collin County Rgnl At Mc 
Kinney, ILS OR LOC RWY 18, Amdt 5 
Winchester, VA, Winchester Rgnl, RNAV 
(GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 1 
Effective 24 JULY 2014 
Susanville, CA, Susanville Muni, RNAV 
(GPS) RWY 29, Amdt 1A 
Jacksonville, FL, Herlong Recreational, 
RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Amdt 1 
Zephyrhills, FL, Zephyrhills Muni, NDB 
RWY 18, Amdt 1A, CANCELED 
Zephyrhills, FL, Zephyrhills Muni, NDB 
RWY 22, Amdt 1A, CANCELED 
Zephyrhills, FL, Zephyrhills Muni, NDB 
RWY 36, Amdt 1A, CANCELED 
Jeffersonville, IN, Clark Rgnl, ILS OR LOC 
RWY 18, Amdt 3 
Jeffersonville, IN, Clark Rgnl, NDB RWY 18, 
Amdt 2 
Jeffersonville, IN, Clark Rgnl, VOR RWY 18, 
Amdt 4, CANCELED 
Natchitoches, LA, Natchitoches Rgnl, Takeoff 
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 7 
Indian Head, MD, Maryland, RNAV (GPS) 
RWY 2, Orig 
Indian Head, MD, Maryland, RNAV (GPS) 
RWY 36, Orig–C, CANCELED 
Indian Head, MD, Maryland, Takeoff 
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig 
Indian Head, MD, Maryland, VOR–A, Orig– 
B, CANCELED 
Marlette, MI, Marlette, VOR/DME–A, Amdt 
6, CANCELED 
Plymouth, MI, Canton-Plymouth-Mettetal, 
RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig, CANCELED 
Plymouth, MI, Canton-Plymouth-Mettetal, 
RNAV (GPS)–B, Orig 
Branson, MO, Branson, ILS OR LOC RWY 32, 
Orig–A 
Grenada, MS, Grenada Muni, ILS OR LOC/
DME RWY 13, Amdt 2 
Elizabeth City, NC, Elizabeth City CG Air 
Station/Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, ORIG– 
A 
Kinston, NC, Kinston Rgnl Jetport At 
Stallings Fld, VOR RWY 23, Amdt 16 
Stigler, OK, Stigler Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums 
and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1 
Newport, OR, Newport Muni, RNAV (GPS) 
RWY 34, Orig–A 
Redmond, OR, Roberts Field, RNAV (GPS) 
RWY 10, Amdt 1 
Redmond, OR, Roberts Field, RNAV (GPS) Y 
RWY 4, Amdt 1 
Redmond, OR, Roberts Field, RNAV (GPS) Y 
RWY 22, Orig–B Redmond, OR, Roberts Field, RNAV (RNP) Z 
RWY 4, Amdt 1 
Redmond, OR, Roberts Field, RNAV (RNP) Z 
RWY 22, Amdt 1 
Redmond, OR, Roberts Field, VOR–A, Amdt 
6 
Altoona, PA, Altoona-Blair County, ILS OR 
LOC RWY 21, Amdt 8 
Latrobe, PA, Arnold Palmer Rgnl, Takeoff 
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 5 
Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, ILS V 
RWY 9R (CONVERGING), Amdt 4B 
Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, ILS V 
RWY 17 (CONVERGING), Amdt 6B 
Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, ILS Z OR 
LOC RWY 9R, ILS Z RWY 9R (CAT II), ILS Z RWY 9R (CAT III), Amdt 9B 
Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, ILS Z OR 
LOC RWY 17, Amdt 8A 
Greeneville, TN, Greeneville-Greene County 
Muni, NDB RWY 5, Amdt 5 
Greeneville, TN, Greeneville-Greene County 
Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig 
Greeneville, TN, Greeneville-Greene County 
Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4 
Smyrna, TN, Smyrna, ILS OR LOC/DME 
RWY 32, Amdt 6 
Smyrna, TN, Smyrna, NDB RWY 32, Amdt 
9B, CANCELED 
Moundsville, WV, Marshall County, Takeoff 
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2 
[FR Doc. 2014–13401 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 
HUMAN SERVICES 
Food and Drug Administration 
21 CFR Part 73 
[Docket No. FDA–2012–C–0900] 
Listing of Color Additives Exempt 
From Certification; Spirulina Extract; Confirmation of Effective Date 
AGENCY : Food and Drug Administration, 
HHS. 
ACTION : Final rule; confirmation of 
effective date. 
SUMMARY : The Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA or we) is confirming the effective date of May 13, 2014, for the final rule that appeared in the Federal Register of April 11, 2014, 
and that amended the color additive regulations to expand the permitted use of spirulina extract made from the dried biomass of the cyanobacteria Arthrospira platensis (A. platensis) as a color additive in food. 
DATES : The effective date for the final 
rule published April 11, 2014 (79 FR 20095), is confirmed as May 13, 2014. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Felicia M. Ellison, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS– 265), Food and Drug Administration, 
VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Jun 10, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM 11JNR1wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with RULES33432 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, 
MD 20740–3835, 240–402–1264. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : In the 
Federal Register of April 11, 2014 (79 FR 20095), we amended the color additive regulations in § 73.530 Spirulina extract (21 CFR 73.530) to expand the permitted use of spirulina extract made from the dried biomass of the cyanobacteria A. platensis, as a color additive in confections (including candy and chewing gum), frostings, ice cream and frozen desserts, dessert coatings and toppings, beverage mixes and powders, yogurts, custards, puddings, cottage cheese, gelatin, breadcrumbs, and ready- to-eat cereals (excluding extruded cereals). 
We gave interested persons until May 
12, 2014, to file objections or requests for a hearing. We received no objections or requests for a hearing on the final rule. Therefore, we find that the effective date of the final rule that published in the Federal Register of April 11, 2014, should be confirmed. 
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 73 
Color additives, Cosmetics, Drugs, 
Medical devices. 
Therefore, under the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 
341, 342, 343, 348, 351, 352, 355, 361, 362, 371, 379e) and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and redelegated to the Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, we are giving notice that no objections or requests for a hearing were filed in response to the April 11, 2014, final rule. Accordingly, the amendments issued thereby became effective May 13, 2014. 
Dated: June 6, 2014. 
Philip L. Chao, 
Acting Director, Office of Regulations, Policy 
and Social Sciences, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 
[FR Doc. 2014–13524 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P 
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 
34 CFR Chapter VI 
[Docket ID ED–2014–OPE–0036; CFDA 
Number 84.016A.] 
Final Priority; Undergraduate 
International Studies and Foreign Language Program 
AGENCY : Office of Postsecondary 
Education, Department of Education. 
ACTION : Final Priority. 
SUMMARY : The Acting Assistant 
Secretary for Postsecondary Education announces a priority under the Undergraduate International Studies and Foreign Language (UISFL) Program administered by the International and Foreign Language Education Office. The Acting Assistant Secretary may use this priority for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2014 and later years. We take this action to focus Federal financial assistance on an identified national need. We intend the priority to address a gap in the types of institutions, faculty, and students that have historically benefited from international education opportunities. 
DATES : Effective Date: This priority is 
effective July 11, 2014. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Tanyelle Richardson, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street NW., Room 6099, Washington, DC 20006–8521. Telephone: (202) 502–7626 or by email: tanyelle.richardson@ed.gov. 
If you use a telecommunications 
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 8339. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Purpose of 
Program: The UISFL Program provides 
grants for planning, developing, and carrying out programs to strengthen and improve undergraduate instruction in international studies and foreign languages. 
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1124. 
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 
CFR parts 655 and 658. 
We published a notice of proposed 
priority for this program in the Federal Register on March 18, 2014 (79 FR 
15087). That notice contained background information and our reasons for proposing this particular priority. 
There are technical differences 
between the proposed priority and this final priority. We have clarified how applicants that are consortia or partnerships may meet the priority. 
Public Comment: In response to our 
invitation in the notice of proposed priority, six parties submitted comments. 
Generally, we do not address 
technical and other minor changes. 
Analysis of Comments and Changes: 
An analysis of the comments and any changes in the priority since publication of the notice of proposed priority follows. 
Comment: Several commenters noted 
their support of the proposed priority, and praised the Department’s efforts to promote the participation of Minority- Serving Institutions (MSIs) and community colleges in programs funded under Title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), and to serve students that are historically 
under-represented in international education programs. 
Discussion: We appreciate the 
commenters’ support. 
Changes: None. 
Comment: One commenter suggested 
that traditional four-year colleges and universities are better prepared to serve as the lead applicant in a consortium than are community colleges and MSIs, as they are better able, in the current fiscal climate, to devote resources to study-abroad activities and the study of critical languages. The commenter also suggested that community colleges and MSIs struggle to continue and sustain efforts begun with UISFL grant funds. 
Discussion: We disagree that 
community colleges and MSIs would not be able to serve effectively as the 
lead applicant in a consortium for this program. This priority aims to increase the number of MSIs and community colleges that become grantees, in order to increase their students’ access to academic coursework, instructional activities, and training that would better prepare them for the 21st-century global economy, careers in international service, and lifelong engagement with the diverse communities in which they will live. 
Although the Department notes the 
commenter’s concerns, the UISFL Program is not meant to be utilized solely for study abroad or critical language study efforts. The program is also intended to support institution- wide internationalization efforts that are customized according to the institution’s and its students’ needs and goals. This could include a program of study that does not include study abroad or critical language study. 
Where fiscal and other resources are 
limited, the Department encourages applicants to the UISFL Program to design consortium applications in which institutions join together to build upon the resources, financial and otherwise, of their partners. In this way, the partnership increases the likelihood of projects being sustained and fully supported. In addition, the program’s matching requirement is meant to encourage sustainability and demonstrate commitment by an applicant institution’s administration. 
Changes: None. 
Comment: One commenter suggested 
that the Department has underestimated the number of additional burden hours required to complete new, OMB- approved forms on project- specific performance measures. The commenter also suggested that new applicants to the program would be at a disadvantage until they are familiar with the forms. 
VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Jun 10, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM 11JNR1wreier-aviles on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with RULES