WT/TPR/ W/214/Rev.1  
 
4 November  2022 
(22-8282) Page: 1/9 
Trade Policy Review Body   
 
 
TRADE POLICY REVIEW MECHANISM  
DRAFT  REPORT OF THE TRADE POLICY REVIEW BODY FOR 20 22 
Chairperson: H.E. Ángel Villalobos Rodríguez  (Mexico ) 
Revision* 
1. This Report by the Trade Policy Review Body (TPRB) provides a brief asse ssment of its 
activities in 20 22. The annexed tables provide information on Members reviewed up to the end of 
2022, the programme of reviews for 20 23, and candidates for review in 20 24. 
Activities of the TPRB  
2. By the end of 20 22, the TPRB  will have conducted 55011 reviews2 since its inception in 1989  
(Annex  I), cover ing 159 out of 164  Members.3 Seventeen Sixteen  Members were reviewed in 202 2, 
including one least developed country ( LDC) (Annex II). FiveFour Members opted for the alternative 
timeline for the Q&A process.  
3. Notwithstanding  various  and continued  constraints  caused by the pandemic , the Secretariat 
prepare d its reports  in close consultation with the authorities of the Members under review , and the 
reports for those review meetings taking place in 2022 were delivered on time. The authorities have 
been making great efforts to respond to requests for information . In prepar ing its reports, the 
Secretariat also continue d its efforts to reduce the burden on Members under review by using, to 
the extent possible, other sources of documentation, including Members' official websites and other 
credible sources. Essential elements of the process are the responses by the authorities to the draft 
reports, and visits to capitals by teams from the Secretariat. In 2022, most in-person visits were 
resumed,  and thus the Secretariat team s were able to communicate directly with officials in c apital, 
as COVID -19-related travel restrictions  were lifted gradually in most WTO Members.  Virtual 
communication also continued, particularly at the beginning of the TPR preparation process , as an 
alternative means of communication and exchange of information between t he Secretariat teams 
and the authorities.  
4. Efforts continue to be made to schedule  TPRB meetings evenly throughout the year and, to 
the extent possible, avoid clashes with other meetings at the WTO so as to reduce pressure on 
Members.  Some TPRB meetings had to be postponed due to the rescheduling of MC12 for June 2022 . 
5. The WTO Secretariat is working on the confirmation of the programme of reviews for 202 3, in 
close contact with the relevant delegations. The programme for 202 3 comprises 16174 meetings, 
covering 2930 Members (Annex  III). Annex  IV provides the list of Members that are considered as 
candidates for review in 20 24. 
 
* This Revision contains the suggested changes in track changes mode.  
1 Resulting from a recent change in the programme for 2022.  
2 To more accurately reflect the number of times each Member has been reviewed, reviews are counted 
individually (regardless of  joint meeting or joint report), resulting in a change to the total number of reviews.  
3 Members not yet reviewed by end -2022 are Afghanistan  (to be reviewed in 202 4); Cuba  (to be 
reviewed in 202 4); Kazakhstan ( to be review ed in 202 4); Liberia ( scheduled f or review in 2023); and Yemen 
(to be reviewed in 202 4). [A question related to Cuba and Kazakhstan to be replied to by the Secretariat at the 
meeting ]. 
4 Resulting from a recent change in the programme for 2022.  WT/TPR/ W/214/Rev.1  
 
- 2 - 
 
  6. The Seventh Appraisal of the TPRM started in September 2022  and two informal meetings of 
the TPRB hav e been held so far.5 
Coverage of LDCs and follow -up to TPRB meetings  
7. TPRs of LDCs have been beneficial to them in terms of improving their understanding of , and 
encouraging their compliance with , WTO agreements. This thus helps them to further integrat e into 
the multilateral trading system. Of the current 35 WTO least-developed Members6, 32 had been 
reviewed by the end of 2022. In 202 2, one LDC Member , Djibouti , was reviewed.  
8. At the request of the Member concerned, the Secretariat organizes a follow -up workshop to 
discuss the outcomes of the TPR with domestic stakeholders . The Secretariat works  closely with the 
Member under review to plan a workshop that not only  disseminat es the results/outcomes of the 
Review, but also  reflects the Member's priorities and technical assistance needs and the concerns 
expressed by other Members during the TPR. The workshops aim at achieving a better understanding 
of recent initiatives taken, or being taken, by the Government, and exchanging views on  steps the 
Government may take to address concerns raised by other Members. In 2022, no national follow -up 
workshops were conducted.7 
Monitoring of trade and trade -related measures  
9. The TPRM requires Members, between their reviews, to provide information o n significant 
trade policy changes. The Secretariat uses this and other information to prepare reports on the trade 
and trade -related developments of Members and Observer Governments. The information is 
consolidated and presented in the Report by the Direc tor-General on the Overview of Developments 
in the International Trading Environment, according to paragraph G of Annex  3 to the Marrakesh 
Agreement. Cooperation and interest from Members in the trade monitoring exercise remain very 
positive, as noted in t he regular meetings of the TPRB on trade monitoring. The Secretariat continues 
to reach out to all Members and Observers with a view to improving the ir participation . 
10. The latest Trade Monitoring Report covered measures taken from mid -October 2021 to 
mid-May 2022.8 It also referred briefly to the outcomes of the 12th Ministerial Conference (MC12) 
concluded successfully on 17  June 2022. This Report arrived at a time when the global economy was 
facing severe challenges posed by , inter alia , the COVID -19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine  
[option  1: "Russia - Ukraine war"]9 [option 2: "the situation in Ukraine"] .10 
11. The Report showed that 66% of the 436 COVID -19-related trade measures implemented by 
Members and Observers on goods since the outbr eak of the pandemic were of a trade -facilitating 
nature, while the remaining 34% could be considered trade -restrictive. Export restrictions accounted 
for 82% of all COVID -19 trade -restrictive measures. During the review period , Members continued 
to repeal measures implemented in response to the pandemic. The estimated trade coverage of the 
COVID -19 trade -facilitating measures still in place (USD  149.7  billion ) was larger than that of trade 
restrictions (USD  99.8 billion ). Since last year, t he numbers of newly introduced COVID -19-related 
trade measures in the areas of goods and services have declined drastically.  
12. [Option 1: Delete the paragraph (original para.  11, now para. 12 in th is draft)] .11 The war in 
Ukraine impacted trade flows significantly. The Se cretariat identified 71 trade and trade -related 
sanctions imposed on the Russian  Federation on trade in goods and 75 on trade in services. Several 
Members also implemented measures and sanctions that might indirectly affect the maintenance 
and licensing of  intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the Russian  Federation.  
 
5 Suggested by 1 delegation.  
6 Vanuatu was an LDC at the time of its review in 2018, but graduated from LDC status in 2020.  
7 A question by 2 delegations to be replied to by the Secretariat at the meeting.  
8 An informal meeting of the TPRB was held , both in person and virtually due to COVID -19 restrictions , 
on 27 July 2022 to discuss the Director -General's Report on Trade -Related Developments contained in 
WTO documents WT/TPR/OV/W/16  and WT/TPR/OV/W/16/Add.1 , 13 July 2022; and 
WT/TPR/OV/W/16/Add.1/Corr.1 , 28 July 2022. 
9 Suggested by 3 delegations.  
10 Suggested by 1 delegation.  
11 Suggested by 4 delegations.  WT/TPR/ W/214/Rev.1  
 
- 3 - 
 
  13. [Option 2: Revised text.]12 "The war crisis in Ukraine impacted trade flows significantly. The 
Secretariat  Report identified at least 71 trade and trade -related sanctions  measures imposed on the 
Russian  Federation on trade in goods and 75 on trade in services that increased trade and 
transaction costs. These unilateral restrictive measures had an overall significant negative impact 
on international trade with serious potential impli cations for many countries around the world, 
especially with respect to food security. While financial measures arising from the conflict in Ukraine 
have to a large extent excluded trade in food products, practical difficulties in processing payments 
of suppliers, resulting from cautious behaviour by financial operators, have been reported to affect 
commercial clients as well as the World Food Program.13 Several Members also implemented 
measures and sanctions that might indirectly affect the maintenance and  licensing of intellectual 
property rights (IPRs) in the Russian Federation." ] 
14. With respect to regular measures, Members and Observers introduced 230 new 
trade -facilitating and 109 trade -restrictive measures, of which 32 export restrictions and 
18 import -facilitating measures were put in place in response to the war. The trade coverage of the 
import -facilitating measures was estimated at USD  603.2  billion  and that of import -restrictive 
measures at USD  23.5 billion . Trade remedy actions remain an important t rade policy tool for 
Members, although the number of trade remedy initiations decline d from the 2021 level. Members 
and Observers introduced 93 new regular measures affecting trade in services, the majority of which 
were trade -facilitating. More than half of the measures concerned telecommunications, and 
computer -, Internet -, and other network -enabled services.  
15. New paragraph. [Option 1: "Members discussed the 2022 Trade Policy Monitoring Report 
during an informal meeting on XX September 2022 and proposed ch anges to improve the process 
and ensure the Report reflects Members' priorities and interests. The Secretariat will continue to 
work closely with Members to address their concerns and increase Member participation with this 
exercise."] .14 
 
16. [Option 2: "Members received the 2022 Trade Policy Monitoring Report with mixed feedback, 
as expressed during the informal meeting on [XX] September 2022. The Secretariat will continue to 
work closely with Members to address their concerns and increase Member partici pation with this 
exercise."]15 
 
17. [Option 3: "Discussions among Members of the mid -year Trade Monitoring Report at the 
27 July 2022 informal meeting of the TPRB provided diverse feedback on its findings. The Secretariat 
will continue to work closely with Mem bers to address their concerns and increase Member 
participation with this exercise."]16 
 
18. The Report by the Director -General on the 2022 Overview of Developments in the 
International Trading Environment is scheduled to be discussed by the TPRB on 8  Decembe r 2022.  
  
 
12 Suggested by 1 delegation.  
13 WTO document WT/TPR/OV/W/16, 13 July 2022, para. 3.17 1. 
14 Suggested by 1 delegation.  
15 Suggested by 1 delegation.  
16 Suggested by the Secretariat.  WT/TPR/ W/214/Rev.1  
 
- 4 - 
 
  ANNEX  I 
TRADE POLICY REVIEWS  
WTO Members reviewed, 1989 -2022 
Europe/Middle East  Asia/Pacific  Africa  America  
Albania (2)  Australia (8)  Angolac (2) Antigua and Barbudaa (3) 
Armenia (2)  Bangladeshc (5) Benina,c (4) Argentina (5) 
Bahrain, Kingdom ofa (4) Brunei  Darussalam  (3) Botswanaa (4) Barbados ( 4) 
European  Unionb (14) Cambodiac (2) Burkina Fasoa,c (4) Belize (3)  
Georgia ( 3) China (8)  Burundia,c (3) Bolivia, Plurinational  
State of (4)  
Iceland (5)  Fiji (3) Cabo Verde (1)  Brazil ( 8) 
Israel (5)  Hong Kong, China (8)  Cameroona (4) Canada (11)  
Jordan (2)  India (7)  Central African Republica,c 
(2) Chile (5)  
Kuwait, State of (1)  Indonesia (7)  Chada,c (2) Colombia (5)  
Liechtensteina (6) Japan (14)  Congo, Democratic Republic 
of thec (2)  Costa Rica (5)  
Moldova, Republic of ( 2) Korea, Republic of (8)  Congo, Republic ofa (2) Dominicaa (3) 
Montenegro (1)  Kyrgyz  Republic  (3) Côte d'Ivoirea (3) Dominican  Republic  (45)17 
North Macedonia (2)  Lao People's Democratic 
Republicc (1) Djiboutia,c (3) Ecuador (3)  
Norway (7)  Macao, China (5)  Egypt (4)  El Salvador (4)  
Omana (3) Malaysia (7)  Eswatinia (4) Grenadaa (3) 
Qatara (3) Maldives (3)  Gabona (3) Guatemala (3)  
Russian  Federation (2) Mongolia (3)  The Gambiac (3) Guyana ( 4) 
Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of (3) Myanmarc (2) Ghana ( 5) Haitic (2) 
Switzerlanda (8) Nepalc (2) Guinea, Republic ofa,c (4) Honduras (3)  
Türkiye (6) New Zealand ( 6) Guinea -Bissaua,c (2) Jamaica (4)  
Ukraine (1) Pakistan ( 5) Kenyaa (5) Mexico ( 7) 
United Arab Emirates ( 4) Papua New Guinea (3)  Lesothoa,c (4) Nicaragua (4)  
 Philippines (5)  Madagascarc (3) Panama ( 3) 
 Samoa (1)  Malawic (3) Paraguay (4)  
 Singapore (8)  Malia,c (4) Peru (5)  
 Solomon Islandsc (3) Mauritaniaa,c (3) 
St. Kitts and Nevisa (3) 
 Sri Lanka (4) Mauritiusa (5) St. Luciaa (3) 
 Chinese  Taipei  (4) Morocco (5)  St. Vincent and the 
Grenadinesa (3) 
 Tajikistan (1)  Mozambiquec (3) Suriname (3)  
 Thailand (8)  Namibiaa (4)
 Trinidad and Tobago (4)  
 Tonga (2)  Nigera,c (3) United  States  (15) 
 Vanuatu (1)  Nigeria (5)  Uruguay (5)  
 Viet Nam (2) Rwandaa,c (3) Venezuela, Bolivarian  
Republic of (2)  
  Senegala,c (4)  
  Seychelles (1)   
  Sierra  Leonec (2)   
  South  Africaa (5)  
  Tanzaniaa,c (4)  
  Togoa,c (4)  
  Tunisia (3)   
  Ugandaa,c (5)  
  Zambiac (4)  
  Zimbabwe (3)   
    
50 Membersd (105 reviews)  33 Members (15 2 reviews)  43 Members ( 146 reviews)  33 Members (14 7818 
reviews)  
a Joint meeting and/or report , but counted as individual Member  review for statistical purposes.  
b The United Kingdom was included in the European  Union's last review, thus the number of Members 
counts as 29 (28 EU member States and 1 for the European Union as a Member itself).  
 Some curre nt EU member States were reviewed separately before joining the European  Union : 
Austria  (1), Bulgaria  (1), Croatia  (1), Cyprus  (1), Czech  Republic  (2), Finland  (1), Hungary  (2), 
Poland  (2), Romania  (3), Slovak  Republic  (2), Slovenia  (1), and Sweden  (2). 
c Least  developed country (LDC) Member.  
 
17 Resulting from a recent change in the programme for 2022.  
18 Resulting from a recent change in the programme for 2022.  WT/TPR/ W/214/Rev.1  
 
- 5 - 
 
  d The United  Kingdom was included in the European  Union's last review (in 2020), and thus the number 
of Members reviewed for the European  Union totals 29 (28 EU member States and 1 for the 
European  Union as a Member itself).19,20 
Note:  Figures in parentheses indicate the total number of reviews that will have been conducted by the end 
of 202 2.  
 
19 Suggested by 1 delegation.  
20 Comment by t he Secretariat: The inclusion of this footnote by the Secretariat is to clarify the 
methodology used to count the number of Members.  WT/TPR/ W/214/Rev.1  
 
- 6 - 
 
  ANNEX  II 
Trade policy reviews conducted in 202 2 
Member  Meeting date  Review cycle (years)  
Georgia  12 and 14  January  7 
Panama  24 and 26  January  7 
Guyana  2 and 4  March  7 
United Arab Emirates  22 and 24  March  5 
Pakistan  30 March and 1  April 7 
Switzerland and Liechtensteina 18 and 20  May 5 
New Zealanda 1 and 3  June 7 
Ghana  21 and 23 June 7 
Moldova, Republic of  20 and 22  July 7 
Mexicoa 5 and 7  October  5 
Djiboutib  12 and 14  October  7 
Barbados  25 and 27  October  7 
Brazil  23 and 25 November  5 
Seychelles  5 and 7  December  7 
United  States   14 and 16  December  3 
Dominican  Republica 19 and 21  December  721 
a Alternative timeline.  
b LDC Member.  
  
 
21 Resulting from a recent change in the programme for 2022.  WT/TPR/ W/214/Rev.1  
 
- 7 - 
 
  ANNEX  III 
Programme of reviews for 202 3 
Member  Meeting dates (scheduled)  Review cycle 
(years)  
Dominican Republic  24 and 26 January  722 
Malaysiaa 8 and 10  February  5 
Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, 
Saint Kitts and Nevis, S aint Lucia, and 
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (OECS) 22 and 24  February  7 
Japana 1 and 3  March  3 
Türkiye  8 and 10  March  7 
El Salvadora 18 and 20  April 7 
Liberiab 24 and 26  May 7 
European  Uniona 5 and 7 June 3 
Cameroon, Central African Republicb, Chadb, 
Congo , and Gabon (CEMAC)  27 and 29  June 7 
Honduras  12 and 14  July 7 
Fiji 19 and 21  July 7 
Jordan  27 and 29  September  7 
Botswana, Eswatini, Lesothob, Namibia, and 
South  Africa  (SACU)  25 and 27  October  7 
Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, 
Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu  (Chinese  Taipei)a 7 and 9  November  5 
Albania  22 and 24  November  7 
Hong Kong, Chinaa 6 and 8 December  5 
Chilea 12 and 14  December  7 
 
a Alternative timeline.  
b LDC Member.  
Note:  CEMAC  = Central African Economic and Monetary Community.  
 OECS = Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States.  
 SACU = Southern African Customs Union.  
 
22 Resulting from a recent change in the programme for 2022.  WT/TPR/ W/214/Rev.1  
 
- 8 - 
 
  ANNEX IV  
Members to be reviewed in 202 4 
(Due date in parentheses)  
Member  
Afghanistana (2023)  
Angolaa (2022)  
Belize (2024)  
Benina (UEMOA)  (2024)  
Bolivia, Plurinational State of (2024)  
Brunei  Darussalam  (2022)  
Burkina Fasoa (UEMOA) (2024)  
Cabo Verde (2022)  
Cambodiaa (2024)  
Canada (2024)  
China (2024)  
Congo, Democratic Republic ofa (2023)  
Côte d'Ivoire (UEMOA) (2024)  
Cuba (200 12)23 
Guatemala  (2023)  
Guinea -Bissaua (UEMOA) (2024)  
Haitia (2022)  
Iceland (2024)  
Jamaica (2024)  
Kazakhstan (2022)  
Kuwait, State of (201 89)24 
Madagascara (2022)  
Malawia (2023)  
Malia (UEMOA) (2024)  
Maldives  (2023)  
Morocco  (2023)  
Mozambiquea (2024)  
Nigera (UEMOA) (2024)  
Nigeria (2024)  
Paraguay (2024)  
Senegala (UEMOA) (2024)  
Sierra Leone (2024)  
Solomon Islandsa (2023)  
Sri Lanka  (2023)  
Togoa (UEMOA) (2024)  
Tunisia  (2023)  
 
23 Considering the change of review cycles started in 2019, the due date was 2001 under the previous 
review cycle.  
24 Considering the change of review cycles started in 2019, the due date was 2018 under the previous 
review cycle.  WT/TPR/ W/214/Rev.1  
 
- 9 - 
 
  Member  
Ukraine  (2023)  
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of (200 89)25 
Yemena (2021)  
Zambiaa (2023)  
a LDC Member.  
 
Note:  UEMOA  = West African Economic and Monetary Union.  
 
 
__________  
 
25 Considering the change of rev iew cycles started in 2019, the due date was 2008 under the previous 
review cycle.