CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2019, VOLUME NUMBER 43 
TITLE 17. AIR RESOURCES BOARD 
The California Air Resources Board (CARB or 
Board) will conduct a public hearing at the time and 
place noted below to consider approving for adoption the proposed amendments to the regulation for limiting 
ozone emissions from indoor air cleaning devices: 
DATE: 
December 12, 2019 
TIME: 
9:00 a.m. 
LOCATION: 
California Environmental Protection Agency 
California Air Resources Board Byron Sher Auditorium 
1001 I Street 
Sacramento, California 95814 
This item will be considered at a meeting of the 
Board, which will commence at 9:00 a.m., December 12, 2019, and may continue at 8:30 a.m., on December 
13, 2019. Please consult the agenda for the hearing, 
which will be available at least ten days before Decem-
ber 12, 2019, to determine the day on which this item 
will be considered. 
WRITTEN COMMENT PERIOD AND 
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS 
In accordance with the Administrative Procedure 
Act, interested members of the public may present com-
ments orally or in writing at the hearing and may pro-
vide comments by postal mail or by electronic submittal 
before the hearing. The public comment period for this 
regulatory action will begin on October 25, 2019. Writ -
ten comments not physically submitted at the hearing must be submitted on or after October 25, 2019, and re -
ceived no later than December 9, 2019.  Any written 
comments on the Environmental Analysis must be sub-
mitted on or after October 25, 2019, and received no 
later than December 9, 2019.  Comments submitted 
outside that comment period are considered untimely. 
CARB may, but is not required to, respond to untimely 
comments, including those raising significant environ-
mental issues. CARB requests that, when possible, 
written and email statements be filed at least 10 days be-
fore the hearing to give CARB staff and Board members 
additional time to consider each comment. The Board 
also encourages members of the public to bring to the 
attention of staff in advance of the hearing any sugges-
tions for modification of the proposed regulatory ac-tion. Comments submitted in advance of the hearing must be addressed to one of the following: Postal mail: 
Clerk’s Of fice, California Air Resources Board 
1001 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814 
Electronic submittal: http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/ comm/bclist.php 
Please note that under the California Public Records 
Act (Gov. Code, section 6250 et seq.), your written and oral comments, attachments, and associated contact in-
formation (e.g., your address, phone, email, etc.) be-
come part of the public record and can be released to the 
public upon request. 
Additionally, the Board requests but does not require 
that persons who submit written comments to the Board 
reference the title of the proposal in their comments to facilitate review. 
AUTHORITY AND REFERENCE 
This regulatory action is proposed under the authority 
granted in California Health and Safety Code, section 41985, 41985.5, and 41986. This action is proposed to implement, interpret, and make specific Health and 
Safety Code, sections 41985, 41985.5 and 41986, by 
amending California Code of Regulations, title 17, sec-
tions 94800−94819. 
INFORMATIVE DIGEST OF PROPOSED ACTION 
AND POLICY STATEMENT OVERVIEW 
(GOV . CODE, section 11346.5, subd. (a)(3)) 
Sections Affected : Proposed amendments to Cali-
fornia Code of Regulations, title 17, sections 94800, 94801, 94802, 94803, 94804, 94805, 94806, 94807, 94808, and 94809. 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED
 BY REFERENCE 
(Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, section 20, subd. (c)(3)) 
The following test methods would be incorporated in 
the regulation by reference as specified in section 
94805: 
 Canadian Standards Association (CSA), 2015. 
“Standard for Electrostatic Air Cleaners,” C22.2 
no. 187−15, as revised by CSA on April, 2016. 
Copyrighted. 
 American National Standards Institute/ Underwriters Laboratory (ANSI/UL), 2018. “Standard 73 for Safety for Motor−Operated 
Appliances,” as revised by ANSI/UL on August 8, 
2018. Copyrighted. 
 ANSI/UL, 2018. “Standard 153 for Safety for 
Portable Electric Luminaires,” as revised by ANSI/UL on July 27, 2018. Copyrighted. 
1483  
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2019, VOLUME NUMBER 43 
 ANSI/UL, 2018. “Standard 484 for Safety for 
Room Air Conditioners,” as revised by ANSI/UL 
on September 6, 2018. Copyrighted 
 ANSI/UL, 2018. “Standard 507 for Safety for Electric Fans,” as revised by ANSI/UL on November 15, 2018. Copyrighted 
 ANSI/UL, 2018. “Standard 867 for Safety for Electrostatic Air Cleaners,” as revised by 
ANSI/UL on August 7, 2018. Copyrighted 
 ANSI/UL, 2016. “Standard 998 for Safety for Humidifiers,” as revised by ANSI/UL on April 4, 
2016. Copyrighted. 
 ANSI/UL, 2018. “Standard 1017 for Safety for 
Vacuum Cleaners, Blower Cleaners, and Household Floor Finishing Machines,” as revised 
by ANSI/UL on July 19, 2018. Copyrighted. 
 ANSI/UL, 2018. “Standard 1278 for Safety for Movable and Wall− or Ceiling−Hung Electric 
Room Heaters,” as revised by ANSI/UL on 
August 20, 2018. Copyrighted. 
 ANSI/UL, 2018. “Standard 1993 for Safety for Self−Ballasted Lamps and Lamp Adapters,” as 
revised by ANSI/UL on August 6, 2018. 
Copyrighted. 
 ANSI/UL, 2018. “Standard 1995 for Safety for Heating and Cooling Equipment,” as revised by 
ANSI/UL on August 17, 2018. Copyrighted. 
 ANSI/UL, 2018. “Standard 1598 for Safety for Luminaires,” as revised by ANSI/UL on August 28, 2018. Copyrighted. 
 ANSI/UL, 2017. “Standard 499 for Electric Heating Appliances,” as revised by ANSI/UL on February 23, 2017. Copyrighted. 
BACKGROUND AND EFFECT OF THE 
PROPOSED REGULATORY ACTION 
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) pro-
poses to amend the California Code of Regulations, title 
17 Subarticle 1, Sections 94800−94809 to reduce the potential for Californians to be exposed to ozone from indoor air cleaning devices. Assembly Bill (AB) 2276 
(Pavley, Stats. 2006, ch. 770) directed CARB to adopt 
regulations to protect public health from ozone emitted by indoor air cleaning devices. CARB approved a regu-
lation, which became effective in 2008, that requires all 
portable indoor air cleaners sold in California after Oc-tober 18, 2010, to be tested, certified, and labeled as complying with electrical safety standards, and have an 
ozone emission concentration limit of 0.050 parts per 
million. Besides the testing requirement, the regulation 
requires manufacturers to notify all of their known dis-tributors, retailers, and sellers about the regulation, pro-vide them with a copy of the regulation, and send docu-
mentation of this notification and contact information for their distributors, retailers, and sellers to CARB. Fi-nally, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, sellers, and 
testing laboratories are required to update and maintain 
production, quality control, sales, and testing records for at least three years, and make them available to CARB upo n request. Several minor amendments to the 
regulation were approved in 2010 and manufacturers were required to meet all provisions of the regulation by 
October 1, 2012. 
The current regulation addresses air cleaning devices 
designed for rooms, whole houses, buildings, vehicles, 
and personal use (i.e. are carried or worn). Currently ex-empted devices include in−duct air cleaners that are an 
electrically connected component of a heating, air con-
ditioning, and ventilation (HV AC) system and a subset 
of ozone−producing devices that are used for specific industrial purposes. Industrial−use devices, as defined 
in the regulation, are exempt as long as specified label-
ing and point−of−purchase requirements are met. 
Since the regulation was adopted in 2007, nearly 
2,500 air cleaning devices from more than 330 manu-
facturers have been certified by CARB. CARB also 
maintains an online list of certified devices, which is widely used by consumers around the United States, leading to additional public health benefits outside of 
the state. Although the air cleaner regulation has been 
successfully implemented for over a decade, the Cali-fornia market has diversified and expanded, with 
changes in air cleaner technology and increasing sales 
driven by California−specific market drivers such as widespread smoke impacts from wildfires, public con-
cern about health effects from air pollution, and the use 
of air cleaners to address cannabis−related (marijuana) odors. Amendments are needed to address market changes as well as to make corrections, updates, and other small changes. 
OBJECTIVES AND BENEFITS OF THE 
PROPOSED REGULATORY ACTION 
Objectives:  The proposed amendments would 
strengthen the regulation by requiring the certification 
of electronic in−duct air cleaning devices and modify-
ing industrial use exemptions. The proposal also streamlines the certification process by reducing the 
testing required to certify certain devices, and eliminat-
ing the requirement for manufacturers of certified de-
vices to complete the notification requirement. The amendments also clarify requirements manufacturers 
need to meet prior to certification and to maintain certi-
fication of their device(s). CARB also proposes to up-
date the regulation text to the latest versions of the ap-proved test standards and incorporate additional test 
1484  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2019, VOLUME NUMBER 43 
standards for dual−function devices and electronic in− 
duct devices. 
Benefits:  Eliminating the exemption from the exist-
ing regulation for in−duct air cleaners and requiring 
their ozone testing and certification will reduce the po-
tential for exposure to harmful ozone to the California 
public. A TechSci Research market report commis-sioned by CARB states that 103,200 electronic in−duct 
air cleaners were purchased by Californians in 2017, with a projected 30 percent increase to 146,620 by 2023. Electronic air cleaners are capable of producing ozone so requiring the certification of in−duct air clean-
ers meets the legislative requirement in AB 2276 to pro-tect public health by restricting ozone emissions from indoor air cleaning devices. 
The California Legislature found, in Section 1. Arti-
cle 8. of the enabling legislation, that exposure to ozone results in significant numbers of hospitalizations due to respiratory and cardiac illnesses and significant num-
bers of premature deaths. At the time the regulation was 
drafted, language was included in some of the exempted 
industrial uses that limited the application of ozone to 
times when people were not present in the space to be 
treated. Amendments to the regulation clarify that 
ozone−generating air cleaners used for exempted in-
dustrial applications can only be used when people are 
not present. These amendments are intended to benefit 
workers in those industries where ozone is intentionally 
used, as well as bystanders and members of the public. 
These clarifications may also result in environmental 
justice−related benefits. Several commercial sectors 
where uncertified ozone−producing devices are permit-
ted for industrial uses typically employ people of color 
and are low−wage jobs — such as in agricultural pro-
cessing, hotel maintenance, property remediation, and 
motor vehicle detailing. For example, ozone− producing air cleaners are used for an industrial purpose 
in fruit and vegetable sorting and packing facilities. 
Clarifying that industrial use exemptions apply if the 
ozone−generating air cleaners are used when people are 
not present could lead to health benefits for workers in 
this sector, who are disproportionately low−income 
workers of color, working in the fruit and vegetable sorting and packing rooms. Similar benefits could be derived for other low−income workers in the hotel, re-
mediation services, and vehicle detailing and recondi-tioning employment sectors. 
COMPARABLE FEDERAL REGULATIONS 
There is no federal regulation that limits ozone emis-
sions from indoor air cleaning devices, as defined in the 
air cleaner regulation. There is a federal regulation on allowable levels of ozone emitted from medical de-
vices, which is 0.050 parts per million (ppm).
1 Indoor 
air cleaning devices are intended to remove pollutants 
from the air, and, in most cases, do not meet the defini-
tion of a medical device. 
AN EV ALUATION OF INCONSISTENCY OR 
INCOMPATIBILITY WITH EXISTING
 STATE REGULATIONS 
(Gov. Code, section 11346.5, subd. (a)(3)(D)) 
During the process of developing the proposed regu-
latory action, CARB conducted a search of any similar 
regulations on this topic and concluded these regula-
tions are neither inconsistent nor incompatible with ex-
isting state regulations. 
MANDATED BY FEDERAL 
LAW OR REGULATIONS 
(Gov. Code, sections 11346.2, subd. (c), 11346.9) 
The proposed regulatory action is not mandated by 
federal law or regulations. 
DISCLOSURES REGARDING THE
 PROPOSED REGULATION 
FISCAL IMPACT/LOCAL MANDATE 
DETERMINATION REGARDING THE 
PROPOSED ACTION 
(Gov. Code, section 11346.5, subds. (a)(5) and (6)) 
The determinations of the Board’s Executive Officer 
concerning the costs or savings incurred by public agencies and private persons and businesses in reason-
able compliance with the proposed regulatory action are presented below. 
Under Government Code sections 11346.5, subdivi-
sion (a)(5) and 11346.5, subdivision (a)(6), the Execu-tive Officer has determined that the proposed regulato-
ry action would not create un−absorbable costs or sav-
ings to any State agency, would not create co sts or sav-
ings in federal funding to the State, would not create costs nor a mandate to any local agency or school dis-
trict, whether or not reimbursable by the State under 
Government Code, title 2, division 4, part 7 (commenc-
ing with section 17500), or other nondiscretionary cost or savings to State or local agencies. 
1 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Code of Federal Regula-
tions Title 21. Special Requirements for Specific Devices. Ac-
cessed at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/ cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=801.415 . 
1485  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2019, VOLUME NUMBER 43 
HOUSING COSTS 
(Gov. Code, section 11346.5, subd. (a)(12)) 
The Executive Officer has also made the initial deter-
mination that the proposed regulatory action will not 
have a significant effect on housing costs. 
SIGNIFICANT STATEWIDE ADVERSE 
ECONOMIC IMPACT DIRECTLY AFFECTING 
BUSINESS, INCLUDING ABILITY TO COMPETE 
(Gov. Code, sections 11346.3, subd. (a), 11346.5, 
subd. (a)(7), 11346.5, subd. (a)(8)) 
The Executive Of ficer has made an initial determina-
tion that the proposed regulatory action would not have 
a significant statewide adverse economic impact direct-
ly affecting businesses, including the ability of Califor-
nia businesses to compete with businesses in other 
states, or on representative private persons. 
RESULTS OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT 
ANALYSIS/ASSESSMENT 
(Gov. Code, section 11346.5, subd. (a)(10)) 
NON−MAJOR REGULATION: Statement of the 
Results of the Economic Impact Assessment (EIA): 
(A) The creation or elimination of jobs within the State 
of California. 
The proposed amendments are not expected to 
have a direct job impact in manufacturing; 
however, a few jobs may be created for technicians 
in testing laboratories and in research and 
development. 
(B) The creation of new business or the elimination of existing businesses within the State of California. 
The proposed amendments are not expected to result in creation of new businesses or the elimination of existing businesses within the State 
of California. 
(C) The expansion of businesses currently doing 
business within the State of California. 
The proposed amendments are not expected to result in the expansion of businesses within the 
State of California. 
(D) The benefits of the regulation to the health and welfare of California residents, worker safety, and 
the state’ s environment. 
The proposed amendments are intended to benefit public health by restricting ozone emissions from 
in−duct air cleaning devices and by limiting the 
use of ozone for exempted purposes to times when 
people are not present. This could lead to improved public health overall, and a reduction in medical−related expenses associated with 
exposure to ozone. 
Effects on Jobs/Businesses: 
The Executive Officer has determined that the pro-
posed regulatory action would not affect the creation or 
elimination of jobs within the State of California, the 
creation of new businesses or the elimination of exist-
ing business within the State of California, or the expan-
sion of businesses currently doing business within the State of California. A detailed assessment of the eco-
nomic impacts of the proposed regulatory action can be 
found in the Economic Impact Analysis in the Initial Statement of Reasons (ISOR). 
Economic Benefits of the Proposed Regulation to 
Manufacturers: 
Manufacturers of certified air cleaning devices will 
also benefit from the elimination of the notification re -
quirement for these manufacturers. This amendment will directly benefit more than 330 manufacturers of 
currently certified air cleaners, with an estimated annu-
al cost savings of approximately $57,000, or $570,000 over the 10−year time period of this analysis. 
Manufacturers of portable air cleaners that use a UV 
lamp emitting light greater than or equal to 240 nanometer (nm) in wavelength and a spectral peak of 
254 nm, with or without mechanical filtration, will also 
experience cost savings because they are no longer re-
quired to test their devices for ozone emissions. This 
amendment is projected to result in an annual cost sav-
ings of $35,000 for these manufacturers, with 10−year 
cost savings of $350,000. 
These benefits will result in total cost savings for 
manufacturers of certified air cleaning devices of 
$920,000 over the next 10 years. 
Benefits of the Pr oposed Regulation: 
The objective of the proposed regulatory action is to 
further reduce Californians’ exposure to ozone emitted 
from indoor air cleaning devices. By requiring the certi-
fication of in−duct air cleaners not exempted for an in-
dustrial purpose, CARB is ensuring that air cleaners that emit unhealthy levels of ozone are excluded from 
the California marketplace. When ozone−producing air 
cleaners are used for an exempted industrial purpose, 
the amendments stipulate that the exemption applies if the devices are used when people are not present, there-
fore seeking to ensure that people are not exposed to un-
healthy levels of ozone. These amendments could lead 
to improved public health overall, and a reduction in 
medical−related expenses associated with exposure to 
ozone. 
A summary of these benefits is provided, please refer 
to “Objectives and Benefits”, under the Informative Di-
gest of Proposed Action and Policy Statement Over-
1486   
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2019, VOLUME NUMBER 43 
view Pursuant to Government Code 11346.5(a)(3) dis-
cussion, above. 
BUSINESS REPORT 
(Gov. Code, sections 11346.5, subd. (a)(11); 
11346.3, subd. (d)) 
In accordance with Government Code sections 
11346.5, subdivisions (a)(11) and 1 1346.3, subdivision 
(d), the Executive Officer finds the reporting require-
ments of the proposed regulatory action which apply to 
businesses are necessary for the health, safety, and wel-
fare of the people of the State of California. 
COST IMPACTS ON REPRESENTATIVE 
PRIV ATE PERSONS OR BUSINESSES 
(Gov. Code, section 11346.5, subd. (a)(9)) 
In developing this regulatory proposal, CARB staff 
evaluated the potential economic impacts on represen-tative private persons or businesses. Only manufactur-
ers of electronic in−duct air cleaners are newly required 
to comply with the proposed amendments by having their air cleaners tested for ozone emissions prior to sales in California, at a one−time cost of $5,000 per 
ozone test. Over the initial 10−year period following 
implementation of the amended regulation, it is predict-
ed that total costs to manufacturers of electronic in−duct air cleaners are estimated to be $1,350,000. Manufac-
turers may also incur negligible incidental costs to com -
ply with minor changes in labeling requirements and to 
marketing materials. 
The total cost of the amended regulation is anticipat-
ed to be approximately $1,890,000 over a ten−year peri-od. This represents the cost to California consumers if manufacturers are able to pass along fully their ozone 
testing costs and mark−up. This cost increase would 
represent less than one percent increase in the average price of an electronic in−duct air cleaners for California 
consumers. 
EFFECT ON SMALL BUSINESS 
(Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, section 4, subds. (a) and (b)) 
The Executive Officer has also determined under 
California Code of Regulations, title 1, section 4, that the proposed regulatory action would affect one manu-facturer of in−duct air cleaners that is considered a small 
business and is located in California. This small busi-ness is expected to incur initial costs of $15,000 to com-
ply with the ozone testing requirement of the proposed amendments. CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES 
(Gov. Code, section 11346.5, subd. (a)(13)) 
Before taking final action on the proposed regulatory 
action, the Board must determine that no reasonable al-
ternative considered by the Board, or that has otherwise 
been identified and brought to the attention of the Board 
would be more ef fective in carrying out the purpose for 
which the action is proposed, would be as effective and less burdensome to affected private persons than the 
proposed action, or would be more cost−effective to af-
fected private persons and equally effective in imple-
menting the statutory policy or other provisions of law. 
The Executive Officer analyzed two alternatives to 
the proposed amendments and determined that these would be less effective in carrying out the purpose for which the action is proposed. Further description of the alternatives considered can be found in Chapter IX of 
the ISOR. 
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 
CARB, as the lead agency for the proposed amend-
ments to the Regulation for Limiting Ozone Emissions 
From Indoor Air Cleaning Devices, has prepared an en-
vironmental analysis (EA) under its certified regulatory 
program (California Code of Regulations, title 17, sec-
tions 60000 through 60008) to comply with the require-
ments of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Public Resources Code section 21080.5). The 
EA determined that the proposed amendments would not result in any significant adverse impacts on the envi-
ronment. The basis for reaching this conclusion is pro-
vided in Chapter VI of the ISOR. Written comments on 
the EA will be accepted during the 45−day public re-view period starting on October 25, 2019, and ending 
on December 9, 2019. 
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION REQUEST 
Consistent with California Government Code Sec-
tion 7296.2, special accommodation or language needs 
may be provided for any of the following: 
 An interpreter to be available at the hearing; 
 Documents made available in an alternate format 
or another language; and 
 A disability−related reasonable accommodation. 
To request these special accommodations or lan-
guage needs, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (916) 322−5594 or by facsimile at (916) 322−3928 as 
soon as possible, but no later than 10 business days be-
fore the scheduled Board hearing. TTY/TDD/Speech to 
Speech users may dial 711 for the California Relay Service. 
Consecuente con la sección 7296.2 del Código de 
Gobierno de California, una acomodación especial o 
1487  
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 CALIFORNIA REGULATORY NOTICE REGISTER 2019, VOLUME NUMBER 43 
necesidades lingüísticas pueden ser suministradas para 
cualquiera de los siguientes: 
 Un intérprete que esté disponible en la audiencia; 
 Documentos disponibles en un formato alterno u 
otro idioma; y 
 Una acomodación razonable relacionados con una incapacidad. 
Para solicitar estas comodidades especiales o necesi-
dades de otro idioma, por favor llame a la oficina del 
Consejo al (916) 322−5594 o envié un fax a (916) 
322−3928 lo más pronto posible, pero no menos de 10 
días de trabajo antes del día programado para la audien-
cia del Consejo. TTY/TDD/Personas que necesiten este servicio pueden marcar el 711 para el Servicio de Re-transmisión de Mensajes de California. 
AGENCY CONTACT PERSONS 
Inquiries concerning the substance of the proposed 
regulatory action may be directed to the agency repre-
sentative, Julia Gress, Air Pollution Specialist, Indoor 
Exposure Assessment Section, at (916) 324−9233 or Patrick Wong, Manager, Indoor Exposure Assessment Section, at (916) 323−1505 (the designated back−up 
contact). 
A V AILABILITY OF DOCUMENTS 
CARB staff has prepared a Staff Report: Initial State-
ment of Reasons (ISOR) for the proposed regulatory ac-
tion, which includes a summary of the economic and 
environmental impacts of the proposal. The report is en-
titled: Public Hearing to Consider the Proposed Amendments to the Regulation for Limiting Ozone Emissions from Indoor Air Cleaning Devices. 
Copies of the ISOR and the full text of the proposed 
regulatory language, in underline and strikeout format to allow for comparison with the existing regulations, may be accessed on CARB’s website listed below, or may be obtained from the Public Information Office, 
California Air Resources Board, 1001 I Street, Visitors 
and Environmental Services Center, First Floor, Sacra-
mento, California, 95814, on October 22, 2019. 
Further, the agency representative to whom nonsub-
stantive inquiries concerning the proposed administra-tive action may be directed is Chris Hopkins, Regula-tions Coordinator, (916) 445−9564. The Board staff has 
compiled a record for this rulemaking action, which in -
cludes all the information upon which the proposal is based. This material is available for inspection upon re-
quest to the contact persons. HEARING PROCEDURES 
The public hearing will be conducted in accordance 
with the California Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, title 2, division 3, part 1, chapter 3.5 
(commencing with section 1 1340). 
Following the public hearing, the Board may take ac-
tion to approve for adoption the regulatory language as 
originally proposed, or with non−substantial or gram-
matical modifications. The Board may also approve for 
adoption the proposed regulatory language with other 
modifications if the text as modified is sufficiently re-lated to the originally proposed text that the public was 
adequately placed on notice and that the regulatory lan-
guage as modified could result from the proposed regu-latory action. If this occurs, the full regulatory text, with 
the modifications clearly indicated, will be made avail-
able to the public, for written comment, at least 15 days before final adoption. 
The public may request a copy of the modified regu-
latory text from CARB’ s Public Information Office, Air 
Resources Board, 1001 I Street, Visitors and Environ-mental Services Center, First Floor, Sacramento, Cali-fornia, 95814. 
FINAL STATEMENT OF 
REASONS A V AILABILITY 
Upon its completion, the Final Statement of Reasons 
(FSOR) will be available and copies may be requested from the agency contact persons in this notice, or may be accessed on CARB’s website listed below. 
INTERNET ACCESS 
This notice, the ISOR and all subsequent regulatory 
documents, including the FSOR, when completed, are 
available on CARB’s website for this rulemaking at: 
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/rulemaking/2019/ aircleaner2019. 
TITLE 19. OFFICE OF STATE 
FIRE MARSHAL 
California Fire Service 
Training and Education Program 
The State Fire Marshal (SFM) is providing notice to 
adopt proposed regulations relevant to fees for certifi-
cation and training standards for California fire service 
personnel described below, after considering all com-
ments and objections, or recommendations regarding the proposed action. 
1488