80682 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Proposed Rules 
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 
Environmental protection, Air 
pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. 
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 
Dated: November 14, 2023. 
Jeaneanne Gettle, 
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 
[FR Doc. 2023–25512 Filed 11–17–23; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 
AGENCY 
40 CFR Part 60 
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2023–0072; FRL–8536–04– 
OAR] 
RIN 2060–AV09 
New Source Performance Standards 
for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; and Repeal of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule 
AGENCY : Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) 
ACTION : Supplemental notice of 
proposed rulemaking. 
SUMMARY : The Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) is announcing the availability of and soliciting comment on an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) following the completion of a Small Business Advocacy Review (SBAR) Panel for the proposed New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units. The EPA is seeking public comment on the regulatory flexibilities considered in the IRFA. In addition, the EPA is soliciting comment on whether to include mechanisms to address potential reliability issues raised by small business and other commenters with respect to both proposed New Source Performance Standards and the proposed Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Fossil Fuel- Fired Electric Generating Units. 
DATES : Comments. Comments must be 
received on or before December 20, 2023. 
ADDRESSES : You may send comments, 
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OAR–2023–0072, by any of the 
following methods: 
•Federal eRulemaking Portal: 
https://www.regulations.gov (our 
preferred method). Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. 
•Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 
Include Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR– 2023–0072 in the subject line of the message. 
•Fax: (202) 566–9744. Attention 
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2023– 0072. 
•Mail: U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center, Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2023– 0072, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460. 
•Hand/Courier Delivery: EPA Docket 
Center, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Docket Center’s hours of operation are 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m., Monday–Friday (except Federal holidays). 
Instructions: All submissions received 
must include the Docket ID No. for this rulemaking. Comments received may be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any 
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 
this document. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : For 
questions about this proposed action, contact Mr. Christian Fellner, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243– 02), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919) 541–4003; and email address: fellner.christian@epa.gov or 
Ms. Lisa Thompson, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243–02), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919) 541– 9775; and email address: thompson.lisa@epa.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Docket. The EPA has established a 
docket for this rulemaking under Docket 
ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2023–0072. All documents in the docket are listed in the Regulations.gov index. Although 
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential 
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy. Written Comments. Direct your 
comments to Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 
OAR–2023–0072 at https://www.regulations.gov (our preferred 
method), or the other methods identified in the 
ADDRESSES section. 
Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from the docket. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit to the EPA’s docket at https://www.regulations.gov any information 
you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. This type of information should be submitted as discussed in the Submitting CBI section of this document. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, 
cloud, or other file sharing system). Please visit https://www.epa.gov/ dockets/commenting-epa-dockets for 
additional submission methods; the full EPA public comment policy; information about CBI or multimedia submissions; and general guidance on making effective comments. 
The https://www.regulations.gov 
website allows you to submit your comment anonymously, which means the EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email 
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any digital storage media you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should not include 
special characters or any form of encryption and should be free of any defects or viruses. 
Submitting CBI. Do not submit 
information containing CBI to the EPA through https://www.regulations.gov. 
Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on any digital storage media that you mail to the EPA, 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 17, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM 20NOP1ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS180683 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Proposed Rules 
1See 88 FR 33240 (May 23, 2023). 2See 88 FR 33418 (May 23, 2023). note the docket ID, mark the outside of 
the digital storage media as CBI, and identify electronically within the digital storage media the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comments that includes information claimed as CBI, you must submit a copy of the comments that does not contain the information claimed as CBI directly to the public docket through the procedures outlined in Written Comments section of this document. If 
you submit any digital storage media that does not contain CBI, mark the outside of the digital storage media clearly that it does not contain CBI and note the docket ID. Information not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and the EPA’s electronic public docket without prior notice. Information marked as CBI will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 2. 
Our preferred method to receive CBI 
is for it to be transmitted electronically using email attachments, File Transfer Protocol (FTP), or other online file sharing services (e.g., Dropbox, 
OneDrive, Google Drive). Electronic submissions must be transmitted directly to the OAQPS CBI Office at the email address oaqpscbi@epa.gov and, as 
described above, should include clear CBI markings and note the docket ID. If assistance is needed with submitting large electronic files that exceed the file size limit for email attachments, and if you do not have your own file sharing service, please email oaqpscbi@epa.gov to request a file transfer link. If sending CBI information through the postal service, please send it to the following address: OAQPS Document Control Officer (C404–02), OAQPS, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA– 
HQ–OAR–2023–0072. The mailed CBI material should be double wrapped and clearly marked. Any CBI markings should not show through the outer envelope. 
I. Background 
On May 23, 2023, the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) proposed 
revised new source performance standards (NSPS) under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(b) for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from new and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired stationary combustion turbine electric generating units (EGUs) and from fossil fuel-fired steam generating units that undertake a large modification.
1As part of that proposal, the EPA certified that the 
proposed NSPS did not have significant impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
2However, the EPA solicited 
comment on a number of more stringent policy options that, if finalized, may increase the impact on small businesses. Therefore, the EPA convened a Small Business Advocacy Review (SBAR) Panel for the proposed rule and has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) under the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., and evaluated 
the economic impact of the proposed NSPS on small entities, as well as any significant alternatives to the proposed rule that may minimize economic impacts on small entities while accomplishing the Agency’s objectives. The complete IRFA is available for review in the rulemaking docket (EPA– HQ–OAR–2023–0072). 
As required by section 604 of the 
RFA, the EPA will prepare a final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) for this action as part of the final rule. The FRFA will address the issues raised by public comments on the IRFA. 
II. Request for Public Comments 
The EPA welcomes public comment 
on all aspects of the IRFA as well as 
alternatives identified in the IRFA for public comment. The EPA is soliciting comment on the small entity impacts of the proposed NSPS and any regulatory alternatives to the proposed NSPS ‘‘which accomplish the stated objectives of the applicable statutes, and which minimize any significant impact of the proposed rule on small entities.’’ The EPA is also soliciting comment on the impacts of the regulatory alternatives described in the proposed NSPS notice and, if they were to be adopted, appropriate regulatory flexibilities. The EPA solicited comment on multiple alternatives that could increase the costs to small entities and the EPA determination that the proposed amendments would not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. For the low load subcategory, these solicitations included reducing the low load electric sales threshold to 15 percent (88 FR 33321), a second BSER component based on co-firing low-GHG hydrogen (88 FR 33286), and a BSER based on the use of high efficiency simple cycle combustion turbines that would include an initial performance test (88 FR 33285). For the intermediate load subcategory, the Agency solicitated comment on an earlier timing of the second component of the BSER and reducing the upper intermediate load 
electric sales threshold to a range of 29 to 35 percent for simple cycle turbines and to a range of 40 to 49 percent for combined cycle, depending on the design efficiency of the combustion turbine (88 FR 33319). The EPA also solicited comment on a BSER based on higher percentages of low-GHG hydrogen co-firing and subcategorizing intermediate load simple cycle and combined cycle turbines and establishing a BSER based on co-firing low-GHG hydrogen for both subcategories (88 FR 33332). This could have the impact of reducing the ability of owners/operators of new intermediate load combustion turbines to use efficient generation as a compliance alternative because combined cycle turbines could not be used as a compliance alternative to co-firing low- GHG hydrogen in a simple cycle combustion turbine. (The EPA notes that the scope of the IRFA is limited to the NSPS and does not include the proposed Emission Guidelines, so this request for comments does not include impacts on small existing sources.) In addition, the EPA is soliciting comment on measures to mitigate reliability concerns raised by small businesses, which were similar to concerns raised by some commenters on the proposed rules. Because mechanisms to address reliability concerns are relevant to many entities in the electricity sector, we are more broadly soliciting comment on reliability issues. The EPA requests that commenters identify which small entity they are representing, how the specific requirements could impact the small entity, and how the suggested approach would reduce burden to the small entity. 
A. Subcategorization 
During the SBAR Panel outreach, 
small entity representatives (SERs) 
expressed concerns that control requirements on rural electric cooperatives may present an additional hardship on economically disadvantaged communities and on small entities. SERs stated that the EPA should further evaluate potential increased energy costs, transmission upgrade costs, and infrastructure encroachment which may directly affect the disproportionately impacted communities. Additionally, SERs stated that neither hydrogen co-firing nor carbon capture and storage (CCS) can be BSER because neither technology is 
commercially available or viable in very rural areas. The EPA is soliciting comment on potential exclusions or subcategories that may address the concerns of small entities. Such 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 17, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM 20NOP1ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS180684 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Proposed Rules 
3See Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2023–0072– 
0007. exclusions or subcategories, if available, 
must be based on the class, type, or size of the sources and be consistent with the Clean Air Act. Additionally, consistent with the SBAR panel report, the EPA solicits comment on whether ‘‘rural electric cooperatives and small utility distribution systems (serving 50,000 customers or less) can expect to have access to hydrogen or CCS infrastructure, and if a subcategory for these units is appropriate.’’ 
B. Reliability Mechanisms 
During the SBAR Panel outreach, 
SERs raised concerns regarding 
potential reliability impacts of the proposed rules, and many of those concerns were similarly raised by commenters on the May 2023 proposal. Commenters requested additional pathways to enable EGUs to operate notwithstanding compliance schedules, based on a showing of reliability need by the relevant balancing authority, Regional Transmission Organizations (RTO), or Independent System Operator (ISO). Commenters also suggested the EPA provide flexibilities for situations outside the control of affected sources (e.g., delay in the issuance of a relevant 
permit needed to meet the standards of performance, infrastructure delays, or supply chain disruptions) that could lead to adverse impacts on grid reliability. The EPA recognizes that it is difficult to separate SERs’ reliability comments from broader considerations of reliability in the context of this rulemaking. Therefore, the EPA will 
consider all comments we receive on this issue whether or not they are small business focused. The EPA is soliciting detailed comment on whether the Agency should include a specific mechanism or mechanisms to address grid reliability needs that may arise during implementation of its final rules, specifically: 
•Tools and mechanisms already 
available to balancing authorities, RTOs, ISOs, and other reliability authorities to address reliability challenges; 
•Circumstances and conditions that 
should be accounted for in a mechanism or mechanisms to address reliability concerns, including (i) concerns driven by events, such as extreme weather, unexpected generator outages, and unanticipated transmission line disruption; and (ii) concerns driven by supply chain or construction delays or disruptions for new generation, transmission lines, or other infrastructure as well as delays in permit issuance for controls required to meet the standards of performance; 
•The technical form and structure of 
such a mechanism or mechanisms, such as an extension of the compliance date or a temporary, alternative standard of performance, and supporting details describing whether such a mechanism or mechanisms should be automated to enable extensions; 
•Detailed descriptions of other 
reliability mechanisms or ways to address commenters’ reliability concerns, including phase-in considerations for small entities; 
•What information would be ample 
and appropriate, but not overly burdensome, to substantiate the need for and use of such a mechanism or mechanisms, including any appropriate documentation from balancing authorities, RTOs, or ISOs (the EPA specifically solicits comment on approaches that would minimize potential documentation burden); and 
•Lessons learned from the 
architecture of any previously proposed or finalized reliability mechanisms and the use of the mechanism in practice. 
III. Statutory and Executive Order 
Reviews 
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 
Planning and Review and Executive Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review 
This action is a ‘‘significant regulatory 
action’’ as defined in Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094. Accordingly, EPA submitted this action to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Executive Order 12866 review. Documentation of any changes made in response to the Executive Order 12866 review is available in the docket. 
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 
This action does not impose any new 
information collection burden under the 
PRA. For 40 CFR part 60, subpart TTTT, OMB has previously approved the information collection activities contained in the existing regulations and has assigned OMB control number 2060–0685. For 40 CFR part 60, subpart TTTTa, the Information Collection Request (ICR) document that the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number 2771.01. For 40 CFR part 60, subpart UUUUb, the ICR document that the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number 2770.01. 
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 
Pursuant to section 603 of the RFA, 
the EPA prepared an Initial Regulatory 
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) that examines the impact of the proposed rule on small entities along with regulatory alternatives that could minimize that impact. The complete IRFA is available for review in the docket and is summarized here. 
The IRFA describes the reason why 
the proposed rule is being considered and describes the objectives and legal basis of the proposed rule, as well as discusses related rules affecting the power sector. The IRFA describes the EPA’s examination of small entity effects prior to proposing a regulatory option and provides information about steps taken to minimize significant impacts on small entities while achieving the objectives of the rule. 
The EPA also summarized the 
potential regulatory cost impacts of the proposed rule and alternatives in Section 5.3 of the RIA.
3The analysis in 
the IRFA drew upon some of the same analyses and assumptions as the analyses presented in the RIA. 
We estimated cost-to-sales ratios 
(CSR) for each small entity to summarize the impacts of the proposed new source rule on small entities that build new natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and natural gas combustion turbines (NGCT) units over the forecast period. For NGCT additions, we find that average compliance costs are expected to be negative. For NGCC additions, 8 small entities are potentially affected based on historical build patterns and projected economic additions. Of these 8 small entities, none are projected to have cost-to-sales ratios greater than 1 percent. The analysis above is subject to a number of caveats and limitations. These are discussed in detail in Section 5 of the IRFA. 
As required by section 609(b) of the 
RFA, the EPA also convened an SBAR Panel to obtain advice and recommendations from small entity representatives that potentially would be subject to the rule’s requirements. The SBAR Panel evaluated the assembled materials and small-entity comments on issues related to elements of an IRFA. A copy of the full SBAR Panel Report is available in the rulemaking docket (EPA–HQ–OAR– 2023–0072). 
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995 (UMRA) 
This action does not contain any 
unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any State, local or Tribal governments or the private sector. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 17, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM 20NOP1ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS180685 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 222 / Monday, November 20, 2023 / Proposed Rules 
182 FR 3854. 
2DSRC is a short-range wireless technology that 
would provide local, nearly instantaneous message 
transmission with good reliability, critical characteristics for detecting potential and imminent crash scenarios. 
3Detailed in a Public Notice from the FCC: 
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_ public/attachmatch/ 
FCC-16-68A1_ Rcd.pdf. E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 
This action does not have federalism 
implications. It will not have substantial 
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. 
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 
and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments 
This action does not have Tribal 
implications as specified in Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. 
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 
Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Populations and Low-Income Populations 
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory action’’ in section 2–202 of the Executive Order. 
Therefore, this action is not subject to 
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or safety risk. Since this action does not concern human health, EPA’s Policy on Children’s Health also does not apply. 
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use 
This action is not a ‘‘significant 
energy action’’ because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution or use of energy because this action only solicits comments on regulatory alternatives for small businesses. 
I. National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR Part 51 
This rulemaking does not involve 
technical standards. 
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 
Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations and Executive Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice for All 
The EPA believes that this type of 
action does not concern human health or environmental conditions and therefore cannot be evaluated with respect to potentially disproportionate and adverse effects on communities with environmental justice concerns because this action only solicits comments on regulatory alternatives for small businesses. 
Michael S. Regan, 
Administrator. 
[FR Doc. 2023–25580 Filed 11–17–23; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 
National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration 
49 CFR Part 571 
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0126] 
RIN 2127–AL55 
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 
Standards; V2V Communications 
AGENCY : National Highway Traffic 
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). 
ACTION : Withdrawal of proposed rule. 
SUMMARY : The National Highway Traffic 
Safety Administration withdraws a previous proposal to create a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard requiring vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications in new light vehicles. After the advent of new V2V communications protocol, and after a recent Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision regarding the regulations governing the 5.850– 5.895 gigahertz (5.9 GHz) band, the agency has decided to withdraw its V2V proposed rule. 
DATES : NHTSA is withdrawing the 
proposed rule published January 12, 2017 (82 FR 3854) as of November 20, 2023. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Joshua Fikentscher, Office of Crash Avoidance Standards, by telephone at 202–366–1688, by email joshua.fikentscher@dot.gov and by fax 
at 202–493–2990. Rebecca Schade, Office of the Chief Counsel, by telephone at 202–366–2992, and by email at rebecca.schade@dot.gov. Mailing address: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
Background on V2V Technology 
Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) technology 
consists of systems that enable vehicles to broadcast Basic Safety Messages (BSMs) about their speed, heading, brake status, and other vehicle information using the radiofrequency 
spectrum, and to receive the same information from surrounding vehicles also equipped with the technology. When received in a timely manner, this information could help vehicle systems identify potential crash situations with other vehicles and provide warning 
messages to their drivers. V2V technology is distinct from ‘‘vehicle- resident’’ technologies (e.g., camera and 
sensor-based systems) and would operate separately from, or complementarily to, advanced driver assistance systems. V2V employs signals which can be received around corners or other physical obstructions and in suboptimal weather and light conditions, without line-of-sight limitations that vehicle-resident technologies can face. 
Summary of the Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking 
On January 12, 2017, the agency 
published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to create a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) for V2V communications, which NHTSA proposed to designate as FMVSS No. 150.
1The NPRM proposed 
to mandate V2V communication technology in all new light vehicles based on DSRC radiofrequency transmissions,
2and also proposed a 
pathway for vehicles to comply using non-DSRC technology if certain performance and interoperability standards were met. The NPRM further proposed technical requirements for the content, security, and handling of V2V messages as well as system requirements more broadly. While the NPRM proposed to allow compliance using non-DSRC technologies, all of the technical requirements (and expectations about the effectiveness of V2V communications at helping vehicles to prevent crashes) were based on DSRC, and the proposal would have required non-DSRC technologies to be interoperable with DSRC. 
The NPRM also discussed the 
possibility that the 5.9 gigahertz (GHz) band of radiofrequency spectrum in which DSRC has operated might be modified and/or opened to unlicensed devices, such as cordless telephones and outdoor broadband transceivers.
3 
NHTSA sought comment on what that 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 17, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM 20NOP1ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1