WT/DS601/6  
 
13 April 2023  
(23-2627) Page: 1/4 
  Original: English  
 
CHINA  – ANTI -DUMPING MEASURES ON STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTS FROM JAPAN  
AGREED PROCEDURES FOR ARBITRATION UNDER ARTICLE  25 OF THE DSU  
The following communication , dated 11 April 2023 , from the delegation of Japan  and the delegation 
of China  to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated at the request of these 
delegations.  
 
_______________  
 
 
Pursuant to Article 25.2 of the  Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of 
Disputes  (DSU), Japan and China notify the Dispute Settlement Body that they have agreed to the 
attached Procedures for Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU in the China — Anti-Dumping 
Measures on Stainless Steel Products from Japan  (DS601) dispute.  
 
Japan and China jointly request that you notify all members through circulation of those Procedures 
in the DS document series for that dispute.  
 
 
_______________  
  WT/DS601/6  
 
- 2 - 
 
  CHINA – ANTI -DUMPING MEASURES ON STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTS FROM JAPAN 
(DS601)  
AGREED PROCEDURES FOR ARBITRATION UNDER ARTICLE 25 OF THE  DSU 
 
 
1. In order to give effect to communication JOB/DSB/1/Add.12 in this dispute, Japan and China 
(hereafter the "parties") mutually agree pursuant to  Article 25.2 of the Understanding on Rules and 
Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU) to enter into arbitration under Article 25 of 
the DSU to decide any appeal from any final panel report1 as issued to the parties in dispute 
China  – Anti-Dumping Measures on Stainless Steel Products From Japan  (DS601). Any party to the 
dispute may initiate arbitration in accordance with these a greed procedures.  
 
2. The arbitration may only be initiated if the Appellate Body is not able to hear an appeal in  this 
dispute under Article 16.4 and 17 of the DSU. For the purposes of these agreed procedures, such 
situation is deemed to arise where, on the date of issuance of the final panel report to the parties, 
there are fewer than three Appellate Body members.  
For greater certainty, if the Appellate Body is able to hear appeals at the date on which the final 
panel report is issued to the parties, a party may not initiate an arbitration, and the parties shall be 
free to consider an appeal under Articles 16.4 and 17 of the DSU.  
 
3. In order to facilitate the proper administration of arbitration under these agreed procedures, the 
parties hereby jointly request the panel to notify the parties of the anticipated date of circulation of 
the final panel report within th e meaning of Article 16 of the DSU, no later than 45 days in advance 
of that date.  
 
4. Following the issuance of the final panel report to the parties, but no later than 10 days prior to 
the anticipated date of circulation of the final panel report to the  rest of the Membership, any party 
may request that the panel suspend the panel proceedings with a view to initiating the arbitration 
under these agreed procedures. Such request by any party is deemed to constitute a joint request 
by the parties for suspen sion of the panel proceedings for 12 months pursuant to Article 12.12 of 
the DSU.  
 
The parties hereby jointly request the panel to provide for the following, before the suspension takes 
effect:  
i. the lifting of confidentiality with respect of the final panel report under the Working Procedures of 
the panel;  
ii. the transmission of the panel record to the arbitrators upon the filing of the Notice of Appeal : 
Rule 25 of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review shall apply mutatis mutandis ;  
iii. the transmission of the final panel report in the working languages of the WTO to the parties and 
to the third parties2.  
 
Except as provided in paragraphs 6 and 18, the parties shall not request the panel to resume the 
panel proceedings.  
 
5. The arbitration shall be initiated by filing of a Notice of Appeal with the WTO Secretariat no later 
than 20 days after the suspension of the panel proceedings referred to in paragraph 4 has taken 
effect. The Notice of Appeal shall include the final pan el report in the working languages of the WTO. 
The Notice of Appeal shall be simultaneously notified to the other party or parties and to the third 
parties in the panel proceedings. Rules 20 -23 of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review shall 
apply mutatis mutandis .  
 
6. Subject to paragraph 2, where the arbitration has not been initiated under these agreed 
procedures, the parties shall be deemed to have agreed not to appeal the panel report pursuant to 
Articles 16.4 and 17 of the DSU, with a view to it s adoption by the DSB. If the panel proceedings 
 
1 For greater certainty, this includes any final panel report issued in compliance proceedings pursuant to 
Article 21.5 of the DSU.  
2 The parties confirm that it is not their intention that the panel report be circulated within the meaning 
of Article 16 of the DSU.  WT/DS601/6  
 
- 3 - 
 
  have been suspended in accordance with paragraph 4, but no Notice of Appeal has been filed in 
accordance with paragraph 5, the parties hereby jointly request the panel to resume the panel 
proceedings.  
 
7. Th e arbitrators shall be three persons selected from  the pool of 10 standing appeal arbitrators 
composed in accordance with paragraph 4 of communication JOB/DSB/1/Add.12 (hereafter the "pool 
of arbitrators")3. The selection from the  pool of arbitrators will be done on the basis of the same 
principles and methods that apply to form a division of the Appellate Body under Article 17.1 of the 
DSU and Rule 6(2) of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review, including the principle of 
rotation.4 The WTO Director  General will notify the parties and third parties of the results of the 
selection. The arbitrators shall elect a Chairperson. Rule 3(2) of the Working Procedure for Appellate 
Review shall apply, mutatis mutandis , to the decision -making by the arbitrators.   
 
8. In order to give effect to paragraph 5 of communication JOB/DSB/1/Add.12 in this dispute, the 
arbitrators may discuss their decisions relating to the appeal with all of the other members of the 
pool of arbitrators, without prejudice to the exclusive responsibility and freedom of the arbitrators 
with respect to such decisions and their quality. All members of the pool of arbitrators shall receive 
any document relating to the appeal.  
 
9. An appeal shall be limited to issues of law covered by the panel report and legal interpretations 
developed by the panel. The arbitrators may uphold, modify or reverse the legal findings and 
conclusions of the panel. Where applicable, the arbitration award shall include recommendations, as 
envisaged in Article 19 of the  DSU. The findings of the panel which have not been appealed shall be 
deemed to form an integral part of the arbitration award together with the arbitrators' own findings.  
 
10. The arbitrators shall only address those issues that are necessary for the res olution of the 
dispute. They shall address only those issues that have been raised by the parties, without prejudice 
to their obligation to rule on jurisdictional issues.  
 
11. Unless otherwise provided for in these agreed procedures, the arbitration shall  be governed, 
mutatis mutandis , by the provisions of the DSU and other rules and procedures applicable to 
Appellate Review. This includes in particular the Working Procedures for Appellate Review and the 
timetable for appeals provided for therein as well a s the Rules of Conduct5. The arbitrators may 
adapt the Working Procedures for Appellate Review and the timetable for appeals provided for 
therein, where justified under Rule 16 of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review, after 
consulting the parties.  
 
12. The parties request the arbitrators to issue the award within 90 days following the filing of the 
Notice of Appeal. To that end, the arbitrators may take appropriate organizational measures to 
streamline the proceedings, without prejudice to the proc edural rights and obligations of the parties 
and due process. Such measures may include decisions on page limits, time limits and deadlines as 
well as on the length and number of hearings required.  
 
13. If necessary in order to issue the award within the 90 day time -period, the arbitrators may also 
propose substantive measures to the parties, such as an exclusion of claims based on the alleged 
lack of an objective assessment of the facts pursuant to Article 11 of the DSU.6 
 
14. On a proposal from the arbi trators, the parties may agree to extend the 90 day time -period for 
the issuance of the award.  
 
 
3 If the pool of arbitrators has not been composed, footnote 1 to paragraph 4 of communication 
JOB/DSB/1/Add.12 shall apply.  
4 However, at the request of a party to a dispute, any member of the pool of arbitrators who is not a 
national of a partic ipating Member shall be excluded from the selection process. Two nationals of the same 
Member shall not serve on the same case.  
5 For greater certainty, paragraphs 14 – 17 of the Rules of Conduct shall apply to arbitrators.  
6 For greater certainty, the pro posal of the arbitrators is not legally binding and it will be up to the party 
concerned to agree with the proposed substantive measures. The fact that the party concerned does not agree 
with the proposed substantive measures shall not prejudice the consid eration of the case or the rights of the 
parties.  WT/DS601/6  
 
- 4 - 
 
  15. The parties agree to abide by the arbitration award, which shall be final. Pursuant to Article 25.3 
of the DSU, the award shall be notified to, but not ado pted by, the DSB and to the Council or 
Committee of any relevant agreement.  
 
16. Only parties to the dispute, not third parties, may initiate the arbitration. Third parties which 
have notified the DSB of a substantial interest in the matter before the pan el pursuant to Article 
10.2 of the DSU may make written submissions to, and shall be given an opportunity to be heard 
by, the arbitrators. Rule 24 of the Working Procedures for Appellate Review shall apply mutatis 
mutandis .  
 
17. Pursuant to Article 25.4 of the DSU, Articles 21 and 22 of the DSU shall apply mutatis mutandis 
to the arbitration award issued in this dispute.  
 
18. At any time during the arbitration, the appellant, or other appellant, may withdraw its appeal, 
or other appeal, by notifying the arbitrators. This notification shall also be notified to the panel and 
third parties, at the same time as the notification to the arbitrators. If no other appeal or appeal 
remains, the notification shall be deemed to constitute  a joint request by the parties to resume panel 
proceedings under Article 12.12 of the DSU.7 If an other appeal or appeal remains at the time an 
appeal or other appeal is withdrawn, the arbitration shall continue.  
 
19. The parties shall jointly notify th ese agreed procedures to the panel in China – Anti-Dumping 
Measures on Stainless Steel Products From Japan  (DS601) and ask the panel to grant, where 
applicable, the joint requests formulated in paragraphs 3, 4, 6, and 18.8 
 
 
__________  
 
7 If the authority of the panel has lapsed pursuant to Article 12.12 of the DSU, the arbitrators shall issue 
an award that incorporates the findings and conclusions of the panel in their entirety.  
8 For greater certainty, should any of these requests not be granted by the panel, the parties will agree 
on alternative procedural modalities to preserve the effects of the relevant provisions of these agreed 
procedures.