MOREPRESS RELEASE
PRESS/TPRB/193
15 May 2002
(02-2714)
TRADE POLICY REVIEW BODY
REVIEW OF SLOVENIA
TPRB'S EVALUATION
The Trade Policy Review Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO) concluded its first
review of Slovenia on 13 and 15 of May 2002. The text of the Chairperson's concluding remarks is
attached as a summary of the salient points which emerged during the discussion.
The review enables the TPRB to conduct a collec tive examination of the full range of trade
policies and practices of each WTO member countries at regular periodic intervals to monitor
significant trends and developments which may have an impact on the global trading system.
The review is based on two reports which are prepared respectively by the WTO Secretariat
and the government under review and which cover all aspects of the country's trade policies, includingits domestic laws and regulations, the institutional framework, bilateral, regional and other
preferential agreements, the wider economic needs and the external environment. A record of the
discussion and the Chairperson's summing-up together with these two reports will be published in due
course as the complete trade policy review of Slovenia and will be available from the WTO
Secretariat, Centre William Rappard, 154 rue de Lausanne, 1211 Geneva 21.PRESS/TPRB/193
Page 2
MORESince December 1989, the following reports have been completed: Argentina (1992 and 1999),
Australia (1989, 1994 and 1998), Austria (1992), Ba hrain (2000) Bangladesh (1992 and 2000), Benin
(1997), Bolivia (1993 and 1999), Botswana (1998), Brazil (1992, 1996 and 2000), Brunei Darussalam
(2001), Burkina Faso (1998), Cameroon (1995  and 2001), Canada (1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1998 and
2000), Chile (1991 and 1997), Colombia (1990 and 1996), Costa Rica (1995 and 2001), Côte d’Ivoire
(1995), Cyprus (1997), the Czech Republic (1996 and 2001), the Dominican Republic (1996), Egypt
(1992 and 1999), El Salvador (1996), the Eu ropean Communities (1991, 1993, 1995, 1997 and 2000),
Fiji (1997), Finland (1992), Gabon (2001), Gh ana (1992 and 2001), Guatemala (2002), Guinea
(1999), Hong Kong (1990, 1994 and 1998), Hungar y (1991 and 1998), Iceland (1994 and 2000), India
(1993 and 1998), Indonesia (1991, 1994 and 1998), Is rael (1994 and 1999), Jamaica (1998), Japan
(1990, 1992, 1995,1998 and 2000), Kenya (1993 and 2000), Korea, Rep. of (1992, 1996 and 2000),
Lesotho (1998), Macao (1994 and 2001), Madagascar  (2001), Malawi (2002), Malaysia (1993, 1997
and 2001), Mali (1998), Mauritius (1995 and 2001), Mexico (1993, 1997 and 2002), Morocco (1989and 1996), Mozambique (2001), New Zealand ( 1990 and 1996), Namibia (1998), Nicaragua (1999),
Nigeria (1991 and 1998), Norway  (1991, 1996 and 2000), OECS (2001), Pakistan (1995 and 2002),
Papua New Guinea (1999), Paraguay (1997), Peru (1994 and 2000), the Philippines (1993 and 1999),
Poland (1993 and 2000), Romania (1992 and 1999), Senegal (1994), Singapore (1992, 1996 and
2000), Slovak Republic (1995 and 2001), Slovenia ( 2002), the Solomon Islands (1998), South Africa
(1993 and 1998), Sri Lanka (1995), Swaziland (1998 ), Sweden (1990 and 1994), Switzerland (1991,
1996 and 2000 (jointly with Liechtenstein)), Tanzania (2000), Thailand (1991, 1995 and 1999), Togo
(1999), Trinidad and Tobago (1998), Tunisia (1994), Turkey (1994 and 1998), the United States
(1989, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1999 and 2001), Uganda ( 1995 and 2001), Uruguay (1992 and 1998),
Venezuela (1996), Zambia (1996) and Zimbabwe (1994).PRESS/TPRB/193
Page 3
MORETRADE POLICY REVIEW BODY
REVIEW OF SLOVENIA
CONCLUDING REMARKS OF THE CHAIRPERSON
This first Trade Policy Review of Slovenia has been excellent. Our discussion has been
thorough and comprehensive, and has raised important trade issues.  Our dialogue has provided a
good understanding of Slovenia's trade-related policies and practices, not the least due to the open and
full involvement of State Secretary Renata Vitez and her delegation, and to the active engagement ofmany delegations.
Members commended Slovenia for its good economic performance.  Slovenia's trade and
investment liberalization efforts have been key elements in its reform programme aimed at restoring
macroeconomic stability and establishing a modern, stable, and fully functioning market economy.  Inconsequence, Slovenia is now well integrated in the world economy through closer trade and
investment links.
Members also praised Slovenia for its strong commitment to the multilateral trading system,
and commended its strong support for the launching of the Doha Development Agenda. At the sametime, Members noted that much of the orientation of Slovenia's economic and trade policies is driven
by its goal of accession to the European Union (EU).  Several Members maintaining preferential trade
agreements with Slovenia commented on the positive effects of such agreements on trade and
investment for Slovenia.  Other Members also noted that, in general, falling trade barriers under
preferential agreements have not been matched by similar improvements for MFN partners. This was
a source of concern to a number of Members, who encouraged Slovenia to narrow the gap.
Several Members noted that an important gap exists between Slovenia's bound and applied
tariff rates, which could undermine the predictability of the tariff regime, although Slovenia has never
exploited this gap.  Some Members requested Slovenia to reduce the gap between applied and bound
rates in the context of the current WTO market access negotiations. There was also some concern
about the escalation in the tariff.
Members commended Slovenia's various initiatives to streamline and increase transparency in
many administrative areas, including customs administration. Clarifications were requested on the
simplified customs procedures.  Some concerns were also expressed about Slovenia's non-automatic
licensing requirements related to public security, safety, health, and the environment; and to theadministration of tariff quotas in agriculture.
Some Members noted that Slovenia has enacted legislation on trade remedy measures, while
having made very little use of it. Several Members encouraged Slovenia to quickly complete its
accession to the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement.
On sectoral policies, Members noted the increase in the level of government assistance to
agriculture, and Slovenia's plans to harmonize support systems with the EU's Common Agricultural
Policy. Concerns were expressed about agriculture being shielded from international competition by
border measures (high tariffs and restrictive tariff quotas).PRESS/TPRB/193
Page 4
Members indicated interest in developments in telecommunications, transport, and tourism,
notably with respect to foreign participation, th e role of the domestic regulators, and commitments
under GATS. On financial services, questions were asked about the 1992 crisis, the privatization plans
and the degree of competition, particularly in the insurance sector.  Several Members thought it
desirable to further open services activities to private investment, observing Slovenia's positive
experience with liberalization in other areas.
Members also sought further clarification on a number of specific areas, including:
− structural weaknesses such as labour market rigidities, administrative obstacles, use of public
resources, and plans to overcome them;
− foreign direct investment (FDI) regime, incentives, and policies for becoming a springboard
for doing business in south-east Europe;
− privatization process, methods, and future plans, particularly for divesting some key financial
and telecommunication enterprises;
− safeguards legislation and its application to FTAs;
− scientific approach to SPS matters;
− export subsidies, and subsidy programmes that support manufacturing sectors;  and
− protection of intellectual property rights.
The Slovenian delegation gave written and oral replies to questions posed during the Review.
The replies provided have made a major contribution to this meeting, and were clearly appreciated by
all Members.
In conclusion, I believe that through this Review we have gained a first-hand appreciation of
Slovenia's achievements since its independence in 1991, and of the challenges that lie ahead.
Slovenia is now seen by many Members as a prime example of the benefits of trade and investment
liberalization, notwithstanding a number of cyclical and structural problems. However, Slovenia's
liberalization paradigm raises important questions for all WTO Members concerning the relationship
between regional and multilateral efforts, questions that no doubt we will have to come to grips with
as part of the Doha Development Agenda.
For Slovenia itself, an additional challenge is to manage its process of accession to the EU, its
large number of preferential agreements, together with the many components of the evolving
multilateral agenda.  Moreover, it is possible that dealing with issues such as ownership and
competition in some critical areas, such as ag riculture, telecommunications, financial services,
transport, and tourism, would contribute to an improved growth profile.  Slovenia's exemplary
participation in this Review bodes well for its capacity to meet those challenges, to the benefit of its
people and its trading partners.
END