New Zealand WT/TPR/S/115
Page 15
II. TRADE POLICY REGIME:  FRAMEWORK AND OBJECTIVES
(1) GENERAL CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK :  OVERVIEW
1. The only significant change in New Zealand's general constitutional and legal framework
since its previous Review in 1996 is the Human Rights Amendment Act 2001.1  New Zealand is a
constitutional monarchy whose constitution is based on a combination of formal legal documents,
common law, and constitutional conventions;  the current structure of Government is defined by theConstitution Act, 1986. Government consists of three branches, the unicameral Parliament, the
Executive, and the Judiciary.  The Crown is vested in the British monarch, represented by the
Governor General.
2. Parliament, which consists of the Crown and the House of Representatives, whose members
are elected by national suffrage, enacts laws and supervises the administration of Government.Proposed legislation may be introduced in Parliament by the relevant minister or, with the exception
of Money Bills, by private members.  Parliament normally sits for a three-year period unless it is
dissolved before that by the Governor General on the advice of the Prime Minister.
2
3. Executive authority is vested in the Executive Council or Cabinet, headed by the Prime
Minister.  Under the Constitution Act, 1986, members of the Cabinet must be elected representativesof Parliament.
3  The Executive Council advises the Crown on policy matters or decisions taken by
Cabinet.
4. New Zealand has an independent judiciary headed by the Chief Justice of New Zealand.  Its
Courts of general jurisdiction consist of, in ascending  order of hierarchy, the District Courts, the High
Court, the Court of Appeal, and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.  In addition, there are a
number of specialist courts.4  The Court of Appeal is the highest Court based in New Zealand.
However, a further appeal may, in some cases, be sent to the Judicial Committee of the PrivyCouncil.
5  The New Zealand Government is currently planning to establish a new Supreme Court, as
the final appellate Court, based in New Zealand, and to end appeals to the Judicial Committee of the
Privy Council.
(2) DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF TRADE POLICY
(i) Main trade laws
5. All trade-related legislation must be enacted by Parliament.  International obligations, such as
WTO obligations, must be implemented domestically through enabling legislation passed by
                                                     
1 The Act represents a change to New Zealand's general constitutional framework, although it does not
have a direct impact on trade policy.
2 Sections 17 and 18 of the Constitution Act 1986.  Parliament is also required to convene not less than
six weeks from the date at which election returns were announced (Article 19).
3 In exceptional circumstances, a non-member may be appointed and may hold office for up to 40 days
if that person was a candidate at the previous general election;  or where a minister ceases to be member of
Parliament (for 28 days) (Article 6).
4 These determine proceedings at first instance on matters such as employment, family, environment
and Maori land law.  Further details are given in WTO (1996).
5 The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council wa s formally established by the United Kingdom
Judicial Committee Act in 1833 to determine appeals from British Colonial Courts and certain United Kingdombodies.  The judges are senior United Kingdom judges and some judges of the Superior Courts in theCommonwealth, which continue to use the Judicial Committee ( Courts of New Zealand  [Online].  Available at:
www.courts.govt.nz/courts/high_court.html [6 June 2002]).WT/TPR/S/115 Trade Policy Review
Page 16
Parliament. They are enforceable in New Zealand's courts only through the domestic legislation
implementing New Zealand's international obligations.  New Zealand's main trade and trade-related
laws are listed in Table AII.1.
(ii) Development and implementation of trade policy
6. Trade policy formulation, including reviews of current policy, is carried out through public
consultation and debate;  the consultations solicit submissions on a wide range of topics such as thetariff, sectoral regulations, etc., from anyone interested in the issue.
6
7. The main agency dealing with trade policy formulation and implementation is the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and Trade, in close cooperation with other key ministries such as the Ministry of
Economic Development, which "facilitates, leads and implements the Government's vision for
sustainable economic development".  The Ministry of Economic Development also implements policyon trade-related issues such as tariff concessions, trade remedies, standards and conformance,
competition policy, and intellectual property rights.
7  The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry,
inter alia,  works with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade to ensure market access for
New Zealand's agricultural exports.
8. New Zealand does not have any independent agencies to assess government policy.
However, the extensive consultation process through which policy is formulated and reviewed ensures
that there is a high level of transparency in th e policy-making process.  The Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and Trade, in developing trade policy, consults routinely with stakeholders, including
business, unions, Maori, consumer representatives, local government, and other non-governmental
organizations.  The purpose of these consultations is to inform interested parties of developments that
may affect them and also to harness their practical experience.  Other relevant government agencies
may also participate in these consultations.  The authorities also point out that any papers consideredby Cabinet must demonstrate that effective consultation has occurred;  in addition, a Regulatory
Impact/Business Compliance Cost Statement must accompany any Cabinet submission proposing
changes to legislation or regulations.  Reviews of government policies are also carried out from time
to time.  The recent Review of the Centre, for example, addressed issues such as delivery of policies
through improved inter-agency interaction, and the fragmentation of public services through aproliferation of agencies.
8  The changes suggested include improved coordination and cooperation
between departments and other agencies, and ways in which to tackle fragmentation in the public
sector.  The Government established a Change Implementation Advisory Group in April 2002 to
implement the changes suggested by the Review.
(3) TRADE POLICY OBJECTIVES
9. Recognizing that trade is vital to the New Z ealand economy and to raising living standards of
the population, successive governments have striven to reduce barriers to imports.  Trade reform was
initiated in the early 1980s, when New Zealand unilaterally abolished import licensing and gradually
reduced its MFN tariffs from an average of around 30% to around 4% currently (Chapter III(2)( iii)).9
The decision to reduce tariff and non-tariff barriers unilaterally followed from similar steps taken
bilaterally to implement the Australia and New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Agreement
                                                     
6 New Zealand is currently consulting on tariff reform.  An invitation to participate in the consultation
process was announced on 28 February 2002.  Ministry of Economic Development online information.
Available at: http://www.med.govt.nz/buslt/tariffs/media/20020228.html [13 June 2002].
7 Ministry of Economic Development (undated).
8 Government of New Zealand (2002a).
9 New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (1999).New Zealand WT/TPR/S/115
Page 17
(ANZCERTA), signed in 1983, which called for a removal of tariff and non-tariff barriers between
the two members.  New Zealand's decision to pursue unilateral trade reform was complemented by the
multilateral process under the WTO and regional agreements such as APEC;  New Zealand intends to
meet the APEC goal of trade and investment  liberalization by 2010 on a reciprocal basis.
10. The only major change in trade policy since New Zealand's previous Review appears to have
been a shift from unilateral trade liberalization to wards regional and bilateral trade liberalization.
New Zealand's unilateral trade liberalization policy was suspended in 1999 and a decision was made
to concentrate on reciprocal trade concessions, for example through regional and bilateral free-trade
agreements.  Thus, since its previous Review, New Zealand has concluded a bilateral trade agreement
with Singapore and has commenced negotiations with Hong Kong, China, as well as with the trilateral
"Pacific three", which includes Chile and Singapore.  Various aspects of the ANZCERTA have alsobeen strengthened during the period (section (4)(iii) below).
(4) T
RADE AGREEMENTS AND ARRANGEMENTS
(i) WTO
(a) Overview
11. New Zealand provides at least MFN treatment to all Members of the WTO.  As a small, open
economy, New Zealand believes that a rules-based multilateral trade system is important in advancing
and protecting its trade interests.  New Zealand is an original Member of the WTO, depositing its
instrument of ratification on 7 December 1994.10  It also signed the Fourth and Fifth Protocols to the
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) (Chapter IV(4)(i)), and is a member of the
Information Technology Agreement (ITA).
(b) Trade negotiations
12. New Zealand's support for multilateral negotiations has been strengthened by the benefits that
have accrued to New Zealand from the Uruguay Round, which incorporated new sectors under the
WTO.  Nevertheless, New Zealand has been frustrated by the lack of progress made in integrating
agriculture fully into the WTO framework.  Market access in agriculture is particularly important for
New Zealand, because it accounts for  a large share of merchandise exports.  At the WTO Ministerial
Conference held in Doha, in November 2001, New Zealand reiterated its wish for "the unjustifiablediscrimination against agriculture" to be dealt with decisively.
11  In addition, New Zealand supports
reform in textiles and clothing.  New Zealand also stresses the need to provide better market access to
developing and least developed countries;  in this regard it removed all remaining tariffs on imports
from least developed countries on 1 July 2001.
13. At the Ministerial meeting in Doha, New Zealand favoured the launching of a new
multilateral trade round.12  New Zealand's main interests in new negotiations include further
liberalization of market access for agriculture, non-agricultural goods such as fisheries and forestry,
                                                     
10 International treaties are ratified by the Government and then tabled in Parliament.
11 WTO document WT/MIN(01)/ST/33, 10 November 2001.
12 See for example, Prime Minister's Statement to Parliament – Part I  [Online].  Available at:
http://www.executive.govt.nz/speech.c fm?speechralph=33612&SR=1 [12 June 2002];  and Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and Trade (undated a).WT/TPR/S/115 Trade Policy Review
Page 18
and services;  strengthened trade rules to guard against protectionism and unfair trade practices;  and
better integration of the WTO with other priorities such as sustainable development.13
14. In negotiations on agricultural liberalization, which have been under way since March 2000,
New Zealand, along with the Cairns Group of agricultural exporting countries14, has presented
proposals on market access, export restrictions and taxes, and domestic support.  The proposals argue
that market access in agriculture is restricted by high tariffs and other measures such as specialsafeguards;  these measures distort world market prices for agricultural products and discourage
liberalization.  The proposals on market access and export restrictions call for time-bound
negotiations to reduce these barriers, including a more rapid pace of liberalization to ensure access for
developing, least developed, and net food importing developing countries.
15  With regard to domestic
support, the Cairns Group, proposes a reduction in and eventual elimination of all trade-distorting and
production-distorting domestic support.16
15. In the services negotiations, New Zealand's position is one of, inter alia:   actively
encouraging liberalization of existing GATS commitments;  increasing the coverage of sectors by
Members in their commitments;  and eliminating MFN exemptions, while keeping in mind the
additional flexibility requirements of developing and least developed countries.17  New Zealand has
also sought to engage constructively on, inter alia , transparency in negotiations, credit for
autonomous liberalization undertaken by Members, and progress in the on-going discussions on
disciplines for domestic regulations and an emergency safeguard mechanism.  New Zealand has
submitted proposals on construction and related engineering services, air transport services, education
services, sporting services, and consulting services.18
(c) Notifications
16. Like all WTO Members, New Zealand is expected to make regular notifications to various
WTO Committees regarding its trade and related policies.  The status of selected notifications, as at
end February 2003, is given in Table II.1.
Table II.1
Status of selected notifications to the WTO, 1995 to February 2003
WTO Agreement Description of requirementDocument symbol and date of most
recent notification
Agriculture
Articles 10 and 18.2 Export subsidies (outlays and quantities) G/AG/N/NZL/35, 14 November 2002
Article 18.2 Domestic support (DS:1) G/AG/N/NZL/33, 14 November 2002
Article 18.3 New or modified domestic support measures exempt
from reduction (DS:2)G/AG/N/NZL/34, 14 November 2002
Table II.1 (cont'd)
                                                     
13 Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (undated b).
14 The other members of the Cairns Group are:  Argentina, Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile,
Colombia, Costa Rica, Fiji, Guatemala, Indonesia, Malaysia, Paraguay, Philippines, South Africa, Thailand, andUruguay.
15 WTO documents G/AG/NG/W/54, 10 Novemb er 2000 and G/AG/NG/ W/93, 21 December 2000.
See also statement by New Zealand at the Sevent h Special Session of the Committee on Agriculture,
26-28 March 2001 (WTO document G/AG/NG/W/153, 4 April 2001).
16 WTO document G/AG/NG/W/35, 22 September 2000.
17 WTO document S/CSS/W/90, 26 June 2001.
18 WTO documents S/CSS/W/91, S/CSS/W/92, S/CSS/ W/93, and S/CSS/W/94, all dated 26 June 2001;
and S/CSS/W/119, 6 November 2001.New Zealand WT/TPR/S/115
Page 19
WTO Agreement Description of requirementDocument symbol and date of most
recent notification
Article 18.2 Information on tariff quotas administration (MA:1) G/AG/N/NZL/1/Add. 1, 21 June 2001
Article 18.2 Volume of imports under tariff quotas (MA:2) G/AG/N/NZL/32, 13 November 2002
Article 5 Special safeguard (MA:5) G/AG/N/NZL/31, 13 November 2002
Article 16.2 Measures concerning the possible negative effects of the
reform programme on least developed and net food
importing developing countriesG/AG/N/NZL/30, 11 December 2001
Anti-dumping
Article 16.4 Anti-dumping actions taken G/ADP/N/98/NZL, 7 February 2003
Article 16.5 Domestic procedures and authorities competent to
initiate and conduct investigationsG/ADP/N/14/Add.15, 16 October 2002
Article 18.5 Laws and regulations (and changes thereof) G/ADP/N/1/NZL/2/Suppl.1,
6 February 2003
GATT 1994 Article VII(Customs valuation)Laws and regulations G/VAL/N/1/NZL/1, 28 August 1995
GATT 1994 Art. XVII:4(a) Notification of products traded by state enterprises G/STR/N/7/NZL, 27 July 2001
Subsidies
Articles 25.1 to 25.6 Subsidies programmes G/SCM/N/48/NZL, 13 October 2000
Article 25.12 Notification of authorities competent to initiate and
conduct investigationsG/SCM/N/18/Add.15, 16 October 2002
Countervailing measures
Article 25.11 Semi-annual report G/SCM/N/93/NZL, 10 February 2003
Article 32.6 Laws and regulations G/SCM/N/1/NZL/2/Suppl.1,
6 February 2003
Safeguards
Article 12.6 Laws and regulations G/SG/N/1/NZL/1, 7 April 1995
Article 12.5 Notification and consultations on safeguard measures G/SG/N/12/NZL/1, 17 May 2002
Sanitary and phytosanitarymeasures
Article 7, Annex B Notification of changes in sanitary and phytosanitary
measuresG/SPS/N/NZL/ 162-197, 2002
Technical barriers to trade
Articles 10.1 and 10.3 National Enquiry Point G/TBT/ENQ/21, 29 November 2002
Article 10.7 Agreement reached by a Member with another country
or countries on issues related to technical regulations,
standards or conformity assessment proceduresG/TBT/10.7/N/27, 14 October 1999
Annex 3 paragraph C Standardizing bodies having accepted or withdrawn
from the Code of Good Practice for the Preparation,
Adoption, and Application of StandardsG/TBT/CS/N/86, 10 December 1997
Textiles and clothing
Article 3.1 Restrictions maintained prior to entry into force of the
WTO AgreementG/TMB/N/89, 24 May 1995
Article 6.1 Notifications of Special Safeguard Mechanism G/TMB/N/119, 15 August 1995
TRIMs
Article 6.2 Publications in which TRIMs may be found G/TRIMS/N/2/Rev.10,
11 December 2002
Article 5.1 Investment measures G/TRIMS/N/1/NZL/1, 25 May 1999
Table II.1 (cont'd)WT/TPR/S/115 Trade Policy Review
Page 20
WTO Agreement Description of requirementDocument symbol and date of most
recent notification
TRIPS
Article 63.2 Laws and regulations IP/N/1/NZL/P/4/Add.1, 16 May 1999
Article 67 Contact point for technical cooperations on TRIPS IP/N/7/Rev.2, 17 September 1998
Article 69 Contact points IP/N/3/Rev.2, 22 July 1996
Articles 4(d), 1.3 and 3.1 Notification of international agreements related to the
protection of intellectual property and which entered
into force prior to the entry into force of the WTO
AgreementIP/N/2/NZL/1, 14 September 1995
Decision of TRIPS Council
(21 November 1995)Checklist of issues on enforcement IP/N/6/NZL/1, 24 February 1997
General Agreement on Trade in
Services (GATS)
Article III:3 Enquiry points and information on service supplier S/ENQ/78/Rev.3, 18 December 2002
Article V.7 (a) An economic integration or free-trade agreement that is
of the type refered to in paragraph 1 of Article V of the
GATSS/C/N/169, 19 September 2001
Article XXVII (k)(ii) Labour mobility S/C/N/2, 23 January 1995
Source: WTO documents.
(d) Disputes and consultations
17. Since the previous Review, New Zealand has been involved in six disputes as a
complainant.19  In addition, New Zealand participated as a third party in the context of disputes
between Canada and the European Communities (Measures concerning meat and meat products,
DS26);  the United States and the European Communities (Definitive safeguard measures on importsof wheat gluten, DS161);  and Australia and Korea (Measures affecting imports of fresh, chilled and
frozen beef, DS169).
(ii) Regional agreements
(a) APEC
18. New Zealand participates in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Forum,
established in 1989.
20  The APEC policy of "open regionalism" conforms with New Zealand's
approach to liberalization;  as an industrialized country member, New Zealand intends to meet the
trade and investment liberalization goals of APEC, on a reciprocal basis, by 2010.
                                                     
19 Against Hungary (DS35), the European Commun ities (DS72), India (DS93) , Canada (DS113), and
the United States (DS177 and DS258).
20 The other APEC members are:  Australia;  Brunei Darussalam;  Canada;  Chile;  China;  Hong Kong
China;  Indonesia;  Japan;  Korea;  Malaysia;  Mexico;  Papua New Guinea;  Peru;  the Philippines;  Russia;Singapore;  Chinese Taipei;  Thailand;  United States;  and Viet Nam.New Zealand WT/TPR/S/115
Page 21
(b) South Pacific Regional Trade and Economic Agreement (SPARTECA)
19. New Zealand grants duty-free access to all products from Forum Island countries21, under the
South Pacific Regional Trade and Economic Agreement (SPARTECA), and will maintain these
preferences under the recently signed PACER.
(c) Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER)
20. The Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations was signed in August 2001.22  It is a
framework agreement that sets an outline for the future development of trade and economic relations
across the region.  It does not contain substantive trade liberalization provisions, but envisages a step
by step trade liberalization process, starting with a subsidiary free-trade agreement in goods among
Pacific Island Countries (the Pacific Island countr ies Trade Agreement, PICTA) and foreshadows the
future negotiation of forum-wide reciprocal free-trade agreements (including Australia andNew Zealand).  The PACER provides that Austra lia and New Zealand must continue to provide
individual Forum Island countries with the existing level of market access until such time as new
arrangements are concluded providing equal or better market access.  The agreement entered into
force on 3 October 2002.
(iii) Bilateral agreements
(a) ANZCERTA
21. Australia remains New Zealand's main trade partner.  Trade between the two countries has
developed through the Australia and New Zeal and Closer Economic Relations Agreement
(ANZCERTA), which entered into force on 1 January 1983.  The ANZCERTA covers all trade in
goods and services;  services were added to the agreement in 1988.  However, as MFN tariffs in both
countries are relatively low and has declined steadily, preferential access has being eroded.  The
agreement also contains provisions, inter alia , dealing with competition, government procurement,
and anti-dumping.
22. Since New Zealand's previous Review, the main changes in the ANZCERTA have
involved:  efforts to improve harmonization of f ood standards, including through the Arrangement on
Food Inspection Measures (AFIM), which came into force on 1 December 1997, the Trans-Tasman
Mutual Recognition Arrangement (TTMRA), which became operational on 1 May 1998, and anagreement on a Joint Food Code, which is due to come into force in December 2002;  a revision to the
Government Procurement Agreement;  and a Memorandum of Understanding on Business Law
Coordination, signed in 2000.
23  Other important changes are:  the revision of governance
arrangements under the ANZFA Treaty;  an Open Skies Air Services Agreement, which incorporates
the 1996 Single Aviation Market arrangements;  and progress on the negotiation of a bi-nationalagency to regulate therapeutics products.  Discussions are also ongoing on the possibilities of creating
a common trans-Tasman currency.
24  The authorities also noted that the twentieth anniversary of the
                                                     
21 The Forum Island countries are:  the Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati,
Nauru, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Republic of the Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga,Tuvalu, and Vanuatu.
22 Its members are Australia, the Forum Island countries, and New Zealand.
23 WTO document WT/REG111/R/B/2, 13 May 2002.
24 This is one of the issues currently being discussed by the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Select
Committee of the New Zealand Parliament.  Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade online information.Available at:  http://www.mft.govt.nz/foreign/regions/ australia/fadtc.html [5 June 2002].WT/TPR/S/115 Trade Policy Review
Page 22
signing of the ANZCERTA in 2003 will provide opportunities to examine ways of further extending
trans-Tasman trade and economic cooperation.
(b) New Zealand–Singapore Closer Economic Partnership
23. New Zealand and Singapore concluded a clos er economic partnership agreement (CEP) on
14 November 2000, which came into force on 1 January 2001.  The authorities consider that outside
the ANZCERTA, the CEP is the most comprehensive bilateral trade agreement signed byNew Zealand.  It aims to improve opportunities fo r trade in goods, services, and investment and
includes commitments to reduce barriers in these areas as well as technical and health-related barriers
between the two countries.  New Zealand's current average tariff on all merchandise imports from
Singapore that meet the rules of origin provided for in the agreement, including agriculture, is zero
(Chapter III(2)(iv)).
25
(c) Others
24. New Zealand grants tariff preferences to Canada under the Trade and Economic Cooperation
Agreement, which has been in effect since 1982.  The main features of the agreement remain
unchanged since 1996, and New Zealand allows preferential access for Canadian imports on
approximately 41% of the tariff;  the average tariff rate is 1.28% compared with an MFN average of4.1%.  New Zealand also grants preferential access to some goods from the United Kingdom,
although the difference between the overall MFN average tariff and that faced by goods from the
United Kingdom is negligible (Chapter III(2)(iii)).
(iv) Unilateral trade preferences
25. New Zealand introduced its generalized system of preferences (GSP) scheme on
1 January 1972.  The scheme has been reviewed and changed several times, most recently in 1997.
All products that meet the rules of origin, unless they  are included in a "negative list", are eligible for
GSP treatment for a restricted list of countries.
26  The negative list at present contains apparel,
footwear, and certain motor-vehicle parts and accessories.27  Under the scheme, tariff preferences of
up to 80% of the MFN rate are granted to developing countries and imports are duty free for least
developed countries (with the exception of footwear, for which they receive no preferences, and
apparel, for which they receive a small margin of preference).28  For some products, developing
countries are granted preferences in excess of 80% of the MFN rate29;  for certain articles of tin and
for wood pulp, for example, there is no duty.  As of November 2002, 102 developing countries and
49 least developed countries are beneficiaries of New Zealand's GSP scheme.
26. In the latest review of the GSP, it was determined that with declining MFN tariffs,
New Zealand's GSP scheme would s oon no longer be effective.  Thus, in 2001 New Zealand took the
additional step of removing tariffs on all imports from least developed countries.
27. For developing countries, preferential rates under the GSP were to be frozen on 1 July 2000
and then phased out as MFN tariffs were removed.  However, a change in government in 1999 led to a
                                                     
25 Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2002).
26 A number of countries were also "graduated" from the scheme between 1995 and 1998.
27 The exclusion of these products was made for "industry assistance reasons" (UNCTAD, 1999).
28 New Zealand follows the United Nations definition of least developed countries, i.e. countries with a
maximum per capita income of US$400 per annum.  Least developed countries have been beneficiaries ofNew Zealand's GSP since 1985.
29 UNCTAD (1999).New Zealand WT/TPR/S/115
Page 23
decision to freeze all tariffs at their July 1999 levels and to cease further tariff reductions, except for
those negotiated under reciprocal arrangements.  New Zealand also maintains a graduation policy
under the GSP, which ensures that once developing countries achieve a per capita income of 70% of
New Zealand's per capita income, they cease to become beneficiaries under the GSP;  product
graduation measures based on import competitiveness were phased out on 1 January 1998.  Some
15.5% of imports from developing countries and 15.4% of imports from least developed countriesentered New Zealand under GSP preferences in the period July 2001/June 2002.
30
(5) FOREIGN INVESTMENT REGIME
(i) Introduction
28. New Zealand maintains a relatively open and transparent foreign investment regime.  In most
sectors, foreign investment of up to 100% may be approved although legislative restrictions onforeign ownership apply to some specific New Zealand-based companies.  According to the
authorities, New Zealand welcomes and encourages investment from overseas and therefore maintains
a minimal level of controls over "significant" investment.
31  Significant in this context, relates to an
overseas person acquiring or controlling 25% or more of:  business or property worth more than
$NZ50 million;  land over five hectares and/or worth more than $NZ10 million;  land on mostoffshore islands;  land over 0.4 hectares that includes or adjoins "sensitive" land (such as on specific
islands, next to reserves, historic or heritage areas or lakes);  and land over 0.2 hectares that includes
or adjoins the foreshore.
29. As a result of a recent review of government policies to encourage foreign investment, the
Investment Promotion Agency (IPA) was created within Industry New Zealand and began operations
on 1 July 2002.
32  The functions of the new entity are to:  highlight investment opportunities;  simplify
and streamline investment evaluation;  liaise with appropriate government agencies, service providers,and potential business partners;  facilitate access to government support programmes;  provide limited
financial support;  and provide commercial advice and market investor and industry intelligence to
other government agencies, where appropriate.  Initial priorities are in information and
communications technology (ICT), creative, and bi otechnology sectors, with support being provided
to existing economic development activities in wood processing and niche manufacturing.  Theauthorities note that the IPA will also "seek to ta rget larger transactions that provide a meaningful
contribution to the growth and development of the New Zealand economy".
(ii) Legislative framework and procedures
30. New Zealand's legislation on foreign investme nt comprises the Overseas Investment Act,
1973, subsequently amended by the Overseas Investment Amendment Acts of 1995 and 1998;  theOverseas Investment Amendment Regulations 1995, subsequently amended by the Overseas
Investment Amendment Regulations 1999;  and the Overseas Investment Regulations, (No. 2), 2001.
The latest amendment, the Overseas Investment Amendment Act 1998 has been in force since
                                                     
30 The percentage is relatively low because the majority of imports from these sources enter duty free
under MFN rates or MFN concessions.  Thus, only 0.66% and 15.16% of imports from least developed and
developing countries, respectively, are subject to duty.
31 Overseas Investment Commission (2002a).
32 The new agency includes the investment operations carried out by Trade New Zealand's Investment
New Zealand Group and Industry New Zealand's Major Investment Service.WT/TPR/S/115 Trade Policy Review
Page 24
1 February 2002.  The main changes resulting from the new law relate to investment approval for
overseas persons in farm land.33
31. Under Section 14A of the Overseas Investment Amendment Act 1973, the criteria for
approval of investment other than in land are unchanged.  They require, inter alia :  that the overseas
person has relevant business experience and acumen;  that they demonstrate financial commitment to
the investment;  and that each person having beneficial interest in the investment of over 25%, or whoexercises control over the overseas person, are of good character.
34
32. Under the Overseas Investment Regulations, 1995, consent must also be sought if the
acquisition by overseas persons would, inter alia , result in a beneficial interest of 25% or more of the
securities or 25% or more of the voting power in the company, if the value of the assets of the issuer
of the securities exceeds $NZ50 million or if the price of the property to be acquired exceeds$NZ50 million.
35  Under the 1995 Regulations, consent must also be sought for the acquisition by an
overseas person of some kinds of land.36  The criteria for approval of investment in land other than
farm land include:  that the overseas person has relevant business experience and acumen;  that they
demonstrate financial commitment to the investme nt;  that each person with more than a 25%
beneficial interest in the investment or who exercises control over the overseas person, is of goodcharacter;  and that the investment be cons idered to be in the "national interest".
37  For overseas
investment in farm land, in addition to these criteria, ministers must be satisfied that the investment is
in the "national interest" and will or is likely to re sult in "substantial and identifiable benefits".  In
addition, criteria for purchase of farm land also requires that the land is offered for sale on the open
market to persons who are not overseas persons unless the Ministers of Finance and for Land
Information waive this requirement under section 14C.
33. Under the Fisheries Act 1983 foreign nationals require permission for obtaining fishing
quotas.38
34. Most sectors are open to FDI of up to 100%, subject to the approval procedures discussed
above.  Restrictions on total foreign equity owners hip do apply, however, to certain services, notably
air services, telecommunications, and maritime serv ices.  In air services, New Zealand maintains
foreign equity restrictions on airlines qualifying as a New Zealand Airline;  foreign nationals arepermitted to own up to 49% of national airlines, wi th up to 35% ownership by foreign airlines (25%
                                                     
33 An overseas person is defined as:  any person wh o is not a citizen of or not ordinarily resident in
New Zealand;  any company or body corporate incorporated outside New Zealand or a subsidiary of any
company or body corporate incorporated outside New Zealand;  any company incorporated in new Zealand in
which 25% or more of any class of shares is held by an overseas person or if the person has the right to exerciseor control the exercise of 25% or more of the voting power of the company;  and any nominee (includingcitizens of New Zealand) of an overseas person.
34 An additional requirement is that they must not be the kind of person referred to in Section 7(1) of
the Immigration Act, 1987.
35 Part II, Section 5 of the Overseas Investment Regulations.
36 As defined in the First Schedule of the Regulations, this includes:  land over five hectares;  all islands
except for certain islands under Part 2 of Schedule 1, wher e consent is required for land over 0.4 hectares;  areas
adjoining the foreshore exceeding 0.2 hectares;  any area adjoining a lake whose bed exceeds 8 hectares and
areas held for conservation, historic or heritage pur poses, where consent is required for the purchase of land
above 0.4 hectares;  land belonging to the Chatham Islands;  and any land whose value exceeds $NZ10 million.
37 To determine whether the investment is in the national interest the ministers must consider whether it
will or is likely to result in job creation, transfer of  technology or business skills, development of new export
markets, productivity improvements, and increased processing.
38 Permission may be granted under Section 57(3) only if the individuals involved are of good character
and if granting the permit is in the national interest;  see also WTO (1996).New Zealand WT/TPR/S/115
Page 25
by individual airlines).  For telecommunications services, foreign investment is limited to 49.9% in
the largest service provider, Telecom, formerly the monopoly state-owned provider of
telecommunications services.39  In addition, at least half of the company's Board must be nationals of
New Zealand.  In maritime services, there are certain circumstances in which ships that are majority
owned by foreigners may be registered in New Zealand.40
35. The Overseas Investment Act, 1973, is administered, under authority delegated by the
Ministry of Finance and by the Minister of Land Information, by the Overseas Investment
Commission, an independent body established under the Act and based at the Reserve Bank of
New Zealand.41  Under the Overseas Investment Regulations all applications not involving investment
in land and freehold "sensitive" land are handled by the Commission usually within ten working days;
decisions on sensitive land applications outside the Commission's delegated authority are made by theMinister of Finance and the Minister of Land Info rmation while the Minister of Finance and Minister
of Fisheries jointly determine applications under Sections 56 and 57 of the Fisheries Act, 1996.
According to the Commission, approximately 30% of applications for acquisition of land are decided
by the Ministers while the rest are decided by the Commission.
42  In addition to its main function of
processing applications by foreign investors, the Commission monitors overseas investment inNew Zealand and compliance with any conditions attached to approved investments.
  The
Commission also administers sections 56 and 57 of the Fisheries Act 1996, which relate to the issuing
of fishing quotas.
36. New Zealand does not provide any tax or other incentives solely to foreign investors.
37. Since its previous Trade Policy Review, New Zealand has signed bilateral investment
agreements with Argentina (27 August 1999) and Chile (22 July 1999);  these are not yet in force.
38. New Zealand has signed new avoidance of double taxation agreements with Chinese Taipei
(in force since 15 December 1997);  Thailand (in force since 14 December 1998);  Russia;  and South
Africa (not yet in force).  In addition, New Zealand has updated agreements with India (in force since
9 January 1997);  Korea (in force since 10 October 1997);  the Philippines (not in force);  and China
(signed on 7 October 1997).
                                                     
39 Furthermore, any investor, whether foreign or a national of New Zealand must obtain permission
from the Treasurer (Kiwi Shareholder) and the Telecom Company Board in order to hold more than 10% of thecompany's shares.
40 A foreign-owned vessel may be registered in New Zealand if it is leased under a bare charter (that is,
New Zealand operator and crew) provided that consent is given by the owner and foreign registry.
41 The Treasury is the primary policy adviser to the Government on FDI and since 1996 the Treasurer
has been responsible for FDI policy.  This responsibility is shared with the Minister of Land in the case of FDIconcerning land;  for all decisions regarding the fishing quota, the responsible authority is the Minister ofFisheries (Overseas Investment Commission, 2002b).
42 Overseas Investment Commission (2002b).