WORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONTN/MA/W/4
31 July 2002
(02-4241)
Negotiating Group on Market Access Original:  English
SCOPE OF THE NEGOTIATION ON NON-TARIFF BARRIERS
Submission by New Zealand
The following communication, dated 30 July 2002, has been received from the Permanent
Mission of New Zealand.
_______________
I. SUMMARY
This paper explores some possible guidelines for handling different categories of non-tariff issues.
II. INTRODUCTION
1. The Doha mandate on market access for non-agricultural products specifies that “negotiations
shall aim ... to reduce or as appropriate eliminate tariffs ... as well as non-tariff barriers, in particular
on products of export interest to developing countries”. Paragraph 16 stipulates that product coverage
is to be comprehensive and without a priori exclusions, and that the negotiations are to take full
account of the special needs and interests of developing and least developed country participants,
including through less than full reciprocity in reduction comments.
III. SCOPE OF THE NE GOTIATION ON NON-TARIFF BARRIERS
2. The theoretical scope of a negotiation on “non-tariff barriers” is extremely wide. One listing -
the U NCTAD TRAINS database - classifies non-tariff measures (NTMs) under six broad headings (eg
quantitative control measures, technical measures) and over eighty specific categories (eg localcontent requirements, labelling requirements). A full discussion on non-tariff measures would cover a
large proportion of WTO agreements and rules.
3. At this point it is not clear what range of issues the negotiation will address. Some might wish
to focus on specific measures applied by individual Members. Others might wish to concentrate onthe WTO provisions governing those measures. Either way we would expect this to be a proposal-
driven process focusing on issues identified by Members in submissions to the negotiating group.
IV. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEGOTIATIONS AND OTHER WORK ON NTMS
4. The mandate does not provide precise guidance on the relationship of the NTB negotiation in
the market access group with the wider WTO programme of work. There are a number of WTO
bodies handling non-tariff issues as part of the Doha mandate (in addition to the Negotiating Group onTN/MA/W/4
Page 2
Market Access these include the Negotiating Group on Rules and, for trade facilitation, the Council
for Trade in Goods). Other bodies examine non-tariff measures as part of their regular work
programme (CTG subsidiary bodies such as the Committee on Customs Valuation, the Committee on
Rules of Origin, and the Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade fall into this category).
5. The open nature of the mandate on non-tariff barriers thus carries the risk of conflict or
overlap with the mandate of other negotiating groups. And with certain issues the question may be
whether the appropriate approach is negotiation or action as part of the regular work programme. To
get the NTB negotiating agenda in the Negotiating Group on Market Access into manageable shape
and to achieve progress by the 5th Ministerial Conference might require a framework to help
determine where and how individual NTB issues of interest to Members might best be addressed.
V. EXAMPLES
6. New Zealand's experience may be relevant to the development of such a framework. A group
of agencies last year commissioned a study to as sess the impact of non-tariff barriers on New Zealand
exporters. The results illustrated the significant incidence of such barriers and the serious impact theyhad on returns for many exporters. These results will be fed into New Zealand's approach to this part
of the negotiation on non-agricultural market access.
7. The top seven categories of non-tariff barrier identified in the survey were the following:
• standards and certification
• customs procedures
• food safety and health requirements
• import quotas and import prohibitions
• cargo handling and port procedures
• high internal taxes and charges
• non-scientific basis to quarantine restrictions.
Many other Members will also have encountered significant non-tariff barriers under such headings
and might be keen to see those barriers addressed.
8. However, the New Zealand list also illustrates a procedural challenge we face in this
negotiation. It will immediately be apparent that:
- there are existing WTO rules which address these issues, albeit at varying levels of detail;
- many “barriers” identified under these headings are likely, on examination, to prove WTO-
legal, notwithstanding their significant trade impacts;
- the Doha ministerial declaration already provides a mandate (conditional or otherwise) for
negotiations in respect of several of these headings.
9. The question that therefore arises is where individual non-tariff issues should be addressed
and, in particular, which of them should become the subject of negotiation in the Negotiating Group
on Market Access. This paper offers some preliminary ideas.
VI. CLASSIFICATION
10. In considering how to address issues identified in the New Zealand survey it became apparent
that a categorisation would be a good starting point. In developing this we sought to make someTN/MA/W/4
Page 3
realistic assumptions about the handling of specific  issues in the context of both the Doha mandate
and the regular WTO work programme. Our initial categorisation takes the following form:
Issues that might be addressed in negotiations elsewhere under the Doha mandate
Some non-tariff issues fall within the scope of negotiations for which there is already a
specific mandate under the Doha ministerial declaration. Our expectation is that any issue for
which there already exists such a negotiating mandate will be addressed in the relevant
negotiating group.
Issues or proposals involving substantial change to existing WTO agreements
While a large proportion of WTO agreements and GATT provisions relate to non-tariff
aspects of non-agricultural market access, few of these agreements are specified in the
negotiating mandate adopted in Doha. While we cannot rule out negotiations on agreements
which are not specified in the Doha declaration, we expect the market access negotiating
group would re-open existing agreements only on the basis of additional guidance.
Proposals involving clarification of existing rulesProposals which do not seek to change existing rules but which seek to reduce uncertainty and
conflict by clarifying those rules could be addressed within the market access negotiatinggroup. There may, however, be mixed views on the extent to which “clarification” should be
seen as part of the group’s current mandate.
Issues involving disputed interpretation of rules
Some practices seen as NTBs will turn on disp uted interpretations of WTO rules. Resolution
through the dispute settlement system remains an option in such cases. An alternative, in
cases where it is broadly agreed that a particular issue has taken on systemic importance,
would be clarification of the rules on the basis outlined above.
Issues open to bilateral resolution
In previous negotiations some non-tariff barriers have been taken up on a bilateral basis
through a request-offer process, with the re sults in some cases being incorporated into
schedules. This option remains available.
Products of interest to developing countriesIn calling for the reduction or elimination of tariffs and non-tariff barriers the mandate makes
particular reference to those affecting products of export interest to developing countries.
Capacity issuesFor some issues involving NTBs a response may, at least in part, take the form of capacity
building or technical assistance. This need not be confined to work under WTO auspices:
experience suggests that bilateral and regional programmes will often be more appropriate.TN/MA/W/4
Page 4
Implementation issues
Many of the issues identified under the implementation mandate relate to non-tariff measures.
Their handling is governed by the provisions of paragraph 12 of the Doha ministerial
declaration.
Special and differential provisionsThe mandate for the market access negotiating group makes specific reference to paragraph
50 of the Doha declaration (the requirement for negotiations to take fully into account the
principle of special and differential treatment for developing and least developed countries).
Work is also under way pursuant to paragraph 44 of the Doha declaration on strengtheningspecial and differential provisions and making them more precise, effective and operational.
Some of the proposals put forward relate to non-tariff aspects of non-agricultural market
access. These issues are being addressed at this stage in the Committee on Trade and
Development in Special Session.
VII. CONCLUSION
11. In the absence of a common understanding on which non-tariff issues should be addressed in
the Negotiating Group on Market Access and which of th em belong elsewhere, there is a risk that this
part of the negotiation will become unwieldy. New Zealand offers these preliminary ideas as acontribution to discussion on how the negotiation might be managed.
__________