Senegal WT/TPR/S/119
Page 1
I. ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
(1) OVERVIEW
1. Since the first review of its trade policy in 1994, Senegal has improved the substance and
structure of its economic policy in order to foster a lasting return to econom ic growth following the
crisis that preceded the devaluation of the CFA franc in January 1994.  A macroeconomic
stabilization programme and structural reforms were launched in 1994, with IMF and World Banksupport, with the aim of State withdrawal from economic activity through liberalization of prices
(Chapter III(3)(iv)) and trade (Chapter III(1)), as well as the privatization of State enterprises.  The
completion of several components of the programme has led to better control of government finance,
which has helped macroeconomic stability in the West African Monetary Union (WAMU), integrated
within the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU).
2. Since 1994, there has been a sustained period of growth in Senegal of around 4.7 per cent a
year, driven by the secondary and tertiary sectors.  Nevertheless, poverty still affects two adults in
three because of the high rate of demographic growth and the disappointing performance of the
primary sector.  In order to combat poverty more effectively, Senegal has drawn up a Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP)
1 within the framework of the Highly Indebted Poor Countries
Initiative (HIPC), and as a result its debt was reduced in June 2000.2  The growth strategy focuses on
the following:  boosting investment and exports ; more effective government spending; local
development, and rational management of the environment.
3. In April 2001, Senegal became a “least developed country (LDC)”.  It intends to take
advantage of stronger support from its development partners, particularly as regards debt reduction,
market access and other measures under the Uruguay Round and the Doha Agenda aimed at
integrating LDCs in the multilateral trading system , as well as technical cooperation in the context of
the Integrated Framework Pilot Programme (Annex II.1).
4. The trade structure has changed little since the first review of Senegal’s trade policy in 1994.
Exports still strongly focus on some unprocessed or minimally processed commodities, and the
European Union is still Senegal’s leading trade partner.  Although the establishment of the WAEMU
is a new feature, exports to member States have not increased to any significant extent because of thelack of complementarity in agriculture, the low level of development of the industrial fabric, and the
tariff barriers that remain in place (Chapter III(2)(iv)).
(2) 
BACKGROUND3
5. Senegal is situated on the western coast of Africa and covers an area of 196,000 km2.  It has
borders with Mauritania to the north, Mali to the east, and Guinea and Guinea-Bissau to the south;Gambia forms an enclave 24 to 50 km wide, covering some 470 km on each side of the Gambia River
up to its estuary.  Senegal has 700 kilometres of coastline and its exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
covers 180,000 km
2.  Three major rivers flow to the west into the Atlantic, the Senegal River
(1,700 km), the Gambia River (750 km) and the Casamance (300 km).
                                                     
1 Government of Senegal (2002).
2 IMF press release No. 00/36.  The nominal va lue of the reduction is US$800 million and US$450
million in actuarial terms, corresponding to 18 per cent.
3 The main sources are:  Government of Senegal (2001a), World Bank (2002), Government of
Senegal (2002), IMF (1999), IMF (2000), IMF (2001a).WT/TPR/S/119 Trade Policy Review
Page 2
6. In 2001, Senegal’s population was estimated to be around 9.8 million, corresponding to a
density of 48 inh/km2.  Forty-one per cent of the population lives in urban areas, two thirds of them in
the region of Dakar, the capital.  There is another concentration of population in the centre of Senegal
(the groundnut basin), where 35 per cent of the population lives.  As a result of the high rate of
demographic growth, Senegal’s population is young and the birth rate is 2.8 per cent per annum, so
job creation is one of the major aims of economic policy.  Around one half of the adult malepopulation is literate, whereas only one quarter of the adult feminine population is literate.
7. In 2002, Senegal’s GDP was estimated to be CFAF 3,552 billion.  As in 1994, the tertiary
sector accounts for around one half of the GDP due to the importance of tourism, trade and transport,
and the low level of agricultural development (Table I.1).
4  In 2002, per capita income was estimated
to be US$545.  These figures are not considered to be wholly reliable because of the size of theinformal sector in urban areas as it is one of the most dynamic components of Senegal’s economy.
5
Table I.l
Basic economic indicators for Senegal, 1994-2002
(Share of GDP)
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Primary
AgricultureLivestock
Fisheries
ForestrySecondary
Mining and quarrying
Oil millsEnergy
Construction and public works
Other industriesTertiary
Transport and telecommunications
TradeOther services
Non-tradable services
HouseholdsGovernment departments19
9
6
2
1
21
1
12
4
14
49
11
241511
1
920
10
7
2
1
20
1
12
3
13
50
10
261410
1
921
11
7
2
1
19
1
12
4
12
50
10
261310
1
920
10
6
2
1
20
1
12
4
12
51
11
2613
9
1
818
9
6
2
1
20
1
12
4
12
53
11
2714
9
1
819
10
6
2
1
20
1
12
4
12
52
11
27
14
9
1
819
11
6
2
1
21
1
12
4
12
51
12
2613
9
1
820
11
6
2
1
21
1
12
4
12
51
12
2613
8
1
716
8
5
2
1
22
1
12
5
13
53
13
2713
9
1
8
Source: Ministry of the Economy and Finance (2003), “ Sénégal:  Balance des paiements 2000-2003”  [online].
Available at http://www.minfinances.sn [15 March 2003].
8. In 2001, Senegal became an LDC because of its per capita income (less than 39 per cent of
the US$900 threshold determined by the United Nations in April 2000), the slow rate of development
of human capital (less than 33 per cent of the threshold established), and its economic vulnerabilitydue to the instability of agricultural production.
6  Population surveys show a high poverty level
affecting around 65 per cent of the population.  The main objective of the PRSP drawn up in 2002 is
to reduce poverty by half by the year 2015.
                                                     
4 GATT (1994), Volume I.
5 UNIDO (2001).
6 Government of Senegal (2001b).Senegal WT/TPR/S/119
Page 3
(3) RECENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS7
(i) Macroeconomic indicators
9. Between 1994 and 2002, Senegal’s average rate of GDP growth was 4.7 per cent, mainly
attributable to the tertiary and secondary sectors.  The trend in the primary sector was very different,
with a downturn in 1997 and 1998, followed by a recovery between 1999 and 2001, and then another
slowdown in activities in 2002 (Table I.1).  The latter 14 per cent reduction was due to the agriculturalsector, mainly because of the lack of rain, which led to a fall in groundnut and cereal production
(Chapter IV(2)).  The positive trend in the secondary sector, due in particular to the satisfactory
performance of non-traditional industries, resulted in  a growth rate of 2.4 per cent for the economy as
a whole.  This slowdown in economic activity took place in a context that is still marked by the
control of inflation, which was 2.3 per cent in 2002 compared with 3 per cent in 2001.
Table I.2
Economic indicators for Senegal, 1994-2002
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Real economy
Change in real
GDP2.8 5.2 5.1 5.0 5.7 5.0 5.6 5.6 2.4
- Primary 1.8 0.5 1.2 -0.5 -0.6 1.0 1.9 1.3 -2.5
- Secondary -0.1 2.1 1.0 1.2 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.3 2.1
- Tertiary 1.1 2.4 2.8 4.3 4.3 2.2 1.9 2.7 2.4
Total domestic
demand-3.2 5.1 4.1 -0.6 4.5 4.7 5.8 7.7 -0.7
Exports 4.8 0.9 -1.5 6.7 3.1 2.2 1.1 2.1 1.9
Imports -3.0 4.8 1.2 -0.5 3.7 -1.4 2.1 1.6 1.7
(CFAF billions)
External
economy
Current
transactions2.1 -13.9 -32.4 -41.2 -126.8 -179.7 -236.6 -180.0 -179.1
- Balance in
goods-128.3 -124.1 -143.7 -151.9 -184.5 -212.9 -296.7 -311.8 -320.0
- Exports,
f.o.b.439.1 483.3 504.0 -532.3 571.1 632.4 654.9 735.3 765.2
- Imports,
f.o.b.-567.4 -607.4 -647.7 -684.3 -755.5 -845.3 -951.6 -1,047.1 -1,085.2
- Net services -84.1 -80.9 -57.7 -57.0 -43.4 -64.8 -92.2 -88.2 -87.3
- Current
transfers215.4 190.8 169.2 167.9 101.0 97.9 152.3 220.0 228.1
Financial
transactions
capital 
account71.2 23.7 30.6 88.3 153.9 220.1 234.4 249.9 286.2
Overall total 73.3 9.8 -1.7 47.2 38.5 52.6 -8.5 76.0 107.1
.. Not available.
Source: IMF (2000), Senegal:  Recent Economic Developments , IMF Staff Country Report 00/91;  IMF (1999),
Senegal:  Statistical Annex , IMF Staff Country Report 99/5;  Ministry of the Economy and
Finance (2003), “ Sénégal:  Balance des paiements 2000-2003 ” [online].  Available at
http://www.minfinances.sn [15 March 2003].
10. With regard to utilization of the GDP, household consumption benefited from the economic
recovery that followed the devaluation of the CF A franc and its share of GDP rose from 75.2 per cent
                                                     
7 Government of Senegal, Ministry of the Economy and Finance (2003), Government of Senegal
(2002).WT/TPR/S/119 Trade Policy Review
Page 4
in 1996 to 76.6 per cent in 1999.  Government investment also increased as a result of the
restructuring of budgetary spending (see above) and the new resources that became available
following the debt reduction in 2000:  its share of GDP increased from 6.4 per cent in 1996 to 7.7 per
cent in 2002.  Private investment, on the other hand, saw a decrease in its share of the GDP from
12.1 per cent to 10.4 per cent between 1996 and 1998, but since then it has risen to 11.1 per cent; the
IMF indicates that the macroeconomic recovery and the structural reform programme have beenconducive to flows of private investment, but that th ere are still obstacles to competitiveness such as
labour relations and the high cost of certain inputs, especially electric power.
8
11. With regard to the external economy, since 1995 Senegal has had a deficit in its current
transactions balance, due in particular to the deficit in trade in goods, partly offset by current transfers,
notably from expatriate workers.  The trade balance shortfall deepened still further in 2002 whenimports (CFAF 38.1 billion) were higher than ex ports (CFAF 29.9 billion), even though the rate of
growth for exports was higher than that for imports (see below).  The current transactions deficit has
increased sharply since 1995, reaching a peak in 2000, but there has been an improvement since then
as a result of current transfers.  An improvement in the financial transactions account, due in
particular to an increased flow of private capital, showed an overall surplus of CFAF 107.1 billion in
the balance of payments for 2002.
(ii) Monetary and exchange policy
(a) Institutional arrangements
12. Senegal is a founding member of the WAEMU, set up in 1994
9, which complements the West
African Monetary Union (WAMU) by an economic integration component (Chapter II(4)(ii)),
incorporating the provisions already adopted, for example, a common currency administered by the
Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) , a specialized autonomous institution of the
WAEMU.10  Consequently, the member countries of the WAEMU have common monetary and
exchange policies. Senegal accepted Article VIII of the Articles of Agreement of the IMF on
6 June 1996.
13. The franc of the CFA (African Financial Community) is the WAMU’s currency unit.  Until
1 January 1999, when the euro became the currency of countries belonging to the European MonetaryUnion, including France, the CFA franc had fixed parity with the French franc.
11  The CFA franc now
has fixed parity with the euro: CFAF 1,000 = €1.52449017.12  The introduction of the euro did not
lead to any substantial changes as far as the arrangements in the franc zone are concerned.13
                                                     
8 IMF (2000), p. 11.
9 The WAEMU Treaty was signed on 11 January 1994 by Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Mali,
Niger, Senegal and Togo; Guinea Bissau acceded to the Treaty on 1 January 1997.  WTO document
WT/COMTD/N/11 of 3 February 2000.
10 Monetary cooperation among member countries of the WAMU (created in 1962 with a new Treaty
signed in 1973) and France dates back to the colonial era.  The BCEAO is the result of a monetary cooperationagreement signed with France in 1972 and supplemented by the transactions account agreement of 1973.
11 When the CFA franc was devalued by 50 per cent in 1994, the fixed rate became CFAF 1,000 =
FF 10.
12 The same parity applies to the CFA (Central African Financial Cooperation) franc, which is the
currency of the member countries of the Central African Economic and Monetary Union (CEMAC), whosestructure is similar to that of the WAEMU.
13 Decision of the Council of the European Union of 23 November 1998 concerning exchange matters
relating to the CFA franc and the Comoran franc (98/683/EC).Senegal WT/TPR/S/119
Page 5
14. The BCEAO is responsible for issuing CFA francs and ensuring their stability.  Its
responsibilities are set out in its articles of inco rporation as follows: to implement the monetary policy
guidelines defined by the WAMU Council of Minister s; to transact exchange operations; to hold and
administer member countries’ exchange reserves;  and to promote the proper functioning of the
Union’s system of payments.  Consequently, there is no monetary policy at the national level.
15. The BCEAO defines its monetary policy in such a way as to maintain the rate of external
cover for the currency at a satisfactory level and to support economic activity in member countries
without inflationary pressure.  It supports each member country’s monetary policy by fixing
objectives for the money supply and credit on an annual basis.  These take into account the general
financing needs of each member country’s economy and the resources required to meet them, as
determined by each national Credit Committee.  There are ceilings for advances to NationalTreasuries, which are subject to an interest rate fi xed by the BCEAO, with a penalty if the ceiling is
exceeded.  Advances have now been frozen at the 31 December 2002 levels, while awaiting the
consolidation planned by the monetary authorities.  The objective is gradually to guide member States
towards financial markets by issuing public securities.
16. Maintaining a common monetary policy calls for financial discipline on the part of each
country belonging to the Union, which keep their own decentralized economic policies.  The
WAEMU has established a Convergence, Stability, Growth and Solidarity Pact
14, subject to
multilateral monitoring, based on the European Union’s preparations for monetary union.  Since 2000,
each of the WAEMU’s member States has been subject to this Pact.  According to the latest report
from the WAEMU Commission, dating from December 2002, Senegal is in a good position because it
meets seven of the eight convergence criteria.15
(b) Foreign exchange regulations16
17. Foreign exchange transactions in euros betw een the BCEAO and Senegal’s commercial banks
are at a fixed rate, as are exchange operations by economic operators.  In addition, the buying and
selling rates for other currencies are determined on the basis of the rate for the euro on the foreign
exchange market.
18. Exchange transactions, movements of capital and payments of any nature between a
WAEMU member State and a foreign country or be tween a resident and a non-resident within the
WAEMU can only be conducted through the BCEAO, the postal authorities, an approved
intermediary bank or approved foreign exchange dealer, within their respective spheres of
competence.  The Ministry of the Economy and Finance verifies exchange transactions relating to
exports or imports ex post facto  on the basis of documents provided by the customs.  Only economic
operators possessing an import-export card (Chapter III(2)(i)) have access to foreign currency.  Any
bank transfer to a country outside the WAEMU is subject to an exchange tax of 0.25 per cent paid to
the Ministry of the Economy and Finance.
19. For economic operators in Senegal, the Investme nt Code (Chapter III(4)(ii)) stipulates that
access to foreign currency and freedom to transfer capital must comply with the rules of the franc
zone.  The following are the main provisions:
- Sums to cover current transactions operations may be freely transferred subject to the
submission of supporting documents;
                                                     
14 Additional Act No. 4/99.
15 WAEMU Commission (2002).  For a description of the convergence criteria, see IMF (2001b).
16 IMF (2002).WT/TPR/S/119 Trade Policy Review
Page 6
- the obligation to repatriate earnings from exports to countries outside the WAEMU
and their conversion into CFA francs;
- in principle, capital may enter freely from any country;
- outflow of capital to countries outside the WAEMU is subject to verification based on
the submission of supporting documents.17
20. Senegal allows foreign investors to repatriate capital invested and profits from their
operations, and to repatriate savings on the salaries of expatriate staff (Chapter III(4)(ii)).
(iii) Budget policy
21. Since the launching of the post-devaluation programme in 1994, Senegal’s objective has been
to control government expenditure in order to achieve a primary budget surplus each year.  This
objective has been met; in 2002, budget policy allowed a primary budget surplus (excluding grants) of
around 1.6 per cent of GDP as a result of a substantial increase in revenue and greater control overcurrent spending.
22. The Government has maintained the relative level of revenue (excluding grants) as a ratio of
GDP at around 16 per cent since 1994, while at the same time pursuing those elements of the post-
devaluation economic programme likely to lower reve nue, for example, liberalization of international
trade.  In 1994, duties and taxes on foreign trade accounted for around 40 per cent of budget revenue
and this figure has been maintained since then desp ite the lowering of the customs tariff following the
introduction of the Common External Tariff (CET) of  the WAEMU, due to an increase in imports
(+91.3 per cent) and an improvement in the collection of customs revenue.
23. Total expenditure and net loans have gradually been reduced from 21 per cent of the GDP in
1994 to 20.2 per cent in 2002.  These currently comprise regular spending on wages (28 per cent),
other current expenditure (31 per cent) and capital expenditure (38 per cent).  Current expenditure
(other than wages) was brought down by 37.4 per cent between 2001 and 2002.
24. Privatization has played a key role in the programme for controlling current expenditure.  The
privatization programme was launched in 1989
18 and since 1996, 12 State enterprises have been
privatized, including Air Sénégal and SONATEL, the national fixed telecommunications operator.
Nine large enterprises are currently included in the privatization programme and other enterprises may
be added to the list.  Government action is curre ntly focusing on the privatization of SENELEC, the
national power company (Chapter IV(3)(ii)), a nd preparations for the privatization in 2004 of
SONACOS, a national company producing and marke ting groundnut oil (Chapter IV(2)(ii)).  Since
2000, there have been 32 State enterprises, but the policy followed is not to privatize State enterprises
in the areas of communications, postal services, culture, or scientific or technical research.
                                                     
17 According to the provisions of Article 6 of Regulation No. 09/98/CM/UEMOA on financial relations
among member States of the WAEMU, investment, loans, deposits and in general all capital movements amongmember States of the WAEMU are free and are not subject to restrictions pursuant to Articles 76, para. (d), 96and 97 of the WAEMU Treaty and Article 4 of the WAMU Treaty.
18 Law No. 87-23 of 18 August 1987 on the privatization of enterprises.Senegal WT/TPR/S/119
Page 7
(4) TRENDS IN TRADE
(i) Breakdown of trade
25. The trade structure has changed little since 1994 (Tables I.3, I.4, I.5, I.6).  Exports still mainly
centre on some unprocessed or minimally processed commodities and the European Union is still
Senegal’s leading trade partner.  In 2001, around 70 per cent of Senegal’s exports were primary
products, especially food products (fisheries products, groundnut oil) and fuel, which represents asignificant increase since 1996.  Europe is the main destination for exports of food products.  Senegal
does not produce hydrocarbons, but one important feature of its international trade is the processing of
imported hydrocarbons, particularly from Nigeria,  in order to supply the domestic and neighbouring
markets (especially Mali).  This is one of the main reasons why neighbouring countries regularly
receive 30 per cent of exports.  The trend in global prices for hydrocarbons has a marked effect ontrends in spending on imports.
26. Chemicals account for most exports of manufactures, due to the processing of phosphates into
phosphoric acid and fertilizer.  The main destination is India because one of the enterprises exploiting
phosphate resources in Senegal is an Indian company (Chapter IV(4));  this explains India’s important
position as a destination, taking around 12 per cent of total exports in 2001.
27. Since 1996, the share of food products in total imports has been around 30 per cent.  The
majority of these products – rice, wheat, sugar, food preparations, milk and cream in particular – goes
to feed the urban population.  Food crops such as millet and sorghum are consumed on the spot in
rural areas.  Office, transport and telecommunications machinery and equipment are another
important category of imports, mainly from Europe and Asia.
Table I.3
Structure of exports, 1996-2001
(Percentage)
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Primary products
Agriculture
Food products
Frozen crustaceansGroundnut oil and fractions thereof
Frozen fish, excl. fillets
Frozen fish filletsFresh or chilled fish, excl. fillets
Products of the mining and quarrying 
industriesMineral ores and other minerals
Fuel
Manufactures
Chemicals
Inorganic acids
FertilizersTransport machinery and equipment
Other51.6
16.6
9.5
0.70.0
1.4
0.30.1
34.9
12.3
22.5
48.237.4
24.1
9.74.4
0.253.8
14.2
6.2
0.20.0
0.2
0.01.0
39.6
12.7
26.6
46.237.1
20.9
11.7
4.0
0.047.2
20.9
15.3
0.08.3
0.0
0.00.0
26.3
8.0
18.0
52.840.7
21.0
9.64.6
0.043.2
16.2
13.4
0.04.6
0.0
0.00.0
27.0
9.5
17.2
56.636.1
18.5
7.1
10.9
0.272.9
54.2
52.4
14.2
9.7
4.3
4.14.6
18.8
4.6
14.0
26.917.4
9.6
2.03.5
0.170.9
48.6
46.3
9.59.1
6.8
4.83.2
22.3
4.3
17.8
28.817.8
9.5
2.44.5
0.3
Source:  UNSD, Comtrade database (ISIC, Rev.3).WT/TPR/S/119 Trade Policy Review
Page 8
Table I.4Structure of imports, 1996-2001
(Percentage)
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Primary products
Agriculture
Products of the mining and quarrying industries
Fuel
Manufactures
Iron and steel
ChemicalsOther semi-manufactures
Transport machinery and 
equipmentOffice and 
telecommunications 
machinery and equipmentOther electrical machinery 
and equipment
Automobile productsTextiles
Other57.6
26.3
31.2
30.1
42.2
3.4
9.08.7
15.9
1.3
1.9
5.4
1.9
0.255.3
28.5
26.7
25.6
44.6
3.1
10.6
7.1
18.7
1.6
1.9
6.6
1.8
0.242.4
32.1
10.4
8.4
57.1
6.9
12.0
7.9
23.9
4.2
2.5
6.9
1.9
0.442.6
30.9
11.7
10.2
57.3
3.4
12.0
8.5
25.9
4.0
3.0
6.4
2.7
0.149.2
25.4
23.9
22.5
50.7
3.3
10.6
7.6
22.8
2.9
2.9
5.7
2.2
0.047.4
28.7
18.7
16.8
52.5
3.2
11.2
8.2
22.8
3.4
3.0
6.7
2.3
0.0
Source: UNSD, Comtrade database (ISIC, Rev.3).
Table I.5
Exports by destination, 1996-2001
(Percentage)
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
America
Europe
European Union (15)
- France- Greece
- Italy
- Spain- Netherlands
Middle East
Asia
- India
Africa
- Mali- Guinea
- Mauritania
- Gambia- Côte d’Ivoire
Other3.1
15.2
15.0
8.70.0
1.8
1.71.1
3.1
30.627.0
27.6
9.40.8
3.0
1.81.5
20.31.1
13.7
13.4
7.00.1
2.3
0.71.1
1.0
32.029.4
30.5
8.41.1
2.6
2.34.4
21.71.9
20.4
20.3
11.0
0.0
2.9
0.72.0
0.4
28.527.6
35.9
8.22.3
4.1
3.13.8
13.00.9
21.1
21.0
14.8
0.0
2.3
0.30.6
0.1
28.727.9
37.7
9.12.0
5.2
4.04.0
11.51.1
47.5
46.4
18.4
2.5
11.0
6.32.5
0.5
15.812.2
28.2
6.21.6
2.6
4.82.1
6.90.6
43.2
42.2
16.8
7.3
6.0
4.02.7
0.2
13.912.4
29.9
6.93.9
3.9
3.43.3
12.2
Source:  UNSD, Comtrade database (ISIC, Rev.3).Senegal WT/TPR/S/119
Page 9
Table I.6Imports by origin, 1996-2001
(Percentage)
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
America
United States
Europe
European Union
- France
- Germany
- Spain
- Italy- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Netherlands
Middle EastAsia
East Asia
- Thailand- Japan
- China
Africa
- Nigeria
- Côte d’Ivoire
Other7.6
3.6
45.743.9
22.7
4.4
4.2
3.12.1
2.7
1.7
15.4
10.4
2.42.6
2.1
14.4
7.8
2.9
15.18.0
3.6
51.848.6
26.4
2.9
4.3
4.62.9
2.8
2.2
15.6
12.0
2.72.7
1.8
17.611.1
2.3
4.79.8
5.5
61.057.0
34.2
4.3
3.6
3.63.8
2.7
0.4
16.7
13.4
5.33.3
1.8
12.0
5.8
2.5
0.17.5
4.1
58.454.8
30.2
4.3
4.0
5.93.0
2.5
0.4
19.4
15.8
5.23.4
2.6
14.1
7.1
3.1
0.16.6
3.6
50.948.0
27.4
3.5
3.4
3.12.9
3.0
0.5
16.2
14.6
5.32.6
2.7
25.518.9
2.6
0.27.8
4.2
55.451.8
27.8
4.8
4.3
4.03.3
3.3
1.5
17.3
16.1
7.72.7
2.4
17.8
9.8
2.9
0.2
Source:  UNSD, Comtrade database (ISIC, Rev.3).
28. The statistics on imports into Senegal do not reflect the large volume of goods entering
Senegal from certain neighbouring countries – especially Gambia and Mauritania – through informal
channels.  This feature was pointed out at the time of the first review of Senegal’s trade policy in 1994and incentives to pursue this trade have not changed since then.  Six products – sugar, textiles,
batteries, tomato concentrate, cigarettes and matches – have been identified as particularly affected
because their smuggling competes directly with domestic production.
(5) 
OUTLOOK
29. The Senegalese authorities are optimistic regarding growth of 6 to 7 per cent in 2003 as a
result of the continued positive trends in the secondary and tertiary sectors and the recovery in the
primary sector.  Growth of 10.8 per cent is forecast for the primary sector as a result of increased
activity in the fisheries, forestry and livestock subsectors, together with strong recovery in the
agricultural sector in 2003 because the performance during the 2001-2002 season had been more
modest due to unfavourable rainfall.  Growth of 6.6 per cent is estimated in the secondary sector, duein particular to the Government’s investment pr ogramme in the context of the PRSP and increased
generation of electric power, although a downturn is expected in groundnut oil mills because of the
problems faced by the groundnut subsector.  The tertiary  sector is expected to grow by 5.1 per cent as
a result of the strong growth in telecommunications services and trade, while stagnation is anticipated
in the tourism subsector.  The authorities are predicting a sharp increase in the current account deficit
caused by the upswing in imports boosted by the recovery and the rise in petroleum prices.
30. As to utilization of the GDP, in 2003 final consumption and investment should increase
substantially.  An 18.7 per cent expansion in public and private investment is expected following a
rise in public development aid and flows of foreign direct investment, at around 20.5 per cent of the
GDP.  Final consumption should grow by 5.8 per cent as a result of the increase in household
consumption, expected to be 6 per cent and higher than the 4.8 per cent increase in Government
consumption.  Overall, domestic demand should increase by 7.5 per cent.  A 4.3 per cent growth inthe total volume of exports is anticipated in 2003 following favourable trends in exports of goods
(4.4 per cent), whereas imports should increase by 6.5 per cent as a result of the predicted upturn inWT/TPR/S/119 Trade Policy Review
Page 10
economic activity in 2003.  The volume of net external demand should therefore be 2.8 per cent lower
compared with 2002.