WORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONTN/RL/6
2 July 2003
(03-3531)
Negotiating Group on Rules
NEGOTIATING GROUP ON RULES
Report by the Chairman
to the Trade Negotiations Committee
I. ORGANIZATION OF WORK
1. On 1 February 2002, the Trade Negotiations Committee created a Negotiating Group on
Rules ("the Group")  (TN/C/M/1).  At its meeting of 13, 15 February and 1 March 2002, the General
Council took note of the consensus regarding the appointment of officers to WTO bodies; that
consensus included the appointment of Ambassador Ti m Groser of New Zealand, as Chairman of the
Group (WT/GC/M/73).
2. The mandate of the Group is set out in paragraphs 28 and 29 of the Doha Ministerial
Declaration, which provide as follows:
"28. In the light of experience and of the increasing application of these
instruments by Members, we agree to negotiations aimed at clarifying and improvingdisciplines under the Agreements on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994
and on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, while preserving the basic concepts,
principles and effectiveness of these Agreements and their instruments and
objectives, and taking into account the needs of developing and least-developed
participants.  In the initial phase of the negotiations, participants will indicate the
provisions, including disciplines on trade distorting practices, that they seek to clarify
and improve in the subsequent phase.  In the context of these negotiations,participants shall also aim to clarify and improve WTO disciplines on fisheries
subsidies, taking into account the importance of this sector to developing countries.
We note that fisheries subsidies are also referred to in paragraph 31.
29. We agree to negotiations aimed at clarifying and improving disciplines and
procedures under the existing WTO provisions applying to regional trade agreements.The negotiations shall take into account the developmental aspects of regional trade
agreements."
3. The Group has met in formal sessions on 11 March, 6-8 May, 8-10 July, 16-18 October, and
25-27 November 2002, and on 3,6 and 7 February, 19-21 March, 5-7 May, 11 June, and
18-19 June 2003.  The summary records for these meetings are reflected  in document seriesTN/RL/M… .  The next formal meeting of the Group is scheduled for 21-23 July 2003.  The Group
has also met in informal mode, most frequently in the context of its consideration of issues relating to
Regional Trade Agreements ("RTAs").
4. In its meetings to date, the Group's agenda has been structured around the following subject
areas:  Anti-Dumping ("AD");  Subsidies and Countervailing Measures ("SCM"), including FisheriesSubsidies; and RTAs.TN/RL/6
Page 2
5. The Group to date has based its work primarily on written proposals and other submissions by
participants.  It was observed during the 11 March 2002 meeting that it would be useful for proposals
to be as specific as possible concerning the identity of the proponent(s), the clarification or
improvement sought, and the underlying rationale.
6.  As of the date of preparation of this Report, a total of 129 submissions had been submitted to
the Group.  These submissions have been circulated as unrestricted documents and may be found in
the TN/RL/W… document series.  A complete list of submissions received as of the date of this report
is annexed.
II. OUTSTANDING ISSUES
7. Other than the issue of observers – a question with horizontal implications – there are no
outstanding procedural issues in the Group at this time.  In my view, and given that some of the work
of the Group is related to activities of other International Governmental Organisations ("IGOs"), itwould be desirable if the issue of observer status for IGOs in the various negotiating bodies could be
resolved promptly.
III. FUTURE WORK
A. A
NTI-DUMPING AND SUBSIDIES AND COUNTERVAILING MEASURES , INCLUDING FISHERIES
SUBSIDIES
8. Paragraph 28 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration states that, in the initial phase of the
negotiations, participants will indicate the provisions that they seek to clarify in the subsequent phase.
Thus, the work of the Group to date in the areas of AD and SCM including fisheries subsidies has
been dedicated primarily to the identification, clar ification and preliminary exchange of views on the
issues that participants would like to see addressed in the negotiations.
9. In my view, the work of the Group to date has been highly productive in identifying the
provisions and issues for negotiation in the areas of AD and SCM.  The Group has received numerous
submissions from a wide range of participants suggesting the clarification and improvement of many
different provisions of the Agreements in question.  Many of the outstanding implementation issues
referred to in paragraph 12 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration have been further pursued throughsubmissions by developing country participants.
10. Most notable perhaps is the degree of activity with respect to AD.  In this area, more than
30 participants have individually or jointly identified issues or submitted proposals for negotiation.
Issues have been identified with respect to virtually every area of the AD Agreement , involving such
diverse questions as dumping margin calculations, non-market economies, injury and causality
determinations, standards for initiation of investigations, facts available, sampling, price undertakings,
lesser duty, all others rates, reviews, public notice and transparency, treatment of confidentialinformation, judicial review, special and differential treatment, public interest, concurrent application
of AD and safeguard measures, technical assistance, a swift control mechanism for initiations,
circumvention, duty refunds, duty absorption and trade- and market-distorting practices.  This list is of
course purely illustrative of the range of issues identified.
1
                                                     
1 As already foreshadowed to the Group, and in order to facilitate our work after Cancún, I intend to
circulate, at an appropriate time, a compilation of all issues and proposals on AD and SCM including fisheriessubsides identified by participants to date.  This compilation will be updated as required to reflect any further
issues or proposals identified by participants.TN/RL/6
Page 3
11. While work on SCM started off more slowly, the level of interest and engagement is now
substantial, with approximately 24 participants individually or jointly identifying issues for
negotiation.  In addition to a wide range of issues identified relating to Part V of the SCM Agreement
(countervailing measures), many but by no means all of which are similar to issues relating to AD,
issues have been identified with respect to th e definition of subsidy, export and local content
subsidies, export credits, remedies for prohibited subsidies, serious prejudice, non-actionable
subsidies, subsidy notifications, special and differential treatment, natural resource and energy
pricing, taxation, calculation of the amount of a subsidy, equity capital, subsidies and environment,
and trade- and market-distorting practices. Again, this list is purely illustrative of the range of issues
identified.  The Group has also been kept informed of work under way in another forum on the
elements of a possible agreement for reducing or eliminating trade-distorting subsidies in steel.
12. With respect to the sub-item of fisheries subsidies, while the level of engagement has been
high, the discussion has been difficult.  Many participants believe that the development of sector-
specific subsidies disciplines in the fisheries sector is necessary, but certain other Members are of the
view that sector-specific disciplines in this area are not warranted.  While this difference of views
among participants remains to be resolved, the Group's work has clarified participants' positions as
well as the general nature of the results sought by different participants.
13. The Group also has before it certain proposals regarding special and differential treatment on
AD/SCM which were referred to it by the Chairman of the General Council on 20 May 2003.  The
Group had a preliminary discussion of these proposals at its formal meeting of 18-19 June, and has
scheduled a further meeting on 21-23 July to further advance its consideration of these proposals.
14. In my view, the process of issue identification has been efficient and productive.  Not only
does the Group have a good idea of the range of issues participants would like to address, but
substantial progress has been made in clarifying the scope of the issues, both through an extensive
process of oral and written questions and answers, and in some cases through the submission by
participants of more detailed proposals identifying precise approaches, including proposed text, for
addressing issues previously identified.  Thus, while I have no doubt that further issues will beidentified for negotiation either at our 21-23 July 2003 meeting or after the Cancún Ministerial
Conference, it is my sense that the greater part of the issues have been identified.
15. The active and constructive approach of participants in the Group so far provides a basis for
optimism that we will be able to make further progress in our work.  There are however no grounds
for complacency.  It is clear to me that, for many participants, negotiations on AD and SCM including
fisheries subsidies are a critical element in the overall balance of the Doha Development Agenda
("DDA").  Given that the DDA negotiations are to be completed not later than 1 January 2005, it isevident that the Group will have to accelerate its work after the Cancún Ministerial Conference, and
that it will need to shift its emphasis from  identifying issues to seeking solutions.
B. R
EGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS
16. Paragraph 29 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration states that negotiations aim at clarifying and
improving disciplines and procedures under the existing WTO provisions applying to RTAs, takingdue account of the developmental aspects of these agreements.
17. The Group has substantively progressed in its work.  The issue-identification phase has been
practically completed, with issues being broadly structured as primarily "procedural" and "systemic".
Procedural questions, and in particular "RTAs tran sparency", were identified as issues for initial
consideration and have been tackled since last Octobe r, mostly in an informal mode.  Systemic issues
have been addressed only in formal meetings until now.TN/RL/6
Page 4
18. After two slow months, discussions in the Group regained momentum at the 11 June meeting,
when three formal submissions were tabled.  These submissions both built upon the progress achieved
in informal discussions on "RTAs transparency" and revived the debate on important systemic issues.
19. Progress achieved on "RTAs transparency" suggests that the Group is heading to a common
understanding on the elements to be included in an early package improving inter alia  the procedures
relating to the timing and content of RTAs notification, and a revived, more transparent and efficient
RTA review process.  It is difficult at this stage to know whether such a procedural package could be
ready before the Cancún Ministerial, but it remains a possible achievement.
20. A number of systemic issues are now on the table for priority discussion:  RTAs and
development; RTAs coverage (in particular the definition of "substantially all trade" in GATT
Article XXIV:8); other (restrictive) regulations of commerce (in particular matters related to
preferential rules of origin and safeguards); and the primacy of the multilateral trading system andpossible RTA negative effects on third parties.  The Group has also considered the question of
"grandfathering" of existing RTAs and retroactive application of any new rules, but it has been
generally held that no useful outcome could be achieved on that issue until the negotiations had
progressed significantly.
21. On development, the Group has before it certain RTA-related S & D proposals, referred to it
by the Chairman of the General Council on 20 May 2003.  The Group held a preliminary discussion
of these proposals at its formal meeting of 11 June, and has scheduled a meeting on 21-23 July to
further advance its consideration of these proposals.
22. The Group remains committed to achieving significant results in both the disciplines and
procedures related to RTAs.  It plans to accelerate work on the clarification and improvement of RTAdisciplines under the existing WTO provisions in the post-Cancún period.TN/RL/6
Page 5
SUBMISSIONS BY PARTICIPANTS TO THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON RULES1
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/1 IMPROVED DISCIPLINES UNDER THE
AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURES AND THE
ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENTCanada
TN/RL/W/2 NEGOTIATIONS ON REGIONAL TRADE
AGREEMENTS:
KEY ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATIONAustralia
TN/RL/W/3 THE DOHA MANDATE TO ADDRESS
FISHERIES SUBSIDIES:  ISSUESAustralia, Chile,
Ecuador, Iceland,
New Zealand, Peru,
Philippines and the
United States
TN/RL/W/4 PROPOSALS ON IMPLEMENTATION RELATED
ISSUES AND CONCERNS
AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURES/
ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENTIndia
TN/RL/W/5 EXPORT CREDITS IN THE WTO Brazil
TN/RL/W/6 ANTI-DUMPING:  ILLUSTRATIVE MAJOR
ISSUESBrazil; Chile;
Colombia; Costa
Rica;
Hong Kong, China
Israel;  Japan;  Korea;
Mexico;  Norway;
Singapore;
Switzerland;
Thailand;  Turkey
TN/RL/W/7 IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES Brazil
                                                     
1 Until 4 July 2003.TN/RL/6
Page 6
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/9 PROPOSAL FROM THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
OF CHINA ON FISHERIES SUBSIDIESThe People's
Republic of China
TN/RL/W/10 SECOND CONTRIBUTION TO DISCUSSION OF
THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON RULES ON
ANTI-DUMPING MEASURESBrazil;  Chile;
Colombia;  Costa
Rica;  Hong Kong,
China;  Israel; Japan;
Korea;  Norway;
Separate Customs
Territory of Taiwan,
Penghu, Kinmen and
Matsu;  Singapore;
Switzerland;  and
Thailand
TN/RL/W/11 JAPAN’S BASIC POSITION ON THE FISHERIES
SUBSIDIES ISSUEJapan
TN/RL/W/12 FISHERIES SUBSIDIES:  LIMITATIONS OF
EXISTING SUBSIDY DISCIPLINESNew Zealand
TN/RL/W/13 SUBMISSION FROM THE EUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES CONCERNING THE
AGREEMENT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF
ARTICLE VI OF GATT 1994 (ANTI-DUMPING
AGREEMENT)European
Communities
TN/RL/W/14 SUBMISSION ON REGIONAL TRADE
AGREEMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES AND THEIR MEMBER STATESEuropean
Communities
TN/RL/W/15 SUBMISSION ON REGIONAL TRADE
AGREEMENTS BY AUSTRALIAAustralia
TN/RL/W/16 SUBMISSION ON REGIONAL TRADE
AGREEMENTSChile
TN/RL/W/17 KOREA'S VIEWS ON THE DOHA
DEVELOPMENT AGENDA DISCUSSIONS ON
FISHERIES SUBSIDIESKorea
TN/RL/W/18 REPLIES TO THE QUESTIONS/COMMENTS
FROM AUSTRALIA ON TN/RL/W/10Brazil;  Chile;
Colombia;  Costa
Rica;  Hong Kong,
China;  Israel; Japan;
Korea;  Norway;
Separate Customs
Territory of Taiwan,
Penghu, Kinmen and
Matsu;  Singapore;
Switzerland;  and
ThailandTN/RL/6
Page 7
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/19 COUNTERVAILING MEASURES:
ILLUSTRATIVE MAJOR ISSUESBrazil
TN/RL/W/20 QUESTIONS FROM THE EUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES ON DOCUMENTS TN/RL/W/6
AND TN/RL/W/10European
Communities
TN/RL/W/21 ADVERSE TRADE AND CONSERVATION
EFFECTS OF FISHERIES SUBSIDIESUnited States
TN/RL/W/22 COMMENTS ON DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/6 ON
ANTI-DUMPING MEASURESAustralia
TN/RL/W/23 COMMENTS ON DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/10 ON
ANTI-DUMPING MEASURESAustralia
TN/RL/W/24 SUBMISSION BY THE UNITED STATES United States
TN/RL/W/25 QUESTIONS FROM THE UNITED STATES ON
PAPERS SUBMITTED TO THE RULES
NEGOTIATING GROUPUnited States
TN/RL/W/26 SECOND SUBMISSION OF INDIA (ANTI-
DUMPING AGREEMENT)India
TN/RL/W/27 COMMUNICATION FROM THE
UNITED STATES
BASIC CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES OF THE
TRADE REMEDY RULESUnited States
TN/RL/W/28/Rev.1 GENERAL CONTRIBUTION TO THE
DISCUSSION OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUP
ON RULES ON ANTI-DUMPING MEASURESBrazil;  Chile;
Colombia;  Costa
Rica;  Hong Kong,
China;  Israel;  Japan;
Korea;  Mexico;
Norway;  Separate
Customs Territory of
Taiwan, Penghu,
Kinmen and Matsu;
Singapore;
Switzerland;
Thailand;  and TurkeyTN/RL/6
Page 8
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/29 THIRD CONTRIBUTION TO DISCUSSION OF
THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON RULES ON
ANTI-DUMPING MEASURESBrazil;  Chile;
Colombia;  Costa
Rica;  Hong Kong,
China;  Japan;  Korea;
Norway;  Separate
Customs Territory of
Taiwan, Penghu,
Kinmen and Matsu;
Singapore;
Switzerland;
Thailand;  and Turkey
TN/RL/W/30 WTO NEGOTIATIONS CONCERNING THE WTO
AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURESEuropean
Communities
TN/RL/W/31 REPLIES TO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS TO
OUR SECOND CONTRIBUTION (TN/RL/W/10)Brazil;  Chile;
Colombia;  Costa
Rica;  Hong Kong,
China;  Israel;  Japan;
Korea;  Norway;
Separate Customs
Territory of Taiwan,
Penghu, Kinmen and
Matsu;  Singapore;
Switzerland;
Thailand
TN/RL/W/32 SUBMISSION ON REGIONAL TRADE
AGREEMENTSTurkey
TN/RL/W/33 SPECIAL AND DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT
AND THE SUBSIDIES AGREEMENTUnited States
TN/RL/W/34 SECOND SET OF QUESTIONS FROM THE
UNITED STATES ON PAPERS SUBMITTED TO
THE RULES NEGOTIATING GROUPUnited States
TN/RL/W/35 INVESTIGATORY PROCEDURES UNDER THE
ANTI-DUMPING AND SUBSIDIES
AGREEMENTSUnited States
TN/RL/W/36 MOROCCO'S VIEWS REGARDING
NEGOTIATIONS ON RULES AND THE
DISCIPLINES OF THE AGREEMENT ON
IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE VI OF GATT
1994 AND THE AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES
AND COUNTERVAILING MEASURESMorocco
TN/RL/W/37 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON BRAZIL'S
PAPER ON COUNTERVAILING MEASURES:
ILLUSTRATIVE MAJOR ISSUES (DOCUMENT
TN/RL/W/19)AustraliaTN/RL/6
Page 9
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/38 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON THE US
PAPER ON BASIC CONCEPTS AND
PRINCIPLES OF THE TRADE REMEDY RULES
(DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/27)Australia
TN/RL/W/39 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON THE
EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES' SUBSIDIES
PAPER (TN/RL/W/30)Australia
TN/RL/W/40 INTERVENTION BY INDIA ON THE
PROPOSAL BY THE EC CAPTIONED WTO
NEGOTIATIONS CONCERNING THE WTO
AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING  MEASURES (TN/RL/W/30)India
TN/RL/W/41/Rev.1 IMPROVED RULES UNDER THE AGREEMENT
ON SUBSIDIES AND COUNTERVAILING
MEASURES – NON-ACTIONABLE SUBSIDIES
PARAGRAPH 10.2 OF THE DOCUMENT ON
IMPLEMENTATION-RELATED ISSUES AND
CONCERNSVenezuela and Cuba
TN/RL/W/42 QUESTIONS TO THE UNITED STATES ON
TN/RL/W/24United States
TN/RL/W/43 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON THE
UNITED STATES’ PAPER ON
INVESTIGATORY PROCEDURES UNDER THE
ANTI-DUMPING AND SUBSIDIES
AGREEMENTS (TN/RL/W/35)Australia
TN/RL/W/44 TREATMENT OF CONFIDENTIAL AND NON-
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION UNDER
ARTICLE 6.5 OF THE WTO ANTI-DUMPING
AGREEMENTAustralia
TN/RL/W/45 REPLIES TO QUESTIONS TO OUR FIRST
CONTRIBUTION (TN/RL/W/6)Brazil;  Chile;
Colombia;
Costa Rica;  Hong
Kong, China;
Israel;  Japan;  Korea;
Norway;  Singapore;
Switzerland and
ThailandTN/RL/6
Page 10
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/46 FOURTH CONTRIBUTION TO THE
DISCUSSION OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUP
ON RULES ON ANTI-DUMPING MEASURESBrazil;  Chile;
Colombia;  Costa
Rica;  Hong Kong,
China;  Israel;  Korea;
Japan;  Mexico;
Norway;  Separate
Customs Territory of
Taiwan, Penghu,
Kinmen and Matsu;
Singapore;
Switzerland;
Thailand and Turkey
TN/RL/W/47 SUBMISSION FROM CANADA RESPECTING
THE AGREEMENT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF
ARTICLE VI OF THE GATT 1994
(THE ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENT)Canada
TN/RL/W/48/Rev.1 ANTI-DUMPING ACTIONS IN THE AREA OF
TEXTILES AND CLOTHING:  DEVELOPING
MEMBERS' EXPERIENCES AND CONCERNSBangladesh;  Brazil;
the People's Republic
of China;  Colombia;
Costa Rica;  Egypt;
Guatemala;
Hong Kong, China;
India;  Indonesia;
Korea;  Macao,
China;  Maldives;
Pakistan;  Paraguay;
Peru;  Thailand and
Vietnam.
TN/RL/W/49 COMMUNICATION FROM THE UNITED
STATES ATTACHING A  COMMUNIQUÉ
FROM THE ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC
COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD)United States
TN/RL/W/50 CIRCUMVENTION United States
TN/RL/W/51 QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE UNITED
STATES' PAPER ON BASIC CONCEPTS AND
PRINCIPLES OF THE TRADE REMEDY RULESUnited States
TN/RL/W/52 JAPAN’S CONTRIBUTION TO DISCUSSION
ON FISHERIES SUBSIDIES ISSUEJapan
TN/RL/W/53 REPLIES TO QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO
THE UNITED STATES
ON SUBMISSION TN/RL/W/27United States
TN/RL/W/54 THIRD SET OF QUESTIONS FROM THE
UNITED STATES ON PAPERS SUBMITTED TO
THE RULES NEGOTIATING GROUPUnited StatesTN/RL/6
Page 11
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/55 POSITION PAPER TO BE PRESENTED BY THE
ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT
ON THE DOHA DECLARATION
CONCERNING THE NEGOTIATIONS
ON THE ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENTEgypt
TN/RL/W/56 EGYPTIAN PAPER CONTAINING COMMENTS
ON THE CONTRIBUTIONS SUBMITTED IN
THE FRAMEWORK OF THE DOHA
NEGOTIATIONS ON THE ANTI-DUMPING
AGREEMENTEgypt
TN/RL/W/57 EGYPTIAN PAPER CONTAINING QUESTIONS
AND COMMENTS ON THE CONTRIBUTIONS
SUBMITTED IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE
DOHA NEGOTIATIONS ON THE SUBSIDIES
AND COUNTERVAILING MEASURES
AGREEMENTEgypt
TN/RL/W/58 SUBSIDIES IN THE FISHERIES SECTOR:
POSSIBLE CATEGORIZATIONSArgentina, Chile,
Iceland, New
Zealand, Norway, and
Peru
TN/RL/W/59 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON THE
THIRD CONTRIBUTION FROM A NUMBER OF
COUNTRIES (DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/29)Australia
TN/RL/W/60 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON
MOROCCO’S PAPER ON ANTI-DUMPING
AND SUBSIDIES AND COUNTERVAILING
MEASURES AGREEMENTS
(DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/36)Australia
TN/RL/W/61 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON
VENEZUELA’S SUBMISSION ON NON-
ACTIONABLE SUBSIDIES UNDER THE
AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURES (DOCUMENT
TN/RL/W/41)Australia
TN/RL/W/62 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON
CANADA’S SUBMISSION ON THE ANTI-
DUMPING AGREEMENT (DOCUMENT
TN/RL/W/47)AustraliaTN/RL/6
Page 12
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/63 SENIOR OFFICIALS’ STATEMENT ON ANTI-
DUMPING NEGOTIATIONSBrazil;  Chile;
Colombia;  Costa
Rica;  Hong Kong,
China;  Israel;  Japan;
Korea;  Mexico;
Norway;  Singapore;
Switzerland;  the
Separate Customs
Territory of Taiwan,
Penghu, Kinmen and
Matsu;  Thailand and
Turkey
TN/RL/W/64 REPLIES TO THE QUESTIONS MADE BY THE
AUSTRALIAN DELEGATION IN DOCUMENT
TN/RL/W/37Brazil
TN/RL/W/65 KOREA’S COMMENTS ON CANADA’S
SUBMISSION ON THE ANTI-DUMPING
AGREEMENT (TN/RL/W/47)Korea
TN/RL/W/66 PROPOSAL OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
CHINA ON THE NEGOTIATION ON
ANTI-DUMPINGChina
TN/RL/W/67 NEGOTIATIONS ON ANTI-DUMPING AND
SUBSIDIES – REFLECTION PAPER
OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ON A
SWIFT CONTROL MECHANISM FOR
INITIATIONSEuropean
Communities
TN/RL/W/68 INTERVENTION BY INDIA ON THE
SUBMISSION BY THE
UNITED STATES ON SPECIAL AND
DIFFERENTIAL  TREATMENT AND
THE SUBSIDIES AGREEMENTIndia
TN/RL/W/69 KOREA’S VIEWS ON THE SUGGESTED
CATEGORIZATION OF FISHERY SUBSIDIESKorea
TN/RL/W/70 PRELIMINARY REPLIES TO THE QUESTIONS
BY AUSTRALIA CONTAINED IN DOCUMENT
TN/RL/W/61Venezuela and Cuba
TN/RL/W/71 RESPONSES BY THE UNITED STATES TO
QUESTIONS FROM
AUSTRALIA ON INVESTIGATORY
PROCEDURES UNDER
THE ANTI-DUMPING AND SUBSIDIES
AGREEMENTSUnited StatesTN/RL/6
Page 13
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/72 IDENTIFICATION OF CERTAIN MAJOR
ISSUES UNDER THE ANTI-DUMPING AND
SUBSIDIES AGREEMENTSUnited States
TN/RL/W/73 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON THE
ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT’S POSITION
PAPER CONCERNING THE NEGOTIATIONS
ON THE ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENT
(TN/RL/W/55)Egypt
TN/RL/W/74 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON THE
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA’S PAPER ON
ANTI-DUMPING (DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/66)Australia
TN/RL/W/75 COMMENTS FROM AUSTRALIA ON THE
EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES’ PAPER:
REFLECTION PAPER ON A SWIFT CONTROL
MECHANISM  FOR INITIATIONS
(DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/67)Australia
TN/RL/W/76 PROPOSAL ON SUNSET Brazil;  Chile;
Colombia;  Costa
Rica;  Hong Kong,
China;  Israel;  Japan;
Korea;
Norway;  the Separate
Customs Territory of
Taiwan, Penghu,
Kinmen and Matsu;
Singapore;
Switzerland;
Thailand and Turkey
TN/RL/W/77 POSSIBLE APPROACHES TO IMPROVED
DISCIPLINES  ON FISHERIES SUBSIDIESUnited States
TN/RL/W/78 SUBSIDIES DISCIPLINES REQUIRING
CLARIFICATION AND IMPROVEMENTUnited States
TN/RL/W/79 PRELIMINARY COMMENTS AND
QUESTIONS BY THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF
EGYPT ON THE CONTRIBUTIONS
SUBMITTED IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE
DOHA NEGOTIATIONS ON THE
ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENT AND ON THE
AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURESEgyptTN/RL/6
Page 14
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/80 CLARIFICATIONS SOUGHT BY INDIA ON
THE SUBMISSIONS BY THE UNITED STATES
(TN/RL/W/35) AND CANADA (TN/RL/W/47)India
TN/RL/W/81 COMMUNICATION FROM ARGENTINA Argentina
TN/RL/W/82 SUBMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN
COMMUNITIES TO THE NEGOTIATING
GROUP ON RULES – FISHERIES SUBSIDIESEuropean
Communities
TN/RL/W/83 PROPOSAL ON REVIEWS Brazil; Chile;
Colombia; Costa
Rica; Hong Kong,
China; Israel; Japan;
Korea; Norway;
Singapore
Switzerland; The
Separate Customs
Territory of Taiwan,
Penghu, Kinmen and
Matsu; and Thailand
TN/RL/W/84 QUESTIONS FROM JAPAN CONCERNING
PAPERS ON THE FISHERIES SUBSIDIES
ISSUEJapan
TN/RL/W/85 GENERAL CONTRIBUTION TO DISCUSSION
OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON RULES
ON THE AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURESAustralia
TN/RL/W/86 GENERAL CONTRIBUTION TO DISCUSSION
OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON RULES
ON THE ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENTAustralia
TN/RL/W/87 REPLIES TO THE QUESTIONS POSED BY
AUSTRALIA CONCERNING THE DOCUMENT
PROVIDED BY MOROCCOMorocco
TN/RL/W/88 COMMENTS FROM THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
OF CHINA ON THE UNITED STATES
PROPOSAL ON FISHERIES SUBSIDIES
(TN/RL/W/77)China
TN/RL/W/89 COMMENTS BY AUSTRALIA ON THE US'
PAPER ON SUBSIDIES DISCIPLINES
REQUIRING CLARIFICATION AND
IMPROVEMENT (DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/78)Australia
TN/RL/W/90 ARTICLE 9.4 OF THE WTO ANTI-DUMPING
AGREEMENT: DUMPING MARGINS FOR
EACH SAMPLED EXPORTER BASED ON
FACTS AVAILABLEAustralia
TN/RL/W/91 "LIKE PRODUCT" WITHIN THE MEANING OF
THE WTO ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENTAustraliaTN/RL/6
Page 15
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/92 RESPONSES FROM CANADA TO CERTAIN
QUESTIONS POSED BY KOREA IN
TN/RL/W/65, AUSTRALIA IN TN/RL/W/62,
EGYPT IN TN/RL/W/79 AND INDIA IN
TN/RL/W/80Canada
TN/RL/W/93 PROPOSAL ON FACTS AVAILABLE Brazil; Chile;
Colombia; Costa
Rica; Hong Kong,
China; Israel; Japan;
Korea; Norway;
Singapore
Switzerland; The
Separate Customs
Territory of Taiwan,
Penghu, Kinmen and
Matsu; and Thailand
TN/RL/W/94 REPLIES TO THE QUESTIONS AND
COMMENTS OF WTO MEMBERS
CONCERNING THE PROPOSAL OF CHINA
(TN/RL/W/66)China
TN/RL/W/95 ELEMENTS OF A STEEL SUBSIDIES
AGREEMENTUnited States
TN/RL/W/96 QUESTIONS FROM KOREA ON THE UNITED
STATES PAPER ON SUBSIDIES DISCIPLINESKorea
TN/RL/W/97 KOREA'S COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION
FROM THE UNITED STATES (TN/RL/W/77)Korea
TN/RL/W/98 IDENTIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL ISSUES
UNDER THE ANTI-DUMPING AND
SUBSIDIES AGREEMENTSUnited States
TN/RL/W/99 INDIA'S REPLIES TO QUESTIONS FROM THE
UNITED STATES ON ITS SUBMISSIONS
(TN/RL/W/4 AND TN/RL/W/26)India
TN/RL/W/100 EGYPT'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS ON THE
CONTRIBUTIONS SUBMITTED IN THE
FRAMEWORK OF THE DOHA
NEGOTIATIONS ON THE AGREEMENTS ON
ANTI-DUMPING AND SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURES (TN/RL/W/72)Egypt
TN/RL/W/101 EGYPTIAN PAPER CONTAINING REPLIES TO
QUESTIONS POSED BY AUSTRALIA IN
DOCUMENT NUMBER TN/RL/W/73Egypt
TN/RL/W/102 EGYPT'S PRELIMINARY COMMENTS ON THE
CONTRIBUTIONS SUBMITTED IN THE
FRAMEWORK OF THE DOHA
NEGOTIATIONS ON THE AGREEMENTS ON
ANTI-DUMPING AND SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURES (TN/RL/W/78)EgyptTN/RL/6
Page 16
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/103 FOURTH SET OF QUESTIONS FROM THE US
ON PAPERS SUBMITTED TO THE
NEGOTIATING GROUP ON RULESUnited States
TN/RL/W/104 AGREEMENTS ON ANTI-DUMPING
PRACTICES AND SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURES
ILLUSTRATIVE COMMON ISSUESBrazil; Chile; Costa
Rica; Hong Kong,
China; Japan; Korea;
Norway; Switzerland;
Thailand and Turkey
TN/RL/W/105 SUBMISSION OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF
EGYPT ON THE CLARIFICATION OF
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE ANTI-
DUMPING AGREEMENTEgypt
TN/RL/W/106 QUESTIONS FROM INDIA ON
AUSTRALIA'S PAPER ON 'GENERAL
CONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION
OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON
RULES ON THE ANTI-DUMPING
AGREEMENT'India
TN/RL/W/107 OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS BY
VENEZUELA ON DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/78
SUBMITTED BY THE UNITED STATES
CONCERNING PROHIBITED SUBSIDIES
AND OTHER SUBJECTS UNDER THE WTO
AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURESVenezuela
TN/RL/W/108 PRELIMINARY ANSWERS OF CUBA
AND VENEZUELA TO THE
QUESTIONS PROVIDED BY EGYPT
REGARDING DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/41Cuba and Venezuela
TN/RL/W/109 QUESTIONS FORM HONG KONG,
CHINA ON PAPERS SUBMITTED TO
THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON
RULESHong Kong, China
TN/RL/W/110 I IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES UNDER THE
ANTI-DUMPING AGREEMENT THAT NEED
TO BE IMPROVED AND CLARIFIED WITHIN
THE CURRENT NEGOTIATIONS ON WTO
RULESEgypt
TN/RL/W/111 KOREA’S VIEW ON THE
IMPROVEMENT OF THE SUNSET
SYSTEMKorea
TN/RL/W/112 IMPROVED DISCIPLINES UNDER THE
AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURESCanadaTN/RL/6
Page 17
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/113 PROPOSAL ON PROHIBITION OF ZEROING Brazil; Chile;
Colombia; Costa
Rica; Hong Kong,
China; Israel; Japan;
Korea; Mexico;
Norway; the Separate
Customs Territory of
Taiwan, Penghu,
Kinmen and Matsu;
Singapore
Switzerland; and
Thailand
TN/RL/W/114 DISCUSSION PAPER ON REGIONAL
TRADING ARRANGEMENTSIndia
TN/RL/W/115 POSSIBLE APPROACH TO STRENGTHEN THE
DISCIPLINES RELATING TO FISHERIES
SUBSIDIESChile
TN/RL/W/116 SUBMISSION ON REGIONAL TRADE
AGREEMENTSKorea
TN/RL/W/117 SUBMISSION ON REGIONAL TRADE
AGREEMENTSAustralia; Chile;
Hong Kong, China;
Korea and New
Zealand
TN/RL/W/118 PROPOSAL ON PRICE UNDERTAKINGS Brazil; Chile;
Colombia; Costa
Rica; Hong Kong,
China; Japan; Korea;
Norway; the Separate
Customs Territory of
Taiwan, Penghu,
Kinmen and Matsu;
Switzerland; and
Thailand
TN/RL/W/119 PROPOSAL ON LESSER DUTY Brazil;  Chile;
Colombia;  Costa
Rica;  Hong Kong,
China;  Israel;  Japan;
Korea; Mexico;
Norway;  Singapore;
Switzerland;  the
Separate Customs
Territory of Taiwan,
Penghu, Kinmen and
Matsu;  Thailand and
TurkeyTN/RL/6
Page 18
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/120 THIRD SUBMISSION BY INDIA  TO
NEGOTIATING GROUP ON  RULES
(AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURES )India
TN/RL/W/121 REPLIES TO QUESTIONS FROM INDIA
(TN/RL/W/106) AND
HONG KONG, CHINA (TN/RL/W/109) ON
AUSTRALIA’S GENERAL CONTRIBUTION ON
ANTI-DUMPING (TN/RL/W/86) AND
“LIKE PRODUCT” (TN/RL/W/91)Australia
TN/RL/W/122 COMMENTS BY AUSTRALIA ON THE
PROPOSAL BY VARIOUS MEMBERS ON
REVIEWS (DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/83)Australia
TN/RL/W/123 COMMENTS BY AUSTRALIA ON THE
PROPOSAL BY VARIOUS MEMBERS ON
SUNSET REVIEWS (DOCUMENT TN/RL/W/76)Australia
TN/RL/W/124 COMMENTS BY AUSTRALIA ON THE
PROPOSAL BY VARIOUS MEMBERS ON
FACTS AVAILABLE (DOCUMENT
TN/RL/W/93)Australia
TN/RL/W/125 COMMENTS BY AUSTRALIA ON THE
UNITED STATES' PAPER ON CERTAIN
MAJOR ISSUES UNDER THE ANTI-DUMPING
AND SUBSIDIES AGREEMENTS (DOCUMENT
TN/RL/W/72)Australia
TN/RL/W/126 EGYPT’S PAPER CONTAINING COMMENTS
ON THE CONTRIBUTIONS
SUBMITTED IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE
DOHA NEGOTIATIONS ON THE ANTI-
DUMPING AGREEMENT AND ON THE
SUBSIDIES AND COUNTERVAILING
MEASURES AGREEMENTEgypt
TN/RL/W/127 REPLY TO THE QUESTIONS OF THE
UNITED STATES2 CONCERNING THE
PROPOSAL OF CHINA (TN/RL/W/66)China
TN/RL/W/128 EGYPT'S PAPER REPLYING TO THE
QUESTIONS POSED BY THE UNITED STATES
IN DOCUMENT NUMBER TN/RL/W/103Egypt
                                                     
2 TN/RL/W/103TN/RL/6
Page 19
Symbol Title of Document Submitted by
TN/RL/W/129 CONCEPT PAPER ON TRADE REMEDY
RULES-EVIDENCE OF TRADE DISTORTING
PRACTICESHong Kong, China
TN/RL/W/130 FURTHER ISSUES IDENTIFIED UNDER THE
ANTI-DUMPING AND SUBSIDIES
AGREEMENTS FOR DISCUSSION BY
THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON RULESUnited States
__________