RESTRICTEDWORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONWT/TPR/G/85
7 May 2001
(01-2210)
Trade Policy Review Body Original:  English
TRADE POLICY REVIEW
OECS-WTO MEMBERS
Report by the Governments
Pursuant to the Agreement Establishing the Trade Policy Review Mechanism
(Annex 3 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade
Organization), attached is a joint report by the Governments of the OECS
Members under review:  Antigua and Ba rbuda, Dominica, Grenada, Saint Kitts
and Nevis, Saint Lucia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
Individual reports by each of these Members are contained in separate
documents in the same series WT/TPR/G/85 with suffixes ATG, DMA, GRD,
KNA, LCA and VCT.
This report was prepared by the OECS Secretariat on behalf of the OECS
Members under review.
Note: This report is subject to restricted circulation and press embargo until the end of the meeting
of the Trade Policy Review Body on OECS-WTO Members.OECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 3
CONTENTS
Page
I. ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 5
(1) MAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS 5
(i) Introduction 5(ii) Structure of the economies 5
(iii) Macroeconomic developments 6
(iv) Fiscal policy 6(v) Monetary policy 7(vi) Balance of payments 7
(2) DEVELOPMENTS IN TRADE AND INVESTMENTS 8
(3) OUTLOOK 8
II. TRADE POLICY REGIME 9
(1) INTRODUCTION 9(2) POLICY OBJECTIVES AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 9
(i) World Trade Organization 10(ii) Regional Agreements 11
(3) THE OECS MEMBERS, THE WTO, AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION 12
III. MARKET ACCESS IN GOODS 13
(1) INTRODUCTION 13(2) TARIFFS AND OTHER PRICE-BASED MEASURES 13
(i) Customs valuation 14(ii) MFN import duties 14
(iii) Preferential tariffs and rules of origin 14
(iv) Other duties and charges 15
(3) NON-TARIFF MEASURES 15
(i) Import prohibitions, restrictions and licensing 15(ii) Safeguards 15
(iii) Anti-dumping and countervailing 16
(4) GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT 16
IV. OTHER MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE 16
(1) INTRODUCTION 16(2) EXPORT MEASURES 16(3) STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL REGULATIONS 17
(4) MARKET COMPETITION 17
(i) Marketing boards and price controls 17(ii) Competition policy and regulatory issues 17(iii) Assistance to activities 17(iv) Intellectual property rights 17
V. INVESTMENT AND MARKET ACCESS IN SERVICES 18
(1) INTRODUCTION 18
(2) FINANCIAL SERVICES 18(3) OTHER OFFSHORE SERVICES 20(4) TELECOMMUNICATIONS 21(5) TOURISM 22OECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 5
I. ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
(1) MAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS
(i) Introduction
1. The independent Members States of the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (Antigua
and Barbuda, The Commonwealth of Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia and
St. Vincent and the Grenadines) welcome this Trade Policy Review conducted by the World TradeOrganization (WTO).  We see it as an exercise in inventory taking of our trade policy regulations
which would lay the basis for transparency in our dealings with international economic agents.  The
exercise could not have come at a more opportune moment since the Eastern Caribbean states are in
the process of articulating a comprehensive economic development strategy.  We have learnt a great
deal from the exercise so far.
2. The independent members of the OECS are small island economies.  Their combined
population is approximately 425,000 people.  In 1999 their combined GDP amounted to
US$2,169.34m.  In 1999, the economies’ share of world exports was approximately 0.0061%.
Bananas, the largest merchandise exported by the economies account for a mere 0.86 percent of world
exports of that commodity.  Exports as a percentage of GDP was 15.4 percent, while imports as apercentage of GDP amounted to 68.4 percent.  Meanwhile, the combined merchandise trade deficit
totalled 52.9 percent of GDP in 1999.  All the economies have a high import content in their
production and consumption patterns making it pointless to use the exchange rate as a policy
instrument aimed at favourably altering their international competitiveness.
(ii) Structure of the economies
3. The economies of the Eastern Caribbean are small, dependent, vulnerable and open.
Historically, the economies of the Eastern Caribbean have been inserted into the global economy onterms which were not of their own making.  Part of that historical insertion into the global economy
has been the development of a mono-crop production system (with the resulting limited export mix
and inflexible economic structures) and preferential  treatment for the resulting product going to the
metropolitan countries.  This character of integration into the world economy has had far reaching
implications for, and diverse impact on, these economies.
4. To a large extent most of the economies are attempting to focus on the services sector as the
engine of growth while at the same time attempting to modernise and diversify their agricultural
sector.  Nonetheless, the economies still remain primarily single sectored thereby prolonging and
reinforcing their vulnerable character.  Besides, the fundamental feature of smallness is one which
cannot be ignored and one which the economies can do little about.  They are small, period.
5. Given the small physical space of all of the economies, production possibilities are limited
and most operations are of a very small scale.  This small scale has also been conditioned by the
narrowness of the domestic markets.  Although there is a larger regional market, the transportation
pattern has, in part, not allowed for any meaningful development of enterprise and joint production
possibilities have remained largely unattainable.  Again the historical pattern of insertion into theworld economy shows itself in the lack of a proper  intra-regional transportation network for goods in
the Eastern Caribbean.  Another dimension of the smallness of the economies is the fact that most are
topographically mountainous which further reduces the available physical economic space which
could be used for sustainable material production.WT/TPR/G/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 6
(iii) Macroeconomic developments
6. While by conventional measures and standards the economies have posted a relatively good
macroeconomic performance during the last two decades  of the twentieth century, the total picture is
not always evident from those macroeconomic indicators.  The economies still continue to suffer from
income volatility primarily as a result of natural disasters and adverse movements in international
prices, including exchange rate.  Five devastating hurricanes in five years underlines the region’s
vulnerability to natural disasters.  An adverse movement in the value of the pound sterling and theprice of bananas on the European market have severe consequences for the economies of the Eastern
Caribbean.  The same is true with respect to travel advisories issued by some developed countries
against the economies of the Eastern Caribbean.
7. Despite the apparent fair macroeconomic performances, unemployment continues to be a
chronic problem for all of the economies as the rate reportedly averages an estimated 20.0 percent.
The attendant problem of poverty also continues to cry out for alleviation, if not eradication.  At the
same time there continues to be rising expectations on the part of the people of the Eastern Caribbean;expectations which in the main are difficult to realis e.  In turn, there has been a growing threat to long
held social values, a noticeable increase in disenchantment and discernable impatience with the
international economic order as characterised by globalisation.  It is against this background that themacroeconomic performance of all the economies of the Eastern Caribbean must be viewed.
(iv) Fiscal policy
8. As a result of prudent fiscal management most of the economies of the OECS have been
posting current account surpluses.  However, the relatively small current account surplus was
achieved under tremendous constraints as expenditure on some critical services had to be curbed.  The
outcome on the current account should also be viewed in the context of fiscal policy instruments
being the only levers available to the governments to influence the course of economic activity.  This
means that there is little scope for the governments to pursue expansionary fiscal policy, especiallysince deficit financing through the central bank is constrained.
9. For all of the governments fiscal policy is primarily directed at raising revenue to finance both
current and capital expenditure.  In the main, most of the revenue goes to satisfying currentexpenditure, while capital expenditure is financed primarily from loans and grants made available
from external savings.  In recent times external sources of funds for financing capital expenditure
have been difficult to identify and access as the geo-political importance of the Caribbean, in general,has been downgraded.
10. The process of trade liberalisation in the form of tariff reduction poses great difficulties for
the Eastern Caribbean.  Because of the narrow production base of the economies and the uneven
distribution of income in the economies most of  government revenue is derived from taxes on
international trade and transactions.  The process of tariff reduction, therefore, poses an acute publicpolicy dilemma for all of the Eastern Caribbean.  Invariably, reductions in tariffs are accompanied by
a compensatory revenue enhancing measure as a first, albeit second best, preliminary approach to
resolving this public policy dilemma.  This policy course was, and still is, necessary so as to allow the
governments of the Eastern Caribbean to continue performing some of the vital economic functions
they are expected to perform.  These include the provision of some essential social services, publicinvestment, and the provision of counterpart financ ing of projects funded by international donors.
Recognising the fundamental policy dilemma posed by the liberalisation of trade the economies have
implemented some measures as part of a comprehensive fiscal reform programme.  More recently the
Heads of Government have called for a review of their fiscal regime and an examination of the
feasibility of implementing a value added tax.OECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 7
11. The governments of the Eastern Caribbean have also pursued a policy of providing fiscal
incentives to investors by way of tax holidays and import duty concessions.  This policy approach also
poses a economic dilemma for all of the governments.  While it is necessary to encourage investment
to alleviate the unemployment condition, the only means for luring investors to the OECS has
considerable fiscal implications in terms of revenue foregone.
(v) Monetary policy
12. Monetary policy in the Eastern Caribbean is centralised under the Eastern Caribbean Central
Bank.  The focus of monetary policy is to maintain a strong Eastern Caribbean dollar so as to provide
a degree of certainty to the economic policy environment.  This policy stance means that the
governments have had to set strict limits on the extent of debt monetisation.  The economies have
never used the central bank to finance government debt beyond statutory limits and economicadjustment has always been on the fiscal side in th e form of contractionary policy.  The external value
of the Eastern Caribbean dollar has consequently remained at the same level for more than two
decades.
13. The strong dollar policy of the central bank has provided a significant degree of policy
predictability in the face of an unpredictable envi ronment.  This has influenced the flow of foreign
direct investment to the economies.  Equally significant, the strong dollar policy has contributed to a
relatively low inflation rate in the region and hence the curbing of further  demands for wage increase.
From the standpoint of the governments, the stability of the value of the dollar has meant that there
was, and still is, a certain degree of certainty with respect to the amortisation of external debt
contracted in United States dollars.  This has played a significant role in assisting the prudential
management of government finances.
14. At the broader financial systemic level, there is the planned establishment of a regional stock
exchange for the economies of the Eastern Caribbean.  The hope is to deepen the financial system so
as to foster greater intermediation of regional financial resources that would facilitate further
mobilisation and allocation across the economies in a market driven manner.  With the passage of
time the expectation is to open up the exchange to global transactions thereby almost completing the
process of integrating the economies into the global financial system.  Relatedly, a regional market forgovernment papers will be operational in the very near future.
(vi) Balance of payments
15. The persistent merchandise trade deficit, and indeed current account deficit, experienced by
the economies of the OECS speaks to a structural characteristic of the economies.  All the economies
are high net importers of food and capital goods, while exporting primary agricultural products.  Onthe services side the economies are heavily dependent on tourism, with efforts currently being made
to develop a vibrant financial services sector and an information technology sector.
16. Given the current trends in foreign direct investment and the general directional movement of
global capital it is not certain that financing of the structural current account deficit on the balance of
payments would be sustainable in the long-run.  This is particularly so in a context where, in order toattract the little foreign direct investment the economies of the OECS have to make sizable fiscal
concessions and when that is done there is the added complication of blacklisting from some
developed countries.  The economies of the OECS would therefore be placed under greater pressure
to close the savings - investment gap through the use of foreign savings.WT/TPR/G/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 8
(2) DEVELOPMENTS IN TRADE AND INVESTMENTS
17. Notwithstanding the difficulties faced by th e economies, there is a commitment to pursuing
economic policy aimed at liberalising trade, market penetration, building more nimble economic
structures and more efficient business facilitation.  At the same time, we advocate appropriate
accommodation for their special circumstances.  All of the economies have embarked on a phased
reduction of external tariffs, curtailing their reliance on quantitative restrictions and are taking steps tomake their legislation consistent with their WTO commitments.  In a very practical way the
economies of the Eastern Caribbean have taken the bold step of de-monopolising the
telecommunications sector and set in motion a process of liberalisation almost unheard of in the
Eastern Caribbean.  This has led to a practical coordination of sector policy and the establishment of a
coherent regional regulatory framework for the sector.  Policy expectations are that this process ofliberalisation of the telecommunications sector will be followed by similar processes with respect to
the other utilities in the economies.  With the passage of time, we would expect to embark on a deeper
process of liberalisation of the economies in a co -ordinated manner and in conformity with our
commitments made under the Marrakesh Agreement.
18. As part of opening up the economies there have been efforts aimed at implementing measures
that would allow for the free movement of labour and capital in the Eastern Caribbean.  The process
of free movement of labour and capital also extends to the wider Caribbean region.  Included in that
process would be provisions for the right of establishment.  Complimentary policy measures were
adopted to liberalise current and capital account transactions and all the economies, operating under a
common central bank, have long attained Article VIII status.
19. The governments of the Eastern Caribbean will co ntinue policies aimed at attracting foreign
direct investment in order to stimulate economi c growth and employment, and close the savings-
investment gap in the economies.  Particular attention will be given to the services sector in general,
and in particular, the tourism industry.  The aim will be to create an environment that is conducive to
investment with the granting of some con cessions to participating foreign investors.
(3) O
UTLOOK
20. Over the medium term, the economies of the Eastern Caribbean are expected to post moderate
growth spurred on by tourism,  information technology, financial services, construction and to a lesser
extent agriculture.  The construction sector is likely to be influenced by public sector projects as well
as projects associated with the tourism industry as hotels seek to expand their capacity and new hotels
are constructed.  While there would be a continuing role for agriculture, the future of that sector is less
certain, especially in the context of the general move to fully liberalise the banana trade on theEuropean market following the ruling of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body.  Nonetheless,
expectations are that developments in the other realm of the agricultural sector would be more
favourable than in the case of bananas.
21. Both fiscal and monetary policies are expected to be in line with the immediate past trend.
The governments of the Eastern Caribbean will continue their prudent fiscal management in order togenerate surpluses so as to facilitate public sector investment in the economies.  Monetary policy will
continue to be directed at maintaining a strong dollar so as to provide a predictable environment for
investment and economic activity in general.  General macroeconomic policy would have to be
guided by policies which recognise the close relationship between productivity and employment in
order to better manage aggregate demand in the system, while stemming pressure on the balance of
payments.OECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 9
II. TRADE POLICY REGIME
(1) INTRODUCTION
22. Contrary to some views, tariffs have not been used in the Eastern Caribbean as a mechanism
for protecting domestic industries.  Indeed, for there to be adequate protection of domestic industries
tariffs would have to be extremely high.  Whatever protection accorded to domestic industries can
only be meaningfully done through the use of quantitative restrictions.  Despite the singularimportance of quantitative restrictions to the economies of the OECS, a process tariffication has
begun and the hope is to ultimately place less reliance on quantitative restrictions as a trade policy
instrument.  However, the process of tariffication has been tempered by fiscal revenue considerations
as well as tariff binding considerations and the economies now have to approach the tariffication
exercise with more caution than anticipated.
(2) P
OLICY OBJECTIVES AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
23. In all our international negotiations and in all our efforts at making the transition to new
global requirements we have sought to place the fundamental economic mitigating factor of
vulnerability on the agenda.  Recognising the vulnerability faced by our economies, we have been
painstakingly arguing for special and differential treatment in regional, hemispheric and globaleconomic negotiations.  Up to more recent times these arguments have in the main fallen on
unreceptive ears.  But the logical economic corollary to vulnerability is the recognition that there is
need for special and differential treatment.  We wish  to place the issues of vulnerability and the need
for special and differential treatment on the global agenda again.
24. From all objective appraisals, the success of any future policy requires the economies of the
Eastern Caribbean to be accorded special and differential treatment in the global economic
environment.  The mitigating factors of vulnerability and lack of capacity are sufficient to suggest thatif these economies are treated equally in the international economic arena, without due consideration
to their peculiarities, then their chances of su rvival in the global economy would be fraught with
greater difficulties.  Even if the playing field is levelled, there is the equally critical factor of unequal
participants in the game.  The economies of the Eastern Caribbean can never be economically equal in
that sense.
25. This special and differential treatment may take the form of longer periods for compliance
with specific regulations and easier market access to our major trading partners, exemption from
certain obligations and lower levels of commitments.  Short of these, the economies of the Eastern
Caribbean would be disproportionately affected by the resulting character of insertion into the global
economy.  This could have untold implications for the peoples of the region.  While some may arguethat it is time for the economies to operate on a level playing field and that all should be treated
equally, we must be reminded that while this may be so, the players in the game of global economic
relations are far from being equal.  It is an irony that equal conditions and requirements, when applied
without regard to the relative position of the players could generate the most unequal set of results.
Factor endowments of the economies are radically different making it more easy, with minimal socio-economic dislocation, for those with a stronger factor endowment to take advantage of equally applied
rules and regulations.
26. We should also be reminded of the interdependent nature of the global economy and the
ultimate objective of the rules and requirements; that is, the economic advancement of all peoples.
We should never lose sight of this objective in the construction of rules and in the application of the
requirements of the global economic system.  If it is the case that the construction of the rules and theWT/TPR/G/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 10
stringent application of the requirements of the global economy would lead to more disadvantaged
countries and more impoverished peoples of the world then we should pause and reflect on the
fundamental objective of global economic integration.  This is not to say that there would not be some
greater gainers from global economic integration.  However, there should not be greater losers,
certainly when contrasted with their initial positi on before entering the global economic arena in this
new type of conditions.  Indeed, it would be usef ul to recall what the Protocol 5 of the EC- ACP
Lomé Convention asserted in respect of the banana  industry of the ACP Member States.  According to
that Protocol, with respect to access and advantage on the European market no ACP states should be
placed “in a less favourable situation than in the past or at present”, i.e, they should be made “no
worse off”.  This is particularly relevant if as a result of globalisation some economies turn out to be
disproportionately worse off from their initial conditions relative to other countries.  The economiesof the Eastern Caribbean are forever mindful of this basic objective and potentially desirable result of
global economic integration.  We hope not to be made worse off.
(i) World Trade Organization
27. In recent times the economies have followed traditional economic wisdom and have adopted
an outward-looking  economic posture.  The economies have gradually reduced their external tariffsover a number of years, while attempting to penetrate external markets.  As a further attempt at
following conventional economic views, the economie s have all joined the World Trade Organisation.
The hopes were that a rules based international trading system would be more beneficial than harmful
to the economies of the Eastern Caribbean, and that there would be a recognition of the peculiar
economic position in which the economies find themselves.
28. While the attempts at inserting the economies into the global system are incomplete, the
hopes of the economies are far from being realised given the conflict over the European bananaregime and the unfavourable rulings of the Dispute Settlement Body against the preferential treatment
accorded to ACP bananas on the European market, as well as the concurrent erosion of preferential
arrangements for sugar.  The economies have been  caught in the middle of a conflict between two
economic powers over issues which had little to do with bananas or sugar.  The economies suffered,
and are still suffering collateral damage as a result of that conflict.  That was particularly worrying tothe economies of the Eastern Caribbean as it compounds the difficulties of economic adjustment and
complicates the process of global engagement.  Similarly, further efforts at diversifying the economies
of the Eastern Caribbean in the form of the development of the financial services sector have met with
challenges from the larger economies.  The system of rules which the Eastern Caribbean economies
had hoped would be of some assistance apparently has been turned against those policies theeconomies have followed based on the prevailing economic consensus on outwardness, global
engagement, and economic diversification.  In this regard, it may be necessary to give greater
prominence to the issue of financial services on the agenda of the new round of multilateral trade
negotiations.
29. Because of resource constraints, coupled with minimal manpower, the OECS countries find it
difficult to participate in the deliberations of the WTO in a consistent manner.  Attempts have been
made to establish a physical presence in Geneva, but the cost of operating such a presence has so far
proven to be prohibitive.  The cost of operating from Geneva plus the cost of implementing the
agreement, when contrasted with the benefits derived from participation in the process, have led to
renewed thinking on the possible net benefit of participating in the WTO.
30. There is also the perennial problem of the lack of capacity.  This is probably one of the most
daunting structural institutional problems facing the economies of the Eastern Caribbean. Theengagement of the economies in the WTO has more forcefully brought to light the acute nature of theOECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 11
capacity shortfalls of the economies.  In some cases we have been unable to establish the requisite
contact point in each country.  We have been unable to address the issue of notification to the fullest.
We have not even been able to take maximum advantage of some offers, especially in the area of
training, made to us because of a lack of capacity.  Worst of all, when the dispute over the European
banana regime was litigated we found ourselves in a legally disadvantaged position in terms of
representation.  Even the process of data gathering for the conduct of this very Trade Policy Reviewwas in many instances hampered by a lack of capacity.  Basic data which most economies are
presumed to have readily at their disposal were not that accessible to the economies of the Eastern
Caribbean and unusual searches had to be conducted to facilitate this Trade Policy Review.
Meaningful participation in the work of the WTO is impossible for the economies of the Eastern
Caribbean without assistance from the developed countries.
(ii) Regional Agreements
(a) OECS
31. As a regional grouping the members of the OE CS have sought to promote free trade among
its members.  As it currently stands there are few restrictions on trade within the OECS and steps aretaken to foster the free movement of labour and capital within the grouping.  The barriers to free
movement of labour and capital are under constant examination with a view to removing them.  The
overall policy objective is to create a single economic space in the economies of the Eastern
Caribbean so as to maximise all possible economies of scales.  The single economic space envisages a
more efficient and effective payment system, greater mobility of labour and capital and a deeper levelof policy co-ordination and harmonisation, especially in the field of international trade.
32. A critical element in the OECS grouping is the fact that a number of activities are conducted
under common arrangements.  The basic idea behind this functional cooperation is to achieve
economies of scale in the provision of some services to the people of the region.  The small size of the
economies is such that not much economies of scale can be derived in the provision of a number of
services.  The per capita cost of providing some services are simply prohibitive, but in some cases,
given the nature of the service, the economies have to absorb the loss associated with the
dis-economies of scale and make individual arrangements for the provision of some vital services.
(b) CARICOM
33. The membership of the OECS in the CARICOM regional integration movement is aimed at
fostering stronger economic ties with the rest of the Caribbean.  It is also directed at attempting to
overcome some of the difficulties associated with  smallness.  This means an expanded market for
products of the OECS economies and common approaches to some activities which could be better
done at a regional level as opposed to a national level.
34. Recognising the small size of the economies of the OECS, the larger member states of the
CASRICOM integration movement have accorded special and differential treatment to these
economies.  Despite the application of some trade restrictions within the ambit of the special anddifferential treatment afforded to OECS countries exports from the rest of CARICOM to the OECS
countries continues to post strong growth over the year s.  It is indeed a clear case of using special and
differential treatment in such a way that trade flows within the members of the regional grouping are
not unduly hampered.WT/TPR/G/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 12
(c) Other
35. Bilateral trade agreements between CARICOM and countries of the hemisphere have all
allowed for non-reciprocal trade between those countries and the small economies of the OECS.
Despite the fact that non-reciprocal status has been given to the OECS in those other trading
arrangements, the economies have not been able to effectively use the agreements to the fullest.  This
is primarily due to the fact that the smallness of the economies does not allow for large-scaleproduction possibilities, and where some more than small production possibilities exist there is the
problem of severe supply response constraint.  Ag ain, we see the constraining factor of smallness
affecting the economies of the OECS in effectively participating in hemispheric arrangements.  The
problem is even greater at the global level.
(3) T
HE OECS M EMBERS , THE WTO, AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION
36. The economies of the Eastern Caribbean are attempting to build capacity in the field of trade
policy.  To that end there is currently in place a trade policy project (funded by the Canadian
government) whose objectives are, among others, the development and maintenance of an OECS
international trade strategy and strengthening of OECS capacity to meet obligations under regional
and international agreements.  Attempts are also being made to rationalise the coordination of inter-agency relations in the area of international trade.  To that end some of the economies have integrated
their Ministries of Foreign Affairs with their Ministries of International Trade.  Greater efforts are
currently being made to structure the relationship among the different agencies dealing with matters
related to trade, for example, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Agriculture, Customs
Department, and the Ministry of Legal Affairs.  In some economies steps have been taken to have a
lawyer specialised in trade law who would operate in the Ministry of Trade.  Meanwhile, the training
of trade officials is an ongoing exercise with the assistance of various regional and internationalorganisations, including the WTO.  And, a series  of legislative reforms is underway to ensure
conformity with obligations under the WTO.
37. In the light of the difficulties faced there is a critical need for technical and financial
assistance to the economies of the Eastern Caribbea n.  Those who were involved in the formulation of
this Trade Policy Review would need no more to convince them of such a need.  Technical andfinancial assistance would be needed in the general areas of economic policy formulation and
implementation, and particularly trade policy formulation and implementation.  For the economies of
the Eastern Caribbean there is a need for technical and financial assistance in capacity building aimed
at transforming the institutional environment of policy making, implementation, management, and
administration.  Important areas needing attention include: customs operations, statistical gatheringand compilation to assist in policy decision making, legislative drafting, standards, and modern
business operations for the private sector.  Our experiences have shown that resources would have to
be allocated for at least the medium term.  Our collective experiences have also made it clear that it is
impossible to build capacity, transform institutions, and adjust economic agents and markets in the
short term.  Nevertheless, the economies of the Eastern Caribbean are committed to those policydirections.
38. The economies of the Eastern Caribbean are also committed to the multilateral trading
system.  As was noted before, the economies are currently in the process of deeper trade liberalisation
and some economic restructuring.  Those are not easy tasks to accomplish in the midst of rising
expectations and growing concerns over the unevenness of globalisation.  The economies would need
all of the assistance they can get from this internat ional body.  Further, whatever international trading
rules are agreed upon in the future, greater efforts wo uld have to be made to take into account, the
special characteristics of these small island economies.  Once these are properly taken into accountOECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 13
the survival and success of the economies of the Eastern Caribbean within the global economic
environment would be made less uncertain than has been the case in the past and is the case at
present.  Special and differential treatment must be securely anchored in all policy regimes which
seek to ensure that the Eastern Caribbean participates in the process of globalisation.  Effective
participation of the economies in the global economy could be meaningful to us only in a context of
special and differential treatment.
III. MARKET ACCESS IN GOODS
(1) INTRODUCTION
39. As Members of the WTO, all OECS are countries committed to definite market access
schedules on entry into the WTO.  In general, items under Chapters 1- 24 of the harmonized trading
system are bound at 100% ad valorem , but each individual country has a list of specific exemptions.
40. OECS Member Countries depend heavily on duties on imports, for fiscal revenue, in order to
facilitate their social and economic development.   The reduction in tariff levels coupled with
tariffication will result in a decline in the level of revenue collected at the borders.  Similarly, imports
of goods from competing countries can result in a significant decline in market share of locally
produced goods.  The possible devastating effects to the economies of the OECS can severely impedeimplementation of programmes in support of the social and economic agenda of the respective
countries and the region in general.  To this end, OECS governments have attempted to make tariff
reductions revenue-neutral by increasing other duties and charges.
41. Market access in the OECS countries is subject to varying trade policies and practices as is
reflected by the rate at which the Common External Tariff (CET) has adopted by Member Countries.
This situation can be attributed to the fact that the countries are severely disadvantaged in their ability
to effectively implement their trade policies due to their limited human resource capacity.
42. Under the CARICOM Single Market and Ec onomy all OECS countries have agreed to
remove licensing arrangements for imported goods, however, some governments have in place
licensing requirements as a temporary safeguard in favor of domestic producers.
(2) T
ARIFFS AND OTHER PRICE -BASED MEASURES
43. OECS countries as members of CARICOM, util ise the CET for imports of goods outside of
the common market.  As Less-developed Countr ies (LDCs) under the CARICOM Agreement, OECS
countries are allowed to apply the facility of conditional duty exemption, by including in their
national tariffs a zero rate or a rate lower than that shown in the schedule.  This accounts for the wide
variation in the levels of national import duties applied by OECS countries.
44. Although the current tariff structure is based on an import substitution model, OECS
governments have indicated that their trade policy objective is being reoriented taking into account
the impact of globalization on the regional trading system.
45. All the OECS countries impose a service/handling charge on imported goods.  The charge
ranges between 3-4% across the OECS and is imposed on goods from all origins including
CARICOM.  Similarly all countries impose consumption taxes on a variety of goods but this tax isapplicable to both imported and domestically pr oduced items.  Under Article 56 of the CARICOM
Treaty, the use of quantitative restrictions on the imports of selected goods from all countries is
allowed.  This due to the fact that within the CARICOM structure OECS countries are treated as small
and different to their larger CARICOM countries.  Those countries have an advantage over OECSWT/TPR/G/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 14
countries with respect to capacity and access to resources.  However, those restrictions will be
replaced with tariffication by 2004.  Quantitative restrictions are applied for selected agricultural
products included in Annex 1 of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture.  This process is used as a
temporary safeguard by member countries in an effort to allow the local agricultural sector the
opportunity to improve its production capacity and efficiency.
(i) Customs valuation
46. OECS countries recognize the need to use transaction value for Customs valuation procedures
and to harmonize their customs valuation procedures, however the use of minimum import or
reference prices are use in most countries in an attempt to collect revenue that may be lost as a result
of widespread under-invoicing of imports.  This practice is of particular concern to Antigua and
Barbuda.  The authorities will use all the means at th eir disposal to curb this problem. OECS countries
will continue their attempt to harmonize customs valuation procedures as they accelerate the pace
with which they build their human resource capacity by  providing the appropriate training to the staff
of the Customs Departments in member countries.
(ii) MFN import duties
47. OECS Members are party to CARICOM’s Comm on External Tariff.  Under the CET, goods
imported from CARICOM member states are allowed tariff free access into other regional countries,
provided that those goods are produced in another CARICOM country.  The CET went into effect on
January 1, 1991, and as of January 2001, all OECS countries except Antigua and Barbuda had reached
Phase IV of the implementation process.  That country has stated its intention to implement Phase IV
by August 2001.
48. The CET was designed to provide higher effective protection to competing final goods in the
CARICOM market.  The CET is applies in principle to all imports from non-CARICOM countries.Article 32 of the CARICOM Treaty allows the reduction or suspension of the CET in cases where a
good is not produced in sufficient quantities wi thin the CARICOM area to meet demand.  Under the
CET, imports from third countries are subjected to import duties of up to 35% for industrial products
and to 40 % for agricultural products.  Most OECS countries apply the rate of 40% for agricultural
products although their bound rate for Agricultural products (under the WTO Agreement) is 100%.This reflects Member countries commitment to trad e liberalization as is indicated by the level of
applied tariff.  Increasing the tariff levels towards the bound level could have severe cost of living
implications with respect to access to food and human nutrition.
49. Tariff bindings for agricultural products at the WTO level differs among OECS countries.
Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, St. Lucia and St. Vincent and the Grenadines have tariff bindingshigher than 100%, while Grenada and St. Kitts and Nevis have bindings that are lower than 100%.
Non-agricultural products were bound at 50% in all countries with the exception of St. Kitts and
Nevis, where they were bound at 70%.
50. With the exception of St. Kitts and Nevis, no OECS country bound other duties and charges,
however, where such charges have been applied, they are generally below the bound tariff levels anddoes not conflict with the overall bound tariff levels.
(iii) Preferential tariffs and rules of origin
51. All OECS Countries grant duty free access to imports from other CARICOM countries,
except where the provisions of Articles 28, 29 and 56 of the CARICOM Treaty are applied.  Those
Articles are designed to give some level of safeguard to selected locally produce manufacturedOECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 15
products.  Given their Less-developed-country stat us within CARICOM, OECS countries are not
obligated to grant concessions to countries with which CARICOM has signed bilateral trade
agreements.
(iv) Other duties and charges
52. No OECS has a value added tax although some consideration has been given to its
implementation.  However all countries apply consumption tax at various levels.  The brunt oftaxation is applied against manufactured goods.  Consumption tax rates have been increased in some
OECS countries at the same time that tariff reductions are implemented.  This action is taken to offset
the revenue losses caused by lower tariffs resulting from the implementation of Phase IV of the CET.
53. Other duties and charges implemented by OECS countries include: environmental levy,
environmental surcharge and customs service tax.  Those charges are applied against selectedproducts.  The environmental levy is used to enable OECS Countries to assist in solid waste disposal
and protection of the environment.
(3) N
ON-TARIFF MEASURES
(i) Import prohibitions, restrictions and licensing
(a) Import prohibitions
54. The Customs Act of each OECS Member state contains a list of goods prohibited from entry
into various Member States.  Goods are restricted from entry based on the following:  health and
safety, phyto-sanitary and sanitary reasons, narcotics, and counterfeits.  Imports from Iraq are banned
(as per UN Resolution).
(b) Quantitative import restrictions and licensing
55. All OECS countries use an import licensing system to ensure some administrative
management of the trade process, and data collect ion for economic planning.  However, they are all
committed tariffication.  Delays in achieving this objective has been due to limited human capacity at
the national level to put the necessary “ machiner y” in place with respect to the human resource
situation in various Customs Departments.  Domini ca is the only OECS country that has tariffied
restrictions allowed under Article 56 in accordance with the requirement for MFN trading partners.
56. Under Article 56 of the CARICOM Treaty, all OECS countries maintain strict quantitative
restrictions on products subjected to Article 56 provisions.  Non-automatic licensing is applied on all
products whose importation is restricted for sanitary, phytosanitary or safety reasons and products
subject to Article 56 provision.
(ii) Safeguards
57. Although OECS Members do not have domestic legislation with respect to safeguards, OECS
countries apply safeguards within the requirements of Articles 28 and 29 of the CARICOM Treaty.
Article 28 permits member States to impose quantitative restrictions on imports for the purpose of
safeguarding their balance of payments.  Article 29 allows quantitative import restrictions if a
particular sector experiences serious difficulties due to increase in imports from other CARICOM
Member States.  These safeguards are applied to assist the fledging manufacturing sector in the regionto take some action that would assist them in facing the intense competition that they are up against
on a regular basis and for employment generation reasons.  The use of Article 29 is a temporaryWT/TPR/G/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 16
safeguard measure that is closely monitored at the national level by the Ministry of trade and reported
to the COTED.
(iii) Anti-dumping and countervailing
58. The OECS countries have not been able to modify their legislation to take into account anti-
dumping and countervailing measures.  This is due to their limited capacity in their respective Legal
Affairs Department to draft and process the required legislation.  The staffs of the Departments are“heavily stretched ” and in some cases, there is only one drafts-person to deal with this and all other
legislation.  The sub-region has approached WIPO to provide the necessary technical assistance and
training to enable them to build capacity to  address the situation.  In the meantime however,
Protocol IX of the Treaty Ame nding the Caribbean Community contains legislation that addresses
anti-dumping and countervailing at the CARICOM level.   This Protocol is a further attempt at policy
regional harmonization with respect to anti-dumping and countervailing.
(4) G
OVERNMENT PROCUREMENT
59. OECS Member Countries are not party to the WTO Plurilateral Agreement on Government
Procurement.  Governments normally follow a tendering process when procuring goods and services.
OECS governments are in the process of reforming the procedure to further improve the transparency
of the process.
IV. OTHER MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE
(1) INTRODUCTION
60. OECS countries provide some degree of incentives to nationals and non-nationals to facilitate
the development of various sectors in member States.  The incentives include income tax exemption,
and the waiver of tariffs and other duties and charges on imports.  In some cases, exporters may also
benefit from an export guarantee programme financed by the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank.
61. A Standards Bureau has been established in each OECS country.  The Bureau provides the
facility for regulating and enforcing various standards, and also perform the function of “ national
enquiry points ” as required under the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) of the WTO.
OECS recognize the difficulty in implementing some of the standards imposed by developed
countries and to this end will continue to plead for extended implementation period, technicalassistance and training to enable them to develop the ability to implementation of those standards.
(2) E
XPORT MEASURES
62. There are no taxes or levies applied by any of the OECS countries on exports.  A limited
number of products may be prohibited from export in accordance with the Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species and Wildlife (CITES).  Other restricted products includenarcotics, and other hazardous products, live animals and selected species of sea foods.
63. Some incentives are provided under the respective Fiscal Incentives Acts.  They are granted
to enclave enterprises that are required to export all of their production.
64. Some OECS Member countries have legislation with respect to the operation of free zones
but during this review it was found that only th e ones in Antigua and Barbuda and St. Lucia were in
operation.  The products entering the free zones are all for export and the facility basically provides
goods to importing countries at a cheaper cost and provides some employment at the national level.OECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 17
(3) STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL REGULATIONS
65. The CARICOM Common Market Standards Council (CCMSC) established in 1973 as an
Association of all national standards bodies in the region, is charged with developing regional
standards and advising the Common Market Council on related technical matters.  Regional standards
apply to 44 products.  The national bureaux of standards are unable to develop and enforce most of
the standards because of their lack of capacity and inadequate analytical laboratory facilities.
(4) MARKET COMPETITION
(i) Marketing boards and price controls
66. Although all OECS countries contain marketin g boards that conduct some limited level of
state trading activities, their functions are restricted to selected agricultural products that are regularly
subjected to drastic fluctuations in prices in response to crop seasonality.  The other function orobjective of the activity is to ensure price stability at the national for those products that are
considered to be staples such as sugar, rice – purchased in the bulk form.  Purchases are secured
through a competitive biding procedure.
67. Price controls are used mainly for cost-of-living management and to allow better access to
essential products such as food and pharmaceutical products at competitive prices to consumers.  Inthat situation, price control is not considered “ trade distorting ” but facilitates access to those products
by the general population.
(ii) Competition policy and regulatory issues
68. Only one OECS country has legislation on competition policy.  That country is St. Vincent
and the Grenadines.  However, under Protocol  VIII of CARICOM Single Market and Economy,
countries are expected to enact appropriate legislation on competition policy.  This Protocol takes into
account the need to further harmonize competition policy at the regional level.
(iii) Assistance to activities
69. Assistance is provided mainly to the manufacturing and services sectors - including tourism,
in OECS Member countries.  These assistance measures are geared towards providing some
development support as countries seek to diversify their economies in response to the changing global
environment.  Protocol III of the amendments to the CARICOM Treaty seeks to establish acommunity investment policy with a harmonized system of investment incentives.
(iv) Intellectual property rights
70. OECS Member Countries are at different stag es of enacting legislation dealing with the
TRIPs Agreement.  The delay experienced by the different countries in enacting the legislation is due
to generally a lack of capacity to facilitate drafting of the appropriate legislation.  The situation isfurther compounded by the backlog of legislation, scheduled for the parliamentary procedure required
for enactment of legislation in Member states.  Despite those limitations, all member countries are
committed to meeting their WTO obligations and have requested training and technical assistance
from WIPO to assist them.  The degree to which OECS countries have amended or introduced
legislation to reflect the TRIPS Agreement varies considerably.  Dominica has made the mostprogress.  That country has updated and or amended domestic legislation regarding trademarks,
industrial designs, geographical indications, patents and protections of layout-designs of integrated
circuits.  Although no new or amended legislation with respects to intellectual property rights hasWT/TPR/G/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 18
been passed in Antigua and Barbuda, St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Grenada, since the inception
of the WTO, those countries are in the process of addressing that problem as they secure the
assistance of WIPO and employ appropriate staff into their legal affairs departments.  The
establishment of a national registry specific for intellectual property rights in Dominica, St. Kitts and
Nevis and St. Lucia gives a clear indication of the commitment of member states to meet their WTO
obligations despite their lack of resources.
V. INVESTMENT AND MARKET ACCESS IN SERVICES
(1) INTRODUCTION
71. Within CARICOM no disciplines for government procurement practices are in place in any of
the Agreements/Protocols, not even in the Single Market and Economy provisions.  There currently is
an initiative in its infancy within CARICOM in re spect of government procurement further to which
the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) has been approached for funding.  This initiative is
intended to achieve a number of objectives, paramount amongst which is a regional agreement on
government procurement.  The public sector in the OECS sub-region plays a major role as a consumer
of goods, services and public works and so will be able to save on the costs of contracts, even more
so, as a result of a liberalized intra-regional government procurement market with a governingAgreement with ‘ binding ’ commonly applicable and transparent practices and modalities for all
signatories.  Important to the micro-economies of the OECS in any such government market
framework, however, would have to be allowances for certain ‘special’ provisions in respect of
exemptions, for instance, the element of  local content in the hotel sector.
72. It is generally recognized that the opening of sub-regional and regional government
procurement markets to competitive supply would likely create new business opportunities for
enterprises and entrepreneurs; working to boost the flow of intra-regional trade in goods & services.
This would have obvious positive spill-overs fo r the economic union envisaged within the CARICOM
framework
(2) F
INANCIAL SERVICES
73. The recent offshore phenomenon in the OECS sub-region must be viewed as an attempt to
diversify the economies of the sub-region, especially in the services sector.  The offshore sector doesconstitute a credible and important instrument to facilitate national development in small OECS
nations in the long-run; especially those in search of development options in lieu of the decline of
traditional industries.
74. There are a number of shining examples of the potential and comparative advantages of
offshore regimes in the sub-region.  In St. Lucia’s offshore jurisdiction, for example, the private sectorand Government partnership developed to operate the offshore framework resulted in the creation of
the Financial Center Corporation and the International Financial and World Investment Center
(IFWIC) – otherwise known as PINNACLE St. Lucia - which is aggressively promoting the use of
advanced information technology to build on the juri sdiction’s comparative advantage.  At the time of
its inception St. Lucia’s offshore sector was the only one in the Caribbean region to offer online IBCregistration.  In addition, the St. Lucian offshore framework is a melange of the best features of
legislation in well established and performing Caribbean offshore jurisdictions.  So not only does the
countries’ legislative and regulatory framework – adapted from the best features of other regional
offshore jurisdictions – serve to build the jurisdiction’s comparative advantage but so does the use of
advanced information technologies making the island the Caribbean’s only public online IBC registry.
Similarly, Anguilla is attempting to build comparativ e advantages in the sector.  Anguilla decided, inOECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 19
1999, to put in place a completely electronic Companies Registry to enable the provision of speedy
and efficient service.  This service is called Anguilla’s Commercial Online Registration Network
(ACORN).  At the time of its inception, in 1999, it was the only companies’ registry of its kind in the
sub-region.
(a) Offshore financial services
75. As of June 2000 an OECD progress report on eliminating harmful tax practices listed 35
offshore jurisdictions in its on going ‘ name and shame’  crusade.  The majority of the jurisdictions on
the list are small states that include OECS Member States.  The criteria that render a given offshore
jurisdiction a ‘tax haven’ and black-list it accordingly are as follows.1
● No taxes or only nominal ones;
● Lack of effective exchange of information;
● Lack of transparency;
● No substantial activities – investment or transactions are mobile and purely tax driven.
76. On the surface these initiatives are directed at overhauling tax havens whose tax frameworks
work – according to the OECD – to unfairly divert non-financial and financial services activity and
distort investment patterns.  As a result these organizations have argued that some offshore financialsectors work to erode countries’ tax bases because as poachers of the natural tax base they encourage
‘tax evasion’, through bank secrecy and confidentiality laws (which it is also argued facilitates money
laundering as ‘transparency’ is stifled).
77. The recent onslaught by international organizations like the OECD, FATF and FSF aimed at
small states’ offshore jurisdictions including those of the Caribbean may very well have hidden
motivations/agendas that go beyond ‘ tax’ and ‘money laundering’  concerns.  While the OECS
offshore jurisdictions are typically offshore booking centers they have the potential of developing intorobust and competitive offshore sectors that could mount a competitive challenge to certain offshore
centers and continue to attract taxable capital away from onshore jurisdictions in industrialized
countries.  The truth of the matter is Caribbean offshore jurisdictions – like any other - are simply
taking  advantage of the laws of free market competition and what might be interpreted as poaching in
respect of tax bases is really just the legal employ of tax avoidance and not evasion ( in the large
majority of cases ) in offshore regulatory regimes that by law enable this legal transference of capital
through the provision client friendly tax planning frameworks.
78. In the high stakes world of offshore finance where literally trillions of Dollars are at stake we
must account for all the motivations that drive attacks on the sub-region’s offshore jurisdictions.  So
while regulatory concerns associated with emerging offshore jurisdictions should not be discounted itis incumbent it be recognized that concern by industrialized countries and their associated
international organizations regarding offshore jurisdictions are not driven purely by ‘tax’ and/or
‘money laundering’ issues.  The OECD’S ‘harmful ta x competition’ scheme must be conceptualized
critically; the fact is, the OECD countries have amongst the highest and most diverse range of taxes in
the world - offshore jurisdictions pose a competitive clear  and present danger  to these countries’
capacity to tax their citizens who choose to channel their assets to no tax or low tax jurisdictions.
                                                     
1 These criteria are listed in the 1998 OECD publication Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging
Global Issue.  Countries on this black-list have until July 2001 to rectify – initially through tentativecommitments - their tax systems in respect of the four criteria as regards the ‘tax haven’ classification, or faceretaliatory action from the OECD.WT/TPR/G/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 20
79. It cannot be stressed enough that the sub-region has a vested interest in having in place a
legally sound offshore framework as the viability and future sustainability of the sector is premised
not only on revenue generation but more importantly on the confidence of the financial community.
With the emergence of more and more offshore jurisdictions – not only in the Caribbean but also – in
developing countries, in general, that offer increasingly attractive regulatory environments to
transnational interests, being a part of the offshore industry demands not only more competitiveframeworks but more reputable and responsible frameworks that instil confidence in non-resident
clients to make use of those jurisdictions.
80. Fundamentally, however, the issue of tax regimes is very much an integral part of
sovereignty.  Recognizing, of course, that tax regimes must respect generally accepted codes of tax
conduct an offshore jurisdiction’s tax code/regime should be free of undue influence from anyexogenous entity; to think otherwise would be a derogation of the principle of sovereignty.
Recognizing, though, that sovereignty as a concept is in flux in a globalizing world, OECS countries
maintain that offshore jurisdictions and associated regulatory entities must work to reconcile and
strike a delicate balance between acquiescing to what ‘others’ perceive as acceptable tax
frameworks/practices and asserting tax prerogatives independently in a national offshore center.
81. This having been said, the OECS is mindful of the fact that the OECD has no legal authority
to speak for the world or to establish rules, norms or standards for any State except its own members.
The OECS is deeply troubled with the OECD setting itself up as the organisation to make tax rulings,
which they expect non-members of the OECD to follow.  Equally troubling is that several OECD
countries are offshore centres yet appear exempt from the ‘harmful tax scheme’ despite lingering
questions over their culpability in and breach of harmful tax requirements; special emphasis here on
Switzerland and Luxembourg.  Curious enough, OECD attacks with respect to offshore jurisdictionsappear to ‘discriminate’ and overly focus on small states; which raises the fundamental question are
the attacks reflective of the fact that the OECD views small states as legitimate targets precisely
because they are small?
82. If any terms, conditions and standards regarding cross-border tax matters are indeed to be set
the OECS is partial to these rules being fashioned in  a multilateral forum.  The modalities of such a
forum would favour ‘inclusive’ discussion of issues from one end of the spectrum such as
terminology, for example, distinctions between ta x avoidance and tax evasion (which the OECD has
yet to satisfactorily make a distinction between) to  issues with respect to the structural aspects of
offshore tax systems/laws regarding transparency, non-discrimination and effective exchange of
information.
(3) O
THER OFFSHORE SERVICES
83. There are various types of offshore services offered within the ambit of a second tier offshore
center, for example, international banking, comp any registration, insurance, mutual funds, shipping
registration, trusts and estates to name a few.  The account, below, lists the offshore services offered
by the various OECS jurisdictions.  While the account is not explicitly reflective of each jurisdiction’scomparative advantage, as regards service provision, it is reflective of the degree to which the
jurisdictions are commanding the high-end of the offshore industry market and the commonalties in
service provision.OECS Members WT/TPR/G/85
Page 21
Box 1 – Offshore Service Provision in Second Tier Jurisdictions
Anguilla
International Business Companies
Limited Liability Companies
Limited PartnershipsOffshore Banks
Trust Companies
Company ManagementAntigua & Barbuda
International Business Companies
Offshore Banks
International TrustsInternational Insurance
Ship Registration
Internet Gaming
Dominica
Offshore Banks
International Business Companies
International Exempt TrustsExempt Insurance
Economic Citizenship
Internet GamingGrenada
International Business Companies
Offshore Banks
International InsuranceInternational Trusts
Economic Citizenship
International Betting
Companies Management
Montserrat
Offshore Banking
International Banking CompaniesSt Lucia
International Business Companies
International TrustsInternational Mutual Funds
International Insurance Companies
International Banks
St Kitts
Exempt Limited PartnershipsExempt TrustsExempt CompaniesNevis
Offshore Banks
International Business CompaniesLimited Liability Companies
International Exempt Trusts
St Vincent and the Grenadines
Offshore BanksInternational Business Companies
Mutual Funds
International Trusts
Ship RegistrationInternational Insurance
Source : Adapted from ECCB, Departmental data provided by Bank Supervision
Department, Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (October 2000).
(4) TELECOMMUNICATIONS
84. The signing, in 2000, of the Treaty establishing the Eastern Caribbean Telecommunications
Authority (ECTEL) represented the culmination of  what the governments of Dominica, Grenada,
St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia and St. Vincent and Grenadines had long recognized of the
telecommunications sector; specifically, its liberalization would serve as a platform for the
transformation of the services sector in general.  Telecommunications underpins all subsets of theservices sector from one end of the spectrum, tourism, to the other end financial services.  A robust,
liberalized and competitive telecommunications sect or/system serves to facilitate the growth and
expansion of these other sub-sectors precisely because they are so intimately linked, with dynamicWT/TPR/G/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 22
synergies.  The OECS expects both direct and ancillary benefits of a cross-sectoral nature to emerge
out of and spillover from a competitive telecommunications environment that will have ripple effects
throughout transformation-related imperatives in the sub-region.
(5) TOURISM
85. The economies of the OECS Member States are subsumed and dominated by service
activities; consider that services account for some  three quarters of GDP in the sub-region.  The
increasing importance of the services sector is at tributable to the significant growth of tourism
especially since the mid-1990s.  Whilst the tourism sector is of major importance to OECS Member
States, however, they are confronted by problems with respect to this sector especially because the
sector is highly dependent on other services such as air, maritime and road transport, financial
services and health services, etc., which are still maturing.
86. More than 100 WTO Members have commitments in tourism, which is amongst the most
liberalized sector, under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS).  There have been
recent developments with respect to tourism in GATS in the form of a proposal for an Annex on
Tourism in the list of 2000 services proposals  for ‘new’ negotiations in the WTO framework.  The
proposal for a special GATS Annex on tourism services was initiated by the Dominican Republic,El Salvador and Honduras.  The OECS is following this development with keen interest as the sub-
region has a stake in creating a competitive environment favouring the growth of tourism.
87. In the main, however, the OECS Member States are considering the following issues.
Member States are considering the extent to which the current GATS structure is adequate to address
the problems which confront their tourism industry which is highly dependent on other services such
as air, maritime and road transport, financial services and health services, etc., which are still
maturing.  Similarly, there are issues that relate to the degree to which the GATS definition oftourism, in general, sufficiently covers the scope of  services activities regarded as key tourism-related
(especially as viewed by the World Tourism Organization);  hence, the GATS Annex on tourism.  On
all these issues, given the importance of tourism to the OECS, the sub-region is paying close attention
to services trade issues at the multilateral level.
__________