3932 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2021 / Proposed Rules 
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use 
This action is not subject to Executive 
Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. 
J. National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR part 51 
This proposed action does not involve 
technical standards. 
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal 
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations 
The EPA believes that this action is 
not subject to Executive Order 12989 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an environmental health or safety standard. 
III. Statutory Authority 
Statutory authority for this action 
comes from section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7545(o). 
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80 
Environmental protection, 
Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Diesel fuel, Fuel additives, Gasoline, Imports, Oil imports, Penalties, Petroleum, 
Renewable fuel, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 
Andrew Wheeler, 
Administrator. 
For the reasons set forth in the 
preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40 CFR part 80 as follows: 
PART 80—REGISTRATION OF FUELS 
AND FUEL ADDITIVES 
■1. The authority citation for part 80 
continues to read as follows: 
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7521, 7542, 
7545, and 7601(a). 
Subpart M—RENEWABLE FUEL 
STANDARD 
■2. Amend § 80.1451 by adding 
paragraphs (a)(1)(xiv)(E) and (F) to read as follows: 
§ 80.1451 What are the reporting 
requirements under the RFS program? 
(a) * * * 
(1) * * * (xiv) * * * (E) For obligated parties that meet the 
requirements for a small refinery under § 80.1441(e)(2)(iii), for the 2019 compliance year, annual compliance reports must be submitted no later than November 30, 2021. (F) For obligated parties, for the 2020 
compliance year, annual compliance reports must be submitted no later than January 31, 2022. 
* * * * * 
■3. Amend § 80.1464 by adding 
paragraphs (g)(7), (8) and (9) to read as follows: 
§ 80.1464 What are the attest engagement 
requirements under the RFS program? 
(g) * * * 
(7) For obligated parties that meet the 
requirements for a small refinery under § 80.1441(e)(2)(iii), for the 2019 compliance year, reports required under this section must be submitted to the EPA no later than June 1, 2022. 
(8) For obligated parties, for the 2020 
compliance year, reports required under this section must be submitted no later than June 1, 2022. 
(9) For RIN-generating renewable fuel 
producers, RIN-generating importers of renewable fuel, and other parties owning RINs, for the 2020 compliance year, reports required under this section shall be submitted to the EPA no later than June 1, 2022. 
* * * * * 
[FR Doc. 2021–00204 Filed 1–14–21; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 
AGENCY 
40 CFR Part 751 
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0163; EPA–HQ– 
OPPT–2016–0387 and EPA–HQ–OPPT– 2016–0231; FRL–10018–67] 
RIN 2070–AK03; 2070–AK11 and 2070–AK07 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rules; 
Discontinuing Three Rulemaking Efforts Listed in the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda 
AGENCY : Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA). 
ACTION : Withdrawal of proposed rules. 
SUMMARY : The Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the proposed regulatory requirements described in the three proposed rules that are identified in this document. This document summarizes the proposed rules and provides a brief explanation for the Agency’s decision not to finalize the proposed actions. 
DATES : As of January 15, 2021, the 
proposed rule published on December 16, 2016 (81 FR 91592; FRL–9949–86); the proposed rule published on January 19, 2017 (82 FR 7432; FRL–9950–08); and the portion of the proposed rule published on January 19, 2017 (82 FR 7464; FRL–9958–57) that pertains to n- 
Methylpyrrolidone (NMP) and methylene chloride in commercial paint and coating removal, are withdrawn. 
ADDRESSES : The dockets are available at 
http://www.regulations.gov or at the 
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, for the OPP Docket it is (703) 305–5805, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566–0280. 
Due to the public health concerns 
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. For the information on EPA/DC services, submitting comments and docket access, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : 
Katherine Sleasman (7101M), Mission Support Division, Office of Program Support, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 347–0409; email address: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
I. Does this action apply to me? 
This action is directed to the public 
in general and may be of particular interest to those persons who follow proposed rules issued under section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. 2605. Since others may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities potentially interested. 
II. Why is EPA issuing this withdrawal 
of proposed rules? 
This document serves the following 
purposes: 
1. It announces to the public that EPA 
is withdrawing certain proposed rules for which the Agency no longer intends to issue a final rule; and 
2. It officially terminates the ongoing 
rulemaking activities, which allows the Agency to close out the individual rulemaking entries for these actions that appear in EPA’s Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. 
All agencies publish Semiannual 
Regulatory Agendas describing regulatory actions they are developing or have recently completed. These agendas are published in the Federal 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 02:37 Jan 15, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM 15JAP13933 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2021 / Proposed Rules 
Register , usually during the spring and 
fall of each year, as part of the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions (Semiannual Regulatory Agenda). The Agency publishes the EPA Semiannual Regulatory Agenda to update the public about: Regulations and major policies currently under development, reviews of existing regulations and major policies, and rules and major policies completed or canceled since the last Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. 
The Semiannual Regulatory Agenda is 
often used as a tool to solicit interest and participation from stakeholders. As such, EPA believes that the public is best served by a Semiannual Regulatory Agenda that reflects active rulemaking efforts. The withdrawal of these inactive rulemaking efforts will streamline EPA’s Semiannual Regulatory Agenda and allow the public to better identify and focus on those rulemaking activities that are active. 
For the individual reasons described 
in this document, the Agency has decided not to complete these actions at this time. By withdrawing the proposed rules, the Agency is eliminating the pending nature of those prior regulatory actions and clarifying its intent for future risk management action concerning these chemicals. Specifically, EPA is initiating separate risk management actions to address unreasonable risks identified for these chemicals following the recent issuance of final risk evaluations under TSCA 
section 6(b) for trichloroethylene (TCE), methylene chloride (MC) (for portions related to commercial paint and coating removal), and NMP. 
III. Which proposed rules are being 
withdrawn? 
This unit identifies the proposed 
regulatory actions that are being withdrawn and provides a summary of what was proposed. The ‘‘RIN’’ refers to the regulatory identification number assigned to the rulemaking effort in the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. 
EPA issued three proposed rules 
under sections 6(a) and 26(l)(4) of the TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2605(a) and 2625(l)(4) (82 FR 7464; FRL–9958–57); (81 FR 91592; FRL–9949–86); (82 FR 7432; FRL–9950–08). Two of the actions proposed to address unreasonable risks that EPA had preliminarily identified with certain uses of TCE, which is a volatile organic compound widely used in industrial and commercial processes with some uses in consumer and commercial products; and one of the actions proposed to address unreasonable risks that EPA had preliminarily identified with certain uses of NMP and MC, which are 
solvents used in a variety of applications, including paint and coating removal (although the Agency is only withdrawing the portions related to 
NMP and MC commercial paint and coating removal). 
A. Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation 
of Certain Uses Under TSCA § 6(a); Proposed Rule; RIN 2070–AK03 
On December 16, 2016 (81 FR 91592; 
FRL–9949–86), EPA issued a proposed rule under TSCA section 6(a), 15 U.S.C. 2605(a), to address unreasonable risks that EPA had preliminarily determined exist with certain uses of TCE: Aerosol degreasing and spot cleaning in dry cleaning. EPA proposed to prohibit the manufacture, processing, and distribution in commerce of TCE for use in aerosol degreasing and for use in spot cleaning in dry cleaning facilities; to prohibit commercial use of TCE for aerosol degreasing and for spot cleaning in dry cleaning facilities; to require manufacturers, processors, and distributors, except for retailers of TCE for any use, to provide downstream notification of these prohibitions throughout the supply chain; and to require limited recordkeeping. 
The rulemaking docket for this action 
is available under docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0163. 
B. Trichloroethylene (TCE); Regulation 
of Use in Vapor Degreasing Under TSCA Section 6(a); Proposed Rule; RIN 2070– AK11 
On January 19, 2017 (82 FR 7432; 
FRL–9950–08), EPA issued a proposed rule under TSCA section 6(a), 15 U.S.C. 2605(a), to address unreasonable risks that EPA had preliminarily determined exist with use of TCE in vapor degreasing. EPA proposed to prohibit the manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of TCE for use in vapor degreasing; to prohibit commercial use of TCE in vapor degreasing; to require manufacturers, processors, and distributors, except for retailers of TCE for any use, to provide downstream notification of these prohibitions throughout the supply chain; and to require limited recordkeeping. 
The rulemaking docket for this action 
is available under docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0387. 
C. n-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP); 
Regulation of Certain Uses Under TSCA Section 6(a); Proposed Rule; RIN 2070– AK07 
On January 19, 2017 (82 FR 7464; 
FRL–9958–57), EPA issued a proposed rule under TSCA section 6(a), 15 U.S.C. 2605(a), to address risks that EPA had 
preliminarily identified with certain uses of NMP, which is a solvent used in a variety of applications, including paint and coating removal. EPA preliminarily identified significant health risks associated with NMP use in commercial and consumer paint and coating removal and EPA proposed a determination that these are unreasonable risks. EPA co-proposed two different options: one co-proposal was to prohibit the manufacture (including import), processing, and distribution in commerce of NMP for all consumer and commercial paint and coating removal; to prohibit the use of NMP for all commercial paint and coating removal; to require downstream notification of these prohibitions throughout the supply chain; to require recordkeeping; and to provide a time- limited exemption from these proposed regulations on NMP for coating removal uses critical for national security. As an alternate proposal, EPA proposed that (1) commercial users of NMP for paint and coating removal establish a worker protection program for dermal and respiratory protection and not use paint and coating removal products that contain greater than 35 percent NMP by weight (except for product formulations destined to be used by Department of Defense (DoD) or its contractors performing work only for DoD projects); and (2) processors of products containing NMP for paint and coating removal reformulate products such that these products do not exceed a maximum of 35 percent NMP by weight, identify gloves that provide effective protection for the formulation, and provide warning and instruction labels on the products. The rulemaking docket for this action is available under docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0231. This withdrawal applies to provisions related to NMP of the proposed rule that published on January 19, 2017. 
D. Methylene chloride (MC); Regulation 
of Certain Uses Under TSCA Section 6(a); Proposed Rule; RIN 2070–AK07 
The proposed rule on January 19, 
2017 (82 FR 7464; FRL–9958–57), which was identified under RIN 2070–AK07, also proposed requirements for MC. Requirements addressing the use of MC for consumer paint and coating removal were subsequently finalized under RIN 2070–AK07 (see 84 FR 11420, March 27, 2019) (FRL–9989–29). The Agency also announced an advance notice of 
proposed rulemaking on March 27, 2019, (84 FR 11466; FRL–9989–30) to solicit public input on training, certification, and limited access requirements that could address any 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 02:37 Jan 15, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM 15JAP13934 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2021 / Proposed Rules 
unreasonable risks that EPA could 
potentially find to be presented by MC when used for commercial paint and coating removal. This withdrawal only applies to provisions of the January 19, 2017 proposed rule related to commercial paint and coating removal of MC. The rulemaking docket for this action is available under docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0231. 
IV. Why are these proposed rules being 
withdrawn? 
The 2016 and 2017 proposed rules 
addressed a limited number of conditions of use (COUs) for TCE, MC and NMP pursuant to TSCA sections 6(a) and 26(l)(4). The COUs not otherwise addressed by final regulatory action that were the subject of the earlier EPA risk assessments and proposed rules, as well as additional COUs for these chemical substances, were evaluated as part of the first ten risk evaluations conducted under TSCA section 6(b). Final risk evaluations for all three substances have been issued recently under TSCA section 6(b) and, consistent with the statute, EPA is proceeding to initiate regulatory action to address the unreasonable risks identified in the final risk evaluations for TCE (85 FR 37942, June 24, 2020; FRL–10011–16); MC (85 FR 75010, November 24, 2020; FRL–10016–91; FRL–9989–29); and NMP (the announcement is scheduled to publish in the Federal Register on December 30, 
2020 and can be identified under FRL– 10017–18). As a result, the retention of the inactive prior proposals on the Agency’s regulatory agenda is not necessary; indeed, retaining these inactive proposals could be duplicative or could create unnecessary public confusion about the extent and nature of the regulatory actions the Agency intends to take to address unreasonable risks identified for these chemical substances. Furthermore, EPA is withdrawing the proposed rules to promote regulatory efficiency because it is impossible for EPA to finalize the rules as proposed and at the same time meet its statutory obligation under TSCA section 6 for risk management rulemaking following finalization of risk evaluations in which EPA makes findings of unreasonable risk. If EPA were to finalize the 2016 and 2017 rules as proposed, the Agency would be leaving out efforts to address additional COUs for these chemical substances that were determined to present 
unreasonable risk as part of the TSCA section 6(b) risk evaluations. EPA would not be able to say that its obligations under TSCA section 6 were met with regard to these chemical substances without issuing supplemental proposed 
and final rules for the additional COUs determined to present unreasonable risks in the TSCA section 6(b) risk evaluations. While the Agency has discretion to undertake multiple risk management actions with regard to unreasonable risks associated with different COUs for a single chemical substance (and, in fact, did so to address the acute unreasonable risks associated with MC in consumer paint and coating removal), it is more efficient to take risk management action on multiple COUs at once where unreasonable risks are identified, particularly where regulatory approaches to different COUs can be combined. In addition, where EPA has completed risk evaluations for chemical substances, EPA believes the Agency will be able to more efficiently address obligations under TSCA section 6(c) (requirements applicable to promulgation of TSCA section 6(a) rules), section 26 (including requirements related to best available science and weight of scientific evidence), and other requirements applicable to TSCA section 6(a) rulemakings through a single rulemaking process, rather than supplementing prior proposals. Therefore, EPA will initiate regulatory actions to address all of the COUs determined to present unreasonable risks for a given chemical substance and will withdraw the earlier proposed actions. 
EPA proposed these rules under 
TSCA section 6(a), which provides authority for EPA to ban or restrict the manufacture (including import), processing, distribution in commerce, use, and disposal of chemical substances, with certain limitations. TSCA section 26(l)(4) authorizes EPA to issue rules under TSCA section 6(a) for chemicals listed in the 2014 Update to the TSCA Work Plan for Chemical Assessments for which EPA published completed risk assessments prior to June 22, 2016, consistent with the scope of the completed risk assessment and other applicable requirements of TSCA section 6. 
In the June 2014 TSCA Work Plan 
Chemical Risk Assessment for TCE, EPA characterized risks from the use of TCE in commercial degreasing and in some consumer uses. On December 16, 2016, based on the 2014 Risk Assessment for TCE, EPA preliminarily determined that these risks are unreasonable risks and proposed regulatory action; specifically, EPA proposed to prohibit the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, or commercial use of TCE in 
spot cleaning in dry cleaning facilities and aerosol degreasing (81 FR 91592; FRL–9949–86). On January 19, 2017, 
EPA proposed to address the unreasonable risks from TCE when used in vapor degreasing (82 FR 7432; FRL– 9950–08). These uses of TCE were subsequently identified as conditions of use within the scope of the risk evaluation for TCE under TSCA section 6(b). EPA issued the final risk evaluation for TCE in November 2020 (85 FR 75010, November 24, 2020; FRL– 10016–91) which determined that 52 out of 54 conditions of use of TCE present unreasonable risks of injury to health. EPA is withdrawing the 2016 and 2017 proposed rules on TCE for the reasons discussed earlier in this section. For more information about TCE and details about the risk evaluation for TCE, see the TSCA website at https://
www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing- chemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluation- trichloroethylene-tce-0#riske valuation. 
In the March 2015 TSCA Work Plan 
Chemical Risk Assessment for NMP, EPA characterized risks from use of this chemical in paint and coating removal. On January 19, 2017, based on the 2015 Risk Assessment for NMP, EPA preliminarily determined that the use of NMP in commercial and consumer paint and coating removal poses an unreasonable risk of injury to health, and proposed options for addressing that risk. The uses of NMP in commercial and consumer paint and coating removal were identified as conditions of use within the scope of the risk evaluation for NMP under TSCA section 6(b). EPA issued the final risk evaluation for NMP in December 2020 (the announcement is scheduled to publish in the Federal Register on 
December 30, 2020 and can be identified under FRL–10017–18). EPA evaluated commercial and consumer use of NMP in paint and coating removal as COUs in the scope of the risk evaluation, along with other COUs for NMP. In response to public and peer review comments on the draft risk evaluation, EPA modified its approach for calculating dose-response, which resulted in a change in the point of departure and modified risk estimates for many COUs, including modified risk estimates for the use of NMP in consumer paint and coating removal. These changes are discussed in the Executive Summary and in Section 3.2, for the points of departure, of the final NMP risk evaluation and differ from the preliminary determination of unreasonable risk in the draft NMP risk evaluation and the 2017 proposed NMP rule. EPA is withdrawing the 2017 proposed rule on NMP, i.e., those 
portions of the proposal not related to 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 02:37 Jan 15, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM 15JAP13935 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2021 / Proposed Rules 
the final rule on MC in consumer paint 
and coating removal, for the reasons discussed earlier in this section. The withdrawal of this rulemaking effort may have an immediate effect on other TSCA requirements for NMP. Withdrawal of the proposal would terminate export notification requirements for NMP. However, the Agency believes withdrawing the proposal will clarify which action the Agency is currently pursuing, and reduce the need for additional, piecemeal or supplemental risk management actions as a result of the final determinations in the risk evaluation conducted under TSCA section 6(b). As noted in Unit V., the Agency is initiating risk management action on this chemical. For more information about NMP and details about the risk evaluation for NMP, see the TSCA website at https://
www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing- chemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluation-n- methylpyrrolidone-nmp-0. 
On March 27, 2019, in the final rule 
for MC in consumer paint and coating removal (RIN 2070–AK07), EPA explained that the Agency was not finalizing the proposed risk determination or proposed regulation for MC commercial paint and coating removal as part of that action. Similar to NMP, EPA evaluated commercial use of MC in paint and coating removal as a COU in the scope of the TSCA section 6(b) risk evaluation for MC, along with other COUs. EPA issued the final risk evaluation for MC on June 24, 2020 (85 FR 37942; FRL–10011–16). For more information about MC and details about the risk evaluation for MC, see the TSCA website at https://www.epa.gov/ 
assessing-and-managing-chemicals- under-tsca/final-risk-evaluation- methylene-chloride. 
V. How does EPA intend to proceed? 
Given the subsequent issuance of final 
risk evaluations under TSCA for TCE, MC and NMP that incorporated the COUs which the three proposed rules would have addressed, and the initiation of new rulemakings for TCE, MC and NMP following issuance of the final risk evaluations in which EPA 
made findings of unreasonable risk, EPA has determined that the previous proposed rules should be withdrawn. The next step in the process required by TSCA section 6 is addressing the unreasonable risks determined in the risk evaluations through rulemaking. EPA has initiated new rulemaking efforts to address the unreasonable risks determined in the final risk evaluations and has one year to propose and take public comments on any risk management actions. Although these 
new rulemaking efforts did not commence in time to be included in the Fall 2020 edition of the EPA’s Unified Regulatory Plan and Agenda, these rulemaking efforts will appear in the Spring 2021 edition of EPA’s semiannual Regulatory Agenda. As part of this effort, EPA will consider comments received on the previously- referenced ANPRM issued in 2019 soliciting input on training, certification and limited access requirements that could address the unreasonable risks associated with methylene chloride in commercial paint and coating removal. 
For these reasons, EPA is 
withdrawing the proposed rule that published on December 16, 2016 (81 FR 91592; FRL–9949–86); the proposed rule that published on January 19, 2017 (82 FR 7432; FRL–9950–08); and the provisions related to NMP and to MC in commercial paint and coating removal in the proposed rule that published on January 19, 2017 (82 FR 7464; FRL– 9958–57). 
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq. 
Andrew Wheeler, 
Administrator. 
[FR Doc. 2021–00115 Filed 1–14–21; 8:45 am] 
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
Defense Acquisition Regulations 
System 
48 CFR Part 212, 225, and 252 
[Docket DARS–2020–0039] 
RIN 0750–AL15 
Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement: Improved Energy Security for Main Operating Bases in Europe (DFARS Case 2020– D030) 
AGENCY : Defense Acquisition 
Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). 
ACTION : Proposed rule. 
SUMMARY : DoD is proposing to amend 
the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 that prohibits contracts for the acquisition of furnished energy for a covered military installation in Europe that is sourced from inside the Russian Federation. 
DATES : Comments on the proposed rule 
should be submitted in writing to the address shown below on or before March 16, 2021, to be considered in the 
formation of a final rule. 
ADDRESSES : Submit comments 
identified by DFARS Case 2020–D030, using any of the following methods: 
ÆRegulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for 
‘‘DFARS Case 2020–D030’’. Select ‘‘Comment Now’’ and follow the instructions provided to submit a comment. Please include ‘‘DFARS Case 2020–D030’’ on any attached documents. 
ÆEmail: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include 
DFARS Case 2020–D030 in the subject line of the message. 
ÆMail: Defense Acquisition 
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Kimberly Bass, OUSD(A&S)DPC/DARS, Room 3B938, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3060. 
Comments received generally will be 
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any 
personal information provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://
www.regulations.gov, approximately 
two to three days after submission to verify posting (except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail). 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Ms. 
Kimberly Bass, telephone 571–372– 6174. 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 
I. Background 
DoD is proposing to amend the 
DFARS to implement section 2821 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 (Pub. L. 116–92). Section 2821 prohibits use of energy sourced from inside the Russian Federation in an effort to promote energy security in Europe. The prohibition applies to all forms of energy ‘‘furnished to a covered military installation’’, as that term is defined in the statute, and only to main operating bases as defined and identified by DoD. This means the energy itself must be furnished to the military installation, not to a third party that uses it to create some other form of energy ( e.g., heating, 
cooling, or electricity). The prohibition applies only to Europe, not to Asia; for example, those parts of Turkey located in Asia are not affected by the rule. 
DoD will promote the energy security 
of its European installations by encouraging energy security and energy resilience and will not purchase energy sourced from inside the Russian Federation unless a waiver of the prohibition in section 2821 is approved by the head of the contracting activity. 
VerDate Sep<11>2014 02:37 Jan 15, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM 15JAP1