RESTRICTEDWORLD TRADE
ORGANIZATIONS/C/W/74
8 December 1998
(98-4942)
Council for Trade in Services
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES
Background Note by the Secretariat
I. INTRODUCTION
1. This note has been prepared in the context of the information exchange programme currently
conducted by the Council for Trade in Services in preparation for the forthcoming further round of
negotiations on services.  It is not a full or exhaustive account of the telecommunication servicessector, which has already been extensively studied by Members.  Following this introduction, Part II
deals with the definition of the sector, Part III with its economic importance, Part IV with an analysis
of GATS commitments and Part V with the trade and regulatory environment.
2. The telecommunications industry is in a process of rapid structural change and dramatic
economic growth.  The national monopolies which have dominated the industry in almost allcountries until very recently are now facing competition and in many countries are being privatised.
Under the stimulus of competition and changing technologies new services are constantly being
developed.  This process was reflected and stimulated by the commitments made in the GATS
negotiations on basic telecommunications which came into force in February 1998.  The most recent
edition of Telegeography confirms that as of July 1998, over 1,000 facilities-based internationalcarriers were operational worldwide, compared wi th less than 500 just two years earlier. In the
European Union, where for many States liberalization came into full effect for the first time in
January 1998, a tide of new competitors is evident, the first of whom are most commonly providing
services through resale means and thus able to start up ahead of new facilities-based providers.
However, many firms are in the process of building facilities that should permit them to begin
facilities-based competition against incumbent operators within the coming year.
3. In these and other markets of liberalized industrialized and emerging
1 economies, demand for
and issues of licenses have increased dramatically. Competitors are prompting sharp reductions in
prices of international and national long distance services. In emerging economies where
commitments on wire-based infrastructure and public voice services are often to be phased in later,
new providers of liberalized wireless services ar e increasing the pace of entry into local service
markets, supplying service to consumers who have been waiting for fixed lines to be installed.  Thecompetition now in effect in more than forty, countries is already showing benefits not only for
customers and new international telecom carriers, who have managed to gain over 11 per cent of the
world market, but also for a few incumbent operators who, by slashing prices to face competition,
have registered impressive growth.
2  Moreover, the new competitors have also to come to figure
among the incumbent operators' major customers.
4. The clear prospect of competition has also further accelerated the pace of innovation, leading
to new services that may have been difficult to foresee less than two years ago when the WTO
negotiations concluded.  New equipment technologies and deregulation are contributing to a rapid
                                                     
1 The phrase "emerging economies" has been used in this paper to note developing countries and
economies in transition.
2 Gregory C. Staple, quoted in a press release of  Telegeography, Inc. of 28 October 1998 announcing
issuance of  the report,  Telegeography 1999 .S/C/W/74
Page 2
breakdown of service segmentation. Suppliers are now seeking to combine, for example, fixed and
mobile services into an integrated service. Ha ndsets which convert between the two will shortly be
available.  New and traditional operators are hasten ing to integrate internet-style backbones into their
network infrastructure. The technical feasibility of providing facsimile and voice-telephone services
over internet has made great strides.  Wholesale capacity services, and even "exchanges" for the
trading of capacity or  "minutes", have emerged.  And with new satellite services such as Global
Mobile Personal Communications by Satellite (GMPCS) just beginning to come on line, still further
advances in satellite-based services with full multimedia capabilities -- the so-called third generation
technologies -- are expected to become operational well within four to five years.
5. As of 5 February 1998, with the entry into force of the Fourth Protocol of the GATS and its
attached commitments on basic telecommunications, the vast bulk of the world market, measured in
revenue terms, is subject to open markets for the supply of  basic telecom services whether on the
basis of simple resale or over a supplier's own in frastructure.  Figure 1 illustrates that governments
representing about 82 per cent of world revenue committed to ensure competition as of February 1998
and another 6 per cent have committed to introduce competition on or before 2005.  This scenario has
dramatic implications for the way the telecom industry will be structured and the way telecom
services will be provided in the future.
Figure 1.  World telecom revenue  covered by Members with commitments to full competition
Source:  1996 Data, ITU
6. The role of telecommunications as essential to the facilitation of international trade, economic
development, and the enrichment of citizens' lives has become widely accepted. Modern means of
telecommunications, enhanced by competition, will enable all countries to participate more fully ininternational trade, particularly if complemented by increased liberalization of cross-border supply of
many electronically deliverable services. Innovation in telecommunications will be essential to
ensuring that the anticipated growth of electronic commerce can be fully realized. Many emerging
economy governments which joined in making GATS commitments on basic telecommunications had
come to view inadequate telecommunications networ ks and services as an impediment to achieving
their full economic potential. Moreover, increased accessibility and added variety of
telecommunications services will be the foundation of successful national and global information
society initiatives and the social benefits these initiatives will bestow.Non WTO
9%
Phase in by 
2005
6%Later/ not 
committed
3%
As of February 
1998
82%S/C/W/74
Page 3
II. DEFINITION OF THE SECTOR
7. The GATS Services Sectoral Classification List (MTN.GNS/W/120) breaks down
telecommunications into 14 sub-sectors (a.- n.) and an "other" category (o.) (spelled out in  annex
Figure A1). For the purposes of the negotiations on basic telecommunications, sub-sectors a. through
g. of this list, as well as a variety of "other" services, including mobile communications, providing
real-time transmission of customer supplied information (usually listed under sub-sector o.), were
generally considered basic telecommunication services. Subsectors h. through n. and any "other"services, not supplied on a real-time basis or which transform the form or content of customer's
information, were considered value-added telecommunication services. It is in this sense that
references to basic and value-added services will be used throughout this Note. It is recognized,
however, that this breakdown does not necessarily re flect and does not need to correspond to any
particular government's national practice with respect to classifying services as basic or value added.
For example, it is not uncommon for mobile telephony, paging, or data transmission (whether or not
real-time) to be designated as value-added servic es in national regimes. Increasingly, in liberalized
markets any distinction between basic and value-added services may have little importance, except
possibly in relation to defining public or universal service objectives.  In partially liberalized markets,
however, the distinction may continue to have some bearing on defining the scope of services which
are to remain under exclusivity and of those which will not.
8. Annex Figure A1 also shows the items of the U.N. Provisional Central Product Classification
(UNCPC) which are cross-referenced in the GATS Sectoral Classification as corresponding to its
telecommunications services sub-sectors. The correspondence is far from perfect, as indicated by the
frequent use of double asterisks, which mean that the GATS sub-sector concerned relates only to
some parts of the UNCPC item description. Moreover, the correspondence can be misleading to
governments and other interested parties who may resort to the UNCPC for definitions of the GATSsub-sectors.  First, where there is partial correspondence there is no way of being certain which
portion of a UNCPC description is intended to be relevant and, second, certain elements of the
UNCPC descriptions used are either out of date or superseded by understandings developed in the
negotiations on basic telecommunications.  For example, the GATS sub-sector 2.C.a. listing "voice
telephone services" is cross-referenced to UNCPC item 7521 which refers to "public telephoneservices". During the negotiations on basic telecommunications, however, it was understood that
commitments on voice telephone services would extend to cover the supply of both public and non-
public voice, unless the commitment specified otherwise.
9. Another difficulty with the GATS list of telecom services is that the distinction between many
of its subsectors has blurred with the adoption of new transmission technologies, the enhanced abilityto integrate different technologies, and the advent of service suppliers who distinguish themselves not
by specializing in particular telecom services, but ra ther by the market segments they seek to serve.
Voice, data, fax, and a full range of value-added telecom services can and are being carried
indiscriminately as digitalized information flows over  telephony networks or leased lines of just about
any supplier. Even distinctions between  fixed and mobile telephony are crumbling as some suppliers
can now offer both as an integrated package, can arrange to re-route calls to a customer's fixed
telephone to its mobile telephone upon demand, and will soon be able to offer a wireless handset thatconverts itself from fixed service to mobile service if carried out of range of the fixed handset base.
Market forces are giving rise to telecom service suppliers that may more accurately break down into
categories characterized as wholesale versus retail, infrastructure owners versus resellers, or
international versus national service providers than into categories based on supply of voice versus
data, for example.
10. Rapid changes in the sector mean not only that that the existing GATS classification of
telecom services is inadequate, but also that any other list that might be devised could become quickly
out of date. The use of categories of service that were developed during the negotiations on basic
telecommunications have been crucial to bridging this gap. These categories consisted of four groups:
a) geographic distinctions - local, domestic long distance, and international; b) means of technology -S/C/W/74
Page 4
wire-based (or fixed infrastructure) and wireless (or radio-based); c) means of delivery - on a resale
basis or fac ilities-based; and d) clientele - for public use, for non-public use (e.g. services sold to
closed user groups).  For partially liberalized regimes, the clarity of commitments has been enhancedby use of the categories, as necessary, to define the scope of a commitment or to indicate different
levels of commitments depending on the category concerned.  For fully liberalized regimes or
services, the absence of category indications has been used to signify that the commitment
encompasses all possible categories, consistently  with the understanding of the technological
neutrality of commitments.
 3
11. The development of the categories, and the fundamental understanding on how to use them,
did much to clarify the intended nature and scope of  the commitments made on basic
telecommunications.  The same approach might also help to clarify commitments on value-added
services. Moreover, it offers wide scope for the simplification of schedules.  The primary shortcomingof the approach is that critical information on the scope, as well as on the exact services covered by, a
given commitment, is often implicit.  A degree of uncertainty that may sometimes result, therefore,
could be compounded in the future, as convergence of broadcast, telecommunications, and computer
technologies and services continues to take hold. For example, many traditional and non-traditional
telecommunications operators are now conducting th e technological and market research to begin
offering video on demand over internet. It will be particularly important to be clear in specifying the
coverage of new commitments in these areas.
III. ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE SECTOR
12. In 1997, world telecommunications revenue st ood at US$ 644 billion and global investment
in telecommunications totalled US$ 170 billion (see table 1). The sector employed nearly 5.4 millionstaff worldwide.  The Americas ranked highest among regions in share of revenue.  The region
accounted for US$ 245 billion, or 38 per cent of world revenue. Europe accounted for US$ 204 billion
or nearly 32 per cent, Asia for US$168 billion (26 per cent), Oceania for US$ 17 billion (2.6 per cent)
and Africa for about US$ 10 billion (1.5 per cent).  In contrast, Asia led in world telecommunications
investment. In Asia, investment reached almost US$ 74 billion (43.5 per cent of the total), followed
by Europe at about US$ 48 billion (28 per cent),  the Americas with US$ 40 billion (23.5 per cent),
Oceania with US$ 4 billion (2.4 pe r cent) and Africa, with nearly US$ 3 billion (nearly 2 per cent).
However, in revenue as a share of GDP and invest ment as a share of gross fixed capital investment,
Oceania was substantially ahead of other regions. Its telecom revenue represented 3.4 per cent of
GDP, followed by the Americas with revenue at 2.3 per cent of GDP.  In investment,  expenditures by
the Oceania region represented 5.3 per cent of gross capital formation, followed by Africa (3.2 per
cent) and then by Asia (2.9 per cent). Levels of employment in telecommunications remained fairlystable between 1995 and 1997 in most regions except the Americas, where it decreased slightly, and
in Oceania, where employment increased by an average of nearly 4 per cent per year.
13. In 1997 world telecommunications networks comprised 792 million main lines and
214 million cellular subscribers (see table 2).  The rate of growth in cellular subscribers, averaging
52.5 per cent per annum from 1990 to 1997, far outpaced that of main lines, which averaged only6.5 per cent average annual growth over the same period. The numbers of main lines and cellular
subscribers per inhabitant are highest in the Oceania region at about 39.5 per 100 and nearly 19 per
100, respectively, followed by Europe and the Americas region. Main line penetration in Europe, at
nearly 36 per 100 inhabitants, is slightly higher than in the Americas, which averages nearly 32 per
100, while the reverse is true for cellular use:  the Americas records slightly higher cellular
                                                     
3 See S/GBT/W/2/Rev.1, "Notes for Scheduling  Basic Telecom Services Commitments," which was
attached to the Report of the Group on Basic Telecommunications (S/GBT/4), adopted on 15 February 1997.S/C/W/74
Page 5
Table 1.  World telecommunications revenue, investment and employment
Revenue Total
1997 (US$ b)As % of GDP
1996Investment
1997 (US$ b)As % of Gross
Fixed Capital
Formation
1996Staff
1997 (000s)CAGR
1995-97
Africa 10 1.7% 3 3.2% 261 0.2%
Americas 245 2.3% 40 2.2% 1'307 -0.4%
Asia 168 2.0% 74 2.9% 1'819 0.8%
Europe 204 2.1% 48 2.5% 1'874 0.0%
Oceania 17 3.4% 4 5.3% 99 3.8%
WORLD 644 2.1% 170 2.7% 5'359 0.2%
Source: ITU
penetration, at about 9 subscribers per 100 inhabitants, than Europe, where it is just below 8 per 100.
However, the rate of expansion of both fixed and cellular networks was highest in Asia and Africa,
where penetration levels are substantially lower than in other regions.
Table 2.  World telecommunications network development: Fixed and cellular
Main lines
1997(m)CAGR
1990-1997Main lines/
100
InhabitantsCellular
subscribers
1997 (m)CAGR
1990-1997Cellular
subscribers/
100 inhabitants
Africa 15 11.0% 1.99 2 102.1% 0.26
Americas 250 5.1% 31.69 72 42.6% 9.04
Asia 230 11.6% 6.59 74 74.4% 2.14
Europe 285 3.8% 35.81 61 50.8% 7.68
Oceania 12 2.2% 39.58 5 56.4% 18.72
WORLD 792 6.5% 13.49 214 52.5% 3.66
Source: ITU
14. The world's leading telecom companies continue, for the most part, to be incumbent operators,
largely from industrialized countries. Nevertheless, a number of emerging economy operators and a
few new entrants are making important inroads. (See annex tables A4 through A7.)  In 1997, the
20 top public telecom operators in terms of revenue accounted for nearly US$ 477 billion or 74 per
cent of total 1997 world revenues. They also accounted for nearly 2.4 million employees, or about
44 per cent of total world employment in the sector.  Telebras of Brazil and DGT of China ranked
among these.  The world's top 20 fixed line operators, ranked by number of main lines, accounted for
nearly 530 main lines, or nearly 67 per cent of all main lines in operation in 1997.  Local servicerevenue for these operators totalled about US$ 114 billion.  Several emerging economy operators
figured among these, including operators from China, Korea, Brazil, India, and Taiwan.
15. Similar patterns are evident with regard to th e key players in markets for international and
cellular services. In terms of international service revenues, the top 20 operators earned an estimated
US$ 115.3 billion from international traffic in 1997.  Operators from China, Singapore and Mexicowere represented among these, both in terms of their volume of traffic (international outgoing
minutes) and revenue.  India's international operator also ranked among the top 20 revenue earners
from international service. In a list which includes the top 25 earners of international service revenue,
four more emerging economy operators meet the ranking. Revenue of the top 20 suppliers of cellular
service (in number of subscribers) in 1997 reached US$ 73 billion.  Among this group, the number ofsubscribers increased by an average of 34 per cent over 1996, with average mobile revenues increasing
by 25 per cent.  Cellular operators from China, Korea and Brazil made great strides in 1997: China's
operator ranked second in the world (in number of cellular subscribers) in 1997, compared with fifthS/C/W/74
Page 6
in 1996; Korea's SK Telecom ranked seventh, up from fifteenth in 1996; and Brazil's operator moved
to twelfth place, up from twenty-first in the previous year.
IV. ANALYSIS OF GATS COMMITMENTS
16. As of  November 1998, 89 WTO Members have included telecommunications services in
their schedules of commitments. The number is likely to rise as additional governments complete the
process of accession to the WTO in the coming months.  All industrialized countries have taken
commitments on basic telecommunications and on most value added telecommunications services. At
present, 52 emerging economies have made commitments on basic telecommunications; while many
of these have also made commitments on value-added services, a few have not.  Also, some emerging
economies that did not participate in the negotiations on basic telecommunications had undertaken
commitments on value-added services in the Uruguay Round or upon WTO accession.
17. In terms of breadth of coverage of telecom service subsectors, the services sectoral
classifications list contains a total of 15 subsectors into which commitments can be organized. As
illustrated in figure 2, approximately one-fourth of all Members that committed on
telecommunications have listed 14 or more of these sub-sectors.  Another 40 per cent committed on
between 10 and 13 of the sub-sectors.  Just over one-fourth committed on 6 to 9 sub-sectors, while
those Members committing on 5 or less sub-sectors represented slightly less than one-tenth of all whohave telecom commitments.
18. Basic telecommunications are included in the commitments of 83 WTO Members. This figure
comprises the 69 participants in the Fourth Protocol on basic telecommunications, the 4 Members
who have subsequently submitted schedules on basic telecoms, 2 recently acceded countries whose
commitments resemble those in the Fourth Protocol, and 8 Members that included some basic services
in their Uruguay Round schedules. In some cases, commitments by the latter, Uruguay Round group,which could not benefit from interpretative notes and schedule drafting techniques developed during
the basic telecom negotiations, may lack clarity in the light of this fact.
19. On value-added telecoms, a total of 70 Members have made commitments. This
predominantly reflects commitments taken in the Uruguay Round, but also includes some value-added
commitments made in accessions, in the Fourth Protocol and in late submissions on basictelecommunications. The technology neutral approa ch to scheduling commitments was developed in
the negotiations on basic telecommunications conducted after the close of the Uruguay Round. As a
result, in some cases it would be misleading to as sume that this approach transposes to value-added
services commitments.  For example, commitments made in the Uruguay Round are silent on whether
firms may build, own or operate their own network facilities for the supply of the value-added
services upon which commitments are taken.  This aside, the simple fact that fewer governments haveFigure 2. Coverage of telecom commitments
7%20%
18%20%26%9%
From 14 to 15From 10 to13From 6 to 9Five or less
Industral Economies Emerging EconomiesS/C/W/74
Page 7
taken commitments on value-added services than on basic telecom services should not be taken as a
reflection of the regulatory situation as it currently stands.  National regulatory regimes are in generalmore liberal for value-added than for basic services:  the greater number of commitments for the latter
is essentially a product of the extended negotiations.
20. There are 75 WTO governments which made telecom commitments during or after the
negotiations on basic telecoms, and thus were in a position to consider making additional
commitments on regulatory principles.  Sixty-eight, or 9 out of 10 such governments, committed onsome or all aspects of the Reference Paper.  This represents half of the total WTO membership.
Sixty-two of the governments committed the Reference Paper in its entirety or with only minor
modifications. Fifty-two emerging economies count among the group of 75.  Of these, 45, or 87  per
cent, included additional commitments on regulatory  matters.  All but 6 of the 45 emerging
economies scheduled the Reference Paper with few, if any, modifications. It is interesting to note that
this means that regulatory commitments were included in more schedules of emerging economy
governments than was any single subsector of basic telecom service except for data transmission
Level of commitments by modes of supply
21. In terms of the extent of market access commitments under the different modes of supply,
there were fairly marked differences when basic services  (sub-sectors a. through g.) are compared
with value-added services (sub-sectors h. through n.). Generally, table A1 shows that fewerlimitations were listed with respect to value-added services for all modes of supply.  For cross-border
supply of various value-added services, between 31 and 37 per cent of governments committing listed
no limitations, whereas for the basic services only 12 to 20 per cent committed fully with no
limitations.  With respect to consumption abroad, value-added services were listed with no limitations
by between 44 and 51 per cent of  committing governments, while the corresponding figure for basicservices ranged between 31 and 49 per cent.  Likewise, commercial presence for value-added services
was fully liberalized without limitation in 17 to 21 per cent of commitments, but only in 9 to 11 per
cent of commitments on basic telecommunications. However, fewer governments refrained from
commitments (i.e. by entering "unbound") with resp ect to commercial presence than for any other of
the  modes of supply; this was true for both basic and value added services.
22. The pattern of commitments by industrialized economies with respect to market-access for
the modes of supply differed somewhat from the overall picture presented above.  Industrialized
economies were two to three times more likely than  the norm to commit to unlimited market access
for cross border supply for basic telecom services ; between 36 to 43 per cent of them did so.
Moreover, they were   about twice as likely to make unrestricted commitments on the supply of basictelecom services via the other two modes of supply, at between 64 to 70 per cent for consumption
abroad and 14 per cent for commercial presence.  Finally, all industrialized countries committed either
fully or partially on all basic services, there being no cases of "unbound" entries listed for any of the
services or modes of supply. This means that all incidences of "unbound" entries on basic services
with respect to particular modes of supply are accounted for by emerging economies, and this was
more often done in respect to cross-border and consumption abroad, than in respect to commercial
presence.
23. The above analysis indicates that priorities in respect to modes appear to differ between
industrialized and emerging economies. For industrialized economies, cross border and consumption
abroad are much more open than commercial presence. Whereas emerging economies, although they
also record fewer limitations on cross border supply and consumption abroad, have recorded a higher
incidence of commitments, overall, on commercial presence, when both full and partial commitmentsare taken into account.  New technologies involvin g satellites and simple resale techniques will make
it possible for supply of telecom services through cross-border supply and consumption abroad to
assume much more importance than in the past.  However, the economic benefits of this trend can
only be realized in the most liberalized markets.  Commercial presence in one form or another will
nevertheless remain important to many service suppliers, and it appears will still remain an importantS/C/W/74
Page 8
prerequisite for service suppliers who wish to pa rticipate in emerging markets.  Their commitments
illustrate the importance they have attached to fore ign direct  investment as a means of improving and
extending national telecom networks and universal access.
Types of limitations maintained
24. Overall, three types of market access limitations are most commonly listed in telecom
commitments. These are: limitations on the number of suppliers, restrictions on type of legal entity
and, a related measure, limits on the participation of foreign capital.  A variety of "other" limitations,
or measures not fitting neatly into the six categories of market access restrictions defined in GATS
Article XVI, are also listed. As implied above, the limitations are, by far, most often associated with
commitments on commercial presence for basic services.
25. Again, significant differences are evident when commitments of developing and
industrialized countries are compared. Overall, emerging economies are about five times more likelythan industrialized countries to have maintain ed limitations on the number suppliers and are almost
four times more likely to require that particular types of  legal entity be established to provide service.
They are nearly three times more likely to have lis ted "other" measures. Such "other" measures often
include restrictions on bypass of, or requirements to use, monopoly network facilities, restrictions on
resale of excess capacity of leased circuits, or prohibitions against interconnection with other leasedcircuits by the suppliers concerned. However, limits on foreign equity participation are not much
more frequent for emerging than for industrialized economies.
V. TRADE AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
Competition and market structure
26. As market forces gain a foothold in the telecommunications sector, they are fundamentally
transforming the structure of the sector and the way the services are traded.  A market  characterized
by monopoly national fixed-network operators, supplying basic telecommunications in their
respective territories and obliged to pass off international traffic to one another, is being replaced by
one where competing companies are free to choose what they will provide, to whom, and how they
will provide it. For the vast majority of the world ma rket, this transformation is already leading to the
replacement of a simple, straightforward market structure with an exceedingly complex structure with
a wide array of  service suppliers operating at various levels of domestic and international markets.  It
is not yet possible to predict with certainty exactly how the market will develop.  Figure 3 represents
at least one scenario, which, although perhaps simplified and incomplete, illustrates the kinds of
complexities that telecom providers and regulators are likely to confront.
27. In addition, technologies and service practices that were once considered marginal are
becoming mainstream, legitimate, and increasingly significant components of trade in
telecommunications. Services based on mobile technologies are growing at such rates that their
economic importance may soon rival fixed-network services. As prices of mobile service fall, some
citizens of emerging economies will experience their first access to telecommunications through
mobile telephony rather than fixed networks.  Internet-based services are undergoing similarly
dramatic growth.  Also, satellite transport capacity will probably become nearly as important asland-based capacity within the next decade.  Practices such as domestic and international simple
resale, call-back (perhaps in new, more sophisticated forms), telephony based on internet protocols,
and international traffic refile and hubbing are no longer grey-area, quasi-legal alternatives. Such
practices are now deregulated, permissible activities in all but a very few industrialized economies
and in a number of emerging markets.  They will soon become normal business practices.S/C/W/74
Page 9
Figure 3.  Suppliers of telecommunications services: Trends in market structure
Long distance
Regional National /g222
CityFull service /g222
International
Long Distance
Regional National /g222
CityRetailers /g222
Business only /g222
International
Submarine Fixed /g222
Dry International /g222
Satellite
Long distance
RegionalINFRASTRUCTURE
OWNERS  /g222
Wholesalers /g222
National /g222
City
Call back
Aggregators Arbitragers /g222
IP Telephony
Value-added messaging
Virtual private networks Wholesalers /g222
Calling cards
Internet service providers
Calling cards
IP-basedSwitched
resellers /g222
ServiceProviders 
/g222
Retailers /g222
Value-addedMessaging 
/g222 Non IP-based
Aggregators Arbitragers /g222
Call back
Premium services Special
numbers /g222 Freephone
MessagingRESELLERS /g222
Switchless
resellers /g222 Serviceproviders 
/g222 Locationservices 
/g222 "Follow me" services
Source:  CommunicationsWeek International , 29 June 1998.
28. One way telecom providers are attempting to cope with upheaval in the sector is through a
multitude of corporate mergers and acquisitions. Both traditional telecom providers and new entrants
are acquiring not only other telecom companies but  also other kinds of businesses in an effort to
prepare for the broader, multidimensional communi cations markets of the future. According to an
article in Telecommunications  magazine, in the first half of 1998 the value of telecom transactions
world wide increased almost seven-fold from US$ 24 billion to US$ 165.4 billion. It noted that this
equates to about 10 per cent of the value of the global telecoms market changing hands in the first six
months of the year. This does not, suggests the arti cle, represent the much-feared advent of a handful
of mega-companies set to dominate the telecom industry, but while "a relatively small number of
colossal deals are inflating overall deal value, there is a much larger number of smaller, discrete
transactions whose significance goes well beyond their apparent scale. These smaller deals are fueledby the advent of new technologies, which have reduced infrastructure requirements in certain sectors,
and which are enabling relatively small businesses to gain strong positions in certain segments of the
market ... ." Moreover, the article stressed that even the large deals "are not exclusively about
traditional consolidation. In many senses they are about staking and maintaining a position against the
backdrop of a large number of industry changes …  Emerging technologies present risks to even the
most gargantuan of companies … ."
4
29. The 1997 Communications Outlook of the OECD also asserts that a combination of
deregulation and a diversity of corporate aims are inspiring the high levels of merger and acquisition
activities in the telecom industry.  Such aims, sa ys the OECD report, include the desire to attain
economies of scale in the face of large competitors, to offer global one-stop shopping opportunities, to
draw upon complementarities to offer integrated services, and to be able to offer a wider range of
                                                     
4 Marco Fasoli, "  M&A: Rewriting Telecoms ," Telecommunications , Sept. 1998.S/C/W/74
Page 10
services to customers. For example, the opening of local networks to competition is an important
contributor to mergers and acquisitions. And as new technologies make alternative routes of access to
customers possible, significant activity has involved telecom and cable television companies, giving
them a head start into multimedia with the capacity to provide both TV and telephone services. In
addition, operators seeking to extend their abilities and customer base are acquiring new competitive
resale-based firms with specialized assets in distribution and customer service and/or computerprocessing and software. Both traditional and new operators are engaging heavily in acquisitions of
internet service providers and other data communications or computer service/software providers to
help capture portions of the growing customer demand for voice over data networks, data
communications, and information technology services, generally.
Regulatory issues
30. The ability of new entrants to arrive on the scene is only part of the picture.  It has proved,
and continues to be, exceedingly difficult for new entrants to gain significant market share,
particularly in relation to access to the final customer and the provision of fixed local service
generally.  In the face what may be continuing dominance over essential infrastructure and the local
loop for a considerable period of time, effective regulatory safeguards, especially in relation to
competition and interconnection, will be indispensable.  Moreover, in the future the importance ofcompetition policy and interconnection guarantees might not be limited to concerns over the control
of fixed, wireline infrastructures.  As cellular network operators assume larger market shares, it is
possible that other service suppliers may find that access to a major cellular operator's network, to
terminate customers' communications, to be inordinately costly, potentially as a result of the
operator's market position rather than competitive for ces.  Also, as the Internet matures, larger internet
access providers are buying smaller ones and large incumbent telecom operators are acquiring internet
access providers to supply these services.  There is a prospect that the largest Internet access providers
may dispense with the mutual fee-less peering arrangements devised when Internet was more a non-
profit endeavour rather than a commercial activity.  In this, there is a risk that that large access
providers could gain a market position permitting them to dictate terms, conditions and prices ofaccess by smaller providers.  Finally, as more telecom providers become global companies, it is
increasingly likely that some of their activities may fall outside the jurisdiction of any single national
competition body or other relevant government authority. In such situations, enhanced bilateral and
multilateral cooperation on competition policy may have an important role to play.
31. Other important functions of telecom regulation remain important but will need to be recast to
complement a competitive environment. A host of obl igations typically required of telecom licensees,
to help satisfy various social and regulatory objectives, include public service obligations, obligations
to service specific groups or areas, quality of service targets, tariff controls, treatment of customers,
competitive behaviour, and obligations to publish selected information. Finding new mechanisms to
meet universal service objectives, whose impact on the many competitors in a market is even-handed,
will require creativity and the flexibility to constantly reassess on the basis of results. Also, many
licensing practices and procedures that are a holdover from the past may need to be streamlined, at aminimum, if not wholly rethought.  For example, for services in which governments have committed
to dispense with limits on the number of suppliers, except perhaps involving use of radio spectrum,
the practice of  requiring suppliers to await the issu e of tenders for licenses may no longer be suitable.
Instead, suppliers themselves may be the best judge of emerging market opportunities that they
believe they can serve and should be able to self-initiate applications accordingly.  Finally, regulatorsand operators everywhere are struggling with the development of costing methodologies appropriate
to the new environment. Improved data collection and new methods of cost calculation are necessary
for regulators' efforts to safeguard competition and for operators' ability to make sound business
decisions. Equally important, they will also reveal information that is essential to determining on the
true cost of  promoting universal access.S/C/W/74
Page 11
32. A transparent and fair regulatory framework will be vital to the investment decisions of new
operators and providers of new services of all kinds, but particularly for satellite and other wirelessservices. One important issue in relation to spectrum is exactly how much competition will be
possible;  spectrum managers' decisions will determ ine how many suppliers will be able to enter new
service markets.  Also critical are the types of qualification criteria that will determine who is eligible
for licenses and the nature of other conditions associated with the licensing processes. The cost of
licenses and spectrum are important issues for new services and service suppliers; it is not uncommonfor licenses and spectrum assignment auctions or fees to be important sources of revenue in both
industrialized and emerging markets. And with the dramatic growth of wireless services of all kinds,
yet another concern will be the availability of spectrum more generally; how it will be organized and
allotted, for example, to meet the many competing new demands in the not-too-distant future.
33. As convergence leads telecom service providers to offer a wider range of multimedia
services, regulatory considerations may become further complicated.  For example, unbundled
interconnection to essential infrastructure controlled by a dominant supplier is seen as necessary toachieve effective market access for basic telecom suppliers. But is it any less crucial for the supply of
video over internet services, when access to the local loop, i.e. the final customer, can only be
obtained from a "major supplier" who also happens to supply this service? Convergence will also pose
a significant challenge to governments to try to ensure that regulations applied across different
segments of the multimedia industry are broadly consistent.  This is particularly true as the differentcomponents of multimedia -- broadcast or audio-visu al, computer or information technology services,
and telecommunication services -- come out of vastly different market structures and regulatory
environments.S/C/W/74
Page 12
VI. POINTS OF CONTACT AND SOURCES OF STATISTICS
International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
UN Plaza
Geneva, Switzerland
http://www.itu.int
Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD)Telecoms and Information Services
http://www.oecd.org/dsti/sti/it/cm/index.htm
The World Bank
Telecommunications and Informatics
DivisionIndustry and Energy Department
http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/ienti/ienti.
html
Aia-Pacific Telecommunity (APT)
http://www.inet.co.th/org/apt/
APECTelecom Working Group
http://www.apecsec.org.sg/workgroup/telecom.h
tml
Caribbean Telecommunications Union
E-mail: Ctunion@tsttnet.tt
Comision Interamericana de
Telecomunicaciones (CITEL)http://www.oas.org/SP/PINFO/CITEL.htm
Pacific Telecommunications CouncilInternational Telecommunications Society
http://itp-www.colorado.edu/its/
Telegeography Inc.
http://www.telegeography.com/
Financial Times
FT Media & Telecoms
http://www.ftmedia.com/
Total Telecom
http://www.totaltele.com/
International Telecommunications Users Group
(INTUG)
6 rue St Jean,B-5000 Namur, Belgium
Tel: +32 81 26 05 16
Fax: +32 81 26 05 17
E-mail: intug@mail.interpac.be
Australian Telecommunications Users Group
(ATUG)
Arbeitsgemeinschaft fuer Datenverarbeitung(ADV), Austria
Belgian Telecommunications Users Group
(BELTUG)
Canadian Business Telecommunications
Alliance  (CBTA)
Danish Data Association (DDA)
Central Chamber of Commerce (CCC), Finland
European Council of Telecommunications Users
Associations (ECTUA)
Association Française des Utilisateurs du
Téléphone et des Télécommunications (AFUTT)
Hong Kong Telecommunications Users Group
(HKTUG)Hungarian Telecommunications Users Group
(TE3)
Associazione Nazionale Utenti Italiani di
Telecomunicazioni  (ANUIT)
Netherlands Association of Business
Telecommunications Users  (BTG)
Telecommunications Users Association of New
Zealand  (TUANZ)
Norwegian Telecommunications Users Group
(NORTIB)
Spanish Association of Telecommunication
Users  (AUTEL)
Swedish Telecommunications Users Group
(NTK)S/C/W/74
Page 13
Associaton Suisse d'Usagers de
Telecommunicatons (ASUT)
International Press Telecommunications Council
(IPTC), UK
Telecom eV (Germany)Telecommunications Managers Association
(TMA), UK
International Communications Association
(ICA), USA
Tele-Communications Association (TCA), USAS/C/W/74
Page 14
REFERENCES
Berendt, Annelise and McClure, Ben, "Third Generation Growing Pains", Telecommunications Magazine ,
September 1998 at http://www.telecommagazine.com/issues/199809/tci/mcclure.html .
Bond, James, "The Drivers of the Information Re volution—Cost, Computing Power, and Convergence" ,
Public policy for the Private Sector,  Note 118,  June 1997, The World Bank Group at
http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/notes/telecoms.htm .
Fasoli, Marco , "M&A: Rewriting Telecoms", Telecommunications Magazine , September 1998 at
http://www.telecommagazine.com/issues/199809/tci/fasoli.html .
Finnie, Graham and Greenman, Andy, "Network Review: Top 100, Peaks and Troughs,"
Communications Week International , Issue No. 215, 23 November 1998 at
http://www.totaltele.com/cwi/215/215nr.html .
European Commission, "Fourth Report on the Impl ementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory
Package", Communication from the Commission to th e European Parliament, the Economic and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 25 November, 1988.
ITU, General Trends in Telecommunication Reform 1998,  June 1998, Geneva.
ITU, Issues in Telecommunications Devel opment: Finance and Trade 1998 Review, June 1998, Geneva.
ITU, World Telecommunication Development Report 19 98, March 1998, Geneva.
ITU and UNDP, Guidelines on Regulatory Organisations , September 1996, Bangkok.
Masud, Sam, "Telecom Merger Mania: New Strategies, Players, and Markets", Telecommunications -
Americas Edition, October 1998 at http://www.telecommagazine.com/issues/199810/tcs/masud.html .
McKnight, Lee W., and Leida, Brett, "Internet Telephony: Costs, Pricing and Policy ",
Telecommunications Policy , Vol. 22., No. 7, August 1998, pp. 555-569, c. Elsevier Science Ltd.
Mendler, Camille, "Network Review: It's a jungle out there," CommunicationsWeek International , Issue
No. 207, 29 June 1998 at http://www.totaltele.com/cwi/207/207nr.html .
Minges, Michael, "Statistics for Regulators", Telecommunications Indicators Speeches and Discussion
Papers, June 1996, ITU at http://www.itu.int/ti/papers/cti/cti.htm
Mustafa, Mohammad A. and Fink, Carsten, "Tapping International Equity Markets through Depository
Receipts—Lessons from the telecoms sector" , Public policy for the Private Sector,  Note 140, April 1998,
The World Bank Group at http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/notes/telecoms.htm .
Nye, Sheridan and Cukier, Kenneth, "Brokers Trade Voice-over-IP Minutes ", CommunicationsWeek
International , 19 October 1998 at http://www.totaltele.com/cwi/213/213news10.html .
OECD, Communications Outlook 199 7, c. OECD, Paris: April 1997.
O'Keefe, Susan,  "Watch Out DSL: Broadband Satellite Systems are Coming", Telecommunications -
Americas Edition, October 1998 at http://www.telecommagazine.com/issues/199810/tcs/okeefe.html .S/C/W/74
Page 15
Petrazzini, Ben A., "Competition in Telecoms—Imp lications for Universal Service and Employment" ,
Public policy for the Private Sector,  Note 96,  October 1996, The World Bank Group at
http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/notes/telecoms.htm .
Primo Braga, Carlos A. and Fink, Carsten, "The Private Sector and the Internet", Public policy for the
Private Sector,  Note 122,  June 1997, The World Bank Group at
http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/notes/telecoms.htm .
Sharman, Camilla (ed.), International Telecoms Review '98 , 1998, c. Euromoney publications.
Shetty, Vineeta, "Interconnection: A red rag to a bull", Communications International , 1 November
1998.
Smith, Peter, "What the Transformation of Telecommunications Markets Means for Regulation" , Public
policy for the Private Sector,  Note 121,  June 1997, The World Bank Group at
http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/notes/telecoms.htm .
Staple, Gregory C., "A Primer on International Simple Resale (ISR)", Telegeography 1996/97 , January
1997, c. Telegeography, Inc.
Telegeography , Inc., Telegeography 1996/97 , January 1997.
Telegeography , Inc., Telegeography 1998/99 , October 1998.
Tuthill, Lee, "A Commitment to Competition", Communications for Emerging Economies, 1998/99,
International Institute of Communications, Kensington Publications Ltd.
Wellenius, Bjorn, "Extending Telecommunications Se rvice to Rural Areas—The Chilean Experience:
Awarding subsidies through competitive bidding" , Public policy for the Private Sector,  Note 105,
February 1997, The World Bank Group,  at http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/notes/telecoms.htm .
Wellenius, Bjorn, "Telecommunications Reform How To Succeed" , Public policy for the Private Sector,
Note 130,  October 1997, The World Bank Group at
http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/notes/telecoms.htm .
Xavier, Patrick, "Price Setting and regulation for telecommunications in the absence of reliable and
detailed cost information", Telecommunications Policy , Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 213-233, 1997, c. Elsevier
Science Ltd.S/C/W/74
Page 16
ANNEX
Figure A1.  Telecommunicati ons service classification
MTN.GNS/W/120 UNCPC*
C. Telecommunication services
a. Voice telephone services 75217521 Public telephone services
75211 Public local telephone services - Switching and transmission
services necessary to establish and maintain communications within alocal calling area.  This service is primarily designed (used) to establishvoice communications, but may serve other applications such as text
communication (facsimile or teletex) and is generally provided for a flat
monthly fee independently of the number of calls made by the subscriber.Exclusions:  Private line services and rental services of terminal equipment
are classified in class 7522 (Business network services) and 7541(Equipment rental services), respectively.75212 Public long distance telephone services  - Switching and
transmission services necessary to establish and maintain communicationsbetween local calling areas.  This service is primarily designed (used) toestablish voice communications, but may serve other applications such astext communication (facsimile or teletex) and may be provided on a toll orflat rate basis.  This service provides the customer with access to thesupplier's and connecting carrier's entire telephone network or, in some
instances, to a limited number of exchange areas (WATS service).
b. Packet-switched data
transmission services  7523**c. Circuit-switched datatransmission services 7523**
d. Telex services 7523**7523 Data and message transmission services
75231 Data network services - Network services necessary to transmit data
between equipment using the same or different protocols.  This service canbe provided via a public or dedicated data network (i.e. via a networkdedicated to the customer's use).75232 Electronic message and information services - Network and related
services (hardware and software) necessary to send and receive electronicmessages (telegraph and telex/TWX services) and/or to access andmanipulate information in databases (so-called value-added networkservices).
e. Telegraph services  7522 7522 (see below)
f. Facsimile services 7521** and7529**7521 (see above)   7529  Other telecommunications services
75291 Paging services - The summoning of a person to the telephone
through the use of an electronic pager.  This subclass includes tone, voice
and digital display paging services.
75292 Teleconferencing services - Network and related services
necessary to hold a one-way or two-way fully interactive videoconference.75299 Other telecommunications services n.e.c. - Telecommunications
services, not elsewhere classified.  This class includes mobile maritime
and air-to-ground communications services.
g. Private leased circuit services
7522** and 7523**7523  (see above) 7522 Business network services
75221  Shared network services - Network services necessary to establish
telephone communications between selected (point-to-point or multi-point)locations (terminals) via a public (shared) network.  This type of service isprimarily used to establish long distance voice communications but someversions can also accommodate facsimile and date transmission.  It is
provided on a pay-as-you-use basis at discount rates over regular long
distance telephone charges.75222 Dedicated network services - Network services necessary to
establish telephone communications between selected (point-to-point ormulti-point) locations (terminals) via private line(s).  This type of serviceis primarily used to establish voice communications between distant PBX's
(tie line), between a distant location and a PBX (off premises extension),
between a PBX and a distant exchange area (foreign exchange) or betweenS/C/W/74
Page 17
MTN.GNS/W/120 UNCPC*
designated telephone sets, but may also accommodate data transmission.
It is provided on a lease basis.
h. Electronic mail  7323**
i. Voice mail 7323**j. On-line information and database retrieval 7323**
k. electronic data interchange
(EDI) 7323**l. enhanced/value-added facsimileservices, incl. Store and forward,
store and retrieve 7323**7523 (see above)
m. code and protocol conversion n.a.
n. on-line information and/or data
processing (incl.transactionprocessing) 843**843 Data processing services
8431 84310 Input preparation services - Data recording services such
as key punching, optical scanning or other methods for data entry.8432 84320 Data-processing and tabulation services - Services such
as data processing and tabulation services, computer calculating services,and rental services of computer time.
8433 84330 Time-sharing services - This seems to be the same type of
services as 84320.  Computer time is bought;  if it is bought from the
customer's premises, telecommunications services are also bought.  Dataprocessing or tabulation services may also be bought from a servicebureau.  In both cases the services might be time sharing processed.  Thus,there is no clear distinction between 84320 and 84330.
o. other n.a.
* United Nations Provisional Central Product Classification, Statistical Papers, Series M, No. 77, 1991.
** Indicates that the service specified constitutes only a part of the total range of activities covered by the CPC concordance
 (e.g. voice mail is only a component of CPC item 7523).S/C/W/74
Page 18
Table A1. Level of commitments by sector and mode of supply1
Cross border Consumption abroadCommercial
presence2.C TelecommunicationServices
In per cent of listed sub-sectors
MARKET ACCESSNo.
Listed
Full Partial None Full Partial None Full Partial None
a Voice Telephone Services 65 1 27 8 9 3 15 81 11 18 8 2
b. Packet-Switched Data
Transmission Services59 19 75 7 42 51 7 10 90 0
c. Circuit-Switched Data
Transmission Services60 18 73 8 42 50 8 10 88 2
d. Telex Services 59 20 75 5 47 45 7 11 89 0
e. Telegraph Services 43 19 72 9 49 42 9 9 91 0
f. Facsimile Services 55 18 75 7 44 49 7 11 87 2
g. Private Leased Circuit Services 55 16 80 4 42 55 4 11 89 0
h. Electronic Mail 52 3 56 0 6 4 64 21 21 77 9 4
i. Voice Mail 48 35 58 6 44 48 8 17 81 2
j. On-line Information and Data
Base Retrieval54 3 16 1 7 4 44 31 31 77 8 6
k. Electronic Data Interchange
(EDI)45 36 58 7 51 42 7 20 76 4
l. Enhanced/Value-Added Facsimile
Services43 3 75 6 7 4 94 01 22 17 4 5
m. Code and Protocol Conversion 42 31 60 10 48 48 5 19 79 2
n. On-line Information and/or data
processing40 33 55 13 50 35 15 18 80 3
o. Other, Terrestrial-based Mobile 61 8 7 91 33 06 11 01 38 7 0
o. Other, Satellite-based Mobile 23 9 87 4 28 68 4 8 92 0
o. Other, other 42 5 8 61 01 08 11 0 2 9 3 5
NATIONAL TREATMENT Full Partial None Full Partial None Full Partial None
a. Voice Telephone Services 65 23 65 12 26 63 11 17 77 6
b Packet-Switched Data
Transmission Services59 37 53 10 39 54 7 34 63 3
c. Circuit-Switched Data
Transmission Services60 37 52 12 40 50 10 30 65 5
d. Telex Services 59 40 55 5 44 47 9 31 65 4
e. Telegraph Services 43 4 05 1 9 4 24 71 23 36 5 2
f. Facsimile Services 55 40 55 5 44 49 7 31 64 5
g. Private Leased Circuit Services 55 36 56 7 40 55 5 27 65 7
h.  Electronic Mail 52 5 04 4 6 4 44 01 54 84 6 6
i Voice Mail 48 4 64 8 6 4 64 21 34 25 4 4
j. On-line Information and Data
Base Retrieval54 5 24 1 7 4 83 51 74 84 4 7
k. Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) 45 5 63 8 7 5 33 61 14 94 2 9
l. Enhanced/Value-Added Facsimile
Services43 5 63 7 7 5 13 31 65 14 2 7
m. Code and Protocol Conversion 42 50 40 10 50 40 10 48 45 7
n. On-line Information and/or data
processing40 55 33 13 53 28 20 55 38 8
o. Other, Terrestrial-based Mobile 61 21 66 13 25 64 11 20 74 7
o. Other, Satellite-based Mobile 23 19 74 8 21 74 6 15 79 6
o. Other, other 42 7 8 31 01 08 01 0 7 8 8 5
Source:  WTO
Legend: FULL = No limitations listed, Partial = Limitations listed None = No commitments taken on this mode
1 Data in this table does not take into account horizontal measures listed in schedules. As such, Mode 4, movement of natural
persons is not included in this table because commitments on this mode are essentially determined by the horizontal
measures .S/C/W/74
Page 19
Table A2. Market access, types of limitations by sector and mode of supply listed1,
Market access limitations2.C Telecommunication services Modeacdefg
CB 5 4 1 11
CA 1 4 1 8 a. Voice Telephone Services
CP 38 1 22 23 38
CB 5 4 1 8
CA 2 4 1 6 b. Packet-Switched Data Transmission Services
CP 24 1 22 17 32
CB 3 4 2 8
CA 2 4 1 6 c. Circuit-Switched Data Transmission Services
CP 23 1 19 18 31
CB 2 3 2 7
CA 1 3 1 5 d. Telex Services
CP 22 1 20 17 27
CB 2 3 1 6
CA 1 3 1 5 e. Telegraph Services
CP 18 1 18 13 24
CB 2 2 2 7
CA 1 2 1 4 f. Facsimile Services
CP 16 1 17 15 28
CB 2 4 2 8
CA 1 4 1 6 g. Private Leased Circuit Services
CP 20 1 18 16 31
CB 3 7
CA 1 1 h. Electronic Mail
CP 14 1 8 7 19
CB 3 4
CA 1 1 i. Voice Mail
CP 13 1 7 8 16
CB 3 5
CA 1 2 j. On-line Information and Data Base Retrieval
CP 12 1 8 9 18
CB 2 4
CA 1 1 k. Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
CP 9 1 4 5 14
CB 2 4
CA 1 l. Enhanced/Value-Added Facsimile Services
CP 10 1 5 6 16
CB 2 3
CA 1 1 m. Code and Protocol Conversion
CP 9 1 3 5 13
CB 3 5
CA 1 1 n. On-line Information and/or data processing
CP 10 1 6 4 13
CB 4 4 2 11
CA 1 4 1 8o. Other
- Terrestrial-based MobileCP 30 1 20 21 33
CB 2 4 2 9
CA 1 4 1 6 - Satellite-based Mobile
CP 24 1 20 18 31
Source:  WTO
Legend: CB - Cross border supply
CA – Consumption abroad
CP - Commercial presencea) Number of suppliers
c) Number of operationsd) Number of natural persons
e) Types of legal entity
f) Participation of foreign capitalg) Other measures
1 Data in this table does not take into account horizontal measures listed in schedules. As such, Mode 4, movement of natural
persons is not included in this table because commitments on this mode are essentially determined by the horizontal
measures .S/C/W/74
Page 20
Table A3. National treatment, types of measures by sector and mode of supply1
National treatment limitations2.C. Telecommunication Services Modeade fghl
CB 1 6 4 4 4
CA 6 4 4 4 a. Voice Telephone Services
CP 1 12 5 3 1 5 5
CB 1 6 4 4 4
CA 6 4 4 4 b. Packet-Switched Data Transmission Services
CP 1 10 5 2 1 5 5
CB 1 7 4 4 4
CA 6 4 4 4 c. Circuit-Switched Data Transmission Services
CP 1 11 5 2 1 5 5
CB 1 7 4 4 4
CA 6 4 4 4 d. Telex Services
CP 1 13 4 1 1 5 5
CB 1 6 4 4 4
CA 6 4 4 4 e. Telegraph Services
CP 1 11 4 1 1 5 5
CB 1 7 4 4 4
CA 6 4 4 4 f. Facsimile Services
CP 1 12 4 1 1 4 5
CB 1 7 4 4 4
CA 6 4 4 4 g. Private Leased Circuit Services
CP 1 10 4 1 1 4 5
CB 1 1
CA 1 1 h. Electronic Mail
CP 4 1 1
CB 1 1
CA 1 1 i. Voice Mail
CP 5 1 1
CB 1 1
CA 1 1 j. On-line Information and Data Base Retrieval
CP 5 1
CB 1 1
CA 1 1 k. Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
CP 4 1
CB 1 1
CA 1 1 l. Enhanced/Value-Added Facsimile Services
CP 4 1 1
CB 1
CA 1 m. Code and Protocol Conversion
CP 3 1
CB 1
CA 1 n. On-line Information and/or data processing
CP 2 1
CB 1 7 4 4 4
CA 6 4 4 4o. Other
 - Terrestrial-based MobileCP 1 12 5 3 1 6 4
CB 1 7 4 4 4
CA 6 4 4 4  - Satellite-based Mobile
CP 1 9 4 1 1 5 4
Source:  WTO
Legend:
CB – Cross border supply
CA – Consumption abroad
CP – Commercial presencea) Tax measures
d) Nationality requirementse) Residency requirements
f) Licensing, standards, qualifications
g) Registration requirementsh) Authorization requirements
l) Ownership of property/land
1 Data in this table does not take into account horizontal measures listed in schedules. As such, Mode 4, movement of natural
persons is not included in this table because commitments on this mode are essentially determined by the horizontal
measures .S/C/W/74
Page 21Table A4.  Top 20 public te lecommunication operators , ranked by 1997 revenue
Rank Telecom revenue Net income Employees
97 96 Operator (Country)Total
(US$
million)Change
(96-97)Total
(US$
million)Change
(96-97)Total
(000s)Change
(96-97)
1 1 NTT (Japan) a 71'591 7.1% 2'196 15.3% 230.0 * -0.4%
2 2 AT&T (United States) 51'319 1.5% 4'638 -21.5% 127.8 0.9%
3 3 Deutsche Telekom (Germ.) 37'694 7.1% 1'843 87.9% 216.0 -5.9%
4 16 Bell Atlantic (United States) b 30'194 3.6% 2'455 -27.8% 62.6 1.3%
5 5 BT (United Kingdom) a 26'277 4.7% 2'908 -17.6% 124.7 -2.2%
6 4 France Télécom (France) 26'174 3.6% 2'482 605.4% 165.0 0.2%
7 14 SBC (United States) c 24'856 6.0% 1'474 -55.0% 118.3 7.7%
8 7 Telecom Italia (Italy) 24'204 9.9% 1'949 12.5% 126.1 -0.2%
9 6 GTE (United States) 23'260 9.0% 2'794 -0.1% 114.0 11.8%
10 8 BellSouth (United States) 20'561 8.0% 3'261 13.9% 81.0 -0.3%
11 9 MCI (United States) 19'653 6.3% 149 -87.6% 60.0 8.5%
12 12 DGT (China) 17'154 1.5% … … 467.7 -2.8%
13 11 Ameritech (United States) 15'998 7.2% 2'296 7.6% 74.4 12.4%
14 10 Telefónica (Spain) 15'577 17.8% 1'253 18.6% 92.2 0.0%
15 17 US West (United States) 15'235 18.0% 697 -40.8% 67.5 -2.6%
16 13 Sprint (United States) 14'874 5.9% 953 -19.5% 49.0 2.1%
17 18 Telebras (Brazil) 14'158 23.7% 3'493 42.1% 87.3 -2.5%
18 19 Telstra (Australia) d 11'915 4.9% 1'205 -29.8% 66.1 -13.6%
19 22 DDI (Japan) a 8'190 * 51.8% -211 * ‡ … * …
20 23 KPN (Netherlands) 7'671 8.4% 962 9.4% 32.7 1.3%
TOP 20 476'554 6.9% 36'798 -4.0% 2'362.4 -0.4%
Note:
United States dollar values are obtained by using operator supplied exchange rate or ending period exchange rate. Net income is  after tax. Change in revenue and net income based on
local currency. * 1996 data. ‡ Net Income was negative in 1996 and/or 1997. ... not available. a Year beginning 1 April. b Merged with Nynex in August 1997. c Merged with Pacific
Telesis in April 1997. d Year ending 30 June.
Source:  International Telecommunication Union, PTO Database.S/C/W/74
Page 22Table A5. Top 25 international carriers, ranked by internatio nal telecommunications revenue
Rank
1997Company International
revenue ($m)Outgoing
MiTT(m. minutes)Change in
MiTT
(1996-97)Total
Revenues
($m 1997)Profit/loss
before tax
($m 1997)Number of
employeesEmployee
change
(1996-97)Revenue per
employee
(US$)State
ownership
1A T & T18,200210,290 9% 51,319 6,968 128,000 -2% 400,930 0%
2 Deutsche Telekom15,200 5,333 5% 37,529 3,998 191,034 -5% 196,451 74%
3 Cable & Wireless 4,99322,065 N.A. 11,668 3,640 46,550 20% 250,662 0%
4M C I13,40025,907 10% 19,653 299 60,409 8% 325,332 0%
5 BT 2,588 3,735 20% 26,067 5,367 124,700 -2% 209,035 0%
6 China Telecom 2,35521,632 14% 15,821 - 970,000 -24% 16,311 100%
7 France Telecom 2,106 3,200 6% 26,122 3,313 165,042 0% 158,274 75%
8 KDD 1,864 1,196 3% 2,708 67 5,275 -2% 513,334 0%
9 Sprint 1,63622,759 11% 14,873 952 47,500 -1% 313,116 0%
10 Telecom Italia11,605 2,381 12% 16,721 2,483 82,317 -5% 203,129 5%
11 Telmex 1,432 1,184 6% 7,534 2,679 54,758 -1% 137,592 0%
12 Stentor11,39121,778 8% 9,939 1,320 77,000 -9% 129,074 3%
13 Swisscom11,386 2,093 9% 6,931 -61 22,170 1% 312,622 100%
14 Singapore Telecom 1,263 753 22% 3,051 1,576 10,793 4% 282,648 80%
15 WorldCom11,24921,400 65% 7,351 799 14,700 25% 500,068 0%
16 Teleglobe 1,05021,112 22% 1,400 211 1,204 -56% 1,162,557 0%
17 KPN Telecom 1,031 488 6% 7,622 1,722 32,709 1% 233,030 44%
18 Telstra 914 705 1% 11,458 2,959 57,122 -16% 200,593 66%
19 Telefonica de Espana 882 1,566 32% 10,509 1,013 62,666 -7% 167,694 0%
20 VSNL 778 428 11% 1,630 362 2,861 0% 569,663 65%
21 Korea Telecom 686 657 27% 4,834 76 59,753 -1% 80,903 71%
22 Chunghwa Telecom 684 826 11% 5,272 1,355 34,748 -3% 151,727 100%
23 Telia Group 6752747 6% 5,827 506 33,930 0% 171,746 100%
24 Telintar 646 183 3% 646 150 700 1% 922,351 0%
25 Telkom 585 306 5% 4,024 707 57,813 0% 69,603 70%
Source:  CommunicationsWeek International ,  23 November 1998
Figures are for the 1997 financial year.  Figures for the United Kingdom, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, India, South Africa, M alaysia and Ireland are for year ending 31 March 1998.
Figures for Telintar are for year ending September.  Figures are converted to US dollars at company financial year-end.  Domest ic operators are excluded.
Notes:
1Yankee Group estimates
2Figures from TeleGeography Inc., Washington DC
N.A.= Not availableS/C/W/74
Page 23
Table A6. Top 20 fixed telephone line operators , ranked by 1997 main telephone lines
Rank Main telephone lines Local telephone service revenue
97 96 Operator (Country)Total
(000s)
1997Change
(96-97)Total
(US$
million)
1997Change
(96-97)As % of
revenue
1997
1 2 DGT (China) 70'310 28.0% $ 6'491* 48.8% 37.1%
2 1 NTT (Japan) a 60'380 -1.8% $ 15'382* 5.4% 21.6%
33Deutsche Telekom
(Germany)45'200 2.3% $ 6'696 7.8% 17.8%
4 8 Bell Atlantic (United States) 39'714 3.7% $ 13'113 4.4% 43.4%
5 4 France Télécom (France) 33'700 1.5% $ 4'326 20.3% 16.5%
6 16 SBC (United States) 33'440 5.0% $ 9'568 9.3% 38.5%
7 5 BT (United Kingdom) a 27'651 0.4% $ 4'968 5.2% 18.9%
8 6 Telecom Italia (Italy) 25'698 1.7% $ 5'579 10.0% 33.3%
9 7 BellSouth (United States) 23'201 4.8% $ 8'499 5.2% 41.3%
10 9 GTE (United States) 21'539 7.7% $ 5'531 7.6% 26.7%
11 10 Ameritech (United States) 20'544 4.3% $ 6'413 5.7% 40.1%
12 11 KT (Korea (Rep.)) 20'422 4.2% $ 2'132 4.5% 46.0%
13 15 US West (United States) 16'033 3.9% $ 5'021 5.3% 49.8%
14 14 Telefónica (Spain) 15'854 2.9% $ 6'644 6.3% 62.8%
15 17 Türk Telekom (Turkey) 15'744 10.2% $ 1'435* 169.5% 74.0%
16 18 Telebras (Brazil) 15'407 14.1% $ 7'492 98.7% 40.4%
17 19 DOT (India) a 14'395 24.8% …* … …
18 20 Bell Canada (Canada) 10'607 3.3% $ 3'026 10.1% 46.8%
19 21Chungwa Telecom (Taiwan-
China) b10'429 8.9% $ 784* 9.1% 13.7%
20 22 Telstra (Australia) b 9'350 2.0% $ 1'297 0.8% 11.3%
TOP 20 529'619 6.5% 114'397 11.4% 30.3%
Note: Equity-based domestic subscribers and revenue. United States dollar values are obtained
by using operator supplied exchange rate or ending period exchange rate. Change in revenue
based on local currency. The definition of local telephone service revenue differs among
operators (e.g., subscription charges only, subscription and local call charges, etc. ) * 1996 data.
... not available. a Year beginning 1 April. b Year ending 30 June.
Source: International Telecommunication Union.S/C/W/74
Page 24
Table A7.  Top 20 mobile cellular operators, ranked by 1997 subscribers
Rank Cellular subscribers Mobile revenue
97 96 Operator (Country)(000s)
1997Change
(96-97)(US$
million)
1997Change
(96-97)As % of
revenue
1997
1 1 NTT (Japan) a 19'240* 14.5% 16'403* 59.8% 23%
2 5 DGT (China) 13'229 93.1% 3'334* 81.9% 23%
3 3 TIM (Italy) 9'278 62.6% 5'345 28.7% 100%
4 2 AT&T (United States) 6'000 15.4% 4'337 10.3% 8%
5 4 SBC (United States) 5'493 23.9% 3'034 15.1% 12%
6 6 BANM (United States) 5'356 21.5% 2'859 17.2% 100%
7 15 SK Telecom (Korea (Rep.)) 4'571 58.1% 2'090 31.2% 100%
8 7 GTE (United States) 4'487 19.7% 2'742 10.5% 12%
9 13 DDI (Japan) a 4'329 26.4% 4'296* 56.1% 52%
10 11 AirTouch (United States) 4'309 26.6% 2'363 19.1% 100%
11 8 BellSouth (United States) 4'193 15.1% 3'555 27.0% 17%
12 21 Telebras (Brazil) 4'023 64.1% 3'762 62.8% 20%
13 12Deutsche Telekom
(Germany)3'752 39.6% 2'776 19.0% 7%
14 18 Mannesmann (Germany) 3'542 54.0% 3'118 32.8% 100%
15 9Vodafone (United
Kingdom) a3'400 18.6% 2'977 13.5% 100%
16 24 Telefónica (Spain) 3'187 35.9% 2'395 40.3% 15%
17 14 Ameritech (United States) 3'177 26.5% 1'760 31.0% 11%
18 10 BT (United Kingdom) a b 3'077 14.0% 1'830 14.8% 7%
19 23 France Télécom (France) 3'000 92.3% 2'851 52.0% 11%
20 16 Telstra (Australia) c 2'777 21.6% 1'477 16.2% 12%
TOP 20 110'420 34.3% 73'304 25.0% 19%
Note: Equity-based domestic subscribers and revenue.  United States dollar values are obtained by using
operator supplied exchange rate or ending period exchange rate. Change in revenue based on local currency.
The definition of mobile revenue differs among operators (e.g., cellular only, cellular and paging, cellularand equipment sales, etc. ) 
* 1996 data. a Year beginning 1 April. b BT owns 60% of Cellnet. The total
number of Cellnet subscribers is shown while the revenue shown is for BT only. c Year ending 30 June.
Source: International Telecommunication Union.S/C/W/74
Page 25
Table A8. Summary of Specific Commit ments on Telecommunications Services
a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. 01. 02. 03
Antigua and
BarbudaXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Argentina XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX
Australia XXXX XXXXXXXX XX
Austria XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX
Bangladesh XXXXXXX XXX
Barbados XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Belize XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Bolivia XXXXXXX XX
Brazil* XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Brunei
DarussalamXX XXX X X X
Bulgaria XXXXXXX X XX XXX
Canada XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Chile XXXXXXXX X XXX
Colombia XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Congo RP X
Côte d'Ivoire XXXXXXX XXX
Cuba XXXXXX X
Czech Republic XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Djibouti XXXXX X X XXX
Dominica* XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Dominican
RepublicXXXXXXX XXX
Ecuador X XXXXXXXX
El Salvador XXXX XX XXX
European
CommunityXXXXXXXXXXX X XX
Finland XXXXXXXXXXX X XX
Gambia XXXX XXXXXXX
Ghana XXXXXXX XXX
Grenada XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX
Guatemala* XXXXXXX XX
Guyana X
Hong Kong XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX
Hungary XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Iceland XXXXXXXXXXX X XX
India X X XXXXX X XX
Indonesia XXXXX XX XXXX
Israel XXXX XXXXXXX XX
Jamaica XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Japan XXXX XXXXXXXXX X
Kenya X X
Korea RP XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Kyrgyz Republic XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Latvia*XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Lesotho X XXXXX
Liechtenstein XXXXXXXX X
Malaysia XXXXXXXXXX XX XXX
Mauritius XXXXXXX XXX
Mexico XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX
Mongolia XXXXXXX
Morocco XX X XXXXXX XXX
New Zealand XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Nicaragua XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Nigeria X XXXXXXXX X
Norway XXXXXXXXXXXX XX
Pakistan XXXXXXX X XXXX
Panama XXXXXXX X
Papua New
Guinea*XXXXXXX XX
Peru XXXXXXXXXX X XXXX
Philippines* XXXXXX XXX X X
Poland XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX
Romania XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXS/C/W/74
Page 26
a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. 01. 02. 03
Saint Kitts &
NevisXX X
Senegal XXXX XXX X XXX
Singapore XXX XXXXX XXX
Slovak Republic XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Slovenia XXX XX
South Africa XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX
Sri Lanka XXX X XX
Suriname XXXX XX XXX
Sweden XXXXXXXXXXX X XX
Switzerland XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X
Thailand XX X X XX XX
Trinidad and
TobagoXXXXX X XXXXXXXX
Tunisia XX X XXX
Turkey XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Uganda**XXXXXXX XXX
USA XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Venezuela XXX X XXX
Zimbabwe XX X XXXXXXX X
Total 69 63 64 59 47 59 59 55 51 57 48 46 45 43 65 57 46
Source:  WTO
*Entry into force subject to acceptance, which is pending.
**Entry into force anticipated on 24 December 1998.
Note:  The GATS services commitments database does not yet include the schedules of Latvia and Krygyz Republic or the
basic telecom commitments of Barbados and Uganda.  These have been manually inserted into this table but are not reflectedin Tables A1 – A3.
Key:
a. Voice Telephone Services
b. Packet-Switched Data Transmission Services
c. Circuit-Switched Data Transmission Services
d. Telex Servicese. Telegraph Servicesf. Facsimile Servicesg. Private Leased Circuit Services
h. Electronic Mail
i. Voice Mailj. On-line Information and Data Base Retrievalk. Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
l. Enhanced/Value-Added Facsimile Services
m. Code and Protocol Conversionn. On-line Information and/or data processing01. Terrestrial- based mobile
02. Satellite-based mobile
03. Other, other.
__________