RESTRICTEDWORLD  TRADE
ORGANIZATIONWT/TPR/S/85
7 May 2001
(01-2211)
Trade Policy Review Body
TRADE POLICY REVIEW
OECS-WTO MEMBERS
Report by the Secretariat
This report, prepared for the first Trade Policy Review of the OECS-WTO
Members, has been drawn up by the WTO Secretariat on its own responsibility.
The Secretariat has, as required by the Agreement establishing the Trade Policy
Review Mechanism (Annex 3 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the
World Trade Organization), sought clarification from the Governments of the
OECS Members on its trade policies and practices under review:  Antigua and
Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia and Saint
Vincent and the Grenadines.
Individual reports for each of these Members are contained in separate
documents in the same series WT/TPR/S/85 with suffixes ATG, DMA, GRD,
KNA, LCA and VCT.
Any technical questions arising from this report may be addressed to
Mr. A. Silvy (tel. 739 52 49) or Mr. R. Valdés (tel. 739 53 46) in the
Trade Policies Review Division, or Mr. S. Delgado (tel. 739 50 22) in the
Technical Cooperation Division.
Document WT/TPR/G/85 contains the policy statement submitted by the
Governments of the OECS Members.
Note: This report is subject to restricted circulation and press embargo until the end of the meeting
of the Trade Policy Review Body on the OECS-WTO Members.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page iii
CONTENTS
Page
SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS vii(1) I
NTRODUCTION vii
(2) E CONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL  FRAMEWORK vii
(3) M ARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS viii
(4) S ECTORAL POLICIES ix
(5) O UTLOOK x
I. ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 1
(1) M AIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS 1
(i) Introduction 1
(ii) Structure of the economies 3
(iii) Macroeconomic developments 4(iv) Fiscal policy 5(v) Monetary policy 7(vi) Balance of payments 8
(2) D
EVELOPMENTS IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT 9
(3) O UTLOOK 10
II. TRADE POLICY REGIME 10
(1) I NTRODUCTION 10
(2) P OLICY OBJECTIVES AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 11
(i) World Trade Organization 11(ii) Regional agreements 13
(3) T
HE OECS M EMBERS , THE WTO, AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION 15
III. MARKET ACCESS IN GOODS 17
(1) I NTRODUCTION 17
(2) T ARIFFS AND OTHER PRICE-BASED MEASURES 18
(i) Customs valuation 18
(ii) MFN import duties 18
(iii) Preferential tariffs and rules of origin 23(iv) Other duties and charges 24
(3) N
ON-TARIFF MEASURES 25
(i) Import prohibitions, restrictions and licensing 25(ii) Safeguards 26
(iii) Anti-dumping and countervailing measures 27
(4) G
OVERNMENT PROCUREMENT 27WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page iv
Page
IV. OTHER MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE 28
(1) I NTRODUCTION 28
(2) E XPORT MEASURES 28
(3) S TANDARDS AND TECHNICAL REGULATIONS 29
(4) M ARKET COMPETITION 30
(i) Marketing boards and price controls 30
(ii) Competition policy and regulatory issues 32(iii) Assistance to activities 32(iv) Intellectual property rights 33
V. INVESTMENT AND MARKET ACCESS IN SERVICES 35
(1) I
NTRODUCTION 35
(2) F INANCIAL SERVICES 37
(3) T ELECOMMUNICATIONS 38
(4) O THER OFFSHORE SERVICES 39
(5) T OURISM 40
(6) T RANSPORTATION 41
(i) Maritime transport and related services 41
(ii) Air transport 41OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page v
CHARTS
Page
I. ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
I.1 Eastern Caribbean States 1
TABLES
I. ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
I.1 Basic economic and social indicators, 1995-2000 2
I.2 Gross domestic product by economic activity, at factor cost 4I.3 Basic macroeconomic indicators, 1996-2000 6I.4 Taxes on international trade as a share of tax revenue and total imports, 1999 7I.5 Balance-of-payments:  current account 1995-99 9
II. TRADE POLICY REGIME
II.1 Notification by OECS countries, 1995-2000 12III. MARKET ACCESS IN GOODSIII.1 CARICOM tariff reduction programme 19
III.2 Implementation of the CET in the OECS 19III.3 List of exceptions to the CET 20
III.4 Customs services charges in the OECS, 2000 20
III.5 OECS summary analysis of import duties 21III.6 WTO bound tariff rates, 2000 22III.7 CARICOM rules of origin 23III.8 Consumption tax, 2000 24
IV. OTHER MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE
IV.1 Standards and technical regulations adopted, 2000 30
IV.2 Marketing boards, 2000 30IV.3 Price controls, 2000 31IV.4 Membership in international instruments on intellectual property rights 34IV.5 Intellectual property rights legislation 34
IV.6 Terms of intellectual property rights protection 35
V. INVESTMENT AND MARKET ACCESS IN SERVICES 35V.1 Sector-specific commitments under the GATS 36
V.2 Tourism statistics, 1999 40OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page vii
SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS
(1) INTRODUCTION
1. Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica,
Grenada, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and St.
Vincent and the Grenadines (OECS-WTO
Members) are small, independent island Stateswith close links to each other in trade;  they
are all members of the Organization of
Eastern Caribbean States (OECS).  As a
group, they are among the better-off
developing-country Members of the WTO, withan average per capita income of about
US$6,500.  This is linked to their intensive
participation in international trade, which,
despite shortcomings in their trade regimes,
has allowed services exports to grow andimports to meet most of their domestic needs.
2. OECS-WTO Members are successfully
moving away from reliance on agriculture to
tertiary activities, notably tourism and
offshore services.  Nevertheless, they remain
vulnerable to external shocks;  this
vulnerability is in part due to local productionpatterns sometimes reflecting long-standing
unilateral preferences granted by a few
trading partners.  Some distortions have also
been introduced through a number of domestic
measures to favour certain activities at thecost of others.  Over time, long-term
international competitiveness has been
reduced and "high cost" economies have
emerged.
3. The six Members under review apply
CARICOM's Common Customs Tariff;  in
practice, although import duties (tariffs plus
customs taxes) have been lowered in recent
years, they remain relatively high and
vary across countries.  This reflects theirrelatively fragile individual fiscal positions,
and pressure from domestic groups seeking
benefits through increased tariff protection
or concessions.  Moreover, some non-price
trade measures remain in effect, notably
non-automatic licensing, local-content
requirements and import quotas.  None of theOECS-WTO Members grants direct exportsubsidies but tax concessions are awarded on
a case by case basis through investment
incentives that carry potentially large benefits
to recipients and costs to taxpayers.
4. OECS-WTO Members determine and
implement trade policy within a multi-layeredstructure in which domestic, OECS,
CARICOM and multilateral considerations
strive for harmony.  The entry into force of the
WTO has brought new rules that are yet to be
fully incorporated into the domestic statutes ofall the OECS Members;  most of them have
also lagged in meeting their notification
obligations.  A more active participation of
these countries in the WTO would be to the
benefit of all, not least to the OECS-WTOMembers themselves, whose national interests
are best protected within the context of a
strong multilateral system.  The administrative
costs of such participation and the limited
resources that these Members could deploy
suggests, perhaps, the delegation of greater
responsibilities to regional structures, buildingon their experience within the OECS on trade
issues and the Eastern Caribbean Central
Bank on monetary policy.
(2) E
CONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL 
FRAMEWORK
5. The economies of the OECS-WTO
Members are characterized by a recurrent
shortage of savings over investment;  they
require substantial capital inflows to finance
deficits in their external current account,which range to 20-30% of GDP.  Growth has
varied considerably in the last decade:  given
the small size of the economies a natural
disaster can lead to a recession, and
subsequent reconstruction to a boom.Although growth rates differ considerably
across these countries, on average they have
been in the 3-4% a year range.  Inflation has
in general been low in recent years, at levels
reflecting international inflation.
6. The OECS-WTO Members participate
in the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union(ECCU).  Since 1976, the Eastern CaribbeanWT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page viii
Central Bank (ECCB), based in St. Kitts,
responsible for monetary and foreign
exchange policy for the OECS, keeping the EC
dollar pegged to the U.S. dollar at a rate of
EC$2.70 per US$.  Each country's fiscal
policy has generally been geared at obtainingan operational (current account) surplus.  The
overall fiscal balances of the OECS countries
are in deficit, largely due to substantial capital
expenditure linked to public projects.
7. The small size of OECS-WTO
Members makes them vulnerable to
diseconomies of scale, both in the production
of goods and the provision of government and
other services. Participation in the integrated
regional market bei ng created by CARICOM
seeks to address this problem.  OECS-WTO
Members are also faced with high labour and
transportation costs, and are exposed to the
effects of hurricanes.  Exports suffer from
these high costs and take place almost
exclusively under preferential conditions,
mostly to the European Union, theUnited States, and other CARICOM members;
the main import sources are the United States,
the United Kingdom, and CARICOM.
8. Most OECS-WTO Members have
experienced difficulties meeting their WTOnotification requirements, as well as in
amending their national legislation to conform
to the WTO Agreements.  The main reason
seems to be the lack of human resources and
adequate infrastructure.  Since the beginningof this Review, however, some OECS-WTO
Members, in particular Dominica and St.
Lucia, have made a serious effort to meet
WTO notification requirements.  Although
most OECS-WTO Members have made effortsto amend national legislation, further
amendments are still necessary to reflect WTO
commitments, especially because WTO
Agreements may not be invoked directly in
domestic courts.
9. The review of the domestic
implementation of WTO Agreements revealsareas where support from the international
community would be of particular assistancein achieving a fuller degree of integration of
OECS-WTO Members into the multilateral
trading system and the global economy,
namely:  customs valuation;  import licensing;
contingency measures;  subsidies;  technical
barriers to trade;  sanitary and phytosanitarymeasures;  TRIPS;  agriculture;  and services.
Support could be provided through
institutional arrangements already in place
with bilateral partners;  at the regional level,
including the OECS and CARICOMSecretariats;  and the Inter-American
Development Bank (IADB).  Indeed, although
OECS countries are not members of the latter,
the IADB provided considerable financial
support in the preparation of this Review.Such collaboration demonstrated the
advantages of linking WTO technical
cooperation with existing arrangements to
avoid duplication and make activities more
efficient.
(3) M
ARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS
10. Although trade policy is in principle
coordinated at the OECS/CARICOM level, in
practice policy differences exist between
countries.  All OECS-WTO Members apply
CARICOM's Common External Tariff (CET)
to imports from third countries at rates of upto 35% for industrial products, and 40% for
agricultural goods.  However, import duties
vary considerably across Members, reflecting
the many allowances CARICOM makes for
tariff suspensions and reductions, and nationalexceptions to the CET.  Although a schedule of
reductions of the CET in four phases, to end in
1998, was established in 1991, few members
have complied fully.  Antigua and Barbuda,
and St. Kitts and Nevis have not reachedPhase IV due to fiscal problems;  Dominica is
expected to do so on 1 July 2001.  The
reduction of the CET has caused some
implementation problems in Grenada, where
import duties exceed WTO bound rates for
some products.
11. In general, OECS-WTO Members are
gradually moving away from an import-
substitution model, towards a more open andOECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page ix
liberal trade regime.  However, the OECS-
WTO Members' fiscal dependence on customs
duties and other charges on imports has
tended at times to slow down the pace of
liberalization.  In this respect, as tariffs have
been lowered in recent years, other duties andcharges, such as the customs service charge,
the consumption tax, and environmental taxes
have been increased;  this has countered the
market-access improvements from the lower
tariffs since, in a number of cases,Governments have attempted to make tariff
reductions revenue-neutral.  Moreover, in
some cases the customs service charge is as
high as 5%, and acts more as a tariff
surcharge than as a charge reflecting the costof processing imports.  With the exception of
St. Kitts and Nevis, OECS-WTO Members
have not recorded the customs service charge
in their WTO Tariff Schedules.
12. Under Article 56 of the CARICOM
Treaty, OECS-WTO Members apply
quantitative restrictions on a number ofproducts, in general to protect infant
industries.  These restrictions, which are
expected to be tariffied by end 2005, affect a
number of products, including beer and
aerated beverages, curry, and pasta, whichare included in Annex I of the WTO Agreement
on Agriculture.  Among OECS-WTO Members,
only Dominica has, since 1998, replaced most
quantitative restrictions with import duties.
Import licensing is widely used by all sixcountries for their trade with third countries.
A number of safeguard measures are also
applied under Article 29 of the CARICOM
Treaty;  these measures have not yet been
notified to the WTO.
13. Despite strained fiscal situations, all
OECS countries apply various wide-ranging
incentives programmes that result in tax
holidays, and the waiver of tariffs and other
charges on imports.  These programmes target
mainly manufacturing and service activities.
The duration of benefits is, in some cases,related to local value added.  Although the
incentives provided are generally for all
production and for a specific number of years,some fiscal advantages are also granted to
export earnings in manufacturing, after the tax
holiday period.
14. In customs valuation, while progress
has been made in some OECS countries
towards the use of the transaction value,others continue to use minimum import or
reference prices, reportedly due to widespread
under-invoicing.  Standards bodies have been
established in each of the OECS-WTO
Members;  these bodies act independently andtheir degree of development varies.  Most
OECS-WTO have adopted, or are in the
process of adopting, new laws in the areas
covered by the TRIPS Agreement, but some
still apply legislation pre-dating the WTO.
(4) S
ECTORAL POLICIES
15. OECS-WTO Members have service-
oriented economies.  Tourism is the most
important economic activity, followed by
offshore financial and other services, which,
combined, provide more than half of the
foreign exchange earnings of these countries.Recent international pressure has resulted in
amendments to the legislation governing the
offshore service industry.  The stated goal of
some OECS-WTO Members is to phase out the
distinction between on-shore and offshoreactivities, by having a uniform set of
regulations.  Incentives are used in tourism, to
promote the construction and renovation of
hotels, and tax exemptions are granted to
providers of  offshore services.  A phased-outliberalization of the telecommunications
industry, to be concluded in late 2002,
has been put in place recently, and a
specialized agency, the Eastern Caribbean
Telecommunications Authority (ECTEL)has been created to regulate the
telecommunications industries of Dominica,
Grenada, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and St.
Vincent and the Grenadines, in coordination
with the respective national regulatory
agencies.  In Antigua and Barbuda the market
is controlled by two operators, and there areplans to partly privatize one of them.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page x
16. Agriculture is in decline but still
significant.  Following quality problems and
an erosion of preferences, the Windward
Islands' (Dominica, Grenada, St. Lucia, and
St. Vincent and the Grenadines), traditional
dependence on bananas for export earningshas been declining in recent years, although
they remain the main crop in Dominica, St.
Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines.  In
Grenada, where nutmeg is the main crop,
banana production has been phased downdrastically.  In St. Kitts and Nevis, the sugar
industry's future is under consideration given
the high costs of production.  Manufacturing
activities play a small albeit gradually
growing role in the economies of the OECScountries.
17. All OECS-WTO Members have made
commitments under the GATS in hotel
construction and management, subject to
number-of-room limitations, as well as in
recreational and sporting services;  all except
St. Kitts and Nevis made commitments inreinsurance.  Commitment in other areas vary
according to the country and are, in general,
relatively limited.  Commercial presence is in
general open to foreign investment in most
service areas, but restrictions still exist forspecific activities, either reserved for nationals
or subject to additional requirements for
foreigners.(5) O
UTLOOK
18. In the OECS-WTO Members, tourism
is expected to remain the main driving force of
growth, particularly through its effect on
investment.  GDP is estimated to expand by
some 4% a year in 2001-03.  Althoughagriculture is likely to recover, the economies
of the OECS countries should continue shifting
towards tertiary activities.  Policy initiatives in
areas such as tariff reductions will continue to
be constrained by the fragile fiscal position;despite this, there seem to be no plans to
rationalize the use of investment incentives.
The external current account is likely to
remain under pressure as imports expand
faster than exports.
19. OECS Members are expected to
continue to implement of the CET reductions
in the near future.  In countries where this
process has been completed, however, no
further tariff reductions are envisaged.  By end
2005, OECS Members are scheduled to
dismantle all quantitative restrictions andreplace them with tariffs.  With respect to
WTO implementation, OECS Members intend
to carry on required legal and institutional
changes where they lag behind, and
consolidate and make operational thosealready introduced.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 1
I. ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
(1) MAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS
(i) Introduction
1. Antigua and Barbuda;  Dominica;  Grenada;  St. Kitts and Nevis;  St. Lucia;  and St. Vincent
and the Grenadines, are all island States in the Lesser Antilles, located in an arc between Puerto Rico
and Trinidad and Tobago (Chart I.1).  The six countries have a combined area of some 2,800 squarekilometres and a total population of only about 540,000.  They are often divided in two geographical
groups:  the Windward Islands (Dominica, Grenada, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines)
and the Leeward Islands (Antigua and Barbuda, and St. Kitts and Nevis).
Chart I.1  Eastern Caribbean States
2. The six countries under review are members of  the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States
(OECS).  The seventh OECS full member is Montserrat, which is not a WTO member;  Anguilla and
the British Virgin Islands are associate OECS Members.  The six OECS-WTO Members (OECSMembers hereafter) account for about 98% of the GDP generated by this Organization's full members.
Overall, OECS Members have made good use of their particular advantages, having achieved the
relatively high average income of about US$6,500 per capita (based on 1999 data).  By this measure,
they are among the better-off WTO developing countries.  Building on their location and on the skillsWT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 2
of a relatively well educated population, they have developed a dynamic services sector, in particular
tourism and financial activities.
3. The individual economies of the OECS Members are small in absolute terms:  in 1999, GDP
ranged from about US$266 million in Dominica to US$667 million in St. Lucia (Table I.1).
Compared with larger economies, their size make s policy formulation in OECS Members potentially
more supple, reduces transaction costs, and permits greater flexibility in the re-allocation of resources
across activities.  Moreover, even modest foreign investment and outside aid can have sizeable
benefits on the local economies.  OECS Members have some of the world's highest ratios of aid per
capita.
Table I.1
Basic economic and social indicators, 1995-2000
Area (km2)C a p i t a lDate of
IndependenceLife
expectancy
(years),
1998Fertility
rate (per
woman),
1998Urban
population
(% of total)Aid
per capita
(US$),
1998
Antigua and Barbuda 440 St. Johns 1 Nov.1981 75 2 36 148
Dominica 751 Roseau 3 Nov. 1978 76 2 70 267
Grenada 344 St. George's 7 Feb. 1974 72 3 37 64
St. Kitts and Nevis 269 Basseterre 19 Sept. 1983 72 2 38 40
St. Lucia 616 Castries 22 Feb. 1979 70 2 34 161
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 389 Kingstown 27 Oct. 1979 73 2 52 181
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Population (thousands)
OECS-WTO Members 524 529 534 536 540
Antigua and Barbuda 66 66 67 67 67
Dominica 71 72 72 73 73
Grenada 92 93 94 95 96
St. Kitts and Nevis 41 42 42 43 44
St. Lucia 142 144 145 146 147
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 112 113 114 112 113
GDP (US$ million)
OECS-WTO Members 2,176.3 2,167.1 2,418.3 2,582.1 2,745.2
Antigua and Barbuda 493.6 540.4 581.0 622.3 655.3
Dominica 224.0 236.4 244.4 256.9 266.4
Grenada 276.3 294.7 314.9 347.1 375.9
St. Kitts and Nevis 230.6 245.7 274.9 288.4 305.6
St. Lucia 554.0 571.4 578.3 626.3 667.4
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 263.9 278.4 293.7 317.3 328.6
GDP per capita (US$)
OECS-WTO Members 5,282.3 5,209.4 5,757.9 6,090.0 6,429.1
Antigua and Barbuda 7,478.7 8,187.4 8,672.2 9,288.6 9,780.0
Dominica 3,155.5 3,284.0 3,395.1 3,519.0 3,649.9
Grenada 3,003.2 3,168.5 3,349.9 3,653.8 3,915.1
St. Kitts and Nevis 5,625.1 5,851.0 6,545.9 6,707.1 6,945.3
St. Lucia 3,901.4 3,968.4 3,988.5 4,289.7 4,539.9
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 2,356.5 2,464.1 2,576.7 2,832.7 2,907.9
Source : Information provided by the authorities;  and World Bank, World Development Indicators Database (2000).  Available at:
http://www.worldbank.org/data/countrydata/countrydata.html.
4. On the other hand, their small size makes them vulnerable to diseconomies of scale, including
in the provision of government services.  For example, it is estimated that Antigua and  Barbuda have
11,000 state employees (36% of the workforce), with wages and salaries absorbing some 64% of total
fiscal revenue.  The authorities noted that there is considerable duplication of public services becauseOECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 3
each State maintains an independent administration.  In this respect, greater coordination at the OECS
level would reduce unnecessary costs.
5. The smallness of domestic markets is an issue in the production of goods;  OECS Members
have tried to address this through participation in the integrated regional market being created by the
Caribbean Community (CARICOM).  OECS Members are also faced with high labour and
transportation costs which, the authorities consider, severely constrain sustainable development.
Because of this, it is particularly important to seek or maintain maximum flexibility in labour markets;labour productivity, to justify high wages;  and best practices in the provision of transport services.
6. The OECS Members under review lie relatively close to major air and maritime transport
corridors, and they are attractive tourist destinations.  In addition, their position is ideal for the
cultivation of a variety of tropical products.  However, this location also exposes them to the
potentially disastrous consequences of natural phenomena, particularly hurricanes.  The authorities
noted that this has significant economic cost and fiscal implications.  Indeed, a particularly cautious
fiscal policy would seem to be called for to factor-in the inevitability of natural disasters in the region.
7. OECS Members have experienced a recurrent shortage of savings over investment, and
require substantial capital inflows to finance large deficits in the current account of the balance-of-
payments.  The need to finance large fiscal deficits  and the heavy reliance on international trade taxes
for revenue purposes have tended at times to sl ow down the pace at which certain OECS countries,
i.e. Antigua and Barbuda and St. Kitts and Nevis have liberalized.  Also for fiscal reasons, in some
cases tariff reductions have been offset by increases in other duties on imports, thus largely denyingany market access improvements from the lower tariffs.
8. A common language and history, as well as a process of economic integration through
CARICOM, would appear to reflect a degree of homogeneity.  A closer look, however, reveals
differences in outlook and resource endowments, and a variety of economic and trade regimes
coexisting with national commitments, both under regional integration schemes and under the
multilateral trading system.  The OECS countries also face the challenge of adapting to stronger, more
transparent multilateral disciplines.
(ii) Structure of the economies
9. The economies of the OECS-WTO Members are dominated by service activities, which
overall account for around three quarters of GDP (Table I.2).  This is the result of a rapid move away
from agriculture over the last decade, especially regarding exports and employment.  Tourism is the
main single economic activity in all OECS countries.  Although its contribution to GDP is not easilyassessed, it is estimated that, including its direct and indirect effects, tourism may well account for
over half of GDP in some countries.  Other services areas of growing importance are financial
services and telecommunications.
10. In general terms, agricultural production has been losing importance.  This has been largely
due to the decline of the banana industry in the four Windward Islands and of sugar production inSt. Kitts and Nevis.  Banana exports and production have been affected by the erosion of, and
uncertainty about  preferences in the European Un ion (EU) market (in practice, mostly the United
Kingdom), and by quality problems.  Attempts to restructure the banana industry have been made in
the last few years, including the creation of the Windward Islands Banana Development and
Exporting Company Limited (WIBDECO).  The WI BDECO acts as the trading agent in the United
Kingdom, undertaking the transport and marketing of bananas under the EU banana regime.  JointlyWT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 4
owned by the banana growers and the Windward Islands Governments, WIBECO holds the monopoly
previously vested in domestic marketing boards.
Table I.2
Gross domestic product by economic activity, at factor cost
(% share)
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Agriculture 11.4 9.6 10.0 9.6 8.6 8.4 7.8
Crops 8.6 6.8 7.3 7.0 6.0 5.7 5.3
Livestock 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8
Forestry 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Fishing 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Mining & Quarrying 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9
Manufacturing 6.3 6.0 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.1 6.0
Services 81.3 83.6 83.0 83.4 84.3 84.4 85.3
Electricity and water 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0
Construction 9.4 9.4 9.9 9.9 10.3 10.8 11.1
Wholesale and retail trade 12.4 12.3 12.4 12.3 12.4 12.4 12.5
Hotels and restaurants 10.0 11.2 9.9 9.9 10.3 10.0 9.9
Transport 10.9 11.1 11.0 11.2 11.5 11.3 11.4
Road transport 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.8 6.8 6.8
Sea transport 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5
Air transport 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0
Communications 7.7 8.5 8.8 9.2 9.4 9.9 10.5
Banks and insurance 8.7 8.9 9.4 9.7 10.3 10.7 10.9
Real estate and housing 5.8 5.8 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.2
Government services 15.6 15.7 15.7 15.5 15.4 15.3 14.9
Other services 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1
Less imputed service charge 6.6 7.0 7.6 7.8 8.3 8.9 9.2
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Growth rate 2.6 3.0 0.7 2.7 3.2 3.6 4.2
Note: Data include Anguilla and Montserrat, which are not WTO Members, and together account for some 5% of total OECS GDP.
Source: ECCB (2000).
11. Manufacturing activities have failed to take hold, their share of GDP declined slightly
between 1993 and 1999.  In this regard, the extensive programme of incentives, including income tax
and import duty exemptions for manufacturers, and in some countries free zones, has failed to
promote sustainable industrial development, as have tariffs and quantitative restrictions maintained oninfant-industry grounds.  High labour and transportation costs and a lack of economies of scale may
be contributing factors.  Only a handful of industries, such as soaps and detergents, have taken
advantage of the expanded regional market;  in most other cases, industries have catered only for the
small national markets, concentrating on products like beverages and other food products.
(iii) Macroeconomic developments
(a) Output, employment, and prices
12. After a period of weak growth in the mid 1990s, output in most OECS countries expanded at
some 4% in both 1998 and 1999, with a similar growth rate estimated for 2000.  Growth has been
strongest in Grenada, followed by St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Antigua and Barbuda.  Output
growth has been weakest in Dominica and St. Kitts and Nevis, affected by natural disasters and the
poor perfomance of traditional export crops (bananas and sugar, respectively).  In most of the OECS
countries, growth has been largely driven by invest ment projects linked to a surge in construction andOECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 5
by tourism receipts.  The main exception to this pattern is Dominica, where growth has been led by
the development of the manufacturing sector, namely the production and exportation of soap,detergent, and toothpaste.
13. Consumer prices have remained subdued, average increases were slightly above 2% for the
OECS in 1998 and 1999.  Inflation has been particularly low in Dominica, Grenada, and St. Vincent
and the Grenadines, while St. Lucia has posted the highest inflation rate (Table I.3).  The main factors
accounting for low inflation have been the tight monetary policy undertaken by the Eastern CaribbeanCentral Bank and the peg of the EC dollar to the US dollar (see below).
14. High unemployment remains a problem in several OECS countries, particularly in Dominica,
St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines.  Most of the investment in the area is capital-intensive,
and the development of the offshore sector has not had a major impact on employment.  Moreover,
workers shed by the shrinking banana industry have not been easily re-deployed into other sectors.  In
the Leeward Islands, on the contrary, the labour market  is tight, and there has been a need to bring in
workers from neighbouring countries.  This has resulted in high negotiated wage increases in thepublic sector, which have spread to the rest of the economy.
15. The economies of the OECS countries are characterized by a domestic savings–investment
gap.  Investment to GDP shares are generally above 20%, while savings rate are, with the exception of
Dominica, below 20%.  Public and private investment  in most countries has been increasing rapidly in
recent years, linked to a number of infrastructure programmes.  Savings, on the other hand, have beengenerally falling as a share of GDP.  The result has been increasing deficits in the current-account of
the balance-of-payments.
(iv) Fiscal policy
16. Fiscal policy is managed independently by each OECS country, generally under the
responsibility of the Ministry of Finance, and is the principal macroeconomic policy instrument usedby the national authorities to influence output an d employment fluctuations.  Trade policy formulation
is closely coordinated with fiscal policy due to the latter's role as main income stabilizer and to the
strong reliance of all OECS countries on revenue from foreign trade taxes (Table I.4).  A reduction of
tariffs, for example, under the recent implementation of Phase IV of the Common External Tariff
(CET) Schedule of Reductions, is in some cases offset by measures such as an increase in theconsumption tax, as in Grenada, St. Kitts and Nevis, or St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
17. In 1999, taxes collected on international trade represented some 57.4% of tax revenue in the
OECS Members as a whole;  they accounted for 26.3% of the value of imports.  The main single
source of tax revenue is the consumption tax (28.3% of tax revenue), followed by tariffs (17.8%), and
the customs service charge (7.3%).  The governments in the region are working on reforms of their
tax systems, including the possibility of introducing a valued-added tax (VAT).
18. The fiscal situation in most OECS countries is characterized by a current account surplus and
a large capital account deficit, with an overall fiscal deficit.  These deficits range from moderate in
Grenada and St. Vincent and the Grenadines (about 1.4% of GDP), to high in Antigua and Barbuda
and Dominica (between 8 and 10% of GDP).  Defici ts have been widening in these two countries,
while they have remained stable or fallen in the others.  During the 1999-2000 period certain tax relief
measures were introduced to aid some sectors in some countries, including the waiver of import dutyand consumption tax on vehicles for use in the agriculture sector, and the removal of the consumption
tax on building materials.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 6
Table I.3
Basic macroeconomic indicators, 1996-2000
(Year to year percentage change unless otherwise specified)
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000a
GDP at market prices (EC$ million) 5,876.0 6,16.4 6,529.5 6,971.8 7,412.1 n.a.
Antigua and Barbuda 1,332.7 1,459.0 1,568.8 1,680.3 1,769.2 n.a.
Dominica 604.9 638.4 660.0 693.6 719.4 755.7
Grenada 746.0 795.6 850.2 937.2 1,014.8 n.a.
St. Kitts and Nevis 622.7 663.5 742.3 778.7 825.1 n.a.
St. Lucia 1,495.8 1,542.9 1,561.5 1,691.0 1,801.9 n.a.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 712.6 751.8 793.1 856.6 887.2 898.9
Gross domestic product (real GDP growth rate) 0.7 2.7 3.2 3.8 4.1 n.a.
Antigua and Barbuda -5.0 6.1 5.6 3.9 4.6 n.a.
Dominica 1.6 3.1 2.0 3.5 0.9 n.a.
Grenada 3.1 2.9 4.2 7.3 8.2 6.0
St. Kitts and Nevis 3.8 5.9 7.3 1.0 2.8 n.a.
St. Lucia 1.7 1.4 0.6 2.0 3.1 n.a.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 8.3 1.2 3.1 5.7 4.0 3.7
Investment/GDP
Antigua and Barbuda 33.0 35.0 32.6 32.4 n.a. n.a.
Dominica 32.4 29.7 32.7 29.4 32.5 n.a.
Grenada n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
St. Kitts and Nevis 46.3 45.8 44.0 43.0 37.4 n.a.
St. Lucia 24.5 24.7 26.8 24.7 24.8 n.a.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 30.2 28.3 30.0 32.6 n.a n.a.
Gross domestic savings/GDP
Antigua and Barbuda 28.3 16.2 17.9 18.1 n.a. n.a.
Dominica 15.3 16.9 20.7 23.0 22.1 n.a.
Grenada n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
St. Kitts and Nevis 26.8 15.4 23.0 26.5 11.3 n.a.
St. Lucia 23.7 17.8 15.1 17.9 16.0 n.a.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines n.a. 18.3 n.a n.a. n.a. n.a.
Current account of the balance of payments -9.7 -14.4 -16.0 -15.1 -18.9 n.a.
Antigua and Barbuda -0.1 -13.2 -11.1 -14.1 -9.5 n.a.
Dominica -20.4 -16.9 -13.7 -7.1 -12.0 n.a.
Grenada -14.8 -19.6 -24.4 -24.1 -23.7 n.a.
St. Kitts and Nevis -19.5 -30.4 -21.0 -16.4 -26.0 n.a.
St. Lucia -5.7 -11.7 -17.0 -13.6 -16.1 n.a.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines -10.0 -20.8 -23.0 -20.2 -13.1 n.a.
Consumer price index 3.5 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.3 n.a.
Antigua and Barbuda 3.0 2.7 2.2 2.8 1.9 n.a.
Dominica 1.4 2.0 2.3 1.4 0.0 n.a.
Grenada 2.1 3.2 0.8 1.3 1.0 n.a.
St. Kitts and Nevis 2.6 3.1 11.3 0.9 1.8 n.a.
St. Lucia 5.8 0.9 0.0 3.8 3.5 n.a.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 3.2 3.6 0.8 3.3 -1.8 0.6
General government finance
Fiscal current account balance (% of GDP)
Antigua and Barbuda -0.1 0.1 0.1 -1.3 -2.4 n.a.
Dominica 1.7 0.8 0.7 1.2 -0.8 0.8
Grenada 2.1 2.1 0.7 1.0 4.9 n.a.
St. Kitts and Nevis -0.2 0.4 1.1 0.2 -1.4 n.a.
St. Lucia 4.7 4.3 3.9 5.3 7.4 n.a.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 4.0 4.3 5.8 4.3 3.0 n.a.
Overall fiscal balance (% GDP)
Antigua and Barbuda -3.3 -2.0 -3.3 -2.7 -2.0 n.a.
Dominica -7.3 -7.9 -3.8 -3.0 -10.6 -3.1
Grenada 0.2 -2.7 -2.2 -4.0 -3.0 n.a.
St. Kitts and Nevis -5.5 -3.9 -3.7 -6.5 -5.7 n.a.
St. Lucia -1.8 -1.9 -1.7 -2.5 -4.6 n.a.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0.2 -4.4 -1.4 -1.4 -2.1 n.a.
Money and interest rates
Broad money, M2 (end of period)
Antigua and Barbuda 21.4 -5.0 8.6 15.3 10.5 n.a.
Dominica 23.1 2.0 3.5 6.9 8.1 n.a.
G r e n a d a 9 . 4 9 . 11 1 . 81 1 . 71 3 . 9 n . a .
St. Kitts and Nevis 12.4 5.5 13.5 4.0 11.3 n.a.
St. Lucia 9.1 1.9 6.7 12.1 9.7 n.a.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 4.4 14.0 16.1 12.5 10.1 n.a.
n.a. Not available.
a Projection.
Source : ECCB (2000).OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 7
Table I.4
Taxes on international trade as a share of tax revenue and total imports, 1999
Customs dutiesCustoms
service chargeConsumption tax
on importsForeign
exchange tax Total
(1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2)
Antigua and Barbuda 18.9 6.2 10.0 3.4 29.1 9.6 2.6 0.9 66.1 21.8
Dominica 14.6 7.4 2.2 1.1 34.5 17.4 n.a. n.a. 52.3 27.6
Grenada 13.8 5.9 10.0 4.3 34.2 14.5 n.a. n.a. 61.2 25.9
St. Kitts and Nevis 21.2 10.0 7.5 2.5 22.4 10.6 n.a. n.a. 50.7 23.1
St. Lucia 17.0 7.6 8.3 3.8 29.7 12.9 n.a. n.a. 55.4 24.4
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 11.1 6.0 4.7 2.2 32.1 14.5 n.a. n.a. 50.2 22.6
OECS 17.8 8.2 7.3 3.3 28.3 12.9 0.2 0.5 57.4 24.9
(1) Share of tax revenue.
(2) Share of imports of merchandise.
n.a. Not applicable.
Note: Totals exclude the Foreign Exchange Tax, except for Antigua and Barbuda.Source: Information provided by the authorities.
19. In most OECS countries, medium-term plans or strategies are aimed at increasing the current
surplus, since there is recognition that the capital account will continue to post a deficit as a result of
large-scale investment projects undertaken or foreseen.  These investments are financed generally
through grants, concessional loans and borrowing from third countries and bank institutions, and, to a
lesser extent, by private-sector participation.
(v) Monetary policy
20. All OECS countries are members of the East ern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU).  The
Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB), based in St. Kitts, has been responsible for monetary and
foreign exchange policy for the whole OECS area  since 1976, keeping the EC dollar pegged to the
U.S. dollar at a rate of EC$2.70 per US$1.  Movement s in the EC dollar real effective exchange rate
are related largely to changes in the value of the U.S. dollar vis-à-vis other major currencies.  As aconsequence, the EC dollar appreciated in real effective terms by 4% between end 1990 and
end 1999.
21. Pursuant to the ECCB Agreement Act of 1983, the ECCB has responsibility for monetary,
credit, and exchange rate policy under a regime of  joint sovereignty.  The Monetary Council is the
main decision-making body;  it comprises a minister from each of the OECS countries but, asmembers of the Monetary Council, ministers represent the currency union and not their respective
countries.  The exchange rate parity may be modified only by unanimous decision of the Monetary
Council and the ECCB's Board of Directors.  The ECCB Agreement Act identifies monetary stability,
money and capital market development, and real sector development as the objectives to be attained
by the Central Bank, in that order.  Monetary stability has been pursued through a fixed exchange rate
regime, or "strong EC dollar policy".  Although th e 1983 ECCB Agreement Act stipulates that foreign
exchange must cover at least 60% of monetary liabilities, in practice the ECCB has been keeping aforeign exchange cover close to 100% (97.7% in 1998).
22. The ECCB uses open market operations to regulate the amount of money supply and its
distribution among member States.  Limits are impos ed on credits to member governments, by which
the ECCB's holding of treasury bills (the credit counterpart) of a certain government may not exceed
10% of that government's current revenue for the current year, while holdings of other governmentsecurities may not exceed 15% of the currency in circulation and other demand liabilities.  Also,WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 8
temporary advances to a government in any financ ial year may not exceed 5% of that government's
average annual current revenue in the preceding three years, and holdings of bonds issued by
development finance corporations may not exceed 2.5% of the average annual government current
revenue over the preceding three years.  To help pool capital across countries of the region, the EECB
has established a regional market for government securities, which is expected to come into operation
in 2001.
23. The money supply has been expanding rapi dly since 1992.  During 1992-97, broad money
grew by an average of 9% a year, which was nearly twice the rate of growth of nominal GDP.
Growth in broad money accelerated in 1998 and 1999, exceeding 10%, in part due to the large inflows
of private transfers.  Bank credit increased even faster, resulting in a sharp decline in the net foreign
assets of the banking system.  Loans for acq uisition of property and durable consumer goods
increased by 50% between December 1997 and March 2000 (Table I.3).  Interest rates remained
broadly unchanged in 1997-2000, with prime lending rates of between 9.5% and 10.5%, owing to
competition and to substantial foreign borrowing by banks.
24. OECS Members generally maintain some form of exchange controls on capital and non-trade
current transactions.  Since 1997, the governments in the region have increased the limit of foreign-exchange purchases for payments for invisible transactions and current transfers that do not require
approval, from EC$100,000 per person per year to EC$250,000, following general guidelines from
the ECCB.  Purchases for amounts above EC$250,000 require the approval from the respective
Ministry of Finance;  this approval is granted almost automatically in most cases, depending on the
country.
(vi) Balance of payments
25. The current account of the balance of payments of all OECS Members posts a sizeable and
structural deficit, primarily triggered by the large deficit in the trade balance, as imports of goods in
most countries are several times larger than exports (Table I.5).  This deficit is not completely covered
by the services surplus, and creates the need for recourse to external savings to finance investment
requirements.  Despite a widening service balance surplus, the current account deficit has deteriorated
in recent years mainly as a result of increased imports.  To a lesser extent, the contraction in exportearnings from bananas in the Windward Islands has also contributed to the widening of the deficit.
26. Current account deficits have been covered by large capital inflows, mainly in the form
of foreign direct investment and official concessional assistance, including grants, and the drawing
down of foreign assets by commercial banks.  The financing needs have led to an increase in the
external debt and in the debt service in most OECS countries.  The disbursed outstanding debt totalledUS$754 million or almost 35% of GDP in 1995.  In 1999, the external debt stood at US$1.07 billion
or 39% of GDP:  the most indebted country in the region was Antigua and Barbuda, where debt
represented 59% of GDP, followed by Dominica, with debt close to 53% of GDP;  the least indebted
country was St. Lucia, where debt was just under 22 % of GDP.  Due to external debt refinancing, the
external debt service ratio remained stable between 1995 and 1999, at 2.6% of GDP.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 9
Table I.5
Balance of payments:  current account 1995-99a
(US$ million)
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Current account balance -217.7 -336.5 -404.1 -388.7 -454.4
Exports (f.o.b.) 354.5 337.6 304.7 316.4 306.8
Imports (f.o.b.) 1,121.5 1,185.6 1,242.1 1,324.2 1,376.3
Services (net) 503.3 518.2 568.4 609.6 648.8
       Receipts of which, 1,002.3 1,054.1 1,146.6 1,247.4 1,314.2
         Travel 770.1 799.8 857.9 906.5 911.2
         Payments 499.1 535.9 578.2 637.9 665.4
Income (net) -124.6 -128.1 -137.3 -153.5 -182.4
Compensation of employees -0.4 0.0 -2.1 0.2 1.0
Investment income -124.3 -126.9 -135.2 -153.7 -183.4
     Direct investment (net) -108.8 -103.0 -107.9 -117.1 -139.2
     Portfolio investment (net) 11.1 8.0 6.8 7.7 4.7
     Other investment (net) -26.6 -32.0 -34.1 -44.3 -48.9
     Transfers (net) 170.7 121.4 102.1 163.0 148.7
Capital and financial account balance 269.1 317.0 426.4 439.5 460.4
  Capital account transfers 82.5 69.1 100.6 112.4 92.9
  Financial account 174.9 243.7 325.8 327.1 367.5
    Direct investment (net) 210.0 185.7 263.0 319.7 321.5
    Portfolio investment (net) -6.1 5.8 4.9 3.9 28.3
    Other investment (net) -29.0 52.3 57.9 3.5 17.7
Net errors and omissions 44.3 -10.9 -33.4 30.2 -14.1
Overall balance -51.5 19.5 -22.3 -50.9 -6.0
Change in reserves -49.2 22.0 -21.1 -53.9 -5.0
a OECS area including Anguilla and Montserrat, but not British Virgin Islands.
Source : ECCB (2000).
(2) DEVELOPMENTS IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT
27. Exports of goods generally cover less than a quarter of imports.  Most exports take place
under preferential conditions.  The main export products vary by country, but are mainly agriculturalproducts:  bananas are the main export product in St. Lucia and St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and
are second in Dominica, after soaps and detergents.  Sugar is St. Kitts and Nevis' main export product,
and nutmeg accounts for over 40% of Grenada's exports.  Manufactured exports are important mainlyfor Dominica and Antigua and Barbuda.
28. Some two thirds of imports are manufactured goods.  The main import items are machinery
and transport equipment, followed by chemicals, semi-manufactures, and other consumer goods.  The
composition of imports in recent years has favoured imports of capital and consumer durable goods.
29. The OECS countries' main trading partners are the United States, the United Kingdom,
Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, and Canada;  combined these partners account for around two thirdsof imports and exports.  The main exporter in the region is St. Lucia, followed closely by Dominica;
the largest importers are Antigua and Barbuda, and St. Lucia.  Trade among OECS countries is
relatively limited, as, in many cases, the products exported by each country are similar;  there is little
intra-industry trade.  The exception is Dominica, where over 50% of exports are directed to other
CARICOM countries;  however, just over a four th of this goes to other OECS Members.
30. Net foreign investment inflows in the OECS  area totalled US$1.3 billion in the 1995-99
period.  As a consequence, net outflows in the form of remittances and other outflows have also been
substantial during the period, amounting to some US$576 million.  The main single area for
investments has been tourism, in particular hotels and resorts.  Investors have generally benefited
from the tax and customs duty concessions granted in all OECS Members, under the existingWT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 10
legislation to promote hotel development.  Anot her area of investment is manufacturing, where
investors have been attracted to areas such as detergents, soaps, and light electronics.  Again,
investors have been able to take advantage of the fiscal incentives legislation existing in each country,
which grants concessions for investment in manufacturing (Chapter III).
(3) OUTLOOK
31. GDP in OECS Members is expected to expand by some 4% in 2001, with growth supported
by the implementation of major infrastructural projects in most countries.  Construction,telecommunications, and tourism are expected to be the most dynamic sectors.  The authorities in
several of the countries are also expecting an acceleration of growth in the agriculture sector.
32. Most OECS Members are counting on posting increased fiscal current account surpluses, of
between 2% and 3% of GDP over the period 2000-03.  In Antigua and Barbuda, and Dominica,
however, this level of savings is unlikely to materialize.  Most governments are concerned about the
high level of unemployment and are committed to reducing it through special incentives to investors
who generate large-scale employment.  The current account of the balance of payments in all
countries is likely to remain under pressure, as imports of building materials, machinery andequipment, inputs for the tourism industry, and consumer goods expand significantly, and exports
expand, at best, modestly.  Current account deficits are expected to remain high, but their financing,
through direct foreign investment and public sector external assistance, should in general pose no
problem.  However, Antigua and Barbuda, and Dominica may face financing difficulties due to the
increase in their external debt service.
II. TRADE POLICY REGIME
(1) I
NTRODUCTION
33. At the center of the present institutional framework in the Caribbean, region-wide institutions,
such as Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) and the Caribbean Development
Bank (CDB), provide the core fr amework for economic integration.  The countries under review, all
members of CARICOM, are engaged in their own sub-regional integration process through the OECS
and the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB).
34. The international trade commitments of the OE CS Members can be thought of in terms of
three concentric circles.  At the core, there is duty-free treatment among OECS partners, with a few
exceptions.  The middle circle would encompass duty-free trade with other CARICOM members, as
well as, in relation to third countries, the adop tion, in stages, of the CARICOM Common Market and
Common External Tariff, again with exceptions.  The outer ring would comprise multilateral
commitments in relation to third countries, including tariff bindings and obligations on other trade
instruments covered by the WTO Agreements.  The establishment of the Free Trade Area of the
Americas (FTAA) would create yet another circle of preferential commitments between the existing
middle and outer circles.
35. The OECS Members face serious challenges and opportunities, to be addressed through
policy and institutional reforms.  Domestic implementation of their WTO commitments has been
somewhat slow, with most countries lagging in their WTO notifications and in the process of
legislative reform required for the implementation of the WTO Agreements.  This has been partly due
to human-resource constraints, and institutional limitations.  In this respect, focusing policy
coordination within the OECS and the rest of CARICOM more sharply on multilateral issues andOECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 11
commitments would help ensure that the consol idation of CARICOM's Single Market promotes,
rather than hinders, multilateral liberalization and a more efficient allocation of resources.
36. While the multilateral trading system does not provide the whole solution for OECS
Members' problems, faithful implementation of WTO commitments and effective participation in its
activities would facilitate the ongoing process of reform.  In turn, such participation would be helped
by a stronger focus on capacity-building.  This ma y also facilitate the fulfilment by OECS Members
of their CARICOM engagements and, thus, more effective participation in the FTAA process.
(2) POLICY OBJECTIVES AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
37. The main trade and investment policy objective of the OECS countries, as stated by their
national authorities, is to enhance living standards through a more liberal trade environment in which
they can compete.  The two aspects, increased liberalization and ensuring that domestic suppliers orproduce can compete, have given way to an array of policies, which at times seem contradictory,
seeking liberalization through lower tariffs and the reduction of non-tariff barriers, on the one hand,
and schemes to pick winners and offer production and investment incentives, on the other.
38. The trade policy objectives of the different OECS countries, as well as a number of trade,
investment, foreign affairs, services, and restrictive business practice issues, are coordinated indifferent fora, including at the OECS level, in the Association of Caribbean States, and in the
CARICOM.  Agricultural policies are coordinate d to some extent with other CARICOM members
under the Regional Transformation Programme, and a greater degree of coordination is anticipated as
the CARICOM Single Market consolidates, as outlined in the Protocol on Agricultural Policy.  The
CARICOM's Regional Negotiating Machinery (RNM ) is responsible for presenting a common
CARICOM position and negotiating in the WTO and the FTAA, as well as with the EU in the
framework of the Cotonou Agreement.  In January 2001, the CARICOM ministers responsible fortrade and economic development agreed on a common CARICOM position for the ongoing WTO
agriculture and services negotiations (see below).
39. Despite this increasing policy coordination, national plans and programmes include aspects of
trade policy that, in practice, show limited synchronization or still diverge, even in areas under
regionally agreed disciplines such as CARICOM's CET Schedule of Reductions.  In general, theOECS economies are moving towards a more open trading environment, but they are doing so
gradually, in part due to concerns about its fiscal implications.  This course has been accompanied by
delays in policy and legislative changes, and their implementation, which have prevented the region
from benefiting fully from the results of reform and liberalization.
(i) World Trade Organization
40. Before Independence, all OECS Members applied GATT de facto, as members of the
metropolitan territory of the United Kingdom.  Following Independence, they became GATT
contracting parties under Article XXVI:5(c) with their rights and obligations under GATT retroactiveto the date of Independence.  Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the
Grenadines are founding members of the WTO.  Grenada, and St. Kitts and Nevis became WTO
Members in 1996.  They all apply at least MFN treatment to all their trading partners.
41. The OECS countries differ considerably in the degree of incorporation of the results of the
Uruguay Round into domestic legislation.  Dominica is  well advanced in  the process, followed by
St. Lucia, and St. Kitts and Nevis.  In other coun tries, particularly Grenada and St. Vincent and the
Grenadines, the process of amendment of domestic legislation, where necessary, is incipient or hasWT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 12
not started.  This implies that provisions of the WTO Agreements not incorporated into domestic
legislation cannot be invoked in domestic courts.
42. In general, the participation of OECS Members in WTO has been limited, including in areas
of particular economic importance to them like services.  They made only few commitments in their
GATS Schedules.  Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, and Grenada presented offers in the WTO
extended Negotiations on Telecommunications.  No offer was presented by the other countries.
OECS Members did not participate in the ex tended Negotiations on Financial Services.
43. With respect to their WTO notifications, all countries are behind.  As of early 2001, Grenada,
and St. Vincent  and the Grenadines had made no not ifications at all, while Antigua and Barbuda had
made only one.  The other countries had made notifications in a few areas (Table II.1) up to 2000.  Inearly 2001, however, Dominica and St. Lucia submitted a number of notifications to the WTO.
Table II.1
Notifications by OECS countries, 1995-2000
Country WTO Agreement WTO document series, date
Antigua and Barbuda Subsidies, Article 25.1, GATT 1994 Article XVI:1 G/SCM/N/, 22 May 1997
Dominica Agriculture, Article 10 and 18.2, ES:1 to ES:3
Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994, Article 16.4
Anti-dumping, Article 18.5
Preshipment Inspection, Article 5
Rules of Origin, Annex II. Par. 4;  rt. 5.1Safeguards, Article 12.6
Subsidies, Article 25.1, GATT Article XVI.1
Subsidies, Article 32.6G/AG/N/DMA/, 3 November 1998 and
10 November 1998
G/ADP/N/, 20 April 1999
G/ADP/N/1/DMA/, 8 June 1999
G/PSI/N/, 28 September 1999
G/RO/N/, 29 June 1998G/SG/N/1/DMA/, 12 November 1998
G/SCM/N/, 20 April 1999
(G/SCM/N/, 7 June 1999)
St. Kitts and Nevis Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994, Article 16.4
Import Licencing, Articles 1.4a and 8.2b,
Subsidies, Article 25.11Textiles and Clothing, Articles 2:8a and 2:7
Textiles and Clothing, Articles 2:6 and 2:7
Textiles and Clothing, Article 3:1
Textiles and Clothing, Article 6:1G/ADP/N/, 17 July 1998
G/LIC/N/, 31 July 1998
G/SCM/N/, 30 July 1998 and 17 July 1998G/TMB/N/, 9 April 1997
G/TMB/N/, 31 December 1996
G/TMB/193/, 9 April 1997, 31 December1996, 29 July 1996, G/TMB/N/, 29 July 1996
G/TMB/N/, 31 December 1996)
St. Lucia Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994, Article 16.4
Preshipment Inspection, Article 5
Safeguards, Article 12.6
Subsidies, Article 25.11Subsidies, Article 32.6
Technical Barriers to Trade, Article 15.2
TRIMs, Article 5.1G/ADP/N/, 16 November 1995
G7PSI/, 19 February 1996
G/SGN/, 10 June 1996
G/SCM/N/, 1 July 1996, 20 March 1996G/SCM/N/, 16 November 1995
G/TBT/N/, 4 August 1997
G/TRIMS/N/, 9 February 1996
Source : WTO Secretariat.
44. To date, there have been no cases under the WTO dispute settlement mechanisms involving
the OECS countries directly, either as plaintiff or defendant.  However, Dominica, Grenada, St. Lucia,
and St. Vincent and the Grenadines reserved their third-party rights to participate in the dispute
involving ACP countries' exports of bana nas to the EU under the Lomé Convention.1
45. The OECS countries have agreed with other CARICOM countries to adopt a common
negotiating position in the ongoing WTO negotiations on agriculture.  That position, submitted to the
WTO by CARICOM, seeks, among other things2:
                                                     
1 WTO document  WT/DS27/45,  18 January 1999.
2 WTO document G/AG/NG/W/100, 15 January 2001.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 13
- cuts in the applied and bound agricultural tariffs of developed countries, particularly for
products of export interest to developing countries, aiming to reduce tariff peaks and tariff
escalation;
- greater transparency on tariffs by eliminating specific, variable and complex tariffs and tariff
dispersion;
- bringing stricter disciplines and improved transparency to the administration of tariff rate
quotas, and ensuring that "non-substantial" suppliers from small developing economies are
provided with meaningful access to market opportunities within those quotas;
- differential commitments and modalities for small developing economies, including the
possibility of exemption from further tariff reductions;
- greater stability, transparency and predictability in trade preferences to facilitate adjustment in
developing countries;
- larger reductions of domestic support by developed countries;
- a special safeguard mechanism to facilitate the adjustment of small developing economies;
- increased market access by curtailing the unjustified use of technical barriers and sanitary and
phytosanitary measures;
- introducing special provisions for products of interest to developing countries for inclusion in
the disciplines in the area of geographical indications;  and
- establishing a technical assistance fund to support the compliance of developing countries
with standards, market norms and other import regulations of developed countries.
(ii) Regional agreements
(a) OECS
46. The OECS was created by the Treaty of Basseterre, and came into being in 1981.  The main
objective of the OECS is to promote cooperation and economic integration between the member
States:  Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and
St. Vincent and the Grenadines;  Anguilla and the Virgin Islands are associate members.  The OECS
aims to assist its members in the realization of their obligations to the international community, and
wherever possible, arrange common representation overseas.  The OECS Secretariat, based in St.Lucia, provides support and coordination services to help members identify scope for joint action.
The Secretariat also conducts some specific, specialized projects.
(b) CARICOM
47. The six OECS Members participate in the Caribbean Community and Common Market
(CARICOM).  Since 1991, CARICOM has had a Comm on External Tariff (CET).  The CARICOM
Treaty was amended in 1997 with the signing of the Protocol Amending the Treaty establishing the
Caribbean Community, Protocol I.  The Protocol restructured the organs and institutions of
CARICOM to deepen the process of integrati on, and set the foundation for the CARICOM Single
Market and Economy.  Protocol I has been ratifi ed by all CARICOM countries and is currently
applied provisionally.  Protocol II, referring to the right of establishment, services, and capital, wassigned in July 1997 and has also been ratified by all CARICOM members.  Most other Protocols have
not been ratified by all members, but  are provisionally applied by some.
48. The Conference of Heads of Government is the highest decision-making forum and the final
authority in the CARICOM.  A subset of the Conference, called the Bureau, reporting to the
Conference, was instituted in 1992.  The Community Council of Ministers is the second highest organ
of CARICOM, and consists of ministers responsib le for Community Affairs and any other ministerWT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 14
designated by member States.  The Community Council has primary responsibility for the
development of strategic planning and coordination in the areas of economic integration, functional
cooperation and external relations, as well as for establishing a system of regional and national
consultations.  A number of ministerial councils exist and deal with policy in different areas;  these
include the Council for Trade and Economic Devel opment (COTED), responsib le for the promotion
of trade and economic development in CARICOM;   and  the Council for Foreign and Community
Relations (COFCOR), responsible for relations between CARICOM, international organizations, and
third countries.  The Council for Finance and Planning is responsible for monetary policy
coordination.3
49. CARICOM has signed bilateral trade agreements with Colombia, Cuba, the Dominican
Republic, and Venezuela.  Under the CARICOM–Colombia Agreement on Trade, Economic andTechnical Co-operation, re-negotiated in 1997, Colombia granted unilateral preferential access to its
market for four years to a group of products originating in CARICOM.  After the four-year period the
preferential trade scheme becomes reciprocal, taking into account development differences.  The
OECS countries, as less developed countries wi thin CARICOM, are not obliged to grant any
concessions under this agreement.  The CARICO M–Cuba Agreement, signed on 3 July 2000, was not
yet in force in early 2001.  It provides for duty-free access on a list of goods agreed by both sides.
The CARICOM–Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement, which came into force in 2000, grants
bilateral duty-free access for a number of products from 1 January 2004.  Exports from the Dominican
Republic to the CARICOM less developed countries, among which the OECS countries, will continue
to attract duties until 2005, but this will be reviewed in 2004.  The CARICOM–Venezuela Agreement
on Trade and Investment entered into force on 1 Janu ary 1993.  It is a one-way preferential agreement
aimed at promoting CARICOM exports to Venezuela by giving some products duty-free access orphased reduction in tariffs.
(c) Other
50. OECS Members participate in the negotiations for a Free Trade Area of the Americas
(FTAA) launched in 1994 and aimed at constructing a free-trade area by 2005.  Twelve working
groups were created to compile information, identify problems, and prepare for negotiations.  Theseworking groups became negotiating groups in 1999, and OECS countries participate and collaborate
with CARICOM member States in coordinating a common regional position mainly through the
Regional Negotiating Machinery.
51. All OECS countries are members of the Association of Caribbean States (ACS), a forum for
economic and trade policy coordination at the regional level comprising 25 countries of the CaribbeanBasin.
52. Under the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI), in effect since 1984, OECS countries are eligible
for duty-free access, subject to strict rules of origin, to the U.S. market for a wide range of exports;
items such as textiles, clothing and footwear, le ather goods, canned tuna and petroleum and petroleum
products are excluded.
4  Preferences were expanded in 2000 through the United States–Caribbean
Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA), which, for a specified period, accorded the same preferential
tariff and quota treatment granted to certain textile and apparel articles imported into the United Sates
from NAFTA countries subject to several conditions.
                                                     
3 For further details on CARICOM's structure and operation see WTO (1998a), Chapter II and WTO
(1998b), Chapter II.
4 For further details see WTO (1999a), Chapter II(iv).OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 15
53. Under CARIBCAN, in force since 1986, expo rts from the OECS and other CARICOM
countries are granted duty-free treatment for their exports to Canada of eligible products (most
products excluding textiles, clothing, footwear, lugga ge and other leather goods, lubricating oils, and
methanol).  To qualify for duty-free access, 60% of the ex-factory price of eligible products must
originate in a beneficiary country or in Canada.
54. Exports of OECS Members are granted preferential access to the EU market under the
ACP-EU Agreement (the ACP–EU Partnership Agreement signed at Cotonou, Benin, and the Fourth
Lomé Convention).  The production and export of bananas to the EU under the agreement has
traditionally been the major economic activity, barring tourism, in Dominica, St. Lucia, and
St. Vincent and the Grenadines.  Apart from the export of bananas, however, the Lomé Agreement
has not had a strong impact on exports from OECS  countries, since very few manufactured products
from these countries are exported to the EU.  Moreover, initiatives to enhance market access for least
developed countries have the side-effect of reducing the margin of preference for OECS Members.
At CARICOM's Council for Trade and Economic Development meeting in January 2001, CARICOM
members expressed concerns that the proposed "first come, first served" mechanism to replace the
existing EU banana regime would "lead to the destruction of the Caribbean banana industry".5  The
COTED advocated the use of a tariff quota allocated primarily on the basis of past trade, as the most
effective means to ensure access.
55. OECS Members, mainly Dominica, Grenada, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines,
have also benefited from Stabex grants from the EU.  Stabex funds were initially used mostly for the
restructuring of the banana industry;  however, in the later programmes, allocations have been made
mainly for agricultural and economic diversification and social and community development.  The
national authorities noted that funds have been disbursed with considerable delay, due to theincreasing conditionality linked to them.
(3) T
HE OECS M EMBERS , THE WTO, AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION
56. Throughout the process of the Trade Policy Review of the OECS Members, special attention
has been focused on identifying the needs and requirements of these countries in the area of trade-
related technical cooperation, particularly in relation to support for domestic implementation of theWTO commitments.  Specific levels of domestic implementation (Table II.1), clearly reveal areas
where support from the international community would assist in achieving fuller integration of these
countries into the global economy and the multilateral trading system.  This exercise has
also attempted to bring to light capabilities that may already exist at the regional institutional level,
inter-alia , with the OECS and CARICOM Secretariats, with bilateral partners, and with the Inter-
American Development Bank
6.  Linking existing programmes with WTO technical cooperation would
avoid duplication and make activities more efficient and better coordinated.  The process of this
Review has already promoted closer contacts between the WTO and the CARICOM and OECS
Secretariats and with the IADB.
57. The following areas have been identified as requiring particular efforts in one or more of the
OECS Members:
                                                     
5 CARICOM Press release 12/2001, 18 January 2001;  CARICOM  statement on the EU banana import
regime issued by the 10th meeting of the Council for Trade and Economic Development (COTED).
6 Although OECS Members are not members of the IADB, they would benefit from assistance
provided at the regional level through the CARICOM Secretariat.  Substantive support has been received
already from the Bank in relation to the preparation of this Trade Policy Review.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 16
- Customs valuation.   Whereas some Members, such as Dominica, St. Kitts and Nevis, St.
Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines appear to be implementing the WTO Customs
Valuation principles, in one case domestic implementation is based on the old GATT
Customs Valuation Code.  The main objective of a Customs Valuation programme for OECS
Members would be for a Customs expert to carry out a survey of its application throughout
the six countries and to make appropriate recommendations for harmonized implementation,including harmonization with other CARICOM Members.
- Trade remedies.   The size of the economies and domestic markets of OECS Members, and
the large proportion of domestic consumption supplied through imports, would not appear to
justify the amount of resources, both human and financial, necessary for individual national
implementation of the agreements on Anti-Dumping, Safeguards, and Subsidies andCountervailing Measures.  The most important component required for the implementation of
these agreements, i.e. the establishment of an investigating authority, could most efficiently
be set up at the regional level of CARICOM.  The CARICOM Secretariat has been promoting
harmonized legislation on anti-dumping, safeguards and countervailing measures.  Thus, the
main objective of technical cooperation in this area would be to support the harmonizationefforts of the CARICOM and OECS Secretaria ts, and to impress upon OECS Members the
validity of this approach.
- Subsidies.   Developing countries' commitments on subsidies and on notifications
requirements are only partly understood in the OECS Members.  Concrete action may lie in
the periodic delivery (once a year for the next three years) of the Workshop developed on this
subject in the WTO Secretariat.
- Import licensing.   Since OECS Members apply import licensing  for a variety of purposes
and objectives, including under CARICOM Treaty provisions, procedures need to be
compatible with their commitments under the relevant WTO Agreement.  Assistance may
require a WTO expert to carry out technical  workshops in each of the countries concerned, in
order to review their import licensing procedures, to suggest modifications for WTO-
compatibility, and to train the officials responsible for their administration.
- Technical barriers to trade.   Considerable efforts are being made by OECS Members in this
area, at the national, sub-regional, and regional levels.  Standardization is fairly advanced at
the CARICOM level.  National standards bureaux are gradually being established throughout
OECS Members.  A main area for technical cooperation would be on notifications, both in
relation to strengthening their notifications capacities, and to the use of the data andinformation available in the WTO Central Registry of Notifications.  Conformity assessment
and certification systems could be better tackled at the regional level, and might require the
intervention of regional and international institutions (i.e. ISO) other than the WTO.
- Sanitary and phytosanitary measures.   The situation is similar to that for TBT.  Whereas
key concepts in the SPS Agreement, such as risk assessment, may still require detailedexplanation through workshops, notification issues would require the same activities as in
TBT.  An important activity, already being pursued by the Inter-American Institute for
Cooperation in Agriculture (IICA), is the promotion of closer contact between the trade
policy community and the SPS community in the Ministries of Agriculture.  WTO action
could be oriented in support of IICA's activities in this area.
- Agriculture.   Three main areas require action in this important sector:  first, better
information and dissemination on the WTO, and the objectives of the Agreement onAgriculture, especially in Ministries of Agriculture.  A Short (one/two weeks) Trade Policy
Course for agriculture officials and negotiators, such as the one developed with the IICA and
delivered to MERCOSUR countries in 1999 woul d be appropriate.  The objective of this
course is not to explain the Agreement on Agriculture, but to explain to agricultural expertsOECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 17
the WTO framework in which the Agriculture Agreement is embedded, and the relationships
between this agreement and the other WTO Agreements.  This activity goes a long way to
allay the concerns and preoccupations about the WTO that are typical in agricultural
communities around the world.  The second action, going beyond WTO mandates and
capabilities, relates to structural adjustment and diversification of the agriculture sector in
these countries, to soften the impact of greater competition in bananas, and to assist them inshifting and diversifying agricultural production.  An important concept would be the linkages
between the agricultural sector and the tourism sector.  The third action would be to
strengthen the capacity of the OECS countries for participation in the WTO agricultural
negotiations.
- Trade-related intellectual property rights.   OECS–WTO Members are progressing in their
implementation in this area.  Pre-Independence legislation has recently been or is in the
process of being replaced by new Acts seeking WTO compliance.  WIPO has been active,
both through the CARICOM and OECS Secr etariats, and at the national level.
- Services.   All OECS Members are service-driven economies.  The most important subsectors
are tourism, telecommunications, and financial services.  Recent problems in financialservices might find a partial solution through stronger participation in the GATS and the offer
of specific commitments in the sector. WTO intervention might be through periodic
workshops on the GATS and on sectors of interest to these countries, and through information
seminars on the course and development of the services negotiations, to help strengthen the
participation of OECS Members in these negotiations.
58. With regard to existing capabilities, three regional projects are in place, which the WTO
might support:
- an OECS Trade Policy Project based in the OECS Secretariat and financed by the
Government of Canada;
- a CARICOM Project on Implementation of WTO Agreements, with a contribution from the
Inter-American Development Bank;  and
- the Caribbean Regional Negotiating Machinery, which has an important training and human
resource development component.
59. In addition, the IADB-INTAL/WTO Joint Programme of technical cooperation for Latin
American and Caribbean countries has supported and carried out activities with the OECS Members.
III. MARKET ACCESS IN GOODS
(1) I
NTRODUCTION
60. Market access in the different OECS countries is subject to divergent trade policies and
practices.  Thus, while intra-CARICOM trade is in general duty free, OECS Members restrict such
trade through quantitative restrictions and import licensing.  Although a process of progressive marketaccess liberalization was built into the Common External Tariff established in 1991, via a schedule of
tariff reductions in four phases, to end in 1998, few members have complied with the schedule.
Antigua and Barbuda, and St. Kitts and Nevis have not reached Phase IV due to fiscal problems.
Moreover, because all OECS countries depend heavily on import duties for fiscal revenue, in a
number of cases governments have attempted to make tariff reductions revenue-neutral by increasingother duties and charges falling mostly or exclusively on imports.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 18
61. The CET applies in principle to imports from third countries at relatively high rates of up to
20-35% for industrial products (depending on the implementation phase), and of 40% for agricultural
goods.  The tariff structure is firmly based on an import-substitution model ill-suited to most OECS
Members, given that their economies are service-based and import-intensive.  All Members also apply
a customs service charge or tax, essentially equivalent to a tariff surcharge.  In practice, national
import duties vary considerably across Members, reflecting in part the many allowances CARICOMmakes for tariff suspensions and reductions, and national exceptions to the CET.
62. In Grenada, import duties exceed WTO bound rates for some products.  In Dominica, if the
customs service charge/tax is considered, applied import duties exceed bound rates for some products
subject to the recent tariffication exercise.  However, the authorities indicate that on 1 July 2000 all
tariffied rates will be lowered.  St. Kitts and Nevis was the only Member to record the customs service
charge/tax in its Tariff Schedule.
63. Customs valuation methods are not harmonized at the OECS level;  although progress has
been made in some countries towards the use of the transaction value, others continue to use
minimum import or reference prices, reportedly due to widespread under-invoicing.  Except forDominica, OECS Members make use of non-automatic import licensing.
64. With the exception of Dominica, quantitative restrictions by all OECS Members apply on a
number of imports from sources other than OECS and CARICOM less developed countries, thus
discriminating between suppliers.  These restrict ions, allowed under Arti cle 56 of the CARICOM
Treaty, must be tariffied by 2005.  Quantitative restrictions affect a number of products included in
Annex I of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and, thus, subject to the WTO tariffication process;
Dominica alone has completed this process.  A number of restrictions are also applied as safeguard
measures;  these are yet to be notified to the WTO
(2) T
ARIFFS AND OTHER PRICE -BASED MEASURES
(i) Customs valuation
65. There is no harmonization between OECS Members with respect to customs valuation
methods.  Dominica, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia,  and St. Vincent and the Grenadines have adopted
the GATT Valuation method, and do not make recourse to minimum import or reference prices.Grenada applies the Brussels Definition of Value, and has a list of minimum import prices.  In
Antigua and Barbuda, although the transaction value is, in principle, used as a first valuation method,
in practice most invoices are investigated by the Ta x Compliance Unit of the Ministry of Finance, and
reference prices based on international lists are generally used.  Customs valuation is a problem of
particular concern in some OECS Members, in particular Antigua and Barbuda, where under-invoicing is reportedly a common practice.
(ii) MFN import duties
66. All OECS Members apply the CARICOM CET, which came into effect when CARICOM
started functioning as a Customs Union on 1 January 1991.  Under the CET, imports from CARICOM
States, or those partially produced from extra-regional materials and transformed in a CARICOMState, are in principle exempt from tariffs;  imports from third countries are subject to import duties
ranging up to 35% for industrial products (according to the phase of implementation of the CET in
each individual country) and to 40% for agricultural goods (Table III.1).  A four-phase schedule of
tariff reductions was established at the outset.  Phase IV, with a tariff ceiling of 20% for non-exempt
industrial goods was to have been reached by members on 1 January 1998.  As at early 2001, threeOECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 19
countries under review had reached Phase IV of the implementation process;  Antigua and Barbuda
was only at Phase I, St. Kitts and Nevis had just implemented Phase III, and Dominica aimed at
implementing Phase IV on 1 July 2001 (Table III.2).
Table III.1
CARICOM tariff reduction programme
Phase Date of implementation Tariff ceiling for industrial goods (%)
Phase I 1 January 1993 - 31 December 1994 30 -35
Phase II 1 January 1995 - 31 December 1996 25-30
Phase III 1 January - 31 December 1997 20 -25
Phase IV 1 January 1998 20
Source :CARICOM Secretariat .
Table III.2
Implementation of the CET in the OECS
Country Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV
Antigua/Barbuda 1 June 1999
Dominica 1 September 1993 1 October 1995 1 January 1999 1 July 2001a
Grenada 1 July 1993 1 July 1995 1 July 1997 1 January 2000
St. Kitts/Nevis 5 July 1993 1 January 1995 1 January 2001
St. Lucia 1 July 1993 1 July 1997 Not implemented 1 January 2000
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 2 April, 1993 1 January 1996 1 January 1997 1 January 1998
a Expected date of implementation.
Source: OECS Secretariat.
67. Although the CET applies in principle to all extra-CARICOM imports, Article 32 of
the CARICOM Treaty allows for the reduction or suspension of the CET in cases where a good is
not produced in sufficient quantities within the CARICOM area to meet demand.  Exceptions to the
CET are agreed between CARICOM members and must be approved by the COTED.
CARICOM members may maintain tariffs at rates below CET rates according to the List of
Conditional Duty Exemptions to the CET.  The List  also states the purposes for which the goods may
be admitted into the importing member State free of import duty or at a rate lower than the CET;
these approved principles are generally use in industry, agriculture, fisheries, forestry, and mining.
68. Each country's tariff schedule also contains a List of Items Ineligible for Duty Exemptions,
which includes goods that may not be exempted, whol ly or in part, from tariffs nor imported at a
reduced rate even if imported for approved uses.  Incentives programmes may not grant concessionalaccess for these goods.  The List includes goods produced in the CARICOM market in quantities
considered adequate to justify the application of tariff protection.
69. Other exemptions to the CET are included in Lists A, B, C, and D (Table III.3, List B is no
longer operational).  List A allows CARICOM members to apply a rate lower than the CET;  it
includes mainly agricultural products, packaging material, ceramics, and a few electrical appliancessuch as washing machines and dryers, and sanitary fixtures.  List C contains mainly alcoholic
beverages, tobacco, oil products, jewellery, electrical appliances, and motor vehicles, generally
products that are highly revenue-sensitive.  Appl ied rates are determined at the national level;
minimum common rates are determined by all members, but only for reference purposes.  Rates are
generally higher than CET rates and may be modified for budgetary purposes.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 20
Table III.3
Lists of  exceptions to the CET
List A Items on which suspension of the CET rates of duty has been granted to Member States for an indefinite period subject to
review by the CARICOM Council, with the rates to be applied by Member States under Article 32 of the Common Market
Annex.  Rates applied are generally lower than the CET.
List C A list of items in respect of which minimum rates of duty have been agreed by Council, with the actual rates of duty to b e
applied by individual Member States.  Comprises products that are highly revenue sensitive such as motor vehicles, cigarettes,
and alcoholic beverages.  Rates are generally higher than the CET.
List D Additional items in respect of which suspension of the rates of duty in the Schedule of Rates under Article 32 of the Com mon
Market Annex has been granted to OECS Member States and Belize, with the actual rates which will be applied by those
Member States.  Part III of the List allows CARICOM's LDCs to suspend the application of the CET on pharmaceuticals since
some of them have zero tariffs on these products.  A number of products indicated as having a cost-of-living relevance wereassigned tariffs of zero, 5 and 10%.
Source : CARICOM Secretariat.
70. By design, the CET is intended to provide higher effective protection to competing final
goods, while imports of non-competing inputs would generally be duty free or face a 5% tariff rate.
However, the number of exemptions granted thr ough different schemes by various OECS Members
probably undermines this structure.  A simplified tariff structure, with fewer rates, accompanied by
the elimination of discretionary tariff concessions, would enhance transparency, streamlineadministration, and reduce economic distortions.
71. In practice, and despite the convergence in rates required by the implementation of the CET,
the incidence of tariffs varies significantly across OECS Members.  This reflects not only the
numerous national exceptions allowed under CET rules, but also the imposition by individual
countries of a customs service charge or tax (CSC) at different rates (Table III.4).  The CSC is
collected solely on imports and on an ad valorem  basis;  the various rates at which it is levied, which
are unlikely to reflect similar variations on any service costs, highlights also the tariff surcharge
nature of the CSC.
Table III.4
Customs services charges in the OECS, 2000
Tax Rate ScopeBound in
the WTO
Antigua and Barbuda Customs service tax 5% All imports No
Dominica Customs service charge 2% All imports No
Grenada Customs service charge 5% All imports save for Government, the flour mill
and telephone companies and domestic
manufacturingNo
St. Lucia Customs service charge 4%;  1%
(reduced rate)All imports No
St. Kitts and Nevis Customs service charge 3%aAll imports Yes
St. Vincent and the
GrenadinesCustoms service charge 4% All imports except imports of the St. Vincent
Banana Growers Association, Canouan ResortsDevelopment Ltd, and Otley Hall Development
Enclave IndustriesNo
a Increased to 5% on 1 January 2001.
Source . Information provided by the authorities.
72. In 2000, the simple average import duty (the CET as applied nationally plus the respective
CSC) ranged from 14.1% in St. Lucia to 19.5% in Antigua and Barbuda (Table III.5);  excluding the
CSC, average duties ranged between 10.1% and 14.5%.  Duty protection was considerably higher for
agricultural products (WTO definition) than for non-agricultural products.  National averages also
conceal large variations across countries on the duty protection afforded to certain product groups.Thus, for example, average variations of 10 percentage points or more arise for certain product
categories, notably beverages and spirits but also fish and fishery products, tobacco, fruit and
vegetables, and textiles and clothing.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 21
Table III.5
OECS summary analysis of import duties
(Simple average tariff)
OECSAntigua and
BarbudaaDominica Grenada St. LuciaSt. Kitts
and NevisSt. Vincent
and the
Grenadines
All tariff lines 15.7 19.5 15.1 16.2 14.1 14.5 14.9
Total number of lines 4,077 6,333 6,334 6,368 6,330 6,237
By WTO category
Agriculture 22.9 25.9 26.7 23.2 20.6 19.1 22.0
Live animals and products thereof 22.2 28.1 19.8 27.1 18.4 18.3 21.7
Dairy products 12.0 20.0 8.9 11.7 10.3 10.6 10.7
Coffee and  tea, cocoa, sugar, etc. 24.0 28.0 27.0 22.9 21.0 23.1 21.9
Cut flowers and plants 15.8 27.5 10.9 15.6 12.8 12.2 15.7
Fruit and vegetables 29.7 30.4 35.4 30.3 29.5 22.1 29.7
Grains 20.1 22.6 17.0 20.0 19.0 20.1 21.8
Oil seeds, fats and oils and products 21.6 22.5 25.6 21.6 20.7 17.4 21.7
Beverages and spirits 34.9 30.1 72.4 29.0 27.4 24.6 26.1
Tobacco 27.8 24.3 33.5 31.0 19.0 29.0 30.0
Non-agriculture (excluding petroleum) 14.3 18.1 12.9 14.8 12.8 13.6 13.6
Fish and fishery products 27.2 26.3 28.0 25.7 30.6 14.6 33.0
Mineral products, precious
stones/metals13.7 16.8 11.8 14.8 12.1 13.5 13.1
Metals 10.6 13.4 8.6 12.1 8.3 10.5 10.6
Leather, rubber, footwear, travel goods 15.7 19.9 14.6 15.7 14.9 14.5 14.7
Wood, pulp, paper, and furniture 15.1 22.2 12.1 14.7 12.4 15.6 13.6
Textiles and clothing 18.0 27.5 14.6 16.7 16.3 17.3 15.6
By ISIC sectorb
Agriculture and fisheries 24.3 24.6 24.8 26.0 24.6 17.2 28.6
Mining 10.1 12.5 8.9 12.6 9.5 6.2 10.9
Manufacturing 15.2 19.5 14.5 15.5 13.4 14.4 14.1
By HS section
01 Live animals and products 24.2 26.6 23.5 28.1 23.8 16.9 26.6
02 Vegetable products 23.2 25.2 24.0 24.6 22.2 18.0 25.6
03 Fats and oils 30.8 30.3 41.2 30.7 29.1 25.3 28.3
04 Prepared foods, etc. 25.5 27.6 37.3 22.5 22.6 22.1 20.8
05 Minerals 9.7 10.6 7.9 12.0 9.3 8.1 10.4
06 Chemicals and products 12.5 16.2 14.6 12.0 10.8 10.5 10.9
07 Plastics and rubber 13.3 18.5 10.8 14.1 11.7 13.1 11.7
08 Hides and skins 14.1 17.9 11.9 15.2 12.1 13.2 14.2
09 Wood and articles 15.4 21.8 12.0 14.9 13.5 16.6 13.7
10 Pulp, paper, etc. 12.9 19.3 9.9 13.2 10.1 12.7 12.2
11 Textile and articles 17.4 26.5 14.0 16.3 15.9 16.7 15.3
12 Footwear, headgear 23.2 26.9 24.9 21.2 22.5 235 20.2
13 Articles of stone 14.8 18.9 12.2 14.9 12.8 160 14.0
14 Precious stones, etc. 22.4 27.6 22.5 24.7 19.7 20.6 19.2
15 Base metals and products 11.0 13.9 9.1 12.5 8.6 11.3 11.0
16 Machinery 11.5 15.3 8.9 12.9 8.7 11.5 11.8
17 Transport equipment 15.1 16.9 12.1 14.8 17.6 15.1 14.1
18 Precision equipment 14.2 15.3 12.0 16.4 12.3 13.7 15.4
19 Arms and munitions 39.0 52.5 32.8 29.3 45.0 46.0 28.3
20 Miscellaneous manufactures 21.1 26.3 20.3 20.3 19.1 21.7 19.3
21 Works of art, etc. 26.4 30.0 27.0 25.0 24.6 28.0 24.0
a Averages without the CSC are included in the corresponding national tables in the country reports.
Source: WTO Secretariat estimates, based on data provided by the respective OECS authorities.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 22
73. Tariff bindings in the WTO also vary considerably among OECS countries, although there are
some elements in common.  The Schedules of St. Lu cia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and to a
lesser extent Antigua and Barbuda, are similar.  Dominica's Schedule has its own characteristics since
some 4.5% of total tariff lines were left unbound;  in other countries the whole tariff was bound, with
the exception of St. Lucia, which left two tariff lines unbound (Table III.6).
74. All six countries bound all their tariffs in agriculture at a ceiling rate of 100%, with
exceptions at different rates:  exceptions were bound higher than 100% in Antigua and Barbuda,
Dominica, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines, while there were some exceptions of
bindings lower than 100% in St. Kitts and Nevis, and Grenada, where some tariff lines are bound at
zero.  The authorities in Grenada, and St. Kitts and Nevis consider that because they were not
founding members of the WTO they had had to pay an extra entrance price.  Non-agricultural goodswere bound at a ceiling rate of 50% except in St. Kitts and Nevis, where they were bound at 70%;  in
all cases there are a number of exceptions including bound rates as high as 250% in agriculture, and
unbound tariff lines in non-agricultural goods in Dominica and St. Lucia (Table III.6).
Table III.6
WTO bound tariff rates, 2000
Agriculture Other products % bound
Antigua and Barbuda Ceiling binding of 100%, with a limited
number of exceptions between 107% and
220%Ceiling binding of 50%, with a number of
exceptions, ranging between 83% and 206%100
Dominica Ceiling binding of 100%, with a limited
number of exceptions bound in 2004 at 150%Ceiling binding of 50%, with a number of
exceptions (some 285 lines), which remainunbound95.5
Grenada Ceiling binding of 100%, with a limited
number of exceptions bound at rates betweenzero and 200%Ceiling binding of 50%, with no exceptions 100
St. Lucia Ceiling binding of 100%, with a number of
exceptions bound at rates between 107% and220%Ceiling binding of 50%, with a number of
exceptions bound at rates between 73% and206%99.9
St. Kitts and Nevis Ceiling binding of 100%, with a limited
number of exceptions bound at rates between10% and 250%Ceiling binding of 70%, with a limited
number of exceptions bound at rates between87% and 170%100
St. Vincent and the
GrenadinesCeiling binding of 100%, with a limited
number of exceptions bound at rates between107% and 250%Ceiling binding of 100%, with a limited
number of exceptions bound at rates between73% and 206%100
Source : WTO Secretariat.
75. WTO bindings are sometimes in conflict with CET rates.  In Grenada, for example, the
implementation of Phase IV of the CET has resulted in applied tariffs exceeding bound rates for
certain products, such as frozen boneless meat, pumpkins, sweet peppers, inedible tallow, soybean oil,
beer, and some juices.  In other countries, if the CSC is taken into account, some products would
exceed bindings.  That is the case, for example, of a few products subject to tariffication in Dominica,for which rates higher than the CET apply.
76. With the exception of St. Kitts and Nevis, no OECS country registered other duties and
charges in their WTO Schedules.  St. Kitts and Nevis bound other duties and charges generally at 18%
(3% CSC and 15% consumption tax), with a number of exceptions.  Several OECS Members have
increased their customs service charge recently:  Dominica, for example, increased its customs
surcharge from 1% to 2%, St. Vincent and the Grenadines from 2.5% to 4%, and St. Kitts and Nevis
from 3% to 5%.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 23
(iii) Preferential tariffs and rules of origin
77. All OECS countries grant duty-free access to imports from other CARICOM countries,
barring those where exceptions are granted under Articles 28, 29 and 56 of the CARICOM Treaty.
However, the CSC is generally applied on impor ts from other CARICOM countries.  Given their
status of less developed countries within CARICOM, the OECS countries are not obliged to grant
concessions to countries with which CARICOM has signed bilateral trade agreements.
78. With respect to rules of origin, OECS Memb ers follow CARICOM rules.  Origin is based
mainly on the use of prescribed regional raw materials (Table III.7).  Qualifying conditions may be
"wholly produced" and "substantial transformation";  substantial transformation includes a change in
tariff heading by the working or processing of extra-regional materials, manufacture in which certain
prescribed materials of Common Market origin are used, or the achievement of a prescribed level of
regional value added.
Table III.7
CARICOM rules of origin
Rules of origin Product
Wholly produced A range of:  meat products;  fish;  vegetables (frozen, preserved or dried);  fruit
(frozen, preserved or dried) and nuts;  products of milling industry;  oil seeds;
vegetable materials;  cocoa beans;  sugar;  molasses
Produced from regional materials A range of:  oils;  animal products;  sugar confectionery;  vegetable, fruit and
nut preparations;  mineral waters;  liqueurs and other spirituous beverages;
vinegar;  wood, wood products and carpentry work;  wicker work;  ceramicproducts;  articles of cement;  articles of plaster;  articles of glass;  jewellery;
gold and silver in semi-manufactured forms;  steel products
Produced by chemical transformation A range of chemical products included in HS Chapters 28-39
Non-regional material content must not exceed 10%
of export price of finished productA range of plastic products
Produced from materials not included in HS 43.03
and not being furskins assembled in plates, crosses orsimilar formsArticles of apparel, clothing, accessories and other articles of furskin (HS 43.03)
Value of extra-regional materials must not exceed
30% of the export price of the finished productDyed or printed fabrics
Value of extra-regional materials must not exceed
50% of the export price of the finished productA group of products including:   paper products;  a range of products included in
HS Chapters 73-96:  copper, nickel and aluminium and articles thereof;  lead, tin
and zinc and articles thereof;  other base metals;  miscellaneous articles of base
metal;  tools;  machinery and mechanical appliances;  boilers;  electrical
machinery and parts;  railway or tramway locomotives and parts thereof;vehicles other than railway and tramway locomotives and parts thereof;  aircraft
and parts thereof;  ships and boats and floating structures;  optical,
photographic, cinematographic, measuring, checking, medical or surgicalinstruments and apparatus and parts and accessories thereof;  clocks and
watches;  musical instruments;  furniture;  arms and ammunitions;  toys;
miscellaneous articles
Source: CARICOM Secretariat.  List of Conditions to be complied with as provided under Article 14 of the Annex to the Treaty and the
rules regarding Common Market origin, Schedule II, 1 January 1998.
79. There is a safeguard mechanism, under which a manufacturer may use extra-regional
materials that cannot be found in CARICOM Stat es with prior temporary derogation from the
qualifying criteria by the CARICOM Council.  Derogations of rules of origin have been granted to
OECS Members in respect of spices, peas and beans, coffee, peanuts, rice, refined sugar, fruit pulp
and fruit juice concentrates, as well as plywood and certain coniferous species of wood, and a few
other products.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 24
(iv) Other duties and charges
80. No OECS country has a value-added tax (Grenada abandoned its VAT and replaced it with a
consumption tax), although several are currently conducting studies to consider its introduction.
81. All countries under review apply a consumpti on tax at varying rates;  consumption taxes,
particularly on imports, are a major source of revenue (Table III.8).  In most countries, rates applied
on revenue-sensitive products, such as motor vehicles, are the highest.  Agricultural products and foodare in general excluded or zero-rated.  The brunt of taxation falls in manufactured goods, and there is
generally a positive correlation between tariff rate and consumption tax rate.
Table III.8
Consumption Tax, 2000
Country Tax rates Tax baseBound in
the WTO
Antigua and
Barbuda0%, 15%, 20%, and 30%.  Aerated beverages, and some types
of motor vehicles are taxed at 50%.  Petroleum products aresubject to an adjusting specific tax rate.Domestically produced goods:  sale
priceImports:  c.i.f. value plus tariffNo
Dominica The general tax rate is 25%, but many items are not taxable,
including foodstuffs, health-related products, machinery, parts,books, government procurement goods, and products imported
under the different incentive schemes.  A few products are
subject to specific tax rates.Applied on all manufactured goods
produced in or imported intoDominica
Domestically produced goods:  ex-
factory priceImports:  c.i.f. value plus import
dutiesNo
Grenada Domestically produced goods and most goods from other
CARICOM countries taxed at 10%.  Imports from non-
CARICOM countries, where there is no domestic production
taxed at 25% tax rate barring exceptions, e.g. wine and spirits,and household appliances are taxed at 10%.  Most agricultural
and food products, computers and medicaments, Government
and some producer associations purchases are zero-rated.Domestically produced goods:  ex-
factory price
Imports:  c.i.f. value plus import
dutiesNo
St. Lucia Consumption  tax applied on most non-agricultural products;
rates vary between zero and 45%
Excise tax:  34-100% (motor vehicles and propellant
powders);  specific for alcoholic beverages.Domestically produced goods:
wholesale price
Imports:  c.i.f. value of imports plus
tariffNo
St. Kitts and
NevisGeneral tax rate: 15%;  some products subject to lower
ad valorem  rates or to specific rates.  General tax rate
increased to 20% on 1 January 2001.Domestically produced goods:
wholesale price
Imports:  c.i.f. value of imports plus
tariffYes
St. Vincent and
the GrenadinesRates may be ad valorem , between 2.5 and 65%, or specific
(wheat flour, certain wines and alcoholic beverages, and
petroleum oils and gases).  Some basic foods are duty-exempt.Domestically produced goods:
current market price
Imports:  c.i.f. value of imports plustariffNo
Source . Information provided by the authorities.
82. Consumption tax rates have been increased in some OECS Members in conjunction with
tariff reductions.  In St. Vincent and the Grenadines, rates were last increased on 1 January 1998 tooffset revenue losses caused by lower tariffs resulting from the implementation of Phase IV of the
CET.  In St. Lucia, an excise tax was introduced in late 1999, prior to the implementation of Phase IV
of the CET reductions on 1 January 2000, to replace the consumption tax on a number of products.
The new excise tax rates took the reduction in tariffs into account, and were designed to be revenue-
neutral.  St. Kitts and Nevis increased the consumption tax on 1 January 2001.
83. Some other duties apply to imported products.  Environmental taxes on returnable glass and
plastic containers, are applied in all countries.  Dominica also imposes an environmental charge on
gasoline, and on domestic appliances, electric heaters, and television receivers.  In Grenada, an
environmental levy is charged on a range of imported electrical appliances, and on imported vehicles.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 25
84. The incidence of other duties and charges on total imports varies considerably among the
OECS Members.  The incidence of the consumption tax is highest in Dominica, where it represents
17.4% of import value, and lowest in Antigua and Barbuda (9.6%).  Total charges on imports
(including tariffs and the CSC) are highest in  St. Lucia and Dominica (27.9 and 27.6% of import
value) and lowest in Antigua and Barbuda (21.8%).  The incidence of the customs service charge is
lowest in Dominica (1.1%) and highest in Grenada (4.3%).  For the OECS as a whole, the incidenceof the consumption tax is 12.9% of the value of imports, and the total incidence of taxes on
international trade is 26.3% of the value of imports (Table I.4).
(3) N
ON-TARIFF MEASURES
(i) Import prohibitions, restrictions and licensing
(a) Import prohibitions
85. The Customs Act of each of the OECS Members contains a list of prohibited imports.  These
are generally goods that are hazardous to health or safety, such as drugs, and food unfit for human
consumption, as well as counterfeit coins and stamps.  Reflecting UN restrictions, imports from Iraq
are banned.  The  importation of some kinds of fish is prohibited  in Grenada.
(b) Quantitative import restrictions and licensing86. OECS Members, except Dominica, use an extensive system of import licensing.  Non-
automatic licensing is applied on products whose importation is restricted for sanitary, phytosanitary
or safety reasons, generally:  live animals;  poultry, plants, vegetable, fruit and plant products;
pesticides;  controlled drugs; and arms, ammunition, and explosives, for which permits are required to
obtain a licence.
87. The import licensing regime is generally administered by the Ministry of Commerce or Trade
in each country.  The list of products subject to licensing is contained in a Negative List, or in anExternal Trade (Restricted Imports) Order, and generally comprises three or four Schedules
containing products subject to licensing.  Generally, goods are divided between products that require
an import licence when imported from any country that is not an OECS member and goods that
require a licence when imported from any country that is not an OECS or CARICOM member.  In
some countries, licences are also required for goods from other OECS Members, often related to somegeneral importation restriction due to sanitary reasons, or because a domestic marketing board has, in
principle, an import monopoly on the good.
88. Licensing is required for the importation of soaps, and margarine, shortening, and oils when
the source is a more developed CARICOM count ry (CARICOM MDC) or a third country, under
Schedule IX of the CARICOM Treaty.  These and some other goods are subject to priority sourcingfrom CARICOM, although according to the authorities in various countries, this rule is seldom
enforced.  In some countries, licences are required for imports of certain clothing products from non-
CARICOM sources and there is priority sourcing  of these products from other CARICOM States.
89. Non-automatic licensing is applied on products subject to quantitative restrictions under
Article 56 of the CARICOM Treaty.  To promote the development of an industry, OECS countriesand other less developed CARICOM members may impose quantitative restrictions and non-
automatic import licensing on imports from CARICO M  MDCs.  The measure must be authorized by
a majority decision of the COTED.  In some case, products granted exemptions under Article 56 are
subject only to import licencing and not to quantitative restrictions.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 26
90. All OECS Members maintain restrictions under Article 56.  Although these restrictions refer
in principle only to other CARICOM members, in practice they are applied to all trading partners.
The restrictions are combined with a non-automatic licensing requirement.  Amounts allowed for
importation are determined every year based on domestic production and import figures for the
previous three years, once a domestic and sub-regional (OECS) volume of production has been
decided.  Import quotas are calculated as the difference between estimated demand and domesticsupply plus a growth factor.  The following products are subject to quantitative restrictions:  curry
powder;  wheat flour;  uncooked pasta;  aerated beve rages;  beer;  candles;  oxygen;  carbon dioxide;
acetylene;  paper bags;  solar water heaters;  chairs and other seats of wood and upholstered fabric.
91. Other restrictions, besides those allowed by Article 56 are applied in some countries.  Until
recently, between 55 and 60% of the market for T-shirts in Antigua and Barbuda was reserved fordomestic producers.  In Grenada, quantitative import restrictions are in place, for textiles under the
Importation of Textile (Quotas) Act, although the authorities noted that this measure has never been
used.  Also, imports of beer and malt from third countries and from CARICOM MDCs are subject to
quantitative restrictions.  In St. Vincent and the Grenadines, beer and malt from third countries and
CARICOM MDCs are subject to import quotas.
92. In some cases, quantitative restrictions have been found to be inconsistent with Article 56 by
the CARICOM Council.  Such is the case for the measure by Antigua and Barbuda, which reserves
75% of its domestic market for locally produced brewery products.  However, the measure continues
to be applied.
93. Dominica is the only OECS country to have tariffied the products in its Negative List in 1998.
The resulting tariffs are high, up to 200%, but were calculated taking into account its WTO bindings.
In early 2001, only MFN tariffs had been tariffied;  preferential tariffs to be applied to imports fromother CARICOM countries, that are subject to Article 56 restrictions were under negotiation.
(ii) Safeguards
94. OECS Members have no domestic legislation with respect to safeguards, although only
Dominica has notified this in the WTO.  CARICOM rules on safeguards are used.
95. Rules for the application of safeguards within the CARICOM area are provided in Articles 28
and 29 of the CARICOM Treaty.  Article 28 permits a member to introduce quantitative restrictions
on imports for the purpose of safeguarding its balance of payments.  Article 29 allows quantitative
import restrictions if a particular sector experiences serious difficulties due to an increase in imports
from other CARICOM members as a result of the establishment of the Common Market.  The
application of these safeguard measures does not require approval by the CARICOM Council buttheir renewal beyond an 18-month period must be approved by the Council by majority vote.
96. Most OECS countries have maintained restrictions under Article 29.  Grenada, St. Kitts and
Nevis, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines, for example, apply or have applied import quotas to the
importation of beer and malt from third countries and CARICOM MDCs;  Antigua and Barbuda
sought to obtain a safeguard under Article 29 for detergents but it was not approved by theCARICOM Council.  Dominica reported that they do not use Article 29 measures.
97. CARICOM's free-trade agreements with Colombia and with the Dominican Republic also
allow the application of temporary bilateral safeguards in the form of suspension of tariff preferences.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 27
(iii) Anti-dumping and countervailing measures
98. No OECS Member has as yet modified its legislation on anti -dumping and countervailing
measures to take account of the WTO Agreements on Anti-Dumping, and on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures.  Existing legislation dates from the pre-Independence period, with the latest
national laws dating from 1964.  According to CA RICOM sources, in late 2000, funding for the
preparation of model legislation on ant-dumping and countervailing measures, at a CARICOM level,had been  secured from UNDP as part of the Single Market Project.  In early 2001, Dominica and
St. Lucia were the only OECS Members to have notified their anti-dumping and countervailing duty
legislation in the WTO.
99. OECS Members have never imposed anti-dumping or countervailing duties.  One
investigation has been reported to have taken pla ce in Grenada.  Antigua and Barbuda, and St. Lucia
have notified the WTO Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures that they maintain no
measures requiring notification.  There are no anti-dumping bodies in place in any of the countries,
and eventual investigations would have to be conducted by officials in the ministry responsible for
trade.
100. Anti-dumping and countervailing duty legislation exists at the CARICOM level.  Protocol IX
Amending the Treaty Establishing the Caribbean Community includes definitions and guidelines for
the determination of dumping and subsidies.  Many of the provisions of Protocol IX follow the WTO
Anti-Dumping, and Subsidies and Countervailing Measure Agreements, but their scope is regional,
referring only to actions by CARICOM member s.  Although all OECS Members have signed
Protocol IX, this is not yet in force, awaiting signature by Belize and Suriname.
(4) G
OVERNMENT PROCUREMENT
101. None of the OECS Members is a party to the WTO Plurilateral Agreement on Government
Procurement.  With the exception of St. Lucia, government procurement is only centralized for largeinvestment projects.  Under the information made available for this Review, the procurement process
in general seems to lack transparency, and this may hinder access to markets that generally represent
between 10% and 15% of GDP in each OECS Member.  The authorities noted that the procurement
process is open to foreign suppliers;  however, in practice, for supplies and small purchases, local
purchase orders are generally used, and in the case of small local public works projects, tenderingmay be advertised at a local or regional level only, sometimes using lists of suppliers.  For large
projects, tenders are published in the respective government gazettes.  In this case, the tendering rules
of the financing agency are often applied.  For example, projects financed by the Caribbean
Development Bank (CDB) follow CD B procurement rules and generally carry a requirement to grant
a margin of preference of 8% for local or regional suppliers.
102. Reforms to public procurement would enhance transparency and reduce purchasing costs.  In
an attempt to discipline the procurement process, Antigua and Barbuda has established a TendersBoard, and St. Kitts and Nevis created a Central Purchasing Unit to gradually centralize procurement.
In Antigua and Barbuda, the Government has also prepared an Ordinance on Government
Procurement, which is expected to be issued in 2001.  Among OECS Members, St. Lucia has more
clearly managed to centralize procurement above a certain threshold, beyond which the Central
Tenders Board is the sole procurement agency.  CARICOM is seeking assistance to implement agovernment procurement regime at a regional level.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 28
IV. OTHER MEASURES AFFECTING TRADE
(1) INTRODUCTION
103. A regionally harmonized but complex web of incentives is in place, mainly in the form of
income tax exemptions, and the waiver of tariffs and other duties and charges on imports.  The
authorities noted that this was an attempt to matc h competing regimes in other countries.  Some of
these programmes have local-content requirements, and in some cases provide support contingent on
exportation.  Exporters may benefit from a number of other advantages, for example, export creditguarantees.  In some countries, exporters may also benefit from free-trade zones, although activity in
these remains limited.
104. OECS Members have state enterprises that perform the function of marketing boards,
enjoying monopoly rights on the importation of certain basic staples.  In many cases, these products
are also subject to price controls.  At the country level, only St. Vincent and the Grenadines haslegislation on competition policies.
105. Standards bodies have been established in each of the OECS Members;  these bodies act
independently and their degree of development varies.  The Grenada Bureau of Standards is the onlyone to have issued a significant number of standards, and some technical regulations.  The
implementation of intellectual property legislation and amendments varies substantially among OECS
Members:  some countries have adopted new laws in most areas covered by the TRIPS Agreement,while others are still applying legislation pre-dating the WTO and, usually, Independence.
(2) E
XPORT MEASURES
106. OECS Members apply no taxes or levies on exports, with the following exceptions:  Antigua
and Barbuda applies taxes on exports of lobsters and fish;  St. Kitts and Nevis applied taxes on live
animals, cotton, and some other products;  and, St. Vincent and the Grenadines applied a 3% export
tax on certain commodities until 1998.
107. In general, there is no preshipment inspection of exports as a requirement;  however, in
St. Vincent and the Grenadines, preshipment inspection takes places for exports to some destinations,
in particular, Barbados, for sanitary and phytosanitary reasons.  Export shipment documents are
examined by Customs at the port of exit, particularly when there is a benefit attached to exportation;
export warrants are required in certain cases.
108. Prohibited and restricted exports in each OECS Member are listed either in a schedule of the
Customs Act or in a Trade Regulation Order.  Certain exports are prohibited in accordance with the
CITES.  In general, other restricted exports include narcotics, hazardous goods, some live animals,
and ginger and dry coconut.  Export licences are generally required for certain seafood for which open
and closed season practices are used.  Agricultural exports generally require clearance from the
corresponding Ministry of Agriculture.
109. Dominica, and St. Kitts and Nevis have notified to the WTO that they maintain no specific or
direct export subsidies, within the meaning of Article 2 of the Agreement on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures or Article XVI:1 of the GATT 1994, respectively.  The other OECS
Members have made no notifications in this respect.
110. Incentives linked with exportation are, however, in place:  some benefits under the respective
Fiscal Incentives Acts are granted to enclave enterprises exporting all of their production;  relief fromOECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 29
income tax is granted to manufacturing enterprises on the profits accruing from exportation, provided
that the enterprise is not enjoying another tax holiday.
111. Antigua and Barbuda, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines have legislation with
respect to free zones but such zones operate only in the first two countries.  Under the existing free
zone legislation, licensees enjoy a number of benefits including the exemption from:  customs duties
for imports of machinery and equipment, inputs, fuels, and supplies;  income taxes on their
international activities;  quotas or import restrictions;  import licensing requirements (except forhealth and safety reasons);  and price controls.  Free zones may be established for the distribution of
goods;  commercial operations in the St. Lucia Goods Distribution Free Zone began in April 2000.
112. The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB) offers OECS exporters insurance coverage
against the risks involved in exporting on commer cial terms, under and Export Credit Guarantee
Scheme.  The ECCB facility covers up to 80% of political and commercial risks.  The scope of this
scheme has been limited by the relative small size of the manufacturing sector in the OECS area.  The
liability outstanding under the scheme at the end of 1999 was EC$383,284 (US$141,957).
7  The soap
and detergent industry in Dominica has been one of the main users of the scheme.
(3) STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL REGULATIONS
113. There is no harmonization of (mandatory) technical regulations in the OECS or CARICOM.
The CARICOM Common Market Standards Council (CCM SC), established in 1973 as an Association
of all national standards bodies in the region, is charged with developing regional standards and
advising the Common Market Council on related te chnical matters.  However, the CCMSC mandate
does not extend to the establishment of technical regulations, an activity that remains fully under the
control of national bodies.  Thus, there are no regional technical regulations;  regional standards (not
mandatory) apply to some 44 products.  CARICOM's current efforts to further regional harmonization
is limited to standards.  The replacement of the CCMSC for a more independent body, the CARICOM
Regional Organization for Standards and Quality ( CROSQ), is envisaged.  Technical regulations
would continue to be issued, however, at a national level.
114. There is no OECS-level common policy concerning standards or technical regulations.  The
latter are issued exclusively at a national level.  All OECS Members have established their own
independent Bureau of Standards, but the extent to which the activities of these bureaux have been
developed varies considerably.  By far the most active is the Grenada Bureau of Standards (GDBS),
which has been functioning since 1989 and has issued a relatively large number of (national)
standards and technical regulations.  The only other active bureaux in the region are the St. LuciaBureau of Standards and the Antigua and Barbuda Bu reau of Standards.  As at late 2000, bureaux in
other countries were just starting to operate.  Only  the activities of the St. Lucia Bureau of Standards
have been notified to the WTO.
115. National standards and technical regulations ar e prepared by technical committees in the
different standards bureaux.  They must generally be approved by a national standards council, and
published in the national gazette for public comment, before they are adopted.  At end 2000, thebureaux of standards of the six OECS Members had adopted 116 national standards and 24 technical
regulations (Table IV.1).  The majority of national standards were adopted in Grenada, followed by
St. Lucia.  Only one standard had been adopted by Antigua and Barbuda, although some 29 have been
drafted.  Three standards had been drafted and sent for public comment in St. Vincent and the
Grenadines.
                                                     
7 ECCB (2000).WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 30
Table IV.1
Standards and technical regulations adopted, 2000
Country Bureau/date of creationNumber of
standardsNumber of
technical
regulationsOther activities of
the bureau
Antigua and Barbuda Antigua and Barbuda Bureau of Standards 0 0 Certification and testing
Dominica Dominica Bureau of Standards/2000 0 0 Certification and testing
Grenada Grenada Bureau of Standards/1989 78 10 Certification and testing;
calibration;  metrology
St. Kitts and Nevis St. Kitts and Nevis Bureau of Standards/1998 0 0 Certification and testing
St. Lucia St. Lucia Bureau of Standards/1990 38 14 Certification and testing;
calibration;  metrology
St. Vincent and theGrenadinesSt. Vincent and the Grenadines Bureau of
Standards/19980 0 Certification and testing;
calibration;  metrology
Total OECS 116 24
Source : Information provided by the authorities.
116. Although most regional bureaux of standards are mandated to conduct certification and
testing, these activities have been very limited.
(4) MARKET COMPETITION
(i) Marketing boards and price controls
117. Most OECS Members have state enterprises that perform the function of marketing boards.
Although their activities have been streamlined in recent years, and their monopoly rights curtailed,
they generally retain the monopoly on the importation of certain basic staples, such as rice, sugar and
flour in bulk, or of certain vegetables (Table IV.2).  In many cases, these products are also subject to
price controls.
Table IV.2
Marketing boards, 2000
Country Marketing board Products marketed exclusively by board
Antigua and
BarbudaCentral Marketing Corporation
(CMC), established in 1973Carrots, cabbage, onions, sweet peppers, and tomatoes.  Responsibility as sole
importer of bulk rice and sugar removed in 2000.
Dominica Dominica Banana Marketing
Corporation (DBMC), established
in 1984
Dominica Export and Import
Agency (DEXIA)DBMC empowered by 1984 Act to be the sole purchaser of bananas for export to
countries outside the Caribbean area.  This power was transferred to the Windward
Islands Banana Development and Exporting Company Limited (WIBDECO) in
1995.  DBMC has the monopoly to handle the receiving and loading of bananas in
Dominica.
Grenada Marketing and National
Importing Board (MNIB),
established in 1973Grenada Co-operative Nutmeg
Association (GCNA);  Grenada
Cocoa Association;  and GrenadaMinor Spices Co-operative
Marketing Society LimitedExclusive importation of bulk rice and sugar in 50 kg. polypropylene bags
Centralized importer of rice in bulk, full cream powdered milk in bags, refined
sugar in bags, and unrefined sugar in bulk
Exclusive marketing of Grenada's exports of nutmeg, cocoa, and minor spices
(cloves, cinnamon, pimento and all other spices except nutmeg and mace),respectively.  Grenada Banana Co-operative Society (GBCS) is no longer the sole
purchaser of bananas for export to countries outside the Caribbean Area:  banana
market liberalized.
St. Kitts and
NevisSt. Kitts Sugar Manufacturing
Corporation (SSMC)
Central Marketing Corporation(CEMACO)
Ministry of Trade and IndustrySole producer and exporter of sugar
Marketing agent for non-sugar agricultural produceMonopoly on importation of bulk rice, wheat flour, and evaporated milk
St. Lucia Ministry of Commerce Monopoly on importation of bulk rice, wheat flour, and sugar
St. Vincent
and the
GrenadinesSt. Vincent and the Grenadines
Marketing Corporation,
established in 1975Diamond Dairies Ltd.Sole importer of edible oils and fats, and sugar in bulk.  Until 2000, also had the
monopoly on importation of bulk rice
Sole importer of dairy products
Source : Information provided by the authorities.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 31
118. The Windward Islands Banana Development Company (WIBDECO), jointly owned by the
banana growers and the governments of Dominica, Grenada, St Lucia, and St Vincent and the
Grenadines, undertakes the transport and marketing of bananas from the Windward Islands to their
traditional market in the United Kingdom, under th e EU banana regime.  WIBDECO also supports the
farmers associations through the provision of inputs and quality assurance programmes.
119. Price controls are used in all OECS Members for a wide range of products, generally
encompassing beverages, staples, salt, construction materials, fuels, and soaps and detergents.  Insome cases, prices are controlled directly by setting maximum prices.  In other cases, maximum
wholesale markups are set on the landed costs or maximum retail markups are set on the wholesale
price.  Landed costs are calculated as the c.i.f. value plus the import duty and consumption tax,
generally plus a certain margin on the c.i.f. value.  Wholesale markups vary according to the country
and product:  they range between 5% and 100%, while retail markups range between 10% and 100%(Table IV.3).
Table IV.3
Price controls, 2000
Country Type of control Products subject to price controls
Antigua
and
BarbudaMaximum wholesale markup on landed
cost (10% to 12.5%) and maximum
retail markup on wholesale price (10%to 22.5%)
Maximum wholesale and retail pricesAerated and mineral waters, poultry and parts, biscuits, bread and cakes, beer,
butter, margarine, cheese, cocoa, coffee, tea, confectionery, fish, fruit, nuts,
fruit juices, oats, rice, flour, pasta, jams, meats and preparations, milk, oil andfats, condiments, sauces, salt, starch, soaps, sugar, vegetables, school books,
toothpaste, disinfectants, insecticides
Gasoline, diesel, kerosene, gas, LPG
Dominica Maximum retail markup on landed cost
(between 10% and 70%)
Maximum wholesale markup on landed
cost (5% to 8%) and maximum retailmarkup on wholesale price (10% to
12%)
Fixed pricesSteel and aluminium sheeting products for construction, cement, nails,
plywood, tiles, sanitaries and kitchen sinks, pipes, electrical wires and sockets
and plugs, glass sheeting
Milk, baby foods, flour,  chicken, fish
Gasoline, diesel, kerosene, LPG
Grenada Maximum retail markup on landed cost
(between 20% and 36%)
Maximum wholesale markup on landed
cost (5% to 20%) and maximum retail
markup on wholesale price (10% to
40%)
Determined by regulationFencing wire, paints, nails, iron and steel, pencils and pens, ladies and
children underwear, hardware, school books, stationery, paints, lumber,cutlasses, agricultural implements, flash lights and bulbs
Sardines, bacon, ham, biscuits, butter, cooking oil, corned beef, salted fish,
flour, cocoa, fruit juices, canned and pickled mackerel, pickled meats,
powdered milk, rice, sugar, salted fish, baking powder, cheese, margarine and
lard, canned meats, onions, potatoes, chicken, poultry feed, cement patent andproprietary medicines.
Gasoline,  kerosene, LPG.
St. Kitts
and NevisFixed prices or maximum wholesale
markup on landed cost (10%, 33.33% or
40%) and maximum retail markup on
wholesale price (15%)Poultry feed, chicken and parts, meat, fish, corn meal, flour, milk, butter,
cheese, margarine, sausages, sardines, biscuits, cereals, lard, oils, peas and
beans, sugar, salt, soups, coffee, tea, rice, pasta, corned beef, juices, ketchup,
toilet paper, fruits, salt, toothpaste, soaps, detergents, bleach, matches,gasoline, LPG, building materials, furniture
St. Lucia Maximum wholesale markup on landed
cost (7.5% to 15%) and maximum retail
markup on wholesale price (10% to
18%)Fixed pricesImported flour, milk, packaged rice, onions, potatoes, garlic, school supplies,
baby foods, cereals, dried peas and beans
Gasoline, diesel, kerosene, bread, cement, wheat , flour, rice, sugar, copra
St. Vincent
and the
GrenadinesMaximum wholesale markup on landed
cost (5% to 15%) and maximum retail
markup on wholesale price (10% to
100%)Fixed pricesMilk, flour, rice, sugar, pharmaceutical, stationary and hardware products,
petrol and motor vehicles
Gasoline, diesel, kerosene, flour, rice
Source : Information provided by the authorities.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 32
120. The prices of gasoline and diesel in all OECS Members are adjusted only by regulation.  A
buffer system is operated:  the tax on the fuels is adjusted as international prices change to bring their
domestic price to administratively set levels.
(ii) Competition policy and regulatory issues
121. Legislation on competition policies at the country level exists only in St. Lucia and in
St. Vincent and the Grenadines.  The authorities in the various countries were consideringimplementing legislation in this respect once CARICOM's Protocol IX on Competition Policy was
ratified by all members.
122. A Fair Trading Commission was created in St . Vincent and the Grenadines in 1999.  The
Commission's role is to regulate uncompetitive practices, such as agreements that lessen competition
or contain exclusionary clauses;  abuse of dominant position;  and practices that lessen competition,such as price fixing, production control or marketing-sharing agreements.  The Commission may
conduct investigations, and if any violation of the competition law is found, may bring the case to
court to request civil remedies;  there are no penal remedies.
(iii) Assistance to activities
123. Assistance to manufacturing and some service activities is widely used by OECS Members.
Their fiscal cost appears sizeable:  according to calculations by the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank,
up to 40% of potential fiscal revenue is forgone in the OECS area under some kind of fiscal incentive
scheme or import duty concessions.
124. Assistance to activities in OECS Members is governed by pre-Independence legislation,
which was harmonized at the CARICOM level and, like the tariff, guided by an import-substitution
strategy.  Further coordination of incentive schemes at the CARICOM level is expected:  Protocol III
of the amendments to the CARICOM Treaty (I ndustrial Policy) seeks to establish a community
investment policy with a harmonized system of investment incentives.  Under Article XIV ofProtocol III (harmonization of investment incentives ), member States are expected to go beyond that
harmonization and harmonize completely national incentives to investments in the industrial,
agricultural, and services sectors.
125. Each OECS Member has a Fiscal Incentives Act, passed in the mid 1970s or early 1980s,
which contains a number a similar guidelines for the concession of tax incentives, in principle limitedin time.  The Acts provide a number of benefits for manufacturing enterprises contingent on national
content and on exportation.  They allow for the granti ng of an income-tax holiday of up to 15 years
for the manufacture of approved products by approved enterprises;  the holiday period lengthens as
the share of local value in sales increases.  Enterprises classified as highly capital intensive, in which
there is investment above a certain minimum, are also granted a tax holiday of up to 15 years.  The
Acts also grant import duty exemptions for the importation of machinery, equipment, spare parts,
building materials, raw materials, and packaging to be used in eligible enterprises.
126. The different Fiscal Incentives Acts also contain provisions granting relief past the tax
holiday period, namely the waiver of income tax on the export profits accruing from the exportation
of an approved manufactured product.  Relief is generally provided for exports to all countries;
however, it is limited to five years for exports to Guyana, Jamaica, and Trinidad and Tobago.  Relief
is granted only if export profits amount to at least 10% of an enterprise's total profits accruing fromsales of an approved product.  The maximum percentage of tax relief depends on the participation of
export profits in total profits.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 33
127. Manufacturing enterprises not enjoying the benefits of a Fiscal Incentives Act, and with a
local value added of 40% or more, may generally benefit from import duty concessions under the List
of Conditional Duty Exemptions of the CET.  Ma nufacturing enterprises may also generally benefit
from discretionary tariff and consumption tax concessions on machinery, raw materials, and
packaging.  Registered manufacturers have also been exempt from the payment of the customs service
charge in certain countries.  The magnitude of the concessions granted under the different incentivesschemes is difficult to quantify, especially in countries where electronic records are not kept, but
estimates range from 1.3% of GDP in St. Lucia, to 5.7% in St. Kitts and Nevis.
128. Incentives are also provided to tourism activities in all OECS Members under different Hotel
Aid or Tourism Incentives Acts.  These Acts generally exempt approved tourist products from income
tax for a period of 10, 15, or 20 years, depending on the country, and grant customs duty andconsumption tax waivers for the importation of supplies, equipment, and materials needed for the
construction of hotels.  Income tax exemptions and customs duty waivers are also granted to farmers
and fishermen in some OECS Members.
129. Enterprises from all OECS Members may benefit from concessionary credits funded or
guaranteed by the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB), which was established in 1970 as anassociate institution of CARICOM to promote region al economic and social development.  The CDB
may invest in the equity capital of an enterprise, make loans directly, or guarantee loans made to the
Government, national development banks or other financial institutions so that these can finance
development projects.  For the allocation of credit or guarantees, the CDB gives priority to nationals
of CARICOM member countries and to companies effe ctively controlled by them.  CDB loans to the
private sector carried an interest rate of 8.75% in 2000, with a repayment period of 14 years with three
years grace.  To benefit from CDB funding, projects should have an expected minimum rate of return
of 12%.
(iv) Intellectual property rights
130. Intellectual property legislation is not harmonized across OECS Members.  Some countries
still apply laws based on United Kingdom legisl ation dating from before Independence;  other
countries have amended legislation to comply with the TRIPS Agreement.  In recent years, mostOECS Members have undertaken reform of their intellectual property legislation, with the aid of
WIPO;  they have also joined vari ous WIPO instruments (Table IV.4).
131. Only Dominica, St. Kitts and Nevis, and St. Lucia have a national registry specifically
for intellectual property rights.  In the other three countries, registration of intellectual
property rights takes place in the Registry of the High Court.  Most countries in the region have asystem of re-registration of trade marks and patents from the United Kingdom.  In St. Lucia, this
situation co-exists with a national registration system .  In others countries, like St. Vincent and the
Grenadines, there is only re-registration.  There are generally few patent registrations in OECS
Members, but considerably more trade mark registrations.
132. The degree to which the OECS Members have amended or introduced domestic legislation to
reflect the TRIPS Agreement varies considerably.  No country has completed the process.  Dominica
has made the most progress, updating or introducing domestic legislation regarding trade marks,
industrial designs, geographical indications, patents, and protection of layout-designs of integrated
circuits, between 1998 and 2000 (Table IV.5).  No new or amended legislation with respect to the
protection of intellectual property rights has been passed in Antigua and Barbuda, Grenada, and
St. Vincent and the Grenadines since the inception of the WTO.  In Antigua and Barbuda, however,WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 34
draft legislation is being prepared with respect to copyright and related rights, layout designs, trade
marks and geographical indications.  Under current legislation, the terms and scope of protection of
intellectual property rights vary substantially among the different OECS Members (Table IV.6).
Table IV.4
Membership in international instruments on intellectual property rights
Convention/InstrumentAntigua
and
Barbuda Dominica GrenadaSt. Kitts and
Nevis St. LuciaSt. Vincent and
the Grenadines
The Convention Establishing the WorldIntellectual Property OrganizationYes (2000) Yes (1998) Yes (1998 Yes (1995) Yes (1993) Yes (1995)
Paris Convention Yes (2000) Yes (1998) Yes (1998) Yes (1995) Yes (1995) Yes (1995)
Berne Convention Yes (2000) Yes (1998) Yes (1998) Yes (1995) Yes (1993) Yes (1995)
Patent Cooperation Treaty Yes (2000) Yes (1998) Yes (1998) No Yes (1996) No
Rome Convention No Yes (1998) No No Yes (1996) No
Nice Agreement No Yes (2000) No No Yes (2000) No
Madrid Agreement Yes (2000) No No No No No
WIPO Copyrights TreatyaNo No No No Yes No
Amendment to Article 9(3) of the
WIPO ConventionsaNo Yes No No Yes No
WIPO Performances and Phonograms
TreatyaNo No No No Yes No
a Not yet in force.
Source : World Intellectual Property Organization.
Table IV.5
Intellectual property rights legislation
FieldAntigua and
Barbuda Dominica GrenadaSt. Kitts and
Nevis St. LuciaSt. Vincent and
the Grenadines
Trade marks Trademarks Act
based on the
Registration ofUK Trade
Marks .Marks,
Collective Marks
and Trade NameAct No. 12 of
1999Registration of
UK Trade Marks
Act, Cap. 284Marks,
Collective Marks
and Trade NamesAct No. 10 of
2000Commercial
Code Ch. 244
Title X Vol. 5.Revised Laws of
Saint Lucia 1957Registration of
UK Trade Marks
Act, Cap. 113
Layout
designsNo legislation Protection of
Layout-Designs
(Topographies)of Integrated
Circuits Act
No. 11 of 1999No legislation No legislation Layout Designs
(Topographies)
of IntegratedCircuits Act
No. 3 of 2000No legislation
Plant varieties No legislation Protection of
New Plant
Varieties ActNo. 14 of 1999No legislation No legislation No legislation No legislation
Industrial
designsNo legislation Industrial
Designs ActNo. 2 of 1998UK Designs
Protection Act,Cap. 331No legislation Industrial
Designs ActNo. 2 of 2001UK Designs
Protection Act,Cap. 116
GeographicalindicationsNo legislation Geographical
Indications ActNo. 13 of 1999.No legislation No legislation Geographical
Indications ActNo. 4 of 2000No legislation
Patents Patents Act,
section 91 of theUK 1907 Patents
and Designs ActPatents Act
No. 8 of 1999Registration of
UK Patents Act,Cap. 283Patents Act No. 9
of 2000Commercial
Code Ch. 244Title X Vol. 5Patents Act
Cap. 110;Registration of
UK Patents Act,
Cap. 112
Copyright Copyright
(Antigua and
Barbuda) Order,1965Copyright
(Dominica)
Order, 1965Copyright Act
Cap. 67Copyright No. 8
of 2000Copyright Act
No. 10 of 1995Copyright Act
No. 53 of 1989,
Cap. 262
Source: Information provided by the authorities.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 35
Table IV.6
Terms of intellectual property rights protection
AreaAntigua and
Barbuda Dominica GrenadaSt. Kitts and
Nevis St. LuciaSt. Vincent and
the Grenadines
Trade marks As long as
protected in UK10 years As long as
protected in UK10 years 14 years As long as
protected in UK
LayoutdesignsNo legislation 10 years No legislation No legislation 10 years No legislation
Plant varieties No legislation 20 or 25 years No legislation No legislation No legislation No legislation
Industrial
designsNo legislation 5 years As long as
protected in UKNo legislation 5 years As long as
protected in UK
Patents As long as
protected in UK20 years As long as
protected in UK20 years 14 years As long as
protected in UK
Copyright As long as
protected in UKLife + 50 years As long as
protected in UKLife + 50 years Life + 50 years Life + 50 years
Source: Information provided by the authorities.
V. INVESTMENT AND MARKET ACCESS IN SERVICES
(1) INTRODUCTION
133. The services sector plays a central role in the economy of all OECS Members, accounting in
most cases for around 75-80% of GDP, and employing an  important portion of the work force.  In all
countries, tourism is the single largest contributor to GDP and the main earner of foreign exchange.
Financial services are also an important area, with several of the countries under review developing as
significant offshore financial centers.  Government services represent a major share of total services,
accounting for some 15-20% of GDP.  Other important  activities are retail trade and distribution, and
communications.
134. The schedules of commitments under the GATS presented by the six OECS Members contain
some common elements.  For example, all countries made commitments in hotel construction and
management, subject to number-of-room limitations, as well as in recreational and sporting services;
all except St. Kitts and Nevis made commitments in reinsurance.  In other areas, commitments varied
significantly and were in general relatively limited (Table V.1).  Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, and
Grenada presented improved offers in the WTO Negotiations on Telecommunications but no OECS
Member participated in the extended WTO Negotiations on Financial Services.
135. The members of CARICOM presented a Negotiating Proposal on Services to the WTO in
early 2001.  The proposal states the need for an assessment addressing the effects on world trade inservices of the specific commitments adopted by WTO members in the GATS;  this assessment
should ascertain the extent to which these commitments have contributed to increased participation by
developing countries in trade in services.  CARICOM considers that the revision of the GATS
Agreement, should focus on ensuring the legal consistency and on improving the clarity of its
provisions and not result in additional obligations for Members.  CARICOM proposes also that:  (a)
the negotiations on services be based on the request and offer approach;  (b) when negotiating
subsidies in the GATS, flexibility for developing country Members is granted; (c) safeguard measures
be included in the GATS, and extended to the four modes of supply; (d) MFN exemptions be
continued;  (e) further liberalization of the movement of natural persons be undertaken;  (f) both the
level of development and the size of the economy be given due weight in negotiations.  CARICOM
stresses the need for “special and differential” treatment for developing countries, in particular small
developing economies, based on an assessment of their needs.  The proposal underlines the need fortechnical assistance to carrying out these assessments, and to collect statistical information on services
trade.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 36
Table V.1
Sector-specific commitments under the GATS
Sector-specific commitmentsAntigua
and
Barbuda Dominica GrenadaSt. Kitts
and
NevisSt.
LuciaSt. Vincent
and the
Grenadines
1. Business services (professional, computer
related, and research and development services) Yes No No No No No
2. Communications services Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
B. Courier services No Yes Yes No No No
C. Telecommunication services Yes Yes Yes YesaNo No
7. Financial services Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
C. Reinsurance Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Registration of offshore companies and trusts No No No Yes No No
8. Health and related social services No No No No Yes No
A. Hospital services No No No No Yes No
9. Tourism and travel related services Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
A. Hotels developmentbYes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
B. Travel agencies and tour operators No No No No No Yes
C. Tourist guides services No No No No No Yes
10. Recreational and sporting services Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
A. Entertainment services Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
D. Sporting and other recreational Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
11. Transport services Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
A. Maritime Transport Services Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
International passenger transportation
services Yes No No No Yes Yes
Freight transportation services No No No No Yes Yes
Maintenance and repair of vessels Yes No No No No No
Ship registration and control No No No Yes No No
H. Auxiliary services No No No No Yes Yes
Transhipment services No No No No Yes Yes
Free Zone Operations No No No No Yes Yes
a Commitments in electronic mail, voice mail, and on-line and data processing services only.
b Subject to minimum room requirements (50 or 100 rooms).
Source: WTO GATS Schedules.
136. Horizontal commitments under the GATS generally included provisions regarding natural
persons and commercial presence, and reserve certain services for national small businesses.  The
provision of services through commercial presence generally requires local incorporation of theforeign service provider, and a licence must be obtained to hold property in accordance with the
different Alien Landholding Acts.  Employment of foreign natural persons is subject to work permit
regulations and labour and immigration laws.
137. Although commercial presence is in general open to foreign investment in most service areas,
restrictions still exist in some countries for specifi c activities, which are either reserved for nationals
(such as reserving small hotels for local investor s, or reserving the provision of certain maritime
services), or subject to additional requirements for foreigners.  Also, some national treatmentexceptions exist in some areas, such as insurance.  An important step to enhance competition in the
telecommunications sector, taken by OECS Members, except Antigua and Barbuda, has been the
liberalization of the market as of 31 March 2001, t hus ending the monopolies in the provision of basic
services.  Incentives are widely used to promote the construction and renovation of hotels.  Tax
exemptions apply to companies that are registered  as International Business Companies and provide
offshore services.OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 37
(2) FINANCIAL SERVICES
138. Financial services in the OECS accounted for some 10.9% of GDP in 1999, up from 8.7% at
the beginning of the 1990s.  The financial sector expanded in particular over the 1996-99 period.  In
all OECS Members, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the supervision and regulation of the
on-shore financial sector, in consultation with the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB).  A special
supervisory body has been created in most countries to regulate the offshore financial sector.  Ingeneral terms, banks and other companies providing offshore services are incorporated under different
legislation and are subject to different provisions than the on-shore industry.
(a) Banking
139. The exercise of banking activities in any OECS Member requires a licence from the
respective Ministry of Finance.  In all cases, applications are investigated by the ECCB, which makesa recommendation to the Ministry of Finance of the respective country.  Banks also require an
authorization from the relevant Ministry of Finance to undertake "fundamental" changes, such as a
reduction in paid-up capital, a transfer of assets and liabilities, or to enter into a merger or
consolidation.  Generally, there are no nationality restrictions for bank managers or directors.
Licences are specific to the country where they are granted;  there are no OECS-wide licences.
140. The Banking Acts of the OECS Members are fairly similar.  There are no distinctions
between domestic and foreign banks in respect of requirements on minimum paid-up or assigned
capital, in all cases this is EC$5 million.  On-shore banks may not engage in trade, or acquire an
interest in any financial or other undertaking;  th ey may hold shares in companies established for the
development of the money or securities markets, but only for up to 10% of the sum of their capital
and reserves.
(b) Insurance
141. The insurance sector in the OECS Members is dominated by agency arrangements.  There are
a large number of insurance companies registered in each country relative to the size of the market.
The main legislation on insurance is contained in the different Insurance Acts, some of which date
from the 1970s.  In general, there have been no major amendments to legislation since the conclusion
of the Uruguay Round.  The supervision of the insurance business is generally in the hands of theMinistry of Finance, through a Registrar of Insu rance or Supervisor of Financial Institutions.
142. Insurance companies require a licence from the Registrar of Insurance of the Ministry of
Finance to operate in any of the OECS Members;  the licence is valid only in the country in which it
was issued.  Market access is generally unrestricted for reinsurance in all modes of suppl y,
 subject to
the provisions of the different Insurance Acts in the case of commercial presence, and to the obtention
of work permits, as well as to immigration regulations in the case of the presence of natural persons.In the Uruguay Round, no market access offer was made for insurance, other than reinsurance by any
OECS Member.  In practice, however, in some countries all or the vast majority of insurance
companies operating are foreign-owned.
143. With the exception of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the provisions of the different
Insurance Acts do not in general terms, accord fo reign companies national treatment with respect to
minimum capital requirements.  Relative to domestic companies, foreign companies are required to a
have a higher minimum paid-up capital to be registered to carry on any type of insurance business.
They are also required to make higher deposits with the Registrar of Insurance.  On the other hand,WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 38
foreign companies are generally subject to less stringent requirements with respect to the lending of
their own funds.
(c) Offshore financial services
144. Offshore banking and insurance activities are regulated in most OECS Members by specific
legislation.  However, most OECS Members are taking steps to implement financial regulation for the
offshore industry in line with those applied to on-s hore banks.  The exercise of offshore banking and
insurance activities requires a licence from the Ministry of Finance or from the pertinent supervisory
authority;  licences do not entitle holders to undertake other offshore (or on-shore) activities.  In
Antigua and Barbuda, and in St. Lucia there are two kinds of licence, one for affiliates and
subsidiaries of foreign financial institutions, and another for other types of offshore banks.  In general,
licences in all countries are restricted in that they do not allow the holder to take deposits fromresidents or invest in assets that represent a claim on residents, except other licensees under some
offshore regulation.  All licences are subject to minimum capital requirements, varying according the
country and the type of licence.
145. A report by the G-7 Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF) named
Dominica, St. Kitts and Nevis, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines as "non-cooperative countries" and
urged them to improve their anti-money-laundering regime.  These countries were reviewed by the
FATF in early 2001.  Moreover, several of the OE CS Members have received advisories from the
United Kingdom and the United States.  At the Caribbean level, the Caribbean Financial Action Task
Force (CFATF), based in Trinidad, also monitors  money laundering issues.  In response to FATF
recommendations, some countries have adopted measures to regulate and monitor the offshore banks
more closely.  Antigua and Barbuda put in place a Money Laundering (Prevention) Act prohibiting
the transfer through financial institutions of any assets obtained illegally and overriding bank secrecyprovisions.  St. Kitts and Nevis put in place the Proceeds of Crime Act for the same purpose.
Dominica has recently updated its offshore legislation.
(3) T
ELECOMMUNICATIONS
146. Telecommunications and postal services in the OECS area accounted for 10.5% of GDP
in 1999, up from 7.9% in 1995.  Except in Antigua and Barbuda, basic telephony services arecontrolled by a monopoly held by Cable and Wireless Ltd.  In Antigua and Barbuda, telephony
services are operated by a state-owned company provide domestic services;  Cable and Wireless
(Antigua and Barbuda) Ltd. providing international services.  In general terms, Cable and Wireless
was granted an exclusive licence for 20 years by the OECS governments;  these exclusive licences
originally expired between 2006 and 2015.  However, the right to exclusive licence was terminatedthrough legislative fiat on 31 March 2001, the date of liberalization of the OECS telecommunications
market.
147. In May 2000, the governments of Dominica, Gren ada, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and
St. Vincent and the Grenadines signed the Treaty Establishing an Eastern Caribbean
Telecommunications Authority (ECTEL), to be located in St. Lucia.  In October 2000, the
liberalization of the telecommunications market for the five countries was agreed, and a transition
period of six months was given, to 31 March 2001.  As of that date, it was decided that national
markets would be liberalized within 18 months.  Each country modified its telecommunications
legislation accordingly, and issued a new Telecommunications Act acknowledging the role of ECTEL
as regulator at the OECS level and creating a National Telecommunications Regulatory Commissions
in each country.  The Commissions were assigned responsibility for domestic technical regulations,OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 39
for the regulation of tariffs of telecommunications se rvices, for the review of licence applications, and
for the compliance with each country's internationa l obligations in the area of telecommunications,
such as commitments under the GATS.  The authorities noted that, as at early 2001, ECTEL did not
act as a regime regulator, but as an adviser.
148. In accordance with the new Acts, licences are required for the provision of
telecommunications services and the operation of a network.  Licences may be individual or classlicences;  the terms and conditions are determined by the minister in charge of communications in
each country in consultation with ECTEL.  The different Acts contain criteria to be taken into account
for granting a licence, including universal service, low price, and enhancement of competition
considerations.  Interconnection agreements in each country must be approved by the respective
National Regulatory Commission.  All licences granted under the new policy are non-exclusive, andin this sense, previous practice, like the granting of exclusive licences to Cable and Wireless, are
outlawed.  In early 2001, most countries were negotiating with Cable and Wireless.
149. Despite the liberalization of the market, the concerted efforts for regional action, and the
similarity of the resulting new Telecommunications Acts, the OECS telecommunications market
remains fragmented.  Licences are granted at the national level, and only for the provision of servicesin the country in which they are granted:  a policy of regional licences, or of centralizing licensing
with ECTEL, is not envisaged yet.
150. Among OECS Members, only Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, and Grenada participated and
presented an offer in the WTO Negotiations on Basic Telecommunications Services.  The offers made
during the Uruguay Round reserved commercial presence in voice telephony and other services  for
Cable and Wireless during the period of its original exclusive licensing arrangement.  After this
period, the offers generally give unrestricted market access for all services, with the exception ofAntigua and Barbuda.  The provision of electric mail, Internet, and other services was opened
provided the network of the exclusive operators is used for the provision of those services.
(4) O
THER OFFSHORE SERVICES
151. Besides financial institutions, the offshore industry consists of management companies, and
other commercial companies, and providers of professional services, such as lawyers, resident agents,and accountants, all of which are generally referred to as International Business Companies (IBCs).
Other offshore services provided in the OECS include international ship registries, Internet gaming,
and Economic Citizenship Programmes in some countries.  There are a large number of  IBCs
registered in the OECS area (the main exception being St. Lucia).
152. The registration and licensing of IBCs is generally regulated by an International Business
Corporation Act;  this is distinct from the Companies Act, which applies to on-shore enterprises.  In
the main, IBCs are free to invest in the local econom y only to the extent that the investment relates to
the development of their business and the delivery of the services offered.  There are no restrictions
on pricing and no monopoly areas. IBCs enjoy a wide range of benefits including exemption from all
local taxes, duties and other similar charges for periods ranging from 20 to 50 years, according to thecountry, and exemption from the regulations of the Exchange Control Ordinance.
153. The Economic (or Honorary) Citizenship Programme was until recently a significant earner
of foreign exchange in some OECS Members, pa rticularly in Dominica.  To be granted Economic
Citizenship, individuals must make a one-time investment of a certain amount and pay certain fees.WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 40
Individuals granted Economic Citizenship are not required to pay taxes on income earned abroad.
The programme is currently under review.
154. Internet gaming is developing rapidly in OECS Members.  Internet gaming businesses usually
operate under an agreement between the gaming company and the Government of the host country.
The gaming business must be strictly offshore and gaming companies must register as IBCs, hence
enjoying the fiscal incentives and tax exemptions granted to offshore businesses in the country wherethey are registered (except in St. Kitts and Nevis).
(5) T
OURISM
155. Tourism is the main earner of foreign exchange in all OECS Members.  In 1999, tourism
receipts accounted for 55% of total exports of goods and services, and for about three times the value
of total exports of merchandise.  Receipts increased substantially during the 1990s, reaching EC$2.39billion (US$905 million) in 1999.  The main recipients in the region are Antigua and Barbuda, which
accounts for 32.8% of total tourism receipts in the OECS, and St. Lucia, which accounts for 30.8% of
the total (Table V.2).  The share of each of the other countries is below 10% of the total.  The number
of visitor arrivals reached 2.34 million in 1999.  Most of the arrivals are from the United States, the
United Kingdom, and other Caribbean countries.
Table V.2
Tourism statistics, 1999
Antigua
and
Barbuda Dominica GrenadaSt. Kitts
and Nevis St. LuciaSt. Vincent
and the
Grenadines OECS
Total arrivals 588,866 276,718 376,535 224,397 664,984 223,125 2,340,604
Stay-over arrivals 231,714 70,791 125,291 84,002 260,583 89,621 830,931
Cruise ship passengers 328,038 202,003 243,042 137,389 394,148 47,743 1,352,363
Same day visitors 6,622 3,924 8,202 3,006 10,253 17,468 50,331
Estimated expenditure
(EC$ million): 782.9 131.8 180.2 182.5 736.0 212,9 2,389.5
Stay-over visitors 735.2 116.4 167.7 171.1 689.4 105.6 1,985.4
Cruise ship passengers 24.8 14.7 12.0 11.0 45.8 2.2 110.5
Excursionists 1.4 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.7 5.4
Yachts 21.6 - - - - 103.4 125.0
Source: ECCB and Information provided by the authorities.
156. All OECS–WTO Members made commitments in their GATS Schedule of Specific
Commitments for the development of hotels.  They generally bound market access for thedevelopment of hotels in excess of 50 rooms, subject to alien landholding and exchange control
regulations.  Hotel development of less than 50 rooms (100 in St. Lucia) may be subject to an
economic needs test, and remains unbound.  In all countries, national treatment was bound for
commercial presence, but subject to the payment of withholding tax.  In some cases, other restrictions
apply :  in St. Kitts and Nevis, for example, ownership of non-ethnic restaurants is reserved for
nationals.  Alone among OECS Members, St. Vincent and the Grenadines made commitments with
respect to travel agencies and tour operators, and tourist guide services.
157. The tourist industry in the different OECS Members benefits from a number of fiscal
incentives, generally under a Hotel Aid Act, or similar legislation.  The incentives offered to investors
in approved hotels and resorts include relief from income tax and import duties on building materials,
machinery and equipment for hotel and resort developments, for periods ranging from 10 to 20 years,OECS-WTO Members WT/TPR/S/85
Page 41
depending on the country.  Benefits are extended for construction or renovation.  To benefit from
incentives a minimum number of rooms per establishment is usually required (five in most cases).
158. Tourism policy is formulated at the country level.  In each country, the Ministry of Tourism,
or the ministry in charge of tourism is responsible for policy formulation and implementation.
Incentives are under the responsibility of the body in charge of administering them, usually the
Ministry of Finance, Trade or Commerce, or a Development Corporation.  The role of the touristboard in each country is generally confined to marketing and promotion activities, but sometimes they
are also responsible for carrying out development plans for the sector.  Although not responsible for
policy issues, the boards are usually the focal point for coordination with the private sector.
(6) T
RANSPORTATION
159. Transportation represented some 11.4% of GDP of OECS Members in 1999, up from 10.9%
in 1995, maritime transport accounted for 22% and air transport for 18%.  A competitive
transportation policy is of particular interest to OECS Members since transportation represent a
substantial part of costs in the islands.  Given the small size of the market, unit costs tend to be high,
and this acts as a disincentive to the exportation of goods, while also adding to the cost of imports.
160. Antigua and Barbuda, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines
made commitments in maritime transport under the GATS;  no commitments were made by any
OECS Members with respect to other means of transportation.
(i) Maritime transport and related services
161. Maritime services accounted for some 2.5% of GDP in the OECS, as a whole, in 1999.
Maritime transport policy is formulated and implemented at the country level.  Ports are generally
owned and administered by a state-owned port authority in each country.  The relevant authorities
manage the country's ports, and provide cargo-handling services, and towage and dredging services.Foreign operators are permitted to operate maritime transport services between OECS Members.
They are also responsible for the provision of cargo and pilotage services and, in general, for the
determination of port charges.  In Dominica and Grenada, the port authority is the sole provider and
has the monopoly in the provision of all port services, although it sometimes contracts-out some
services.  In other Members, there is competition in the provision of some of these services, such astrans-shipment services.
162. Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, and St. Kitts and Nevis maintain an International Ships'
Registry.  The Antigua and Barbuda registry is particularly active, while the Dominica registry has
been created recently.  The OECS Members participate in a number of international maritime
conventions.  While all except St. Kitts and Nevis are parties to the International MaritimeConvention (IMO), participation in conventions is not coordinated, and the scope of each country's
participation varies considerably.
(ii) Air transport
163. Air transport accounts for some 2% of GDP in the OECS area.  Airports in the region are
generally under the control of the airports or civi l aviation authority.  The main two hubs in the OECS
are the V C Bird International Airport,  in Antigua, and the Hewanorra and G.F.L. Charles Airports in
St. Lucia.  Antigua and Barbuda, Grenada, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines are
signatories to the Chicago Convention of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).WT/TPR/S/85 Trade Policy Review
Page 42
These four States therefore have an international obligation to meet the standards and recommended
practices (SARPS) contained in the annexes to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
164. Despite the differences in international obligations among the Members, air transport policy is
coordinated and set at the OECS level by the OECS Civil Aviation Regulatory Board, comprising the
OECS Ministers responsible for Civil Aviation.  This body formulates and manages aviation policy
and is also in charge of reviewing aviation laws and regulations within the OECS.  The Board alsoreviews issues such as air fares, air service agreements, and environmental protection.
165. Apart from the Regulatory Board, each OECS country has a domestic civil aviation authority
responsible for the granting of licences.  Some countries have an Air Transport Licencing Board,
playing an advisory role in relation to applicati ons for air transport licences and on air transportation
passenger and cargo fares.  Specific national regulations determine landing fees, parking charges, andother fees. Policy formulation at the domestic level is under the ministry responsible for civil aviation.
166. The Directorate of Civil Aviation of the Easter n Caribbean States, headquartered in Antigua,
provides safety oversight through a system of inspection, investigation, maintenance, monitoring,
coordination and licensing, and is in charge of ensuring that all civil aviation activities in OECS
ICAO contracting parties are in accordance with the applicable ICAO annexes.  The Directorateoperates under the directive of the OECS Civil Aviation Regulatory Board.  The Directorate does
some regulatory work through the Regulatory Body for Civil Aviation, created in February 2000, but
always in consultation with national authorities.
167. The main legislation governing civil aviation activities in each OECS country is the Civil
Aviation Act, as implemented by the respective Civil Aviation (Air Navigation) Regulations.  In
general terms, licences are granted taking into account factors such as the existence of other air
services in the area, the period for which air transport services have been operated, safety, continuity,regularity, and efficiency concerns, the financial resources of the applicant, and the type of aircraft to
be used.  There are, in general, no specific nationality requirements for granting a licence but the
different laws and regulations allow for discretion in this respect.
168. Aviation agreements with third parties are negotiated through bilateral and regional channels.
Several OECS Members have bilateral agreements.  At the regional level, there are a number ofMemoranda of Understanding signed with different countries, and a Multilateral Transport Agreement
exists at CARICOM level.  CARICOM has initiated discussions for an open skies agreement with the
United States, on behalf of all its members.
__________