WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
ORGANISATION MONDIALE DU COMMERCE
ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DEL COMERCIOIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
26 July 2001
(01-3746)
Council for Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property RightsOriginal:  English/
anglais/
inglés
MAIN DEDICATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
LAWS AND REGULATIONS NOTIFIED UNDER
ARTICLE 63.2 OF THE AGREEMENT
PHILIPPINES
The present document reproduces the text1 of the Rules and Regulations on Administrative
Complaints (for Violation of Laws Involving Intellectual Property Rights), as notified by the
Philippines under Article 63.2 of the Agreement (see document IP/N/1/PHL/2).
Conseil des aspects des droits de propriétéintellectuelle qui touchent au commerce
PRINCIPALES LOIS ET RÉGLEMENTATIONS CONSACRÉES À LA
PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE NOTIFIÉES AU TITRE
DE L'ARTICLE 63:2 DE L'ACCORD
PHILIPPINES
Le présent document contient le texte
1 des règles et réglementations relatives aux plaintes
administratives (pour violation de lois relatives aux droits de propriété intellectuelle) notifiées par les
Philippines au titre de l'article 63:2 de l'Accord (voir le document IP/N/1/PHL/2).
Consejo de los Aspectos de los Derechos de Propiedad
Intelectual relacionados con el Comercio
PRINCIPALES LEYES Y REGLAMENTOS DEDICADOS A LA
PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL NOTIFICADOS EN VIRTUD
DEL PÁRRAFO 2 DEL ARTÍCULO 63 DEL ACUERDO
FILIPINAS
En el presente documento se reproduce el texto1 de las Normas y reglamentos sobre
reclamaciones administrativas (aplicables a las infracciones de leyes relacionadas con los derechos de
propiedad intelectual), notificado por Filipinas en virtud del párrafo 2 del artículo 63 del Acuerdo
(véase el documento IP/N/1/PHL/2).
                                                     
1 In English only./En anglais seulement./En inglés solamente.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 2
December 1, 1998             December 16, 1998
RULES AND REGULATIONS ON ADMINISTRATIVE
COMPLAINTS FOR VIOLATION OF LAWS INVOLVING
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Whereas , the State recognizes that an effective intellectual and
industrial property system is vital to the development of domestic creativity,
facilitates transfer of technology, attracts foreign investments and ensures
market access for our products;
Whereas , the State recognizes that the use of intellectual property bears
a social function and to this end, the State shall promote the diffusion ofknowledge and information for the promotion of national development and
progress and the common good;
Whereas , it is the policy of the State to enhance the enforcement of
intellectual property rights in the country; and, to protect and secure the
exclusive rights of scientists, inventors, artists and other gifted citizens to their
intellectual property and creations, particularly when beneficial to the people;
Whereas , it is the policy of the State to enhance the enforcement of
intellectual property rights in the Philippines;
Now, therefore , pursuant to the provisions of Republic Act No. 8293,
otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, the
following rules and regulations on administrative complaints for violation oflaws involving intellectual property rights are hereby promulgated:
RULE 1
Definitions, Interpretation; Rules of Court
SECTION 1. Definition of Terms . — Unless otherwise indicated,
the following terms shall be understood as follows:
(a) "Answer" means a pleading in which the adverse party sets forth
the negative and affirmative defenses upon which he relies;
(b) "Bureau" means the Bureau of Legal Affairs of the Intellectual
Property Office;IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 3
(c) "Chief Hearing Officer" means the officer within the Bureau who
exercises immediate supervision over any Hearing Officer. His title
or official designation may differ from the words "Chief Hearing
Officer" depending on the structure of the Office;
(d) "Complaint" means a concise statement of the ultimate facts
constituting the complainant’s cause or causes of action. It shall
specify the relief sought, but it may add a general prayer for such
further or other relief as may be just and equitable;
(e) "Court” means    a   court   of   general jurisdiction such as
Regional Trial Court;
(f) "Director General" means the head of the Intellectual Property
Office;
(g) "Director" means the Director of the Bureau of Legal Affairs;
(h) "False Designation of Origin" means the act of any person who, on
or in connection with any goods or services, or any container forgoods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device,
or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false
or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading
representation of fact, which:
(a) Is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as
to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with
another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval ofhis or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another
person; or (b) In commercial advertising or promotion,
misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic
origin of his or her or another person’s goods, services or
commercial activities, shall be liable to a civil action for
damages and injunction provided in Sections 156 and 157 of the
IP Code by any person who believes that he or she is likely to bedamaged by such act. (Sec. 169, RA 8293)
(i) "False or Fraudulent Declaration" means the act of any person who
shall procure registration in the Office of a mark by a false or
fraudulent declaration or representation, whether oral or writing,
or by any false means.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 4
(j) "Hearing Officer" means the officer within the Bureau authorized to
exercise the functions of “Hearing Officer” in these Regulations.
The title or official designation of such officers may differ from the
words "Hearing Officer" depending on the structure of the Office;
(k) “Infringement of Copyright and related rights" means any violation
of the rights provided under Part IV of the IP Code and/or the
applicable IP Law, including the act of any person who at the time
when copyright subsists in a work has in his possession an articlewhich he knows, or ought to know, to be an infringing copy of the
work for the purpose of: (a) selling, letting for hire, or by way of
trade offering or exposing for sale, or hire, the article; (b)
distributing the article for purpose of trade, or for any other purpose
to an extent that will prejudice the rights of the copyright owner in
the work; or (c) Trade exhibit of the article in public.
(l) "Infringement of Patent" means any violation of any of the rights of
patentees and holders of utility model patents and industrial design
registrations under Part II of the IP Code and/or the applicable IP
Law, including the act of making, using, offering for sale, selling,
or importing a patented product or a product obtained directly or
indirectly from a patented process, or the use of a patented process
without the authorization of the patentee.
(m) "Infringement of mark" means any violation of any of the rights of
the registered owner under Part III of the IP Code and/or the
applicable IP Law, including the act of any person who shall,
without the consent of the owner of the registered mark and
regardless of whether there is actual sale of goods or services using
the infringing material,
1. Use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or
colorable imitation of a registered mark or the samecontainer or a dominant feature thereof in connection
with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, advertising of
any goods or services including other preparatory steps
necessary to carry out the sale of any goods or services
on or in connection with which such use is likely to causeconfusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; orIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 5
2. Reproduce, counterfeit, copy or colorably imitate a
registered mark or a dominant feature thereof and apply
such reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable
imitation to labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers,
receptacles or advertisements intended to be used in
commerce upon or in connection with the sale, offering
for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods or services
on or in connection with which such use is likely to causeconfusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive;
(n) "Intellectual property rights" include:
(a) Copyright and Related Rights;
(b) Trademarks and Service Marks;
(c) Geographic Indications;
(d) Industrial Designs;
(e) Patents;
(f) Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated
Circuits; and
(g) Undisclosed Information
(o) "IP Code" means Republic Act No. 8293 otherwise known as the
Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines;
(p) "IP Law" means any law, in addition to the IP Code, involving
intellectual property rights;
(q) “Office" means the Intellectual Property Office;
(r) "Regulations" means this set of rules and regulations and such
Regulations as may be formulated by the Director of Legal Affairs
and approved by the Director General.
(s) "Unfair Competition" means the act of any person who shall
employ deception or any other means contrary to good faith by
which he shall pass off the goods manufactured by him or in whichhe deals, or his business, or services for those of the one having
established such goodwill, or who shall commit any acts calculated
to produce said result.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 6
The following shall likewise constitute unfair competition:
• The act of selling ones goods and giving them the general appearance of
goods of another manufacturer or dealer, either as to the goods
themselves or in the wrapping of the packages in which they are
contained, or the devices or words thereon, or in any other feature of
their appearance, which would be likely to influence purchasers to
believe that the goods offered are those of a manufacturer or dealer, or
the act of clothing the goods with such appearance as shall deceive the
public and defraud another of his legitimate trade, or the act of reselling
the goods by any subsequent vendor with a like purpose.
• The act of employing any other means, by artifice or device,
calculated to induce the false belief that a person is offering theservices of another who has identified such services in the mind of
the public.
• The act of making any false statement in the course of trade or any
act contrary to good faith of a nature calculated to discredit the
goods, business or services of another. (Section 168, IP CODE)
(t) "Violation of laws involving intellectual property rights mentioned
in Rule 2 Section 2" means violation of any law relating to the
intellectual property rights enumerated under Section 4 of IP
CODE.
SECTION 2. Interpretation . — These Regulations shall be liberally construed
to carry out the objectives of the IP Code and IP Laws and to assist the parties in
obtaining just and expeditious settlement or disposition of administrative cases filedbefore the Office.
SECTION 3. Suppletory application of the Rules of Court . — These
Regulations shall primarily govern in the prosecution of administrative complaints in
the Bureau. The provisions of the Rules of Court, however, shall apply in a suppletory
character.
RULE 2
Commencement of Action
SECTION 1. Complaint, when and to whom filed . — All administrative
complaints for violation of the IP Code or IP Laws shall be commenced by filing a
verified complaint with the Bureau within four (4) years from the date of commission
of the violation, or if the date be unknown, from the date of discovery of the violation.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 7
The verification portion of the complaint shall include a statement that to the best of
his knowledge, the party commencing the action has not filed any other administrative
action or proceeding involving the same issue or issues before any tribunal or agency
nor such action or proceeding is pending in other quasi-judicial bodies; Provided,
however, that if any such action is pending, the status of the same must be stated and
should knowledge thereof be acquired after the filing of the complaint, the party
concerned undertakes to notify the Office within five (5) days from such knowledge.
The complaint shall thereafter be forwarded to the Hearing Officer who shall
act as the Clerk of Court for all the proceedings to be conducted therein.
SECTION 2. Original Jurisdiction . — (a) The Bureau shall have original
jurisdiction in administrative actions for violations of laws involving intellectual
property rights where the total damages claimed are not less  than two hundred
thousand pesos (P 200,000.00); Provided however, that availment of the provisionalremedies may be granted in accordance with these Regulations and the provisions of
the Rules of Court; The Director shall coordinate with local enforcement agencies for
the strict and effective implementation and enforcement of these Regulations.
The commencement of the action under these Rules and Regulations is
independent and without prejudice to the filing of any action with the regular courts.
SECTION 3. Venue of Hearings . — All hearings on actions covered by these
regulations shall be held within the premises of the Office. However, upon written
request and payment of the required fee, the Director may authorize that the Mediation
Conference or any session thereof be held outside the premises of the Office provided
that the same is necessary and will enhance the proceedings and the other party, if the
request was made by only one party, agrees thereto. The parties shall not unreasonably
withhold their consent to such request. The total cost to hold the MediationConference or any session thereof outside the premises of the Office, including air
transportation, accommodation and per diem, shall be borne by the party requesting;
and, if the request was made by all parties, the total cost shall be shared by them
equally or in such other proportion as they may state in their request.
SECTION 4. Formal Requirement . — The Complaint shall be typewritten and
addressed to the Bureau, and shall contain the names and residences of the parties and
a concise statement of the ultimate facts constituting the complainant’s cause or
causes of action. It shall specify the relief/s sought, but it may add a general prayer for
such further or other relief/s as may be deemed just or equitable. Every pleading filed
shall likewise contain a caption setting forth the name of the Office, the title of the
case, the case number, and the designation of the pleading.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 8
No  pleading shall be accepted by the Office unless it conforms to the formal
requirements provided by these Regulations and accompanied by the required filing
fee.
SECTION 5. Partners, named individually . — When two or more persons
associated in any business, transact such business under a common name, the
associates may be sued under such common name.
The associates of the business who are sued under a common name may be
named individually in the Answer filed by them or on their behalf with their
respective postal addresses.
SECTION 6. Payment of Filing Fee . — The complaint shall be filed in
triplicate with the Bureau upon payment of the required fee as assessed by the Bureau.
SECTION 7. Representation and Confidentiality of Records . —
(a) The complaint may be prosecuted by the complainant by himself or
through counsel. The complainant and his counsel are required to
conduct their business with politeness, decorum and courtesy.
(b) It is strictly and absolutely forbidden for the Director, and other
employees of the Office to discuss the case or any phase thereof with
either counsel of record in the absence of the other or with any third
person not having any interest or legal standing before the Bureau.
SECTION 8. Summons . — (a) Within three (3) days from receipt of the
complaint, the Staff Clerk shall prepare and the Process server serve, the summons or
Notice to Answer together with a copy of the complaint to the Respondent by mail orby personal service. If the service is done through registered mail, the return card shall
be attached to the documents as evidence of receipt.
(b) If service cannot be made under the preceding paragraph, the office and
place of residence of the party being unknown, service may be made bypublication at the expense of the complainant. When a party summoned by
publication failed to appear in the action, final orders or judgments against
him shall be served upon him also by publication at the expense of the
prevailing party.
SECTION 9. Answer . — The summons shall require respondent to answer the
complaint within ten (10) days from receipt thereof. The Respondent shall answer thecomplaint in writing, either by specifically denying the material allegations of the
complaint or alleging any affirmative defense.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 9
If the respondent fails to answer within the time allowed therefore, the Hearing
Officer motu proprio or upon motion of the complainant with notice to the respondent,
and proof of such failure, declare the respondent in default. Thereupon, the Hearing
Officer shall proceed to render judgment granting the complainant such relief as his
pleading may warrant, unless the Hearing Officer in his discretion requires the
complainant to submit evidence. All such decisions or orders shall comply with Rule
11 of these Regulations.
SECTION 10. Pre-trial . — Upon joinder of issues, the pre-trial
conference shall be set immediately by the Hearing Officer. The notice of said pre-
trial shall be delivered by the Process Server within two (2) days from receipt of the
Answer or other pleadings. The notice of pre-trial shall require the parties to submit a
pre-trial brief containing the following:
(a) A brief statement of the parties’ claims and defenses.
(b) Suggestions, if any, for simplification of issues.(c) A list of documents they intend to produce as evidence,
together with appropriate markings as exhibits as well as the
identification of witnesses and a statement of the substance and
purpose of their testimony during the hearing on the merits. The
originals of these documents must be produced for comparison
during the pre-trial conference without prejudice to the
presentation of additional documents during the trial if the partywas prevented from producing the same during the pre-trial on
account of fraud, accident, mistake, excusable negligence or
such other reason which the Director or Hearing Officer deems
justifiable in the interest of justice and fair play.
(d) A statement whether they can stipulate on facts not covered by
admissions in their pleadings. If so, they should come with
drafts of matters they are ready to stipulate on.
(e) A statement whether they are open to the possibility of an
amicable settlement; if so, they should be prepared on the pre-
trial date to submit their minimum demands for purposes of
settlement.
(f) Such other matters as may aid in the prompt disposition of the
action.
Each party shall file with the Bureau of Legal Affairs and serve on the adverse
party said pre-trial briefs at least three (3) days before the date of pre-trial conference
fixed in the notice.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 10
As counsel needs the consent of his client for purposes of accepting an offer of
compromise, the attendance not only of the attorneys of record but also of the parties
themselves, is required for the pre-trial conference herein scheduled. Presence of the
parties themselves may be dispensed with if their counsel is provided with power of
attorney or the appropriate corporate authorization to make admissions and/or to
accept and approve compromise proposals.
SECTION 11. Notice of Pre-Trial . — The notice of Pre-Trial shall be
served on counsel, or on the party who has no counsel. The counsel served with such
notice is charged with the duty of notifying the party represented by him.
SECTION 12. Appearance of parties . — It shall be the duty of the parties
and their counsel to appear at the pre-trial. The non-appearance of a party may be
excused only if a valid cause is shown therefore or if a representative shall appear in
his behalf fully authorized in writing to enter into an amicable settlement, to submit toalternative modes of dispute resolution, and to enter into stipulations or admissions of
facts and of documents.
SECTION 13. Effect of failure to file Pre-Trial Brief or to appear . —
The failure of the complainant to submit the Pre-Trial Brief within the prescribed
period or to appear at the pre-trial pursuant to these Regulations shall be cause for
dismissal of the action with prejudice motu proprio or upon motion. A similar failureon the part of the respondent shall be cause to declare Respondent as in default motu
proprio or upon motion and to allow the complainant to present his evidence ex parte
and the office to render judgment on the basis thereof.
SECTION 14. Record of Pre-Trial Results . — After the Pre-Trial, the
Hearing Officer shall make an Order which recites the action taken at the conference,
the amendments allowed to the pleadings, and the agreements made by the parties asto any of the matters considered. Such order shall limit the issues for trial to those not
disposed of by admissions or agreements of counsel and when entered, controls the
subsequent course of the action, unless modified before trial to prevent manifest
injustice.
SECTION 15. Pre-Trial Calendar . — The Hearing Officer shall cause to
be prepared a pre-trial calendar of cases for consideration as above provided. After
preparing Notice of Pre-Trial, it shall be the duty of the designated clerk of the Bureau
to place such case in the pre-trial calendar.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 11
RULE 3
Powers of Hearing Officers
SECTION 1. Powers of Hearing Officers . — (a) A Hearing Officer conducting
the hearing and investigations shall be empowered to administer oaths and
affirmations, issue subpoena and subpoena duces tecum to compel attendance of
parties and witnesses and the production of any book, paper, document,correspondence and other records which are material to the case, to grant provisional
remedies in accordance with these Regulations and the Rules of Court and to make
preliminary rulings on questions raised at the hearings, with the ultimate decision on
the merits of all the issues involved being left to the Director.
(b) Furthermore, a Hearing Officer as alter ego of the Director, shall have
the power to cite a party or counsel or any person in contempt inaccordance with these Regulations.
(c) The Hearing Officer shall likewise have the power to pass upon and
approve bonds and counterbonds that may be posted by the parties;
Provided, that the bond or counterbonds are issued by a bonding
company duly approved by the Director.
SECTION 2. Service of Subpoena . — Service of Subpoena shall be made at
least three (3) calendar days before the scheduled hearing so as to allow the witness
reasonable time for preparation and travel to the place of attendance.
SECTION 3. Quashing a subpoena duces tecum . — The Hearing Officer, upon
motion made before the time specified in a subpoena duces tecum for compliance
therewith, may quash the subpoena if it is unreasonable or the relevance of the books,documents do not appear, or if the person in whose behalf the subpoena is issued fails
to advance the reasonable cost of the production thereof.
RULE 4
Preliminary Attachment
SECTION 1. Grounds upon which attachment may issue . — At the
commencement of the action or at any time before entry of judgment, a complainant
or any proper party may have the property of the adverse party attached as security for
the satisfaction of any judgment that may be recovered in the following cases:
a.) In an action against a party who has been guilty of fraud in
procuring the registration of a mark in the Office by false orIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 12
fraudulent declaration or representation, whether oral or in
writing, or by any false means;
b.) In an action against a party who has employed deception or any
other means contrary to good faith by which he shall pass off
the goods manufactured by him or in which he deals or his
business or services for those of the one having established
such goodwill, or who shall commit any act calculated to
produce said result whether or not a mark is involved;
c.) In an action against a party who does not reside and is not
found in the Philippines, or on whom summons may be served
by publication;
d.) In an action for the recovery of a specified amount of money or
damages on a cause of action arising from a violation of the IP
Code against a party who is about to depart from the
Philippines with intent to evade the execution of judgment; or
e.) In an action against a party who has removed or disposed of his
property, or is about to do so, with intent to defraud the party
aggrieved.
SECTION 2. Issuance and contents of order . — An order of attachment may
be issued either ex parte or upon motion with notice and hearing conducted by the
Hearing Officer. The Hearing Officer shall determine whether the attachment sought
is meritorious or not. Should an Order of Attachment be issued by the Hearing
Officer, he shall sign and forward the Order to the Director who shall direct, withoutdelay, the officer or such other designated employee of the Bureau to attach so much
of the property in the Philippines of the party against whom it is issued, not exempt
from execution, as may be sufficient to satisfy the applicant's demand, unless such
party makes deposit or gives a bond as hereinafter provided in an amount equal to that
fixed in the order, which may be the amount sufficient to satisfy the applicant’s
demand or the value of the property to be attached as stated by the applicant, exclusive
of costs.
SECTION 3. Affidavit and bond required . — An order of attachment shall be
granted only when it appears by the affidavit of the applicant, or of some other person
who personally knows the facts, that a sufficient cause of action exists, that the case is
one of those mentioned in Section 1 hereof, that there is no other sufficient security
for the claim sought to be enforced by the action, and that the amount due to the
applicant, or the value of the property the possession of which he is entitled torecover, is as much as the sum for which the order is granted above all legalIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 13
counterclaims. The affidavit and the bond must be duly filed with the Hearing Officer
and forwarded to the Office of the Director before the order issues.
SECTION 4. Condition of applicant's bond . — The party applying for the
order must give a bond executed to the adverse party in the amount fixed by the
Hearing Officer in his order granting the issuance of the writ, conditioned that the
applicant will pay all the costs which may be adjudged to the adverse party and all
damages which he may sustain by reason of the attachment, if the Hearing Officershall finally adjudge that the applicant was not entitled thereto.
SECTION 5. Manner of attaching property . — The officer enforcing the writ
shall, without delay and with all reasonable diligence, attach, to await judgment and
execution in the action, only so much of the property in the Philippines of the party
against whom the writ is issued, not exempt from execution, as may be sufficient to
satisfy the applicant’s demand, unless the former makes a deposit with the Office ofthe Director from which the writ is issued, or gives a counterbond executed to the
applicant, in an mount equal to the bond fixed by the Hearing Officer in the order of
attachment or to the value of the property to be attached, exclusive of costs. No levy
on attachment pursuant to the writ shall be enforced unless it is preceded, or
contemporaneously accompanied by service of summons, together with a copy of the
complaint, the application for attachment, the applicant's affidavit and bond, and the
order and writ of attachment on the defendant within the Philippines.
The requirement of prior or contemporaneous service of summons shall not
apply where the summons could not be served personally or by substituted service
despite diligent efforts, or the defendant is a resident of the Philippines temporarily
absent therefrom, or the defendant is a non-resident of the Philippines.
SECTION 6. Return . — (a) After enforcing the writ, the officer must likewise,
without delay, make a return thereon to the Hearing Officer from whom the writ
issued, with a full statement of his proceedings under the writ and a complete
inventory of the property attached, together with any counterbond given by the party
against whom attachment is issued, and serve copies thereof on the applicant.
(b) The officer shall submit a report to the responsible officer of the Bureau on the
action taken on all writs and processes assigned to them within twenty (20)
days from receipt of said process or writ. Said report shall form part of the
records of the case.
(c) At the end of every month, said responsible officer shall submit a report to the
Director indicating therein the number of writs and processes issued andserved, as well as the number of writs and processes unserved during the month
and the names of the Sheriffs who executed each writ. Unserved writs and
processes shall be explained in the report.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 14
SECTION 7. What may be the subject of Attachment and the manner of
executing the same . — The following properties may be the subject of attachment:
a.) Real Properties. — Real properties, or the machineries that may
be found inside the premises belonging to the party against
whom the writ is issued, or any interest therein, by filing with
the Registry of Deeds a copy of the order, together with a
description of the property attached, and a notice that it isattached, and by leaving a copy of such order, description, and
notice with the occupant of the property, if any, or with such
other person or his agent if found within the city or province
where the property is located. The Registrar of Deeds must
index attachments filed under this section in the name of the
applicant, the adverse party, or the person by whom the
property is held or in whose name it stands in the records. If theattachment is not claimed on the entire area of the land covered
by the certificate of title, a description sufficiently accurate for
the identification of the land or interest to be affected shall be
included in the registration of such attachment.
b.) Personal properties. — Those personal properties capable of
manual delivery, by taking and safely keeping it in officer’s
custody, after issuing the corresponding receipt therefore.
c.) Stocks or shares, or an interest in stocks or shares, of any
corporation or company, by leaving with the president or
managing agent thereof, a copy of the writ, and a notice stating
that the stock or interest of the party against whom the
attachment is issued is attached in pursuance of such writ.
SECTION 8. When attached property may be sold after levy on attachment and
before entry of judgment . — Whenever it shall be made to appear to the Hearing
Officer, upon hearing with notice to both parties, that the property attached isperishable, or that the interests of all the parties to the action will be subserved by the
sale thereof, the Hearing Officer may order such property to be sold at public auction
in such manner as he may direct, and the proceeds of such sale to be deposited in the
Office of the Director to await the judgment in the action.
SECTION 9. Discharge of attachment upon giving counterbond . — After a
writ if attachment has been enforced, the party whose property has been attached, orthe person appearing on his behalf, may move for the discharge of the attachment
wholly or in part on the security given. The Hearing Officer shall, after due notice and
hearing, order the discharge of the attachment if the movant makes a cash deposit, orIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 15
files a counterbond executed to the attaching party with the Office of the Director in
an amount equal to that fixed by the Hearing Officer in the order of attachment,
exclusive of costs. But if the attachment is sought to be discharged with respect to a
particular property, the counterbond shall be equal to the value of that property as
determined by the Hearing Officer. In either case, the cash deposit or the counterbond
shall secure the payment of any judgment that the attaching party may recover in the
action. A notice of the deposit shall forthwith be served on the attaching party. Upon
the discharge of an attachment in accordance with the provisions of this section, theproperty attached, or the proceeds of any sale thereof, shall be delivered to the party
making the deposit or giving the counterbond, or to the person appearing on his
behalf, the deposit or counterbond aforesaid standing in place of the property so
released. Should such counterbond for any reason be found to be or become
insufficient, and the party furnishing the same fail to file an additional counterbond,
the attaching party may apply for a new order of attachment.
SECTION 10. Discharge of attachment on other grounds . — The party
whose property has been ordered attached may file a motion with the Hearing Officer
to whom the case is pending, before or after levy or even after the release of the
attached property, for an order to set aside or discharge the attachment on the ground
that the same was improperly or irregularly issued or enforced, or that the bond is
insufficient. If the attachment is excessive, the discharge shall be limited to the excess.
If the motion be made on affidavits on the part of the movant but not otherwise, theattaching party may oppose the motion by counter-affidavits or other evidence in
addition to that on which the attachment was made. After due notice and hearing, the
Hearing Officer shall order the setting aside or the corresponding discharge of the
attachment if it appears that it was improperly or irregularly issued or enforced, or that
the bond is insufficient, or that the attachment is excessive, and the defect is not cured
forthwith.
SECTION 11. When the property attached is claimed by third person . —
If the property attached is claimed by a person not a party to the proceeding, and such
person makes an affidavit of his title thereto, or right to the possession thereof, and
serves such affidavit upon the sheriff and a copy thereof upon the attaching party, the
sheriff shall not be bound to keep the property under attachment unless the attachingparty or his agent, on demand of the sheriff shall file a bond approved by the Hearing
Officer to indemnify the third party claimant in a sum not less than the value of the
property levied upon. In case of disagreement as to such value, the same shall be
decided by the Director. No claim for damages for the taking or keeping of the
property may be enforced against the bond unless the action therefore is filed within
sixty (60) days from the date of the filing of the bond.
The sheriff shall not be liable for damages for the taking or keeping of such
property, to any such third party claimant, if such bond shall be filed. Nothing herein
contained shall prevent such claimant or any third person from vindicating his claimIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 16
to the property, or prevent the attaching party from claiming damages against a third
party claimant who filed a frivolous or plainly spurious claim, in the same or a
separate action.
SECTION 12. Satisfaction of judgment out of property attached; return
of sheriff . — If judgment be recovered by the attaching party and execution issue
thereon, the sheriff may cause the judgment to be satisfied out of the property
attached, if it be sufficient for that purpose in the following manner:
(a) By paying to the judgment obligee the proceeds of all sales of
perishable or other property sold in pursuance of the order of the
court, or so much as shall be necessary to satisfy the judgment;
(b) If any balance remains due, by selling so much of the property, real
or personal, as may be necessary to satisfy the balance, if enough
for that purpose remain in the sheriff’s hands, or in those of the
Office of the Director.
SECTION 13. Balance due collected upon an execution; excess delivered
to judgment obligor . — If after realizing upon all the property attached, and applying
the proceeds to the satisfaction of the judgment, less the expenses of proceedings upon
the judgment, any balance shall remain due, the sheriff must proceed to collect such
balance as upon ordinary execution. Whenever the judgment shall have been paid, the
sheriff, upon reasonable demand, must return to the judgment obligor the attached
property remaining in his hands, and any proceeds of the sale of the property attached
not applied to the judgment.
SECTION 14. Recovery upon the counterbond . — When the judgment
has become executory, the surety or sureties on any counterbond given pursuant to the
provisions of this Rule to secure the payment of the judgment shall become charged
on such counterbond and bound to pay the judgment obligee upon demand the amount
due under the judgment, which amount may be recovered from such surety or sureties
after notice and summary hearing in the same action.
SECTION 15. Disposition of attached property where judgment is for
party against whom attachment was issued . — If judgment be rendered against the
attaching party, all the proceeds of sales and money collected or received by the
sheriff, under the order of attachment and all property attached remaining in such
officer’s hands, shall be delivered to the party against whom attachment was issued,
and the order of attachment discharged.
SECTION 16. Claim for damages on account of improper, irregular or
excessive attachment . — An application for damages on account of improper,
irregular or excessive attachment must be filed with the Director before the trial orIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 17
before appeal is perfected or before the judgment becomes executory, with due notice
to the attaching party and his surety or sureties, setting forth the facts showing his
right to damages and the amount thereof. Such damages may be awarded only after
proper hearing and shall be included in the judgment on the main case.
If, on appeal, the judgment of the Director-General be favorable to the party
against whom the attachment was issued, the latter may claim damages sustained
during the pendency of the appeal by filing an application in the Office of theDirector-General, with notice to the party in whose favor the attachment was issued or
his surety or sureties, before the judgment of the Director-General becomes executory.
The Director-General may reward the application to the Bureau for hearing and
decision.
Nothing herein contained shall prevent the party against whom the attachment
was issued from recovering in the same action the damages awarded to him from anyproperty of the attaching party not exempt from execution should the bond or deposit
given by the latter be insufficient or fail to fully satisfy the award.
RULE 5
Preliminary Injunction
SECTION 1. Preliminary injunction defined; who may grant . — A preliminary
injunction is an order granted at any stage of an action or proceeding prior to the
judgment or final order, requiring a party to an administrative case or any third person
to refrain from a particular act or acts. It may also require the performance of a
particular act or acts, in which case it shall be known as a preliminary mandatory
injunction.
A preliminary injunction may be granted by the Hearing Officer who is
handling or hearing the case but no such power can be exercised as against concurrent
court or other Office which have already acquired jurisdiction over the subject matter.
SECTION 2. Grounds for issuance of preliminary injunction . — A preliminary
injunction may be granted when it is established:
(a) That the applicant is entitled to the relief demanded, and the whole
or part of such relief consists in restraining the commission or
continuance of the act or acts complained of, or in requiring the
performance of an act or acts, either for a limited period or
perpetually;
(b) That the commission, continuance or non-performance of the act
or acts complained of during the litigation would probably workinjustice to the applicant; orIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 18
(c) That a party or any person is doing, threatening, or is attempting to
do, or is procuring or suffering to be done, some act or acts
probably in violation of the rights of the applicant respecting the
subject of the action or proceeding and tending to render the
judgment ineffectual.
SECTION 3. Verified application and bond for preliminary injunction or
temporary restraining order . — A preliminary or temporary restraining order may be
granted only when:
(a) The application in the action or proceeding is verified and
shows facts entitling the applicant to the relief demanded;
(b) Unless exempted by the Bureau, the applicant files with the
Bureau a bond executed to the party or person enjoined in an
amount to be fixed by the Hearing Officer, to the effect that the
applicant will pay to such party or person all damages which he
may sustain by reason of the injunction or temporary restraining
order if the Hearing Officer should finally decide that theapplicant was not entitled thereto. Upon approval of the
requisite bond, a writ of preliminary injunction shall be issued;
(c) When an application for a writ of preliminary injunction or a
temporary restraining order is included in a complaint or any
initiatory pleading, the case shall be raffled only after notice to
and in the presence of the adverse party or the person to be
enjoined. In any event, such notice shall be preceded, orcontemporaneously accompanied by service of summons,
together with a copy of the complaint or initiatory pleading and
the applicant’s affidavit and bond upon the adverse party in the
Philippines. However, where the summons could not be served
personally or by substituted service despite diligent efforts, or
the adverse party is a resident of the Philippines temporarily
absent therefrom or is a nonresident thereof, the requirement ofprior or contemporaneous service of summons shall not apply.
(d)    The application for a temporary restraining order shall
thereafter be acted upon only after all the parties are heard in a
summary hearing which shall be conducted within twenty-four
(24) hours after the sheriff’s return of service and/or the
records are received by the Hearing Officer to whom the case
was raffled and to whom the records shall be transmittedimmediately.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 19
SECTION 4. Preliminary injunction not granted without notice; exception . —
No preliminary injunction shall be granted without hearing and prior notice to the
party or person sought to be enjoined. Should the petition be granted after compliance
with the requirement of due process, the Hearing Officer shall issue an Order
enjoining the party against whom it is issued from further committing acts detrimental
or injurious to the applicant effective for such period of time as may be determined by
the Hearing Officer with the concurrence of the Director without prejudice to the
filing of counterbonds as provided in subsequent sections.
SECTION 5. Grounds for objection to, or for motion of dissolution of,
injunction or restraining order . — The application for injunction or restraining order
may be denied, upon showing of its insufficiency. The injunction or restraining order
may also be denied, or if granted, may be dissolved, on other grounds upon affidavits
of the party or person enjoined, which may be opposed by the applicant also by
affidavits. It may further be denied, or, if granted, may be dissolved, if it appears afterhearing that although the applicant is entitled to the injunction or restraining order, the
issuance or continuance thereof, as the case may be, would cause irreparable damage
to the party or person enjoined while the applicant can be fully compensated for such
damages as he may suffer, and the former files a bond in an amount fixed by the
Hearing Officer conditioned that he will pay all damages which the applicant may
suffer by the denial or the dissolution of the injunction or restraining order. If it
appears that the extent of the preliminary injunction or restraining order granted is toogreat, it may be modified.
SECTION 6. Service of copies of bonds; effect of disapproval of same . — The
party filing a bond in accordance with the provisions of this Rule shall forthwith serve
a copy of such bond on the other party, who may except to the sufficiency of the bond,
or of the surety or sureties thereon. If the applicant’s bond is found to be insufficient
in amount, or if the surety or sureties thereon fail to justify, and a bond sufficient inamount with sufficient sureties approved after justification is not filed forthwith, the
injunction shall be dissolved. If the bond of the adverse party is found to be
insufficient in amount, or the surety or sureties thereon fail to justify a bond sufficient
in amount with sufficient sureties approved after justification is not filed forthwith, the
injunction shall be granted or restored, as the case may be.
SECTION 7. When final injunction granted . — If after the trial of the action it
appears that the applicant is entitled to have the act or acts complained of permanently
enjoined, the Hearing Officer shall grant a final injunction perpetually restraining the
party or person enjoined from the commission or continuance of the act or acts or
confirming the preliminary mandatory injunction.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 20
RULE 6
Contempt
SECTION 1. Direct Contempt Punished Summarily . — A person guilty of
misbehavior in the presence of or so near the Director or Hearing Officer as to
obstruct or interrupt the proceedings before him, including disrespect toward the
Director or Hearing Officer, offensive personalities toward others, or refusal to besworn to or answer as a witness, or to subscribe an affidavit or deposition when
lawfully required to do so, may be summarily adjudged in contempt by the Director or
Hearing Officer and punished by fine not exceeding Two Thousand Five Hundred
Pesos (P2,500.00) or imprisonment not exceeding ten (10) days, or both.
SECTION 2. Indirect Contempt to be Punished After Charge and Hearing . —
After a charge in writing has been filed, and an opportunity given to the respondent tobe heard by himself or counsel, a person guilty of any of the following acts may be
punished for contempt:
(a) Disobedience of or resistance to a lawful writ, process, order,
judgment, or command of the Hearing Officer, or injunction
granted by him;
(b) Any abuse of or unlawful interference with the process or
proceedings of the Bureau, not constituting direct contemptunder section 1 of this rule;
(c) Any improper conduct tending, directly or indirectly, to
impede, obstruct, or degrade the administration of justice or the
performance of the Bureau’s proper function;
(d) Failure to obey a subpoena duly served.
But nothing in this section shall be so construed as to prevent the Hearing
Officer from issuing process to bring the respondent party into or before the Office, orfrom holding him in custody pending such proceedings.
SECTION 3. Hearing; Release on Bail . — If the hearing is not ordered to be
had forthwith, the respondent may be released from custody upon filing a bond, in an
amount fixed by the Director or Hearing Officer, for his appearance to answer thecharge. Upon the day set for the hearing, the Director or Hearing Officer shall proceed
to investigate the charge and consider such answer or testimony as the respondent may
make or offer.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 21
SECTION 4. Punishment if Found Guilty . — If the respondent is thereupon
adjudged guilty of contempt committed against the Director or Hearing Officer, he
may be punished by a fine not exceeding Ten Thousand Pesos (P10,000.00) or
imprisonment of not more than five (5) years, or both, and if the contempt consists in
the violation of an injunction, he may also be ordered to make a complete restitution
to the party injured by such violation.
SECTION 5. Imprisonment Until Order Obeyed . — When the contempt
consists in the omission to do an act which is yet in the power of the respondent to
perform, he may be imprisoned by order of the Hearing Officer until he performs it.
SECTION 6. Proceedings When Party Released on Bail Fails to Answer . —
When a respondent released on bail fails to appear on the date fixed for the hearing,
the Hearing Officer may issue another order of arrest or may order the bond for his
appearance to be prosecuted, or both; and, if the bond be prosecuted, the measure ofdamages shall be the extent of the loss or injury sustained by the aggrieved party by
reason of the misconduct for which the contempt was prosecuted, and the costs of the
proceedings, and such recovery shall be for the benefit of the party injured. But if
there is no aggrieved party, the bond shall be liable as in criminal cases.
SECTION 7. Hearing Officer May Release Respondent . — The Director or the
Hearing Officer may discharge from imprisonment a person imprisoned for contemptwhen it appears that public interest will not suffer thereby.
SECTION 8. Review of Judgment or Order by the Director . — The judgment
or order of the Hearing Officer made in a case of contempt punished after written
charge and hearing may be reviewed by the Director, but execution of the judgment or
order shall not be suspended until a bond is filed by the person in contempt, in an
amount fixed by the Hearing Officer conditioned that if the appeal be decided againsthim he will abide by and perform the judgment or order.
RULE 7
Calendar and Adjournments
SECTION 1. Trial Calendar . — The staff clerk shall have a trial calendar for
the cases that have passed pre-trial stage. Cases where there is a prayer for preliminary
mandatory injunction and/or attachment shall be given preference.
SECTION 2. Notice of Trial . — Upon entry of a case in the trial calendar, the
staff clerk shall cause a notice of the date of its trial to be served upon the partieswithin three (3) days by the process server.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 22
SECTION 3. Continuous Trial . — All hearings shall be continuous until the
case is terminated subject to exceptions provided under Rule 9, Section 2.
SECTION 4. Raffle of cases . — Actions which are to be conducted before this
Office shall be raffled to the different Hearing Officers who shall thereafter handle the
proceeding from its commencement until its final resolution. However, should the
Hearing Officer to whom the case was raffled be unavailable during any scheduled
hearing, upon request of either counsel, the Director shall designate an appropriateofficer to preside or conduct the proceedings.
RULE 8
Depositions and Discoveries
SECTION 1. Deposition pending action . — By leave of the Hearing Officer
after the Answer has been filed, the testimony of any person, whether a party or not,
may be taken, at the instance of any party, by deposition upon written interrogatories.
The attendance of witness the attendance of witness through a subpoena may be
compelled Rule VI, section 2(d).
SECTION 2. Effect of taking depositions . — A party shall not be deemed to
make a person his own witness for any purpose by taking his deposition.
SECTION 3. Stipulations regarding taking of depositions . — If the parties so
stipulate in writing, depositions may be taken before any person authorized to
administer oaths, at anytime or place, in accordance with the Rules of Court, and
when so taken may be used like other depositions.
SECTION 4. Period within which to submit answers to written interrogatories .
— Should a party request to take the deposition of a non-resident in a foreign land, the
answer to such written interrogatories must be submitted to the Hearing Officer
handling the case within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the Letters
Commission, without extension. Failure to submit the same within the period shall
result in the striking off of the said deposition and the affidavits of such deponent.
RULE 9
Hearing
SECTION 1. Trial of Cases . — The Hearing Officer shall, as far as practicable,
set the case for successive and continuous daily hearing for the reception not only ofthe evidence in chief but also on any provisional remedy prayed for in the complaint
or petition; Provided, however, that the hearing of the case on the merits or the
reception of evidence of the parties shall be terminated within ninety (90) days, thirtyIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 23
(30) days to be allotted to complainant’s or petitioner’s evidence, thirty (30) days for
respondent, and thirty (30) days for any rebuttal and sur-rebuttal evidence. In the case
of provisional remedies, the hearings or reception of evidence thereof shall be
terminated within thirty (30) days.
SECTION 2. Postponement of Hearings . — Postponement of hearings shall be
allowed only on extremely meritorious grounds and provided, that the reception of
evidence of the parties shall not exceed the periods provided under the precedingsection.
SECTION 3. Order of Trial . — Unless the Hearing Officer, for special
reasons, otherwise directs, the order of trial shall be as follows:
(a) The complainant or petitioner must produce evidence in support
of his allegations in the complaint or petition. The
affiants/witnesses whose affidavits were submitted must besubject to a cross examination by the opposing counsel on the
basis of their affidavits.
(b) The respondent shall then offer evidence in support of his
defense, counterclaim, cross-claim, and third-party claims
subject to cross-examination by complainant or petitioner or his
counsel.
(c) The third party-respondent, if any, shall introduce evidence of
his defense, counterclaim, cross-claim and third-party claim.
(d) The fourth, etc. party, if any, shall introduce evidence of the
material facts pleaded by him.
(e) The parties against whom any counterclaim or cross-claim has
been pleaded shall introduce evidence in support of their
defense, in the order to be prescribed by the Hearing Officer.
(f) The parties may then respectively offer rebutting evidence only,
unless the Hearing Officer, for good reasons, in the furtherance
of justice, permits them to offer additional evidence pertinent to
the original issue.
(g) When the presentation of evidence is concluded, the parties
may submit their respective memoranda, including draft ofdecision, the submission of which shall be simultaneous, within
ten (10) days from the date of the last hearing.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 24
SECTION 4. Answer to Amended Complaint . — If the complaint is amended,
the time fixed for the filing and service of the Answer shall, unless otherwise ordered,
run from the service of such Amended Complaint. The Original Answer shall be
considered as Answer to the Amended Complaint unless a new Answer is filed within
ten (10) days from receipt or service of the amended complaint.
SECTION 5. Motion to Dismiss Not Allowed . — No Motion to Dismiss on any
of the grounds mentioned in the Rules of Court and in any other law shall be allowedexcept on the ground of prescription. Such grounds other than Prescription shall
instead be pleaded as affirmative defenses, the resolution of which shall be made in
the decision on the merits. The Hearing Officer may, for good cause shown, conduct a
preliminary hearing on any of the affirmative defenses if this will expedite the
resolution of the case.
SECTION 6. Agreed Statements of Facts . — (a) The Complainant and the
Respondent may agree in writing upon the facts involved in the action, and ask
judgment upon the facts agreed upon, without the introduction of evidence. The
Hearing Officer shall immediately prepare the decision and submit it to the Division
Chief of the Administrative Complaints Division who shall recommend the same to
the Director for his approval, if the agreed statement of facts is sufficient to support a
decision.
(b) If the parties can agree only on some of the facts in issue, the Hearing
shall be held as to the others.
SECTION 7. Period for resolving cases . — Unless a different period is fixed
by special laws, all contested cases or any incident thereof shall be decided or
resolved within thirty (30) calendar days from submission for decision or resolution
by the Hearing Officer.
SECTION 8. Consolidation . — When actions involving a common question of
law or fact are pending before the Bureau, the Hearing Officer may order a joint
hearing or trial on any or all the matters in issue in the actions. It may order all the
actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein asmay tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.
RULE 10
Evidence
SECTION 1. Evidence required . — Substantial evidence shall be sufficient to
support a decision or order.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 25
A fact may be deemed established if it is supported by substantial evidence. It
means such relevant evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to
support or justify a conclusion.
SECTION 2. Ex Parte Evidence . — In addition to sworn statements,
testimonies and documentary evidence submitted by the parties, the Hearing Officer
may receive ex parte evidence material and relevant to the case or conduct an ocular
inspection without prior notice to the parties. All ex parte evidence received by theHearing Officer shall be reduced to writing and any party in interest shall have the
opportunity to examine and rebut the same by further evidence.
SECTION 3. Burden of Proof in Process Patents . — If the subject matter of a
patent is a process for obtaining a product, any identical product shall be presumed to
have been obtained through the use of the patented process if the product is new or
there is substantial likelihood that the identical product was made by the process andthe owner of the patent has been unable despite reasonable efforts, to determine the
process actually used. In ordering the defendant to prove that the process to obtain the
identical product is different from the patented process, the Director shall adopt
measures to protect, as far as practicable, his manufacturing and business secrets.
(Sec. 78, RA8293)
SECTION 4. Power to stop further evidence . — The Hearing Officer may stop
the introduction of further testimony upon any particular point when the evidence
upon it is already so full that more witness to the same point cannot be reasonably
expected to be additionally persuasive. The Hearing Officer, however, should exercise
this power with caution so as not to cause manifest injustice to the parties.
SECTION 5. Equitable principles to govern proceedings . — In all cases
involving Trademarks, the equitable principles of laches, estoppel, and acquiescencewhere applicable, may be considered and applied.
RULE 11
Decisions and Orders
SECTION 1. Rendition of Decisions . — (a) The case is deemed submitted for
resolution upon termination of the period for reception of evidence provided in Rule 9,
Section 1 and the evidence formally offered. Whether or not the parties submit a final
pleading such as memorandum, the case shall be decided by the Hearing Officer
within thirty (30) calendar days from submission as provided herein.
All Decisions determining the merits of cases shall be in writing prepared by
the Hearing Officer, stating clearly and distinctly the facts and law on which they are
based, approved and signed by the Director.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 26
(b) Decisions and final orders shall be served by mail, personal service or
publication as the case may require.
RULE 12
Administrative Penalties and Sanctions
SECTION 1. Administrative Penalties Imposable . — After formal
investigation, the Director, may impose one (1) or more of the following
administrative penalties:
(a) Issuance of a cease and desist order which shall specify the acts
that the respondent shall cease and desist from and shall require
him to submit a compliance report within a reasonable time
which shall be fixed in the Order;
(i) The acceptance of a voluntary assurance of compliance
or discontinuance as may be imposed. Such voluntary
assurance may include one or more of the following:
(a) An assurance to comply with the provisions of the
Intellectual Property Law violated;
(b) An assurance to refrain from engaging in
unlawful and unfair acts and practices subject ofthe formal investigations;
(c) An assurance to recall, replace, repair or refund
the money value of defective goods distributed in
commerce;
(d) An assurance to reimburse the complainant the
expenses and costs incurred in prosecuting the
case in the Bureau;
(e) The Director may also require the respondent to
submit periodic compliance reports and file a
bond to guarantee compliance of his undertaking.
(ii) The condemnation or seizure of products which are
subject of the offense. The goods seized hereunder shallbe disposed of in such manner as may be deemed
appropriate by the Director, such as by sale, donation to
distressed local government or to charitable or relief
institutions, exportation recycling into other goods, orIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 27
any combination thereof, under such guidelines as he
may provide;
(iii) The forfeiture of paraphernalia and all real and personal
properties which have been used in the commission of
the offense;
(iv) The imposition of administrative fines in such amount as
deemed reasonable by the Director, which shall in no
case be less than Five Thousand Pesos (P5,000.00) normore than One Hundred Fifty Thousand Pesos
(P150,000.00). In addition, an additional fine of not
more than One Thousand Pesos (P1,000.00) shall be
imposed for each day of continuing violation;
(v) The cancellation of any permit, license, authority, or
registration which may have been granted by the Office,
or the suspension of the validity thereof for such periodof time as the Director may deem reasonable which shall
not exceed one (1) year;
(vi) The withholding of any permit, license, authority or
registration which is being secured by the respondent
from the Office;
(vii) The assessment and award of damages;
(viii) Censure;(ix) Other analogous penalties or sanctions such as those
provided under Section 216 of the IP Code.
RULE 13
Judgments, Final Orders and Entry Thereof
SECTION 1. Rendition of judgments and final orders . — A judgment or final
order determining the merits of the case shall be in writing, stating clearly anddistinctly the facts and the law on which it is based, signed by the Director, and filed
with the appropriate Register of the Office.
SECTION 2. Entry of judgments and final orders . — If no appeal or motion
for reconsideration is filed within the time provided in these Regulations, the Director
shall forthwith cause the entry of the judgment or final order in the appropriate
Register of the Office. The date of finality of the judgment or final order shall beIP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 28
deemed to be the date of its entry. The record shall contain the dispositive part of the
judgment or final order and shall be signed by the Director, with a certificate that such
judgment or final order has become final and executory.
If no appeal or motion for reconsideration has been filed on time, the judgment
or final order rendered by the Director or the Director General, as the case may be,
becomes final and executory, and should immediately be caused to be entered by the
Director. To ensure this action the prevailing party should file a motion for the entry(and execution, if proper) of the judgment. The date of entry is the starting point of the
six month period for filing a petition of relief, as well as the five year period of
prescription of judgments.
This rule corrects the erroneous practice of entering the judgment or final order
long after it had become final and executory. Even if the physical act of entering the
judgment or final order is done after it had become final and executory, the date whenit became final and executory shall be deemed the date of its entry.
SECTION 3. Order and writ of execution . — As soon as a decision or order
has become final and executory, the Director of Legal Affairs shall, motu proprio or
on motion of the interested party issue an order of execution deputizing and requiring
the appropriate officer or personnel of the Office, or such other duly authorized
government agent, officer, or personnel, to execute and enforce said decision or order.
SECTION 4. Execution pending appeal . — On Motion of the prevailing party
with notice to the adverse party or motu proprio and upon filing of an approved bond,
the Director of Legal Affairs may, in his discretion, order execution to issue even
before the expiration of the time to appeal, upon good reasons to be stated in the order.
The execution pending appeal may be stayed by the filing of an approved counterbond
in an amount to be fixed by the Director.
RULE 14
Appeal
SECTION 1. Finality of Decision and Order . — (a) The decision and order of
the Director shall become final and executory fifteen (15) days after the receipt of a
copy thereof by the party affected unless within the said period a motion for
reconsideration is filed with the Bureau or an appeal to the Director General has been
perfected.
(b) Decisions of the Director-General shall be final and executory unless an
appeal to the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court is perfected in
accordance with Rule 41 of the Rules of Court applicable to appeals
from decision of Regional Trial Courts.IP/N/1/PHL/C/4
IP/N/1/PHL/I/5
Page 29
(c) Interlocutory orders shall not be appealable.
(d) No motion for reconsideration of the decision of the Director General or
the Director shall be allowed.
SECTION 11. Appeal, how perfected . — Appeal may be perfected by
filing a Notice of Appeal with the Director-General and the Director and a copythereof served upon the adverse party within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the
Order or Decision and upon payment of the corresponding docket fee.
Final Provisions
SECTION 1. Implementation . — The Director General shall publish in a
newspaper of general circulation the corresponding notice as soon as the Office is in aposition to accept and process complaints governed by and in accordance with these
Regulations.
SECTION 2. Separability . — If any provision in these Regulations or
application of such provision to any circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of
these Regulations shall not be affected thereby.
SECTION 3. Furnishing of certified copies . — Mr. Eduardo Joson, Records
Officer II, is hereby directed to immediately file three (3) certified copies of these
Regulations with the University of the Philippines Law Center, and, one (1) certified
copy each to the Office of the President, the Senate of the Philippines, the House of
Representatives, the Supreme Court of the Philippines, and the National Library.
SECTION 4. Effectivity . — These rules and regulations shall take effect fifteen
(15) days after publication in a newspaper of general circulation.
Done this 1st day of December 1998.
(Sgd.) EMMA C. FRANCISCO
    Director General
__________